Erratum in: “The Effect of Refractive Error on Melanopsin-Driven Pupillary Responses” by Donald O. Mutti, Shane P. Mulvihill, Danielle J. Orr, Patrick D. Shorter, and Andrew T. E. Hartwick. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(12):22, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.12.22.
In a sentence in the second paragraph of the Results, the words “myopic” and “non-myopic” were switched inadvertently. The sentence “When ΔBlue and ExpBlue were considered together as a repeated factor (blue), myopic subjects had greater pupillary constriction and slower redilation compared to non-myopic subjects (P = 0.011)” has been changed to “When ΔBlue and ExpBlue were considered together as a repeated factor (blue), non-myopic subjects had greater pupillary constriction and slower redilation compared to myopic subjects (P = 0.011)” in the article online.