Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2022 Sep 11;89(1):343–355. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29436

Noninvasive assessment of renal dynamics and pH in a unilateral ureter obstruction model using DCE MR-CEST urography

Julia Stabinska 1,2, Aruna Singh 1,2, Nora M Haney 3, Yuguo Li 1,2, Farzad Sedaghat 2, Max Kates 3, Michael T McMahon 1,2
PMCID: PMC9753579  NIHMSID: NIHMS1854310  PMID: 36089805

Abstract

Purpose:

To assess the potential of DCE MR CEST urography for assessing renal function in mice with unilateral ureter obstruction (UUO) by simultaneous pH and renal uptake/clearance measurements following injection of iopamidol.

Methods:

The right ureter of nine mice was obstructed via suture ligation. The animals were imaged at day 1, 2, and 3 post-obstruction on an 11.7T MRI scanner. Ninety-six sets of saturated CEST images at 4.3 and 5.5 ppm were collected. Renal pH values were obtained by calculating the signal ratio for these two frequencies and using a pH calibration curve. Renal time activity curves were measured as a percentage change in the post-injection CEST signal at 4.3 ppm relative to the average pre-injection signal.

Results:

For the healthy mice, the time activity curves of both kidneys were nearly identical and displayed rapid excretion of contrast. For the UUO mice, the dynamic CEST curves for the obstructed kidneys displayed prolonged time to peak (TTP) values and delayed contrast excretion compared with the contralateral (CL) kidneys. Renal pH maps of the healthy animals showed similar acidic values for both kidneys (pH 6.65 ± 0.04 vs 6.67 ± 0.02), whereas in the obstructed kidneys there was a significant increase in pH values compared with the CL kidneys (pH 6.67 ± 0.08 vs 6.79 ± 0.11 in CL and UUO kidneys, respectively).

Conclusion:

Our findings indicate that DCE-MR-CEST urography can detect changes in renal uptake/excretion and pH homeostasis and distinguish between obstructed and unobstructed kidney as early as 1 day after UUO.

Keywords: chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST), iopamidol, kidney, pH, unilateral ureter obstruction (UUO)

1 |. INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract obstructions (UTOs) at any point in the urinary tract that disrupt normal urine flow cause urinary retention and increased retrograde hydrostatic pressure. The most common cause of UTO are kidney stones with a lifetime prevalence of 8.5%. Other common causes include urothelial malignancy, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), strictures, and congenital ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction.1 There are as many 1 44 320 surgeries/year performed for kidney stones and 1 01 270 surgeries/year for BPH in the United States alone.2 Significant obstructions profoundly impair the excretory function of the kidney as well as its ability to maintain fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. If undiagnosed or left untreated UTOs lead to a progressive tubular atrophy and chronic interstitial inflammation and fibrosis.1,3,4 Because the extent of recovery of kidney function in obstructive nephropathy (ON) resulting from UTO depends on the severity and duration of the obstruction, early diagnosis and prompt intervention are crucial to prevent chronic kidney disease (CKD) and avoid irreversible kidney damage.

Imaging plays an important role in the initial diagnosis of UTOs in the clinic and several radiologic techniques are available to detect the site, level and cause of the obstruction and to determine whether dilation of the renal pelvis and calices (hydronephrosis) represents a functional obstruction that will lead to kidney injury or a non-obstructive process with preserved kidney function.5 While ultrasound and conventional CT have emerged as preferred anatomic imaging modalities when obstruction is suspected, they cannot reliably quantify renal function. Conversely, dynamic nuclear scintigraphy provides a functional assessment of both kidneys after intravenous administration of a radiotracer such as 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (99mTc-MAG3) and can diagnose upper UTO, but its anatomic definition is poor. Moreover, this technique has other pitfalls related to drawing ROIs (particularly in the setting of hydronephrosis), inadequate SNR, and variation in scanning intervals.1 Because of their comparatively high temporal and spatial resolution, fast CT variants such as multi-detector CT (MDCT) and electron-beam CT (EBCT) have the potential to provide adequate evaluation of differential renal function via glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements. Unfortunately, these novel approaches involve exposure to relatively high levels of ionizing radiation and doses of contrast agent.610

MRI can overcome some of these limitations and, unlike CT and nuclear scintigraphy, does not involve exposure to ionizing radiation, which makes it particularly useful for examining children, pregnant women and patients who need frequent scans.11 Furthermore, because of the significant advances made over the past decades, MRI is now capable of providing information on renal physiological function characterized by perfusion, renal excretory function, and intra-renal oxygenation in addition to having high spatial resolution, excellent soft tissue delineation.12,13 Excretory gadolinium-enhanced MR urography (MRU) can provide functional information on renal perfusion, excretion, and drainage.1416 However, the use of gadolinium-based contrast agent requires caution in patients with severe renal insufficiency as it may lead to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, which is a progressive and potentially fatal fibrotic disorder of the skin and internal organs.17,18 Moreover, there are increasing concerns related to cumulative gadolinium administration, as the effects of CNS gadolinium deposition remain incompletely understood.19 As a result of these limitations for all current radiological methods, new technologies are warranted.

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is an emerging MRI technique that allows indirect detection of low concentration molecules after applying a saturation pulse on resonance with exchangeable protons and measuring the saturation frequency dependence of the water signal. Chemical exchange between saturated labile protons on the contrast agents and water results in amplification of this saturation signal loss onto the water signal.2026 Several recent studies have demonstrated the potential of CEST imaging for detecting molecular and cellular changes associated with renal and urinary diseases such as diabetic nephropathy,27 acute renal allograft rejection,28 sepsis-induced acute kidney injury,29 unilateral ureter obstruction (UUO),30 and kidney fibrosis.31 Furthermore, because of its high sensitivity to pH changes, contrast-enhanced CEST imaging has been proposed to measure renal pH3234 values and induced pH alterations following an acute renal injury,35 reperfusion ischemia,36 and CKD.37 In the present study, we have applied dynamic contrast-enhanced CEST imaging to a murine model of irreversible UUO, and assessed its utility for evaluating differential renal function in obstructive nephropathy. We have demonstrated that using a dynamic CEST-MRI approach combined with a single injection of iopamidol, which is a clinically approved x-ray contrast agent, it is possible to obtain both the spatially localized time-activity curves that are similar to standard renograms and renal pH maps. This allows for simultaneous assessment of renal perfusion and excretory function, as well as renal pH changes in response to kidney damage in UUO.

2 |. METHODS

2.1 |. Animal preparation

All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines and approved by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Thirteen male and female C57BL/6N-mice were fed a standard diet and allowed free access to water. To perform the surgery, nine mice were anesthetized with 2%–2.5% isoflurane and the right kidney was exposed through a midline incision. The ureter was obstructed completely near the renal pelvis using a silk tie suture. The mice were imaged at day 1 (three mice), 2 (three mice), and 3 (three mice) after the procedure. For histologic evaluation, three additional mice underwent UUO surgery, and their kidneys were harvested at the same time points as in the MRI experiments.

2.2 |. In silico CEST protocol optimization

Numerical simulations were performed using an open-source Matlab-based implementation of the Bloch-McConnell equations (https://github.com/cest-sources/BM_sim_fit),38 investigating the effect of saturation power (B1), saturation time duration (tsat), recovery time (Trec, the time between the end of the acquisition and begin of the subsequent saturation pulse), and longitudinal relaxation rate of water (R1A) on the iopamidol CEST signal. The Bloch-McConnell system consisted of six pools including amide (4.3 ppm), 2-hydrooxypropanamido protons (5.5 ppm), two hydroxyl groups (1.8 and 0.8 ppm), bulk water (0 ppm),39 and an in vivo-like semisolid MT pool (0 ppm). The chemical exchange rates of iopamidol were taken from the literature.39,40 The relaxation rates of the water CEST pool were set to R1w = 0.66 1/s and R2w = 35 1/s mimicking the values reported in the healthy kidney tissue.29 Detailed simulation parameters are given in Table 1. We did not include an NOE pool or any other endogenous CEST pool in our simulations because we assume that the endogenous NOE effects are negligible for the optimization outcome. After the optimal B1 at tsec = 3 s was found, tsat and Trec were optimized iteratively. Furthermore, the effect of longitudinal water relaxation on the CEST signal simulated with the final set of saturation parameters and T1A (=1/R1A) values in the physiological range between 1 and 3 s was explored.

TABLE 1.

Detailed parameters used for numerical Bloch-McConnell simulations

Water Semi-solid MT Iopamidol I Iopamidol II Iopamidol III Iopamidol IV
Chemical shift [ppm] 0 4.3 5.5 1.8 0.8
Fraction f 1 0.05 2/3700 1/3700 1/3700 4/3700
R1 [1/s] 0.66 0.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
R2 [1/s] 34 109 890 66 66 66 66
Exchange rate [1/s] - 40 380 1200 1104 1715

2.3 |. In vivo MR imaging

Each mouse was placed in a mouse restrainer and a needle catheter was inserted into a lateral tail vein for intravenous injection. The in vivo MRI experiments were conducted on an 11.7 T Bruker horizontal bore animal scanner (Bruker Biospin GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) using an eight-channel mouse body phased-array receive coil. The animals were positioned on an imaging cradle and anesthetized with 0.5%–2% isoflurane. The respiratory rate was continuously monitored and the mice body temperature was maintained at 37°C using a water-heated animal bed. Twenty-one axial and 12 coronal contiguous slices were collected using a multi-slice T2w RARE sequence with the following parameters: TE/TR: 20/4000 msec, matrix size: 128 × 128, slice thickness: 1.5 mm, and RARE factor: 8. A single coronal slice of 1.5 mm thickness containing the center of two kidneys was selected for CEST imaging. To obtain B0 inhomogeneity maps, the water saturation shift referencing (WASSR) approach41 was used. The WASSR images were collected at 42 frequency offsets between −1.5 and 1.5 ppm using 10 saturation pulses with a duration of 300 ms, an inter-pulse delay of 10 μs and B1 = 1.2 μT. For the dynamic CEST experiments, the CEST saturation module consisted of 10 rectangular-shaped RF pulses, each 300 ms long with an inter-pulse delay of 10 μs and an amplitude of 3.6 μT. This amplitude was chosen based on the results of our numerical simulations, which showed strong CEST contrast at 4.3 ppm and better separation between two amide peaks of iopamidol than the 4.0 μT we used previously. The readout parameters were: TE/TR = 3.49/5125 ms, matrix size: 64 × 64, FOV: 28 × 20 mm2, slice thickness: 1.5 mm, RARE factor: 33. A total of two-hundred and four CEST images were collected, including 12 images at 40 ppm and 96 sets of images at 4.3 and 5.5 ppm. Iopamidol (Bracco Imaging S.p.A, Milan, Italy) at a weight-controlled dose of 1.5 g of iodine per kilogram was injected approximately 3 min and 30 s after the start of CEST data acquisition. Total CEST scan time was 17 min and 25 s.

2.4 |. In vivo dynamic CEST-MRI data analysis and pH mapping

Image post-processing and dynamic CEST data analysis were performed using custom-written MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) procedures. Parenchymal ROIs, excluding the renal hilum, were drawn manually around each kidney on high-resolution T2w images. To remove motion-related signal fluctuations, a moving average filter (MATLAB function filter) with the span of four was applied at each frequency offset. A region of interest (ROI)-based time-course curves of signal enhancement were obtained by plotting percentage change in the CEST-prepared signal intensity at 4.3 ppm after iopamidol injection (Mz,post) relative to the averaged signal from seven images measured before the injection (Mz,pre): %STenh(t) = 100 × (Mz,pre—Mz,post(t))/Mz,pre. The time-to-peak (TTP) in units of seconds and percent peak CEST signal enhancement (Peak %STenh) were computed from the time-activity curves of each kidney.

For pH mapping, post-injection magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) at 4.3 and 5.5 ppm was quantified from three averaged images collected at the peak enhancement time. Averaged pre-injection MTR maps were then subtracted from the post-injection MTR images to remove endogenous CEST signals. Subsequently, renal pH values were obtained by calculating the concentration-independent saturation transfer ratio RST = (1—MTR4.3ppm) × MTR5.5ppm/((1—MTR4.3ppm) × MTR5.5ppm)42 and using the pH calibration curve as described previously.37

2.5 |. Histologic examination

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded kidney tissues were cut into 7 μm-thick coronal sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Mason trichrome staining (MTS). Percentage of fibrosis was estimated from the Trichrome stain at 40x magnification using ImageJ Software for pixel analysis.

2.6 |. Statistical analysis

A Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine whether the null hypothesis of composite normality of the CEST-derived parameters (pH, TTP, and %STenh) estimated in obstructed and contralateral kidneys is true at a significance level α = 0.05. Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, or Tukey-Kramer test for post-hoc analysis was applied to compare the parameters between groups where appropriate.

3 |. RESULTS

3.1 |. CEST protocol optimization

In order to optimize our CEST imaging sequence for detecting the iopamidol signals at 4.3 and 5.5 ppm in kidney tissue, we performed numerical simulations based on a six-pool Bloch-McConnell model with simulated MTRasym curves shown in Figure 1 and MTR curves shown in Supporting Information Figure S1, which is available online. With tsat set to 3 s, the CEST contrast at 4.3 ppm increases with saturation field strength (B1) while in contrast the 5.5 ppm signal decreases above 2.6 μT (Figure 1A). In addition, as expected higher saturation B1 also leads to a broadening of both peaks. Trying to maximize the size of both signals, a B1 = 3.6 μT was selected. We then simulated at this B1 how tsat will impact contrast (Figure 1B). Based on our simulations, tsat >1.8 s will result in strong CEST signals at both frequencies. To account for the potential loss in labeling efficiency due to B0 and B1 inhomogeneities and differences in relaxation rates, a slightly longer saturation pulse tsat = 3 s was chosen. Our simulations also indicate that for the optimized set of saturation parameters (B1 = 3.6 μT, tsat = 3 s), the maximal iopamidol contrast can be achieved with a short recovery time (Trec) of around 1 s (Figure 1C). Nevertheless, the optimal Trec depends on the longitudinal relaxation rate of solute and solvent pools (R1B and R1A) and is therefore affected by deviations in R1 from the one used in our simulations. A Trec of 2 s was eventually selected for our in vivo study to reduce the specific absorption rate (SAR) to 60% since we will acquire for prolonged periods to monitor iopamidol excretion. As shown in Figure 1D, the CEST signals at 4.3 and 5.5 ppm and their ratio were also only slightly affected by the longitudinal water relaxation in the range of R1A values observed in vivo. These minor differences in R1 can be effectively removed by ratiometric analysis.34 With the optimized pre-saturation parameters of tsat = 3 s and Trec = 2 s combined with an acquisition matrix of 64 × 64 and a single-shot RARE readout, the TR was 5125 ms yielding a temporal resolution of ~10 s for the two-offset protocol, which has been demonstrated to be sufficient to monitor intra-renal signal changes in previous studies.43 As we aimed to use a single CEST sequence to obtain both renal pH maps and time-activity curves, we decided to acquire CEST images at only two frequency offsets that are needed for the ratiometric pH analysis. Based on our results of the BM simulations, the larger CEST signal (4.3 ppm) was used to assess renal perfusion and excretory function.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

MTRasym curves obtained using numerical Bloch-McConnell simulations at different (A) B1, (B) tsat, (C) Trec, and (D) R1A

3.2 |. Dynamic iopamidol-enhanced MR-CEST urography

Taking inspiration from how MAG3 nuclear scintigraphy data is used to characterize differential kidney function, we proceeded with an in vivo evaluation of injecting iopamidol and performing CEST imaging in such a way that we could examine the relative CEST contrast in each kidney and how the contrast evolves after injection, i.e. time-activity curves. Specifically, we decided to characterize the uptake and excretion of iopamidol on nine mice with UUO (three for each time point after surgery) and three control mice. Representative T2w images of a healthy mouse and UUO mice are shown in Figure 2 AD. These display a gradual dilatation of the renal pelvis and ureter in the obstructed kidney (hydronephrosis) with time after ligation, confirming progression in renal injury caused by UUO. By 3 days, a disappearance of the papilla and thinning of the medulla could be observed. We manually segmented both obstructed and contralateral kidneys excluding the collecting system to depict how contrast varies with time after injection. As presented in Figure 2 EH, prolonged contrast was measured in UUO compared to native kidneys. This can also be observed in MTR maps at 4.3 ppm as is shown in Figure 3 for a representative UUO mouse at day 1 after obstruction. In the contralateral kidney, peak medullar enhancement occurred between 1 and 1.5 min after injection, whereas in the UUO kidney maximum enhancement in the medulla was reached between 1.5 and 2 min. Based on this data, we could conclude that our surgery was successful in obstructing the ureter, and this obstruction resulted in an injury that evolved with time.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

T2w images and dynamic CEST signal enhancement curves measured in (A, E) a control mouse, (B, F) UUO mice at day 1, (C, G) day 2, and (D, H) day 3 after obstruction. Blue and red contour indicate ROIs in the contralateral and UUO kidney, respectively

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

MTR images at 4.3 at different time points following iopamidol injection at day 1 after UUO. Blue and red contour indicate ROIs in the contralateral and UUO kidney, respectively

We next performed a group analysis of our time activity data on these mice. As can be seen in Figure 4, CEST MRI time-activity curves showed clear differences between the healthy and UUO kidneys. For the healthy mice, the dynamic CEST curves of both kidneys were nearly identical and displayed rapid excretion of the contrast agent. In the UUO mice, the time-activity curve for the obstructed kidneys showed prolonged contrast excretion with decreased STenh% values with time after ligation compared with the contralateral kidneys. As shown in Figure 4, TTP was significantly longer in the UUO kidney than in the contralateral kidney (p < 0.001). Differences in TTP increased further as the disease progressed. At the same time, the peak %STenh values were slightly decreased in the obstructed kidney, although this was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

A comparison of maximal CEST signal enhancement (%STenh) (A) and mean TTP values (C) and %STenh (B) and TTP distribution (D) in obstructed and contralateral kidneys at different time points post-surgery

3.3 |. CEST-MRI pH mapping

In addition to the time-activity curves, iopamidol-enhanced dynamic CEST MRI also provides truly quantitative and spatially resolved information about tissue pH. To assess whether pH might be a valuable biomarker for early diagnosis of obstructive nephropathy, we performed the ratiometric CEST-MRI pH imaging on our mice and compared the mean pH values and pH distribution between the control and UUO kidneys. Representative renal pH maps overlaid on M0 images, and pH histograms obtained in a healthy mouse, and UUO mice at day 1, day 2, and day 3 after obstruction are displayed in Figure 5. Whereas for the healthy kidneys a pH gradient from the cortex and outer medulla (more neutral pH) to the inner medulla and papilla (more acidic pH) could be observed, the obstructed kidneys showed a slight alkalinization of the regions corresponding to the inner and outer medulla. The pH histograms demonstrated that both kidneys of the control mouse had very similar pH distributions with a peak at pH 6.7, while in the UUO mice the distribution was shifted towards higher pH values in the obstructed kidney compared with the unobstructed one. We also performed group analysis on these mice with the results presented in Figure 6. In the control mice, both kidneys showed similar pH values. As early as 1 day after UUO, there was an increase in pH values in the obstructed kidney compared with the contralateral one. The same trend was observed at day 2, and day 3 after obstruction. The box-plot analysis for all nine UUO mice revealed significantly increased pH values in the UUO kidneys compared with the native kidneys (p < 0.01). All the CEST-derived semi-quantitative parameters are summarized in Table 2. Based on this mouse data, we conclude that DCE-MR CEST urography based pH imaging can detect differential function between kidneys after UTO.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

CEST pH maps and pH histograms measured in a control mouse (A,E), UUO mice at day 1 (B,F), day 2 (C,G), and day 3 (D,H) after obstruction

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

A comparison of mean pH values (A) and pH differences between UUO and contralateral kidneys (B)

TABLE 2.

A summary of CEST-derived parameters (TTP, %STenh, and pH) in the obstructed and native kidneys

Kidney TTP (s) %STenh pH
Control (n = 3) Left 72 ± 27 17 ± 13 6.65 ± 0.04
Right 72 ± 27 17 ± 13 6.67 ± 0.02

UUO Day 1 (n = 3) CL 75 ± 6 13 ± 10 6.63 ± 0.03
UUO 85 ± 12 12 ± 8 6.77 ± 0.12

UUO Day 2 (n = 3) CL 69 ± 22 9 ± 6 6.61 ± 0.05
UUO 89 ± 12 8 ± 5 6.69 ± 0.02

UUO Day 3 (n = 3) CL 55 ± 5 12 ± 12 6.77 ± 0.06
UUO 79 ± 12 7 ± 5 6.89 ± 0.02

3.4 |. Histologic evaluation

H&E staining demonstrates progressive glomerular atrophy, tubular dilation, and tubular atrophy in the obstructed kidney (Supporting Information Figure S2). Masson’s trichrome staining displayed in Figure 7 show that the extent of interstitial fibrosis (blue stain) gradually increases as the disease progresses. The percentage of fibrosis was significantly higher in the obstructed kidney compared to the contralateral kidney on day 3 (p = 0.0007). The percentage of fibrosis of the obstructed kidney was significantly higher on day 3 compared to both kidneys in the control mouse and ipsilateral kidneys at day 1 and day 2 post UUO (p = 0.0004, p = 0.0004, p = 0.0074, respectively).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Masson trichrome staining of the kidneys of a control mouse, and UUO mice at day 1, day 2, and day 3 post obstruction

4 |. DISCUSSION

In the present study, we have applied DCE-MR CEST urography to a mouse model of obstructive nephropathy and non-invasively assessed kidney function over 3 days after UUO. Our results demonstrate that DCE MR CEST acquisitions combined with a single injection of iopamidol allow simultaneous measurements of both renal uptake/clearance and pH as opposed to the conventional diagnostic techniques which provide only one type of metric to characterize kidney function. Similar CEST MRI measurements have recently been used for monitoring renal perfusion and pH homeostasis in an glycerol-induced bilateral kidney injury35 murine model.44 In contrast to that study, we were able to obtain both renal pH maps and time-activity curves using a single CEST acquisition and two-offset protocol, which has shown promising performance in our previous study characterizing perfusion and pH changes associated with a progression to CKD in an methylmalonic academia mouse model.37 The two-offset CEST approach achieves a much higher temporal resolution (10 s in our case) than the conventional full z-spectra acquisition which is required to measure signal changes during the wash-in/wash-out process in the kidney. Moreover, it also allows the use of a moving average filter and signal averaging to reduce the impact of motion on our pH maps, improve SNR and hence the sensitivity of pH measurements. Compared to our previous study, here we increased the spatial resolution while maintaining the same high temporal resolution and acquired a coronal slice instead of axial slice to better depict the renal pelvis and ureter. These improvements were felt to be necessary for detecting the subtle changes observed from suture obstructions.

Urographic contrast media such as iopamidol and 99mTc-MAG3 are primarily filtered through the glomerulus and primarily not reabsorbed or secreted in the renal tubule,6,45 therefore, it is possible to monitor their transit through vascular and tubular compartments through DCE-CT, MRI and renal scintigraphy. The resulting contrast kinetics provides a measure of renal function. In patients with tubular dysfunction, 99mTc-MAG3 renograms show radiotracer retention in the renal parenchyma and delayed probe detection in the pelvis and bladder.46,47 Similar observations have been reported in a renal scintigraphy study on a mouse model of UUO by Tantawy et al.43 Our results appear to confirm these findings, revealing altered TTP values and prolonged iopamidol clearance in the obstructed kidneys compared with the contralateral kidneys. The histological evaluation showed typical patterns of UUO, including progressive glomerular atrophy, tubular dilation, and tubular atrophy. These findings are consistent with previous histological findings43,48,49 and indicate that structural changes in UUO kidneys could be assessed by measuring iopamidol excretion via CEST MRI. However, the application of DCE CEST MR urography for estimating perfusion-related parameters may be hampered by the nonlinear relationship between CEST signal enhancement and iopamidol concentration and the influence of relaxation on our measurements which may result in more variability than seen in measurements based on detecting x-ray scattering or detecting emitted gamma radiation.

Besides providing information on renal uptake and clearance of iopamidol, dynamic CEST MRI enables spatially resolved pH measurements. In the present study, no clear difference in peak %STenh between the UUO and CL kidney was observed at day 1 and 2 post-obstruction, suggesting that minimally dilated obstructive nephropathy might not cause a significant decrease in perfusion.9 Furthermore, the degree of dilation partially depends on the patient’s hydration status and thus in dehydrated patients hydronephrosis might be less evident despite progressing ON. In contrast, as early as day one after UUO we observed increased pH values in the obstructed kidney compared with the contralateral one, suggesting that pH might be a more useful MRI biomarker for the early diagnosis of ON. Similar findings were reported in previous studies in different murine models murine models, which demonstrated elevated renal pH levels in the affected kidneys as a result of glycerol-induced bilateral injury,35 and an unilateral ischemia-reperfusion damage.36 Impaired urinary acidification has also been documented in patients with various types of ON.50 Furthermore, animal studies with experimentally induced obstructive nephropathy have reported a transport defect in the distal nephron accompanied by impaired sodium reabsorption and reduced excretion of hydrogen and potassium.51,52 In both animals and patients following release of obstruction, there was no decrease in urinary pH in response to acid loading, indicating that obstruction substantially impact the ability of the distal nephron to acidify the urine.5355

The structural and molecular changes associated with obstructive renal damage have previously been assessed in a murine model of UUO using endogenous CEST MRI instead of applying a contrast agent such as iopamidol.30 While no regional changes in CEST signals between 1 and 3 ppm were detected, signals from 3 to 5 ppm and −5 to −1 ppm were higher in medulla and papilla of UUO kidney compared with CL kidney. Nevertheless, the interpretation of pH- and concentration-dependent CEST effects originating from various kidney metabolites is challenging.56 In contrast, iopamidol contrast enhanced CEST pH imaging enables quantitative assessment of renal function, and has been proven feasible on clinical scanners.5,57 Conversely, while iodinated contrast agents are considered safe and widely used, there are concerns regarding their potential nephrotoxicity in patients with preexisting renal impairment.58 Although multiple retrospective studies have shown that iopamidol demonstrates a reasonable safety profile,59,60 there is an increasing interest in developing novel non-iodinated pH-responsive MRI probes with reduced risk of nephrotoxicity.61,62

Our study has several limitations worth noting. First, temporal resolution of the dynamic CEST acquisition was too low to ensure an adequate sampling of the rapid signal variations occurring during the first past of iopamidol through the vascular and each of tubular compartments. Second, DCE-CEST MR urography provides only semi-quantitative measures of renal perfusion and excretory function, which are hardly comparable with those obtained using conventional gadolinium-enhanced DCE-MRI or multi-detector CT. Third, differences in peak signal enhancement observed between the kidneys and different animals might be partially due to B0/B1 field inhomogeneities. Last but not least, unlike the human kidney, the mouse kidney is unilobar with only a single papilla that extends deep into the renal pelvis. Consequently, the translational capability of this animal work to human UTOs remains unknown.

5 |. CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that DCE-MR-CEST urography can detect changes in renal excretion and pH homeostasis and distinguish between obstructed and unobstructed kidney as early as 1 day after UUO. Overall, our results suggest that CEST imaging might be particularly useful for detecting and monitoring the progression of renal injury caused by UUO. On the basis of these findings, we believe that our dynamic CEST MRI protocol is promising for early assessment of upper UTOs and could be translated to patients with obstructive nephropathy.

Supplementary Material

Supp Info

Figure S1: MTR curves obtained using numerical Bloch-McConnell simulations at different (A) B1, (B) tsat, (C) Trec, and (D) R1A.

Figure S2: H&E stained sections of the kidneys of a control mouse, and UUO mice at day 1, day 2 and day 3 post obstruction.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work is supported by NIH grant 5R01DK121847-02 and P41EB024495 and by a KKI Goldstein Innovation and Collaboration Award.

Footnotes

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of the article at the publisher’s website.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Brenner BM, Levine SA. Brenner and Rector’s the Kidney. Vol 2. 8th ed. Saunders Elsevier; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Feinstein L, Matlaga B. Urologic Diseases in America. Kidney Stones. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2017:12. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nagle RB, Bulger RE. Unilateral obstructive nephropathy in the rabbit. II. Late morphologic changes. Lab Invest. 1978;38:270–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McDougal WS, Rhodes RS, Persky L. A histochemical and morphologic study of postobstructive diuresis in the rat. Invest Urol. 1976;14:169–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bo S, Sedaghat F, Pavuluri K, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced-MR CEST urography: an emerging tool in the diagnosis and management of upper urinary tract obstruction. Tomography. 2021;7:80–94. doi: 10.3390/tomography7010008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lerman LO, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Carlos RJ. The development of x-ray imaging to study renal function. Kidney Int. 1999;55:400–416. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00301.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Itano NB, Sherrill LE, Lerman LO, et al. Electron beam computerized tomography assessment of in vivo single kidney glomerular filtration rate and tubular dynamics during chronic partial unilateral ureteral obstruction in the pig. J Urol. 2001;166:2530–2535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Krier JD, Ritman EL, Bajzer Z, Romero JC, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Noninvasive measurement of concurrent single-kidney perfusion, glomerular filtration, and tubular function. Am J Physiol-Ren Physiol. 2001;281:F630–F638. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.281.4.F630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cai XR, Zhou QC, Yu J, et al. Assessment of renal function in patients with unilateral ureteral obstruction using whole-organ perfusion imaging with 320-detector row computed tomography. Valenti G, ed. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122454. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jiang K, Ferguson CM, Abumoawad A, Saad A, Textor SC, Lerman LO. A modified two-compartment model for measurement of renal function using dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Joles JA, ed. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0219605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gorin MA, Rowe SP. Urinary tract imaging: basic principles of nuclear medicine. Campbell-Walsh-Wein Urology Twelfth Edition Review. 3rd ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prasad PV. Functional MRI of the kidney: tools for translational studies of pathophysiology of renal disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290:F958–F974. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00114.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chandarana H, Lee VS. Renal functional MRI: are we ready for clinical application? Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:1550–1557. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Leyendecker JR, Barnes CE, Zagoria RJ. MR urography: techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2008;28:23–46. doi: 10.1148/rg.281075077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jones RA, Easley K, Little SB, Scherz H, Kirsch AJ, Grattan-Smith JD. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR urography in the evaluation of pediatric Hydronephrosis: part 1, functional assessment. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1598–1607. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McDaniel BB, Jones RA, Scherz H, Kirsch AJ, Little SB, Grattan-Smith JD. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR urography in the evaluation of pediatric Hydronephrosis: part 2, anatomic and functional assessment of Uteropelvic junction obstruction. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1608–1614. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology. 2007;243:148–157. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2431062144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Broome DR, Girguis MS, Baron PW, Cottrell AC, Kjellin I, Kirk GA. Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:586–592. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.1094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McDonald RJ, Levine D, Weinreb J, et al. Gadolinium retention: a research roadmap from the 2018 NIH/ACR/RSNA workshop on gadolinium chelates. Radiology. 2018;289:517–534. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Forsén S, Hoffman RA. Study of moderately rapid chemical exchange reactions by means of nuclear magnetic double resonance. J Chem Phys. 1963;39:2892–2901. doi: 10.1063/1.1734121 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wolff SD, Balaban RS. Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 1989;10:135–144. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910100113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guivel-Scharen V, Sinnwell T, Wolff SD, Balaban RS. Detection of proton chemical exchange between metabolites and water in biological tissues. J Magn Reson. 1998;133:36–45. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1998.1440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dagher AP, Aletras A, Choyke P, Balaban RS. Imaging of urea using chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer at 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:745–748. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ward KM, Aletras AH, Balaban RS. A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST). J Magn Reson. 2000;143:79–87. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1999.1956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhou J, Lal B, Wilson DA, Laterra J, van Zijl PCM. Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:1120–1126. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McMahon MT, Gilad AA, Bulte JWM, van Zijl PCM. Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer Imaging: Advances and Applications. Routledge & CRC Press. Published 2017. Accessed December 10, 2021. https://www.routledge.com/Chemical-Exchange-Saturation-Transfer-Imaging-Advances-and-Applications/McMahon-Gilad-Bulte-Zijl/p/book/9789814745703 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang F, Kopylov D, Zu Z, et al. Mapping murine diabetic kidney disease using chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2016;76:1531–1541. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kentrup D, Bovenkamp P, Busch A, et al. GlucoCEST magnetic resonance imaging in vivo may be diagnostic of acute renal allograft rejection. Kidney Int. 2017;92:757–764. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu J, Han Z, Chen G, et al. CEST MRI of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. NMR Biomed. 2018;31:e3942. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang F, Takahashi K, Li H, et al. Assessment of unilateral ureter obstruction with multi-parametric MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:2216–2227. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li A, Xu C, Liang P, et al. Role of chemical exchange saturation transfer and magnetization transfer MRI in detecting metabolic and structural changes of renal fibrosis in an animal model at 3T. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21:588–597. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wu Y, Zhou IY, Igarashi T, Longo DL, Aime S, Sun PZ. A generalized Ratiometric chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI approach for mapping renal pH using Iopamidol. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:1553–1558. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Longo DL, Sun PZ, Consolino L, Michelotti FC, Uggeri F, Aime S. A general MRI-CEST Ratiometric approach for pH imaging: demonstration of in vivo pH mapping with Iobitridol. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:14333–14336. doi: 10.1021/ja5059313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wu Y, Zhang S, Soesbe TC, et al. pH imaging of mouse kidneys in vivo using a frequency-dependent paraCEST agent. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75:2432–2441. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Longo DL, Busato A, Lanzardo S, Antico F, Aime S. Imaging the pH evolution of an acute kidney injury model by means of iopamidol, a MRI-CEST pH-responsive contrast agent. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70:859–864. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Longo DL, Cutrin JC, Michelotti F, Irrera P, Aime S. Noninvasive evaluation of renal pH homeostasis after ischemia reperfusion injury by CEST-MRI. NMR Biomed. 2017;30:e3720. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pavuluri K, Manoli I, Pass A, et al. Noninvasive monitoring of chronic kidney disease using pH and perfusion imaging. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaaw8357. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw8357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zaiss M, Angelovski G, Demetriou E, McMahon MT, Golay X, Scheffler K. QUESP and QUEST revisited – fast and accurate quantitative CEST experiments. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:1708–1721. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sun PZ, Longo DL, Hu W, Xiao G, Wu R. Quantification of iopamidol multi-site chemical exchange properties for ratiometric chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging of pH. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:4493–4504. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/16/4493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Villano D, Romdhane F, Irrera P, et al. A fast multislice sequence for 3D MRI-CEST pH imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2021;85:1335–1349. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim M, Gillen J, Landman BA, Zhou J, van Zijl PCM. Water saturation shift referencing (WASSR) for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) experiments. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61:1441–1450. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Longo DL, Dastrù W, Digilio G, et al. Iopamidol as a responsive MRI-chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast agent for pH mapping of kidneys: in vivo studies in mice at 7 T. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65:202–211. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22608 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tantawy MN, Jiang R, Wang F, et al. Assessment of renal function in mice with unilateral ureteral obstruction using 99mTc-MAG3 dynamic scintigraphy. BMC Nephrol. 2012;13:168. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Irrera P, Consolino L, Cutrin JC, Zöllner FG, Longo DL. Dual assessment of kidney perfusion and pH by exploiting a dynamic CEST-MRI approach in an acute kidney ischemia–reperfusion injury murine model. NMR Biomed. 2020;33:e4287. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rehling M, Frøkiaer J, Poulsen EU, Marqversen J, Nielsen BV, Bacher T. 99mTc-MAG3 kinetics in the normal pig. A comparison to 131I-OIH and 125I-iothalamate after single injection and during continuous infusion. Clin Physiol. 1995;15:57–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.1995.tb00430.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Taylor A, Nally JV. Clinical applications of renal scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:31–41. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.1.7998566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schlotmann A, Clorius JH, Rohrschneider WK, Clorius SN, Amelung F, Becker K. Diuretic Renography in Hydronephrosis: delayed tissue tracer transit accompanies both functional decline and tissue reorganization. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1196–1203. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.049890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Elder JS, Stansbrey R, Dahms BB, Selzman AA. Renal histological changes secondary to ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 1995;154:719–722. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199508000-00102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Klahr S, Morrissey J. Obstructive nephropathy and renal fibrosis. Am J Physiol-Renal Physiol. 2002;283:F861–F875. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00362.2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Batlle DC, Arruda JA, Kurtzman NA. Hyperkalemic distal renal tubular acidosis associated with obstructive Uropathy | NEJM. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:373–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Harris R, Yarger W. Renal function after release of unilateral ureteral obstruction in rats. Am J Physiol. 1974;227:806–815. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1974.227.4.806 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Thirakomen K, Kozlov N, Arruda J, Kurtzman N. Renal hydrogen ion secretion after release of unilateral ureteral obstruction. Am J Physiol. 1976;231:1233–1239. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1976.231.4.1233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Okegawa T, Jonas PE, DeSchryver K, Kawasaki A, Needleman P. Metabolic and cellular alterations underlying the exaggerated renal prostaglandin and thromboxane synthesis in ureter obstruction in rabbits. Inflammatory response involving fibroblasts and mononuclear cells. J Clin Invest. 1983;71:81–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Laski ME, Kurtzman NA. Site of the acidification defect in the perfused postobstructed collecting tubule. Miner Electrolyte Metab. 1989;15:195–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Purcell H, Bastani B, Harris KP, Hemken P, Klahr S, Gluck S. Cellular distribution of H(+)-ATPase following acute unilateral ureteral obstruction in rats. Am J Physiol-Ren Physiol Published online September. 1991;1:F365–F376. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1991.261.3.F365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Stabinska J, Neudecker P, Ljimani A, Wittsack HJ, Lanzman RS, Müller-Lutz A. Proton exchange in aqueous urea solutions measured by water-exchange (WEX) NMR spectroscopy and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging in vitro. Magn Reson Med. 2019;82:935–947. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Müller-Lutz A, Khalil N, Schmitt B, et al. Pilot study of Iopamidol-based quantitative pH imaging on a clinical 3T MR scanner. MAGMA. 2014;27:477–485. doi: 10.1007/s10334-014-0433-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Su TH, Hsieh CH, Chan YL, et al. Intravenous CT contrast media and acute kidney injury: a multicenter emergency department-based study. Radiology. 2021;12:571–581. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Khan SF, Kalantari K. The use of iodinated contrast Media in Patients with end-stage renal disease. Semin Dial. 2014;27:607–610. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Haight AE, Kaste SC, Goloubeva OG, Xiong XP, Bowman LC. Nephrotoxicity of Iopamidol in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients who have undergone allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Radiology. 2003;226:399–404. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2262011471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chan KWY, Liu G, Song X, et al. MRI-detectable pH nanosensors incorporated into hydrogels for in vivo sensing of transplanted-cell viability. Nat Mater. 2013;12:268–275. doi: 10.1038/nmat3525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yang X, Song X, Banerjee SR, et al. Developing imidazoles as CEST MRI pH sensors. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2016;11:304–312. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.1693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Info

Figure S1: MTR curves obtained using numerical Bloch-McConnell simulations at different (A) B1, (B) tsat, (C) Trec, and (D) R1A.

Figure S2: H&E stained sections of the kidneys of a control mouse, and UUO mice at day 1, day 2 and day 3 post obstruction.

RESOURCES