Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2022 Nov 7;11(12):e00914-22. doi: 10.1128/mra.00914-22

Draft Genome Sequences for Bacteria Associated with Root Nodules of Alnus incana in New England

Kelsey Mercurio a, Joseph Sevigny a,b, Céline Pesce a,*, W Kelley Thomas a,b, Louis S Tisa a,
Editor: David A Baltrusc
PMCID: PMC9753616  PMID: 36342277

ABSTRACT

Nine bacterial strains isolated from the root nodules of Alnus incana were sequenced to determine their potential roles in plant health. The selected bacterial isolates belonged to the genera Bacillus, Herbaspirillum, Pantoea, Paenibacillus, and Rothia. Here, we report the draft genome sequences.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Besides hosting endosymbionts, root nodules have other occupants or plant endophytes that appear to assist plant growth and health (15). Using a culture-independent approach, we elucidated the nodule microbiome of Casuarina glauca (1) and have extended this study to Alnus incana found in New England. We previously reported the genome sequences of 10 bacterial isolates obtained in 2018 (6). Here, we continue to isolate more endophytes of alder nodules.

In September and November 2019, root nodule samples were collected from A. incana found by Adams Point at Jackson’s laboratory in Durham, New Hampshire. The root nodules were surface sterilized with hydrogen peroxide and rinsed several times with sterile distilled water. The nodule was cut into a fine powder with a sterilized razor, and dilutions were plated onto Czapek (7) and R2A (8) media. About 77 isolates were initially obtained, purified, and propagated on either Czapek or R2A media. These isolates were incubated overnight in their respective isolation medium (Table 1), and genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) DNA extraction protocol (9). RNA was removed by RNase treatment. The quality and quantity of the gDNA were verified by a Thermo Scientific NanoDrop. Nine isolates were chosen for whole-genome sequencing analysis to provide insight into their plant-microbe interactions, including potential plant growth-promoting activity.

TABLE 1.

Genome characteristics

Bacterial species Isolatea GenBank accession no. SRA accession no. No. of reads No. of contigs Avg. coverage (×) Genome assembly size (bp) N50 contig size (bp) No. of CDSsb G+C content (%) No. of rRNAs No. of tRNAs
Bacillus velezensis alder76 JAIUDC000000000 SRX12008554 3,356,518 34 209.7 4,341,411 341,132 4,334 45.7 15 80
Bacillus velezensis alder77 JAIUDB000000000 SRX12008555 3,171,512 32 198.2 4,340,492 341,132 4,332 45.7 15 80
Bacillus velezensis alder71 JAIUDD000000000 SRX12008553 3,179,306 34 198.7 4,340,599 341,132 4,337 45.7 15 80
Herbaspirillum sp. alder98 JAIUCY000000000 SRX12008550 4,825,154 26 301.5 5,342,531 530,052 4,764 62.3 3 53
Paenibacillus sp. alder61 JAIUDG000000000 SRX12008549 4,198,488 63 262.4 6,112,889 244,801 5,371 53.0 25 79
Pantoea sp. alder81 JAIUDA000000000 SRX12008556 6,011,958 35 375.7 5,643,466 534,706 5,206 53.4 12 71
Pantoea sp. alder70 JAIUDE000000000 SRX12008552 4,283,982 81 267.7 5,648,269 140,384 5,244 53.4 14 70
Pantoea sp. alder69 JAIUDF000000000 SRX12008551 4,000,000 42 250 5,648,814 534,706 5,219 53.4 12 71
Rothia kristinae alder54 JAIUDH000000000 SRX12008548 4,144,358 18 259 2,344,478 266,588 2,050 71.9 4 47
a

Bacteria were isolated on Czapek (alder54, alder61, alder69, and alder 70) and R2A (alder71, alder76, alder77, alder81, and alder98) media.

b

CDSs, coding DNA sequences.

Whole-genome sequencing was performed at the Hubbard Center for Genome Studies (University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH) using Illumina technology techniques (10). A paired-end library was constructed using a Nextera DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and sequenced on an Illumina NovoSeq instrument to produce 250-bp paired-end reads. The total numbers of reads for all 9 strains are listed in Table 1. The Illumina sequence data were trimmed by Trimmomatic version 0.36 (11). TruSeq adapters were trimmed with an allowance of two mismatches. Leading and trailing bases below the quality of 3 were trimmed. The read was then scanned with a sliding window of 4 bp and trimmed if the average quality dropped below 30. Finally, reads were dropped if the length was less than 36 bp. Trimmed sequencing reads were assembled using SPAdes version 3.15.2 (12) with the default settings. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. The assembled genomes were annotated via the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (13). The assembly metrics and annotation features are given in Table 1.

The identities of the strains were determined by a whole genome-based taxonomic analysis via the Type (Strain) Genome Server (TYGS) platform (14) (https://tygs.dsmz.de), including digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values (15). The type-based species clustering using a 70% dDDH radius around each of the type strains was used as previously described (16), while subspecies clustering was done using a 79% dDDH threshold as previously introduced (17). Among the nine isolates, the three Bacillus velezensis strains are identical to each other, and the type strain and Paenibacillus sp. alder61 isolates were characterized as belonging to Paenibacillus faecis. Although three Pantoea isolates are identical to each other, they represent a potential new species, as does the Herbaspirillum isolate.

Data availability.

The draft genome sequences of these bacterial strains have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. Both the assembly and raw reads are available at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA748777.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the following 2021 UNH CEPS TechLeaders workshop participants for their efforts on this project: A. Bertrand, D. Mahaveer, A. Watkins, A. Karr, M. Ajit, N. Kutschke, N. Chung, S. Lasut, T. Odugu, K. Schaible, and J. Finocchiaro.

Partial funding was provided by the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station. This is scientific contribution 2951. This work was supported by USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch 1019869 (L.S.T.), National Institutes of Health P20GM103506 IDeA program (W.K.T.), and the College of Life Sciences and Agriculture at the University of New Hampshire.

Contributor Information

Louis S. Tisa, Email: louis.tisa@unh.edu.

David A. Baltrus, University of Arizona

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ghodhbane-Gtari F, D’Angelo T, Gueddou A, Ghazouani S, Gtari M, Tisa LS. 2021. Alone yet not alone: Frankia lives under the same roof with other bacteria in actinorhizal nodules. Front Microbiol 12:749760. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.749760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ghodhbane-Gtari F, Tisa LS. 2014. Ecology and physiology of Non-Frankia actinobacteria from actinorhizal plants, p 27–42. In Katsey EI (ed), Plasticity in plant-growth-promoting and phytopathogenic bacteria. Springer, New York, NY. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9203-0_2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Martínez-Hidalgo P, Hirsch AM. 2017. The nodule microbiome: N2-fixing rhizobia do not live alone. Phytobiomes J 1:70–82. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-12-16-0019-RVW. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aserse AA, Rasanen LA, Aseffa F, Hailemariam A, Lindstrom K. 2013. Diversity of sporadic symbionts and nonsymbiotic endophytic bacteria isolated from nodules of woody, shrub, and food legumes in Ethiopia. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:10117–10134. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5248-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Leite J, Fischer D, Rouws LFM, Fernandes PI, Hofmann A, Kublik S, Schloter M, Xavier GR, Radl V. 2016. Cowpea nodules harbor non-rhizobial bacterial communities that are shaped by soil type rather than plant genotype. Front Plant Sci 7:2064. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.02064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Davis I, Sevigny J, Kleiner V, Mercurio K, Pesce C, Swanson E, Thomas WK, Tisa LS. 2020. Draft genome sequences of 10 bacterial strains isolated from root nodules of Alnus trees in New Hampshire. Microbiol Resour Announc 9:e01440-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01440-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hunter-Cevera JC, Fonda ME, Belt A. 1986. Isolation of cultures, p 3–23. In Demain AL, Solomon NA (ed), Manual of industrial microbiology and biotechnology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE. 1985. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1–7. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.1.1-7.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Murray MG, Thompson WF. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular-weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8:4321–4325. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.19.4321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bennett S. 2004. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics 5:433–438. doi: 10.1517/14622416.5.4.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin A, Sirotkin A, Sirotkin Y, Stepanauskas R, Clingenpeel SR, Woyke T, McLean JS, Lasken R, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2013. Assembling single-cell genomes and mini-metagenomes from chimeric MDA products. J Comput Biol 20:714–737. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2013.0084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Goker M. 2019. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Goker M. 2013. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu Y, Lai Q, Goker M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Wang M, Sun Y, Wang L, Shao Z. 2015. Genomic insights into the taxonomic status of the Bacillus cereus group. Sci Rep 5:14082. doi: 10.1038/srep14082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen J, Scheuner C, Michael V, Fiebig A, Rohde C, Rohde M, Fartmann B, Goodwin LA, Chertkov O, Reddy TBK, Pati A, Ivanova NN, Markowitz V, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Goker M, Klenk HP. 2014. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083(T), the type strain (U5/41(T)) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand Genomic Sci 9:2. doi: 10.1186/1944-3277-9-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The draft genome sequences of these bacterial strains have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1. Both the assembly and raw reads are available at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA748777.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES