ABSTRACT
A two-plasmid mutagenesis system for Clostridioides difficile is described that improves ease of use and efficiency in creating site-directed mutations. pJB06 contains a xylose-inducible cas9 gene, while the second plasmid (pJB07) encodes the corresponding guide RNA (gRNA) and regions of homology for repair of the introduced double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) breaks, both of which are replaceable via restriction digest.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Developing a reliable and versatile method of generating targeted mutations in Clostridioides difficile is important to further our understanding of its pathogenesis. We previously designed a single-plasmid CRISPR-Cas9 system that uses a type II-A CRISPR system that was codon optimized for expression in C. difficile (1). Here, we seek to improve on that system.
CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis works through the combined effects of a Cas9-mediated double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) break and the endogenous homologous recombination system. This dsDNA break is introduced by Cas9 at a locus matching a 20-bp guide RNA (gRNA) sequence. The specificity of chromosomal cleavage is further increased by the requirement of the downstream protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence 5′-NGG-3′ (2). The introduced dsDNA break is then repaired by recombination with the regions of homology, resulting in the introduction of the desired mutation (e.g., deletion) (3, 4).
In the prior system, we observed that some mutagenesis plasmids never created the desired mutation, while others could never be introduced into C. difficile. We hypothesized that this could be due to toxicity of the plasmid when both cas9 and the gRNA were located on the same plasmid. Therefore, we split the system into two separate plasmids (Fig. 1). pJB06 contains a XylR-repressed (5) cas9 gene and is the base plasmid for the two-plasmid system. It can be stably maintained, with selection, and stored for future use.
The second plasmid, pJB07, contains two modular regions designed to be removed by restriction digest and replaced through Gibson assembly or standard ligations. The first module contains regions of homology flanking the desired insertion (if any) to be used in repairing the host chromosome. The second contains a sequence encoding a gRNA. Once transcribed, the gRNA directs the Cas9 endonuclease to the specified chromosomal region for cleavage. In addition, the promoter driving gRNA expression has been changed from the constitutively active, gdh promoter to the same xylose-inducible promoter used for cas9 expression. This change should allow for simultaneous, conditional expression, while also reducing premature chromosomal cleavage due to excess gRNA production and increasing the efficiency of conjugations. Both plasmids also now contain two origins of transfer: traJ for conjugal transfer from Escherichia coli (6), and the Tn916 oriT for conjugal transfer from Tn916-containing Bacillus subtilis (6).
Plasmid assembly.
pJB06 was constructed as follows. PxylR-controlled, codon-optimized cas9 genes were amplified using primers 5′PxylR_COcas9 and 3′PxylR_COcas9 (Table 1) and inserted via Gibson assembly into pJS116 digested with NotI/XhoI, yielding pJB10. Both sequences for conjugal transfer were amplified using primers 5′Tn916_ori_gibson and 3′traJ and inserted via Gibson assembly into pJB10 digested with ApaI, yielding pJB06.
TABLE 1.
Primer name | Primer sequence |
---|---|
5′PxylR_COcas9 | TTATCAGGAAACAGCTATGACCGCGGCCGCCCCTTATATTTCATTAATTAAAGTTAAATT |
3′PxylR_COcas9 | TGCCAAGCTTGCATGTCTGCAGGCCTCGAGTTAATCACCACCTAATTGAGATAAATC |
5′Tn916_ori_Gibson | CGGAAGAGCGCCCAATACGCAGGGCCCTAACATCTTCTATTTTTCCCAAATC |
3′traJ | AATTTATCTACAATTTTTTTATCCTGCAGGGGGCCCGATCGGTCTTGCCTTG |
5′pyrE_UP | TTATCAGGAAACAGCTATGACCGCGGCCGCGACGTGATTTTTAATGGGTA |
3′pyrE_DN | TGCCAAGCTTGCATGTCTGCAGGCCTCGAGAAGCATTGATGTTCTTCCTTC |
pyrE_gRNA_PxylR | GCCCTTCCCAACAGTTGCGCAGCCTGAATGGCGAATGGCGCTAGCTGACAAAGATAATTAAATATTTTATTATTAGTTCATAAGTTAGTTTAATATACTAACAAAAATAAAGCAAGTAAAATATACCTAAAATATAAAAAAATTAGGATAGGAAAACGATAGTTATGAAGTGGCATTCAAGGAGGGGGTACCGAAAAGTGATGCATTGTTGGGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGTTAAAATAAGGCTAGTCCGTTATCAACTTGAAAAAGTGGCACCGAGTCGGTGCTTTTTTTCTATGGAGAAATCTAGATCAGCATGATGTCTGACTAGACGCGTGCTAGCATAAAAATAAGAAGCCTGCATTT |
pJB07 was constructed as follows. Regions of homology were amplified with primers 5′pyrE_UP and 3′pyrE_DN and then inserted via Gibson assembly into pMTL82254 digested with NotI/XhoI. The resulting plasmid was digested with NheI, and gBlock pyrE_gRNA_PxylR containing PxylR-controlled gRNA sequence targeted to C. difficile pyrE was inserted via Gibson assembly, resulting in pJB11. pJB11 was then digested with ApaI, and the fragment required for both conjugal transfer systems (primers 5′Tn916_ori_gibson and 3′traJ) was inserted via Gibson assembly, resulting in pJB07.
Data availability.
The complete sequences and availability of both plasmids are obtainable through the Addgene depository at https://www.addgene.org/depositing/81505/ (pJB06 ID 190480 and pJB07 ID 190481).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project was supported by awards 5R01AI116895 and 5R01AI172043 to J.A.S. from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIAID. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Contributor Information
Joseph A. Sorg, Email: jsorg@bio.tamu.edu.
Irene L. G. Newton, Indiana University, Bloomington
REFERENCES
- 1.McAllister KN, Bouillaut L, Kahn JN, Self WT, Sorg JA. 2017. Using CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing to generate C. difficile mutants defective in selenoproteins synthesis. Sci Rep 7:14672. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15236-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang JY, Pausch P, Doudna JA. 2022. Structural biology of CRISPR-Cas immunity and genome editing enzymes. Nat Rev Microbiol 20:641–656. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00739-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA. 2013. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31:233–239. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.McAllister KN, Sorg JA. 2019. CRISPR genome editing systems in the genus Clostridium: a timely advancement. J Bacteriol 201:e00219-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00219-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Muh U, Pannullo AG, Weiss DS, Ellermeier CD. 2019. A xylose-inducible expression system and a CRISPR interference plasmid for targeted knockdown of gene expression in Clostridioides difficile. J Bacteriol 201:e00711-18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00711-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bouillaut L, McBride SM, Sorg JA. 2011. Genetic manipulation of Clostridium difficile. Curr Protoc Microbiol Chapter 9:Unit 9A2. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc09a02s20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The complete sequences and availability of both plasmids are obtainable through the Addgene depository at https://www.addgene.org/depositing/81505/ (pJB06 ID 190480 and pJB07 ID 190481).