Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2022 Nov 7;11(12):e00629-22. doi: 10.1128/mra.00629-22

Draft Genome Sequence of Lactococcus lactis Strain PrHT3, Isolated from Organic Basil

Chelsea Truitt a, Guadalupe Meza c, Hung King Tiong c, Peter R Hoyt b, Ratnakar Deole a,
Editor: David Raskod
PMCID: PMC9753720  PMID: 36342285

ABSTRACT

Here, we report the draft genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis strain PrHT3, which was isolated from organic basil. This strain possesses one chromosome and two plasmids. This strain possesses potential probiotic characteristics.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are found in a variety of different environments, including plant materials and animals (1). Health benefits imparted by LAB with probiotic characteristics include antibacterial activity against pathogens, immune system stimulation, and improvement in inflammatory responses (24). Food and beverage market research reports estimate the probiotic market size by revenue to reach 69 billion dollars by 2023 (5). Here, we report the draft genome sequence of Lactococcus lactis (a member of the LAB) strain PrHT3, which was isolated from organic basil.

L. lactis strain PrHT3 was isolated from LAB isolated from grocery organic basil using de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) lactobacillus broth and agar for growth and was identified using 16S rRNA gene sequencing with an ABI 3730XL sequencer (6). Produce material was collected from a local grocery store in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, refrigerated at 4°C (i.e., storage), homogenized in MRS broth in sterile sampling bags, enriched at 30°C for 8 h, and plated on MRS agar plates using a sandwich overlay method described by Henning et al. (7). Bacterial colonies were separately streaked for establishment of pure cultures and then stored at −76°C in sterile MRS broth containing 10% glycerol. Bacterial culture material and identification information is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20497074.

For genomic DNA sequencing, L. lactis strain PrHT3 was grown overnight at 37°C in MRS broth, and genomic DNA was prepared using a Qiagen Genomic-tip 100/G kit. Paired-end libraries were prepared using the KAPA/Roche HyperPlus DNA library preparation kit (catalog number KK8512) and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500 sequencer using the midoutput 150-cycle flow cell, which generated 288,757,304 total reads. The data generated were processed to obtain high-quality reads using bcl2fastq (Illumina Inc.), Trimmomatic v. 0.38 (8), FastQC v. 0.11.9 (9), and custom scripts (available at https://github.com/hoytpr/Lacto_genome). Subsequently, assembly of the genome and plasmids used 4 million randomly selected paired-end reads to create an average genomic read coverage of 216-fold. The initial de novo assembly using SPAdes v. 3.15.0 (10) produced long contigs for use with BLAST (11) to identify a reference genome (GenBank assembly accession number GCA_016028835.1). The SPAdes assembler was also used with the plasmid option to identify putative plasmid sequences. The assembly and plasmid sequences were visualized using Bandage v. 0.8.1 (12), and the presumptive plasmid nodes were extracted as fasta contigs. To separate plasmid reads from genome reads, the fasta contigs from Bandage were converted to a BLAST+ database (separately for each plasmid) and searched with all reads returning the read names. Read names for each plasmid were used to separate and remove plasmid reads from the genome reads. The subsequent genome-only reads were scaffolded to the reference genome and submitted as .bam files using Bowtie2 v. 2.4.2 (13). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. The submission was annotated by PGAP v. 6.1 at NCBI (14). Table 1 shows statistics for the sequencing data.

TABLE 1.

Genomic features of Lactococcus lactis PrHT3

Genomic element No. of reads Size (bp) No. of scaffolds N50 (bp) G+C content (%) Mean coverage (×)
Chromosomal DNA 144,378,652 2,448,464 98 134,484 35.22 215
Plasmid 1 (plasmid 1ab) 571,732 12,772 8 4,564 31.69 3,357
Plasmid 2 (plasmid 2) 417,160 57,382 13 11,477 34.69 545

Data availability.

The 16S rRNA gene sequence was deposited in the NCBI database under GenBank accession number OP090157. The draft whole-genome sequencing (WGS) project was deposited in the NBCI database under GenBank accession number JAHLJE000000000. The reads have been deposited in the SRA under accession number SRR14619658. The BioProject accession number is PRJNA731925.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

H.K.T. expresses gratitude to the project funders and supporters. Appreciation is given to Tracy Keener (University of West Alabama) for providing indicator microorganisms.

This work was supported, in part, by the Competitive Seed Grants Program of the University of West Alabama Office of Sponsored Programs and Research (OSPR), the Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries, and the USDA (project A18-0513). R.D. acknowledges support from the Office of the Vice President of Research at the Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences.

P.H. acknowledges support by NSF-MRI 1626257 at Oklahoma State University.

Contributor Information

Ratnakar Deole, Email: ratnakar.deole@okstate.edu.

David Rasko, University of Maryland School of Medicine.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Naidu AS, Bidlack WR, Clemens RA. 1999. Probiotic spectra of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 39:13–126. doi: 10.1080/10408699991279187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kurmann JA, Rašić JL. 1991. The health potential of products containing bifidobacteria, p 117–157. In Robinson RK (ed), Therapeutic properties of fermented milks. Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Shah NP. 2000. Effects of milk-derived bioactives: an overview. Br J Nutr 84:3–10. doi: 10.1017/S000711450000218X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reid G, Gadir AA, Dhir R. 2019. Probiotics: reiterating what they are and what they are not. Front Microbiol 10:4. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hallak R, Lee C, Onur I. 2019. Examining healthy beverages in the hospitality industry: evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Br Food J 122:365–379. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-05-2019-0324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Meza G, Majrshi H, Tiong HK. 2022. Recovery of pasteurization-resistant Vibrio parahaemolyticus from seafoods using a modified, two-step enrichment. Foods 11:764. doi: 10.3390/foods11050764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Henning C, Vijayakumar P, Adhikari R, Jagannathan B, Gautam D, Muriana PM. 2015. Isolation and taxonomic identity of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria from retail foods and animal sources. Microorganisms 3:80–93. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms3010080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Andrews S. 2011. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
  • 10.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. 2015. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The 16S rRNA gene sequence was deposited in the NCBI database under GenBank accession number OP090157. The draft whole-genome sequencing (WGS) project was deposited in the NBCI database under GenBank accession number JAHLJE000000000. The reads have been deposited in the SRA under accession number SRR14619658. The BioProject accession number is PRJNA731925.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES