Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains a highly lethal malignancy. We have recently shown that simultaneous expression of Kras and mutant Tp53R175H promotes invasive ductal adenocarcinoma from pancreatic ductal cells. We hypothesized specific mutations in TP53 have divergent mechanisms of transforming ductal cells. In order to understand the role of mutant TP53 in transforming pancreatic ductal cells, we used a lentiviral system to express mutant TP53R175H and TP53R273H, two of the most frequently mutated TP53 alleles in pancreatic cancer patients, in immortalized, but not transformed, pancreatic ductal epithelial cells carrying a KRAS mutation (HPNE:KRASG12D). Mutant TP53 expression enhanced colony formation and an RPPA assay results revealed TP53R175H uniquely induced HSP70 expression in HPNE:KRASG12D cells. In the context of TP53R175H expression; we observed nuclear localization of HSP70. We performed immunoprecipitation experiments to show mutant p53R175H binds to HSP70. We also provide evidence mutant p53R175H is important for HSP70 stability and, more importantly, HSP70 is required for mutant p53 stability. These data are critical in the context of events leading to cellular transformation in the pancreas.
Keywords: pancreatic cancer, proteomics
1. INTRODUCTION
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is the third leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States [1]. PDA remains challenging to treat as most patients have few recognizable symptoms. To complicate potential therapeutic options, more than 60% of patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease, eliminating a possibility for surgical resection [2]. Genomic sequencing analysis of pancreatic tumors has revealed more than 93% of human PDA have mutations in the KRAS gene [3–6]. Other prominent mutations occur in TP53 (60–70%), SMAD4 (50%) and CDKN2A (>50%) [3]. Less frequent mutations are present in ATM, BRCA2, MLL3, ARID1A and SMARCA1[3]. Sequencing data of low and high grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) has shown TP53 mutations occur in late stage PanIN lesions, indicating gain of function mutations in TP53 are important for transformation [7]. Due to its high incidence of mutation in human PDA, KRAS remains an attractive target for therapeutic testing. However, there are no effective strategies to target KRAS. Therefore, deeper understanding of the biology of the earliest initiating events in PDA, especially defining the mechanisms responsible for cancer initiation from pancreatic epithelial cells, will provide important insight for the development of novel and effective therapeutic drugs.
We recently reported expression of p53R175H promotes cancer formation in pancreatic epithelial cells [8]. We have now expanded upon this finding to study how mutations in TP53 regulate ductal cell transformation. Our data reveal a gain of function mutation in p53, (TP53R175H) increases the abundance and nuclear localization of Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70). Heat shock proteins are chaperones that function to protect cells in the context of injury[9, 10]. They are dysregulated in pancreatic diseases including pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer[11–14]. In animal models of pancreatitis, HSP70 has been shown to protect pancreatic acinar cells from injury and in pancreatic cancer, inhibition of HSP70 using Triptolide has shown HSP70 is important for cancer cell survival and invasion[11–13]. Despite an increased understanding regarding the significance of HSP70 expression in pancreatic diseases, the molecular events that promote HSP70 expression and stabilization remain an area of investigation.
2. MATERIALS and METHODS
2.1. RPPA assay
HPNE:KRASG12D cells expressing either vector control (VC) or p53 mutants (R175H and R273H) were lysed using lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 50mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150mM NaCl, 1.5mM MgCl2, 1mMEGTA, 100 mM NaF, 10mM Na pyrophosphate, 1mM Na3VO4, 10% glycerol, containing freshly added protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MO) and protein concentration was measured by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method. Protein concentrations of samples were adjusted to 1mg/ml with lysis buffer. Cell lysates were serially diluted two-fold for 5 dilutions (from undiluted to 1:16 dilution) and arrayed on nitrocellulose-coated slides in an 11×11 format. Samples were probed with antibodies by tyramide-based signal amplification approach and visualized by DAB colorimetric reaction. The slides were analyzed and protein expression quantitated with the use of Array-Pro Analyzer. All the data points were normalized for protein loading and transformed to linear value, designated as “Normalized Linear”.
2.2. Cell culture
PANC-1, BxPC-3, MIA PaCa-2, Capan2, CFPA, HPNE, T-HPNE, HPNE:KRASG12Dcells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 units/ml of penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in 5% CO2. All hTert-HPNE cell lines (HPNE) were obtained from Dr. Ouellette and were cultured in Medium D as described previously [15–17]. Cell lines have been authenticated using ATCC.
2.3. Cell proliferation assay
Cell growth was measured in logarithmically growing HPNE:KRASG12Dcells stably expressing either vector control or mutant p53 (p53R175H or p53R273H). Cells were plated in six well plate at initial seeding density of 20000 cells/well and cell viability was measured at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours using a hemocytometer. Live and dead cells were differentiated using tyrpan blue dye.
2.4. Heat shock treatment
HPNE:KRASG12D cells expressing either vector control or mutant p53 were exposed to 42°C for 1 hour and then were allowed to recover at 37 °C for 6 hours. Immediately after recovery, cell lysates were prepared and a western blot experiment was performed.
2.5. Soft agar assay
Clonogenic growth of HPNE:KRASG12D cells expressing either vector control or mutant p53 was measured using colony formation assay in a 2-layer soft agar assay with top layer containing 0.3% agar, and bottom layer containing 0.5% agar. Cells were seeded in 6 well plates at 5000 cells/well. Media containing either DMSO or HSP70 inhibitor, triptolide was added on top of the agar layer. After 21 days colonies were counted using GelCount (Oxford OPtronix).
2.6. Generation of Human Pancreas Model of Neoplasia
Four human mutant TP53 cDNAs containing gain of function R175H and R273H sequences were cloned, sequence-validated, and packaged as lentiviral particles described previously [18]. All lentiviral constructs were purchased from Addgene (Cambridge, MA). Vector control plasmid (pLenti6/V5-GW/LacZ) was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Grand Island, NY). These mutations represent the most common point mutations of TP53 in human pancreatic cancer tissue. Stable cell lines harboring either vector control or mutant p53 were generated by transduction of lentiviral particles, followed by selection using blasticidine. Stable cell lines were maintained in 1 μg/ml blasticidine (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA). P53 over expression was confirmed by western blotting. The transduced mutant p53 constructs were V5 epitope-tagged to discriminate between exogenous mutant p53 and endogenous wild-type p53 protein in HPNE cells.
2.7. Transfection and Western for HSP70 Knockdown
HSP70 siRNA was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Plasmid and siRNA transfections were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using Lipofectamine 3000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY). In brief, 1 μg of plasmid DNA was suspended in 125 μl of OPTIMEM or 0.05 μM of HSP70 siRNA was mixed with equal volume of OPTIMEM containing 5 μl of lipofectamine 3000. Transfection mix was incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature and then added to cells in 6 well plates. After transfection, cells were washed with PBS and total cell lysate was collected by directly lysing the cells in lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA) for western blotting analysis.
2.8. Real-time PCR and western blotting
For western analysis, cell lysates were prepared by directly lysing the cells in cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) supplemented with protease inhibitor. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000g for 10 min. Supernatant fraction was collected and protein concentration was determined by BCA method. Equal amount of protein was analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) followed by transfer to Nitrocellulose membrane. Blots were probed with mono and/or polyclonalanti-V5 antibody, anti-γ-tubulin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), anti-HSP40, anti-HSP90, anti-HSF1, anti-HSF2, anti-HSF4, anti-p53 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA ) anti-histone 3, anti-pERK, anti-ERK, anti-pAKT, anti-AKT, anti-vinculin (Sigma, St.louis, MO), anti-HSP70 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA), (Mitosciences, Eugene, OR) antibodies. We detected the secondary antibody by using a chemiiluminescence detection kit (Genesee Scientific, San Diego, CA). For qPCR, all isoforms mapped to chromosome 6p21.3 were analyzed. HSP isoform primers include: HSPA1b Set1F TCA GGC CCT ACC ATT GAG GA; HSPA1b Set1R CCT TGA GTC CCA ACA GTC CA; HSPA1b Set2F TGT AAC CCC ATC ATC AGC GG; HSPA1b Set2R TCC CAA CAG TCC ACC TCA AAG; HSPA2 Set1F TTG GAC GGA AAT TCG AGG ATG; HSPA2 Set1R AAA TAG GCC GGG ACC GTT ATG; HSPA2 Set2F GGT CCC GGC CTA TTT CAA CG; HSPA2 Set2R GGA CAC GTC GAA AGT GCC A; HSPA5 Set1F CAT CAC GCC GTC CTA TGT CG; HSPA5 Set1R CGT CAA AGA CCG TGT TCT CG; HSPA5 Set2F CAC GGT CTT TGA CGC CAA G; HSPA5 Set2R CCA AAT AAG CCT CAG CGG TTT; HSPA9 Set1F CTT GTT TCA AGG CGG GAT TAT GC; HSPA9 Set1R GCA GGA GTT GGT AGT ACC CAA A; HSPA9 Set2F GGA AGG TAA ACA AGC AAA GGT GC; HSPA9 Set2R CCA ACA AGT CGC TCA CCA TCT; HSPA8 Set1F ACC TAC TCT TGT GTG GGT GTT; HSPA8 Set1R GAC ATA GCT TGG AGT GGT TCG; HSPA8 Set2F ACT CCA AGC TAT GTC GCC TTT; HSPA8 Set2R TGG CAT CAA AAA CTG TGT TGG T; HSPA6 Set1F CAA GGT GCG CGT ATG CTA C; HSPA6 Set1R GCT CAT TGA TGA TCC GCA ACA C; HSPA6 Set2F CAT CGC CTA TGG GCT GGA C; HSPA6 Set2R GGA GAG AAC CGA CAC ATC GAA; HSPA1L Set1F CTA CTG CCA AGG GAA TCG CC; HSPA1L Set1R GCC GAT CAG ACG TTT AGC ATC A; HSPA1L Set2F TAA ACG TCT GAT CGG CAG GAA; HSPA1L Set2R GCA CGG TAA TCA CTG CAT TGG; Hikeshi-F Set 1 TAG GAT TTG TCA CGA ATG GGA AG; Hikeshi-R Set 1 AGC AAC AGA TGG AGT TCG GAC; HSP70-F Set1 AGC TGG AGC AGG TGT GTA AC; HSP70-r Set1 CAG CAA TCT TGG AAA GGC CC.
2.9. Isolation of Nuclear fraction
Nuclear fraction from HPNE:KRASG12D cells expressing either vector control or mutant p53 were isolated using the following protocol [19]. Briefly, equal number of HPNE:KRASG12D cells expressing either vector control or different mutants were washed with ice cold PBS and then suspended in 1ml of lysis buffer (PBS containing 0.1% NP40) and titrated using p1000 micropipette. A few microliters of total cell lysate was saved and the rest of the fraction was centrifuged at maximum speed for 30 sec. Supernatant was saved as cytosolic fraction. Nuclear pellet was washed twice using lysis buffer. Nuclear pellet was suspended in lysis buffer and sonicated using microprobe at 15% power for 20 sec (10 seconds on followed by 5 seconds off on ice). BCA method was used to determine the protein concentration.
2.10. Immunohistochemistry
Paraffin-embedded tumor sections (5 μM thick) were deparaffinized and rehydrated by serial incubation in xylene, 100%, 95% ethanol, and water. Endogenous peroxide was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide at room temperature for 10 minutes. Antigen retrieval was performed by boiling citrate buffer (Vector labs Cat no. H-3300–250) for 10 minutes at 50% power followed by 2 minutes at 20% power in microwave oven. Sections were blocked using 10% FBS in 1xPBST. Anti-HSP70 and anti-TP53 (R175H) primary antibodies (Biolegend, San Diego, CA and ewEast Biosciences) were incubated overnight at 4°C. Biotinylated secondary antibody and DAB were used to develop the sections (Vectastain ABC–AP kit, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). All the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. For analysis of mutant TP53R175H expression in human PDA specimens, individual IHC samples were imaged and defined as positive or negative based on positive immunoreactivity (presence of brown stain after DAB) in tumor cells. For scoring HSP70 expression, a scale of 1–3 was designated with 1 indicating low immunoreactivity (light brown stain), 2 indicating moderate immunoreactivity (medium brown intensity) and 3 indicating high reactivity (dark brown intensity). To determine the intensity of HSP70 expression in p53R175H positive versus negative samples, we scored the arrays individually then correlated the intensity score with a positive or negative classification of p53R175H. Two columns were then defined using Prism Graphpad software and individual intensity scores were added to each column. A student’s t test was performed to determine if patients with p53R175H positive expression had a higher intensity score for HSP70. Representative IHC and analysis are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4: mutant p53R175H promotes nuclear accumulation of and stabilizes HSP70.
A. Western blot analysis was performed to detect HSP70 expression in isolated cytosolic and nuclear fractions from HPNE:KRASG12D cells that are stably expressing either vector control or different p53 mutants. Histone 3 was used as a nuclear marker and α-tubulin was used as a cytosolic markers. B. HPNE:KRASG12D cells that are stably expressing either vector control or different p53 mutants subjected to heat shock treatment and then HSP70 detected in cytosolic and nuclear fractions. C. Representative IHC showing intensity scores of staining used to define the levels of HSP70 in each human PDA sample analyzed. D. A p53R175H specific antibody was used to evaluate mutant p53 status in a human PDA array. Representative HSP70 IHC in p53R175H mutant positive versus negative samples are also shown. E. Pie graph showing the percentage of human PDA samples that stained positive for mutant p53R175H (47%). F. Quantification of HSP70 Intensity Score (1, 2 or 3) as a function of mutant p53R175H status. IHC analysis revealed a significant increase in the intensity of HSP70 in patients with mutant p53R175H. G. Quantification of percentage of cells per field with positive nuclear localization of HSP70. We observed a significant increase in the percentage of tumors cells with positive accumulation of HSP70 in patients with mutant p53. A student’s t-test using Prism software was used for all analysis.
To analyze the percentage of HSP70+ nuclear accumulation, we quantified the percentage of cells with nuclear expression of HSP70 and divided by the total number of malignant cells per field analyzed. Two columns were then defined using Prism Graphpad solftware and percentage of cells with nuclear expression of HSP70 were added to each column (either p53R175H positive or p53R175H negative). A student’s t test was performed to determine if patients with p53R175H positive expression had increased nuclear expression of HSP70. Representative IHC and analysis are shown in Figure 4.
2.11. Immunoprecipitation
Logarithmically growing HPNE:KRASG12D cells expressing either vector control or different p53 mutants (R175H and R273H) were suspended in 500 μl of cell lysis buffer (CST) and then incubated on ice for 10 in. Samples were sonicated for 15 sec (15 AMP power, 3 cycles, 5 Sec each). Samples were centrifuged at 14,000xg for 3 minutes and supernatant was collected for immunoprecipitation reaction. 200 μg of protein was precleared with 20 μl of protein A/G beads for 1 hour at 4°C on a shaker. Precleared protein samples were incubated with 1 μg of rabbit IgG or V5 antibody at 4°C for overnight on a shaker. After overnight incubation, 20 μl of protein A/G beads were added to the immunoprecipitation reaction and incubated at 4°C for 2 hours on a shaker. Immunoprecipitated proteins were eluted directly into 30 μl of 2X laemmlli buffer and boiled for 5 minutes. Samples were centrifuged and supernatant was subjected to western blotting.
2.12. Patient samples
Human tissues studied were approved for collection and study by the UTHSC CPHS under an approved IRB protocol. All samples are de-identified. Human PDA tissue arrays were also purchased through US Biomax.
2.13. Statistical Analysis
All statistical analysis was done using either a 2-way Anova comparison or student’s t-test. Both tests were done using Prism Graphpad software for analysis.
RESULTS
3.1. Mutant TP53 promotes survival and neoplastic features in normal pancreatic ductal cells
Mouse models of pancreatic cancer have shown gain of function mutations in TP53 rapidly accelerate PDA initiation and metastasis[8, 20, 21]. In models of pancreatic cancer, mutant p53 (p53R172H; p53R175H in humans) relieves growth arrest/senescence caused by KRASG12D [22]. We tested the ability of 2 common mutant p53 alleles, p53R175H and p53R273H, to induce proliferation in immortalized hTert-HPNE cells expressing KRASG12D (HPNE:KRASG12D) cells using an MTT proliferation assay. For this experiment, we tested the ability of p53 mutations to promote cellular proliferation in the context of 10% Serum, 2% Serum or Serum Free media. Our results revealed expression of p53R175H induced a significant increase in cell proliferation in HPNE:KRASG12D cells when cells were cultured in 10% Serum or 2% Serum for 48 hours (Fig. 1A). Under Serum Free conditions, expression of mutant p53 enhanced the proliferative capacity of HPNE:KRASG12D cells at 48 hours and at 72 hours, expression of p53R175H had the greatest effect on cell proliferation (Fig. 1A). Consistent with in vitro cell proliferation results, when HPNE:KRASG12D cells were cultured in serum free media, we observed higher levels of expression of p-ErkT204/Y204 in mutant p53 expressing HPNE:KRASG12D cells relative to vector control cells suggesting mutant p53 sustains downstream RAS/MAPK signaling in conditions of cellular stress. The ability of cells to form colonies and survive in anchorage independent conditions is one method to study the neoplastic capacity of cells. Furthermore, colony formation in soft agar assay strongly correlates with tumorigenicity of cancer cells, especially in comparison to mouse PDA xenograft models[23]. Therefore, we tested the ability of p53R175H and p53R273H to induce colony formation in HPNE:KRASG12D cells in serum free conditions. While both mutants enhanced colony formation relative to vector control (VC) transduced cells, mutant p53R175H had the greatest capacity for sphere formation (Fig. 1C).
Figure 1: Mutant p53 promotes survival and neoplastic growth of normal pancreatic ductal cells.
A. An MTT assay reveals mutant p53R175H promotes proliferation in 10% Serum, 2% Serum and Serum Free Conditions. Mutant p53R273H also promotes proliferation, but in serum free conditions at 72 hours, the increase is not significant. A 2-way Anova using Prism Graphpad software was used to test for significance. B. Western blot for extracellular-regulated kinase p-ErkT202/Y204 and AktS473 phosphorylation. In conditions of serum deprivation, expression of mutant 53 sustained p-ErkT202/Y204 C. Images of colonies in soft agar assay. D. Ability of mutant p53 to induce anchorage independent growth was measured using soft agar assay. A Students t-test using Prism software was used to test for significance.
3.2. Mutant TP53R175H stabilizes HSP70 in normal ductal epithelial cells
We employed a functional proteomics experiment to define how expression of mutant p53R175H in an immortalized human pancreatic epithelial cell promoted cancer initiation. Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) was performed at the MDAnderson RPPA functional proteomics core facility to quantify proteomic changes upon mutant p53R175H and p53R273H expression in HPNE:KRASG12D cells. The protein array was probed with 304 antibodies, which recognize specific proteins in major signaling pathways. RPPA data was generated from three independent biological samples. We observed a significant increase in HSP70 with p53R175H mutant expression in HPNE:KRASG12D cells (Fig. 2A-D). Using western blot as a secondary assay, we validated HSP70 expression in RPPA samples and in HPNE:KRASG12D cell lines in culture (Fig. 2B). Transient transfection of p53R175H also resulted in increased expression of HSP70 (Fig. 2E) and, notably, wild type p53 and p53R273H failed to induce expression of HSP70 (Fig. 2D,E). To expand our approach, we tested the effect of p53R175H expression on human pancreatic cancer cell lines. In the context of transient overexpression, p53R175H increased the expression of HSP70 in AsPC-1, BxPC-3 and MIA PaCa-2 cells. However, p53R175H did not induce expression of HSP70 in Capan-2 and CFPAC cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 1). Since HSP70 is a heat shock protein, we exposed HPNE:KRASG12D cells expressing VC, p53R273H, or p53R175H to heat shock conditions to determine if mutant p53 had any effect on heat shock response (42°C for 1 hour and recovery at 37°C for 6 hours). Using western blot detection methods, we determined heat shock treatment increased HSP70 expression and mutant p53 did not alter this response (Fig. 2F). Notably, p53R175H expression induced similar levels of HSP70 as observed in heat shock conditions (Fig. 2F).
Figure 2. A functional proteomics screen reveals mutant p53R175H increases expression of HSP70.
A. Heat map showing differential expression of proteins upon either vector control or mutant p53 over expression in HPNE:KRASG12D cells. B. RPPA assay samples were used to validate the expression of HSP70 using western blotting. C,D. Normalized RPPA data in linear values was used to draw the bar graphs showing the expression of p53 and HSP70. E. Western blot analysis to detect HSP70 expression in total cell lysate from stable cell lines in culture. F. HPNE:KRAS G12D cells expressing either vector control or mutant p53 exposed either 37 0C or 42 0C for 1hr and then recovered at 37 0C for 6 hrs. Total cell lysate was prepared for western blot analysis and then HSP70 was detected. A students t-test was used to evaluate significance.
3.3. Mutant p53R175H increases expression of multiple isoforms of HSP70
Recent sequencing studies have shown TP53 mutations occur in late human PanIN, which has heightened our interest in studying the mechanism by which p53R175H increases expression of HSP70 as an early event in the initiation of PDAC[7, 14, 24]. The HSP70 family consists of 13 homologous proteins (HSPA1A, 1B, 1L, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12A, 12B, 13, 14). While sharing homology, HSP70 family members differ from each other by cellular localization, amino acid sequence, and expression levels. HSPA-1A and HSPA-1B, collectively known as HSP70–1, are a major stress inducible complex, frequently altered in a broad range of cancers [9]. We performed Real Time (qRT-PCR) analysis to detect expression levels of other HSP isoforms in the context of increased p53R175H. Our data revealed p53R175H specifically increased expression of HSPA1A, HSPA1B, HSPA1L and HSPA8, but not HSPA2, 5, 6 and 9 (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, in direct contrast, expression of p53R273H had no effect on the abundance of HSP70 isoforms, indicating expression of HSP70 is directly regulated by p53R175H (Fig. 3A). We also tested to see if KRASG12D is required for mutant p53R175H mediated expression of HSP70–1. Transient expression of p53R175H in HPNE and transformed (T-HPNE) cells enhanced expression of HSP70 mRNA (Fig. 3B), suggesting that KRASG12D is not required for mutant p53R175H mediated expression of HSP70–1. As we observed increased expression of HSP isoforms, we wanted to determine if mutant p53R175H also increased the abundance of HSP transcription factors known to promote expression of HSP isoforms. Using western blots, we observed increased expression of Heat Shock Factor 2 (HSF2), but not HSF1 or HSF4 in HPNE:KRASG12D expressing cells (Fig. 3C). We performed western blot analysis to detect other HSPs (HSP27, 40, and 90). p53R175H increased expression of HSP40 but did not increase expression of HSP90 or HSP27 (Fig. 3C).
Figure 3. Mutant p53R175H increases mRNA levels of multiple HSP70 isoforms.
A. Real time PCR was carried out to detect gene expression changes in different HSP70 isoforms with mutant p53 over expression. Mutant p53R175H significantly increased expression of HSPA-1b, HSPA-1L and HSPA-8. B. Real time PCR was used to confirm mutant p53R157H increases mRNA levels of HSP70 in HPNE cells, HPNE:KRASG12D and T-HPNE cells, which indicated mutant p53R175H exerts an effect on HSP70 independent of mutant KRAS C. Western blot analysis to detect HSP27, 40, 90 and HSF1, 2, 4 in HPNE:KRASG12D cells expressing either vector control or mutant p53. Mutant p53R175H increased expression of HSP40 and HSF2. A student’s t test was used to calculate statistics.
3.4. Mutant p53 promotes HSP70 nuclear localization
Various cellular proteins, including HSP70, undergo cytoplasmic to nuclear translocation under stress conditions [10, 25]. Therefore, we studied the effect of mutant p53 on HSP70 nuclear localization. HPNE:KRASG12D cells that are stably expressing p53R175H had higher nuclear HSP70 levels. In contrast, cells expressing either VC or p53R273H failed to induce nuclear localization (Fig. 4A). We tested the sub cellular distribution of HSP70 in HPNE:KRASG12D cells under heat shock stress conditions. Heat shock treatment promoted nuclear localization of HSP70 independent of p53 mutational status (Fig. 4B). Our nuclear preps showed either very low or lack of cytosolic marker protein, α-tubulin, eliminating the possibility of cytosolic contamination. In addition to our in vitro experiments, we stained a human PDA tissue array and additional clinical samples for HSP70 and a TP53R175H mutant specific antibody to determine if there is a clinical correlation between TP53R175H and HSP70. Using IHC, we scored human clinical samples using an intensity of staining scale from 1 (low intensity/expression of HSP70) to 3 (high intensity/expression of HSP70). Representative staining intensity is shown in Figure 4C. In serial sections, we stained for a TP53R175H specific antibody and labeled each sample as positive or negative (Fig. 4D,E). At the conclusion of our analysis, we observed 47% of the clinical samples we analyzed had TP53R175H expression (Fig. 4E) and samples positive for TP53R175H had significantly increased intensity of staining for HSP70 (Fig. 4F). To determine if TP53R175H expression was associated with nuclear accumulation of HSP70, we quantified the percentage of neoplastic cells with nuclear localization of HSP70. We observed a significant increase in the percentage of cells with nuclear expression of HSP70 as in patients with mutant TP53R175H (Fig. 4G).
3.5. HSP70 is required for the stability of mutant p53
In normal tissues, negative regulators such as MDM2 and CHIP suppress p53 levels. In response to stress, p53 is released from negative regulators and stabilized to induce cell cycle arrest, senescence, and apoptosis [26–29]. Consistent with its known role in regulating wild type p53, MDM2 promotes degradation of mutant p53 in normal and premalignant tissues [30]. As other factors regulating mutant p53 stability remain unknown [31–34], we wanted to determine if HSP70 has any role in the stabilization of p53 in the context of PDA initiation. First, we performed an immunoprecipitation experiment to detect HSP70 and mutant p53 interactions. Our results showed that p53R175H, not p53R273H interacts with HSP70 (Fig. 5A). We studied the role of HSP70 in mutant p53 stabilization using Triptolide, an HSP70 inhibitor with known therapeutic potential in human and murine PDA [13, 35, 36]. HPNE:KRASG12D cells expressing either vector control or p53R175H were treated with Triptolide and western blot analysis was performed to detect p53 expression. Triptolide treatment reduced the levels of mutant p53 and increased wild type p53 expression in vector control cells (Fig. 5B). As a reciprocal experiment, we wanted to determine if p53R175H increased stability of HSP70. We exposed HPNE:KRASG12D-VC, -p53R175H and -p53R273H cells to heat shock conditions to induce expression of HSP70 and treated one group with siRNA targeting HSP70. We then probed for expression of HSP70 and p53. Our data revealed p53R175H specifically inhibits siRNA-targeted degradation of HSP70 and, thus, is vital to HSP70 stability. Furthermore, this experiment highlighted the specificity and efficacy of our HSP70 siRNA targeting construct (Fig. 5C; see also Supplemental Fig. 2).
Figure 5. HSP70 interacts with and stabilizes mutant p53.
A. Western blot analysis of immunoprecipitated samples for HSP70 antibody. HPNE:KRASG12D cells stably expressing either vector control or mutant p53 were immunoprecipitated with V5 antibody. B, D. Western blot for p53 and HSP70 in the cytosolic and nuclear fractions after Triptolide treatment in HPNE:KRASG12D cells stably expressing either vector control or mutant p53. C. Immunoblot analysis of HSP70 and p53 expression after scrambled siRNA or HSP70 specific siRNA transfection, followed by heat shock treatment in HPNE:KRASG12D cells stably expressing either vector control or mutant p53.
3.6. HSP70 is required for mutant p53R175H induced sphere formation
The therapeutic potential for using Triptolide, an HSP70 inhibitor, to treat patients with pancreatic cancer has been described previously [11, 37, 38]. We wanted to determine if Triptolide would have a similar effect on the sphere forming capacity of HPNE:KRASG12D cells expressing specific gain of function mutations in p53. Our results revealed Triptolide significantly reduces the sphere forming capacity of p53 mutant HPNE:KRASG12D cells (Fig. 6A). To further study the mechanism by which Triptolide reduces sphere formation, we used a dose response and treated vector control and p53R175H expressing HPNE:KRASG12D cells with Triptolide. In vector control cells expressing LacZ-V5 fusion protein, Triptolide treatment had no effect on V5 expression. Notably, in a dose dependent manner (Fig. 6B), we observed expression of wild type p53 in vector control treated cells, indicating in the absence of mutant p53, wild type p53 is expressed in response to Triptolide treatment, as has been previously reported[38]. In mutant p53R175H-V5 fusion protein expressing cells, V5 expression was significantly reduced with Triptolide treatment, confirming Triptolide specifically promotes mutant p53 degradation (Fig. 6B).
Figure 6. HSP70 is required for mutant p53 mediated cellular transformation:
A. Bar graph showing the number of colonies from HPNE:KRAS G12D cells that are stably expressing either vector control or mutant p53R175H treated with DMSO or Triptolide in a soft agar assay. B. Western blot analysis of wild type and mutant p53 expression levels in HPNE:KRASG12D cells treated with a dose response C. Bar graph showing the number of colonies from HPNE:KRASG12D cells that are stably expressing either vector control or mutant p53 transfected with scrambled siRNA or HSP70 specific siRNA in soft agar assay. D. Western blot analysis showing siRNA guided deletion of HSP70 decreases the stability of mutant p53.
To determine more precisely if HSP70 is required for sphere forming capacity, we used a specific siRNA targeting HSP70. Our initial data indicated the sphere forming capacity of HPNE:KRASG12D cells expressing mutant p53R175H is dependent on HSP70 (Fig. 6A,B). We observed similar results when HSP70 was knocked down using siRNA (Fig. 6C). More importantly, we show siRNA knockdown of HSP70 decreases the abundance of mutant p53, as evidenced by reduced V5 tag expression (Fig. 6D). These results reveal targeting HSP70 and mutant p53 are important for inducing anti-neoplastic effects. Previous work has shown Triptolide can reduce the levels of HSP70 in human PDA cells, but not normal pancreatic epithelial cells [38]. Our cells expressing mutant TP53 and KRASG12D are experimentally represent c a neoplastic cell type with genetic features of high-grade PanIN lesions. In our experiment, the HSP70 inhibitor, Triptolide, reduced cytoplasmic levels of HSP70 at higher dosages (Fig. 6B), destabilized mutant p53, increased expression of wild type p53 and reduced nuclear accumulation of HSP70 (Fig. 5B).
DISCUSSION
In mouse models of pancreatic cancer, cooperation between Kras and mutant p53 is associated with high frequency of invasion, metastasis, colony growth and reduced survival[8, 21]. In this current study, we used a human pancreatic epithelial cell model to better understand how mutations in p53 promote cancer initiation. Specifically, we were interested in critical mechanisms by which KRASG12D, in cooperation with mutant TP53, promotes cancer initiation in pancreatic ductal cells. We show that expression of a specific gain of function mutation in TP53, p53R175H, in HPNE:KRASG12D cells increases HSP70 expression, which is important for clonogenic growth. We also observe increased nuclear HSP70 in p53R175H expressing cells and increased expression of HSF2, an important transcription factor for HSP70 mRNA expression. We also observed mutant p53R175H directly interacts with HSP70 and is important for HSP70 stabilization. When we introduced an siRNA targeting HSP70, we observe stabilized expression HSP70 in p53R175H expressing cells. Not only did we observe mutant p53 is important for HSP70 stabilization, but we also observe HSP70 is important for p53R175H stability. Our data using siRNA to target HSP70 revealed HSP70 regulates the stability of mutant p53. When siRNA was used to decrease the abundance of HSP70, we observed reduced expression of mutant p53. These data are complimentary to previous studies showing HSP70 can inhibit MDM2-dependent degradation of p53R172H in mouse embryonic fibroblasts [39].
Supplementary Material
HIGHLIGHTS.
Expression of mutant p53R175H increases colony forming capacity in immortalized pancreatic epithelial cells.
A proteomics screen reveals HSP70 is highly expressed in mutant p53R175H expressing cells.
Mutant p53R175H immunoprecipitates with HSP70 and promotes HSP70 stability.
Acknowledgements
J.M.B. is supported by the AACR/Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Pathway to Leadership Award, a grant from the National Pancreas Foundation and a Pilot Award from the Texas Medical Center Digestive Disease Center NIH P30DK056338. N.C.J. is supported by NIH T35 DK007676-22. The RPPA Core at MDAnderson is funded by NCI CA16672.
Footnotes
Competing Interests
The authors have no competing financial interests to disclose.
Credit Author Statement
Conceptualization: JMB and KP
Data curation: KP, KS, MP, NCJ, NVM, PP
Formal analysis: JMB, KP
Funding acquisition: JMB, NCJ
Resources: MO, GVB, JSB, WAD
Supervision: JMB
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Electronic address, a.a.d.h.e. and N. Cancer Genome Atlas Research, Integrated Genomic Characterization of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell, 2017. 32(2): p. 185–203 e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegel RL, Miller KD, and Jemal A, Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin, 2017. 67(1): p. 7–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sidaway P, Pancreatic cancer: TCGA data reveal a highly heterogeneous disease. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2017. 14(11): p. 648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bailey P, et al. , Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Nature, 2016. 531(7592): p. 47–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Collisson EA, et al. , Subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their differing responses to therapy. Nat Med, 2011. 17(4): p. 500–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Waddell N, et al. , Whole genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer. Nature, 2015. 518(7540): p. 495–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hosoda W, et al. , Genetic analyses of isolated high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-PanIN) reveal paucity of alterations in TP53 and SMAD4. J Pathol, 2017. 242(1): p. 16–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bailey JM, et al. , p53 mutations cooperate with oncogenic Kras to promote adenocarcinoma from pancreatic ductal cells. Oncogene, 2016. 35(32): p. 4282–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Radons J, The human HSP70 family of chaperones: where do we stand? Cell Stress Chaperones, 2016. 21(3): p. 379–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Velazquez JM and Lindquist S, hsp70: nuclear concentration during environmental stress and cytoplasmic storage during recovery. Cell, 1984. 36(3): p. 655–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sangwan V, et al. , Primary and liver metastasis-derived cell lines from KrasG12D; Trp53R172H; Pdx-1 Cre animals undergo apoptosis in response to triptolide. Pancreas, 2015. 44(4): p. 583–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dutta SK, et al. , Serum HSP70: a novel biomarker for early detection of pancreatic cancer. Pancreas, 2012. 41(4): p. 530–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bhagat L, et al. , Thermal stress-induced HSP70 mediates protection against intrapancreatic trypsinogen activation and acute pancreatitis in rats. Gastroenterology, 2002. 122(1): p. 156–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Giri B, et al. , “Heat shock protein 70 in pancreatic diseases: Friend or foe”. J Surg Oncol, 2017. 116(1): p. 114–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Campbell PM, et al. , Ras-driven transformation of human nestin-positive pancreatic epithelial cells. Methods Enzymol, 2008. 439: p. 451–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Campbell PM, et al. , K-Ras promotes growth transformation and invasion of immortalized human pancreatic cells by Raf and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling. Cancer Res, 2007. 67(5): p. 2098–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee KM, et al. , Immortalization with telomerase of the Nestin-positive cells of the human pancreas. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2003. 301(4): p. 1038–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Junk DJ, et al. , Different mutant/wild-type p53 combinations cause a spectrum of increased invasive potential in nonmalignant immortalized human mammary epithelial cells. Neoplasia, 2008. 10(5): p. 450–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Suzuki K, et al. , REAP: A two minute cell fractionation method. BMC Res Notes, 2010. 3: p. 294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Oren M. and Rotter V, Mutant p53 gain-of-function in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2010. 2(2): p. a001107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hingorani SR, et al. , Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. Cancer Cell, 2005. 7(5): p. 469–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Morton JP, et al. , Mutant p53 drives metastasis and overcomes growth arrest/senescence in pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010. 107(1): p. 246–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rasheed ZA, et al. , Prognostic significance of tumorigenic cells with mesenchymal features in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2010. 102(5): p. 340–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aghdassi A, et al. , Heat shock protein 70 increases tumorigenicity and inhibits apoptosis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res, 2007. 67(2): p. 616–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Welch WJ and Feramisco JR, Nuclear and nucleolar localization of the 72,000-dalton heat shock protein in heat-shocked mammalian cells. J Biol Chem, 1984. 259(7): p. 4501–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pant V. and Lozano G, Dissecting the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in vivo: uncoupling the role in p53 stability and activity. Oncotarget, 2014. 5(5): p. 1149–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pant V, et al. , The p53-Mdm2 feedback loop protects against DNA damage by inhibiting p53 activity but is dispensable for p53 stability, development, and longevity. Genes Dev, 2013. 27(17): p. 1857–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cooks T, et al. , Mutant p53 prolongs NF-kappaB activation and promotes chronic inflammation and inflammation-associated colorectal cancer. Cancer Cell, 2013. 23(5): p. 634–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pant V, et al. , Heterodimerization of Mdm2 and Mdm4 is critical for regulating p53 activity during embryogenesis but dispensable for p53 and Mdm2 stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2011. 108(29): p. 11995–2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kubbutat MH, Jones SN, and Vousden KH, Regulation of p53 stability by Mdm2. Nature, 1997. 387(6630): p. 299–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lang GA, et al. , Gain of function of a p53 hot spot mutation in a mouse model of Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cell, 2004. 119(6): p. 861–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Olive KP, et al. , Mutant p53 gain of function in two mouse models of Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cell, 2004. 119(6): p. 847–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Suh YA, et al. , Multiple stress signals activate mutant p53 in vivo. Cancer Res, 2011. 71(23): p. 7168–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Terzian T, et al. , The inherent instability of mutant p53 is alleviated by Mdm2 or p16INK4a loss. Genes Dev, 2008. 22(10): p. 1337–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arora N, et al. , Downregulation of Sp1 by Minnelide leads to decrease in HSP70 and decrease in tumor burden of gastric cancer. PLoS One, 2017. 12(2): p. e0171827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jacobson BA, et al. , Triptolide and its prodrug minnelide suppress Hsp70 and inhibit in vivo growth in a xenograft model of mesothelioma. Genes Cancer, 2015. 6(3–4): p. 144–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mujumdar N, et al. , Triptolide induces cell death in pancreatic cancer cells by apoptotic and autophagic pathways. Gastroenterology, 2010. 139(2): p. 598–608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Phillips PA, et al. , Triptolide induces pancreatic cancer cell death via inhibition of heat shock protein 70. Cancer Res, 2007. 67(19): p. 9407–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wiech M, et al. , Molecular mechanism of mutant p53 stabilization: the role of HSP70 and MDM2. PLoS One, 2012. 7(12): p. e51426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.