Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Sep 8;305:130824. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.130824

Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 using graphene-based IoT integrated advanced electrochemical biosensor

Mohd Abubakar Sadique a, Shalu Yadav a,b, Pushpesh Ranjan a,b, Mohd Akram Khan a, Ashok Kumar c, Raju Khan a,b,
PMCID: PMC9754796  PMID: 36540867

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name ga1_lrg.jpg

Keywords: Graphene, Nanomaterials, POC, Electrochemical, SARS-CoV-2, IoT

Abstract

Unique characteristics like large surface area, excellent conductivity, functionality, ease of fabrication, etc., of graphene and its derivatives, have been extensively studied as potential candidates in healthcare applications. They have been utilized as a potential nanomaterial in biosensor fabrication for commercialized point-of-care (POC) devices. This review concisely provided innovative graphene and its derivative-based-IoT (Internet-of-Things) integrated electrochemical biosensor for accurate and advanced high-throughput testing of SARS-CoV-2 in POC setting.

1. Introduction

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) illness triggered by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has greatly affected mankind worldwide. Nowadays, it is not only the major cause of demises but also harms the healthcare sector as well as socio-economic conditions globally [1]. Commonly, the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), computed tomography, and lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) are being utilized for COVID-19 diagnostics. Although these modalities offer highly sensitive results but also suffer from few drawbacks like they require a sophisticated laboratory setup, tedious processes, and inaccurate outcomes. Hence, advanced diagnostics modalities with ultra-sensitivity and specificity are required to manage the swiftly spreading COVID-19 [2], [3]. Subsequently, electrochemical biosensors have been validated as potential techniques for early, in-place, swift, and highly sensitive quantification of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, they exhibited several advantages like flexibility, selectivity, compatibility, and commercial applicability over conventional methods [4], [5], [6].

In recent times, numerous novel materials like gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), graphene, graphene oxides (GO), metal oxides/sulfides were utilized for the fabrication of electrochemical biosensors [7], [8]. Since, graphene and GO have a broad span of electrochemical potential, high rate of electrical conductivity (∼6000 S/m for graphene), large surface area (∼2600 m2/g for monolayer graphene, ∼700 m2/g for GO), zeta potential (-21 mV graphene, −40 mV GO), tensile strength (∼130 GPa graphene, ∼120 MPa GO) and linear range of anodic and cathodic currents with high redox peaks [9]. Owing to these physical, chemical, and electronic properties of graphene, it is considered as a suitable matrix for the fabrication of electrochemical immunosensors. Graphene-based nanomaterials are feasible with utmost tiny proportions and significantly enhance the performance of the sensor [10]. Hence, the exploration of graphene-based biosensors can be utilized in the diagnosis of COVID-19 and open new avenues in the production as well as commercialization of advanced biosensors in the healthcare sector [11]. For instance, Seo et al. firstly developed the highly sensitive and specific graphene-enabled field-effect transistor for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2. Herein, a thin sheet of graphene was coated and modified by the antibody specific to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. It efficiently detected the spike protein with the lower detection limit of 1.0 fg/mL and 2.42 × 102 copies/mL in phosphate buffer saline and clinical specimens respectively [12]. GO and reduced GO (rGO) are less electro-conductive materials than graphene but are rich in oxygen functionality which introduces the hydrophilic nature and makes them suitable materials in this regard. Since, oxygen functionality favors the immobilization of a high load of biomolecules like antibodies, nucleic acids, and enzymes by providing the active sites that make them suitable in an aqueous medium. Contrarily, graphene possesses hydrophobic nature and hence lacks such functionalities. Therefore, graphene is considered an inferior material in an aqueous medium [13], [14]. However, GO can achieve graphene-like characteristics by conversion into rGO through chemical reduction [15].

Currently, there have been several studies reported regarding the graphene-based label or label-free electrochemical biosensors for the detection of viral infections such as influenza, dengue, and human immune deficiency virus (HIV) with high sensitivity and specificity. In contrast, recently, there are few reports suggested to analyse SARS-CoV-2 effectively [16], [17]. This mini-review is aimed at the graphene-based electrochemical biosensors integrated with smart IoT for the monitoring and management of SARS-CoV-2 with high-throughput devices.

2. Electrode surface functionalization with nanomaterials

The properties of electrode materials greatly affect the performance of electrochemical biosensors. Subsequently, graphene, GO, rGO, AuNPs, carbon black, metal oxides/sulfides, etc. [18], have been utilized in the surface modification of electrodes. Nanomaterials govern the characteristics of the biosensor (sensitivity, specificity, and direct electron transfer processes), where immobilization of the biorecognition elements specific to target analytes takes place. A nano-enabled biosensing system has the ability of rapid detection of the disease-specific biomarker with the ultra-low detection limit up to fM [19]. Out of these nanomaterials, graphene, and its derivatives hold much attention for electrode fabrication. Since graphene has a planer surface and high π-electron cloud. Therefore, it has excellent electrochemical conductivity due to hetero electron transfer. In addition, the high surface area and presence of functional groups in abundance in GO make them perfect substrates for performing direct electron processes in electrochemical biosensors [20], [21], [22]. The graphical representation of sampling, detection and analysis of graphene-based IoT integrated electrochemical biosensor is shown in Fig. 1 .

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Graphical interpretation of sampling, detection, and analysis of graphene-based IoT integrated electrochemical biosensor.

3. Graphene-based electrochemical immunosensor for SARS-CoV-2

Graphene-based nanomaterials hold many advantages over other materials. Some of the following studies show the potential of the work which attracts the scientific community to explore feasible, practical applicability of such material-based devices commercially. Very recently, Yakoh et al. [23] developed a label-free electrochemical paper-based analytical device (ePAD) for aiming at SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Briefly, the solution of GO was implanted in a permeable framework at the test region of the graphene working ePAD and dried at room temperature. An embedded GO, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl) carbodiimide/N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide chemistry was employed via a reversed electrode architecture to immobilize spike protein at the hydrophilic paper substrate of the working ePAD, for selective binding of IgG and IgM SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The square-wave voltammetry (SWV) technique was used to monitor the electrochemical response. In clinical sera samples, the reported sensing platform has shown satisfactory results. Fig. 2 (A and B) show the detection principle of ePAD for SARS-CoV-2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic of the (A) detection principle and (B) detection process of the COVID-19 ePAD [23]. (C) A graphene-enabled wireless telemedicine Rapidplex platform for detection of SARS-CoV-2 [25].

In another study, a graphene-based electrochemical biosensor developed by Alafeef et al. [24] selectively detected the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The density of the ssDNA probe affected sensor sensitivity after its immobilization on the sensor surface. Significantly, thiol-modified antisense oligonucleotides (ssDNA)-capped AuNPs on the gold electrode surface showed better sensitivity in disparity to the lone ssDNA without AuNP conjugation. The proposed sensor is specific for the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2. Alike four ssDNA probes were configured to trigger the two distinct zones to enhance the diagnostic performance of the assay simultaneously in the field of the similar viral N-gene. The output signal response time was less than 5 min having a sensitivity of 231.0 copies/μL. Consequently, SARS-CoV-2 RapidPlex was demonstrated by Torrente-Rodriguez and co-workers [25] as a multiplexed, hand-held, and wireless electrochemical system for quick diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. The multiplexed biosensor is engineered based upon mass-producible laser engraved graphene (LEG) electrode that quantitatively detects the IgM and IgG antibodies (immune response), viral antigen nucleocapsid protein (viral infection), as well as C-reactive protein (disease severity) in both saliva and blood. Fig. 2 (C) shows the detection principle of the electrochemical RapidPlex platform for multiplex diagnosis.

Zhao et al. [26] described a sandwich-type recognition strategy-based electrochemical biosensor using p-sulfocalix(8)arene modified graphene to enhance toluidine blue (TB) signal for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection. The detection limit is the lowest of 200.0 copies/mL amongst reported RNA measurements of SARS-CoV-2 for the clinical specimen. In another study, Ali et al. [27] reported an advanced nanomaterial-enabled biosensing system fabricated by nano printing of three-dimensional (3D) electrodes and further coated with rGO nanoflakes. They integrated the electrodes with the microfluidic device and detected the antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike S1-protein and receptor-binding-domain (RBD) with LOD of 2.8 × 10−15 and 16.9 × 10−15 mol/L respectively. Additionally, they proposed a smartphone-assisted user interface for signal readout. The regeneration time of the sensor is < 60 seconds with no cross-reactivity for other antibodies and proteins. The modification of 3D-printed micropillar electrode and 3D-printed COVID-19 test chip (3DcC) sensor operation integrated with a smartphone is shown in Fig. 3 (a-g). Respective Graphene-based IoT integrated electrochemical immunosensors for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics are listed in Table 1 .

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(a-g) Functionalization of 3D-printed micropillar electrode and working principle 3DcC sensor operation. [27].

Table 1.

Graphene enabled IoT integrated electrochemical immunosensor for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics.

Material Sensing Platform Performance/LOD Ref.
GO Paper-based ePAD 0.11 ng/mL [23]
AuNPs-graphene Paper-based sensor chip 6.9 copies/μL [24]
LEG Wireless telemedicine Target capture within 1.0 min [25]
SCX8-RGO Plug-and-play 200 copies/mL [26]
rGO nanoflakes 3DcC Test chip 2.8 × 10−15 M for S1 protein, 16.9 × 10−15 M for RBD [27]
LSG POC electrochemical analyser (KAUSTat) 2.9 ng/mL for S-protein [28]

Very recently, Beduk and group [28] revealed miniaturized laser-scribed graphene (LSG)-based electrochemical biosensor with 3D gold nanostructures for diagnosis of COVID-19. This electrochemical immunosensor quantitatively analysed S-protein from 5.0 to 500.0 ng/mL with LOD of 2.9 ng/mL. This smartphone-assisted setup also provides faster and accurate results than other commercial conventional detection techniques.

4. Significance of IoT for COVID-19 disease management

During this pandemic, screening, monitoring, and diagnosis of COVID-19 are the need of the hour. In this regard, telemedicine or mobile health is well considered to locate patients and prevent the swift spreading of the coronavirus [29]. The IoT integration with POC devices is a technological link between on-ground operation and online data collection and analysis. The IoT is a device that joins numerous platforms like electronics, smartphones, sensors, actuators, and networks at a local level. Hence, the medical data analysis can be done faster, remotely, along with high-throughput testing [19]. In the modern trend, smartphone-assisted POC devices take advantage of smartphone as a mediator for processing and transmitting the signal into digital and readable form. Such POC devices developed by integration of smartphones with biosensors make them inexpensive, hand-held, and wearable that modernizes the diagnosis [30]. Moreover, ease of sampling and quick detection makes the IoT-integrated electrochemical biosensor one of the most prominent diagnostic tools for COVID-19 management. Such advantages help in efficient health management for the COVID pandemic on a global scale.

5. Conclusion and future outlook

The upsurge of the pandemic in the current scenario requires astonishing solutions for monitoring and management of this unanticipated problem faced by mankind. Accordingly, nanotechnology with smart electronics paved a way to combat the SARS-CoV-2 effectively. Herein we reviewed potential ultrasensitive graphene-based IoT integrated advanced electrochemical biosensors that will accomplish the diagnostic demand as well as screen SARS-CoV-2 transmission with high throughput potency. In addition, IoT integration provides better infrastructure for both patients and physicians to diagnose and manage SARS-CoV-2 cases at the preliminary stage. These aforementioned biosensors detect biomarkers associated with SARS-CoV-2 with high selectivity and sensitivity, making them effective allies against current and future pandemics.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere thanks to Director, CSIR-AMPRI for his encouragement and support in this work. MAS is obligated to DST-SERB for JRF. SY and PR are thankful to CSIR, India for the award of JRF and SRF respectively. RK acknowledges SERB for IPA/2020/000130 project fund.

References

  • 1.Asif M., Ajmal M., Ashraf G., Muhammad N., Aziz A., Iftikhar T., Wang J., Liu H. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020;23:174–184. doi: 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ranjan P., Singhal A., Yadav S., Kumar N., Murali S., Sanghi S.K., Khan R. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2021;40:126–142. doi: 10.1080/08830185.2021.1872566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yadav S., Sadique M.A., Ranjan P., Kumar N., Singhal A., Srivastava A.K., Khan R., Appl A.C.S. Bio Mater. 2021;4:2974–2995. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.1c00102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.A. Demeke Teklemariam, M. Samaddar, M.G. Alharbi, RR. Al-Hindi, A.K. Bhunia, Mol. Cell. Probes. 54 (2020) 101662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 5.Anik Ü., Tepeli Y., Sayhi M., Nsiri J., Diouani M.F. Analyst. 2017;143:150–156. doi: 10.1039/c7an01537b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abd Muain M.F., Cheo K.H., Omar M.N., Amir Hamzah A.S., Lim H.N., Salleh A.B., Tan W.S., Ahmad Tajudin A. Bioelectrochemistry. 2018;122:199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ahmadi M., Ahour F. Anal. Methods. 2020;12:4541–4550. doi: 10.1039/d0ay01128b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li S., Ma L., Zhou M., Li Y., Xia Y., Fan X., Cheng C., Luo H. Curr Opin. Biomed Eng. 2020;13:32–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Justino C.I., Gomes A.R., Freitas A.C., Duarte A.C., Rocha-Santos T.A. TrAC Trends in Anal Chem. 2017;91:53–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fadel T.R., Farrell D.F., Friedersdorf L.E., Griep M.H., Hoover M.D., Meador M.A., Meyyappan M. ACS Sens. 2016;1:207–216. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.5b00279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Srivastava A.K., Dwivedi N., Dhand C., Khan R., Sathish N., Gupta M.K., Kumar R., Kumar S. Mater Today Chem. 2020;18 doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seo G., Lee G., Kim M.J., Baek S.H., Choi M., Ku K.B., Lee C.S., Jun S., Park D., Kim H.G., Kim S.J. ACS nano. 2020;14:5135–5142. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c02823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.A. Nag, A. Mitra, S.C. Mukhopadhyay, Sens. Actuators A. 270 (2018) 177–94.
  • 14.Peña-Bahamonde J., Nguyen H.N., Fanourakis S.K., Rodrigues D.F. J. Nanobiotechnology. 2018;16:1–17. doi: 10.1186/s12951-018-0400-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hidayah N.M.S., Liu W.-W., Lai C.-W., Noriman N.Z., Khe C.-S., Hashim U., Lee H.C. AIP Conf Proc. 2017;1892 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huang J., Xie Z., Xie Z., Luo S., Xie L., Huang L., Fan Q., Zhang Y., Wang S., Zeng T. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2016;913:121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.01.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Singh R., Hong S., Jang J. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:42771. doi: 10.1038/srep42771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fabiani L., Saroglia M., Galatà G., De Santis R., Fillo S., Luca V., Faggioni G., D'Amore N., Regalbuto E., Salvatori P., Terova G. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;171 doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mujawar M.A., Gohel H., Bhardwaj S.K., Srinivasan S., Hickman N., Kaushik A. Mater Today Chem. 2020;17 doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen A., Chatterjee S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42:5425–5438. doi: 10.1039/c3cs35518g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou M., Zhai Y., Dong S. Anal. Chem. 2009;81:5603–5613. doi: 10.1021/ac900136z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gao H., Duan H. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015;65:404–419. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2014.10.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yakoh A., Pimpitak U., Rengpipat S., Hirankarn N., Chailapakul O., Chaiyo S. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;176 doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alafeef M., Dighe K., Moitra P., Pan D. ACS nano. 2020;14:17028–17045. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c06392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Torrente-Rodríguez R.M., Lukas H., Tu J., Min J., Yang Y., Xu C., Rossiter H.B., Gao W. Matter. 2020;3:1981–1998. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2020.09.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhao H., Liu F., Xie W., Zhou T.C., OuYang J., Jin L., Li H., Zhao C.Y., Zhang L., Wei J., Zhang Y.P. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021;327 doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ali M.A., Hu C., Jahan S., Yuan B., Saleh M.S., Ju E., Gao S.J., Panat R. Adv. Mater. 2021;33:2006647. doi: 10.1002/adma.202006647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Beduk T., Beduk D., de Oliveira Filho J.I., Zihnioglu F., Cicek C., Sertoz R., Arda B., Goksel T., Turhan K., Salama K.N., Timur S. Anal Chem. 2021;93:8585–8594. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lukas H., Xu C., Yu Y., Gao W. ACS nano. 2020;14:16180–16193. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c08494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Purohit B., Kumar A., Mahato K., Chandra P. Curr Opin. Biomed Eng. 2020;13:42–50. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Materials Letters are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES