Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Dec 16;41(3):826–835. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.026

A broad assessment of covid-19 vaccine safety using tree-based data-mining in the vaccine safety datalink

W Katherine Yih a,, Matthew F Daley b, Jonathan Duffy c, Bruce Fireman d, David McClure e, Jennifer Nelson f, Lei Qian g, Ning Smith h, Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez i, Eric Weintraub c, Joshua TB Williams j, Stanley Xu g, Judith C Maro a
PMCID: PMC9755007  PMID: 36535825

Abstract

Background

Except for spontaneous reporting systems, vaccine safety monitoring generally involves pre-specifying health outcomes and post-vaccination risk windows of concern. Instead, we used tree-based data-mining to look more broadly for possible adverse events after Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen COVID-19 vaccination.

Methods

Vaccine Safety Datalink enrollees receiving ≥1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine in 2020–2021 were followed for 70 days after Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna and 56 days after Janssen vaccination. Incident diagnoses in inpatient or emergency department settings were analyzed for clustering within both the hierarchical ICD-10-CM code structure and the post-vaccination follow-up period. We used the self-controlled tree-temporal scan statistic and TreeScan software. Monte Carlo simulation was used to estimate p-values; p = 0.01 was the pre-specified cut-off for statistical significance of a cluster.

Results

There were 4.1, 2.6, and 0.4 million Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen vaccinees, respectively. Clusters after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination included: (1) unspecified adverse effects, (2) common vaccine reactions, such as fever, myalgia, and headache, (3) myocarditis/pericarditis, and (4) less specific cardiac or respiratory symptoms, all with the strongest clusters generally after Dose 2; and (5) COVID-19/viral pneumonia/sepsis/respiratory failure in the first 3 weeks after Dose 1. Moderna results were similar but without a significant myocarditis/pericarditis cluster. Further investigation suggested the fifth signal group was a manifestation of mRNA vaccine effectiveness after the first 3 weeks. Janssen vaccinees had clusters of unspecified or common vaccine reactions, gait/mobility abnormalities, and muscle weakness. The latter two were deemed to have arisen from confounding related to practices at one site.

Conclusions

We detected post-vaccination clusters of unspecified adverse effects, common vaccine reactions, and, for the mRNA vaccines, chest pain and palpitations, as well as myocarditis/pericarditis after Pfizer-BioNTech Dose 2. Unique advantages of this data mining are its untargeted nature and its inherent adjustment for the multiplicity of diagnoses and risk intervals scanned.

Abbreviations: ACIP, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; ICD-10-CM, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification; VAERS, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System; VSD, Vaccine Safety Datalink

1. Introduction

Vaccine safety monitoring in the U.S. began immediately after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued the first Emergency Use Authorization for a COVID-19 vaccine in December 2020. Among the systems in place were the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), which was conducting active population-based surveillance for 23 outcomes, using sequential analysis [1]; the CDC- and FDA-managed Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous reporting system [2], [3]; and the new opt-in smartphone-based v-safe, a cohort-based event monitoring system [2], [4]. Vaccine safety monitoring in Europe, Israel, and the U.S., to date has identified four serious but rare vaccine-associated adverse events: anaphylaxis after the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273) mRNA vaccines and the Janssen (Ad26.COV2.S) vaccine [5], [6], myocarditis/pericarditis after the mRNA vaccines [7], [8], and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) after the Janssen vaccine [9], [10], [11]. The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has critically assessed the risks and benefits of these three vaccines repeatedly over time and issued revised recommendations, including one issued in mid-December 2021 for the preferential use of mRNA vaccines over the Janssen vaccine [12], [13].

To complement these COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring methods, the VSD employed a data-mining approach to look for possible associations between receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine and any of an extremely broad range of medically attended adverse events. The method involves scanning vaccinees’ diagnosis data during follow-up to check for statistically unusual temporal clustering of cases for thousands of outcome categories. This signal-detection method has been previously applied to three vaccines recommended for adolescents and young adults, the quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine and the quadrivalent and nonavalent human papillomavirus vaccines [14], [15], [16], and two vaccines recommended for older adults, the live viral and recombinant herpes zoster vaccines [17], [18]. In this work, the method has not identified unanticipated adverse events but has found known vaccine-associated adverse events and has produced few false signals. Our objective in the current study was to use the method to further assess the safety of the primary series of the three authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccines in the U.S. during 2020–2021, Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen, considering it a screening tool capable of identifying unexpected adverse events (generating hypotheses), which could be further investigated in a targeted study.

2. Methods

2.1. Study population

The VSD is a collaboration between CDC and 9 integrated healthcare organizations with medical record and administrative data for a population of more than 12 million people. VSD investigators have performed population-based research on vaccine safety in the U.S. since 1990 [19]. The study population consisted of COVID-19 vaccinees who were enrolled at a VSD site from at least 400 days prior to vaccination through a pre-specified follow-up period after vaccination: 70 days after Dose 1 of Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna and 56 days after Janssen vaccination. COVID-19 vaccines administered between December 2020 and December 2021 were included. Data were extracted from VSD sites’ up-to-date dynamic data files, which contain data from electronic medical records, claims, and state immunization registries.

Analyses were conducted for all ages combined, as well as separately for the following age groups for which the respective vaccine was authorized or approved: ages 5–11, 12–17, 18–39, 40–64, and ≥65 years.

2.2. COVID-19 vaccine exposure and follow-up

We conducted separate analyses for Pfizer-BioNTech (ascertained by CVX codes 208, 217, and 218), Moderna (CVX code 207), and Janssen (CVX code 212). For the Janssen vaccine, which had a 1-dose primary series, the follow-up period was 56 days. In view of the 2-dose primary series for mRNA vaccines and the recommended dose-spacing of 21 days for Pfizer-BioNTech and 28 days for Moderna, we used a 70-day follow-up period after the first dose for those vaccines, allowing capture of up to 6–7 weeks after the second dose. No Dose 2-specific analyses were done, as we assumed Dose 2-specific adverse events would be detectable using this longer follow-up period, in view of the close adherence to the recommended dose-spacing in the VSD. (In prior studies of multi-dose vaccines using tree-based data-mining, we either evaluated only the first dose [15], [16] or included all doses without distinguishing among them [18]).

2.3. Hierarchical diagnosis tree and outcomes of interest

We identified outcomes using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. ICD-10-CM codes have a hierarchical tree-like structure, starting with 21 broad categories of diagnoses, e.g., diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue, which progressively branch into more and more specific sets of diagnoses, culminating in highly specific diagnosis codes (Table 1 ). The ICD-10-CM tree has at most 7 levels, depending on the branch. We did not look for clustering in Levels 1, 2, or 7, so as not to expend statistical power looking for clusters that were either too broad or too specific to be of clinical significance.

Table 1.

Example of hierarchical organization of ICD-10-CM coding system; this branch of the tree does not have a seventh level.

Level Code range or code Description
1 M00-M99 Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue
2 M60-M63  Disorders of muscles
3 M62  Other disorders of muscle
4 M62.8  Other specified disorders of muscle
5 M62.83  Muscle spasm
6 M62.830  Muscle spasm of back

We removed the following categories of diagnoses from consideration, as not plausibly vaccine-related, at least not within the few weeks after vaccination: neoplasms (C00–D49); congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities (Q00–Q99); external causes of morbidity (V00–Y99); and factors influencing health status and contact with health services (Z00–Z99). We also removed codes for certain conditions originating in the perinatal period (P00–P96) and codes for pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium (O00–O9A), as self-controlled analysis of these outcomes would be subject to time-varying confounding [20] due to gestational stage likely being related to both the timing of vaccination and the timing of birth. Other monitoring efforts have been conducting surveillance for pregnancy-related COVID-19 vaccine adverse events [21], [22], [23], [24].

Included in analysis were incident diagnoses recorded in the inpatient or emergency department setting. An “incident” case was defined as one that was not preceded by another ICD-10 diagnosis code having the same first 3 characters (i.e., in the same third level of the tree) in any setting (including outpatient) during the prior 400 days. We chose 400 days to enable ascertainment of pre-existing conditions that might have been recorded at a visit roughly 1 year prior, considering that some patients seek preventive care on an approximately annual basis.

We evaluated case clustering in all risk windows of length 2 through x/2 days that started on or after Day 1 after Dose 1, where x was the follow-up period (70 days or 56 days). The self-controlled comparison period for each defined risk window consisted of the days within the follow-up period that were not in the risk window being evaluated. Events on the day of the first dose (Day 0) were excluded because a diagnosis on that date might reflect a health condition that started prior to vaccination. However, events on the day of the second dose were included, as follow-up was anchored on the first dose.

3. The tree-temporal scan statistic

We used the self-controlled tree-temporal scan statistic, which does not require pre-specifying either specific health outcomes of interest or any specific post-exposure period of putative increased risk. With the tree-temporal scan statistic, one considers many potential clusters of cases across two dimensions in combination:1) the hierarchical structure (tree) of diagnoses (ICD-10-CM codes, in this study) and 2) time, i.e., cases of each diagnosis group are checked for temporal clustering within the pre-defined post-exposure follow-up window. In using the tree-temporal scan statistic with a self-controlled design, the comparison is within person among time periods, which controls for time-invariant potential confounders such as chronic disease status or socio-economic status. The self-controlled tree-temporal scan method is described in greater detail in Yih et al. [18]. Although the method adjusts for the multiplicity of evaluations of diagnoses and risk intervals, we pre-specified the p-value cut-off for statistical significance as 0.01 rather than the more conventional 0.05 to further guard against false signals; no adjustment for the multiple testing entailed in conducting age group-specific analyses was implemented. In the tables of statistical results for all ages combined and for the specific age strata, we show all instances of clustering with p ≤ 0.05 for transparency, although we reserve the term “cluster” for those with p ≤ 0.01.

Only the strongest cluster (i.e., the one with the highest test statistic) for any diagnosis code or group of related diagnosis codes is identified.

We conducted the statistical analyses using TreeScan version 2.0 [25].

3.1. Signal investigation

We conducted signal investigation except for common vaccine-associated adverse events and other known or expected adverse events. To investigate smaller clusters, we generated and examined a list of diagnoses and procedures between 4 weeks before through 4 weeks after vaccination for each case in each cluster, using patient-level information stored at the sites. This approach permitted assessment of recent medical history without entailing more resource-intensive medical record review. It also allowed consideration of differences among sites regarding coding and other practices. For larger clusters (i.e., those with more cases), we instead generated aggregated lists and frequencies of diagnosis and procedure codes within +/-5 or 10 days of the outcome in question, to better characterize the cases. For clusters of outcomes suggestive of COVID-19, e.g., sepsis, we obtained counts of COVID-19 and pneumonia diagnoses recorded during follow-up among the cases in those clusters.

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of all the VSD sites and was conducted in a manner consistent with federal law and CDC policy.

4. Results

Demographic characteristics and number of second dose recipients among the study population of first dose recipients are shown in Table 2 . For all three vaccines, the largest age group of vaccinees was the 40–64-year old group. However, there were differences in the age distribution across vaccines, with, for example, 36 %, 43 %, and 54 % of Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen doses, respectively, received by the 40–64-year old group and 19 %, 29 %, and 13 % of Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen doses, respectively, received by people aged 65 or older. More than half the doses of the mRNA vaccines were received by females, whereas the reverse was observed for Janssen vaccine. Ninety-seven percent of mRNA vaccinees received Dose 2 during the follow-up period.

Table 2.

Distribution of study participants by demographic characteristics, and number of second-dose recipients.

Number of vaccinees Pfizer-BioNTech
Moderna
Janssen
4,068,513 2,559,563 417,854
Age

5–11* 186,778 5 % 89 0.0 % 8 0.0 %
12–17* 529,234 13 % 994 0.0 % 204 0.0 %
18–39 1,141,410 28 % 713,525 28 % 137,391 33 %
40–64 1,450,828 36 % 1,104,729 43 % 227,441 54 %
65+ 760,263 19 % 740,226 29 % 52,810 13 %



Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic 3,068,635 75 % 1,935,840 76 % 328,840 79 %
Hispanic 999,878 25 % 623,723 24 % 89,014 21 %



Race
Unknown 1,263,222 31 % 744,769 29 % 122,128 29 %
American Indian or Alaska Native 13,707 0.3 % 9,526 0.4 % 1,668 0.4 %
Asian 653,474 16 % 362,067 14 % 49,977 12 %
Black or African American 255,073 6 % 160,259 6 % 28,630 7 %
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 27,735 1 % 16,259 1 % 2,511 1 %
White 1,855,302 46 % 1,266,683 49 % 212,940 51 %



Sex
Female 2,192,338 54 % 1,395,720 55 % 194,405 47 %
Male 1,875,859 46 % 1,163,677 45 % 223,407 53 %
Other 316 0.0 % 166 0.0 % 42 0.0 %



Received second dose during follow-up 3,943,933 97 % 2,483,424 97 % 1,170 0.3 %

* Neither Moderna nor Janssen vaccine was authorized for use in people less than 18 years of age at the time of this study.

4.1. Pfizer-BioNTech

Among the 4,068,513 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinees, there were 524,357 incident diagnoses during follow-up and 54 clusters detected in the all-ages-combined analysis. There were several clusters of unspecified adverse effects, all in Days 21–24 after Dose 1, presumably spanning the day of Dose 2 and the few days immediately thereafter (Table 3 ). Another outcome category with significant clustering comprised conditions we deemed related to COVID-19 disease, including codes specifically for COVID-19 (U07 and J12.82) and also viral pneumonia, sepsis, acute respiratory failure, and hypoxemia. All of these clusters were in periods within Days 3–21. In the post hoc category of local or systemic adverse effects were urticaria, myalgia, nausea and vomiting, fever, headache, malaise and fatigue, syncope, enlarged lymph nodes, chills, and unspecified allergy. Most of these clusters began on Days 21 or 22, presumably just after Dose 2. There were myocarditis/pericarditis clusters in periods within Days 23–26. Finally, there were clusters of other adverse events, namely, ‘pain in throat and chest’ in periods within Days 22–26, palpitations in Days 1–3, abnormalities of breathing in Days 21–26, and dyspnea and shortness of breath in Days 1–26.

Table 3.

Clusters of adverse events found after Pfizer-BioNTech primary series, all-ages analysis.*

ICD-10 code Adverse Event Total Number of Cases Risk Window Start Day Risk Window End Day Number of Cases in Risk Window Attributable Risk per 100,000 1st Doses Log Likelihood Ratio Test Statistic P-Value
Unspecified adverse effects
T50 Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of diuretics and other and unspecified drugs, medicaments and biological substances 2148 21 24 621 13.00 487.3 0.0001
T50.B95 Adverse effect of other viral vaccines 914 21 24 403 9.10 457.7 0.0001
T50.Z Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of other vaccines and biological substances 309 21 24 152 3.50 187.1 0.0001
T50.Z9 Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of other vaccines and biological substances 303 21 24 152 3.50 189.7 0.0001
T50.Z95 Adverse effect of other vaccines and biological substances 302 21 24 152 3.50 190.2 0.0001
T88 Other complications of surgical and medical care, not elsewhere classified 549 21 24 223 5.00 237.5 0.0001
T88.1 Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified 412 21 24 208 4.80 260.8 0.0001



Conditions suggestive of COVID-19
U07 Emergency use of U07 2125 4 15 1017 20.00 427.4 0.0001
U07.1 COVID-19 2120 4 15 1016 20.00 427.9 0.0001
J12 Viral pneumonia, not elsewhere classified 1031 6 17 600 13.00 327.1 0.0001
J12.8 Other viral pneumonia 994 6 17 589 13.00 328.8 0.0001
J12.82 Pneumonia due to coronavirus disease 2019 942 6 17 559 12.00 312.6 0.0001
J12.89 Other viral pneumonia 48 3 16 34 0.76 19.9 0.0001
A41.8 Other specified sepsis 282 4 21 175 3.50 57.1 0.0001
A41.89 Other specified sepsis 242 7 16 113 2.30 58.1 0.0001
J96 Respiratory failure, not elsewhere classified 3185 7 16 628 5.40 35.6 0.0001
J96.0 Acute respiratory failure 2567 7 16 546 5.50 44.5 0.0001
J96.01 Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia 2023 6 16 498 5.50 49.4 0.0001
R09.0 Asphyxia and hypoxemia 1532 6 17 346 2.80 15.5 0.0028
R09.02 Hypoxemia 1528 6 17 345 2.70 15.5 0.0028



Local or systemic adverse effects known to be associated with some injected vaccines
L50 Urticaria 648 21 27 115 1.40 15.2 0.004
M79 Other and unspecified soft tissue disorders, not elsewhere classified 5435 22 23 275 2.70 26.9 0.0001
M79.1 Myalgia 980 22 23 128 2.50 85.3 0.0001
M79.10 Myalgia, unspecified site 771 22 23 115 2.30 88.5 0.0001
R11 Nausea and vomiting 7872 21 24 592 3.20 14.7 0.006
R50 Fever of other and unknown origin 2763 22 23 257 4.30 109.0 0.0001
R50.8 Other specified fever 329 22 23 51 1.00 40.8 0.0001
R50.83 Postvaccination fever 94 22 23 46 1.10 83.3 0.0001
R50.9 Fever, unspecified 2419 22 23 202 3.20 71.6 0.0001
R51 Headache 6004 1 29 2642 11.00 15.0 0.0047
R51.9 Headache, unspecified 5999 1 29 2638 11.00 14.8 0.0056
R53 Malaise and fatigue 4832 22 23 239 2.20 21.4 0.0001
R53.8 Other malaise and fatigue 2063 22 25 212 2.30 26.0 0.0001
R53.83 Other fatigue 1440 22 25 152 1.70 20.3 0.0001
R55 Syncope and collapse 4447 21 23 340 3.60 40.1 0.0001
R59 Enlarged lymph nodes 698 22 25 115 1.90 43.1 0.0001
R59.0 Localized enlarged lymph nodes 473 22 25 78 1.30 29.3 0.0001
R68.83 Chills (without fever) 429 21 24 64 1.00 20.2 0.0001
T78 Adverse effects, not elsewhere classified 1302 1 4 118 1.50 20.3 0.0001
T78.4 Other and unspecified allergy 807 19 27 183 2.20 24.7 0.0001
T78.40 Allergy, unspecified 753 19 27 164 1.90 19.3 0.0001



Other adverse events
R07 Pain in throat and chest 14,543 22 24 975 7.90 61.5 0.0001
R07.9 Chest pain, unspecified 7978 22 26 800 5.60 34.2 0.0001
R07.8 Other chest pain 5884 22 24 403 3.40 28.2 0.0001
R07.89 Other chest pain 5340 22 24 383 3.50 32.9 0.0001
R00.2 Palpitations 2506 1 3 152 1.60 18.5 0.0002
R06 Abnormalities of breathing 6908 21 26 746 3.80 15.5 0.0028
R06.0 Dyspnea 6132 1 26 2432 10.00 15.7 0.0027
R06.02 Shortness of breath 4689 1 26 1899 9.20 16.9 0.0004



Myo/pericarditis
I51 Complications and ill-defined descriptions of heart disease 1331 24 25 84 1.20 20.6 0.0001
I51.4 Myocarditis, unspecified 75 23 26 43 1.00 60.7 0.0001
I40 Acute myocarditis 47 24 25 23 0.55 43.7 0.0001
I40.9 Acute myocarditis, unspecified 28 24 26 18 0.43 32.1 0.0001
I31.9 Disease of pericardium, unspecified 95 24 25 16 0.34 15.1 0.0042

* For ease of review, we grouped clusters post hoc into five categories: unspecified adverse effects; local or systemic adverse effects known to be associated with injected vaccines; myo/pericarditis; other adverse events; and COVID-19, viral pneumonia, and other conditions suggestive of COVID-19. Within the table, these categories are separated by blank rows and appear in descending order of the largest test statistic in the category. Within each category, codes sharing the same first three characters are nested together. Except for one category, these nests of codes are arranged in descending order of the largest test statistic in the nest. The exception is the category of local or systemic adverse effects, a relatively large category, where we chose to organize the rows in order of their alphanumeric code, to facilitate comparison among the tables. Clusters with 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, if any were found, appear in italics.

In age-stratified analyses (Table S1) for the 186,778 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinees aged 5–11 years, the only cluster with p < 0.05 was for COVID-19 (U07.1) in Days 44–69, late in the follow-up period (p = 0.0001). This cluster of 87 cases constituted 0.05 % of the vaccinees in this age group. For all the other age groups, the health outcomes with clusters were a subset of those with clusters in the all-ages analysis. In the 12–17 and 18–39-year age groups, myocarditis (I51.4 and I40) clusters within Days 23–26 and clusters of chest pain in similar timeframes were detected. In the 40–64- and ≥65-year age groups, the strongest clusters were of COVID-19 and other viral pneumonia within 3 weeks of vaccination, and there were no clusters of myocarditis/pericarditis or chest pain.

4.2. Moderna

In the all-ages-combined analysis of the 2,559,563 Moderna vaccinees, there were 408,749 incident diagnoses during follow-up and 43 clusters. Clusters of unspecified adverse effects emerged, all within Days 28–32 after Dose 1, likely on the day of Dose 2 and the few days following it (Table 4 ). There were clusters of COVID-19, viral pneumonia, sepsis, and acute respiratory failure, all within Days 1–16. In the post hoc category of local or systemic adverse effects were clusters of myalgia, nausea and vomiting, fever, headache, pain, malaise and fatigue, syncope, chills, and unspecified allergy, almost all of which started on Day 28 or 29, likely after Dose 2. There were no clusters of myocarditis/pericarditis, although there was a non-statistically significant grouping of acute myocarditis (I40) in Days 31–32 and one of acute pericarditis (I30) also in Days 31–32 (Table S2). There were statistically significant clusters of ‘pain in throat and chest’ during Days 1–5, tachycardia during Days 29–30, and palpitations during Days 1–4.

Table 4.

Clusters of adverse events found after Moderna primary series, all-ages analysis.*.

ICD-10 code Adverse Event Total Number of Cases Risk Window Start Day Risk Window End Day Number of Cases in Risk Window Attributable Risk per 100,000 1st Doses Log Likelihood Ratio Test Statistic P-Value
Unspecified adverse effects
T50 Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of diuretics and other and unspecified drugs, medicaments and biological substances 1953 28 31 597 20.00 460.0 0.0001
T50.B9 Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of other viral vaccines 931 28 32 438 15.00 419.9 0.0001
T50.B95 Adverse effect of other viral vaccines 930 28 32 438 15.00 420.3 0.0001
T50.Z Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of other vaccines and biological substances 323 28 30 138 5.00 176.0 0.0001
T50.Z9 Adverse effect of other vaccines and biological substances 319 28 30 138 5.00 177.5 0.0001
T88 Other complications of surgical and medical care, not elsewhere classified 574 28 31 234 8.20 235.3 0.0001
T88.1 Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified 457 28 30 193 7.00 244.1 0.0001
T80.6 Other serum reactions 33 28 30 14 0.51 17.8 0.0001
T80.62 Other serum reaction due to vaccination 25 28 30 14 0.52 21.3 0.0001



Conditions suggestive of COVID-19
U07 Emergency use of U07 1038 1 16 613 20.00 239.5 0.0001
U07.1 COVID-19 1031 1 14 563 18.00 240.9 0.0001
J12 Viral pneumonia, not elsewhere classified 555 6 16 309 10.00 180.0 0.0001
J12.8 Other viral pneumonia 530 6 15 289 9.80 183.0 0.0001
J12.82 Pneumonia due to coronavirus disease 2019 489 4 16 312 11.00 178.4 0.0001
A41.8 Other specified sepsis 235 8 14 70 2.00 31.5 0.0001
A41.89 Other specified sepsis 184 8 14 66 2.10 38.3 0.0001
J96 Respiratory failure, not elsewhere classified 2610 8 16 438 5.20 19.0 0.0001
J96.0 Acute respiratory failure 2009 8 13 251 3.60 19.1 0.0001
J96.01 Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia 1596 5 15 341 4.70 19.8 0.0001



Local or systemic adverse effects known to be associated with some injected vaccines
M79 Other and unspecified soft tissue disorders, not elsewhere classified 4073 29 30 227 3.50 22.4 0.0001
M79.1 Myalgia 803 29 30 119 3.70 82.2 0.0001
M79.10 Myalgia, unspecified site 638 29 30 110 3.60 89.0 0.0001
R11 Nausea and vomiting 5374 29 31 380 4.70 21.6 0.0001
R50 Fever of other and unknown origin 2136 29 30 261 7.60 142.8 0.0001
R50.8 Other specified fever 323 1 2 48 1.60 46.7 0.0001
R50.83 Postvaccination fever 124 1 2 40 1.50 66.4 0.0001
R50.9 Fever, unspecified 1793 29 30 211 6.00 109.8 0.0001
R51 Headache 4383 29 31 327 4.50 24.2 0.0001
R51.9 Headache, unspecified 4378 29 31 327 4.50 24.4 0.0001
R52 Pain, unspecified 355 29 30 49 1.50 31.2 0.0001
R53 Malaise and fatigue 3994 29 30 290 6.20 63.6 0.0001
R53.1 Weakness 2382 29 30 162 3.20 30.1 0.0001
R53.8 Other malaise and fatigue 1604 29 30 127 2.90 33.8 0.0001
R53.81 Other malaise 457 29 30 48 1.30 21.2 0.0001
R53.83 Other fatigue 1132 28 33 174 2.90 18.0 0.0001
R55 Syncope and collapse 3285 28 30 332 7.00 68.3 0.0001
R68.83 Chills (without fever) 323 29 30 41 1.20 23.6 0.0001
T78 Adverse effects, not elsewhere classified 861 28 32 128 2.60 21.4 0.0001
T78.4 Other and unspecified allergy 551 28 29 52 1.30 19.2 0.0001
T78.40 Allergy, unspecified 507 28 29 45 1.10 14.9 0.0042



Other adverse events
R07 Pain in throat and chest 10,808 1 5 828 7.50 22.8 0.0001
R07.8 Other chest pain 4879 1 5 383 3.70 12.7 0.0453
R00.0 Tachycardia, unspecified 1942 29 30 119 2.10 16.4 0.0005
R00.2 Palpitations 1800 1 4 142 2.30 14.8 0.0043

* See footnote under Table 3.

In the 18–39-year age group, the health outcomes with clusters were largely a subset of those with clusters in the all-ages analysis. In addition, there were clusters of abnormalities of heartbeat in Days 1–6, dyspnea/shortness of breath in Days 28–32, and unspecified chest pain in Days 29–32 (Table S3). There were non-statistically significant groupings of acute pericarditis (I30 and I30.9) in Days 31–32 and Days 26–37, respectively (Table S2).

For the 40–64- and ≥65-year age groups, the health outcomes with statistically significant clusters were a complete subset of those seen in the all-ages analysis (Table S3). COVID-19, viral pneumonia, respiratory failure, and sepsis clusters (the latter two only in the 40–64-year group) were all within Days 1–16. Other than COVID-19 and viral pneumonia, there were no clusters of any respiratory or cardiac outcomes or symptoms (e.g., chest pain, abnormalities of heartbeat, or shortness of breath) nor any of myocarditis/pericarditis.

4.3. Janssen

The 417,854 Janssen vaccinees had 57,874 incident diagnoses during follow-up and 21 clusters. There were clusters of unspecified adverse effects in Days 1–5 and clusters of local or systemic adverse effects, specifically myalgia and fever on Days 1–2 and headache on Days 1–13 (Table 5 ). In the “other” category, there were clusters of abnormalities of gait and mobility, including difficulty walking, and of other disorders of muscle, including generalized muscle weakness, all on Days 1–2. In addition, there was a cluster of dyspnea on Days 3–14 (p = 0.01). A non-statistically significant grouping of COVID-19 appeared in Days 7–15 (p = 0.0453).

Table 5.

Clusters of adverse events found after Janssen primary series, all-ages analysis.*

ICD-10 code Adverse Event Total Number of Cases Risk Window Start Day Risk Window End Day Number of Cases in Risk Window Attributable Risk per 100,000 1st Doses Log Likelihood Ratio Test Statistic P-Value
Unspecified adverse effects
T50 Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of diuretics and other and unspecified drugs, medicaments and biological substances 307 1 4 153 33.00 146.5 0.0001
T50.B95 Adverse effect of other viral vaccines 148 1 5 106 24.00 116.2 0.0001
T50.Z Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of other vaccines and biological substances 64 1 4 48 11.00 62.9 0.0001
T50.Z9 Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of other vaccines and biological substances 62 1 4 48 11.00 64.2 0.0001
T50.Z95 Adverse effect of other vaccines and biological substances 61 1 4 48 11.00 64.9 0.0001
T88 Other complications of surgical and medical care, not elsewhere classified 82 1 4 55 13.00 66.6 0.0001
T88.1 Other complications following immunization, not elsewhere classified 64 1 4 51 12.00 69.6 0.0001



Local or systemic adverse effects known to be associated with some injected vaccines
M79.1 Myalgia 168 1 2 37 7.40 30.3 0.0001
M79.10 Myalgia, unspecified site 140 1 2 35 7.20 32.3 0.0001
R50 Fever of other and unknown origin 294 1 2 52 9.80 33.7 0.0001
R50.8 Other specified fever 36 1 2 12 2.60 14.0 0.0021
R50.83 Postvaccination fever 14 1 2 11 2.60 21.4 0.0001
R50.9 Fever, unspecified 255 1 2 38 6.70 19.9 0.0001
R51 Headache 903 1 13 359 41.00 29.4 0.0001
R51.9 Headache, unspecified 902 1 13 359 41.00 29.6 0.0001



Other adverse events
R26 Abnormalities of gait and mobility 197 1 2 42 8.40 33.3 0.0001
R26.8 Other abnormalities of gait and mobility 101 1 2 21 4.20 16.2 0.0002
R26.89 Other abnormalities of gait and mobility 69 1 2 15 3.00 12.1 0.0168
R26.2 Difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified 66 1 2 17 3.50 16.1 0.0004
M62 Other disorders of muscle 246 1 2 32 5.30 13.7 0.0024
M62.8 Other specified disorders of muscle 226 1 2 29 4.80 12.2 0.0151
M62.81 Muscle weakness (generalized) 113 1 2 28 5.80 25.6 0.0001
R06.0 Dyspnea 779 3 14 254 22.00 12.6 0.01



Conditions suggestive of COVID-19
U07 Emergency use of U07 334 7 15 100 12.00 11.6 0.0315
U07.1 COVID-19 332 7 15 99 12.00 11.3 0.0453

* See footnote under Table 3.

In analyses of the specific age groups, the health outcomes with clusters were subsets of those with clusters in the all-ages analysis. Clusters of abnormalities of gait and mobility and disorders of muscle, all within 4 days after vaccination, were seen only in the ≥65-year age group (Table S4).

Among Janssen vaccinees of all ages, there were 58 cases of “abnormalities of gait and mobility” (R26 with or without M62) during Days 1–4 and 16 unique cases of “other disorders of muscle” (M62 without R26) on Days 1–2. One VSD site had disproportionately many cases of both R26 and M62 relative to its number of Janssen vaccinees (40 %): 43 (74 %) of the 58 cases of R26 and 13 (81 %) of the 16 cases of M62 without R26. All 43 of this site’s R26 cases in Days 1–4 had been hospitalized days earlier and received Janssen vaccine in the hospital, within a few days prior to discharge. All but one (98 %) had codes indicating they had been discharged to a nursing facility. The R26 code was, in all cases, one of many diagnosis codes appearing on the day of hospital discharge and nursing facility admission (range of number of diagnosis codes per patient: 7–33; mean and median: 15). Regarding the 13 cases of M26 without R26 on Days 1–2 at this site, 11 (85 %) had been hospitalized days earlier and received Janssen in the few days before discharge. Eight (73 %) of the 11 had codes indicating discharge to a nursing facility. For all 11 hospitalized patients, the M62 code was on the day of hospital discharge/nursing facility admission. Furthermore, for both the R26 and the M62 hospitalized cases, the primary diagnoses (prior to vaccination) were often conditions that could have produced gait/mobility problems or muscle weakness, e.g., broken fibula, tibia or femur; strokes; traumatic head injuries; cellulitis of lower limbs or diabetic ulcers on the foot; etc.

5. Discussion

We retrospectively applied a tree-based scan statistical approach to longitudinal data from approximately 4.1 million Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinees, 2.6 million Moderna vaccinees, and 0.4 million Janssen vaccinees in the VSD to look broadly for clusters of cases of any of thousands of potential adverse events during the several weeks after vaccination. We did not identify any previously unknown serious adverse events for either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna mRNA vaccines. For Janssen vaccine, we detected unexpected statistical signals for abnormalities of gait and mobility and for other disorders of muscle, both of which we investigated and determined not to be safety signals, as discussed below. In addition, the analyses provided some evidence of vaccine effectiveness with respect to COVID-19 and related conditions attended to in inpatient or emergency department settings.

All three vaccines were associated with codes for unspecified adverse effects, the strongest clusters of which were seen in the days immediately following the second dose of the mRNA vaccines and the one dose of the Janssen vaccine. These clusters likely reflect known, non-serious vaccine-associated adverse events, given findings of an earlier application of these methods [15]. In that earlier study, codes received in conjunction with non-specific adverse effects codes were for pain in and/or swelling of the limb, local skin reactions and/or unspecific allergic reactions, cellulitis, nausea and/or vomiting, fever, viral exanthem, dizziness and giddiness, headache, and/or unspecified myalgia and myositis, with few or no subsequent medical visits recorded [15]. In view of this previous experience, we did not investigate such clusters further in the current study.

In addition to unspecified adverse effects, there were clusters of local or systemic adverse effects for all three vaccines. Consistent with greater reactogenicity of Dose 2 of both mRNA vaccines, most of these clusters started on Day 21 or 22 after Pfizer-BioNTech and on Day 28 or 29 after Moderna. Clusters of myalgia, fever, and headache were also seen in the days immediately after vaccination among the Janssen vaccinees.

Myocarditis/pericarditis is known to be rarely associated with mRNA vaccination, observed primarily in adolescent and young adult males and particularly in the week after Dose 2 [8]. In our study, clusters of myocarditis/pericarditis were detected within Days 23–26 after Pfizer-BioNTech Dose 1 vaccination, i.e., very likely in the week after Dose 2 in most or all instances. Myocarditis/pericarditis clusters were found in the inclusive all-ages analysis as well as for the 12–17-year and 18–39- year age groups, but not for the older age groups. No clusters of myocarditis/pericarditis were seen among the Moderna vaccinees, likely due in part to sample size. However, non-statistically significant groupings of myocarditis/pericarditis were found in Days 31–32 in the all-ages and 18–39-year groups.

Other serious COVID-19 vaccine-associated adverse events that have been documented in the literature are the even rarer thrombosis with thrombocytopenia after Janssen vaccination, with an attributable risk of approximately 7 cases per million vaccinations for the highest-risk group, women aged 18–49 years [10], and Guillain-Barré syndrome after Janssen vaccination, with an attributable risk of approximately 15.5 cases per million vaccinations (using a risk window of Days 1–21) compared with mRNA vaccines [11]. The rareness of these adverse events together with the relatively small size of our Janssen-vaccinated group likely explain the lack of signals for both of these events in our analyses.

The numbers of cases in the clusters of chest pain, palpitations, tachycardia (for Moderna), and abnormalities of breathing (for Pfizer-BioNTech) were an order of magnitude greater than the numbers of myocarditis/pericarditis cases, and there was no evidence that these clusters were being driven by myocarditis/pericarditis. The conditions frequently coded within +/−5 days of chest pain in Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinees (appearing in at least 5 % of the chest pain cases) were shortness of breath, unspecified anxiety disorder, and headache. For Moderna, these conditions coded within +/−5 days of chest pain were shortness of breath, palpitations, fever, tachycardia, myalgia, and unspecified anxiety disorder. Similarly, conditions frequently coded within +/-5 days of dyspnea in Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinees included chest pain, unspecified anxiety disorder, headache, tachycardia, palpitations, and myalgia. The conditions featured in these statistical signals as well as the conditions reflected by the proximate codes are for the most part signs and symptoms rather than specific diagnoses, and the etiology of the symptoms remains unknown.

Clusters of abnormalities of gait and mobility (R26) and disorders of muscle (M62), including generalized muscle weakness, were seen in the Janssen analysis of all ages combined but were driven by the elderly, as such clusters were present only for the ≥65-year age group in age-stratified analysis (Table S4). Both the R26 and M62 clusters within a few days of vaccination appear to have resulted from one large site’s pattern of vaccinating frail hospitalized patients (many of whom were hospitalized for conditions plausibly affecting mobility) with Janssen vaccine within a few days before discharge—perhaps particularly patients heading to a nursing facility—and recording gait/mobility abnormalities and/or muscle weakness, typically along with several other diagnoses, upon transfer to a nursing facility. In synthesis, we believe these two signals are explained by (a) temporal confounding, in which hospital discharge is temporally related to both exposure and outcome, and (b) the fact that many of these patients were evidently hospitalized (prior to vaccination) for a condition that was plausibly associated with gait/mobility problems or muscle weakness.

Clusters of codes consistent with COVID-19—COVID-19 codes U07 and J12.82, viral pneumonia, sepsis, acute respiratory failure, and hypoxemia—appeared in similar time frames for both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccinees: within Days 3–21 for Pfizer-BioNTech and Days 1–16 for Moderna. More than 80 % of the cases in the sepsis clusters and roughly half of the cases in the acute respiratory failure clusters also had diagnosis codes for COVID-19 during follow-up, suggesting that these clusters were largely manifestations of COVID-19, particularly considering that these outcomes are known complications of COVID-19 [26], [27]. There was also a non-statistically significant group of the code U07 in Days 7–15 for Janssen (p = 0.04). There were no sepsis clusters in age groups younger than 40 years of age for any of the three vaccines. We interpret these clusters as evidence that vaccination suppressed severe COVID-19 starting in the third week after Dose 1 (i.e., in the control windows of these clusters). The one exception to this temporal pattern was the observation among the 5–11-year-old Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinees of a COVID-19 cluster on Days 44–69 after vaccination, late in follow-up. This is likely due to break-through COVID-19 (in just 0.05 % of vaccinees), considering the timing of FDA’s authorization of this vaccine for use in this age group on October 29, 2021, long after authorization for older age groups, and the rapid rise in COVID-19 cases nationwide during December 2021–January 2022.

Limitations of this study include the possibility of temporal confounding. The clusters of gait/mobility abnormalities and muscle disorders after Janssen and of COVID-19 break-through disease late in follow-up in 5–11-year-old Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinees are examples of such confounding. Second, scanning tens of thousands of diagnoses and groups of diagnoses and hundreds of time intervals uses statistical power, meaning that rare health outcomes producing a signal in a more targeted study might not signal in a study like ours, even with a similar number of vaccinees. For example, the groups of myocarditis/pericarditis after Moderna did not rise to statistical significance, even in the analysis of the 18–39-year age group. Third, anchoring follow-up on Dose 1 and not doing dose-specific analyses means that true clusters of a given outcome occurring after both doses could be detected after at most one of the doses, the one with the strongest cluster. Fourth, the requirement that study subjects be enrolled for the full follow-up period means that cases of death were excluded, so we may have missed the most severe cases of any type of outcome. However, a study conducted in the VSD found no increased risk of death among COVID-19 vaccine recipients [28]. Finally, if true adverse reactions do not show strong clustering in time (e.g., because of insidious onset) or in the diagnosis tree (e.g., because they manifest across multiple body systems and might be coded differently, depending on the case and/or the clinician), they might not be detected with this tree-temporal method. We believe this would be a concern for only a small minority of potential adverse reactions, however.

Notwithstanding the limitations, this self-controlled tree-temporal scan statistical method provides unique advantages for vaccine safety monitoring by virtue of its population-based and untargeted nature—neither specific health outcomes nor specific post-exposure periods of potentially increased risk are pre-specified. Adjustment for the evaluation of the tens of thousands of diagnoses and groups of diagnoses and the hundreds of risk intervals keeps the number of false signals low. Further, the method is self-controlled, such that any potential confounding from time-invariant characteristics, including chronic disease status, is essentially eliminated. It nicely complements VSD’s sequential analysis (also known as “rapid cycle analysis”), which has greater power to detect increased risks of its prespecified health outcomes in prespecified risk windows but is not as broad an assessment of safety, given the need to prespecify outcomes and risk windows.

In summary, in this inclusive data-mining evaluation of 4.1, 2.6, and 0.4 million Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Janssen vaccinees, respectively, completely unanticipated adverse events within several weeks of vaccination could have come to light. However, no unexpected serious adverse events were identified, only known adverse events. Clusters of myocarditis in the week after Pfizer-BioNTech Dose 2 were detected in vaccinees of ages 12–17- and 18–39-years. While not ruling out the possibility of rare vaccine-associated adverse events, these results offer additional reassurance about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, in view of the broad, untargeted nature of the study.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Declaration of Competing Interest

WK Yih has received research funding from Pfizer in the past.  JC Nelson received grant funding to participate on the External Safety Advisory Board for Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine program in 2020 – April 2021.  L Qian has received funding from Moderna, GlaxoSmithKline, and Dynavax for work unrelated to this manuscript.  The other authors report no conflicts.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

The VSD organizations providing data for this study were Denver Health (Colorado), HealthPartners Research Foundation (Minnesota), Kaiser Permanente of Colorado (Colorado), Kaiser Permanente of Northern California (California), Kaiser Permanente of Southern California (California), Kaiser Permanente Washington (Washington), Marshfıeld Clinic Research Foundation (Wisconsin), and Northwest Kaiser Permanente (Oregon). We would like to thank the data managers, programmers, and project managers at those sites: Hannah Berger, Jonathan Block, Kristin Breslin, Rachael Burganowski, Cheryl Carlson, Berwick Chan, Sungching Glenn, Kristin Goddard, Kayla Hanson, Tia Kauffman, Erika Kiniry, Leslie Kuckler, Kate Kurlandsky, Ned Lewis, Sudha Medabalimi, Karen Nunley, Arthur Runkle, Denison Ryan, Erica Scotty, Jo Ann Shoup, Matthew Slaughter, Kris Wain, and Jingyi Zhu. We also gratefully acknowledge the scientific and logistical support of the VSD team at CDC: Amelia Jazwa, Michael McNeil, Christopher Schembri, and Tom Shimabukuro. Finally, we thank our team members at the Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute (Massachusetts), David Cole, Inna Dashevsky, Jessica LeBlanc, and Robert Rosofsky, as well as our colleague Martin Kulldorff, for their valuable contributions to this work.

This work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contract 200-2012-53514, task order 75D30121F-00006.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.026.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.docx (69.6KB, docx)

Data availability

Researchers may request the data via the standard VSD data sharing program described on CDC’s public website: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vsd/accessing-data.html.

References

  • 1.Klein N.P., Lewis N., Goddard K., Fireman B., Zerbo O., Hanson K.E., et al. Surveillance for adverse events after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. JAMA. 2021;326:1390–1399. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.15072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gee J., Marquez P., Su J., Calvert G.M., Liu R., Myers T., et al. First month of COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring - United States, December 14, 2020-January 13, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:283–288. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7008e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rizk J.G., Barr C.E., Rizk Y., Lewin J.C. The next frontier in vaccine safety and VAERS: lessons from COVID-19 and ten recommendations for action. Vaccine. 2021;39:6017–6018. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rosenblum H.G., Gee J., Liu R., Marquez P.L., Zhang B., Strid P., et al. Safety of mRNA vaccines administered during the initial 6 months of the US COVID-19 vaccination programme: an observational study of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and v-safe. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22:802–812. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00054-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shimabukuro T.T., Cole M., Su J.R. Reports of anaphylaxis after receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the US—December 14, 2020-January 18, 2021. JAMA. 2021;325:1101–1102. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shay DK, Gee J, Su JR, Myers TR, Marquez P, Liu R. Safety monitoring of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccine—United States, March-April 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:680-4. <http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7018e2>. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Oster M.E., Shay D.K., Su J.R., Gee J., Creech C.B., Broder K.R., et al. Myocarditis cases reported after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination in the US from December 2020 to August 2021. JAMA. 2022;327:331–340. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goddard K, Lewis E, Fireman B, Weintraub E, Shimabukuro TT, Zerbo O, et al. Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis following BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccination. Lancet preprint. <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4059218>. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.See I, Su JR, Lale A, Woo EJ, Guh AY, Shimabukuro TT, et al. US case reports of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with thrombocytopenia after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination, March 2 to April 21, 2021. JAMA. 2021;325:2448–56. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.7517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 10.MacNeil J.R., Su J.R., Broder K.R., Guh A.Y., Gargano J.W., Wallace M., et al. Updated recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for use of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccine after reports of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome among vaccine recipients - United States, April 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:651–656. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7017e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hanson K.E., Goddard K., Lewis N., Fireman B., Myers T.R., Bakshi N., et al. Incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5:e228879. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Oliver S.E., Wallace M., See I., Mbaeyi S., Godfrey M., Hadler S.C., et al. Use of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 vaccine: Updated interim recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, December 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:90–95. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7103a4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wallace M., Moulia D., Blain A.E., Ricketts E.K., Minhaj F.S., Link-Gelles R., et al. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' recommendation for use of Moderna COVID-19 vaccine in adults aged ≥18 years and considerations for extended intervals for administration of primary series doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines - United States, February 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:416–421. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7111a4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Li R., Weintraub E., McNeil M.M., Kulldorff M., Lewis E.M., Nelson J., et al. Meningococcal conjugate vaccine safety surveillance in the Vaccine Safety Datalink using a tree-temporal scan data mining method. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27:391–397. doi: 10.1002/pds.4397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yih WK,* Maro JC,* Nguyen M, Baker MA, Balsbaugh C, Cole DV, et al. Assessment of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine safety using the self-controlled tree-temporal scan statistic signal-detection method in the Sentinel System. Am J Epidemiol 2018;187:1269-76. (*co-primary). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Yih W.K., Kulldorff M., Dashevsky I., Maro J.C. A broad safety assessment of the 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190:1253–1259. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yih W.K., Kulldorff M., Dashevsky I., Maro J.C. Using the self-controlled tree-temporal scan statistic to assess the safety of live attenuated herpes zoster vaccine. Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188:1383–1388. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yih W.K., Kulldorff M., Dashevsky I., Maro J.C. A broad safety assessment of the recombinant herpes zoster vaccine. Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191:957–964. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.McNeil M.M., Gee J., Weintraub E.S., Belongia E.A., Lee G.M., Glanz J.M., et al. The vaccine safety datalink: successes and challenges monitoring vaccine safety. Vaccine. 2014;32:5390–5398. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yih WK (co-primary), Maro JC (co-primary), Nguyen M, Baker MA, Balsbaugh C, Cole DV, et al.. Pilot of self-controlled tree-temporal scan analysis for Gardasil vaccine. Final report posted to Sentinel website; September 2016. <https://www.sentinelinitiative.org/sites/default/files/Methods/Mini-Sentinel_PRISM_Pilot-Self-Controlled-Tree-Temporal-Scan-Analysis-Gardasil-Vaccine-Report.pdf>.
  • 21.Shimabukuro T.T., Kim S.Y., Myers T.R., Moro P.L., Oduyebo T., Panagiotakopoulos L., et al. Preliminary findings of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnant persons. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2273–2282. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kharbanda E.O., Haapala J., DeSilva M., Vazquez-Benitez G., Vesco K.K., Naleway A.L., et al. Spontaneous abortion following COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. JAMA. 2021;326:1629–1631. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.15494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lipkind H.S., Vazquez-Benitez G., DeSilva M., Vesco K.K., Ackerman-Banks C., Zhu J., et al. Receipt of COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy and preterm or small-for-gestational-age at birth — Eight integrated health care organizations, United States, December 15, 2020–July 22, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:26–30. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7101e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.DeSilva M, Haapala J, Vazquez-Benitez G, Vesco KK, Daley MF, Getahun, D, et al. Evaluation of acute adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. N Engl J Med; 2022. <https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2205276>. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 25.Kulldorff M and Information Management Services, Inc. TreeScan: software for the tree-based scan statistic, version 2.0. Calverton, MD: Information Management Services, Inc.; 2021.
  • 26.Beltran-García J., Osca-Verdegal R., Pallardó F.V., Ferreres J., Rodríguez M., Mulet S., et al. Sepsis and coronavirus disease 2019: Common features and anti-inflammatory therapeutic approaches. Crit Care Med. 2020;48:1841–1844. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li X., Ma X. Acute respiratory failure in COVID-19: is it “typical” ARDS? Crit Care. 2020;24:198. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02911-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu S., Huang R., Sy L.S., Glenn S.C., Ryan D.S., Morrissette K., et al. COVID-19 vaccination and non-COVID-19 mortality risk—Seven integrated health care organization, United States, December 14, 2020-July 31, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:1520–1524. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7043e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.docx (69.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Researchers may request the data via the standard VSD data sharing program described on CDC’s public website: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vsd/accessing-data.html.


Articles from Vaccine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES