Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2021 Mar 10;397(10280):1177–1178. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00622-X

School reopening without robust COVID-19 mitigation risks accelerating the pandemic

Deepti Gurdasani a, Nisreen A Alwan b, Trisha Greenhalgh c, Zoë Hyde d, Luke Johnson b, Martin McKee e, Susan Michie f, Kimberly A Prather g, Sarah D Rasmussen h,i, Stephen Reicher j, Paul Roderick b, Hisham Ziauddeen k
PMCID: PMC9755467  PMID: 33713595

On Feb 22, 2021, the UK Government announced that schools in England would fully reopen on March 8, 2021. While returning to school as soon as possible is imperative for the education, social development, and mental and physical welfare of children, not enough has been done to make schools safer for students and staff.1 Without additional mitigations, increases in transmission are likely, this time with more infectious and possibly more virulent variants, resulting in further lockdowns, school closures, and absenteeism. Even when schools were supposed to be fully open, at points of high community transmission, 22% of secondary school children were not attending due to self-isolation.2 In some areas, attendance was as low as 61%.3

Arguments that schools do not contribute to community transmission and that the overall risk to children from COVID-19 is very small have meant that mitigations in schools have received low priority. Yet the evidence cited for these arguments has serious limitations.4, 5 Primary and secondary school closures have been associated with substantial reductions over time in the effective reproduction number (Rt) across many countries (including England) and time periods.6, 7 In contrast, data from the Office for National Statistics' (ONS) 2020 COVID-19 Infection Survey show that the prevalence of infection among children aged 2–10 years (2%) and 11–16 years (3%) rose above the prevalence for all other age groups before the 2020 Christmas break (appendix p 4). Both modelling and real-world data in preprint showing rising cases in regions where the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variant was prevalent during the lockdown in November, 2020 (when schools were open),8, 9 suggest that opening all schools now without robust mitigatory measures in place will probably lead to Rt rising above 1 in almost all scenarios. Modelling data by the University of Warwick and Imperial College London10 suggest that at least 30 000 more deaths from COVID-19 are estimated under the proposed reopening scenarios. Throughout February, 2021,11 despite fewer students being in school at this time, teaching staff were at higher risk of infection. Recent school outbreaks in northern Italy, where the B.1.1.7 variant is prevalent, are also concerning.12

Although COVID-19 is unlikely to cause severe disease in children, estimates of the prevalence of long COVID symptoms based on the ONS Infection Survey suggest that 13% of children aged 2–10 year and 15% of those aged 12–16 years have at least one persistent symptom 5 weeks after testing positive. Given uncertainty around the long-term health effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, it would be unwise to let the virus circulate in children, with consequent risk to their families. Reopening fully in the setting of high community transmission without appropriate safeguards risks depriving many children of education and social interaction again, worsening existing inequalities. By contributing to high community transmission, it also provides fertile ground for virus evolution and new variants.

Multi-layered mitigations can substantially reduce the risk of transmission within schools and into households.13 In the panel we summarise a set of recommendations that are in line with guidelines from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and practised in many countries to reduce the risk of transmission in schools and mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on children and families. A detailed set of recommendations and an infographic are provided in the appendix. Making schools safer goes hand in hand with reducing community transmission and is essential to allow schools to safely reopen and remain open.

Panel. Recommendations.

Physical distancing

General

  • Traffic light system of risk

  • Use remote or blended learning to reduce footfall

During travel

  • Keep travel bubbles constant

  • Stagger start and finish times

  • Avoid mixing (eg, at school gates)

  • Open windows and wear masks on transport

In classrooms

  • Keep bubble size small

  • Reduce movement among bubbles

  • Deploy additional staff to reduce class sizes

  • Use large spaces (eg, halls)

  • Quarantine applies to whole bubbles

Protections for students and staff

Hand and surface hygiene

  • Provide hand washing stations and hand sanitisers

  • Wash hands regularly and at key points (eg, after using the toilet)

Vaccination

  • Account for exposure alongside age and disease-related risk in vaccine prioritisation

  • Prioritising school staff reduces educational disruption due to staff illness

Testing

  • Do not assume tests are 100% accurate

  • Testing complements other measures rather than replacing them

Ventilation and face coverings

Ventilation

  • Open windows and doors

  • Teach outdoors (or in large halls) wherever possible

  • Use CO2 monitors to assess air quality

  • Install High Efficiency Particulate Air filters with air cleaning devices

  • All physical education outdoors

  • No high-risk lessons (eg, singing, brass or wind instruments), except remotely

Face coverings

  • Encourage children aged 5 years or older to use a mask (with exemptions)

  • Teach correct mask fitting and use

  • Remove masks only when outdoors or eating

  • Consider transparent face coverings to improve communication

  • Safe disposal or washing of masks

Support children and families

Support blended and remote learning

  • Allow optional remote learning

  • Support remote learning with technologies, funding, practical support, and skills training

  • Provide for safe delivery or pick-up of free school meals

  • Ensure safeguarding of at-risk children

Address the harms of educational disruption

  • Support with isolation

  • Record educational disruption alongside grades

  • Provide mental health support to children

  • Enhanced skills provision (eg, summer schools)

Acknowledgments

NAA and PR were involved in SARS-CoV-2 saliva testing pilots in Southampton supported by the Department of Health and Social Care. NAA experienced Long COVID symptoms. MM, SM, and SR are members of Independent SAGE. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary appendix
mmc1.pdf (683.3KB, pdf)

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary appendix
mmc1.pdf (683.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Lancet (London, England) are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES