Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Dec 25;121:105875. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105875

Depression and anxiety symptoms are associated with problematic smartphone use under the COVID-19 epidemic: The mediation models

Liangyi Jin a,b, Zejun Hao a,, Jinzi Huang c, Hafiza Rabia Akram a, Muhammad Farhan Saeed d, Haibo Ma e
PMCID: PMC9756353  PMID: 36540404

Abstract

COVID-19 epidemic has brought wide psychological impacts on the young adults. To investigate the depression and anxiety symptoms and their associations with problematic smartphone use under the COVID-19 epidemic, a total of 847 Chinese undergraduate students joined in this study and were measured with their levels of depression and anxiety symptoms, resilience, perceived social support, the sense of school belonging and problematic smartphone use. Results showed that among the Chinese undergraduate students, the disorder rates of depression and anxiety symptoms were 29.16% and 46.64% respectively, and their symptoms ranged from mild to extreme severe. Depression and anxiety symptoms both positively predicted problematic smartphone use. Resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging partially mediated both associations; resilience and the sense of school belonging exerted buffering effects, while perceived social support exacerbated the impacts. The current study advanced our understanding of the COVID-19 impacts and furthermore, suggested the protective factors for mitigating these impacts.

Keywords: COVID-19 epidemic, Depression, Anxiety, Problematic smartphone use, Resilience, Perceived social support, The sense of school belonging

1. Introduction

Researchers have analyzed the roles of depression and anxiety symptoms for predicting problematic smartphone use and the theorized model has been proposed which explains that an individual with depression and anxiety symptoms overuses the smartphone as a coping strategy for releasing these negative emotions (Brand et al., 2016, Brand et al., 2019, Kardefelt-Winther, 2014). The fast spreading COVID-19 has greatly elevated the depression and anxiety levels among college students (Hager et al., 2020, Li et al., 2020); therefore, we focused on the associations between these negative affect and problematic smartphone use among the young adults under the status quo. Furthermore, the psychological health protective factors of resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging were tested with their roles in these associations (see Figs. 1 and 2 ).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The model with the mediation effects between depression symptom and problematic smartphone use under the COVID-19 epidemic (n = 847). ***p < 0.001. PSU = Problematic smartphone use.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The model with the mediation effects between anxiety symptom and problematic smartphone use under the COVID-19 epidemic (n = 847). ***p < 0.001. PSU = Problematic smartphone use.

1.1. Problematic smartphone use

Problematic smartphone use describes the maladaptive smartphone use with the functional impairments on the users (Elhai et al., 2016, Elhai et al., 2020, Lo Coco et al., 2020). Although problematic smartphone use has not been officially included as a mental disorder in either DSM-5 or ICD-11, researchers have reported many findings in literature. The harmful effects of problematic smartphone use include neck and shoulder pain (Shan et al., 2013), hand dysfunction (İNal et al., 2015), disturbed sleep quality (Hughes and Burke, 2018, Liu et al., 2017) and the mental health issues of loneliness (Enez Darcin et al., 2016), decreased social support (Herrero, Urueña López, Torres, & Hidalgo, 2017) and lower altruistic level (Hao, Jin, Lyu, & Rabia Akram, 2020). Among college students, who are the advocates of cutting-edge technologies, problematic smartphone use is associated with lower grading points and less effective learning style (Lepp et al., 2014, Samaha and Hawi, 2016). Besides, researchers have discovered the predisposing factors of problematic smartphone use. Mindfulness (Li & Hao, 2019), empathy (Lachmann et al., 2018) and self-control (Jiang & Zhao, 2016) are negatively associated with problematic smartphone use while alexithymia demonstrates positive connection (Hao et al., 2019, Hao and Jin, 2020).

1.2. Depression and anxiety symptoms and problematic smartphone use

Previous studies have reported that both depression and anxiety symptoms are positively associated with problematic smartphone use (Elhai et al., 2020, Elhai et al., 2020). A theory for understanding these relationships is the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition Execution model (I-PACE) (Brand et al., 2016, Brand et al., 2019). I-PACE model proposes the determinants of excessive smartphone use including biology, personality, cognition, and psychopathology, etc. This model also suggests that an individual under the stressful condition tends to conduct the maladaptive use of the smartphone as a coping strategy for releasing the negative emotions. COVID-19, which was first discovered in late December 2019 in Wuhan (China), is spreading fast globally. As of 16 December 2020, the World Health Organization have reported 71,919,725 confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide, including 1,623,064 deaths (Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard, 2020). The dangerous and unfamiliar virus together with the associated home quarantine and social distancing have brought considerable psychological impacts on the college students by increasing their depression and anxiety symptoms (Hager et al., 2020, Li et al., 2020). Following the I-PACE theory, we focused on the depression and anxiety symptoms under the COVID-19 epidemic as the predisposing psychopathology factors and aimed to examine their associations with problematic smartphone use.

1.3. Resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging as mediators

Resilience is defined as a personal quality that enables one to recover from failures and thrive in face of life adversities (Connor and Davidson, 2003, Richardson, 2002). In face of challenging situations, a resilient individual cherishes hope, tolerates the distress and conducts self-reflections and such qualities help to deal with the stressors efficiently and reduce negative emotions (Bacchi and Licinio, 2017, Simpson and Jones, 2013). This is supported by the findings concerning the COVID-19 that the buffering effect intrigued by resilience was evident for mitigating the depression and anxiety symptoms among the individuals (Barzilay et al., 2020, Labrague and Santos, 2020). Moreover, as a protective factor for securing an individual’s wellbeing, resilience is effective for countering addictive behaviors. Individuals with higher resilience are more capable of maintaining the psychological balance during the aftermath of adversities and this prevents them from falling into the addictive behaviors of gambling (Oei & Goh, 2015) and excessive alcohol consumptions (Krinner, Warren-Findlow, & Bowling, 2020). Furthermore, resilience is negatively associated with internet addiction which is interwoven with problematic smartphone use (Robertson, Yan, & Rapoza, 2018). Based on these evidences, we hypothesized that resilience should mediate and mitigate both the impacts of depression and anxiety symptoms on problematic smartphone use.

Perceived social support refers to the quality of emotional support provided by others and is a major source one counts on in difficult situations (Uchino, 2009, Zhang et al., 2018). Perceived social support could adjust individuals’ perspectives of stressful events because they believe they have the adequate resources to keep off the threats (Miloseva, Vukosavljevic-Gvozden, Richter, Milosev, & Niklewski, 2017). Therefore, such individuals are less likely to be bothered by depression and anxiety that usually come after the stressors such as an epidemic event (Li, Wu, et al., 2020). In addition, perceived social support is related to less addictive behaviors and this is supported by previous findings that social support increases the level of resilience to drug abuse (Nikmanesh & Honakzehi, 2016). The support received from friends and social circles could sufficiently compensate the loneliness, drive away negative emotions and help an individual to refrain from developing addictive behaviors (Costa, Patrão, & Machado, 2019). Perceived social support is negatively associated with problematic smartphone use thereof (P. Wang et al., 2018). Based on these, we hypothesized that perceived social support should mediate and mitigate both associations between depression and anxiety symptoms and problematic smartphone use.

The need to belong is the fundamental motivation of human beings and directs human’s emotions and behaviors (Baumeister & Leary, 1995). The sense of school belonging describes “the extent to which students feel personally accepted, respected, included, and supported by others in the school environment” (Carol, 1993), and is related to a student’s psychological wellbeing. A good sense of school belonging could help a student develop a meaningful life purpose (Lambert et al., 2013) and together with the support provided by the teachers and peers will increase an individual’s resilience to manage depression and anxiety symptoms (Shochet et al., 2011, Zhang et al., 2018). Moreover, a good sense of school belonging drives away the loneliness by helping a student develop healthy interpersonal relationships (Arslan, 2020). Consequently, the students spend less time on their smartphones seeking in the virtual world for unreal interpersonal interactions and the chance to develop problematic smartphone use is reduced (Wang et al., 2017). We hypothesized that the sense of school belonging should mediate and mitigate both the impacts of depression and anxiety symptoms on problematic smartphone use.

1.4. The current study

Following the I-PACE theory (Brand et al., 2016, Brand et al., 2019), we constructed two mediation models. The current study focused on the associations between depression and anxiety symptoms and problematic mobile phone use under the COVID-19 epidemic. Furthermore, we examined the mediation effects of resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging in these relationships. We hypothesized that (1) depression and anxiety symptoms were both positively associated with problematic smartphone use; (2) resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging mediated these relationships and mitigated the impacts.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants and procedure

The method of stratified random cluster sampling was used to recruit the participants from three universities in Northeast China. The survey was conducted in early March 2020 when the COVID-19 was in epidemic in China and all college students were required to remain at home and continued their learning via online courses. Questionnaires were stored in a website (https://www.wjx.cn/) and the link was forwarded to the students at the end of the online classes via QQ and WeChat groups. It took 20 minutes to complete the survey. The participants clicked the submit button and answers were collected automatically. A total of 907 students joined in the survey and 847 were valid for analyses afterwards (60 responded with missing data). The average age of the participants was 20.09 years (SD = 1.168). More female students (n = 657, 77.6%) joined in the survey than male students (n = 190, 22.4%). The survey was approved by the Ethics Committee of Liaoning National Normal College and the written consent was obtained from each participant. By online lottery, small gifts were given to participants for joining this survey.

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Smartphone addiction scale-short version (SAS-SV)

We used the SAS-SV to measure the levels of problematic smartphone use among the participants (Kwon, Kim, Cho, & Yang, 2013). The SAS-SV is a short version of the original SAS. The shortened questionnaire contains 10 items and runs on a 6-point Likert system ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate higher levels of problematic smartphone use. Sample items include e.g., “Missing planned work due to smartphone use” and “Having a hard time concentrating in class, while doing assignments, or while working due to smartphone use”. SAS-SV has been widely used and its Chinse version has been proved with great reliability (Elhai et al., 2020, Luk et al., 2018). The Cronbach’s alpha in the current sample was 0.844.

2.2.2. Depression, anxiety, stress scale-21 (DASS-21)

The DASS-21 was used to measure the depression and anxiety symptoms among Chinese undergraduate students under the COVID-19 epidemic (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995). Each symptom was measured by 7 items with options from 0 = did not apply to me to 3 = applied to me very much. Based on the scores obtained, each symptom was categorized as normal (depression 0–9, anxiety 0–7), mild (depression 10–13, anxiety 8–9), moderate (depression 14–20, anxiety 10–14), severe (depression, 21–27, anxiety 15–19) and extreme severe (depression 28+, anxiety 20 + ). Sample items include e.g., “I couldn’t seem to experience any positive feeling at all” (depression); “I was aware of dryness of my mouth” (anxiety). The Chinese version of DASS-21 has been tested with good reliability among Chinese population (Elhai et al., 2020, Wang et al., 2016). The Cronbach’s alphas in the current sample were 0.879 for depression symptoms and 0.84 for anxiety symptoms.

2.2.3. The Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC)

The CD-RISC running on 5-point Likert system consists of 25 items for measuring an individual’s level of resilience with options from 0 = not true at all to 4 = true nearly all the time. Sample items include e.g., “Past success gives confidence for new challenge” and “Tend to bounce back after illness or hardship”. The Chinese version of CD-RISC works well on Chinse population and has been tested with good validity (Chen et al., n.d, Tian et al., 2016). The Cronbach’s alpha in the current sample was 0.932.

2.2.4. Perceived social support scale (PSSS)

The participants’ levels of perceived social support were measured with PSSS which contains 12 items and runs on a 7-point Likert system with 1 = very strongly disagree and 7 = very strongly agree. Sample items include e.g., “There is a special person who is around when I am in need” and “There is a special person with whom I can share joys and sorrows”. The questionnaire has been widely used among Chinese participants and was proved with good validity (Tian et al., 2016, Zhang et al., 2018). The Cronbach’s alpha in the current sample was 0.943.

2.2.5. Psychological sense of school membership scale (PSSM)

The sense of school belonging was measured by PSSM which runs on a 6-point Likert system. It consists of 18 items and ranges from 1 = very strongly disagree to 6 = very strongly agree. Sample items include e.g., “People at this school are friendly to me” and “I am included in lots of activities at this school”. The Chinese version of PSSM has been proved with good validity (Pan, Wang, Song, Ding, & Dai, 2011). The Cronbach’s alpha in the current sample was 0.9.

2.3. Data analyses

2.3.1. Statistical analyses

We used the SPSS 22 for the statistical analyses of the current study. The significant value was set at 0.05. First, the scores of DASS-21 were calculated to measure the depression and anxiety symptoms among the Chinese undergraduate students under the COVID-19 epidemic. Second, the data were checked with the distribution and we found they were in non-normal distribution. Wilconxon Mann-Whitney test was used to check the possible differences in the levels of depression and anxiety symptoms, resilience, perceived social support, the sense of school belonging and problematic smartphone use among the male and female participants. Third, Spearman’s analysis was conducted to test the correlations among all the investigated variables. Fourth, model 4 of SPSS macro PROCESS 3.1 (Hayes, 2018) was used to examine the mediation effects of resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging in the relationships between depression and anxiety symptoms and problematic smartphone use respectively by generating bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval (using 5000 bootstrapping samples). According to Preacher et al., 2007, Hayes, 2015, the analyses via the SPSS macro PROCESS had no requirement on the data distribution.

2.3.2. Control variables

Based on the results of previous findings (Demirci et al., 2015, van Deursen et al., 2015, Wang et al., 2015), age and gender were significantly correlated with problematic smartphone use and thus were treated as control variables in the mediation analyses afterwards.

3. Results

3.1. The depression and anxiety symptoms under the COVID-19 epidemic

Our study showed that the frequencies of each symptom were depression (normal n = 600, 70.84%, mild n = 103, 12.16%, moderate n = 108, 12.75%, severe n = 18, 2.13% and extreme severe, n = 18, 2.13%) and anxiety (normal n = 452, 53.36%, mild n = 77, 9,09%, moderate n = 196, 23.14%, severe n = 70, 8.26% and extreme severe, n = 52, 6.14%) (see Table 1 ).

Table 1.

The COVID-19 depression and anxiety symptoms.

Rating Depression Anxiety
Normal 600(70.84%) 452(53.36%)
Mild 103(12.16%) 77(9.09%)
Moderate 108(12.75%) 196(23.14%)
Severe 18(2.13%) 70(8.26%)
Extreme severe 18(2.13%) 52(6.14%)
Total 847 847

Note. N = 847, Normal (depression 0–9, anxiety 0–7), Mild (depression 10–13, anxiety 8–9), Moderate (depression 14–20, anxiety 10–14), Severe (depression, 21–27, anxiety 15–19) and Extreme severe (depression 28+, anxiety 20 + )

3.2. Testing for the differences in the participants’ gender

The results of the Wilconxon Mann-Whitney test indicated that male students showed significantly higher levels in depression and anxiety symptoms and resilience. No significant difference was observed in other variables (see Table 2 ).

Table 2.

Results of Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney test.

Variables Depression Anxiety Resilience Perceived social support School belonging PSU
Male 478.1 478.71 468.26 406.81 409.8 432.84
Female 408.35 408.18 411.20 428.97 428.11 421.44
Z −3.501*** −3.521*** −2.832** −1.1 -0.909 -0.566

Note. N = 847, **p < 0.01. ***p < .001. PSU = problematic smartphone use. Male = 1, female = 2.

3.3. Correlations among the investigated variables

The results of Spearman’s analysis showed that all the investigated variables were in significant associations with each other. Depression and anxiety symptoms were positively correlated with problematic smartphone use. Resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging were negatively associated with depression and anxiety symptoms and problematic smartphone use (see Table 3 ).

Table 3.

Spearman correlation coefficients of all the investigated variables.

Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Depression
2. Anxiety 0.817***
3. Resilience −0.386*** −0.295***
4. Perceived social support −0.368*** −0.313*** 0.492***
5. School belonging −0.417*** −0.356*** 0.449*** 0.511***
6. PSU 0.360*** 0.393*** −0.229*** −0.118*** −0.216***
Median 4 6 87 63 79 31
P25, P75 2,10 2,12 78,97 54,71 70,86 25,36

Note. N = 847, ***P ≤ 0.001. PSU = Problematic smartphone use. P25 = 25th percentile, P75 = 75th percentile. The data were in non-normal distribution and Spearman’s analysis was conducted accordingly.

3.4. Testing for the mediation effects of resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging

The results of the mediation analyses showed that after controlling for age and gender, depression symptom predicted problematic smartphone use (β = 0.329, p < 0.001) both directly and indirectly via resilience (β = 0.07, 95% confidence interval 0.033 to 0.113), perceived social support (β = −0.064, 95% confidence interval −0.112 to −0.021) and the sense of school belonging (β = 0.047, 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 0.092) (see Tables 4 and 5 ). The analysis on the association between anxiety symptom and problematic smartphone use yielded similar results. After controlling for age and gender, anxiety symptom predicted problematic smartphone use (β = 0.402, p < 0.001) directly and indirectly via resilience (β = 0.055, 95% confidence interval 0.028 to 0.088), perceived social support (β = -0.046, 95% confidence interval −0.083 to −0.016) and the sense of school belonging (β = 0.038, 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 0.076) (see Tables 6 and 7 ). Namely, resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging partially mediated the effects between depression and anxiety symptoms and problematic smartphone use respectively under the COVID-19 epidemic.

Table 4.

Mediation analysis between depression and PSU by Process model 4.

Outcome variables Independent variables β SE t P
PSU constant 29.968*** 4.631 6.471 0.000
Age −0.150 0.224 −0.670 0.503
Gendera 0.643 0.633 1.016 0.310
Depression 0.382*** 0.038 10.153 0.000



Resilience constant 93.169*** 7.934 11.743 0.000
Age 0.515 0.383 1.344 0.179
Gendera −5.766*** 1.084 −5.137 0.000
Depression −0.718*** 0.064 −11.143 0.000



Perceived social support constant 58.777*** 7.027 8.336 0.000
Age 0.505 0.339 1.488 0.137
Gendera −0.995 0.960 −1.036 0.300
Depression −0.699*** 0.057 −12.255 0.000



School belonging constant 81.162*** 6.802 11.933 0.000
Age 0.151 0.328 0.461 0.645
Gendera −1.010 0.930 −1.087 0.277
Depression −0.752*** 0.055 −13.624 0.000



PSU constant 38.709*** 5.087 7.610 0.000
Age −0.136 0.220 −0.618 0.536
Gendera 0.110 0.634 0.174 0.862
Resilience −0.097*** 0.022 −4.358 0.000
Perceived social support 0.091*** 0.027 3.430 0.001
School belonging −0.062* 0.027 −2.325 0.020
Depression 0.329*** 0.042 7.797 0.000

Note. N = 847, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. PSU = Problematic smartphone use.

a

Male = 1, female = 2.

Table 5.

Bootstrapping indirect effect and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mediation model between depression and PSU by Process model 4.

Indirect paths Estimated effect 95% CI
Lower Upper
Depression → resilience → PSU 0.07a 0.033 0.113
Depression → Perceived social support → PSU −0.064a −0.112 −0.021
Depression → school belonging → PSU 0.047a 0.003 0.092
Total indirect effects 0.053a 0.002 0.105

Note. N = 847. Bootstrap sample size = 5000. PSU = problematic smartphone use.

a

Empirical 95% confidence interval does not overlap with zero.

Table 6.

Mediation analysis between Anxiety and PSU by Process model 4.

Outcome variables Independent variables β SE t P
PSU constant 28.796*** 4.563 6.311 0.000
Age −0.144 0.220 −0.656 0.512
Gendera 0.631 0.621 1.016 0.310
Anxiety 0.448*** 0.039 11.562 0.000



Resilience constant 90.002*** 8.253 10.906 0.000
Age 0.574 0.398 1.444 0.149
Gendera −5.013*** 1.124 −4.462 0.000
Anxiety −0.510*** 0.070 −7.279 0.000



Perceived social support constant 56.109*** 7.321 7.664 0.000
Age 0.555 0.353 1.572 0.116
Gendera −0.347 0.997 −0.348 0.728
Anxiety −0.535*** 0.062 −8.606 0.000



School belonging constant 78.986*** 7.110 11.110 0.000
Age 0.199 0.343 0.581 0.562
Gendera −0.377 0.968 −0.390 0.697
Anxiety −0.606*** 0.060 −10.027 0.000



PSU constant 38.515*** 4.907 7.848 0.000
Age −0.118 0.216 −0.547 0.584
Gendera 0.100 0.618 0.162 0.871
Resilience −0.107*** 0.022 −4.945 0.000
Perceived social support 0.087*** 0.026 0.341 0.001
School belonging −0.062* 0.026 −2.414 0.016
Anxiety 0.402*** 0.041 9.889 0.000

Note. N = 847, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.

a

Male = 1, female = 2.

Table 7.

Bootstrapping indirect effect and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mediation model between anxiety and PSU by Process model 4.

Indirect paths Estimated effect 95% CI
Lower Upper
Anxiety → resilience → PSU 0.055a 0.028 0.088
Anxiety → Perceived social support → PSU −0.046a −0.083 −0.016
Anxiety → school belonging → PSU 0.038a 0.003 0.076
Total indirect effects 0.046a 0.006 0.088

Note. N = 847. Bootstrap sample size = 5000. PSU = problematic smartphone use, CI = confidence interval.

a

Empirical 95% confidence interval does not overlap with zero.

4. Discussion

The current study focused on the associations between depression and anxiety symptoms and problematic smartphone use respectively under the COVID-19 epidemic. In addition, we found that both relationships were partially mediated by resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging.

We observed that male students had significantly higher scores in both depression and anxiety symptoms. Compared with female students, the COVID-19 associated home quarantine and social distancing pose more trouble to the young male adults who are sports enthusiasts and keen on socializing. In our study, the resilience level of male students was higher than females. This could be explained by that males have more optimistic attitudes than females towards life adversities (Lasota, Tomaszek, & Bosacki, 2020). In addition, the CD-RISC scale (Connor & Davidson, 2003), which assesses the individual, personal strengths and resources, could be more applicable to males (You & Park, 2017).

4.1. The relationships between depression and anxiety symptoms and problematic smartphone use under the COVID-19 epidemic

Our study revealed that both depression and anxiety symptoms positively predicted problematic smartphone use, which supported our hypothesis 1. As suggested by the I-PACE model (Brand et al., 2016, Brand et al., 2019), individuals with depression and anxiety symptoms depend on the disorderly use of smartphones for releasing their negative emotions. The COVID-19 associated home quarantine, social distancing and online teaching have elevated the students’ psychological distress (Li, Cao, et al., 2020) and smartphones are their first and probably the only option to reach out and release the unwanted feelings. In addition, the excessive reassurance seeking motive observed among the distressed individuals (Cougle et al., 2012, Evraire and Dozois, 2011) drives the uncontrollable smartphone use of repeatedly checking for updated information about the virus and the status quo (Billieux, Maurage, Lopez-Fernandez, Kuss, & Griffiths, 2015), which also enhances the likelihood to develop problematic smartphone use.

4.2. Mediation effects of resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging

Our study revealed the mediation effects of resilience and the sense of school belonging for mitigating the impacts of both depression and anxiety symptoms on problematic smartphone use. These findings partially supported our hypothesis 2. COVID-19 has escalated into a global pandemic and the associated home quarantine and the social distancing add to the distress level of college students who are more vulnerable to psychological disturbance under stressful situations (Lee and Lee, 2019, Peng et al., 2010). There is a study that reported that under the COVID-19 epidemic, individuals with depression and anxiety symptoms are also observed with low resilience (Barzilay et al., 2020). According to the Matthew effect or “The rich get richer, the poor get poorer” model (Merton, 1968), individuals with adequate resources manage to attain more, while those with less fail to get enough. The distressed students with low resilience, instead of gaining more psychological toughness to get through the difficulties, fail to become resilient enough to tackle the influence of depression and anxiety. With less resilience, such students tend to lose control over their smartphone use by indulging in the entertaining contents to escape the challenging situation (Kim et al., 2014). This would increase the likelihood of developing problematic behavior.

We observed that the sense of school belonging was another mediator between depression and anxiety symptoms and problematic smartphone use. Among the factors contributing to the psychological distress among college students, the low sense of school belonging could be a critical one (Pittman & Richmond, 2007). The depression and anxiety symptoms emerge with the low sense of school belonging (Arslan, 2020) and such situation could become worse because they are off the campus and confront inadequate face to face communications with teachers and peers due to home quarantine. Again, the Matthew theory (Merton, 1968) suggests that the students with psychological distress and low sense of school belonging could only sense part of the help and kindness offered by the teachers and school administrators away from their homes. Consequently, the psychological detachment from the campus deteriorates. To keep in touch with the academic progression and satisfy their intrinsic need to belong, the students turn to excessive smartphone use for information checking and this behavior would induce problematic use.

In the same model, we observed the mediation effect of perceived social support; however, contrary to our hypothesis 2, it exacerbated the impacts. Perceived social support is effective for mitigating the adverse impacts brought by stressful events and individuals with depression and anxiety symptoms are eager for external support to comfort their hearts (Miloseva et al., 2017). However, the temporarily altered life patterns suggested the other possibility. Smartphone communication is the most common way for maintaining interpersonal relationship among college students and they are used to sending and obtaining support through the cyber connections. This scenario is strengthened by the home quarantine and social distancing during the epidemic. The more social support a student sends and gets, the more time he/she has to spend on the smartphone. The excessive smartphone use under the COVID-19 satisfies an individual’s need to care for others; however, if becoming uncontrollable, the more frequent uses would convert into a problematic behavior.

5. Strengths and limitations

Our study focused on the depression and anxiety symptoms and problematic smartphone use among Chinese undergraduate students under the COVID-19 epidemic. In addition, we examined the mediation effects of resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging in these relationships. The current study advanced our understanding of the studied issue and had practical implications as well.

Negative life events such as an epidemic increase an individual’s distress symptom especially among the young adults (Wong, Gao, & Tam, 2007). Our study measured the depression and anxiety levels of Chinese undergraduate students under the COVID-19 epidemic. The results showed that compared with depression, nearly half of the participants had anxiety symptoms ranging from mild to extreme severe. Although the average age of the participants was over 20 years, they are still not well prepared for the emergencies. Our study demonstrated the protective roles of resilience and the sense of school belonging for buffering the impacts of depression and anxiety symptoms on problematic smartphone use. We sincerely hope with our findings, the whole community, while calculating the material losses, pay more attention to the psychological status of the young adults. In addition, measures should be taken by college authorities to train the students’ resilience and enhance their connectedness to schools, so that they are more competent for future challenges.

Despite the findings of the current study, several limitations need to be addressed. First, the study recruited the undergraduate students from the universities in Liaoning Province in North China which may not generalize to the larger population in the whole country. Second, the gender disparity in the current survey should be balanced and the majority of female participants might impact the results. Third, this cross-sectional study could not build the causality between the negative affect and problematic smartphone use.

6. Conclusion

The current study focused on the depression and anxiety symptoms under the COVID-19 epidemic and their associations with problematic smartphone use. Besides, we found the mediation effects of resilience, perceived social support and the sense of school belonging in these relationships. Our findings helped to broaden the understanding of the COVID-19 epidemic and suggested the ways to mitigate its adverse impacts.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Contributors

Author L.J. and Z.H. designed the study and wrote the protocol. Authors L.J., J.H. and H.A. conducted literature searches and provided summaries of previous research studies. Authors L.J. and Z.H. conducted the statistical analysis. Authors J.H., M.S. and H.M. collected the data. Author L.J. wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

References

  1. Arslan G. School belongingness, well-being, and mental health among adolescents: Exploring the role of loneliness. Australian Journal of Psychology. 2020 doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bacchi S., Licinio J. Resilience and psychological distress in psychology and medical students. Academic Psychiatry. 2017;41(2):185–188. doi: 10.1007/s40596-016-0488-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barzilay R., Moore T.M., Greenberg D.M., DiDomenico G.E., Brown L.A., White L.K.…Gur R.E. Resilience, COVID-19-related stress, anxiety and depression during the pandemic in a large population enriched for healthcare providers. Translational Psychiatry. 2020;10(1):291. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-00982-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumeister R.F., Leary M.R. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin. 1995;117(3):497–529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Billieux J., Maurage P., Lopez-Fernandez O., Kuss D.J., Griffiths M.D. Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research. Current Addiction Reports. 2015;2(2):156–162. doi: 10.1007/s40429-015-0054-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brand M., Wegmann E., Stark R., Müller A., Wölfling K., Robbins T.W., Potenza M.N. The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2019;104:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brand M., Young K.S., Laier C., Wölfling K., Potenza M.N. Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2016;71:252–266. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carol G. The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents-scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools. 1993;30 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Y., Sun, Y., Pei, T., & Zhang, N. (n.d.). Reliability and validity of Connor-Davidson resilience scale in Chinese college students. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science, 22(11), 1040–1043.
  10. Connor K.M., Davidson J.R.T. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) Depression and Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76–82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Costa R.M., Patrão I., Machado M. Problematic internet use and feelings of loneliness. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice. 2019;23(2):160–162. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2018.1539180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cougle J.R., Fitch K.E., Fincham F.D., Riccardi C.J., Keough M.E., Timpano K.R. Excessive reassurance seeking and anxiety pathology: Tests of incremental associations and directionality. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2012;26(1):117–125. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Demirci K., Akgönül M., Akpinar A. Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2015;4(2):85–92. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Elhai J.D., Levine J.C., Dvorak R.D., Hall B.J. Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;63:509–516. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Elhai J.D., Yang H., Fang J., Bai X., Hall B.J. Depression and anxiety symptoms are related to problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese young adults: Fear of missing out as a mediator. Addictive Behaviors. 2020;101:105962. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Elhai J.D., Yang H., McKay D., Asmundson G.J.G. COVID-19 anxiety symptoms associated with problematic smartphone use severity in Chinese adults. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2020;274:576–582. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Enez Darcin, A., Kose, S., Noyan, C., Nurmedov, S., Yılmaz, O., & Dilbaz, N. (2016). Smartphone addiction and its relationship with social anxiety and loneliness (Vol. 35). 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1158319. [DOI]
  18. Evraire L.E., Dozois D.J.A. An integrative model of excessive reassurance seeking and negative feedback seeking in the development and maintenance of depression. Clinical Psychology Review. 2011;31(8):1291–1303. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hager, N., Judah, M., & Milam, A. (2020). Loneliness and Depression in College Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Boredom and Repetitive Negative Thinking as Mediators. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-101533/v1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Hao Z., Jin L. Alexithymia and problematic mobile phone use: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;11:541507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.541507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hao Z., Jin L., Li Y., Akram H.R., Saeed M.F., Ma J.…Huang J. Alexithymia and mobile phone addiction in Chinese undergraduate students: The roles of mobile phone use patterns. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019;97:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hao Z., Jin L., Lyu R., Rabia Akram H. Problematic mobile phone use and altruism in Chinese undergraduate students: The mediation effects of alexithymia and empathy. Children and Youth Services Review. 2020;105402 doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hayes A.F. An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2015;50(1):1–22. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.962683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hayes . 2nd ed. The Guilford Press; 2018. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. [Google Scholar]
  25. Herrero, J., Urueña López, A., Torres, A., & Hidalgo, A. (2017). Socially Connected but Still Isolated: Smartphone Addiction Decreases Social Support Over Time. 10.1177/0894439317742611. [DOI]
  26. Hughes N., Burke J. Sleeping with the frenemy: How restricting ‘bedroom use’ of smartphones impacts happiness and wellbeing. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018;85:236–244. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. İNal, E. E., Demİrcİ, kadİr, Çetİntürk, A., Akgönül, M., & Savaş, S. (2015). Effects of smartphone overuse on hand function, pinch strength, and the median nerve: Smartphone Overuse. Muscle & Nerve, 52(2), 183–188. 10.1002/mus.24695. [DOI] [PubMed]
  28. Jiang Z., Zhao X. Self-control and problematic mobile phone use in Chinese college students: The mediating role of mobile phone use patterns. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1) doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1131-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kardefelt-Winther D. A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014;31:351–354. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim S.M., Huh H.J., Cho H., Kwon M., Choi J.H., Ahn H.J.…Kim D.J. The Effect of Depression, Impulsivity, and Resilience on Smartphone Addiction in University Students. Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 2014;53(4):214. doi: 10.4306/jknpa.2014.53.4.214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Krinner L.M., Warren-Findlow J., Bowling J. Examining the role of childhood adversity on excess alcohol intake and tobacco exposure among US College Students. Substance Use & Misuse. 2020;55(13):2087–2098. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1790009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kwon M., Kim D.-J., Cho H., Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(12):e83558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Labrague L.J., Santos J.A.A. COVID-19 anxiety among front-line nurses: Predictive role of organisational support, personal resilience and social support. Journal of Nursing Management. 2020;28(7):1653–1661. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lachmann B., Sindermann C., Sariyska R.Y., Luo R., Melchers M.C., Becker B.…Montag C. The role of empathy and life satisfaction in internet and smartphone use disorder. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lambert N.M., Stillman T.F., Hicks J.A., Kamble S., Baumeister R.F., Fincham F.D. To belong is to matter: Sense of belonging enhances meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2013;39(11):1418–1427. doi: 10.1177/0146167213499186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lasota A., Tomaszek K., Bosacki S. Empathy, gratitude, and resilience – Does gender make a difference? Anales de Psicología. 2020;36(3):521–532. doi: 10.6018/analesps.391541. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee E., Lee H. Disaster awareness and coping: Impact on stress, anxiety, and depression. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care. 2019;55(2):311–318. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lepp A., Barkley J.E., Karpinski A.C. The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014;31:343–350. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li H.Y., Cao H., Leung D.Y.P., Mak Y.W. The psychological impacts of a COVID-19 outbreak on college students in China: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(11):3933. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Li Xiaoqing, Hao C. The relationship between parental attachment and mobile phone dependence among chinese rural adolescents: The role of alexithymia and mindfulness. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Li Xiaoshan, Wu H., Meng F., Li L., Wang Y., Zhou M. Relations of COVID-19-Related Stressors and Social Support With Chinese College Students’ Psychological Response During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2020;11:551315. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.551315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu Q., Zhou Z., Niu G., Fan C. Mobile phone addiction and sleep quality in adolescents: Mediation and moderation analyses. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 2017;49(12):1524. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lo Coco G., Salerno L., Franchina V., La Tona A., Di Blasi M., Giordano C. Examining bi-directionality between Fear of Missing Out and problematic smartphone use. A two-wave panel study among adolescents. Addictive Behaviors. 2020;106:106360. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). In Sydney Psychology Foundation (Vol. 2).
  45. Luk T.T., Wang M.P., Shen C., Wan A., Chau P.H., Oliffe J.…Lam T.H. Short version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale in Chinese adults: Psychometric properties, sociodemographic, and health behavioral correlates. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2018;7(4):1157–1165. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Merton R. The Matthew effect in science. Science. 1968;159:56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Miloseva L., Vukosavljevic-Gvozden T., Richter K., Milosev V., Niklewski G. Perceived social support as a moderator between negative life events and depression in adolescence: Implications for prediction and targeted prevention. EPMA Journal. 2017;8(3):237–245. doi: 10.1007/s13167-017-0095-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Nikmanesh Z., Honakzehi F. Examining perceived social support, positive affection, and spirituality, as resilience factors, among boys of drug-dependent fathers. Shiraz E-Medical Journal. 2016;17(12) doi: 10.17795/semj42200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Oei T.P.S., Goh Z. Interactions between risk and protective factors on problem Gambling in Asia. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2015;31(2):557–572. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9440-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pan F., Wang Q., Song L., Ding J., Dai J. A Research on reliability and validity of psychological sense of school membership scale. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2011;19(2):200–202. [Google Scholar]
  51. Peng E.Y.-C., Lee M.-B., Tsai S.-T., Yang C.-C., Morisky D.E., Tsai L.-T.…Lyu S.-Y. Population-based post-crisis psychological distress: An example from the SARS Outbreak in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2010;109(7):524–532. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(10)60087-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Pittman L.D., Richmond A. Academic and psychological functioning in late adolescence: The importance of school belonging. The Journal of Experimental Education. 2007;75(4):270–290. doi: 10.3200/JEXE.75.4.270-292. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Preacher K.J., Rucker D.D., Hayes A.F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2007;42(1):185–227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Richardson G.E. The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2002;58(3):307–321. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Robertson T.W., Yan Z., Rapoza K.A. Is resilience a protective factor of internet addiction? Computers in Human Behavior. 2018;78:255–260. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Samaha M., Hawi N.S. Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;57:321–325. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Shan Z., Deng G., Li J., Li Y., Zhang Y., Zhao Q. Correlational analysis of neck/shoulder pain and low back pain with the use of digital products, physical activity and psychological status among adolescents in Shanghai. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e78109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Shochet I.M., Smith C.L., Furlong M.J., Homel R. A prospective study investigating the impact of school belonging factors on negative affect in adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 2011;40(4):586–595. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2011.581616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Simpson G., Jones K. How important is resilience among family members supporting relatives with traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury? Clinical Rehabilitation. 2013;27(4):367–377. doi: 10.1177/0269215512457961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tian X., Gao Q., Li G., Zou G., Liu C., Kong L., Li P. Resilience is associated with low psychological distress in renal transplant recipients. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2016;39:86–90. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Uchino B.N. Understanding the links between social support and physical health: a life-span perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2009;4(3):236–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. van Deursen A.J.A.M., Bolle C.L., Hegner S.M., Kommers P.A.M. Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;45:411–420. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang P., Lei L., Wang X., Nie J., Chu X., Jin S. The exacerbating role of perceived social support and the “buffering” role of depression in the relation between sensation seeking and adolescent smartphone addiction. Personality and Individual Differences. 2018;130:129–134. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang K., Shi H.-S., Geng F.-L., Zou L.-Q., Tan S.-P., Wang Y.…Chan R.C.K. Cross-cultural validation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale–21 in China. Psychological Assessment. 2016;28(5):e88–e100. doi: 10.1037/pas0000207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang J.-L., Wang H.-Z., Gaskin J., Wang L.-H. The role of stress and motivation in problematic smartphone use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;53:181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang P., Zhao M., Wang X., Xie X., Wang Y., Lei L. Peer relationship and adolescent smartphone addiction: The mediating role of self-esteem and the moderating role of the need to belong. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2017;6(4):708–717. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. (2020, December 16). World Health Organization. https://covid19.who.int/.
  68. Wong T.W., Gao Y., Tam W.W.S. Anxiety among university students during the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong. Stress and Health. 2007;23(1):31–35. doi: 10.1002/smi.1116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. You S., Park M. Resilience Protected against Suicidal Behavior for Men But Not Women in a Community Sample of Older Adults in Korea. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang Meng, Mou N., Tong K., Wu A. Investigation of the Effects of Purpose in Life, Grit, Gratitude, and School Belonging on Mental Distress among Chinese Emerging Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15(10):2147. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang Mingliang, Zhang J., Zhang F., Zhang L., Feng D. Prevalence of psychological distress and the effects of resilience and perceived social support among Chinese college students: Does gender make a difference? Psychiatry Research. 2018;267:409–413. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Children and Youth Services Review are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES