Human iPSC-derived neural stem cells with ALDH5A1 mutation as a model of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency

Xiaodan Chen; Minzhi Peng; Yanna Cai; Chengcheng Zhou; Li Liu

doi:10.1186/s12868-022-00755-3

. 2022 Dec 16;23:77. doi: 10.1186/s12868-022-00755-3

Human iPSC-derived neural stem cells with ALDH5A1 mutation as a model of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency

Xiaodan Chen ¹, Minzhi Peng ¹, Yanna Cai ¹, Chengcheng Zhou ¹, Li Liu ^1,^✉

PMCID: PMC9756581 PMID: 36527006

Abstract

Background

Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADH-D) is an autosomal recessive gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) metabolism disorder that can arise due to ALDH5A1 mutations, resulting in severe, progressive, untreatable neurodegeneration. SSADH-D is primarily studied using simplified models, such as HEK293 cells overexpressing genes of interest, but such overexpression can result in protein aggregation or pathway saturation that may not be representative of actual underlying disease phenotypes.

Methods

We used a CRISPR/Cas9 approach to generate human iPSC cell lines bearing ALDH5A1 mutations. Through screening, two different mutant cell lines, NM_001080.3: c.727_735del (p.L243_S245del) and NM_001080.3: c.730_738del (p.A244_Q246del), were obtained. We induced iPSCs to neural stem cells and analyzed the characteristics of ALDH5A1 mutations in stem cells.

Results

The human iPSC and NSC cell lines presented typical stem cell–like morphology. We found changes in ALDH5A1 expression and GABA accumulation in the different cell lines. In addition, by analyzing the cDNA between the wild-type and the mutant cell lines, we found that the mutant cell lines had a splicing variant.

Conclusions

iPSCs represent a promising in vitro model for SSADH-D that can be used to study early central nervous system developmental alterations and pathogenic mechanisms.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12868-022-00755-3.

Keywords: SSADH-D, Human induced pluripotent stem cells, CRISPR/Cas9, Neural stem cells

Introduction

ALDH5A1 encodes the SSADH protein that is responsible for a step in the breakdown of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), an inhibitory neurotransmitter present in neural cells. ALDH5A1 mutations lead to a rare inborn error in the metabolism of GABA. As a consequence, physiologic fluids from individuals harboring ALDH5A1 mutations accumulate gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), and succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADH-D) occurs. Patients with SSADH-D present with late-infantile to early-childhood onset of slowly progressive neurodegeneration or static encephalopathy [1, 2]. While many researchers have sought to understand this condition, knowledge about many aspects of the pathophysiology of SSADH-D remains insufficient because of the difficulty of establishing a nervous system model [3]. SSADH-D has been studied using simplified models, such as HEK293 cells overexpressing genes of interest. However, overexpression of proteins can result in protein aggregation or pathway saturation that may not represent actual underlying disease phenotypes [3]. Furthermore, dermal fibroblasts of SSADH-D patients have a short life span and low expression levels of SSADH, limiting their application for study. Several animal models of SSADH-D have been reported [4–7], however, making a mouse model is much more expensive and time consuming than obtaining a cell model. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) provide a well-defined source of tissue-specific cells and are invaluable disease modeling tools. Other advantages of iPSCs include their unlimited proliferation and multi-directional differentiation.

In this study, we generated iPSCs with ALDH5A1 mutation as a disease research model of SSADH. NM_001080.3: c.727_735del is a compound heterozygous mutation in ALDH5A1 that we previously reported [8]. We used the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing system to generate mutated hiPSC lines harboring this mutation. A single guide RNAs (sgRNA) targeting ALDH5A1 NM_001080.3: c.727_735del and the ribonucleoprotein Cas9 were used to edit the gene via homologous recombination. The sgRNA was engineered with an endogenous fluorescent reporter-enhanced green fluorescent protein (sgRNA-eGFP). The edited knock-in cell lines expressed the fluorescent reporter that was detectable by flow cytometry and confirmed transfection. Through screening, two different mutant cell lines, NM_001080.3: c.727_735del (p.L243_S245del) and NM_001080.3: c.730_738del (p.A244_Q246del), were obtained. These two cell lines and the control iPSCs were further differentiated into neural stem cells (NSCs). ALDH5A1-mutated cell lines were then used for disease modelling, with the wild-type as the control line. Our results indicated that ALDH5A1 expression significantly increased when iPSCs were induced into NSCs. The absolute amount of GABA in NSCs was less than that in iPSCs. The accumulation rate of GABA in the mutant NSCs was higher than that in the mutant iPSCs. Interestingly, the two cell lines with only one amino acid mutation difference exhibited various characteristic changes when iPSCs were induced to NSCs. This finding suggested that the constructed SSADH disease models in iPSCs will be beneficial for studies on disease mechanisms.

Results

Generation of knock-in hiPSC lines with CRISPR/Cas9 technology

We used a CRISPR/Cas9 editing strategy to engineer a hiPSC line with mutations in the ALDH5A1 locus (Fig. 1A). First, two different sgRNAs were designed in silico using the online CRISPR Design Tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/) [9]. The efficiency of each candidate was tested in vitro using hiPSCs. We evaluated the transfection efficiency by assessing eGFP fluorescence and estimated the editing efficiency via sequencing to single out two sgRNAs. The Cas9 plasmid contained a nonviral vector to express Cas9 protein and an EF1A core promoter sequence flanked by T2A sites. The sgRNA plasmid contained a nonviral vector of gRNA for mammalian cells and the eGFP coding gene with the U6 core promoter sequence flanked by P2A sites.

hiPSCs were transfected with the sgRNA plasmid and an expression vector carrying Cas9 (Fig. 1B) The successfully transfected cells were screened with flow cytometry; the results revealed that secondary sorting improved the acquisition of positive-edited cells. Single hiPSC clones were obtained and amplified to obtain DNA for sequencing (Fig. 1C) and find homozygous mutated hiPSC clones. Whole-genome sequencing confirmed no other significant changes in the mutant cell lines. The target fragment of the ALDH5A1 gene was edited correctly.

The iPSC cell line presented a normal karyotype (Fig. 1E) and was free of mycoplasma. The mutated hiPSC was also confirmed to have a normal karyotype.

Immunofluorescence of iPSCs

The cell line presented typical stem cell-like morphology (data not shown). Immunofluorescence assays showed the expression of the pluripotency markers, such as OCT4, SSEA-4, TRA-1–60, and NANOG (Fig. 1D) in the parental and edited hiPSC lines.

Sox1 and Nestin were expressed in wild-type and mutant NSC lines (Fig. 2A).

mRNA and protein expression levels in iPSC and NSC lines

We next evaluated ALDH5A1 mRNA levels in the iPSC and NSC parental and mutated cell lines (Fig. 2B). The results showed that p.A244_Q246del cells may be more unstable than p.L243_ S245del cells because of the significant difference in ALDH5A1 mRNA between the wild-type and p.A244_ Q246del cells (Fig. 2B); the same result was observed in western blot analyses of iPSC cell lines (Fig. 2D). However, there was only a slight decrease in gene and protein expression of ALDH5A1 in p.L243_ S245del compared with wild-type. And the gene expression increased significantly than that of wild-type when induced to NSCs (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, the expression of ALDH5A1 in NSCs with the same mutation type was also significantly higher than that in iPSCs because of the tissue-specific expression (Fig. 2C).

GABA accumulation in iPSCs and NSCs

We evaluated intracellular GABA accumulation using HPLC (Fig. 2F and G), and the results showed that the GABA accumulation in the two mutant cell lines was higher than that of the wild-type in iPSCs and NSCs. The GABA content in the two iPSC mutant lines was 50% higher than that in wild-type, and levels in NSCs were three-fold higher than the wild-type. Our results showed that differentiation of iPSCs into NSCs led to increased ALDH5A1 expression (Fig. 2C), which may be why the GABA concentration detected in NSCs was generally lower than that of the iPSCs. The p.L243_S245del mutant line had similar (iPSCs) or higher (NSCs) ALDH5A1 RNA expression than wild-type line (Fig. 2B) and similar protein expression (Fig. 2D and E), yet the GABA concentration was higher in both iPSCs and NSCs, indicating that the p.L243_S245del mutant ALDH5A1 protein is less active than the wild-type protein. The p.A244_Q246del iPSCs express significantly less ALDH5A1 protein (Fig. 2D), which explains why the GABA concentration is higher compared with levels in the wild-type. However, the GABA concentration in the p.A244_Q246del line was higher relative to the wild-type line even after differentiation into NSCs, where the protein levels of ALDH5A1 were similar (Fig. 2E). This further suggests that the p.A244_Q246del mutant protein may be less active than the wild-type protein.

mRNA sequence analysis after genome editing in iPSC

Finally, we performed mRNA sequence analysis. In the first round of amplification, we used F1 and R1 primers to amplify the entire mRNA, and the fragment size was 1637 bp. F2-1 sequencing of the A244_Q246del sample was successful, and F2-2 sequencing failed. The F2-1 sequencing result is the range of F2-2 sequencing. There may be splicing variants between the sequences between F2-1 and F2-2. Through analyses of the sequencing results, we found that the A244_Q246del has a large fragment splicing variant, and L243_S245del has 12 base splicing variants (Fig. 3, Table 1).

Fig. 3 — The cDNA sequencing of *ALDH5A1*-mutated iPSC lines (p.L243_S245del and p.A244_Q246del) and the wild-type. A The letters F1, R1, F2-1, F2-2, R2, F3, and R3 indicate the location of each primer for cDNA sequencing. B Comparison of the cDNA sequencing results among two mutant cell lines and the wild type. The mRNA splicing variant detected in L243_S245del results in the deletion of 12 bases in exon 5 and the mRNA splicing variant detected in p.A244_Q246del mutant lacks 545 bases encompassing exons 4 to 6 and parts of exons 3 and 7

Table 1.

Reagents and primers details

Antibodies used for immunocytochemistry Antibody	Dilution	Cat # and RRID
Pluripotency markers
Mouse anti-OCT4	1:200	CST Cat.75463
Rabbit anti-NANOG	1:200	CST Cat.4903 T
Mouse anti-TRA1-60	1:500	Abcam Cat.ab/6288
Mouse anti-SSEA4	1:500	CST Cat.MC813
NSC differentiation markers
Mouse anti-Nestin	1:200	ABcam.Cat.ab18102
Rabbit anti-sox1	1:200	CST Cat.4194 s
Secondary antibodies
Mouse anti-IgG	1:1000	CST Cat.4409
Goat-anti-Rabbit	1:500	Servicebio. Cat.GB25303

Primers	Target	Forward/Reverse primer (5′-3′)
Targeted mutation	ALDH5A1-Exon5	ACGTGACTTTAGCACTAATAAGA	AGAGCTTTTAACACTCTGCTGGA
RT-qPCR Primers	ALDH5A1-RNA-1 (exons 8–10)	GGCACCAGTTATCAAGTTCG	ACTCCACCAAAAGGGCACTC
	ALDH5A1-RNA-2 (exons 3–4)	AGTCATCACCCCGTGGAATTT	GAGAAGGGCGTGTCTTCGG
	ALDH5A1-RNA-3 (exons 5–6)	AGGGGAGGCAATTTGTACTGA	GTGGTGCAACAGGATCTTTCC
	GAPDH	GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC	TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGG
	β-ACTIN	CATGTACGTTGCTATCCAGGC	CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGAT
cDNA sequencing	F1/R1	TTCCTGTCGCCGTCGTTGC	ATCCTACAAGCCCCCGTAACAC
	F2-1	GGTCCTCAAGCAGCCCATA
	F2-2	TTTGTAAAAGCATTCGCCG
	F3	GATGCCGTTTCTAAAGGTGC
	R2		AAAATAACCTGCTAACCCAACATC
	R3		TTACAAGGACTGGATGAGTTCT

Open in a new tab

Discussion

The biochemical hallmark of SSADH-D is an increase in the concentration of GABA and GHB in body fluids, such as blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid. These two substances mainly affect the nervous system. Thus, SSADH-D is often characterized by nervous system lesions [10, 11]. SSADH-D has been studied using simplified model symptoms such as HEK293 cells overexpressing genes of interest, but such overexpression can result in protein aggregation or pathway saturation that may not represent actual underlying disease phenotypes [3]. The short life span of dermal fibroblasts and low expression levels of SSADH in these cells further limit the application of dermal fibroblasts in a patient. Thus, more in vitro approaches with cellular models should be developed. For instance, iPSC models of various diseases have emerged [12–16]. In the present study, we successfully generated two SSADH-D iPSC lines via CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering combined with flow cytometry and a clonal loop. The advantage of this model was that iPSCs can be differentiated into all cell types of the body, especially those representing the target tissue cells, such as NSCs. Through the induction of iPSCs, NSCs harboring wild type and mutant ALDH5A1 showed the characteristic changes of SSADH-D. Comparing the expression of ALDH5A1 and the amount of GABA between iPSCs and NSCs shows an interesting finding (Fig. 2F and G). When iPSCs were induced into NSCs, ALDH5A1 expression increased in the wild type and mutant cells, but the degree of increase differed, and the increase in mutant cell lines was more apparent (Fig. 2C). The GABA accumulation in mutants in NSCs was more pronounced than that of the mutants in iPSC lines (Fig. 2F and G). However, in comparison with NSCs, iPSC likely tolerated higher GABA concentrations. This observation emphasizes that more SSADH was needed to help metabolize GABA in NSCs. GABA accumulation could not be reduced even when the gene expression increased because of ALDH5A1 mutation.

Furthermore, the generation of L243_S245del and A244_Q246del allowed us to conclude about the in vitro function of the splicing region between exons 4 and 5 in ALDH5A1. As shown in Fig. 2B, the expression of the A244_Q246del mutant was only 30%–40% of that of the wild-type before and after iPSCs induced to NSCs. However, the decrease in the ALDH5A1 expression in the L243_S245del mutant (75% of wild-type) in iPSC lines was not statistically significant compared with that in the wild-type. Even after induction, ALDH5A1 expression was higher in the L243_S245del mutant than the wild-type (Fig. 2C). These results showed that although only one amino acid difference existed between these two mutations, the two mutant cell lines harbored different mechanisms affecting protein expression. This hypothesis was tested by sequencing the cDNA of the target gene in the two different mutants. As expected, the A244_Q246del mutant (mutation in exon 5) severely affected RNA splicing, resulting in a 545 bp deletion encompassing exons 4 to 6 and parts of exons 3 and 7 of ALDH5A1 (Fig. 3B). PCR amplification of cDNA obtained from the p.A244_Q246del line using primers F1 and R1 yielded two bands with similar intensities, suggesting similar abundance of the full-length and spliced product (data not shown). L243_S245del only affected the deletion of 12 bases (CTTGCAAGCCAG) in exon 5 (Fig. 3B). Thus, this observation was the fundamental reason for the different changes in ALDH5A1 expression before and after iPSC induction between the two mutant cell lines. Akaboshi et al. [17] concluded that the mutations in a short stretch between aa 223 and 268 (encoded by exons 4 and 5) are not entirely random, and this region in the gene may be vital. This finding was helpful for further studying the functional contribution of the vital region of the ALDH5A1 gene. Therefore, the iPSC disease model may be useful for research on SSADH-D mechanisms.

A correct diagnosis is the first step in treating rare diseases, and it is the basis of disease mechanism research. For rare diseases, the availability of validated samples from patients with a specific disease is usually low, limiting the possibilities of using these samples. iPSC disease models can be differentiated into various target cells because of the pluripotency of iPSCs. In our study, the iPSC disease model was successfully differentiated into NSCs. This model was utilized to detect changes in ALDH5A1 expression and GABA accumulation in two mutant cell lines. This may be a good cell model for drug screening because the therapy-induced reduction of GABA in the periphery may be a vital issue for the development of future therapies for SSADH-D [18].

In conclusion, CRISPR-based genome editing of iPSCs shows potential for future studies on the pathogenicity of diseases. Our research demonstrated that iPSCs could be helpful for SSADH-D disease modelling.

Materials and methods

Cell line

The hiPSC line (DYR0100), derived from a human prepuce cell of a healthy boy donor, and was procured from Hunan Fenghui Biotechnology Company (ATCC-ACS-1011TM).

Gene editing

sgRNA design and testing

sgRNAs were designed in silico using the CRISPR Design Tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/). The sgRNAs were designed to target the NM_001080.3: c.727_735del region of ALDH5A1. Two sgRNAs with a high fraction of efficacy were selected. The two oligonucleotides for sgRNAs were cloned into two VB UltraStable competent cells. The sgRNA1 sequence was: 5′-TATAGCTTGCAAGCCAGGCT-3′, and the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequence was GGG. The sgRNA2 sequence was: 5′-TTATAGCTTGCAAGCCAGGC-3′, and the PAM sequence was TGG.

hiPSC cells (300,000/well) were plated in a 6-well culture plate. On the following day, the cells were transfected with 2 µg sgRNA1 and Cas9-carrying plasmid using DNA Lipofectamine™ Stem transfection reagent (ThermoFisher, Cat# STEM00003). Cells were cultured for 24 h and then screened by flow cytometry (BD FACS Aria SORP, USA). sgRNA1 was more efficient than sgRNA2, and they had editorial effects.

ssDNA for homologous directed repair

Single-stranded donor oligonucleotides were synthesized by Vector Builder and provided at 10 µM concentrations. The sequence was TTTTTTTTTTTTTTCAGTTTGGTAAATTTTGGCAAGTTTGCTTTTCTCTTTATAGCAGGCTGG GATTCCTTCAGGTGTATACAATGTTTTCCCTGTTCTCGAAAGAATGCCAAGGA. At the time of transfection, 2 µl was added to each well of the 6-well plate.

Cell culture

hiPSCs culture and transfection

hiPSCs were cultured in a PGM1 medium (Cellapy, CAT# CA3001500) with 0.5% Plasmocin prophylactic on matrix-coated (Corning Matrigel hESC-Qualified) plate and maintained at 37 °C in humidified air with 5% CO₂. Cells were passaged with Cellapy Cell Dissociation Reagent (Stem cell, CAT# 07174) every 3–4 days and plated at a density of 2 × 10⁴ cells/cm² with a split ratio of around 1:6. During cell generation, 10 µM Y-27632 (STEMCELL Technologies, CAT# 72,302) was added.

Cells were transfected with a complex formed with the Cas9 plasmid (VB190801_1165nbd) and two sgRNA plasmids (VB190801-1166xkk and VB190801-1168fdu), constructed by VectorBuilder, using Lipofectamine Stem transfection reagent (Invitrogen, CAT #STEM00001).

The detailed steps were as follows:

Steps	Tube	Component	Per well of a 6-well plate
1	1	Opti-MEM™ I Medium	100 µl
1	1	Lipofectamine™ Stem Reagent	4 µl
2	2	Opti-MEM™ I Medium	100 µl
2	2	DNA	2 µg*
3	Add diluted DNA to diluted Lipofectamine Stem Reagent
4	Incubate for 10 min at room temperature
5	Add DNA-lipid complex to cells (200 µl/per well)
6	Incubate and monitor the transfected stem cells at 37 °C for 2 days

Open in a new tab

*Equimolar amounts of Cas9 plasmid DNA and gRNA plasmid DNA were added

Screening of positive clones with targeted homozygosity

After 48 h of transfection, the cells were harvested with StemPro Accutase (Stem Cell, CAT. #At-104) and sorted on a BD FACS Aria SORP (BD Biosciences). eGFP-positive cells were collected, re-sorted to remove false-positive cells, and cultured in 12-well plates. For homologous directed repair screening, 1 week after cultivation, a portion of the cells of each colony was removed and DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) for PCR amplification and sequencing. Sequencing results confirmed successful editing and cells were selected in a 10-cm dish by clone ring (Sigma, Aldrich, CAT# C7983-50EA).

Chromosome analysis and whole-genome sequencing for iPSC

Cultured cells were incubated in 50 ng/ml colcemide solution (Gibco, CAT# 15210–040) for 1 h, subjected to hypotonic treatment in 0.075 M KCl for 20 min at 37 °C, fixed with Carnoy solution (3:1 v/v methanol/acetic acid) twice for 20 min each and spread on a wet cooled microscopic slide with a plastic transfer pipette to obtain chromosome preparations for karyotype analysis. After the specimen was air-dried, the slide was incubated on a heating plate at 82 °C for 2.5 h. After 10 min of Giemsa staining, changes in karyotype were observed under a phase-contrast microscope.

The two successfully edited homozygous cell lines and the unedited cell lines were sent to BGI for genome-wide sequencing to confirm that no undesired editing was present in the cell lines.

Immunofluorescence staining

The cells were fixed in 4% PFA for 20 min and washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were permeabilized with 1 ml of 0.5% Triton-X 100 for 20 min and blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies (against OCT4, TRA-1–60, SSEA, and NANOG) at 4 °C for overnight and then washed three times with PBS. Cells were then incubated with secondary antibodies in the dark at room temperature for 2 h. Nuclei were stained with 0.5 µg/ml DAPI, and images were acquired with a ZOE fluorescence cell imager (Bio-Rad).

Induction and identification of NSCs

iPSC Neural Induction Medium (Gibco, CAT# A1647801) was used to differentiate human iPSCs into NSCs following the manufacturer’s instructions. The staining was performed to identify NSCs as in Section above. Primary antibodies were Sox1 and Nestin antibodies.

Real-time PCR analysis

Total mRNA was extracted from cells by Trizol (Invitrogen). First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed on 1 µg of the total RNA. Real-time PCR for ALDH5A1, GAPDH and β-ACTIN was performed using ChamQ™ Universal SYBR-qPCR Master Mix (version7.1, Vazyme); reactions were performed in triplicate. The following primers were used for gene detection: ALDH5A1-1, forward 5′ -GGC ACC AGT TAT CAA GTT CG-3′ and reverse 5′ -ACT CCA AAA GGG CAC TC-3′; ALDH5A1-2, forward 5′ -AGT CAT CAC CCC GTG GAA TTT-3′ and reverse 5′-GAG AAG GGC GTG TCT TCG G-3′; ALDH5A1-3, forward 5′-AGG GGA GGC AAT TTG TAC TGA-3′ and reverse 5′-GTG GTG CAA CAG GAT CTT TCC-3′; GAPDH, forward 5′-GCACCGTCA AGG CTG AGA AC-3′ and reverse 5′-TGG TGA AGA CGC CAGTGG A-3′; and β-ACTIN, forward 5′–3′ CATGTACGTTGCTATCCAGGC and reverse 5′–3′ CTCCTTAATGTCACGCACGAT (Table 1). The target gene (ALDH5A1) expression levels were calculated using the comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method with the following formula: ΔCt = Ct (gene of interest) − Ct (GAPDH and β-ACTIN); the 2^−ΔΔCt was calculated with the following formula: ΔΔCt = ΔCt (control group) − ΔCt (experimental group) to determine the relative expression. In each experiment, each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The result of β-ACTIN is not show in the figure.

Western blot

Cells were lysed with RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Beijing, China) containing 1% PMSF (Beyotime, Beijing, China). Protein (15 μg) was loaded on 10% SDS-PAGE gels for electrophoresis and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk in TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 for 1.5 h at room temperature and then incubated with antibody for SSADH (AffinitY, Cat# DF12820) and β-actin (Multi Sciences, Hangzhou, China) at 4 °C overnight. The membranes were then incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Multi Sciences, Hangzhou, China) for 2 h at room temperature. Signals were detected using film by darkroom exposure (Servicebio, G2019, China). In each experiment, each sample run on the SDS-PAGE gel in duplicate.

High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS)

GABA in iPSC and NSC cell lines was determined with HPLC–MS/MS, as previously described [19]. The samples used were total protein obtained by two duplicate experiments (n = 2).

cDNA sequencing

RNA from wild-type and mutant cell lines was extracted and reverse transcribed to cDNA. cDNA was amplified using the following primers: F1: TTCCTGTCGCCGTCGTTGC, R1: ATCCTACAAGCCCCCGTAACAC. For segmented sequencing analysis, we used the following primers: F2-1: GGTCCTCAAGCAGCCCATA, F2-2: TTTGTAAAAGCATTCGCCG, R2: AAAATAACCTGCTAACCCAACATC; F3: GATGCCGTTTCTAAAGGTGC, and R3: TTACAAGGACTGGATGAGTTCTG. The locations of the primers are shown in Fig. 3. (Table 1).

Supplementary Information

12868_2022_755_MOESM1_ESM.tif^{(274.1KB, tif)}

Additional file 1: full-length blot gels are presented in Supplementary Figure 2D.

12868_2022_755_MOESM2_ESM.tif^{(281.8KB, tif)}

Additional file 2: full-length blot gels are presented in Supplementary Figure 2E.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

LL contributed to the conception of the article. XC contributed to the study's design and drafted and revised the manuscript. YC and CZ contributed to the acquisition of data. Minzhi Peng contributed to the analysis of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Fund support from Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Grant/Award Number: YIP-2019-003.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the Clinvar repository, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar, Submission ID: SUB11566734].

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were following the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

1.Pearl PL, Gibson K, Acosta M, Vezina L, Theodore W, Rogawski MA, Novotny E, Gropman A, Conry J, Berry G. Clinical spectrum of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Neurology. 2003;60(9):1413–1417. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000059549.70717.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Malaspina P, Picklo MJ, Jakobs C, Snead OC, Gibson KM. Comparative genomics of aldehyde dehydrogenase 5a1 (succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase) and accumulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate associated with its deficiency. Hum Genomics. 2009;3(2):1–15. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-3-2-106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Didiasova M, Banning A, Brennenstuhl H, Jung-Klawitter S, Cinquemani C, Opladen T, Tikkanen R. Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency: an update. Cells. 2020;9(2):477. doi: 10.3390/cells9020477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Vogel KR, Ainslie GR, Jansen EE, Salomons GS, Roullet J-B, Gibson KM. In vitro modeling of experimental succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADHD) using brain-derived neural stem cells. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0186919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Gibson K, Jakobs C, Pearl P, Snead O. Murine succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (SSADH) deficiency, a heritable disorder of GABA metabolism with epileptic phenotype. IUBMB Life. 2005;57(9):639–644. doi: 10.1080/15216540500264588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Brown M, Turgeon C, Rinaldo P, Roullet J-B, Gibson KM. Temporal metabolomics in dried bloodspots suggests multipathway disruptions in aldh5a1−/− mice, a model of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2019;128(4):397–408. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2019.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Lee HH, McGinty GE, Pearl PL, Rotenberg A. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADHD): towards the development of SSADH-targeted medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(5):2606. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Chen XD, Lin YT, Jiang MY, Li XZ, Li D, Hu H, Liu L. Novel mutations in a Chinese family with two patients with succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36(10):929–933. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1744555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, Agarwala V, Scott DA, Zhang F. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(11):2281–2308. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Knerr I, Gibson KM, Murdoch G, Salomons GS, Jakobs C, Combs S, Pearl PL. Neuropathology in succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Pediatr Neurol. 2010;42(4):255–258. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Malaspina P, Roullet J-B, Pearl P, Ainslie G, Vogel K, Gibson K. Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADHD): pathophysiological complexity and multifactorial trait associations in a rare monogenic disorder of GABA metabolism. Neurochem Int. 2016;99:72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Überbacher C, Obergasteiger J, Volta M, Venezia S, Müller S, Pesce I, Pizzi S, Lamonaca G, Picard A, Cattelan G. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 editing and digital droplet PCR in human iPSCs to generate novel knock-in reporter lines to visualize dopaminergic neurons. Stem Cell Res. 2019;41:101656. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Dannenmann B, Nasri M, Welte K, Skokowa J. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of human-induced pluripotent stem cells followed by granulocytic differentiation. In: Sioud M, editor. RNA Interference and CRISPR Technologies. New York: Springer; 2020. pp. 471–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Benetó N, Cozar M, Gort i Mas L, Pacheco L, Vilageliu i Arqués L, Grinberg Vaisman DR, Canals Montferrer I. Generation of two NAGLU-mutated homozygous cell lines from healthy induced pluripotent stem cells using CRISPR/Cas9 to model Sanfilippo B syndrome. Stem Cell Res. 2019;42:101668. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Yoshimura Y, Yamanishi A, Kamitani T, Kim J-S, Takeda J. Generation of targeted homozygosity in the genome of human induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(12):e0225740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Kachamakova-Trojanowska N, Stepniewski J, Dulak J. Human iPSCs-derived endothelial cells with mutation in HNF1A as a model of maturity-onset diabetes of the young. Cells. 2019;8(11):1440. doi: 10.3390/cells8111440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Akaboshi S, Hogema BM, Novelletto A, Malaspina P, Salomons GS, Maropoulos GD, Jakobs C, Grompe M, Gibson KM. Mutational spectrum of the succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH5A1) gene and functional analysis of 27 novel disease-causing mutations in patients with SSADH deficiency. Hum Mutat. 2003;22(6):442–450. doi: 10.1002/humu.10288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Gupta M, Jansen EE, Senephansiri H, Jakobs C, Snead OC, Grompe M, Gibson KM. Liver-directed adenoviral gene transfer in murine succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Mol Ther. 2004;9(4):527–539. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Peng M-Z, Cai Y-N, Shao Y-X, Zhao L, Jiang M-Y, Lin Y-T, Yin X, Sheng H-Y, Liu L. Simultaneous quantification of 48 plasma amino acids by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to investigate urea cycle disorders. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;495:406–416. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12868_2022_755_MOESM1_ESM.tif^{(274.1KB, tif)}

Additional file 1: full-length blot gels are presented in Supplementary Figure 2D.

12868_2022_755_MOESM2_ESM.tif^{(281.8KB, tif)}

Additional file 2: full-length blot gels are presented in Supplementary Figure 2E.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available in the Clinvar repository, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar, Submission ID: SUB11566734].

[CR1] 1.Pearl PL, Gibson K, Acosta M, Vezina L, Theodore W, Rogawski MA, Novotny E, Gropman A, Conry J, Berry G. Clinical spectrum of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Neurology. 2003;60(9):1413–1417. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000059549.70717.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR2] 2.Malaspina P, Picklo MJ, Jakobs C, Snead OC, Gibson KM. Comparative genomics of aldehyde dehydrogenase 5a1 (succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase) and accumulation of gamma-hydroxybutyrate associated with its deficiency. Hum Genomics. 2009;3(2):1–15. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-3-2-106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR3] 3.Didiasova M, Banning A, Brennenstuhl H, Jung-Klawitter S, Cinquemani C, Opladen T, Tikkanen R. Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency: an update. Cells. 2020;9(2):477. doi: 10.3390/cells9020477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Vogel KR, Ainslie GR, Jansen EE, Salomons GS, Roullet J-B, Gibson KM. In vitro modeling of experimental succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADHD) using brain-derived neural stem cells. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0186919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR5] 5.Gibson K, Jakobs C, Pearl P, Snead O. Murine succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (SSADH) deficiency, a heritable disorder of GABA metabolism with epileptic phenotype. IUBMB Life. 2005;57(9):639–644. doi: 10.1080/15216540500264588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR6] 6.Brown M, Turgeon C, Rinaldo P, Roullet J-B, Gibson KM. Temporal metabolomics in dried bloodspots suggests multipathway disruptions in aldh5a1−/− mice, a model of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2019;128(4):397–408. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2019.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.Lee HH, McGinty GE, Pearl PL, Rotenberg A. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADHD): towards the development of SSADH-targeted medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(5):2606. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.Chen XD, Lin YT, Jiang MY, Li XZ, Li D, Hu H, Liu L. Novel mutations in a Chinese family with two patients with succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2020;36(10):929–933. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1744555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, Agarwala V, Scott DA, Zhang F. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(11):2281–2308. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR10] 10.Knerr I, Gibson KM, Murdoch G, Salomons GS, Jakobs C, Combs S, Pearl PL. Neuropathology in succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Pediatr Neurol. 2010;42(4):255–258. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR11] 11.Malaspina P, Roullet J-B, Pearl P, Ainslie G, Vogel K, Gibson K. Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADHD): pathophysiological complexity and multifactorial trait associations in a rare monogenic disorder of GABA metabolism. Neurochem Int. 2016;99:72–84. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Überbacher C, Obergasteiger J, Volta M, Venezia S, Müller S, Pesce I, Pizzi S, Lamonaca G, Picard A, Cattelan G. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 editing and digital droplet PCR in human iPSCs to generate novel knock-in reporter lines to visualize dopaminergic neurons. Stem Cell Res. 2019;41:101656. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR13] 13.Dannenmann B, Nasri M, Welte K, Skokowa J. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of human-induced pluripotent stem cells followed by granulocytic differentiation. In: Sioud M, editor. RNA Interference and CRISPR Technologies. New York: Springer; 2020. pp. 471–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.Benetó N, Cozar M, Gort i Mas L, Pacheco L, Vilageliu i Arqués L, Grinberg Vaisman DR, Canals Montferrer I. Generation of two NAGLU-mutated homozygous cell lines from healthy induced pluripotent stem cells using CRISPR/Cas9 to model Sanfilippo B syndrome. Stem Cell Res. 2019;42:101668. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR15] 15.Yoshimura Y, Yamanishi A, Kamitani T, Kim J-S, Takeda J. Generation of targeted homozygosity in the genome of human induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(12):e0225740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR16] 16.Kachamakova-Trojanowska N, Stepniewski J, Dulak J. Human iPSCs-derived endothelial cells with mutation in HNF1A as a model of maturity-onset diabetes of the young. Cells. 2019;8(11):1440. doi: 10.3390/cells8111440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.Akaboshi S, Hogema BM, Novelletto A, Malaspina P, Salomons GS, Maropoulos GD, Jakobs C, Grompe M, Gibson KM. Mutational spectrum of the succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH5A1) gene and functional analysis of 27 novel disease-causing mutations in patients with SSADH deficiency. Hum Mutat. 2003;22(6):442–450. doi: 10.1002/humu.10288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.Gupta M, Jansen EE, Senephansiri H, Jakobs C, Snead OC, Grompe M, Gibson KM. Liver-directed adenoviral gene transfer in murine succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Mol Ther. 2004;9(4):527–539. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2004.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR19] 19.Peng M-Z, Cai Y-N, Shao Y-X, Zhao L, Jiang M-Y, Lin Y-T, Yin X, Sheng H-Y, Liu L. Simultaneous quantification of 48 plasma amino acids by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to investigate urea cycle disorders. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;495:406–416. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Human iPSC-derived neural stem cells with ALDH5A1 mutation as a model of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency

Xiaodan Chen

Minzhi Peng

Yanna Cai

Chengcheng Zhou

Li Liu

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Supplementary Information

Introduction

Results

Generation of knock-in hiPSC lines with CRISPR/Cas9 technology

Fig. 1.

Immunofluorescence of iPSCs

Fig. 2.

mRNA and protein expression levels in iPSC and NSC lines

GABA accumulation in iPSCs and NSCs

mRNA sequence analysis after genome editing in iPSC

Fig. 3.

Table 1.

Discussion

Materials and methods

Cell line

Gene editing

sgRNA design and testing

ssDNA for homologous directed repair

Cell culture

hiPSCs culture and transfection

Screening of positive clones with targeted homozygosity

Chromosome analysis and whole-genome sequencing for iPSC

Immunofluorescence staining

Induction and identification of NSCs

Real-time PCR analysis

Western blot

High-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS)

cDNA sequencing

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Funding

Availability of data and materials

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Footnotes

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases