Skip to main content
Cancer Communications logoLink to Cancer Communications
. 2022 Nov 9;42(12):1403–1406. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12378

Lymphatic metastasis in non‐small cell lung cancer: recent discoveries and novel therapeutic targets

Xiayao Diao 1, Chao Guo 1, Shanqing Li 1,
PMCID: PMC9759757  PMID: 36353797

List of abbreviations

NSCLC

non‐small cell lung cancer

LEC

lymphatic endothelial cell

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

VEGFR

vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

PGDH

prostaglandin dehydrogenase

CCBE‐1

collagen and calcium‐binding EGF domain‐1

CCR7

C‐C motif chemokine receptor 7

CCL21

C‐C motif chemokine ligand 21

CXCR4

C‐X‐C motif chemokine receptor 4

IL

interleukin

EV

extracellular vesicle

AGAP2‐AS1

AGAP2 antisense RNA 1

sVEGFR‐2

soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2

miRNA

microRNA

MMP‐2

matrix metalloproteinase‐2

MMP‐9

matrix metalloproteinase‐9

PTEN

phosphatase and tensin homolog

1. LYMPHATIC METASTASIS AND LYMPHANGIOGENESIS IN NON‐SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

Lung cancer is the 2nd most common and 1st deadliest cancer worldwide [1]. It presents an enormous burden on society in China, because of its high incidence and mortality rate [2, 3]. About 80%‐85% of lung cancers are non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lymphatic metastasis is a critical event in disease progression that influences clinical treatment and determines the prognosis for NSCLC [4].

Unlike the tightly joined smooth muscle cells and pericytes that make up the walls of blood vessels, lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) of lymphatic capillaries loosely overlap due to the lack of a complete basement membrane. Due to the high interstitial pressure in tumor tissues and the loose structure of lymphatic capillaries, initial lymphatics are considered the most accessible route for tumor metastasis [5]. Tumors were found to acquire the characteristics of lymphatic metastasis mainly in two ways. One of them is that tumor cells passively enter the lymphatic system through the existing lymphatic vessels. Another is that tumor cells actively mediate the remodeling of the lymphatic system to escape from the primary site, and lymphangiogenesis plays a pivotal role in this lymphatic metastasis way [6].

Lymphangiogenesis has been observed in several cancer types, including NSCLC. It is an indispensable procedure involving lymphatic metastasis in NSCLC progression. Here, we outlined current understanding of the dysregulation of lymphangiogenic factors in NSCLC and discussed potential therapeutic strategies that target these factors during NSCLC progression.

2. MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF LYMPHATIC METASTASIS AND LYMPHANGIOGENESIS IN NON‐SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

Several molecular mechanisms of lymphatic metastasis have been reported in lung cancer. Here, we highlighted some growth factors, inflammation factors, and extracellular vesicle components associated with NSCLC lymphatic metastasis and tumor‐associated lymphangiogenesis.

The members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family are not only key regulators of tumor angiogenesis but also key mediators of tumor lymphangiogenesis. The VEGF‐C/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)‐3 and VEGF‐D/VEGFR‐3 axes are the main drivers of tumor lymphangiogenesis [7]. In addition, some molecules can also play important roles in tumor lymphangiogenesis by regulating VEGF‐C/VEGFR‐3 or VEGF‐D/VEGFR‐3 axes. For instance, prostaglandin dehydrogenase (PGDH) can also enhance VEGF‐D‐mediated lymphangiogenesis by increasing prostaglandin synthesis [8]. Moreover, collagen and calcium‐binding EGF domain‐1 (CCBE‐1) can enhance the proteolysis of VEGF‐C to promote tube formation and migration of LECs [9]. Therefore, VEGF‐C/D acts as a primary hub of tumor lymphangiogenesis. Other lymphangiogenic factors have also been identified currently, including fibroblast growth factor [10], platelet‐derived growth factor [11], hepatocyte growth factor [12], epidermal growth factor [13], angiopoietins [14] and so on.

Apart from the lymphangiogenic factors mentioned above, some inflammatory factors, such as chemokines, cytokines and their receptors, also serve essential functions in the lymphatic metastasis of lung cancer. C‐C motif chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) is known to promote lymphatic metastasis of NSCLC cells. Sun et al. [15] found a strong positive correlation between lymphangiogenic factor VEGF‐D and C‐C motif chemokine ligand 21 (CCL21)/CCR7 chemokine axis. They found that CCL21/CCR7 drives lymphangiogenesis in NSCLC by inducing VEGF‐D up‐regulation via ERK/Akt pathway. In addition, Feng et al. [16] specifically knockdown the expression of VEGF‐C in NSCLC cell lines and found that C‐X‐C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and CCR7 were involved in NSCLC progression by promoting lymphangiogenesis. By comparing the highly metastatic tumors to low metastatic counterparts, Watari et al. [17] found that interleukin (IL)‐1α‐driven lymphangiogenesis provided a pre‐metastatic niche favorable for lymphatic metastasis through cross‐talk with tumor‐associated macrophages.

Secreted factors have long been recognized as key regulators of lymphangiogenesis. With the discovery of the emerging roles of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in cancer biology, especially in tumor angiogenesis, EVs are gradually becoming the focal point of studies related to tumor lymphangiogenesis. EV‐microRNAs (miRNAs) have proved to be key diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of lymphatic metastasis in lung cancer. For instance, the overexpression of EV‐miR‐106b in serum was frequently observed in NSCLC patients with lymphatic metastasis. It promotes lymphatic metastasis by upregulating the expression of matrix metalloproteinase‐2/matrix metalloproteinase‐9 (MMP‐2/MMP‐9) and downregulating phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) [18]. Additionally, EV‐miR‐378 upregulation has been reported to indicate lymphatic metastasis in NSCLC [19]. EV‐miR‐203a‐3p was also shown to be significantly increased in lymph node‐positive NSCLC patients [20]. Moreover, uregulated EV‐derived circular RNAs and long non‐coding RNAs, such as circR‐0056285 and AGAP2 antisense RNA 1 (AGAP2‐AS1), have been explored to diagnose lymphatic metastasis in NSCLC [21, 22]. These findings indicated the potency of EVs as tools for understanding the pathology and improving clinical management of lung cancer.

3. TARGETED THERAPY AGAINST LYMPHATIC METASTASIS IN NON‐SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

The systemic treatment for lymph node‐positive NSCLC patients has dramatically changed in the last decade. In addition to chemotherapy, targeted treatment and immunotherapy have been widely used in lymph node‐positive NSCLC. Although these treatment options were shown to greatly impact the short‐term survival of NSCLC, the low response rate and easy development of drug resistance seriously affect the long‐term survival of patients with NSCLC. Targeted treatment specific to NSCLC lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis have received great attentions.

To date, anti‐lymphangiogenic therapy of NSCLC is still in the initial stage. Qin et al. [23] retrospectively analyzed the incidence of new metastatic lesions in advanced NSCLC patients treated with anlotinib, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. They found that anlotinib significantly suppressed new metastatic lesion formation in patients with advanced NSCLC (new metastatic lesion rate: 18.18% in anlotinib arm vs. 31.82% in the placebo arm). Their study further revealed a critical role for anlotinib in lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis in NSCLC mouse models. They reported that anlotinib inhibited human LECs growth, migration, and lymphangiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo by disrupting the phosphorylation of VEGFR‐3. This study provides new insights into the promising therapeutic potential of anlotinib in the treatment aimed at lymphatic metastasis in NSCLC.

Although there is a lack of treatment data on NSCLC, some factors may be promising targets for lymph node‐positive NSCLC. The introduction of soluble VEGFR‐2 (sVEGFR‐2), one of the receptors of the VEGF family, inhibited lymphangiogenesis and suppressed lymphatic metastasis in NSCLC mouse models by inhibiting VEGF‐C [24]. In recent years, inhibitors targeting other molecules are also being investigated in the lymphangiogenesis of NSCLC. Itraconazole, a potent inhibitor of endothelial cell proliferation, was reported to play a key role in NSCLC mice with malignant pleural effusion by suppressing lymphangiogenesis, demonstrating the potential of itraconazole in treating patients with lymph node‐positive NSCLC [25]. However, more clinical trials are warranted to confirm its efficacy in NSCLC.

4. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Lymphatic metastasis is a key prognostic factor in NSCLC. The treatment of lymph node‐positive NSCLC patients is important in clinical practice. Current studies focused on the molecular mechanisms of lymphatic metastasis have greatly improved the discovery of therapeutic targets. Future studies will focus on investigating more precise drugs aimed at lymphatic metastasis in NSCLC and identifying predictive biomarkers for lymph node‐positive NSCLC.

Targeted therapy aimed at lymphatic metastasis in lung cancer is still in its infancy. Existing inhibitors of lymphangiogenesis remain to be verified in lung cancer. Nanoparticles targeting key exosome components will become novel and promising therapeutic strategies in lung cancer. As more and more therapeutic targets being discovered, the therapeutic effects of targeted drugs on lymphatic metastasis in lung cancer are worth further investigation.

DECLARATIONS

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors contributed substantially to the conception of this work and drafted the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The author declares no competing interests.

FUNDING

This study was supported by the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (Grant No. 2022‐PUMCH‐A‐259) and the CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine (Grant No. 2021‐I2M‐1‐015).

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

Not applicable.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Not applicable.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Not applicable.

Diao X, Guo C, Li S. Lymphatic metastasis in non‐small cell lung cancer: recent discoveries and novel therapeutic targets. Cancer Commun. 2022;42:1403–1406. 10.1002/cac2.12378

Contributor Information

Xiayao Diao, Email: pumc_diaoxy@student.pumc.edu.cn.

Chao Guo, Email: guochao@pumch.cn.

Shanqing Li, Email: lishanqing@pumch.cn.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. Ca‐Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Qiu H, Cao S, Xu R. Cancer incidence, mortality, and burden in China: a time‐trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2021;41(10):1037–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cao M, Li H, Sun D, Chen W. Cancer burden of major cancers in China: A need for sustainable actions. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2020;40(5):205–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sun J, Wu S, Jin Z, Ren S, Cho WC, Zhu C, et al. Lymph node micrometastasis in non‐small cell lung cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;149:112817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Tang WF, Fu R, Liang Y, Lin JS, Qiu ZB, Wu YL, et al. Genomic Evolution of Lung Cancer Metastasis: Current Status and Perspectives. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021;41(12):1252–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Stacker SA, Williams SP, Karnezis T, Shayan R, Fox SB, Achen MG. Lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel remodelling in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(3):159–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Tammela T, Alitalo K. Lymphangiogenesis: Molecular mechanisms and future promise. Cell. 2010;140(4):460–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Karnezis T, Shayan R, Caesar C, Roufail S, Harris NC, Ardipradja K, et al. VEGF‐D promotes tumor metastasis by regulating prostaglandins produced by the collecting lymphatic endothelium. Cancer Cell. 2012;21(2):181–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Song J, Chen W, Cui X, Huang Z, Wen D, Yang Y, et al. CCBE1 promotes tumor lymphangiogenesis and is negatively regulated by TGFbeta signaling in colorectal cancer. Theranostics. 2020;10(5):2327–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cao R, Ji H, Feng N, Zhang Y, Yang X, Andersson P, et al. Collaborative interplay between FGF‐2 and VEGF‐C promotes lymphangiogenesis and metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(39):15894–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cadamuro M, Brivio S, Mertens J, Vismara M, Moncsek A, Milani C, et al. Platelet‐derived growth factor‐D enables liver myofibroblasts to promote tumor lymphangiogenesis in cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2019;70(4):700–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Cao R, Björndahl MA, Gallego MI, Chen S, Religa P, Hansen AJ, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor is a lymphangiogenic factor with an indirect mechanism of action. Blood. 2006;107(9):3531–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Bracher A, Cardona AS, Tauber S, Fink AM, Steiner A, Pehamberger H, et al. Epidermal growth factor facilitates melanoma lymph node metastasis by influencing tumor lymphangiogenesis. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(1):230–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Holopainen T, Saharinen P, D'Amico G, Lampinen A, Eklund L, Sormunen R, et al. Effects of angiopoietin‐2‐blocking antibody on endothelial cell‐cell junctions and lung metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(6):461–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sun L, Zhang Q, Li Y, Tang N, Qiu X. CCL21/CCR7 up‐regulate vascular endothelial growth factor‐D expression via ERK pathway in human non‐small cell lung cancer cells. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(12):15729–38. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Feng Y, Hu J, Ma J, Feng K, Zhang X, Yang S, et al. RNAi‐mediated silencing of VEGF‐C inhibits non‐small cell lung cancer progression by simultaneously down‐regulating the CXCR4, CCR7, VEGFR‐2 and VEGFR‐3‐dependent axes‐induced ERK, p38 and AKT signalling pathways. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(15):2353–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Watari K, Shibata T, Kawahara A, Sata K, Nabeshima H, Shinoda A, et al. Tumor‐derived interleukin‐1 promotes lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis through M2‐type macrophages. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sun S, Chen H, Xu C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Chen L, et al. Exosomal miR‐106b serves as a novel marker for lung cancer and promotes cancer metastasis via targeting PTEN. Life Sci. 2020;244:117297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhang Y, Xu H. Serum exosomal miR‐378 upregulation is associated with poor prognosis in non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(6):e23237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Han B, Molins L, He Y, Vinolas N, Sanchez‐Lorente D, Boada M, et al. Characterization of the MicroRNA Cargo of Extracellular Vesicles Isolated from a Pulmonary Tumor‐Draining Vein Identifies miR‐203a‐3p as a Relapse Biomarker for Resected Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(13). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Xian J, Su W, Liu L, Rao B, Lin M, Feng Y, et al. Identification of Three Circular RNA Cargoes in Serum Exosomes as Diagnostic Biomarkers of Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer in the Chinese Population. The J Mol Diagn: JMD. 2020;22(8):1096–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tao Y, Tang Y, Yang Z, Wu F, Wang L, Yang L, et al. Exploration of Serum Exosomal LncRNA TBILA and AGAP2‐AS1 as Promising Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(3):471–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Qin T, Liu Z, Wang J, Xia J, Liu S, Jia Y, et al. Anlotinib suppresses lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma through a process potentially involving VEGFR‐3 signaling. Cancer Biol Med. 2020;17(3):753–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Maehana S, Nakamura M, Ogawa F, Imai R, Murakami R, Kojima F, et al. Suppression of lymphangiogenesis by soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 in a mouse lung cancer model. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016;84:660–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wang Y, Yao Y, Liu H, Ma X, Lv T, Yuan D, et al. Itraconazole can inhibit malignant pleural effusion by suppressing lymphangiogenesis in mice. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015;4(1):27–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Cancer Communications are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES