Abstract
Suboptimal nutrient and water availability are primary constraints to crop growth. Global agriculture requires crops with greater nutrient and water efficiency. Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma (MCS), a root anatomical trait characterized by small cells with thick cell walls encrusted with lignin in the outer cortex, has been shown to be an important trait for adaptation in maize and wheat in mechanically impeded soils. However, MCS has the potential to improve edaphic stress tolerance in a number of different crop taxa and in a number of different environments. This review explores the functional implications of MCS as an adaptive trait for water and nutrient acquisition and discusses future research perspectives on this trait for incorporation into crop breeding programs. For example, MCS may influence water and nutrient uptake, resistance to pests, symbiotic interactions, microbial interactions in the rhizosphere and soil carbon deposition. Root anatomical phenotypes are underutilized; however, important breeding targets for the development of efficient, productive and resilient crops urgently needed in global agriculture.
Keywords: Anatomy, cortex, edaphic stress, multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma, root
Root traits play a primary role in plant adaption to stress. Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma (MCS) is an anatomical trait characterized by small cells encrusted with lignin in the outer cortex. Progress has recently been achieved in understanding the development and physiological implications of MCS. This review proposes that MCS is a useful trait for water and nutrient acquisition, particularly in edaphic stress conditions. Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma may be a useful breeding target for improved soil resource capture and biotic stress tolerance in several major crop species including wheat, maize, sorghum and barley.
Introduction
Sustainable crop production is a major challenge for humanity as the global population and food demand continue to grow. Humanity urgently requires crops with greater water and nutrient efficiency that are more productive in degraded soils with fewer fertilizer, water and chemical inputs. To meet the demands of the growing population, food production will need to increase by 25–50 % in the next 30 years (Hunter et al. 2017). Climate change adds further complexity to this challenge as altered precipitation patterns, heat stress, soil degradation and depletion of freshwater resources will reduce the regions and number and length of growing seasons suited for crop production (IPCC 2021). One of the greatest challenges facing humanity is to produce higher crop yields in the face of climate change with fewer inputs (Anderson et al. 2020).
One pragmatic solution for addressing these grand challenges lies in the breeding of improved crop cultivars with enhanced resource use efficiency. Although phenotypic variation in above-ground tissues can have important impacts on water and nutrient utilization efficiency in crops, roots are the primary organ for nutrient and water uptake and are the interface of plants with soils (Fageria et al. 2008). Variation in root phenotypes can have significant effects on soil resource acquisition by modifying the placement of roots in the soil where limiting resources are most available, improving the metabolic efficiency of soil foraging, influencing the radial and axial transport of resources and altering the mechanical strength of the root (Lynch 2019; Lynch et al. 2021b; Amtmann et al. 2022).
The main purpose of this review is to highlight multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma (MCS) as a crop breeding target and draw attention to open questions and the potential of this trait for improved plant stress tolerance and, ultimately, plant performance and yield. This review will not aim to provide a comprehensive review of MCS; however, it will focus on opportunities and perspectives for studying this trait and its potential for application in crop breeding programs.
MCS Is an Important Trait for Stress Tolerance
Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma is characterized by small sclerenchymatous cells with thick cell walls encrusted with lignin in the outer cortex of nodal roots in several Poaceae species including maize, wheat, barley and sorghum (Fig. 1). Developmentally, MCS forms in axial roots, primarily in younger nodal roots and persists throughout plant maturity. Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma has not been observed in seminal or lateral roots. In maize, the MCS phenotype was observed after the zone of differentiation and lateral root formation in axial nodal roots. Unlike other anatomical traits, cortical cells with MCS do not change their cell wall thickness once MCS has formed (Schneider et al. 2021; Clément et al. 2022). Roots with MCS have significantly more lignin in the root (Fig. 2) and root tip compared to roots without MCS. Experiments have also demonstrated that MCS development is modulated by ethylene exposure and has a relatively high heritability (Schneider et al. 2021). Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma can be quantitatively phenotyped through measuring the cell wall-to-lumen ratio in outer cortical cells. Maize, wheat and barley lines with a cell wall-to-lumen area ratio of greater than two are classified as having MCS (Fig. 1) (Schneider et al. 2021).
Figure 1.
Lines with MCS have smaller and thicker outer cortical cells. These thickened cortical cells are stained with phloroglucinol–HCl due to their high lignin content. Cryo-SEM images show detailed images of the smaller cells with thick cell walls in the outer cortex (scale bar, 100 µm). Violin plot showing median, interquartile range, 95 % CIs and frequency of cell wall:lumen area ratio for MCS (n = 27) and non-MCS (n = 26) root samples. Letters denote significant differences as determined by Welch’s two-sample t-test at a confidence level of α ≤ 0.05. Reprinted with permission from Schneider et al. (2021).
Figure 2.
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy demonstrates that outer cortical cells in genotypes with MCS are embedded with lignin (highlighted in red circles) and do not have elevated concentrations of pectin or cellulose when compared to non-MCS genotypes (n = 2). The heatmap displays the concentration of the cell wall component and the hotter the colour, the greater the concentration. Images are of nodal, field-grown maize roots (scale bar, 50 µm). Reprinted with permission from Schneider et al. (2021).
The MCS phenotype is present in some modern maize inbreds but not in accessions of teosinte parviglumis and Z. mays ssp. mexicana (teosinte mexicana) suggesting it might represent an adaptation acquired during domestication (Schneider et al. 2021). Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma also has not been observed in landraces of wheat or barley, but is present in many modern wheat and barley cultivars (Schneider et al. 2021). It has been proposed that crop domestication included selection for adaption to more challenging soil environments (Lynch et al. 2021a). However, interestingly MCS is not found in the wild ancestors of cereal crops (e.g. teosinte), but is present in many cultivated lines, including in 5280-year-old maize roots from Mexico (Lopez-valdivia et al. 2022).
The composition and size of cortical cells have been shown to be important for soil penetration in hard soils (Chimungu et al. 2015; Colombi and Walter 2016; Huang et al. 2022). Several physical soil properties such as water content, texture and bulk density influence mechanical impedance (Gao et al. 2016; Vanhees et al. 2020) and can limit root elongation, crop growth and, subsequently, crop yield (Whalley et al. 2005; Whitmore and Whalley 2009; Bengough et al. 2011; Gao et al. 2016). Sclerenchymatous tissue is generally characterized by complexes of thick cell walls encrusted with lignin that enable plant organs to withstand stretching, bending and pressure strains (Evert 2006). Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma encrusted with lignin enhanced the tensile strength of the root by 24 % and the bending force of the root tip by 109 % which enabled increased penetration in mechanically impeded soils (Schneider et al. 2021). In the field, maize genotypes with MCS had root systems with 22 % greater depth and 49 % greater shoot biomass in compacted soils compared to genotypes without MCS (Schneider et al. 2021). Similarly, smaller outer cortical cells in maize enhanced root tensile strength and root bending force (Chimungu et al. 2015) and plant growth in dry, hard soils (Klein et al. 2020). Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma has an important role in the mechanical strength of the root for continued elongation into hard or dense soils. Soil cultivation in traditional agriculture generally leads to soil degradation through accelerated erosion, and loss of organic matter, biopores and soil structure which leads to increased mechanical impedance (Lynch et al. 2021a). Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma is an important root trait that enables penetration of hard soils, typically found in modern agroecosystems.
Future Perspectives and Research Opportunities for Understanding and Deploying MCS for Crop Improvement
There is great potential of MCS to be utilized in crop breeding programs for the development of more productive crops in a range of environments. Although MCS has been characterized as a trait that improves plant performance in mechanical impedance, many open research questions remain that may highlight this trait for adaptation to a number of different edaphic stresses. Here, several research gaps are presented that could be addressed in order to facilitate our understanding of MCS and its dynamic interactions with the plant and rhizosphere in many environments. Understanding the benefits and trade-offs of MCS in specific environments will facilitate the incorporation of this trait into crop breeding programs for the development of crops with edaphic stress tolerance and enhanced yield.
MCS may influence the metabolic cost of soil exploration
Plants that are able to acquire soil resources at a reduced carbon and nutrient cost will have increased productivity due to greater allocation of resources to shoot and root growth, continued resource acquisition and reproduction (Lynch 2019). Different anatomical features require different investments and costs in metabolic resources and therefore are a primary determinant of the metabolic cost of root (Chimungu et al. 2014a; Colombi et al. 2019). For example, some types of sclerenchyma cells are dead and living cell types, including parenchyma, have varying proportions of polysaccharides, protein and nucleic acids. The proportion of living and dead cells, cell composition and cell activity are primary determinants of the metabolic costs of root construction and maintenance and, subsequently soil exploration (Lynch et al. 2021b).
Reducing the cortical burden and metabolic costs of soil exploration has been shown to be an adaptive trait and improves plant growth in many environments including drought (Zhu et al. 2010), suboptimal nitrogen availability (Saengwilai et al. 2014) and suboptimal phosphorus availability (Galindo-Castaneda et al. 2018). Several anatomical traits are important for reducing the metabolic cost of root foraging. For example, a greater cortical cell size (Chimungu et al. 2014b; Colombi et al. 2019) and fewer cortical cell files (Chimungu et al. 2014a) enhance plant growth in drought by reducing respiration and root construction and maintenance costs. Larger cells have proportionately greater vacuole/cytoplasm volume, as the cytoplasm is more metabolically active than the vacuole. In addition, by reducing the number of cortical cell files, the number of parenchyma cells in the cortex is reduced, which alters the metabolic cost of root construction and maintenance. Similarly, MCS may impact the metabolic costs for root construction and maintenance through modifications in cell size (Chimungu et al. 2014b; Colombi et al. 2019), cell wall thickness and cell wall composition. It has been proposed that the lignified cell walls in MCS are less metabolically active than cortical parenchyma. If roots with MCS have a reduced metabolic cost of root construction and/or maintenance, this may allow for a greater fraction of photosynthate to be partitioned to competing plant functions such as the growth of photosynthetic tissue, resource storage and reproduction (Lynch et al. 2021b). Contrastingly, the construction of cell walls embedded with more lignin may come at a greater metabolic cost compared to parenchyma cells without the MCS phenotype. Although the carbon costs of the construction of lignin, suberin, cellulose and other cell wall components in root tissue have not been extensively studied, alterations in lignin deposition may be associated with yield penalties (Bonawitz and Chapple 2013; Muro-Villanueva et al. 2019). Understanding the metabolic costs of MCS formation, from the perspective of any limiting resource, but most importantly in the context of carbon fluxes and budgets can provide insight into the costs of root elongation or volume of soil explored which is important for deploying this trait in breeding programs and its adaptive value in different environments.
MCS may influence water and nutrient uptake
Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma may influence resource acquisition as the root cortex has an important function in apoplastic and symplastic transport of water and nutrients to the vasculature. For example, the deposition of heavily lignified and suberized secondary tissues decreases the absorptive capacity of roots (Rewald et al. 2011). In addition, increased cortical width caused by a greater number of cortical cell files and/or an increase in cortical cell size reduces radial conductivity (Heymans et al. 2021). Several root anatomical traits including root diameter influence rice and wheat drought tolerance (Kadam et al. 2015). Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma may influence radial water and nutrient uptake through the deposition of heavily lignified tissues and by altering cell-to-cell and apoplastic pathways through smaller cortical cells resulting in a longer path length and therefore influencing the uptake of soil resources. Presumably, MCS reduces radial water and nutrient transport in the root. As MCS formation is absent near the root tips of axial roots and in lateral roots, the spatial pattern of MCS has functional implications for water capture. The spatial and temporal pattern of MCS in different root classes and tissue ages presumably interacts with dynamic water availability in the soil profile to influence root water uptake and plant growth and productivity.
In water-limited environments, a reduced radial conductivity may be advantageous by enabling ‘water banking’, or the conservation of soil water throughout the growth season (He et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2016). A reduced hydraulic conductivity may be advantageous under water deficit by preventing desiccation of mature roots, the root tip and soil surrounding the root tip. In drought environments, conservation of soil water throughout the growth season contributes to reproductive success and greater yield (Lynch et al. 2014). The development of MCS, which presumably influences radial water transport, may be an adaptive trait in water-limiting environments through promoting water banking, but a functionally maladaptive trait in environments with optimal water or nutrient limitation by reducing water and nutrient transport. Nevertheless, MCS forms in axial roots and is absent in lateral roots (Schneider et al. 2021). Lateral roots comprise the majority of the root length and are responsible for the majority of nutrient and water capture (Ahmed et al. 2015; Schneider and Lynch 2017; Schneider et al. 2017a, 2020b). Since MCS does not develop in lateral roots, MCS may not be a benefit or trade-off to overall water or nutrient capture of the plant. After the development of MCS in axial roots, lateral roots may perform the majority of root water and nutrient uptake and the development of MCS may have little to no effect on total resource uptake of the plant, similarly to the root cortical senescence phenotype in barley (Schneider and Lynch 2017; Schneider et al. 2020b). The influence of MCS on nutrient and water uptake may be adaptive, maladaptive or neutral for crop fitness and yield depending on the environment and interaction with other plant traits. The influence of MCS on water and nutrient uptake of the plant and its impact on plant fitness is essential to understand in the context of specific environments and interaction with other root traits before integration into crop breeding programs.
Root anatomical phenotypes have not only been shown to impact radial transport, but also radial water loss. Several root anatomical phenotypes that have been shown to reduce radial transport of water also reduce radial water loss. For example, the development of root cortical senescence involves the programmed cell death of cortical cells. Enhanced endodermal suberization was detected after the development of root cortical senescence in barley, which resulted in reduced radial conductivity and radial water loss of the root (Schneider et al. 2017b). Presumably, MCS also results in reduced radial water loss through the encrusting of cortical cells with lignin. Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma could be an important trait in axial roots in water-limiting environments by reducing radial water loss to the rhizosphere and therefore improving plant water status and yield.
Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma may also influence water and nutrient capture through enabling penetration of hard soils (see section II (Schneider et al. 2021)). In compacted soils, roots with MCS were able to grow deeper and subsequently had greater plant performance, presumably due to greater soil resource capture (Schneider et al. 2021). However, recently another strategy for plant productivity in compacted soils has been demonstrated. Roots also sense mechanical impedance through ethylene, as soil compaction reduces gas diffusion through a reduction in the number and size of air-filled pores. This accumulation of ethylene at the root tip in compacted soil triggers a suite of hormones that restrict root growth (Jacobsen et al. 2021; Pandey et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2022). Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma and this ethylene ‘stop signal’ suggest that there may be several strategies of plants to optimize root forage in soils with greater mechanical impedance.
MCS may influence interactions with edaphic organisms
Root interactions with arthropods and nematodes also have significant impacts on soil resource capture, plant growth and yield. The incorporation of lignin in roots can provide physical and mechanical barriers to herbivory (Meihls et al. 2012; Moore and Johnson 2017). Endodermal and exodermal barriers in maize roots that are suberized and lignified act as a barrier to discourage larval feeding of western corn rootworm (Riedell and Kim 1990). Similarly, the cutting resistance of maize roots correlated with the intensity of western corn rootworm feeding on the cortex (Castano-Duque et al. 2017) and tobacco roots with greater lignin concentration had delayed penetration by wireworms (Johnson et al. 2010). The deposition of secondary metabolites has important roles in determining the potential resistance of the cortex to a number of pests. Presumably, the deposition of lignin during the formation of MCS would also confer resistance to edaphic pests, which would make MCS a desirable breeding target.
The development of highly lignified MCS tissue may also mechanically inhibit colonization of symbionts. For example, roots with sclerenchyma in the outer cortex had decreased arbuscular mycorrhizae colonization (Dreyer et al. 2010). However, fine roots (e.g. lateral roots) have increased active arbuscular mycorrhizae colonization compared to lignified, coarse and older roots within the same plant (Guo et al. 2008), and the lack of MCS formation in lateral roots may indicate that MCS in axial roots does not significantly influence these interactions. The relationship between anatomical traits and colonization between symbionts is poorly understood and presumably involves many small anatomical and environmental nuances (Strock et al. 2019). From a physiological perspective, the relative contribution of the symbiosis compared to the root anatomical trait itself for resource capture or plant growth would reveal the importance of the different mechanisms for plant productivity. It is critical to understand the fitness landscape of MCS and its benefits and trade-offs for pest resistance, symbiotic interactions and subsequently plant fitness and yield in specific environments.
MCS may influence root exudation and the microbiome
Studies have suggested that root exudation benefits plants through stimulation of beneficial microbes and promoting nutrient acquisition (Mommer et al. 2016). How root anatomy, and therefore the biochemical composition and thickness of the root (particularly the outermost cortical layer) influences root exudates along root systems, across different root classes, and in different species remains an open question that has implications for crop productivity and yield. Presumably, outer cortical tissues represent major control points for root exudation and act as a barrier for the release of root exudates that diffuse through the apoplastic spaces when lignified or suberized (Canarini et al. 2019). Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma, influencing the biochemical composition and cell wall thickness of cortical cells, has the potential to influence root exudation and the microbiome by altering the apoplastic space and the length of the symplastic pathways through which exudates travel (Galindo-Castaneda et al. 2022). In addition, several root traits including MCS presumably alter oxygen and water content and nutrient availability in the rhizosphere and also influence carbon rhizodeposition to determine the structural and physical characteristics of niches and microhabitats for microbial communities (Galindo-Castaneda et al. 2022). It has been proposed that plants with MCS may have reduced exudate secretion and cell shedding resulting in a less diverse and less abundant microbial rhizosphere community. Roots with MCS may also be reduced colonization of endophytes entering the root via the rhizosphere (Galindo-Castaneda et al. 2022). However, since MCS is not formed in lateral roots which also contribute to root exudation (Badri and Vivanco 2009), it remains unclear how much a reduction in axial root exudation after MCS formation will influence these interactions and processes. The link between spatiotemporal variation in MCS with other phenotypes including exudates, carbon rhizodeposition and metabolite concentration is poorly understood but crucial for understanding root-microbial associations that have the potential to improve nutrient and water capture and plant productivity (Galindo-Castaneda et al. 2022). Optimal combinations of root phenotypes and microbiomes can be matched together to improve plant growth and yield, particularly in environments with stress including suboptimal nitrogen availability and drought (Lynch et al. 2021b; Birt et al. 2022; Galindo-Castaneda et al. 2022).
MCS may have synergistic interactions with other root traits
While variation for MCS can have significant effects on resource capture and plant growth, the integration of multiple anatomical and architectural traits may also have synergistic or antagonistic effects for resource acquisition and crop performance. Breeding strategies considering the interaction between root traits are especially important in environments where multiple stresses exist and the availability of limiting resources is spatially and temporally variable (Lynch 2021). Understanding the idiosyncratic strategies underlying crop productivity requires investigation of the broader interactions between both above- and below-ground traits that affect soil resource acquisition, transport and utilization.
Interactions between different root traits are important for soil resource capture (Lynch et al. 2021b). Several synergisms between root anatomical and architectural traits have been explored for enhanced resource capture (Postma and Lynch 2011; York et al. 2013; Schneider et al. 2017a, 2020c); however, the identification of synergistic and antagonistic interactions between anatomical traits is lacking. The coupling of fewer cortical cell files with larger cortical cells has been suggested as a synergistic combination to facilitate deeper rooting (Lynch 2013), and plants with thick roots with a larger proportion of stele and smaller distal cortical cells have been proposed as an integrated anatomical phenotype for drought tolerance (Klein et al. 2020). Thick roots with a large stele have been reported as an advantageous root phenotype to best surmount mechanical impedance by maximizing root penetrative ability (Colombi and Walter 2016). However, many of these potential interactions between cortical traits remain to be explored and it is likely that root anatomical and architectural traits have many important interactions with each other, with the shoot phenotype, and the environment to influence plant performance and yield.
The potential for the cortex to develop successive and potentially synergistic phenotypes is mostly unknown. For example, barley has the capacity to develop root cortical aerenchyma, root cortical senescence and MCS, among other cortical traits. Nevertheless, it is unknown if barley genotypes have the capacity to develop these root phenotypes successively or simultaneously. For example, whether genotypes could develop MCS early in growth, which subsequently develops into root cortical senescence, remains an open question. If several of these cortical traits could be developed successively, or if genetic variation exists for this phenomenon, these traits could have potentially synergistic effects with utility for plant growth in stress conditions. For example, root cortical aerenchyma (Striker et al. 2007) and presumably root cortical senescence decrease the mechanical strength of the root, while MCS enhances root tensile strength (Schneider et al. 2021). If these traits are expressed simultaneously or successively, they could have important functional interactions for the mechanical strength of the root and penetration of hard, dry soils and ultimately plant productivity. Plant breeders could select for multiple and potentially successive traits that synergistically interact to improve plant growth and yield.
MCS may influence soil carbon deposition
The ability of plants to sequester carbon from the atmosphere into deep soil domains is also an important goal for global agriculture (Chabbi et al. 2017) and supports building soil health and resilience for enhanced crop productivity (Cooper et al. 2021). Biosequestration, or the biologically mediated uptake and conversion of atmospheric CO2 into inert, long-lived carbon-containing materials, has the ability to reduce the concentration of atmospheric carbon of important greenhouse gases while creating significant economic land value. Increased soil carbon can be achieved through reducing the rate of decomposition of organic matter in the soil or increasing the rate of carbon additions to the soil.
Tissue composition has been shown to influence the rate and extent of residue decomposition. In general, all plants contain the same classes of organic compounds including cellulose, hemicellulose, starches, proteins, lipids and polyphenols but the proportions of each, which are influenced by species, genotype, maturity and specific plant traits (e.g. MCS), affect the rate of decomposition (Stott et al. 1986). Recalcitrant carbon forms, particularly lignin, increase carbon sequestration because they have a long residence time in soil due to the specificity of lignin-degrading enzymes (De Deyn et al. 2008). Lignin is a complex polymer of phenylpropane units cross-linked to each other with a variety of chemical bonds and therefore constitutes the most recalcitrant component of the plant cell wall. Subsequently, lignin may also influence the bioavailability of other cell wall components as lignin molecules may physically restrict access to other cell wall components (e.g. cellulose and hemicellulose) and reduce the surface area available to enzymatic penetration and activity. Importantly, the degradation of lignin by soil microbes requires a complex set of carbohydrate-degrading enzymes, which are often not allocated within a single organism. For example, albeit certain white rot fungi, brown rot fungi and soft rot fungi were shown to be capable of completely metabolizing intact lignin molecules (Kirk and Farrell 1987; Bernhard-Reversat and Schwartz 1997); other fungi and bacteria are known to have genes involved just in specific steps of lignin degradation (Crawford and Crawford 1980). The development of MCS, a lignified cortical tissue, may have potential for enhanced soil carbon sequestration through the deposition of recalcitrant forms of carbon (e.g. lignin) in deep soil domains.
MCS Has Potential in Plant Breeding Programs
Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma has potential for incorporation into breeding programs for the development of more efficient and productive crop cultivars. Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma has the potential to substantially influence many important plant functions including water and nutrient uptake and resistance to pests. Genetic variation in MCS has been observed in many important crop species including maize, wheat, sorghum and barley. The heritability of MCS is relatively high (in maize H2 = 0.64) (Schneider et al. 2021), which suggests that this trait could be successfully selected for in breeding programs using either phenotypic selection or marker-assisted selection. In addition, a candidate gene has been identified to be associated with MCS. Genome-wide association analysis and quantitative trait loci mapping in maize revealed MCS to be associated with a genetic marker encoding a MEI2-like RNA-binding protein (Schneider et al. 2021). MEI2-like genes are associated with morphogenesis in plants and are required in early formation of the plant (Alvarez 2002). This gene is root-expressed and has elevated expression in root cortical cells and in younger nodes (Stelpflug et al. 2015). The confirmation of the role of this candidate gene and identification of additional genes controlling MCS formation will provide molecular tools for breeders to develop improved crop cultivars with enhanced edaphic stress tolerance.
Notably, the formation of MCS in later growth stages during the emergence of roots from younger shoot nodes does not enable phenotypic selection or phenotyping of this trait at the seedling stage or in young plants, which is typically used to accelerate phenotypic selection in breeding programs. In addition, the elevated lignin concentrations in roots with MCS were not correlated with lignin concentration in the stems or leaves of the plant (Schneider et al. 2021) which limits selection of this trait based on above-ground phenotypes. However, recent advancements in anatomical imaging, phenotyping and modeling (Strock et al. 2019, 2022; Heymans et al. 2020, 2021) enable high-throughput phenotyping and exploration of functional implications of anatomical traits of mature field-grown plants (e.g. Schneider et al. 2020a) which is required for further research on MCS and for its integration into plant breeding programs.
Also important for breeding programs is the fact that development of MCS is restricted to specific taxa. For example, while MCS is commonly developed in modern maize, barley, wheat and sorghum cultivars, it has not been observed in dicot plants or in several other Poaceae including rice (Schneider et al. 2021). Because different plant taxa do not express all cortical phenotypes, the relevance of model organisms in determining the function and genetic control of MCS is limited. For example, Arabidopsis has a simple and highly regular root cortical structure that often only consists of two cortical layers that may not provide the variation needed to understand the function and variability of many cortical phenotypes. In addition, many model species, including Arabidopsis do not form MCS, but instead cortical parenchyma are destroyed through secondary growth processes. Brachypodium may offer opportunities to study MCS in model species; however, given technological advancements that enable our ability to understand and manipulate crop genomes, as well as recent technological advances in root anatomical phenotyping of mature field-grown plants, it is more efficient to conduct research directly on crop species rather than rely on model species to maximize direct impact for plant breeding programs.
With the exception of a few notable cases (e.g. Richards et al. 1989; Burridge et al. 2019), breeders have not directly selected for root traits in breeding programs. Several studies have focused on the identification of suitable genetic markers for root traits to be implemented in marker-assisted selection to enhance crop yield (e.g. Hirel et al. 2007; Burton et al. 2014; Burridge et al. 2017; Kadam et al. 2017; Tardieu et al. 2017; Schneider et al. 2020a, 2022). As noted before, genetic markers and a candidate gene have been identified for MCS (Schneider et al. 2021). Nevertheless, few successful cases have demonstrated the integration of this knowledge for the development of new crop cultivars. There are a number of challenges in incorporating root traits into breeding programs including difficulties in incorporating genomics-assisted crop improvement into extant breeding programs and the inability to leverage complex traits to deliver new, profitable cultivars to farmers (Blum 2014; Turner et al. 2014; Bernardo 2016; Schneider and Lynch 2020).
Recently, the successful development of new cultivars with root traits for enhanced stress tolerance involving work of crop physiologists and social scientists has laid a framework for the incorporation of root traits into breeding programs (Burridge et al. 2019). In addition, the selection of combinations of adaptive alleles or traits for specific environmental conditions through phenomics, modelling and genomic prediction has been proposed as an essential strategy for the development of productive crops (Tardieu 2022). The functional utility of MCS for crop improvement for compaction stress tolerance and the potential of MCS for stress tolerance of additional abiotic and biotic factors and its relatively high make it a strong target for trait-based breeding for the development of more productive crops in edaphic stress (Fig. 3).
Figure 3.
Diagram summarizing the relationships between MCS and soil resource acquisition, metabolic costs and interactions with soil organisms. Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma is proposed to reduce root respiration, reduce radial water conductivity and radial water loss, improve resistance against pathogens and herbivores, reduce symbiotic associations and reduce radial nutrient transport. Many of these proposed functions of MCS remain to be explored, but have the potential to impact plant health, growth and yield. Images of cross-sections from roots of maize.
Conclusions
The wide range of genetic variation in MCS within a plant and among and between species suggests that benefits and trade-offs exist. These benefits and trade-offs could involve the ability of the root to develop other, potentially more useful anatomical phenotypes, influence susceptibility to pests and diseases and affect radial nutrient and water transport, microbial associations, among many others. Several important research areas are highlighted to better understand MCS and its potential as a crop breeding target for enhanced stress tolerance. A challenging bottleneck is our incomplete understanding of the fitness landscape of MCS. Understanding the fitness landscape is required to understand the utility of MCS in specific environments, management scenarios and potential interactions with other plant traits. The influence of MCS on plant growth and health is multifaceted over space and time and we must embrace this complexity to better define the fitness optima for specific phenotypes (Lynch et al. 2021b; Schneider et al. 2021; Schneider 2022). The dearth of previous research on the functional utility of MCS and other anatomical traits combined with new advances in root phenotyping highlights opportunities to study the function and structure of root anatomical traits and offers opportunities for diverse perspectives on these issues. The investigation of broader interactions among multiple cortical, root and plant phenotypes may reveal synergistic relationships among different plant tissues and organs. Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma merits consideration as a target in plant breeding programs as a trait for plant adaptation to edaphic stress.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Paul Struik and Jonathan Lynch for their helpful comments.
Form & Function. Chief Editor: Kate McCulloh
Data Availability
No new data were generated or analysed in support of this research.
Literature Cited
- Alvarez NDG. 2002. Molecular genetic analysis of plant Mei2-like genes: a thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Plant Biology atMassey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand: (Doctoral dissertation, Massey University). [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed MA, Zarebanadkouki M, Kaestner A, Carminati A.. 2015. Measurements of water uptake of maize roots: the key function of lateral roots. Plant and Soil 398:59–77. [Google Scholar]
- Amtmann A, Bennett M, Henry A.. 2022. Root phenotypes for the future. Plant Cell and Environment 45:595–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson R, Bayer PE, Edwards D.. 2020. Climate change and the need for agricultural adaptation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 56:197–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Badri DV, Vivanco JM.. 2009. Regulation and function of root exudates. Plant Cell and Environment 32:666–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bengough AG, McKenzie BM, Hallett PD, Valentine TA.. 2011. Root elongation, water stress, and mechanical impedance: a review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits. Journal of Experimental Botany 62:59–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernardo R. 2016. Bandwagons I, too, have known. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 129:2323–2332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernhard-Reversat F, Schwartz D.. 1997. Change in lignin content during litter decomposition in tropical forest soils (Congo): comparison of exotic plantations and native stands. Earth and Planetary Science 325:427–432. [Google Scholar]
- Birt HWG, Tharp CL, Custer GF, Dini-Andreote F.. 2022. Root phenotypes as modulators of microbial microhabitats. Frontiers in Plant Science. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1003868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blum A. 2014. Genomics for drought resistance-getting down to earth. Functional Plant Biology 41:1191–1198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonawitz ND, Chapple C.. 2013. Can genetic engineering of lignin deposition be accomplished without an unacceptable yield penalty? Current Opinion in Biotechnology 24:336–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burridge JD, Findeis JL, Jochua CN, Miguel MA, Mubichi-Kut FM, Quinhentos ML, Xerinda SA, Lynch JP.. 2019. A case study on the efficacy of root phenotypic selection for edaphic stress tolerance in low-input agriculture: common bean breeding in Mozambique. Field Crops Research 244:107612. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107612 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Burridge JD, Schneider HM, Huynh BL, Roberts PA, Bucksch A, Lynch JP.. 2017. Genome-wide association mapping and agronomic impact of cowpea root architecture. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 130:419–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burton AL, Johnson JM, Foerster JM, Hirsch CN, Buell CR, Hanlon MT, Kaeppler SM, Brown KM, Lynch JP, Hanlon, MT, et al. 2014. QTL mapping and phenotypic variation for root architectural traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 127:2293–2311. doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2353-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canarini A, Kaiser C, Merchant A, Richter A, Wanek W.. 2019. Root exudation of primary metabolites: mechanisms and their roles in plant responses to environmental stimuli. Frontiers in Plant Science 10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Castano-Duque L, Loades KW, Tooker JF, Brown KM, Paul Williams W, Luthe DS.. 2017. A maize inbred exhibits resistance against western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera. Journal of Chemical Ecology 43:1109–1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chabbi A, Lehmann J, Ciais P, Loescher HW, Cotrufo MF, Don A, Sanclements M, Schipper L, Six J, Smith P, et al. 2017. Aligning agriculture and climate policy. Nature Climate Change 7:307–309. doi: 10.1038/nclimate3286 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chimungu J, Brown K, Lynch J.. 2014a. Reduced root cortical cell file number improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Physiology 166:1943–1955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chimungu J, Loades K, Lynch J.. 2015. Root anatomical phenes predict root penetration ability and biomechanical properties in maize (Zea mays). Journal of Experimental Botany 66:3151–3162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chimungu JG, Brown KM, Lynch JP.. 2014b. Large root cortical cell size improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Physiology 166:2166–2178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clément C, Schneider HM, Dresbøll DB, Lynch JP, Thorup-Kristensen K.. 2022. Root and xylem anatomy varies with root length, root order, soil depth and environment in intermediate wheatgrass (Kernza®) and alfalfa. Annals of Botany. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colombi T, Herrmann AM, Vallenback P, Keller T.. 2019. Cortical cell diameter is key to energy costs of root growth in wheat. Plant Physiology 180:2049–2060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colombi T, Walter A.. 2016. Root responses of triticale and soybean to soil compaction in the field are reproducible under controlled conditions. Functional Plant Biology 43:114–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper HV, Sjögersten S, Lark RM, Mooney SJ.. 2021. To till or not to till in a temperate ecosystem? Implications for climate change mitigation. Environmental Research Letters 16:054022. [Google Scholar]
- Crawford D, Crawford R.. 1980. Microbial degradation of lignin. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2:11–22. [Google Scholar]
- De Deyn GB, Cornelissen JHC, Bardgett RD.. 2008. Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. Ecology Letters 11:516–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dreyer B, Morte A, López JÁ, Honrubia M.. 2010. Comparative study of mycorrhizal susceptibility and anatomy of four palm species. Mycorrhiza 20:103–115. doi: 10.1007/s00572-009-0266-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evert R. 2006. Esau’s plant anatomy: meristems, cells, and tissues of the plant body: their structure, function, and development, 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [Google Scholar]
- Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Li YC.. 2008. The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty first century. Journal of Plant Nutrition 31:1121–1157. [Google Scholar]
- Galindo-Castañeda T, Brown KM, Lynch JP.. 2018. Reduced root cortical burden improves growth and grain yield under low phosphorus availability in maize. Plant Cell and Environment 41:1579–1592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galindo-Castañeda T, Lynch JP, Six J, Hartmann M.. 2022. Improving soil resource uptake by plants through capitalizing on synergies between root architecture and anatomy and root-associated microorganisms. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao W, Hodgkinson L, Jin K, Watts CWW, Ashton RWW, Shen J, Ren T, Dodd ICC, Binley A, Phillips ALL, et al. 2016. Deep roots and soil structure. Plant Cell and Environment 39:1662–1668. doi: 10.1111/pce.12684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo D, Xia M, Wei X, Chang W, Liu Y, Wang Z.. 2008. Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species. New Phytologist 180:673–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He J, Du Y, Wang T, Turner NC, Yang R, Jin Y, Xi Y, Zhang C, Cui T, Fang X, et al. 2016. Conserved water use improves the yield performance of soybean. Agricultural Water Management. 179:236–245. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Heymans A, Couvreur V, Larue T, Paez-Garcia A, Lobet G.. 2020. GRANAR, a computational tool to better understand the functional importance of monocotyledon root anatomy. Plant Physiology 182:707–720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heymans A, Couvreur V, Lobet G.. 2021. Combining cross-section images and modeling tools to create high-resolution root system hydraulic atlases in Zea mays. Plant Direct 5:e00290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirel B, Le Gouis J, Ney B, Gallais A.. 2007. The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches. Journal of Experimental Botany 58:2369–2387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang G, Kilic A, Karady M, Zhang J, Mehra P, Hu H, Sturrock J, Chang S, Qin H, Hartman S, et al. 2022. Ethylene inhibits rice root growth in compacted soil via ABA and auxin mediated mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119:e2201072119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2201072119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunter MC, Smith RG, Schipanski ME, Atwood LW, Mortensen DA.. 2017. Agriculture in 2050: recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. Bioscience 67:386–391. [Google Scholar]
- IPCC. 2021. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors S, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, et al., eds. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobsen AGR, Jervis G, Xu J, Topping JF, Lindsey K.. 2021. Root growth responses to mechanical impedance are regulated by a network of ROS, ethylene and auxin signalling in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist 231:225–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson S, Hallett P, Gillespie T, Halpin C.. 2010. Below-ground herbivory and root toughness a potential model system using lignin-modified tobacco. Physiological Entomology 35:186–191. [Google Scholar]
- Kadam NN, Tamilselvan A, Lawas LMF, Quinones C, Bahuguna RN, Thomson MJ, Dingkuhn M, Muthurajan R, Struik PC, Yin X, et al. 2017. Genetic control of plasticity in root morphology and anatomy of rice in response to water-deficit. Plant Physiology 174:2302–2315. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kadam NN, Yin X, Bindraban PS, Struik PC, Jagadish KSVV.. 2015. Does morphological and anatomical plasticity during the vegetative stage make wheat more tolerant of water deficit stress than rice? Plant Physiology 167:1389–1401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirk KT, Farrell R.. 1987. Enzymatic “combustion”: the microbial degredation of lignin. Annual Review of Microbiology 41:465–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klein SP, Schneider HM, Perkins AC, Brown KM, Lynch JP.. 2020. Multiple integrated root phenotypes are associated with improved drought tolerance in maize. Plant Physiology. In press. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lopez-valdivia I, Perkins AC, Schneider HM, Vallebueno-Estrada M, Burridge J, Gonzalez-Orozco E, Montufar A, Montiel R, Lynch J, & Vielle-Calzada J.. 2022. Gradual domestication of root traits in the earliest maize from Tehuacan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119:e2110245119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2110245119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch JP. 2013. Steep, cheap and deep: an ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Annals of Botany 112:347–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch JP. 2019. Root phenotypes for improved nutrient capture: an underexploited opportunity for global agriculture. New Phytologist 223:548–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch JP. 2021. Harnessing root architecture to address global challenges. Plant Journal 109:415–431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch JP, Chimungu JG, Brown KM.. 2014. Root anatomical phenes associated with water acquisition from drying soil: targets for crop improvement. Journal of Experimental Botany 65:6155–6166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch JP, Strock CF, Mooney SJ, Schneider HM.. 2021a. Future roots for future soils. Plant Cell and Environment. doi: 10.1111/pce.14213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch JP, Strock CF, Schneider HM, Sidhu J, Ajmera I, Galindo-Castaneda T, Klein SP, & Hanlon MT.. 2021b. Root anatomy and soil resource capture. Plant and Soil 466:21–63. doi:10.1007/s11104-021-05010-y [Google Scholar]
- Meihls LN, Kaur H, Jander G.. 2012. Natural variation in maize defense against insect herbivores. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 77:269–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mommer L, Kirkegaard J, van Ruijven J.. 2016. Root-root interactions: towards a rhizosphere framework. Trends in Plant Science 21:209–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore BD, Johnson SN.. 2017. Get tough, get toxic, or get a bodyguard: identifying candidate traits conferring belowground resistance to herbivores in grasses. Frontiers in Plant Science 7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muro-Villanueva F, Mao X, Chapple C.. 2019. Linking phenylpropanoid metabolism, lignin deposition, and plant growth inhibition. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 56:202–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pandey BK, Huang G, Bhosale R, Hartman S, Sturrock CJ, Jose L, Martin OC, Karady M, Voesenek LACJ, Ljung K, et al. 2021. Plant roots sense soil compaction through restricted ethylene diffusion. Science 371:276–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Postma JA, Lynch JP.. 2011. Root cortical aerenchyma enhances the growth of maize on soils with suboptimal availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Plant Physiology 156:1190–1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rewald B, Ephrath JE, Rachmilevitch S.. 2011. A root is a root is a root? Water uptake rates of Citrus root orders. Plant, Cell & Environment 34:33–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richards RA, Passioura JB.. 1989. A breeding program to reduce the diameter of the major xylem vessel in the seminal roots of wheat and its effect on grain yield in rain-fed environments. Crop and Pasture Science 40:943–950. [Google Scholar]
- Riedell WE, Kim AY.. 1990. Anatomical characterization of western corn rootworm damage in adventitious roots of maize. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Sciences 97:15–17. [Google Scholar]
- Saengwilai P, Nord EA, Chimungu JG, Brown KM, Lynch JP.. 2014. Root cortical aerenchyma enhances nitrogen acquisition from low-nitrogen soils in maize. Plant Physiology 166:726–735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider H. 2022. Characterization, costs, cues, and future perspectives of phenotypic plasticity. Annals of Botany. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider H, Klein S, Hanlon M, Brown K, Kaeppler S, Lynch J.. 2020a. Genetic control of root anatomical plasticity in maize. Plant Genome 13:e20003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider H, Postma J, Wojciechowski T, Kuppe C, Lynch JP.. 2017a. Root cortical senescence improves barley growth under suboptimal availability of N, P, and K. Plant Physiology 174:2333–2347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider H, Postma JA, Kochs J, Daniel P, Lynch JP, Dusschoten DV.. 2020b. Spatio-temporal variation in water uptake in seminal and nodal root systems of barley plants grown in soil. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider H, Wojciechowski T, Postma J, Brown K, Lücke A, Zeisler V, Schreiber L, Lynch J.. 2017b. Root cortical senescence decreases root respiration, nutrient content, and radial water and nutrient transport in barley. Plant Cell and Environment 40:1392–1408. doi: 10.1111/pce.12933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider HM, Lor VSN, Hanlon MT, Perkins A, Kaeppler SM, Borkar AN, Bhosale R, Zhang X, Rodriguez J, Bucksch A, et al. 2022. Root angle in maize influences nitrogen capture and is regulated by calcineurin B-like protein (CBL)-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 15 (ZmCIPK15). Plant Cell and Environment 45:837–853. doi: 10.1111/pce.14135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider HM, Lynch JP.. 2017. Functional implications of root cortical senescence for soil resource capture. Plant and Soil 423:13–26. [Google Scholar]
- Schneider HM, Lynch JP.. 2020. Should root plasticity be a crop breeding target? Frontiers in Plant Science 11:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider HM, Strock CF, Hanlon MT, Vanhees DJ, Perkins AC, Ajmera IB, Sidhu JS, Mooney SJ, Brown KM, & Lynch JP.. 2021. Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma enhance root penetration in compacted soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118:e2012087118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012087118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schneider HM, Yang JT, Brown KM, Lynch JP.. 2020c. Nodal root diameter and node number in maize (Zea mays L.) interact to influence plant growth under nitrogen stress. Plant Direct 5:e00310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stelpflug SC, Rajandeep S, Vaillancourt B, Hirsch CN, Buell CR, de Leon N, Kaeppler SM.. 2015. An expanded maize gene expression atlas based on RNA-sequencing and its use to explore root development. Plant Genome 9:314–362. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2015.04.0025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stott DE, Elliott LF, Papendick RI, Campbell GS.. 1986. Low temperature or low water potential effects on the mictobial decomposition of wheat residue. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 18:577–582. [Google Scholar]
- Striker GG, Insausti P, Grimoldi AA, Vega AS.. 2007. Trade-off between root porosity and mechanical strength in species with different types of aerenchyma. Plant Cell and Environment 30:580–589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strock CF, Schneider HM, Galindo-Castañeda T, Hall BT, Van Gansbeke B, Mather DE, Roth MG, Chilvers MI, Guo X, Brown K, et al. 2019. Laser ablation tomography for visualization of root colonization by edaphic organisms. Journal of Experimental Botany 70:5327–5342. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strock CF, Schneider HM, Lynch JP.. 2022. Anatomics: high-throughput phenotyping of plant anatomy. Trends in Plant Science 27:520–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tardieu F. 2022. Different avenues for progress apply to drought tolerance, water use efficiency and yield in dry areas. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 73:128–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tardieu F, Draye X, Javaux M.. 2017. Root water uptake and ideotypes of the root system: whole-plant controls matter. Vadose Zone Journal 16:1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Turner NC, Blum A, Cakir M, Steduto P, Tuberosa R, Young N.. 2014. Strategies to increase the yield and yield stability of crops under drought - are we making progress? Functional Plant Biology 41:1199–1206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vanhees D, Loades K, Bengough G, Mooney S, Lynch J.. 2020. Root anatomical traits contribute to deeper rooting of maize (Zea mays L.) under compacted field conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany 71:4243–4257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang W-F, Zong Y-Z, Zhang S-Q.. 2016. Hydraulic regulation strategies for whole-plant water balance of two maize inbred lines differing in drought resistance under short-term osmotic stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 38:179. [Google Scholar]
- Whalley WR, Leeds-Harrison PB, Clark LJ, Gowing DJG.. 2005. Use of effective stress to predict the penetrometer resistance of unsaturated agricultural soils. Soil and Tillage Research 84:18–27. [Google Scholar]
- Whitmore AP, Whalley WR.. 2009. Physical effects of soil drying on roots and crop growth. Journal of Experimental Botany 60:2845–2857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- York LM, Nord EA, Lynch JP.. 2013. Integration of root phenes for soil resource acquisition. Frontiers in Plant Science 4:355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu J, Brown KM, Lynch JP.. 2010. Root cortical aerenchyma improves the drought tolerance of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant, Cell & Environment 33:740–749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were generated or analysed in support of this research.



