To the Editor: With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019, facial masks (FMs) were ultimately recommended to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Reports during that period have associated FMs with many facial reactions, including perioral dermatitis (POD).1,2 There are few reports associating increased POD incidence with FMs during the COVID-19 pandemic.3 We report the results of a retrospective study comparing the incidence of POD diagnosed by dermatologists before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Analysis was conducted on a review of 15,177 patient encounters with diagnosis codes inclusive of rosacea, acne, and POD at NYU Langone Health from the periods of April 1to December 31, 2019 (pre-COVID [n = 7184]) and April 1 to December 31, 2020 (mid-COVID [n = 7993]). A total of 637 encounters (491 patients) for POD were identified. The percentage of POD encounters increased between 2019 (n = 262) and 2020 (n = 375) (3.65%-4.69% [P = 0.0014]), as did mentions of mask use (0.43%-10.53%; P < .0001) (Table I). The rate of POD was generally greater in 2020 relative to 2019, though POD was more common in December 2019 than in December 2020 (Supplementary Fig 1, available via Mendeley at https://doi.org/10.17632/tjgj2n69rk.1). The rate of mask use never exceeded 1% in 2019, while the rate of mask use rose steadily throughout 2020 from 3.1% in April to 12.2% in December (Supplementary Fig 2, available via Mendeley at https://doi.org/10.17632/tjgj2n69rk.1). Multivariable logistic regression revealed mask use was associated with 2.54 times the odds of POD (95% confidence interval: 1.98-3.25) with no difference in the likelihood of POD when controlling for the years 2019 and 2020 (P = .24) (Table II).
Table I.
Encounter characteristics by pre- and mid-COVID periods∗
Encounter-level analysis |
|||
---|---|---|---|
2019 |
2020 |
P-value | |
N = 7184 | N = 7993 | ||
Mask use | 31 (0.43) | 842 (10.53) | <.0001 |
POD | 262 (3.65) | 375 (4.69) | .0014 |
Age | 31.0 (24.0, 46.0) | 30.0 (24.0, 43.0) | <.0001 |
Age, y | <.0001 | ||
12-17 | 767 (10.68) | 815 (10.20) | |
18-34 | 3383 (47.09) | 4135 (51.73) | |
35-44 | 1107 (15.41) | 1207 (15.10) | |
45-54 | 704 (9.80) | 705 (8.82) | |
55-64 | 567 (7.89) | 500 (6.26) | |
65-74 | 470 (6.54) | 462 (5.78) | |
75+ | 186 (2.59) | 169 (2.11) | |
Sex | <.0001 | ||
Female | 4941 (68.78) | 5978 (74.79) | |
Male | 2243 (31.22) | 2015 (25.21) | |
Month | <.0001 | ||
April | 852 (11.86) | 653 (8.17) | |
May | 933 (12.99) | 746 (9.33) | |
June | 780 (10.86) | 923 (11.55) | |
July | 833 (11.60) | 965 (12.07) | |
August | 873 (12.15) | 890 (11.13) | |
September | 757 (10.54) | 1022 (12.79) | |
October | 962 (13.39) | 1085 (13.57) | |
November | 791 (11.01) | 1109 (13.87) | |
December | 403 (5.61) | 600 (7.51) |
IQR, Interquartile range.
Median (IQR).
Table II.
Multivariable analysis of factors associated with likelihood of having perioral dermatitis
Encounter-level analysis |
|||
---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | P-value | |
Mask use | |||
No mask | 1.00 | ||
Mask mentioned | 2.54 | [1.98-3.25] | <.0001 |
Year | |||
2019 | 1.00 | ||
2020 | 1.11 | [0.93-1.32] | .24 |
Age, y | |||
12-17 | 0.41 | [0.26-0.66] | .0003 |
18-34 | 1.00 | ||
35-44 | 1.63 | [1.32-2.03] | <.0001 |
45-54 | 1.37 | [1.04-1.80] | .025 |
55-64 | 1.95 | [1.48-2.57] | <.0001 |
65-74 | 1.62 | [1.19-2.20] | .0020 |
75+ | 1.24 | [0.74-2.09] | .41 |
CI, Confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
FMs may account for the significant increase in incidence of POD from the pre- to mid-COVID-19 periods. Our data demonstrate a significant increase in the incidence of POD during the mid-COVID-19 period. Reports of mask use increased dramatically mid-COVID and appeared to correlate significantly with an increased likelihood of POD. We hypothesize that the use of protective FMs during the COVID-19 pandemic is contributing to an increased incidence of POD. The possible mechanisms behind this relationship may include dysbiosis, mechanical stress, increased use of nasal sprays for congestion, and emotional stress.4 Marked microbiome dysbiosis also has been seen with mask usage.3 Skin temperature, erythema, hydration, and sebum secretion are dramatically changed by mask wearing.5 These characteristic changes with mask usage could account for the exacerbation of POD. Despite controlling for multiple covariates available in the charts, the findings may result from an unidentified confounder and not a true association between the likelihood of POD and risk factors. For example, the term mask use is not clear and is not binary, and it is unlikely for physicians to be querying mask use before the pandemic.
This was a retrospective cohort study examining the relative incidence of POD and its associated risk factors during the identical periods of pre- and mid-COVID-19. A significant increase in the incidence of POD occurred during the mid-COVID-19 period, with a significant association with FM usage. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, it is unlikely that mask wearing will disappear entirely from daily life.
Conflicts of interest
None disclosed.
Footnotes
Funding sources: None.
IRB approval status: This study was granted exempt status by the NYU Langone Health Institutional Review Board.
Patient consent: Not applicable.
References
- 1.Darlenski R., Kazandjieva J., Tsankov N. Prevention and occupational hazards for the skin during COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Dermatol. 2021;39(1):92–97. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2020.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Damiani G., Gironi L.C., Grada A., et al. COVID-19 related masks increase severity of both acne (maskne) and rosacea (mask rosacea): multi-center, real-life, telemedical, and observational prospective study. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(2) doi: 10.1111/dth.14848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Olisova O.Y., Teplyuk N.P., Grekova E.V., Lepekhova A.A. Dermatoses caused by face mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35(11):e738–e741. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lipozencic J., Hadzavdic S.L. Perioral dermatitis. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32(1):125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Park S.R., Han J., Yeon Y.M., Kang N.Y., Kim E. Effect of face mask on skin characteristics changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Skin Res Technol. 2021;27(4):554–559. doi: 10.1111/srt.12983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]