Abstract
Objectives
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the most important causes of lower respiratory tract illnesses. In this study, we examined the number and severity of RSV infections among adult patients. The underlying diseases and background information of patients with RSV were examined and compared with the patients with influenza.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting
Patients receiving tertiary care services in Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) district in Eastern Finland.
Participants
725 patients (152 with RSV infection and 573 with influenza) treated in KUH between November 2017 and May 2018.
Primary and secondary outcome measures
Hospitalisation and mortality.
Results
Compared with influenza, RSV caused a more serious disease in terms of hospitalisation (84.2% vs 66.0%, p<0.001), incidence of pneumonia (37.5% vs 23.2%, p<0.001), need for antibiotics (67.1% vs 47.3%, p<0.001) and supplemental oxygen (50.7% vs 31.2%, p<0.001). The all-cause mortality during hospitalisation and 30 days after discharge was higher among the RSV-infected patients (8.6% vs 3.5%, p=0.010). Solid malignancies (23.1% vs 5.0%, p=0.042) and chronic kidney disease (30.8% vs 5.8%, p=0.011) were more common among the RSV-infected non-survivors compared with survivors. RSV was an independent risk factor for hospitalisation (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.035; 95% CI 1.17 to 3.55) and mortality (aOR 2.288; 95% CI 1.09 to 4.81) compared with influenza.
Conclusions
Among all the screened patients, those with RSV infection were older and had more underlying conditions than patients with influenza. They had increased likelihood of hospitalisation and mortality when compared with influenza. Solid malignancies and chronic kidney disease seemed to be independent risk factors for death among RSV-infected patients. During RSV and influenza epidemics, it is important to test patients with respiratory symptoms for RSV and influenza to prevent the spread of the infections among elderly and chronically ill patients.
Keywords: respiratory infections, epidemiology, infection control
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY.
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the most important causes of lower respiratory tract illnesses.
RSV has been discovered to cause mortality equal or close to the mortality related to influenza among elderly patients.
This retrospective cohort study compares the effects of multiple background factors on clinical outcomes in RSV-infected and influenza-infected adult patients.
The major limitation of the study was that there was no possibility to gather information about patient recovery from primary care facilities.
During the study, there was a major RSV epidemic in Finland explaining the high number of RSV infections compared with influenza.
Introduction
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the most important causes of lower respiratory tract illnesses.1 RSV bronchitis or pneumonia can lead to hospitalisation and even death, especially in elderly people with underlying conditions.2 A major RSV epidemic is observed in Finland every other winter, often starting in November–December. In addition, minor epidemics occur between the major ones.3 4
In adults ≥50 years of age, RSV is responsible for 1%–10% of acute respiratory tract infections.5 RSV hospitalisation rates in adults ≥65 years of age are estimated to be 1/1000 and 0.3/1000 person-years in industrialised and developing countries, respectively.6 The mortality rate among the elderly patients treated in hospital due to RSV infection varies between 1.1% and 15.9%7–12 and the 30-day all-cause mortality rate varies between 3.2% and 13.7%.9 10 12–14
Among elderly patients living in long-term care facilities, RSV is estimated to cause 7.2%–11.4% of the hospitalisation among patients with chronic pulmonary diseases.2 The hospitalised patients with RSV infection and influenza-like symptoms have often immunosuppressive medication, haematological malignancy or other malignancies.15 16 In immunocompromised patients, RSV is reported to account for 2.8%–10.3% of all acute respiratory tract infections, and 8.6%–20.0% of all respiratory viral infections.5 Thirty per cent to 70% of the patients admitted to hospital because of RSV have cardiovascular disease.7 9 14 15 During hospitalisation, 14%–25% of the patients with RSV infection experience a cardiovascular complication such as worsening heart failure, myocardial infarction or stroke.7 8 13 Adults who are obese are more likely to be hospitalised from RSV infection and influenza than normal-weight adults.17 Smoking is associated with higher risk of hospital admissions after influenza infection.18
Among adult patients hospitalised because of RSV infection, hypoxaemia is reported in 53%–68% and pneumonia in 31%–80% of the patients.7 8 11 13–16 Empirical antibiotics are used on 76%–95% of the patients,7 8 10 and blood cultures are positive in 4% of the patients.8 Ten per cent to 25% of the RSV-infected hospitalised adults require treatment in intensive care unit (ICU)10 11 16 and mechanical ventilation is needed for 10%–36% of the patients.7 8 10 The average duration of hospitalisation has been reported to range from 4 to 9 days.8 10 12 13 16
When compared with the prevalence of influenza, the prevalence of RSV has been estimated to be up to twice as high among patients at risk and over 65 years.2 In Finland, seasonal influenza has been estimated to cause 500–1000 excess deaths annually.19 The patients hospitalised due to RSV are older, have more chronic diseases and are more likely living in long-term care compared with influenza.8 14 15 20 Among elderly patients aged over 65 years, the in-hospital mortality related to RSV has been estimated to be equal or close to the mortality related to influenza.5 15 However, the 30-day mortality rate has been estimated to be higher among RSV-infected patients.14 The patients with RSV infection have more often underlying lung diseases, need more often supplemental oxygen and ventilatory support and develop more complications, such as pneumonia, than the patients with influenza.8 13–15
Objectives
The aim of the study was to examine the number and severity of RSV infections among adult patients in Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) district in Eastern Finland during the RSV epidemic. We also examined the underlying diseases and background information of patients with RSV. The results were compared with patients with influenza. The population in the study area has more underlying diseases than the average Finnish population, and therefore we focused on the disease burden in the outcomes of patients with RSV.21
Methods
Study subjects
This retrospective cohort study was carried out in KUH. KUH is one of Finland’s five university hospitals. The hospital is a 600-bed teaching hospital that provides tertiary care services to approximately 800 000 citizens in Central and Eastern Finland. Patients treated in KUH due to influenza and RSV were identified retrospectively from the information management system of Eastern Finland Laboratory Centre (ISLAB) between November 2017 and May 2018. During the study time, there was a major RSV epidemic in Finland.3 Patients under 18 years of age and patients with mixed infections (influenza and RSV) were excluded from the study. Also, patients from regional hospitals were excluded if there was a lack of availability of electronic medical records.
Data collection
We collected clinical data by using electronic medical records. For general characteristics and background information, we observed age, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), gender, smoking status, type of housing and underlying conditions. All underlying conditions were classified according to the 2021 ICD-10-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification) codes: hypertension (ICD-10-CM I10–I15), ischaemic heart disease (ICD-10-CM I20–I25), heart failure (ICD-10-CM I50), cerebrovascular disease (ICD-10-CM I60–70), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ICD-10-CM J44), asthma (ICD-10-CM J45), solid malignancy (ICD-10-CM C00–C80), haematological malignancy (ICD-10-CM C81–C96), diabetes (ICD-10-CM E08–E13), chronic kidney disease (ICD-10-CM N18) and dementia (ICD-10-CM F00–F03). In addition, the patients with immunosuppressive medication due to other diseases were identified. Type of housing was divided into living independently and living with daily support (nursing homes, home care). Patients with BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 were defined as obese and patients with BMI under 18.5 kg/m2 were defined as underweight.22 Smoking status was divided into smokers and non-smokers. The requirement and duration of hospitalisation, requirement of supplemental oxygen and non-invasive ventilation support (bilevel positive airway pressure, continuous positive airway pressure or nasal high flow), requirement of treatment in ICU and duration of ICU care, requirement of invasive ventilation, blood culture sample results, use of antibiotics, prevalence of pneumonia, all-cause mortality during hospitalisation and during the following 30 days after discharge were documented. The diagnosis of pneumonia was made by treating physicians based on clinical status, laboratory tests and X-rays.
Laboratory methods
The nasopharyngeal samples of influenza and RSV were taken from the patients during hospital visits. The samples were stored in Copan UTM-RT tubes for transport. The fresh samples were analysed with multiplex PCR assay for detecting influenza A and B virus and RSV nucleic acids in respiratory tract specimens (Xpert Xpress influenza/RSV test, Cepheid) according to the manufacturer’s instructions in the clinical microbiology laboratory of KUH (Eastern Finland Laboratory Centre Joint Authority Enterprise, ISLAB).
Analyses
Data were collected from electronic medical records into an SPSS file and the data analysis was completed using SPSS V.25 (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows). Mean, median and IQR (25th–75th percentile) were summarised using descriptive statistics. The statistical analyses between categorical variables were done by using the χ2 test. The Fisher’s exact test was used instead of χ2 test when analysing categorical variables, if any cells had low (<5) minimum expected count. Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison between continuous variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the crude ORs and adjusted ORs (aORs) of the factors associated with hospitalisation and all-cause mortality during hospitalisation and 30 days after discharge. In the multivariable model, only the variables with a p value of <0.100 at univariate analysis were included, and the final model was built using a stepwise forward procedure to calculate the aORs. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used for goodness of fit for logistic regression models. The results with a p value lower than 0.05 were counted statistically significant.
Patient and public involvement
Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Results
Study population
In total, 2484 patients with positive screening test results for influenza and RSV were identified at ISLAB between November 2017 and May 2018. Patients under 18 years of age, patients without electronic medical record available and patients with mixed infections (influenza and RSV, n=6) were excluded from the study. After this, a total of 725 patients (152 with RSV infection and 573 with influenza infection) were included in the study. BMI was available on 99 (65.1%) of the RSV-infected patients and on 396 (69.1%) of the influenza-infected patients. Smoking status was available on 115 (75.7%) of the RSV-infected patients and on 412 (71.9%) of the influenza-infected patients. Other characteristics and all hospital events were available on all patients in the electronic medical record.
Characteristics
The characteristics of the study population are presented in table 1. The RSV-infected patients were significantly older than the influenza-infected patients (mean 73.3 vs 68.1, median 73 vs 71 years, p=0.002). They were also more likely to have diagnoses of hypertension (60.5% vs 45.5%, p=0.001) and heart failure (17.8% vs 10.5%, p=0.014) than the patients with influenza infection. There were no significant differences in gender, smoking status, housing status or other underlying conditions between patients with influenza and RSV infections, but the patients with RSV infection had more underlying conditions (mean 2.32 vs 1.93, median 2 vs 2 underlying conditions, p=0.003) than those with influenza infection.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the study population
| RSV n=152, n (%) |
Influenza n=573, n (%) |
P value | |
| Male | 75 (49.3) | 262 (45.7) | 0.427 |
| Age (years) | |||
| Range | 23–96 | 18–100 | |
| Mean (SD) | 73.3 (15.1) | 68.1 (18.4) | 0.002 |
| Median (IQR) | 73 (65–86) | 71 (59–82) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | |||
| Range | 15.4–43.2 | 14.9–51.2 | |
| Mean (SD) | 27.0 (5.7) | 27.3 (5.7) | 0.297 |
| Median (IQR) | 25.6 (22.9–29.2) | 27.0 (23.4–30.8) | |
| Smoking status | |||
| Smoking | 26 (17.1) | 89 (15.5) | 0.454 |
| Non-smoker | 89 (58.6) | 323 (56.4) | |
| Housing status | |||
| Independent | 102 (67.1) | 418 (72.9) | 0.155 |
| Supported | 50 (32.9) | 155 (27.1) | |
| Number of underlying conditions | |||
| Range | 0–6 | 0–7 | |
| Mean (SD) | 2.32 (1.4) | 1.93 (1.5) | 0.003 |
| Median (IQR) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) | |
| Hypertension | 92 (60.5) | 261 (45.5) | 0.001 |
| Ischaemic heart disease | 51 (33.6) | 154 (26.9) | 0.104 |
| Heart failure | 27 (17.8) | 60 (10.5) | 0.014 |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 28 (18.4) | 77 (13.4) | 0.121 |
| COPD | 20 (13.2) | 57 (9.9) | 0.253 |
| Asthma | 39 (25.7) | 135 (23.6) | 0.590 |
| Solid malignancy | 10 (6.6) | 47 (8.2) | 0.509 |
| Haematological malignancy | 7 (4.6) | 16 (2.8) | 0.257* |
| Diabetes | 34 (22.4) | 122 (21.3) | 0.774 |
| Chronic kidney disease | 12 (7.9) | 43 (7.5) | 0.872 |
| Dementia | 22 (14.5) | 71 (12.4) | 0.495 |
| Immunosuppressive medication | 11 (7.2) | 65 (11.3) | 0.142 |
Continuous variables (age, BMI, number of underlying conditions) are presented as mean and SD and median and IQR (25th–75th percentile); categorical variables are presented as number (n) and per cent (%). P values were calculated with Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and with χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.
*Calculated with Fisher’s exact test.
BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
Hospitalisation
The hospital events of the study population are presented in table 2. The patients with RSV infection were hospitalised more often than those with influenza (84.2% vs 66.0%, p<0.001). During hospitalisation, the RSV-infected patients needed supplemental oxygen (50.7% vs 31.2%, p<0.001) and developed pneumonia (37.5% vs 23.2%, p<0.001) more often than patients with influenza. There was no difference in ICU admission between the groups, but the duration of the treatment in the ICU was longer in influenza-infected patients than those with RSV (mean 5.3 vs 2.5, median 4 vs 3 days, p=0.016). Blood culture positivity was detected more often (4.6% vs 1.7%, p=0.045) and antibiotics were used more often (67.1% vs 47.3%, p<0.001) among patients with RSV than those with influenza. The all-cause mortality during hospitalisation and 30 days after discharge was higher among RSV-infected patients than among those infected by influenza (8.6% vs 3.5%, p=0.010). There was no significant difference in the in-hospital all-cause mortality between the two groups.
Table 2.
Outcomes and hospital events of the study population
| RSV n=152, n (%) |
Influenza n=573, n (%) |
P value | |
| Hospitalised | 128 (84.2) | 378 (66.0) | <0.001 |
| Discharged from ER | 24 (15.8) | 195 (34.0) | |
| Hospital treatment (days) | |||
| Range | 1–40 | 1–66 | |
| Mean (SD) | 4.5 (4.5) | 4.1 (5.7) | 0.425 |
| Median (IQR) | 5 (3–6) | 5 (3–7) | |
| Need of supplemental oxygen | 77 (50.7) | 179 (31.2) | <0.001 |
| Non-invasive ventilation | 17 (11.2) | 50 (8.7) | 0.352 |
| ICU admission | 6 (3.9) | 23 (4.0) | 0.970 |
| ICU treatment duration (days) | |||
| Range | 1–3 | 1–21 | |
| Mean (SD) | 2.5 (0.8) | 5.3 (4.3) | 0.016 |
| Median (IQR) | 3 (2–3) | 4 (3–6) | |
| Invasive ventilation | 2 (1.3) | 4 (0.7) | 0.383* |
| Pneumonia | 57 (37.5) | 133 (23.2) | <0.001 |
| Positive blood cultures | 7 (4.6) | 10 (1.7) | 0.045* |
| Antibiotic used | 102 (67.1) | 272 (47.3) | <0.001 |
| Hospital all-cause mortality | 5 (3.3) | 15 (2.6) | 0.413 |
| All-cause mortality during hospitalisation and 30 days after discharge | 13 (8.6) | 20 (3.5) | 0.010 |
| Time from hospitalisation to death (days) | |||
| Range | 3–40 | 1–51 | |
| Mean (SD) | 13.4 (15.3) | 8.1 (12.4) | 0.266 |
| Median (IQR) | 6 (4–27) | 4 (2–9) | |
Continuous variables (hospital treatment duration, ICU treatment duration, time from hospitalisation to death) are presented as mean and SD and median and IQR (25th–75th percentile); categorical variables are presented as number (n) and per cent (%). P values were calculated with Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and with χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.
*Calculated with Fisher’s exact test.
ER, emergency room; ICU, intensive care unit; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
In blood cultures of patients with RSV, Streptococcus pneumoniae was found among two patients. Klebsiella pneumoniae, Prevotella oralis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia coli and S. viridans were found in the blood cultures of one patient each. In the blood cultures of influenza-infected patients, S. aureus was found among three patients, and S. pneumoniae in two patients. Positive blood cultures for S. epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, S. dysgalactiae subsp equisimilis and Proteus mirabilis were detected each in one patient. In one patient with influenza, blood cultures were positive, but the pathogen remained unknown.
Altogether, 27 different antibiotics and 591 courses of antibiotics were used during the hospitalisation. In the RSV and influenza-infected patients, 47 (30.9%) vs 154 (26.9%) received a single antibiotic, 44 (28.9%) vs 87 (15.2%) received two different antibiotics, 8 (5.3%) vs 24 (4.2%) received three different antibiotics and 2 (1.3%) vs 6 (1.0%) patients received four different antibiotics. One (0.2%) patient with influenza infection received five different antibiotics during hospitalisation.
Factors associated with hospitalisation and mortality
Cross-tabulation of the baseline characteristics affecting all-cause mortality during hospitalisation and 30 days after discharge is presented in table 3. Non-surviving RSV-infected patients had significantly more often solid malignancies (23.1% vs 5.0%, p=0.042) and chronic kidney disease (30.8% vs 5.8%, p=0.011) than the survivors. In patients with influenza, underlying heart failure was more common among the non-survivors than the survivors (30.0% vs 9.8%, p=0.012). The non-survivors were also significantly older (mean 83.6 vs 67.5, median 83 vs 70 years, p<0.001) and lived in supported housing more often than the survivors (55.0% vs 26.0%, p=0.004).
Table 3.
Comparison of the characteristics between RSV-infected non-survivors and survivors and influenza-infected non-survivors and survivors during hospitalisation and 30 days after discharge
| RSV non-survivors (n=13), n (%) |
RSV survivors (n=139), n (%) |
P value | Influenza non-survivors (n=20), n (%) |
Influenza survivors (n=553), n (%) |
P value | |
| Male | 5 (38.5) | 70 (50.4) | 0.412 | 9 (45.0) | 253 (45.8) | 0.947 |
| Female | 8 (61.5) | 69 (49.6) | 11 (55.0) | 300 (54.2) | ||
| Age (years) | ||||||
| Range | 39–94 | 23–96 | 68–100 | 18–98 | ||
| Mean (SD) | 77.5 (15.2) | 73.0 (15.1) | 0.195 | 83.6 (10.0) | 67.5 (18.4) | <0.001 |
| Median (IQR) | 81 (70–90) | 73 (64–86) | 83 (77–93) | 70 (59–82) | ||
| Obesity | 2 (15.4) | 23 (16.5) | 0.648* | 2 (10.0) | 111 (20.1) | 0.308* |
| Underweight | 0 (0) | 4 (2.9) | 0.708* | 0 (0) | 20 (3.6) | 0.512* |
| Smoking | 2 (15.4) | 24 (17.3) | 0.598* | 0 (0) | 89 (16.1) | 0.109* |
| Number of underlying conditions | ||||||
| Range | 1–6 | 0–6 | 0–5 | 0–7 | ||
| Mean (SD) | 3.2 (1.8) | 2.2 (1.3) | 0.059 | 2.2 (1.3) | 1.9 (1.5) | 0.291 |
| Median (IQR) | 3 (2–5) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) | 2 (1–3) | ||
| Supported housing | 6 (46.2) | 44 (31.2) | 0.222* | 11 (55.0) | 144 (26.0) | 0.004 |
| Hypertension | 8 (61.5) | 84 (60.4) | 0.938 | 8 (40.0) | 253 (45.8) | 0.612 |
| Ischaemic heart disease | 7 (53.8) | 44 (31.7) | 0.097* | 6 (30.0) | 148 (26.8) | 0.460 |
| Heart failure | 4 (30.8) | 23 (16.5) | 0.179* | 6 (30.0) | 54 (9.8) | 0.012* |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 5 (38.5) | 23 (16.5) | 0.065* | 4 (20.0) | 73 (13.2) | 0.276* |
| COPD | 2 (15.4) | 18 (12.9) | 0.534* | 1 (5.0) | 56 (10.1) | 0.390* |
| Asthma | 1 (7.7) | 38 (27.3) | 0.106* | 6 (30.0) | 129 (23.3) | 0.323* |
| Solid malignancy | 3 (23.1) | 7 (5.0) | 0.042* | 3 (15.0) | 44 (8.0) | 0.221* |
| Haematological malignancy | 1 (7.7) | 6 (4.3) | 0.472* | 1 (5.0) | 15 (2.7) | 0.438* |
| Diabetes | 4 (30.8) | 30 (21.6) | 0.324* | 3 (15.0) | 119 (21.5) | 0.353* |
| Chronic kidney disease | 4 (30.8) | 8 (5.8) | 0.011* | 1 (5.0) | 42 (7.6) | 0.548* |
| Dementia | 1 (7.7) | 21 (15.1) | 0.409* | 3 (15.0) | 68 (12.3) | 0.460* |
| Immunosuppressive medication | 3 (23.1) | 8 (5.8) | 0.054* | 2 (10.0) | 63 (11.4) | 0.599* |
In categorical variables, men were compared with women, obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) patients with patients with BMI greater than or equal to 18.5–29.9 kg/m2, smokers with non-smokers and patients living in supported housing with patients living independently. The patients with certain underlying condition were compared with those without the underlying condition in question. Continuous variables (age, number of underlying conditions) are presented as mean and SD and median and IQR (25th–75th percentile); categorical variables are presented as number (n) and per cent (%). P values were calculated with Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and with χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.
*Calculated with Fisher’s exact test.
BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
In multivariable logistic regression analyses among all study patients, RSV infection (p=0.012), age (p=0.003), smoking (p=0.001) and number of underlying conditions (p<0.001) were positively associated with the likelihood of hospitalisation (table 4). RSV infection (p=0.029), age (p<0.001) and solid malignancies (p=0.042) were positively associated with the all-cause mortality during hospitalisation and 30 days after discharge (table 5).
Table 4.
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of factors associated with hospitalisation among all study population (n=725)
| Crude OR (95% CI) | P value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | P value | |
| RSV infection | 2.751 (1.721 to 4.398) | <0.001 | 2.035 (1.167 to 3.546) | 0.012 |
| Male gender | 0.929 (0.676 to 1.277) | 0.650 | ||
| Age (years) | 1.032 (1.023 to 1.042) | <0.001 | 1.021 (1.007 to 1.035) | 0.003 |
| Obesity | 1.419 (0.892 to 2.257) | 0.140 | ||
| Underweight | 1.233 (0.475 to 3.200) | 0.667 | ||
| Smoking | 1.995 (1.189 to 3.346) | 0.009 | 2.621 (1.502 to 4.573) | 0.001 |
| Number of underlying conditions | 1.611 (1.418 to 1.830) | <0.001 | 1.433 (1.210 to 1.696) | <0.001 |
| Supported housing | 1.546 (1.069 to 2.238) | 0.021 | ||
| Hypertension | 2.864 (2.047 to 4.007) | <0.001 | ||
| Ischaemic heart disease | 2.445 (1.641 to 3.644) | <0.001 | ||
| Heart failure | 3.342 (1.738 to 6.425) | <0.001 | ||
| Cerebrovascular disease | 2.502 (1.449 to 4.317) | 0.001 | ||
| COPD | 3.190 (1.609 to 6.325) | 0.001 | ||
| Asthma | 1.323 (0.901 to 1.942) | 0.153 | ||
| Solid malignancy | 1.891 (0.960 to 3.725) | 0.065 | ||
| Haematological malignancy | 0.806 (0.337 to 1.929) | 0.628 | ||
| Diabetes | 2.310 (1.481 to 3.602) | <0.001 | ||
| Chronic kidney disease | 1.434 (0.754 to 2.729) | 0.272 | ||
| Dementia | 1.205 (0.739 to 1.964) | 0.455 | ||
| Immunosuppressive medication | 0.814 (0.492 to 1.346) | 0.422 |
The HL confirmed the goodness of fit for the multivariable model (p=0.138). In categorical variables, men were compared with women, obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) patients with patients with BMI greater than or equal to 18.5–29.9 kg/m2, smokers with non-smokers, patients living in supported housing with patients living independently. The patients with certain underlying condition were compared with those without the underlying condition in question.
BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HL, Hosmer-Lemeshow; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
Table 5.
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of factors associated with all-cause mortality during hospitalisation and 30 days after discharge among all study population (n=725)
| Crude OR (95% CI) | P value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | P value | |
| RSV infection | 2.586 (1.255 to 5.327) | 0.010 | 2.288 (1.089 to 4.806) | 0.029 |
| Male gender | 1.188 (0.586 to 2.407) | 0.633 | ||
| Age (years) | 1.065 (1.031 to 1.100) | <0.001 | 1.063 (1.029 to 1.099) | <0.001 |
| Obesity | 0.633 (0.206 to 1.942) | 0.424 | ||
| Underweight | – | – | ||
| Smoking | 0.411 (0.094 to 1.807) | 0.239 | ||
| Number of underlying conditions | 1.290 (1.037 to 1.606) | 0.022 | ||
| Supported housing | 2.848 (1.410 to 5.753) | 0.004 | ||
| Hypertension | 0.991 (0.493 to 1.994) | 0.981 | ||
| Ischaemic heart disease | 1.693 (0.826 to 3.470) | 0.151 | ||
| Heart failure | 3.473 (1.593 to 7.570) | 0.002 | ||
| Cerebrovascular disease | 2.328 (1.050 to 5.160) | 0.037 | ||
| COPD | 0.835 (0.249 to 2.804) | 0.771 | ||
| Asthma | 0.846 (0.361 to 1.985) | 0.701 | ||
| Solid malignancy | 2.793 (1.103 to 7.075) | 0.030 | 2.703 (1.038 to 7.039) | 0.042 |
| Haematological malignancy | 2.061 (0.463 to 9.187) | 0.343 | ||
| Diabetes | 0.981 (0.418 to 2.305) | 0.965 | ||
| Chronic kidney disease | 2.293 (0.848 to 6.196) | 0.102 | ||
| Dementia | 0.935 (0.321 to 2.721) | 0.901 | ||
| Immunosuppressive medication | 1.562 (0.585 to 4.173) | 0.374 |
The HL confirmed the goodness of fit for the multivariable model (p=0.607). In categorical variables, men were compared with women, obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) patients with patients with BMI greater than or equal to 18.5–29.9 kg/m2, smokers with non-smokers, patients living in supported housing with patients living independently. The patients with certain underlying condition were compared with those without the underlying condition in question.
BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HL, Hosmer-Lemeshow; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
Discussion
We examined the number and severity of RSV and influenza infections among adult patients in KUH district in Eastern Finland during the 2017–2018 RSV epidemic season. The majority of the patients in both groups were elderly and had several underlying conditions, but most of them were living independently. However, because of the high general morbidity in population of Eastern Finland, the impact of epidemic RSV and influenza is considerable.21 Although there was high general morbidity in the population studied, patients with RSV in our study did not have an exceptionally high rate of comorbidities compared with previous similar studies.7 9 14 15
Consistent with previous studies, the patients with RSV were older and had significantly more underlying conditions than those with influenza,8 14 15 20 especially high blood pressure and heart failure. Compared with influenza, RSV caused a more serious disease in terms of hospitalisation, secondary pneumonia, blood culture positivity, need for antibiotics and supplemental oxygen. In addition, the all-cause mortality during hospitalisation and 30 days after discharge was higher among the RSV-infected patients than those with influenza (8.6% vs 3.5%) as found in earlier studies.8 14 15 20 In multivariate analyses, RSV remained as a significant independent risk factor to hospitalisation (aOR 2.0, p=0.012) and mortality (aOR 2.3, p=0.029) compared with influenza. However, though patients with RSV had more serious disease compared with influenza in many terms, the duration of the treatment in the ICU was longer in influenza-infected patients than those with RSV. The majority of the deaths due to influenza infection occurred during hospitalisation, whereas the majority of the deaths due to RSV infection occurred within 30 days after discharge. RSV-infected patients in our study were generally older and their burden of diseases was heavier compared with patients with influenza. This may reflect the limited ability of many elderly patients to recover from serious illness and therefore explain the high mortality after discharge from hospital.
Regarding hospital events in RSV-infected patients, the time in hospital treatment (mean 4.5 vs 4–9 days), incidence of pneumonia (37.5% vs 31%–80%) and positive results in blood cultures (4.6% vs 4%) were in accordance with other studies.7 8 11–15 However, hypoxaemia and the need of supplemental oxygen (50.7% vs 53%–68%), ICU admission (3.9% vs 10%–25%) and the use of invasive ventilation (1.3% vs 10%–36%) were less common in our study.7 8 10 11 13 Separate Step Down Units (SDUs) are in active use in our own hospital and this might be one explanation for the low ICU admissions. SDUs provide an intermediate level of care between ICU and the medical wards. One of these SDUs is located in our pulmonary unit, where intensive observation, treatment and oxygen support like high nasal flow oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation are available. Fragile patients and patients with treatment limitations, for example, withholding of life-sustaining treatment, are especially treated in SDUs instead of the ICU. Interestingly, a decision not to initiate or escalate a life-sustaining treatment in terminal illness in accordance with expressed wishes of the patient or surrogate is a widespread practice in Finland. These decisions are more common in elderly patients, non-surgical patients and those who have more comorbidities, malignancy and cardiovascular or respiratory insufficiency.23 This description correlates quite nicely with hospitalised patients with RSV in this paper. The exact number of patients who denied intensive treatment in present study is not known but they also exist. Despite the differences in treatment compared with earlier studies, in-hospital mortality rate (3.3%) was generally low and in accordance with earlier studies (1.1%–15.9%).7 8 10–12
The use of antibiotics among both RSV-infected (67.1%) and influenza-infected (47.3%) patients was common in our study, but lower than reported earlier among RSV-infected patients (76%–95%).7 8 10 Among patients with influenza, the proportion of patients treated with prophylactic antibiotics has been reported to be as high as 96.6%.24 In our study, the proportion of patients with influenza treated with antibiotics was significantly lower. In both groups, the proportion of those who received antibiotics was higher than the amount of actual pneumonia diagnoses. In Finland, the antimicrobial resistance has remained low compared with other countries in European Union due to strict antimicrobial policy.25 The lower usage of antibiotics in our study did not increase the mortality rate in RSV-infected patients compared with other studies where the use of antibiotics had been studied.7 8 10
The number of deceased patients in our study was low, which is in line with previous studies conducted with RSV-infected and influenza-infected patients.7–14 Solid malignancies and chronic kidney disease were more common among the RSV-infected non-survivors than survivors. Older age and heart failure were more common among non-survivors than survivors in influenza-infected patients, but not in RSV-infected patients. In earlier studies, older age has been reported to be a significant factor predicting mortality in RSV-infected patients.8 9 12–14 Age and previous haematological disease have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of death during the first 21 days of hospitalisation among both RSV-infected and influenza-infected patients.12 As far as we know, our finding that solid malignancies and chronic kidney disease are factors predicting mortality in RSV infections has not been reported before.
Among all study patients, smoking (aOR 2.621, p=0.001) was positively associated with the increased risk of hospitalisation, but not with mortality. The result is in line with previous studies, where the positive association with likelihood of hospitalisation has been observed, but effect on mortality has been less conclusive.18 Unlike reported previously,17 obesity was not associated with the increased risk of hospitalisation among influenza-infected and RSV-infected patients in our study. In current study, 15.8% of the patients with RSV and 19.8% with influenza were obese (BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2), while on average in Finland 26.1% of men and 27.5% of women over 30 years of age are obese.26 Still, only 15.4% of the deceased patients with RSV and 10.0% with influenza in our study were obese. When compared with COVID-19, the difference is remarkable, since 28.9% of the deceased patients aged 20 years and older with COVID-19 have been reported to be obese.27
The study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital, and there was no possibility to gather information about patient recovery from primary care facilities, which is a limitation. During the study period, there was a major RSV epidemic in Finland, which explains the high number of RSV infections compared with influenza infections. During this time, influenza B was more common than influenza A in Finland and the total number of influenza infections was higher than in previous years explained by the high prevalence of influenza B.19 However, there was no significant difference in excess mortality compared with previous influenza seasons during the study time.19
In our study, RSV infection was associated with increased likelihood of hospitalisation and mortality compared with influenza. The patients with RSV infection were older and had more underlying conditions than the patients with influenza. No difference in BMI or smoking status was found, but solid malignancies and chronic kidney disease were shown to be independent risk factors for death among RSV-infected patients. During RSV and influenza epidemics, it is important to test all hospitalised patients with respiratory symptoms to prevent the spread of infection by using contact and respiratory precautions as well as isolation and cohorting of infected patients. The same practices are important in managing COVID-19-infected patients.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Contributors: AH—conceptualisation, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing (original draft and reviewing and editing), visualisation, guarantor. ES—conceptualisation, validation, resources, investigation, data curation, writing (original draft and reviewing and editing), visualisation. SH—conceptualisation, methodology, validation, formal analysis, writing (review and editing), visualisation. KS—conceptualisation, methodology, validation, formal analysis, writing (review and editing), visualisation. JK—conceptualisation, methodology, data curation, writing (review and editing). IK—conceptualisation, methodology, validation, writing (reviewing and editing), visualisation. R-LP—conceptualisation, methodology, writing (review and editing), supervision, project administration. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement
No data are available. Due to legal and ethical restrictions, no additional data are available.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Not required.
Ethics approval
This registry study was approved by a local ethics committee (the Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Savo Hospital District; 1107/13.02.00/2018). This study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
References
- 1.Simoes EA. Respiratory syncytial virus infection. Lancet 1999;354:847–52. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)80040-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Falsey AR, Hennessey PA, Formica MA, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly and high-risk adults. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2005;352:1749–59. 10.1056/NEJMoa043951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare . Tartuntataudit Suomessa, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li Y, Reeves RM, Wang X, et al. Global patterns in monthly activity of influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, and metapneumovirus: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2019;7:e1031–45. 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30264-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tin Tin Htar M, Yerramalla MS, Moïsi JC, et al. The burden of respiratory syncytial virus in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Infect 2020;148:E48. 10.1017/S0950268820000400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shi T, Denouel A, Tietjen AK, et al. Global disease burden estimates of respiratory syncytial virus-associated acute respiratory infection in older adults in 2015: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dis 2020;222:S577–83. 10.1093/infdis/jiz059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chuaychoo B, Ngamwongwan S, Kaewnaphan B, et al. Clinical manifestations and outcomes of respiratory syncytial virus infection in adult hospitalized patients. J Clin Virol 2019;117:103–8. 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cohen R, Babushkin F, Geller K, et al. Characteristics of hospitalized adult patients with laboratory documented Influenza A, B and Respiratory Syncytial Virus - A single center retrospective observational study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0214517. 10.1371/journal.pone.0214517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wyffels V, Kariburyo F, Gavart S, et al. A real-world analysis of patient characteristics and predictors of hospitalization among US Medicare beneficiaries with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Adv Ther 2020;37:1203–17. 10.1007/s12325-020-01230-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vos LM, Oosterheert JJ, Hoepelman AIM, et al. External validation and update of a prognostic model to predict mortality in hospitalized adults with RSV: a retrospective Dutch cohort study. J Med Virol 2019;91:2117–24. 10.1002/jmv.25568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yoon JG, Noh JY, Choi WS, et al. Clinical characteristics and disease burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection among hospitalized adults. Sci Rep 2020;10:12106. 10.1038/s41598-020-69017-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Prasad N, Newbern EC, Trenholme AA, et al. The health and economic burden of respiratory syncytial virus associated hospitalizations in adults. PLoS One 2020;15:e0234235. 10.1371/journal.pone.0234235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee N, Lui GCY, Wong KT, et al. High morbidity and mortality in adults hospitalized for respiratory syncytial virus infections. Clin Infect Dis 2013;57:1069–77. 10.1093/cid/cit471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhao J, et al. Severity and mortality of respiratory syncytial virus vs influenza A infection in hospitalized adults in China. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2020;14:483–90. 10.1111/irv.12754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ackerson B, Tseng HF, Sy LS, et al. Severe morbidity and mortality associated with respiratory syncytial virus versus influenza infection in hospitalized older adults. Clin Infect Dis 2019;69:197–203. 10.1093/cid/ciy991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Loubet P, Lenzi N, Valette M, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of respiratory syncytial virus infection among adults hospitalized with influenza-like illness in France. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;23:253–9. 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moser J-AS, Galindo-Fraga A, Ortiz-Hernández AA, et al. Underweight, overweight, and obesity as independent risk factors for hospitalization in adults and children from influenza and other respiratory viruses. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2019;13:3–9. 10.1111/irv.12618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Han L, Ran J, Mak Y-W, et al. Smoking and influenza-associated morbidity and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology 2019;30:405–17. 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ikonen N, Murtopuro S, Haveri A, et al. Influenssakausi Suomessa, viikot 40/2017‐20/2018. Seurantaraportti. Finland: National Institute for Health and Welfare, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kwon YS, Park SH, Kim M-A, et al. Risk of mortality associated with respiratory syncytial virus and influenza infection in adults. BMC Infect Dis 2017;17:785. 10.1186/s12879-017-2897-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.THL’s Morbidity Index. Available: https://thl.fi/en/web/thlfi-en/statistics-and-data/statistics-by-topic/morbidity/thl-s-morbidity-index [Accessed 04 Jan 2022].
- 22.Anon . Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a who consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000;894:i–xii. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Adamski J, Weigl W, Lahtinen P, et al. Intensive care patient survival after limiting life-sustaining treatment-The FINNEOL* national cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2020;64:1144–53. 10.1111/aas.13612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Manohar P, Loh B, Nachimuthu R, et al. Secondary bacterial infections in patients with viral pneumonia. Front Med 2020;7:420. 10.3389/fmed.2020.00420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control . Antimicrobial resistance in the EU/EEA (EARS-Net) - Annual Epidemiological Report 2019. Stockholm: ECDC, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Koponen P, Borodulin K, Lundqvist A, et al. Terveys, toimintakyky ja hyvinvointi Suomessa - FinTerveys2017-tutkimus. Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gao M, Piernas C, Astbury NM, et al. Associations between body-mass index and COVID-19 severity in 6·9 million people in England: a prospective, community-based, cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021;9:350–9. 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00089-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No data are available. Due to legal and ethical restrictions, no additional data are available.