Sir,
Trigeminal neuralgia and short-lasting, unilateral, neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) are classified as distinct disorders.[1] Most of SUNCT are idiopathic, but there are some casies in the previous report that are secondary to intracranial neoplasm,[2,3,4] most of which are pituitary tumors and no reports of vestibular schwannoma. Herein, we report a short case of SUNCT syndrome and trigeminal neuralgia secondary to cerebellopontine angle (CPA) vestibular scwannoma.
A 45-year-old woman presented with a chief complaint of paroxysmal pain in the right maxillary region. The initial onset of the patient's chief complaints occurred 3 months earlier, and she noticed pain when she touched her tongue to the palate gingiva. The primary care dentist administered splint therapy and loxoprofen (Loxonin®) 50 mg/day after diagnosing temporomandibular disorder (TMD), which did not alleviate her symptoms. One week before presenting to our clinic, the patient developed severe pain in the entire right upper jaw and temporal region, lasting a few minutes. Exacerbations with lacrimation and sweating of the face occurred 1–2 times/day. Subsequently, the patient complained of hearing loss and double vision on the right side. A clinical diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia TN was made based on your description of the pain, including type, location and triggers of pain, and the patient was prescribed oral carbamazepine (Tegretol®) 100 mg twice daily (200 mg/day), which resulted in complete remission of pain attacks and autonomic signs. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a mass compressing the pons and right fifth cranial nerve complex [Figure 1a-d]. The patient was referred to a neurosurgeon who removed the tumor under general anesthesia; orofacial pain disappeared immediately. The histopathological diagnosis was a vestibular schwannoma.
Figure 1.

MRI axial T1 after contrast agent (a), and heavily T2 2D image (b). The mass compresses the ipsilateral trigeminal root at the CPA. The size of the tumor is 17 × 15 mm. MRI of the coronal plane with T1 contrast (c). MRI of the sagittal plane with T1 contrast (d). Yellow and white arrows indicate tumor and the cerebral blood vessels, respectively
From April 1990 to February 2022, 19 cases of secondary SUNCT due to neoplasm have been reported so far. Of these, five cases were pituitary adenoma, four cases were pituitary macroadenoma, three cases were pituitary macroadenoma, and the one case was pilocytic astrocytoma, leiomyosarcoma, epidermoid tumor, cyst, meningioma, pulmonary metastases, angioma, and our case (vestibular schwannoma), respectively Table 1.[2,3,4] Regarding the location of the neoplasm confirmed by MRI, the cavernous sinus were observed in five cases, three in the pons-CPA, two in the carotid artery, two in the ocular region, and one in the frontotemporal area. Three pituitary microadenomas and three pituitary adenomas showed no extension, but the remaining one case was expanding in MRI.[2,3,4] To our knowledge, this is the first case reporting a SUNCT syndrome probably caused by vestibular schwannoma in CPA. Initially, classical trigeminal neuralgia appeared in the second division, which gradually changed to atypical trigeminal neuralgia, eventually becoming SUNCT syndrome, suggesting secondary SUNCT syndrome with transformation from trigeminal neuralgia. From the MRI sagittal section, since the first branch of the trigeminal nerve is located between the mass and the cerebral blood vessels, we assume that the tumor compresses the trigeminal nerve which was compressed by the artery opposite region. The pathophysiology of primary and secondary SUNCT cases may be related to compression of the trigeminal nerve, and the process of SUNCT is activated.[5]
Table 1.
Clinical features of 20 patients with SUNCT attributed to neoplasm
| Disease | Patient no. | Age at onset (years) | SEX | Duration (seconds) | Frequency T (per day) | rigger | Pain side | Focus location in MRI/CT | Effective treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pituitary adenoma | 1 | 46 | M | 15-120 | 3-6 | Yes | L | L cavernous sinus | CAB |
| 2 | 22 | F | <60 | 5-10 | Yes | L | No extension | CAB | |
| 3 | 26 | M | 60 | 2-8 | N/A | L | No extension | Surgery | |
| 4 | 18 | F | 30 | 5-10 | No | R | No extension | LMT | |
| 5 | 26 | M | 180-240 | 4 | No | L | extension | CAB | |
| Pituitary macroadenoma | 6 | 26 | M | 20-30 | 1-6 | Yes | R | R cavernous sinus and carotid artery | BCT |
| 7 | 33 | M | 10 | 1-10 | Yes | L | L cavernous sinus | DA | |
| 8 | 35 | F | 60-120 | 40 | Yes | R | R cavernous carotid artery | LMT | |
| 9 | 27 | F | 15-30 | N/A | Yes | L | L cavernous sinus | Radiotherapy | |
| Pituitary microadenoma | 10 | 24 | F | 15-30 | 10-30 | Yes | L | No extension | Surgery |
| 11 | 28 | M | 20-30 | 100-200 | N/A | R | No extension | Surgery | |
| 12 | 33 | M | 60-120 | 30 | N/A | L | No extension | Surgery | |
| angioma | 13 | 62 | M | 60 | 15-23 | YES | R | R pons-CPA | CA |
| Leiomyosarcoma | 14 | 45 | M | 60-120 | 10-15 | Yes | L | L cavernous sinus | N/A |
| Pilocytic astrocytoma | 15 | 11 | F | 30-60 | 20 | No | R | R pons-CPA | Surgery |
| Epidermoid tumor | 16 | 33 | M | 30-60 | 240 | Yes | L | L pons-CPA | Surgery |
| Cyst | 17 | 23 | F | 10-60 | 20-30 | Yes | R | R ocular region | Surgery |
| Pulmonary metastases | 18 | 69 | F | 60-120 | 50-70 | Yes | R | R ocular region | Radiotherapy |
| Meningioma | 19 | 81 | F | N/A | 60 | No | L | L frontotemporal infiltrative growing | GBP |
| Our casetvestibular schwannoma) | 20 | 45 | F | 60-120 | 1-2 | Yes | R | R pons-CPA | Surgery |
BCT = bromocriptine, CA = Carbamazepine, CAB = cabergoline, CPA = cerebellopontine angle, CT = computed tomography, DA = dopamine, GBP = gabapentin, LMT = lamotrigine, MRI = magnetic resonance, N/A = not applicable
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for English language editing.
REFERENCES
- 1.Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1–211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cao Y, Yang F, Dong Z, Huang X, Cao B, Yu S. Secondary short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing:A new case and a literature review. J Clin Neurol. 2018;14:433–43. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2018.14.4.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.De Benedittis G. SUNCT syndrome associated with cavernous angioma of the brain stem. Cephalalgia. 1996;16:503–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1996.1607503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hiraldo JD, Sánchez Fernández F, Fuerte Hortigón A, Viguera Romero FJ. SUNCT syndrome secondary to expanding prolactinoma responsive to lamotrigine-A case report. Headache. 2019;59:1382–4. doi: 10.1111/head.13612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rodgers SD, Marascalchi BJ, Strom RG, Huang PP. Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing syndrome secondary to an epidermoid tumor in the cerebellopontine angle. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;34:E1. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.focus12233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
