ABSTRACT
Bacteriophages put intense selective pressure on microbes, which must evolve diverse resistance mechanisms to survive continuous phage attacks. We used a library of spontaneous Bacteriophage Insensitive Mutants (BIMs) to learn how the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum resists the virulent lytic podophage phiAP1. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of many BIMs suggested that the R. solanacearum Type II Secretion System (T2SS) plays a key role in phiAP1 infection. Using precision engineered mutations that permit T2SS assembly but either inactivate the T2SS GspE ATPase or sterically block the secretion portal, we demonstrated that phiAP1 needs a functional T2SS to infect R. solanacearum. This distinction between the static presence of T2SS components, which is necessary but not sufficient for phage sensitivity, and the energized and functional T2SS, which is sufficient, implies that binding interactions alone cannot explain the role of the T2SS in phiAP1 infection. Rather, our results imply that some aspect of the resetting of the T2SS, such as disassembly of the pseudopilus, is required. Because R. solanacearum secretes multiple virulence factors via the T2SS, acquiring resistance to phiAP1 also dramatically reduced R. solanacearum virulence on tomato plants. This acute fitness trade-off suggests this group of phages may be a sustainable control strategy for an important crop disease.
KEYWORDS: fitness cost, phage resistance, Ralstonia solanacearum, bacterial wilt, virus-host interactions, pseudopilin, general secretion pathway
INTRODUCTION
In the ongoing arms race between phages and bacteria, virus-mediated selection plays a central role in maintaining bacterial diversity (1, 2). This selective pressure drives rapid molecular evolution as part of the natural cycles of adaptation and counter adaptation (3 to 5). The prevalence of a genotype is determined by the relative adaptive advantages and biological cost of its cognate functions (6). Bacterial hosts resist viruses directly with mechanisms like the broadly distributed CRISPR-Cas systems (7) restriction-modification (R-M) (8), and abortive infection (Abi) systems (9). Additionally, viral resistance phenotypes can result from host mutations that alter factors essential for primary interactions with the phage (10), such as viral adsorption (11, 12).
The Gram-negative betaproteobacterium Ralstonia solanacearum (R. solanacearum) is a widely distributed plant pathogen that belongs to a bacterial complex called Ralstonia solanacearum species complex (RSSC), consisting of three species, Ralstonia syzygii, R. solanacearum, and Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum (13). Originally, the RSSC isolates were subdivided into four genotypically different phylotypes and classified according to their geographical origins. Currently, the isolates belonging to phylotypes I and III are classified as R. pseudosolanacearum, and the isolates from the phylotypes II and IV as R. solanacearum and R. syzygii, respectively (13, 14). R. solanacearum strains form a heterogeneous group that causes lethal bacterial wilt disease in more than 200 plant species, including economically important crops like potato, banana, tobacco, and tomato (14 to 18).
Efforts to control bacterial wilt with bacteriophages have had mixed results because R. solanacearum populations are often phage resistant, apparently using multiple strategies to escape viral infection (19 to 21). Some R. solanacearum isolates carry canonical CRISPR-Cas systems, but these are apparently ineffective in their native state (22). The occurrence of phage-insensitive strains suggests R. solanacearum has other viral evasion strategies. To better understand the natural anti-phage strategies in R. solanacearum, we generated a library of spontaneous bacteriophage insensitive mutants (BIMs) by exposing wild-type (WT) R. solanacearum strain CFBP2957 (Phylotype 2A) to the virulent podophage phiAP1. Two of these BIMs, BIM4 and BIM30, were previously characterized (22) and shown to allow phage adsorption but not phage DNA replication.
Here, we identify the genetic determinants of phage resistance in several BIMs derived from R. solanacearum CFBP2957. One system implicated was the Type II Secretion System (T2SS). The T2SS is a complex, highly dynamic molecular machine that transports folded proteins from the periplasm to the exterior of the bacterial cell (Fig. 1). This system is composed of an outer membrane protein complex, the secretin, which is made of 15 GspD subunits; an inner membrane platform; and transenvelope connecting proteins. The inner membrane platform (23, 24) is formed by the transmembrane proteins GspL, GspM, and GspF, as well as the cytoplasmic ATPase GspE. ATP hydrolysis by GspE provides the energy that drives assembly of the pseudopilus. This pseudopilus is a polymer of the major pseudopilin GspG with a terminal cap composed of four minor pseudopilins (23, 25). Growth of the pseudopilus guides the protein cargo into the periplasmic vestibule of the outer membrane secretin complex, and from there it leaves the cell via the secretin pore domain. Prior to their addition to the growing pseudopilus, charged leader peptides must be removed from prepseudopilins by a prepilin peptidase (26). Interestingly, we discovered that phage phiAP1 needs a functional T2SS, which R. solanacearum uses to secrete virulence factors. We found that function-destroying mutation of T2SS components provided phage resistance but imposed a severe fitness cost because R. solanacearum BIMs had significantly reduced virulence on tomato plants. Furthermore, we showed that the PilD prepilin peptidase plays an active role in both type IV pili (T4P) and in the T2SS of R. solanacearum.
FIG 1.
Mutations in gspL and pilD confer resistance to phage phiAP1. (a) Genomic location of the unique mutations in R. solanacearum BIM4 and BIM30. BIM4 contains a mutation in gspL, a gene coding for an inner membrane protein of the T2SS. BIM30 contains a mutation in pilD coding for a prepilin peptidase of the T4P. Asterisk indicates mutated genes in the BIMs. (b) Structure of the T2SS. The inner membrane complex is composed of the cytoplasmic ATPase GspE (shown in red) and the inner membrane proteins GspC, GspF, GspL, and GspM. GspN is not pictured. GspC (shown in gray) links the inner membrane complex to the outer membrane complex, which is composed of the outer membrane secretin GspD (shown in blue). GspE uses the energy from ATP hydrolysis to assemble the pseudopilus, which is a polymer of the major pseudopilin GspG (shown in dark green) capped with the minor pseudopilins GspH, GspI, GspJ, and GspK (shown in shades of light green). The growth of the pseudopilus pushes T2SS cargo out of the cell. The T2SS is structurally related to the type IV pilus, shown on the right. PilA (shown in yellow) processed by PilD are added to the pilus. (c) The table shows the titration results of phage phiAP1 on CFBP2957, BIM4, and BIM30, in addition to the strains with empty pUFJ10 and the BIMs complements. The values are the average of two double-layer plaque assay independent experiments performed in triplicates ± standard deviation. Different letters in the same column are significantly different at P < 0.05 (ANOVA). Both BIM4 and BIM30 are resistant to phage phiAP1 infection, and complementing the mutants with the first 658 nucleotides (219 amino acids) of gspL or full-length pilD, respectively, restores their phage sensitivity. Ten-fold dilutions of a phage phiAP1 lysate were spotted onto a lawn of each bacterial strain in the spot test.
RESULTS
Mutations in the T2SS and T4P in BIMs of R. solanacearum.
To understand the mechanism of phage resistance in R. solanacearum mutants, we first sequenced the genomes of two BIMs (BIM4 and BM30) that are fully resistant to phage phiAP1 as well as of the phage-sensitive WT parent strain CFBP2957. Several single nucleotide mutations and deletions were identified in the two BIMs compared to the WT. To map the mutations involved in phage resistance, we focused on the few nonsynonymous mutations (Table S1). BIM4 contained a 3-bp deletion that removed a leucine at position 65 in the membrane protein GspL (481 amino acids), which is involved of the general secretion pathway. Specifically, GspL is a part of the T2SS inner membrane complex and participates in the formation of the pseudopilus (Fig. 1a and b) (23). In BIM30, a 4-bp deletion caused a frameshift after the 42nd of the 290 amino acids of the prepilin peptidase (PilD). PilD processes prepilins before they are added to the type IV pilus (T4P), a structure involved in R. solanacearum twitching motility and virulence.
Mutation in the BIMs of Ralstonia solanacearum strain CFBP2957. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.1 MB (101KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Phage sensitivity is restored by complementing the BIM mutations.
To confirm that the mutations in gspL and pilD were responsible for the phage resistance phenotype, we first separately cloned the WT gspL and pilD genes from R. solanacearum CFBP2957 into the low-copy replicative plasmid pUFJ10 (27) to generate plasmids pGspL and pPilD. The expression of each WT gene is under the control of the kanamycin resistance cassette promoter in pUFJ10. While cloning pilD was straightforward and expected sequenced-confirmed clones were readily obtained, we could not clone the complete gspL despite multiple attempts. We did, however, succeed in cloning a truncated version of gspL, which contained the first 219 codons (the mutation in BIM4 is in codon 65). These cloning difficulties suggested that this gene, coding for a membrane protein, is detrimental for E. coli growth. Still, plasmids pPilD and pGspL219 (containing a truncated version) were both successfully transformed into R. solanacearum BIM30 and BIM4, respectively. Of significant interest, both complemented strains (BIM4::pGspL219 and BIM30::pPilD) were sensitive to phage phiAP1, restoring the phage-sensitive phenotype of the WT strain CFBP2957 (Fig. 1c). In a separate experiment, pilD was also cloned under its native promoter into pUFJ10, and this construct also restored sensitivity to phage phiAP1. These results confirmed that R. solanacearum PilD and GspL are essential for phage phiAP1 to complete its infection cycle.
BIM4 and BIM30 are defective in Type II secretion, twitching motility, or both.
Because gspL and pilD are predicted to be involved in the activity of T2SS and T4P, respectively, we assayed these two functions in BIM4 and BIM30. Twitching motility was used to assess T4P functionality by spotting each strain on low-percentage agar plates and observing colony margins after 16 h of growth (28). The edges of the BIM4 and WT colonies had the diffuse and reticulate margins typical of R. solanacearum twitching motility (Fig. 2a) (28). In contrast, the BIM30 colony rapidly developed thick, defined edges, similarly to a twitching-defective control strain lacking the major pilin PilA (Fig. 2a). These results indicate that the loss of pilD in BIM30 impairs R. solanacearum twitching motility.
FIG 2.
R. solanacearum BIM4 and BIM30 are both deficient in T2SS, but only BIM30 is deficient in T4P-mediated twitching motility. (a) Colony margins of R. solanacearum CFBP2957 WT, BIM4, and BIM30 grown on low-percentage (0.08%) agar plates. GMI1000 and a twitching deficient mutant (GMI1000 ΔpilA) are included as controls. The colony margins of WT and BIM4 at low cell densities were diffuse and undefined. In contrast, microcolonies of BIM30 and ΔpilA coalesced earlier, forming compact, defined masses even at low densities. BIM30 was deficient in twitching motility, but BIM4 was not. Scale bars represent 0.1 mm. (b) Secretion of the T2SS polygalacturonase enzymes by WT R. solanacearum CFBP2957, BIM4, BIM30, WT GMI1000, and GMI1000 ΔpilA. Strains were plated on minimal media plates containing polygalacturonic acid. After 24 h of growth, the colonies were rinsed away, and the plates were flooded with 2N HCl to reveal zones of clearing made by the polygalacturonase activity. Both BIM4 and BIM30 were unable to export polygalacturonase enzyme, indicating they have defects in the T2SS.
As an indicator of T2SS function, we tested BIM4 and BIM30 for activity of the type II secreted enzyme polygalacturonase. When grown on agar plates containing polygalacturonic acid substrate, the T2SS-positive WT R. solanacearum strain CFBP2957 produced a clearing zone due to the secretion of this enzyme (29). Neither BIM4 nor BIM30 produced a clearing zone on polygalacturonic acid plates, indicating a nonfunctional T2SS (Fig. 2b). In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, PilD processes not only pilins for the T4P, but also plays a role in the T2SS (30). The loss of these activities in BIM30 strongly suggests that PilD plays the same role in R. solanacearum T2SS as it does in P. aeruginosa.
Phage phiAP1 does not directly depend on T4P for R. solanacearum infection.
The phage resistance phenotype of BIM4 and BIM30 suggests that phage phiAP1 requires the T2SS for infection. However, while both BIMs lacked T2 secretion, BIM30 also had impaired twitching motility (T4P defect). To rule out a direct role of the T4P in phage phiAP1 infection, we used a validated PilA mutant of Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum strain GMI1000 (phylotype I), which is also sensitive to phage phiAP1. GMI1000 ΔpilA has no twitching motility because it lacks the major pilin subunit PilA. PilA is a major component of the P. aeruginosa T4P and is important for infection by some phages (31) (Fig. 3a). Both WT GMI1000 and its ΔpilA mutant retained phage sensitivity, indicating that neither functional twitching motility nor the T4P are required for phiAP1 infection (Fig. 3b).
FIG 3.

Phage phiAP1 infection depends on an active T2SS, but not the T4P. (a) Predicted effects of two T2SS deficient mutants. (b) Serial dilutions (10-fold) of phage phiAP1 lysate were spotted onto a lawn of either GMI1000 WT or GMI1000 ΔpilA. The ΔpilA mutant was as sensitive to phage phiAP1 as the WT, indicating that T4P is not required for phiAP1 infecion. The R. solanacearum gspEK274A mutant contains a single mutation in the ATP binding domain of the inner membrane ATPase GspE, shown in red. When GspE is unable to bind and hydrolyze ATP, it cannot add pseudopilins to the pseudopilus, and the system cannot export any cargo. The R. pseudosolanacearum GMI1000 gspG OE mutant contains an additional copy of the major pseudopilin gene gspG (dark green) under the control of an active promoter. This strain expresses gspG roughly 10-fold more than WT (Fig. S2) and most likely forms an overextended pseudopilus that is predicted to reduce cargo export. In both mutants, the T2SS complex is still predicted to form. (c) CFBP2957 gspEK274A cannot export polygalacturonase and is resistant to phiAP1. Ten-fold serial dilutions of each R. solanacearum strain were spotted onto minimal media plates containing polygalacturonic acid. Phage suspensions were spotted onto a lawn of each mutant. (d) The GMI1000 gspG OE mutant had roughly 10-fold lower secretion of polygalacturonase compared to WT and is partially resistant to phiAP1.
Cloning of gspG under the control of the rplM promoter increases gspG expression approximately 10-fold. Semiquantitative RT-PCR was used to measure gene expression in two independent clones of GspG OE. The stably expressed serC transcript is used as an endogenous control. Download FIG S2, DOCX file, 0.1 MB (156.3KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Phage phiAP1 requires a functional T2SS to infect R. solanacearum.
The T2SS exports proteins by using a dynamic pseudopilus to guide cargo from the periplasm to the outer membrane secretion complex from which it is released into the extracellular space. Retraction of the pseudopilus resets the system for additional rounds of secretion (23). To determine if phage phiAP1 requires a functional T2SS for infection or merely depends on the inert T2SS complex, we made two mutants in R. solanacearum strains CFBP2957 or GMI1000 designed to interfere with the secretion process while still allowing the complex to form. First, we constructed a point mutation in the ATP-binding site of GspE (gspEK274A), the cytoplasmic ATPase that powers addition of pseudopilin units at the base of the growing T2SS pseudopilus (23). This single amino acid change results in a GspE protein that can still form the T2SS complex but cannot bind or cleave ATP, so a functional pseudopilus cannot be assembled (Fig. 3a) (32, 33). Consistent with our hypothesis, a mutant with this single amino acid substitution not only was unable to export either polygalacturonase or pectin methylesterase, two type II secreted enzymes, but was also completely resistant to phage phiAP1 (Fig. 3c, Fig. S1).
Targeted mutations in the T2SS reduce the export of pectin methylesterase. Ten-fold serial dilutions of each strain were spotted on minimal media plates containing pectin. After 24 h of growth, the colonies were rinsed off and the plates were washed with HCl. BIM1 and a GspG overexpression strain produced a clearing zone at a 10-fold higher dilution than the WT. A point mutation in gspE led to a loss of pectin methylesterase secretion. Download FIG S1, DOCX file, 0.2 MB (213.8KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Second, we made a construct that overexpresses gspG (coding for the major T2SS pseudopilin) using a strong ribosomal promoter (34). Because the formation of the T2SS complex is dependent on correct stoichiometry (35, 36), increasing the number of available GspG subunits has been shown to increase the length of the pseudopilus, allowing it to breach the outer membrane (37, 38) and interfering with normal T2SS function (Fig. 3a). Overexpression of gspG with this construct was confirmed using semiquantitative RT-PCR, with expression being roughly 10-fold higher in the mutant compared to WT (Fig. S2). As expected, secretion of polygalacturonase and pectin methylesterase in this mutant decreased approximately 10-fold (Fig. 3d, Fig. S1). Remarkably, this strain was also (mostly) resistant to phage phiAP1 (Fig. 3d). Together, these results demonstrate that phage phiAP1 requires not just the assembled proteins of the T2SS but indeed a functional and energized T2SS to successfully infect R. solanacearum.
Phage resistance imposes a fitness cost by reducing R. solanacearum virulence.
Because the T2SS translocates a wide range of plant cell wall-degrading enzymes and other proteins from the periplasm across the outer membrane, we suspected that a defective T2SS in R. solanacearum would reduce the plant pathogen’s fitness. We quantified the bacterial wilt virulence of BIM4 and BIM30 on tomato plants using a naturalistic soil soak inoculation that mimics the R. solanacearum infection process in the field. Under these conditions, WT R. solanacearum strain CFBP2957 caused significant bacterial wilt disease, killing nearly all plants within 8 days, while BIM4 and BIM30 caused little or no disease (Fig. 4). The complemented BIMs containing either the full-length pilD or the truncated gspL (658 nucleotides/219 amino acids), cloned on the low-copy-number plasmid pUFJ10, led to intermediate virulence phenotypes (Fig. 4) and were more virulent than the BIMs (BIM4 versus BIM4comp, P = 0.024; BIM30 versus BIM30comp, P = 0.0016, ANOVA). These data indicate that BIM4 and BIM30 are strikingly less virulent on tomato than WT R. solanacearum strain CFBP2957.
FIG 4.

Bacteriophage-insensitive R. solanacearum mutants BIM4 and BIM30 have reduced virulence on tomato plants. Unwounded tomato plants were inoculated by pouring a 108 CFU/mL suspension of R. solanacearum onto the soil. Plants were incubated in a 28°C growth chamber and rated daily on a 0 to 4 disease index scale. Each point represents the mean disease index of a total of 30 plants in 3 independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard error. R. solanacearum mutants BIM4 and BIM30 were less virulent than the phage-sensitive strains, the parent CFBP2957, and the complemented BIMs (P < 0.0005, repeated-measures ANOVA).
Other BIMs also have defects in T2SS.
We analyzed an additional set of 26 BIMs isolated after exposing WT R. solanacearum strain CFBP2957 to phage phiAP1. First, we tested the twitching and T2SS phenotypes of these phage-resistant mutants. Interestingly, 20 of them (77%) also had a defect in their T2SS, suggesting that the emergence of bacteriophage-insensitive mutants with a T2SS defect is common under our laboratory conditions. Three out of the 20 T2SS-defective BIMs also lacked twitching motility. Sequencing the pilD genes from these three BIMs (BIM6, BIM14, and BIM19) revealed that they all had a mutation leading either to a frameshift early in the gene or to premature stop codons.
We also analyzed the virulence of these additional 26 BIMs on tomato plants using a faster infection assay in which ~200 CFU of each strain were placed on a cut leaf petiole. This introduces the bacteria directly into the plant xylem, leading to rapid, consistent disease. Bacterial wilt symptoms a week after inoculation correlated directly with the strain’s T2SS function (Table S2, Fig. S3). The 20 BIMs with a defective T2SS did not infect tomato plants, while five of the six BIMs with a functional T2SS (BIM3, BIM9, BIM17, BIM25, and BIM29) caused significant wilt disease. The phage-resistance phenotype in these five BIMs is likely due to mutations outside the T2SS system that affect other steps involved in viral infection.
Only T2SS-positive BIMs retain virulence. Bonny Best tomato plants (21 days old) were inoculated through a cut leaf petiole with 200 CFU of each BIM. Five plants were included per treatment. BIMs that have both functional T2SS and twitching motility are shown in red, those that are deficient in both T2SS and twitching motility are shown in grey, and BIMs that are deficient in T2SS but have WT levels of twitching motility are shown in blue. The wild-type parent strain is shown in black. Download FIG S3, DOCX file, 0.1 MB (157KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
BIM1 was noteworthy because of its intermediate behavior, with secreted levels of pectin methylesterase roughly 10-fold lower than the WT strain (Fig. S1) and significantly reduced virulence compared to the fully T2SS-functional BIMs. Sequencing the genome of BIM1 revealed a 15-bp insertion in the gene coding for the T2SS inner membrane protein, GspF. This insertion added five hydrophobic amino acids (VLAAI) near the midpoint of the protein. These results bolster the connection among phage sensitivity, T2SS activity, and virulence.
DISCUSSION
Because few effective in-field treatments for R. solanacearum exist, there has been much interest in isolating R. solanacearum-infecting phages for use as biocontrol agents (39). However, designing long-lasting biocontrol regimes likely requires a comprehensive understanding of the biology of the phages and how they interact with both R. solanacearum and their environment (40). For example, some temperate phages influence the expression of key virulence-related genes in their host. Phages of the genus Inoviridae have been shown to reduce the expression of virulence factors like motility and the Type III Secretion System in R. solanacearum (41 to 44), suggesting that they could be useful as a nonlethal form of disease suppression. In contrast, the inovirus φrSS1 increased R. solanacearum virulence by inducing the expression of the main quorum-sensing system regulator to allow infected cells to grow more aggressively in planta (45). Additionally, it is useful to understand how abiotic factors such as UV or adherence to soil particles impact phage dynamics in the field (40). Perhaps the most important factor, however, is the development of resistance to phage infection by R. solanacearum itself (22, 46). We found that R. solanacearum CFBP2957 is readily capable of developing resistance to phiAP1, echoing many previous results showing a robust ability to evolve phage resistance (46 to 49). Even when challenged by a cocktail of multiple phages, R. solanacearum can develop broad resistance to the entire cohort of phages, albeit at a fitness cost severe enough to be seen even in vitro (48). Carefully managing the rate of infection may help to mitigate the costs of phage resistance. The ability of a panel of lytic R. solanacearum-infecting phages to combat bacterial wilt disease both in culture and on tomato seedlings has also been examined (47). Interestingly, the phage that had the slowest replication cycle and did not completely suppress R. solanacearum growth in culture was effective at reducing bacterial wilt disease on tomato seedlings. This suggests that the phage was able to suppress R. solanacearum growth enough to promote plant health but not enough to drive resistance. Moreover, the presence of competing microbes might also impact the pressure toward resistance. When R. solanacearum was cultured with either a lytic phage, an antibiotic-producing bacterial competitor, or a combination of both, while the rate acquisition of phage resistance was unaffected by the bacterial competitor in vitro, a lower rate was observed in the rhizosphere, suggesting that complex biotic and abiotic factors influence R. solanacearum evolution of phage resistance (49). In our study, we only examined how R. solanacearum develops resistance to phiAP1 in vitro. While we found that mutations in the T2SS were the primary mechanism of resistance in our conditions, more work would be necessary to see if R. solancearum would use the same mechanism to develop phiAP1 resistance in the field. While the loss of the T2SS is detrimental to R. solanacearum in planta, it is not clear how the loss would affect its fitness in the rhizosphere in competition with other soil microbes. However, determining the major molecular pathway of resistance will aid in the further use and study of phiAP1.
R. solanacearum T2SS genes and pilD are hot spots for phiAP1 BIM mutations, but disrupting either type II secretion or twitching motility also significantly reduces the ability of this plant pathogen to cause disease (28, 29) (Fig. 5). In P. aeruginosa, the prepilin peptidase PilD also processes prepilins for the T4P (30). The R. solanacearum PilD homolog was mutated in four BIMs, including BIM30, which is deficient in both T2SS and T4P (Table S2). This indicates that PilD also processes pseudopilins in R. solanacearum. Enzymes secreted through the T2SS help the bacterium move between adjacent xylem vessels and disrupt water flow in the host plant (50). These contributions to virulence explain why most BIMs have impaired virulence. This trade-off between phiAP1 resistance and virulence could improve the durability of phage phiAP1 as a R. solanacearum biocontrol agent. However, while the T2SS is a key component for a successful phiAP1 infection, a fraction of the analyzed BIMs had mutations unrelated to T2SS and retained their virulence in tomatoes. It has been suggested that parasite resistance evolution studies should also be performed in ecologically relevant environments to better predict the effectiveness of phage biocontrol regimes (51). Reliable biocontrol of bacterial wilt disease will likely require multiple phages, each with different host targets to reduce the incidence of resistance, which may also influence virulence.
FIG 5.
Defective T2SS-dependent phage resistance imposes a fitness cost by reducing R. solanacearum virulence. (a) After the adsorption of phage phiAP1 to its bacterial host, the phage DNA is introduced into the cell through the T2SS, which is also used for the secretion of virulence factors associated with host plant wilt symptoms. Thus, the T2SS acts as “two-way street.” (b) Once inactivated, T2SS can no longer participate in viral infection and R. solanacearum becomes phage resistant. However, the phage-resistant bacteria also lose their ability to cause plant disease as the portal is closed for the transport key macromolecules.
Phenotypes of several strains of Ralstonia solanacearum used in this study. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (24.1KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Remarkably, we found that the functional activity of the T2SS was important for phiAP1 infection (Fig. 5). The fact that both BIM4 and BIM30 allow phage adsorption, supported by the requirement of a functional system, implies that the T2SS is not simply acting as a passive receptor for phiAP1 attachment. We designed T2SS mutants with reduced activity that would still allow the full assembly of the complex. First, a conserved lysine was converted to alanine in the Walker A motif of the GspE ATP binding site. An analogous substitution in EspE of Vibrio cholerae has been shown in vitro to have reduced ATPase activity both alone and when copurified with other T2SS inner-membrane subunits (32, 33). In R. solanacearum, this ATPase mutant could not export key T2SS enzymes and was resistant to phage phiAP1. Interfering with the stoichiometry of subunits can also alter the structure and function of the T2SS complex. Overexpressing the gene coding for the major pseudopilin GspG (or the entire gsp operon) results in an abnormally long pseudopilus that, unlike the native pseudopilus, crosses the outer membrane as an extracellular filament (35 to 37). We created a R. solanacearum mutant overexpressing gspG by using the promoter of the ribosomal protein rplM, which is highly expressed in culture conditions (34) like those in our T2SS and phiAP1 infection assays. To take advantage of existing genetic tools, this construct was made in the related R. pseudosolanacearum strain GMI1000, which is also susceptible to phiAP1 and has T2SS machinery with a high degree of homology to CFBP2957 (97% amino acid identity for GspG, 88% amino acid identify for GspL, 98% amino acid identity for GspE, 97% amino acid identity for GspD, 94% amino acid identity for pilD, 93% amino acid identity for pilA). In this mutant, gspG expression increased roughly 10-fold, leading to a 10-fold decrease in the secretion of T2SS enzymes and to a phage resistance phenotype. Thus, phage resistance was imparted either by preventing assembly of the native short T2SS pseudopilus or by a secretion defect via an extended hyperpseudopilus, again implicating a functional T2SS in phage infection in R. solanacearum.
BIM1 was phage resistant but kept residual T2SS activity. This mutant had a 15-bp in-frame insertion that added five hydrophobic amino acids after leucine 230 in GspF, a key component of the T2SS inner membrane platform (23). GspF is predicted to be composed of an N-terminal cytoplasmic domain, followed by a transmembrane helical hairpin, then a second cytoplasmic domain, and finally a third transmembrane helix (52). The two cytoplasmic domains interact with the cytoplasmic ATPase GspE and the cytoplasmic domain of the membrane-spanning protein GspL, respectively, to form the T2SS inner membrane platform. Alignment of the R. solanacearum GspF with its P. aeruginosa and V. cholerae homologs suggests that the 5-aa (amino acid) insertion occurred in the second TM helix (52, 53). Given that this insertion is buried in the inner membrane, it seems unlikely that this mutated region interacts directly with phage phiAP1. Instead, the mutation probably hinders phage infection through its reduced T2SS activity.
We created complements for BIM4 and BIM30, which have mutations in key elements of the T2SS, gspL (BIM4), and pilD (BIM30). Complementing BIM30 with the WT pilD successfully restored phage sensitivity in this BIM and largely restored its ability to cause disease in tomato plants. A truncated version of GspL (219/481 aa) was enough to reestablish sensitivity to phage phiAP1 in BIM4 but only modestly increased virulence of this mutant in tomato plants (Fig. 4). GspL is a transinner membrane protein with globular domains on cytoplasmic and periplasmic sides of the membrane (23). The substituted amino acid at position 65 is located in the cytoplasmic domain, near the site of interaction with the ATPase GspE (54). The partial restoration of function seen upon introduction of pGspLcyto implies this domain may function in ATPase activation, while the residual activity of GspLBIM4 may serve in the periplasm. Full activity would not be expected, and is not observed, because of the interference of the defective GspLBIM4 in the cytoplasm and the lack of connection between the two domains via the inner membrane helix. Indeed, in the mechanistically related T4P pathway, the GspL equivalent is encoded as two separate polypeptides; PilM corresponds to the GspLcyto domain while PilN encodes a single-pass transmembrane protein with a globular periplasmic domain (55).
Taken together, the analyses of dozens of phage-resistant BIMs and two site-directed mutations showed that a functional T2SS is important for phiAP1 infection. The T2SS has been shown to be a receptor for the Vibrio cholerae-infecting podovirus (56). However, the V. cholerae T2SS is likely a direct receptor for VP2, because a tail filament protein interacts with the outer membrane secretin in vitro and a knockout of the secretin prevented phage adsorption. Phage phiAP1 still adsorbs to both BIM4 and BIM30 (22), so it is unlikely that the static components of the R. solanacearum T2SS are only receptors for phiAP1. An energized functional T2SS is imperative for successful phiAP1 infection; it is possible that during active cycling of the T2SS, an epitope is exposed that functions as a phage receptor. However, given that it was also previously demonstrated that viral DNA replication does not occur in BIM4 (22), our data are also consistent with a molecular model in which an active T2SS is involved in phage DNA uptake. This model puts the T2SS in a category with related nanomachines like the T4P, which can serve as a natural competence pilus (57) that depends on ATPase-energized transenvelope assemblies to import DNA. While these systems generally include an active retraction ATPase, which is lacking in the T2SS, recent work has uncovered pilus retraction and DNA uptake models that are independent of this second ATPase (58, 59). Our work highlights the importance of studies on phage–host interactions to support the renaissance of phages as biocontrol agents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial isolates, phage, and growth conditions.
The wild-type phage-sensitive strain R. solanacearum CFBP2957 and its phage-resistant derivatives (BIMs) previously obtained (22) were cultured in Casamino acid-peptone-glucose (CPG) medium (60) containing casein (1 g/L), peptone (10 g/L), and glucose (5 g/L) at 28°C with shaking at 250 rpm. Bacteria were stored in CPG medium containing 15% glycerol and kept at −80°C (61). Phage phiAP1 (20) (family Autographiviridae, dsDNA, short tail) was propagated as described elsewhere (62), with modifications (20). The list of strains used in this study is presented in Table S3.
List of strains and plasmids. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (20.3KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Whole-genome sequencing of R. solanacearum CFBP2957, BIM4, and BIM30.
Genomic DNA was extracted as previously described (63), except for the lysozyme step. Libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT kit, Nextera XT Index kit, and a MiSeq reagent kit v2 (Illumina) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Whole-genome sequencing (2 × 250 nucleotides) was performed on an Illumina MiSeq system. The genome of our CFBP2957 strain was assembled using Ray Assembler (64) version 2.3.1 with a k-mer size of 31 and compared to the CFBP2957 reference sequence (GenBank accession PRJEA50685). The reads from the BIMs were aligned with the CFBP2957 reference sequence and updated using the Burrows-Wheeler Alignment tool (BWA) version 0.7.10 (65). The mutations were identified using a pipeline that consisted of BAM file manipulations (merging, adding header) using Picard (version 1.123) (66) and indexed with Samtools (version 1.1) (67). Mutations were also searched using GATK (version 3.3-0) (68). The resulting .vcf files were compared manually.
Plasmid constructs and transformation.
To verify whether the phage-sensitivity phenotype would be restored in the BIMs, the wild-type gspL and pilD genes from R. solanacearum CFBP2957 were complemented into strains BIM4 and BIM30, respectively. The replicative plasmid pUFJ10 was used in the following cloning strategy (27). An empty vector was linearized overnight at 37°C using the restriction enzyme BsrGI, which cut pUFJ10 only once and downstream of the kanamycin resistance gene (KanR), and gel purified. Terminators were searched using ARNold (69) to verify whether the cloned genes could be expressed through the KanR gene promoter. Two constructs were designed for each gene. For the first construct, the gspL and pilD genes were controlled by the KanR gene promoter. For the second construct, the putative native promoter of either the gsp or pil operon was added upstream of each respective gene.
The plasmids were constructed using Gibson assembly (70), and the primers used are found in Table S4. PCR of the inserts was performed using a Q5 DNA polymerase and GC enhancer. PCR products were cleaned using the Qiagen PCR Cleanup kit and gel purified. Gibson assembly (70) was performed for 60 min using 100 ng of pUFJ10 and a 3:1 insert and vector ratio, following the manufacturer's instructions. Five μL of the Gibson assembly was transformed into E. coli NEB5α competent cells (NEB). Colony PCR was performed using a set of primers designed to target the cloned region in the plasmid (pUFJ10-3,389-F and pUFJ10-3,632-R). Resulting plasmids pGspL (gspL inserted in pUFJ10) and pPilD (pilD inserted in pUFJ10) were extracted from E. coli clones using a Qiagen Miniprep kit and confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
List of primers used in this research. Download Table S4, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (18.1KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Preparation of electrocompetent R. solanacearum cells.
The three strains (CFBP2957, BIM4, and BIM30) were cultivated in 200 mL of modified CPG broth (1 g/L Casamino acids, 2 g/l peptone, 0.5 g/l glucose) incubated at 30°C and shaken at 200 rpm until an OD600nm of 0.8 was reached. The cultures were then transferred to a centrifuge bottle and kept on ice for 30 min. The cultures were centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C and the supernatants discarded. The pellets were washed with 100 mL of a cold 10% glycerol solution, followed by centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 10 min, at 4°C. This step was repeated once more, and, subsequently the pellet was carefully resuspended through successive washes using 2 mL of cold 10% glycerol solution. This process was repeated until the pellet was completely homogenized and resuspended. Several 50 μL aliquots of competent cells were transferred to 1.5-mL screw cap vials, flash frozen and stored at −80°C.
Transformation of R. solanacearum strains.
Plasmid DNA (500 ng) was added to a 0.2-cm cuvette followed by 50 μL of electrocompetent cells. R. solanacearum CFBP2957, BIM4 (CFBP2957ΔgspL), and BIM30 (CFBP2957ΔpilD) were electroporated with either pUFJ10 empty vector, pGspLG1 (or pGspLRG), or pPilDG1 (or pPilDRG), respectively. To verify the competence of the cells, BIM4 and BIM30 were also electroporated with empty vector pUFJ10. Electroporation was performed using 200 Ω resistance, 25 μF capacitance, and a voltage of 2.5 kV (Bio-Rad). Immediately after electroporation, 950 μL of cold CPG broth was added to the cuvette. The electroporated cells were gently mixed and transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, where they were kept on ice for 10 min. The cells were then incubated for 4 h at 30°C with 200 rpm for recovery. The cell suspensions were subsequently plated on CPG agar (CPG broth with 1.5% agar), with or without 50 μg/mL of kanamycin.
PCR screening of the complemented R. solanacearum clones.
To confirm the presence of the plasmids in R. solanacearum cells, five colonies were selected for each construction. Each colony was added to 100 μL of sterile water and heat-treated at 95°C for 5 min. Then, 3 μL of each heat-treated cell suspension was used as a template. PCRs were performed using Taq DNA polymerase (BioBasics) and GC enhancer at an annealing temperature at 66°C.
Creation of mutants of gspE and gspG in R. solanacearum.
gspE was replaced in its native locus with an ATPase mutant using the positive selection suicide vector pUFR80 (71). The WT version of gspE was PCR amplified from the genomic DNA of R. solanacearum CFBP2957 using primers gspE region_F/R and inserted into the pUFR80 vector digested with XbaI and EcoRI using Gibson assembly (70). A mutated version of pUFR80-gspE was made using a QuikChange mutagenesis protocol gspEK274A_F/R primers (Agilent). The pUFR80-gspEK274A was then transformed into the WT R. solanacearum. Transformants were first screened on CPG supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/mL) and counterselected on CPG supplemented with 5% wt/vol sucrose. Sucrose-resistant colonies were screened for T2SS on polygalacturonase activity plates (29) and confirmed by sequencing gspE.
To create a strain that overexpresses gspG, the gspG and the rplM promoter were PCR amplified from the genomic DNA of R. solanacearum CFBP2957 using primer pairs gspG_F/R and rplM_F/R, respectively. Resulting PCR products were cloned into the AvrII-XbaI linearized plasmid pRCK-GWY (72) using Gibson assembly. The resulting plasmid was confirmed by sequencing, transformed into R. pseudosolanacearum GMI1000, and selected on CPG supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/mL). Overexpression of gspG was confirmed using semiquantitative RT-PCR. RNA was extracted from roughly 109 cells from an overnight culture in CPG. The cells were pelleted and resuspended in 400 μL of ice-cold Tris-EDTA (TE) solution at pH 8 with 1 mg/mL lysozyme, 80 μL of 10% SDS, and 0.25 μL of SUPERase-In RNase Inhibitor (Invitrogen). The mixture was incubated at room temperature while shaking for two min. RNA was extracted from this lysate using a Zymo Quick-RNA Miniprep kit (Zymo Research). DNA was removed from the resulting materials using the DNA-Free DNA removal kit (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized using the Superscript VILO cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). This cDNA was serial diluted 10-fold four times and used as a template for semiquantitative RT-PCR. Reactions were conducted using GoTaq Green PCR.
Phage-sensitivity assays.
Sensitivity to phage phiAP1 was assayed using the wild-type strains CFBP2957 and GMI1000 as well as the BIMs and their complemented derivatives. Phage sensitivity of mutants with deletions of other components of the type II secretion system (CFBP2957ΔgspE) or the type IV pili (GMI1000ΔpilA::tetAR) was also tested. To do so, 250 μL of an overnight bacterial culture was added to 3 mL of CPG soft agar (0.75% agar) and left to dry. Then, spot tests were performed by adding 5 μL of the phage lysate as well as of serially diluted preparations of the phage lysate on the plates that contained the inoculated bacterial culture. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 24 h. The presence of phage plaques or clear lysis zones indicated phage sensitivity. Double layer plaque assays were performed by pouring CPG soft agar containing 250 μL of the overnight bacterial culture with 100 μL of phage dilutions on CPG agar plates.
Twitching motility test.
Twitching motility assays were conducted as previously described (28). Briefly, a 10-fold serial dilution of bacterial suspensions in water were spotted onto CPG plates with 0.08% agar. Colonies were allowed to grow for 16 h, and the colony margins were imaged under a light microscope.
Tomato disease assays.
The virulence of BIM mutants was measured on wilt-susceptible tomato plants (cv. Bonny Best), as previously described (73). For soil soak inoculations, overnight cultures of each R. solanacearum strain were resuspended in water to a final concentration of 108 CFU/mL. Fifty mL of this suspension was poured directly onto the soil of each pot containing one unwounded 17-day-old plant in a 28°C growth chamber with a 12-h photoperiod. Disease was rated daily for 2 weeks on a 0 to 4 Disease Index scale where 0 = no leaflets wilted, 1 = 1 to 25% wilted, 2 = 26 to 50% wilted, 3 = 51 to 75% wilted, and 4 = 76 to 100% wilted (74). Soil soak assays were replicated in three independent experiments containing 10 plants per strain (total n = 30 plants per strain). For petiole inoculations, roughly 200 CFU of each strain suspended in water was introduced to 21-day-old plants through a cut petiole. Disease was rated daily for 1 week using the rating scheme described above. Five plants were inoculated per strain.
Type II Secretion System assays.
Activity of the T2SS was tested as described (29). Bacterial cultures were suspended in water to a concentration of 105 CFU/mL and spotted on modified BMM plates (0.5 g/l ammonium sulfate, 3.4 g/l KH2PO4, 0.125 g/l FeSO4.7H2O, 250 μM MgSO4) with 0.1% yeast extract, 0.5% glycerol, and 1.6% agar. Pgl media (29) was prepared by adding modified BMM and 0.5% polygalacturonic acid (final concentration), while modified BMM, 0.1 mM CaCl2 1 mM MgSO4, and 0.5% pectin were added to Pme media (29). After 24 h growth, the plates were flooded with 2N HCl.
Whole-genome sequencing of T2SS positive mutant.
Genomic DNA was extracted from BIM1 using the Epicentre MasterPure gDNA extraction kit (Epicentre). Whole-genome sequencing was conducted at the Microbial Genome Sequencing Center (MIGS, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) using an Illumina NextSeq 550 platform. Reads were cleaned using Trimmomatic version 0.39 with a sliding window of four and trimming bases with a Phred score below 20. Trimmed reads were then assembled on the CFBP2957 genome using BWA version 0.7.17. The assemblies were then indexed using Samtools version 1.9. Variants were detected, and a .vcf file was produced using bcftools version 1.9. Variants were compared manually, as described above.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Juliana C. F. de Almeida for helpful discussions during the development of this work. A.S.X. was the recipient of a FAPEMIG graduate fellowship. A.G.M. was awarded a scholarship from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq-Brazil) in partnership with CALDO (Canada). This research was supported by the grant APQ-01926-14 (FAPEMIG) to P.A.Z. This work was also supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program to C.G.H. under grant no. DGE-1747503. K.T.F. was supported by a Vilas Associate Award from UW—Madison. S.M. holds a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Bacteriophages. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Contributor Information
Poliane Alfenas-Zerbini, Email: palfenas@ufv.br.
Caitilyn Allen, Email: caitilyn.allen@wisc.edu.
Sylvain Moineau, Email: sylvain.moineau@bcm.ulaval.ca.
Anne K. Vidaver, University of Nebraska—Lincoln
REFERENCES
- 1.Buckling A, Rainey PB. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between a bacterium and a bacteriophage. Proc Biol Sci 269:931–936. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Banfield And JF, Young M. 2009. Variety—the splice of life—in microbial communities. Science 326:1198–1199. doi: 10.1126/science.1181501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Paterson S, Vogwill T, Buckling A, Benmayor R, Spiers AJ, Thomson NR, Quail M, Smith F, Walker D, Libberton B, Fenton A, Hall N, Brockhurst MA. 2010. Antagonistic coevolution accelerates molecular evolution. Nature 464:275–278. doi: 10.1038/nature08798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dy RL, Przybilski R, Semeijn K, Salmond GPC, Fineran PC. 2014. A widespread bacteriophage abortive infection system functions through a Type IV toxin–antitoxin mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res 42:4590–4605. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Van Valen L. 1974. Molecular evolution as predicted by natural selection. J Mol Evol 3:89–101. doi: 10.1007/BF01796554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Meaden S, Paszkiewicz K, Koskella B. 2015. The cost of phage resistance in a plant pathogenic bacterium is context-dependent. Evolution 69:1321–1328. doi: 10.1111/evo.12652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marraffini LA. 2015. CRISPR-Cas immunity in prokaryotes. Nature 526:55–61. doi: 10.1038/nature15386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tock MR, Dryden DTF. 2005. The biology of restriction and anti-restriction. Curr Opin Microbiol 8:466–472. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chopin MC, Chopin A, Bidnenko E. 2005. Phage abortive infection in lactococci: variations on a theme. Curr Opin Microbiol 8:473–479. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Leprohon P, Gingras H, Ouennane S, Moineau S, Ouellette M. 2015. A genomic approach to understand interactions between Streptococcus pneumoniae and its bacteriophages. BMC Genomics 16:972. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2134-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nordström K, Forsgren A. 1974. Effect of protein A on adsorption of bacteriophages to Staphylococcus aureus. J Virol 14:198–202. doi: 10.1128/JVI.14.2.198-202.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lu MJ, Stierhof YD, Henning U. 1993. Location and unusual membrane topology of the immunity protein of the Escherichia coli phage T4. J Virol 67:4905–4913. doi: 10.1128/JVI.67.8.4905-4913.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Prior P, Ailloud F, Dalsing BL, Remenant B, Sanchez B, Allen C. 2016. Genomic and proteomic evidence supporting the division of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum into three species. BMC Genomics 17:90. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2413-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Safni I, Cleenwerck I, De Vos P, Fegan M, Sly L, Kappler U. 2014. Polyphasic taxonomic revision of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex: proposal to emend the descriptions of Ralstonia solanacearum and Ralstonia syzygii and reclassify current R. syzygii strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. syzygii subsp. nov., R. solanacearum phylotype IV strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. indonesiensis subsp. nov., banana blood disease bacterium strains as Ralstonia syzygii subsp. celebesensis subsp. nov. and R. solanacearum phylotype I and III strains as Ralstonia pseudosolanacearum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3087–3103. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.066712-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fegan M, Prior P. 2005. How complex is the “Ralstonia solanacearum species complex”? p 449–461. In Allen C, Prior P, Hayward AC (ed), Bacterial wilt disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex, 1st ed APS Press, St Paul, MN. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Denny TP. 2006. Plant pathogenic Ralstonia species, p 573–644. In Gnanamanickam SS (ed), Plant associated bacteria. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hayward AC. 1991. Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu Rev Phytopathol 29:65–87. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.29.090191.000433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hayward AC. 2000. Ralstonia solanacearum, p 32–42. In Lederberg J (ed),Encyclopedia of microbiology, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kawasaki T, Shimizu M, Satsuma H, Fujiwara A, Fujie M, Usami S, Yamada T. 2009. Genomic characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum phage φRSB1, a T7-like wide-host-range phage. J Bacteriol 191:422–427. doi: 10.1128/JB.01263-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.da Silva Xavier A, da Silva FP, Vidigal PMP, Lima TTM, de Souza FO, Alfenas-Zerbini P. 2018. Genomic and biological characterization of a new member of the genus Phikmvvirus infecting phytopathogenic Ralstonia bacteria. Arch Virol 163:3275–3290. doi: 10.1007/s00705-018-4006-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Biosca EG, Català-Senent JF, Figàs-Segura À, Bertolini E, López MM, Álvarez B. 2021. Genomic analysis of the first European bacteriophages with depolymerase activity and biocontrol efficacy against the phytopathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. Viruses 13:2539. doi: 10.3390/v13122539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.da Silva Xavier A, de Almeida JCF, de Melo AG, Rousseau GM, Tremblay DM, de Rezende RR, Moineau S, Alfenas-Zerbini P. 2019. Characterization of CRISPR-Cas systems in the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Mol Plant Pathol 20:223–239. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McLaughlin LS, Haft RJF, Forest KT. 2012. Structural insights into the Type II secretion nanomachine. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22:208–216. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yan Z, Yin M, Xu D, Zhu Y, Li X. 2017. Structural insights into the secretin translocation channel in the type II secretion system. Nat Struct Mol Biol 24:177–183. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Escobar CA, Douzi B, Ball G, Barbat B, Alphonse S, Quinton L, Voulhoux R, Forest KT. 2021. Structural interactions define assembly adapter function of a type II secretion system pseudopilin. Structure 29:1116–1127.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2021.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Campos M, Cisneros DA, Nivaskumar M, Francetic O. 2013. The type II secretion system—a dynamic fiber assembly nanomachine. Res Microbiol 164:545–555. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2013.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gabriel DW, Allen C, Schell M, Denny TP, Greenberg JT, Duan YP, Flores-Cruz Z, Huang Q, Clifford JM, Presting G, González ET, Reddy J, Elphinstone J, Swanson J, Yao J, Mulholland V, Liu L, Farmerie W, Patnaikuni M, Balogh B, Norman D, Alvarez A, Castillo JA, Jones J, Saddler G, Walunas T, Zhukov A, Mikhailova N. 2006. Identification of open reading frames unique to a select agent: Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 biovar 2. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19:69–79. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu H, Kang Y, Genin S, Schell MA, Denny TP. 2001. Twitching motility of Ralstonia solanacearum requires a type IV pilus system. Microbiology (Reading) 147:3215–3229. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-12-3215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu H, Zhang S, Schell MA, Denny TP. 2005. Pyramiding unmarked deletions in Ralstonia solanacearum shows that secreted proteins in addition to plant cell-wall-degrading enzymes contribute to virulence. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 18:1296–1305. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-18-1296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Filloux A. 2004. The underlying mechanisms of type II protein secretion. Biochim Biophys Acta 1694:163–179. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2004.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Harvey H, Bondy-Denomy J, Marquis H, Sztanko KM, Davidson AR, Burrows LL. 2018. Pseudomonas aeruginosa defends against phages through type IV pilus glycosylation. Nat Microbiol 3:47–52. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0061-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Camberg JL, Sandkvist M. 2005. Molecular analysis of the Vibrio cholerae type II secretion ATPase EpsE. J Bacteriol 187:249–256. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.1.249-256.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Camberg JL, Johnson TL, Patrick M, Abendroth J, Hol WGJ, Sandkvist M. 2007. Synergistic stimulation of EpsE ATP hydrolysis by EpsL and acidic phospholipids. EMBO J 26:19–27. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jacobs JM, Babujee L, Meng F, Milling AS, Allen C. 2012. The in planta transcriptome of Ralstonia solanacearum: conserved physiological and virulence strategies during bacterial wilt of tomato. mBio 3:e00114-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00114-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Durand É, Michel G, Voulhoux R, Kürner J, Bernadac A, Filloux A. 2005. XcpX controls biogenesis of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa XcpT-containing pseudopilus. J Biol Chem 280:31378–31389. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505812200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vignon G, Köhler R, Larquet E, Giroux S, Prévost MC, Roux P, Pugsley AP. 2003. Type IV-like pili formed by the type II secreton: specificity, composition, bundling, polar localization, and surface presentation of peptides. J Bacteriol 185:3416–3428. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.11.3416-3428.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sauvonnet N, Vignon G, Pugsley AP, Gounon P. 2000. Pilus formation and protein secretion by the same machinery in Escherichia coli. EMBO J 19:2221–2228. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.10.2221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Durand É, Bernadac A, Ball G, Lazdunski A, Sturgis JN, Filloux A. 2003. Type II protein secretion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the pseudopilus is a multifibrillar and adhesive structure. J Bacteriol 185:2749–2758. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.9.2749-2758.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Álvarez B, Biosca EG. 2017. Bacteriophage-based bacterial wilt biocontrol for an environmentally sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci 8:1218. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Buttimer C, Mcauliffe O, Ross RP, Hill C, Mahony JO, Coffey A, Abedon ST, Chan BK. 2017. Bacteriophages and bacterial plant diseases. Front Microbiol 8:34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yamada T. 2013. Filamentous phages of Ralstonia solanacearum: double-edged swords for pathogenic bacteria. Front Microbiol 4:325. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Murugaiyan S, Bae JY, Wu J, Lee SD, Um HY, Choi HK, Chung E, Lee JH, Lee SW. 2011. Characterization of filamentous bacteriophage PE226 infecting Ralstonia solanacearum strains. J Appl Microbiol 110:296–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04882.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Addy HS, Askora A, Kawasaki T, Fujie M, Yamada T. 2012. Loss of virulence of the phytopathogen Ralstonia solanacearum through infection by φRSM filamentous phages. Phytopathology 102:469–477. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-11-0319-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ahmad AA, Stulberg MJ, Mershon JP, Mollov DS, Huang Q. 2017. Molecular and biological characterization of ϕRs551, a filamentous bacteriophage isolated from a race 3 biovar 2 strain of Ralstonia solanacearum. PLoS One 12:e0185034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Addy HS, Askora A, Kawasaki T, Fujie M, Yamada T. 2012. The filamentous phage φrSS1 enhances virulence of phytopathogenic Ralstonia solanacearum on tomato. Phytopathology 102:244–251. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-10-11-0277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Álvarez B, López MM, Biosca EG. 2019. Biocontrol of the major plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum in irrigation water and host plants by novel waterborne lytic bacteriophages. Front Microbiol 10:2813. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fujiwara A, Fujisawa M, Hamasaki R, Kawasaki T, Fujie M, Yamada T. 2011. Biocontrol of Ralstonia solanacearum by treatment with lytic bacteriophages. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:4155–4162. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02847-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang X, Wei Z, Yang K, Wang J, Jousset A, Xu Y, Shen Q, Friman VP. 2019. Phage combination therapies for bacterial wilt disease in tomato. Nat Biotechnol 37:1513–1520. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0328-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang X, Wei Z, Li M, Wang X, Shan A, Mei X, Jousset A, Shen Q, Xu Y, Friman VP. 2017. Parasites and competitors suppress bacterial pathogen synergistically due to evolutionary trade-offs. Evolution 71:733–746. doi: 10.1111/evo.13143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tsujimoto S, Nakaho K, Adachi M, Ohnishi K, Kiba A, Hikichi Y. 2008. Contribution of the type II secretion system in systemic infectivity of Ralstonia solanacearum through xylem vessels. J Gen Plant Pathol 74:71–75. doi: 10.1007/s10327-007-0061-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hernandez CA, Koskella B. 2019. Phage resistance evolution in vitro is not reflective of in vivo outcome in a plant-bacteria-phage system. Evolution 73:2461–2475. doi: 10.1111/evo.13833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Arts J, de Groot A, Ball G, Durand E, El Khattabi M, Filloux AF, Tommassen J, Koster MC. 2007. Interaction domains in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type II secretory apparatus component XcpS (GspF). Microbiology (Reading) 153:1582–1592. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/002840-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Abendroth J, Mitchell DD, Korotkov KV, Johnson TL, Kreger A, Sandkvist M, Hol WGJ. 2009. The three-dimensional structure of the cytoplasmic domains of EpsF from the type 2 secretion system of Vibrio cholerae. J Struct Biol 166:303–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lu C, Korotkov KV, Hol WGJ. 2014. Crystal structure of the full-length ATPase GspE from the Vibrio vulnificus type II secretion system in complex with the cytoplasmic domain of GspL. J Struct Biol 187:223–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2014.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fulara A, Vandenberghe I, Read RJ, Devreese B, Savvides SN. 2018. Structure and oligomerization of the periplasmic domain of GspL from the type II secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci Rep 8:16760. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34956-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sun H, Liu M, Fan F, Li Z, Fan Y, Zhang J, Huang Y, Li Z, Li J, Xu J, Kan B. 2021. The type II secretory system mediates phage infection in Vibrio cholerae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:662344. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.662344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ellison CK, Dalia TN, Vidal Ceballos A, Wang JC-Y, Biais N, Brun YV, Dalia AB. 2018. Retraction of DNA-bound type IV competence pili initiates DNA uptake during natural transformation in Vibrio cholerae. Nat Microbiol 3:773–780. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0174-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chlebek JL, Denise R, Craig L, Dalia AB. 2021. Motor-independent retraction of type IV pili is governed by an inherent property of the pilus filament. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2102780118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102780118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zöllner R, Cronenberg T, Maier B. 2019. Motor properties of PilT-independent type 4 pilus retraction in gonococci. J Bacteriol 201:e00778-18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00778-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Horita MTK. 2002. Causal agent of bacterial wilt disease Ralstonia solanacearum. Natl Inst Agric Sci 12:1–35. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Melo AG, Rousseau GM, Tremblay DM, Labrie SJ, Moineau S. 2020. DNA tandem repeats contribute to the genetic diversity of Brevibacterium aurantiacum phages. Environ Microbiol 22:3413–3428. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yamada T, Kawasaki T, Nagata S, Fujiwara A, Usami S, Fujie M. 2007. New bacteriophages that infect the phytopathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbiology (Reading) 153:2630–2639. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/001453-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Garneau JE, Dupuis MÈ, Villion M, Romero DA, Barrangou R, Boyaval P, Fremaux C, Horvath P, Magadán AH, Moineau S. 2010. The CRISPR/cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA. Nature 468:67–71. doi: 10.1038/nature09523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Boisvert S, Laviolette F, Corbeil J. 2010. Ray: simultaneous assembly of reads from a mix of high-throughput sequencing technologies. J Comput Biol 17:1519–1533. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2009.0238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Broad Institute. 2018. Picard. https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/.
- 67.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA. 2010. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Naville M, Ghuillot-Gaudeffroy A, Marchais A, Gautheret D. 2011. ARNold: a web tool for the prediction of rho-independent transcription terminators. RNA Biol 8:11–13. doi: 10.4161/rna.8.1.13346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA, Smith HO. 2009. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6:343–345. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Castañeda A, Reddy J, El-Yacoubi B, Gabriel D. 2005. Mutagenesis of all eight avr genes in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris had no detected effect on pathogenicity, but one avr gene affected race specificity. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 18:1306–1317. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-18-1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Monteiro F, Solé M, van Dijk I, Valls M. 2012. A chromosomal insertion toolbox for promoter probing, mutant complementation, and pathogenicity studies in Ralstonia solanacearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25:557–568. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-07-11-0201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Dalsing BL, Truchon AN, Gonzalez-Orta ET, Milling AS, Allen C. 2015. Ralstonia solanacearum uses inorganic nitrogen metabolism for virulence, ATP production, and detoxification in the oxygen-limited host xylem environment. mBio 6:e02471-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02471-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Tans-kersten J, Huang H, Allen C. 2001. Ralstonia solanacearum needs motility for invasive virulence on tomato. J Bacteriol 183:3597–3605. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.12.3597-3605.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Mutation in the BIMs of Ralstonia solanacearum strain CFBP2957. Download Table S1, DOCX file, 0.1 MB (101KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Cloning of gspG under the control of the rplM promoter increases gspG expression approximately 10-fold. Semiquantitative RT-PCR was used to measure gene expression in two independent clones of GspG OE. The stably expressed serC transcript is used as an endogenous control. Download FIG S2, DOCX file, 0.1 MB (156.3KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Targeted mutations in the T2SS reduce the export of pectin methylesterase. Ten-fold serial dilutions of each strain were spotted on minimal media plates containing pectin. After 24 h of growth, the colonies were rinsed off and the plates were washed with HCl. BIM1 and a GspG overexpression strain produced a clearing zone at a 10-fold higher dilution than the WT. A point mutation in gspE led to a loss of pectin methylesterase secretion. Download FIG S1, DOCX file, 0.2 MB (213.8KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Only T2SS-positive BIMs retain virulence. Bonny Best tomato plants (21 days old) were inoculated through a cut leaf petiole with 200 CFU of each BIM. Five plants were included per treatment. BIMs that have both functional T2SS and twitching motility are shown in red, those that are deficient in both T2SS and twitching motility are shown in grey, and BIMs that are deficient in T2SS but have WT levels of twitching motility are shown in blue. The wild-type parent strain is shown in black. Download FIG S3, DOCX file, 0.1 MB (157KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Phenotypes of several strains of Ralstonia solanacearum used in this study. Download Table S2, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (24.1KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
List of strains and plasmids. Download Table S3, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (20.3KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
List of primers used in this research. Download Table S4, DOCX file, 0.02 MB (18.1KB, docx) .
Copyright © 2022 Xavier et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.



