Abstract
Age-related vascular alterations promote the pathogenesis of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). Cardiovascular risk factors that accelerate vascular aging exacerbate VCI. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) constitutes a cluster of critical cardiovascular risk factors (abdominal obesity, hypertension, elevated triglycerides, elevated fasting glucose, reduced HDL cholesterol), which affects nearly 37% of the adult US population. The present study was designed to test the hypotheses that MetS exacerbates cognitive impairment and that arterial stiffening moderates the association between cognitive dysfunction and MetS in older adults. MetS was defined by the NCEP ATP III guidelines. Cognitive function (digit span and trail-making tests) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV; a non-invasive clinical measurement of arterial stiffness) were assessed in older adults with MetS and age- and sex-matched controls. Multiple linear regression models were applied to test for the main effects of MetS, baPWV, and their interaction on cognitive performance. Fifty-three participants with MetS (age: 68 ± 8 years) and 39 age-matched individuals without MetS (age: 66 ± 9 years) were enrolled into the study. In adjusted multivariable regression analyses of the digit span backward length score, both MetS (ß = 1.97, p = 0.048) and MetS by baPWV interaction (ß = − 0.001, p = 0.026) were significant predictors. In participants with MetS, higher baPWV was associated with poorer performance on digit span backward length score, a test of working memory (R = − 0.44, p = 0.0012), but there was no association in those without MetS (R = 0.035, p = 0.83). MetS was negatively associated with performance on the digit span backward length score, baPWV was negatively associated with multiple neuropsychological outcomes, and baPWV moderated the association between digit span backward length score and MetS, as individuals with both MetS and higher baPWV had the most impaired cognitive function. Our findings add to the growing body of evidence that individuals with MetS and higher baPWV may be prone to VCI.
Keywords: Metabolic syndrome, Vascular cognitive impairment, Arterial stiffness, Brain aging, Neuropsychological tests
Introduction
A growing body of evidence from epidemiological, clinical, and experimental studies indicates that age-related vascular dysfunction and structural alterations critically contribute to the pathogenesis of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and Alzheimer’s disease [1–4]. Pathophysiological conditions that promote accelerated vascular aging increase risk for VCI and Alzheimer’s disease [5–8], decreasing quality of life in older adults [9, 10]. Understanding and targeting cardiovascular risk factors the exacerbate age-related cognitive impairment is expected to have a major role in preserving brain health in older individuals.
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) constitutes a cluster of related cardiovascular risk factors defined by the presence of any 3 of the 5 following conditions: abdominal obesity, elevated blood pressure, elevated triglycerides, elevated fasting glucose, and reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol [11]. Over the past years, the prevalence of MetS has steadily increased, reaching nearly 37% of the adult US population diagnosed with this debilitating condition today [12, 13]. Recent evidence demonstrates that MetS is linked to a threefold increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and cardiovascular-related mortality [14–17]. This increase in risk is above the risk attributable by the individual components [18], indicating that the accumulation of cardiometabolic risk factors represents a significant public health concern that is increasing in prevalence.
There is evidence that MetS promotes accelerated cognitive decline [19–25]. Specifically, MetS is associated with reduced performance on tasks related to executive function [19, 26–28], a domain of cognition that encapsulates multiple processes important for the regulation of thoughts, behaviors, and complex actions [29–31]. Although several cross-sectional and longitudinal studies indicate that MetS is associated with poorer cognitive functioning, there is no clear consensus if the cluster of components that defines MetS uniquely explains the decline in cognitive function beyond the contribution of the individual component(s) [21, 28, 32–34]. This may be because some previous reports used differing criteria for MetS, failed to control for important covariates (i.e., disease burden, education, etc.), and utilized single item assessments of cognitive function [35].
The mechanisms by which MetS impairs cognitive function are not completely understood. The cardiovascular risk factors constituting MetS associate with multifaceted structural and functional vascular abnormalities, which were shown to exacerbate arterial stiffness. Increased arterial stiffness is known to impose significant hemodynamic burden on the cerebral circulation, contributing to the pathogenesis of various forms of dementia. However, the role of increased arterial stiffness in the genesis of cognitive impairment associated with MetS is yet to be fully understood [36].
The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that older individuals with MetS exhibit decreased cognitive performance when compared with those without MetS, and that arterial stiffening moderates the association between cognitive dysfunction and MetS. To test this hypothesis, we enrolled older adults with MetS and age-matched controls and assessed cognitive function (digit span and trail-making tests) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV; a proxy measurement for arterial stiffness). Multiple linear regression modeling was applied to test the main effects of MetS, baPWV, and their interaction on cognitive performance.
Methods
Participants
Approval and informed consent
The procedures of this study were approved by the Penn State College of Medicine institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to beginning the investigation.
Recruitment
Participants were recruited from flyers posted throughout The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and from local newspaper advertisements for possible enrollment into the study. Participants were evaluated in the Clinical Research Center and were screened on inclusion and exclusion criteria that have been used previously [37], and which are listed below.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Participants were included in this study if they met the following criteria: (a) age ≥ 50 years and (b) ambulatory without the need of an assistive device. Participants were excluded for the following conditions: (a) age < 50 years, (b) non-ambulatory, (c) neurological diseases (including but not limited to Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), (d) active cancer, and (e) stage 5 chronic kidney disease (end stage), as defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 ml/min per 1.73 m [38].
Medical screening
Participants arrived at the Clinical Research Center in the morning fasted but were permitted to take their usual medications. Vital signs, demographic information, education level, height, weight, body mass index, waist circumference, and ankle/brachial index were obtained according to standard guidelines [39]. Participants had blood samples drawn, which were then sent to a central laboratory for analyses for a fasting complete metabolic panel, a lipid panel, and insulin.
Participants then underwent a medical history and physical examination by study physicians, in which comorbid conditions, cardiovascular risk factors, and current medications were recorded. Based on this battery of baseline assessments, participants were coded on cardiovascular risk factors according to standard definitions for hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, obesity, abdominal obesity, and MetS [11]. Additionally, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, and chronic kidney disease [37] were coded according to standard definitions, as previously described [40]. Participants were characterized on the history and symptoms of arthritis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The physical examination concluded with the assessment of peripheral neuropathy, as a 10 g Semmes–Weinstein monofilament was applied to 10 sites on each foot [41, 42], and a C 128-Hz tuning fork was applied to the big toe, first metatarsal joint, ankle, and knee [43] to assess vibration perception. Peripheral neuropathy was recorded if the participants did not correctly perceive the application of the monofilament or the disappearance of the vibration of the tuning fork at the various locations.
Assessment of body composition
Body fat percentage was obtained using a model D1000-3 eight-electrode bio-electric impedance device (Rice Lake Weighing Systems, Rice Lake, WI) while subjects stood barefoot on two stainless-steel rectangular foot-pad electrodes on the base of the machine and held hand grip electrodes [44, 45].
MetS group classification
According to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III [46–48], MetS is defined as having three or more of the following components: (1) abdominal obesity (waist circumference > 102 cm in men and > 88 cm in women), (2) elevated triglycerides (≥ 150 mg/dl), (3) reduced HDL cholesterol (< 40 mg/dl in men and < 50 mg/dl in women), (4) elevated blood pressure (≥ 130/85 mmHg), and (5) elevated fasting glucose (≥ 100 mg/dl) as well as those with diabetes mellitus. Although several definitions of MetS exist, the NCEP ATP III definition was used in this investigation because it was specifically established on a population from the USA. In the total group of 92 patients, 53 patients (58%) screened positive for MetS, whereas the remaining 39 patients (42%) screened negative.
Neuropsychological testing
Participants were assessed using neuropsychological test battery as previously described [49]. Tests were selected for previously demonstrated sensitivity to vascular diseases including hypertension, PAD, and/or stroke, and to briefly assess the following domains of cognitive function: attention, working memory, perceptuo-motor speed, and executive function.
Attention and working memory were assessed by standard administration of the Digits Forward and Digits Backward portions of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Revised, respectively [49]. Digits Forward and Digits Backward test performance were measured both as total score (total trials correct out of 14) and as best length score (highest string of numbers reached, i.e., 7 numbers in length). Trail making test parts A and B were performed to assess perceptuo-motor speed and executive function. Part A of the trail making test requires participants to draw a line connecting randomly arrayed, consecutively numbered circles as quickly as possible. In part B, participants draw a line connecting consecutively numbered and lettered circles as quickly as possible by alternating between numbers and letters (i.e., 1-A-2-B-3). In addition to perceptuo-motor speed, this test assesses mental flexibility which is a key dimension of executive function [50].
The Digit Span tests and the Trail Making tests are part of the neuropsychological tests from the Uniform Data Set (UDS) and were completed by participants in this study. The obtained scores were converted into normative z-scores using a calculator based on linear regression models to better interpret performance at a population level, by taking into consideration participant age, sex, and education level [51]. Use of this calculator has been widely adopted to calculate normative z-scores across various and diverse settings.
Assessment of systemic arterial pulse wave velocity (baPWV)
Measurements of baPWV were completed using a computerized vascular profiling machine (VP-1000, Omron Colin Medical). The VP-1000 device simultaneously measures an electrocardiogram, phonogram, and oscillometric bilateral brachial and ankle blood pressures [52]. Electrocardiographic electrodes were placed on the wrists, and a microphone for the phonocardiogram was placed over the left chest to provide timing markers. Distances between measurement sites were derived from participant data entered into the machine and on-board algorithms for body segment lengths [53]. Automated baPWV was measured in participants after 10 min of supine rest. The measurement of baPWV is highly reliable with repeat testing (coefficient of variation = 3.8%) [54].
Statistical analyses
Summary statistics including mean and standard deviations for continuous variables, and frequency with percentage for categorical variables are reported. The normality assumption for continuous variables was assessed using Shapiro–Wilk tests. P values for two group comparisons were obtained based on two-sample t-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables, and Pearson’s chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables, as appropriate. Correlation analysis between baPWV and neuropsychological outcomes for overall and stratified by group were performed with both Pearson correlation and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Further, to address our hypothesis that arterial stiffening, as measured by baPWV, moderates the association between cognitive dysfunction and MetS in older adults, multivariable regressions were fitted to evaluate their relationship, after adjusting for standard demographic data (age, sex, race, and education), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease because of its association with cognitive function [55, 56], and potential confounding variables that were shown to have significant group differences in Table 1 (ankle/brachial index and prevalence of cardiovascular disease). Other variables in Table 1 that were significantly different between the two groups were not considered as covariates because they are either factors involved in defining MetS (blood pressure and prevalence of hypertension and dyslipidemia), or they are highly correlated with MetS (weight, body mass index, body fat percentage, and prevalence of obesity). Consequently, to avoid the collinearity issue in regression analysis, we did not consider these variables for adjustment. All hypothesis tests were two-sided with the significance level of 0.05. All data analyses were performed using R and SAS version 9.4.
Table 1.
Clinical characteristics of participants with and without metabolic syndrome (MetS)
| Variables | Entire group (n = 92) | Control group (n = 39) | MetS group (n = 53) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 67 ± 8 | 66 ± 9 | 68 ± 8 | 0.36 |
| Weight (kg) | 75.5 ± 14.8 | 68.6 ± 10.7 | 80.5 ± 15.5 | < 0.001 |
| Height (cm) | 165.8 ± 9.5 | 164.7 ± 6.8 | 166.7 ± 11.0 | 0.28 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 27.4 ± 4.3 | 25.3 ± 3.6 | 28.9 ± 4.2 | < 0.001 |
| Body fat percentage (%) | 33.8 ± 8.6 | 31.7 ± 7.0 | 35.2 ± 9.4 | 0.045 |
| Ankle/brachial index | 1.10 ± 0.17 | 1.15 ± 0.11 | 1.06 ± 0.20 | 0.007 |
| Pulse wave velocity (cm/s) | 1690 ± 414 | 1607 ± 399 | 1753 ± 417 | 0.093 |
| Systolic pressure (mm Hg) | 134 ± 17 | 128 ± 18 | 139 ± 15 | 0.005 |
| Diastolic pressure (mm Hg) | 76 ± 9 | 75 ± 10 | 77 ± 8 | 0.198 |
| Pulse pressure (mm Hg) | 58 ± 14 | 54 ± 13 | 61 ± 14 | 0.007 |
| Sex (men) | 33 (36) | 8 (21) | 25 (47) | 0.016 |
| Race (Caucasian) | 84 (91) | 36 (92) | 48 (91) | 1.0 |
| Education (college graduate) | 57 (62) | 25 (64) | 32 (60) | 0.88 |
| Coronary artery disease | 13 (14) | 1 (3) | 12 (23) | 0.015 |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 4 (4) | 0 (0) | 4 (8) | 0.21 |
| Peripheral artery disease | 11 (12) | 2 (5) | 9 (17) | 0.16 |
| Chronic kidney disease | 9 (10) | 4 (10) | 5 (9) | 1.0 |
| Peripheral neuropathy | 36 (39) | 11 (28) | 25 (47) | 0.10 |
| Current/previous smoking | 31 (34) | 10 (26) | 21 (40) | 0.26 |
| Hypertension | 71 (77) | 23 (59) | 48 (91) | < 0.001 |
| Dyslipidemia | 73 (79) | 21 (54) | 52 (98) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 5 (5) | 0 (0) | 5 (9) | 0.13 |
| Obesity | 25 (27) | 5 (13) | 20 (38) | 0.016 |
| Arthritis | 33 (36) | 11 (28) | 22 (42) | 0.24 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 9 (10) | 1 (3) | 8 (15) | 0.10 |
Data are presented as means ± SD or n (%)
Results
Descriptive study participant characteristics are shown in Table 1. In summary, the MetS group had a higher body mass index (p < 0.001), higher body fat percentage (p = 0.045), lower ankle/brachial index (p = 0.007), and greater percentage of men (p = 0.016), and prevalence of coronary artery disease (p = 0.015), hypertension (p < 0.001), dyslipidemia (p < 0.001), and obesity (p = 0.016), when compared to the control group. With respect to the prevalence of MetS components, the MetS group had significantly greater prevalence of abdominal obesity (p < 0.001), elevated triglycerides (p < 0.001), decreased HDL cholesterol (p < 0.001), elevated blood pressure (p = 0.002), and elevated plasma glucose (p = 0.005), compared to the control group (Table 2).
Table 2.
Prevalence of each metabolic syndrome (MetS) component in participants with and without MetS
| Variables | Control group (n = 39) | MetS group (n = 53) | P valuea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal obesity | 12 (31) | 42 (79) | < 0.001 |
| Elevated triglycerides | 2 (5) | 47 (89) | < 0.001 |
| Decreased high-density lipoprotein | 1 (3) | 50 (94) | < 0.001 |
| Elevated blood pressure | 24 (62) | 48 (91) | 0.002 |
| Elevated plasma glucose | 6 (15) | 24 (45) | 0.005 |
Data are presented as n (%)
aP value based on chi-square tests or Fisher’s exact tests, as appropriate
The mean unadjusted memory and executive function task performances for each group are presented in Table 3. There were no significant differences between groups in unadjusted neuropsychological performance tests, except for the z-score analysis of the digit span forward length score (p = 0.02).
Table 3.
Unadjusted neuropsychological performance of participants with and without metabolic syndrome (MetS)
| Raw scores | Normative z-scores (unadjusted) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Control group (n = 39) | MetS group (n = 53) | P valuea | Control group (n = 39) | MetS group (n = 53) | P valueb |
| Digit span forward score | 10.4 ± 2.0 | 9.7 ± 2.2 | 0.16 | 0.85 ± 0.94 | 0.54 ± 1.07 | 0.16 |
| Digit span backward score | 8.2 ± 2.7 | 7.5 ± 2.1 | 0.19 | 0.59 ± 1.21 | 0.33 ± 1.05 | 0.28 |
| Digit span forward length score | 8.0 ± 1.0 | 7.5 ± 1.3 | 0.14 | 1.16 ± 0.86 | 0.62 ± 1.14 | 0.02 |
| Digit span backward length score | 5.9 ± 1.4 | 5.5 ± 1.2 | 0.19 | 0.68 ± 1.11 | 0.40 ± 0.97 | 0.20 |
| Trail making A (s)a | 27.8 ± 7.9 | 31.6 ± 14.2 | 0.21 | 0.44 ± 0.51 | 0.20 ± 0.94 | 0.15 |
| Trail making B (s)a | 89.9 ± 56.1 | 94.7 ± 51.3 | 0.66 | 0.01 ± 1.11 | − 0.11 ± 0.98 | 0.59 |
Data are presented as means ± SD
aP value based on Wilcoxon rank sum tests
bP value based on Mann–Whitney tests
The scatterplot relations between baPWV and unadjusted neuropsychological outcome z-scores in all participants (Fig. 1) demonstrate a significant correlation between baPWV and digit span forward score (R = − 0.28, p = 0.008; Fig. 1A), digit span backward score (R = − 0.29, p = 0.005; Fig. 1C), digit span backward length score (R = − 0.24, p = 0.021; Fig. 1D), trail making test A (R = − 0.23, p = 0.029; Fig. 1E), and trail making test B performance (R = − 0.40, p = 0.0001; Fig. 1F). The same significance results were achieved based on Spearman’s correlation. Examination of the relations between pulse pressure and unadjusted neuropsychological outcome z-scores in all participants combined demonstrated similar significant associations as those found for baPWV (Table 4). Within the MetS group pulse pressure was associated with digit span backward score (− 0.35, p = 0.011) and digit span backward length score (− 0.42, p = 0.002), whereas pulse pressure was not significantly associated with any of the variables in the control group (Table 4).
Fig. 1.
Correlations between brachial-to-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and neuropsychological outcomes z-scoresa in older adults. Digit span forward score (A); digit span forward length score (B); digit span backward score (C); digit span backward length score (D); trail making test A (E); trail making test B (F). aR(Pearson) and rho(spearman) are both displayed
Table 4.
Association between pulse pressure and unadjusted normative z-scores of neuropsychological performance
| Variables | Entire group (n = 92) | Control group (n = 39) | MetS group (n = 53) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digit span forward score | − 0.26* | − 0.17 | − 0.26 |
| Digit span backward score | − 0.30** | − 0.19 | − 0.35* |
| Digit span forward length score | − 0.18 | 0.08 | − 0.21 |
| Digit span backward length score | − 0.31** | − 0.12 | − 0.42** |
| Trail making A | − 0.15 | − 0.2 | − 0.08 |
| Trail making B | − 0.28** | − 0.31 | − 0.25 |
Data are Pearson correlation coefficients
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Table 5 shows the result of the multivariable regression model for digit span backward length score. Both MetS (ß = 1.97, p = 0.048) and MetS by baPWV interaction (ß = − 0.001, p = 0.026) were significant predictors. The significant interaction indicates that baPWV moderated the relation between digit span backward length score and MetS (Table 5). Thus, only for the MetS group, higher baPWV was related to poorer scores for the digit span backward length score (R = − 0.44, p = 0.0012) (Fig. 2). In contrast, in the control group, baPWV was not related to the digit span backward length score (R = 0.035, p = 0.83). No other multivariable regression model showed significant interaction effects between baPWV and MetS (data not shown) for the remaining neuropsychological outcomes, consisting of digit span forward score, digit span forward length score, digit span backward score, trail making test A, and trail making test B.
Table 5.
Multivariable regression model for digit span backward length score
| Measure | Coefficients | Estimate | Std error | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digit span backward length score | Intercept | 1.424 | 1.520 | 0.35 |
| MetS | 1.966 | 0.976 | 0.048 | |
| baPWV | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.37 | |
| Age | − 0.027 | 0.017 | 0.11 | |
| ABI | 0.717 | 0.780 | 0.36 | |
| Sex (= male) | − 0.016 | 0.252 | 0.95 | |
| Race (= Caucasian) | − 0.025 | 0.403 | 0.54 | |
| Education(= college grad or higher) | − 0.023 | 0.251 | 0.36 | |
| CAD | − 0.166 | 0.353 | 0.64 | |
| COPD | 0.165 | 0.404 | 0.68 | |
| MetS × baPWV | − 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.026 |
MetS metabolic syndrome, baPWV brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, ABI ankle-brachial index, CAD coronary artery disease, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fig. 2.
Correlations between brachial-to-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and digit span backward length scorea in older adults with or without metabolic syndrome (MetS). A Correlation for control participants without MetS. B Correlation for participants with MetS. aR(Pearson) and rho(spearman) are both displayed
Discussion
The main findings of this study were (1) MetS was negatively associated with working memory performance (assessed by the digit span backwards test), (2) baPWV was negatively associated with multiple neuropsychological outcomes, and (3) baPWV moderated the association between working memory performance and MetS in older adults.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association between MetS and cognition while accounting for changes in baPWV. We found that MetS was a significant predictor of working memory performance (assessed by the digit span backwards test) in a multivariate model, with poorer performance seen in those with MetS. The digit span backward length score is a sub score of the digit span backward test [57], and its changes are interpreted to indicate impaired working memory and/or executive function [58]. Individuals with MetS exhibit worse digit span backward length score, extending findings of previous reports [26, 28, 33]. For example, a study performed in 197 midlife adults showed that MetS was associated with lower performance in tests of executive function and memory from the Wechsler Abbreviated Tests of Intelligence (WASI-II), including the digit span tests and trail making tests [26]. Additionally, in older individuals, MetS was associated with poor performance across different domains of executive function [33]. Lastly, individuals with MetS performed worse on tests of executive function, including trail making test B and clock drawing test [28]. We confirmed that the negative impact of MetS on the aforementioned cognitive domains is independent of age, demographic variables, and presence of cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases.
Short-term working memory relies significantly on the prefrontal cortex, which focuses attention on the relevant sensory representation, selects information and performs executive function, which are needed for regulation of cognitive processing of the information [59–61]. The anterior cingulate cortex is connected to the prefrontal cortex and is implicated in sustained attention. There is growing evidence that function of the aforementioned brain regions is critically sensitive to microvascular pathophysiological alterations decreasing regional cerebral blood supply. Importantly, aging was shown to impair blood flow both to the prefrontal cortex [62, 63] and the anterior cingulate cortex [64, 65] which negatively impacts cognitive function regulated by these brain regions. It is generally considered that components of the MetS induce accelerated (micro)vascular aging [66–72]. Thus, future studies should determine how MetS in older adults affect microvascular regulation of cerebral blood supply, including the dynamics and magnitude of neurovascular coupling responses.
The results from the current study showed that higher baPWV was related to poorer performance across the digits span tests and trail making tests, which agrees with previous findings across different populations [73, 74]. In cognitively healthy adults, increases in baPWV by 1 m/s was inversely related to tasks of scanning and tracking, which fall under the domain of executive functioning [1]. Additionally, the combination of old age and high baPWV was associated with the lowest level of cognitive performance in this cohort. In the Baltimore longitudinal Study of Aging, individuals with higher baseline baPWV exhibited a greater decline in performance on tests of verbal and working memory [73]. In the current study, after adjusting for several known risk factors for cognitive decline, individuals with MetS who had higher baPWV had the worst cognitive function. Increased baPWV is clinically interpreted as a measure of increased arterial stiffness. The mechanisms by which increased arterial stiffness exacerbates the deleterious effects of MetS on the cerebral circulation are likely multifaceted. Arterial stiffness results in increased pulse pressure and increased penetration of the systolic pressure wave into the vulnerable, distal portion of the microcirculation, promoting microvascular damage. Due to this consideration, increased baPWV can be used for assessment of end-organ damage in hypertensive patients [75]. In the aged brain, penetration of increased pulsatile pressure to the cerebral microcirculation is thought to contribute to blood–brain barrier disruption, genesis of cerebral microhemorrhages and microvascular rarefaction, all of which may promote cognitive dysfunction [3, 71, 76]. The myogenic response of proximal cerebral arteries has a critical role in neuroprotection by preventing the penetration of pulsatile pressure to the thin-walled distal portion of the microcirculation, thereby protecting the microcirculation from high pressure-induced damage [66, 77, 78]. Importantly, experimental studies show that aging [66, 79] and components of MetS, including obesity [66, 67] impair these autoregulatory protective mechanisms, which likely exacerbate microvascular damage induced by transient increases in arterial pulsatile pressure (e.g., during Valsalva maneuvers). Future studies should determine how synergistic interaction of old age, MetS and arterial stiffening promote microvascular damage, including blood brain barrier disruption, microhemorrhages, and other radiological signs of small vessel disease.
Methodological considerations
Carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) is the gold standard for assessing PWV and has strong prognostic value in CVD development and mortality [80]. In this study, baPWV was determined, which is an emerging and well-accepted non-invasive technique of PWV that is easily obtained in the clinical research setting. BaPWV has also shown predictive value for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity [81], shown strong positive correlations against measurement of cfPWV (r = 0.73 [82], and is largely determined by the stiffness of the elastic central arteries similar to cfPWV [83]. For these reasons, baPWV is a clinical measurement that is suitable for the assessment of systemic arterial stiffness.
Limitations
There are several limitations to this study. The MetS group consistently scored lower on all cognitive outcomes compared to non-MetS group, but only the digit span backward length score was significantly different. Lack of group differences might have been due to the non-MetS group also having clinically significant cardiovascular risk factor burden, including hypertension. It is likely that the presence of these conditions in the non-MetS group also impact cognitive function. However, this observation increases the generalizability of our study because the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors is relatively high in older adults. Additionally, a larger sample may have provided increased power to determine the effects of baPWV and MetS on cognitive function. Another important limitation is that age-related vascular changes were only determined by systemic baPWV. Additional measurements such as aortic baPWV, carotid compliance, or microvascular functional measurements may have provided different insight into the relation between MetS and cognitive function. Another limitation is that because only two neurocognitive assessments were utilized (digits span tests and trail making tests), it is unclear whether performance on other neurocognitive tests that assess different domains of cognition (learning, subdomains of executive function, verbal memory) might be affected by MetS. However, the use of these two cognitive tests provided a broad scope of cognitive function, as they assessed short-term memory, working memory, attention, and executive function which are regulated in two general regions of the brain. Lastly, due to the cross-sectional nature of this study, causal relations cannot be established, and future studies should utilize randomized controlled trials to determine the mechanisms and directionality regarding the associations observed in this study.
Conclusion
In conclusion, increased brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity is related to impaired working memory and executive function in older adults with MetS. Our findings add to the growing evidence that MetS promotes the pathogenesis of vascular cognitive impairment, by impairing the function of the cerebral microcirculation [2, 84–86]. Since MetS is a condition comprised of modifiable risk factors, interventions designed to improve cardiovascular risk factors and promote cerebrovascular health may also be a clinical approach to improve cognitive functioning in individuals with MetS.
Author contribution
All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant UL1 TR002014, the American Heart Association, the National Institute on Aging (RF1AG072295, R01AG055395, R01AG068295; R01AG070915, K01AG073614), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS100782), the National Cancer Institute (R01CA255840), and the Cellular and Molecular GeroScience CoBRE (P20GM125528). The funding sources had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, the American Heart Association, or the Presbyterian Health Foundation.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Anna Csiszar and Dr. Andriy Yabluchanskiy serve as Associate Editors for GeroScience. Dr. Zoltan Ungvari serves as Editor-in-Chief for GeroScience and as Consulting Editor for The American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Elias MF, Robbins MA, Budge MM, Abhayaratna WP, Dore GA, Elias PK. Arterial pulse wave velocity and cognition with advancing age. Hypertension. 2009;53:668–673. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.126342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dichgans M, Leys D. Vascular Cognitive Impairment. Circ Res. 2017;120:573–591. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Toth P, Tarantini S, Csiszar A, Ungvari Z. Functional vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: mechanisms and consequences of cerebral autoregulatory dysfunction, endothelial impairment, and neurovascular uncoupling in aging. Am J Physiol Circ Physiol. 2017;312:H1–20. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00581.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.O’Brien JT, Erkinjuntti T, Reisberg B, Roman G, Sawada T, Pantoni L, et al. Vascular cognitive impairment. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:89–98. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00305-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boyle PA, Wilson RS, Aggarwal NT, Tang Y, Bennett DA. Mild cognitive impairment: Risk of Alzheimer disease and rate of cognitive decline. Neurology. 2006;67:441–445. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000228244.10416.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pal K, Mukadam N, Petersen I, Cooper C. Mild cognitive impairment and progression to dementia in people with diabetes, prediabetes and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018;53:1149–1160. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1581-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu-Ambrose TY, Ashe MC, Graf P, Beattie BL, Khan KM. Increased risk of falling in older community-dwelling women with mild cognitive impairment. Phys Ther. 2008;88:1482–1491. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wilson RS, Segawa E, Boyle PA, Anagnos SE, Hizel LP, Bennett DA. The natural history of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Psychol Aging. 2012;27:1008–1017. doi: 10.1037/a0029857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hussenoeder FS, Conrad I, Roehr S, Fuchs A, Pentzek M, Bickel H, et al. Mild cognitive impairment and quality of life in the oldest old: a closer look. Qual Life Res. 2020;29:1675–1683. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02425-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guehne U, Luck T, Busse A, Angermeyer MC, Riedel-Heller SG. Mortality in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Neuroepidemiol. 2007;29:226–234. doi: 10.1159/000112479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and T of HBC in A. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA J Am Med Assoc 2001;285:2486–97. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 12.Hirode G, Wong RJ. Trends in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the United States, 2011–2016. JAMA. 2020;323:2526. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moore JX, Chaudhary N, Akinyemiju T. Metabolic syndrome prevalence by race/ethnicity and sex in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–2012. Prev Chronic Dis. 2017;14:160287. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alexander CM, Landsman PB, Teutsch SM, Haffner SM. NCEP-defined metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and prevalence of coronary heart disease among NHANES III participants age 50 years and older. Diabetes. 2003;52:1210–1214. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.5.1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wilson PWF, D’Agostino RB, Parise H, Sullivan L, Meigs JB. Metabolic syndrome as a precursor of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2005;112:3066–3072. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.539528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Forsén B, Lahti K, Nissén M, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:683–689. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.4.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lakka H-M. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA. 2002;288:2709. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.21.2709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Guembe MJ, Fernandez-Lazaro CI, Sayon-Orea C, Toledo E, Moreno-Iribas C. Risk for cardiovascular disease associated with metabolic syndrome and its components: a 13-year prospective study in the RIVANA cohort. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19:195. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01166-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Segura B, Jurado MÁ, Freixenet N, Albuin C, Muniesa J, Junqué C. Mental slowness and executive dysfunctions in patients with metabolic syndrome. Neurosci Lett. 2009;462:49–53. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Marseglia A, Darin-Mattsson A, Skoog J, Rydén L, Hadarsson-Bodin T, Kern S, et al. Metabolic syndrome is associated with poor cognition: a population-based study of 70-year-old adults without dementia. Journals Gerontol Ser A. 2021;76:2275–2283. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dearborn JL, Knopman D, Sharrett AR, Schneider ALC, Jack CR, Jr, Coker LH, et al. The metabolic syndrome and cognitive decline in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC) Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2014;38:337–346. doi: 10.1159/000362265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang X, Ji L, Tang Z, Ding G, Chen X, Lv J, et al. The association of metabolic syndrome and cognitive impairment in Jidong of China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21:40. doi: 10.1186/s12902-021-00705-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu Z, Lippa CF. Association of metabolic syndrome and inflammation with cognitive decline in adults aged 60 years and older: findings from a national health survey in the United States. Neurosci J. 2013;2013:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2013/846027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lai MMY, Ames DJ, Cox KL, Ellis KA, Sharman MJ, Hepworth G, et al. Association between cognitive function and clustered cardiovascular risk of metabolic syndrome in older adults at risk of cognitive decline. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24:300–304. doi: 10.1007/s12603-020-1333-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Raffaitin C, Feart C, Le Goff M, Amieva H, Helmer C, Akbaraly TN, et al. Metabolic syndrome and cognitive decline in French elders: the Three-City Study. Neurology. 2011;76:518–525. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820b7656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Foret JT, Oleson S, Hickson B, Valek S, Tanaka H, Haley AP. Metabolic syndrome and cognitive function in midlife. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021;36:897–907. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rouch I, Trombert B, Kossowsky MP, Laurent B, Celle S, Ntougou Assoumou G, et al. Metabolic Syndrome is associated with poor memory and executive performance in elderly community residents: the PROOF study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22:1096–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Falkowski J, Atchison T, DeButte-Smith M, Weiner MF, O’Bryant S. Executive functioning and the metabolic syndrome: a project FRONTIER study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;29:47–53. doi: 10.1093/arclin/act078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Diamond A. Executive Functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135–168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Moreira HS, Costa AS, Castro SL, Lima CF, Vicente SG. Assessing executive dysfunction in neurodegenerative disorders: a critical review of brief neuropsychological tools. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:1780–1782. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000;41:49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Feinkohl I, Janke J, Hadzidiakos D, Slooter A, Winterer G, Spies C, et al. Associations of the metabolic syndrome and its components with cognitive impairment in older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19:77. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1073-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Dik MG, Jonker C, Comijs HC, Deeg DJH, Kok A, Yaffe K, et al. Contribution of metabolic syndrome components to cognition in older individuals. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2655–2660. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Overman MJ, Pendleton N, O’Neill TW, Bartfai G, Casanueva FF, Forti G, et al. Glycemia but not the metabolic syndrome is associated with cognitive decline: findings from the European male ageing study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;25:662–671. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Assuncao N, Sudo FK, Drummond C, de Felice FG, Mattos P. Metabolic syndrome and cognitive decline in the elderly: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tomiyama H, Hirayama Y, Hashimoto H, Yambe M, Yamada J, Koji Y, et al. The effects of changes in the metabolic syndrome detection status on arterial stiffening: a prospective study. Hypertens Res. 2006;29:673–678. doi: 10.1291/hypres.29.673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gardner AW, Parker DE, Montgomery PS, Blevins SM. Step-monitored home exercise improves ambulation, vascular function, and inflammation in symptomatic patients with peripheral artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:2233–2245. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:S1–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Aboyans V, Criqui MH, Abraham P, Allison MA, Creager MA, Diehm C, et al. Measurement and interpretation of the ankle-brachial index. Circulation. 2012;126:2890–2909. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318276fbcb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gardner AW, Montgomery PS, Casanegra AI, Silva-Palacios F, Ungvari Z, Csiszar A. Association between gait characteristics and endothelial oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease. Age (Omaha) 2016;38:64. doi: 10.1007/s11357-016-9925-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang Q, Yi N, Liu S, Zheng H, Qiao X, Xiong Q, et al. Easier operation and similar power of 10 g monofilament test for screening diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Int Med Res. 2018;46:3278–3284. doi: 10.1177/0300060518775244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Vela SA, Quebedeaux TL, Fleischli JG. Choosing a practical screening instrument to identify patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:289. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.3.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Oyer DS, Saxon D, Shah A. Quantitative assessment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with use of the clanging tuning fork test. Endocr Pract. 2007;13:5–10. doi: 10.4158/EP.13.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pietrobelli A, Rubiano F, St-Onge M-P, Heymsfield SB. New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58:1479–1484. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sluyter JD, Schaaf D, Scragg RKR, Plank LD. Prediction of fatness by standing 8-electrode bioimpedance: a multiethnic adolescent population. Obesity. 2010;18:183–189. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Huang PL. A comprehensive definition for metabolic syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2009;2:231–237. doi: 10.1242/dmm.001180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–2752. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.169404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zimmet P, Magliano D, Matsuzawa Y, Alberti G, Shaw J. The metabolic syndrome: a global public health problem and a new definition. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2005;12:295–300. doi: 10.5551/jat.12.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Waldstein SR, Tankard CF, Maier KJ, Pelletier JR, Snow J, Gardner AW, et al. Peripheral arterial disease and cognitive function. Psychosom Med. 2003;65:757–763. doi: 10.1097/01.PSY.0000088581.09495.5E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Goetz CG. Textbook of clinical neurology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2007.
- 51.Shirk SD, Mitchell MB, Shaughnessy LW, Sherman JC, Locascio JJ, Weintraub S, et al. A web-based normative calculator for the uniform data set (UDS) neuropsychological test battery. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2011;3:32. doi: 10.1186/alzrt94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cortez-Cooper MY, Supak JA, Tanaka H. A new device for automatic measurements of arterial stiffness and ankle-brachial index. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:1519–1522. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(03)00416-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hung C-S, Lin J-W, Hsu C-N, Chen H-M, Tsai R-Y, Chien Y-F, et al. Using brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity to associate arterial stiffness with cardiovascular risks. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;19:241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2008.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ridout SJ, Parker BA, Proctor DN. Age and regional specificity of peak limb vascular conductance in women. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99:2067–2074. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00825.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Torres-Sánchez I, Rodríguez-Alzueta E, Cabrera-Martos I, López-Torres I, Moreno-Ramírez MP, Valenza MC. Cognitive impairment in COPD: a systematic review. J Bras Pneumol. 2015;41:182–190. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132015000004424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Dodd JW, Chung AW, Van Den Broek MD, Barrick TR, Charlton RA, Jones PW. Brain structure and function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multimodal cranial magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:240–245. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201202-0355OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gignac GE, Weiss LG. Digit Span is (mostly) related linearly to general intelligence: every extra bit of span counts. Psychol Assess. 2015;27:1312–1323. doi: 10.1037/pas0000105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Groth-Marnat G. Handbook of psychological assessment. 5th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2009.
- 59.D’Esposito M, Postle BR. The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66:115–142. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031.THE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lara AH, Wallis JD. The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory: a mini review. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9:1–7. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chai WJ, Abd Hamid AI, Abdullah JM. Working memory from the psychological and neurosciences perspectives: a review. Front Psychol. 2018;9:196–198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sakatani K, Lichty W, Xie Y, Li S, Zuo H. Effects of aging on language-activated cerebral blood oxygenation changes of the left prefrontal cortex: near infrared spectroscopy study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999;8:398–403. doi: 10.1016/S1052-3057(99)80047-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Murayama Y, Sato Y, Hu L, Brugnera A, Compare A, Sakatani K. Relation between cognitive function and baseline concentrations of hemoglobin in prefrontal cortex of elderly people measured by time-resolved near-infrared spectroscopy. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;977:269–276. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55231-6_37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Vaidya JG, Paradiso S, Boles Ponto LL, McCormick LM, Robinson RG. Aging, grey matter, and blood flow in the anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroimage. 2007;37:1346–1353. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pardo JV, Nyabwari SM, Lee JT. Aging-related hypometabolism in the anterior cingulate cortex of cognitively intact, amyloid-negative seniors at rest mediates the relationship between age and executive function but not memory. Cereb Cortex Commun. 2020;1:1–9. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Toth P, Tucsek Z, Sosnowska D, Gautam T, Mitschelen M, Tarantini S, et al. Age-related autoregulatory dysfunction and cerebromicrovascular injury in mice with angiotensin II-induced hypertension. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:1732–1742. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Scuteri A, Cunha PG, Cucca F, Cockcroft J, Raso FUM, Muiesan ML, et al. Syndrome: a cross-countries study. Atherosclerosis. 2015;233:654–660. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.01.041.ARTERIAL. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tucsek Z, Toth P, Sosnowska D, Gautam T, Mitschelen M, Koller A, et al. Obesity in aging exacerbates blood-brain barrier disruption, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress in the mouse hippocampus: effects on expression of genes involved in beta-amyloid generation and Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol - Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:1212–1226. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Tucsek Z, Toth P, Tarantini S, Sosnowska D, Gautam T, Warrington JP, et al. Aging exacerbates obesity-induced cerebromicrovascular rarefaction, neurovascular uncoupling, and cognitive decline in mice. J Gerontol - Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69:1339–1352. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Toth P, Tarantini S, Springo Z, Tucsek Z, Gautam T, Giles CB, et al. Aging exacerbates hypertension-induced cerebral microhemorrhages in mice: role of resveratrol treatment in vasoprotection. Aging Cell. 2015;14:400–408. doi: 10.1111/acel.12315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ungvari Z, Toth P, Tarantini S, Prodan CI, Sorond F, Merkely B, et al. Hypertension-induced cognitive impairment: from pathophysiology to public health. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17:639–654. doi: 10.1038/s41581-021-00430-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gkousioudi A, Yu X, Ferruzzi J, Qian J, Wainford RD, Seta F, et al. Biomechanical properties of mouse carotid arteries with diet-induced metabolic syndrome and aging. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.862996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Waldstein SR, Rice SC, Thayer JF, Najjar SS, Scuteri A, Zonderman AB. Pulse pressure and pulse wave velocity are related to cognitive decline in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Hypertension. 2008;51:99–104. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.093674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zlokovic BV, Gottesman RF, Bernstein KE, Seshadri S, McKee A, Snyder H, et al. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID): a report from the 2018 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Workshop. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2020;16:1714–1733. doi: 10.1002/alz.12157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Coutinho T, Turner ST, Kullo IJ. Aortic pulse wave velocity is associated with measures of subclinical target organ damage. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:754–761. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ungvari Z, Tarantini S, Kirkpatrick AC, Csiszar A, Prodan CI. Cerebral microhemorrhages: mechanisms, consequences, and prevention. Am J Physiol - Hear Circ Physiol. 2017;312:H1128–H1143. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00780.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Cipolla MJ. The cerebral circulation. 2nd ed. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences; 2009. [PubMed]
- 78.Toth P, Tucsek Z, Tarantini S, Sosnowska D, Gautam T, Mitschelen M, et al. IGF-1 deficiency impairs cerebral myogenic autoregulation in hypertensive mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34:1887–1897. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Springo Z, Toth P, Tarantini S, Ashpole NM, Tucsek Z, Sonntag WE, et al. Aging impairs myogenic adaptation to pulsatile pressure in mouse cerebral arteries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35:527–530. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sequí-Domínguez I, Cavero-Redondo I, Álvarez-Bueno C, Pozuelo-Carrascosa DP, de Arenas-Arroyo SN, Martínez-Vizcaíno V. Accuracy of pulse wave velocity predicting cardiovascular and all-cause mortality A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1–13. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Terentes-Printzios D, Ioakeimidis N, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with brachial-ankle elasticity index: A systematic review and meta-Analysis. Hypertension. 2012;60:556–562. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.194779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Tanaka H, Munakata M, Kawano Y, Ohishi M, Shoji T, Sugawara J, et al. Comparison between carotid-femoral and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as measures of arterial stiffness. J Hypertens. 2009;27:2022–2027. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32832e94e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Sugawara J, Tanaka H. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity: myths, misconceptions, and realities. Pulse. 2015;3:106–113. doi: 10.1159/000430771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Atti AR, Valente S, Iodice A, Caramella I, Ferrari B, Albert U, et al. Metabolic syndrome, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;27:625–637. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.01.214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Bangen KJ, Armstrong NM, Au R, Gross AL. Metabolic syndrome and cognitive trajectories in the Framingham Offspring Study. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2019;71:931–943. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Livingston JM, McDonald MW, Gagnon T, Jeffers MS, Gomez-Smith M, Antonescu S, et al. Influence of metabolic syndrome on cerebral perfusion and cognition. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;137:104756. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


