Skip to main content
Biology Letters logoLink to Biology Letters
. 2022 Dec 21;18(12):20220331. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0331

Impaired immune function accompanies social evolution in spiders

Jesper Bechsgaard 1, Tove Hedegaard Jorgensen 1, Anne Katrine Jønsson 1, Mads Schou 2, Trine Bilde 1,
PMCID: PMC9768628  PMID: 36541093

Abstract

An efficient immune system is essential to the survival of many animals. Sociality increases risk of pathogen transmission, which should select for enhanced immune function. However, two hypotheses instead predict a weakened immune function: relaxed selection caused by social immunity/protection, and reduced efficacy of selection due to inbreeding, reproductive skew and female bias in social species that reduce effective population size and accelerate genetic drift. We assessed the effect of social evolution on immune function in a comparative study of two social spider species and their closely related subsocial sister species (genus Stegodyphus). The haemolymph of social species was less efficient in inhibiting bacterial growth of the potentially pathogenic bacteria Bacillus subtilis than that of subsocial species. Reduced efficacy of selection in social species was supported by comparative genomic analysis showing substantially elevated non-synonymous substitutions in immune genes in one of the social species. We propose that impaired immune function results from reduced efficacy of selection because the evolution of sociality in spiders is accompanied by demographic processes that elevate genetic drift. Positive feedback between pathogen-induced local extinctions and the resulting elevation of genetic drift may further weaken responses to selection by pathogens, and threaten species persistence.

Keywords: immunity, sociality, comparative genomics, social spider, subsocial spider, haemolymph assay

1. Introduction

The physiological responses of immune systems are critical for reducing detrimental effects of pathogen infections. In most animals, the genes that control a physiological immune response are either highly conserved to maintain essential functions in signalling pathways, or under positive and/or balancing selection to recognize and eliminate a diversity of invading pathogens e.g. [1,2]. Group living animals experience increased risk of pathogen transmission due to frequent and close contact between individuals e.g. [3], suggesting that selection for efficient immune responses is stronger in social than in non-social species. Two conditions of social lifestyle may however interfere with the adaptive evolution of immune genes and obscure predictions on their substitution patterns and the resulting immune response efficiency. Firstly, many social species have evolved social protection from infection, including behavioural responses, which collectively reduce disease transfer [4]. Social protection includes the collective increase in body temperature in honeybees [5], the use of antimicrobial tree resins in ant nests [6] or the association with microbial symbionts in spiders [7] and possibly aphids [8]. Effective social protection should relax selection on physiological immune responses [912]; in line with observations of relaxed selection on behavioural responses owing to group living [1316]. Secondly, genetic drift may be particularly strong in some social species due to low effective population size (Ne) [1720]. This causes random loss of genetic diversity by drift as well as reduced efficacy of selection [21,22], which may impair immune gene function.

In general, the arthropod immune system is innate and therefore relies on immune gene variants to recognize and eliminate invading pathogens. The first line of defence is constitutive and includes the actions of haemocytes and rapidly activated enzyme cascades that may effectively clear infection [23,24]. The second line of defence consists of induced responses (signal transduction) that occur when blood cell membrane receptor proteins bind to certain surface proteins of the pathogen and initiate signalling pathways like Toll and Imd, resulting in the production of antimicrobial peptides [1,23]. There is however substantial variation in immune system responses across taxonomic groups. In spiders, several genes that encode proteins involved in the signal transduction pathways seem to be missing [25], supporting the presence of constitutively expressed antimicrobial peptides [26,27].

Here we test the effect of sociality on immune function assayed by growth inhibition of two bacteria in two independently evolved social spiders and their respective subsocial sister species of the genus Stegodyphus [28] (figure 1a). Social Stegodyphus spiders form permanent groups in communal nests, with obligate inbreeding, female-biased sex ratio (approx. 1 : 8), and reproductive skew [19], factors that all contribute to reduce effective population size. Low population genetic diversity and elevated rates of genome-wide non-synonymous substitutions compared to their subsocial sister species indicate strong effect of drift and reduced efficacy of selection in social lineages [22,29,30]. We first investigated if haemolymph of Stegodyphus spiders inhibits the growth of two surrogate pathogens, the Gram-negative Escherichia coli and the Gram-positive Bacillus subtilis. Then we investigated whether social species show a relatively stronger immune response (stronger inhibition) than subsocial species as expected if sociality and elevated risk of transmission selects for a more efficient immune response; or alternatively, whether social species show relatively weaker inhibition, as predicted under lower efficacy of selection and/or relaxed selection due to social protection. We additionally investigated whether selection at the molecular level differs between social and subsocial species by comparing substitution patterns (dN/dS) in genes involved in the immune signal transduction pathways.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phylogenetic (a) and geographical (b) information on sampled species and populations. Stegodyphus lineatus is included as outgroup in (a). S. tentoriicola was sampled at R4, R5, N8 and R64, S. dumicola at PON, SKU, WEE, S. africanus at HOE, PON, SHI, SKU and S. mimosarum at PON, PP, SKU, WEE. Social species are marked in red and subsocial species in black.

2. Material and methods

Multiple individuals were sampled from 3–4 populations of each of the social species S. mimosarum and S. dumicola and subsocial S. africanus and S. tentoriicola in January 2015 in South Africa (figure 1). Individuals were kept at 27°C and a 13 L : 11 D light/dark cycle until use in in vitro immune assays in mid-April 2015. Two experiments were conducted, with Bacillus subtilis DSM10 and Escherichia coli OP50 respectively, both in NB medium (Scharlau, Spain). Haemolymph was extracted from fully hydrated, sterilized and anaesthetized female spiders by piercing a book lung and collecting 2 µl from the emerging droplet. Each 2 µl haemolymph sample was randomly distributed to wells containing bacterial medium (100 µl each) in 96-well plates. On average 6.4 ± 3.8 (s.d.) haemolymph samples were included per run to keep the time from adding haemolymph to incubation short. Plates were incubated at 27°C except during measurements at approximately 20°C. Each plate contained two treatment controls; one sample of NB medium without haemolymph and one with Ringer's solution, the latter to mimic the haemolymph salt composition. Sample sizes for assays were: B. subtilis: nafricanus = 37, nmimosarum = 51, ntentoriicola = 14, ndumicola = 28, nNB = 27, nNB+Ringer = 27 and E. coli: nafricanus = 35, nmimosarum = 52, ntentoriicola = 14, ndumicola = 24, nNB = 24, nNB+Ringer = 24. Before the addition of haemolymph, bacterial concentration in each well was measured as light absorbance using an Epoch microplate spectrophotometer to standardize start concentrations. After addition of haemolymph the light absorbance was measured every 2nd minute from 0 to 16 min, every 5th minute from 20 to 50 min, and then at 60, 70, 80, 100 and 120 min.

In the analyses, we first examined the difference in bacteria growth of NB medium with and without Ringer's solution. We modelled absorbance values (Gaussian response variable) using the R-package lmerTest v. 3.1-3 [31] in R v. 4.0.5 [32], with the fixed effects Time (continuous, scaled but not centred), Medium (factorial, Ringer's or without Ringer's solution) and Bacteria (factorial, E. coli or B. subtilis) with full sets of interactions. We included plate identity as a random effect, with both random intercept across plates, and random slopes of each plate over time. We used Ringer as a control to test for inhibition of growth of each of the two bacteria caused by the haemolymph of four spider species since we found no effect on absorbance (electronic supplementary material, table S1). We constructed one model per spider species, with the fixed effects Time and Medium (factorial, Ringer or spider haemolymph), and with random intercept and slopes of plate identity over time. We checked whether our results were sensitive to potential nonlinearity by repeating all analyses of B. subtilis in two separate linear phases (0–16 min and 20–120 min, electronic supplementary material, table S1 and S2) post hoc.

To investigate if the haemolymph of social spiders differed from subsocial spiders in the inhibition of bacteria growth, we constructed models for each spider sister pair. These models contained the fixed effects Time and Social (Yes or No), and their interaction. As the structure of repeated sampling over time was similar across the two media, we could model random slopes and intercept of each haemolymph sample within a plate. We also added plate identity and population of origin as random intercepts. The statistical significance of model terms was estimated using F-tests by the Satterthwaite's approximation in lmerTest (type II ANOVA).

To investigate if selection at the molecular level differs between social and subsocial species, we used 23 immune genes annotated in the S. mimosarum genome [25]. Alignments consisting of orthologue sequences from S. mimosarum, S. africanus and S. lineatus were obtained from Bechsgaard et al. [29]. Stegodyphus dumicola sequences were extracted from the genome assembly published by Liu et al. [33] and S. tentoriicola sequences were extracted from an unpublished genome assembly. We used PAML 4.6 [34] to estimate dN/dS ratios averaged across sites for each branch separately, first for individual loci, and secondly for all loci concatenated. Ninety-five per cent confidence intervals were estimated from 1000 bootstrapped datasets using codeml. We analysed whether selection was relaxed or intensified in species with elevated dN/dS using RELAX [35].

3. Results

The haemolymph of all four spider species inhibited the growth of B. subtilis (electronic supplementary material, table S2), while none of the species inhibited the growth of E. coli (electronic supplementary material, table S3). The subsocial S. africanus showed stronger inhibition of B. subtilis growth than the social S. mimosarum (table 1, figure 2a). The result for the S. tentoriicolaS. dumicola comparison was inconclusive (table 1, figure 2b), although, the data could indicate stronger inhibition of B. subtilis growth by subsocial S. tentoriicola than by social S. dumicola after the first approximately 20 min. No differences in growth inhibition of E. coli among spider species were detected (table 2).

Table 1.

Comparison of growth rates of B. subtilis in haemolymph from two sister-species pairs: subsocial Stegodyphus tentoriicola/social S. dumicola and subsocial S. africanus/social S. mimosarum.

pair term estimate (se) d.f. F p
S. tentoriicola versus S. dumicola intercept 0.098 (0.007)
social (no) 0.006 (0.007) 1.31 0.9 0.337
time_z 0.026 (0.003) 1.42 82.6 <0.001
social (no):time_z −0.004 (0.006) 1.42 0.6 0.458
S. africanus versus S. mimosarum intercept 0.099 (0.006)
social (no) 0 (0.005) 1.75 0 0.923
time_z 0.023 (0.002) 1.88 143.9 <0.001
social (no):time_z −0.008 (0.003) 1.88 6.2 0.015

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Growth of Bacillus subtilis (top panels) and Escherichia coli (lower panels) measured as changes to cell concentration in NB media with haemolymph from subsocial Stegodyphus africanus and its social sister species S. mimosarum (a,c) and from subsocial S. tentoriicola and its social sister species S. dumicola (b,d). Changes to cell concentration was estimated as mean absorbance (OD) (± S.E.). Baseline measures of uninhibited bacterial growth were obtained in pure NB media (NB) and NB with Ringer's solution (NB + Ringer). Cell concentrations are standardized to Ringer's medium at time zero to illustrate differences in growth rates.

Table 2.

Comparison of growth rates of E. coli in haemolymph from two sister-species pairs: subsocial Stegodyphus tentoriicola/social S. dumicola and subsocial S. africanus/social S. mimosarum.

pair term estimate (s.e.) d.f. f p
S. tentoriicola versus S. dumicola intercept 0.079 (0.006)
social (no) 0.008 (0.006) 1.10 2.3 0.16
time_z 0.017 (0.002) 1.38 182.7 <0.001
social (no):time_z 0.004 (0.003) 1.38 1.8 0.193
S. africanus versus S. mimosarum intercept 0.08 (0.004)
social (no) 0.001 (0.003) 1.23 0.2 0.657
time_z 0.017 (0.001) 1.87 508.2 <0.001
social (no):time_z −0.001 (0.002) 1.87 0.6 0.439

Estimated dN/dS ratio averaged across sites were significantly higher in the social S. mimosarum (0.1876 (95% CI: 0.1295–0.2691)) than the subsocial S. africanus (0.0759 (95% CI: 0.0396–0.1210)) in the concatenated alignments of 12 496 codons in 23 immune genes (electronic supplementary material, table S4). A branch-site specific analysis of dN/dS ratios suggest that the elevated dN/dS averaged across sites is due to relaxed selection (RELAX: k = 0.62, p = 0.021, LR = 5.32). This is consistent with social immunity/protection leading to less infections of pathogens and/or a less efficient removal of slightly deleterious non-synonymous variants in the social S. mimosarum. This effect was not confirmed in dN/dS estimates of S. dumicola (0.1432 (95% CI: 0.0857–0.2285)) and S. tentoriicola (0.1827 (95% CI: 0.1096–0.2929)). In all four species, the differences in dN/dS estimates were mainly due to differences in rates of non-synonymous substitutions, since the rates of synonymous substitutions were similar in the two species pairs (electronic supplementary material, table S4 and S5). The estimates of the individual loci were highly variable, due to the existence of only few substitutions in many of the loci.

4. Discussion

Our results provide some evidence for less efficient immune responses of social species compared with subsocial sister species. This effect was strongest in the social S. mimosarum, and was coupled with elevated rates of non-synonymous substitutions in immune genes. We did not find evidence for increased selection on the immune response in social species, i.e. more rapid or stronger suppression of bacterial growth, as could be expected if social species experience elevated risk of social pathogen transmission. An impaired immune function in social species can be explained by two different hypotheses: an adaptive explanation suggests that social protection can lead to relaxed selection on immune responses. A non-adaptive explanation posits that elevated drift reduces the efficacy of selection to maintain an efficient immune system. Understanding the importance of an impaired immune function in social species requires separation of social protection and reduced efficacy of selection as the underlying force.

In social spiders, hygiene behaviour with removal of prey carcasses in social spiders (R Berger-Tal 2010, personal observation; [36]), and the presence of anti-microbial compounds from bacterial and fungal species in the communal nests of social Stegodyphus [7], which inhibit potential pathogens [37], could provide collective protection and potentially relax selection on the physiological immune response. Similar effects are seen in other social arthropods like termites and honeybees, where behavioural mechanisms may relax selective constraints on immune-related genes [12,38]. Common for these mechanisms are that the impaired immune function is adaptive and unlikely to reduce the persistence of social species. However, a 10-fold reduction in effective population sizes of social compared to subsocial spider species [22,39] substantiate the role of genetic drift in reducing efficacy of selection. Over time, this may reduce the ability of social species to combat pathogens through accumulation of slightly deleterious substitutions in immune-related genes. As expected under this scenario, previous studies found elevated rates of genome-wide non-synonymous substitutions in social species [29,30]. Here, our finding of elevated dN/dS ratios was likely caused by reduced efficacy of selection in one of the social species (S. mimosarum), while data from the other species pair were inconclusive. Note that if the inhibition of B. subtilis results from constitutively expressed immune effector molecules, the genes encoding signal transduction pathways components may not be involved in the immune responses tested here. Overall, we propose that reduced efficacy of selection is the most likely explanation for impaired immune function in social species.

Our finding that the transition to sociality may be accompanied by an impaired immune response may help explain frequent population and nest extinctions of social spiders [14,4043]. Nest extinctions can be preceded by a build-up of cell bacterial load [41], supporting the hypothesis that a mounting parasite load contribute to high extinction rates of nests and entire populations after relatively few generations [19,41]. The ‘boom and bust’ population dynamics of social spiders further enhance the negative effects of low effective population size on loss of population and species-wide genetic diversity [21,22,28,39].

The superior inhibitory effect of S. africanus haemolymph relative to S. mimosarum on bacterial growth was immediate. Data on the S. tentoriicola-S. dumicola species pair were inconclusive, but possibly indicating a lower inhibitory effect on B. subtilis of the social S. dumicola after 20 min. This difference in timing suggests that the four species vary in the composition and/or concentration of inhibiting molecules in the haemolymph. Candidate molecules are the antimicrobial peptides (AMP) that contribute to bacterial inhibition by lysing cells within minutes of their release [44]. A broad suite of AMP genes are commonly upregulated in arthropods upon pathogen challenge, but may also be constitutively expressed especially in arachnids [2527]. In spiders, they are stored in haemocyte granules in the haemolymph where they are released upon pathogen challenge [26,45,46]. Because AMPs are specific and potentially under diversifying selection (reviewed by [47,48]) they may contribute to between-species variation in inhibitory effects in Stegodyphus.

Evolutionary transitions from solitary to social living are often associated with decreased genetic diversity and efficacy of selection, and hence suggested to increase species' extinction risk [22]. Our results provide some support for reduced adaptive potential in immune responses of social Stegodyphus. They also highlight the potential role of pathogens as contributing and reinforcing drivers of meta-population dynamics by driving local extinctions, which further accelerates long-term loss of genetic diversity and thereby evolutionary potential.

Data accessibility

The data from this study are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1ns1rn8x1 [49].

The data consist of the data from haemolymph assays, data for all spider species in assays with two different bacteria are uploaded in a single file (Step 2).

We also present comparative analyses of sequence data of immune genes. All sequence alignments are uploaded as fas files (Step 2).

The data are provided in electronic supplementary material [50].

Authors' contributions

J.B.: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; T.H.J.: validation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; A.K.J.: investigation, methodology, writing—original draft; M.S.: formal analysis, methodology, software, visualization, writing—review and editing; T.B.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing.

All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.

Conflict of interest declaration

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

The study was supported by The Danish Council for Independent Research grant number DFF – 6108-00565 to T.B.

References

  • 1.Baxter RH, Contet A, Krueger K. 2017. Arthropod innate immune systems and vector-borne diseases. Biochemistry 56, 907-918. ( 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00870) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sackton TB, Lazzaro BP, Schlenke TA, Evans JD, Hultmark D, Clark AG. 2007. Dynamic evolution of the innate immune system in Drosophila. Nat. Genet. 39, 1461-1468. ( 10.1038/ng.2007.60) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Briard L, Ezenwa VO. 2021. Parasitism and host social behaviour: a meta-analysis of insights derived from social network analysis. Anim. Behav. 172, 171-182. ( 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.11.010) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cremer S, Armitage SAO, Schmid-Hempel P. 2007. Social immunity. Curr. Biol. 17, R693-R702. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Starks PT, Blackie CA, Seeley TD. 2000. Fever in honeybee colonies. Naturwissenschaften 87, 229-231. ( 10.1007/s001140050709) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Christe P, Oppliger A, Bancala F, Castella G, Chapuisat M. 2003. Evidence for collective medication in ants. Ecol. Lett. 6, 19-22. ( 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00395.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nazipi S, Elberg CL, Busck MM, Lund MB, Bilde T, Schramm A. 2021. The bacterial and fungal nest microbiomes in populations of the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 44, 126222. ( 10.1016/j.syapm.2021.126222) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gerardo NM, et al. 2010. Immunity and other defenses in pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Genome Biol. 11, 1-17. ( 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r21) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barribeau SM, et al. 2015. A depauperate immune repertoire precedes evolution of sociality in bees. Genome Biol. 16, 1-21. ( 10.1186/s13059-015-0628-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Evans JD, et al. 2006. Immune pathways and defence mechanisms in honey bees Apis mellifera. Insect. Mol. Biol. 15, 645-656. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00682.x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mee L, Barribeau SM. 2021. Immunity vs sociality: adaptive evolution tests suggest social lifestyle exerts greater selection pressures than host–pathogen coevolution in the bees. bioRxiv 2021.2009.2007.459261. ( 10.1101/2021.09.07.459261). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bulmer MS, Stefano AM. 2022. Termite eusociality and contrasting selective pressure on social and innate immunity. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 76, 1-12. ( 10.1007/s00265-021-03090-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harwood G, Avilés L. 2018. The shortfall of sociality: group-living affects hunting performance of individual social spiders. Behav. Ecol. 29, 1487-1493. ( 10.1093/beheco/ary099) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rose C, Schramm A, Irish J, Bilde T, Bird TL. 2021. Host plant availability and nest-site selection of the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola Pocock, 1898 (Eresidae). Insects 13, 30. ( 10.3390/insects13010030) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Samuk KM, LeDue EE, Avilés L. 2011. Sister clade comparisons reveal reduced maternal care behavior in social cobweb spiders. Behav. Ecol. 23, 35-43. ( 10.1093/beheco/arr146) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Berger-Tal R, Lubin Y, Settepani V, Majer M, Bilde T, Tuni C. 2015. Evidence for loss of nepotism in the evolution of permanent sociality. Sci. Rep. 5, 13284. ( 10.1038/srep13284) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Johnson PCD, Llewellyn KS, Amos W. 2000. Microsatellite loci for studying clonal mixing, population structure and inbreeding in a social aphid, Pemphigus spyrothecae (Hemiptera: Pemphigidae). Mol. Ecol. 9, 1445-1446. ( 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01017-8.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Keller L, Peer K, Bernasconi C, Taborsky M, Shuker DM. 2011. Inbreeding and selection on sex ratio in the bark beetle Xylosandrus germanus. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 1-6. ( 10.1186/1471-2148-11-359) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lubin Y, Bilde T. 2007. The evolution of sociality in spiders. In Advances in the study of behavior, pp. 83-145. New York, NY: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reeve HK, Westneat DF, Noon WA, Sherman PW, Aquadro CF. 1990. DNA fingerprinting reveals high-levels of inbreeding in colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 2496-2500. ( 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2496) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Settepani V, Bechsgaard J, Bilde T. 2014. Low genetic diversity and strong but shallow population differentiation suggests genetic homogenization by metapopulation dynamics in a social spider. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 2850-2855. ( 10.1111/jeb.12520) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Settepani V, Schou MF, Greve M, Grinsted L, Bechsgaard J, Bilde T. 2017. Evolution of sociality in spiders leads to depleted genomic diversity at both population and species levels. Mol. Ecol. 26, 4197-4210. ( 10.1111/mec.14196) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Haine ER, Moret Y, Siva-Jothy MT, Rolff J. 2008. Antimicrobial defense and persistent infection in insects. Science 322, 1257-1259. ( 10.1126/science.1165265) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Siva-Jothy MT, Moret Y, Rolff J. 2005. Insect immunity: an evolutionary ecology perspective. Adv. Insect Physiol. 32, 1-48. ( 10.1016/S0065-2806(05)32001-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bechsgaard J, Vanthournout B, Funch P, Vestbo S, Gibbs RA, Richards S, Sanggaard KW, Enghild JJ, Bilde T. 2016. Comparative genomic study of arachnid immune systems indicates loss of beta-1,3-glucanase-related proteins and theimmune deficiency pathway. J. Evol. Biol. 29, 277-291. ( 10.1111/jeb.12780) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kuhn-Nentwig L, Nentwig W. 2013. The immune system of spiders. In Spider ecophysiology, pp. 81-91, Berlin, Germany: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lorenzini DM, da Silva PI, Fogaca AC, Bulet P, Daffre S. 2003. Acanthoscurrin: a novel glycine-rich antimicrobial peptide constitutively expressed in the hemocytes of the spider Acanthoscurria gomesiana. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 27, 781-791. ( 10.1016/S0145-305x(03)00058-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Settepani V, Bechsgaard J, Bilde T. 2016. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that sociality is associated with reduced effectiveness of selection. Ecol. Evol. 6, 469-477. ( 10.1002/ece3.1886) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bechsgaard J, Schou MF, Vanthournout B, Hendrickx F, Knudsen B, Settepani V, Schierup MH, Bilde T. 2019. Evidence for faster X chromosome evolution in spiders. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 1281-1293. ( 10.1093/molbev/msz074) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mattila TM, Bechsgaard JS, Hansen TT, Schierup MH, Bilde T. 2012. Orthologous genes identified by transcriptome sequencing in the spider genus Stegodyphus. BMC Genomics 13, 1-18. ( 10.1186/1471-2164-13-70) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. 2017. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1-26. ( 10.18637/jss.v082.i13) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu SL, Aagaard A, Bechsgaard J, Bilde T. 2019. DNA methylation patterns in the social spider, Stegodyphus dumicola. Genes-Basel 10, 137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yang ZH. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586-1591. ( 10.1093/molbev/msm088) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wertheim JO, Murrell B, Smith MD, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Scheffler K. 2014. RELAX: detecting relaxed selection in a phylogenetic framework. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 820-832. ( 10.1093/molbev/msu400) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Straus S, Avilés L. 2018. Effects of host colony size and hygiene behaviours on social spider kleptoparasite loads along an elevation gradient. Funct. Ecol. 32, 2707-2716. ( 10.1111/1365-2435.13225) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lammers A, Nazipi S, Zweers H, Bilde T, Schramm A, Garbeva P, Lalk M. 2022. Antimicrobial volatiles emitted by members of the nest microbiome of social spiders. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 369, fnac088. in press. ( 10.1093/femsle/fnac088) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Harpur BA, et al. 2019. Integrative genomics reveals the genetics and evolution of the honey bee's social immune system. Genome Biol. Evol. 11, 937-948. ( 10.1093/gbe/evz018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Agnarsson I, Aviles L, Maddison WP. 2013. Loss of genetic variability in social spiders: genetic and phylogenetic consequences of population subdivision and inbreeding. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 27-37. ( 10.1111/jeb.12022) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bilde T, Coates KS, Birkhofer K, Bird T, Maklakov AA, Lubin Y, Avilés L. 2007. Survival benefits select for group living in a social spider despite reproductive costs. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 2412-2426. ( 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01407.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Busck MM, Lund MB, Bird TL, Bechsgaard JS, Bilde T, Schramm A. 2022. Temporal and spatial microbiome dynamics across natural populations of the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 98, fiac015. ( 10.1093/femsec/fiac015) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Crouch T, Lubin Y. 2001. Population stability and extinction in a social spider Stegodyphus mimosarum (Araneae: Eresidae). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 72, 409-417. ( 10.1006/bijl.2001.0508) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Riechert SE, Roeloffs R, Echternacht AC. 1986. The ecology of the cooperative spider Agelena consociata in equatorial Africa (Araneae, Agelenidae). J. Arachnol. 14, 175-191. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yeaman MR, Yount NY. 2003. Mechanisms of antimicrobial peptide action and resistance. Pharmacol. Rev. 55, 27-55. ( 10.1124/pr.55.1.2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lorenzini DM, Fukuzawa AH, da Silva PI, Machado-Santelli G, Bijovsky AT, Daffre S. 2003. Molecular cloning, expression analysis and cellular localization of gomesin, an anti-microbial peptide from hemocytes of the spider, Acanthoscurria gomesiana. Insect Biochem. Mol. 33, 1011-1016. ( 10.1016/S0965-1748(03)00115-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Silva PI, Daffre S, Bulet P. 2000. Isolation and characterization of gomesin, an 18-residue cysteine-rich defense peptide from the spider Acanthoscurria gomesiana hemocytes with sequence similarities to horseshoe crab antimicrobial peptides of the tachyplesin family. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 33 464-33 470. ( 10.1074/jbc.M001491200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lazzaro BP, Zasloff M, Rolff J. 2020. Antimicrobial peptides: application informed by evolution. Science 368, eaau5480. ( 10.1126/science.aau5480) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rolff J, Schmid-Hempel P. 2016. Perspectives on the evolutionary ecology of arthropod antimicrobial peptides. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150297. ( 10.1098/rstb.2015.0297) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bechsgaard J, Jorgensen TH, Jønsson AK, Schou M, Bilde T. 2022. Data from: Impaired immune function accompanies social evolution in spiders. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.1ns1rn8x1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 50.Bechsgaard J, Jorgensen TH, Jønsson AK, Schou M, Bilde T. 2022. Impaired immune function accompanies social evolution in spiders. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6331300) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Bechsgaard J, Jorgensen TH, Jønsson AK, Schou M, Bilde T. 2022. Data from: Impaired immune function accompanies social evolution in spiders. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.1ns1rn8x1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Bechsgaard J, Jorgensen TH, Jønsson AK, Schou M, Bilde T. 2022. Impaired immune function accompanies social evolution in spiders. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6331300) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Data Availability Statement

The data from this study are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1ns1rn8x1 [49].

The data consist of the data from haemolymph assays, data for all spider species in assays with two different bacteria are uploaded in a single file (Step 2).

We also present comparative analyses of sequence data of immune genes. All sequence alignments are uploaded as fas files (Step 2).

The data are provided in electronic supplementary material [50].


Articles from Biology Letters are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES