Skip to main content
Biology Letters logoLink to Biology Letters
. 2022 Dec 21;18(12):20220360. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0360

Evolutionary models demonstrate rapid and adaptive diversification of Australo-Papuan pythons

Damien Esquerré 1,, Ian G Brennan 1, Stephen Donnellan 2,3, J Scott Keogh 1
PMCID: PMC9768648  PMID: 36541096

Abstract

Lineages may diversify when they encounter available ecological niches. Adaptive divergence by ecological opportunity often appears to follow the invasion of a new environment with open ecological space. This evolutionary process is hypothesized to explain the explosive diversification of numerous Australian vertebrate groups following the collision of the Eurasian and Australian plates 25 Mya. One of these groups is the pythons, which demonstrate their greatest phenotypic and ecological diversity in Australo-Papua (Australia and New Guinea). Here, using an updated and near complete time-calibrated phylogenomic hypothesis of the group, we show that following invasion of this region, pythons experienced a sudden burst of speciation rates coupled with multiple instances of accelerated phenotypic evolution in head and body shape and body size. These results are consistent with adaptive radiation theory with an initial rapid niche-filling phase and later slow-down approaching niche saturation. We discuss these findings in the context of other Australo-Papuan adaptive radiations and the importance of incorporating adaptive diversification systems that are not extraordinarily species-rich but ecomorphologically diverse to understand how biodiversity is generated.

Keywords: adaptive radiation, Australia, snakes, Wallace's line, morphometrics, Gondwana

1. Introduction

Lineages that encounter multiple available ecological niches may ultimately diversify to fill this ecological space, a process known as adaptive radiation [1,2]. This results in both an increase in speciation rates as the lineages diversify and the evolution of novel phenotypes as they adapt to the new ecological niches [35]. Colonization of an environmentally diverse region with less competition is a common precursor to adaptive radiation, and it has resulted in many spectacular radiations, both at small geographical scales [6,7] and when continents approach each other—facilitating biological exchanges [811].

Australo-Papua, the region comprising Australia, New Guinea and surrounding islands, broke apart completely from Antarctica in the early Eocene (around 45 Mya) and then began a long period of isolation from other major landmasses [12,13]. This time and isolation allowed for the diversification of many animal and plant groups including the iconic Australian marsupials and Eucalyptus trees, among many others [1417]. However, many of the most diverse and emblematic groups in the region are descended from much more recent colonization events from Asia, coinciding with the collision of the Eurasian and Australian plates in the Oligocene around 25 Mya [1820]. Squamate reptiles are extraordinarily diverse in the Australo-Papua region and the vast majority of this diversity is comparatively recent [19]. For example, agamid lizards, monitor lizards, blind snakes, elapid snakes and pythons are all groups that arrived to Australo-Papua probably sometime in the late Palaeogene and early Neogene (20–30 Mya) and then diversified in both species number and ecological strategies [19,2126].

Pythons are a clade of 40 constrictor snakes that display a remarkable level of ecomorphological diversity [25]. They have diversified into a number of ecomorphs that appear to be driven by microhabitat specialization, which is supported by findings of clade-wide convergence in morphology and ecology with New World boas and other snake lineages [27]. Despite being found from Africa to Australia, most of the species and ecological diversity are found east of Wallace's line in Australo-Papua. A recent study showed that pythons likely originated in Asia and later experienced a dramatic burst in morphological evolution accompanied by diverging ecological specialization when they crossed Wallace's line around 23 Mya [25]. This is consistent with adaptive radiation induced by ecological opportunity upon colonization of a new environment with open ecological niches [9].

Phenotypic and ecological aspects of python adaptive radiation have been well studied but the patterns of lineage diversification require further investigation. It is now possible to identify the signatures in phylogenetic trees left from evolutionary processes that can change rates of diversification [28,29], like adaptive radiation in response to ecological opportunity [9,30]. Theory predicts that when this happens there may be a sudden increase in speciation rates followed by a subsequent slow-down coinciding with niche space filling, termed diversity-dependent (DD) diversification [31,32]. Here, we implement a variety of lineage diversification analyses to investigate if pythons experienced an increase in speciation when they colonized Australo-Papua followed by a subsequent slow-down, which is expected if they adaptively radiated. However, because diversification patterns alone can fit a variety of evolutionary scenarios [33], we also investigate how rates of phenotypic evolution changed upon Australo-Papuan invasion. Although taxonomic diversification and phenotypic evolution are not necessarily coupled in adaptive diversification [34,35], synchronicity of these patterns with biogeographic milestones provides valuable evidence for the role of ecological opportunity in the generation of biodiversity.

2. Methods

We use a range of methods to detect diversification patterns consistent with adaptive radiation. To test our hypotheses on a well-sampled and updated phylogenetic tree with recent changes in python taxonomy [36,37], we built a species tree with Astral III v. 5.7.8 [38] using the gene trees for 33 species from 376 nuclear exons from Esquerré et al. [25], as well as a mitochondrial genome gene tree including 32 of those species and five species not sampled for the nuclear exons and not included in Esquerré et al. [25]. We time-calibrated this tree using MCMCTree from the PAML 4.9 package [39], using the dates inferred by Esquerré et al. as secondary calibrations. See electronic supplementary material for details. This time-calibrated tree contains 37 of the 40 (93%) currently recognized species: 27 for the Australo-Papuan clade, eight for the Afro-Asian clade and the two Malayopython species from Southeast Asia.

During an adaptive radiation, we often expect early bursts of diversification as lineages diversify to fill available niches. To visualize the diversification patterns, we constructed lineage through time (LTT) plots [40] of the Pythonidae and the Australo-Papuan clade separately and of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1000 simulated trees under a pure-birth model and an early burst model (with a γ-statistic of −1). This was done with the functions ltt95 and pbtree from the R package phytools [41]. As an additional more powerful tool to test the hypothesis that reaching Australo-Papua resulted in an increased rate of diversification with subsequent slow-down as a consequence of niche filling, we fitted constant rate (CR) and DD birth–death models to the Pythonidae and Australo-Papuan clade trees and performed a bootstrap-likelihood ratio test of DD against CR and computed the power of the test. This was done using the R package DDD [42,43].

In an attempt to identify diversification patterns associated with crossing biogeographic lines, we implemented a method based on graph theory that estimates the spectral density profile of a tree based on its Laplacian graph [44]. These spectral densities are used to identify different ‘modalities’ that can reflect distinct diversification patterns. In addition to fitting a model with the optimal number of modalities (i), we fitted models with 1 to (i) modalities to identify modalities in the tree that were consistent across all models. This was performed using the R package RPANDA [45]. Finally, we implemented the recently developed Bayesian method cladogenetic diversification rate shift (CLaDS) that aims to infer small changes in diversification rates by allowing rates to change at every speciation event [46,47]. At each speciation event in the tree, the two daughter lineages inherit speciation (λ) and extinction (μ) rates drawn from the joint probability distribution parametrized by the parental lineage's λ and μ. We implemented the CLaDS2 model that allows λ and μ to vary while maintaining the turnover constant and ran three MCMC sampling every 200 iterations until the Gelman statistic [48] was under 1.05 for every parameter, after discarding 25% of the chains as burnin. We specified a sampling fraction of 93%. This was run on the Julia package PANDA which implements a new version of CLaDS that runs much faster and more efficiently using data augmentation within a Bayesian MCMC [45,47].

To determine if shifts in lineage diversification rates were coupled with shifts in phenotypic evolution rates, we used the R package RRPhylo [49]. This program uses phylogenetic ridge regression to estimate branch-specific evolution rates and finds shifts towards higher or lower evolution rates across the phylogeny [49].

Linear measurements of body shape data and landmark coordinates for head shape data were taken from previous studies [25,27,50], which were size corrected (corrected for scale) using Procrustes superimposition for head shape landmark coordinates and log shape ratios for linear body shape measurements [50]. We did not perform allometric corrections as allometry is extremely variable and likely adaptive in pythons, and we see it as part of the evolutionary diversity [50]. Due to small morphological sampling sizes (n < 5) that resulted in overestimation of head and body shape evolutionary rates within the Australo-Papuan clade, we conservatively removed Liasis savuensis and Simalia clastolepis. We also analysed maximum snout–vent length as a measure of maximum body size. These data were obtained from the literature or from our own specimen measurements when these were larger than previously reported. With the analysis of maximum body size, we used the same character as a covariate, to avoid misleading inferences of increased evolutionary rates in lineages with larger body sizes.

3. Results

In the LTT plot (figure 1), the Pythonidae as a whole falls well within a pure-birth model of diversification, whereas the Australo-Papuan clade clearly fits an early burst pattern. For the Australo-Papuan clade, the maximum log-likelihood for a CR model is −91.71, and for a DD model is −86.95. The test rejects the CR model (p = 0.049) which has a power of 0.88. A visual inspection of the log-likelihood ratios (LLR; figure 1) shows how the LLR for the Australo-Papuan tree lies closer to the mode of bootstrap simulations when fitting a DD model than a CR model.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) LTT plots of the Pythonidae and the Australo-Papuan clade. Solid lines represent the observed tree and the dotted lines the 95% CI of 1000 simulated trees under a pure-birth model and under an early burst model. (b) LLRs inferred by DDD, for the Australo-Papuan clade and bootstrap simulations. (c) Pythonidae tree painted with the optimal nine diversification modalities estimated from its spectral distances profile. (d) The same tree with branches painted according to estimated speciation rates from CLaDS, as the legend on the bottom right.

Using the spectral distances profile from the Pythonidae tree, we identify 12 distinct modalities of diversification (figure 1; electronic supplementary material, figure S1). Testing varied numbers of possible modalities (from 1 to 12), we consistently recovered an independent modality assigned to the base of the Australo-Papuan radiation (electronic supplementary material, figure S1). The CLaDS model finds an increase in diversification rates in the Australo-Papuan radiation (figure 1).

The analysis on branch-specific rates of phenotypic evolution shows a trend towards increased rates of evolution in the Australo-Papuan radiation compared to the rest (figure 2). For head shape, there are six shifts towards higher rates, all within the Australo-Papuan radiation, and one shift towards a slower rate, which is at the base of the Afro-Asian radiation. For body shape, there are five shifts towards higher rates, all within the Australo-Papuan radiation, which also includes a single rate towards lower rates. For maximum size, the three shifts towards higher rates are within the Australo-Papuan radiation and the three towards lower rates are within the Afro-Asian radiation (figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Rates of phenotypic evolution for head shape, body shape and maximum body size across the Pythonidae. Dots represent changes in evolutionary rates (red = positive; blue = negative). The dots are scaled by the relative size of the shift compared to all significant shifts (weather its positive or negative).

4. Discussion

After crossing Wallace's line into Australo-Papua, pythons evolved an array of new phenotypes to match new ecological roles that were possibly never realized in Africa or Asia [25]. Aspidites evolved a semi-fossorial ecomorph almost losing the thermoreceptive organs that all other pythons have, with a phenotype so different that morphology-based phylogenetics placed it as the sister to all other pythons [51]. Water pythons (Liasis mackloti complex) and tree pythons (Morelia viridis complex) evolved the most specialized aquatic and arboreal lifestyles, respectively [27], and dwarf pythons (Antaresia) diverged towards the smallest body sizes seen in the family [36]. Arrival in Australo-Papua resulted in considerable ecomorphological space expansion [25]. Here we now show that this colonization event led to increased rates of lineage diversification and phenotypic evolution—a pattern consistent with adaptive radiation.

Our results point to an increased burst of speciation when pythons arrived in Australo-Papua, with a gradual slow-down towards the present (figure 1). We find that diversification rates have been higher in Australo-Papua and that the diversification mode lies closer to a DD model than a CR (figure 1). We find support for a unique diversification modality, as well as increased speciation rates, at the base of the Australo-Papuan clade (figure 1). These patterns are consistent with niche filling or diversity dependence [8,5254]. However, our lineage diversification inferences on pythons acquire a lot more evolutionary significance when combined with what we know about their biogeographic and phenotypic evolution (figure 2).

Aside from an increase in speciation rates, early evolution of morphological diversity is also an important property of adaptive radiation, as has been postulated for eutherian mammals [55], Caribbean anole lizards [56] and Darwin's famous finches [57]. Although this pattern seems to be rare in empirical data [58], Australo-Papuan pythons rapidly evolved a variety of phenotypes soon after crossing Wallace's line [25]. Importantly, this considerable evolution of novel and diverging morphologies has been shown to match adaptations to a variety of different microhabitats [27]. The combination of early divergence into different ecotypes with an increase in speciation rates upon crossing an important biogeographic line is strongly indicative of Australo-Papua providing ecological opportunity for adaptive radiation. After the early ecomorphological divergence and as the speciation rates slow-down, speciation events towards the tip more likely represent allopatric speciation since these ecologically similar species are distributed in allopatry [59].

The main caveat of our findings is the low statistical power derived from the small number of tips in the python phylogeny, which is why it is important to interpret lineage diversification patterns of small radiations in conjunction with other lines of evidence. Adaptive radiation resulting in hundreds of biologically diverse species within a few million years provides truly fascinating opportunities for evolutionary biologists, but these are rare [2,60]. Most groups radiate into much more modest clades, for example, the famous Darwin's finches. This clade comprises only 14 species that diversified across the Galapagos volcanic archipelago and evolved different beak shapes that exploit different food resources [57]. Their diversification was rapid and adaptive, but due to reasons likely involving time, geographical area and available ecological niches they have not evolved into a particularly species-rich clade. Furthermore, animals like large constrictor snakes occupy high trophic levels where niche availability is more limited [61], and we should not expect apex predators to diversity into a myriad of sympatric species. Boas [27], monitor lizards [26] and different carnivoran mammal radiations [62], also exhibit patterns of adaptive radiation without diversifying into hundreds of species. Adaptive radiations resulting in a more limited number of species that diverged and specialized seem to be far more common than the extraordinary text-book examples of Caribbean anoles and African lake cichlids [54,63,64]. Incorporating these clades as models to understand the processes that generate biodiversity is vital for a comprehensive treatment of the study of adaptive radiation.

There can be alternative explanations for the speciation patterns we find in pythons. Speciation rates are not necessarily linked to an enhancement in ecological space [65,66], and slow-downs in diversifications rates are common throughout the tree of life and are not necessarily related to biotic factors [28,29]. Time dependence, protracted speciation and tree reconstruction methodological issues can all result in inferred diversification slow-downs [28]. Moreover, branching patterns themselves have been shown ineffective in discriminating between DD and time-dependent diversification models effectively [67]. Finally, the higher diversity of pythons in Australo-Papua might be related to more stochastic factors than ecological opportunity. However, the repeated radiation events among squamate reptiles after invading Australo-Papua [64] offer strong evidence that crossing these biogeographic barriers results in increased diversification and rates of trait evolution. Most of the snake and large lizard diversity in Australo-Papua shares the python's history of an Afro-Asian origin but reaches their highest diversity after the crossing of Wallace's line around 20–30 Mya [19,21,22,2426,68]. This includes, among others, the ecomorphologically diverse agamid and varanid lizards [22,26,69], and all of the region's snake clades, including the mega-diverse elapids and the cryptic blindsnakes [21,24,25,68]. Moreover, our findings of matching increased phenotypic evolutionary rates and lineage diversification also strongly support a role of ecological opportunity.

Australo-Papua offers a large and environmentally heterogeneous area, which combined with the presence of fewer similar organisms competing for niche space, offered ample opportunity for ecological specialization and also allopatric speciation [70,71]. This study adds to the body of evidence showing that Australo-Papua is an incredible land of ecological opportunity with much of its extraordinary contemporary diversity drawn from Laurasian rather than Gondwanan origins.

Acknowledgements

We thank Rampal Etienne and Dan Rabosky for useful advice on the analytical details of some parts of this paper.

Data accessibility

The electronic supplementary material includes additional information on the phylogenetic reconstruction methodology and electronic supplementary material, figure S1 [72]. All data used for this study are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.wstqjq2q5 [73].

Authors' contributions

D.E.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, visualization, writing—original draft and writing—review and editing; I.G.B.: conceptualization, formal analysis and writing—review and editing; S.D.: conceptualization, funding acquisition and writing—review and editing; J.S.K.: conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision and writing—review and editing.

All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.

Conflict of interest declaration

We declare we have no competing interests.

Funding

This project was funded by the Australian Research Council Discovery grant no. DP120104146 to J.S.K. and S.D. and grant no. DP150102403 to J.S.K.

References

  • 1.Simpson GG. 1953. The major features of evolution. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schluter D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burress ED, Wainwright PC. 2019. Adaptive radiation in labrid fishes: a central role for functional innovations during 65 My of relentless diversification. Evolution 106, 18067. ( 10.1111/evo.13670) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ronco F, et al. 2020. Drivers and dynamics of a massive adaptive radiation in cichlid fishes. Nature 589, 76-81. ( 10.1038/s41586-020-2930-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McGee MD, et al. 2020. The ecological and genomic basis of explosive adaptive radiation. Nature 586, 75-79. ( 10.1038/s41586-020-2652-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moser FN, Rijssel JC van, Mwaiko S, Meier JI, Ngatunga B, Seehausen O. 2018. The onset of ecological diversification 50 years after colonization of a crater lake by haplochromine cichlid fishes. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20180171. ( 10.1098/rspb.2018.0171) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Poe S, Donald LAH, Anderson C. 2021. What constrains adaptive radiation? Documentation and explanation of under-evolved morphologies in Anolis lizards. Proc. R. Soc. B 288, 20210340. ( 10.1098/rspb.2021.0340) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Burbrink FT, Pyron RA. 2009. How does ecological opportunity influence rates of speciation, extinction, and moprhological diversification in New World ratsnakes (tribe Lampropeltini)? Evolution 64, 934-943. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00888.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yoder JB, et al. 2010. Ecological opportunity and the origin of adaptive radiations. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1581-1596. ( 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02029.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oliver PM, Skipwith P, Lee MSY. 2014. Crossing the line: increasing body size in a trans-Wallacean lizard radiation (Cyrtodactylus, Gekkota). Biol. Lett. 10, 20140479. ( 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0479) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schweizer M, Hertwig ST, Seehausen O. 2014. Diversity versus disparity and the role of ecological opportunity in a continental bird radiation. J. Biogeogr. 41, 1301-1312. ( 10.1111/jbi.12293) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Upchurch P. 2008. Gondwanan break-up: legacies of a lost world? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 229-236. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Williams SE, Whittaker JM, Halpin JA, Müller RD. 2018. Australian–Antarctic breakup and seafloor spreading: balancing geological and geophysical constraints. Earth-sci Rev. 188, 41-58. ( 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.10.011) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ladiges PY, Udovicic F, Nelson G. 2003. Australian biogeographical connections and the phylogeny of large genera in the plant family Myrtaceae. J. Biogeogr. 30, 989-998. ( 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00881.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nilsson MA, Arnason U, Spencer PBS, Janke A. 2004. Marsupial relationships and a timeline for marsupial radiation in South Gondwana. Gene 340, 189-196. ( 10.1016/j.gene.2004.07.040) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jønsson KA, Fabre PH, Ricklefs RE, Fjeldså J. 2011. Major global radiation of corvoid birds originated in the proto-Papuan archipelago. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2328-2333. ( 10.1073/pnas.1018956108) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Skipwith PL, Bi K, Oliver PM. 2019. Relicts and radiations: phylogenomics of an Australasian lizard clade with east Gondwanan origins (Gekkota: Diplodactyloidea). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 140, 106589. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106589) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hall R. 2002. Cenozoic geological and plate tectonic evolution of SE Asia and the SW Pacific: computer-based reconstructions, model and animations. J. Asian Earth Sci. 20, 353-431. ( 10.1016/s1367-9120(01)00069-4) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Oliver PM, Hugall AF. 2017. Phylogenetic evidence for mid-Cenozoic turnover of a diverse continental biota. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1896-1902. ( 10.1038/s41559-017-0355-8) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Roycroft EJ, Moussalli A, Rowe KC. 2019. Phylogenomics uncovers confidence and conflict in the rapid radiation of Australo-Papuan rodents. Syst. Biol. 69, 431-444. ( 10.1093/sysbio/syz044) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Keogh JS. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of elapid snakes and a consideration of their biogeographic history. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 63, 177-203. ( 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1998.tb01513.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hugall AF, Lee MSY. 2004. Molecular claims of Gondwanan age for Australian agamid lizards are untenable. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 2102-2110. ( 10.1093/molbev/msh219) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vidal N, et al. 2010. Blindsnake evolutionary tree reveals long history on Gondwana. Biol. Lett. 6, 558-561. ( 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0220) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lee MSY, Sanders KL, King B, Palci A. 2016. Diversification rates and phenotypic evolution in venomous snakes (Elapidae). R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 150277. ( 10.1098/rsos.150277) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Esquerré D, Donnellan S, Brennan IG, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM, Zaher H, Grazziotin FG, Keogh JS. 2020. Phylogenomics, biogeography, and morphometrics reveal rapid phenotypic evolution in pythons after crossing Wallace's line. Syst. Biol. 69, 1039-1051. ( 10.1093/sysbio/syaa024) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brennan IG, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM, Portik DM, Weijola V, Welton L, Donnellan SC, Keogh JS. 2021. Phylogenomics of monitor lizards and the role of competition in dictating body size disparity. Syst. Biol. 70, 120-132. ( 10.1093/sysbio/syaa046) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Esquerré D, Keogh JS. 2016. Parallel selective pressures drive convergent diversification of phenotypes in pythons and boas. Ecol. Lett. 19, 800-809. ( 10.1111/ele.12620) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Moen D, Morlon H. 2014. Why does diversification slow down? Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 190-197. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2014.01.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Condamine FL, Rolland J, Morlon H. 2019. Assessing the causes of diversification slowdowns: temperature-dependent and diversity-dependent models receive equivalent support. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1900-1912. ( 10.1111/ele.13382) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stroud JT, Losos JB. 2016. Ecological opportunity and adaptive radiation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 47, 507-537. ( 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032254) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sepkoski JJ Jr. 1978. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity I. Analysis of marine orders. Paleobiology 4, 223-251. ( 10.2307/2400203) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rabosky DL, Lovette IJ. 2008. Density-dependent diversification in North American wood warblers. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 2363-2371. ( 10.1098/rspb.2008.0630) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Louca S, Pennell MW. 2020. Extant timetrees are consistent with a myriad of diversification histories. Nature 580, 502-505. ( 10.1038/s41586-020-2176-1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cantalapiedra JL, Prado JL, Fernández MH, Alberdi MT. 2017. Decoupled ecomorphological evolution and diversification in Neogene–Quaternary horses. Science 355, 627-630. ( 10.1126/science.aag1772) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cooney CR, Thomas GH. 2021. Heterogeneous relationships between rates of speciation and body size evolution across vertebrate clades. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 101-110. ( 10.1038/s41559-020-01321-y) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Esquerré D, Donnellan SC, Pavón-Vázquez CJ, Fenker J, Keogh JS. 2021. Phylogeography, historical demography and systematics of the world's smallest pythons (Pythonidae, Antaresia). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 161, 107181. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107181) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Natusch DJD, Esquerré D, Lyons JA, Hamidy A, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM, Riyanto A, Keogh JS, Donnellan S. 2021. Phylogenomics, biogeography and taxonomic revision of New Guinean pythons (Pythonidae, Leiopython) harvested for international trade. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 158, 106960. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106960) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang C, Rabiee M, Sayyari E, Mirarab S. 2018. ASTRAL-III: polynomial time species tree reconstruction from partially resolved gene trees. BMC Bioinform. 19, 153. ( 10.1186/s12859-018-2129-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586-1591. ( 10.1093/molbev/msm088) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nee S, Mooers AO, Harvey PH. 1992. Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 8322-8326. ( 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8322) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Revell LJ. 2012. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217-223. ( 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00169.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Etienne RS, Haegeman B. 2012. A conceptual and statistical framework for adaptive radiations with a key role for diversity dependence. Am. Nat. 180, 75-89. ( 10.1086/667574) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Etienne RS, Pigot AL, Phillimore AB. 2016. How reliably can we infer diversity-dependent diversification from phylogenies? Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1092-1099. ( 10.1111/2041-210x.12565) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lewitus E, Morlon H. 2016. Characterizing and comparing phylogenies from their Laplacian spectrum. Syst. Biol. 65, 495-507. ( 10.1093/sysbio/syv116) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Morlon H, Lewitus E, Condamine FL, Manceau M, Clavel J, Drury J. 2016. RPANDA: an R package for macroevolutionary analyses on phylogenetic trees. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 589-597. ( 10.1111/2041-210x.12526) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Maliet O, Hartig F, Morlon H. 2019. A model with many small shifts for estimating species-specific diversification rates. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1086-1092. ( 10.1038/s41559-019-0908-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Maliet O, Morlon H. 2021. Fast and accurate estimation of species-specific diversification rates using data augmentation. Syst. Biol. 71, 353-366. ( 10.1093/sysbio/syab055) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB. 2014. Bayesian data analysis, vol. 2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Castiglione S, Tesone G, Piccolo M, Melchionna M, Mondanaro A, Serio C, Febbraro MD, Raia P. 2018. A new method for testing evolutionary rate variation and shifts in phenotypic evolution. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 974-983. ( 10.1111/2041-210x.12954) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Esquerré D, Sherratt E, Keogh JS. 2017. Evolution of extreme ontogenetic allometric diversity and heterochrony in pythons, a clade of giant and dwarf snakes. Evolution 71, 2829-2844. ( 10.1111/evo.13382) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kluge A. 1993. Aspidites and the phylogeny of pythonine snakes. Rec. Aust. Mus. 19, 1-77. ( 10.3853/j.0812-7387.19.1993.52) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kozak KH, Weisrock DW, Larson A. 2006. Rapid lineage accumulation in a non-adaptive radiation: phylogenetic analysis of diversification rates in eastern North American woodland salamanders (Plethodontidae: Plethodon). Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 539-546. ( 10.1098/rspb.2005.3326) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.McPeek MA. 2008. The ecological dynamics of clade diversification and community assembly. Am. Nat. 172, 270-278. ( 10.1086/593137) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gavrilets S, Losos JB. 2009. Adaptive radiation: contrasting theory with data. Science 323, 732-737. ( 10.1126/science.1157966) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Foote M, Hunter JP, Janis CM, Sepkoski JJ. 1999. Evolutionary and preservational constraints on origins of biologic groups: divergence times of Eutherian mammals. Science 283, 1310-1314. ( 10.1126/science.283.5406.1310) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Losos JB. 2009. Lizards in an evolutionary tree: ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Grant PR, Grant RB. 2008. How and why species multiply. The radiation of Darwin's finches. Princteon, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Harmon LJ, et al. 2010. Early bursts of body size and shape evolution are in comparative data. Evolution 64, 2385-2396. ( 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01025.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Near TJ, Benard MF. 2004. Rapid allopatric speciation in longperch darters (Percidae: Percina). Evolution 58, 2798-2808. ( 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01631.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lieberman BS. 2012. Adaptive radiations in the context of macroevolutionary theory: a paleontological perspective. Evol. Biol. 39, 181-191. ( 10.1007/s11692-012-9165-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Turney S, Buddle CM. 2016. Pyramids of species richness: the determinants and distribution of species diversity across trophic levels. Oikos 125, 1224-1232. ( 10.1111/oik.03404) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nyakatura K, Bininda-Emonds OR. 2012. Updating the evolutionary history of Carnivora (Mammalia): a new species-level supertree complete with divergence time estimates. BMC Biol. 10, 1-31. ( 10.1186/1741-7007-10-12) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Streelman JT, Danley PD. 2003. The stages of vertebrate evolutionary radiation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 126-131. ( 10.1016/s0169-5347(02)00036-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Givnish TJ. 2015. Adaptive radiation versus ‘radiation’ and ‘explosive diversification’: why conceptual distinctions are fundamental to understanding evolution. New Phytol. 207, 297-303. ( 10.1111/nph.13482) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rabosky DL. 2017. Phylogenetic tests for evolutionary innovation: the problematic link between key innovations and exceptional diversification. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20160417-8. ( 10.1098/rstb.2016.0417) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Aristide L, Morlon H. 2019. Understanding the effect of competition during evolutionary radiations: an integrated model of phenotypic and species diversification. Ecol. Lett. 22, 2006-2017. ( 10.1111/ele.13385) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pannetier T, Martinez C, Bunnefeld L, Etienne RS. 2020. Branching patterns in phylogenies cannot distinguish diversity-dependent diversification from time-dependent diversification. Evolution 75, 25-38. ( 10.1111/evo.14124) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Vidal N, et al. 2012. Molecular evidence for an Asian origin of monitor lizards followed by Tertiary dispersals to Africa and Australasia. Biol. Lett .8, 853-855. ( 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0460) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pavón-Vázquez CJ, Brennan IG, Skeels A, Keogh JS. 2022. Competition and geography underlie speciation and morphological evolution in Indo-Australasian monitor lizards. Evolution 76, 476-495. ( 10.1111/evo.14403) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gavrilets S, Vose A. 2005. Dynamic patterns of adaptive radiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18 040-18 045. ( 10.1073/pnas.0506330102) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Seehausen O. 2006. African cichlid fish: a model system in adaptive radiation research. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 1987-1998. ( 10.1098/rspb.2006.3539) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Esquerré D, Brennan IG, Donnellan S, Keogh JS. 2022. Evolutionary models demonstrate rapid and adaptive diversification of Australo-Papuan pythons. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6330215) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 73.Esquerré D, Brennan IG, Donnellan S, Keogh JS. 2022. Data from: Evolutionary models demonstrate rapid and adaptive diversification of Australo-Papuan pythons. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.wstqjq2q5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Citations

  1. Esquerré D, Brennan IG, Donnellan S, Keogh JS. 2022. Evolutionary models demonstrate rapid and adaptive diversification of Australo-Papuan pythons. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6330215) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Esquerré D, Brennan IG, Donnellan S, Keogh JS. 2022. Data from: Evolutionary models demonstrate rapid and adaptive diversification of Australo-Papuan pythons. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.wstqjq2q5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Data Availability Statement

The electronic supplementary material includes additional information on the phylogenetic reconstruction methodology and electronic supplementary material, figure S1 [72]. All data used for this study are available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.wstqjq2q5 [73].


Articles from Biology Letters are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES