Abstract
Background
Acknowledging the popularity of TikTok, how quickly medical information can spread, and how users seek support on social media, there is a clear lack of research on breast cancer conversations on TikTok. There is a paucity of information on how these videos can advocate for those impacted by breast cancer as a means to provide support and information as well as raise awareness.
Objective
The purpose of this cross-sectional content analysis was to describe the content of videos from the hashtag #breastcancer on TikTok. Content related to breast cancer support and coping, cancer education, and heightening the awareness of breast cancer early detection, prevention, and treatment was evaluated.
Methods
This study included 100 of the most viewed TikTok videos related to breast cancer through June 30, 2022. Videos were excluded if they were not in the English language or relevant to the topic being studied. Content was deductively coded into categories related to video characteristics and content topics using a screener based on expert breast cancer information sheets. Univariable analyses were conducted to evaluate differences in video characteristics and content when stratified as advocating or not advocating for breast cancer (yes or no) support, education, and awareness.
Results
The cumulative number of views of the videos included in this study was 369,504,590. The majority (n=81, 81%) of videos were created by patients and loved ones of individuals with breast cancer, and the most commonly discussed topic was breast cancer support (n=88, 88%), followed by coping with the myriad issues surrounding breast cancer (n=79, 79%). Overall, <50% of the videos addressed important issues such as body image (n=48, 48%), surgery (n=46, 46%), medication and therapy (n=41, 41%), or the stigma associated with a breast cancer diagnosis (n=44, 44%); however, in videos that were advocacy oriented, body image (40/62, 64% vs 8/38, 21%; P<.001), stigma associated with breast cancer (33/62, 53% vs 11/38, 29%; P=.02), and breast cancer surgery (36/62, 58% vs 10/38, 26%; P=.002) were discussed significantly more often than in videos that did not specifically advocate for breast cancer.
Conclusions
The use of videos to display health journeys can facilitate engagement by patients, family members, and loved ones interested in information about challenging conditions. Collectively, these findings highlight the level of peer-to-peer involvement on TikTok and may provide insights for designing breast cancer educational campaigns.
Keywords: TikTok, breast cancer, social media, short video apps, social support, content analysis, video, patient support, medical information, health information, peer support, online conversation, online health information
Introduction
Globally, the World Health Organization reports that breast cancer is the most common newly diagnosed cancer [1], only just recently edging out lung cancer. There were 2.3 million cases of breast cancer diagnosed globally during 2020 and 685,000 breast cancer deaths [2]. The incidence of breast cancer is increasing in most countries [3], and it is the most prevalent in high-income countries [4]. The incidence of breast cancer, particularly in women aged ≥20 years from 2004 to 2018 [5], is believed to be due to controllable risk factors, which also increased during that time [5].
The American Cancer Society reports that breast cancer is the second most common cancer among women in the United States [6] and projects that there will be approximately 287,850 new cases of invasive breast cancer in women, with about 43,250 breast cancer deaths in the United States in 2022 [6]. Given the expansive impact of breast cancer, it is imperative that the general public become as informed as possible about breast cancer detection and treatment. Social media has become an incredibly popular mechanism for attaining such information.
In fact, according to a Pew Research Center survey of adults, 7 in 10 (72%) Americans use social media [7], and a similar percentage have sought out health information on the web [8]. People with chronic diseases such as cancer are most likely to seek out others with similar diagnoses through social media [8]. For example, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and Quora share an enormous, combined audience of 5 billion viewers, and studies on these platforms suggest that there is an active level of discourse related to breast cancer on them [9].
Further, there is more traffic on social media, specifically Twitter and Instagram, regarding women’s reproductive cancers than there is traffic about male reproductive cancers in relation to targeted campaigns [10]. Vraga et al [10] theorize that this finding is because breast cancer awareness campaigns have branded their cause well, with a pink ribbon and other pink symbols, and have also engaged powerful partners such as the National Football League to increase awareness.
Other social media platforms are also active on the subject of cancer [11-16]. An increase of over 300% in tweets associated with breast cancer was observed during Breast Cancer Awareness Month from 2012 to 2018 [17]. There is also a relationship between Twitter participation and improvements in patients’ self-reported knowledge about breast cancer [18]. Twitter generated more traffic when it came to both male and female reproductive cancer campaigns than Instagram, leading researchers to consider Instagram as an underused resource for the communication of information to the public about these cancers [10]. The most shared material on social networking sites is personal or social in nature; two-thirds of posts portray true experiences or otherwise provide support [19]. It is also used as a form of self-distraction from the stressors caused by a new, recurring, or terminal illness [20], which is helpful to both providers and patients.
Cancer advocacy works to improve the lives of people with cancer. Of the several key elements of cancer advocacy [21], social media platforms are the best positioned to guide individuals (eg, listening and sharing personal stories and providing support), educate about cancer, and raise awareness of important issues. Web-based peer-to-peer support can reduce social isolation and address unmet support needs by connecting individuals, especially younger individuals, to share their experiences and validate their treatment and life concerns [22].
TikTok is one of the most popular applications in 2022, attracting an audience of 1.5 billion active users [23]. The TikTok audience is generally younger, which could explain why TikTok has been underused in breast cancer awareness campaigns in the past. Further, breast cancer awareness campaigns are usually targeted at an older audience. However, a substantial proportion of young people are diagnosed with breast cancer, and it is beneficial to create awareness and discussion from an earlier age for early detection and treatment purposes. More than half (67%) of teens aged 13-17 years use TikTok, with 73% of girls aged 13-17 years using TikTok [24]. Acknowledging the popularity of TikTok, how quickly medical information can spread, and how users seek support on social media, there is a clear lack of research on breast cancer conversations on TikTok. Therefore, the purpose of this cross-sectional content analysis was to describe the content of videos from the hashtag #breastcancer on TikTok and to assess the breast cancer advocacy potential of these videos.
Methods
Data Collection
This study included the 100 most viewed TikTok videos related to breast cancer as a means of evaluating the content and messages seen by individuals at the time of data collection (through June 30, 2022). At the start of the study, the hashtag #breastcancer was the most popular, with 1.1 billion views; thus, our sample of 100 videos with 369,504,590 views represents approximately one-third of breast cancer–related Tik Tok videos viewed. Videos were excluded if they were not in the English language or relevant to the topic being studied. In total, 6 of the top 100 videos were not in English and 2 were not relevant to the study (8 in total). Thus, the next 8 most liked, relevant videos in English were included.
Data were collected by watching and analyzing the videos for mentions or suggestions of predetermined content categories. The content categories were created based on breast cancer and the breast cancer gene (fact sheets from the Mayo Clinic [25], a well-known and respected source of expert-vetted medical information). For each video, the link, date of posting, views, likes, comments, and shares were collected. The type of creator and content were also analyzed.
The content categories included the use of dance, music, or humor; mention or suggestion of cancer; new diagnosis; relapse or recurrent cancer; breast cancer gene testing; advocacy (ie, content that advocated for breast cancer support, provided breast cancer information to educate viewers, and raised awareness of breast cancer issues such as early detection, prevention, and treatment); body image; hair loss; anxiety; stigma; support; coping; surgery; medication and therapy; radiation treatment; combination treatment; nonmedical treatment; adverse effects; opinion, feelings, and experiences regarding providers of health care; cost of health care; and loss of a loved one due to breast cancer.
Statistical Analysis
Frequency distributions were conducted for the categorical and dichotomous variables and mean with SD and range for continuous variables. The number of views, likes, comments, and shares were summed. We compared differences between TikTok videos that were related to or supported breast cancer advocacy, whether self-advocacy or advocacy on behalf of a loved one, and performed univariable analyses using chi-square test for categorical and dichotomous variables and ANOVA for continuous variables. A random sample of 10% of the videos was coded by a second coder. Discrepancies between the 2 coders were resolved through discussion. The interrater reliability was computed and found to be very high (κ=0.98). All analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software (version 28; IBM Corp) [26]. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
Ethical Considerations
This study was exempt from review by William Paterson University’s Institutional Review Board due to the lack of human subject involvement.
Results
Of the 100 TikTok videos related to breast cancer reviewed, 60% (n=60) were created since 2021 (Table 1). The cumulative number of views of the videos included in this study was 369,504,590. On average, the videos had approximately 3.7 million (SD 3,581,698) views each and collectively were shared more than half a million times. Patients and loved ones of individuals with breast cancer created the greatest number of videos (n=81, 81%). Videos that were related to breast cancer advocacy (n=62, 62%) differed from those that did not (n=38, 38%) by both characteristics and content. Videos advocating for breast cancer received substantially more shares (mean 7396, SD 11,903 vs mean 1290, SD 1951; P=.002; Table 1).
Table 1.
Differences in the characteristics of TikTok videos (N=100) related to breast cancer among those related to breast cancer advocacy (n=62) and those that did not (n=38).
|
|
Total (N=100) | Advocacy | P value | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Yes (n=62) | No (n=38) |
|
||||
| Video characteristics | ||||||||||
|
|
Year (total: N=100; advocacy, yes: n=62; advocacy, no: n=38), n (%) | .33 | ||||||||
|
|
|
2019 | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.6) |
|
||||
|
|
|
2020 | 14 (14) | 9 (14.5) | 5 (13.2) |
|
||||
|
|
|
2021 | 60 (60) | 35 (56.5) | 25 (65.8) |
|
||||
|
|
|
January to July 2022 | 25 (25) | 18 (29) | 7 (18.4) |
|
||||
|
|
Number of views (n=369,504,590) | |||||||||
|
|
|
n (%) | 369,504,590 (100) | 262,825,700 (71.1) | 106,678,890 (28.8) | .05 | ||||
|
|
|
Mean (SD) | 3,695,046 (3,581,698) | 4,239,124 (3,879,713) | 2,807,339 (2,864,258) |
|
||||
|
|
|
Range | 290,600-18,900,000 | 290,600-18,900,000 | 446,000-11,600,000 |
|
||||
|
|
Number of comments (n=676,604) | |||||||||
|
|
|
n (%) | 676,604 (100) | 492,062 (72.7) | 184,542 (27.3) |
|
||||
|
|
|
Mean (SD) | 6766 (11,314) | 7936 (13,703) | 4856 (5183) | .19 | ||||
|
|
|
Range | 70-92,500 | 70-92,500 | 133-22,000 |
|
||||
|
|
Number of shares (n=507,638) | |||||||||
|
|
|
n (%) | 507,638 (100) | 458,603 (90.3) | 49,035 (9.7) |
|
||||
|
|
|
Mean (SD) | 5076 (9879) | 7396 (11,903) | 1290 (1951) | .002 | ||||
|
|
|
Range | 45-66,400 | 45-66,400 | 84-11,700 |
|
||||
| Format (total: N=100; advocacy, yes: n=62; advocacy, no: n=38), n (%) | ||||||||||
|
|
Uses dance | .71 | ||||||||
|
|
|
Yes | 8 (8) | 6 (9.7) | 2 (5.3) |
|
||||
|
|
|
No | 92 (92) | 56 (90.3) | 36 (94.7) |
|
||||
|
|
Uses music | .13 | ||||||||
|
|
|
Yes | 70 (70) | 40 (64.5) | 30 (78.9) |
|
||||
|
|
|
No | 30 (30) | 22 (35.5) | 8 (21.1) |
|
||||
|
|
Uses humor | .13 | ||||||||
|
|
|
Yes | 27 (27) | 20 (32.3) | 7 (18.4) |
|
||||
|
|
|
No | 73 (73) | 42 (67.7) | 31 (81.6) |
|
||||
|
|
Video creator | .12 | ||||||||
|
|
|
Patient | 68 (68) | 42 (67.7) | 26 (68.4) |
|
||||
|
|
|
Loved one | 12 (12) | 5 (8.1) | 7 (18.4) |
|
||||
|
|
|
Health professional | 3 (3) | 3 (4.8) | 0 (0) |
|
||||
|
|
|
Company | 7 (7) | 6 (9.7) | 1 (2.6) |
|
||||
|
|
|
Consumer | 9 (9) | 6 (9.7) | 3 (7.9) |
|
||||
|
|
|
Patient/loved one | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.6) |
|
||||
The majority (n=83, 83%) of the videos featured an individual who currently has or has had breast cancer, although only 14% (n=14) revealed a new breast cancer diagnosis (Table 2). The most commonly discussed topic was having breast cancer support (n=88, 88%), followed by coping with the myriad issues surrounding breast cancer (n=79, 79%). Between one-third and about one-half of videos talked about important issues such as body image (n=48, 48%), hair loss following treatment (n=38, 38%), surgery (n=46, 46%), medication and therapy (n=41, 41%), adverse effects of treatment (n=33, 33%), or the stigma associated with a breast cancer diagnosis (n=44, 44%). Very few videos addressed radiotherapy (n=1, 1%), combination therapy (n=9, 9%), or nonmedical treatment (n=4, 4%). Advocating videos more often discussed body image (40/62, 64% vs 8/38, 21%; P<.001), stigma associated with breast cancer (33/62, 53% vs 11/38, 29%; P=.02), and breast cancer surgery (36/62, 58% vs 10/38, 26%; P=.002) compared to videos that did not specifically advocate for breast cancer. Among videos with no mentions of breast cancer advocacy, content focused more frequently on near-term breast cancer issues that included hair loss (20/38, 53% vs 18/62, 29%; P=.02), anxiety (18/38, 47% vs 9/62, 14%; P<.001), coping (35/38, 92% vs 44/62, 71%; P=.01), medication and therapy (23/38, 60% vs 18/62, 29%; P=.002), and adverse effects of treatment (18/38, 47% vs 15/62, 24%; P=.02).
Table 2.
Differences in the content of TikTok videos (N=100) related to breast cancer among those related to breast cancer advocacy (n=62) and those that did not (n=38).
| Content | Total (N=100), n (%) | Advocacy | P value | ||||
|
|
|
|
Yes (n=62), n (%) | No (n=38), n (%) |
|
||
| Have or had breast cancer | .01 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 83 (83) | 47 (76) | 36 (95) |
|
||
|
|
No | 17 (17) | 15 (24) | 2 (5) |
|
||
| New breast cancer diagnosis | <.001 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 14 (14) | 3 (5) | 11 (29) |
|
||
|
|
No | 86 (86) | 59 (95) | 27 (71) |
|
||
| BRCAa genetic mutation | .37 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 5 (5) | 2 (3) | 3 (8) |
|
||
|
|
No | 95 (95) | 60 (97) | 35 (92) |
|
||
| Body image | <.001 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 48 (48) | 40 (64) | 8 (21) |
|
||
|
|
No | 52 (52) | 22 (36) | 30 (79) |
|
||
| Hair loss following treatment | .02 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 38 (38) | 18 (29) | 20 (53) |
|
||
|
|
No | 62 (62) | 44 (71) | 18 (47) |
|
||
| Anxiety | <.001 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 27 (27) | 9 (14) | 18 (47) |
|
||
|
|
No | 73 (73) | 53 (86) | 20 (53) |
|
||
| Stigma associated with breast cancer | .02 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 44 (44) | 33 (53) | 11 (29) |
|
||
|
|
No | 56 (56) | 29 (47) | 27 (71) |
|
||
| Support | .56 | ||||||
|
|
Having support | 88 (88) | 56 (90) | 32 (84) |
|
||
|
|
Lack of support | 5 (5) | 3 (5) | 2 (5) |
|
||
|
|
Unknown | 7 (7) | 3 (5) | 4 (11) |
|
||
| Coping | .01 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 79 (79) | 44 (71) | 35 (92) |
|
||
|
|
No | 21 (21) | 18 (29) | 3 (8) |
|
||
| Surgery | .002 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 46 (46) | 36 (58) | 10 (26) |
|
||
|
|
No | 54 (54) | 26 (42) | 28 (74) |
|
||
| Medication and therapy | .002 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 41 (41) | 18 (29) | 23 (60) |
|
||
|
|
No | 59 (59) | 44 (71) | 15 (40) |
|
||
| Radiation therapy | >.99 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 1 (1) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) |
|
||
|
|
No | 99 (99) | 61 (98) | 38 (100) |
|
||
| Combination therapy | >.99 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 9 (9) | 6 (10) | 3 (8) |
|
||
|
|
No | 91 (91) | 56 (90) | 35 (92) |
|
||
| Nonmedical treatment | .63 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 4 (4) | 2 (3) | 2 (5) |
|
||
|
|
No | 96 (96) | 60 (97) | 36 (95) |
|
||
| Adverse effects of treatment | .02 | ||||||
|
|
Yes | 33 (33) | 15 (24) | 18 (47) |
|
||
|
|
No | 67 (67) | 47 (76) | 20 (53) |
|
||
aBRCA: breast cancer gene.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study describing the content of the most viewed TikTok videos on the larger topic of breast cancer. Our review of the literature revealed one prior publication focusing on fat grafting in breast cancer [27]. Prior research evaluated breast cancer coverage on various social media platforms [16,28]. The findings of this study indicate that the 100 TikTok videos related to breast cancer reviewed were filled with messages created to support and advocate for individuals with breast cancer. Social support has long been noted as being beneficial [29], especially in health situations [30] and more specifically in the case of patients with cancer, survivors, and their loved ones [31-33]. In the digital era, social support can easily take place through technological mediums, whether through preplanned interventions or spontaneously through individual use [22,34-38]. Our findings corroborate with this existing research in that the overwhelming majority of videos in our sample mentioned support, coping, and advocacy [39,40].
Although there is research that indicates the possibility of misinformation spreading on TikTok, as it has on many social media platforms [41,42], emerging research also supports the concept that TikTok can provide a high level of support for those experiencing difficulty [43,44]. This possibility of far-reaching effects of support are enhanced by the widespread reach of TikTok. The nature of expression over social media can lead to greater support as geographic boundaries are eliminated.
Issues affecting the individual both physically and psychologically were frequently noted in the videos we reviewed. The psychological factors that accompany breast cancer include substantial life changes, dealing with a life-threatening illness, and painful treatments. Physical changes and issues related to a new body image also amplify psychological distress [45,46]. Breast cancer surgeries such as biopsies, lumpectomies, mastectomies (total, double, modified radical, radical, nipple-sparing, or skin-sparing), aesthetic flat closures, and breast reconstruction are all options that impact physical appearance [47] and leave many women stigmatized, which can affect quality of life [48]. Video creators discussed the stigma of surgery options that they faced and their experience with chemotherapy. They mentioned not feeling feminine or losing their femininity and hair loss—all part of self-identity and body image. For instance, although hair loss is common with chemotherapy, it can lead to psychological disturbance and stress [49,50].
The limitations of this study include the fact that the design was cross-sectional and that we only reviewed English-language videos. Additionally, only one popular hashtag was used, which can lead to a limited perspective. The relatively small sample of only 100 videos may not represent the full range of videos. Content analysis does not allow an in-depth reflection of how information in these videos is processed and used by viewers. Hence, this is an area for future research. Of note, TikTok is only one social media platform, with content delivered in a specific way. Therefore, findings cannot be generalized across other social media platforms. Further, although patients and loved ones claim to be creating many of the videos included in this study, there is no way to verify this information. However, this study offers perspective into the use of TikTok to discuss breast cancer and the level of support found on this medium.
Social media platforms such as TikTok provide a space for health information to be disseminated to a wide variety of populations with varying health literacy skills [51]. Video creators on this platform used advocacy and support to cope with breast cancer in some respect.
The findings of this study indicate that most of the interest in TikTok videos was around patient journeys, coping mechanisms, and support systems. As cancer interventions have better outcomes in patients with early diagnosis, it is important to reach vulnerable populations at a young age. TikTok, which is predominantly used by young women, represents an ideal platform for outreach by professional societies and advocacy groups focusing on breast cancer. Their campaigns may benefit from incorporating the findings of this study.
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: CHB serves as an Editorial Board Member for JMIR; she did not have a role in the review or editorial process for this article. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Breast cancer now most common form of cancer: WHO taking action. World Health Organization. 2021. Feb 03, [2022-08-20]. https://www.who.int/news/item/03-02-2021-breast-cancer-now-most-common-form-of-cancer-who-taking-action .
- 2.Breast cancer. World Health Organization. 2021. Mar 26, [2022-08-20]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer .
- 3.Huang J, Chan PS, Lok V, Chen X, Ding H, Jin Y, Yuan J, Lao X, Zheng Z, Wong MC. Global incidence and mortality of breast cancer: a trend analysis. Aging (Albany NY) 2021 Mar 11;13(4):5748–5803. doi: 10.18632/aging.202502. https://www.aging-us.com/full/13/5748 .202502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sharma R. Breast cancer incidence, mortality and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) are associated with human development, 1990-2016: evidence from Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;26(4):428–445. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-00941-4.10.1007/s12282-018-00941-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ellington TD, Miller JW, Henley SJ, Wilson RJ, Wu M, Richardson LC. Trends in breast cancer incidence, by race, ethnicity, and age among women aged ≥20 years - United States, 1999-2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 14;71(2):43–47. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7102a2. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7102a2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Key statistics for breast cancer: how common is breast cancer? American Cancer Society. 2022. [2022-08-14]. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/about/how-common-is-breast-cancer.html .
- 7.Social media fact sheet. Pew Research Center. 2021. Apr 07, [2022-08-06]. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/?menuItem=45b45364-d5e4-4f53-bf01-b77106560d4c .
- 8.Fox S. The social life of health information. Pew Research Center. 2014. Jan 15, [2021-03-01]. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/01/15/the-social-life-of-health-information/
- 9.Döbrössy Bence, Girasek E, Susánszky Anna, Koncz Z, Győrffy Z, Bognár Virág Katalin. "Clicks, likes, shares and comments" a systematic review of breast cancer screening discourse in social media. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0231422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231422. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231422 .PONE-D-20-01314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vraga EK, Stefanidis A, Lamprianidis G, Croitoru A, Crooks AT, Delamater PL, Pfoser D, Radzikowski JR, Jacobsen KH. Cancer and social media: a comparison of traffic about breast cancer, prostate cancer, and other reproductive cancers on Twitter and Instagram. J Health Commun. 2018 Jan 09;23(2):181–189. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1421730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McKenzie JF, Neiger BL, Thackeray R. Planning, implementing, and evaluating health promotion programs: A primer. 7th ed. New York, NY: Pearson; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Huesch M, Chetlen A, Segel J, Schetter S. Frequencies of private mentions and sharing of mammography and breast cancer terms on Facebook: a pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 09;19(6):e201. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7508. https://www.jmir.org/2017/6/e201/ v19i6e201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mikal JP, Beckstrand MJ, Parks E, Oyenuga M, Odebunmi T, Okedele O, Uchino B, Horvath K. Online social support among breast cancer patients: longitudinal changes to Facebook use following breast cancer diagnosis and transition off therapy. J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Jun;14(3):322–330. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00847-w.10.1007/s11764-019-00847-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Plackett R, Kaushal A, Kassianos AP, Cross A, Lewins D, Sheringham J, Waller J, von Wagner C. Use of social media to promote cancer screening and early diagnosis: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 09;22(11):e21582. doi: 10.2196/21582. https://www.jmir.org/2020/11/e21582/ v22i11e21582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ure C, Cooper-Ryan AM, Condie J, Galpin A. Exploring strategies for using social media to self-manage health care when living with and beyond breast cancer: in-depth qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 25;22(5):e16902. doi: 10.2196/16902. https://www.jmir.org/2020/5/e16902/ v22i5e16902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wellman ML, Holton AE, Kaphingst KA. Previvorship posting: why breast cancer previvors share their stories on social media. Health Commun. 2022 May 17;:1–9. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2074780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Johnson BS, Shepard S, Torgeson T, Johnson A, McMurray M, Vassar M. Using Google Trends and Twitter for prostate cancer awareness: a comparative analysis of Prostate Cancer Awareness Month and Breast Cancer Awareness Month. Cureus. 2021 Mar 13;13(2):e13325. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13325. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/33738168 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Attai DJ, Cowher MS, Al-Hamadani M, Schoger JM, Staley AC, Landercasper J. Twitter social media is an effective tool for breast cancer patient education and support: patient-reported outcomes by survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 30;17(7):e188. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4721. https://www.jmir.org/2015/7/e188/ v17i7e188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Biancovilli P, Makszin L, Csongor A. Breast cancer on social media: a quali-quantitative study on the credibility and content type of the most shared news stories. BMC Womens Health. 2021 May 15;21(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01352-y. https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12905-021-01352-y .10.1186/s12905-021-01352-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wolfers LN, Utz S. Social media use, stress, and coping. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Jun;45:101305. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101305. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352-250X(22)00007-0 .S2352-250X(22)00007-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.For patient advocates. American Society for Clinical Oncology. 2022. [2022-10-31]. https://www.cancer.net/research-and-advocacy/patient-advocates/being-cancer-advocateinclude%20raising%20awareness%20about%20cancer%20and%20related%20issues .
- 22.Lazard AJ, Collins MKR, Hedrick A, Varma T, Love B, Valle CG, Brooks E, Benedict C. Using social media for peer-to-peer cancer support: interviews with young adults with cancer. JMIR Cancer. 2021 Sep 02;7(3):e28234. doi: 10.2196/28234. https://cancer.jmir.org/2021/3/e28234/ v7i3e28234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ruby D. 35+ TikTok user statistics: how many TikTok users are there In 2022? Demand Sage. 2022. Nov 16, [2022-08-06]. https://tinyurl.com/3xvncbad .
- 24.Teens, social media and technology 2022. Pew Research Center. 2022. Aug 10, [2022-10-31]. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/08/10/teens-social-media-and-technology-2022/
- 25.Mayo C. Breast cancer. Mayo Clinic. [2022-08-06]. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/breast-cancer/symptoms-causes/syc-20352470 .
- 26.IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28. IBM Corp. 2021. [2022-11-29]. https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics .
- 27.Gupta R, John J, Gupta M, Haq M, Peshel E, Boudiab E, Shaheen K, Chaiyasate K. A cross-sectional analysis of breast reconstruction with fat grafting content on TikTok. Arch Plast Surg. 2022 Sep;49(5):614–616. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756296. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/36159384 .aps-21-315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Walsh-Buhi ER. Social media and cancer misinformation: additional platforms to explore. Am J Public Health. 2020 Oct;110(S3):S292–S293. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Charney DS. Psychobiological mechanisms of resilience and vulnerability: implications for successful adaptation to extreme stress. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;161(2):195–216. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Reblin M, Uchino BN. Social and emotional support and its implication for health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;21(2):201–5. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3282f3ad89. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/18332671 .00001504-200803000-00021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Waters EA, Liu Y, Schootman M, Jeffe DB. Worry about cancer progression and low perceived social support: implications for quality of life among early-stage breast cancer patients. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Mar;45(1):57–68. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9406-1. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22983622 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dunn LB, Langford DJ, Paul SM, Berman MB, Shumay DM, Kober K, Merriman JD, West C, Neuhaus JM, Miaskowski C. Trajectories of fear of recurrence in women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):2033–43. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2513-8. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25524004 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Usta YY. Importance of social support in cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):3569–72. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.8.3569. http://journal.waocp.org/?sid=Entrez:PubMed&id=pmid:23098436&key=2012.13.8.3569 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Leung J, Pachana NA, McLaughlin D. Social support and health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer: a longitudinal study. Psychooncology. 2014 Sep;23(9):1014–20. doi: 10.1002/pon.3523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Manning-Walsh J. Social support as a mediator between symptom distress and quality of life in women with breast cancer. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2005 Jul 01;34(4):482–93. doi: 10.1177/0884217505278310.S0884-2175(15)34287-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kroenke CH, Michael YL, Shu X, Poole EM, Kwan ML, Nechuta S, Caan BJ, Pierce JP, Chen WY. Post-diagnosis social networks, and lifestyle and treatment factors in the After Breast Cancer Pooling Project. Psychooncology. 2017 Apr;26(4):544–552. doi: 10.1002/pon.4059. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26749519 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kyriazidou E, Alevizopoulos N, Dokutsidou E, Kavga A, Kalemikerakis I, Konstantinidis T, Tsatsou I, Govina O. Health-related quality of life and social support of elderly lung and gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Jun 13;8:23779608221106444. doi: 10.1177/23779608221106444. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/23779608221106444?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub0pubmed .10.1177_23779608221106444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tso HH, Parikh JR. Using Facebook Live to advocate breast cancer screening. J Digit Imaging. 2020 Aug;33(4):1047–1052. doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00340-2. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32318896 .10.1007/s10278-020-00340-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Love B, Donovan EE. Online friends, offline loved ones, and full-time media: young adult "mass personal" use of communication resources for informational and emotional support. J Cancer Educ. 2014 Jun;29(2):241–6. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0579-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Treadgold CL, Kuperberg A. Been there, done that, wrote the blog: the choices and challenges of supporting adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 10;28(32):4842–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0516.JCO.2009.23.0516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Basch CH, Meleo-Erwin Z, Fera J, Jaime C, Basch CE. A global pandemic in the time of viral memes: COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation on TikTok. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Aug 03;17(8):2373–2377. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1894896. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/33764283 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.O'Connor C. How TikTok sounds are used to fuel anti-vaccine fears. Institute for Strategic Dialogue. 2021. Jul 12, [2022-08-06]. https://www.isdglobal.org/digital_dispatches/how-tiktok-sounds-are-used-to-fuel-anti-vaccine-fears/
- 43.Basch CH, Hillyer GC, Jaime C. COVID-19 on TikTok: harnessing an emerging social media platform to convey important public health messages. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2022 Oct 01;34(5):367–369. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2020-0111. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2020-0111 ./j/ijamh.ahead-of-print/ijamh-2020-0111/ijamh-2020-0111.xml [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Basch CH, Donelle L, Fera J, Jaime C. Deconstructing TikTok videos on mental health: cross-sectional, descriptive content analysis. JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 19;6(5):e38340. doi: 10.2196/38340. https://formative.jmir.org/2022/5/e38340/ v6i5e38340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Helms RL, O'Hea EL, Corso M. Body image issues in women with breast cancer. Psychol Health Med. 2008 May;13(3):313–25. doi: 10.1080/13548500701405509.793276798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ban Y, Li M, Yu M, Wu H. The effect of fear of progression on quality of life among breast cancer patients: the mediating role of social support. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jul 10;19(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01816-7. https://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12955-021-01816-7 .10.1186/s12955-021-01816-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Breast cancer surgery. Cleveland Clinic. 2022. [2022-08-14]. https://tinyurl.com/3nsm5wpj .
- 48.Waljee JF, Ubel PA, Atisha DM, Hu ES, Alderman AK. The choice for breast cancer surgery: can women accurately predict postoperative quality of life and disease-related stigma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep;18(9):2477–82. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1582-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dhami L. Psychology of hair loss patients and importance of counseling. Indian J Plast Surg. 2021 Oct;54(4):411–415. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741037. https://www.thieme-connect.com/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1741037 .2150788 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hair loss and your cancer treatment. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. 2022. [2022-08-11]. https://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/patient-education/hair-loss-cancer-treatment .
- 51.Basch CH, Hillyer GC, MacDonald ZL, Reeves R, Basch CE. Characteristics of YouTube videos related to mammography. J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec 12;30(4):699–703. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0769-9.10.1007/s13187-014-0769-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]