Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2022 Dec 1;10(6):e02542-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02542-22

Suppression of Streptococcosis and Modulation of the Gut Bacteriome in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by the Marine Sediment Bacteria Bacillus haynesii and Advenella mimigardefordensis

Md Mahfuzur Rahman a,#, Sulav Indra Paul a,#, Ashikur Rahman a, Md Shameul Haque a, Md Ali Arman Ador a, Md Javed Foysal b, Md Tofazzal Islam a, Md Mahbubur Rahman a,
Editor: Artem S Rogovskyyc
Reviewed by: Pabodha Weththasinghe, Uriel Rodriguez-Estrada
PMCID: PMC9769507  PMID: 36453920

ABSTRACT

Streptococcosis is one of the major threats to Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in most regions of the world. Recently, Enterococcus faecalis has been widely reported to be involved in streptococcosis in O. niloticus in Asia and Africa. This study aimed to isolate beneficial marine bacteria to evaluate their effects on growth, hematological parameters, nonspecific immunity, the gut bacteriome, and streptococcosis prevention efficacy in O. niloticus. A total of 36 marine soil bacteria were isolated, and in vitro screening was conducted to determine their antibacterial activities against fish pathogens. Two antagonistic bacteria were identified based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing, Bacillus haynesii CD223 and Advenella mimigardefordensis SM421. These bacteria were incorporated into fish feed and fed to O. niloticus for 90 days. The application of these strains via incorporation into fish feed significantly promoted growth, improved hematological parameters and immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels, modulated the gut bacteriome by reducing the load of pathogenic Enterococcus spp., and developed disease prevention efficacy in O. niloticus. Furthermore, in vivo assays revealed that the inclusion of extracellular products (ECPs) (at 250 μg mL−1) of CD223 and SM421 with feed significantly enhanced the rate of survival (100%) of O. niloticus from streptococcosis compared to the controls (only 30%). The ECPs of these bacteria also prevented 90 to 100% of fish from developing streptococcosis. These strains could be promising for safe use in O. niloticus farming to prevent and control the emergence of streptococcosis caused by E. faecalis.

IMPORTANCE Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) is one of the most economically important cultured fish species throughout the world. Streptococcosis is a significant threat to global Nile tilapia farming. Enterococcus faecalis has recently emerged as an important pathogen of streptococcosis in Asia and Africa. The application of antibiotics and probiotics and vaccination are the major ways to combat streptococcosis. However, the extensive use of antibiotics leads to the development of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic as well as environmental bacteria, which is a great threat to public health. There is no study on preventing streptococcosis caused by E. faecalis using beneficial bacteria. For the first time, the present study demonstrated that two marine bacteria, Bacillus haynesii strain CD223 and Advenella mimigardefordensis strain SM421, have great potential for controlling streptococcosis in Nile tilapia. These bacteria also enhanced the growth, improved hematological parameters and IgM levels, and positively modulated the gut bacteriome of Nile tilapia.

KEYWORDS: Bacillus haynesii, Advenella mimigardefordensis, Enterococcus faecalis, streptococcosis, antimicrobial activity, disease prevention, Oreochromis niloticus

INTRODUCTION

Aquaculture has progressively become a potential source of animal protein around the world, accounting for approximately 44% (74 million tons) of the total global fish production, with a value of $160 billion (1). The prodigious growth of aquaculture production has greatly contributed to the nutritional security of many developing countries (2, 3). However, the emergence and prevalence of various diseases have led to severe production and financial losses in the aquaculture sector (4). For the sustainability of this sector, proper disease management and biosecurity measures are imperative to reduce losses. Different therapeutic and prophylactic agents, including antibiotics, are used to control pathogens (5). However, the extensive use of antibiotics leads to the development of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic as well as environmental bacteria, posing a great threat to public health. Thus, the development of new eco-friendly agents to combat drug resistance in bacterial pathogens is urgently needed.

Saint Peter’s fish, the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), is one of the most commercially important aquaculture species throughout the world (6). This fish is reported to be susceptible to different bacterial diseases (streptococcosis, motile Aeromonas septicemia, and francisellosis, etc.) (7), viral infections (by tilapia lake virus [TiLV], nervous necrosis virus [NNV], and infectious pancreatic necrosis virus [IPNV], etc.) (8), and parasitic diseases (monogeniasis and trichodiniasis, etc.) (9). Among the bacterial diseases, streptococcosis is considered a major threat, causing substantial annual losses in tilapia production worldwide (1012). Streptococcus iniae, S. agalactiae, S. parauberis, and S. dysgalactiae are recognized as the prominent causative agents of streptococcosis in different geographical regions (1316). In addition, Lactococcus garvieae, Vagococcus sp., Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium, and E. hirae have also been reported as notable causative agents of streptococcosis in Asian countries such as India (17), Bangladesh (10, 11, 18), Philippines (19), and Indonesia (20) as well as an African country, Egypt (21, 22). Enterococci were previously classified as streptococci of Lancefield group D (23). Enterococcus sp. has also been reported as a pathogen in many fish species such as Japanese yellow tail (Seriola quinqueradiata) (24), turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) (25), walking catfish (Clarias batrachus) (10), stinging catfish (Heteropneustes fossilis) (10), silver barb (Barbonymus gonionotus) (18), red tilapia (Oreochromis hybrid) (20), and flathead gray mullet (Mugil cephalus) (26).

The control of streptococcosis usually relies on the application of chemotherapeutic agents, vaccines, and environmental management strategies, but vaccination is usually less effective in preventing outbreaks of streptococcosis (27, 28). Disinfectants may be a good option for controlling the disease, but dissolved disinfectants may have hazardous side effects on aquatic ecosystems (28). In this respect, the oral administration of beneficial microbes or their derivatives could be an excellent disease control strategy to prevent streptococcosis in Nile tilapia.

Soil is a rich bioresource and promotes the growth of various types of microorganisms (29). Marine soil sediments harbor diverse microorganisms that are known to produce novel bioactive natural products with important biological activities such as antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antitumor, and anticancer activities (30). Moreover, soil-derived bacteria are prolific producers of diverse antimicrobial compounds that can inhibit the growth of many pathogens (31). Furthermore, bacterial species isolated from marine environments can improve the aquaculture environment and can be used as probiotics for O. niloticus (3234). Saint Martin’s Island in the Bay of Bengal region of Bangladesh is an untapped reservoir of diverse economically important beneficial microorganisms. In a recent study, we demonstrated that some marine sponge-associated bacteria of Saint Martin’s Island in the Bay of Bengal significantly prevent motile Aeromonas septicemia in the cultured fish species Labeo rohita (35). Therefore, in this study, we aimed to discover novel strains of bacteria from the soil sediments of Saint Martin’s Island with the potential to control streptococcosis in Nile tilapia. The specific objectives of this study were to (i) isolate and characterize antagonistic bacteria from the soil sediments of Saint Martin’s Island against E. faecalis, which causes streptococcosis in Nile tilapia; (ii) assess the effects of the dietary inclusion of these bacteria and the extracts of their culture supernatants on the growth, immune response, and gut microbial communities of Nile tilapia; and (iii) evaluate the efficacy of these bioagents in the prevention of E. faecalis infection in Nile tilapia.

RESULTS

Isolation and in vitro inhibition assay of marine soil bacterial isolates.

Thirty-six bacterial isolates were obtained from the soil sediments of Saint Martin’s Island in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. Four bacterial groups were identified based on the preliminary phenotypic characteristics of these isolates (Table 1). Further in vitro inhibition assays revealed that the cell-free culture supernatants of isolates CD223 and SM421 exhibited inhibitory activities against the fish-pathogenic E. faecalis strains FF11 and F1B1 (Table 2). Based on phenotypic characteristics (Table 1), isolate CD223 was preliminarily identified as Bacillus sp. by Paul et al. (35), and isolate SM421 was identified as Advenella sp. by Coenye et al. (36).

TABLE 1.

Marine soil bacterial isolates identified in different groups based on their colony, morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristicsa

Characteristic and test parameter Result for bacterial group:
1 2 3 4
Colony characteristics
 Size Medium Small Medium Small
 Type Round Round Round Round
 Color Whitish Yellowish Creamy Opaque
 Shape Convex Convex Convex Convex
Morphological characteristics
 Shape Rod Coccus Rod Coccus
Physiological characteristics
 Motility + + +
 Growth with 6.5% NaCl + + + +
Biochemical characteristics
 Gram staining + +
 Oxidase + + +
 Catalase + + +
 Oxidative-fermentative F O O F
 Motility + +
 Methyl red + + +
 Voges-Proskauer +
 Indole +
 H2S production + +
 Urease + V
 Nitrate reductase + +
 β-Galactosidase V
Hydrolysis of:
 Gelatin + + + +
 Esculin + + V +
 Casein + + V +
 Tween 40 + + + V
Acid production from:
 Glycerol + + +
 Galactose V + +
d-Glucose V + +
d-Fructose + + V +
d-Mannose + +
 Mannitol + V
 Amygdalin V + +
 Maltose + V +
a

O, oxidative; F, fermentative; +, positive; −, negative; V, variable. Isolates CD223 and SM421 were picked from group 1 and group 3, respectively. The numbers of isolates in the different groups were as follows: 9 in group 1, 8 in group 2, 14 in group 3, and 5 in group 4.

TABLE 2.

Inhibitory activity of marine soil isolates against fish and shrimp pathogensa

Soil isolate Result with test pathogen
RhG4 FF11 F1B1 B55 B19 TS122 43BS11
CD223 + +
SM421 + +
a

−, negative; +, positive; RhG4, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain; F1B1 and FF11, Enterococcus faecalis strains; B55 and B19, Aeromonas veronii strains; TS122, Providencia rettgeri strain; 43BS11, Serratia marcescens strain.

Molecular identification of the selected marine bacterial isolates.

The 16S rRNA gene sequence of isolate CD223 exhibited 99.43% homology with that of Bacillus haynesii strain NRRL B-41327, and isolate SM421 showed 99.78% homology with Advenella mimigardefordensis strain DPN7. Phylogenetic tree analysis also supported the results of the homology study and confirmed the close positioning of B. haynesii strain CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis strain SM421 with the reference strains B. haynesii NRRL B-41327 and A. mimigardefordensis DPN7, respectively (Fig. 1).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Phylogenetic positions of the marine soil isolates B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421. The 16S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic reconstruction was based on the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The red solid circles indicate the strains used in this study.

Bile esculin activity, tolerance to different pH levels, and cytotoxic effects of CD223 and SM421.

Both strains CD223 and SM421 exhibited hydrolytic activity toward bile esculin and could grow under both acidic and alkaline conditions (pH range of 3 to 9) (Fig. 2). The in vivo cytotoxic and toxigenic effects of the extracellular products (ECPs) of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 on the survival of hatched brine shrimp (Artemia salina) nauplii (at developmental stage II) were assessed to measure their safety in animal hosts. The ECPs extracted from strains CD223 and SM421 did not show any significant cytotoxic or toxigenic effects on the survival of A. salina nauplii compared to the control.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Assessment of the viability of B. haynesii strain CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis strain SM421 at different pH levels (range, 3 to 9) and their bile-hydrolyzing activity. (A) pH tolerance test. (B) Bile-hydrolyzing activity test.

Growth performance of O. niloticus upon dietary inclusion of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421.

The growth performance of O. niloticus after dietary supplementation with B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 was found to be significantly (P < 0.05) better than that of the control. The body weight gains (percentages) obtained in the B. haynesii CD223- and A. mimigardefordensis SM421-fed fish and the control fish were 114.59% ± 3.84%, 221.68% ± 9.76%, and 48.28% ± 2.21%, respectively (Table 3). The specific growth rate (SGR) (percentage per day) values obtained for the B. haynesii CD223- and A. mimigardefordensis SM421-fed fish and the control fish were 1.23% ± 0.13%, 1.92% ± 0.11%, and 0.62% ± 0.12%, respectively (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Effects of B. haynesii strain CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis strain SM421 on the growth performance and hematological parameters of O. niloticusa

Parameter Mean value ± SD for group
Control fish CD223-fed fish SM421-fed fish
BWG (%) 48.28 ± 2.21 C 114.59 ± 3.84 B 221.68 ± 9.76 A
SGR (%/day) 0 0.62 ± 0.12 C 1.23 ± 0.13 B 1.92 ± 0.11 A
Hemoglobin concn (g dL−1) 4.33 ± 0.4 B 6.17 ± 0.1 A 3.47 ± 0.4 C
WBC count (107 mL−1) 2.29 ± 0.2 C 3.65 ± 0.2 A 2.38 ± 0.7 B
RBC count (105 mL−1) 0.78 ± 0.2 C 1.00 ± 0.2 B 2.83 ± 0.09 A
IgM concn (μg dL−1) 70.00 ± 4.6 C 101.67 ± 5.3 B 108.33 ± 3.3 A
a

Values are expressed as means ± standard deviations. Different letters in the rows indicate significant differences by an LSD test (P < 0.05) (n = 3). BWG, body weight gain; SGR, specific growth rate; WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; IgM, immunoglobulin M.

B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 improved hematological parameters and IgM levels in O. niloticus.

The hematological parameters (hemoglobin, white blood cell [WBC], and red blood cell [RBC] levels) and nonspecific immunity (immunoglobulin M [IgM] level) in B. haynesii CD223- and A. mimigardefordensis SM421-fed fish were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those of the controls (Table 3). Among all of the treatments, the highest levels of hemoglobin (6.17 ± 0.1 g dL−1) and WBCs (3.65 × 107 ± 0.2 × 107 cells mL−1) were found in CD223-fed fish compared to the controls. On the contrary, the highest levels of RBCs (2.83 × 105 ± 0.09 × 105 cells mL−1) and IgM (108.33 ± 3.3 μg dL−1) were found in SM421-fed fish compared to the controls (Table 3).

B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 modulated the gut bacterial flora of O. niloticus.

A total of 816,569 high-quality reads were obtained after DADA2 filtration. The reads were classified into 4 phyla, 8 families, and 21 genera. We found 13 shared amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) among the 3 groups and 9 unique ASVs in the CD (B. haynesii CD223) and SM (A. mimigardefordensis SM421) groups (Fig. 3A). The alpha diversity measurements showed an enhancement of bacterial diversity with the SM diet in terms of richness (observed, P = 0.002) and the presence of rare species (Chao1, P = 0.002). While the Shannon evenness was found to be significantly higher in the SM group than in the CD group and the control group, the Simpson diversity increased in both treatment groups (CD and SM) compared with the control group (Fig. 3B). The beta ordination in terms of unweighted and weighted UniFrac distance metrics showed distinct clustering of bacteria for both treatments compared to the control; however, the dispersion based on presence/absence (unweighted, P < 0.001) was found to be more significant than the relative abundance (weighted, P < 0.002) (Fig. 3C and D). Overall, the bacterial community was dominated by Fusobacterium (92.6%) at the phylum level and Cetobacterium (86.8%) at the genus level. SM treatment increased the abundances of Shewanella (P = 0.004) and Bacteroides (P = 0.051) and reduced that of Enterobacter, which had a higher abundance in the control group (P = 0.02) than in the two treatment groups (Fig. 3E and F).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Gut microbial communities in tilapia fish after feeding with ECPs of B. haynesii strain CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis strain SM421. (A) Numbers of shared and unique classified ASVs in three different groups. (B) Alpha diversity measurements in terms of richness (observed species and Chao1) and evenness (Shannon and Simpson). (C and D) Beta ordination based on unweighted (presence/absence) (C) and weighted (abundance) (D) UniFrac distance metrics. (E) Relative abundances of bacteria at the genus level in the three different groups. (F) Significantly different genera in the fish gut with LDA values of ≥2.0 and P values of <0.05. Abbreviations: CD, Bacillus haynesii strain CD223; SM, Advenella mimigardefordensis strain SM421.

B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 prevented E. faecalis infection in artificially challenged O. niloticus.

To assess the effects of the dietary inclusion of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 on disease prevention in treated O. niloticus fish, bacterium-treated fish were artificially infected with E. faecalis strains F1B1 and FF11 by an immersion assay. Surprisingly, both groups of marine bacterium-fed fish survived and showed no disease symptoms when challenged with E. faecalis F1B1. The rates of survival of the B. haynesii CD223- and A. mimigardefordensis SM421-fed fish were 80% and 100%, respectively, when artificially infected with E. faecalis FF11. However, all of the untreated control fish died, with prominent symptoms of streptococcosis.

MIC of the ECPs of CD223 and SM421.

The MIC of the ECPs of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 was determined against highly virulent fish-pathogenic strains of E. faecalis (strains F1B1 and FF11). The quantitative bioassay revealed that the MIC of the ECPs of strains CD223 and SM421 was 125 μg mL−1 against E. faecalis strains F1B1 and FF11 (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

MICs of the ECPs of B. haynesii strain CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis strain SM421 against fish-pathogenic E. faecalis strainsa

E. faecalis strain and ECP concn (μg/mL) Inhibition zone ratio of B. haynesii strain CD223 Inhibition zone ratio of A. mimigardefordensis strain SM421
F1B1
 1,000 2.5 2.8
 500 2 2.2
 250 1.5 1.8
 125 1.2 1.3
 62.5
 31.25
FF11
 1,000 2.5 2.7
 500 2 2.2
 250 1.5 1.8
 125 1.2 1.2
 62.5
 31.25
a

The MICs of the ECPs against E. faecalis strains F1B1 and FF11 were determined to be 125 μg/mL.

In vivo infection recovery study.

(i) In vivo curative recovery assay. To determine the potential applicability of the ECPs of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 as antimicrobial agents, in vivo infection recovery studies were carried out. O. niloticus fish were immersed in a culture suspension of E. faecalis strains F1B1 and FF11. Next, methanolic extracts of the crude bacterial ECPs of both strains were mixed with fish feed and fed separately to O. niloticus fish for 7 days at doses of 125, 250, and 500 μg mL−1. For both strains CD223 and SM421, the highest survival rate (100%) was obtained when the fish were challenged with E. faecalis strain F1B1 and fed crude ECPs at 250 μg mL−1 (treatment 2 [T2] and T10) (Table 5). For B. haynesii CD223, the rates of survival of fish challenged with E. faecalis strain F1B1 and fed crude ECPs at 125 μg mL−1 (T1) and 500 μg mL−1 (T3) were 60% and 80%, respectively; for A. mimigardefordensis SM421, the values were 70% (T9) and 90% (T11), respectively (Table 5). Only 30% of the control group fish (T4 and T12) survived when challenged with E. faecalis strain F1B1. In contrast, when the fish were challenged with E. faecalis strain FF11, the highest survival rate (90%) was obtained in fish fed crude ECPs at a rate of 250 μg mL−1 (T6 and T14), and only 20% of the control group fish (T8 and T16) survived when challenged with E. faecalis strain FF11. No disease symptoms were observed in the treated fish, whereas distinct disease symptoms were observed in the challenged control group fish (Fig. 4). The symptoms of streptococcosis observed were opaque and protruded eyes, a slimy body, a swollen abdomen with tail and fin erosion, and hemorrhaging at the mouth, opercula, fins, and anus. The significant beneficial effects of the ECPs of strains CD223 and SM421 were also supported by nested analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Table 6).

TABLE 5.

Curative effect of the ECPs of B. haynesii strain CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis strain SM421 on O. niloticus against streptococcosis caused by E. faecalis

Marine bacterium against pathogenic strain Treatment Pathogen concn (CFU/mL) ECP concn (μg/mL) Rate of survival (%)
B. haynesii strain CD223 against:
E. faecalis strain F1B1 T1 1.8 × 107 125 60
T2 1.8 × 107 250 100
T3 1.8 × 107 500 80
T4 (control) 1.8 × 107 30
E. faecalis strain FF11 T5 2.3 × 107 125 60
T6 2.3 × 107 250 90
T7 2.3 × 107 500 80
T8 (control) 2.3 × 107 20
A. mimigardefordensis strain SM421 against:
E. faecalis strain F1B1 T9 1.8 × 107 125 70
T10 1.8 × 107 250 100
T11 1.8 × 107 500 90
T12 (control) 1.8 × 107 30
E. faecalis strain FF11 T13 2.3 × 107 125 60
T14 2.3 × 107 250 90
T15 2.3 × 107 500 80
T16 (control) 2.3 × 107 20

FIG 4.

FIG 4

In vivo infection challenge test with highly virulent E. faecalis. (A) Fish fed ECPs of B. haynesii strain CD223 and infected with E. faecalis strain FF11 with no disease symptoms. (B) Control group fish artificially infected with E. faecalis strain FF11 exhibiting streptococcosis.

TABLE 6.

Nested ANOVA based on the response variable survival and three factors, marine bacteria, pathogens, and ECPsa

Factor(s) df Sum of squares Mean square F value Pr(>F)
Marine bacteria 1 208 208.3 2.041 0.1628
Marine bacteria, pathogens 2 750 375 3.673 0.0366
Marine bacteria, ECPs 6 33,183 5,531 52.672 0.0000
Marine bacteria, pathogens, ECPs 12 33,367 2,780.6 27.238 0.0000
a

df, degree of freedom. The P value for marine bacteria plus ECPs was lower than that for marine bacteria plus pathogens and ECPs.

(ii) In vivo prophylactic recovery assay.

To identify the prophylactic potential of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421, in vivo assays were performed. Methanolic extracts of crude bacterial ECPs were mixed with commercial pelleted feed and fed to O. niloticus fish for 7 days at a dose of 250 μg mL−1. After 7 days, O. niloticus fish were immersed in a culture suspension of E. faecalis strains F1B1 and FF11. The bacterial methanolic extract of the ECP-mixed feed was fed to the fish for another 7 days. In this study, the highest survival rate (100%) was obtained for both B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 when the fish were artificially challenged with E. faecalis strain F1B1 and fed crude ECPs at 250 μg mL−1. On the other hand, a survival rate of 90% and 100% were obtained in the fish challenged with E. faecalis strain FF11 and fed crude ECPs of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421, respectively at a rate of 250 μg mL−1 (Table 7). However, only 20% of the control group fish challenged with E. faecalis survived in both treatment groups. No disease symptoms were observed in the treated O. niloticus fish.

TABLE 7.

Preventive effect of the ECPs of B. haynesii strain CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis strain SM421 against streptococcosis caused by E. faecalis

E. faecalis strain and treatment Type of bacterial isolate Bacterial concn (CFU/mL) ECP concn (μg/mL) Rate of survival (%)
F1B1
 Positive control 1.5 × 107 20
 Negative control 100
 ECPs of CD223 Normal 1.5 × 107 250 100
 ECPs of SM421 Normal 1.5 × 107 250 100
FF11
 Positive control 2.3 × 107 20
 Negative control 100
 ECPs of CD223 Normal 2.3 × 107 250 90
 ECPs of SM421 Normal 2.3 × 107 250 100

DISCUSSION

The inappropriate application and overuse of different antibiotics in aquaculture have propelled the rapid emergence of numerous multidrug-resistant (MDR) fish pathogens globally. Accordingly, fish diseases are becoming the major limiting factor for the development of aquaculture worldwide. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new antibiotic-producing beneficial bacterial strains that can effectively prevent and control emerging MDR fish pathogens. Marine bacteria have the potential to produce a wide array of novel bioactive natural products, such as antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antiparasitic, antitumor, and antioxidant compounds (37). In the present study, we discovered two bacteria, viz., B. haynesii strain CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis strain SM421, from the sediments of Saint Martin’s Island in the Bay of Bengal that significantly inhibited MDR isolates of a destructive fish pathogen, E. faecalis. The application of both live bacteria and their ECPs has been shown to protect fish from streptococcosis when the fish were previously artificially challenged with highly virulent strains of E. faecalis. The suppressive effects of some marine bacteria isolated from marine sponges from Saint Martin’s Island on fish disease have recently been reported. The present study demonstrated, for the first time, that two soil-derived marine bacteria from the same island suppressed the MDR fish-pathogenic bacterium E. faecalis and prevented streptococcosis in Nile tilapia.

E. faecalis strains FF11 and F1B1 were previously identified from diseased O. niloticus fish in Bangladesh and were shown to have developed antibiotic resistance to amoxicillin, ampicillin, cefuroxime, erythromycin, and penicillin G (10). In the present study, the marine soil bacteria B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 exhibited inhibitory activities against these strains both in vitro and in vivo. The marine soil isolates CD223, and SM421 were shown to belong to the genera Bacillus and Advenella, respectively, as confirmed by several biochemical tests and 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses. Different phenotypic characteristics, such as the bile esculin-hydrolyzing activity, antimicrobial activity, noncytotoxicity, enhancement of nonspecific immunity (IgM), and promotion of other hematological parameters, revealed that B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 are potentially beneficial marine bacterial strains for controlling disease occurrence in aquaculture. The application of the ECPs of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 at a dose of 250 μg mL−1 in fish feed for 7 days significantly prevented the occurrence of streptococcosis in O. niloticus, with the ECPs acting as both therapeutic and preventive agents. The prevention of other fish diseases using beneficial bacteria has been studied by many researchers (35, 3840). However, until now, there have been no reports on the prevention of streptococcosis caused by E. faecalis via the application of beneficial marine bacteria.

B. haynesii is a species of Firmicutes that was first isolated from soil in Evolution Canyon III in Israel (41). A. mimigardefordensis (formerly Tetrathiobacter mimigardefordensis) is a betaproteobacterium that was first isolated from compost and exhibits the remarkable capacity to utilize organosulfur compounds as the sole carbon source for growth (42, 43). To the best of our knowledge, these bacteria have never been investigated for their role in fish disease prevention and growth promotion. Further study is warranted to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying their disease prevention efficacy in host organisms.

The dietary inclusion of probiotics and other beneficial microbes positively influences the growth, digestive enzyme activation, host immune response, and disease resistance of O. niloticus (4447). Among beneficial bacteria, Bacillus species are widely used for their beneficial effects on immunity and health and have been reported to be promising probiotics for Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) (45, 46, 48). Members of the genus Bacillus are well known for their ability to produce numerous antimicrobial peptides such as the polyketides difficidin, subtilin, subtilosin A, bacillibactin, macrolactin, surfactin, bacilysin, bacillaene, and fengycin, which can protect host organisms through the induction of systemic resistance by inducing the production of stress-related metabolites and the expression of stress response genes (4951). The potential effects of beneficial Bacillus spp. on growth enhancement, improvement of host immunity, and disease prevention have been extensively investigated in many aquacultured species (52). This is the first report on the assessment of the beneficial role of A. mimigardefordensis in growth promotion and disease prevention in fish. However, this species is well known for its ability to catabolize the xenobiotic polythioester (53).

In the present study, the application of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 as feed supplements (1 × 106 CFU mL−1) for O. niloticus significantly (P < 0.05) enhanced morphometric characteristics such as weight gain (percent) and the SGR (percent per day) compared to the control (Table 3). These findings suggested that B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 enhanced growth and caused physiological changes in O. niloticus, similar to the findings of other researchers (54, 55). These positive changes may be attributed to the increase in digestive enzyme activity as well as the enhancement of metabolic responses (56, 57). In addition, B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 enhanced the RBC, WBC, IgM, and hemoglobin levels in the blood of the treated O. niloticus fish. Therefore, the treated O. niloticus fish might have been able to consume a sufficient amount of dissolved oxygen (DO) for daily respiration. Moreover, the enhanced WBC and IgM levels in the blood also enhanced the immunity of O. niloticus via macrophages and neutrophils, which might help prevent E. faecalis infection. The ECPs of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 may also have increased the immunoglobulin level by stimulating the proliferation of T and B lymphocytes in O. niloticus, which is consistent with the findings of Dohail et al. (58) and Picchietti et al. (59).

Gut microbiota analysis has become a robust and popular tool to assess the effects of dietary supplementation on aquaculture. In this study, O. niloticus fish were cultured in a controlled environment (water temperature, pH, DO level, and ammonia concentration). Hence, gut microbial differences were observed in terms of the antibacterial activity of the ECPs of the beneficial bacteria B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421. Investigation of the gut microbiota in all of the treatment groups clearly showed that B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 modulated the intestinal microbial communities by reducing the load of pathogenic Enterococcus spp. in the gut, which ultimately induced the formation of healthy gut microflora. These bacterial communities might have the ability to synthesize ECPs that activate digestive enzymes to promote digestion in the host (60). Moreover, the overwhelming abundance of Cetobacterium in the gastrointestinal tract of O. niloticus demonstrated that it constitutes the core microbiota of O. niloticus and plays an impactful role in immunity and digestion. In recent decades, several studies have also documented that anaerobic bacterial communities of Cetobacterium are commonly found in the gastrointestinal tract of many fish species and are considered mostly beneficial for their role in microbe-host interactions and digestion (6164). The oral administration of the ECPs of A. mimigardefordensis SM421 significantly increased the abundance of the genus Shewanella, members of which are also considered beneficial bacteria due to their role in growth enhancement and disease prevention in fish (65).

In summary, the application of two newly identified marine bacteria, B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421, and their ECPs through feed significantly improved growth, the immune response, and the gut microbiota composition and led to the development of disease resistance against streptococcosis in O. niloticus, exhibiting both prophylactic and therapeutic effects. Taken together, our results suggest that B. haynesii strain CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis strain SM421 are two marine bacteria with potential applications in the biocontrol of streptococcosis in aquacultured Nile tilapia. A further large-scale study is needed to evaluate the efficacy of these bioagents and elucidate their mode of action in disease control in Nile tilapia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical statement.

The number of animals used was kept to the absolute minimum required to achieve statistical significance for validation purposes. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the United Kingdom Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986 and ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines (66) and were approved by the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of the Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (IBGE), Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Gazipur, Bangladesh (reference number BSMRAU/IBGE/ERC/001).

Euthanasia methods.

Experimental fingerlings of Nile tilapia (O. niloticus) were euthanized using pure clove oil (catalog number C8392; Sigma) as described previously by Fernandes et al. (67). Briefly, an emulsion of clove oil was prepared by mixing it with ethyl alcohol in a 1:9 ratio (clove oil-ethyl alcohol). Next, the emulsion was diluted in water to obtain concentrations of 0.05 mL (50 mg) and 0.20 mL (200 mg) of clove oil per 500 mL of water. For blood collection, experimental fish were anesthetized by using 0.05 mL of clove oil per 500 mL of water. For the metagenomics study, fish were humanely killed by using 0.20 mL of clove oil per 500 mL of water, and finally, death was ensured by the destruction of the brain (67, 68).

Collection of experimental fingerlings.

Experimental fingerlings of O. niloticus (average weight of 30 ± 1.2 g) were acquired from a fish farm in Mymensingh, Bangladesh, with no previous report of disease occurrence and transported under live conditions to the wet laboratory of IBGE, BSMRAU, under sufficient oxygenation. The handling and housing of all the experimental fingerlings were performed according to guidelines for the care and use of fish by the Canadian Council on Animal Care (68). Water quality parameters (temperature, pH, and DO level) were routinely measured during the acclimatization period (15 days) to maintain the good health of the fingerlings. The fingerlings were fed commercial pelleted fish feed (Mega Feed Company Ltd., Bangladesh) containing 13% moisture, 31% protein, 7% lipid, 13% ash, and 11% fiber at 5% of their body weight until further use.

Collection and pretreatment of soil samples.

During low tide, marine soil samples were collected from the shore of Saint Martin’s Island (20°37′40.3″N, 92°19′22.3″E) in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. To avoid collecting undesirable microbes present on the soil surface, the samples were collected from a depth of 6 to 15 in. using an auger and immediately transferred to a 50-mL sterile Falcon tube. Next, the collected samples were transported to the Advanced Molecular Biology Laboratory of the IBGE, BSMRAU, for the isolation of bacteria. Prior to inoculation, the soil samples were aseptically dried at 120°C for 60 min to eliminate undesirable bacteria (69). Next, the dried soils were ground finely using a sterile mortar and pestle.

Isolation, phenotypic identification, and maintenance of bacteria.

Bacteria were isolated by serial dilution (up to 10−3) according to methods described previously by Mohseni et al. (70). Briefly, 1 g of each soil sample was suspended in 9 mL of autoclaved seawater in an individual test tube by using a vortex mixer (Stuart SA7; Bibby Scientific Ltd., Staffordshire, UK). Next, 100-μL suspensions from each diluted stock (10−2 and 10−3) were aseptically inoculated onto individual starch casein agar (SCA) (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., India) plates in a laminar airflow cabinet (Esco Micro Pte. Ltd., Singapore). The SCA medium was supplemented with cycloheximide (100 mg L−1) and nalidixic acid (20 mg L−1) to minimize fungal contamination (71). The inoculated plates were incubated at 27°C ± 2°C for 7 days and observed intermittently during incubation. After incubation, different colonies were picked based on their characteristics (color, shape, and size) and purified by subculturing them onto the same medium by the streak culture method. The shapes of the bacterial isolates were observed under a light microscope (Primo Star; Carl Zeiss, Germany) after Gram staining (72). Biochemical tests, such as oxidase, catalase, motility, and oxidative-fermentative (O-F) tests, were accomplished according to methods described previously (35, 73) for the phenotypic characterization of the marine bacterial isolates. The bacterial stocks were maintained in nutrient broth (NB) supplemented with 10% glycerol and stored in a freezer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at −80°C.

Test fish pathogens.

Seven MDR high-virulence fish and shrimp pathogens belonging to five genera were used as test organisms for the in vitro screening of the antimicrobial activity of soil bacteria. These strains were Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain RhG4 (74), E. faecalis strains F1B1 and FF11 (10), Aeromonas veronii strains B55 and B19 (75), Providencia rettgeri strain TS122, and Serratia marcescens strain 43BS11 (76). All of the strains were isolated from diseased fish and shrimp from Bangladesh and stored at the laboratory of the IBGE, BSMRAU.

Screening for antagonistic activity of marine soil isolates.

To assess the antimicrobial activity of soil isolates, bacteria were grown in marine broth (MB) 2216 (Merck, USA) for 7 days at 28°C. The broth culture was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min, and the culture supernatant was passed through a 0.22-μm Millipore membrane filter (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The inhibitory activity of the culture supernatant was determined by an agar well diffusion assay as described previously by Rakshanya et al. (77). Briefly, 30 μL of pathogenic isolates (3 × 105 CFU mL−1) was spread onto Mueller-Hinton agar (Liofilchem, Italy) plates, and the filtered supernatants (50 μL) of marine soil bacterial isolates were inoculated into a hole made on the agar plates. The plates were incubated at 28°C for 24 h. At the end of the incubation period, the presence of an inhibition zone surrounding the agar wells was recorded.

Molecular identification of marine soil isolates.

The genomic DNA of the selected isolates was extracted using a commercial DNA purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was quantified using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). PCR for the amplification of the targeted 16S rRNA genes of the bacteria was performed with the universal primer pair 8F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) according to the method described previously by Paul et al. (35). Briefly, an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min was followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 57°C for 40 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min and then a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Next, the amplified PCR products were purified using a PCR purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Next, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was completed at the National Institute of Biotechnology (NIB), Dhaka, Bangladesh. The sequence received in a raw format was then assembled to generate contigs using MEGA 7.0 (78) and primarily edited using BioEdit (version 7.2) to remove the overlapping sequences and chimeras. 16S rRNA gene sequence homology was studied using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) program of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), and phylogenetic analysis was performed by using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA 7.0 (78).

Assessment of bile esculin activity and evaluation of the viability of bacteria at different pH values.

The bile esculin activity of the strains was evaluated according to methods described previously by Mathew et al. (79). Briefly, isolates CD223 and SM421 were inoculated individually into NB and incubated at 28°C for 48 h. After incubation, the broths were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 10 min to discard the culture supernatant. The pellets were washed and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer (pH 7.2). Next, the supernatant was discarded by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 10 min. The pellets of CD223 and SM421 were then carefully taken and inoculated onto bile esculin agar (BEA) (HiMedia, India) plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. At the end of the incubation period, the presence of growth and blackening of the BEA were considered a positive reaction.

The viability of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 was assessed under both acidic and alkaline conditions (pH range of 3 to 9) according to the method described previously by Borah et al. (80), with a few modifications. Briefly, the pH of the SCA broth was adjusted from pH 3 to 9. Next, B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 were inoculated into this broth and incubated for 24 h at 28°C. The viability of the cells was then confirmed by the spread plate method by inoculating them onto SCA plates (pH 7).

Preparation of bacterial ECPs.

Bacterial ECPs were prepared as described previously by Paul et al. (35), with some modifications. Briefly, B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 were enriched in MB at 28°C for 10 days on an orbital shaker (WiseShake SHO-1D) at 190 rpm. The ECPs were harvested, mixed with an equal volume of ethyl acetate in a separatory funnel, and shaken for 25 min. Next, the upper phase was collected and evaporated in a rotary evaporator (IKA RV-10; IKA-Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) at 42°C. After that, the concentrated ethyl acetate extract was suspended in 20 mL of a methanol–n-hexane (1:1) solution in a separatory funnel and gently shaken for 20 min. Finally, the lower phase was collected and air dried for 2 days in a laminar airflow cabinet (Esco Micro Pte. Ltd., Singapore). Next, the air-dried extract was weighed and dissolved in methanol for further use.

Brine shrimp lethality assay of ECPs.

The cytotoxic effects of the ECPs of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 on axenic brine shrimp (Artemia salina) nauplii were determined as described previously (81). Briefly, brine shrimp cysts were immersed in an autoclaved marine water solution with a constant supply of oxygen for 48 h for hatching. Next, 1,000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, and 31.25 μg of the ECP extracts of CD223 and SM421 were individually added to 1 mL (100 cells mL−1) of a hatched brine shrimp nauplius (at developmental stage II) solution in 24-well plates and kept on an orbital shaker at 100 rpm for 24 h. Each of the treatments and controls were performed in triplicate. After incubation, the survival of the brine shrimp nauplii was recorded.

MIC determination.

The MIC of the ECPs of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 was determined by the agar dilution method (35). In this regard, sterilized paper discs (10 mm in size) were immersed in several concentrations of ECPs for 10 min. The discs were then air dried for 24 h for the complete evaporation of the solvents. Next, 50-μL inocula of fish-pathogenic E. faecalis strains F1B1 and FF11 were individually spread onto Mueller-Hinton agar plates by the spread culture method. The discs holding different concentrations of ECP extracts (1,000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, and 31.25 μg mL−1) of the bacterial strains were then carefully placed onto the surface of the bacterial culture plates and incubated at 28°C for 24 h. After incubation, the culture plates were observed carefully, and the MICs of the ECPs of CD223 and SM421 were calculated as described previously by Paul et al. (35).

In vivo growth performance of O. niloticus upon dietary inclusion of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421.

To assess the beneficial effects of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 on the growth parameters, nine plastic tanks (300 L) were divided into three treatments, F-T1 (control), F-T2 (B. haynesii CD223), and F-T3 (A. mimigardefordensis SM421), with three replicates each. A total of 180 uniformly sized (average weight of 30 ± 1.2 g) premature O. niloticus fingerlings were randomly distributed into the three treatments, where the stocking density was maintained at 20 fish per tank. Before feeding with the experimental feed, the initial weight of all of the fish was recorded by a digital weight machine (Vision, Bangladesh). The experimental feed was given to the fish twice a day at 5% of their body weight. The unutilized feed and fecal matter were collected every morning, and the water was changed once a day by siphoning. Underground water was used for the experiment. The tanks were maintained at an ambient temperature of 28°C ± 1°C at pH 7.3 to 8.2 under constant aeration (DO level, 5 ± 0.5 mg L−1).

Commercial pelleted feed (Mega Feed Company Ltd., Bangladesh) was used as the basal diet for supplementation with B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 for 90 days. B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421 were sprayed aseptically into the feed to provide a final concentration of bacterial cells of approximately 1 × 106 CFU mL−1. The amount of each bacterial strain in the feed was determined using the spread plate technique as described previously by Zokaeifar et al. (82).

The growth of O. niloticus fingerlings was evaluated in terms of weight gain and SGR. Regular sampling was performed at 15-day intervals. Weight gain (percent) and SGR (percent per day) were calculated by using the following formulas as described previously by Tekinay and Davies (83): weight gain (%) = [(final weight − initial weight)/initial weight] × 100 and SGR (%/day) = {[ln(final weight) − ln(initial weight)]/time (day)} × 100.

Hematological parameters and nonspecific immunity.

After a 90-day feeding trial, the treated fish were anesthetized with clove oil (0.05 mL per 500 mL of water) for hematological analysis. Blood samples were collected from the fish and taken in a tube containing heparin (which acts as an anticoagulant). The hemoglobin content in the samples was tested by using the EasyTouch CGHb testing kit (Bioptik Technologies Inc., China), wherein collected blood samples were poured into the edge of a strip of the hemoglobin meter before the coagulation of blood, as described previously by Salam et al. (60). The RBCs and WBCs were counted using an improved Neubauer hemocytometer (MarienFeld Company, Germany) under a light microscope (DM 100; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) according to methods described previously by Hesser (84). A standard RBC dilution pipette and a 1:200 dilution were used to determine the erythrocyte count. Estimation of the immunoglobulin M (IgM) concentration was carried out by using a Humalyzer-3000 analyzer.

DNA extraction and high-throughput sequencing.

The bacterial DNA from the digesta of the hindgut of the experimental O. niloticus fish was extracted using the commercial GeneJET genomic DNA purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000cc spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and the DNA was subsequently diluted with nuclease-free water (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) to a final concentration of 30 ng μL−1 for PCR. A total of 50 μL of PCR mix was prepared by mixing 25 μL of Hot Start 2× master mix (New England BioLabs Inc., USA), 2 μL of template DNA, 1 μL each of V3 and V4 sequencing primers with Illumina overhang adapters (forward primer 5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG and reverse primer 5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC) (part number 15044223 Rev. B), and 21 μL of nuclease-free water (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Thirty cycles of PCR amplification were performed in a Bio-Rad S100 gradient thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., CA, USA). Successful amplification was confirmed by gel electrophoresis in 1% agarose, followed by the cleaning and purification of positive amplicons using AMPure XP beads (Bioline, USA). The amplicons were indexed with a Nextera XT index kit via 12 cycles of secondary PCR according to the standard Illumina protocol (part number 15044223 Rev. B). The samples were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) at the Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Western Australia, using a v3 kit (600 cycles, part number MS-102-3003).

Bioinformatics analyses.

(i) Processing of Illumina reads. The raw sequence data were imported into QIIME2 (v2021.4) for paired-end processing (85). Quality trimming (deionizing) of demultiplexed sequences was performed using the q2-dada2 plug-in (86) with the following parameters: -p-trim-left-l 0, -p-trunc-len-f 280, -p-trim-left-r 0, and -p-trunc-len-r 220. The DADA2 output as a feature frequency of an ASV that represents biological features of the amplicon sequence was taxonomically classified against the SILVA 138 release (87). The chimeric features were removed from the table with the q2-vsearch plug-in using the uchime-denovo tool. The feature ASV table was filtered based on the lowest nonzero frequency of 120. Each sample was set to an even depth of 48,804 for downstream analyses of alpha-beta diversity and microbial composition.

(ii) Downstream bioinformatics. The rarefied ASV table, taxonomy table, and metadata were used for alpha-beta diversity analyses with R statistical software (v4.11) (88). The observed species and Chao1 indices were selected to observe the changes in diversity, while the Shannon and Simpson indices were used to calculate evenness among groups. Weighted (relative abundance) and unweighted (presence/absence) UniFrac distance metrics were used to calculate beta diversity. Alpha-beta diversity measurements were performed using the phyloseq (89), microbiomeSeq (https://github.com/umerijaz/microbiomeSeq), microbiome (https://github.com/microbiome/microbiome), and vegan R packages that support the ggplot2 plotting packages (90). The relative abundance of bacteria at various taxonomic levels was calculated with the phyloseq R package.

Statistical analyses of high-throughput sequence reads.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Kruskal-Wallis rank test was used to compare alpha diversity values among groups. Centroid analysis of beta dispersion among the groups was performed as permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with the vegan R package (91). Bacteria that were significantly differentially abundant at the genus level in the three different groups were identified using the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) algorithm at an LDA cutoff value of 2.0. At every stage of data analysis, a P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

In vivo artificial infection with E. faecalis by the immersion method.

At the end of the 90-day feeding trial, 10 fish from each treatment (F-T1, F-T2, and F-T3) were artificially challenged with E. faecalis strains F1B1 and FF11 by the immersion method. Pathogen inocula were prepared by adding 1,000 mL of a broth culture into 9,000 mL of sterile water. The number of CFU per milliliter of the inoculum was recorded for each isolate tested. The fingerlings were immersed in a pathogenic suspension for approximately 20 min at room temperature (approximately 28°C) and then placed into an aquarium containing 200 L of freshwater to observe the disease prevention efficacy of each treatment.

In vivo therapeutic effects of the ECPs of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421.

(i) In vivo curative recovery assay. An artificial infection challenge test with E. faecalis strains F1B1 and FF11 was carried out using the acclimatized fingerlings of O. niloticus. After exposure to the highly virulent E. faecalis F1B1 and FF11 suspensions, the O. niloticus fingerlings were divided into four treatment groups with three replicates (10 fish per tank) for each strain. To assess the curative effects of B. haynesii CD223, the treatments were denoted T1, T2, T3, and T4 (control) for strain F1B1 and T5, T6, T7, and T8 (control) for strain FF11. Similarly, to assess the curative effects of A. mimigardefordensis SM421, the treatments were denoted T9, T10, T11, and T12 (control) for strain F1B1 and T13, T14, T15, and T16 (control) for strain FF11. Next, the ECPs of B. haynesii CD223 incorporated into pelleted feed were fed to the fingerlings at rates of 125 μg mL−1 (for T1 and T5), 250 μg mL−1 (for T2 and T6), and 500 μg mL−1 (for T3 and T7). Similarly, the ECPs of A. mimigardefordensis SM421 incorporated into pelleted feed were fed to the fingerlings at rates of 125 μg mL−1 (for T9 and T13), 250 μg mL−1 (for T10 and T14), and 500 μg mL−1 (for T11 and T15). The control group (T4, T8, T12, and T16) fingerlings were fed commercial pelleted feed with no ECP extracts. Fish were fed at 5% of their body weight for 7 days. Continuous aeration was supplied to the aquarium, and half of the aquarium water was replaced every day during the experimental period.

(ii) In vivo prophylactic assay. To assess the in vivo prophylactic effects of the ECPs of B. haynesii CD223 and A. mimigardefordensis SM421, the O. niloticus fingerlings were divided into three treatments with three replicates (10 fish per tank). O. niloticus fingerlings were fed ECP extracts incorporated into commercial pelleted feed at a rate of 250 μg mL−1 for 30 days. After that, the fingerlings were exposed to the pathogenic E. faecalis strains F1B1 and FF11 by using the same method as the one described above for the artificial infection study and returned to the aquarium. After exposure to pathogenic isolates, the fish were fed basal diets for 14 days. A control group of fish that was not previously provided any ECP extract was maintained for each strain. During this period, fingerlings were observed for any external disease symptoms and abnormal behaviors. Aeration was maintained throughout the experiment, and approximately 50% of the water from the aquarium was replaced every day during the experiment.

Statistical analyses.

Typical power analysis for one-way ANOVA was performed using G*Power version 3.0.10 as described previously by Faul et al. (92). Arithmetical data were analyzed using IBM SPSS (v23, 2017). ANOVA and nested ANOVA were used to calculate any significant differences (P < 0.05) among variables in the control and treatment groups, and the values were separated by least significance difference (LSD) post hoc statistics.

Data availability.

The 16S rRNA gene sequences of isolates CD223 and SM421 were deposited in the GenBank database with accession numbers MW512512.1 and OL960631.1, respectively.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (336.4KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We sincerely acknowledge the financial support of the Research Management Wing of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh, for conducting the research work under the research project entitled Development of Native Probiotics, Herbal Extracts, and Antimicrobial Agents for Sustainable Management of Major Fish Diseases of Bangladesh.

Md Mahfuzur Rahman contributed to methodology and investigation. Sulav Indra Paul contributed to writing – original draft preparation, formal analysis, data curation, methodology, and investigation. Ashikur Rahman, Md Shameul Haque, and Md Ali Arman Ador contributed to methodology. Md Javed Foysal contributed to formal analysis and data curation and revised the manuscript. Md Tofazzal Islam contributed to writing – reviewing and editing. Md Mahbubur Rahman contributed to conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing – reviewing and editing, visualization, supervision, funding acquisition, and project administration. All authors gave final approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

We declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Contributor Information

Md Mahbubur Rahman, Email: mahbub-biotech@bsmrau.edu.bd.

Artem S. Rogovskyy, Texas A&M University

REFERENCES

  • 1.FAO. 2016. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016: contributing to food security and nutrition for all. FAO, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5555e.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stentiford GD, Sritunyalucksana K, Flegel TW, Williams BA, Withyachumnarnkul B, Itsathitphaisarn O, Bass D. 2017. New paradigms to help solve the global aquaculture disease crisis. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006160. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Assefa A, Abunna F. 2018. Maintenance of fish health in aquaculture: review of epidemiological approaches for prevention and control of infectious disease of fish. Vet Med Int 2018:5432497. doi: 10.1155/2018/5432497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Murray AG, Peeler EJA. 2005. Framework for understanding the potential for emerging diseases in aquaculture. Prev Vet Med 67:223–235. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.León-Buitimea A, Garza-Cárdenas CR, Garza-Cervantes JA, Lerma-Escalera JA, Morones-Ramírez JR. 2020. The demand for new antibiotics: antimicrobial peptides, nanoparticles, and combinatorial therapies as future strategies in antibacterial agent design. Front Microbiol 11:1669. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Popma T, Masser M. 1999. Tilapia: life history and biology. SRAC publication no 283. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center, Stoneville, MS. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Plumb JA, Hanson LA. 2011. Tilapia bacterial diseases, p 445–463. In Plumb JA, Hanson LA (ed), Health maintenance and principal microbial diseases of cultured fishes, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ames, IA. doi: 10.1002/9780470958353.ch16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Machimbirike VI, Jansen MD, Senapin S, Khunrae P, Rattanarojpong T, Dong HT. 2019. Viral infections in tilapines: more than just tilapia lake virus. Aquaculture 503:508–518. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.01.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Akoll P, Konecny R, Mwanja WW, Nattabi JK, Agoe C, Schiemer F. 2012. Parasite fauna of farmed Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in Uganda. Parasitol Res 110:315–323. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2491-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rahman M, Rahman MM, Deb SC, Alam MS, Alam MJ, Islam MT. 2017. Molecular identification of multiple antibiotic resistant fish pathogenic Enterococcus faecalis and their control by medicinal herbs. Sci Rep 7:3747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03673-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Akter T, Foysal MJ, Alam M, Ehsan R, Paul SI, Momtaz F, Siddik MA, Tay ACY, Fotedar R, Gupta SK, Islam T, Rahman MM. 2021. Involvement of Enterococcus species in streptococcosis of Nile tilapia in Bangladesh. Aquaculture 531:735790. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735790. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rizkiantino R, Pasaribu FH, Soejoedono RD, Purnama S, Wibowo DB, Wibawan IW. 2021. Experimental infection of Enterococcus faecalis in red tilapia (Oreochromis hybrid) revealed low pathogenicity to cause streptococcosis. Open Vet J 11:309–318. doi: 10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Toranzo AE, Magariños B, Romalde JL. 2005. A review of the main bacterial fish diseases in mariculture systems. Aquaculture 246:37–61. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vendrell D, Balcázar JL, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, De Blas I, Gironés O, Múzquiz JL. 2006. Lactococcus garvieae in fish: a review. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 29:177–198. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2006.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Agnew W, Barnes AC. 2007. Streptococcus iniae: an aquatic pathogen of global veterinary significance and a challenging candidate for reliable vaccination. Vet Microbiol 122:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nho S-W, Hikima J, Park SB, Jang HB, Cha IS, Yasuike M, Nakamura Y, Fujiwara A, Sano M, Kanai K, Kondo H, Hirono I, Takeyama H, Aoki T, Jung T-S. 2013. Comparative genomic characterization of three Streptococcus parauberis strains in fish pathogen, as assessed by wide-genome analyses. PLoS One 8:e80395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Arumugam U, Stalin N, Rebecca GP. 2017. Isolation, molecular identification and antibiotic resistance of Enterococcus faecalis from diseased tilapia. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 6:136–146. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.606.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ehsan R, Alam M, Akter T, Paul SI, Foysal MJ, Gupta DR, Islam T, Rahman MM. 2021. Enterococcus faecalis involved in streptococcosis like infection in silver barb (Barbonymus gonionotus). Aquac Rep 21:100868. doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100868. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reyes AT, Madrid FGN. 2020. Isolation and biochemical identification of Enterococcus faecalis on moribund Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L). Adv Pharmacol Clin Trials 5:000177. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rizkiantino R, Wibawan IWT, Pasaribu FH, Soejoedono RD, Arnafia W, Ulyama V, Wibowo DB. 2020. Isolation and characterization of the Enterococcus faecalis strain isolated from red tilapia (Oreochromis hybrid) in Indonesia: a preliminary report. J Surv Fish Sci 7:27–42. doi: 10.18331/SFS2020.7.1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zahran E, Mahgoub HA, Abdelhamid F, Sadeyen JR, Risha E. 2019. Experimental pathogenesis and host immune responses of Enterococcus faecalis infection in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 512:734319. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734319. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Abu-Elala NM, Abd-Elsalam RM, Younis NA. 2020. Streptococcosis, lactococcosis and enterococcosis are potential threats facing cultured Nile tilapia (Oreochomis niloticus) production. Aquac Res 51:4183–4195. doi: 10.1111/are.14760. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Coia J, Cubie H. 1995. Enterococcus species (Streptococcus beta-haemolytic, group D), p 710–712. In Coia J, Cubie H (ed), The immunoassay kit directory, vol 2/1/3. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-0359-3_14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kusuda R, Salati F. 1993. Major bacterial diseases affecting mariculture in Japan. Annu Rev Fish Dis 3:69–85. doi: 10.1016/0959-8030(93)90029-B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nieto JM, Devesa S, Quiroga I, Toranzo AE. 1995. Pathology of Enterococcus sp. infection in farmed turbot, Scophthalmus maximus L. J Fish Dis 18:21–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1995.tb01262.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hassan MA, Abdel-Naeim NS, Mabrok M, Dessouki AA, Hassan AM. 2022. Isolation and identification of Enterococcus faecalis from cultured Oreochromis niloticus and Mugil cephalus with a special emphasis on a possible integrated control strategy. Aquac Res 53:5521–5535. doi: 10.1111/are.16034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Amal MNA, Zamri-Saad M. 2011. Streptococcosis in tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): a review. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci 34:195–206. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mishra A, Nam G-H, Gim J-A, Lee H-E, Jo A, Kim H-S. 2018. Current challenges of Streptococcus infection and effective molecular, cellular, and environmental control methods in aquaculture. Mol Cells 41:495–505. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2018.2154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Balachandar R, Karmegam N, Saravanan M, Subbaiya R, Gurumoorthy P. 2018. Synthesis of bioactive compounds from vermicast isolated actinomycetes species and its antimicrobial activity against human pathogenic bacteria. Microb Pathog 121:155–165. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Das S, Ward LR, Burke C. 2008. Prospects of using marine actinobacteria as probiotics in aquaculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81:419–429. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1731-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sharma P, Thakur D. 2020. Antimicrobial biosynthetic potential and diversity of culturable soil actinobacteria from forest ecosystems of northeast India. Sci Rep 10:4104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60968-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Makled SO, Hamdan AM, El-Sayed AF, Hafez EE. 2017. Evaluation of marine psychrophile, Psychrobacter namhaensis SO89, as a probiotic in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) diets. Fish Shellfish Immunol 61:194–200. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Makled SO, Hamdan AM, El-Sayed AF. 2019. Effects of dietary supplementation of a marine thermotolerant bacterium, Bacillus paralicheniformis SO-1, on growth performance and immune responses of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquac Nutr 25:817–827. doi: 10.1111/anu.12899. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Makled SO, Hamdan AM, El-Sayed AF. 2020. Growth promotion and immune stimulation in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, fingerlings following dietary administration of a novel marine probiotic, Psychrobacter maritimus S. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 12:365–374. doi: 10.1007/s12602-019-09575-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Paul SI, Rahman MM, Salam MA, Khan MAR, Islam MT. 2021. Identification of marine sponge-associated bacteria of the Saint Martin’s Island of the Bay of Bengal emphasizing on the prevention of motile Aeromonas septicemia in Labeo rohita. Aquaculture 545:737156. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Coenye T, Vanlaere E, Samyn E, Falsen E, Larsson P, Vandamme P. 2005. Advenella incenata gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the Alcaligenaceae, isolated from various clinical samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:251–256. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63267-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Paul SI, Majumdar BC, Ehsan R, Hasan M, Baidya A, Bakky MAH. 2021. Bioprospecting potential of marine microbial natural bioactive compounds. J Appl Biotechnol Rep 8:96–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gupta A, Gupta P, Dhawan A. 2014. Dietary supplementation of probiotics affects growth, immune response and disease resistance of Cyprinus carpio fry. Fish Shellfish Immunol 41:113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ramesh D, Vinothkanna A, Rai AK, Vignesh VS. 2015. Isolation of potential probiotic Bacillus spp. and assessment of their subcellular components to induce immune responses in Labeo rohita against Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish Shellfish Immunol 45:268–276. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Van Doan H, Hoseinifar SH, Khanongnuch C, Kanpiengjai A, Unban K, Van Kim V, Srichaiyo S. 2018. Host-associated probiotics boosted mucosal and serum immunity, disease resistance and growth performance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 491:94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.03.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dunlap CA, Schisler DA, Perry EB, Connor N, Cohan FM, Rooney AP. 2017. Bacillus swezeyi sp. nov. and Bacillus haynesii sp. nov. isolated from desert soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:2720–2725. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wübbeler JH, Lütke-Eversloh T, Van Trappen S, Vandamme P, Steinbüchel A. 2006. Tetrathiobacter mimigardefordensis sp. nov., isolated from compost, a betaproteobacterium capable of utilizing the organic disulfide 3,3′-dithiodipropionic acid. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:1305–1310. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64126-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wübbeler JH, Bruland N, Kretschmer K, Steinbüchel A. 2008. Novel pathway for catabolism of the organic sulfur compound 3,3′-dithiodipropionic acid via 3-mercaptopropionic acid and 3-sulfinopropionic acid to propionyl-coenzyme A by the aerobic bacterium Tetrathiobacter mimigardefordensis strain DPN7. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:4028–4035. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00422-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rawling MD, Merrifield DL, Davies SJ. 2009. Preliminary assessment of dietary supplementation of Sangrovit on red tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) growth performance and health. Aquaculture 294:118–122. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Galagarza OA, Smith SA, Drahos DJ, Eifert JD, Williams RC, Kuhn DD. 2018. Modulation of innate immunity in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis endospores. Fish Shellfish Immunol 83:171–179. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.08.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Midhun SJ, Neethu S, Arun D, Vysakh A, Divya L, Radhakrishnan EK, Jyothis M. 2019. Dietary supplementation of Bacillus licheniformis HGA8B improves growth parameters, enzymatic profile and gene expression of Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture 505:289–296. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.02.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Abdel-Aziz M, Bessat M, Fadel A, Elblehi S. 2020. Responses of dietary supplementation of probiotic effective microorganisms (EMs) in Oreochromis niloticus on growth, hematological, intestinal histopathological, and antiparasitic activities. Aquac Int 28:947–963. doi: 10.1007/s10499-019-00505-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Aly SM, Ahmed YA-G, Ghareeb AA-A, Mohamed MF. 2008. Studies on Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus acidophilus, as potential probiotics, on the immune response and resistance of tilapia nilotica (Oreochromis niloticus) to challenge infections. Fish Shellfish Immunol 25:128–136. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Paul SI, Rahman MM. 2022. Draft genome sequence of Bacillus subtilis YBS29, a potential fish probiotic that prevents motile Aeromonas septicemia in Labeo rohita. Microbiol Resour Announc 11:e00915-22. doi: 10.1128/mra.00915-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mondol MAM, Shin HJ, Islam MT. 2013. Diversity of secondary metabolites from marine Bacillus species: chemistry and biological activity. Mar Drugs 11:2846–2872. doi: 10.3390/md11082846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rahman MM, Paul SI, Akter T, Tay AC, Foysal MJ, Islam MT. 2020. Whole-genome sequence of Bacillus subtilis WS1A, a promising fish probiotic strain isolated from marine sponge of the Bay of Bengal. Microbiol Resour Announc 9:e00641-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00641-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rahman MM, Kawser AQMR, Islam MT. 2019. Probiotic bacilli in sustainable aquaculture, p 305–335. In Islam MT, Rahman MM, Pandey P, Boehme MH, Haesaert G (ed), Bacilli and agrobiotechnology: phytostimulation and biocontrol. Bacilli in climate resilient agriculture and bioprospecting. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15175-1_16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wübbeler JH, Hiessl S, Schuldes J, Thürmer A, Daniel R, Steinbüchel A. 2014. Unravelling the complete genome sequence of Advenella mimigardefordensis strain DPN7T and novel insights in the catabolism of the xenobiotic polythioester precursor 3,3′-dithiodipropionate. Microbiology (Reading) 160:1401–1416. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.078279-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gobi N, Vaseeharan B, Chen JC, Rekha R, Vijayakumar S, Anjugam M, Iswarya A. 2018. Dietary supplementation of probiotic Bacillus licheniformis Dahb1 improves growth performance, mucus and serum immune parameters, antioxidant enzyme activity as well as resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus. Fish Shellfish Immunol 74:501–508. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.12.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Opiyo MA, Jumbe J, Ngugi CC, Charo-Karisa H. 2019. Different levels of probiotics affect growth, survival and body composition of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cultured in low input ponds. Sci Afr 4:e00103. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Balcázar JL, De Blas I, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, Cunningham D, Vendrell D, Múzquiz JL. 2006. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Vet Microbiol 114:173–186. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Irianto A, Austin B. 2002. Use of probiotics to control furunculosis in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J Fish Dis 25:333–342. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2002.00375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Dohail MA, Hashim R, Aliyu-Paiko M. 2009. Effects of the probiotic, Lactobacillus acidophilus, on the growth performance, haematology parameters and immunoglobulin concentration in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus, Burchell 1822) fingerling. Aquac Res 40:1642–1652. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2009.02265.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Picchietti S, Fausto AM, Randelli E, Carnevali O, Taddei AR, Buonocore F, Scapigliati G, Abelli L. 2009. Early treatment with Lactobacillus delbrueckii strain induces an increase in intestinal T-cells and granulocytes and modulates immune-related genes of larval Dicentrarchus labrax (L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol 26:368–376. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2008.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Salam MA, Islam M, Paul SI, Rahman M, Rahman ML, Islam F, Rahman A, Shaha DC, Alam MS, Islam T. 2021. Gut probiotic bacteria of Barbonymus gonionotus improve growth, hematological parameters and reproductive performances of the host. Sci Rep 11:10692. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90158-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tsuchiya C, Sakata T, Sugita H. 2008. Novel ecological niche of Cetobacterium somerae, an anaerobic bacterium in the intestinal tracts of freshwater fish. Let Appl Microbiol 46:43–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02258.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ramírez C, Coronado J, Silva A, Romero J. 2018. Cetobacterium is a major component of the microbiome of giant Amazonian fish (Arapaima gigas) in Ecuador. Animals (Basel) 8:189. doi: 10.3390/ani8110189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang A, Zhang Z, Ding Q, Yang Y, Bindelle J, Ran C, Zhou Z. 2021. Intestinal Cetobacterium and acetate modify glucose homeostasis via parasympathetic activation in zebrafish. Gut Microbes 13:1–15. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1900996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Xie M, Zhou W, Xie Y, Li Y, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Olsen RE, Ran C, Zhou Z. 2021. Effects of Cetobacterium somerae fermentation product on gut and liver health of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fed diet supplemented with ultra-micro ground mixed plant proteins. Aquaculture 543:736943. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736943. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cámara-Ruiz M, Balebona MC, Moriñigo MÁ, Esteban MÁ. 2020. Probiotic Shewanella putrefaciens (SpPdp11) as a fish health modulator: a review. Microorganisms 8:1990. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Du Sert NP, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, Browne WJ, Clark A, Cuthill IC, Dirnagl U, Emerson M, Garner P. 2020. Reporting animal research: explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol 18:e3000411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fernandes IM, Bastos YF, Barreto DS, Lourenço LS, Penha JM. 2017. The efficacy of clove oil as an anaesthetic and in euthanasia procedure for small-sized tropical fishes. Braz J Biol 77:444–450. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.15015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Batt J, Bennett-Steward K, Couturier C, Hammell L, Harvey-Clark C, Kreiberg H, Iwama G, Lall S, Litvak M, Rainnie D, Stevens D. 2005. CCAC guidelines on: the care and use of fish in research, teaching, and testing. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, ON, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pisano MA, Sommer MJ, Lopez MM. 1986. Application of pretreatments for the isolation of bioactive actinomycetes from marine sediments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 25:285–288. doi: 10.1007/BF00253664. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mohseni M, Norouzi H, Hamedi J, Roohi A. 2013. Screening of antibacterial producing actinomycetes from sediments of the Caspian Sea. Int J Mol Cell Med 2:64–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gozari M, Bahador N, Jassbi AR, Mortazavi MS, Hamzehei S, Eftekhar E. 2019. Isolation, distribution and evaluation of cytotoxic and antioxidant activity of cultivable actinobacteria from the Oman Sea sediments. Acta Oceanol Sin 38:84–90. doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1515-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gram C. 1884. Uber die isolirte Farbung der Schizomyceten in Schnitt- und Trockenpreparaten. Fortschr Med 2:185–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hansen GH, Sørheim R. 1991. Improved method for phenotypical characterization of marine bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 13:231–241. doi: 10.1016/0167-7012(91)90049-V. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Deb SC. 2014. Identification of multidrug-resistant fish pathogen Stenotrophomonas sp. and in-vitro inhibition by Streptomyces sp. MSc thesis. Department of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hossain MS. 2016. Molecular characterization of fish pathogenic Aeromonas veronii by multiplex PCR and control of Aeromonas septicaemia by herbal extracts. MSc thesis. Department of Biotechnology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chowdhury G. 2015. Molecular identification and control of the pathogens associated with black spot disease in prawn and shrimp. MSc thesis. Department of Fisheries Management, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, Bangladesh. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Rakshanya U, Shenpagam NH, Devi DK. 2011. Antagonistic activity of actinomycetes isolates against human pathogen. J Microbiol Biotechnol Res 1:74–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Mathew S, Vijay S, Potty VP. 2017. Assessment of probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from curd and its application using fruit juice. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 6:282–289. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.601.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Borah D, Gogoi O, Adhikari C, Kakoti BB. 2016. Isolation and characterization of the new indigenous Staphylococcus sp. DBOCP06 as a probiotic bacterium from traditionally fermented fish and meat products of Assam state. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci 3:232–240. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbas.2016.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lieberman MA. 1999. Brine shrimp bioassay for measuring toxicity and remediation of chemicals. J Chem Educ 76:1689–1691. doi: 10.1021/ed076p1689. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Zokaeifar H, Balcázar JL, Saad CR, Kamarudin MS, Sijam K, Arshad A, Nejat N. 2012. Effects of Bacillus subtilis on the growth performance, digestive enzymes, immune gene expression and disease resistance of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immunol 33:683–689. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2012.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tekinay AA, Davies SJ. 2001. Dietary carbohydrate level influencing feed intake, nutrient utilisation and plasma glucose concentration in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 25:657–666. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Hesser EF. 1960. Methods for routine fish hematology. Progress Fish Cult 22:164–171. doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(1960)22[164:MFRFH]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodríguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and Web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2013. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wickham H. 2011. ggplot2. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comp Stat 3:180–185. doi: 10.1002/wics.147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Dixon P. 2003. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J Veg Sci 14:927–930. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. 2007. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (336.4KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The 16S rRNA gene sequences of isolates CD223 and SM421 were deposited in the GenBank database with accession numbers MW512512.1 and OL960631.1, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES