Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2022 Nov 3;10(6):e02960-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02960-22

Comparative Analysis of Novel Lytic Phages for Biological Control of Phytopathogenic Xanthomonas spp.

M L Domingo-Calap a,b, M Bernabéu-Gimeno c, C M Aure b, E Marco-Noales b,, P Domingo-Calap c,
Editor: Olaya Rendueles Garciad
PMCID: PMC9769650  PMID: 36326506

ABSTRACT

Xanthomonas is an important genus of plant-pathogenic bacteria that affects agronomic and economically important crops, causing serious economic losses. In fact, several Xanthomonas species are considered regulated quarantine pests. Due to the lack of effective control measures to treat plant-pathogenic bacteria, innovative control tools are needed to carry out integrated disease management. In this regard, bacteriophages (phages), viruses of bacteria, constitute a promising biocontrol tool. In this work, we report the isolation and characterization of 11 novel Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis phages belonging to different families and genera of the class Caudoviricetes. Infectivity matrix in more than 60 isolates of different xanthomonads and other phytopathogenic bacteria suggests that these phages are specific to the Xanthomonas genus, with different host ranges depending on the isolates tested. Interestingly, some of these phages showed relevant features to be used as biocontrol tools to combat pathogenic Xanthomonas spp. as important as X. oryzae or X. citri.

IMPORTANCE Phytopathogenic bacteria represent serious losses worldwide. The lack of current treatments has focused the spotlight on phages, viruses of bacteria, as very promising biocontrol tools. Phages are very specific and can help to control bacterial infections in crops, as is the case of xanthomonads-associated diseases. The discovery of new environmental phages with lytic capacity that can help to combat these pathogens is of special relevance, and it is necessary to implement phage isolation and characterization techniques to determine their host range and their genomic properties. The establishment of phage collections worldwide will allow their use as preventive, diagnostic, or therapeutic tools. Although there is still a long way to go, this work is a step forward in the implementation of new ecofriendly techniques to combat key pathogens in the field.

KEYWORDS: plant-pathogenic bacteria, phage, biocontrol, Xanthomonas spp.

INTRODUCTION

Plant diseases are a major cause of production losses worldwide, with important economic, social, and ecological consequences. In particular, plant-pathogenic bacteria are difficult to manage due to their recurrence, rapid bacterial dissemination in crops, and lack of effective control methods (1, 2). The maintenance of crop production systems involves the identification and deployment of sustainable solutions for bacterial disease management, including biocontrol strategies (3). In general, the control of bacterial diseases in crops consists of cultural practices aimed at reducing the bacterial population together with the application of copper compounds and antibiotics where allowed (4, 5). Unfortunately, copper, due to its toxicity, has negative effects on agricultural systems and the environment. In addition, its bioaccumulation in soil and surface water reduces microbial biodiversity (6). The most commonly used antibiotics in agriculture, such as streptomycin, kasugamycin, and tetracycline, may also pose unacceptable risks when used as pesticides (3), and their use is not allowed in many countries. Moreover, copper compounds and antibiotics lead to the emergence of resistance in bacteria. All this has raised worldwide interest in research and application of biocontrol for the management of bacterial plant diseases.

In this context, the use of bacteriophages, bacterial viruses, is one of the most promising ecofriendly alternatives to combat phytopathogenic bacteria. Phages have important advantages over chemical compounds. Their natural presence in all ecosystems does not pose a danger to the environment since their use is considered a minor intervention in the native microbiota of the plant (6). In fact, the application of phages could contribute to maintaining beneficial bacteria by suppressing target pathogenic bacteria. Other benefits are their low cost of production, their autoamplification (autodosage), and their ability to counteract bacterial resistance (7).

Among phytopathogenic bacteria, the genus Xanthomonas stands out for containing a large number of species (more than 35) pathogenic to more than 400 plant species (8). In fact, xanthomonads are the largest group of plant bacteria that cause devastating diseases in crops and are considered a global threat (6). The species Xanthomonas arboricola has been proposed to be composed of nine pathovars, and some of them are the most important phytopathogenic bacteria of stone fruits and nuts (9). Among them, X. arboricola pv. juglandis is the causal agent of walnut blight disease, a severe disease of walnuts that can produce serious damage in leaves, nuts, buds, catkins, and young twigs and is considered the most serious biotic stress affecting Persian walnut trees, causing economic losses in walnut production worldwide (10). Information on the detection of X. arboricola pv. juglandis strains has been increasing throughout Europe, and population studies have found an unprecedented genetic diversity of this pathovar (8). Infected nursery stock is considered the main route of introduction and spread in newly cultivated areas, although it has been shown that it can be disseminated through pollen (9). Moreover, globalization and plant trade favor its dispersal worldwide, and global warming allows the pathogen to adapt and establish in new areas (6).

The first use of phages as biocontrol agents against Xanthomonas spp. dates from the 19th century (11). Since then, more than 160 phages specific for different xanthomonads have been isolated worldwide (12), belonging to 5 families: Podoviridae, Siphoviridae, Myoviridae, Autographiviridae, and Herelleviridae (12). These last two families collect the lowest number of phages infecting Xanthomonas spp., and the family Autographiviridae includes only 3 members, none of them infecting X. arboricola pv. juglandis. In this regard, all the reported phages infecting the strains of this pathovar belong to the families Podoviridae and Siphoviridae (13, 14). Recently, novel phages against important pathogenic species have been reported, including Xanthomonas citri (15, 16), Xanthomonas translucens, and Xanthomonas campestris (17) and Xanthomonas oryzae (18). To date, two Xanthomonas phage-based products are commercially available for biological control (manufactured by AgriPhage [https://www.omnilytics.com/]) and have been shown to successfully control pathogens that cause tomato and pepper spot disease and citrus canker disease. Despite this, there is great unexploited potential for the use of phages to replace or reduce the number of agrochemicals used for control of most plant-pathogenic bacteria.

In the present work, we have isolated and characterized 11 novel bacteriophages against the pathogen X. arboricola pv. juglandis from environmental samples in Valencia (Spain). All phages were morphological and genomically characterized and showed high diversity. Host range analysis on a large collection of pathogenic Xanthomonas spp. and other phytopathogenic bacteria showed that the isolated phages were highly specific against Xanthomonas spp. and had strong lytic activity against some quarantine bacterial strains of species that constitute major threats for agriculture. This work provides an excellent starting point for investigating the potential use of these phages in biocontrol programs to combat xanthomonads worldwide.

RESULTS

Phage isolation and purification.

A total of 11 X. arboricola pv. juglandis phages against the host IVIA 1317-1a, named vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11, were isolated from sewage using the double-layer agar technique. To isolate each phage, a triple plaque-to-plaque transfer was performed. Subsequently, each isolated plaque was used to infect log-phase bacterial cultures, and the supernatant was titered by the standard plaque assay. Under these conditions, the viral titer of the isolated phages lysates ranged from 109 to 1010 PFU/mL on lawns of IVIA 1317-1a. All phages formed clear plaques, with sizes ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 mm in diameter and well-defined boundaries.

Transmission electron phage micrographs.

Transmission electron micrographs from high-titer phage-lysed cultures revealed three main phage morphologies (Fig. 1). Phages vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa4, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa9 showed an isometric head (diameter of approximately 50 nm) and a very short cone-shaped tail (length of approximately 10 nm). Phages vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa3, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa8, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 had larger sizes with an isometric head (diameter of approximately 50 nm) and a long cone-shaped tail (length greater than 100 nm). Finally, phages vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 had icosahedral elongated heads (diameter of approximately 70 nm) and a long cone-shaped tail (length greater than 100 nm).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Morphological characterization of the isolated Xanthomonas phages. Transmission electron microscopy images are shown; scale bars, 100 nm.

Lytic activity of the isolated phages in IVIA 1317-1a cultures.

To assess the lytic activity of the isolated phages in liquid medium, log-phase IVIA 1317-1a cultures were inoculated with each phage in parallel with noninfected cultures grown as controls (Fig. 2). In the presence of each phage, a drastic reduction in growth of bacterial strain IVIA 1317-1a was observed during the first 48 h, followed by the emergence of bacterial resistance clones in all cases. However, the timing of the emergence of resistance varied slightly, depending on the phage, between 42 h and around 60 h postinfection. In addition, a phage cocktail encompassing all the isolated phages (vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11) did not prevent the emergence of resistance, although resistance emergence was delayed until after 60 h. These assays revealed a strong lytic effect, as the growth of the bacterial strain was completely inhibited until the emergence of resistant clones, as also suggested by the large and clear plaques formed in bacterial lawns.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Growth curves of strain IVIA 1317-1a in the presence/absence of the isolated Xanthomonas phages. In total, 11 phages named vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 are shown. In addition, a cocktail encompassing the 11 phages was tested. Each measured point was recorded every 30 min until 110 h. All the experiments were done in triplicate, and error bars are shown. Black indicates the absence of phage, and green indicates the presence of phage.

Determination of phage host range.

To determine the host range of the new X. arboricola pv. juglandis phages, spot tests in soft agar plates were performed for a battery of 63 bacterial isolates, including 46 Xanthomonas species isolates and 19 distant phytopathogenic bacterial species (Fig. 3). The phages showed lytic activity against some Xanthomonas species strains, including quarantine species such as X. oryzae and X. citri, with different ranges depending on the phage considered. In the case of isolates of other phytopathogenic bacterial genera, none of them were susceptible to viral infection by any of the new isolated phages.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Host range of the isolated Xanthomonas phages against 47 strains of Xanthomonas spp. and 19 strains of other phytopathogenic bacteria. In total, 11 phages named vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 are shown; blue, lysis; white, no lysis.

Focusing on X. arboricola pv. juglandis, six independent isolates were used to determine the host range of the phages, and four isolates were susceptible to all phages. In contrast, isolate CFBP 2528 was susceptible only to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1, and isolate IVIA 3114.1 was susceptible only to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10. Regarding the whole infectivity matrix, which included several Xanthomonas pathovars and species, phage vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 was the phage showing the broadest host range, infecting 31 of the evaluated strains. In contrast, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2 was the phage with the narrowest host range and was able to infect only 18 of the isolates. Indeed, some Xanthomonas species isolates were not infected by any of the 11 phages: CFBP 1846 of X. arboricola pv. corylina, strains IVIA 2667, IVIA 2795, and DAR 56680 of X. arboricola pv. pruni, strains IVIA 3287-1 and IVIA 3287-2 of X. arboricola pv. prunicola, strain CFBP 3123 of X. arboricola pv. populi, strains CECT914 and NCPPB 3035 of X. axonopodis pv. phaseoli, strain IVIA 2734-1 of X. campestris pv. campestris, strains NCPPB 381 and NCPPB 3660 of X. citri pv. fuscans, and strain CECT792 of X. vesicatoria.

Genome sequencing and comparative genomics of the phages.

The 11 phages were sequenced using the MiSeq Illumina platform. The sequencing run led to 685,328 to 5,808,456 filtered paired-end reads (depending on the phage) that were used to perform the de novo assembly with SPAdes v3.13.1 (19). One long contig with high coverage was found in all the samples, indicating the assembly of complete phage genomes. These genomes were then reorganized based on the start of the large terminase subunit and corrected with Pilon. The resulting genomes had sizes ranging from 40 to 60 kb, with a G+C content fluctuating between 54 and 66% (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

General features of phage genomes of vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11, including size, percentage of GC and coverage of the assembled genomes, predicted ORFs by consensus gene calling, and most related phage in the nucleotide database by BLASTn analysis

Xanthomonas phage Size (bp) GC content (%) Avg sequencing coverage No. of CDSa BLAST nearest genome
Class Familyb Genusb
Name Cov.a (%) E value Ident.a (%)
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 43,533 54.4 211 54 Xanthomonas phage Samson 94 0.0 98.47 Caudoviricetes - Septimatrevirus
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2 42,846 62.7 1,914 51 Xylella phage Prado 88 0.0 96.06 Caudoviricetes Autographiviridae Pradovirus
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa3 58,103 58.6 3,532 75 Pseudomonas phage JG012 94 0.0 96.89 Caudoviricetes - Nipunavirus
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa4 42,996 62.9 593 50 Xylella phage Prado 94 0.0 95.89 Caudoviricetes Autographiviridae Pradovirus
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5 56,407 59.6 1,209 74 Stenotrophomonas phage vB_Sm_QDWS359 42 0.0 77.59 Caudoviricetes Mesyanzhinoviridae Bosavirus
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6 62,950 67.0 275 82 Xanthomonas phage Bosa 97 0.0 93.51 Caudoviricetes Mesyanzhinoviridae Bosavirus
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7 42,843 59.4 2,451 55 Stenotrophomonas phage Ponderosa 4 0.0 81.97 Caudoviricetes Autographiviridae -
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa8 43,677 54.4 6,247 55 Pseudomonas phage vB_Pae_TR 91 0.0 98.48 Caudoviricetes - Septimatrevirus
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa9 43,229 62.9 3,792 49 Xylella phage Prado 91 0.0 96.09 Caudoviricetes Autographiviridae Pradovirus
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 64,023 65.5 379 84 Xanthomonas phage Bosa 97 0.0 94.43 Caudoviricetes Mesyanzhinoviridae Bosavirus
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 43,005 53.7 1,387 56 Pseudomonas phage vB_Pae_PS9N 97 0.0 98.01 Caudoviricetes - Septimatrevirus
a

CDS, coding sequence; cov., coverage; indent., identity.

b

-, taxonomic rank not determined or under discussion by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV).

Comparison against the nucleotide database using BLAST (20) showed a closest relative with high coverage and similarity for all the phages except for vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5 and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7. In these two phages, only 42% and 4% of their genomes, respectively, were similar to a genome available in public databases. In vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7, 4% corresponded to regions encoding a 3′ to 5′ exonuclease, a major capsid protein, and a DNA polymerase. The nearest organisms to all phages belonged to different families and genera of the class Caudoviricetes; vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa4, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa9 showed similarities with phages from the Autographiviridae family, while vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa3, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa8, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 were more similar to phages from the Septimatrevirus, Nipunavirus, and Bosavirus genera. Specifically, the closest relatives were of the genus Pradovirus for vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa4, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa9, Septimatrevirus for vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa8, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11, Nipunavirus for vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa3, and Bosavirus for vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10.

Functional annotation, comparative analysis, and lifestyle prediction of phages.

Consensus gene calling using Phanotate (21), Prodigal (22), and Glimmer (23) identified around 50 open reading frames (ORFs) in phages belonging to the Autographiviridae family and Septimatrevirus genus, while more than 70 ORFs were found in all phages belonging to the Nipunavirus and Bosavirus genera. BLAST (20) against the RefSeq protein database allowed the functional annotation of almost all the ORFs identified except for those from the vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7 genome that maintain 48 of 55 predicted ORFs without functional annotation. CD-Search (24) using the Conserved Domains Database (CDD) detected conserved protein domains in 16 of these 48 ORFs without functional annotation predicted in the vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7 genome. Moreover, 1 of the 9 ORFs without functional annotation predicted in the vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2 genome and 1 of the 5 ORFs without functional annotation predicted in the vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6 genome had domain hits. The rest of the ORFs identified remain without functional annotation.

All phages showed a genomic organization previously described in phages from the same genus (Fig. 4). Similar to Xylella phage Prado (accession number NC_022987), vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa4, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa9 are phiKMV-like phages with genomes consisting of three functional modules, with a gene encoding a single-subunit RNA polymerase at the end of the second cluster formed by genes involved in DNA metabolism (25). In the case of VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7, despite having half of the predicted ORFs without functional annotation, similar genomic organization could be identified. Genes of vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa8, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 were also grouped in functional clusters. All of these genes encoded a RecB exonuclease and a RecA ATPase, homologous recombination proteins present in genomes from other phages belonging to the Septimatrevirus genus, like the Pseudomonas phage vB_Pae-Kakheti25 (accession number JQ307387) (26). vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa8 showed a similarity higher than 95% in almost their entire genome, whereas vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 was slightly different. vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa3 has a genomic organization similar to Pseudomonas phages vB_PaeS_PAJD-1 (accession number MW835180) and Pamx25 (accession number NC_041953), NP1-like phages belonging to the Nipunavirus genus (27, 28). In addition to an ORF encoding a RecB exonuclease, a cluster of ORFs related to the biosynthesis of 7-deazaguanine derivatives (ORFs 30 to 34) and an ORF encoding a UvrD helicase were found, which have been described as essential for the replication of filamentous phages (29). vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6 and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 had the largest genomes with more than 80 ORFs. Both showed high similarity to each other and to the temperate phages belonging to the Bosavirus genus, Xanthomonas phage Bosa (accession number NC_052967), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia phage DLP4 (accession number MG018224). VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5 was more different than VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6 and VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 (and to phages previously described) but had a modular arrangement of genes similar to those and Xanthomonas phage Bosa (30) and S. maltophilia phage DLP4 (31). Interestingly, in vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10, a gene very similar to a putative integrase gene predicted in the genome of Xanthomonas phage Bosa, and renamed as “bifunctional primase/polymerase” in the RefSeq database (ORF 71, ORF 77, and ORF 78, respectively), was detected.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Comparative genomic organization of the isolated Xanthomonas phages. In total, 11 phages named vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 are shown. Predicted ORFs by the consensus of gene callers Glimmer3, Phanotate, and Prodigal are represented by arrows colored based on their function, predicted using BLASTp against the RefSeq viral protein database and CD-Search using CDD. No annotated ORFs were left in white. Representations were generated using gggenomes (48). Overlapping between the first and last gene in all the genomes is not shown.

To determine the relationship between the isolated phages and those previously described, unclassified virus belonging to the family Autographiviridae and phages belonging to the subfamily Bradleyvirinae and the genera Pradovirus, Nipunavirus, and Septimatrevirus were selected and used to perform a single-gene phylogenetic analysis and a whole-genome comparison.

First, a maximum likelihood phylogeny was performed with the sequences of the DNA polymerase protein using the VT substitution model, grouping the phages into different taxonomic ranks (Fig. 5A). On one hand, VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1, VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa8, and VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 were close to phages belonging to the Septimatrevirus genus, and VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa3 was closer to phages belonging to the Nipunavirus genus. VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5, VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6, and VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 fell within phages belonging to the Bradleyvirinae subfamily, even though VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6 and VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 were more closely related, and to other phages of the Bosavirus genus. On the other hand, VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa4, VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2, VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7, and VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa9 were grouped with phages of the Autographiviridae family, although VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2, VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa4, and VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa9 were closer to each other, and to other phages belonging to the Pradovirus genus. As previously shown by other methods, VB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7 appeared to be the most distant phage.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Taxonomy of the isolated Xanthomonas spp. phages. (A) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on DNA polymerase protein sequences of the phages. Root is fixed at midpoint, and all branches have a bootstrap value of at least 90. (B) VIRIDIC clustering by intergenomic similarity (threshold of 95% and 70% for the demarcation of viruses into species and genera). In total, 11 phages named vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 are shown, including previously published phage species of unclassified virus belonging to the family Autographiviridae and phages belonging to the subfamily Bradleyvirinae and the genera Pradovirus, Nipunavirus, and Septimatrevirus.

Second, fixing a threshold of 95% for the demarcation of viruses into species and 70% into genera, as suggested by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV), whole-genome sequencing comparison was done by VIRIDIC. Nine of the 11 phages isolated clustered with previously described phages (at least at the genus level), similar to the results from single-gene phylogeny. However, vB_Xar_IVIADoCa5 and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7 remained unclustered (Fig. 5B). These results are understandable since only 42% and 7% of their genomes, respectively, were similar to genomes available in public databases. Interestingly, these two phages seem to be related to other phages isolated in this study, vB_Xar_IVIADoCa6 and vB_Xar_IVIADoCa10 in the case of vB_Xar_IVIADoCa5 (50% of intergenomic similarity) and vB_Xar_IVIADoCa2, vB_Xar_IVIADoCa4, and vB_Xar_IVIADoCa9 in the case of vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7 (23% of intergenomic similarity). Moreover, this analysis showed that phages vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa4, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa9 belong to the same genera but not to the same species (similarity from 89.7 to 92.2% in all the pairwise comparisons). In contrast, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa8 belong to the same species (intergenomic similarity of 96%) and these along with vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 belong to the same genera (intergenomic similarity of 70% in all the pairwise comparisons). Finally, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6 and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 belong to the same genera (intergenomic similarity of 90.6%). A complete heat map was obtained with VIRIDIC (Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).

Despite the similarity of vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 with temperate phages belonging to the Bosavirus genus and the detection of a gene very similar to a putative integrase gene predicted in the genome of Xanthomonas phage Bosa, lifestyle prediction by PhageAI (32) and Bacphlip (33) showed them to be virulent (Table 2). Specifically, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 was predicted to be virulent with a probability higher than 85% by both software packages, whereas PhageAI and Bacphlip differ slightly more when analyzing vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5 and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6.

TABLE 2.

Lifestyle prediction of phages vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 and probability of vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 phages being virulent as assessed by two different software packages of lifestyle prediction (PhageAI and Bacphlip)

Xanthomonas phage PhageAI prediction Bacphlip prediction
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 Virulent (100.00%) Virulent (96.15%)
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2 Virulent (88.00%) Virulent (52.50%)
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa3 Virulent (93.47%) Virulent (100.00%)
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa4 Virulent (88.30%) Virulent (98.75%)
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5 Virulent (66.64%) Virulent (95.00%)
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6 Virulent (99.21%) Virulent (78.75%)
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7 Virulent (93.47%) Virulent (98.75%)
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa8 Virulent (100%) Virulent (99.17%)
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa9 Virulent (89.46%) Virulent (89.50%)
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 Virulent (99.33%) Virulent (86.25%)
vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11 Virulent (100.00%) Virulent (85.00%)

DISCUSSION

In the last years, reports on phage biocontrol of plant-pathogenic bacteria are arising (6, 34, 35). However, there is still a long way to reduce the use of agrochemicals and to integrate phage as a valuable tool in management programs. The great biodiversity of phages in nature, being the most variable and abundant biological entities in the biosphere, makes very different niches an important source of phages. The isolation of new phages from the environment will help to implement novel strategies to combat pathogenic bacteria, as an ecofriendly alternative, preserving the microbiome of the plant ecosystem and leaving no residues. This approach requires specific protocols for phage hunting and characterization of novel viruses and an understanding of the emergence of phage-resistant clones and the infectivity of other bacterial species. In the present work, we have isolated and characterized 11 X. arboricola pv. juglandis phages, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa11, with strong lytic activity against several plant-pathogenic Xanthomonas species, causal agents of many important crop diseases that produce economically significant losses worldwide. All the phages were isolated from wastewater samples from the metropolitan area of Valencia (Spain), and an isolate X. arboricola pv. juglandis was used as the primary host. After purification of the phages that showed different plaque morphology or from different sampling times, in depth characterization of the phages was performed, including phenotypic and genomic characterization. vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7 was the most divergent phage, showing only 4% similarity with previously reported viruses. The closest phage, within the Pradovirus genus, included interesting phages capable of lysing the major pathogen Xylella fastidiosa (25). However, our results suggested that any of the isolated Xanthomonas phages were able to lyse X. fastidiosa strains.

Previous work isolating phages against X. arboricola pv. juglandis reported 26 phages from plant material, all belonging to the Podoviridae and Siphoviridae families by electron micrographs but with no genomic data available (14). All of them were capable of infecting bacterial species other than Xanthomonas spp., suggesting broad-range infection and reducing their potential use as biocontrol agents. Recently, 24 phages were isolated from soil samples and infected walnut plants, but only two of them were selected for characterization, and no infectivity test in other bacteria was done (13). Again, one of these phages belonged to the Podoviridae family and the other belonged to the Siphoviridae family. Here, we have isolated a total of 11 phages from wastewater samples, and 4 of them (vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa2, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa4, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa7, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa9) belong to the Autographiviridae family. So far, these phages represent the first phages isolated against X. arboricola pv. juglandis belonging to a different family. Moreover, all of these phages are highly specific, since they have not been able to infect any of the 19 isolates of different phytopathogenic bacteria tested, which makes them good candidates for use in biocontrol of walnut blight disease.

Phage biocontrol requires the use of lytic phages to combat pathogenic bacteria without disturbing the microbiome of the plant and reducing secondary effects in the plant and the ecosystem (36). Lysogenic phages can transduce genetic material from one bacterium to another and have implications in terms of resistance or other virulence factors (37). For these reasons, it is important to detect potential proteins involved in lysogeny in phage genomes. In this regard, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa5, vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa6, and vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 encode a putative integrase, suggesting that they may be capable of lysogenic conversion. However, lifestyle prediction of these phages with two different software packages suggested that they are strictly lytic, as observed in semisolid and liquid cultures, in terms of plaque formation and inhibition of growth. In addition, the characterization of the cyanophage S-TIP37 demonstrated that the presence of an integrase does not imply a lysogenic life cycle (38). Despite these results, further research in this direction should be done to determine the lysogenic potential of the phages and the actual involvement of temperate phase in the life cycle of these phages.

Another important feature of phages for biocontrol is their specificity, usually limited to certain strains within a particular bacterial species. However, some polyvalent phages are capable of infecting different species within the same genus (39), as is the case of the phages isolated in this study, with vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa10 being the phage with the broadest range. Nevertheless, differences in the host range of the phages within the xanthomonads group suggest variability within phages, as previously reported (13, 14). This diversity in phage response is not surprising considering the enormous genetic diversity of Xanthomonas spp. In fact, high genome plasticity has been demonstrated in several xanthomonads, pointing to mechanisms of adaptation and selection (8). Differences in cell wall receptors in susceptible and phage-resistant strains for the phages may be responsible, although other factors, such as postentry resistance mechanisms, may also be involved, which requires further investigation. Although phage biocontrol can be used as an ad hoc strategy to specifically control a given pathogenic bacterium, the phages isolated in the present study are able to lyse bacteria belonging to the same pathovar from different origins, suggesting the potential of these phages to control multiple Xanthomonas strains over the world. Interestingly, none of the nonxanthomonad bacteria tested were susceptible to the phages, indicating a genus specificity that could be useful for biocontrol of xanthomonads.

To develop a phage biocontrol tool, phage cocktails are an interesting solution to broaden the spectrum of action and also counteract bacterial resistance. Cocktails should contain phages capable of recognizing different strains, with the objective of constituting a useful strategy to control pathogenic bacteria (40). Thus, a phage cocktail could be designed based on the range host matrix obtained in this work to specifically control different pathogenic Xanthomonas spp. The other possible function of phage cocktails is to reduce or delay the emergence of bacterial phage-resistant clones, although it has been shown that some resistant clones are avirulent in vivo (41, 42). Here, we have tested a phage cocktail encompassing the 11 phages in the primary bacterial host in the bacterium used for phage hunting to prevent the emergence of resistant clones. In fact, the cocktail delayed the emergence of phage-resistant clones beyond 60 h. However, future in vivo analysis might determine differences in resistance emergence or in infectivity using other phytopathogenic hosts.

Conclusions.

Although much research remains to be done to develop a phage biocontrol product against phytopathogenic xanthomonads, this work represents a step forward in the understanding of phage diversity and infectivity. Here, 11 Xanthomonas phages with strong lytic activity against plant-pathogenic species have been characterized in depth. Their potential as biocontrol agents is still incipient, but their properties in terms of host range and lytic activity place them as a promising tool. In addition, phages can be used as diagnostic tools, and bacterial typing based on phage specificity may be another strategy to exploit phages to monitor plant pathogens and adopt appropriate control measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates and growth conditions.

X. arboricola pv. juglandis IVIA 1317-1a, isolated from a diseased walnut at Badajoz province (Spain) in 1993, was used as a primary host to isolate phages. Additionally, 46 bacterial isolates belonging to several species of Xanthomonas and 19 isolates of other phytopathogenic bacterial species were used (Table S1 in the supplemental material). All bacteria were routinely grown at 25 to 28°C (depending on the bacterial species) in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth under shaking conditions.

Bacteriophage isolation, purification, amplification, and concentration.

Sewage samples from two wastewater treatment plants from the Valencia metropolitan area (Spain), belonging to the Entidad Pública de Saneamiento de Aguas Residuales (EPSAR) from the Valencian region, were used for phage hunting using strain IVIA 1317-1a as a primary host. Wastewater samples were centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 10 min at room temperature and filtered twice through 0.45- and 0.22-μm syringe filters to remove large particles, including bacterial cells and cellular debris. Then, 1-mL aliquots of the filtered samples were added to 100 μL of overnight cultures of the strain IVIA 1317-1a in stationary phase, and the mixture was poured onto petri dishes using the soft agar overlay method. Plates were incubated at 25°C for 24 h to allow phage plaques to develop. Isolated plaques were picked by micropipette aspiration using filter tips, and a triple plaque-to-plaque transfer was performed to generate pure phage isolates. Cleaned phage stocks were kept at 4°C.

Amplification of the phages was performed in liquid cultures of the bacteria. Briefly, 500 μL of IVIA 1317-1a culture at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.2 were mixed with 10 μL of the cleaned phage stock to amplify it, and the mix was incubated for up to 24 h at 25°C and 250 rpm. Then, cultures with phages were centrifuged (13,000 × g for 3 min), and the supernatants were filtered (0.22-μm filter). Lysates were serially diluted and titrated to verify the amplification. To obtain high-titer lysates, amplified phages were filtered through 0.22-μm filters and concentrated by high-speed centrifugation (70,000 × g for 2.5 h). For each phage, the pellet was resuspended in 200 μL of SM buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 8 mM MgSO4•7H2O, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.01% gelatin [w/v]) and kept at −70°C for further analysis.

Transmission electron microscopy.

To determine phage morphology, purified high-titer phages in SM buffer were analyzed. Briefly, the glow discharge technique (30 s at 7.2 V using a Bal-Tec MED 020 coating system) was applied over carbon-coated copper grids, and grids were immediately placed on top of sample drops for 10 min. After two brief washes in distilled water, samples were contrasted with 2% uranyl acetate for 5 min. Excess fluid was removed and allowed to dry before examination with a transmission electron FEI Tecnai G2 Spirit microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, OR, USA). All images were acquired using Radius software (version 2.1) with a digital camera Xarosa (EMSIS, Münster, Germany).

Phage host range.

The spot assay method on the surface of double-layer agar plates was used to determine the host range of the isolated phages with 63 isolates encompassing different phytopathogenic bacterial species. Challenged bacteria in the exponential growth phase (100 μL) were mixed with 3.5 mL of soft LB agar (0.7%) and poured on top of a bottom layer containing 1.5% agar. A drop of 1 μL of each amplified phage at 109 PFU/mL was spotted onto bacterial lawns, followed by overnight incubation at the optimal growth temperature for each bacterial isolate. Plates were visually examined for lysis-cleared zones after 24 to 48 h, and the presence of a clear zone in the spot area was considered evidence of bacterial susceptibility to the tested phages. Three replicates were performed to ensure reproducibility of the results.

Bacterial growth curves.

Growth curves of the strain IVIA 1317-1a in the presence and absence of each phage in liquid cultures were performed to determine the ability of the phages to lyse host bacteria. The strain IVIA 1317-1a was grown in LB broth overnight, and the OD600 was adjusted to 0.2 (approximately equivalent to 108 CFU/mL) using fresh LB broth. A volume of 20 μL of the refreshed culture was inoculated into 178 μL of LB broth with 2 μL of each phage at 109 PFU/mL (resulting in a final bacterial inoculum of 107 CFU/mL). Control bacterial cultures in the absence of phage were generated in parallel. Growth curves were recorded in 96-well plates with Bioscreen C Pro (Bioscreen, Finland) equipment at 25°C, and OD600 measurements were acquired every 30 min across 112 h. All experiments were done in triplicate.

DNA extraction and genome sequencing of the phages.

DNA was extracted from 10 μL of high-titer lysates by treating with DNase I to remove nonencapsidated DNA, followed by purification using the commercial DNA Clean & Concentrator 5 kit (Zymo), and DNA was quantified using Qubit. DNA was tagged for library preparation using a Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit, and samples were sequenced using the MiSeq Illumina platform (250 paired-end reads). Quality assessment of the reads was performed using the fastp program (min_length: 50; trim_qual_right: 30; trim_qual_type: mean; trim_qual_window: 10) (43). The resulting reads were assembled with SPAdes v3.13.1 (-only-assembly mode) (19). Contigs with less than 1,000 bp or corresponding to host contamination were discarded, leading to one large contig with high k-mer coverage per sample. Read coverage of the final contig was obtained by mapping reads using bbmap.sh (44). BLAST (20) against the nucleotide database was used to find the closest relative of each genome.

Genomic characterization, comparative genomics, and lifestyle prediction of the phages.

Because of the transposon-based library preparation, the packaging strategy of the phages could not be predicted. Alternatively, and due to the absence of a close relative common to all the phages, the large terminase subunit, a conserved gene through all the phages, was searched by an initial annotation and fixed as the start point to reorder the genomes. The reorganized genomes were checked for assembly errors with Pilon (45) and reannotated with MultiPhATE2 (46) using Phanotate (21), Prodigal (22), and Glimmer (23) to generate a consensus gene call. BLAST (20) against the RefSeq protein database (minimum identity of 60%) was done to perform the functional analysis. Predicted ORFs without functional annotation were analyzed with CD-Search (47) using the CDD (E value threshold of 0.01) to predict conserved protein domains. The resulting annotation was manually refined, and annotated genomes were compared by BLAST (20) and represented using gggenomes (48).

To better understand the relatedness of our isolated phages between each other and previously described viruses, phages phylogenetically related to the closest relatives of isolated phages by NCBI Taxonomy were selected. To perform a single-gene phylogenetic analysis, amino acid sequences of the DNA polymerases were aligned using ClustalW (47). The best substitution model for the alignment was predicted using ProtTest 3 (49) and used to construct a maximum likelihood phylogeny with 1000 fast bootstrap pseudoreplicates in IQ-TREE (50). The best tree was represented with ITOL (51), fixing the root in the midpoint and deleting branches with a value of bootstrap lower than 90. Additionally, complete genomes of selected phages were downloaded and analyzed along with the isolated phage genomes by running VIRIDIC (52) (95% and 70% thresholds for virus delimitation in species and genera). Clusters generated by VIRIDIC were plotted using RAWGraphs (53).

Due to the similarity and phylogenetic relatedness of some of our isolated phages to temperate phages, lifestyle prediction was performed by using PhageAI (32) and Bacphlip (33).

Data availability.

The sequences of the isolated phages vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1-11 are available in GenBank under the accession numbers ON911538, ON911539, ON911540, ON932078, ON932079, ON932080, ON932081, ON932082, ON932083, ON932084, and ON932085, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Augusto Montamarta and Ignacio García (Entitat de Sanejament d’Aigües, Generalitat Valenciana) for access to wastewater treatment plants and Sonia Tristante and María José Tárrega for wastewater sampling.

This work was funded by project SEJIGENT/2021/014, funded by Conselleria d’Innovació, Universitats, Ciència I Societat Digital (Generalitat Valenciana), to P.D.-C. and grant number 727987 XF-ACTORS (Xylella fastidiosa Active Containment Through a Multidisciplinary-Oriented Research Strategy) from European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program and IVIA/52202D, Sostenible, funded by Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Generalitat, Valenciana to E.M.-N. P.D.-C. was financially supported by a Ramón y Cajal contract RYC2019-028015-I funded by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.

P.D.-C. and E.M.-N. designed and directed the research. M.L.D.-C. participated in the study design and performed the experiments. C.M.A. participated in the experiments. M.B.-G. performed the bioinformatics analysis. M.L.D.-C. wrote the manuscript. E.M.-N. and P.D.-C. analyzed the data and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

We declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Supplemental material. Download spectrum.02960-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.5 MB (479.8KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 2
Table S1. Download spectrum.02960-22-s0002.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (12.3KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 3
Table S2. Download spectrum.02960-22-s0003.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.05 MB (50.9KB, xlsx)

Contributor Information

E. Marco-Noales, Email: marco_est@gva.es.

P. Domingo-Calap, Email: pilar.domingo@uv.es.

Olaya Rendueles Garcia, Institut Pasteur.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Marin VR, Ferrarezi JH, Vieira G, Sass DC. 2019. Recent advances in the biocontrol of Xanthomonas spp. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 35:72. doi: 10.1007/s11274-019-2646-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oerke E-C. 2006. Crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci 144:31–43. doi: 10.1017/S0021859605005708. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sundin GW, Castiblanco LF, Yuan X, Zeng Q, Yang C-H. 2016. Bacterial disease management: challenges, experience, innovation and future prospects. Mol Plant Pathol 17:1506–1518. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sundin GW, Wang N. 2018. Antibiotic resistance in plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 56:161–180. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417-045946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.La Torre A, Iovino V, Caradonia F. 2018. Copper in plant protection: current situation and prospects. Phytopathol Mediterr 57:201–236. doi: 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-23407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stefani E, Obradović A, Gašić K, Altin I, Nagy IK, Kovács T. 2021. Bacteriophage-mediated control of phytopathogenic xanthomonads: a promising green solution for the future. Microorganisms 9:1056. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9051056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Domingo-Calap P, Delgado-Martínez J. 2018. Bacteriophages: protagonists of a post-antibiotic era. Antibiotics (Basel) 7:66. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics7030066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Timilsina S, Potnis N, Newberry EA, Liyanapathiranage P, Iruegas-Bocardo F, White FF, Goss EM, Jones JB. 2020. Xanthomonas diversity, virulence and plant-pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 18:415–427. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0361-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kałużna M, Fischer-Le Saux M, Pothier JF, Jacques MA, Obradović A, Tavares F, Stefani E. 2021. Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis and pv. corylina: brothers or distant relatives? Genetic clues, epidemiology, and insights for disease management. Mol Plant Pathol 22:1481–1499. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lamichhane JR. 2014. Xanthomonas arboricola diseases of stone fruit, almond, and walnut trees: progress toward understanding and management. Plant Dis 98:1600–1610. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-14-0831-FE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mallmann WL, Hemstreet C. 1924. Isolation of an inhibitory substance from plants. J Agric Res 28:599–602. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nakayinga R, Makumi A, Tumuhaise V, Tinzaara W. 2021. Xanthomonas bacteriophages: a review of their biology and biocontrol applications in agriculture. BMC Microbiol 21:291. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02351-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dömötör D, Frank T, Rákhely G, Doffkay Z, Schneider G, Kovács T. 2016. Comparative analysis of two bacteriophages of Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis. Infect Genet Evol 43:371–377. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Romero-Suarez S, Jordan B, Heinemann JA. 2012. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages infecting Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis, the causal agent of walnut blight disease. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1917–1927. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0992-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ibrahim YE, Saleh AA, Al-Saleh MA. 2017. Management of Asiatic citrus canker under field conditions in Saudi Arabia using bacteriophages and acibenzolar-S-methyl. Plant Dis 101:761–765. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-16-1213-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Marquioni V, Rossi FPN, Mendonça DC, Martins LF, Behlau F, Setubal JC, da Silva AM, Novo-Mansur MTM. 2022. Isolation and characterization of vB_XciM_LucasX, a new jumbo phage that infects Xanthomonas citri and Xanthomonas fuscans. PLoS One 17:e0266891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Erdrich SH, Sharma V, Schurr U, Arsova B, Frunzke J. 2022. Isolation of novel Xanthomonas phages infecting the plant pathogens X. translucens and X. campestris. Viruses 14:1449. doi: 10.3390/v14071449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ranjani P, Gowthami Y, Gnanamanickam SS, Palani P. 2018. Bacteriophages: a new weapon for the control of bacterial blight disease in rice caused by Xanthomonas oryzae. Microbiol Biotechnol 46:346–359. doi: 10.4014/mbl.1807.07009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McNair K, Zhou C, Dinsdale EA, Souza B, Edwards RA. 2019. PHANOTATE: a novel approach to gene identification in phage genomes. Bioinformatics 35:4537–4542. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. 2004. CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res 32:W327–W331. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ahern SJ, Das M, Bhowmick TS, Young R, Gonzalez CF. 2014. Characterization of novel virulent broad-host-range phages of Xylella fastidiosa and Xanthomonas. J Bacteriol 196:459–471. doi: 10.1128/JB.01080-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Karumidze N, Thomas JA, Kvatadze N, Goderdzishvili M, Hakala KW, Weintraub ST, Alavidze Z, Hardies SC. 2012. Characterization of lytic Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophages via biological properties and genomic sequences. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94:1609–1617. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4119-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang Z, Zhang F, Liang Y, Zheng K, Gu C, Zhang W, Liu Y, Zhang X, Shao H, Jiang Y, Guo C, He H, Wang H, Sung YY, Mok WJ, Wong LL, He J, McMinn A, Wang M. 2021. Genome and ecology of a novel alteromonas podovirus, ZP6, representing a new viral genus, mareflavirus. Microbiology Spectrum 9. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00463-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Flores V, Sepúlveda-Robles O, Cazares A, Kameyama L, Guarneros G. 2017. Comparative genomic analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa phage PaMx25 reveals a novel siphovirus group related to phages infecting hosts of different taxonomic classes. Archives of Virology 162:2345–2355. doi: 10.1007/s00705-017-3366-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Martínez E, Campos-Gómez J. 2016. Pf filamentous phage requires UvrD for replication in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mSphere 1:e00104-15. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00104-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Clavijo-Coppens F, Ginet N, Cesbron S, Briand M, Jacques MA, Ansaldi M. 2021. Novel virulent bacteriophages infecting Mediterranean isolates of the plant pest Xylella fastidiosa and Xanthomonas albilineans. Viruses 13:725. doi: 10.3390/v13050725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Peters DL, McCutcheon JG, Dennis JJ. 2020. Characterization of novel broad-host-range bacteriophage DLP3 specific to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as a potential therapeutic agent. Front Microbiol 11:1358. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tynecki P, Arkadiusz G, Kazimierczak J, Jadczuk M, Dastych J, Onisko A. 2020. PhageAI—bacteriophage life cycle recognition with machine learning and natural language processing. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.11.198606. [DOI]
  • 33.Hockenberry AJ, Wilke CO. 2021. BACPHLIP: predicting bacteriophage lifestyle from conserved protein domains. PeerJ 9:e11396. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shitrit D, Hackl T, Laurenceau R, Raho N, Carlson MCG, Sabehi G, Schwartz DA, Chisholm SW, Lindell D. 2022. Genetic engineering of marine cyanophages reveals integration but not lysogeny in T7-like cyanophages. ISME J 16:488–499. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01085-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Buttimer C, McAuliffe O, Ross RP, Hill C, O’Mahony J, Coffey A. 2017. Bacteriophages and bacterial plant diseases. Front Microbiol 8:34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Holtappels D, Fortuna K, Lavigne R, Wagemans J. 2021. The future of phage biocontrol in integrated plant protection for sustainable crop production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 68:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vu NT, Oh C-S. 2020. Bacteriophage usage for bacterial disease management and diagnosis in plants. Plant Pathol J 36:204–217. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.RW.04.2020.0074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Colavecchio A, Cadieux B, Lo A, Goodridge LD. 2017. Bacteriophages contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance genes among foodborne pathogens of the Enterobacteriaceae family—a review. Front Microbiol 8:1108. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Weinbauer MG. 2004. Ecology of prokaryotic viruses. FEMS Microbiol Rev 28:127–181. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Koskella B, Meaden S. 2013. Understanding bacteriophage specificity in natural microbial communities. Viruses 5:806–823. doi: 10.3390/v5030806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Filippov AA, Sergueev KV, He Y, Huang X-Z, Gnade BT, Mueller AJ, Fernandez-Prada CM, Nikolich MP. 2011. Bacteriophage-resistant mutants in Yersinia pestis: identification of phage receptors and attenuation for mice. PLoS One 6:e25486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Oechslin F. 2018. Resistance development to bacteriophages occurring during bacteriophage therapy. Viruses 10:351. doi: 10.3390/v10070351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bushnell B. 2014. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, CA. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ecale Zhou CL, Kimbrel J, Edwards R, McNair K, Souza BA, Malfatti S. 2021. MultiPhATE2: code for functional annotation and comparison of phage genomes. G3 (Bethesda) 11:jkab074. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hackl T, Ankenbrand M. 2022. gggenomes: a grammar of graphic for comparative genomics. https://thackl.github.io/gggenomes/. Accessed 14 October 2022.
  • 49.Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2011. ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 27:1164–1165. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen LT, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2016. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W232–W235. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Letunic I, Bork P. 2021. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Moraru C, Varsani A, Kropinski AM. 2020. VIRIDIC—a novel tool to calculate the intergenomic similarities of prokaryote-infecting viruses. Viruses 12:1268. doi: 10.3390/v12111268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mauri M, Elli T, Caviglia G, Uboldi G, Azzi M. 2017. RAWGraphs: a visualisation platform to create open outputs, p. 28:1–28:5. In Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter. ACM, New York, NY, USA. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Supplemental material. Download spectrum.02960-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.5 MB (479.8KB, pdf)

Supplemental file 2

Table S1. Download spectrum.02960-22-s0002.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (12.3KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 3

Table S2. Download spectrum.02960-22-s0003.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.05 MB (50.9KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The sequences of the isolated phages vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1 to vB_Xar_IVIA-DoCa1-11 are available in GenBank under the accession numbers ON911538, ON911539, ON911540, ON932078, ON932079, ON932080, ON932081, ON932082, ON932083, ON932084, and ON932085, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES