Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2022 Nov 21;10(6):e03421-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03421-22

Characterization and DNA Stable-Isotope Probing of Methanotrophic Bioaerosols

Kevin P Dillon a, Valdis Krumins a, Aishwarya Deshpande b, Lee J Kerkhof c, Gediminas Mainelis a, Donna E Fennell a,
Editor: Kristen M DeAngelisd
PMCID: PMC9769660  PMID: 36409096

ABSTRACT

The growth and activity of bacteria have been extensively studied in nearly every environment on Earth, but there have been limited studies focusing on the air. Suspended bacteria (outside of water droplets) may stay in the atmosphere for time frames that could allow for growth on volatile compounds, including the potent greenhouse gas methane. We investigated the ability of aerosolized methanotrophic bacteria to grow on methane in the airborne state in rotating gas-phase bioreactors. The physical half-life of the aerial bacterium-sized particles was 3 days. To assess the potential for airborne growth, gas-phase bioreactors containing the aerosolized cultures were amended with 1,500 ppmv 13CH4 or 12CH4. Three of seven experiments demonstrated 13C incorporation into DNA, indicating growth in air. Bacteria associated with the genera Methylocystis and Methylocaldum were detected in 13C-DNA fractions, thus indicating that they were synthesizing new DNA, suggesting growth in air. We conclude that methanotrophs outside of water droplets in the air can potentially grow under certain conditions. Based on our data, humidity seems to be a major limitation to bacterial growth in air. Furthermore, low biomass levels can pose problems for detecting 13C-DNA synthesis in our experimental system.

IMPORTANCE Currently, the cellular activities of bacteria in the airborne state outside of water droplets have not been heavily studied. Evidence suggests that these airborne bacteria produce ribosomes and metabolize gaseous compounds. Despite having a potentially important impact on atmospheric chemistry, the ability of bacteria in the air to metabolize substrates such as methane is not well understood. Demonstrating that bacteria in the air can metabolize and grow on substrates will expand knowledge about the potential activities and functions of the atmospheric microbiome. This study provides evidence for DNA synthesis and, ultimately, growth of airborne methanotrophs.

KEYWORDS: bacterial growth, aerobiology, methane oxidation, humidity, water availability

INTRODUCTION

Microbes are important mediators of elemental cycling in nearly all environments in which they are present. However, it is not known if microbes participate in elemental cycling in the alfresco atmosphere. There are 104 to 105 microbes/m3 of air (1) in the atmosphere that are derived from various sources and return to the Earth’s surface through wet or dry deposition (2). In the atmosphere, microbes can be suspended in water droplets (e.g., clouds), adhered to particles, or suspended planktonically in air. While mixed with water droplets, microbes in clouds have the potential to affect in situ cloud physics and chemistry (3) and cloud water can support microbial growth (4). In laboratory experiments, it has been demonstrated that microbes in airborne water droplets can metabolize glucose (5), synthesize new DNA (6), and divide (7, 8). However, the major part of the atmosphere does not contain water droplets, and the bacteria are usually either attached to particles or present as single cells suspended in air (9). It has been found that bacteria associated with larger particles in the air were less viable on average than single bacterial cells in the air (10).

Recent studies have indicated that microorganisms that are suspended in the air outside of water droplets have the potential to be active. Bacteria adhered to Saharan dust were thought to actively metabolize nitrogenous compounds (11). Furthermore, airborne bacteria in urban and indoor environments were determined to have active enzymes (1214). Additionally, bacteria present in outdoor air have elevated RNA/DNA ratios, which indicates potential cellular activity (1517). This activity could involve cellular maintenance, stress responses, substrate metabolism, or possibly growth. When supplied with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and humid conditions, airborne bacteria are able to synthesize ribosomes (18), which is a prerequisite for growth. Various VOCs in the air are present at sufficient concentrations for microbial growth (19). Based upon this, the atmosphere could be an environment in which microorganisms metabolize VOCs and grow.

To study microbial activity and growth, various techniques are used that range from “omic” analyses (3, 20) and enzymatic assays (13, 21) to the incorporation of stable isotopes (e.g., 13C) (22, 23). A common application of the latter approach is DNA stable-isotope probing (DNA-SIP), which is used to study microbial growth on a specific substrate (24). The microbes need to produce new DNA and replicate, typically twice, to be detected by DNA-SIP. The doubling time of microbes in the natural environment has been estimated based on the combination of accumulated mutations and measured mutation rates to be between 1 and 25 h for certain model organisms (25). Microbes can be suspended in the atmosphere for days to weeks, depending on the characteristics of aerosolized cells and meteorological conditions (26), which allows enough time for theoretical microbial growth in the atmosphere. Single cells in the atmosphere have access to volatile compounds, making the question of their ability to grow on these compounds pertinent.

An important gas that has been increasing in concentration over the last few decades due to anthropogenic activities is methane, the concentration of which is over 1,800 ppb on average in the atmosphere (27, 28). However, there are methane hot spots in which the ambient local methane concentration can be increased by thousands of parts per billion, depending upon local emissions and meteorological conditions (29). The main sink for methane in the atmosphere is reactions with radicals (30). However, an important sink for this gas in terrestrial and aquatic systems is biological, through the activity of methane-oxidizing bacteria (methanotrophs) (31), which are common in soils, rice paddies, and the phyllosphere (32, 33). Among methanotrophs, the most well known are within the orders Methylococcales (Gammaproteobacteria) and Rhizobiales (Alphaproteobacteria), which are also referred to as type I and type II methanotrophs, respectively (34). Beyond phylogeny, these groups differ according to cellular structure and biochemistry (35). Methanotrophs can also be categorized depending upon the concentration of methane that they can oxidize. High-affinity methanotrophs can oxidize methane at low concentrations (e.g., atmospheric levels), while low-affinity methanotrophs oxidize methane at higher concentrations. High-affinity methanotrophs include the USCα clade of type II methanotrophs, such as Methylocapsa gorgona MG08, which can grow on atmospheric concentrations of methane (36). Some methanotrophs can oxidize atmospheric methane concentrations when first provided a higher concentration of methane (37). As a result, the concentration of methane in the environment dictates the types of methanotrophs that are able to oxidize it.

The presence of methanotrophs in these different environments has wide-ranging implications for the Earth’s methane budget (31). From wetland soils to tree bark, methanotrophs can be important removers of methane (33, 38). Methanotrophs can also be found in the atmosphere and have been demonstrated to be active under cloud-like conditions (39). As discussed, various heterotrophic bacteria can be active in the air, so it is possible that airborne methanotrophs oxidize and grow on methane in the air outside of water droplets (40). The goal of this study was to address this possibility. We sought to characterize bioaerosol particles produced from methanotrophic enrichment cultures and to determine by DNA-based SIP if methanotrophs synthesize 13C-DNA in the airborne state when provided with 13C-methane. Because DNA synthesis represents the final process before cellular division, our findings provide strong evidence that aerosolized methanotrophs can grow while suspended in the air.

RESULTS

Enrichment of methanotrophs.

Microbial growth was observed in both the air and maple leaf enrichment cultures on 4% (vol/vol) methane by measuring a decrease in methane concentrations and an increase in optical density at 600 nm (OD600) (see Fig. S1A and S1B in the supplemental material). Community analyses (Fig. 1) indicated that 41% of the 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) in the air culture were related to the family Methylococcaceae (type I methanotroph). In the maple leaf enrichment culture, 18% of the 16S rRNA gene ASVs were related to the Methylocystaceae (type II methanotroph) (Fig. 1A). The remainder of the community was related to taxa not known to be methanotrophs. Among these other taxa, the methylotrophic Methylobacteriaceae were present at about 0.5% in the air culture only. Members of this family are not methanotrophic but are known to metabolize other compounds in the methane oxidation pathway (e.g., methanol). Various other heterotrophic bacteria were present in the enrichment cultures (Fig. 1A). Based upon pmoA gene sequences, the air enrichment culture contained Methylocystis and Methylocaldum, while the maple leaf enrichment culture contained only Methylocystis (Fig. 1B).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Bacterial compositions of the methanotrophic air enrichment and methanotrophic maple leaf enrichment cultures. (A) Relative abundances of the different ASVs at the family level based upon partial 16S rRNA gene sequences. (B) Compositions of the cultures at the genus level for methanotrophs present in the cultures based upon partial pmoA gene sequences.

Bioaerosol particle behavior.

When the cultures were aerosolized into the bioreactors, the particles increased in concentration over time (Fig. 2A). Particle size distributions are presented as the number of particles normalized to the logarithmic difference between the upper and lower size bins. The particle size distribution reached a potential dynamic equilibrium at 25 min (Fig. 2A). The particle size distribution peaked in the 0.5- to 0.7-μm size bin, with a midpoint optical diameter of 0.6 μm. However, the particles in this size bin could be salts from the growth medium, as well as bacteria. We found that even if the cell suspension was washed three times with sterile water, thus removing salts, the particle size distribution value in the 0.5- to 0.7-μm size bin was the greatest (Fig. S2). This value was about half of that of the unwashed cell suspension (Fig. S2). Based upon this observation, bacteria were likely detected in this size bin for optical diameter.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Bioaerosol characteristics. Two gas-phase bioreactors rotating at 1 rpm were filled with bioaerosols of a mixture of a methanotrophic air enrichment and S. aerolata NW12 for 30 min in 5-min increments. (A) Bioaerosols are characterized by the filling profile showing particle size distribution in the bioreactors; (B) physical retention (half-life) of particles in different particle size bins over a 5-day period; (C) average particle size distribution at days 0 and 5.

Once particles were introduced into the bioreactors, the particle half-lives were assessed over a 5-day period (Fig. 2B). The bacterium-sized particles had a half-life (referring to physical retention of particles, not survival) of about 3 days at 3 rpm. The number of particles in the bioreactors decreased daily (Fig. 2C). Based on the size distributions, at day 0 there were 2.3 × 106 ± 1.4 × 105 ΔN/Δlog(d)/L particles and 6.9 × 105 ± 1.9 × 105 ΔN/Δlog(d)/L particles in the 0.5- to 0.7-μm size bin. In particle size distributions, N refers to the concentration of the particles in a specific size bin and d refers to the particle diameter for the same size bin. The particle concentrations for these size distributions are presented in Table S2. Bacteria were culturable on DSMZ 921, a nitrate mineral salts medium, after aerosolization and after 5 days of incubation (Fig. S3). Immediately after aerosolization, the ratio was 1.94 × 10−2 ± 6.37 × 10−3 CFU/particle initially, and it decreased to 3.12 × 10−3 ± 3.19 × 10−4 CFU/particle after 5 days, a significant decrease (P = 1.36 × 10−3) (Fig. S3).

Liquid-phase DNA stable-isotope probing.

To benchmark subsequent experiments in the gas-phase bioreactors using aerosolized cells, we incubated duplicate sets of the air enrichment culture in liquid medium in the presence of [13C]methane or [12C]methane (Fig. 3). This served as a control to ensure that SIP analytical procedures were working under a best-case scenario of high biomass and replicating cells. Sequences of pmoA gene amplicons were classified into ASVs according to association with different genera of methanotrophs, and relative amounts were plotted versus the buoyant density of the fractions. Methylocystis was dominant in DNA recovered from cultures fed [12C]methane and [13C]methane (Fig. 3). Unknown pmoA sequences and pmoA sequences associated with Methylocaldum were detected in trace relative abundances. These PmoA sequences clustered with known Methylocystis and Methylocaldum species in phylogenetic analyses as well (Fig. S4). Based upon our data from the liquid-phase DNA-SIP, we detected 13C-labeled DNA and 12C-labeled DNA. Results of DNA-SIP indicate that methanotrophs were actively growing on methane while in the liquid phase.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Liquid-phase growth of methanotrophs. (A and B) Duplicate sets of the methanotrophic air enrichment culture in liquid medium incubated with 4% [12C]methane or [13C]methane (vol/vol, gas headspace) over 6 days. The 12C- and 13C-labeled DNA was separated by ultracentrifugation and gradient fractionation. The presence of the DNA of methanotrophs across the density gradient was detected by qPCR of the pmoA gene (normalized to the highest copy number of the pmoA gene in a single sample). The pmoA amplicons of fractions at select densities were sequenced, and the relative abundances of different genera were identified as Methylocystis, Methylocaldum, or unknown based upon pmoA sequencing.

Gas-phase DNA stable-isotope probing.

Table 1 provides an overview of the experiments conducted for gas-phase DNA stable-isotope probing. The temperatures in the reactors after aerosolization (day 0) and upon sampling (day 5) ranged from 18 to 24°C. The total amount of DNA (inferred from concentrations) recovered at the end of airborne incubation varied across the experiments. Reactor 1 in experiment 7 had 34.2 ng DNA as the maximum DNA mass, while the DNA amount in experiment 3 was below the detection limit (estimated to be 0.2 ng) of the Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Table 1). After the 5-day incubation period, there were 105 particles/L when the air or maple leaf enrichments were present in the bioreactors. The particles in the reactors were not all bacterial cells, as salts from the growth medium were also present (Fig. S2). The estimated methanotrophic cell numbers are based upon the cumulative total of pmoA genes detected by quantitative PCR (qPCR) for analyzed fractions. After the 5-day incubation period, the number of methanotrophic cells ranged from none detected to a maximum of 3.01 × 105 cells in total for bioreactor 2 of experiment 5 (Table 1). Upon sampling (day 5), the relative humidity in the reactors ranged from 78 to 98% and the absolute humidity ranged from 0.013 to 0.015 kg/m3.

TABLE 1.

DNA-SIP experimental setupa

Expt Culture Reactor C isotope Day 0/day 5 temp (°C) Total DNA mass collected (ng) Day 5 estimated no. of methanotrophic cellsb Day 5 relative humidity (%) Day 5 total no. of particles/L Day 5 absolute humidity (kg/m3)
1 Maple leaf 1 12 24/NAc 16.2 9.05 × 100 NA NA NA
2 13 24/NA 18.3 NDd NA NA NA
2 Maple 1 13 24/24 26 6.40 × 102 81 3.30 × 105 0.018
2 12 24/24 8 3.27 × 101 78 3.73 × 105 0.017
3 Air 1 13 24/19 ND NA 93 NA 0.015
2 12 24/19 ND NA 94 NA 0.015
4 Air 1 13 22/20 3 7.70 × 103 86 3.99 × 105 0.015
2 12 22/21 11.8 1.45 × 105 84 4.29 × 105 0.015
5 Maple leaf 1 12 22/20 14.9 5.51 × 104 80 2.58 × 105 0.014
2 13 22/19 28.6 3.01 × 105 78 2.79 × 105 0.013
6 Maple leaf 1 13 20/NA 23.4 NA NA NA NA
2 12 20/NA 19.2 NA NA NA NA
7 Air 1 12 21/28 34.2 6.14 × 102 86 3.31 × 105 0.013
2 13 20/18 7.4 1.70 × 102 85 3.40 × 105 0.013
a

Details include airborne particle concentrations after 5 days, DNA mass extracted, estimated methanotrophic cells, and humidity present for seven experiments with airborne methanotrophs in duplicate bioreactors amended with either [12C]methane or [13C]methane.

b

Based on number of pmoA genes detected by qPCR, assuming two copies of pmoA in a single methanotrophic cell (74).

c

NA, not available. For experiments 1 and 6, the total number of particles and relative/absolute humidity were unknown; for experiment 6, the DNA extract was compromised.

d

ND, not detected.

Duplicate bioreactor incubations with [12C]- or [13C]methane amendment were carried out through the entire DNA-SIP process for experiments 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7. Note that experiments 3 and 6 were not further processed (Table 1). Sequencing of pmoA gene amplicons was performed for selected fractions. DNA was present and pmoA genes were amplified in fractions with buoyant densities of 1.71 to 1.76 g/mL, with variable normalized pmoA gene copy numbers detected (Fig. 4).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Isotopic incorporation of 13C into DNA from [13C]methane by aerosolized methanotrophic enrichment cultures. Each graph shows the average amounts of pmoA copies determined from technical replicates of a fraction with a specific buoyant density. The pmoA copy number was normalized to the highest copy number of the collected fractions for a sample (left y axis). Amplicons from qPCR of experiments 2 and 4 were sequenced (right y axis), and methanotrophs were identified. (A) Experiment 5; (B) experiment 2; (C) experiment 7; (D) experiment 4.

Detection of growth via DNA-SIP analysis is dictated by detection of DNA at a higher density in a treatment receiving a 13C-labeled growth substrate than of the DNA of a treatment receiving a 12C-labeled growth substrate. Experiments 2, 4, and 5 exhibited a shift in the buoyant density of the DNA in this manner (Fig. 4A, B, and D). More specifically, the density of the 13C-treated samples of experiments 2 and 4 (Fig. 4B and D) have DNA of a similar density as the 13C-treated liquid-phase incubations at about 1.75 g/mL (Fig. 3). We therefore selected some fractions that corresponded with the liquid-phase results and sequenced the pmoA amplicons generated by qPCR. In experiments 2 and 4, pmoA gene ASVs associated with the genera Methylocaldum and Methylocystis were present at higher buoyant density fractions. These ASVs were also present in the less-dense DNA fractions in experiment 4 (Fig. 4D). The predicted PmoA sequences retrieved from heavier fractions also clustered with Methylocystis and Methylocaldum in a phylogenetic tree (Fig. S4). Overall, these results indicate the growth of methanotrophs on methane in the airborne state.

DISCUSSION

Methanotrophic diversity.

Based upon sequenced portions of the 16S rRNA gene and the pmoA gene, the maple leaf and air enrichments contained methanotrophs belonging to the family Methylocystaceae (type II). Additionally, the air enrichment contained members of the family Methylococcaceae (type I). The most dominant ASV of the 16S rRNA sequences of the Methylocystaceae were associated with Methylocystis. Specifically, this genus has been found in upland soils, rice paddies, groundwater, and other environments (41). The dominant ASV of the air enrichment culture was associated with Methylocaldum (type I) and specifically with a phylotype detected in a methanotrophic enrichment culture sampled from air over a landfill, which was able to oxidize methane under cloud-like conditions (39). In general, some members of the Methylocaldum genus are thermotolerant and have been found in various habitats, including landfills, upland soils, and rice paddies (41). It has been shown that the methanotrophs can be tolerant of desiccation during drought-like conditions and exposure to heat (42). Additionally, some methanotrophs form resting states and cysts (43), which could assist with their survival in the atmosphere and aeolian dispersal (39). Type II methanotrophs have been reported to tolerate dynamic and fluctuating desiccative conditions (42, 43), which are common in the phyllosphere and atmosphere. Type I methanotrophs are classified as being able to respond quickly when conditions become favorable and are classified as competitors/competitors-ruderals (44). Ecologically, there are benefits from both sets of attributes in terms of maintaining activity and growth in the atmosphere. Tolerating stress is essential to atmospheric life, but being able to respond quickly when a specific parameter, such as humidity or substrate concentration, becomes more conducive to growth might be beneficial too.

The substrate concentration needs to be adequate for metabolic activity. High- and low-affinity methanotrophs can metabolize and grow on low or high concentrations of methane, respectively. Some methanotrophs, including Methylocystis sp. strain SC2, have two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase that are expressed when exposed to different methane concentrations (45). Some “conventional” methanotrophs that were thought not to be able to oxidize atmospheric levels of methane can do so under certain conditions (37), but they are not known to grow on atmospheric methane. Currently, the only known isolate to grow on atmospheric levels of methane is Methylocapsa gorgona MG08, a type II methanotroph. This isolate is able to oxidize methane at high (e.g., 20% methane) and low atmospheric concentrations, with only a single particulate methane monooxygenase (36). There have been no demonstrated isolates of type I methanotrophs to grow on atmospheric methane. However, USCγ phylotypes were dominant in a cave that functions as a methane sink (46). A nearly complete genome of a Methylocaldum-like bacterium was found in soil in which atmospheric methane was reportedly oxidized (47). In our study, the “experiment 4 13C 1” PmoA sequence had homology to that found in Methylocaldum gracile (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). The PmoA sequences from the airborne SIP experiments were homologous to those from experiments 2 and 4 as well as those from liquids 1 and 2.

Of the seven experiments in this study, only three results demonstrate synthesis of 13C-DNA and, presumably, growth of airborne methanotrophs on [13C]methane. Even though the concentration of methane did not reflect atmospheric concentrations, some methanotrophs (36) may be able to oxidize and grow on higher concentrations of methane, like those in our gas-phase incubation, as well as on lower atmospheric concentrations. Although our airborne incubations were performed at 1,500 ppm methane, almost 1,000 times higher than atmospheric concentrations, the data are still informative. Further work is needed to compare the methane oxidation abilities of type I and II methanotrophs as well as those of high- and low-affinity methanotrophs in the atmosphere at relevant concentrations.

Physical retention of particles.

We aerosolized a mixture of a methanotrophic enrichment culture with Sphingomonas aerolata across multiple experiments into gas-phase bioreactors. As time went on in the process of introducing bioaerosols into the bioreactors, a dynamic equilibrium was reached, indicating that there was a limit to the number of particles that could be introduced into the bioreactors (Fig. 1A). After the introduction of particles, we found that bacterium-sized particles had a half-life of 3 days (Fig. 1B). The physical half-life of particles in rotating drums depends upon various factors, including rotation speed, humidity, and rotating drum design (48). The concentration of different-sized particles in rotating drums decreases over long periods of time through size changes via desiccation, humidification, agglomeration, or disintegration or through settling and impact with the sides of the bioreactor vessel.

Factors affecting culturability.

Over the 5-day period, there was a substantial decrease in the concentration of particles across all size bins (Fig. 2C). However, we were able to cultivate bacteria from bioaerosols recovered from the bioreactors on DSMZ 921 agar when incubated in an anaerobic jar with 30% methane in the air of the jar over a 2-week period, after the 5-day aerial incubation. There was a significant difference in the numbers of culturable bacteria/particle initially and after the 5-day incubation period (Fig. S3). Staphylococcus epidermidis remained culturable after being suspended in a rotating drum for 5 days at 76% humidity (49). Sphingomonas aerolata remained culturable after 2 days at relative humidities between 81% and 97% in a previous study (18) that used the same gas-phase bioreactors described here. The present study demonstrated the survival of bacteria in air when the relative humidity was adjusted daily to be at least 95% (Fig. S3).

In our system, a variety of factors could affect culturability. The methods employed in experimental aerobiology to generate bioaerosols can negatively affect the integrity of the bacterial cell and, thus, culturability and growth potential. To decrease this, we utilized a single-pass aerosol generator (SPAG), which relative to conventional aerosolization methods was found to be the least damaging to bacteria (50). There was a decrease in the culturability of airborne bacteria based upon the ratio of culturable bacteria to particles in the 0.5- to 0.7-μm size bin. However, there are also salts present in the size bin, making a 1:1 ratio impossible (Fig. S2). Although washing the cell suspensions prior to aerosolization removes the salts, thus giving a more accurate bacteria-to-particle ratio, this imposes osmotic stress upon the bacteria. This imposed stress would negatively affect the growth potential of airborne cells. Benchmarking the number of culturable cells to the total number of cells would give insight about the culturable, the viable but nonculturable, and total populations.

In the environment, while microbes/bioaerosol particles are suspended in the air, they are subjected to numerous processes and stressors that age them. This aging process is driven by a variety of physical and chemical processes, all of which can affect the particle size and viability of the microbes (51, 52). For instance, the viability of Escherichia coli in a rotating drum was affected by solar radiation, humidity, ozone, and VOCs, which are part of the aging process in the alfresco atmosphere (53). In the experiments described here, bioaerosols were incubated in the dark, so humidity may be the primary environmental factor affecting the airborne cells in our study. Previous work has demonstrated that humidity has a large effect on bacterial culturability (5456). The ability to respond to changing osmotic environments is important for the survival of airborne bacteria (57). During the incubation time in the experiments described here, humidity will affect the size of the particle and the amount of water associated with the bioaerosol particle (58), which could have implications for bacterial growth.

Growth of methanotrophs in air.

The ability of a bacterium to grow in air depends on favorable conditions for growth and whether its residence time in air is long enough for the process of growth to occur. During the gas-phase incubations in this study, bacterium-sized particles had a half-life of about 3 days due to gravitational settling and impact with the sides of the bioreactor vessel. Mesophilic bacteria related to Methylocystis and Methylocaldum have growth rates between 0.068 and 0.074 h−1 at 30°C (45) and between 0.049 and 0.057 h−1 at 25°C (59), respectively, under optimal conditions in the liquid phase. Based upon this taxonomic association, the methanotrophic bacteria in the enrichment cultures utilized in this study had enough time to grow over the 5-day period, if conditions were favorable.

We conducted DNA stable-isotope experiments across seven experiments with two different methanotrophic enrichment cultures mixed with S. aerolata. Results from three experiments indicated that the airborne methanotrophs grew on [13C]methane (experiments 5, 2, and 4 as shown in Fig. 4A, B, and D, respectively). The denser DNA in experiments 2 and 4 contained ASVs associated with the genera Methylocaldum and Methylocystis (Fig. 4B and D). This suggests that Methylocaldum and Methylocystis grew on methane in the airborne state. Within the competitor-stress-ruderal (C-S-R) framework for methanotrophs, these genera were present separately across the spectrum of classification (44). The C-S-R framework puts methanotrophs into these categories related to survival and stress tolerance based upon known characteristics of the genera. According to this framework, the genera had the ability to tolerate stressors that were associated with biomass restriction (e.g., nutrient availability/fluctuation) and destruction (e.g., desiccation), which are important for airborne growth. For example, Methylocystis sp. SC2 tolerates changes in salinity (60). The constant evaporation and condensation of water on bioaerosol particles lead to osmotic shocks, so tolerating these conditions is important for atmospheric growth. In our experiments, the presence of these genera in the denser DNA similar in buoyant density to that of the liquid-phase incubations demonstrates that two rounds of growth likely occurred. The ability of these bacteria to tolerate stressors may have been key to their aerial growth.

The other experiment indicating incorporation of [13C]methane in air was experiment 5, in which there was a shift in the density of DNA between the 12C- and 13C-amended incubations. However, this shift in density was not as large as that observed in experiments 2 and 4. Based upon these data, it is possible that one round of growth or partial incorporation occurred for experiment 5. Depending upon the biochemical needs of the cell-facing airborne stressors, the fluxes of ATP and reducing equivalents could be diverted to processes other than growth. For growth to occur, new nucleotides need to be synthesized by the de novo pathway, which is more energy intensive, or the salvage pathway, which is less energy intensive (61). Since airborne cells are energetically limited, the salvage pathways might be favored over the de novo pathway, especially if DNA is damaged. It was found that excision repair might help bacteria to maintain viability after being in the air (62). However, excision repair occurs only across small portions of DNA (<50 bp), so it is unlikely that this would result in the shift in DNA density observed in this study. Traditional DNA-SIP relies upon at least two replications of cells for both strands of DNA to be replaced with 13C atoms. A single replication event of a cell would result in a 12C-13C hybrid double-stranded DNA. If DNA replication occurred only once in air, then partial incorporation could occur, which has been discussed in previous studies (63, 64). Further work is needed to confirm if the DNA molecules are composed of mixed carbon isotopes.

Humidity and growth in air.

The variability in these results and the other gas-phase incubations could be due to many factors. When selected parameters of the gas-phase incubations were compared for all experiments, the absolute humidity values were the highest for experiments 2 and 4 (Table 1). Although experiment 5 had lower humidity and particle concentrations, the incorporation of [13C]methane could have occurred earlier in incubation, when the humidity was higher. Experiments 2 and 4 resulted in a higher absolute humidity at the end of the incubation period, which could have led to the results observed. As discussed previously, relative humidity is typically reported in studies focusing on bioaerosol survival, as it affects the water content of a bioaerosol particle (58). Since the temperature varied, the absolute humidity metric allows comparison of the experiments to one another.

The availability of water has been suggested to be a major regulator of microbial growth and activity (65). The minimum water activity for extremophilic microbial growth is about 0.6 (66), which corresponds to 60% relative humidity (17). Most bacteria can grow only at water activity levels greater than 0.91, but this varies depending on the specific bacterial strain and environmental conditions (67). Most importantly, it has been observed that there is a correlation between airborne microbial activity and humidity (17). Having a lower humidity also results in increased osmotic pressure (55), which could negatively affect growth potential. Based upon our data, a certain amount of water must be present to allow aerial bacterial growth. In this study, the particle size distributions demonstrate that the bacteria were not in large water droplets. However, the cells likely had at least a film of water surrounding part of the cells, which would be affected by the changing humidity levels in the bioreactors. This water on the cell surface would be an important interface allowing for partitioning of compounds that the cell could metabolize. Bacterial growth in water droplets under laboratory conditions (8) and microbial activity in cloud droplets (3) have been demonstrated. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that bacteria grow in the air outside of water droplets under laboratory conditions.

Conclusions, limitations, and future work.

This study examined the characteristics of aerosolized methanotrophic enrichment cultures and the potential growth of methanotrophic bacteria in the air. The ability to maintain culturability while in the airborne state has important consequences for aeolian dispersal of bacteria and also potential effects upon human health (49). It is also an important indication that a cell could have the potential to grow in air, depending upon environmental conditions. Only three out of seven experiments demonstrated methanotrophic growth in the airborne state as evidenced by production of heavier DNA. In our study, due to the challenges of aerosolizing and keeping the bacteria suspended in air, our samples contained limited biomass. The humidity decreased during the DNA-SIP incubations, which may have also affected bacterial growth. Although not all replicates support the hypothesis, the variation among the replicates might be explained through humidity.

Regardless, we demonstrate a proof of concept of the replication of aerial methanotrophic bacteria outside of water droplets. Future laboratory work should utilize higher humidity values and more sensitive techniques, such as the incorporation of radioactive elements, to detect airborne bacterial growth and activity. Additionally, atmospherically relevant methane concentrations should be used. This study used high methane concentrations, which may have affected which methanotrophs were cultured and identified. It is possible for a methanotroph to grow on high and low methane concentrations, so more work is needed to understand the growth of airborne methanotrophs. If they can metabolize and grow on methane, a very potent greenhouse gas, in situ in the atmosphere, then this would be a potential new methane sink. A better understanding of the spatial distribution of airborne methanotrophs and cellular activities of methanotrophs in situ while in the airborne state must be gained to truly evaluate the potential magnitude of this biological methane sink. In the ambient environment, these bacteria would also need sources of micro- and macronutrients for growth. In this study, the growth medium provided the necessary nutrients. The importance of different nutrient sources influencing aerial growth, including gaseous compounds, intracellular stores, and particles associated with cells, needs to be investigated. The activity of airborne microbes is understudied, and a combination of field sampling and experimental aerobiological techniques is necessary to answer questions central to the discipline of atmospheric microbiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Establishment and incubation of methanotrophic enrichments.

An environmental enrichment culture was developed from a maple leaf collected from the Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, campus. The leaf was rinsed with sterile water, and the rinsate was cultured with 10% (vol/vol, gas headspace) methane in DSMZ 921 medium. An ambient air enrichment culture was developed by sampling air above grass outside of a teaching and research building at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. The air was sampled into DSMZ 921 medium with a BioSampler (SKC, Inc., Eighty Four, PA), operating at 12.5 L/min, for a 2-h period. The sampling liquid was transferred into a 500-mL serum bottle and incubated statically at room temperature (~22°C) for 6 months with 10% methane. Later, prior to refreshing the culture, 2 mL of both cultures was transferred to triplicate 120-mL serum bottles with 40 mL DSMZ 921 broth. These cultures were amended with 4% methane (vol/vol, gas headspace) and incubated at room temperature with shaking at 100 rpm for 1 week. The methane in the headspace was measured with a gas chromatograph (described below), and the optical density of the culture at 600 nm was measured with an Evolution 60S UV-visible spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA).

Prior to the aerosol experiments described below, the initial enrichments were increased to a volume of 3 L by adding fresh, sterile DSMZ 921 medium, amended with 4% (vol/vol, gas headspace) methane, and transferred (10%, vol/vol) into 3 L fresh medium when needed for subsequent experiments after 2 weeks of incubation. Additionally, Sphingomonas aerolata NW12 (68) was cultured in a minimal medium (69) with 2 mM acetic acid at room temperature for 5 days prior to the start of each experiment. This organism was used as a negative control for aerosolized incubations because it does not metabolize methane.

Analysis of methane.

Methane utilization by cultures in liquid was monitored with an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (GC-FID) with a GS-GasPro column (30 m long by 0.32 mm inside diameter; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA), using previously described methods (70). Two alterations were made to this protocol: headspace samples (0.25 mL) were removed from culture vessels that were incubated at room temperature (~22°C), and the column was held isothermally at 210°C for 1.2 min. Standards were made in 125-mL serum bottles with 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10% (vol/vol, gas headspace) methane.

Bioaerosol measurement in experimental setup.

The particle size distributions of aerosols produced from the mixed cell suspensions of the methanotrophic enrichments and S. aerolata were assessed in an experimental setup previously described (71). Two liters of methanotrophic enrichment and 1 L of S. aerolata were centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 10 min and concentrated into 10 mL. Then, the cell suspension was split into two 5-mL samples. One sample was kept in medium, while the other sample was centrifuged (as described above), resuspended in sterile water, and centrifuged again. This was repeated three times, with a final resuspension in 5 mL of sterile water. Each of these was aerosolized into the experimental setup with the single-pass aerosol generator (SPAG) (50) by injecting the cell suspensions at a rate of 0.1 mL/min with a syringe pump into the SPAG. The bioaerosols were generated at a flow rate of 1.2 L/min of HEPA-filtered air and mixed with humidified HEPA-filtered air flowing at 20 L/min. The system was maintained at 18 to 20 lb/in2. The generated bioaerosols were directed into the experimental setup. The washed and unwashed samples were aerosolized for 30 min each, and the particle size distributions were measured once in 5-min increments (0 to 5 min, 5 to 10 min, etc.) with an ARTI HHPC-6 hand-held airborne particle counter (Met One, Grants Pass, OR). Washing the cell suspension was done to remove the salts from the cultivation medium, since those particles would be detected as well.

Filling gas-phase bioreactors, culturability, and biomass testing.

The retention, culturability, and particle size distributions of the methanotrophic air enrichment mixed with a culture of S. aerolata were assessed. Two liters of the methanotrophic air enrichment culture and 1 L of S. aerolata were combined and concentrated by centrifugation into ~8 mL. This cell suspension was aerosolized using the SPAG, and the bioaerosols were directed into duplicate 320-L gas-phase stainless steel bioreactors (1.02 m long by 0.66 m in diameter) (18) over a 60-min period, with each bioreactor receiving bioaerosols for 5 min alternately during that time. The reactors were rotating at 1 rpm for the time of filling, and rotation was increased to 3 rpm afterwards for the duration of incubation. While each reactor was receiving bioaerosols, the particle size distribution was measured at the bioreactor outlet with an ARTI HHPC-6 (Met One, Grants Pass, OR) to assess a filling profile every 5 min. After filling of the gas-phase bioreactors, the particle size distributions were measured daily for 5 days. The relative humidity was measured using the ARTI HHPC-6 and adjusted to 95% as needed by using previously described methods (18). Five days was selected as the incubation time, because the average residence time of bacteria in the atmosphere is 5.6 days (26). Due to temperature variations during incubation at room temperature, the relative humidity readings were converted to absolute humidity using an online calculator (https://planetcalc.com/2167/) to allow for comparison. The experiments described here were conducted twice for duplicate bioreactors (n = 4). Prior to each incubation, the bioreactors were disinfected with 70% (vol/vol) ethanol and flushed with HEPA-filtered air for 3 h at a flow rate of ~30 L/min.

For one experiment, after introduction of the bioaerosols into the gas-phase bioreactors, BioSamplers containing 5 mL DSMZ 921 medium were used to sample the bioreactors for 1 min. This was repeated after the 5-day incubation period. This sampling liquid was used to culture aerosolized methanotrophs on DSMZ 921 agar plates in an anaerobic jar filled with 30% methane. The numbers of CFU on the agar plates were counted after 2 weeks of incubation at room temperature and converted into CFU/L by dividing by the total amount of air sampled, 12.5 L. The CFU/L metric was normalized by the number of particles/L, detected with the optical particle counter in the 0.5- to 0.7-μm size bin, to present the data as CFU/particle.

Gas-phase stable-isotope probing.

The methanotrophic enrichments and S. aerolata cultures were incubated as described above. The bioreactors were filled with bioaerosols generated from a final 8-mL cell suspension derived from 2-L methanotrophic and 1-L S. aerolata cultures. The operating and filling procedures were the same as described above. One bioreactor was amended with 1,500 ppmv [12C]methane (AirGas, Radnor, PA), and the other was amended with 1,500 ppmv [13C]methane (Sigma-Aldrich). The bioaerosols were incubated in the bioreactors for 5 days, with no humidity adjustments during incubation, after which the aerosols were sampled onto membrane filters (0.8-μm SUPOR filters; Pall Life Sciences, Port Washington, NY) at a flow rate of 20 L/min for 1 h and stored at −80°C until DNA extraction.

Liquid-phase stable-isotope probing.

In addition to gas-phase incubations, we conducted liquid-phase DNA-SIP as a control. Two duplicate 10% (vol/vol) transfers of the methanotrophic air enrichment culture were established for a final volume of 40 mL in 120-mL serum bottles. One duplicate set was amended with 4% (vol/vol, gas headspace) [12C]methane, and the other set was amended with 4% (vol/vol, gas headspace) [13C]methane in DSMZ 921 medium. The concentration of the methane in the duplicate bottles was measured on days 0, 1, 5, 6, and 7, as described above. After 7 days, the cells were centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 10 min, and the resulting cell pellets were stored at −20°C until DNA extraction.

DNA extraction.

DNA was extracted by following a phenol-chloroform-based extraction method for bioaerosols on filters with slight modifications (18). Briefly, filters were wetted with 50 μL of a solution of glucose (50 mM), EDTA (10 mM), and Tris-HCl (25 mM) and then subjected to 5 cycles of freeze-thawing. Freezing was done by submerging the tube containing the filter in −80°C-chilled 100% ethanol, and thawing was done by placing the tube in a 55°C heat block. Following this, 300 μL of 0.4 mg/mL lysozyme and 50 μL of 0.5 M EDTA were added and incubated at room temperature for 5 min at 100 rpm. Then, 50 μL of 10% SDS and 800 μL of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) were added. The tube was vortexed to form an emulsion and then centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 3 min. The aqueous phase of the emulsion was transferred to a new tube, extracted with 800 μL of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1), and centrifuged again. The DNA from the final aqueous layer was precipitated with 30 μL of 3 M sodium acetate, 1 mL of 100% ethanol, and 5 μL of glycogen (5 mg/mL). This tube was centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated sterile water. The liquid-phase stable-isotope probing samples of the air enrichment were extracted with a DNeasy UltraClean microbial kit (Qiagen, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol, with the DNA suspended in 30 μL of nuclease-free water. All DNA samples (1 μL) were quantified with a Qubit double-stranded DNA high-sensitivity assay kit and a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen, OR, USA).

Gradient formation and fractionation.

12C- and 13C-labeled DNA were separated on a CsCl gradient. The CsCl solution was prepared in 0.1 M Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer, resulting in a buoyant density of about 1.7742 g/mL as measured by an AR200 digital refractometer (Reichert Technologies, NY), and was distributed into 4.7-mL OptiSeal polypropylene ultracentrifuge tubes (Beckman Coulter, CA). All the genomic DNA (gDNA) from the gas-phase incubations and 1 μg of the gDNA of the liquid-phase incubations of the air enrichment were added to the CsCl gradients. The buoyant densities of the gradients were then adjusted to be between 1.7231 and 1.7340 g/mL by the addition of more of the CsCl solution or TE buffer. The gradients were centrifuged at 86,700 × g at 28°C for at least 48 h in an Optima Max TL ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter, CA). After centrifugation, the samples were fractionated with a fraction recovery system (Beckman Coulter, CA), with the aid of a syringe pump, and 24 fractions of 200 μL were collected. The DNA was precipitated using a glycogen-assisted ethanol precipitation. After precipitation, DNA was resuspended in 20 μL of nuclease-free water.

qPCR of fractions.

From the gDNA of the enrichment cultures, a portion of the pmoA gene was amplified with primers A189F/mb661R (7274) in accordance with previous protocols (75). The amplicon was ligated into the pCR2.1 TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and transformed into TOP10 E. coli made competent by following the protocols of Inoue et al. (76). Plasmids were extracted with a Zyppy plasmid miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) from transformed cells incubated overnight in LB broth supplemented with 50 μg/mL kanamycin. The presence of the inserted amplicon in the plasmid was verified by PCR and visualized on a 1.5% (wt/vol) agarose gel. Plasmids were linearized with FastDigest KpnI (Thermofisher Scientific, MA) in accordance with its associated protocol. The linearized plasmid was purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, USA) and quantified with a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer with dsDNA broad-range standards (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) by following the manufacturer’s protocols. The abundance of the pmoA gene was assessed by qPCR in accordance with the protocols of Kolb et al. (75). The reactions were performed in 10 μL with 5 μL PowerUp SYBR green master mix (ThermoFisher Scientific), 0.67 μM each primer, 0.5 μL 25 mM MgCl2, 2.16 μL water, and 1 μL of template. The standard curves of the linearized plasmids were a series of 10-fold dilutions with an average amplification efficiency of 80.9% and an average r2 value of 0.98, with the detection limit ranging between about 102 to 103 total pmoA copies. The average copy numbers of pmoA in the collected fractions from the DNA-SIP experiments were quantified as the average of technical replicates with a standard curve associated with each qPCR plate. Experiment 2 was analyzed by qPCR with a total reaction volume of 50 μL with 1 μL of template, but the concentrations of the other components remained the same.

Sequencing and bioinformatics.

DNA extracts from maple leaf and air enrichments were sent for PCR amplification and sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene by Mr. DNA (Shallowater, TX, USA) (https://www.mrdnalab.com). Using the primer set 515f/806r (77), a portion of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with a HotStarTaq plus master mix Kit (Qiagen, USA). The following conditions were used for PCR amplification: 94°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 53°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 1 min, and ending with a final elongation at 72°C for 5 min. An Ion S5 XL instrument (Ion 530 chip) was used to sequence the amplicons in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines by Mr. DNA (Shallowater, TX, USA). Selected amplicons from the pmoA qPCR analysis of DNA-SIP fractions were purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, USA). The amplicons were confirmed on a 1.5% (wt/vol) agarose gel and sent to Mr. DNA for Illumina MiSeq 2 × 300 bp sequencing.

The 16S rRNA and pmoA gene sequences were demultiplexed with sabre (https://github.com/najoshi/sabre). All fastq files were imported into QIIME2 (v2020.2) (78). The 16S rRNA gene sequences were trimmed and denoised with DADA2 (79), and the pmoA sequences were trimmed and denoised in vsearch (80). A naive Bayes scikit-learn classifier (81, 82) for the 16S rRNA gene primer set was trained on the extracted reference full-length operon reads of the Silva v132 database (83) and used for classification of the ASVs. The gene sequences were grouped at the family level (for 16S rRNA gene) or the genus level (for the pmoA gene) for visualization. The relative abundances were calculated manually. ASVs that were of interest were manually queried against the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) BLAST database with the BLASTn algorithm. Samples were rarefied and analyzed for Shannon’s diversity, Chao1, and observed ASVs in QIIME2 (v2020.2) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The pmoA sequence-naive Bayes scikit-learn classifier was trained with the primers used for PCR on a pmoA database (84).

The most abundant pmoA ASV in the 13C incubations of liquid 1, liquid 2, experiment 2, and experiment 4 were selected. MEGA11 (85) was used to translate the DNA sequences into amino acids and aligned with Clustal W (86). Phylogenetic trees were made with a maximum-likelihood tree computed with the Jones Taylor Thornton matrix-based model of amino acid substitution with 1,000 bootstraps. PmoA sequences used for comparison were accessed from GenBank with the corresponding accession numbers shown in Fig. S4.

Statistical analysis.

OriginPro 2020b was used to conduct a t test to compare the culturability of the methanotrophic air enrichment culture after aerosolization with that after 5 days of suspension in air.

Data availability.

All sequences have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession no. PRJNA863376.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was funded by National Science Foundation CBET award no. 1512511 (to D.E.F., V.K., L.J.K., and G.M.) and a Graduate Student Grant-in-Aid from the New Jersey Water Resources Research Institute (to K.P.D.). Additionally, K.P.D. was funded by an Air Pollution Educational and Research Grant (APERG) from the Mid-Atlantic States Section of the Air and Waste Management Association (A&WMA) and an NIEHS training grant in exposure science to Rutgers University (grant no. 1T32ES019854).

We thank T. Han and A. Bautista for laboratory assistance.

We declare that we have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Supplemental material. Download spectrum.03421-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.4 MB (400.4KB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Donna E. Fennell, Email: fennell@envsci.rutgers.edu.

Kristen M. DeAngelis, University of Massachusetts Amherst

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lighthart B. 2000. Mini-review of the concentration of variations found in the alfresco atmospheric bacterial populations. Aerobiologia 16:7–16. doi: 10.1023/A:1007694618888. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fröhlich-Nowoisky J, Kampf CJ, Weber B, Huffman JA, Pöhlker C, Andreae MO, Lang-Yona N, Burrows SM, Gunthe SS, Elbert W, Su H, Hoor P, Thines E, Hoffmann T, Després VR, Pöschl U. 2016. Bioaerosols in the Earth system: climate, health, and ecosystem interactions. Atmos Res 182:346–376. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.07.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amato P, Besaury L, Joly M, Penaud B, Deguillaume L, Delort A-M. 2019. Metatranscriptomic exploration of microbial functioning in clouds. Sci Rep 9:4383. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41032-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sattler B, Puxbaum H, Psenner R. 2001. Bacterial growth in supercooled cloud droplets. Geophys Res Lett 28:239–242. doi: 10.1029/2000GL011684. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dimmick R, Straat P, Wolochow H, Levin G, Chatigny M, Schrot J. 1975. Evidence for metabolic activity of airborne bacteria. J Aerosol Sci 6:387–393. doi: 10.1016/0021-8502(75)90054-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Straat P, Wolochow H, Dimmick R, Chatigny M. 1977. Evidence for incorporation of thymidine into deoxyribonucleic acid in airborne bacterial cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 34:292–296. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.3.292-296.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dimmick R, Wolochow H, Chatigny M. 1979. Evidence that bacteria can form new cells in airborne particles. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:924–927. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.5.924-927.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dimmick R, Wolochow H, Chatigny M. 1979. Evidence for more than one division of bacteria within airborne particles. Appl Environ Microbiol 38:642–643. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.4.642-643.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lighthart B. 1997. The ecology of bacteria in the alfresco atmosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 23:263–274. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(97)00036-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hu W, Murata K, Fan C, Huang S, Matsusaki H, Fu P, Zhang D. 2020. Abundance and viability of particle-attached and free-floating bacteria in dusty and nondusty air. Biogeosciences 17:4477–4487. doi: 10.5194/bg-17-4477-2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dall’Osto M, Santl-Temkiv T, O'Dowd C, Harrison RM. 2020. Enrichment of organic nitrogen in primary biological particles during advection over the North Atlantic. Atmos Environ 222:117160. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hernandez M, Miller S, Landfear D, Macher J. 1999. A combined fluorochrome method for quantitation of metabolically active and inactive airborne bacteria. Aerosol Sci Technol 30:145–160. doi: 10.1080/027868299304741. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Qi J, Zhong X, Shao Q, Gao D, Wu L, Huang L, Ye Y. 2015. Microbial activity levels in atmospheric bioaerosols in Qingdao. Aerobiologia 31:353–365. doi: 10.1007/s10453-015-9369-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang B, Li Y, Xie Z, Du S, Zeng X, Hou J, Ma T. 2020. Characteristics of microbial activity in atmospheric aerosols and its relationship to chemical composition of PM2.5 in Xi’an, China. J Aerosol Sci 146:105572. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Klein A, Bohannan B, Jaffe D, Levin D, Green J. 2016. Molecular evidence for metabolically active bacteria in the atmosphere. Front Microbiol 7:772. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhen H, Krumins V, Fennell D, Mainelis G. 2018. Analysis of airborne microbial communities using 16S ribosomal RNA: potential bias due to air sampling stress. Sci Total Environ 621:939–947. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Šantl-Temkiv T, Gosewinkel U, Starnawski P, Lever M, Finster K. 2018. Aeolian dispersal of bacteria in southwest Greenland: their sources, abundance, diversity and physiological states. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 94:fiy031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Krumins V, Mainelis G, Kerkhof L, Fennell D. 2014. Substrate-dependent rRNA production in an airborne bacterium. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1:376–381. doi: 10.1021/ez500245y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Geller A. 1983. Growth of bacteria in inorganic medium at different levels of airborne organic substrates. Appl Environ Microbiol 46:1258–1262. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.6.1258-1262.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ji M, Greening C, Vanwonterghem I, Carere CR, Bay SK, Steen JA, Montgomery K, Lines T, Beardall J, van Dorst J, Snape I, Stott MB, Hugenholtz P, Ferrari BC. 2017. Atmospheric trace gases support primary production in Antarctic desert surface soil. Nature 552:400–403. doi: 10.1038/nature25014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Green V, Stott D, Diack M. 2006. Assay for fluorescein diacetate hydrolytic activity: optimization for soil samples. Soil Biol Biochem 38:693–701. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.06.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pett-Ridge J, Firestone M. 2017. Using stable isotopes to explore root-microbe-mineral interactions in soil. Rhizosphere 3:244–253. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.04.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Boschker H, Middelburg J. 2002. Stable isotopes and biomarkers in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 40:85–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb00940.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Radajewski S, Ineson P, Parekh NR, Murrell JC. 2000. Stable-isotope probing as a tool in microbial ecology. Nature 403:646–649. doi: 10.1038/35001054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gibson B, Wilson DJ, Feil E, Eyre-Walker A. 2018. The distribution of bacterial doubling times in the wild. Proc Biol Sci 285:20180789. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Burrows S, Butler T, Jöckel P, Tost H, Kerkweg A, Pöschl U, Lawrence M. 2009. Bacteria in the global atmosphere - Part 2: modeling of emissions and transport between different ecosystems. Atmos Chem Phys 9:9281–9297. doi: 10.5194/acp-9-9281-2009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Saunois M, Jackson R, Bousquet P, Poulter B, Canadell J. 2016. The growing role of methane in anthropogenic climate change. Environ Res Lett 11:120207. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/120207. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Turner A, Frankenberg C, Kort E. 2019. Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:2805–2813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814297116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pétron G, Miller B, Vaughn B, Thorley E, Kofler J, Mielke-Maday I, Sherwood O, Dlugokencky E, Hall B, Schwietzke S, Conley S, Peischl J, Lang P, Moglia E, Crotwell M, Crotwell A, Sweeney C, Newberger T, Wolter S, Kitzis D, Bianco L, King C, Coleman T, White A, Rhodes M, Tans P, Schnell R. 2020. Investigating large methane enhancements in the U.S. San Juan Basin. Elementa Sci Anthropocene 8:e038. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ehhalt D. 1974. The atmospheric cycle of methane. Tellus 26:58–70. doi: 10.3402/tellusa.v26i1-2.9737. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Conrad R. 2009. The global methane cycle: recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved. Environ Microbiol Rep 1:285–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00038.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Semrau J, DiSpirito A. 2019. Methanotrophy—environmental, industrial and medical applications, p 1–22. In Chistoserdova L (ed), Methylotrophs and methylotroph communities. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jeffrey L, Maher D, Chiri E, Leung P, Nauer P, Arndt S, Tait D, Greening C, Johnston S. 2021. Bark-dwelling methanotrophic bacteria decrease methane emissions from trees. Nat Commun 12:2127. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22333-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith G, Wrighton K. 2019. Metagenomic approaches unearth methanotroph phylogenetic and metabolic diversity. Curr Issues Mol Biol 33:57–84. doi: 10.21775/cimb.033.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hanson R, Hanson T. 1996. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Rev 60:439–471. doi: 10.1128/mr.60.2.439-471.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tveit A, Hestnes A, Robinson S, Schintlmeister A, Dedysh S, Jehmlich N, von Bergen M, Herbold C, Wagner M, Richter A, Svenning M. 2019. Widespread soil bacterium that oxidizes atmospheric methane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:8515–8524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817812116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cai Y, Zheng Y, Bodelier P, Conrad R, Jia Z. 2016. Conventional methanotrophs are responsible for atmospheric methane oxidation in paddy soils. Nat Commun 7:11728. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Iguchi H, Sato I, Sakakibara M, Yurimoto H, Sakai Y. 2012. Distribution of methanotrophs in the phyllosphere. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 76:1580–1583. doi: 10.1271/bbb.120281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Šantl-Temkiv T, Finster K, Hansen B, Pasic L, Karlson U. 2013. Viable methanotrophic bacteria enriched from air and rain can oxidize methane at cloud-like conditions. Aerobiologia 29:373–384. doi: 10.1007/s10453-013-9287-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Archer S, Pointing S. 2020. Anthropogenic impact on the atmospheric microbiome. Nat Microbiol 5:229–231. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0650-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dedysh S, Knief C. 2018. Diversity and phylogeny of described aerobic methanotrophs. In Kalyuzhnaya M, Xing X-H (ed), Methane biocatalysis: paving the way to sustainability Springer, Cham, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ho A, Luke C, Reim A, Frenzel P. 2016. Resilience of (seed bank) aerobic methanotrophs and methanotrophic activity to desiccation and heat stress. Soil Biol Biochem 101:130–138. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Whittenbury R, Davies S, Davey J. 1970. Exospores and cysts formed by methane-utilizing bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 61:219–226. doi: 10.1099/00221287-61-2-219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ho A, Kerckhof F-M, Luke C, Reim A, Krause S, Boon N, Bodelier P. 2013. Conceptualizing functional traits and ecological characteristics of methane-oxidizing bacteria as life strategies. Environ Microbiol Rep 5:335–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2012.00370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Baani M, Liesack W. 2008. Two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase with different methane oxidation kinetics are found in Methylocystis sp. strain SC2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:10203–10208. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702643105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cheng X-Y, Liu X-Y, Wang H-M, Su C-T, Zhao R, Bodelier P, Wang W-Q, Ma L-Y, Lu X-L. 2021. USCγ dominated community composition and cooccurrence network of methanotrophs and bacteria in subterranean karst caves. Microbiol Spectr 9:e00820-21. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00820-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Edwards C, Onstott T, Miller J, Wiggins J, Wang W, Lee C, Cary C, Pointing S, Lau M. 2017. Draft genome sequence of uncultured upland soil cluster gammaproteobacteria gives molecular insights into high-affinity methanotrophy. Genome Announc 5:e00047-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00047-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Goldberg L. 1971. Naval biomedical research laboratory, programmed environment, aerosol facility. Appl Microbiol 21:244–252. doi: 10.1128/am.21.2.244-252.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Thompson K-A, Bennett A, Walker J. 2011. Aerosol survival of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Hosp Infect 78:216–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhen H, Han T, Fennell D, Mainelis G. 2014. A systematic comparison of four bioaerosol generators: affect on culturability and cell membrane integrity when aerosolizing Escherichia coli bacteria. J Aerosol Sci 70:67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Santarpia J, Ratnesar-Shumate S, Haddrell A. 2020. Laboratory study of bioaerosols: traditional test systems, modern approaches, and environmental control. Aerosol Sci Technol 54:585–600. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1696452. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Haddrell A, Thomas R. 2017. Aerobiology: experimental considerations, observations, and future tools. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e00809-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00809-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kinahan S, Tezak M, Siegrist C, Lucero G, Servantes B, Santarpia J, Kalume A, Zhang J, Felton M, Williamson C, Pan Y-L. 2019. Changes of fluorescence spectra and viability from aging aerosolized E. coli cells under various laboratory-controlled conditions in an advanced rotating drum. Aerosol Sci Technol 53:1261–1276. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2019.1653446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ng T, Chan W, Lai K. 2017. Importance of stress-response genes to the survival of airborne Escherichia coli under different levels of relative humidity. AMB Express 7:71. doi: 10.1186/s13568-017-0376-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lin K, Marr L. 2020. Humidity-dependent decay of viruses, but not bacteria, in aerosols and droplets follows disinfection kinetics. Environ Sci Technol 54:1024–1032. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b04959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fernandez M, Thomas R, Oswin H, Haddrell A, Reid J. 2020. Transformative approach to investigate the microphysical factors influencing airborne transmission of pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 86:e01543-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01543-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ng T, Ip M, Chao C, Tang J, Lai K, Fu S, Leung W, Lai K. 2018. Differential gene expression in Escherichia coli during aerosolization from liquid suspension. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:6257–6267. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9083-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Santarpia J, Ratnesar-Shumate S, Gilberry J, Quizon J. 2013. Relationship between biologically fluorescent aerosol and local meteorological conditions. Aerosol Sci Technol 47:655–661. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2013.781263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Islam T, Larsen Ø, Torsvik V, Øvreås L, Panosyan H, Murrell J, Birkeland N, Bodrossy L. 2015. Novel methanotrophs of the family Methylococcaceae from different geographical regions and habitats. Microorganisms 3:484–499. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms3030484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Han D, Link H, Liesack W. 2017. Response of Methylocystis sp. strain SC2 to salt stress: physiology, global transcriptome, and amino acid profiles. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e00866-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00866-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nyhan W. 2014. Nucleotide synthesis via salvage pathway. In eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom. doi: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0001399. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cox C, Bondurant M, Hatch M. 1971. Effects of oxygen on aerosol survival of radiation sensitive and resistant strains of Escherichia coli B. J Hyg (Lond) 69:661–672. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400021938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dumont M, Pommerenke B, Casper P, Conrad R. 2011. DNA-, rRNA- and mRNA-based stable isotope probing of aerobic methanotrophs in lake sediment. Environ Microbiol 13:1153–1167. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02415.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Starr E, Shi S, Blazewicz S, Probst A, Herman D, Firestone M, Banfield J. 2018. Stable isotope informed genome-resolved metagenomics reveals that Saccharibacteria utilize microbially-processed plant-derived carbon. Microbiome 6:122. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0499-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Potts M. 1994. Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes. Microbiol Rev 58:755–805. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.4.755-805.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Stevenson A, Cray J, Williams J, Santos R, Sahay R, Neuenkirchen N, McClure C, Grant I, Houghton J, Quinn J, Timson D, Patil S, Singhal R, Antón J, Dijksterhuis J, Hocking A, Lievens B, Rangel D, Voytek M, Gunde-Cimerman N, Oren A, Timmis K, McGenity T, Hallsworth J. 2015. Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life? ISME J 9:1333–1351. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lebre P, De Maayer P, Cowan D. 2017. Xerotolerant bacteria: surviving through a dry spell. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:285–296. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Busse H-J, Denner EBM, Buczolits S, Salkinoja-Salonen M, Bennasar A, Kämpfer P. 2003. Sphingomonas aurantiaca sp. nov., Sphingomonas aerolata sp. nov. and Sphingomonas faeni sp. nov., air- and dustborne and Antarctic, orange-pigmented, psychrotolerant bacteria, and emended description of the genus Sphingomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1253–1260. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02461-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kämpfer P, Steiof M, Dott W. 1991. Microbiological characterization of a fuel-oil contaminated site including numerical identification of heterotrophic water and soil bacteria. Microb Ecol 21:227–251. doi: 10.1007/BF02539156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Dean R, Schneider C, Almnehlawi H, Dawson K, Fennell D. 2020. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin dechlorination is differentially enhanced by dichlorobenzene amendment in Passaic River. Environ Sci Technol 54:8380–8389. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Han T, Thomas N, Mainelis G. 2018. Performance of personal electrostatic bioaerosol sampler (PEBS) when collecting airborne microorganisms. J Aerosol Sci 124:54–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.07.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Holmes AJ, Costello A, Lidstrom ME, Murrell JC. 1995. Evidence that particulate methane monooxygenase and ammonia monooxygenase may be evolutionarily related. FEMS Microbiol Lett 132:203–208. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(95)00311-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Costello AM, Lidstrom ME. 1999. Molecular characterization of functional and phylogenetic genes from natural populations of methanotrophs in lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:5066–5074. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.11.5066-5074.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Dumont M, Murrell J. 2005. Community-level analysis: key genes of aerobic methane oxidation. Methods Enzymol 397:413–427. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)97025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kolb S, Knief C, Stubner S, Conrad R. 2003. Quantitative detection of methanotrophs in soil by novel pmoA-targeted real-time PCR assays. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:2423–2429. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.5.2423-2429.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Inoue H, Nojima H, Okayama H. 1990. High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. Gene 96:23–28. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90336-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Caporaso JG, Lauber C, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, Fierer N, Knight R. 2011. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:4516–4522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000080107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodríguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, et al. . 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Callahan B, McMurdie P, Rosen M, Han A, Johnson A, Holmes S. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. 2016. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4:e2584. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D. 2011. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bokulich N, Kaehler B, Rideout J, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, Huttley G, Caporaso J. 2018. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 6:90. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner F. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yang S, Xi W, Susanne L. 2016. pmoA gene reference database (fasta-formatted sequences and taxonomy). GFZ Data Services; doi: 10.5880/GFZ.5.3.2016.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 38:3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. 2007. Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Supplemental material. Download spectrum.03421-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.4 MB (400.4KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All sequences have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession no. PRJNA863376.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES