ABSTRACT
Soil microbiomes play an essential role in maintaining soil geochemical cycle and function. Although there have been some reports on the diversity patterns and drivers of the tropical forest soil microbial community, how space and seasonal changes affect spatiotemporal distribution at the regional scales are poorly understood. Based on 260 soil samples, we investigated the spatiotemporal patterns of rubber plantations and rainforest soil microbial communities across the whole of Hainan Island, China during the dry and rainy seasons. We examined soil bacterial and fungal composition and diversity and the main drivers of these microbes using Illumina sequencing and assembly. Our results revealed that the diversity (both alpha and beta) spatiotemporal variation in microbial communities is highly dependent on regional location rather than seasonal changes. For example, the site explained 28.5% and 37.2% of the variation in alpha diversity for soil bacteria and fungi, respectively, and explained 34.6% of the bacterial variance and 14.3% of the fungal variance in beta diversity. Soil pH, mean annual temperature, and mean annual precipitation were the most important factors associated with the distribution of soil microbial communities. Furthermore, we identified that variations in edaphic (e.g., soil pH) and climatic factors (e.g., mean annual temperature [MAT] and mean annual precipitation [MAP]) were mainly caused by regional sites (P < 0.001). Collectively, our work provides empirical evidence that space, rather than seasonal changes, explained more of the spatiotemporal variation of soil microbial communities in tropical forests, mediated by regional location-induced changes in climatic factors and edaphic properties.
IMPORTANCE The soil microbiomes communities of the two forests were not only affected by environmental factors (e.g., edaphic and climatic factors), but also by different dominant geographic factors. In particular, our work showed that spatial variation in bacterial and fungal community composition was mainly dominated by edaphic properties (e.g., pH) and climatic factors (e.g., MAT and MAP). Moreover, the environmental factors were mainly explained by geographic location effect rather than by seasonal effect, and environmental dissimilarity significantly increased with geographic distance. In conclusion, our study provides solid empirical evidence that space rather than season explained more of the spatiotemporal variation of soil microbial communities in the tropical forest.
KEYWORDS: rubber plantation, rainforest, soil microbiome, community structure, diversity, drivers
INTRODUCTION
Soil microorganisms play a critical role in the functioning of ecosystems around the world. They are known to maintain the rates and stability of multiple ecosystem processes (1, 2). Therefore, we must develop a better understanding of the distribution and ecological drivers of belowground communities. There have been reports in the literature on the drivers of tropical forest soil microbial communities (2–7). A study by Lan et al. (4) showed that variation of soil microbial communities of rubber plantations was mainly caused by historical contingencies, whereas seasonal changes explained variation at the local scale. However, the relative importance of spatial heterogeneity versus time for driving soil microbial community composition at the regional scale is poorly understood.
Previous studies have investigated the soil microbial communities associated with diverse forests. Many published reports have examined the response of microbial composition to spatial or temporal change (3, 8–14). Biogeography, geographic location, and seasonal change have been demonstrated to influence community composition. However, the extent to which each variable plays a role has differed between studies (2–4, 15, 16). Most studies on soil microbial ecology have focused on temperate trees, crops, or other plant species (17–19), providing limited insight into the tropical forest, specifically rubber plantations and tropical rainforests. Moreover, these examples have shown that soil microbial communities are influenced by spatial or temporal change; however, understanding of how seasonal changes (dry and rainy seasons) affect the composition and diversity of soil microbial communities at the regional scale is still limited.
Hainan Island is a part of the Indo-Burma, a global biodiversity hot spot (20, 21), which is home to a large area of tropical rainforest, accounting for 17.3% of the island’s area (5). During the last two decades, rubber tree plantations seem to have multiplied quickly throughout Southeast Asia (22). Tropical rubber tree plantations have become the most economically important vegetation ecosystem in tropical China, particularly on Hainan Island (23). Now, rubber forests account for almost 25% of the total vegetation area on Hainan Island (24). Soil microbes play important functional roles in tropical forest ecosystems. Tropical rainforest and rubber plantations are the two most important terrestrial ecosystems in Hainan. Therefore, it is necessary to study the distribution patterns and ecological drivers of the soil microbial communities of these two forests.
Hainan Island is the largest tropical area with the lowest latitude in China (25), with an evident dry and rainy season within a year. Previous work on the island has shown that seasonal change and site location were the dominant factors resulting in shifts in bacterial composition at the local and geographic scales, respectively (3, 4). However, previous studies of soil bacterial diversity have been limited, particularly in the sample sizes and sampling scales they used (3–5). Moreover, little attention has been paid to the relative contributions of seasonal change and spatial heterogeneity in shaping the distribution of soil microbial communities. Other research has shown that the dominant phylum of a soil fungal community was mainly correlated with slow-changing environmental factors (e.g., pH and temperature) (5), which were influenced by the historical contingency of the geographic location (26, 27). Therefore, we hypothesize that space or site location would explain more of the spatiotemporal variation in tropical soil microbial communities than seasonal change at the regional scale.
To test this hypothesis, we evaluated soil microbial composition and diversity patterns based on field samples of rubber and rainforest plantations during both the dry and rainy season across the whole of Hainan Island (Fig. S1). The primary goals of this study were to (i) identify the taxa composition and spatial patterns (including alpha and beta diversity) of bacterial and fungal communities in the soil across different seasons; (ii) quantify the drivers of spatiotemporal variation in the soil microbiome, including the relative influence of seasonal changes, edaphic characteristics, climatic variables, and geographic distance; and (iii) quantify the main predictors of the soil microbial communities of tropical forests.
RESULTS
Environmental variables and community composition.
For the 12 measured environmental variables, respective variation was mainly explained by geographic sites: water content (WC), soil organic matter (SOM), soil pH, nitrate nitrogen (NN), available potassium (AK), total potassium (TK), mean annual precipitation (MAP) and mean annual temperature (MAT) were highly localized; site location had a stronger effect than season on environmental variables (Fig. S2 and S3). Furthermore, environmental dissimilarity (environmental distance between sites based on measured environmental variables) significantly increased with geographic distance during both the dry and rainy seasons (Fig. S4).
At a 97% taxonomy identity threshold, a total of 14,834 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were detected for the fungal communities and 13,294 for the bacterial communities. In the rubber plantation, most bacterial OTUs were assigned to Proteobacteria (33.28%), Acidobacteria (19.27%), Chloroflexi (13.63%), and Actinobacteria (12.41%) at the phylum level (Fig. S5a); and the fungal OTUs were assigned to Sordariomycetes (13.63%), Agaricomycetes (12.20%), and Eurotiomycetes (4.42%) at the class level (Fig. S5c). In the rainforest, most bacterial OTUs were assigned to Proteobacteria (43.13%), Acidobacteria (20.30%), and Actinobacteria (10.24%) at the phylum level (see Fig. S5b); and fungal OTUs were assigned to Agaricomycetes (30.13%), Tremellomycetes (18.69%) and Sordariomycetes (12.14%) at the class level (Fig. S5d).
Spatiotemporal patterns of the soil microbiome community.
We used the OTU richness (Sobs) index to measure microbial alpha diversity in each soil sample. Generally, season and site had significant effects on the diversity of bacterial communities. For example, season explained 3.7% and 4.9% of the variation and site explained 40.2% and 19.9% of the variation in soil bacteria and fungi, respectively, in rubber plantations (Fig. 1). For rainforest, season explained 0.2% and 0.3% of the variation and site explained 28.5% and 37.2% of the variation in soil bacteria and fungi, respectively. When considering microbial beta diversity based on the abundance-related Bray-Curtis distance, we found that for the rainforest, sampling site explained 34.6% of the bacterial variance and 14.3% of the fungal variance, while season only explained 2.2% of the bacterial variance and 8.1% of the fungal variance (Fig. 2a and b). For rubber plantation, we also found a much greater effect for site than season: 39.3% of bacterial variance and 18.3% of fungal variance were explained by site, while only 2.5% of bacterial variance and 1.7% of fungal variance were explained by season (Fig. 2c and d). Other factors explained no more than 7.0% of the variation in the soil composition at the OTU level. In brief, this study argues that site location had a stronger effect than season on both microbial alpha and beta diversity estimates.
FIG 1.
Alpha diversity of bacterial and fungal communities of rubber (a, b) and rainforest (c, d). Significant differences between seasons in each sampling area are indicated by asterisks (***, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05).
FIG 2.
Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of taxonomic similarity based on Bray-Curtis distances (OTU [operational taxonomic unit] level). ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05.
Drives of environmental factors in shaping soil microbial community.
Random Forest (RF) analyses indicated that soil pH was the most important predictor of bacterial richness; however, for fungal richness, pH and precipitation were the most important predictors in rubber plantations and rainforests, respectively (Fig. 3). Furthermore, these results were confirmed by significant simple linear regressions. For example, richness was strongly positively related to pH but negatively related to precipitation (Fig. 4).
FIG 3.
Random Forest (RF) analyses identifying the importance of potential predictors of bacterial and fungal richness. RF importance = increase in % mean square error. Blue and red columns represent P < 0.05 and P > 0.05, respectively.
FIG 4.
Relationships between main environmental predictors and soil microbiome richness.
According to the Mantel test results, the environmental factors were significantly (P = 0.001) correlated with microbial communities in fungi and bacterial communities in rubber plantations. The geographic factors were significantly related to the bacterial and fungal communities and had greater effects on the bacterial communities in rubber plantations than in rainforests (geographic distance: r = 0.571, environment distance: r = 0.447; P < 0.001; Table 1). These results were partially confirmed by the slopes of the distance decay relationships (DDRs; Fig. 5). Significant DDRs were observed for both the rubber plantation (bacteria: R2 = 0.33, P < 0.001; fungi: R2 = 0.16, P < 0.001) and rainforest (bacteria: R2 = 0.0.02, P < 0.001; fungi: R2 = 0.08, P < 0.001) communities. Specifically, pH was significantly correlated with bacterial community composition in each forest type, and temperature and total phosphorus (TP) were significantly correlated with fungal community composition in the rubber plantation and rainforest, respectively (Fig. 6a and b). According to a redundancy analysis (RDA), the dominant factors shaping bacterial communities in the rubber plantation and rainforest were SOM and pH (Fig. S6a and b). For the fungal communities in the rubber plantation and rainforest, an RDA showed that precipitation and TP, respectively, were the dominant drivers (Fig. S6 c and d). The relationship between the individual soil physicochemical variables and the main microbial taxa (phylum for bacteria and class for fungi) also partially supports these results (Fig. S7). We illustrated the contributions of season, edaphic, geographic, and climatic variables to bacterial and fungal community variation with a modified variation partitioning (VPA) diagram (Fig. 6). The complete set of all variables together explained 47% and 22% of the variation in the bacterial and fungal communities of the rubber plantation and 26% and 19% of the variation in the bacterial and fungal communities of the rainforest, with edaphic properties contributing the most. In addition, the VPA models revealed that factors exclusively related to climate predicted a larger significant proportion of the variation in rubber plantation communities, and the highest proportion was predicted in the fungal community (R2 = 4%). Moreover, factors exclusively related to geography contributed a larger proportion of variation relative to edaphic factors to the beta diversity of rubber plantation soils (bacterial 83%, fungal 67%) than to that of rainforest soils (bacterial 15%, and fungal 33%).
TABLE 1.
Mantel and partial Mantel test results for the correlations between community similarity and environmental and geographic distance
| Factor | Controlling for | Bacteria |
Fungi |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber |
Rainforest |
Rubber |
Rainforest |
||||||
| R | P | R | P | R | P | R | P | ||
| Geographic distance | 0.5711 | <0.001 | 0.308 | <0.001 | 0.2258 | <0.001 | 0.18 | <0.001 | |
| Environment distance | 0.4467 | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.37 | 0.2093 | <0.001 | 0.36 | <0.001 | |
| Geographic distance | Environment distance | 0.4392 | 0.001 | 0.21 | 0.001 | 0.1441 | 0.001 | 0.04 | 0.1 |
| Environment distance | Geographic distance | 0.2033 | 0.001 | 0.21 | 0.001 | 0.1156 | 0.003 | 0.32 | 0.001 |
FIG 5.
Relationships between the Bray-Curtis similarities of bacterial and fungal communities and geographic distance (OTU level).
FIG 6.
Interactions among environment, geography, and microbiotas. (a and b) Correlation analysis of edaphic properties, climatic characteristics, and microbial communities in rubber plantation and rainforest soils determined using the Mantel test. Line color represents the significance of the correlation (P values). Line width represents size of the correlation coefficients (Mantel’s r). Square color and size represent values of the correlation coefficients (Pearson’s r). (c to f) Variation partitioning analysis (VPA) showing the effects of edaphic properties, climatic characteristics and geographic factors, and season on microbial community composition in terms of soil beta diversity. Values indicate the percentage of variation significantly explained by each section. WC, water content; SOM, doil organic matter, pH, soil pH; AN, ammonium nitrogen; NN, nitrate nitrogen; AP, available phosphorus; AK, available potassium; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; TK, total potassium.
DISCUSSION
A few studies investigating tropical soil microbial communities over time at the local scale have revealed large temporal variability in their structures (4). For example, a previous study investigating soil microbial communities at the Amazon rainforest revealed high spatial heterogeneity in their structures (7); however, few studies of tropical soil microbial biogeography have been conducted to compare the effects of temporal and spatial dynamics on soil microbial community distributions on a large spatial scale. In this study, we investigated the spatiotemporal patterns of tropical soil bacterial and fungal communities across the whole of Hainan Island during the dry and rainy seasons to clarify the independent effects of space and seasonal change on microbial community variations. Our results provide solid empirical evidence that space, rather than season, explains more of the spatiotemporal variation of soil microbial communities in tropical plantations.
The effect of site location was far more important than that of seasonal change in regulating both bacterial and fungal communities at the regional scale. Previous studies have also demonstrated that space is more important than season for shaping soil microbial communities across a large spatial scale (4, 28, 29). Our results indicated that the effect of seasonal change on the microbial community composition was rather limited, yet significant (Fig. 1 and 2). Similarly, seasonal change was previously observed to have a significant effect on microbial diversity (3, 15, 30, 31). In this study, all major soil bacterial phyla and fungal classes were present in the soil samples (Fig. S5). Of the bacterial taxa, Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria encompassed the largest proportion of sequences, while Agaricomycetes and Sordariomycetes were the most abundant fungal class. The major microbial taxa are sensitive to mean annual precipitation and soil pH according to their life strategies; for example, the Proteobacteria have been assigned as copiotrophic bacteria and the Acidobacteria are strongly linked to pH. Therefore, it is not surprising to find that these groups responded to altered edaphic and climatic factors (Fig. S7), as has already been demonstrated (32–34). In the present study, environmental dissimilarity significantly increased with geographic distance. Furthermore, we observed a stronger effect for geographic location than for season upon environmental variables. Essentially, the dominant drivers of microbial communities, for example, soil edaphic (e.g., soil pH) and climatic factors (e.g., precipitation), were mainly affected by geographic location, thus contributing to the mechanisms driving microbial spatial variation.
We also uncovered evidence indicating that edaphic variables underpin the mechanisms responsible for soil microbial variation in Hainan Island. Among the edaphic variables, we found that soil pH was the dominant predictor for bacterial richness, as has also been found in numerous previous studies (35–39), and bacterial richness was positively correlated with pH in both the rubber plantation and rainforest. Likewise, pH was a dominant driver of bacterial communities in the tropical forest because bacterial communities are most sensitive to soil pH (40, 41). For fungal richness, soil pH and MAP were the most important predictors in the rubber plantation and rainforest; this result was consistent with that of a previous study on a global scale (6). Compared with bacterial communities, fungal beta diversity was affected by climatic (MAT and MAP) and edaphic variables (TP) in rubber plantation and rainforest ecosystems, respectively. The weaker geographic effect on fungal communities coupled with the effects of distinct dominant factors on fungal beta diversity between the two forests (Fig. 4) could be linked to the fact that fungi have weak stability and resistance to the external environment (38, 41) and greater individual body sizes than bacteria (40, 42, 43), while bacteria have greater motility than fungi (44, 45). In addition, taxa belonging to Tremellomycetes (Fig. S5), which produce large quantities of aerially dispersed mitospores, were generally widely distributed, which could lend further support to these results (6). It is worth noting that edaphic factors evidently affected microbial community similarity, suggesting that deterministic processes drive community assembly. Geographic factors contributed a larger proportion of variation relative to edaphic factors to the beta diversity of rubber plantation soils than to that of rainforest soils, indicating a stronger effect of stochastic processes in driving the beta diversity of rubber plantation soils. This result was also confirmed by the VPA models and Mantel test. This is also partially consistent with previous studies (46).
Conclusions.
The soil microbial communities of the two forests were not only affected by environmental factors (e.g., edaphic and climatic factors), but also by different dominant geographic factors. In particular, our work showed that spatial variation in bacterial and fungal community composition was mainly dominated by edaphic properties (e.g., pH) and climatic factors (e.g., MAT and MAP). Moreover, the environmental factors were mainly explained by geographic location rather than by season, and environmental dissimilarity significantly increased with geographic distance. In conclusion, our study provides solid empirical evidence that space, rather than season, explained more of the spatiotemporal variation of soil microbial communities in the tropical forest.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study site and sampling.
The study was conducted on Hainan Island (18°10′ to 20°10′N and 108°37′ to 111° 03′E), China. Hainan has a warm and humid climate all year round, with evident dry (November to April) and rainy (May to October) seasons within a year. Rubber forest plantations are mainly distributed on the platforms around the central mountainous areas with convenient transportation and nearby water sources. The tropical rainforest is mainly distributed in the central part of the mountains.
The soil sampling approach described here is based on that of our previous study (5). Sampling sites are shown in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material. From each site, 13 repetitions were sampled as previously described (5). Information on our study sites is presented in Table S1. Each site had 13 soil samples and there were 65 samples. Sample collections in these sites were performed in January and July of 2018, corresponding to the dry and rainy seasons, respectively. Thus, we obtained a total of 260 soil samples (including rubber plantation and rainforest). Each sample was then divided into two parts: one for analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics, and the other to be stored at −80°C for future analyses (DNA extraction). Soil physicochemical characteristics were analyzed using standard soil test methods described by Lu (47). More detailed descriptions of the methods for soil properties measurement are described by Lan et al. (5) and provided in the supplemental materials (Methods S1).
DNA extraction and Illumina sequencing.
Microbial DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of soil using the E.Z.N.A. Soil DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The primer pair ITS1F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and ITS2R (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′) was used to amplify the fungal ITS1 region (48). The pair 515FmodF (5′-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806RmodR (5′-GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) was used to amplify the 16S V4 hypervariable region (49, 50). Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform according to standard protocols.
Data analysis.
Raw .fastq files were demultiplexed and quality-filtered using QIIME (version 1.9.1) (51). Both the alpha diversity and beta diversity of the fungal community were calculated in QIIME. OTUs were clustered with 97% similarity cutoff using UPARSE (52) (version 7.1) and chimeric sequences were identified and removed using UCHIME. The taxonomy of each OTU representative sequence was analyzed by RDP Classifier version 2.2 (53) against the 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA databases using a confidence threshold of 0.7 (17). We modeled the alpha diversity (expressed as observed richness) as a response variable and site location and seasonal change as fixed effects. Pairwise comparison results were obtained using the Wilcoxon test with the P values corrected using the false discovery rate method.
Random Forest analysis was used to identify the main environmental drivers for soil fungal alpha diversity (54, 55). In the RF models, edaphic (soil pH, WC, SOM, TK, TN [total nitrogen], TP, AN, NN, AK, AP [available phosphorus]) and climatic (temperature and precipitation) properties served as predictors for soil microbial richness. To estimate the importance of these variables, we used percentage increases in the mean squared error (MSE) of variables: higher MSE% values imply more important variables. The “vegan” package was used to calculate Bray-Curtis similarity matrices for bacterial and fungal community data. Distance-decay relationships were estimated by Bray-Curtis similarity and geographic distance. We carried out standard and partial Mantel tests on the Bray-Curtis distances and geographic distances of significant variables to determine the effects of geographic distance and environmental variables on microbial communities. Pairwise geographic distances between samples were calculated using the “geosphere” R package with the latitude and longitude coordinates. We implemented a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis distances for the 130 samples to explore bacterial and fungal community composition differences. Differences in community composition between the investigated site locations and seasonal changes were tested using permutational multivariate analysis of variance analysis in R “vegan” with 999 permutations. Latitudinal and longitudinal data for each site were transformed to rectangular data to represent spatial distance by function pcnm, and variation partitioning analyses were conducted with function varpart in the “vegan” package for R. We used variation partitioning (56) to quantify the relative importance of seasonal change (dry and rainy season), climatic factors (temperature and precipitation), edaphic factors (including soil pH, WC, SOM, TK, TN, TP, AN, NN, AK, AP), and geographic variables.
Data availability.
The raw reads were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database (accession no.: SRP278296, SRP278319).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271603), High Level Talents Project of Hainan Natural Science Foundation (320RC733), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770661), the Finance Science and Technology Project of Hainan Province (ZDYF2019145), and the Earmarked Fund for Chinese Agricultural Research Systems (CARS-33-ZP3).
Footnotes
[This article was published on 23 November 2022 with errors in the affiliation letters in the byline. The affiliation letters were corrected in the current version, posted on 29 November 2022.]
Supplemental material is available online only.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bardgett RD, van der Putten WH. 2014. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515:505–511. doi: 10.1038/nature13855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Delgado-Baquerizo M, Oliverio AM, Brewer TE, Benavent-González A, Eldridge DJ, Bardgett RD, Maestre FT, Singh BK, Fierer N. 2018. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science 359:320–325. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lan G, Li Y, Lesueur D, Wu Z, Xie G. 2018. Seasonal changes impact soil bacterial communities in a rubber plantation on Hainan Island, China. Sci Total Environ 626:826–834. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lan G, Zhixiang W, Li Y, Chen B. 2020. The drivers of soil bacterial communities in rubber plantation at local and geographic scales. Archives Agronomy Soil Sci 66:358–369. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2019.1616286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lan G, Zhixiang W, Yang C, Sun R, Chen B, Zhang X. 2020. Tropical rainforest conversion into rubber plantations results in changes in soil fungal composition, but underling mechanisms of community assembly remain unchanged. Geoderma 375:114505. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, Kõljalg U, Yorou NS, Wijesundera R, Villarreal Ruiz L, Vasco-Palacios AM, Thu PQ, Suija A, Smith ME, Sharp C, Saluveer E, Saitta A, Rosas M, Riit T, Ratkowsky D, Pritsch K, Põldmaa K, Piepenbring M, Phosri C, Peterson M, Parts K, Pärtel K, Otsing E, Nouhra E, Njouonkou AL, Nilsson RH, Morgado LN, Mayor J, May TW, Majuakim L, Lodge DJ, Lee SS, Larsson KH, Kohout P, Hosaka K, Hiiesalu I, Henkel TW, Harend H, Guo LD, Greslebin A, Grelet G, Geml J, Gates G, Dunstan W, Dunk C, Drenkhan R, Dearnaley J, De Kesel A, et al. 2014. Fungal biogeography. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 346:1256688. doi: 10.1126/science.1256688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Buscardo E, Geml J, Schmidt SK, Freitas H, da Cunha HB, Nagy L. 2018. Spatio-temporal dynamics of soil bacterial communities as a function of Amazon forest phenology. Sci Rep 8:4382. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22380-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Buckley DH, Schmidt T. 2002. Exploring the biodiversity of soil: a microbial rain forest. Biodiversity Microb Life 183–208. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Horz HP, Barbrook A, Field CB, Bohannan BJ. 2004. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria respond to multifactorial global change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:15136–15141. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406616101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Koch O, Tscherko D, Kandeler E. 2007. Temperature sensitivity of microbial respiration, nitrogen mineralization, and potential soil enzyme activities in organic alpine soils. Global Biogeochem Cycles 21. doi: 10.1029/2007GB002983. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Habekost M, Eisenhauer N, Scheu S, Steinbeiss S, Weigelt A, Gleixner G. 2008. Seasonal changes in the soil microbial community in a grassland plant diversity gradient four years after establishment. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2588–2595. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.06.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hubbard C, Brock M, van Diepen L, Maignien L, Ewers B, Weinig C. 2017. The plant circadian clock influences rhizosphere community structure and function. ISME J 12:400–410. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ma B, Dai Z, Wang H, Dsouza M, Liu X, He Y, Wu J, Rodrigues JL, Gilbert JA, Brookes PC, Xu J. 2017. Distinct biogeographic patterns for archaea, bacteria, and fungi along the vegetation gradient at the continental scale in eastern China. mSystems 2:e00174-16. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00174-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jing Z, Lu Z, Mao T, Cao W, Wang W, Ke Y, Zhao Z, Wang X, Sun W. 2021. Microbial composition and diversity of drinking water: a full scale spatial-temporal investigation of a city in northern China. Sci Total Environ 776:145986. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xiang Q, Qiao M, Zhu D, Giles M, Neilson R, Yang X-R, Zhu Y-G, Chen Q-L. 2021. Seasonal change is a major driver of soil resistomes at a watershed scale. Isme Commun 1. doi: 10.1038/s43705-021-00018-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang J, Jiao S, Lu Y. 2018. Biogeographic distribution of bacterial, archaeal and methanogenic communities and their associations with methanogenic capacity in Chinese wetlands. Sci Total Environ 622–623:664–675. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Abdelfattah A, Freilich S, Bartuv R, Zhimo VY, Kumar A, Biasi A, Salim S, Feygenberg O, Burchard E, Dardick C, Liu J, Khan A, Ellouze W, Ali S, Spadaro D, Torres R, Teixido N, Ozkaya O, Buehlmann A, Vero S, Mondino P, Berg G, Wisniewski M, Droby S. 2021. Global analysis of the apple fruit microbiome: are all apples the same? Environ Microbiol 23:6038–6055. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jiao S, Yang Y, Xu Y, Zhang J, Lu Y. 2020. Balance between community assembly processes mediates species coexistence in agricultural soil microbiomes across eastern China. ISME J 14:202–216. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0522-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xiong C, Singh B, He J-Z, Han Y-L, Li P-P, Wan L-H, Meng G-Z, Liu S-Y, Wang J, Wu C-F, Ge A-H, Zhang L. 2021. Plant developmental stage drives the differentiation in ecological role of the maize microbiome. Microbiome 9. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01118-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Francisco-Ortega J, Wang Z-S, Wang F, Xing F-W, Liu H, Xu H, Xu W-X, Luo Y-B, Song X-Q, Gale S, Boufford D, Maunder M, An S-Q. 2010. Seed plant endemism on Hainan Island: a framework for conservation actions. Bot Rev 76:346–376. doi: 10.1007/s12229-010-9055-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li Y, Xia Y, Lei Y, Deng Y, Chen H, Sha L, Cao M, Deng X. 2014. Estimating changes in soil organic carbon storage due to land use changes using a modified calculation method. iForest Biogeosci Forestry 8:45–52. doi: 10.3832/ifor1151-007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lan G, Zhixiang W, Chen B, Xie G. 2017. Species diversity in a naturally managed rubber plantation in Hainan Island, South China. Tropical Conserv Sci 10:194008291771242. doi: 10.1177/1940082917712427. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhai DL, Cannon CH, Slik JW, Zhang CP, Dai ZC. 2012. Rubber and pulp plantations represent a double threat to Hainan’s natural tropical forests. J Environ Manage 96:64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lopez S, Rousset F, Shaw FH, Shaw RG, Ronce O. 2009. Joint effects of inbreeding and local adaptation on the evolution of genetic load after fragmentation. Conserv Biol 23:1618–1627. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01326.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Martiny JB, Bohannan BJ, Brown JH, Colwell RK, Fuhrman JA, Green JL, Horner-Devine MC, Kane M, Krumins JA, Kuske CR, Morin PJ, Naeem S, Ovreås L, Reysenbach AL, Smith VH, Staley JT. 2006. Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:102–112. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang K, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Zhu YG, Chu H. 2020. Space is more important than season when shaping soil microbial communities at a large spatial scale. mSystems 5:e00783-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00783-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fierer N, Jackson RB. 2006. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:626–631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507535103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lauber CL, Ramirez KS, Aanderud Z, Lennon J, Fierer N. 2013. Temporal variability in soil microbial communities across land-use types. ISME J 7:1641–1650. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Copeland JK, Yuan L, Layeghifard M, Wang PW, Guttman DS. 2015. Seasonal community succession of the phyllosphere microbiome. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 28:274–285. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-14-0331-FI. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rasche F, Knapp D, Kaiser C, Koranda M, Kitzler B, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S, Richter A, Sessitsch A. 2011. Seasonality and resource availability control bacterial and archaeal communities in soils of a temperate beech forest. ISME J 5:389–402. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ho A, Di Lonardo DP, Bodelier PLE. 2017. Revisiting life strategy concepts in environmental microbial ecology. Microbiol Ecol 93:fix006. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Placella SA, Brodie EL, Firestone MK. 2012. Rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses result from sequential resuscitation of phylogenetically clustered microbial groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:10931–10936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204306109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Evans SE, Wallenstein MD, Burke IC. 2014. Is bacterial moisture niche a good predictor of shifts in community composition under long-term drought? Ecology 95:110–122. doi: 10.1890/13-0500.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N. 2009. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5111–5120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00335-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Root H, McCune B. 2012. Regional patterns of biological soil crust lichen species composition related to vegetation, soils, and climate in Oregon, USA. J Arid Environments 79:93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.11.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bowker MA, Belnap J, Büdel B, Sannier C, Pietrasiak N, Eldridge DJ, Rivera-Aguilar V. 2016. Controls on distribution patterns of biological soil crusts at micro- to global scales, p 173–197. In Weber B, Büdel B, Belnap J (ed), Biological soil crusts: an organizing principle in drylands. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-30214-0_10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cano-Díaz C, Maestre F, Eldridge D, Singh B, Bardgett R, Fierer N, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Branquinho C. 2020. Contrasting environmental preferences of photosynthetic and non-photosinthetic soil cyanobacteria across the globe. Global Ecol Biogeogr 29:2025–2038. doi: 10.1111/geb.13173. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fierer N. 2017. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:579–590. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rousk J, Bååth E, Brookes PC, Lauber CL, Lozupone C, Caporaso JG, Knight R, Fierer N. 2010. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J 4:1340–1351. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shen C, Xiong J, Zhang H, Feng Y, Lin X, Li X, Liang W, Chu H. 2013. Soil pH drives the spatial distribution of bacterial communities along elevation on Changbai Mountain. Soil Biol Biochem 57:204–211. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hannula SE, Morriën E, de Hollander M, van der Putten WH, van Veen JA, de Boer W. 2017. Shifts in rhizosphere fungal community during secondary succession following abandonment from agriculture. ISME J 11:2294–2304. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schmidt SK, Nemergut DR, Darcy JL, Lynch R. 2014. Do bacterial and fungal communities assemble differently during primary succession? Molecular Ecol 23:254–258. doi: 10.1111/mec.12589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Young K. 2006. The selective value of bacterial shape. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70:660–703. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00001-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li S-P, Wang P, Chen Y, Wilson MC, Yang X, Ma C, Lu J, Chen X-Y, Wu J, Shu W-S, Jiang L. 2020. Island biogeography of soil bacteria and fungi: similar patterns, but different mechanisms. ISME J 14:1886–1896. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0657-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lan G, Quan F, Yang C, Sun R, Chen B, Zhang X, Wu Z. 2022. Driving factors for soil fungal and bacterial community assembly in tropical forest of China. Appl Soil Ecol 177:104520. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104520. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lu RK. 2000. Methods for soil agrochemistry analysis. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing, China. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Adams RI, Miletto M, Taylor JW, Bruns TD. 2013. Dispersal in microbes: fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show dispersal limitation at short distances. ISME J 7:1262–1273. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sampson TR, Debelius JW, Thron T, Janssen S, Shastri GG, Ilhan ZE, Challis C, Schretter CE, Rocha S, Gradinaru V, Chesselet MF, Keshavarzian A, Shannon KM, Krajmalnik-Brown R, Wittung-Stafshede P, Knight R, Mazmanian SK. 2016. Gut microbiota regulate motor deficits and neuroinflammation in a model of Parkinson’s disease. Cell 167:1469–1480.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Walters W, Hyde ER, Berg-Lyons D, Ackermann G, Humphrey G, Parada A, Gilbert JA, Jansson JK, Caporaso JG, Fuhrman JA, Apprill A, Knight R. 2016. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. mSystems 1:e00009-15. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00009-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.f.303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Edgar RC. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Trivedi P, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Trivedi C, Hu H, Anderson IC, Jeffries TC, Zhou J, Singh BK. 2016. Microbial regulation of the soil carbon cycle: evidence from gene-enzyme relationships. ISME J 10:2593–2604. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Reich PB, Jeffries TC, Gaitan JJ, Encinar D, Berdugo M, Campbell CD, Singh BK. 2016. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat Commun 7:10541. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Simpson G, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H. 2010. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 117-4.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material. Download spectrum.01846-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.9 MB (994.2KB, pdf)
Data Availability Statement
The raw reads were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database (accession no.: SRP278296, SRP278319).






