ABSTRACT
Arthropod pathogens and other microorganisms have been documented from mass production systems aimed at producing natural enemies for pest control. If losses due to pathogens are encountered in such systems, they could lead to uneconomical production of natural enemies and/or a loss of predator quality for effective field control of target pests. Here, we identify and describe the laboratory transmission of a bacterial pathogen, Acaricomes phytoseiuli, in a Chinese strain of the local predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus following contact with Phytoseiulus persimilis, a predatory mite imported for the control of small sap-sucking pests in greenhouses. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequences of A. phytoseiuli isolated from the Chinese strain of N. californicus showed 99.6 and 99.78% similarity, respectively, to the pathogen isolated from a European population (DSM14247 strain). This is the first report of P. persimilis infected with A. phytoseiuli outside Europe and transmitting to a local predatory mite species. A. phytoseiuli severely damaged local N. californicus, leading to a dorso-ventrally flattened body and reduced prey consumption and reproduction as well as early death. Through fluorescence in situ hybridization, A. phytoseiuli was shown to accumulate in the digestive tract of mites and in the oviductal bulb of adult females. Infected males had no obvious symptoms, but they still were able to pass on the infection to healthy females through contact and mating. The pathogen was transmitted vertically to offspring by either infected parent through adherence to eggshells. A. phytoseiuli could also persist in other herbivorous arthropods from the same habitat, suggesting wider potential risks. Our study highlights pathogen risk to predators in local biocontrol industries through pathogen spread from imported material.
IMPORTANCE Predatory mites are important natural enemies for biological control of pests, but mass rearing of the mites can be affected by pathogens. In particular, the mite pathogen Acaricomes phytoseiuli may pose a threat to predatory mite production, and we have now detected this pathogen in China. We explored the pathogen’s transmission within species, its ability to transfer to a locally important predatory mite species, and symptoms following transfer. The detection of A. phytoseiuli and its ability to transfer to a local predator where it reduces performance highlight the importance of ongoing monitoring and hygiene in the predatory mite industry.
KEYWORDS: biological control, vertical transmission, cross-species infection, fluorescence localization, Neoseiulus californicus
INTRODUCTION
Arthropods and microbes interact in various ways, with the microorganisms functioning as mutualists, pathogens, or commensals, depending on the nature of their interactions with the host (1). Environmental microbes can become opportunistic pathogens of their arthropod hosts, particularly when arthropod hosts develop under overcrowded conditions, leading to hosts encountering much higher doses of pathogens than they would likely encounter normally (2). This is an important consideration for natural enemies of arthropods, which are increasingly being intensively produced under crowded conditions for release to control pests in various agroecosystems (3).
Predatory mites represent important predators that have been widely used in biological control for more than half a century worldwide. In particular, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot has become one of the mainstays of integrated management of spider mites in greenhouses in Europe since the 1960s (3, 4). However, the effect of pathogens on predator mite quality is often ignored in mass rearing situations, even though some pathogens are known to affect the performance of their mite hosts. Acaricomes phytoseiuli is the first report bacterial pathogen in P. persimilis isolated from host populations in Europe (5), resulting in host mites insensitive to herbivore-induced plant volatiles, known as “nonresponding syndrome,” as well as ceasing prey consumption and oviposition until eventual death (6). P. persimilis infected by A. phytoseiuli therefore presents a risk in integrated pest control (IPM) programs based on release of mass-reared mites. Moreover, as commercially produced P. persimilis mites are traded worldwide, but other predatory mites can be important to industries locally, there is the potential for pathogens to spill over from imported species to local commercially important species where the microbes may have detrimental effects.
In China, P. persimilis was first introduced from Sweden as a commercial strain in 1975 (7). There have been subsequent introductions from Europe to local commercial producers and further exchanges among research institutions and between these and commercial producers in the past few decades (8, 9). Besides widespread release of P. persimilis, the suitability of mass rearing of many indigenous predatory mites has also been explored and other mite species are now produced for different crop zones targeting various pests in China (9): these include Neoseiulus californicus McGregor (10), a particularly efficient predator of spider mites (11), citrus red mites (12), and thrips (13) on vegetables and fruits. To improve control of a range of mite pests, N. californicus has been used in a complementary manner with P. persimilis in the field.
The A. phytoseiuli infection has so far only been documented in P. persimilis populations in Europe, but not in P. persimilis or other predatory mite species in the United States and Australia (5), even though predatory mites have been moved across continents for several decades. Here, we now report the first detection of A. phytoseiuli on P. persimilis populations reared over 10 years in our lab. The pathogen showed a high level of molecular similarity with European isolates. We then demonstrate the capability for the pathogen to transfer to N. californicus, where it had a substantial negative effect on female reproduction. We also characterize the mode of transmission of the pathogen within species and its potential transfer to other arthropods.
RESULTS
Acaricomes phytoseiuli detected in area of Asia for the first time.
We selected 5 P. persimilis and 10 N. californicus laboratory lines for screening of the microbial community by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Among the N. californicus lines, 5 shared an insectary with P. persimilis, while the other 5 were located in a separate insectary. A. phytoseiuli was identified in all P. persimilis lines and 5 N. californicus lines (Fig. 1A); all A. phytoseiuli-positive N. californicus lines were from the insectary shared with P. persimilis. The relative abundance of A. phytoseiuli in the microbial community as assessed from read number was high and constituted >75% of reads in two of the lines tested for each of the species (Fig. 1A).
FIG 1.
Detection of A. phytoseiuli in two species of predatory mites, P. persimilis and N. californicus. (A) Relative abundance of A. phytoseiuli from 5 and 10 lines of P. persimilis and N. californicus, respectively; (B) maximum likelihood tree of 16S rRNA sequences among Micrococcaceae. Bar colors indicate bacteria isolated from environments (black), plants (green), or animals (red). Relative bootstrap values are represented by circles at each node with colors. (C) Presence of A. phytoseiuli in the original lines and mixed rearing lines of two mite species, including (from left to right) P. persimilis cultured by itself, mixed cultures of P. persimilis and N. californicus, and N. californicus cultured by itself.
The A. phytoseiuli strains from Chinese populations of P. persimilis and N. californicus showed 100% similarity of 16S rRNA sequence (MZ361977 and MZ363838), while they were 99.6% identical (1,326/1,331 bp) to the sequence of the DSM14247 strain isolated from a European population (NR_042334) (14). Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the isolates from N. californicus named as ZQ strains belonged to the Acaricomes genus, with the nearest phylogenetic neighbor being Haematomicrobium sanguinis (NR_044399), a pathogen isolated from human blood (Fig. 1B and see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis suggested that the ZQ strain was closely related to the DSM14247 strain (GCA_000376245.1) with 99.78% identity (PRJNA886762) (Table S1), possessing a 2.37-Mb genome with 2,194 genes. To investigate the potential virulence factors affecting host mites, we characterized 176 genes from the Virulence Factor database (VFDB) and 140 genes from Pathogen-Host Interactions database (PHI-base) by protein sequence BLAST searches. A total of 56 intersecting virulence genes were found, which involved intercellular toxins (proteases), secretion systems and effectors (type I secretion system [T1SS], T4SS, and T6SS), and response regulators and transporters (Table S2), suggesting potential molecular interactions between the pathogen and its hosts.
To clarify whether A. phytoseiuli was an original pathogen in local N. californicus, we amplified the 16S rRNA gene of this bacterium in four wild populations from various plant hosts (Tables S3 and S4). None of the samples in wild populations were found to harbor A. phytoseiuli. Then we intentionally set up containers to monitor whether A. phytoseiuli could horizontally transfer between laboratory species in a confined space. We found that all five replicates of an uninfected culture of N. californicus (Fig. 1C, indicated in yellow) became infected after 2 weeks of being held together in rearing boxes with A. phytoseiuli-positive P. persimilis (red) (Fig. 1C).
Pathogenicity of A. phytoseiuli to N. californicus.
Using in vivo virulence assays, we found that A. phytoseiuli was pathogenic to new host N. californicus, which was infected after exposure to a microbial suspension (Fig. 2). When infected with A. phytoseiuli, female adults were affected morphologically, becoming dorso-ventrally flattened, with a less intense body color and with discoloration in the opisthosoma compared to healthy individuals (Fig. 2A, panels b and f). In contrast, infected males were only lighter in color than uninfected males (Fig. 2A, panels d and h). We also found that both the infected male and female adults had dark stains in the opisthosoma when observed on glass slides (Fig. 2A, panels n and p). Under polarized light, bright areas were obvious to represent crystal precipitations in the rectum and Malpighian tubules in infected mites (Fig. 2A, panels j and l), in contrast to normal females and males (Fig. 2A, panels i and k).
FIG 2.
Symptoms of N. californicus infected by A. phytoseiuli. (A) Graphs of adult mites of both sexes with and without pathogen under stereoscopic microscope and light microscope. Bright color in panel j and l insets represents locations of exogenous microbial accumulation. (B) Survival rate of N. californicus after being treated with a 1× PBS suspension of live- and heat-killed A. phytoseiuli; (C) T. urticae egg consumption by N. californicus infected with and without A. phytoseiuli; (D) first week fecundity of N. californicus mated in four combinations. “−” indicates clean adults, and “+” indicates adults infected by A. phytoseiuli. (E) Predatory index of N. californicus infected with and without A. phytoseiuli. Each group/dot indicates the preference of 20 female mites. ****, P < 0.0001; NS, not significant.
A. phytoseiuli caused >50% mortality in N. californicus within a week (Fig. 2B) (Kaplan-Meier survival curve, P < 0.001), whereas exposure to heat-killed A. phytoseiuli did not affect the survival rate of mites, suggesting a detrimental effect of bacterial proliferation on their hosts. The A. phytoseiuli infection also significantly reduced the predatory capacity of N. californicus from 8.18 to 4.95 spider mite eggs consumed per female per day (Fig. 2C). Additionally, A. phytoseiuli caused a significant reduction of fecundity from 18.90 to 2.76 eggs per infected female within the first week (Fig. 2D). However, “nonresponding syndrome” to prey was not found in infected predators (Fig. 2E). Surprisingly, infected males transmitted the pathogen to females during copulation, resulting in female mortality (Fig. S2). The A. phytoseiuli infection could be transferred to the next generation through either female or male parents (Fig. S3), while infected females passed a higher dose of A. phytoseiuli than infected males to offspring.
The A. phytoseiuli infection targets the reproductive system of N. californicus females.
To clarify the enriched location of the pathogen, we performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of A. phytoseiuli in both infected males and females. After 3 days since the mites had been sprayed with A. phytoseiuli suspension, the pathogen was widely distributed in the esophagus (Os), three cecal pairings (Ca I to III), central midgut (Mg), Malpighian tubules (Mt), and especially in the oviductal bulb epithelium (Ob) of females (Fig. 3e). In males, A. phytoseiuli was confined to the Os, Mt, and anal atrium (Aa) (Fig. 3j).
FIG 3.
Accumulated locations of A. phytoseiuli in two sexes of N. californicus by FISH. Adult female (a to e) and male (f to j) mites were observed under ×40 magnification from the dorsal side. Blue, red, and green signals were used for host nuclei (b and g), A. phytoseiuli (e and j), and all bacteria (c and h), respectively. Abbreviations: Os, esophagus; Ca I to III, ceca I to III; Mt, Malpighian tubules; Mg, midgut; Ob, oviductal bulb; Aa, anal atrium.
The A. phytoseiuli infection may transmit through eggshells and to other arthropods.
Given the presence of vertical transmission, we were interested in testing whether A. phytoseiuli showed transovarial transmission. FISH images indicate that A. phytoseiuli did not exist in ventrally located eggs of both P. persimilis and N. californicus females, but only on the eggshell (Fig. 4A, panels IIIc and IVc). After eggs had been laid, A. phytoseiuli was still on the surface of the egg (Fig. 4B), and then it entered and proliferated in adult predatory mites (Fig. 4C). As mentioned above, A. phytoseiuli-free females can become infected by the pathogen when copulating with infected males (Fig. S2). In this case, the pathogen can also pass on the infection to offspring (Fig. S3).
FIG 4.
Transgenerational transmission and accumulation of A. phytoseiuli in two mite species. (A) FISH images of gravid P. persimilis and N. californicus from the dorsal side are displayed in 5 different channels: (a) bright field, (b) DAPI (blue) for host nuclei, (c) Cy5 (red) for A. phytoseiuli, (d) Alexa Fluor 488 (A488 [green]) for all bacterial endosymbionts, and (e) four merged channels. Rows I and III are P. persimilis, and rows II and IV are N. californicus. The white dotted outline indicates the mite body shape. The orange arrow indicates the existence of bacteria but not A. phytoseiuli in internal eggs. The white scale bars are 100 μm. (B) FISH and SEM images of newly laid eggs of N. californicus. Red signals (Cy5 labeled) and short bacilli are both present on eggshell. (C) Copy number of 16S rRNA of A. phytoseiuli in five developmental stages of P. persimilis and N. californicus. Different uppercase and lowercase letters indicate significance among stages in N. californicus and P. persimilis, respectively. The asterisks indicate comparisons of specific stages between two species. ****, P < 0.0001; *, P < 0.05.
We also examined the potential transfer of A. phytoseiuli to other species. We therefore sprayed A. phytoseiuli suspension on selected arthropod pests that predatory mites often encountered in the same ecosystem, including two-spotted spider mites (Tetranychus urticae), diamondback moths (Plutella xylostella), whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci), western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) and bean aphids (Megoura japonica). After spraying 3 days, A. phytoseiuli could be detected in T. urticae (3/10), P. xylostella (2/10), B. tabaci (5/10), F. occidentalis (6/10), and M. japonica (2/10). The proportion of A. phytoseiuli-positive adults increased in all species across time (Fig. S4), although disease symptoms were not detected.
DISCUSSION
In our study, we uncovered the successful spread of the pathogen A. phytoseiuli from the commercial predator P. persimilis to an indigenous species, N. californicus. While A. phytoseiuli was thought to be a restricted pathogen only in P. persimilis (5), we show here that it may have a potentially wider host range. Given that the genomic identity of the isolate from our study was over 99.8% with the A. phytoseiuli infection characterized previously, we consider the strains in China and Europe to be the same. So far, there are no reports of A. phytoseiuli infection of P. persimilis populations in America and Australia or in other predatory mite species (5), and we also have not detected A. phytoseiuli in several wild populations of N. californicus in China. We therefore hypothesize that A. phytoseiuli may be introduced through P. persimilis strains from Europe, with the capacity to be horizontally transferred to N. californicus following its close contact with P. persimilis.
The transfer of the infection to N. californicus was accompanied by severe morphological damage to the mites, involving a shrunken body, reduced prey consumption, early cessation of oviposition, and early death. The disease appeared particularly detrimental to female adults where the pathogen accumulated. In mass-reared P. persimilis, A. phytoseiuli can induce a “nonresponding syndrome” and reduce predation efficiency (15). However, we found that it did not affect the foraging behavior of N. californicus attacking spider mites.
The negative effect of A. phytoseiuli on the maternal reproduction system of predatory mites may relate to direct or indirect impacts on mite tissues. Schütte et al. (6) have found that A. phytoseiuli accumulated in the lumen of the alimentary tract and may even block it, while the epithelium of the alimentary tract was degenerated. The infection also invaded other tissues, such as the fat body and hemolymph. In our study, we noted effects on the reproductive system of N. californicus that included accumulation in the female oviductal bulb. The epithelial cells of the oviduct play an important role in the developing gamete/embryo by secreting various growth factors (16). We assume that A. phytoseiuli is entering the alimentary tract by feeding and degrading the epithelium of the lumen before targeting and proliferating in the oviductal bulb.
While tissue destruction associated with the pathogen would prevent vertical transmission intracellularly, the eggshell route of transmission used by the pathogen seems effective, particularly given that transmission can occur via both male and female parental mites. A comparable vertical transmission can be seen in the tortoise leaf beetle, Cassida rubiginosa, where Salem et al. reported that a bacterial symbiont, Stammera, only existed in the spheres of the egg caplet of C. rubiginosa during the egg stage; thus, the vertical transmission of the symbiont may follow ingestion by an emerging larva (17). However, in the adult stage of C. rubiginosa, the Stammera infection accumulated in the foregut as well as in the female reproductive tract. During copulation, the spermatophore of the host mite is an isolated structure that is then transferred to the spermatodactyl tip at the bottom of the chelicerae before entering the insemination pore and the spermatheca of the female (18). With the pathogen likely to be present in the spermatophore, this may be the route of pathogen transfer to uninfected females and their reproductive organs.
Through both vertical and horizontal transmission, A. phytoseiuli might be expected to be common in predatory mite populations, suggesting a high risk of spread in mass production of predatory mites. Feces and dead mites containing A. phytoseiuli can be key sources for infestation of populations (19). In our study, A. phytoseiuli could easily enter other insect bodies on leaves with a pathogen suspension. On the one hand, food could be unignorable media to transmit pathogen from prey to predators when feeding. On the other hand, when environmental humidity is suitable, prey fecal bacteria are diluted and active on the leaf surfaces, and from there they could be picked up by other arthropods through natural body openings or the integument (19). According to the “predator prey models with infectious diseases” (20), the predator’s population could acquire an infection from the prey population through the predation process (21). The pathogen may therefore represent a potential source of infection to wild predatory mites if infected P. persimilis mites are released for biological control. Interestingly, A. phytoseiuli has also been found in three social spiders collected in South Africa, although it does not represent a core component of the microbiota of those species (22). Because the similarity between this Acaricomes strain and the DSM14247 A. phytoseiuli strain was 98%, pathogenic A. phytoseiuli may also to spread to spider host populations.
Invasive mosquitoes, ticks, and mites feeding on host fluids can transmit pathogens to affect mammals and birds, while worldwide invasion by the commercial European honey bee Apis mellifera accelerated the spread of Varroa destructor, the vector of bee viruses and bacteria that kill wild bee colonies (23). We suspect that the current study represents one of the first reports of an introduced invertebrate predator carrying and spreading pathogens in a new region. Once the pathogen infects stocks used in the production of predatory mites, it is possible that the pathogen could spread to natural environments. The pathogen therefore should be routinely monitored during the production of predatory mites. Invasive microbial pathogens might be an increasingly important issue over the next 2 decades (24), and any new introductions of biological control agents should include an evaluation of pathogen risks and their possible ecological impact (25).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Survey of A. phytoseiuli in two predatory mite species.
N. californicus was collected in Dinghushan Natural Reserve, Guangdong, China, in 2010 (10). P. persimilis was shared by a local institute from 2006. These two predatory mite populations were maintained in the Laboratory of Predatory Mites, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, over a decade. Both species were fed with Tetranychus urticae (Koch) from Phaseolus vulgaris L. Five P. persimilis isofemale lines and 10 N. californicus isofemale lines used in the present study were separately maintained in plastic boxes, each containing hundreds of individuals (26). All rearing boxes were placed in the incubator under 25 ± 1°C and 70% ± 5% rH with a 16-h/8-h light/dark photoperiod.
The total DNA from 10 adult mites from each line was extracted using a Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit (catalog no. 69506). Predatory mites were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol for 30 s and 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 30 s before being rinsed 3 times in sterile water for another 30 s. Microbial community profiling was performed using the V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene with primers of 515F and 806R by DNA polymerase (Phusion HF DNA polymerase M0530S; NEB). The purified and barcoded amplicon libraries were pooled on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system for PE250 paired-end sequencing (Sinobiocore, Inc., Beijing, China). After filtering of low-quality reads, forward and reverse reads were joined to assign zero-radius operational taxonomic units (zOTUs) using a 97% similarity cutoff in USEARCH UPARSE (27). All zOTUs presented in less than 0.1% abundance were removed. The samples were rarefied at a depth of 10,000 reads per sample. The relative abundance of A. phytoseiuli in 5 P. persimilis lines and 10 N. californicus lines was determined from the percentage of A. phytoseiuli reads among the rarefied 10,000 total reads per sample.
Isolation and genome sequencing of A. phytoseiuli from N. californicus.
Based on the microbiome results, we selected isofemale lines for sequencing from both P. persimilis and N. californicus that were infected by A. phytoseiuli and homogenized 10 surface-sterilized female adults. We then diluted homogenates to 200 μL and plated them onto tryptic soy agar (TSA) plates before incubating them at 25°C for 14 days. The A. phytoseiuli colonies had a smooth, circular and yellowish morphology 1 to 2 mm in diameter at 12 days (14). PCR amplicons of the isolated colonies were amplified using universal primers 27F and 1492R of the 16S rRNA gene (see Table S4 in the supplemental material) before Sanger sequencing (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). A. phytoseiuli-specific primers Ap1-F and Ap1-R were designed for further microbial identification (Table S4).
Genomic DNA of the A. phytoseiuli ZQ strain was extracted from a colony isolated from N. californicus by a Qiagen DNeasy kit and then submitted to the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 system for PE250 paired-end sequencing (Sinobiocore, Inc., Beijing, China), resulting in 4,665,212 raw reads and finally 99.51% quality control (QC) reads. Reads were assembled using Edena v.3.131028 (28) with default parameters, producing 146 contigs and a 2.37-Mb genome size. A total of 2,194 genes were predicted by Prodigal v.2.6 (29). Virulence factors were searched using BLAST against the VFDB (30) and PHI-base (31).
Phylogenetic analysis.
Besides one sequence from our study, a total of 80 sequences of 16S rRNA from the family Micrococcaceae and two sequences from Streptomycetaceae as outgroups were downloaded from NCBI. These sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (32). Poorly aligned positions and divergent regions were eliminated by the Gblocks server (33) with settings of allowed gap positions, smaller final blocks, and less strict flanking positions. The final alignment was used to build a maximum likelihood phylogeny using IQ-TREE with an automatically determined best-fit model and 1,000 bootstrap replicates (34).
Transfer of A. phytoseiuli from P. persimilis to N. californicus.
Based on microbiome profiling and PCR identification of A. phytoseiuli, we identified five infected P. persimilis lines and five uninfected N. californicus lines to test pathogen transfer. We combined two randomly selected lines (one line from each species) in another new rearing box used for normal mite rearing. This produced five combinations of lines that were considered five biological replicates. Controls consisted of five lines of each species kept separately. After 2 weeks, 10 adults from each box were sampled to characterize A. phytoseiuli prevalence by extracting DNA and PCR amplification as described above.
Bioassays on pathogenicity of A. phytoseiuli isolated from N. californicus.
One A. phytoseiuli colony was transferred from TSA plates to TSB in an incubator shaker at 25°C for 180 rpm. After 2 to 3 days, the A. phytoseiuli culture was collected, and the cells were dispersed in 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer. The optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was adjusted to 1, corresponding to A. phytoseiuli at 1.76 × 108 CFU/mL.
(i) Survival assays.
A solution of A. phytoseiuli cells was prepared to spray mites. Half of the solution was heated at 80°C for 30 min and considered a heat-killed bacterial suspension; plating on TSA confirmed the absence of living cells. Sixty N. californicus predatory mites for each of the three treatments (live and heat-killed A. phytoseiuli suspensions as well as PBS) and 40 N. californicus mites assigned as the control (no spray) were used to assess pathogen impact on survival rate. Mites were reared from egg stage in a rearing chamber, which was described by Zhang et al. (35). The bacterial suspension or PBS was sprayed evenly over the surface of 4-cm-diameter bean leaf discs by a handheld sprayer every day. The number of live mites was recorded daily, and dead bodies were collected and stored in ethanol immediately for further confirmation of the presence of the pathogen. Survival curves and statistical analysis using a pairwise log rank test was completed in Prism (GraphPad).
(ii) Predatory capacity of N. californicus infected with A. phytoseiuli.
More than 100 female deutonymph mites from an uninfected population of N. californicus were randomly divided into two groups and sprayed with the A. phytoseiuli suspension (OD600 = 1) or PBS for 3 days. The individuals used for prey consumption were picked from these two groups. To detect the predatory efficiency of adult mites, we individually transferred young female adults starved for 24 h to rearing chambers containing 10 spider mite eggs. We then recorded the remaining eggs number after 24 h. A new chamber with 10 eggs was provided for each predatory mite every day for successive 7 days.
(iii) Fecundity of N. californicus infected with A. phytoseiuli.
To test whether males or females were more affected by the infection, the treatments of N. californicus deutonymph mites of both sexes were repeated, but mites were mated after emergence to adults in four combinations: A. phytoseiuli-free female × A. phytoseiuli-free male (♀− × ♂−), A. phytoseiuli-free female × A. phytoseiuli-infected male (♀− × ♂+), A. phytoseiuli-infected female × A. phytoseiuli-free male (♀+ × ♂−), and A. phytoseiuli-infected female × A. phytoseiuli-infected male (♀+ × ♂+). Males were removed after 1 day to ensure that females could be observed better. Daily fecundity of each female on a leaf disc was recorded, while leaf discs were changed daily to ensure sufficient prey.
(iv) Predatory behavior of N. californicus infected with A. phytoseiuli.
To examine whether the pathogen affected predatory behavior, 20 young females of N. californicus as a group were used to develop a predatory index (−1 to 1). The predatory index of each group was calculated by the formula (no. of mites selected T. urticae – no. of mites selected clean leaf)/20. A T. urticae-infected leaf disc and a clean leaf disc separated by 10 cm were placed in a clean petri dish, and the group of 24-h-starved N. californicus mites was then introduced between the two leaf discs. If all predatory mites in the group chose the T. urticae-infected leaf disc, it was scored as 1, and if all predatory mites chose the clean leaf disc, it was scored as −1. Eleven and 14 replicate groups were tested for A. phytoseiuli-infected mites (treatment) and A. phytoseiuli-free mites (PBS), respectively. Because data were normally distributed, an independent t test was used to compare treatments using Prism (GraphPad).
FISH to detect A. phytoseiuli in P. persimilis and N. californicus adults.
Whole-mount FISH analyses followed published protocols (36). Briefly, newly mated adults were sampled and fixed in Carnoy’s solution overnight before undergoing bleaching in 6% hydrogen peroxide in 80% ethanol to quench autofluorescence. After being hybridized overnight, samples were mounted in SlowFade Diamond antifade mountant with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and observed under a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Zeiss 980). The information on fluorescent dyes and wavelengths is provided in Table S5. We inspected 10 adult predatory mites per species or per sex and picked a single representative mite to perform a z-stack capture using constant laser intensity and aperture. Images were acquired using Zeiss ZEN microscope software.
Scanning electron microscopy of A. phytoseiuli and N. californicus eggs.
We collected A. phytoseiuli cells by rinsing with 1× PBS (pH 7.0) and removing the supernatant. We also sampled newly laid eggs produced by infected N. californicus females. Samples were fixed overnight by 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution at 4°C and rinsed with 1× PBS three times. We then added 500 μL of 1% osmic acid to fix for an hour and dehydrated by ethanol solution with a gradient concentration from 20 to 50 to 80 to 100%. Pure acetone was finally used to replace 100% ethanol, and the samples were air dried. Over 20 samples of A. phytoseiuli and N. californicus eggs were then coated with platinum (Leica EM ACE600) and observed under 3 kV (Hitachi Regulus 8100).
Real-time qPCR assay on P. persimilis and N. californicus.
Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed to detect titers of A. phytoseiuli at different developmental stages of infected P. persimilis and N. californicus isofemale lines. Thirty eggs or nymphs and 10 adults were collected from each line and surface sterilized for DNA extraction. The concentrations of all DNA samples were measured by a Qubit 4 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) before dilution to the same concentration. Four biological repeats and three technical replicates were undertaken for each sample. Copy numbers of 16S rRNA were determined by standard curves covering the range from 102 to 107 copies with R2 above 0.99. Real-time qPCR assays were run in an Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Data availability.
The entire genome of A. phytoseiuli has been deposited at GenBank under BioProject no. PRJNA886762. Two 16S rRNA sequences of A. phytoseiuli were uploaded in GenBank under accession no. MZ361977 and MZ363838.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We appreciate Nicolai Vitt Meyling and Morgane Ourry (Group of Insect Pathology and Biological Control, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark) for valuable suggestions and revisions.
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 32070402), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 6222052), and Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program, CAAS “Protection and Application of Insect Natural Enemies.”
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Bo Zhang, Email: zhangbo05@caas.cn.
Xuenong Xu, Email: xuxuenong@caas.cn.
Daifeng Cheng, South China Agricultural University.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hammer TJ, Sanders JG, Fierer N. 2019. Not all animals need a microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Lett 366:fnz117. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bjørnson S. 2008. Natural enemies of mass-reared predatory mites (family Phytoseiidae) used for biological pest control. Exp Appl Acarol 46:299–306. doi: 10.1007/s10493-008-9187-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.van Lenteren JC, Alomar O, Bjørnson Ravensberg WJ, Urbaneja A. 2020. Biological control agents for control of pests in greenhouses, p 409–439. In Gullino ML, Albajes R, Nicot PC (ed), Integrated pest and disease management in greenhouse crops. Springer, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chant DA. 1961. An experiment in biological control of Tetranychus telarius (L.) (Acarina: Tetranychidae) in a greenhouse using the predacious mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Phytoseiidae). Can Entomol 93:437–443. doi: 10.4039/Ent93437-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gols R, Schütte C, Stouthamer R, Dicke M. 2007. PCR-based identification of the pathogenic bacterium, Acaricomes phytoseiuli, in the biological control agent Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biol Control 42:316–325. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schütte C, Gols R, Kleespies RG, Poitevin O, Dicke M. 2008. Novel bacterial pathogen Acaricomes phytoseiuli causes severe disease symptoms and histopathological changes in the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari, Phytoseiidae). J Invertebr Pathol 98:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2008.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xin J. 1978. Progress in studies on the utilization of beneficial mites. Chin J Appl Entomol 5:88–90. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wu V, Ouyan T, Qian X, Ling X, Wang X, Liang X. 1982. The effects of temperature on development and experiments of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot release to control Tetranychus piercei McGregor. J Plant Prot 9:279–281. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xu X, Lv J, Wang E. 2013. Review of research on predatory mites and its applications in China. China Plant Prot 33:26–34. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xu X, Wang B, Wang E, Zhang ZQ. 2013. Comments on the identity of Neoseiulus californicus sensu lato (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with a redescription of this species from southern China. Syst Appl Acarol 18:329–344. doi: 10.11158/saa.18.4.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Escudero LA, Ferragut F. 2005. Life-history of predatory mites Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on four spider mite species as prey, with special reference to Tetranychus evansi (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biol Control 32:378–384. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2004.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Qin G, Li Q, Yang Q, Wang H, Jiang C. 2013. Potential of predacious mite Neoseiulus californicus in controlling citrus red mite Panonychus citri. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica 2:149–154. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mizobe M, Kashio T, Morita S, Takagi M. 2005. Predation rate of Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) on three species of greenhouse thrips. Kyushu Pl Prot Res 51:73–77. doi: 10.4241/kyubyochu.51.73. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pukall R, Schumann P, Schutte C, Gols R, Dicke M. 2006. Acaricomes phytoseiuli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:465–469. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63930-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schütte C, Kleijn PW, Dicke M. 2006. A novel disease affecting the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari, Phytoseiidae). 1. Symptoms in adult females. Exp Appl Acarol 38:275–297. doi: 10.1007/s10493-006-0015-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee SH, Lee BC. 2021. The interplay between oviduct-derived exosomes and cumulus-oocyte complexes. In Alzahrani FA, Saadeldin IM. (ed) Role of exosomes in biological communication systems. Springer, Singapore. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Salem H, Bauer E, Kirsch R, Berasategui A, Cripps M, Weiss B, Koga R, Fukumori K, Vogel H, Fukatsu T, Kaltenpoth M. 2017. Drastic genome reduction in an herbivore's pectinolytic symbiont. Cell 171:1520–1531.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jiang X, Lv J, Wang E, Xu X. 2019. Spermatophore producing process and sperm transfer in Phytoseiulus persimilis. Exp Appl Acarol 77:11–25. doi: 10.1007/s10493-018-0333-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schütte C, Poitevin O, Negash T, Dicke M. 2006. A novel disease affecting the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari, Phytoseiidae). 2. Disease transmission by adult females. Exp Appl Acarol 39:85–103. doi: 10.1007/s10493-006-0020-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Han L, Ma Z, Hethcote HW. 2001. Four predator prey models with infectious diseases. Math Comput Model 34:849–858. doi: 10.1016/S0895-7177(01)00104-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cojocaru MG, Migot T, Jaber A. 2020. Controlling infection in predator-prey systems with transmission dynamics. Infect Dis Model 5:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2019.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Busck MM, Settepani V, Bechsgaard J, Lund MB, Bilde T, Schramm A. 2020. Microbiomes and specific symbionts of social spiders: compositional patterns in host species, populations, and nests. Front Microbiol 11:1845. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sanders C, Mellor P, Wilson A. 2010. Invasive arthropods. Rev Sci Tech 29:273–286. doi: 10.20506/rst.29.2.1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ricciardi A, Blackburn TM, Carlton JT, Dick JTA, Hulme PE, Iacarella JC, Jeschke JM, Liebhold AM, Lockwood JL, MacIsaac HJ, Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Ruiz GM, Simberloff D, Sutherland WJ, Wardle DA, Aldridge DC. 2017. Invasion science: a horizon scan of emerging challenges and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 32:464–474. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Simberloff D, Stiling P. 1996. Risks of species introduced for biological control. Biol Conserv 78:185–192. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(96)00027-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Xie Z, Lv J, Wang E, Xu X. 2021. Impact of feeding experiences on oviposition and sex allocation of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Syst Appl Acarol 26:1426–1436. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Edgar RC. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat Methods 10:996–998. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hernandez D, François P, Farinelli L, Østerås M, Schrenzel J. 2008. De novo bacterial genome sequencing: millions of very short reads assembled on a desktop computer. Genome Res 18:802–809. doi: 10.1101/gr.072033.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liu B, Zheng D, Jin Q, Chen L, Yang J. 2019. VFDB 2019: a comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D687–D692. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Baldwin TK, Winnenburg R, Urban M, Rawlings C, Koehler J, Hammond-Kosack KE. 2006. The Pathogen-Host Interactions database (PHI-base) provides insights into generic and novel themes of pathogenicity. Mol Plant Microb Interact 19:1451–1462. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Talavera G, Castresana J. 2007. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol 56:564–577. doi: 10.1080/10635150701472164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang X, Lv J, Hu Y, Wang B, Chen X, Xu X, Wang E. 2015. Prey preference and life table of Amblyseius orientalis on Bemisia tabaci and Tetranychus cinnabarinus. PLoS One 10:e0138820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang B, Leonard SP, Li Y, Moran NA. 2019. Obligate bacterial endosymbionts limit thermal tolerance of insect host species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:24712–24718. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915307116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig. S1 to S4 and Tables S1 and S3 to S5. Download spectrum.02654-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.5 MB (505KB, pdf)
Table S2. Download spectrum.02654-22-s0002.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (14.7KB, xlsx)
Data Availability Statement
The entire genome of A. phytoseiuli has been deposited at GenBank under BioProject no. PRJNA886762. Two 16S rRNA sequences of A. phytoseiuli were uploaded in GenBank under accession no. MZ361977 and MZ363838.




