Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2022 Oct 26;10(6):e00614-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00614-22

Metagenomic Features Characterized with Microbial Iron Oxidoreduction and Mineral Interaction in Southwest Indian Ridge

Ying-Wen Zhong a,b, Peng Zhou b, Hong Cheng b, Ya-Dong Zhou b, Jie Pan c,d, Lin Xu b,e, Meng Li c,d, Chun-Hui Tao a,f, Yue-Hong Wu a,b,, Xue-Wei Xu a,b,
Editor: Jeffrey A Gralnickg
PMCID: PMC9769843  PMID: 36286994

ABSTRACT

The Southwest Indian Ridge (SWIR) is one of the typical representatives of deep-sea ultraslow-spreading ridges, and has increasingly become a hot spot of studying subsurface geological activities and deep-sea mining management. However, the understanding of microbial activities is still limited on active hydrothermal vent chimneys in SWIR. In this study, samples from an active black smoker and a diffuse vent located in the Longqi hydrothermal region were collected for deep metagenomic sequencing, which yielded approximately 290 GB clean data and 295 mid-to-high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Sulfur oxidation conducted by a variety of Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Campylobacterota was presumed to be the major energy source for chemosynthesis in Longqi hydrothermal vents. Diverse iron-related microorganisms were recovered, including iron-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria, iron-reducing Deferrisoma, and magnetotactic bacterium. Twenty-two bacterial MAGs from 12 uncultured phyla harbored iron oxidase Cyc2 homologs and enzymes for organic carbon degradation, indicated novel chemolithoheterotrophic iron-oxidizing bacteria that affected iron biogeochemistry in hydrothermal vents. Meanwhile, potential interactions between microbial communities and chimney minerals were emphasized as enriched metabolic potential of siderophore transportation, and extracellular electron transfer functioned by multi-heme proteins was discovered. Composition of chimney minerals probably affected microbial iron metabolic potential, as pyrrhotite might provide more available iron for microbial communities. Collectively, this study provides novel insights into microbial activities and potential mineral-microorganism interactions in hydrothermal vents.

IMPORTANCE Microbial activities and interactions with minerals and venting fluid in active hydrothermal vents remain unclear in the ultraslow-spreading SWIR (Southwest Indian Ridge). Understanding about how minerals influence microbial metabolism is currently limited given the obstacles in cultivating microorganisms with sulfur or iron oxidoreduction functions. Here, comprehensive descriptions on microbial composition and metabolic profile on 2 hydrothermal vents in SWIR were obtained based on cultivation-free metagenome sequencing. In particular, autotrophic sulfur oxidation supported by minerals was presumed, emphasizing the role of chimney minerals in supporting chemosynthesis. Presence of novel heterotrophic iron-oxidizing bacteria was also indicated, suggesting overlooked biogeochemical pathways directed by microorganisms that connected sulfide mineral dissolution and organic carbon degradation in hydrothermal vents. Our findings offer novel insights into microbial function and biotic interactions on minerals in ultraslow-spreading ridges.

KEYWORDS: Southwest Indian Ridge, microbial community, hydrothermal vent, iron oxidation, sulfur oxidation, pyrrhotite

INTRODUCTION

Mid-ocean ridges constitute the longest deep-sea mountain chains on Earth, occupying approximately one third of the area of the global ocean. Based on their spreading rate, mid-ocean ridges can be categorized into fast (full spreading rate ≥ 60 mm yr−1), intermediate (20 mm yr−1 ≤ spreading rate < 60 mm yr−1), slow, and ultraslow (<20 mm yr−1) ridges. Notably, ultraslow ridges have been recently acknowledged as a new class of mid-ocean ridges and increasingly become the ideal model for observing subseafloor geological processes for their uniqueness in morphology and crustal characteristics (1). The Southwest Indian Ridge (SWIR) is a typical ultraslow-spreading center, with a spreading rate as low as 12-15 mm yr−1 (2, 3), occupying approximately 10% of the area of the global oceanic ridge system (4). It is also known as one of the most complicated mid-ocean ridge systems in the global oceans, as its hydrothermal activities are under the interactive control of multiple geological factors such as magma supply, thermal sources of magmatic activities, and tectonic settings (5). Massive deep-sea research has been performed in the SWIR, seeking novel insights in subsurface hydrothermal systems (6, 7), global biogeographic connections (8), and deep-sea mining management (5, 9, 10).

The first active hydrothermal region reported in the SWIR was Longqi, which was discovered during the Chinese DY115-19 cruise in 2007 (11). Up to now, 9 active black smokers and 5 diffuse vents have been reported in Longqi (12), with the maximum temperature reaching 381°C (13). A deep subsurface circulation system featured with a high-temperature, fluid-water mixing process was identified, and may be responsible for the formation of massive sulfide deposits (6, 14, 15) and high Fe but low pH hydrothermal fluids (6). Hydrothermal activities in Longqi have also been presumed active the last 100 thousand years up to now (16), and are continually growing at matured stages (15). Previous investigations have mainly aimed to study microbial community compositions on hydrothermal vents or plumes by means of 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing or denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) (1720). Ding et al. has revealed that microbial communities in Longqi were highly diverse and comparable to other vents in global oceans (17). However, little is known about the potential microbial activities in Longqi hydrothermal vent communities. It is unclear how microbial communities interact with venting activities, seawater, and chimney minerals in the Longqi area.

Biotic iron oxidation in hydrothermal vents is currently poorly understood but is known to be actively associated with local mineral biogeochemistry and microbial energy conservation (2125). Several autotrophic iron-oxidizing species have been reported functionally versatile and metabolically active, such as Zetaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria (Thiomicrospira) (2628). Conversely, up to now, heterotrophic iron-oxidizing bacteria have been rarely detected and most of them are presumed to have limited abilities of conducting iron oxidation by subsidiary abiotic processes (29, 30). Heterotrophic bacteria that can direct enzymatic iron oxidation are scarcely reported across all nature ecosystems, let alone hydrothermal vent environments (29, 31). In fact, strict requirements for growth have consistently composed obstacles in the discovery and cultivation of novel iron-oxidizing species (32). However, recent progresses associated with molecular mechanisms of microbial iron oxidation, such as the recognition of Cyc2 as an iron oxidase (3335) and the discovery of multi-heme proteins functioning in extracellular electron transportation (36, 37), have facilitated chances of studying microbial iron oxidation through bioinformatic methods. Combined with genome-level data and qualified annotation tools (28, 3840), identification of novel iron-oxidizing species would be feasible, as well as evaluation of the microbial interactions with chimney minerals.

To deepen the understanding of the potential microbial activities in ultraslow ridges, deep metagenomic sequencing of samples from an active black smoker (DFF12) and a diffuse vent (DFF1) in the Longqi hydrothermal region were performed. Combined with mineralogical analysis, potential reconstruction of microbiome and its interactions with environment were indicated in this study.

RESULTS

Venting features and mineralogical composition.

Sample Dive96 was collected from DFF12, which is an active black smoker with vigorous venting activity. Sample Dive100 was collected from the diffuse vent DFF1. In 2011, DFF1 was observed as an active black smoker venting at its early stage (41). However, by the time for sample collection in 2015, venting activity in DFF1 had dramatically declined and became a diffuse vent (12). Diverse megafauna were observed in DFF1 such as small fish, shrimp, and gastropods (12). Two vents were situating at a distance of about 370 m in Longqi hydrothermal vent region.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) examination revealed that 2 samples were with distinct mineralogical composition. Bulk sulfide mineral Dive96 was mainly composed of sphalerite (ZnS) with iron-oxyhydroxide (FeOOH) covering the surface (Fig. S1 and Table S1). Anhydrite (Ca2SO4) and pyrrhotite (Fe1-xS) was also detected in Dive96. Dive100 formed hollow cylinder, with iron-oxyhydroxide on its outer surface and the inner wall mainly composed of sphalerite (Fig. S1).

Metagenomic sequencing and binning.

Metagenomic sequencing yielded approximately141.2 GB and 149.8 GB of clean reads for Dive96 and Dive100, respectively. The following assembly processes produced 4.6 GB and 1.1 GB contig data (Table S1). A total of 208 mid-to-high quality (completeness > 70%, contamination <10%) MAGs were recovered from Dive96, and 87 mid-to-high quality MAGs were recovered from Dive100. These MAGs represented 7 archaeal phyla and 35 existing bacterial phyla, as determined by GTDB-Tk and a phylogenetic tree constructed from concatenated alignments of 16 ribosomal proteins (Fig. 1).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

(a) Metagenomic profile of rps3 abundance in two microbial communities. (b) Phylogeny of 295 MAGs inferred from concatenated alignment of 16 ribosomal proteins. Phylogenetic distribution of 7 archaeal phyla and 35 bacterial phyla were collapsed down to phyla or class level (Desulfobacteria). Yet MAGs Dive96_bin2.216 and Dive96_bin4.233 were presumed as unclassified bacteria due to low support in their phylogenetic positions (bootstrap values lower than 70). Solid circles inside phylogenetic tree marked nodes with bootstrap values not lower than 90. Hollow circles marked nodes with bootstrap values lower than 90 but higher than 70.

Microbial structure and composition of MAGs.

Based on an abundance profile of ribosomal protein Rps3 in the 2 metagenomes (Fig. 1), the dominant members of these microbial communities were bacteria rather than archaea. The most enriched members in these 2 bacterial communities belonged to Gammaproteobacteria, which accounted for 20.6% and 61.0% of the total Rps3 abundance in Dive96 and Dive100, respectively (Fig. 1). Campylobacterota was also detected in both samples, with relative abundance reaching 4.5% in Dive96 and 8.1% in Dive100. Chloroflexota and Desulfobacterota were enriched in Dive96, accounting for 10.0% and 12.0% of the abundance, respectively. Alphaproteobacteria were abundant in Dive100, accounting for 24.5% of the total Rps3 abundance.

Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Desulfobacterota were also the dominant groups as each of them were represented by at least 30 MAGs in total. Common thermophilies Aquificota and Methanocaldococcus were detected with total MAG abundance at 0.7% in Dive100, as well as mesophilic Campylobacterota (1.9%) including Sulfurovum, Sulfurimonadaceae, and Sulfurospirillaceae. In Dive96, apart from Sulfurimonadaceae, thermophiles such as Thermosulfidibacterota, Dissulfuribacteria, Defferisomatia (4245) were identified with total MAG abundance at 0.4%. Two MAGs related Nitrospirota, which was previously assumed as the indicators for recent extinct venting activities, were recovered in black smoker Dive96 with abundance at 0.5%. In addition, diverse MAGs related to uncultured FCB superphylum such as of KSB1, Krumholzibacteriota, Gemmatimonadota, Eisenbacteria, and Calditrichota were exclusively obtained in Dive96. Neither MAGs nor 16S rRNA fragments from these bacteria were detected in Dive100 (Fig. 1).

Microbial sulfur metabolic features and associated groups.

Genes participating in sulfide and sulfur were enriched in both microbial communities, such as sqr (sulfide: quinone oxidoreductase) and psrA (thiosulfate reductase/polysulfide reductase chain A) (Fig. 2). Sulfide: quinone oxidoreductase was with the highest abundance in both samples among all genes involved in inorganic sulfur metabolism. It was also widely distributed in approximately half of MAGs associated to 2 archaeal phyla and 18 bacterial phyla. A total of 25.0% and 39.4% of the sqr abundance in Dive96 and Dive100, respectively, were contributed by subtypes (type IV, V, and VI) that play a role in microbial autotropic growth according to phylogenetic analysis (Fig. S2) (46). Sulfide dehydrogenase (fccB) was also with high relative abundance in Dive96 and consequently identified in MAGs associated with Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and Campylobacterota. In addition, psrA was enriched and encoded by 30.8% of MAGs in 16 bacterial phyla, indicating wide metabolic potential of thiosulfate or polysulfide reduction (Fig. 2). Extensive possession of psrA and sqr among different microorganisms also indicated the common metabolic potential for sulfur species (S0, S2−, S2O32−) respiration or detoxification, which is beneficial for adaptation to the dynamic and toxic sulfide-rich environment. As for another key sulfur gene dsrB (dissimilatory sulfite reductase beta subunit), phylogenetic analysis revealed that oxidative type took up approximately 49.8% and 84.6% of total dsrB abundance in Dive96 and Dive100, respectively, emphasizing the dominance of sulfur oxidation (Fig. S3). In contrast, sequences of reductive dsrB took up less abundance and were mainly identified in MAGs associated to Desulfobacterota, Nitrospirota, and Zixibacteria (Fig. 3). Overall, genes associated with sulfur oxidation were relatively enriched in comparison to sulfate reduction ones (Fig. 2), suggesting that the microbial sulfur oxidation might be prior to sulfate reduction.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

(a) Abundance statistics of sulfur metabolic genes in Dive96 and Dive100. (b) Taxonomic profile of key sulfur metabolic genes including dsrAB, sqr, fccB, soxY in Dive96 and Dive100.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Statistics of abundance and metabolism potential of MAGs recovered in this study. In columns that presented the relative abundances of certain microbial groups in 2 samples, diagonal lines in grids indicated that certain microbial group was absent from MAGs pool assembled from the sample. “A” labeled in “sqr” column represented autotrophic subtypes (type IV, V, and VI) of sulfide: quinone oxidoreductase, while others were subtypes that were not indicated with capability of supporting autotrophic growth through sulfide oxidation.

Taxonomic assignment of key sulfur genes sqr, fccB, dsrAB and soxY revealed the major players of microbial sulfur cycle in Dive96 and Dive100 (Fig. 2). Alphaproteobacteria, Campylobacterota, Gammaproteobacteria, and Desulfobacterota were the dominant contributors for sulfur-related genes. Total abundance of sulfur genes assigned to these microbial groups ranged from 46.6% to 97.6%, suggesting they were the dominant sulfur metabolic groups in Dive96 and Dive100. Contribution of Gammaproteobacteria to all 5 genes was the highest in both communities, with abundance taking up 33.9% and 41.9% on average. Following microbial groups were Campylobacterota, with average contribution to fccB, soxY and sqr reaching 16.8% and 25.8% in Dive96 and Dive100, respectively, while no DsrAB sequence were assigned to Campylobacterota (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). Alphaproteobacteria was also an important contributor, averaging 16.8% (Dive96) and 22.9% (Dive100) of 5 sulfur genes (sqr, fccB, dsrAB, and soxY) that were taxonomically assigned to it. In addition, 26.9% (Dive96) and 14.1% (Dive100) of DsrAB protein sequences were assumed to be taxonomically related to Desulfobacterota, corresponding to the reductive type of DsrB sequences identified phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 3 and Fig. S3). A few reductive types of DsrB sequences was also identified in Nitrospirota, Chlofoflexota, Planctomycetota, and Zixibacteria associated MAGs. Meanwhile, Desulfobacterota also contributed about 3.2% of soxY, suggesting it might comprise sulfur-oxidizing members (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3).

Diverse MAGs, encoding dsrABEFHLMKJOP gene clusters or Sox thiosulfate oxidation pathway, were also recovered in Dive96 and Dive100, including Gammaproteobacteria (Thioglobus, UBA4486, SZUA-229 Thiohalomonadales, Thiotrichaceae, Woeseiales, and Xanthomonadales) and Alphaproteobacteria (Rhodobacteraceae, Rhodospirillales, and Rhizobiales) (Fig. 3). Co-occurrence of the reverse dissimilatory sulfate reduction pathway (rDSR) and Sox pathway indicated the metabolic potential for sulfide and thiosulfate oxidation by various Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria members. Sox gene clusters were also identified in Camoylobacterota (Sulfurovum, Sulfurospirillaceae, Sulfurimonadaceae), Aquificota, and Desulfobacterota. The presence of the Sox pathway in Desulfobacterota-associated members, such as Desulfobulbaceae and Desulfurivibrionaceae, has been reported in sulfide mineral community (47), which might represent novel cable bacteria species that were able to form large filaments for sulfide oxidation and thrive across anoxic and oxic niches (48) (Fig. 3). soxCD was absent from some of the putative sulfur-oxidizing members, including Desulfobacterota, Hyphomicrobiaceae, Thiolapillus, SZUA-229, and Xanthomonadales, indicating incomplete oxidation of thiosulfate and production of elemental sulfur. However, Hyphomicrobiaceae might be capable of disproportion of elemental sulfur as sor (sulfur oxygenase) was also identified (Fig. 3).

Microbial iron metabolic features.

Here, homologs of the iron oxidase Cytochrome c Cyc2 were detected in 39 MAGs affiliated with 17 bacterial phyla, including Calditrichota, Eisenbacteria, Gemmatimonadota, Hydrogenedentota, Nitrospinota, Planctomycetota, Acidobacteriota, Krumholzibacteriota, CSSED10-310, KSB1, Gammaproteobacteria, Zetaproteobacteria, and Bacteroidota (Fig. 3, Table S2, and Fig. S9). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 3 clusters were formed between these newly-discovered Cyc2 homologs and function-verified Cyc2 sequences, similar to the description in Mcallistar et al., (2020) (35) (Fig. 4). Represented by diverse FeOB including Zetaproteobacteria and Leptospirillum spp, cluster III comprised approximately 75% of Cyc2 homologs identified in this research. Most of the Cyc2-like sequences in cluster III were situated in a large subclade associated with acidophilic Leptospirillum spp and electroautotroph Candidatus Tenderia electrophaga, which has been reported to oxidize electrodes to derive energy (49). Four Cyc2 homologs from MAGs associated with DTB120 (Desulfobacterota) and Nitrospinota with situated in cluster I, which is represented by neutrophilic FeOB Gallionellaece. Cluster II also contained four Cyc2-like sequences identified in Bacteroidota and Methylomonadaceae (Gammaproteobacteria) associated MAGs.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Phylogenetic tree of Cyc2 and Cyc2-like protein sequences identified in this study. Visualization followed as McAllister et al., 2020 presented. Gray clusters that marked with star symbols indicated the positions novel Cyc2 homologs identified in MAGs.

Multi-heme proteins were widely detected among 64.6% of the recovered MAGs affiliated with 28 bacterial phyla, such as Gammaproteobacteria, Desulfobacterota, Calditrichota, and Gemmatimonadota (Fig. 3 and Table S2). These multi-heme sequences were inferred as cytochrome proteins by eggNOG 5.0 database. A total of 80.7% of these multi-heme protein sequences were predicted with signal peptide for secretion by SignalP (50), and 57.0% of them were presumed to be located on the outer membrane, periplasmic, or extracellularly by PSORTb (51), sites where multi-heme proteins have been found to conduct extracellular electron transfer during respiration activities (52).

Metabolic potential of iron acquisition and storage were massively detected among MAGs in Dive96 and Dive100 (Fig. S10 and Table S2). Approximately 22.4% of MAGs contained amoA (amonabactin biosynthetic gene) or angR (anguibactin system regulator), which are responsible for synthesizing amonabactin and anguibactin, siderophores with high chelation affinity to extracellular iron for metabolic usage. Transportation of siderophores was detected in over 60% of the MAGs, which is related to at least 7 different types of organic molecules such as anguibactin and bacillibactin. Fe(II) ions ABC transporter genes FeoAB were also detected in approximately 50% MAGs. Ferritin proteins serving in iron storage were densely identified in 68.2% and 59.8% of MAGs in Dive96 and Dive100, respectively (Fig. S10).

Iron-oxidizing and iron-reducing microorganisms.

(i) Zetaproteobacteria. Identification of ZetaOTUs indicated the hidden, but large diversity of Zetaproteobacteria species inhabiting Dive96. A total of 21 types of ZetaOTUs were detected in Dive96, while 4 of them assumed as novel ZetaOTUs representing unassigned species (Fig. S5). Two types of ZetaOTU were detected in Dive100, related to members of Mariprofundus (ZetaOTU36) and Ghiorsea (ZetaOTU09). Ghiorsea might be the dominant Zetaproteobacteria member in both Dive96 and Dive100, as ZetaOTU09 took up approximately 43.8% and 88.1% of the total Zetaproteobacteria abundance in Dive96 and Dive100, respectively. In addition, 5 MAGs associated with Zetaproteobacteria were also recovered from Dive96, and took up about 2.7% of the total abundance among all MAGs, indicating that energy derived from iron oxidation might also support chemosynthesis in vent chimneys (Fig. 3).

(ii) Iron-reducing bacteria. MAGs associated to iron-reducing representatives were recovered in Dive96 (Fig. 3), including Fe(III)-reducing and Mn(IV)-reducing Deferrisoma (44, 45) and ferrihydrite-reducing Thermosulfidibacter (42) (Fig. S6 and Fig. S7). Electrode-respiring and Fe(III)-reducing Geopsychrobacter (53) were detected in Dive96 and Dive100, which is also enriched in inactive sulfide mineral samples. In addition, genes mtrAB functioning in Fe(III) reduction (54) were also encoded by diverse MAGs associated to Acidobacteria, Desulfobacterota, Zixibacteria, etc. (Fig. 3 and Table S2). MAGs associated to Zixibacteria encoded both iron oxidoreductase mtrAB and rTCA pathways, indicating chemolithoautotrophic lifestyle. While previous research has indicated the iron-reducing metabolic potential for Zixibacteria in coastal sediment (55), the recovery of chemotrophic iron-reducing Zixibacteria in hydrothermal chemosynthetic ecosystem highlighted not only its wide distribution, but also function in iron and carbon biogeochemistry in global ecosystems.

(iii) Magnetotactic bacterium. Another MAG named Dive96_bin3.242, associated with Nitrospirota, also carried a complete magnetosome gene cluster and Wood-Ljungdahl pathway, which might be autotrophic magnetotactic bacterium (MTB) producing magnetosomes made of magnetite (Fe3O4) or greigite (Fe3S4) (Fig. 3 and Fig. S8). As a result of reductive sulfide-rich hydrothermal fluid and oxygenic seawater mixing, a dynamic redox gradient was created, and an oxic-anoxic interface was formed around the venting area, which might be an ideal niche for magnetotactic bacteria to grow and facilitate magnetosme production.

DISCUSSION

Mineral-involved chemosynthesis.

Sulfur oxidation was the most frequently detected pathway for chemosynthesis in Dive96 and Dive100. The majority of assimilatory RubisCO (Ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase) sequences (form I and II [56]) were identified in MAGs carrying the rDSR or Sox pathway, such as Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria (Fig. 3). The reductive citrate cycle (rTCA) pathway was present in putative thiosulfate-oxidizing MAGs associated with Campylobacterota, Nitrospinota, and Aquificota in which a Sox cluster was also detected (Fig. 3). Overall, sulfur-oxidizing pathways were possessed by 64.10% of putative autotrophic MAGs in Dive96, and 88.46% in Dive100. Notably, some of these sulfur-oxidizing MAGs affiliated with Gammaproteobacteria and Alphaproteobacteria carried various combinations of sulfur-related genes such as sqr, Sox, rDSR, and soeABC, which indicated versatile genomic potential for sulfur oxidation using various sulfur substrates (sulfide, thiosulfate, sulfite) in multiple reaction sites (cytoplasmic and periplasmic), connecting energy conservation with cellular growth and primary production (57). These sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) such as Thiohalomonadales, Thiotrichaceae, and Hyphomicrobiaceae were enriched in microbial communities, further emphasizing the significance of sulfur oxidation in microbial chemosynthesis (Fig. 3).

Some of the sulfur-oxidizing primary producers were also detected in microbial communities on inactive sulfide minerals (Fig. S4). After extinction of hydrothermal vent activities, solidate sulfide mineral was presumed to substantially support chemosynthesis in terms of microbial sulfur-oxidation. Autotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria enriched in inactive sulfide minerals might be experts in utilizing sulfide mineral as energy source, capable of dissolving or extracting reductive sulfide species from sulfide minerals for energy conservation. Members of Thiohalomonadales encoding Sox and rDSR gene clusters were detected in Dive96 and Dive100, which were also previously found enriched in extinct vents in the East Pacific Rise and sulfide mineral in Manus Basin (58, 59). Sulfur-oxidizing SZUA-229 members dominant in inactive sulfide minerals or chimney walls (58, 59) were also recovered in Dive96, with MAGs encoding Sox gene clusters. Electrode-respiring Cadidatus Tenderia was recovered in Dive96 although the sulfur-oxidizing pathway was absent. Detection of these “mineral-preferred” sulfur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria indicated chimney mineral supporting microbial chemosynthesis in Dive96 and Dive100 (Table 1, Fig. 3, and Fig. S4). With the additional assistance of diverse “mineral” Gammaproteobacteria members, microbial community might be able to utilize sulfur from chimney minerals and surrounding fluid for chemosynthesis, simultaneously.

TABLE 1.

Feature and distribution of several Gammaproteobacteria members found in Dive96 and Dive100a

Class/phylum Members Sample Reference
Gammaproteobacteria SZUA-229 Dive96 47, 58, 59
Gammaproteobacteria Tenderia Dive96 58, 59
Gammaproteobacteria Thiohalomonadales Dive96, Dive100 58, 59
Gammaproteobacteria Xanthomonadales Dive96, Dive100 48, 58
a

“Mineral” type Gammaproteobacteria are presumed capable of oxidizing insoluble sulfur from chimney minerals except for Tenderia. Phylogenetic positions with reference Gammaproteobacteria genomes from other hydrothermal vents or inactive minerals were presented in Fig. S4.

Expanded mineral-microbe interaction.

Microbial sulfur and iron metabolisms could be significant in as both chimney samples were composed of sulfide minerals (Table S1 and Fig. S1). As both fccB and sqr participate in the oxidation of sulfide and generation of elemental sulfur product (S8 or HS-(Sn)-SH) in forms of sulfur globules or extracellular organic minerals (53, 54), their significant enrichment also highlighted the metabolic potential in oxidizing sulfide and transforming sulfur-related minerals in the microbial community. Through sulfur metabolisms, microbes might participate in sulfide material transformation involved with mineral weathering as a result of energy conservation or cellular detoxification.

Electron transportation between cells and minerals was also fascinating as it indicated microorganisms’ capabilities of utilizing mineral for energy conservation. Previous metagenomic surveys have demonstrated that putative extracellular electron transporter such as multi-heme proteins (36, 52, 56) were frequently detected and highly expressed in microbial communities accommodated on inactive sulfide minerals (58). In Dive96 and Dive100, wide distributions of multi-heme protein sequences were also observed, and their products were mostly assumed to be secreted to periplasmic or extracellular sites where oxidoreduction were reported (52). This expanded distribution of multi-heme proteins (Fig. 3 and Table S2) covered both chemolithoautorophs and heterotrophs with different energy conservation strategies such as SOB (Gammaproteobacteria, Campylobacterota), sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB, Desulfobacterota), nitrate-oxidizing bacteria (NOB, Nitrospinota), and iron-oxidizing bacteria (FeOB, Zetaproteobacteria and Zixibacteria). As potentially serving in establishments of massive networks of extracellular electron transfer (EET) between cells or cells to minerals (36, 52, 56), multi-heme proteins can assist in cooperative energy conservation between syntrophic partners (57) or enabling microorganisms to access more diverse electron acceptors or donors, such as insoluble sulfide minerals or soluble Fe(III), Mn(IV) ions, etc. (36, 52, 56). The establishment of well-organized electron transport networks by multi-heme proteins might comprehensively enhance microorganisms’ adaptation and survival in extreme hydrothermal conditions (37), extending their energy sources to solid chimney minerals rather than being constrained by the availability of materials from hydrothermal fluids or seawater.

Potential influences of minerals on microbial community.

Distinct microbial iron oxidoreduction metabolic potential was observed between Dive96 and Dive100, and more diverse microbial participation was featured in Dive96. Firstly, a more diverse composition of iron-oxidizing Zetaproteobacteria represented by ZetaOTUs was detected in Dive96 (Fig. S5). Secondly, more diverse Cyc2 homologs possessed by MAGs were also detected in Dive96 than in Dive100 (Fig. 4 and Fig. S9). Thirdly, various iron-related bacteria were also identified in Dive96, such as Defferisomatia, Thermosulfidibacter, Desulfovibrionaceae, and magnetotactic bacteria Nitrospirota (Fig. 3, Fig. 5, Fig. S6, Fig. S7, and Fig. S8) (42, 44, 45, 60, 61). This increased diversity of both iron-oxidizing members and iron-reducing members might indicate a more active iron biogeochemical cycle in Dive96 directed by multiple microbial species.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Potential scheme of microbial sulfur and iron metabolisms and associated interactions between hydrothermal environment, chimney mineral and microbial communities in Longqi region.

One of the underlying reasons could be owed to the difference in mineral compositions between Dive96 and Dive100. Participation of chimney minerals in chemosynthetic sulfur oxidation was already indicated by the detection of abundant mineral-based Gammproteobacteria members in Dive96 and Dive100. In fact, mineral composition could affect local microbial structure (6268) and cause thermodynamic shifts in the local environment (69). Previous research has illustrated the significant influence of pyrrhotite on microbial iron-oxidizing metabolism in mineral-based communities (70). Content of pyrrhotite supplied to the sphalerite mixture provided more dissolved iron to surrounding environments, which subsequently allowed iron-oxidizing members to thrive and enhance biotic iron oxidization and sulfur oxidization in the microbial community (70) (Fig. 5). In Dive96, it is possible that the augment of Fe(II) and Fe(III) supplied from pyrrhotite enhanced the growth of more diverse FeOBs, such as Zetaproteobacteria. Further dissolution of minerals also released sulfur materials, which could enhance in chemosynthetic sulfur oxidation in Dive96 and allow potential heterotrophic FeOBs to thrive. Accelerated FeOBs further caused dissolution and oxidation of minerals, forming positive feedbacks with increased Fe(III) supply and growth of iron-reducing bacteria. As a result, more diverse microbial iron oxidoreduction indicated by the composition of FeOBs and iron-reducing species was observed in Dive96.

Novel iron-oxidizing bacteria.

As Cyc2 functions as an iron oxidase in FeOBs (34), its distribution in microorganisms might be indicative of potential iron-related functions in hydrothermal vent microorganisms. However, as functional understandings about Cyc2 proteins are still very limited, caution should be practiced about connecting the possessions of Cyc2 homologs and biotic iron oxidation among microorganisms. In this study, multiple steps of bioinformatic analysis were conducted to demonstrate the proper annotation of Cyc2 homologs. Firstly, close examination of conserved regions with heme-binding functions (71) were required. Only sequences with N terminus composition similar to those encoded by function-verified iron-oxidizing bacteria, such as Gallionella, Mariprofundus, Thiomonas, and Acidithiobacillus spp. (Fig. S9) could be identified as Cyc2 homolog candidates (33, 35, 72, 73). Secondly, checking the destinations of these putative Cyc2 products was also necessary, as current research supported that Cyc2 conducted Fe(II) oxidation on the outer membrane where energy conservation was performed with cytochrome oxidases in FeOBs (33, 74, 75).

Analysis in the conserved region compositions, product destinations, and phylogeny diversity revealed that features of novel Cyc2 homologs catered to the current understandings of Cyc2 proteins verified for iron oxidation. Given their similarities, it is theoretically possible that these protein products function as an iron oxidases or electron transporter as previously demonstrated (34, 76), further enhancing microorganisms′ capabilities of conducting extracellular electron uptake or even allowing them to access additional electron donors such as Fe(II) for energy conservation (77).

In this way, potential FeOBs encoding Cyc2 were identified in Dive96 and Dive100. Some of the relevant MAGs also encoded carbon fixation pathways and might be potential chemolithoautotrophic iron-oxidizing bacteria. In addition to Zetaproteobacteria discussed above, 2 MAGs related to Gammaproteobacteria (class SZUA-229 and Thiohalomondales) carried both Cyc2 homologs from cluster III and assimilatory form of RubisCO sequences (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4). These autotrophic MAGs also carried metabolic potential for nitrate reduction and thus catered to the definition of NRFeOx (29), which is capable of utilizing nitrate as electron acceptor coupling with iron oxidation. Our result expands the diversity of uncultured iron-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria inhabiting in hydrothermal vent regions, in addition to isolated Thiomicrospira (26).

Notably, the majority of novel Cyc2-like sequences were found in putative heterotrophic bacterial groups including DTB120, Calditrichota, Gemmatimonadota, Eisenbacteria, Hydrogenedentota, Krumholzibacteriota, Planctomycetota, CSSED10-310, Acidobacteriota, Bacteroidota, KSB1, and SAR324.

Apart from Bacteroidota (78, 79) and uncultured phylum DTB120 (28), other heterotrophic groups detected with Cyc2 here have not been presumed with iron oxidation function previously. However, functional profiles of these MAGs in this study were identical to the prediction of uncultured iron-oxidizing extremophiles featured with functions of versatile organic degradation and utilization of nitrate as electron acceptors (31). For one thing, these MAGs encoded enriched copies of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) while absent of carbon fixation pathways. For example, MAGs related to Gemmatimonadota contained up to 20 copies of PLs (polysaccharide lyases), while members of CSSED10-310, Krumholzibacteriota, Planctomycetota, Hydrogenedentota, Calditrichota, and Bacteroidota contained approximately 30 copies of CEs (carbohydrate esterases), on average. MAGs associated with Eisenbacteria also carried over 50 copies of genes functioning in peptide degradation, suggesting its specialty in utilizing peptide molecules (Fig. 3). Furthermore, genes involved in nitrate or nitrite reduction were also carried by these MAGs, suggesting that nitrate may serve as electron acceptors for microbial iron oxidation. Metabolisms and functions that were practical for microbial iron oxidation were also encoded among these microbial groups. Sixteen MAGs associated with Krumholzibacteriota, Acidobacteriota, Bacteroidota, Calditrichota, CSSED10-310, Hydrogenedentota, Eisenbacteria, Planctomycetota, KSB1, and SAR324 also encoded cytochrome c oxidase for respiration (Table S2), indicating the complete energy conservation path known for microbial iron oxidation (35) (Fig. 3). Functions that were potentially advantageous for iron oxidation were also found, including EPS production and biofilm generation, which can protect microorganisms from suicidal cell encrustation caused by iron-oxyhydroxide (80, 81), and enhance their efficiency in acquisition of organic carbon and iron as aggregates (82).

In fact, microorganisms with phenotypes of heterotrophic iron oxidation have been reported in species of Marinobacter (8386), Alteromonas, Pseudoalteromonas, Pseudomonas, Halomonas, and Alcanivorax (8789), which were indicated with important roles in the iron cycle in subsurface fluid and hydrothermal vents. Research targeting microbial mats covering hydrothermal chimneys have also suggested the activity of heterotrophic iron oxidizers DTB120, and play an important role in element cycling (28). Similarly, our study also indicated the potential function of iron oxidation in diverse heterotrophic bacteria. From the perspective of hydrothermal vent biogeochemistry, a novel biogeochemical pathway connecting biotic dissolution or weathering of sulfide minerals and accessibility of organic carbon was predicted because of the presence of heterotrophic FeOBs. While taking advantage from iron oxidation, heterotrophic FeOBs also cause further dissolution of sulfide minerals as the equilibrium of mineral dissolution is constantly disrupted. Additional sulfur species such as polysulfide, sulfide, and thiosulfate could be supplied into microbial communities (90, 91), and further accelerate carbon fixation performed by sulfur-oxidizing bacteria such as Gammaproteobacteria and Campylobacteria (26). In this way, iron-oxidizing heterotrophs and sulfur-oxidizing autotrophs are mutualistic to each other as they participate in the material replenishment processes for counterparts as a result of cellular energy conservation. A new iron-related biogeochemical pathway influenced by organic carbon availability may be present, which is under the control of the interaction of sulfide-oxidizing chemolithoautotrophs and iron-oxidizing chemoorganotrophs.

Conclusion.

In this study, a metagenomic survey was conducted targeting 2 Longqi hydrothermal vents in the SWIR. Through bulk metagenomic analysis and functional profiling on 295 MAGs, microbial structure and metabolic features in Longqi hydrothermal vents revealed the potential impacts of fluid-water mixing and mineralogical composition on microbial communities. Sulfur oxidation by diverse Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Campylobacterota might be the major energy source for primary production in both active black smoker and diffuse vent chimneys, while support from chimney mineral for microbial chemosynthesis was also emphasized. Novel chemoheterotrophic iron-oxidizing species in 12 phyla were identified, and might use nitrate as electron acceptors to couple with iron. Wide distribution of multi-heme and siderophore transportation genes among MAGs also suggested massive electron transportation network between microbes and chimney minerals. Stronger microbial iron oxidoreduction potential was revealed in Dive96 as more diverse compositions of iron-oxidizing and iron-reducing bacteria were detected. It is possible that pyrrhotite in Dive96 minerals provides more dissoluble iron supply for the growth of iron-related species. Inhabitance of these novel iron-oxidizing chemoheterotrophs could further influence iron biogeochemistry in hydrothermal vent minerals but more efforts are essential to verify and quantitively study their iron-oxidizing capabilities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection and mineralogical analysis.

Samples were collected in 2015 on the Chinese Dayang 35th cruise by the R/V, Xiangyanghong 9, and Human operated vehicle (HOV), Jiaolong, using a seven-function manipulator and sample basket. Sample Dive96 was collected from the exterior of the vent DFF12 in Longqi (Fig. 6). Sample Dive100 was collected from a spire branch from the vent DFF1 (also named Jabberwocky). When aboard, the 2 samples were washed using sterile seawater and stored at −80°C until lab subsampling for metagenomic sequencing and mineralogical analysis took place.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Geographical location of Longqi hydrothermal vent region and images of hydrothermal vents DFF12 and DFF1.

Bulk sulfide mineral Dive96 seemed homogeneous with constant mineral composition when observed with naked eyes. Thus, it was cut into 2 small sections for mineralogical analysis and metagenomic sequencing, respectively. Dive100 was a hollow branch and accidentally broken apart during transportation. Only intact pieces of this branch mineral were chosen for further metagenomic sequencing and mineralogical analysis. To conduct mineralogical analysis, a fraction of mineral sample was cut apart and dried out for grating. Three grams of mineral powders with particle sizes less than 0.074 mm were then examined by Powder X-ray Diffraction (X’ Pert PRO) under diffraction conditions of copper target, 45 KV tube voltage, 40 mA tube current, scanning step size at 0.0167°/2θ, scanning range of 5–80°/2θ, and scanning speed at 1.8°min−1. Mineralogical composition was analyzed using the Rietveld full spectrum fitting method (92).

Metagenomic sequencing, assembly, and binning.

Magnetic Soil and Stool DNA Kit (TIANGEN) was used for DNA extraction for samples Dive100 and Dive96. For sample Dive96, a second extraction was conducted following modified DNA extraction protocols introduced by Jenni et al. (93), and products from 2 extraction procedures were mixed to obtain enough DNA for metagenomic sequencing. Library construction was performed using NEBNext Ultra DNA Library Prep Kit for illumina. Sequencing was conducted on the Illumina Hiseq X-10 (PE150) platform in Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.

Raw sequencing data were filtered by Trimmomatic (94) and assembled through IDBA-UD with parameters as “–mink 50,–maxk 92,–steps 8”. MetaBAT2 with 12 sets of parameters was used for metagenomic binning, and standard pipeline of DASTools was used to recover non-redundant binning genomes (95, 96). Subsequent MAG quality checks and refinements were conducted by checkM and refineM (97, 98), respectively. Only bins with genome completeness higher than 70% and contamination less than 10% were retained for further analysis.

Phylogeny and abundance profile of MAGs.

Genome classifier GTDB-Tk (database version: Release 95) (99) was used to assign taxonomy of MAGs. For phylogeny analysis, additional 201 GTDB representative genomes were downloaded and included in phylogenetic analysis (100). Sixteen ribosomal proteins (L2, L3, L4, L5, L6, L14, L16, L18, L22, L24, S3, S8, S10, S17, and S19) were identified by PhyloSift (101) and aligned by MUSCLE (102). Concatenated alignment of 16 ribosomal proteins were merged (103), where positions that contained more than 30% gaps were removed by trimAI (104). Reduced alignments were used as input for IQ-TREE (105, 106) and phylogenetic trees were constructed with a bootstrap value set at 1000 and amino acid substitution model set at LG+G, as Hug et al. suggested (103). Abundance of MAGs was calculated by the proportion of coverage of their binned contigs in the sum of coverage of all contigs assembled in the metagenome. BWA-MEM were used in metagenomic reads mapping to MAGs, and Samtools was used to sort the mapping results (107, 108), which were ultimately analyzed by bedtools to obtain the relative coverage of each MAG (109).

Basic gene calling and multi-step functional annotation.

Multiple annotation tools were used in this study. Coding sequences were first called by Prokka (110). First-round annotation was based on KEGG (111, 112) and eggNOG 5.0 (113, 114). ko2cog tool (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/files/ko2cog.xl) was used to assign COG predictions generated from eggNOG annotation into KO numbers. In the second round, the Hidden Markov Search (115) was conducted as a complementary and double-check measure. Alignments or pre-built models were obtained from TIGRFAMs (116), Pfam (117), CDD (118), and COG (119). These searches were limited at 1 × 10−20 as cutoff e value. To identify hydrogen metabolism genes, custom Hidden Markov Models for hydrogenases from Lithogenie (https://github.com/Arkadiy-Garber/LithoGenie) were deployed, following recommended bitscore cutoffs. Further affirmation in HydDB (120) was also performed for these candidate sequences. CAZymes were annotated using dbcan2 package with default settings (121). Genes related to protein degradation were searched, as Baker et al. suggested (55), in which transcriptional regulator (PF0155) was neglected.

Homologs of iron oxidase Cyc2 were first identified by Lithogenie. Examinations were performed based on alignment features at N-terminal region and predictions of subcellular localizations. Subcellular locations of their products were predicted using SignalP 5.0 (50) and PSORTb 3.0 (51). Only those sequences with similar features that He et al., reported (122) and potentially localized in periplasmic would be recognized as Cyc2-like sequences for further discussion. Multi-heme proteins were predicted as Meier et al. suggested (58), with doubled CXXCH motif PF09699. Genes related to siderophore synthesis and iron transport were annotated using Fegenie (38) with recommended thresholds. Magnetosome associated genes were annotated using the NCBI RefSeq non-redundant protein database (downloaded in September, 2020) (123).

Phylogenetic analysis and abundance profile of functional genes.

Classification of Rps3 protein sequences were based on the NCBI RefSeq non-redundant protein database (downloaded in September, 2020) (123). Maximum likelihood trees of SQR, DsrB, Cyc2, and hydrogenase protein sequences were constructed using IQ-TREE (105, 106). Due to the large numbers of annotated sequences, SQR and DsrB amino acid sequences were first clustered using cd-hit (124) with identity threshold set at 0.85 and 0.75, respectively. Representatives were then merged with reference sequences (125127) and aligned using Muscle (102). Positions with more than 30% gaps would be discarded by trimAI (104). Amino acid substitution models for SQR and DsrB alignment results were inferred through ModelFinder (46). As for Cyc2 phylogeny, additional homologs were searched as Mcallistar et al. (35) suggested, which yielded 484 sequences from IMG and NCBI databases. IQ-TREE ultrafast bootstrapping algorithm (105, 106) and VT+F+R9 models were utilized to construct the phylogenetic tree of these homologs and Cyc2-like sequences found in this study. Brief annotations of resulted phylogenetic trees were conducted in the online tool, iTOL2 (128).

For Rps3 protein sequences, abundance was determined by the relative abundance of the situating contig. For other functional genes, abundance was calculated based on their proportion of recruited reads in the proportion of total reads, as Hou et al. suggested (59). BWA-MEM and Samtools were used in reads mapping and sorting processes (107, 108) while bedtools (109) was used for relative coverage calculation.

ZetaOTU identification and classification.

ZetaOTUs in unbinned contigs were considered as a way of investigating the composition of Zetaproteobacteria, given the difficulty of simultaneously recovering Zetaproteobacteria genomes and corresponding 16S rRNA sequences (107). All 16S rRNA sequences in assembled contigs were first identified by metaxa2 (129). Primary classification was completed through blastn with the SILVA database (version: 138.1) (130, 131). Sequences assumed to be Zetaproteobacteria-related were then classified using ZetaHunter (39).

Data availability.

All metagenome-assembled genomes are available under NCBI Bioproject PRJNA771178.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We deeply appreciate all members and scientists, participating DY35 cruise, and the submersible Jiaolong team. We especially thank Li Xiangyang and Yang Qunhui in Tongji University who collected hydrothermal vent samples during the deep dive in SWIR.

We also appreciate the editing and professional suggestions for the manuscript from Liu Qian (Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources) and Liao Li (Polar Research Institute of China). We thank Ge Shutong for the efforts of embellishing figure six.

X.-W.X. and Y.-H.W. designed this research. Y.-W.Z. conducted data analysis and wrote this manuscript. P.Z. and L.X. gave professional suggestions regarding to organizing this manuscript and helped revise it. H.C. participated in mineralogical analysis of 2 samples. Y.-D.Z. provided background information of SWIR hydrothermal vents. J.P. and M.L. gave technical support in metagenomic data assembly. All writers revised this article.

This work was supported by grants from National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2021YFF0501303), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41876182) and Scientific Research Fund of the Second Institute of Oceanography, MNR, grand no. JZ1901.

We declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Supplemental material. Download spectrum.00614-22-s0001.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.04 MB (45.7KB, xlsx)
Supplemental file 2
Supplemental material. Download spectrum.00614-22-s0002.pdf, PDF file, 1.3 MB (1.3MB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Yue-Hong Wu, Email: yuehongwu@sio.org.cn.

Xue-Wei Xu, Email: xuxw@sio.org.cn.

Jeffrey A. Gralnick, University of Minnesota

REFERENCES

  • 1.Snow JE, Edmonds HN. 2007. Ultraslow-spreading Ridges: rapid paradigm changes. Oceanog 20:90–101. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2007.83. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Husson L, Yamato P, Bézos A. 2015. Ultraslow, slow, or fast spreading ridges: arm wrestling between mantle convection and far-field tectonics. Earth and Planetary Science Lett 429:205–215. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.07.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yang W, Tao C, Li H, Liang J, Liao S, Long J, Ma Z, Wang L. 2017. 230Th/238U dating of hydrothermal sulfides from Duanqiao hydrothermal field, Southwest Indian Ridge. Mar Geophys Res 38:71–83. doi: 10.1007/s11001-016-9279-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sauter D, Cannat M. 2010. The ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge, p 153–173. In Rona PA, Devey CW, Dyment J, Murton BJ (ed), Diversity of hydrothermal systems on slow spreading ocean ridges. American Geophysical Union, United States of America. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tao C, Li H, Jin X, Zhou J, Wu T, He Y, Deng X, Gu C, Zhang G, Liu W. 2014. Seafloor hydrothermal activity and polymetallic sulfide exploration on the southwest Indian ridge. Chin Sci Bull 59:2266–2276. doi: 10.1007/s11434-014-0182-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tao C, Seyfried WE, Lowell RP, Liu Y, Liang J, Guo Z, Ding K, Zhang H, Liu J, Qiu L, Egorov I, Liao S, Zhao M, Zhou J, Deng X, Li H, Wang H, Cai W, Zhang G, Zhou H, Lin J, Li W. 2020. Deep high-temperature hydrothermal circulation in a detachment faulting system on the ultra-slow spreading ridge. Nat Commun 11:1300. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15062-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu T, Tivey MA, Tao C, Zhang J, Zhou F, Liu Y. 2021. An intermittent detachment faulting system with a large sulfide deposit revealed by multi-scale magnetic surveys. Nat Commun 12:5642. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25880-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.German CR, Ramirez-Llodra E, Baker MC, Tyler PA, the ChEss Scientific Steering C, ChEss Scientific Steering Committee . 2011. Deep-water chemosynthetic ecosystem research during the census of marine life decade and beyond: a proposed deep-ocean road map. PLoS One 6:e23259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Van Dover CL, Arnaud-Haond S, Gianni M, Helmreich S, Huber JA, Jaeckel AL, Metaxas A, Pendleton LH, Petersen S, Ramirez-Llodra E, Steinberg PE, Tunnicliffe V, Yamamoto H. 2018. Scientific rationale and international obligations for protection of active hydrothermal vent ecosystems from deep-sea mining. Marine Policy 90:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.01.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ren M, Chen J, Shao K, Zhang S. 2016. Metallogenic information extraction and quantitative prediction process of seafloor massive sulfide resources in the Southwest Indian Ocean. Ore Geology Rev 76:108–121. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tao C, Lin J, Guo S, Chen YJ, Wu G, Han X, German CR, Yoerger DR, Zhou N, Li H, Su X, Zhu J, DY115-19 at, Parties D-S . 2012. First active hydrothermal vents on an ultraslow-spreading center: Southwest Indian Ridge. Geology 40:47–50. doi: 10.1130/G32389.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhou Y, Zhang D, Zhang R, Liu Z, Tao C, Lu B, Sun D, Xu P, Lin R, Wang J, Wang C. 2018. Characterization of vent fauna at three hydrothermal vent fields on the Southwest Indian Ridge: Implications for biogeography and interannual dynamics on ultraslow-spreading ridges. Deep Sea Res Part I: Oceanographic Res Papers 137:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2018.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liang J, Tao C, Yang W, Liao S, Jia L, Liu Y, Zhang G, Cai W. 2020. Morphology of hydrothermal deposits and its implication for evolution in the Longqi-1 hydrothermal field, Southwest Indian Ridge. Abstract Goldschmidt, Virtual, Global, European Association of Geochemistry and the Geochemical Society. Goldschmidt, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ji F, Zhou H, Yang Q, Gao H, Wang H, Lilley MD. 2017. Geochemistry of hydrothermal vent fluids and its implications for subsurface processes at the active Longqi hydrothermal field, Southwest Indian Ridge. Deep Sea Res Part I: Oceanographic Res Papers 122:41–47. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2017.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yuan B, Yang Y, Yu H, Zhao Y, Ding Q, Yang J, Tang X. 2018. Geochemistry of pyrite and chalcopyrite from an active black smoker in 49.6°E Southwest Indian Ridge. Mar Geophys Res 39:441–461. doi: 10.1007/s11001-017-9324-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liang J, Tao C, Yang W, Liao S, Huang W. 2019. 230Th/238U Dating of sulfide chimneys in the Longqi-1 hydrothermal fleld, Southwest Indian Ridge. Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition 93:77–78. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.14202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ding J, Zhang Y, Wang H, Jian H, Leng H, Xiao X. 2017. Microbial community structure of deep-sea hydrothermal vents on the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge. Front Microbiol 8:1012. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Li J, Yang J, Sun M, Su L, Wang H, Gao J, Bai S. 2020. Distribution and succession of microbial communities along the dispersal pathway of hydrothermal plumes on the Southwest Indian Ridge. Front Mar Sci 7:581381. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.581381. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lei J, Chu F, Yu X, Li X, Tao C. 2017. Lipid biomarkers reveal microbial communities in hydrothermal chimney structures from the 49.6°E hydrothermal vent field at the Southwest Indian Ocean Ridge. Geomicrobiol J 34:557–566. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2016.1238979. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li J, Zhou H, Fang J, Wu Z, Peng X. 2016. Microbial distribution in a hydrothermal plume of the Southwest Indian Ridge. Geomicrobiol J 33:401–415. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2015.1048393. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kato S, Nakamura K, Toki T, Ishibashi J-i, Tsunogai U, Hirota A, Ohkuma M, Yamagishi A. 2012. Iron-based microbial ecosystem on and below the seafloor: a case study of hydrothermal fields of the Southern Mariana Trough. Front Microbiol 3:89. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rouxel O, Toner B, Germain Y, Glazer B. 2018. Geochemical and iron isotopic insights into hydrothermal iron oxyhydroxide deposit formation at Loihi Seamount. Geochim et Cosmochim Acta 220:449–482. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2017.09.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kennedy CB, Scott SD, Ferris FG. 2003. Characterization of bacteriogenic iron oxide deposits from axial volcano, Juan de Fuca Ridge, Northeast Pacific Ocean. Geomicrobiol J 20:199–214. doi: 10.1080/01490450303873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Edwards KJ, Glazer BT, Rouxel OJ, Bach W, Emerson D, Davis RE, Toner BM, Chan CS, Tebo BM, Staudigel H, Moyer CL. 2011. Ultra-diffuse hydrothermal venting supports Fe-oxidizing bacteria and massive umber deposition at 5000 m off Hawaii. ISME J 5:1748–1758. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Akerman NH, Price RE, Pichler T, Amend JP. 2011. Energy sources for chemolithotrophs in an arsenic- and iron-rich shallow-sea hydrothermal system. Geobiology 9:436–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2011.00291.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Barco RA, Hoffman CL, Ramírez GA, Toner BM, Edwards KJ, Sylvan JB. 2017. In-situ incubation of iron-sulfur mineral reveals a diverse chemolithoautotrophic community and a new biogeochemical role for Thiomicrospira. Environ Microbiol 19:1322–1337. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mori JF, Scott JJ, Hager KW, Moyer CL, Küsel K, Emerson D. 2017. Physiological and ecological implications of an iron- or hydrogen-oxidizing member of the Zetaproteobacteria, Ghiorsea bivora, gen. nov., sp. nov. ISME J 11:2624–2636. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McAllister SM, Vandzura R, Keffer JL, Polson SW, Chan CS. 2021. Aerobic and anaerobic iron oxidizers together drive denitrification and carbon cycling at marine iron-rich hydrothermal vents. ISME J 15:1271–1286. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00849-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bryce C, Blackwell N, Schmidt C, Otte J, Huang Y-M, Kleindienst S, Tomaszewski E, Schad M, Warter V, Peng C, Byrne JM, Kappler A. 2018. Microbial anaerobic Fe(II) oxidation – ecology, mechanisms and environmental implications. Environ Microbiol 20:3462–3483. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jain A, Bonis BM, Gralnick JA. 2021. Oligo-heterotrophic activity of Marinobacter subterrani creates an indirect Fe(II)-oxidation phenotype in gradient tubes. Appl Environ Microbiol 87:e01367-21. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01367-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Price A, Pearson VK, Schwenzer SP, Miot J, Olsson-Francis K. 2018. Nitrate-dependent iron oxidation: a potential Mars metabolism. Front Microbiol 9:513. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Emerson D, Fleming EJ, McBeth JM. 2010. Iron-oxidizing bacteria: an environmental and genomic perspective. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:561–583. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Castelle C, Guiral M, Malarte G, Ledgham F, Leroy G, Brugna M, Giudici-Orticoni M-T. 2008. A new iron-oxidizing/O2-reducing dupercomplex dpanning both inner and outer membranes, isolated from the extreme acidophile Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. J Biol Chem 283:25803–25811. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802496200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Keffer JL, McAllister SM, Garber AI, Hallahan BJ, Sutherland MC, Rozovsky S, Chan CS, Komeili A. 2021. Iron oxidation by a fused cytochrome-porin common to diverse iron-oxidizing bacteria. mBio 12:e01074-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01074-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.McAllister SM, Polson SW, Butterfield DA, Glazer BT, Sylvan JB, Chan CS, Lloyd KG. 2020. Validating the Cyc2 neutrophilic iron oxidation pathway using meta-omics of Zetaproteobacteria iron mats at marine hydrothermal vents. mSystems 5:e00553-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00553-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chong GW, Karbelkar AA, El-Naggar MY. 2018. Nature’s conductors: what can microbial multi-heme cytochromes teach us about electron transport and biological energy conversion? Curr Opin Chem Biol 47:7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2018.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Deng X, Dohmae N, Nealson KH, Hashimoto K, Okamoto A. 2018. Multi-heme cytochromes provide a pathway for survival in energy-limited environments. Sci Adv 4:eaao5682. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Garber AI, Nealson KH, Okamoto A, McAllister SM, Chan CS, Barco RA, Merino N. 2020. FeGenie: a comprehensive tool for the identification of iron genes and iron gene neighborhoods in genome and metagenome assemblies. Front Microbiol 11:37. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.McAllister SM, Moore RM, Chan CS. 2018. ZetaHunter, a reproducible taxonomic classification tool for tracking the ecology of the Zetaproteobacteria and other poorly resolved taxa. Microbiol Resour Announc 7:e00932-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00932-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ward LM, Fischer WW, McGlynn SE. 2020. Candidatus Anthektikosiphon siderophilum OHK22, a new member of the Chloroflexi family herpetosiphonaceae from Oku-okuhachikurou Onsen. Microb Environ 35. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME20030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Copley JT, Marsh L, Glover AG, Hühnerbach V, Nye VE, Reid WDK, Sweeting CJ, Wigham BD, Wiklund H. 2016. Ecology and biogeography of megafauna and macrofauna at the first known deep-sea hydrothermal vents on the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge. Sci Rep 6:39158. doi: 10.1038/srep39158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nunoura T, Oida H, Miyazaki M, Suzuki Y. 2008. Thermosulfidibacter takaii gen. nov., sp. nov., a thermophilic, hydrogen-oxidizing, sulfur-reducing chemolithoautotroph isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal field in the Southern Okinawa Trough. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:659–665. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65349-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Slobodkin AI, Reysenbach AL, Slobodkina GB, Kolganova TV, Kostrikina NA, Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA. 2013. Dissulfuribacter thermophilus gen. nov., sp. nov., a thermophilic, autotrophic, sulfur-disproportionating, deeply branching deltaproteobacterium from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:1967–1971. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.046938-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pérez-Rodríguez I, Rawls M, Coykendall DK, Foustoukos DI. 2016. Deferrisoma palaeochoriense sp. nov., a thermophilic, iron(III)-reducing bacterium from a shallow-water hydrothermal vent in the Mediterranean Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:830–836. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Slobodkina GB, Reysenbach A-L, Panteleeva AN, Kostrikina NA, Wagner ID, Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA, Slobodkin AI. 2012. Deferrisoma camini gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic, dissimilatory iron(III)-reducing bacterium from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent that forms a distinct phylogenetic branch in the Deltaproteobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:2463–2468. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.038372-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. 2017. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhou Z, Liu Y, Xu W, Pan J, Luo Z-H, Li M. 2020. Genome- and community-level interaction insights into carbon utilization and element cycling functions of Hydrothermarchaeota in hydrothermal sediment. mSystems 5:e00795-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00795-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sylvan JB, Toner BM, Edwards KJ. 2012. Life and death of deep-sea vents: bacterial diversity and ecosystem succession on inactive hydrothermal sulfides. mBio 3:e00279-11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00279-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Eddie BJ, Wang Z, Hervey WJ, Leary DH, Malanoski AP, Tender LM, Lin B, Strycharz-Glaven SM, Rabaey K. 2017. Metatranscriptomics supports the mechanism for biocathode electroautotrophy by “Candidatus Tenderia electrophaga”. mSystems 2:e00002-17. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00002-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Almagro Armenteros JJ, Tsirigos KD, Sønderby CK, Petersen TN, Winther O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2019. SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nat Biotechnol 37:420–423. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0036-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yu NY, Wagner JR, Laird MR, Melli G, Rey S, Lo R, Dao P, Sahinalp SC, Ester M, Foster LJ, Brinkman FSL. 2010. PSORTb 3.0: improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes. Bioinformatics 26:1608–1615. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Edwards MJ, Richardson DJ, Paquete CM, Clarke TA. 2020. Role of multiheme cytochromes involved in extracellular anaerobic respiration in bacteria. Protein Sci 29:830–842. doi: 10.1002/pro.3787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Holmes DE, Nicoll JS, Bond DR, Lovley DR. 2004. Potential role of a novel psychrotolerant member of the family Geobacteraceae, Geopsychrobacter electrodiphilus gen. nov., sp. nov., in electricity production by a marine sediment fuel cell. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6023–6030. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6023-6030.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Myers CR, Myers JM. 2002. MtrB is required for proper incorporation of the cytochromes OmcA and OmcB into the outer membrane of Shewanella putrefaciens MR-1. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5585–5594. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.11.5585-5594.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Baker BJ, Lazar CS, Teske AP, Dick GJ. 2015. Genomic resolution of linkages in carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling among widespread estuary sediment bacteria. Microbiome 3:14. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0077-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Salgueiro CA, Dantas JM. 2016. Multiheme cytochromes, p 1–39. In Salgueiro CA, Dantas JM. (ed). Multiheme Cytochromes. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Skennerton CT, Chourey K, Iyer R, Hettich RL, Tyson GW, Orphan VJ, Dubilier N. 2017. Methane-fueled syntrophy through extracellular electron transfer: uncovering the genomic traits conserved within diverse bacterial partners of anaerobic methanotrophic archaea. mBio 8:e00530-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00530-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Meier DV, Pjevac P, Bach W, Markert S, Schweder T, Jamieson J, Petersen S, Amann R, Meyerdierks A. 2019. Microbial metal-sulfide oxidation in inactive hydrothermal vent chimneys suggested by metagenomic and metaproteomic analyses. Environ Microbiol 21:682–701. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hou J, Sievert SM, Wang Y, Seewald JS, Natarajan VP, Wang F, Xiao X. 2020. Microbial succession during the transition from active to inactive stages of deep-sea hydrothermal vent sulfide chimneys. Microbiome 8:102. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00851-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Holmes DE, Bond DR, Lovley DR. 2004. Electron transfer by Desulfobulbus propionicus to Fe(III) and graphite electrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1234–1237. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1234-1237.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Galushuko A, Kuever J. 2020. Desulfovibrionaceae, p 1–3. In Trujillo ME, Dedysh S, DeVos P, Hedlund B, Kämpfer P, Rainey FA, Whitman WB (ed), Bergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jaeschke A, Jørgensen SL, Bernasconi SM, Pedersen RB, Thorseth IH, Früh-Green GL. 2012. Microbial diversity of Loki's Castle black smokers at the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Geobiology 10:548–561. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Li J, Cui J, Yang Q, Cui G, Wei B, Wu Z, Wang Y, Zhou H. 2017. Oxidative weathering and microbial diversity of an inactive seafloor hydrothermal sulfide chimney. Front Microbiol 8:1378. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Flores GE, Campbell JH, Kirshtein JD, Meneghin J, Podar M, Steinberg JI, Seewald JS, Tivey MK, Voytek MA, Yang ZK, Reysenbach A-L. 2011. Microbial community structure of hydrothermal deposits from geochemically different vent fields along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Environ Microbiol 13:2158–2171. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02463.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Patwardhan S, Smedile F, Giovannelli D, Vetriani C. 2021. Metaproteogenomic profiling of chemosynthetic microbial biofilms reveals metabolic flexibility during colonization of a shallow-water gas vent. Front Microbiol 12:638300. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.638300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Toner BM, Lesniewski RA, Marlow JJ, Briscoe LJ, Santelli CM, Bach W, Orcutt BN, Edwards KJ. 2013. Mineralogy drives bacterial biogeography of hydrothermally inactive seafloor sulfide deposits. Geomicrobiol J 30:313–326. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2012.688925. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Christakis CA, Polymenakou PN, Mandalakis M, Nomikou P, Kristoffersen JB, Lampridou D, Kotoulas G, Magoulas A. 2018. Microbial community differentiation between active and inactive sulfide chimneys of the Kolumbo submarine volcano, Hellenic Volcanic Arc. Extremophiles 22:13–27. doi: 10.1007/s00792-017-0971-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Han Y, Gonnella G, Adam N, Schippers A, Burkhardt L, Kurtz S, Schwarz-Schampera U, Franke H, Perner M. 2018. Hydrothermal chimneys host habitat-specific microbial communities: analogues for studying the possible impact of mining seafloor massive sulfide deposits. Sci Rep 8:10386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28613-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Amend JP, McCollom TM, Hentscher M, Bach W. 2011. Catabolic and anabolic energy for chemolithoautotrophs in deep-sea hydrothermal systems hosted in different rock types. Geochim et Cosmochim Acta 75:5736–5748. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2011.07.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Xiao Y, Xu Y, Dong W, Liang Y, Fan F, Zhang X, Zhang X, Niu J, Ma L, She S, He Z, Liu X, Yin H. 2015. The complicated substrates enhance the microbial diversity and zinc leaching efficiency in sphalerite bioleaching system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:10311–10322. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6881-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jiang V, Khare SD, Banta S. 2021. Computational structure prediction provides a plausible mechanism for electron transfer by the outer membrane protein Cyc2 from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Protein Sci 30:1640–1652. doi: 10.1002/pro.4106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Jeans C, Singer SW, Chan CS, VerBerkmoes NC, Shah M, Hettich RL, Banfield JF, Thelen MP. 2008. Cytochrome 572 is a conspicuous membrane protein with iron oxidation activity purified directly from a natural acidophilic microbial community. ISME J 2:542–550. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Barco RA, Emerson D, Sylvan JB, Orcutt BN, Jacobson Meyers ME, Ramírez GA, Zhong JD, Edwards KJ, Voordouw G. 2015. New insight into microbial iron oxidation as revealed by the proteomic profile of an obligate iron-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:5927–5937. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01374-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yarzábal A, Brasseur G, Ratouchniak J, Lund K, Lemesle-Meunier D, DeMoss JA, Bonnefoy V. 2002. The High-molecular-weight cytochrome Cyc2 of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is an outer membrane protein. J Bacteriol 184:313–317. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.1.313-317.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Chi A, Valenzuela L, Beard S, Mackey AJ, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Jerez CA. 2007. Periplasmic proteins of the extremophile Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans: a high throughput proteomics analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 6:2239–2251. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700042-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gupta D, Guzman MS, Rengasamy K, Stoica A, Singh R, Ranaivoarisoa TO, Davenport EJ, Bai W, McGinley B, Meacham JM, Bose A. 2021. Photoferrotrophy and phototrophic extracellular electron uptake is common in the marine anoxygenic phototroph Rhodovulum sulfidophilum. ISME J 15:3384–3398. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01015-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Borch T, Kretzschmar R, Kappler A, Cappellen PV, Ginder-Vogel M, Voegelin A, Campbell K. 2010. Biogeochemical redox processes and their impact on contaminant dynamics. Environ Sci Technol 44:15–23. doi: 10.1021/es9026248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Stoecker K, Bendinger B, Schöning B, Nielsen PH, Nielsen JL, Baranyi C, Toenshoff ER, Daims H, Wagner M. 2006. Crenothrix is a filamentous methane oxidizer with an unusual methane monooxygenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:2363–2367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506361103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Omoregie EO, Mastalerz V, Lange G, Straub KL, Kappler A, Røy H, Stadnitskaia A, Foucher J-P, Boetius A. 2008. Biogeochemistry and community composition of iron- and sulfur-precipitating microbial mats at the Chefren Mud Volcano (Nile Deep Sea Fan, Eastern Mediterranean). Appl Environ Microbiol 74:3198–3215. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01751-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Klueglein N, Zeitvogel F, Stierhof Y-D, Floetenmeyer M, Konhauser KO, Kappler A, Obst M. 2014. Potential role of nitrite for abiotic Fe(II) oxidation and cell encrustation during nitrate reduction by denitrifying bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:1051–1061. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03277-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wu W, Swanner ED, Hao L, Zeitvogel F, Obst M, Pan Y, Kappler A. 2014. Characterization of the physiology and cell–mineral interactions of the marine anoxygenic phototrophic Fe(II) oxidizer Rhodovulum iodosum – implications for Precambrian Fe(II) oxidation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 88:503–515. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Flemming H-C, Wingender J, Szewzyk U, Steinberg P, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S. 2016. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:563–575. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Singer E, Webb EA, Nelson WC, Heidelberg JF, Ivanova N, Pati A, Edwards KJ. 2011. Genomic Potential of Marinobacter aquaeolei, a biogeochemical opportunitroph. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2763–2771. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01866-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chua MJ, Campen RL, Wahl L, Grzymski JJ, Mikucki JA. 2018. Genomic and physiological characterization and description of Marinobacter gelidimuriae sp. nov., a psychrophilic, moderate halophile from Blood Falls, an antarctic subglacial brine. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 94:3. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiy021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yi E, Shao Z, Li G, Liang X, Zhou M. 2021. Marinobacter mangrovi sp. nov., isolated from mangrove sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 71:11. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bonis BM, Gralnick JA. 2015. Marinobacter subterrani, a genetically tractable neutrophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing strain isolated from the Soudan Iron Mine. Front Microbiol 6:719. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Smith AR. 2011. Subsurface igneous mineral microbiology: iron-oxidizing organotrophs on olivine surfaces and the significance of mineral heterogeneity in basalts. Portland State University, Ann Arbor. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sudek LA, Templeton AS, Tebo BM, Staudigel H. 2009. Microbial ecology of Fe (hydr)oxide mats and basaltic rock from Vailulu'u Seamount, American Samoa. Geomicrobiol J 26:581–596. doi: 10.1080/01490450903263400. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sudek LA, Wanger G, Templeton AS, Staudigel H, Tebo BM. 2017. Submarine basaltic glass colonization by the heterotrophic Fe(II)-Oxidizing and siderophore-producing deep-sea bacterium Pseudomonas stutzeri VS-10: the potential role of basalt in enhancing growth. Front Microbiol 8:363. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Belzile N, Chen Y-W, Cai M-F, Li Y. 2004. A review on pyrrhotite oxidation. J Geochemical Exploration 84:65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2004.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Heidel C, Tichomirowa M, Junghans M. 2013. Oxygen and sulfur isotope investigations of the oxidation of sulfide mixtures containing pyrite, galena, and sphalerite. Chem Geol 342:29–43. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.01.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhang W, Yu X, Liu Y, Ye L, Xu D, Bian Y, Yao X, Guo H, Liu X. 2015. Paleoenvironmental significance of clay mineral assemblages of core Arc5-M06 on the Chukchi Sea continental slope since late pleistocene. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology 35:83–94. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1140.2015.03083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hultman J, Waldrop MP, Mackelprang R, David MM, McFarland J, Blazewicz SJ, Harden J, Turetsky MR, McGuire AD, Shah MB, VerBerkmoes NC, Lee LH, Mavrommatis K, Jansson JK. 2015. Multi-omics of permafrost, active layer and thermokarst bog soil microbiomes. Nature 521:208–212. doi: 10.1038/nature14238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M, Tringe SG, Banfield JF. 2018. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol 3:836–843. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0171-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. 2019. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7:e7359. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Parks DH, Rinke C, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Woodcroft BJ, Evans PN, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2017. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat Microbiol 2:1533–1542. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2019. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. 2021. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D785–D794. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Darling AE, Jospin G, Lowe E, Matsen F, Bik HM, Eisen JA. 2014. PhyloSift: phylogenetic analysis of genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ 2:e243. doi: 10.7717/peerj.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hug LA, Baker BJ, Anantharaman K, Brown CT, Probst AJ, Castelle CJ, Butterfield CN, Hernsdorf AW, Amano Y, Ise K, Suzuki Y, Dudek N, Relman DA, Finstad KM, Amundson R, Thomas BC, Banfield JF. 2016. A new view of the tree of life. Nat Microbiol 1:16048. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. 2018. UFBoot2: mproving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 35:518–522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO, Whitwham A, Keane T, McCarthy SA, Davies RM, Li H. 2021. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Vasimuddin M, Misra S, Li H, Aluru S. 2019. Efficient architecture-aware acceleration of BWA-MEM for multicore systems, abstr 2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS). IEEE, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. doi: 10.1109/IPDPS.2019.00041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26:841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. 2016. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D457–D462. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa AC, Kanehisa M. 2007. KAAS: an automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W182–W185. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernández-Plaza A, Forslund SK, Cook H, Mende DR, Letunic I, Rattei T, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2019. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D309–D314. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. 2017. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology sssignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol Biol Evol 34:2115–2122. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Eddy SR. 2011. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol 7:e1002195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Haft DH, Loftus BJ, Richardson DL, Yang F, Eisen JA, Paulsen IT, White O. 2001. TIGRFAMs: a protein family resource for the functional identification of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 29:41–43. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.El-Gebali S, Mistry J, Bateman A, Eddy SR, Luciani A, Potter SC, Qureshi M, Richardson LJ, Salazar GA, Smart A, Sonnhammer EL, Hirsh L, Paladin L, Piovesan D, Tosatto SE, Finn RD. 2019. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D427–D432. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Lu S, Wang J, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Yang M, Zhang D, Zheng C, Lanczycki CJ, Marchler-Bauer A. 2020. CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D265–D268. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Galperin MY, Wolf YI, Makarova KS, Vera Alvarez R, Landsman D, Koonin EV. 2021. COG database update: focus on microbial diversity, model organisms, and widespread pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D274–D281. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Søndergaard D, Pedersen CNS, Greening C. 2016. HydDB: A web tool for hydrogenase classification and analysis. Sci Rep 6:34212. doi: 10.1038/srep34212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L, Entwistle S, Wu P, Yang Z, Busk PK, Xu Y, Yin Y. 2018. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W95–W101. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.He S, Barco RA, Emerson D, Roden EE. 2017. Comparative genomic analysis of neutrophilic iron(II) oxidizer genomes for candidate genes in extracellular electron transfer. Front Microbiol 8:1584. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.O'Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, McVeigh R, Rajput B, Robbertse B, Smith-White B, Ako-Adjei D, Astashyn A, Badretdin A, Bao Y, Blinkova O, Brover V, Chetvernin V, Choi J, Cox E, Ermolaeva O, Farrell CM, Goldfarb T, Gupta T, Haft D, Hatcher E, Hlavina W, Joardar VS, Kodali VK, Li W, Maglott D, Masterson P, McGarvey KM, Murphy MR, O'Neill K, Pujar S, Rangwala SH, Rausch D, Riddick LD, Schoch C, Shkeda A, Storz SS, Sun H, Thibaud-Nissen F, Tolstoy I, Tully RE, Vatsan AR, Wallin C, Webb D, Wu W, Landrum MJ, Kimchi A, et al. 2016. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D733–D745. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Li W, Godzik A. 2006. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22:1658–1659. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Marcia M, Ermler U, Peng G, Michel H. 2010. A new structure-based classification of sulfide:quinone oxidoreductases. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 78:1073–1083. doi: 10.1002/prot.22665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Sousa FM, Pereira JG, Marreiros BC, Pereira MM. 2018. Taxonomic distribution, structure/function relationship and metabolic context of the two families of sulfide dehydrogenases: SQR and FCSD. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1859:742–753. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2018.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Müller AL, Kjeldsen KU, Rattei T, Pester M, Loy A. 2015. Phylogenetic and environmental diversity of DsrAB-type dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductases. ISME J 9:1152–1165. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Letunic I, Bork P. 2021. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Bengtsson-Palme J, Hartmann M, Eriksson KM, Pal C, Thorell K, Larsson DGJ, Nilsson RH. 2015. metaxa2: improved identification and taxonomic classification of small and large subunit rRNA in metagenomic data. Mol Ecol Resour 15:1403–1414. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Supplemental material. Download spectrum.00614-22-s0001.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.04 MB (45.7KB, xlsx)

Supplemental file 2

Supplemental material. Download spectrum.00614-22-s0002.pdf, PDF file, 1.3 MB (1.3MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All metagenome-assembled genomes are available under NCBI Bioproject PRJNA771178.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES