Table 4.

Statistical table

Hypothesis	p-value	F value ${\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{1}}-{\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{2}}$ or $\mathit{\beta }$	Nb samples
Zone significant predictor of HGEC	0.000497	7.60	52,203
Zone significant predictor of LGEC	0.130	2.041	52,203
Zone significant predictor of ThEC	0.057	2.860	52,203
Regions significant predictor of HGEC	2.14e–191	180	52,203
Regions significant predictor of LGEC	4.85–25	241	52,203
Regions significant predictor of ThEC	4.31e–105	99.7	52,203
SF patients significantly different from NSF in HGEC	0.206	1.65	52,203
SF patients significantly different from NSF in LGEC	0.910	0.013	52,203
SF patients significantly different from NSF in ThEC	0.205	1.66	52,203
Seizure outcome significant predictor of HGEC	0.162	2.02	52,203
Seizure outcome significant predictor of LGEC	0.539	0.384	52,203
Seizure outcome significant predictor of ThEC	0.520	0.421	52,203
SOZ HGEC > NSOZ HGEC in SF patients	1.10e–9	18.8 ( ${\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{1}}-{\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{2}}$ = 0.0165)	401
SOZ LGEC > NSOZ LGEC in SF patients	0.0217	8.23 ( ${\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{1}}-{\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{2}}$ = 0.00412)	401
SOZ ThEC < NSOZ ThEC in SF patients	1.12e–6	12.1 ( ${\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{1}}-{\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{2}}$ = –0.00761)	2785
SOZ ThEC < NSOZ ThEC in NSF patients	0.00855	14.9 ( ${\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{1}}-{\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{2}}$ = –0.00245)	2785
In SOZ, M-L, HGEC SF > HGEC NSF	0.00114	11.8 ( ${\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{1}}-{\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{2}}$ = 0.001143)	996
In SOZ, M-L, LGEC SF > LGEC NSF	0.00205	9.94 ( ${\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{1}}-{\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{2}}$ = 0.016924)	996
In NSOZ, E-E, LGEC SF < LGEC NSF	0.0089	7.46 ( ${\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{1}}-{\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{2}}$ = –0.011616)	5069
In NSOZ, L-L, ThEC SF < ThEC NSF	0.0111	7.03 ( ${\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{1}}-{\mathit{\mu }}_{\mathbf{2}}$ = –0.010777)	6106
Spikes significant predictor of HGEC	1.22e–100	455 ( $\mathit{\beta }$ = 0.00410)	52,203
Spikes significant predictor of LGEC	7.71e–106	479 ( $\mathit{\beta }$ = 0.00279)	52,203
Spikes significant predictor of ThEC	1.54e–50	233 ( $\mathit{\beta }$ = 0.00165)	52,203
Distance significant predictor of HGEC	7.32e–110	5504 ( $\mathit{\beta }$ = 0.900)	52,203
Distance significant predictor of LGEC	1.40e–121	6401 ( $\mathit{\beta }$ = 0.868)	52,203
Distance significant predictor of ThEC	2.12e–87	3804 ( $\mathit{\beta }$ = 0.717)	52,203

Significant values are shown in bold.