Skip to main content
Innovation in Aging logoLink to Innovation in Aging
. 2022 Dec 20;6(Suppl 1):254–255. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac059.1010

WHICH NEIGHBORHOOD FEATURES MATTER MOST FOR MUSCLE STRENGTH? FINDINGS FROM THE HEALTH AND RETIREMENT STUDY

Kate Duchowny 1, L Grisell Diaz-Ramirez 2, W John Boscardin 3, Peggy Cawthon 4, Maria Glymour 5, Scarlett Lin Gomez 6
PMCID: PMC9770240

Abstract

Linking data from the National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA) to the 2006-2018 Health and Retirement Study (N=22,245), we fit linear mixed models to assess which of 22 built and social neighborhood environment variables predicted grip strength, a measure of total-body muscle strength. Among 22,245 respondents (mean age=63 years, SD=9.2) with up to 4 grip strength measures, neighborhood physical disorder (B= -0.25 kg, 95% CI= -0.37,-0.13), number of parks (B= 0.05 kg, 95% CI= 0.01, 0.10), number of gyms/fitness centers (B=-0.44 kg, 95% CI= -0.82, -0.07), proportion of highly developed land (B=-2.06 kg, 95% CI=-4.06, -0.07), and % urban (B=-0.66 kg, 95% CI=-1.27, -0.05) were associated with grip strength level after adjustment. No social neighborhood variables were associated with grip strength. Although preliminary, findings suggest that highly developed urbanized land may be a barrier to maintaining muscle strength in later life, but resources such as parks are associated with better outcomes.


Articles from Innovation in Aging are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES