Skip to main content
Innovation in Aging logoLink to Innovation in Aging
. 2022 Dec 20;6(Suppl 1):526–527. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac059.2007

AWARENESS OF AGE-RELATED GAINS AND LOSSES AND THEIR ASSOCIATIONS WITH PHYSICAL AND COGNITIVE FUNCTION

Sarah Barber 1, Vanessa Martinez Lenis 2, Kate Hamel 3
PMCID: PMC9770975

Abstract

Awareness of age-related change (AARC) refers to people’s recognition of how aging has affected their performance, behavior, and ways of experiencing life. Sometimes these age-related changes are perceived as losses (AARC-Losses), such as when people notice declines in their health. However, other times these age-related changes are perceived as gains (AARC-Gains), such as when people notice they have developed a better sense of what is important to them. Past research has shown that higher AARC-Losses (and to a lesser extent lower AARC-Gains) are associated with poorer self-rated health. However, no research has yet examined whether AARC also relates to an objective performance-based measure of health. To address this, we examined the cross-sectional relationships between AARC-Losses and AARC-Gains with gait speed (i.e., a measure of physical function) in 164 community-dwelling older adults. Participants in this study also completed health-related questionnaires and the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery. Results showed that AARC-Losses were most strongly predicted by depression levels, but higher AARC-Losses were also predicted by slower gait speeds. A different pattern emerged for AARC-Gains. After controlling for demographic factors, depression, and other self-reported measures of health, we found that higher AARC-Gains were predicted by poorer cognition and slower gait speed. The counterintuitive relationship between AARC-Gains and objective cognition has previously been reported in the literature. However, this study is the first to document that AARC-Gains are also associated with poorer performance on an objective measure of physical function. We discuss features of the AARC questionnaire that may lead to these paradoxical effects.


Articles from Innovation in Aging are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES