Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2022 Sep 16;152(3):417–428. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34269

Global burden of HPV-attributable squamous cell carcinoma of the anus in 2020, according to sex and HIV status: a worldwide analysis

Ashish A Deshmukh 1,*,§, Haluk Damgacioglu 1,*, Damien Georges 2, Kalyani Sonawane 1,§, Jacques Ferlay 3, Freddie Bray 3, Gary M Clifford 2
PMCID: PMC9771908  NIHMSID: NIHMS1832932  PMID: 36054026

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is caused by HPV, and is elevated in persons living with HIV (PLWHIV). We aimed to estimate sex- and HIV-stratified SCCA burden at a country, regional and global level. Using anal cancer incidence estimates from 185 countries available through GLOBOCAN 2020, and region/country-specific proportions of SCCA versus non-SCCA from the Cancer Incidence in Five Continents (CI5) Volume XI database, we estimated country- and sex-specific SCCA incidence. Proportions of SCCA diagnosed in PLWHIV, and attributable to HIV, were calculated using estimates of HIV prevalence (UNAIDS 2019) and relative risk applied to SCCA incidence. Of 30 416 SCCA estimated globally in 2020, two-thirds occurred in women (19 792) and one-third among men (10 624). 53% of male SCCA and 65% of female SCCA occurred in countries with a very high Human Development Index (HDI). 21% of the global male SCCA burden occurred in PLWHIV (n=2203), largely concentrated in North America, Europe, and Africa. While, only 3% of global female SCCA burden (n=561) occurred in PLWHIV, mainly in Africa. The global age-standardized incidence rate of HIV-negative SCCA was higher in women (0.55 cases per 100,000) than men (0.28), whereas HIV-positive SCCA was higher in men (0.07) than women (0.02). HIV prevalence reached >40% in 22 countries for male SCCA and in 10 countries for female SCCA, mostly in Africa. Understanding global SCCA burden by HIV status can inform SCCA prevention programs (through HPV vaccination, screening, and HIV control) and help raise awareness to combat the disease.

Keywords: anal cancer, human papillomavirus, HIV, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, global burden

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1832932-f0006.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is the most common subtype of anal cancer, and is considered 100% associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection.1 Studies from high- and middle-income countries have reported a 2–6% annual increase in SCCA incidence in the last few decades.27

HIV co-infection enhances the carcinogenicity of HPV, putting persons living with HIV (PLWHIV) at heightened SCCA risk.8 Among PLWHIV, SCCA risk is particularly high in men who have sex with men (MSM), but is also elevated in men who have sex with women (MSW) and women.9,10 In the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy, the global HIV burden rose to an estimated 38 million PLWHIV in 2019.11 The majority of the HIV burden in high-income countries is concentrated among MSM; whereas, in low- and middle-income countries (particularly in eastern and southern Africa), HIV is endemic and disproportionately affects MSW and women.11 Given that HIV and HPV share common sexual transmission routes, the contribution of HIV to SCCA burden can thus be expected to vary substantially by sex and world region, although it has yet to be quantified.

In 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a global call to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, underpinned by prophylactic HPV vaccination, which is expected also to have an important impact on the future anal cancer burden. As of June 2020, 107 of 194 WHO member countries have introduced HPV vaccination, with one-third of programs are currently gender-neutral.12 However, given the prolonged time between initial HPV infection to the development of SCCA, combined with suboptimal global HPV vaccination coverage (especially in males), the impact of vaccination on anal cancer prevention will not be seen for many decades.

In the meantime, several professional organizations in high-income countries (e.g., European AIDS Clinical Society, New York State) advise SCCA early detection programs for PLWHIV, in recognition of their elevated risk.13 These approaches include using digital anorectal examination to detect early-stage SCCA and improve treatment outcomes, or using diagnostic high-resolution anoscopy to detect and treat precancerous lesions to reduce anal cancer incidence. To date, however, an absence of international consensus and evidence-based recommendations, combined with the scarcity of appropriately trained personnel, has limited the implementation of early detection programs in PLWHIV, even in high-resource settings.

A better understanding of the global burden of SCCA according to HIV status could thus have important implications for raising awareness, mobilizing resources and informing the design of appropriate anal cancer prevention initiatives. To this end, our aim was to use global databases of cancer incidence (GLOBOCAN 2020 and CI5 Vol. XI, as compiled by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), HIV prevalence (UNAIDS 2019), and estimates of relative risk of SCCA in PLWHIV, to describe the SCCA incidence and burden in 185 countries, by sex and HIV status.

2. METHODS

2.1. Data sources

2.1.1. Country-specific estimates of SCCA and HIV prevalence

Age and gender-specific population denominators, number of anal cancer cases (International Classification of Diseases tenth edition [ICD-10] code C21), and anal cancer incidence rates (cases per 100 000 person years) were extracted for 185 individual countries/territories estimated in the GLOBOCAN database for the year 2020 via the Global Cancer Observatory (GCO) (https://gco.iarc.fr). Detailed GLOBOCAN methods are described elsewhere.14 Given the rarity of anal cancer in persons aged <15 years (only 12 cases reported in GLOBOCAN 2020), we estimated the outcomes for persons aged 15 years or older.

Proportions of SCCA cases were calculated as described previously.1 In brief, data on microscopically verified anal cancer were extracted from CI5 XI database of cancer registries, complemented with data submitted by population-based cancer registries for the estimation of the GLOBOCAN 2020 database, and supplemented by updated data from the African Cancer Registry Network (AFCRN) for the sub-Saharan African region. These were partitioned by sex and by age group (15–59 years and 60 years and older) for 60 countries that recorded a sufficient number of informative cases (at least 4 microscopically verified SCCA cases per sex and at least 8 cases per sex in the broader anal cancer category C21).15 When country-specific data were not available, or insufficient, we applied an average proportion at the sub-regional level.

Numbers of SCCA were estimated by applying these proportions to the estimated number of cases of anal cancer in GLOBOCAN, by country, sex and age group. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) for SCCA overall (i.e., persons aged 15 years and older) and for two age groups (15–59 years and 60 years and older), were calculated using the world standard population as proposed by Segi and modified by Doll and expressed as cases per 100 000 person-years.16 The details can be found in the supplementary methods (pp 3–9, including Tables S1S2).

HIV prevalence estimates for men and women aged 15 years or older in 2019 were acquired from UNAIDS for 176 of the 185 GLOBOCAN countries/territories. Age-specific denominators (population size) and numerators (number of PLWHIV) were provided by UNAIDS to produce HIV prevalence estimates for the age groups 15–59, and ≥60 years. For the remaining GLOBOCAN countries/territories, estimates were derived with similarly aggregated age-specific HIV prevalence for 2019 published by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool).

2.1.2. Relative risks (RRs) for HIV and SCCA

RRs for SCCA incidence among PLWHIV versus SCCA incidence in persons without HIV were derived separately for MSM, MSW and women, and by age (15–59 years and >60 years). SCCA incidence among MSM, MSW and women LWHIV came from a large population-based study in North America, the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD).17 Population size of PLWHIV for similar groups was obtained from the USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National HIV surveillance system.18 SCCA incidence among men and women without HIV were derived from SCCA incidence in the general U.S. population (the National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database),19 after an adjustment to remove cases estimated to occur in PLWHIV from SCCA cases in the general population (detail reported in supplementary methods, pp 10–12).

2.2. Procedures and statistical analysis

For each of the 185 countries included in the GLOBOCAN 2020 database, by sex and age group (15–59 and ≥60 years), we estimated: (a) the fraction of SCCA diagnosed among PLWHIV (or HIV prevalence in SCCA), and (b) the fraction of SCCA attributable to HIV (or population-attributable fraction [PAF]), according to the following formulae:

HIVprevalenceinSCCA=HIVprevalence×RR1-HIVprevalence+(HIVprevalence×RR) (a)
PAF=HIVprevalence×(RR-1)1+HIVprevalence×(RR-1) (b)

For women, we applied the same age-specific RRs in all countries. For men, however, we applied age-specific RRs in three categories according to the relative burden of HIV infection among men in the given country (as a surrogate for the concentration of the HIV epidemic in MSM): 1) >70% of HIV burden among men, RR for MSM only; (2) 50–70%, RR for all men, and (3) <50%, RR for MSW only. Country-specific RR assignments and detailed methods are available in the supplementary methods (pp 3–11, including Tables S1S3). Finally, proportions of SCCA cases living with HIV and PAFs were validated by comparing our estimates against observed data, where available (Table S4).

For each country, by sex and age group, we calculated the number of new SCCA cases that were: (a) diagnosed among PLWHIV, and (b) attributable to HIV, on multiplying these two respective fractions by the number of SCCA cases estimated in GLOBOCAN. Finally, proportions of SCCA diagnosed in PLWHIV were applied to ASIRs to calculate ASIRs of SCCA diagnosed in a) the absence and b) presence of HIV.

In order to address the potential overestimation of HIV-attributable SCCA burden among males in countries with a high concentration of HIV epidemic among MSM (due to HIV and anal HPV sharing a common sexual transmission route), we also performed a sensitivity analysis applying RRs for MSW living with HIV (given the relatively low prevalence of high-risk anal HPV in this risk group)20 to all countries.

Country-specific estimates were aggregated worldwide and according to UN geographic (sub)regions. Countries were also grouped by the Human Development Index (HDI) into four tiers (low, medium, high, and very high HDI).21 All statistical analyses were conducted in Matlab (version 2020b) and world maps were created using R (version 3.6.4).

3. RESULTS

In 2020, an estimated 30 416 SCCA cases were diagnosed globally, of which one-third were among men (10 624) and two-thirds among women (19 792). 50% of male SCCA, and 62% of female SCCA, were concentrated in Europe and North America alone (Table). Indeed, the majority of the global SCCA burden occurred in more developed regions of the world, with 53% of all SCCA in men and 65% of all SCCA in women occurring in countries of very high HDI.

Table:

Squamous cell carcinoma in men and women in 2020 worldwide, by UN (sub)region, and by HDI level

Male Female
Total male population (millions) Number of SCCA cases Proportion of global SCCA cases (%) ASIR (per 100 000) men Total female population (millions) Number of SCCA cases Proportion of global SCCA cases (%) ASIR (per 100 000) women
Global 2895 10 624 100 0.35 2893 19 792 100 0.57
Asia 1794 2887 27.2 0.16 1736 2857 14.4 0.14
 Eastern Asia 692 436 4.1 0.05 678 927 4.7 0.09
 South-central Asia 748 2003 18.9 0.31 711 1449 7.3 0.22
 South-eastern Asia 248 325 3.1 0.14 253 378 1.9 0.14
 Western Asia 106 123 1.2 0.14 94 103 0.5 0.12
Africa 395 1295 12.2 0.49 404 1772 9.0 0.59
 Northern Africa 82 303 2.9 0.43 83 231 1.2 0.30
 Sub-Saharan Africa 313 992 9.3 0.51 321 1541 7.8 0.68
  Eastern Africa 127 328 3.1 0.48 132 684 3.5 0.76
  Middle Africa 49 173 1.6 0.62 50 253 1.3 0.83
  Southern Africa 23 81 0.8 0.43 24 181 0.9 0.75
  Western Africa 114 410 3.9 0.52 114 423 2.1 0.53
Europe 300 2928 27.6 0.66 328 6893 34.8 1.28
 Central-eastern Europe 112 459 4.3 0.30 131 1104 5.6 0.52
 Northern Europe 43 560 5.3 0.88 45 1324 6.7 1.97
 Southern Europe 64 474 4.5 0.47 68 933 4.7 0.72
 Western Europe 81 1435 13.5 1.18 85 3532 17.8 2.56
Latin America and the Caribbean 241 975 9.2 0.40 255 2577 13.0 0.86
 Caribbean and Central America 79 152 1.4 0.19 84 391 2.0 0.43
 South America 162 823 7.7 0.49 171 2186 11.0 1.05
North America 148 2332 22.0 1.18 154 5298 26.8 2.32
Oceania 16 207 1.9 0.99 16 395 2.0 1.88
HDI Level
 Very high 563 5605 52.8 0.71 586 12 926 65.3 1.40
 High 1007 1622 15.3 0.14 1007 3448 17.4 0.26
 Medium 1023 2431 22.9 0.28 992 2164 10.9 0.24
 Low 303 966 9.1 0.54 308 1254 6.3 0.60

ASIR=age-standardized incidence rate. HDI=human development index. SCCA=squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.

Global ASIRs of SCCA were 0.35 per 100 000 for men and 0.57 for women (Table). ASIRs were highest in North America (1.18 for men, and 2.32 for women) and lowest in Asia (0.16 and 0.14). In Europe, Latin America & the Caribbean, North America, and Oceania, ASIRs in women were nearly double those in men. In contrast, there were few differences in sex-specific ASIRs in Asia and Africa. Country- and sex-specific ASIRs of SCCA are shown in three categories, projected onto the world map, presented in Figure 1. Age-specific incidence rates of SCCA among men and women are presented by world region in Figure S1 and S2.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Geographic distribution of world age-standardized incidence (per 100 000) of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus among men (A) and women (B), aged 15 years or older. ASIR, age-standardized incidence rate; NA, not available. The designations used and the presentation of the material in this Article do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part WHO and the IARC about the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries

Worldwide in 2020, an estimated 20.7% (2203 of 10 624) of all new SCCA cases in men and 2.8% (561 of 19 792) of all new SCCA cases in women occurred among PLWHIV (Figure 2, Table S5), with 29% and 27% of the global SCCA cases occurring among PWLHIV in North America and Africa, respectively. However, the global distribution of SCCA in PWLHIV varied significantly by sex. For men, 34% occurred in North America (mainly [97%] in the USA), 22% in Europe (majority [47%] in Western Europe), and 17% in Africa ([mainly [97%] in sub-Saharan Africa). Whereas, SCCA in PWLHIV among women was concentrated heavily in Africa (68%), mainly in sub-Saharan Africa. Very high HDI countries contributed 58% (1277 of 2203) of the global SCCA burden among men living with HIV, versus 20% (114 of 561) of the global SCCA burden among women living with HIV.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Estimated proportions of new squamous cell carcinoma of the anus in persons living with HIV in 2020, worldwide and by United Nations region and sub-region. HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; SCCA, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus

The proportion of SCCA cases living with HIV for men ranged from 36.0% in sub-Saharan Africa, 33.0% in the USA, 30.1% in Caribbean & Central America, down to 4.1% in Northern African. Among women, this proportion was 24.6% in sub-Saharan Africa, but ≤2% in other sub-regions (Figure 2). The range in proportions based on 95% CIs in RRs are presented in Table S5. Country- and sex-specific SCCA living with HIV are shown in six categories, projected onto the world map, in Figures 3A and 3B. Proportions were consistently higher in men than in women. The proportions were particularly high in Southern Africa where 78.9% of male SCCA and 63.2% of female SCCA occurred among PLWHIV. Of the 50 countries with the highest proportion of cases living with HIV, the majority (21 for men and 38 for women) were in sub-Saharan Africa.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Geographic distribution of worldwide estimation of proportion of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus in patients living with HIV in 2020. Proportions of SCCA in persons living with HIV for men (A) and for women (B). NA, not available. The designations used and the presentation of the material in this Article do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part WHO and the IARC about the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries

Figure 4 describes ASIRs for SCCA, by sex and by HIV status. Global ASIRs for HIV-negative SCCA were 0.55 cases per 100 000 person-years for women and 0.28 for men. ASIRs for HIV-positive SCCA were 0.02 for women and 0.07 for men. The ASIR for male HIV-positive SCCA was nearly 3 fold greater in North America (0.41) compared to other regions (≤0.14), whereas for female HIV-positive SCCA, it was higher in Africa (0.11) than other regions (≤0.03). ASIRs for male HIV-negative SCCA were highest in Oceania (0.85), North America (0.78) and Europe (0.53), as were ASIRs for female HIV-negative SCCA (1.85, 2.28 and 1.26 respectively). SCCA incidence by HIV status for 60 countries with ASIRs (and proportions of SCCA:non-SCCA) derived from population-based cancer registries are presented in Figure 5.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Age-standardized incidence (per 100 000) of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus with and without HIV in 2020, worldwide and by United Nations region and sub-region.

ASIR, age-standardized incidence rate; SCCA, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Age-standardized incidence (per 100 000) of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus with and without HIV in 2020 among men and women in countries with available registry data. Incidence rates are arranged in decreasing order of overall SCCA incidence among men and women. ASIR, age-standardized incidence rate; SCCA, squamous cell carcinoma of the anus

Worldwide, an estimated 20.4% (2165 cases) of all SCCA cases among men and 2.5% (489 cases) among women were estimated to be directly attributable to HIV, and patterns of HIV-attributable SCCA by sex and worldwide region and countries (Table S6 and Figures S3 to S5) were similar to those of SCCA occurring among PLWHIV (see above). Sensitivity analysis showed that the lower estimate of attributable fraction of HIV to SCCA among men was 12.9% (1375 cases) when RRs for MSW were considered for all countries (detailed results shown by region in Table S6).

4. DISCUSSION

An estimated 30 000 SCCA were diagnosed globally in 2020, slightly higher than the previous estimate of 29 000 in 2018.1 Women contributed two-thirds of the global SCCA burden, and the majority of SCCA cases, in both men and women, occurred in highest-resource countries. The present study is however the first to comprehensively describe the global SCCA burden according to sex and HIV status, revealing important variations. Globally, 21% of SCCA among men and 3% among women were diagnosed among PLWHIV, of which the majority were directly attributable to HIV. However, the global distribution of SCCA in PLWHIV varied greatly by sex. For men, the burden of SCCA in PLWLHIV was mainly in very high HDI countries in North America and Europe, whereas for women, it was concentrated in Africa. These patterns are expected to be driven by a combination of differences in underlying HIV endemicity, in predominant routes of HIV transmission in different world regions, and by the extent to which these transmission routes are correlated with anal HPV exposure (see below).

The majority of worldwide SCCA occurs in women in the absence of HIV, and the incidence rates of female HIV-negative SCCA were highest in North America, Oceania, and Europe, likely representing increased exposure to anal HPV infection, the necessary cause of anal cancer. It is hypothesized that the sexual revolution that started during the 1960s-1980s in high-income countries may have contributed to the increased anal HPV exposure among contemporary birth cohorts.2 Consistent with this hypothesis, a study from the USA reported that the rise in incidence among women was restricted to SCCA,22 whereas non-HPV-associated anal cancer (e.g., adenocarcinoma) incidence declined or plateaued.22 Among women ≥60 years in the USA and western Europe in the present study, SCCA incidence reached rates of 7 or above per 100 000, nearing those of cervical cancer incidence.4,23

Multiple lines of evidence suggest that anal HPV exposure in females may occur via the cervix/external genital region. These include studies reporting associations between anal sexual intercourse and anal HPV that are either non-significant or less significant than number of sexual partners per se,2428 studies showing that a majority of women with anal cancer report no history of anal sexual intercourse,29 and a study reporting a link between front-to-back wiping and anal HPV infection.30 Furthermore, longitudinal studies in both HIV-negative women and women living with HIV have shown that anal HPV incidence is higher among women with previous cervical HPV infection of the same type.31,32 It is therefore unclear why female SCCA burden in the absence of HIV was relatively low in sub-Saharan Africa (and Latin America), where the population prevalence of cervical HPV infection is known to be very high. One can speculate that differences in sexual practices or possibly under-reporting of SCCA in sub-Saharan Africa may be drivers; future research is needed to understand the contribution of cervical HPV to the national variations in SCCA incidence observed here.

Among men, SCCA incidence not attributable to HIV is expected to be at least partly driven by exposure to HPV through anal sexual intercourse,29,33 as MSM without HIV are known to be at higher SCCA risk than MSW without HIV.9 However, anal HPV infection has also been reported among MSW without HIV, i.e., in the absence of both anal intercourse and HIV infection.20,34,35 Due simply to their large relative population size, MSW without HIV can still contribute a substantial proportion of the male anal cancer burden at the population level29 It thus remains unknown to what extent same-sex HPV transmission may have contributed to regional and country-level differences in male SCCA incidence not attributable to HIV.

The concentration of SCCA burden in men living with HIV in very high HDI countries in North America and Europe is likely to be a function of the greater contribution of same-sex sexual transmission to male HIV and HPV infections in these regions. Invariably, MSM living with HIV have highest SCCA risks due to the combination of increased acquisition of anal HPV and greater HPV persistence due to HIV-related immunosuppression.3638 The rising population size and aging of PLWHIV due to improved longevity from cART use39 and the increasing contribution of same-sex sexual transmission to HIV means that SCCA cases living with and attributable to HIV may continue to rise.40

Similar to prior work for cervical cancer,41 we present two measures of the burden of HIV-associated SCCA—SCCA diagnosed among PLWHIV (i.e., HIV prevalence among SCCA) and that attributable to HIV (i.e., PAF). The burden of HIV-attributable SCCA represents cases that could be theoretically avoided by HIV prevention. Earlier diagnosis of HIV and timelier initiation of cART could contribute to reducing the HIV attributable SCCA burden, given cART use is likely to reduce the risk of anal HPV infection and SCCA among PLWHIV.37 Given that HIV and HPV share a common sexual transmission route, there is a potential for unmeasured confounding in our calculation of PAFs, particularly in settings where the concentration of HIV epidemic among MSM is greatest. Nevertheless, without any possibility of controlling this interaction, our estimates provide the best current approximation of the SCCA burden that would not exist in the absence of HIV, and we also provide a lower bound of male PAFs by applying RRs for MSW to all males.

Estimates of SCCA patients living with HIV are unaffected by the above methodological issue and, furthermore, can be validated against empirically observed evidence (as we compared our findings against available data from Belgium, Botswana, France, Mozambique, Rwanda, South Africa, West Africa, United States, and Puerto Rico [Table S4]). For example, our estimates of a 1% and 25% HIV prevalence in female and male SCCA in France are consistent with the 5% and 33% reported in a case series of 225 women and 137 men with SCCA, respectively,42 and estimates of 2% and 26% HIV prevalence in female and male SCCA in Puerto Rico can be compared with 2% and 28% observed in a registry data analysis of 525 women and 197 men with SCCA, respectively.6 This measure can be used to understand the extent to which the burden of disease falls on PLWHIV, irrespective of causality, and is relevant for informing the design and evaluating the potential impact of SCCA prevention strategies and for guiding resource allocation for SCCA prevention, notably screening. Of note, our national estimates for men in Australia were lower (14% vs 46%) compared to a study by Hillman and colleagues conducted in Sydney, where the Australian MSM community is known to concentrate (but estimates for women were comparable).43

Emerging data indicate that screening and treatment of anal precancer may reduce SCCA incidence among PLWHIV44,45 with current priorities to determine the benefit to harm ratios and cost-effectiveness of different screening algorithms.46,47 Indeed, the country- and region-specific concentration of SCCA among PLWHIV that we observe offers an opportunity to build screening infrastructure and capacity, alongside the necessary workforce trained to perform SCCA screening, diagnostic procedures, and treatment.

A few additional limitations need to be considered. Firstly, SCCA incidence estimates are limited by the availability of population-based cancer registry data, especially in low-income countries. Thus, given the rarity of anal cancer in some registries, the estimates propagated to the regional level (e.g., Africa and Asia) may be subjected to uncertainty. For example, the recorded data from which estimates of SCCA proportions in anal cancer were derived were available for 60 countries only. Correcting this proportion is, however, essential in order to exclude adenocarcinomas of the anus and the potentially larger number of misclassified adenocarcinomas derived from the lower rectum, neither of which are HPV-attributable. Country-specific HIV prevalence estimates may also be imperfect, particularly in countries with insufficient surveillance information. Of note, because of these uncertainties, and given the rarity of anal cancer below age 60 years in many countries (Supplement Figure S2), although we derived our overall estimates using age-stratified (15–59 and ≥60 years) component measures, we do not show findings stratified by age. Finally, given the lack of valid data on sexual identity at the population level, it was not possible to directly characterize the contribution of same-sex sexual vs heterosexual contact to the male SCCA burden. We did, however, apply different relative risks for MSM and MSW living with HIV in different countries according to an objective measure of the concentration of the HIV epidemic in MSM.

Finally, this study provides the first estimates of worldwide SCCA incidence, burden, and cases living with and attributable to HIV. Our findings seek to raise awareness, guide policies and programs for HIV and SCCA prevention, and should serve as a baseline in monitoring longer-term progress. To achieve long-term direct and indirect (herd immunity) protection from HPV vaccination, it is crucial to administer the HPV vaccines before sexual debut and establish optimal vaccination coverage.20 Unfortunately, over one-third of the male and one-fifth of the female worldwide SCCA burden in 2020 occurred in countries where HPV vaccination programs are yet to be introduced, while one-fifth of the global male SCCA burden occurred in countries with female-only HPV vaccination programs. In many high-resource countries where most global SCCA burden occurred, suboptimal HPV vaccination coverage12 combined with high vaccine hesitancy remain key barriers to SCCA prevention.4850 Also, MSM, who are expected to contribute greatly to the worldwide male SCCA burden may not derive any benefit from female-only HPV vaccination programs due to a lack of herd immunity, thus increasing the importance of targeted HPV vaccination of MSM and screening. PLWHIV represents an important risk group that is being prioritized for SCCA screening. Presently however, SCCA screening is limited to high-income settings with available resources in a few high-income countries. Our study shows that the contribution of HIV to the burden of SCCA is substantial but varies greatly by world region and country. Our findings may thus serve as a pivotal framework to guide the introduction and implementation of targeted SCCA screening programs for PLWHIV.

Supplementary Material

supinfo

What’s new?

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is the most commonly-diagnosed anal cancer subtype for which human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is considered a necessary cause and HIV is a major risk factor. The present study describes for the first time SCCA incidence, burden, and contribution of HIV among men and women at the country, region and global level. These data can help raise awareness, inform recommendations for SCCA prevention, and help mobilize screening resources.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully thank Susan Gamon for her help on text editing. The authors also thank The North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD) Steering Committee for their comments and the consortium for providing the data. The authors also gratefully acknowledge all cancer registries and their staff who have contributed in sharing the data needed for this study. We would like to thank the African Cancer Registry Network (AFCRN) and all its collaborators for the provision of data. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute award numbers R01CA232888 and U54CA096300 and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities award number K01MD016440. The NA-ACCORD is supported by National Institutes of Health grant U01AI069918.

FUNDING

This manuscript is based on research funded in part by the National Cancer Institute and National Health on Minority and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health of the United States. The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of the National Institutes of Health. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this paper and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions, or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.

Abbreviations:

AFCRN

African Cancer Registry Network

ASIR

age-standardized SCCA incidence rates

HDI

human development index

HIV

human immunodeficiency virus

HPV

human papillomavirus

HSIL

high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

IARC

International Agency for Research on Cancer

ICD

International Classification of Diseases

IHME

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation

MSM

men who have sex with men

MSW

men who have sex with women

NA-ACCORD

North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design

PLWHIV

persons living with HIV

SCCA

squamous cell carcinoma of the anus

SIR

standardized incidence ratio

WHO

World Health Organization

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Dr Sonawane reported personal fees from Value Analytics Lab outside the submitted work. Dr Deshmukh reported consulting fees from Merck outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

DISCLAIMER

Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer or WHO, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer or WHO. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institute of Health.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Only publicly available data were used in this study, and data sources and handling of these data are described in the Materials and Methods and in the Supplementary Tables S1S3. Further information is available from the corresponding author upon request.

REFERENCES

  • 1.de Martel C, Georges D, Bray F, Ferlay J, Clifford GM. Global burden of cancer attributable to infections in 2018: a worldwide incidence analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2020; 8(2): e180–e90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Deshmukh AA, Suk R, Shiels MS, et al. Recent Trends in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus Incidence and Mortality in the United States, 2001–2015. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 112(8): 829–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Islami F, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Bray F, Jemal A. International trends in anal cancer incidence rates. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46(3): 924–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Deshmukh AA, Suk R, Shiels MS, et al. Incidence trends and burden of human papillomavirus-associated cancers among women in the United States, 2001–2017. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nielsen A, Munk C, Kjaer SK. Trends in incidence of anal cancer and high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia in Denmark, 1978–2008. Int J Cancer 2012; 130(5): 1168–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ortiz-Ortiz KJ, Ramos-Cartagena JM, Deshmukh AA, Torres-Cintron CR, Colon-Lopez V, Ortiz AP. Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus Incidence, Mortality, and Survival Among the General Population and Persons Living With HIV in Puerto Rico, 2000–2016. JCO Glob Oncol 2021; 7: 133–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jin F, Stein AN, Conway EL, et al. Trends in anal cancer in Australia, 1982–2005. Vaccine 2011; 29(12): 2322–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Martel C, Shiels MS, Franceschi S, et al. Cancers attributable to infections among adults with HIV in the United States. AIDS 2015; 29(16): 2173–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Clifford GM, Georges D, Shiels MS, et al. A meta-analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale. Int J Cancer 2021; 148(1): 38–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Colon-Lopez V, Shiels MS, Machin M, et al. Anal Cancer Risk Among People With HIV Infection in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36(1): 68–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. HIV estimates with uncertainty bounds 1990-Present. 2021. https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2021/HIV_estimates_with_uncertainty_bounds_1990-present (accessed April 2021 ).
  • 12.Bruni L, Saura-Lazaro A, Montoliu A, et al. HPV vaccination introduction worldwide and WHO and UNICEF estimates of national HPV immunization coverage 2010–2019. Prev Med 2021; 144: 106399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Albuquerque A, Rios E, Schmitt F. Recommendations Favoring Anal Cytology as a Method for Anal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today (accessed November 2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.International Agency for Research on Cancer. CI5: Cancer incidence in five continents 2021. https://ci5.iarc.fr/Default.aspx (accessed November 1 2021).
  • 16.Doll R, Waterhouse JAH. Cancer incidence in five continents. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer: Geneva, Switzerland: Union Internationale Contre le Cancer; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gange SJ, Kitahata MM, Saag MS, et al. Cohort profile: the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD). Int J Epidemiol 2007; 36(2): 294–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV in the Southern United States National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance E, and End Results Program SEER*Stat Database. NPCR and SEER Incidence – U.S. Cancer Statistics 2001–2018 Public Use Research Database, 2020 submission (2001–2018). www.cdc.gov/cancer/uscs/public-use (accessed April 2022).
  • 20.Wei F, Gaisa MM, D’Souza G, et al. Epidemiology of anal human papillomavirus infection and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in 29 900 men according to HIV status, sexuality, and age: a collaborative pooled analysis of 64 studies. Lancet HIV 2021; 8(9): e531–e43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.UN Development Programme. Human development report 2016: human development for everyone. 2016. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf.
  • 22.Shiels MS, Kreimer AR, Coghill AE, Darragh TM, Devesa SS. Anal Cancer Incidence in the United States, 1977–2011: Distinct Patterns by Histology and Behavior. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015; 24(10): 1548–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cancer Research UK. Cervical cancer incidence statistics. Cancer Research UK; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lin C, Slama J, Gonzalez P, et al. Cervical determinants of anal HPV infection and high-grade anal lesions in women: a collaborative pooled analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19(8): 880–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lin C, Franceschi S, Clifford GM. Human papillomavirus types from infection to cancer in the anus, according to sex and HIV status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18(2): 198–206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Volpini LPB, Boldrini NAT, de Freitas LB, Miranda AE, Spano LC. The high prevalence of HPV and HPV16 European variants in cervical and anal samples of HIV-seropositive women with normal Pap test results. PLoS One 2017; 12(4): e0176422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kojic EM, Cu-Uvin S, Conley L, et al. Human papillomavirus infection and cytologic abnormalities of the anus and cervix among HIV-infected women in the study to understand the natural history of HIV/AIDS in the era of effective therapy (the SUN study). Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38(4): 253–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stier EA, Sebring MC, Mendez AE, Ba FS, Trimble DD, Chiao EY. Prevalence of anal human papillomavirus infection and anal HPV-related disorders in women: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(3): 278–309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Johnson LG, et al. Human papillomavirus, smoking, and sexual practices in the etiology of anal cancer. Cancer 2004; 101(2): 270–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Simpson S Jr., Blomfield P, Cornall A, Tabrizi SN, Blizzard L, Turner R. Front-to-back & dabbing wiping behaviour post-toilet associated with anal neoplasia & HR-HPV carriage in women with previous HPV-mediated gynaecological neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiol 2016; 42: 124–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Goodman MT, Shvetsov YB, McDuffie K, et al. Sequential acquisition of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection of the anus and cervix: the Hawaii HPV Cohort Study. J Infect Dis 2010; 201(9): 1331–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wei F, Su Y, Cui X, et al. Sequential Acquisition of Human Papillomavirus Infection at Genital and Anal Sites, Liuzhou, China. Emerg Infect Dis 2020; 26(10): 2387–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Daling JR, Weiss NS, Klopfenstein LL, Cochran LE, Chow WH, Daifuku R. Correlates of homosexual behavior and the incidence of anal cancer. JAMA 1982; 247(14): 1988–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nyitray A, Nielson CM, Harris RB, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for anal human papillomavirus infection in heterosexual men. J Infect Dis 2008; 197(12): 1676–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Van Doornum GJ, Prins M, Juffermans LH, et al. Regional distribution and incidence of human papillomavirus infections among heterosexual men and women with multiple sexual partners: a prospective study. Genitourin Med 1994; 70(4): 240–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hernandez AL, Efird JT, Holly EA, Berry JM, Jay N, Palefsky JM. Incidence of and risk factors for type-specific anal human papillomavirus infection among HIV-positive MSM. AIDS 2014; 28(9): 1341–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kelly H, Chikandiwa A, Alemany Vilches L, Palefsky JM, de Sanjose S, Mayaud P. Association of antiretroviral therapy with anal high-risk human papillomavirus, anal intraepithelial neoplasia, and anal cancer in people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV 2020; 7(4): e262–e78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tong WW, Jin F, McHugh LC, et al. Progression to and spontaneous regression of high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-infected and uninfected men. AIDS 2013; 27(14): 2233–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Samji H, Cescon A, Hogg RS, et al. Closing the gap: increases in life expectancy among treated HIV-positive individuals in the United States and Canada. PLoS One 2013; 8(12): e81355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Althoff K, Stewart C, Humes E, et al. The shifting age distribution of people with HIV using antiretroviral therapy in the United States, 2020 to 2030. AIDS 2021; doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ibrahim Khalil A, Mpunga T, Wei F, et al. Age-specific burden of cervical cancer associated with HIV: A global analysis with a focus on sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Cancer 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abramowitz L, Jacquard AC, Jaroud F, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype distribution in anal cancer in France: the EDiTH V study. Int J Cancer 2011; 129(2): 433–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hillman RJ, Garland SM, Gunathilake MP, et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in an Australian sample of anal cancers. Int J Cancer 2014; 135(4): 996–1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Revollo B, Videla S, Llibre JM, et al. Routine Screening of Anal Cytology in Persons With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and the Impact on Invasive Anal Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71(2): 390–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Palefsky JM, Lee JY, Jay N, et al. Treatment of Anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions to Prevent Anal Cancer. N Engl J Med 2022; 386(24): 2273–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Deshmukh AA, Chiao EY, Cantor SB, et al. Management of precancerous anal intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus-positive men who have sex with men: Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Cancer 2017; 123(23): 4709–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Clarke MA, Deshmukh AA, Suk R, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cytology and HPV-related Biomarkers for Anal Cancer Screening Among Different Risk Groups. Int J Cancer 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sonawane K, Zhu Y, Montealegre JR, et al. Parental intent to initiate and complete the human papillomavirus vaccine series in the USA: a nationwide, cross-sectional survey. Lancet Public Health 2020; 5(9): e484–e92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Karafillakis E, Simas C, Jarrett C, et al. HPV vaccination in a context of public mistrust and uncertainty: a systematic literature review of determinants of HPV vaccine hesitancy in Europe. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 15(7–8): 1615–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sonawane K, Lin YY, Damgacioglu H, et al. Trends in Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Safety Concerns and Adverse Event Reporting in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4(9): e2124502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supinfo

Data Availability Statement

Only publicly available data were used in this study, and data sources and handling of these data are described in the Materials and Methods and in the Supplementary Tables S1S3. Further information is available from the corresponding author upon request.

RESOURCES