Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
2022 Dec 22;10(1):51–66. doi: 10.1007/s42524-022-0231-3

Improving the resilience of maritime supply chains: The integration of ports and inland transporters in duopoly markets

Jia Shi 1, Jihong Chen 1,✉, Lang Xu 2, Zhongjie Di 3, Qunzhen Qu 4
PMCID: PMC9773681

Abstract

The adverse impact of the outbreak of COVID-19 has reduced ports’ operational efficiency. In addition, ports and inland logistics providers are generally independent of each other and difficult to work together, which leads to time loss. Thus, as the core player, ports can integrate with inland logistics providers to improve the efficiency and resilience of maritime supply chains. This study examines the strategic options of two competing maritime supply chains consisting of ports and inland logistics providers. We investigate the impact of cooperation between ports and inland logistics providers and government regulation on the maritime supply chain by comparing members’ optimal pricing and overall social welfare under centralized, decentralized, and hybrid scenarios. Results indicate that the hybrid scenario is an equilibrium strategy for maritime supply chain, although this strategy is not optimal for governments seeking to improve supply chain resilience and maximize social welfare. Furthermore, observations show that through government economic intervention, both seaborne supplies can be incentivized to adopt an integrated strategy, and business and society can achieve a win–win situation.

Keywords: resilience, Hotelling model, social welfare, maritime supply chain, game theory

Footnotes

This research is supported by the major projects of National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 20&ZD130).

References

  1. Ali A, Mahfouz A, Arisha A. Analysing supply chain resilience: Integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management. 2017;22(1):16–39. doi: 10.1108/SCM-06-2016-0197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Álvarez-SanJaime Ó, Cantos-Sánchez P, Moner-Colonques R, Sempere-Monerris J J. The impact on port competition of the integration of port and inland transport services. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2015;80:291–302. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2015.07.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ambulkar S, Blackhurst J, Grawe S. Firm’s resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management. 2015;33–34(1):111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2014.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Asgari N, Farahani R Z, Goh M. Network design approach for hub ports-shipping companies competition and cooperation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2013;48:1–18. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aslam H, Khan A Q, Rashid K, Rehman S. Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. 2020;31(6):1185–1204. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-07-2019-0263. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhamra R, Dani S, Burnard K. Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research. 2011;49(18):5375–5393. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.563826. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brandon-Jones E, Squire B, Autry C, Petersen K J. A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2014;50(3):55–73. doi: 10.1111/jscm.12050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cao M, Vonderembse M A, Zhang Q, Ragu-Nathan T S. Supply chain collaboration: Conceptualisation and instrument development. International Journal of Production Research. 2010;48(22):6613–6635. doi: 10.1080/00207540903349039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen J, Bian W, Wan Z, Yang Z, Zheng H, Wang P. Identifying factors influencing total-loss marine accidents in the world: Analysis and evaluation based on ship types and sea regions. Ocean Engineering. 2019;191:106495. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen J, Di Z, Shi J, Shu Y, Wan Z, Song L, Zhang W. Marine oil spill pollution causes and governance: A case study of Sanchi tanker collision and explosion. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;273:122978. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122978. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen J, Fei Y, Lee P T W, Tao X. Overseas port investment policy for China’s central and local governments in the Belt and Road Initiative. Journal of Contemporary China. 2019;28(116):196–215. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2018.1511392. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen J, Fei Y, Wan Z. The relationship between the development of global maritime fleets and GHG emission from shipping. Journal of Environmental Management. 2019;242:31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen J, Fei Y, Wan Z, Yang Z, Li H, Choi K S, Xie X. Allometric relationship and development potential comparison of ports in a regional cluster: A case study of ports in the Pearl River Delta in China. Transport Policy. 2020;85:80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.10.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen J, Zhang W, Wan Z, Li S, Huang T, Fei Y. Oil spills from global tankers: Status review and future governance. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;227:20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen J, Zheng H, Wei L, Wan Z, Ren R, Li J, Li H, Bian W, Gao M, Bai Y. Factor diagnosis and future governance of dangerous goods accidents in China’s ports. Environmental Pollution. 2020;257:113582. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chowdhury M M H, Quaddus M. Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory. International Journal of Production Economics. 2017;188:185–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chowdhury M M H, Quaddus M, Agarwal R. Supply chain resilience for performance: Role of relational practices and network complexities. Supply Chain Management. 2019;24(5):659–676. doi: 10.1108/SCM-09-2018-0332. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cui H, Notteboom T. Modelling emission control taxes in port areas and port privatization levels in port competition and co-operation sub-games. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2017;56:110–128. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Daugherty P J, Richey R G, Roath A S, Min S, Chen H, Arndt A D, Genchev S E. Is collaboration paying off for firms. Business Horizons. 2006;49(1):61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2005.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Borger B, Proost S, van Dender K. Private port pricing and public investment in port and hinterland capacity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. 2008;42(3):527–561. [Google Scholar]
  21. Do T M H, Park G K, Choi K, Kang K, Baik O. Application of game theory and uncertainty theory in port competition between Hong Kong Port and Shenzhen Port. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy. 2015;2:12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.enavi.2015.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dong G, Huang R B, Ng P. Tacit collusion between two terminals of a port. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2016;93:199–211. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Franc P, van der Horst M. Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Transport Geography. 2010;18(4):557–566. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Frémont A, Franc P. Hinterland transportation in Europe: Combined transport versus road transport. Journal of Transport Geography. 2010;18(4):548–556. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gonzalez Aregall M, Bergqvist R, Monios J. A global review of the hinterland dimension of green port strategies. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2018;59:23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Homsombat W, Yip T L, Yang H J, Fu X W. Regional cooperation and management of port pollution. Maritime Policy & Management. 2013;40(5):451–466. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.797118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hotelling H. Stability in competition. Economic Journal. 1929;39(153):41–57. doi: 10.2307/2224214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hua C, Chen J, Wan Z, Xu L, Bai Y, Zheng T, Fei Y. Evaluation and governance of green development practice of port: A sea port case of China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;249:119434. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ishii M, Lee P T, Tezuka K, Chang Y T D. A game theoretical analysis of port competition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2013;49(1):92–106. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2012.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jüttner U, Maklan S. Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: An empirical study. Supply Chain Management. 2011;16(4):246–259. doi: 10.1108/13598541111139062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaselimi E N, Notteboom T E, de Borger B. A game theoretical approach to competition between multi-user terminals: The impact of dedicated terminals. Maritime Policy & Management. 2011;38(4):395–414. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2011.588260. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. King D A, Gordon C E, Peters J R. Does road pricing affect port freight activity: Recent evidence from the port of New York and New Jersey. Research in Transportation Economics. 2014;44:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2014.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li J, Oh Y. A research on competition and cooperation between Shanghai Port and Ningbo-Zhoushan Port. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 2010;26(1):67–91. doi: 10.1016/S2092-5212(10)80012-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li L, Negenborn R R, de Schutter B. Intermodal freight transport planning: A receding horizon control approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2015;60:77–95. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu F, Wang J, Liu J, Kong Y. Coordination of port service chain with an integrated contract. Soft Computing. 2020;24(9):6245–6258. doi: 10.1007/s00500-019-03839-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu J, Wang J. Carrier alliance incentive analysis and coordination in a maritime transport chain based on service competition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2019;128:333–355. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2019.06.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu P, Liu C, Du J, Mu D. A system dynamics model for emissions projection of hinterland transportation. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;218:591–600. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Luo M, Liu L, Gao F. Post-entry container port capacity expansion. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2012;46(1):120–138. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2011.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Luo T, Chang D F. Empty container repositioning strategy in intermodal transport with demand switching. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2019;40:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2019.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Meersman H, Sys C, van de V, Vanelslander T. Road pricing and port hinterland competitiveness: An application to the Hamburg-Le Havre range. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. 2016;10(3):170–179. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2013.878771. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Merkel A. Spatial competition and complementarity in European port regions. Journal of Transport Geography. 2017;61:40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.04.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Monios J, Wilmsmeier G. Giving a direction to port regionalisation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2012;46(10):1551–1561. [Google Scholar]
  43. Monios J, Wilmsmeier G. The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation. Transport Policy. 2013;30:161–172. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Peng Q, Wang C, Xu L. Emission abatement and procurement strategies in a low-carbon supply chain with option contracts under stochastic demand. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2020;144:106502. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Peng Y, Li X, Wang W, Wei Z, Bing X, Song X. A method for determining the allocation strategy of on-shore power supply from a green container terminal perspective. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2019;167:158–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ponomarov S Y, Holcomb M C. Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management. 2009;20(1):124–143. [Google Scholar]
  47. Randrianarisoa L M, Zhang A. Adaptation to climate change effects and competition between ports: Invest now or later? Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2019;123:279–322. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2019.03.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sahebjamnia N, Torabi S A, Mansouri S A. Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018;197:63–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Scholten K, Schilder S. The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management. 2015;20(4):471–484. doi: 10.1108/SCM-11-2014-0386. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Scholten K, Sharkey Scott P, Fynes B. Mitigation processes: Antecedents for building supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management. 2014;19(2):211–228. doi: 10.1108/SCM-06-2013-0191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sheng D, Li Z C, Fu X, Gillen D. Modeling the effects of unilateral and uniform emission regulations under shipping company and port competition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2017;101:99–114. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Song D P, Lyons A, Li D, Sharifi H. Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2016;87:75–96. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Song D W. Regional container port competition and co-operation: The case of Hong Kong and South China. Journal of Transport Geography. 2002;10(2):99–110. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00003-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Stoll J S, Pinto da Silva P, Olson J, Benjamin S. Expanding the “geography” of resilience in fisheries by bringing focus to seafood distribution systems. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2015;116:185–192. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.07.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sugawara J. Port and hinterland network: A case study of the Crescent Corridor intermodal freight program in the US. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017;25:916–927. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Tae-Woo Lee P, Flynn M. Charting a new paradigm of container hub port development policy: The Asian doctrine. Transport Reviews. 2011;31(6):791–806. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2011.597005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tan Z, Meng Q, Wang F, Kuang H. Strategic integration of the inland port and shipping service for the ocean carrier. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2018;110:90–109. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Tian X, Liu L, Wang S. Evolving competition between Hong Kong and Shenzhen ports. Maritime Policy & Management. 2015;42(8):729–745. doi: 10.1080/03088839.2015.1029553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Tukamuhabwa B, Stevenson M, Busby J. Supply chain resilience in a developing country context: A case study on the interconnectedness of threats, strategies and outcomes. Supply Chain Management. 2017;22(6):486–505. doi: 10.1108/SCM-02-2017-0059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wagner S M, Bode C. An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of Business Logistics. 2008;29(1):307–325. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00081.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang F, Zhuo X, Niu B, He J. Who canvasses for cargos? Incentive analysis and channel structure in a shipping supply chain. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2017;97:78–101. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang J, Liu J. Vertical contract selection under chain-to-chain service competition in shipping supply chain. Transport Policy. 2019;81:184–196. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.06.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wieland A, Wallenburg C M. The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: A relational view. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2013;43(4):300–320. doi: 10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2012-0243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Witkowski J, Kiba-Janiak M. The role of local governments in the development of city logistics. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;125:373–385. [Google Scholar]
  65. Witte P, Wiegmans B, Rodrigue J P. Competition or complementarity in Dutch inland port development: A case of overproximity. Journal of Transport Geography. 2017;60:80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Woodburn A. An analysis of rail freight operational efficiency and mode share in the British port-hinterland container market. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2017;51:190–202. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Xie F, Wang C, Xu L. Whether to invest in terminal efficiency: A perspective considering customer preference and capital constraint in competitive environment. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2021;205:105563. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Xu F, Lu H, Ding N, Liu J. Game theory analysis of container port alliance. Journal of Coastal Research. 2015;73:635–640. doi: 10.2112/SI73-110.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Xu L. Analysis for waste collection and management of closed-loop supply chain with dual-channel forward logistics. International Journal of Industrial Engineering. 2020;27(1):124–139. [Google Scholar]
  70. Xu L, Shi J, Chen J, Li L. Estimating the effect of COVID-19 epidemic on shipping trade: An empirical analysis using panel data. Marine Policy. 2021;133:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Xu X L, Zhang Q, Wang W Y, Peng Y, Song X Q, Jiang Y. Modelling port competition for intermodal network design with environmental concerns. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;202:720–735. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yang Z, Guo L, Lian F. Port integration in a region with multiport gateways in the context of industrial transformation and upgrading of the port. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2019;122:231–246. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2018.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yin C, Ke Y, Chen J, Liu M. Interrelations between sea hub ports and inland hinterlands: Perspectives of multimodal freight transport organization and low carbon emissions. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2021;214:105919. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105919. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhang Q, Wang W, Peng Y, Guo Z. Impact of rail transport services on port competition based on a spatial duopoly model. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2017;148:113–130. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.06.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang Q, Wang W, Peng Y, Zhang J, Guo Z. A game-theoretical model of port competition on intermodal network and pricing strategy. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2018;114:19–39. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2018.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhou X. Competition or cooperation: A simulation of the price strategy of ports. International Journal of Simulation Modelling. 2015;14(3):463–474. doi: 10.2507/IJSIMM14(3)8.303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers of Engineering Management are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES