Abstract
Simple Summary
A potential new treatment for glioma patients is the blockade of KCa3.1 potassium channels. In our study, we performed experiments with the KCa3.1 blocker TRAM-34 in five glioma cell lines. To broaden our findings, effects on cultures enriched in glioma stem cells which are thought to be responsible for treatment failure and relapse were delineated in addition to standard culture conditions. Accordingly, stem-cell enriched cultures were found to be more resistant towards irradiation therapy. Effects of TRAM-34 were dependent on cell line and culture condition and included direct tumoricidal effects, but also temozolomide- and irradiation-sensitizing effects, showing its synergistic potential with current treatment strategies. TRAM-34 effects were mostly found in stem-cell enriched cultures. Overall, our results underline the importance of testing new interventions in several cell lines and different culture conditions to mimic in vivo inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity.
Abstract
Reportedly, the intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated potassium channel KCa3.1 contributes to the invasion of glioma cells into healthy brain tissue and resistance to temozolomide and ionizing radiation. Therefore, KCa3.1 has been proposed as a potential target in glioma therapy. The aim of the present study was to assess the variability of the temozolomide- and radiation-sensitizing effects conferred by the KCa3.1 blocking agent TRAM-34 between five different glioma cell lines grown as differentiated bulk tumor cells or under glioma stem cell-enriching conditions. As a result, cultures grown under stem cell-enriching conditions exhibited indeed higher abundances of mRNAs encoding for stem cell markers compared to differentiated bulk tumor cultures. In addition, stem cell enrichment was paralleled by an increased resistance to ionizing radiation in three out of the five glioma cell lines tested. Finally, TRAM-34 led to inconsistent results regarding its tumoricidal but also temozolomide- and radiation-sensitizing effects, which were dependent on both cell line and culture condition. In conclusion, these findings underscore the importance of testing new drug interventions in multiple cell lines and different culture conditions to partially mimic the in vivo inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity.
Keywords: glioma stem cells, colony formation assay, limited dilution assay, TRAM-34, temozolomide, ionizing radiation
1. Introduction
Patients with glioblastoma, the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults [1], exhibit dismal median overall survival times of below two years after multimodal therapy. Standard therapy comprises surgical resection followed by radio-chemotherapy with the DNA-alkylating agent temozolomide and temozolomide maintenance therapy, and, optionally, electrotherapy with tumor-treating fields [2]. One potential new drug target is the intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated potassium channel KCa3.1 (also known as IK, SK4, Gardos Channel or KCNN4; for reviews see [3,4]), which may be inhibited by TRAM-34 (1-[(2-Chlorophenyl)diphenylmethyl]-1H-pyrazole, for review see [5]). In the brain, early reports hypothesized KCa3.1 to be solely expressed on malignant cells; however, it is now well-established that normal brain tissues also express KCa3.1, such as brain-resident immune cells [6], astrocytes or neurons [7,8]. Importantly, KCa3.1 expression is reportedly highly upregulated in glioma stem cells [9] and its function has been demonstrated to regulate tumor cell proliferation [10,11] and spreading of glioma cells in the brain [9,12,13,14,15,16]. In addition, blocking KCa3.1 with TRAM-34 reportedly radio-sensitizes glioma cells both in vitro and in vivo [17]. Beyond that, KCa3.1 targeting has been shown to sensitize glioma cells to temozolomide [16]. Both findings underscore potential synergistic effects of KCa3.1 targeting to two main pillars of standard therapy. Finally, high abundance of KCa3.1 mRNA in glioblastoma resection specimens has been proposed to associate with poor survival times of glioblastoma patients in both the REMBRANDT [14] and TCGA patient cohorts [17], even though this type of analysis suffers from structural weaknesses (as discussed in [18]).
The aim of this work was to define the radio- and chemo-sensitizing effects of pharmacological KCa3.1 targeting in glioma cell lines that differ in genetic background or phenotype. As many earlier reports identified cancer stem cells as more therapy-resistant than “differentiated” cancer cells (for reviews see [19,20]), we compared bulk tumor-differentiating with glioma stem cell-enriching growth conditions in five glioma cell lines.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Cell Culture
Three different murine glioma cell lines (SMA-560, SMA-540 and GL-261) and two human glioma cell lines (U-87MG and U-251MG) were studied. SMA-560 and SMA-540 cells originated from the same spontaneous mouse astrocytoma and are, hence, believed to be genetically related [21,22], whereas GL-261 cells were chemically induced by intracranial injection of 3-methylcholantrene in C57BL/6 mice [23]. Both human glioma cell lines were established several decades ago in Sweden [24]. Although several reports describe difficulties tracing back present cultures to original tumor tissues, analyses show glioma origin for both U-87MG and U-251MG cell lines [25,26]. To induce “differentiated” bulk tumor cells, the cell lines were grown in a DMEM medium (ThermoFisher, #41965-039, Austin, TX, USA) supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a 10% CO2 atmosphere. For glioblastoma stem cell enriching conditions, cells were cultivated in complete human NeuroCult NS-A Proliferation Medium (including 10 ng/mL rhFGF, 20 ng/mL rhEGF, 2 µg/mL Heparin; STEMCELL Technologies, #05751, #78003, #78006.2, #07980) at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
To detach adherent cells or to dissociate cells from spheres, cells were incubated with Trypsin-EDTA 0.05 % (ThermoFisher, #25300054, Austin, TX, USA) for 5–10 min and cell numbers were determined using hemocytometer chips (Neubauer improved). The SMA-540 cells were kindly provided by Hans-Georg Wirsching (Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland), and the U-251MG cells were a gift from Dr. Luiz O. Penalva (Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, UT Health San Antonio, TX, USA).
2.2. RNA Isolation and qPCR
mRNA was isolated with NucleoSpin RNA isolation kit (Macherey-Nagel, #740955.250) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Resulting RNA concentrations were determined with a NanoDrop ND-100 spectrometer. A total of 20 ng of RNA was used for each sample. One step SYBR Green-based reverse transcriptase PCR was accomplished using the 1 Step RT PCR Green ROX L Kit (highQu) following the manufacturer’s instruction. Specific fragments used for murine cell lines were (all Quantitect Primer Assays, Qiagen): ALDH1A3 (QT01077867), CXCR4 (QT00249305), Nestin (QT00316799), SOX2 (QT00249347), KCNN4 (KCa3.1, QT00105672). mRNA abundances were normalized to the geometric means of those of the housekeeper genes GAPDH (QT01658692) and PDHB1 (QT00163366). Fragments used for human cell lines were (again all Quantitect Primer Assays, Qiagen): KCNN4 (KCa3.1, QT00003780), ALDH1A3 (QT00077588), CXCR4 (QT00223188), NES (QT00235781) and SOX2 (QT00237601). mRNA abundances were normalized to the geometric means of those of the housekeeper genes GAPDH (QT01192646) and ACTB (QT00095431).
Measurements were conducted on a LightCycler480 (Roche), and crossing point values and melting curves were analyzed using LightCycler 480 software (Roche, version 1.5.0).
2.3. Drug Treatment
TRAM-34 (Sigma Aldrich, T6700) was dissolved in DMSO (10 mM stock solution, Sigma Aldrich, D2650) and used at final concentrations of 1 µM (patch-clamp) or 5 µM (all other experiments). The KCa3.1 channel opener 1-EBIO (1-ethyl-2-benzimidazolinone, 200 µM; Sigma Aldrich, SML0034) was diluted from a 20 mM stock solution in DMSO. Temozolomide (Sigma Aldrich, T2577) was dissolved in DMSO (100 mM stock solution) and used at final concentrations of 30 µM. Drugs were added to the cells 1 h before irradiation. Equivalent volumes of DMSO were used as control conditions. Except electrophysiology, all experiments were conducted in a blinded fashion until statistical analysis.
2.4. Ionizing Radiation
Irradiation with 6 MV photons of cells at indicated doses was accomplished using a linear accelerator (LINAC SL15, Philips) at a dose rate of 4 Gy/min at room temperature.
2.5. Patch-Clamp on-Cell Recording
Macroscopic on-cell (cell-attached) currents from NSC (10–14 d) and DMEM medium-grown SMA-540 mouse glioma cells were recorded in voltage-clamp mode (10 kHz sampling rate) and 3 kHz low-pass-filtered by an EPC-9 patch-clamp amplifier (Heka, Lambrecht, Germany) using Pulse software (Heka) and an ITC-16 Interface (Instrutech, Port Washington, NY, USA). Borosilicate glass pipettes (~5 MΩ pipette resistance; GC150 TF-10, Clark Medical Instruments, Pangbourne, UK) manufactured by a microprocessor-driven DMZ puller (Zeitz, Augsburg, Germany) were used in combination with a STM electrical micromanipulator (Lang, Gießen, Germany). Cells were continuously super-fused at 37 °C with NaCl solution (in mM: 125 NaCl, 32 N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 5 KCl, 5 d-glucose, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, titrated with NaOH to pH 7.4) additionally containing the KCa3.1 K+ channel activator 1-EBIO (0 or 200 µM) and TRAM-34 (0 or 1 µM). The pipette solution contained (in mM) 130 KCl, 32 HEPES, 5 d-glucose, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, titrated with KOH to pH 7.4. Currents were elicited by 41 voltage square pulses (700 ms each) from 0 mV holding potential to voltages between −100 mV and +100 mV delivered in 5 mV increments. Clamp voltages refer to the cytosolic face of the plasma membrane and were not corrected for the liquid junction potential between pipette and bath solution. For analysis, macroscopic on-cell currents were averaged between 100 and 700 ms of each voltage sweep. Inward currents are defined as influx of cations into the cells (or efflux of anions out of the cell), depicted as downward deflections of the current tracings, and defined as negative currents in the current voltage relationships. Macroscopic on-cell conductance was calculated for the inward currents between −75 mV and +25 mV clamp voltage. The 1-EBIO-stimulated and TRAM-34-sensitive increase in macroscopic on-cell conductance was used as a measure of functional KCa3.1 channel expression in the plasma membrane.
2.6. Clonogenic Survival
Clonogenic survival after drug and/or irradiation treatment was tested using colony formation (attached cells) and limited dilution assays (floating spheres) due to different growth phenotypes of the cell lines (see Supplemental Figure S1). For delayed plating colony formation assays (SMA-560, SMA-540 and GL-261 cells), 600 cells were seeded per well in 6-well plates in a drug-free medium 24 h after irradiation (0–6 Gy). 60 min prior to 24 h after irradiation, cells were incubated with TRAM-34 (0 or 5 µM) and temozolomide (0 or 30 µM). For pre-plating colony formation assays (U-87MG and U-251MG cells), 300 cells were seeded per well. After 4 h of incubation period, cells were incubated with TRAM-34 (0 or 5 µM) and temozolomide (0 or 30 µM). Irradiation treatment was conducted 1 h after TRAM-34 or temozolomide were added. After 5–7 (SMA-560, SMA-540 and U-87MG), 11 (U-251MG) or 13–14 (GL-261) days, cells were fixated with 4.5% formaldehyde and stained with 0.05 % Coomassie blue. Resulting colonies, defined as cell clusters consisting of at least 50 cells, were counted. Plating efficiency was calculated by dividing the number of colonies by the number of plated cells. Survival fractions were calculated by dividing the plating efficiencies by the respective plating efficiency at 0 Gy of each treatment arm. All experiments consist of 3 experimental and 3-6 observational units each (for definitions of experimental and observational unit, see [27]).
For limited dilution assays, singularized cells were serially 1:2 diluted in 96-well plates resulting in cell numbers between 2048 and 1 cell per well. A total of 24 h after cell plating, cells were pretreated (60 min) and continuously post-treated before and after irradiation (0–8 Gy) with TRAM-34 (0 or 5 µM) and temozolomide (0 or 30 µM). After a further 5–7 (SMA-560, U-87MG), 11 (U-251MG) or 14 days (SMA-540, GL-261), minimal cell number to retain the culture was determined. Plating efficiency was defined as the reciprocal value of this minimal cell number. The survival fraction was calculated as mentioned above. All experiments consist of three experimental and four observational units each. Fitted curves were calculated according to the linear quadratic model [28] with the following equation:
with D = radiation dose, and α and β = cell-type specific parameters.
3. Results
To account for genetic, but also phenotypical differences, three different murine and two human glioma cell lines were grown in two different culture media, DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum that should “differentiate” glioblastoma “bulk” cells [29,30], and a neural stem cell-enriching/inducing NSC medium. To assess the influence of these two incubation conditions on stem cell properties, the mRNA abundance of four established stem cell markers, ALDH1A3 [31], CXCR4 [32], Nestin [33] and SOX2 [34] was determined (Figure 1A–D). All but U-87MG (SMA-560, SMA-540, GL-261 and U-251MG) showed statistically significant increases in mRNA abundance in one or more of the stem cell markers when grown in NSC medium (see Figure 1). For example, mRNA abundance of ALDH1A3 was more than doubled (p = 0.0183), while mRNA abundance of CXCR4 was more than 100× greater when SMA-540 cells were grown in NSC compared to standard DMEM culture. U-87MG cells were the only cell line for which no statistically significant increase in any of the four analyzed stem cell markers was observed, even though Nestin was upregulated on a low basal level (p = 0.0883). Combined, these data suggest that stem cell-enriching culture conditions indeed increased the expression of stem cell markers in all but one cell line studied.
Next, the effect of this stem cell enrichment on survival fractions after irradiation was analyzed. For “differentiated” cells grown in DMEM culture medium, colony formation assays (CFA) were performed. Since the cell lines formed floating or attached spheroids when cultured in NSC medium (Supplemental Figure S1), we used limited dilution assays (LDA) for NSC-grown cells. To exclude LDA vs. CFA inter-assay differences, SMA-560 cells, grown in DMEM medium, were tested both in CFAs and LDAs, which resulted in only negligible differences of clonogenicity (see Supplemental Figure S2) indicating inter-assay concordance.
Comparison of the two culturing media suggested that stem cell-enriching conditions led to higher survival fractions in irradiated SMA-560 and SMA-540 cells, as compared to “differentiated” DMEM-grown cells (Figure 2A,B). No differences were observed with GL-261 cells (Figure 2C). In contrast, U-87MG cells cultured in DMEM medium exhibited higher numerical survival fractions, even though data largely overlapped between both culture media (Figure 2D). Last, human U-251MG cells showed a doubling in survival fraction when grown in stem cell-enriching NSC medium (p = 0.056, Figure 2E).
To test the influence of stem-cell enriching culture conditions on KCa3.1 (KCNN4) mRNA, we performed real-time RT-PCR analyses for all five cell lines under both culture conditions. SMA-560 cells expressed KCa3.1 independently of culture conditions to a moderate-to-high extent (Figure 3A). In SMA-540 cells, KCa3.1 mRNA abundance was increased by twofold under stem cell enriching as compared to DMEM culture conditions, even though statistical significance was not reached (Figure 3B). Both murine GL-261 (Figure 3C) and human U-87MG cells did express KCa3.1 to a much lower extent, and this expression was not influenced by the culture condition (Figure 3D). U-251MG cells also expressed KCa3.1 on a low-to-moderate level; however, its expression almost doubled when cultured in NSC medium (Figure 3E). Irradiation of cells had no further systematic influence on mRNA abundances of stem cell-associated genes or KCa3.1 (Supplemental Figure S3) in all three murine cell lines.
To confirm functional expression of KCa3.1 K+ channels in the plasma membrane of SMA-540 murine glioma cells and to identify its dependence on the culture conditions, macroscopic on-cell (cell-attached) currents as obtained with patch-clamp recordings in voltage-clamp mode were compared between cells grown in NSC medium and continuously DMEM medium-cultured sub-confluent monolayers. Macroscopic on-cell currents were recorded with KCl pipette and NaCl bath solution at clamp voltages between −100 and +100 mV. Maximal KCa3.1 K+ channel activity was first induced by bath super-fusion with the KCa3.1 opener 1-EBIO (200 µM) and then blocked by co-super-fusion of the KCa3.1 blocker TRAM-34 (1 µM). The TRAM-34-sensitive current fraction was analyzed as a measure of functional KCa3.1 surface expression (Figure 4A,B).
In on-cell mode, the physiological membrane potential also applies to the electrically sealed membrane patch and contributes additively to the transmembrane voltage of the recorded membrane patch on top of the clamp voltage. With KCl pipette solution and with an assumed high intracellular K+ concentration, the EK electrochemical equilibrium potential for potassium across the recorded membrane patch can be expected to be around 0 mV transmembrane voltage, i.e., when the positive clamp voltage zeroes the negative physiological membrane potential. Since (further) activation of the KCa3.1 K+ conductance by 1-EBIO is expected to hyperpolarize the membrane potential and KCa3.1 blockage by TRAM-34 to depolarize it, KCa3.1 activation and blockage should be paralleled by an increase and decrease, respectively, of the positive clamp voltage that is required to zero the physiological membrane potential. Assuming finally that the K+ conductance is the largest conductance fraction in the plasma membrane of glioma cells and this fraction largely determines the membrane potential, the reversal potential (Vrev) of the recorded macroscopic current should to some extent represent EK and thereby the negative value of the membrane potential.
In our experiments on SMA-540 cells, 1-EBIO induced an increase in the macroscopic on-cell inward currents and TRAM-34 the blockage of these currents (Figure 4B). Notably, on average, the 1-EBIO-induced increase in macroscopic on-cell inward current and TRAM-34-sensitive current fractions seemed to be larger in SMA-540 cells grown in NSC medium than in DMEM medium-cultivated cells (Figure 4C,D). As a matter of fact, a significant and almost significant higher number of NSC medium-grown and 1-EBIO-treated cells exhibited a large inward conductance and a high TRAM-34-sensitive conductance fraction, respectively, than 1-EBIO-treated DMEM medium cultivated cells. Moreover, and in accordance with the above-mentioned assumptions, 1-EBIO induced a right shift (i.e., an increase) and TRAM-34 an left shift (i.e., decrease), respectively, in Vrev of the macroscopic on-cell current especially in NSC medium-grown SMA-540 cells (Figure 4C,F). In two-by-two contingency plots (Figure 4G), however, number of cells with high Vrev and large TRAM-34-induced Vrev decline were not significantly different between both culture conditions. Combined, this data indicate functional expression of KCa3.1 channels in SMA-540 murine glioma cells and suggest upregulation of KCa3.1 in the plasma membrane upon transferring SMA-540 from DMEM in NSC medium.
To test for the functional significance of KCa3.1 on clonogenic survival of DMEM cultured and stem-cell enriched (NSC culture) glioma cells after irradiation (0–8 Gy) and/or chemotherapy, we applied the KCa3.1 blocker TRAM-34 (0 or 5 µM) in combination with temozolomide (0 or 30 µM). As shown in Figure 5A–C, temozolomide or TRAM-34 alone hardly affected plating efficiency of SMA-560 cells in colony formation assay or limited dilution assay. TRAM-34, however, sensitized SMA-560 cells to temozolomide when grown in DMEM medium, while this trend was only numerical when grown in NSC medium. Furthermore, in DMEM-grown irradiated (0–6 Gy) SMA-560 cells, neither TRAM-34 nor temozolomide, nor their combination, decreased survival fraction in colony formation assay (Figure 5D), suggesting no radio-sensitizing action of both drugs alone or their combination in “differentiated” SMA-560 cells. In limited dilution assay with stem cell-enriched NSC-grown SMA-560 cells, temozolomide showed a trend (p = 0.056) towards radio-sensitization of the cells at high irradiation doses (Figure 5D). TRAM-34 alone, in contrast, did not exhibit any effect on survival fraction of irradiated stem cell-enriched SMA-560 cells (Figure 5E).
In SMA-540 cells, neither TRAM-34 nor temozolomide, nor their combination, decreased plating efficiency in both culture conditions (Figure 6A–C). However, while neither TRAM-34 nor TMZ affected survival fractions after irradiation in DMEM-cultured SMA-540 cells (Figure 6D), both agents (and their combination) did significantly reduce survival fractions at high irradiation doses in stem-cell enriched SMA-540 cells (Figure 6E).
In contrast to SMA-540 and SMA-560 cells, GL-261 cells were highly temozolomide-sensitive irrespective of culture conditions. Temozolomide reduced plating efficiency in colony formation assay and limited dilution assay by approximately 85% and 97%, respectively (Figure 7A–C; p < 0.0001). Further reductions by the addition of TRAM-34 were small and only numerical (Figure 7B,C). Due to temozolomide’s large effect on plating efficiency on its own, we subsequently only analyzed TRAM-34′s effects on survival fraction after irradiation. TRAM-34 had no effect on survival fraction in DMEM-grown “differentiated” GL-261 cells (Figure 7D). In stem cell-enriched culture, TRAM-34 treatment showed a trend towards higher survival fractions, i.e., towards an increased radioresistance (Figure 7E).
Next, we did not identify changes in plating efficiency for human U-87MG cells cultured in DMEM medium for any treatment group (Figure 8A,B). Interestingly, NSC cultured U-87MG showed an 80% reduction in plating efficiency when incubated with TRAM-34, and near total reductions when TRAM-34 and TMZ were applied concomitantly (Figure 8C). We observed only small effects of any treatment on survival fraction after irradiation in DMEM cultured U-87MG cells, with only numerical reductions of the survival fraction at 3 Gy in the TMZ and TRAM-34 + TMZ treatment group. Due to the large effects of TRAM-34 and TRAM-34 + TMZ on U-87MG cells cultured in NSC medium alone, only TMZ’s effect was analyzed regarding its effect on radiation sensitivity, showing ambiguous results depending on the irradiation dose (Figure 8D,E).
Last, we analyzed the human U-251MG cell line, which exhibited a large sensitivity towards TMZ with large reductions in plating efficiency in both culture conditions (Figure 9A–C). Moreover, TRAM-34 reduced plating efficiency in limited dilution assay by approximately 40%, even though statistical significance was not reached (Figure 9C; p = 0.0649). Due to the large effects of TMZ on its own, only TRAM-34 treatment was subsequently analyzed regarding its radio-sensitization effects. Overall, only small effects of TRAM-34 trending towards reduced survival fractions after irradiation were found (Figure 9D,E).
4. Discussion
The present study showed that radio-sensitivity was influenced by culture conditions. SMA-560, SMA-540 and (to a smaller degree) U-251MG cells were more radio-resistant when cultured in stem cell-enriching NSC medium as compared to the “bulk” glioma DMEM/FBS cell cultures. Culture medium-induced changes of radiation sensitivity in GL-261 cells and U-87MG were only small (see Figure 2). Notably, U-87MG cells were the only cell line studied which did not show a clear induction of any of the four tested stem cell markers when grown in NSC medium. The increased radioresistance in stem cell-enriched cultures is in line with previous reports, showing increased radioresistance of cancer stem cells as compared to “differentiated bulk” tumor cells, which is most probably due to upregulation of repair mechanisms, increased oxidative defense and/or activation of pro-survival pathways in cancer stem cells (as reviewed in [20]).
The main finding of the present study is that tumoricidal, but also radio- and temozolomide-sensitizing effects of the KCa3.1 inhibitor TRAM-34 varied considerably between glioma cell lines and culture conditions. Specifically, TRAM-34 had radio-sensitizing effects in stem cell-enriched but not in “differentiated” SMA-540 cells (see Figure 6D,E). While TRAM-34 had no effect on clonogenic survival in DMEM-cultured U-87MG cells, plating efficiency was reduced by 80% when applied to NSC-cultured U-87MG cells (see Figure 8B,C). A similar trend was found in U-251MG; however, TRAM-34′s effect in NSC medium did not quite reach statistical significance (see Figure 9B,C; p = 0.0649). Furthermore, no effect of TRAM-34 was seen in GL-261 cells, arguably due to its low KCa3.1 expression compared to the other cell lines (see Figure 3 and Figure 7). This contrasts a previous study [16], which reported both direct tumoricidal but also TMZ-sensitizing effects of TRAM-34 in GL-261 cells. Notably, D’Alessandro et al. [16] applied 5 µM TRAM-34 in DMEM medium containing 1 % FBS for TRAM-34 single and temozolomide co-treatment, while our experiments on “bulk-differentiated” GL-261 cells were conducted with 5 µM TRAM-34 in DMEM medium containing 10% FBS (see Section 2).
In theory, differences in free TRAM-34 concentration may explain intra-cell line differences between both culture conditions, and the differences between this and D’Alessandro et al.’s paper: Given the reported high plasma protein binding rates (around 98% in rat plasma) of TRAM-34 [35], it is justified to assume higher free TRAM-34 concentrations in culture media with less or no FBS, such as NSC. Nevertheless, IC50 values for TRAM-34 are reportedly around 20 nM [36], which should ensure quantitative blockage of KCa3.1 even when used in cell culture medium containing 10% FBS. To explore this possibility further, we conducted CFA using DMEM + 1% FBS with U-87MG cells, which showed the largest reduction in plating efficiency with TRAM-34 treatment in NSC medium (see Figure 8B). While colony formation was slower, TRAM-34 treatment did not lead to reductions in plating efficiency and resembled findings as when grown in DMEM + 10% FBS, rendering this hypothesis unlikely (Supplemental Figure S4).
Alternatively, this high variability might result from cell line- and culture condition-dependent differences in KCa3.1 expression. While KCa3.1 mRNA abundance did not differ in SMA-560 (high KCa3.1 expression), GL-261 (low KCa3.1 expression) and U-87MG (low KCa3.1 expression) cells between both culture conditions, SMA-540 cells (high KCa3.1 expression; p = 0.154) and U-251MG (low KCa3.1 expression) showed an increase in KCa3.1 mRNA abundance with stem cell enrichment in NSC medium (see Figure 3), which was also seen functionally in SMA-540 cells with patch-clamp recording (see Figure 4). This might explain why a radio-sensitizing effect of TRAM-34 alone and an additive radio-sensitizing effect of TRAM-34 combined with temozolomide treatment was only apparent in glioma stem cell-enriched SMA-540 cells (see Figure 6D–E) which was the culture with the highest KCa3.1 mRNA abundance (see Figure 3B). In contrast to this line of argumentation, the large tumoricidal effect of TRAM-34 in NSC-cultured U-87MG cells was not observed in DMEM culture, even though the expression of KCa3.1 did not differ between both culture conditions and was generally low compared to SMA-540 cells (see Figure 3D and Figure 8B,C).
Temozolomide did not reduce the clonogenic survival in SMA-560, SMA-540 and U-87MG cells or only did so to a small, statistically non-significant amount (see Figure 5B,C, Figure 6B,C and Figure 8B,C). Speculatively, this may be due to high expression of the temozolomide resistance gene O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT), or (as is the case for U-87MG with a methylated and hence low MGMT expression status [37]) result from a reduced expression of mismatch repair proteins [38,39], or an enhanced expression of DHC2, which interferes with nuclear transportation of DNA repair proteins [40]. This is contrasted by large and culture condition-independent effects of TMZ in GL-261 and U-251MG cells (see Figure 7B,C and Figure 9B,C).
In contrast to the present study, previous work of our group and others have consistently disclosed a radioprotective function of KCa3.1. In particular, TRAM-34 treatment has been shown to radio-sensitize human glioblastoma cell lines (T98G and U87MG, both cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FCS and using higher TRAM-34 concentrations of up to 10 µmol/L). Strikingly, knockdown of KCa3.1 by RNA interference in T98G cells mimicked the radio-sensitizing TRAM-34 effect and concomitantly abolished the sensitivity to TRAM-34 [17]. Vice versa, downregulation of the stem cell marker musashi-1 in U251 human glioblastoma cells reportedly upregulates KCa3.1 and induces TRAM-34-sensitive radioresistance [41]. Likewise, genetic knockdown of KCa3.1 radio-sensitizes murine breast cancer cells with loss of TRAM-34-sensitive radioresistance [42].
Combined with the data of the present study, this might suggest that KCa3.1 targeting with TRAM-34 may sensitize glioma cells to radiation (or temozolomide) only under specific culture conditions and in selected glioma cell lines/cultures, speculatively preferentially in stem cell-enriching (serum-free) culture conditions. In our previous work on patient-derived primary glioblastoma stem cell cultures, KCa3.1 expression varied considerably between individual tumors and was associated with mesenchymal subpopulations of stem cells [3,43], which are especially radiation-resistant [44] and may, hence, represent the subpopulation of glioblastoma cells to test further anti-KCa3.1 therapies in.
Importantly, several groups identified also anti-migratory or anti-invasive effects of anti-KCa3.1 treatment [9,12,13,14,15,16], properties which were not part of our present assessment. Moreover, other authors found the immune constitution of animals to be a better predictor for response to radiation treatment than intrinsic radiosensitivity of cancer cells [45]. This might be especially interesting in light of the findings of Grimaldi et al. [46], demonstrating anti-immunosuppressive effects of TRAM-34 in glioma-infiltrating microglia/macrophages, which led to decreased tumor volumes in a glioma mouse model.
Limitations. There are several limitations, potentially challenging the generalizability of the present study. First, NSC medium was originally developed for culturing human stem cells. However, as shown in Figure 1, expression of stem cell associated genes was also increased in all three murine cell lines. Second, while we did show inter-assay concordance of CFAs and LDAs, incubation times were chosen based on proliferation rate of each cell line in each culture medium. This led to different incubation times of SMA-540 cells in CFA and LDA (7 days versus 14 days), which may complicate direct comparisons of radiosensitivity between DMEM and NSC cultures of SMA-540 cells. Last, determining drug concentrations is challenging. While there is evidence that TMZ may reach brain tissue concentrations of up to 30 µM in human patients [47,48], no human pharmacokinetic data are available for TRAM-34. Experiments in rats identified peak concentration levels of 2.5 µmol/l in brain tissue after intraperitoneal injections [35], while other authors found concentrations of up to 1.3 µmol/L in mice brain tissue [13].
5. Conclusions
We identified tumoricidal, TMZ- and radiation-sensitizing effects of pharmacological KCa3.1 targeting by TRAM-34 in our tested glioma cell lines. However, these effects were not only cell line-specific, but also dependent on the culture conditions used. Notably, TRAM-34 was especially effective against stem-cell enriched cell cultures, which are generally thought of as responsible for therapy resistance and tumor relapse. This underpins the importance of testing new drug targets in various cell lines and different culture conditions, to mimic intra- and inter-tumor heterogeneity in glioblastoma patients at least partially [49,50].
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Heidrun Faltin (from the Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany) for excellent technical assistance.
Abbreviations
ANOVA | analysis of variance |
CFA | colony formation assay |
DMEM | Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium |
DMSO | dimethylsulfoxide |
FBS | fetal Bovine Serum |
LDA | limited dilution assay |
NSC | neural stem cell inducing medium |
qPCR | quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction |
RT | reverse transcriptase |
TMZ | temozolomide |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cancers14246199/s1, Figure S1: Representative images of growth phenotypes in “bulk” cell-“differentiating” DMEM/10% FBS (top) and glioma stem cell-enriching NSC (bottom) medium; Figure S2: Survival fractions of irradiated (0–6 Gy) SMA-560 cells grown in DMEM + 10% FBS determined by limited dilution assay (LDA; B, open circles) or colony formation assay (CFA; B, closed circles) are not different; Figure S3: Irradiation does not affect mRNA abundance of (A) ALDH1A3, (B) CXCR4, (C) Nestin, (D) SOX2 or (E) KCNN4 in SMA-560 (left), SMA-540 (middle) or GL-261 (right) cells systematically irrespective of culture condition; Figure S4: TRAM-34 does not exhibit tumoricidal effects on U-87MG cells when incubated in DMEM + 1% FBS.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.S., K.G., S.M.H. and P.R.; formal analysis, N.S. and S.M.H.; funding acquisition, S.M.H. and P.R.; investigation, N.S. and K.G.; methodology, N.S. and K.G.; resources, U.N.; supervision, U.N., S.M.H. and P.R.; visualization, N.S. and S.M.H.; writing—original draft, N.S. and S.M.H.; writing—review and editing, N.S., K.G., U.N., S.M.H. and P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
All authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Statement
N.S., K.G., S.M.H. and P.R. were funded by a grant from the German Cancer Aid (70112872, 70113144).
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Ostrom Q.T., Cioffi G., Waite K., Kruchko C., Barnholtz-Sloan J.S. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro.-Oncol. 2021;23:iii1–iii105. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stupp R., Taillibert S., Kanner A., Read W., Steinberg D.M., Lhermitte B., Toms S., Idbaih A., Ahluwalia M.S., Fink K., et al. Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs. Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;318:2306–2316. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Klumpp L., Sezgin E.C., Skardelly M., Eckert F., Huber S.M. KCa3.1 Channels and Glioblastoma: In Vitro Studies. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2018;16:627–635. doi: 10.2174/1570159X15666170808115821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Catacuzzeno L., Sforna L., Esposito V., Limatola C., Franciolini F. Ion Channels in Glioma Malignancy. In: Stock C., Pardo L.A., editors. Transportome Malfunction in the Cancer Spectrum: Ion Transport in Tumor Biology. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Germany: 2021. pp. 223–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brown B.M., Pressley B., Wulff H. KCa3.1 Channel Modulators as Potential Therapeutic Compounds for Glioblastoma. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2018;16:618–626. doi: 10.2174/1570159X15666170630164226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ferreira R., Lively S., Schlichter L.C. IL-4 type 1 receptor signaling up-regulates KCNN4 expression, and increases the KCa3.1 current and its contribution to migration of alternative-activated microglia. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:183. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wei T., Yi M., Gu W., Hou L., Lu Q., Yu Z., Chen H. The Potassium Channel KCa3.1 Represents a Valid Pharmacological Target for Astrogliosis-Induced Neuronal Impairment in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Pharm. 2016;7:528. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Faragó N., Kocsis Á.K., Braskó C., Lovas S., Rózsa M., Baka J., Kovács B., Mikite K., Szemenyei V., Molnár G., et al. Human neuronal changes in brain edema and increased intracranial pressure. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2016;4:78. doi: 10.1186/s40478-016-0356-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ruggieri P., Mangino G., Fioretti B., Catacuzzeno L., Puca R., Ponti D., Miscusi M., Franciolini F., Ragona G., Calogero A. The inhibition of KCa3.1 channels activity reduces cell motility in glioblastoma derived cancer stem cells. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jäger H., Dreker T., Buck A., Giehl K., Gress T., Grissmer S. Blockage of intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels inhibit human pancreatic cancer cell growth in vitro. Mol. Pharm. 2004;65:630–638. doi: 10.1124/mol.65.3.630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lallet-Daher H., Roudbaraki M., Bavencoffe A., Mariot P., Gackière F., Bidaux G., Urbain R., Gosset P., Delcourt P., Fleurisse L., et al. Intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (IKCa1) regulate human prostate cancer cell proliferation through a close control of calcium entry. Oncogene. 2009;28:1792–1806. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cuddapah V.A., Turner K.L., Seifert S., Sontheimer H. Bradykinin-induced chemotaxis of human gliomas requires the activation of KCa3.1 and ClC-3. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:1427–1440. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3980-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.D’Alessandro G., Catalano M., Sciaccaluga M., Chece G., Cipriani R., Rosito M., Grimaldi A., Lauro C., Cantore G., Santoro A., et al. KCa3.1 channels are involved in the infiltrative behavior of glioblastoma in vivo. Cell Death. Dis. 2013;4:e773. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Turner K.L., Honasoge A., Robert S.M., McFerrin M.M., Sontheimer H. A proinvasive role for the Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channel KCa3.1 in malignant glioma. Glia. 2014;62:971–981. doi: 10.1002/glia.22655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.D’Alessandro G., Monaco L., Catacuzzeno L., Antonangeli F., Santoro A., Esposito V., Franciolini F., Wulff H., Limatola C. Radiation Increases Functional KCa3.1 Expression and Invasiveness in Glioblastoma. Cancers. 2019;11:279. doi: 10.3390/cancers11030279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.D’Alessandro G., Grimaldi A., Chece G., Porzia A., Esposito V., Santoro A., Salvati M., Mainiero F., Ragozzino D., Di Angelantonio S., et al. KCa3.1 channel inhibition sensitizes malignant gliomas to temozolomide treatment. Oncotarget. 2016;7:30781–30796. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stegen B., Butz L., Klumpp L., Zips D., Dittmann K., Ruth P., Huber S.M. Ca2+-Activated IK K+ Channel Blockade Radiosensitizes Glioblastoma Cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 2015;13:1283–1295. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Smith J.C., Sheltzer J.M. Genome-wide identification and analysis of prognostic features in human cancers. Cell Rep. 2022;38:110569. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Batlle E., Clevers H. Cancer stem cells revisited. Nat. Med. 2017;23:1124–1134. doi: 10.1038/nm.4409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schulz A., Meyer F., Dubrovska A., Borgmann K. Cancer Stem Cells and Radioresistance: DNA Repair and Beyond. Cancers. 2019;11:862. doi: 10.3390/cancers11060862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Serano R.D., Pegram C.N., Bigner D.D. Tumorigenic cell culture lines from a spontaneous VM/Dk murine astrocytoma (SMA) Acta Neuropathol. 1980;51:53–64. doi: 10.1007/BF00688850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pilkington G.J., Darling J.L., Lantos P.L., Thomas D.G.T. Cell lines (VMDk) derived from a spontaneous murine astrocytoma: Morphological and immunocytochemical characterization. J. Neurol. Sci. 1983;62:115–139. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(83)90193-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ausman J.I., Shapiro W.R., Rall D.P. Studies on the Chemotherapy of Experimental Brain Tumors: Development of an Experimental Model. Cancer Res. 1970;30:2394–2400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pontén J., Macintyre E.H. Long term culture of normal and neoplastic human glia. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 1968;74:465–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1968.tb03502.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Allen M., Bjerke M., Edlund H., Nelander S., Westermark B. Origin of the U87MG glioma cell line: Good news and bad news. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016;8:354re3. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Torsvik A., Stieber D., Enger P., Golebiewska A., Molven A., Svendsen A., Westermark B., Niclou S.P., Olsen T.K., Enger M.C., et al. U-251 revisited: Genetic drift and phenotypic consequences of long-term cultures of glioblastoma cells. Cancer Med. 2014;3:812–824. doi: 10.1002/cam4.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lazic S.E., Clarke-Williams C.J., Munafò M.R. What exactly is ‘N’ in cell culture and animal experiments? PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e2005282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.McMahon S.J. The linear quadratic model: Usage, interpretation and challenges. Phys. Med. Amp. Biol. 2018;64:01TR01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf26a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Huang L., Xu S., Hu D., Lu W., Xie X., Cheng X. IQGAP1 is Involved in Enhanced Aggressive Behavior of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Stem Cell-Like Cells During Differentiation. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2015;25:559–565. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Quiñones-Hinojosa A., Sanai N., Gonzalez-Perez O., Garcia-Verdugo J.M. The human brain subventricular zone: Stem cells in this niche and its organization. Neurosurg. Clin. N Am. 2007;18:15–20, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2006.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Soehngen E., Schaefer A., Koeritzer J., Huelsmeyer V., Zimmer C., Ringel F., Gempt J., Schlegel J. Hypoxia upregulates aldehyde dehydrogenase isoform 1 (ALDH1) expression and induces functional stem cell characteristics in human glioblastoma cells. Brain. Tumor. Pathol. 2014;31:247–256. doi: 10.1007/s10014-013-0170-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gatti M., Pattarozzi A., Bajetto A., Würth R., Daga A., Fiaschi P., Zona G., Florio T., Barbieri F. Inhibition of CXCL12/CXCR4 autocrine/paracrine loop reduces viability of human glioblastoma stem-like cells affecting self-renewal activity. Toxicology. 2013;314:209–220. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2013.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jin X., Jin X., Jung J.-E., Beck S., Kim H. Cell surface Nestin is a biomarker for glioma stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013;433:496–501. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Behnan J., Stangeland B., Hosainey S.A.M., Joel M., Olsen T.K., Micci F., Glover J.C., Isakson P., Brinchmann J.E. Differential propagation of stroma and cancer stem cells dictates tumorigenesis and multipotency. Oncogene. 2017;36:570–584. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen Y.J., Raman G., Bodendiek S., O’Donnell M.E., Wulff H. The KCa3.1 blocker TRAM-34 reduces infarction and neurological deficit in a rat model of ischemia/reperfusion stroke. J. Cereb. Blood. Flow. Metab. 2011;31:2363–2374. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wulff H., Miller M.J., Hansel W., Grissmer S., Cahalan M.D., Chandy K.G. Design of a potent and selective inhibitor of the intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel, IKCa1: A potential immunosuppressant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:8151–8156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.14.8151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sesen J., Dahan P., Scotland S.J., Saland E., Dang V.T., Lemarié A., Tyler B.M., Brem H., Toulas C., Moyal E.C.-J., et al. Metformin inhibits growth of human glioblastoma cells and enhances therapeutic response. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0123721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.McFaline-Figueroa J.L., Braun C.J., Stanciu M., Nagel Z.D., Mazzucato P., Sangaraju D., Cerniauskas E., Barford K., Vargas A., Chen Y., et al. Minor Changes in Expression of the Mismatch Repair Protein MSH2 Exert a Major Impact on Glioblastoma Response to Temozolomide. Cancer Res. 2015;75:3127–3138. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lin K., Gueble S.E., Sundaram R.K., Huseman E.D., Bindra R.S., Herzon S.B. Mechanism-based design of agents that selectively target drug-resistant glioma. Science. 2022;377:502–511. doi: 10.1126/science.abn7570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yi G.Z., Huang G., Guo M., Zhang X., Wang H., Deng S., Li Y., Xiang W., Chen Z., Pan J., et al. Acquired temozolomide resistance in MGMT-deficient glioblastoma cells is associated with regulation of DNA repair by DHC2. Brain. 2019;142:2352–2366. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Stegen B., Klumpp L., Misovic M., Edalat L., Eckert M., Klumpp D., Ruth P., Huber S.M. K+ channel signaling in irradiated tumor cells. Eur. Biophys. J. 2016;45:585–598. doi: 10.1007/s00249-016-1136-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mohr C.J., Gross D., Sezgin E.C., Steudel F.A., Ruth P., Huber S.M., Lukowski R. K(Ca)3.1 Channels Confer Radioresistance to Breast Cancer Cells. Cancers. 2019;11:1285. doi: 10.3390/cancers11091285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ganser K., Eckert F., Riedel A., Stransky N., Paulsen F., Noell S., Krueger M., Schittenhelm J., Beck-Wödl S., Zips D., et al. Patient-individual phenotypes of glioblastoma stem cells are conserved in culture and associate with radioresistance, brain infiltration and patient prognosis. Int. J. Cancer. 2022;150:1722–1733. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mao P., Joshi K., Li J., Kim S.-H., Li P., Santana-Santos L., Luthra S., Chandran U.R., Benos P.V., Smith L., et al. Mesenchymal glioma stem cells are maintained by activated glycolytic metabolism involving aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:8644–8649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221478110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Weichselbaum R.R., Liang H., Deng L., Fu Y.-X. Radiotherapy and immunotherapy: A beneficial liaison? Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017;14:365–379. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Grimaldi A., D’Alessandro G., Golia M.T., Grössinger E.M., Di Angelantonio S., Ragozzino D., Santoro A., Esposito V., Wulff H., Catalano M., et al. KCa3.1 inhibition switches the phenotype of glioma-infiltrating microglia/macrophages. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2174. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Becker A.P., Sells B.E., Haque S.J., Chakravarti A. Tumor Heterogeneity in Glioblastomas: From Light Microscopy to Molecular Pathology. Cancers. 2021;13:761. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Patel A.P., Tirosh I., Trombetta J.J., Shalek A.K., Gillespie S.M., Wakimoto H., Cahill D.P., Nahed B.V., Curry W.T., Martuza R.L., et al. Single-cell RNA-seq highlights intratumoral heterogeneity in primary glioblastoma. Science. 2014;344:1396–1401. doi: 10.1126/science.1254257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Brada M., Judson I., Beale P., Moore S., Reidenberg P., Statkevich P., Dugan M., Batra V., Cutler D. Phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide (SCH 52365) for refractory or relapsing malignancies. Br. J. Cancer. 1999;81:1022–1030. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rosso L., Brock C.S., Gallo J.M., Saleem A., Price P.M., Turkheimer F.E., Aboagye E.O. A New Model for Prediction of Drug Distribution in Tumor and Normal Tissues: Pharmacokinetics of Temozolomide in Glioma Patients. Cancer Res. 2008;69:120–127. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.