Abstract
Metformin, a biguanide, exerts different functions through various signaling pathways. In order to investigate the function and mechanism of metformin in burn wounds, we established burn rat models, subcutaneously injected metformin to treat the wounds, and observed the morphologies and the expression of collagen I, collagen III, fibronectin, and pro-inflammatory markers. In vitro experiments were performed to investigate the effects of metformin on the proliferation, migration, and collagen I synthesis of the mouse embryonic fibroblast (NIH 3T3) cell line and on the proliferation, apoptosis, and immune response of the mouse mononuclear macrophage (RAW 264.7) cell line. Finally, we studied the regulatory effects of metformin on a co-culture of RAW 264.7/NIH 3T3 cells. We found that 100 mM of metformin reduced dermal thickness, collagen I deposition, and mRNA expression of IL1β and CCL2 in rat burn wounds. In vitro experiments revealed that metformin inhibited the proliferation of NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7 cells. Metformin attenuated NIH 3T3 cell migration via the AMPK/mTOR pathway and attenuated collagen I synthesis through the TGFβ1/Smad3 pathway. Metformin inhibited the apoptosis of RAW 264.7 cells induced by 10 μg/mL LPS. Metformin downregulated the mRNA expression of IL1β and CCL2 in RAW 264.7 cells under 1 μg/mL LPS induction by inhibiting NF-κB p65 phosphorylation. In a RAW 264.7/NIH 3T3 co-culture, metformin attenuated collagen I synthesis in NIH 3T3 cells by inhibiting RAW 264.7 paracrine secretion of TGF-β1. This provides new evidence related to the development of metformin for potentially improving burn wound healing.
Keywords: burn, metformin, AMPK, mTOR, collagen I, NF-κB, co-culture
1. Introduction
Burns are damage to the skin or other tissues caused by heat, electricity, chemicals, etc. Although the incidence of burns is decreasing year by year in developed countries, there are still a large number of patients in developing countries who suffer from burns for various reasons every year, with minor disfigurement, limb deformity, or death, indicating that burns seriously endanger public health [1]. Deep second-degree burns are classified as deep dermal burns with residual skin attachments and dull sensations, requiring 3 to 4 weeks of healing, and result in the formation of scars. Deep second-degree burns tend to deepen scarring, because burn wounds are often associated with infection, wound compression, residual necrotic tissue, and local inflammatory imbalances that deepen the wound, leading to slow healing and the formation of hypertrophic scars [2]. Post-burn hyperplastic scarring and subsequent possible scar contracture are known to be two important problems affecting patients, and their management directly affects the level of post-burn functional recovery [3]. Conventional treatment modalities for hypertrophic scarring following deep second-degree burns include medication, compression therapy [4], radiotherapy, laser therapy, gene therapy, immunotherapy, and surgery [5]. However, the mechanism of occurrence of hypertrophic scarring has not been fully elucidated. At present, clinical treatment is complex, there is no specific drug, and the recurrence rate is high. Therefore, it is necessary to find a drug with wide applications and which yields good results.
However, because wound repair is a result of the combined action of multiple mechanisms in multiple cells, it has been proposed to use the wound microenvironment to simulate and study the real wound healing process. Multiple studies have demonstrated the critical roles of fibrosis and inflammation in scar formation. Additionally, fibroblasts and macrophages play an important role in fibrosis and inflammation. Hence, strategies that target fibroblast and macrophage signaling pathways may provide promising opportunities to protect against hypertrophic scarring.
Metformin has been used as a first-line agent in treatments for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for over 60 years [6]. In 2020, the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Guidelines recommended the drug as a first-line treatment for T2DM [7]. The mechanism of glycemic control by metformin remains an area of active research. There are currently three proposed mechanisms: (1) complex I inhibition, where complex I acquires two electrons from the reducing force NADH obtained from the TCA cycle, which are passed to coenzyme Q via iron–sulfur proteins. In this process, complex I provides energy for gluconeogenesis. Metformin alters the energy charge of hepatic adenine nucleotides, leading to complex I inhibition, which reduces ATP/ADP and ATP/AMP ratios [8]; (2) AMPK activation, because metformin is proposed to activate AMPK by inhibiting complex I and reducing ATP/ADP and ATP/AMP ratios. The activation of AMPK leads to the downregulation of gluconeogenic gene transcription, which reduces hepatic glucose production (HGP) and the phosphorylation of ACC1 and ACC2, thereby reducing adipogenesis and promoting hepatic mitochondrial oxidation [9], resulting in reduced hepatic diacylglycerol content and increased hepatic insulin sensitivity [10]; (3) an increased cytosolic redox state—a novel mechanism that has been suggested in which the glycemic control effect of metformin is due to the inhibition of hepatic GDP2 activity and thus the enhancement of cell membrane redox [11].
In recent years, a number of studies have confirmed that metformin has therapeutic effects, such as anti-aging effects, cardiovascular protection, PCOS improvement, anti-tumoral properties, autism treatment, attenuation of silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis, smoking cessation, anti-inflammatory effects, and reversal of cognitive impairment [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Regarding these effects, although the anti-aging properties, reversal of pulmonary fibrosis, and anti-inflammatory efficacy of metformin have been studied and proven to act through the mitochondria, the mechanisms for other disease-specific details remain largely unclear. In vitro and in vivo assays have shown that metformin promotes the formation of the AMPKαβγ heterotrimeric complex, which thus activates AMPK, possibly explaining the pleiotropic effect of metformin [21]. Nevertheless, this has yet to be detailed and dissected.
Metformin has been shown to attenuate fibrosis in multiple organs, such as the liver, lungs, kidneys, and myocardium [22,23,24,25]; however, whether and how it affects the proliferation of post-burn wounds and its mechanisms have not been studied.
We aimed to observe the effects of different drug concentrations on burn wounds and select optimal drug concentrations in our experimental studies; observe the effects of metformin modulating AMPK signaling on fibroblasts and macrophages in vitro; and explore the possible regulatory mechanisms and how cellular interactions in local microenvironments affect cytokine secretion and expression. Through these experiments, we sought to reveal the mechanism of AMPK in improving the healing of burn wounds and provide a new approach for improving burn wound healing.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animal Experiments
In total, 12 healthy SD rats, 6–8 weeks old and with body weights in the range of 160–180 g, were purchased from the Animal Center, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China, and fed in a clean environment. The rats were anesthetized with intraperitoneal chloral hydrate injection. The rats’ backs were shaved to expose the skin. The back skin was burned with boiling water at 95 ℃ for 8 s in a relatively symmetrical manner, with a diameter of 2 cm [26]. The margins of each burn wound in our in vivo experiment were spaced at least 3 cm apart. Each burn wound on the dorsal surface of all rats was subcutaneously injected with 1 mL of 10 mM PBS solution or different concentrations of metformin (1 mM, 10 mM, 100 mM) solution. Five groups of tissues were investigated: wounds treated with 1 mM metformin (Met 1 mM), wounds treated with 10 mM metformin (Met 10 mM), wounds treated with 100 mM metformin (Met 100 mM), PBS-treated wounds (Met 0 mM) as a positive control, and normal skin tissue as a negative control (Figure 2A,B). We changed the dressings every two days with dry sterile gauze and disinfected the wounds with iodophor. To try and avoid excessive irritation of the wounds, we did not remove scabs, even if they were loose. For intermittent applications, agents were administered every other day per week, followed by one week without treatment. Then, the rats were sacrificed and the skin tissues were isolated. The wound bed biopsy was divided equally into parts for paraffin-embedded samples, frozen sections, and protein extractions.
2.2. Cell Culture
The NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7 cells were maintained in DMEM (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin; Solarbio, Beijing, China). The cell lines were incubated in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Logarithmic growth cells were used for the experiment. Cells were sub-cultured at a ratio of 4 × 106 cells/flask and in 6-well cell culture plates at 5 × 105 cells/well. Culture media were freshly changed every day.
2.3. Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining
Rat skin tissue was routinely fixed, sliced, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for histological investigations.
2.4. Masson Staining
Masson staining, which distinguishes between collagen fibers and muscle fibers, rendering collagen fibers blue (aniline blue) and muscle fibers red (lixin red and acidic magenta), is the conventional method of connective tissue dyeing. The rat skins were quickly removed under anesthesia and blood was cleaned with PBS. The skins were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Samples were embedded in paraffin and cut into 3 mm-thick slices. After staining with Masson’s trichrome stain, the slices were observed under a light microscope (CKX41, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and the sections were imaged using a digital microscope. Samples were observed at 400× magnification and three horizons were tested in each sample. The volume fraction of collagen (CVF) in the skin tissues was analyzed with ImageJ/Fiji software 1.53v (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
2.5. Picrosirius Red Staining
Picrosirius red staining is a straightforward and sensitive method for identifying collagen fibril networks in tissue sections. Rat skin tissue was routinely fixed, sectioned, and stained with Picrosirius red (Serviecbio, Wuhan, China). Four collagen fiber types (I, II, III, IV) were shown under polarization microscopy (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) based on collagen birefringence and staining. Polarization microscopy revealed type III collagen fibers with low birefringence and appeared as fine green fibers. The areal percent of collagen III was measured with ImageJ/Fiji software 1.53v (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
2.6. Immunohistochemical Staining
Briefly, paraffin-embedded rat skin was routinely de-paraffinized and re-hydrated. The samples were incubated with diluted primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight and then processed with the iVision™ Poly-HRP goat anti-mouse/rabbit secondary antibody reagent (Talentbiomedical, Xiamen, China, DD13) and ABC complexes. Finally, samples were reacted with a DAB kit (Servicebio, Wuhan, China, G1212-200T). Images were acquired with an optical microscope (CKX41, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed for IOD in each view.
The primary antibodies used were as follows:
Anti-Collagen III (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA, 22734-1-AP, 1:500);
Anti-Fibronectin (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA, 15613-1-AP, 1:500).
2.7. Cell Viability Assay
Cell proliferation was detected using the cell counting kit-8 (CCK8), following the manufacturer’s instructions (GLPBIO, Montclair, CA, USA). Cells were incubated for 24 h in media containing different concentrations of metformin (0.1 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM); 100 μL of CCK8 reagent was added to each well and left for 1 h. The OD of each well was measured at 450 nm using a fully automated microplate reader, and the values were recorded for subsequent data analysis. IC50 values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated (Table 1).
Table 1.
IC50 (mM) | 95% IC50 (mM) | |
---|---|---|
NIH 3T3 | 2.71 | 1.02~3.282 |
RAW 264.7 | 2.15 | 1.32~2.98 |
2.8. EdU Staining
As a thymidine nucleoside analog, EdU (5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine) can be used to replicate DNA rather than the thymidine cell proliferation phase. The proliferation ability of cells can be detected quickly and accurately through the reaction of EdU with fluorescent dyes. Transfected NIH 3T3 cells were seeded onto 12-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well and cultured to normal adherent growth. The Cell-Light EdU Apollo567 in Vitro Kit (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) was used to incubate cells with EdU (50 μM) for 2 h, in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were fixed at room temperature with 4% paraformaldehyde formaldehyde for 30 min, then dyed with Apollo for 30 min. After 30 min of nuclear staining, cells were observed under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany). EdU-positive cells were counted as percentages of all EdU-positive cells randomly captured in each well.
2.9. Transwell Migration Assay
The cell density was adjusted to 6 × 105 cells/mL by microcount using serum-free DMEM resuscitation. Approximately 200 μL of cell suspension was added to each well in the 24-well plates with a cell count of approximately 1.2 × 105 cells/mL. The lower chamber of each well was infused with 600 μL of complete media, and the upper chamber was carefully impregnated with sterile forceps to avoid the formation of air bubbles between the upper chamber and lower chamber, affecting the observation results. Finally, the 24-well plates were returned to the CO2 cell incubator and incubated for 24 h. The media from each of the upper and lower chambers in the 24-well plates were then flushed twice using 500 μL of PBS. Each lower chamber was fixed at 400 μL, 4% paraformaldehyde, for 15–20 min. Subsequently, 500 μL of PBS was added to each upper and lower compartment and these were washed twice to remove the formaldehyde. Then, 400 mL of 1% crystalline purple was added to each chamber and stained for 30 min. Cells stained with 1% crystal violet were washed 3 times with natural water and air-dried for 12–24 h in a ventilated place. Cell migration was observed under 5 random fields of vision under a microscope.
2.10. Cell Apoptosis Assay
RAW 264.7 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 106/well. Pretreatment with metformin at different concentrations for 18 h was followed by further intervention with or without the addition of 10 μg/mL LPS for 6 h. Following EDTA-free trypsin digestion, cells were harvested and suspended in binding buffer, followed by mixing with Annexin V-FITC and PI. This was performed at room temperature, with protection from light, for 10 min, followed by observation and detection by flow cytometry (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The results were analyzed using FlowJo 7.0 (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
2.11. Cell Co-Culture
Cell co-culture analysis was performed in Transwell chambers (Corning, NY, USA) containing 6.5 mm diameter polycarbonate filters (0.4 μm pore). NIH 3T3 cells at a seeding density of 1 × 106/well in the lower chambers and RAW 264.7 cells with a seeding density of 0.3 × 106/well in the upper chambers were defined as the RAW 264.7/NIH 3T3 group. Both the upper and lower chambers were seeded with NIH 3T3 cells, defined as the NIH 3T3/NIH 3T3 group, as controls. Each group was divided into 3 sub-groups by interventions, such as LPS (1 μg/mL) and Met (10 mM). After a total of 48 h of co-culture, the collagen I expression was evaluated by Western blotting of NIH 3T3 cells in the lower chambers. The expression of TGF-β1 in the supernatant of each group was determined by ELISA.
2.12. siRNA Assay
AMPK siRNA was synthesized by Gene Pharma (Shanghai, China). Following the manufacturer’s instructions, cells were instantaneously transfected with Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). NIH 3T3 cells were cultured in six-well plates in DMEM (2 mL per well) without antibiotics or FBS, then transfected with 5 μL of 20 μM siRNA per well using 5 μL Lipofectamine 2000 reagent. The steps were as follows: each siRNA (5 μL) was diluted in 100 μL of OPTIMEM I reduced serum medium; 5 μL Lipofectamine was diluted in 100 μL of OPTIMEM I reduced serum medium; the transfection complexes (200 μL) were placed in 6-well culture plates and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 24 h. AMPK activity, assessed by monitoring the phosphorylation of AMPK at Thr172, was significantly downregulated when NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with AMPK siRNA for 24 h (Figure 1C,D). All siRNA sequences used in this study are shown in Table 2. We chose Prakaa1-mus-1337 for the next stage of the experiment.
Table 2.
Name | Sequence (5′ ~ 3′) | |
---|---|---|
Prakaa1-mus-827 | Sense | GGGAACACGAGUGGUUUAATT |
Antisense | UUAAACCACUCGUGUUCCCTT | |
Prakaa1-mus-1250 | Sense | GCCGACCCAAUGAUAUCAUTT |
Antisense | AUGAUAUCAUUGGGUCGGCTT | |
Prakaa1-mus-1337 | Sense | GCGUGUACGAAGGAAGAAUTT |
Antisense | AUUCUUCCUUCGUACACGCTT | |
Negative control | Sense | UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT |
Antisense | ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT |
2.13. Lentiviral shRNA Assay
shRNA specific to mouse AMPK plasmids was synthesized by HanBio (Shanghai, China) (Table 3). The plasmids were transfected into NIH 3T3 cells using polybrene (Shanghai, China) to enhance virus transduction. Cell lines exhibiting the stable lentiviral knockdown of AMPK were screened stepwise with puromycin-containing medium, and the knockdown of AMPK and pAMPK was confirmed by Western blotting (Figure 1E–G). We selected shAMPK3 for further study.
Table 3.
Name | ||
---|---|---|
shAMPK1 | Top strand | GATCCGCAGAAGTCATTTCAGGAAGATTGTATTCAAGAGATACAATCTTCCTGAAATGACTTCTGTTTTTTG |
Bottom strand | AATTCAAAAAACAGAAGTCATTTCAGGAAGATTGTATCTCTTGAATACAATCTTCCTGAAATGACTTCTGCG | |
shAMPK2 | Top strand | GATCCGTCTCTTTCCTGAGGACCCATCTTATTTCAAGAGAATAAGATGGGTCCTCAGGAAAGAGATTTTTTG |
Bottom strand | AATTCAAAAAATCTCTTTCCTGAGGACCCATCTTATTCTCTTGAAATAAGATGGGTCCTCAGGAAAGAGACG | |
shAMPK3 | Top strand | GATCCGAGCAATCAAGCAGTTGGATTATGAATTCAAGAGATTCATAATCCAACTGCTTGATTGCTTTTTTTG |
Bottom strand | AATTCAAAAAAAGCAATCAAGCAGTTGGATTATGAATCTCTTGAATTCATAATCCAACTGCTTGATTGCTCG | |
shNC | Top strand | GATCCGTTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGTAATTCAAGAGATTACGTGACACGTTCGGAGAATTTTTTC |
Bottom strand | AATTGAAAAAATTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGTAATCTCTTGAATTACGTGACACGTTCGGAGAACG |
2.14. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)
RNA from rat skin tissue and RAW 264.7 cells was extracted using TRIZOL and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using PrimeScript RT Master Mix (ABI, Waltham, MA, USA), in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). Primer sequences are shown in Table 4 and Table 5. Gene expression was normalized for GAPDH using the ΔΔCT method.
Table 4.
Name | Sequence (5′~3′) | Concentration | |
---|---|---|---|
CCL2 | Forward primer | CTCACCTGCTGCTACTCATTCACTG | 150 nM |
Reverse primer | CTTCTTTGGGACACCTGCTGCTG | 150 nM | |
IL1β | Forward primer | AATCTCACAGCAGCATCTCGACAAG | 150 nM |
Reverse primer | TCCACGGGCAAGACATAGGTAGC | 150 nM | |
GAPDH | Forward primer | GACATGCCGCCTGGAGAAAC | 150 nM |
Reverse primer | AGCCCAGGATGCCCTTTAGT | 150 nM |
Table 5.
Name | Sequence (5′~3′) | Concentration | |
---|---|---|---|
CCL2 | Forward primer | TTTTTGTCACCAAGCTCAAGAG | 150 nM |
Reverse primer | TTCTGATCTCATTTGGTTCCGA | 150 nM | |
IL1β | Forward primer | TCGCAGCAGCACATCAACAAGAG | 150 nM |
Reverse primer | AGGTCCACGGGAAAGACACAGG | 150 nM | |
GAPDH | Forward primer | GGTTGTCTCCTGCGACTTCA | 150 nM |
Reverse primer | TGGTCCAGGGTTTCTTACTCC | 150 nM |
2.15. Western Blotting
Total proteins isolated from treated NIH 3T3 cells, RAW 264.7 cells, and rat skin tissues were separated by gels using SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes and sealed at room temperature with 5% skim milk for 1 h. The PVDF membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with appropriate primary antibodies. The membranes were washed 3 times, 10 min each time, with 1 × TBST buffer, then incubated at room temperature with corresponding HRP conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h. Each time, PVDF membranes were washed 3 times with 1 × TBST for 10 min followed by treatment with enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (ECL) (BioSience, Shanghai, China). Images were obtained using the Molecular Manager® ChemiDoc™ XRS+ Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and quantified using Image Lab analysis software version 4.1 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
The primary antibodies used were as follows:
Anti-AMPKα1 + α2 antibody (Abcam, ab207442, 1:1000);
Anti-AMPKα1 (phospho T183) + α2 (phospho T172) antibody (Abcam, ab133448, 1:5000);
Anti-TGF-β1 antibody (Abcam, ab215715, 1:1000);
Anti-Smad3 antibody (Abcam, ab208182, 1:1000);
Anti-Smad3 (phospho S423 + S425) antibody (Abcam, ab52903, 1:2000);
Anti-Collagen I antibody (Abcam, ab260043, 1:1000);
Anti-mTOR antibody (Abcam, ab134903, 1:10000);
Anti-mTOR (phospho S2448) antibody (Abcam, ab109268, 1:5000);
Anti-AKT1 + AKT2 + AKT3 antibody (Abcam, ab179463, 1:10000);
Anti-AKT1 + AKT2 + AKT3 (phospho S472 + S473 + S474) antibody (Abcam, ab192623, 1:1000);
Anti-MMP2 antibody (Abcam, ab181286, 1:1000);
Anti-MMP9 antibody (Abcam, ab228402, 1:1000);
Anti-NF-κB p65 antibody (Abcam, ab32536, 1:5000);
Anti-NF-κB p65 (phospho S536) antibody (Abcam, ab76302, 1:000);
Anti-GAPDH antibody (ZSGB-Bio, 1:1000).
2.16. ELISA
The culture supernatant collected was collected. TGF-β1, IL-1β, and CCL2 were stored at −80 °C until required for each assay. Levels of TGF-β1 (detection range: 15.6–1000 pg/mL; sensitivity < 1 pg/mL of recombinant mouse TGF-β1), IL-1β (detection range: 15.6–1000 pg/mL; sensitivity < 1 ng/mL of recombinant mouse IL-1β), and CCL2 (detection range: 15.6–1000 pg/mL; sensitivity < 0.5 ng/mL of recombinant mouse CCL2) in the culture supernatant (samples per group) were determined using a commercial ELISA kit (BOSTER, Wuhan, China). Concentrations of cytokines, including TGF-β1, IL-1β, and CCL2, were determined by ELISAs, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All samples were assayed for OD values at 450 nM using a microplate reader.
2.17. Data and Statistical Analysis
GraphPad 8.0 statistical software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for all data and statistical analysis. Intergroup differences were analyzed by two-sided unpaired Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test following a normal distribution test. The Student’s t-test and ANOVA data were used for statistical significance analyses; p values < 0.05 indicated significant differences.
3. Results
3.1. Metformin Inhibits Collagen I Deposition In Vivo
After the burn model was established, subcutaneous drug injection was performed every other day for seven days (Figure 2A). Two weeks after the model was established, the wounds were all closed with no occurrences of wound infection or delayed closure inter/intra-individually. The skin tissue was extracted: part of it was used for HE staining and Masson staining; part of it was used for protein extraction. In this study, the thickness of the dermis and the collagen volume fraction (CVF) were significantly reduced in the 100 mM MET group (Figure 2B–E), while no significant differences were found in the expression of collagen III or fibronectin (p > 0.05) (Figure 2H–M). Western blot analyses showed that collagen I expression in the 100 mM metformin group was lower than in the burn group (p < 0.001) (Figure 2F,G). This suggests that metformin attenuates the deposition of collagen I in burn wounds in rats.
3.2. Metformin Reduces IL1β and CCL2 mRNA Expression in Burn Wounds in Rats
On the fourth day after the model had successfully been established, 0.5 cm margins of the burn wounds were harvested. RNA was extracted for RT-PCR assays. The observed mRNA expression of IL1β and CCL2 in the skin tissues showed that levels in the metformin group were significantly lower than in the burn group (Figure 2N,O).
3.3. Metformin Inhibits NIH 3T3 Proliferation via the Activation of AMPK In Vitro
To investigate whether metformin inhibits cell proliferation, the CCK-8 assay was employed to evaluate its proliferation effect in NIH 3T3 cells. NIH 3T3 cell proliferation was inhibited following treatment with different concentrations of metformin in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3A).
We observed a significant attenuation of cell proliferation 24 h after treatment with either 5 mM or 10 mM of metformin compared with the control.
Then, we used AMPK siRNA to downregulate AMPK. The percentage of EdU-positive cells increased compared with the negative control group. We observed that the cell proliferation ability was significantly enhanced after transfection (Figure 3B,C).
3.4. Metformin Attenuates NIH 3T3 Migration through the AMPK/mTOR Pathway In Vitro
We stimulated NIH 3T3 cells with metformin at different concentrations and found that the activation of AMPK in NIH 3T3 cells in the 0–10 mM range for metformin showed a dose-dependent effect (Figure 1A,B). To investigate the effects of metformin on NIH 3T3 cell migration, we investigated the effects of different concentrations of metformin on cell migration using the Transwell migration assay. After 24 h of intervention with 2.5 mM, 5 mM, and 10 mM metformin, migration cells in each group were observed and photographed (Figure 4A).
Dose-dependent differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001) (Figure 4B), suggesting that metformin inhibits NIH 3T3 cell migration (Figure 4B). Correspondingly, the levels of mTOR and AKT phosphorylation exhibited reverse changes compared with the levels of metformin. Moreover, we also found that levels of MMP2 and MMP9 decreased in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4C–G).
Specific AMPK-siRNA was used to study the effect of AMPK signaling on the inhibition of cell migration by metformin in vitro. Interestingly, the knockdown of AMPK promoted the migration of NIH 3T3 cell migration compared with the NC group (Figure 5A,B); the knockdown of AMPK, the levels of mTOR and AKT phosphorylation, and MMP2 and MMP9 expression increased correspondingly (Figure 5C–G).
We further used a commercial plasmid to downregulate the expression of AMPK; the phosphorylation of mTOR and AKT, MMP2, and MMP9 was significantly increased in AMPK compared with corresponding NC groups (Figure 5H–L). Taken together, our results suggest that AMPK regulates the metformin-induced inhibitory effect on the cellular migration of NIH 3T3.
3.5. Metformin Downregulates the Expression of Collagen I in NIH 3T3 Cells via the Activation of AMPK
To investigate the anti-fibrotic effect of metformin in vitro, we treated NIH 3T3 cells with different concentrations of metformin for 24 h. We then measured the protein expression of TGF-β1, Smad3, pSmad3, and collagen I, and found that the levels of all three proteins (TGF-β1, pSmad3, and collagen I) in the Met group were significantly lower than in the control group (Figure 6A–D).
To further substantiate the role of AMPK in the antifibrotic activity of metformin, we used AMPK siRNA to downregulate AMPK expression. Key proteins in TGF-β/Smad3 were determined by Western blotting. The protein expressions of TGF-β1, pSmad3, and collagen I were significantly increased in AMPK siRNA treatment conditions (Figure 6E–H).
In addition to AMPK siRNA, we used a commercial plasmid to downregulate AMPK expression to explore its role in relation to the anti-fibrotic effect of metformin. However, in Figure 5I, Smad3 protein expression levels remained unchanged in all treatment conditions; in contrast, TGF-β1, p-Smad3, and collagen I were all significantly upregulated in plasmid treatment groups with AMPK knockdown compared with the corresponding negative control groups (Figure 6I–L).
The results showed that the knockdown of AMPK significantly upregulated the TGF-β1-induced upregulation of collagen I at the protein level. AMPK cross-talk occurred via the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway in NIH 3T3 cells.
3.6. Metformin Inhibits RAW 264.7 proliferation and Attenuates Apoptosis after High Concentrations of LPS Stimulation In Vitro
The proliferation of RAW 264.7 cells was inhibited following treatment with metformin in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 7A). RAW 264.7 cells pretreated with metformin at different concentrations for 24 h did not exhibit significant apoptosis (Figure 7B,C). Nevertheless, RAW 264.7 cells pretreated with different concentrations of metformin for 16 h, followed by the addition of 10 μg/mL LPS for 8 h of continuous stimulation, showed varying degrees of apoptosis (Figure 7D,E). The early apoptosis of RAW 264.7 cells after metformin pretreatment was significantly reduced.
3.7. Metformin Suppresses LPS-Induced Inflammation through Inhibiting the NF-κB Pathway in RAW 264.7 Cells
To study the anti-inflammatory effects of metformin on RAW 264.7 cells treated with 1 μg/mL LPS, the cells were pretreated with metformin for 18 h prior to 6 h of combined LPS treatment. The proteins were extracted and the phosphorylation levels of NF-κB in the RAW 264.7 cells were detected by Western blot assays. The IL1β and CCL2 mRNA expression levels were measured by RT-PCR after the same treatment. The results showed that metformin suppresses the NF-κB signaling pathway to regulate the immune response of RAW 264.7 cells. The protein expression of pNF-κB and mRNA expression of IL1β and CCL2 were significantly reduced in each intervention group in a dose-dependent manner compared with the LPS group (Figure 8A,B,E,F). The ELISA results showed that: amounts of secreted CCL2 increased in RAW 264.7 cells after LPS stimulation; metformin reduced CCL2 secretion in RAW 264.7 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 8G); and IL1β was not detected in this experiment due to its low levels in the cell supernatant.
QNZ (EVP4593) was administered to inhibit the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, and metformin, an AMPK activator, was also administered to the RAW 264.7 cells. The cells were pretreated with metformin (0–10 mM) and QNZ (10 ng/mL) for 16 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/mL) for 8 h. Levels of IL-1β and CCL2 expression were measured by RT-PCR, and NF-κB phosphorylation was detected by Western blot assay. Under conditions in which NF-κB was not activated, metformin could no longer inhibit the expression of the above cytokines (Figure 8C,D,H,I).
3.8. Metformin Leads to a Reduction in Collagen I in NIH 3T3 Cells by Inhibiting TGF-β1 Paracrine Secretion from RAW 264.7 Cells in a Co-Culture Model
We used in vitro co-culture to simulate the in vivo burn microenvironment, co-cultured NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7 cells for 48 h (NIH 3T3 and NIH 3T3 co-culture was used as the control group), and observed the collagen I synthesis of NIH 3T3 cells after adding metformin (10 mM) with or without LPS (1 μg/mL). In the NIH 3T3/NIH 3T3 group, after the system was co-cultured with 1 μg/mL LPS for 48 h, the collagen I expression in NIH 3T3 cells in the lower chamber was significantly reduced compared with the control group, and collagen I expression in NIH 3T3 cells with the concurrent addition of metformin was significantly reduced compared with both the control and LPS groups; in the RAW 264.7/NIH 3T3 group, after the system was co-cultured with 1 μg/mL LPS for 48 h, the expression of collagen I in NIH 3T3 cells in the lower chamber was significantly increased compared with the control group, and collagen I expression in NIH 3T3 cells with the simultaneous addition of metformin was significantly decreased compared with both the control and LPS groups (Figure 9A,B).
The ELISA results showed that RAW 264.7 cells secreted high levels of TGF-β1 in response to 6 h of LPS stimulation and that this effect could be attenuated by metformin pretreatment for 18 h (Figure 9C). We then performed ELISAs using supernatants from the co-cultures, and the results showed that TGF-β1 expression was relatively low in the NIH3T3/NIH 3T3 groups, with lower levels of expression in the LPS+ Met− and LPS+ Met+ groups compared with the LPS− Met− group; the levels of TGF-β1 expression in the LPS+ Met− group and in the RAW 264.7/NIH 3T3 group were significantly increased compared with the LPS− Met− group, whereas the LPS+ Met+ group showed significantly lower TGF-β1 expression levels compared with the LPS+ Met− group (Figure 9D). These results suggest that RAW 264.7 cells induced an increase in NIH 3T3 collagen I expression through the massive paracrine secretion of TGF-β1 in response to LPS stimulation, whereas metformin was able to downregulate collagen I expression in NIH 3T3 cells by inhibiting the paracrine secretion of TGF-β1 from RAW 264.7 cells.
4. Discussion
The treatment of deep burn wounds remains a major clinical challenge due to the deterioration of the tissue microenvironment, including extracellular matrix loss, excessive inflammation, impaired angiogenesis, and bacterial infection. Various methods have been developed to reduce the deepening of second-degree burn wounds and to improve the quality of wound healing, such as nicorandil, hydrogen-rich saline, and astaxanthin treatment [27,28,29], which have different mechanisms of action, poor clinical results, and many limitations in their application.
AMPK, or AMP-dependent protein kinase, is a key molecule regulating energy metabolism and is central to research in diabetes and the treatment of other diseases linked to metabolism. Different types of AMPK proteins are heterozygotes consisting of an α-catalytic subunit, a β-regulatory subunit, and γ-regulatory subgroups. Two isoforms of α-subunits (α1 and α2), two isoforms of β-subunits (β1 and β1), and three isoforms of the γ-subunit (γ1, γ2, and γ3) were expressed by different genes in humans and rodents. The binding site of threonine 172 (Thrl72) in its kinase region and its phosphorylation play an important role in regulating AMPK activity [30]. Many kinds of AMPK activators have been discovered, with different activation mechanisms, such as metformin, resveratrol, AICAR, melatonin, etc. Additionally, there have been a number of recent studies on the role of AMPK agonists in wound healing.
Metformin is a typical AMPK activator, which activates AMPK by changing the ATP/ADP and ATP/AMP ratios in both in vivo and in vitro assays, which may lead to diverse responses in different tissues [31]. It has been reported that the long-term external use of metformin or resveratrol promotes wound healing in rats and improves the epidermis, follicles, and collagen deposits, which are associated with improved vascular formation in wounds. Notably, this study further confirmed that metformin promotes wound healing by activating AMPK in aging rats and promotes wound vascularization, reverses aging, and reduces the scarring of aging skin, providing a theoretical basis for metformin as a treatment for wounds [32]. Faraz Chogan et al. designed, optimized, and prepared a three-layer nanofiber scaffold [33]. The scaffold consisted of two supportive polycaprolactone (PCL)–chitosan layers and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)–metformin hydrochloride (metformin–HCl). Exposure to metformin significantly reduced the expression of fibrosis-related genes: TGF-β1, collagen I (Col-I), fibronectin (Fn), collagen III (Col-III), and α-SMA. The inhibition of these genes reduces scar formation but delays wound healing. However, the introduction of this slow-release engineered scaffold has the dual effect of reducing fibrosis and promoting wound healing by accurately preventing the delay of wound healing.
Despite the progress of studies such as the above, metformin’s effect on the burn wound microenvironment has not been reported. Our motivation for conducting these studies was related to our previous studies investigating the effects of metformin on fibrosis and inflammation.
During the inflammatory stages of wound healing, macrophages express IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, which exert pro-inflammatory and bactericidal effects. Moreover, it can recruit more monocytes and exacerbate the inflammatory response of macrophages by producing potent chemokines (CCL2). With the resolution of inflammation, fibroblasts and myofibroblasts differentiate from them and secrete large quantities of ECM proteins, such as Col-I, Col-III, and Fn, play an active role in the healing process, and have an impact on the healing outcome. Myofibroblasts, for example, can control wound contraction via the ECM, affecting the “tension balance” of the wound and thus the degree of fibrosis, though excessive fibrosis frequently results in hyperplastic scarring. In our study, we were able to verify that an intermittent hypodermic injection of metformin (100 mM) reduced collagen I deposition and decreased the relative mRNA expression of IL1β and CCL2 in vivo. However, we did not find similar differences in the expression of collagen III and fibronectin, to which the timing and duration of the metformin intervention, among other factors, may have contributed. Therefore, our preliminary in vivo experiments demonstrated that metformin may have antifibrotic and anti-inflammatory effects on the skin of burned rats.
Networks of growth factors and hormones are well known to be responsible for the initiation and maintenance of fibrotic responses in vivo. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is a broad-spectrum growth factor which regulates many fundamental biological processes, including cell growth, differentiation, adhesion, the repair of proliferating tissues, and apoptosis. TGF-β1 is a member of the TGF-β superfamily; Smad3 is an important signaling gene downstream of TGF-β1. TGF-β1 activates Smad3, which induces and promotes fibrosis in TGF-β1- and Smad3-expressing organs, particularly in the skin, liver, kidneys, and lungs. Fibroblasts are the most abundant cell types in the dermis, maintaining different extracellular matrix components, including collagen, elastin, and proteopolysaccharides. In addition, they secrete various growth factors, including TGF-β, TNF-α, other cytokines, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which directly affect the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes and ECM formation.
To further investigate the relationship between AMPK and the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway, we stimulated NIH 3T3 metformin at different concentrations and observed attenuation in the activation of the TGF-β1/smad3 pathway and downstream collagen I expression. The results showed that metformin had a negative dose-dependent regulatory impact on the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway and downstream collagen I. To further demonstrate the relationship between AMPK and TGF-β1/Smad3, we used siRNA and shRNA to knock down AMPK. The results we obtained showed that the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway and collage I expression were enhanced after AMPK knockdown.
Another finding is that metformin could inhibit the migration of NIH 3T3 cells by activating AMPK. The Transwell migration assay showed that NIH 3T3 cells exhibited an inhibition of migration positively correlated with metformin under different concentration stimuli. In our experiments, when siAMPK was transfected into NIH 3T3 cells, the number of migrated NIH 3T3 cells was significantly higher compared with the negative control group.
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a class of metal-dependent proteolytic enzymes with similar structures and functions. They are important enzymes which degrade components of the extracellular matrix (ECM), play important roles in cell migration and differentiation, repair, and tissue reconstitution, and are involved in physiological and pathological processes in various tissues and organs of the human body. Furthermore, we explored the molecular mechanisms involved and found that AMPK inhibited the migration of NIH 3T3 cells by activating the AMPK/mTOR pathway and downregulated downstream AKT, MMP2, and MMP9 expression. Furthermore, the downregulation of AMPK by siAMPK resulted in increased MMP2 and MMP9 expression, and the AMPK/mTOR pathway was found to be associated with metformin. siRNA transfection is relatively inefficient: it can only be transfected briefly and cannot be inherited from daughter cells; therefore, expression levels decrease over time and the probability of experiencing off-target effects is high [34]. To further confirm AMPK’s role in mediating cell migration, AMPK knockout was performed using shRNA. Thus, we found that shAMPK increases the expression of pmTOR, pAKT, MMP2, and MMP9. These data indicate that AMPK attenuated the migration of NIH 3T3 cells by inhibiting mTOR and downstream proteins.
Lipopolysaccharide is the main element in the cell walls of Gram-negative bacteria. In addition to its bioactivity, toxicity, and immunity, which influence wound healing and scar formation, the inflammatory response it induces has important implications for wound repair. For example, its own toxic substance, lipid A, can lead to the release of pro-inflammatory factors and increased activity of inflammatory cells. NF-κB, a nuclear protein released from activated macrophages or injured cells, activates several inflammatory responses, immune responses, and gene transcription processes of various pro-inflammatory markers, thus controlling their biosynthesis. pNF-κB stimulates the expression of cytokines and chemokines, such as IL-1α, IL-1β, IL6, CCL2, CXCL10, and CXCL11, which in turn stimulate NF-κB and further activate NF-κB, leading to a sustained or amplified inflammatory response [35]. Our study demonstrated the ability of pAMPK to downregulate pNF-κB p65 expression, resulting in reductions in IL-1β and CCL2 levels. However, the anti-inflammatory effects of pAMPK, including those that occur through inhibition of the NF-κB pathway, were blocked by the intervention of the NF-κB inhibitor QNZ. Ultimately, metformin exerts its inhibitory effect on inflammation in an NF-κB-dependent way.
Indeed, LPS has also been reported to induce apoptosis and oxidative damage in RAW 264.7 cells at high levels [36]. To study the protective effects of metformin on RAW 264.7 cells stimulated by high levels of LPS, we pretreated the cells with different concentrations of metformin for 16 h and added 10 μg/mL of LPS for 8 h; we found that metformin significantly inhibited the early apoptosis of RAW 264.7 cells induced by high levels of LPS.
Normal wound healing in organisms is regulated by complex and subtle physiological processes, involving cell migration, inflammatory response, nerve control, and angiogenesis [37]. There are four distinct and overlapping stages of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling [38]. Fibroblasts and macrophages are two of the most important factors in wound healing; therefore, their interaction deserves further study. Inflammation is involved in the development of fibrosis and tissue regeneration, but the inflammatory process is neither a prerequisite for tissue regeneration nor necessarily a cause of fibrosis. Various studies have reported that macrophage-derived TGF-β promotes fibroblast growth and collagen synthesis and induces migration [39]. Eisuke Ueshima et al. [40] found that stimulating paracrine TGF-β1 from macrophages is necessary and sufficient to increase the collagen secretion of fibroblasts.
Low concentrations of LPS promote the proliferation of HPDLF. One direct approach may be that LPS promotes intracellular gene expression in cells by activating signaling pathways, such as ephrin/Eph [41], or that LPS affects Ca2+ the transmembrane transport inside and outside cells [42]; another indirect approach is that LPS promotes cell proliferation by stimulating the production of bioactive factors in cells. However, with increased LPS intervention times, cell tolerance decreases, cells overmature, production capacity decreases, and the secretion of multiple enzymes, such as matrix metalloproteinases, increases, leading to cytotoxicity [43].
To further elucidate the interaction between NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7 cells in the inflammatory microenvironment and whether metformin plays a regulatory role, we co-cultured NIH 3T3 cells with RAW 264.7 cells and compared NIH 3T3 cells with NIH 3T3 cells.
Each group was divided into LPS− Met−, LPS+ Met−, and LPS+ Met+ sub-groups by intervention. In the NIH 3T3/NIH 3T3 group, NIH 3T3 cells in the LPS+ Met− group showed a significant reduction in type I collagen expression due to prolonged LPS stimulation at high LPS concentrations. NIH 3T3 cells in the LPS+ Met+ group showed a further reduction in type I collagen expression due to the effect of metformin. However, in the RAW 264.7/NIH 3T3 group, RAW 264.7 cells in the LPS+ Met− group secreted paracrine TGF-β1 in large amounts due to LPS stimulation, which was delivered to NIH 3T3 cells in the lower chamber, resulting in a significant increase in type I collagen expression in NIH 3T3 cells; in addition, in the LPS+ Met+ group, NIH 3T3 cells were downregulated by the effect of metformin. Metformin mainly reduced collagen I expression in NIH 3T3 cells by inhibiting TGF-β1 secretion in RAW 264.7 cells in RAW 264.7/NIH 3T3 co-cultures.
It should be noted that this study has many limitations. First, because RAW 264.7 causes cell polarization in most cases after siAMPK or shAMPK, the experiments yielded contradictory results; thus, these data were not published. Second, the burn microenvironment not only includes fibroblasts and macrophages, but also T cells, endothelial cells, dendritic cells, etc. [38]. In this study, we only investigated the effect of macrophages on collagen I expression in fibroblasts co-cultured with macrophages. Moreover, the mechanism through which NIH 3T3 affects RAW 264.7 cells by secreting cytokines and chemokines during the co-culture of NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7 cells has not been further investigated. These data are relatively limited. Third, inflammation is a double-edged sword. Normal inflammatory responses can promote wound healing, although an increase in uncontrolled inflammation could lead to hypertrophic scarring—a severe disorder leading to hyperplastic tissue formation that degrades the physical properties and physiological functions of normal tissue.
In summary, we have demonstrated that metformin has an inhibitory effect on collagen I deposition and the inflammatory response during the inflammatory and proliferative phases of burn wound healing in rats, as measured by the detection of collagen I deposition and pro-inflammatory markers in burn wounds. In subsequent in vitro assays, we confirmed that: (1) metformin inhibits the proliferation, migration, and collagen I production of fibroblast cell line NIH 3T3 through the detection of migration- and fibrosis-related molecules and other indicators; (2) metformin inhibits the proliferation of mononuclear macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 and suppresses its inflammatory response and apoptosis in response to LPS stimulation through the detection of inflammation-related molecules and other assays; and (3) the preliminary mechanism of metformin regulation in these two cell types in the inflammatory microenvironment is downregulation of collagen I production in NIH 3T3 cells by inhibition of the RAW 264.7 paracrine secretion of TGF-β1, as was determined in the cell co-culture experiments.
However, the optimal dosage, timing of dosing, duration, and frequency of administration in humans to promote burn wound healing by reducing excessive inflammatory responses and fibrosis are still unknown. Further research is therefore needed to address these issues.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, metformin’s functions include the inhibition of collagen I deposition and the suppression of pro-inflammatory markers IL1β and CCL2 in burn wounds in rats. Additionally, further exploration of the mechanism revealed that metformin could inhibit the proliferation of NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7 cells. In NIH 3T3 cells, metformin could both reduce collagen I expression by activating AMPK to inhibit the TGF-β1/Smad3 pathway and reduce the migration of NIH 3T3 cells by inhibiting the AMPK/mTOR pathway. Meanwhile, metformin could inhibit the LPS-induced apoptosis of RAW 264.7 cells and reduce the downstream expression of IL1β and CCL2 by inhibiting the NF-κB pathway. More importantly, in cell co-culture, metformin could reduce the expression of collagen I in NIH 3T3 cells through the downregulation of paracellularly secreted TGF-β1 in RAW 264.7 cells. Therefore, metformin has potential clinical value in regulating wound healing in deep burn wounds. Due to the complexity of the burn wound microenvironment, further extensive studies are still needed.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Zhujun Cheng and Longxiang Tu for excellent technical assistance.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.L. and B.X.; methodology, Z.F.; software, L.S.; validation, L.S., H.L. and Z.J.; formal analysis, J.L.; investigation, L.S.; resources, Z.F. and M.L.; data curation, L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.S.; writing—review and editing, M.L. and L.S.; visualization, X.L.; supervision, G.G. and H.A.; project administration, G.G.; funding acquisition, G.G. and M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (protocol code: (2020) Medical Research Ethics Committee (1−48), date of approval: 20 January 2020).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81960352); the Key Research and Development Plan of the Science and Technology Department of Jiangxi Province of China (20171ACG70004); the Youth Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province of China (20192BAB215029); the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20212ACB214002).
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Smolle C., Cambiaso-Daniel J., Forbes A.A., Wurzer P., Hundeshagen G., Branski L.K., Huss F., Kamolz L.-P. Recent trends in burn epidemiology worldwide: A systematic review. Burns. 2017;43:249–257. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Castaño O., Pérez-Amodio S., Navarro-Requena C., Mateos-Timoneda M.Á., Engel E. Instructive microenvironments in skin wound healing: Biomaterials as signal releasing platforms. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018;129:95–117. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jeschke M.G., Van Baar M.E., Choudhry M.A., Chung K.K., Gibran N.S., Logsetty S. Burn injury. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020;6:11. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0145-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Finnerty C.C., Jeschke M.G., Branski L.K., Barret J.P., Dziewulski P., Herndon D.N. Hypertrophic scarring: The greatest unmet challenge after burn injury. Lancet. 2016;388:1427–1436. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31406-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grabowski G., Pacana M.J., Chen E. Keloid and Hypertrophic Scar Formation, Prevention, and Management: Standard Review of Abnormal Scarring in Orthopaedic Surgery. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2020;28:e408–e414. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lv Z., Guo Y. Metformin and Its Benefits for Various Diseases. Front. Endocrinol. 2020;11:191. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Association American Diabetes Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations:Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43((Suppl. S1)):S7–S13. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Miller R.A., Chu Q., Xie J., Foretz M., Viollet B., Birnbaum M.J. Biguanides suppress hepatic glucagon signalling by decreasing production of cyclic AMP. Nature. 2013;494:256–260. doi: 10.1038/nature11808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Savage D.B., Choi C.S., Samuel V.T., Liu Z.X., Zhang D., Wang A., Zhang X.M., Cline G.W., Yu X.X., Geisler J.G., et al. Reversal of diet-induced hepatic steatosis and hepatic insulin resistance by antisense oligonucleotide inhibitors of acetyl-CoA carboxylases 1 and 2. J. Clin. Investig. 2006;116:817–824. doi: 10.1172/JCI27300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fullerton M.D., Galic S., Marcinko K., Sikkema S., Pulinilkunnil T., Chen Z.-P., O’Neill H.M., Ford R.J., Palanivel R., O’Brien M., et al. Single phosphorylation sites in Acc1 and Acc2 regulate lipid homeostasis and the insulin-sensitizing effects of metformin. Nat. Med. 2013;19:1649–1654. doi: 10.1038/nm.3372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xie J., Ye J., Cai Z., Luo Y., Zhu X., Deng Y., Feng Y., Liang Y., Liu R., Han Z., et al. GPD1 Enhances the Anticancer Effects of Metformin by Synergistically Increasing Total Cellular Glycerol-3-Phosphate. Cancer Res. 2020;80:2150–2162. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mohammed I., Hollenberg M.D., Ding H., Triggle C.R. A Critical Review of the Evidence That Metformin Is a Putative Anti-Aging Drug That Enhances Healthspan and Extends Lifespan. Front. Endocrinol. 2021;12:718942. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.718942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Luo F., Das A., Chen J., Wu P., Li X., Fang Z. Metformin in patients with and without diabetes: A paradigm shift in cardiovascular disease management. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2019;18:54. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0860-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zeng X., Xie Y.-J., Liu Y.-T., Long S.-L., Mo Z.-C. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: Correlation between hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance and obesity. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2019;502:214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen G.G., Woo P.Y., Ng S.C., Wong G.K., Chan D.T., van Hasselt C.A., Tong M.C., Poon W.S. Impact of metformin on immunological markers: Implication in its anti-tumor mechanism. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020;213:107585. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gasser B.A., Buerki S.F., Kurz J., Mohaupt M.G. Hyperandrogenism? Increased 17, 20-Lyase Activity? A Metanalysis and Systematic Review of Altered Androgens in Boys and Girls with Autism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:12324. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cheng D., Xu Q., Wang Y., Li G., Sun W., Ma D., Zhou S., Liu Y., Han L., Ni C. Metformin attenuates silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis via AMPK signaling. J. Transl. Med. 2021;19:349. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-03036-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Smith L.C., George O. Advances in smoking cessation pharmacotherapy: Non-nicotinic approaches in animal models. Neuropharmacology. 2020;178:108225. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bharath L.P., Nikolajczyk B.S. The intersection of metformin and inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 2021;320:C873–C879. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00604.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Samaras K., Makkar S., CRAW ford J.D., Kochan N.A., Wen W., Draper B., Trollor J.N., Brodaty H., Sachdev P.S. Metformin Use Is Associated with Slowed Cognitive Decline and Reduced Incident Dementia in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: The Sydney Memory and Ageing Study. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:2691–2701. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Meng S., Cao J., He Q., Xiong L., Chang E., Radovick S., Wondisford F.E., He L. Metformin activates AMP-activated protein kinase by promoting formation of the αβγ heterotrimeric complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:3793–3802. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.604421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shankaraiah R.C., Callegari E., Guerriero P., Rimessi A., Pinton P., Gramantieri L., Silini E.M., Sabbioni S., Negrini M. Metformin prevents liver tumourigenesis by attenuating fibrosis in a transgenic mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 2019;38:7035–7045. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0942-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rangarajan S., Bone N.B., Zmijewska A.A., Jiang S., Park D.W., Bernard K., Locy M.L., Ravi S., Deshane J., Mannon R.B., et al. Metformin reverses established lung fibrosis in a bleomycin model. Nat. Med. 2018;24:1121–1127. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0087-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee M., Katerelos M., Gleich K., Galic S., Kemp B.E., Mount P.F., Power D.A. Phosphorylation of Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase by AMPK Reduces Renal Fibrosis and Is Essential for the Anti-Fibrotic Effect of Metformin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2018;29:2326–2336. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018010050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Loi H., Kramar S., Laborde C., Marsal D., Pizzinat N., Cussac D., Roncalli J., Boal F., Tronchere H., Oleshchuk O., et al. Metformin Attenuates Postinfarction Myocardial Fibrosis and Inflammation in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:9393. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baer L., Wu X., Tou J.C., Johnson E., Wolf S., Wade C. Contributions of severe burn and disuse to bone structure and strength in rats. Bone. 2012;52:644–650. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guo S.X., Jin Y.Y., Fang Q., You C.G., Wang X.G., Hu X.L., Han C.M. Beneficial effects of hydrogen-rich saline on early burn-wound progression in rats. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0124897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Choi J., Kim R., Kim J., Jeong W., Park S.W., Lee H.W., Chung H.Y. Nicorandil reduces burn wound progression by enhancing skin blood flow. J. Plastic Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2018;71:1196–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fang Q., Guo S., Zhou H., Han R., Wu P., Han C. Astaxanthin protects against early burn-wound progression in rats by attenuating oxidative stress-induced inflammation and mitochondria-related apoptosis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:41440. doi: 10.1038/srep41440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Herzig S., Shaw R.J. AMPK: Guardian of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:121–135. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rena G., Hardie D.G., Pearson E.R. The mechanisms of action of metformin. Diabetologia. 2017;60:1577–1585. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4342-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhao P., Sui B.-D., Liu N., Lv Y.-J., Zheng C.-X., Lu Y.-B., Huang W.-T., Zhou C.-H., Chen J., Pang D.-L., et al. Anti-aging pharmacology in cutaneous wound healing: Effects of metformin, resveratrol, and rapamycin by local application. Aging Cell. 2017;16:1083–1093. doi: 10.1111/acel.12635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chogan F., Mirmajidi T., Rezayan A.H., Sharifi A.M., Ghahary A., Nourmohammadi J., Kamali A., Rahaie M. Design, fabrication, and optimization of a dual function three-layer scaffold for controlled release of metformin hydrochloride to alleviate fibrosis and accelerate wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2020;113:144–163. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rao D.D., Vorhies J.S., Senzer N., Nemunaitis J. siRNA vs. shRNA: Similarities and differences. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2009;61:746–759. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Taniguchi K., Karin M. NF-κB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: Coming of age. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018;18:309–324. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xiang P., Chen T., Mou Y., Wu H., Xie P., Lu G., Gong X., Hu Q., Zhang Y., Ji H. NZ suppresses TLR4/NF-κB signalings and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages. Inflamm. Res. 2015;64:799–808. doi: 10.1007/s00011-015-0863-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wilkinson H.N., Hardman M.J. Wound healing: Cellular mechanisms and pathological outcomes. Open Biol. 2020;10:200223. doi: 10.1098/rsob.200223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rodrigues M., Kosaric N., Bonham C.A., Gurtner G.C. Wound Healing: A Cellular Perspective. Physiol. Rev. 2019;99:665–706. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00067.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Acharya P.S., Majumdar S., Jacob M., Hayden J., Mrass P., Weninger W., Assoian R.K., Pure E. Fibroblast migration is mediated by CD44-dependent TGF beta activation. J. Cell Sci. 2008;121:1393–1402. doi: 10.1242/jcs.021683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ueshima E., Fujimori M., Kodama H., Felsen D., Chen J., Durack J.C., Solomon S.B., Coleman J.A., Srimathveeravalli G. Macrophage-secreted TGF-β1 contributes to fibroblast activation and ureteral stricture after ablation injury. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 2019;317:F52–F64. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00260.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li M., Zhang C., Jin L., Matsuo K., Yang Y. Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide regulates ephrin/Eph signalling in human periodontal ligament fibroblasts. J. Periodontal Res. 2017;52:913–921. doi: 10.1111/jre.12463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Azenabor A.A., Kennedy P., York J. Free intracellular Ca2+ regulates bacterial lipopolysaccharide induction of iNOS in human macrophages. Immunobiology. 2009;214:143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2008.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhou J., Windsor L.J. Heterogeneity in the collagen-degrading ability of Porphyromonas gingivalis-stimulated human gingival fibroblasts. J. Periodontal Res. 2006;42:77–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2006.00918.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.