Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2022 Nov 23;54(1):159–166. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039660

Table 3.

Regression analysis for LTPA-clusters and ECAS/ICAS

Association of LTPA with ICAS
Characteristic Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
≥50% 0.80 (0.45–1.41) 0.92 (0.81–1.05) 0.96 (0.84–1.10)
≥70% 0.78 (0.67–0.92) 0.79 (0.67–0.93) 0.83 (0.70–0.99)
Association of LTPA with ECAS
Characteristic Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
β-Estimate (95% CI) β-Estimate (95% CI) β-Estimate (95% CI)
Number of carotid plaques −0.02 (−0.06–0.02) −0.01 (−0.03–0.45) −0.01 (−0.05–0.04)
cIMT 0.002 (0.001–0.003) 0.003 (0.002–0.005) 0.004 (0.002–0.005)

LTPA = leisure time physical activity; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; ICAS = intracranial artery stenosis; ECAS = extracranial carotid artery stenosis; cIMT = carotid intima-media thickness

Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, high school completion, and insurance status

Model 2: model 1 additionally adjusted for body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, current smoking

Model 3: model 1 additionally adjusted for body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, years of hypertension, number of anti-hypertensive medications, blood glucose, years of diabetes mellitus, number of anti-glycemic medications, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, statin use, years smoked, and packs per day.