Abstract
Lymphatic vessels are low-pressure, blind-ended tubular structures that play a crucial role in the maintenance of tissue fluid homeostasis, immune cell trafficking, and dietary lipid uptake and transport. Emerging research has indicated that the promotion of lymphatic vascular growth, remodeling, and function can reduce inflammation and diminish disease severity in several pathophysiologic conditions. In particular, recent groundbreaking studies have shown that lymphangiogenesis, which describes the formation of new lymphatic vessels from the existing lymphatic vasculature, can be beneficial for the alleviation and resolution of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, promoting lymphangiogenesis represents a promising therapeutic approach. This brief review summarizes the most recent findings related to the modulation of lymphatic function to treat metabolic and cardiovascular diseases such as obesity, myocardial infarction, atherosclerosis, and hypertension. We also discuss experimental and therapeutic approaches to enforce lymphatic growth and remodeling as well as efforts to define the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying these processes.
Keywords: Lymphatic endothelial cells, lymph, lymphangiogenesis, metabolic disease, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, hypertension
Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION
The lymphatic system is composed of a network of thin-walled initial lymphatics, pre-collecting and collecting vessels, and nodes that run parallel to the blood circulatory system1. Initial lymphatics are formed by a single layer of lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) that lack a continuous basement membrane and remain tethered to the interstitium through anchoring filaments. As a result, initial lymphatics are characterized by discontinuous button-like junctions at LEC borders, making them highly permeable and capable of absorbing excess interstitial fluid and macromolecules through passive drainage1. The fluid and macromolecules that are taken up by the initial lymphatics are collectively referred to as ‘lymph,’ which drains into pre-collecting lymphatic vessels and collecting lymphatic vessels2. The pre-collecting and collecting lymphatic vessels are composed of LECs that are tightly connected by zipper-like junctions, unlike the initial lymphatics, and covered with smooth muscle cells and a basement membrane to prevent the leakage of lymph2-4. Collecting lymphatic vessels also contain intraluminal valves that regulate the unidirectional flow of lymph5, 6. The lymph carried by the collecting lymphatics are transported into the larger thoracic duct and the right lymphatic duct, which eventually drain into the blood vascular system through the subclavian veins7-10.
Role of Prox1 and VEGF-C/D in Lymphatic Development
Over past few decades, our understanding of lymphatic development and function has greatly improved1, 11, 12. For example, the transcription factor Prospero homeobox 1 (Prox1) has been shown to be one of the key regulators of lymphatic development and function13, 14. It is now well-documented that Prox1 is a master regulator of LEC identity and specification15. In mice, Prox1 is first expressed around E9.5 in a subgroup of endothelial cells in the cardinal vein13. These Prox1 expressing lymphatic progenitor cells commit to a LEC fate, bud off from the cardinal vein, and migrate to form lymph sacs13, 16.
Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) is a major lymphangiogenic factor and harbors multiple lymphangiogenic properties such as promoting LEC proliferation, migration, and tube formation17. VEGF-D is the second member of the lymphangiogenic growth factor family17, 18. Both VEGF-C and VEGF-D are secreted glycoproteins that can bind and activate VEGF receptors (VEGFR2 and VEGFR3) on the blood and lymphatic endothelium to initiate signaling downstream of VEGFRs17, 18. They are also prominent mitogens for LECs and, as a result, promote the growth and remodeling of blood and lymphatic vessels. Despite the fact that VEGF-D shares many similarities with VEGF-C, VEGF-D possesses a higher binding affinity for VEGFR3 than VEGF-C17, 18. Budding LEC migration responds to a gradient of VEGF-C in the surrounding mesenchyme19. As previously mentioned, the major receptor for VEGF-C, VEGFR3 is highly expressed in LECs and its activity is required for LEC migration and proliferation19. Importantly, Prox1 activity is required for lymphatic vasculature maintenance and function throughout life as expression of Prox1 is required to maintain LEC identity, even in adult mice, where the extensive lymphatic vasculature appears to be quiescent in physiological conditions15. Furthermore, a Prox1-VEGFR3 feedback loop during early lymphatic development is required to intricately regulate the budding of LEC progenitors and to maintain LEC fate20.
The murine lymphatic system further develops from these lymph sacs to form the mature lymphatic vasculature that coordinates specific functions in different organs1. Many genes and signaling pathways that governing the early steps of lymphatic development have been identified, including Sox1821, Ccbe122, Fat423, Adamts324, Calcrl25, podoplanin26, and Rasip127. Importantly, a recent study also suggests that mitochondrial function and metabolism regulates Prox1 expression and LEC fate specification28, 29. Although many studies dispute the single venous origin of LECs during mammalian development and alternative sources of LECs from different organ beds have been reported30-33, additional studies are needed to determine whether non-venous derived LECs play functional roles during development. Nevertheless, it is generally accepted that the majority of mammalian LECs are venous-derived.
Role of Lymphatic System in Physiological and Pathological Conditions
Under physiological conditions, most lymphatic vessels in adults are mature and quiescent, except for in the intestinal lacteals, where constant VEGF-C activity is required to maintain lacteal lymphatic development and function34, and the reproductive organs during ovarian cycles and pregnancy35. In adult lymphatic vessels, the quiescent state can be disrupted by pathological conditions such as inflammation and tumor growth, both of which promote lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel remodeling36, 37. At the same time, several types of cancer cells utilize the lymphatic vasculature to spread from one lymph node to another37-39. Cancer cells also produce vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) or VEGF-D that induce lymphangiogenesis to facilitate tumor metastasis37-39. In the context of organ transplantation, increased lymphangiogenesis provokes immune system reactivation in the lymph nodes, which is a major cause of rejection of transplanted organs40, 41. Consequently, anti-lymphangiogenic therapies have been used to prevent and treat cancer metastasis, inflammation, and organ transplantation by suppressing immune reactivation36, 41, 42.
Lymphatic vessels also exert beneficial effects by enhancing the clearance of excessive interstitial fluids and pro-inflammatory mediators along with immune cells43. In view of that, the development of pro-lymphangiogenic therapeutic approaches need to be robustly investigated following detailed characterization of the underlying molecular mechanisms and downstream signaling events. A number of recent studies suggest the therapeutic potential for inducing lymphangiogenesis in various pathological conditions, including cardiovascular and metabolic diseases1, 12, 44. Unfortunately, the causal stimulators of adult lymphangiogenesis remain largely undiscovered and the therapeutic effect of promoting lymphangiogenesis is untested.
Although some studies contend there is no role for injury-induced endogenous lymphangiogenesis in cardiac repair45, 46, other reports indicate that increased lymphangiogenesis can slow or reverse the progression of pathology by facilitating immune cell clearance and fluid transport in a number of cardiac injury models including mice47-49, rats50 and zebrafish51, 52.Intriguingly, a recent study by one of the authors and other investigators has shown the lymphatics actively secrete paracrine factors (i.e., lymphoangiocrine) under pathophysiological conditions in an organ-specific manner53. This study illuminates the processes by which the lymphatics promote cardiac growth, repair, and protection from infarction in mice. For the remainder of this brief review, we provide an overview of this and other studies that investigated the therapeutic potential of enhancing lymphangiogenesis for metabolic disease, hypertension, atherosclerosis, and myocardial infraction (MI).
Enhancing Lymphangiogenesis to Treat Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases
Obesity and Diabetes
Obesity is an epidemic-level metabolic syndrome characterized by deficiencies in lymphatic growth and function54-59. Diet-induced obesity impairs lymphangiogenesis, which is associated with decreased dermal and subcutaneous lymphatic vessel density56. Thus, obesity also affects lymphatic transport. At the cellular and molecular levels, high-fat diet-induced obesity resulted in peri-lymphatic inflammation and decreased expression of VEFGR3, which is the critical lymphangiogenesis receptor on LECs. LECs with reduced VEGFR3 expression and signaling are pro-apoptotic56. Increased apoptosis of LECs destabilized lymphatic vessels and caused impaired lymphatic function56. Impaired lymphangiogenesis is also observed in mouse models of metabolic diseases such as diabetes60.
A direct link between obesity and lymphatic defects was initially observed in a mouse model with lymphatic defects61. Specifically, Prox1 heterozygous mice were shown to develop adult on-set obesity61. These mice exhibited pronounced fat accumulation with leaky lymphatic vessels. Interestingly, leaky chyle from Prox1 heterozygous mice induced adipocyte hypertrophy and adipogenesis61. In addition, Chy mice, which lack dermal initial lymphatics and exhibit a lymphedematous phenotype due to inactivating mutations in VEGFR3, was reported to exhibit increased collagen and lipid accumulation in skin62, 63. Notably, the restoration of Prox1 dosage in LECs rescued the obese phenotypes in Prox1 heterozygous mice64. Together, these studies provided direct evidence that lymphatic defects lead to obesity. For that reason, the modulation of Prox1 and VEGFR3 activity may have therapeutic potential for obesity as well as metabolic diseases in general.
Consequently, our laboratories have been studying the regulation of VEGFR3 receptor activity in the lymphatic vasculature. We have reported that enhancing VEGFR3 expression and signaling by depleting clathrin-dependent endocytic adaptor proteins called epsins, modulated VEGFR3 levels in isolated LECs and promoted lymphangiogenesis in development and under pathological conditions65. We also found genetic deletion of epsins 1 and 2 augmented the flow of lymph in type 2 diabetic mice66. Therefore, the depletion of epsins in LECs increased VEGFR3 protein levels by reducing VEGFR3 endocytosis and degradation, resulting in enhanced VEGF-C signaling. When we utilized a skin biopsy wound-healing model and surgically-induced tail lymphedema model, we observed enhanced wound-healing and resolution of tail lymphedema in mice66.
Interestingly, an elegant study using transgenic mice with doxycycline-inducible expression of murine VEGF-D in adipose tissues showed that VEGF-D overexpression in adipocytes increased initial lymphatic density, as demonstrated by Lyve1 and Prox1 immunostaining, with a concomitant reduction in local immune cell accumulation and improved systemic metabolic responsiveness; thereby, reducing insulin resistance and increasing insulin sensitivity in HFD-induced obesity in mice67. Because there are few lymphatic vessels in the white adipose tissue of mice, de novo lymphangiogenesis enhances insulin sensitivity. Even though the body weights were similar between VEGF-D overexpressing mice and their littermate controls, enhancing lymphatic vessel growth in adipose tissue resulted in increased insulin sensitivity and reduced insulin resistance67. This study suggested a functional role for lymphatic vessels in glycerol clearance and removal of infiltrating immune cells to improve metabolism in obese mice.
Atherosclerosis
Atherosclerosis is known to be a vascular inflammatory disease and the major cause of heart attacks and strokes68. Atherosclerosis begins with an accumulation of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) in the subendothelial space, which results in endothelial cell activation and macrophage recruitment for oxLDL engulfment. These lipid-laden macrophages become foam cells, produce inflammatory cytokines, and contribute to the formation of atherosclerotic plaques69. These plaques consist of fat, cholesterol, and immune cells that reside within the walls of arteries70. With increased foam cell accumulation and chronic inflammatory stimulation, these plaques become vulnerable to rupture, which can result in thrombosis and the occlusion of blood flow71, 72. Various strategies have been proposed to treat atherosclerosis, such as minimizing the inflammatory response or reducing plaque burden70. The mobilization of cholesterol transport from the blood vessel may also provide a possible solution to alleviate pathological progression of atherosclerosis.
In recent years, a growing body of literature has shown that in mice the lymphatics in the aortic wall are a major route for the transport of cholesterol into the bloodstream—a process referred to as reverse cholesterol transport (RCT). These publications suggest that the lymphatics could represent another means to treat atherosclerosis73, 74. One study showed that damage of lymphatic function by surgical ablation of the lymphatic collecting vessels promoted adventitial inflammation, impaired RCT, and encouraged the development of atherosclerotic plaques in hypercholesterolemic mice73. In addition, the prevention of lymphatic growth using VEGFR3 blocking antibodies or by using Chy mice, which lack functional draining lymphatics due to selective inactivating mutations in Flt4 (VEGFR3), and insufficient coverage of the collecting lymphatic vessels with vascular smooth cells, caused impaired lymphatic function and reduced RCT74, 75. Moreover, inhibition of VEGFR3 signaling or silencing of CXCL12, a lymphangiogenic factor that stimulates lymphatic growth and function, also aggravated atherosclerotic plaque formation by blunting initial lymphatic vessel expansion in the adventitia. The consequence was augmented T cell accumulation that presumably exacerbated inflammation in the atherosclerotic plaque76. By measuring aortic lymphatic transport, a recent study showed that lymphatic drainage is largely impaired during atherosclerotic progression and the disruption of aortic lymphatic flow by lymphatic ligation promoted atherosclerotic plaque formation77. Taken together, a beneficial role for the peri-adventitial lymphatics to limit cholesterol accumulation and chronic plaque inflammation during pathologic progression of atherosclerosis is evident.
In support of this idea, the restoration of lymphangiogenesis using VEGF-C or VEGF-C152S, a mutant form of VEGF-C that specifically activates VEGFR3 signaling and elevates lymphangiogenesis in mice, can improve cholesterol clearance and RCT transport73, 78. Interestingly, a more recent study reported that arterial delivery of VEGF-C antibodies to pre-existing lesions reversed lipid accumulation, reduced intimal cell death, and stabilized atherosclerotic lesions79. These findings indicate that the application of an antibody-based delivery strategy was a promising therapy for the treatment of atherosclerosis. Despite these encouraging findings, critical questions remain to be answered regarding whether induction of local lymphatic growth and function can reduce fat deposition or accelerate lipid removal to lessen tissue inflammation to protect against the progression of atherosclerosis.
Myocardial Infarction
Unlike the collecting lymphatics in distal sites of the body, the cardiac lymphatics are dependent on myocardial contraction to transport lymph from the endocardium to the epicardium. This lymph subsequently drains into the thoracic duct via periaortic and paratracheal mediastinal lymph nodes through connected subepicardial lymphatic trunks80-82. Cardiovascular pathologies such as pressure overload, myocardial infarction, pulmonary hypertension, and heart failure induce cardiac contractile impairment and microvascular fluid flow disruption, resulting in myocardial edema, inflammation and cardiac fibrosis81.
Accumulating evidence shows that elevated VEGF-C and VEGF-D during the early stage of myocardial infarction increased endogenous lymphangiogenesis within the infarct zone48, 49, 83, 84. Increased lymphangiogenesis following myocardial infarction is associated with elevated immune cell infiltration, attracted by pro-apoptotic signals released from damaged cells, cell debris, and cytokines from neighboring cells48. However, it is debatable whether endogenous lymphangiogenesis is important for the improvement of cardiac function in the early phase of post-infarction. One research group has reported that genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis through ablation of VEGFR3 signaling using mice deficient in VEGF-C and VEGF-D or VEGFR3 does not impair cardiac function in mice two weeks following MI45. While mice with LEC-specific loss of the endothelial adhesion protein VE-cadherin cause lymphatic vessel regression in the injured hearts, the cardiac function in these mutant mice was surprisingly well-preserved46. However, the latter mice showed increased cardiac infarct size and fibrosis after MI46, suggesting that an impaired lymphatic vasculature may impact long-term heart function following MI and worsen heart failure.
While the above studies show that loss of, or reductions in, the cardiac lymphatics did not impact cardiac functional recovery after initial injury45, 46, another study suggested that the delivery of soluble VEGFR3 to the infarcted heart improves cardiac function in both mice and rats; however, this effect was attributed to the acute suppression of T-cell infiltration85. Nevertheless, it is entirely plausible that the maintenance of proper lymphatic function through lymphangiogenesis in the infarcted heart is necessary in the long-term by ensuring fluid drainage in addition to transporting essential lipids, peptides, and reparative myeloid cells.
In support of this contention, one study demonstrated that defects in the cardiac lymphatics were associated with an increased inflammatory response in the injured heart86. In this article, the authors showed that mice with Apelin-deficiency exhibit morphological and functional defects in lymphatic vessels and that the defective lymphatics were associated with increased inflammation in the infarcted heart86. In addition, several studies in zebrafish indicated the importance of the endogenous lymphatics for cardiac growth and regeneration51, 87. In both papers, it was apparent that zebrafish with blockage or genetic inactivation of VEGF-C/VEGFR3 signaling showed defects in cardiac recovery51, 87. Clearly, more work is needed to confirm if cardiac injury-induced lymphatic vessels are functional and whether lymphatic function is required for cardiac repair.
Because different stages post-MI have been studied, the role of lymphatic function in regulating cardiac repair and regeneration appears quite variable. While the lymphatic vasculature is involved in the pathogenesis of acute cardiac injuries and therapeutic lymphangiogenesis can improve cardiac function following MI, the role of this vascular system in regulating repair and regeneration during the chronic phase (i.e., 6 to 8 weeks post-MI in mice), when inflammation, fibrosis, and impaired cardiac function become established, has only recently been investigated85, 88.
Several recent studies support the contention that enhanced lymphangiogenesis restrains cardiac tissue damage in the chronic phase of recovery in addition to the acute phase85, 88. Moreover, the benefits of cardiac lymphangiogenesis after cardiac injury are evident in numerous studies using a variety of animal models such as mice47-49, rats89, and zebrafish51, 87. In mice, increased lymphangiogenesis through activation of VEGFR3 signaling preserves cardiac function and promotes cardiac recovery post-infarction, indicating the therapeutic potential of enhanced lymphangiogenesis for cardiac repair47. Consistent with these results, another report showed that increased cardiac lymphangiogenesis through the stimulation of VEGFR3 signaling by the overexpression of the endogenous epicardial-derived factor adrenomedullin, improved cardiac recovery following MI49. Moreover, selectively targeting VEGFR3 in a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury promoted lymphangiogenesis in the subepicardial region of the heart in a dose-dependent manner and facilitated cardiac functional recovery after injury89. Similarly, activating VEGFR3 signaling in zebrafish improved cardiac regeneration and inflammatory resolution after injury51, 87.
Enhanced lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic remodeling improved cardiac function in these cases, most likely, by facilitating myocardial fluid reabsorption in combination with resolving macrophage infiltration48. Aside from the expected immune clearance function, our recent study identified a novel paracrine signal produced by cardiac LECs that regulates cardiac regeneration and repair, further accentuating the essential function of lymphatics in the recovery of cardiac injury53. In this paper, we found that Reelin, an extracellular matrix protein primarily expressed by LECs in the murine heart, regulated embryonic heart development by promoting cardiomyocyte proliferation and survival53. Interestingly, Reelin expression was highly induced in the newly formed lymphatics after MI, and Reelin mutant pups showed impaired cardiac regeneration as a consequence of reduced cardiomyocyte proliferation and increased cardiomyocyte apoptosis53. Furthermore, delivery of Reelin using bioengineered collagen patches into the infarcted adult heart greatly reduced cardiomyocyte apoptosis and promoted cardiac repair post-MI53.
This work provided a novel mechanism describing how cardiac lymphatics could promote cardiac repair. The concept of active paracrine signals from cardiac lymphatics has motivated the field to re-think the functional role of lymphatics in pathologic conditions, not only in heart, but also in other organs. Indeed, more recent studies have reported a similar paracrine function of lymphatics in other vascular beds. In mouse adipose tissue, Neurotensin was identified as an anti-thermogenic peptide produced by LECs and it was found to play an important role in thermogenesis90. In the mouse intestine, Wnt signaling and Reelin from intestinal LECs functioned as a central signaling hub to regulate intestinal stem cell activity91. Taken together, these studies show the importance of the cardiac lymphatics in myocardial injury and suggest the therapeutic potential of promoting lymphangiogenesis to improve cardiac function following acute injury.
Hypertension
Hypertension is associated with renal immune cell infiltration and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines that alter renal sodium retention. The renal lymphatics, similar to those in other organs, are critical to transport fluid, small molecules, and cells from the renal interstitial space and they play a fundamental role in renal physiology and pathology92-94. Because the kidney has a unique microenvironment protected by dynamic immune cell subsets and downstream signaling molecules, the lymphatics likely act important conduits for moving antigen-presenting and immune cells from the kidney to the lymph nodes94. Hypertension-related renal inflammation and other kidney pathologies exhibit increased renal lymphangiogenesis in a compensatory manner, similar to other tissues41, 95-98.
Selectively promoting initial lymphatic vessel density in the kidney by renal VEGF-D overexpression protected mice from the development of salt-induced hypertension as mice with tetracycline-responsive kidney-specific overexpression of murine VEGF-D (kidney-specific VEGF-D overexpression) enhanced renal lymphatic vessel expansion visualized by Lyve1 immunostaining and prevented hypertension in mice99. Furthermore, expanded initial lymphatic vessels in kidney prevented the development of hypertension by inhibiting the elaboration of nitric oxide99. These expanded vessels decreased renal immune cell infiltration and lowered blood pressure99-101. Furthermore, increased lymphangiogenesis also promoted urinary Na excretion, which lowered blood pressure by reducing renal interstitial Na retention101. Interestingly, there are also gender differences in the regulation of lymphangiogenesis in the kidney100. In female mice, there was increased VEGF-C expression in the kidney during Angiotensin II infusion, which was linked to lower Angiotensin II-induced hypertension in females when compared to males100. This finding is in line with another study showing that the lymphatic vasculature requires Estrogen Receptor-α to protect against lymphedema102. Despite this, the exact role of Estrogen Receptor-α in renal lymphangiogenesis has not been fully elucidated.
At the same time, enhanced lymphangiogenesis in the kidney promotes clearance of interstitial immune cells that reduce inflammation regardless of sex. While enhanced renal lymphatics increase Na excretion, high Na promotes lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic contractility in collecting vessels, which enhances the clearance of fluid and infiltrated immune cells to maintain electrolyte homeostasis103. Together, promoting renal lymphangiogenesis can prevent salt-sensitive hypertension through augmenting of Na and immune cell clearance in the kidney and represents yet another therapeutic opportunity. Interestingly, a recent report from Helge Wiig’s group using mice with either hypoplastic (Chy), absent (K14-VEGFR3), or hyperplastic (K14-VEGF-C) dermal lymphatic vessels and littermate controls demonstrated lymphatic vessels in skin have minimal impact on blood pressure regulation when the mice were fed with high-salt diet (i.e., 4% NaCl in the chow)104.
Summary and Future Directions
Here, we have described recent findings that suggest increasing lymphatic function through the promotion of lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic growth and remodeling may represent a treatment for various metabolic disorders as well as myocardial infarction, atherosclerosis, and hypertension (Table 1 and Figure 1). At the same time, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in controlling the lymphatic vasculature is largely incomplete. Conversely, VEGF-C or VEGF-D therapies have been shown to play an important role in modulating the behavior of immune cells and the inflammatory tumor microenvironment105. Especially, in an inflammatory skin carcinogenesis model, VEGF-C and VEGF-D blockade reduces infiltrating macrophages and diminishes inflammatory cytokines secreted by these macrophages, suggesting that targeting VEGF-C/VEGF-D using blocking agents holds promise for constraining inflammation in various pathological conditions. As our knowledge of lymphatic biology continues to grow, we expect that the therapeutic potential for targeting this biological system will continue to expand.
Table 1:
Models of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases
| Disease model |
Approach to promote lymphatic growth |
Effects | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolic Diseases | |||
| Obesity induced by HFD in mice | VEGF-D overexpression in adipose tissue | Promoted lymphangiogenesis in adipose tissue; enhanced glucose clearance and reduce insulin and triglyceride levels | 67 |
| Stage III type 2 diabetes by streptozotocin injection and HFD in mice | LEC specific Epsins deficient mice to promote VEGF-C/VEGFR3 signaling | Promoted lymphangiogenesis; resolved lymphatic function in diabetic mice. | 66 |
| Myocardial Infarction | |||
| MI in mice | Recombinant human VEGF-C (C156S), hVEGF-Cc156S) or VEGFR3 adeno-associated viral gene (AAV) delivery | Reduced cardiac inflammation; enhanced post-MI cardiac function; Reduced infarction size and suppressed acute T cell infiltration | 85 |
| MI in mice | Recombinant human VEGF-C (C156S) | Improved immune cell clearance; promoted immune trafficking; preserved cardiac function | 48 |
| MI in mice | Overexpression of adrenomedullin | Increased connexin 43 localization; improved cardiac function; reduced infarcted size | 49 |
| MI in rat | Recombinant human VEGF-C (C152S) | Decreased cardiac inflammation and fibrosis; Increased cardiac function | 50 |
| MI in mice | Recombinant human VEGF-C (C156S) | Decreased cardiac fibrosis; Increased cardiac function | 47 |
| Hypertension | |||
| Hypertension induced by chronic 4% high salt diet in mice | Overexpression VEGF-D in kidney | Reduced blood pressure; increased urinary Na excretion | 99 |
| Hypertension induced by angiotensin II infusion in mice | Overexpression VEGF-D in kidney | Reduced blood pressure | 98 |
| Hypertension induced by NO inhibitor or high salt diet in mice | Overexpression VEGF-D in kidney | Reduced renal immune cell infiltration; protected nitric oxide synthase inhibition-induced and salt-sensitive hypertension | 97 |
Figure 1. Increasing lymphatic growth and function to treat metabolic and cardiovascular diseases.
A number of recent studies have highlighted the therapeutic potential of stimulating lymphatic function through lymphangiogenesis, lymphatic growth, and lymphatic remodeling for the treatment of obesity, myocardial infarction, atherosclerosis, and hypertension. (A) Metabolic diseases can systemically impair lymphatic function. Promoting lymphatic growth in metabolic tissues (e.g., skeletal muscle, brown adipose tissue [BAT], and white adipose tissue [WAT]) may resolve insulin resistance and enhance insulin sensitivity to protect against disorders such as obesity. (B) Enhancing lymphangiogenesis after myocardial infarction may clear infiltrating immune cells to reduce the elaboration of pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as decreasing edema, inflammation, and fibrosis to increase functional recovery of the injured heart. (C) Halting the progression or reversing growth of atherosclerotic lesions may depend on increasing lymphatic function in the surrounding tissues by blunting inflammation and reducing cholesterol uptake by immune cell clearance. (D) During hypertension, increased immune cell infiltration and inflammation in renal tissue can contribute to elevations in blood pressure. Augmenting renal lymphangiogenesis may promote immune cell clearance to increase kidney function through sodium excretion to reduce blood pressure.
Highlights.
A brief review of recent research regarding the promotion of lymphatic growth to treat metabolic and cardiovascular diseases
The diseases discussed in this review include obesity, myocardial infarction, atherosclerosis, and hypertension
Actual and potential experimental and/or therapeutic approaches that induce lymphatic function and remodeling are presented
Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying physiological and pathological lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic growth and remodeling are discussed
Acknowledgments:
All authors performed the literature search and wrote the manuscript. XL, KC, DBC, and HC created the table and/or figure. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.
Sources of Funding:
This work was supported by NIH grants R01HL093242 (H.C., D.W.), R01HL130845 (H.C.), R01HL133216 (H.C., J.B.D., R.S.S., D.W.), R01HL137229 (H.C.), R01HL141858 (D.W., H.C.), R01HL146134 (H.C.), and R01HL158097 (H.C., Y.C.); an American Heart Association Transformative Program Award (H.C.); an American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant 17SDG33410868 (H.W.); and an American Heart Association Career Development Award 18CDA34110356 (X.L.).
Non-standard Abbreviations and Acronyms:
- HFD
High-fat diet
- LEC
Lymphatic endothelial cell
- MI
Myocardial infarction
- oxLDL
oxidized low density lipoprotein oxidized
- Prox1
Prospero homeobox 1
- RCT
Reverse cholesterol transport
- VE-cadherin
Vascular endothelial cadherin (Cadherin 5)
- VEGF
Vascular endothelial growth factor
- VEGFR3
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3
Footnotes
Disclosures:
None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Oliver G, Kipnis J, Randolph GJ, Harvey NL. The lymphatic vasculature in the 21(st) century: Novel functional roles in homeostasis and disease. Cell. 2020;182:270–296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baluk P, Fuxe J, Hashizume H, et al. Functionally specialized junctions between endothelial cells of lymphatic vessels. J Exp Med. 2007;204:2349–2362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alitalo K. The lymphatic vasculature in disease. Nat Med. 2011;17:1371–1380 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Muthuchamy M, Zawieja D. Molecular regulation of lymphatic contractility. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1131:89–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Norrmen C, Ivanov KI, Cheng J, et al. Foxc2 controls formation and maturation of lymphatic collecting vessels through cooperation with nfatc1. J Cell Biol. 2009;185:439–457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sabine A, Saygili Demir C, Petrova TV. Endothelial cell responses to biomechanical forces in lymphatic vessels. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2016;25:451–465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Srinivasan RS, Oliver G. Prox1 dosage controls the number of lymphatic endothelial cell progenitors and the formation of the lymphovenous valves. Genes Dev. 2011;25:2187–2197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.van der Putte SC. The early development of the lymphatic system in mouse embryos. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand. 1975;13:245–286 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang Y, Oliver G. Current views on the function of the lymphatic vasculature in health and disease. Genes Dev. 2010;24:2115–2126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yang Y, Oliver G. Development of the mammalian lymphatic vasculature. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:888–897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Petrova TV, Koh GY. Biological functions of lymphatic vessels. Science. 2020;369:eaax4063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu X, Oliver G. New insights about the lymphatic vasculature in cardiovascular diseases. F1000Res. 2019;8:F1000 Faculty Rev–1811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wigle JT, Oliver G. Prox1 function is required for the development of the murine lymphatic system. Cell. 1999;98:769–778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wigle JT, Harvey N, Detmar M, Lagutina I, Grosveld G, Gunn MD, Jackson DG, Oliver G. An essential role for prox1 in the induction of the lymphatic endothelial cell phenotype. EMBO J. 2002;21:1505–1513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Johnson NC, Dillard ME, Baluk P, McDonald DM, Harvey NL, Frase SL, Oliver G. Lymphatic endothelial cell identity is reversible and its maintenance requires prox1 activity. Genes Dev. 2008;22:3282–3291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yang Y, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Soriano-Navarro M, Srinivasan RS, Scallan JP, Singh MK, Epstein JA, Oliver G. Lymphatic endothelial progenitors bud from the cardinal vein and intersomitic vessels in mammalian embryos. Blood. 2012;120:2340–2348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rauniyar K, Jha SK, Jeltsch M. Biology of vascular endothelial growth factor c in the morphogenesis of lymphatic vessels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Olsson AK, Dimberg A, Kreuger J, Claesson-Welsh L. Vegf receptor signalling - in control of vascular function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:359–371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Karkkainen MJ, Haiko P, Sainio K, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor c is required for sprouting of the first lymphatic vessels from embryonic veins. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:74–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Srinivasan RS, Escobedo N, Yang Y, et al. The prox1-vegfr3 feedback loop maintains the identity and the number of lymphatic endothelial cell progenitors. Genes & development. 2014;28:2175–2187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Francois M, Caprini A, Hosking B, et al. Sox18 induces development of the lymphatic vasculature in mice. Nature. 2008;456:643–647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hogan BM, Bos FL, Bussmann J, Witte M, Chi NC, Duckers HJ, Schulte-Merker S. Ccbe1 is required for embryonic lymphangiogenesis and venous sprouting. Nat Genet. 2009;41:396–398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Betterman KL, Sutton DL, Secker GA, et al. Atypical cadherin fat4 orchestrates lymphatic endothelial cell polarity in response to flow. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:3315–3328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Brouillard P, Dupont L, Helaers R, Coulie R, Tiller GE, Peeden J, Colige A, Vikkula M. Loss of adamts3 activity causes hennekam lymphangiectasia-lymphedema syndrome 3. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:4095–4104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fritz-Six KL, Dunworth WP, Li M, Caron KM. Adrenomedullin signaling is necessary for murine lymphatic vascular development. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:40–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schacht V, Ramirez MI, Hong YK, et al. T1alpha/podoplanin deficiency disrupts normal lymphatic vasculature formation and causes lymphedema. EMBO J. 2003;22:3546–3556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu X, Gu X, Ma W, Oxendine M, Gil HJ, Davis GE, Cleaver O, Oliver G. Rasip1 controls lymphatic vessel lumen maintenance by regulating endothelial cell junctions. Development. 2018;145:dev165092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wong BW, Wang X, Zecchin A, et al. The role of fatty acid beta-oxidation in lymphangiogenesis. Nature. 2017;542:49–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ma W, Gil HJ, Liu X, Diebold LP, Morgan MA, Oxendine-Burns MJ, Gao P, Chandel NS, Oliver G. Mitochondrial respiration controls the prox1-vegfr3 feedback loop during lymphatic endothelial cell fate specification and maintenance. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabe7359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Martinez-Corral I, Ulvmar MH, Stanczuk L, Tatin F, Kizhatil K, John SW, Alitalo K, Ortega S, Makinen T. Nonvenous origin of dermal lymphatic vasculature. Circ Res. 2015;116:1649–1654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stone OA, Stainier DYR. Paraxial mesoderm is the major source of lymphatic endothelium. Dev Cell. 2019;50:247–255 e243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pichol-Thievend C, Betterman KL, Liu X, et al. A blood capillary plexus-derived population of progenitor cells contributes to genesis of the dermal lymphatic vasculature during embryonic development. Development. 2018;145:dev160184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lioux G, Liu X, Temino S, Oxendine M, Ayala E, Ortega S, Kelly RG, Oliver G, Torres M. A second heart field-derived vasculogenic niche contributes to cardiac lymphatics. Dev Cell. 2020;52:350–363 e356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nurmi H, Saharinen P, Zarkada G, Zheng W, Robciuc MR, Alitalo K. Vegf-c is required for intestinal lymphatic vessel maintenance and lipid absorption. EMBO Mol Med. 2015;7:1418–1425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rutkowski JM, Ihm JE, Lee ST, et al. Vegfr-3 neutralization inhibits ovarian lymphangiogenesis, follicle maturation, and murine pregnancy. Am J Pathol. 2013;183:1596–1607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nihei M, Okazaki T, Ebihara S, et al. Chronic inflammation, lymphangiogenesis, and effect of an anti-vegfr therapy in a mouse model and in human patients with aspiration pneumonia. J Pathol. 2015;235:632–645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stacker SA, Williams SP, Karnezis T, Shayan R, Fox SB, Achen MG. Lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic vessel remodelling in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:159–172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Skobe M, Hawighorst T, Jackson DG, et al. Induction of tumor lymphangiogenesis by vegf-c promotes breast cancer metastasis. Nat Med. 2001;7:192–198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Stacker SA, Caesar C, Baldwin ME, et al. Vegf-d promotes the metastatic spread of tumor cells via the lymphatics. Nat Med. 2001;7:186–191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Soong TR, Pathak AP, Asano H, Fox-Talbot K, Baldwin WM 3rd. Lymphatic injury and regeneration in cardiac allografts. Transplantation. 2010;89:500–508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kim H, Kataru RP, Koh GY. Regulation and implications of inflammatory lymphangiogenesis. Trends Immunol. 2012;33:350–356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yin N, Zhang N, Xu J, Shi Q, Ding Y, Bromberg JS. Targeting lymphangiogenesis after islet transplantation prolongs islet allograft survival. Transplantation. 2011;92:25–30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Witte MH, Bernas MJ, Martin CP, Witte CL. Lymphangiogenesis and lymphangiodysplasia: From molecular to clinical lymphology. Microsc Res Tech. 2001;55:122–145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhou Y, Huang C, Hu Y, Xu Q, Hu X. Lymphatics in cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:e275–e283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Keller TCSt, Lim L, Shewale SV, et al. Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest. 2021;131:e147070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Harris NR, Nielsen NR, Pawlak JB, et al. Ve-cadherin is required for cardiac lymphatic maintenance and signaling. Circ Res. 2022;130:5–23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Klotz L, Norman S, Vieira JM, et al. Cardiac lymphatics are heterogeneous in origin and respond to injury. Nature. 2015;522:62–67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vieira JM, Norman S, Villa Del Campo C, et al. The cardiac lymphatic system stimulates resolution of inflammation following myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:3402–3412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Trincot CE, Xu W, Zhang H, Kulikauskas MR, Caranasos TG, Jensen BC, Sabine A, Petrova TV, Caron KM. Adrenomedullin induces cardiac lymphangiogenesis after myocardial infarction and regulates cardiac edema via connexin 43. Circ Res. 2019;124:101–113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Henri O, Pouehe C, Houssari M, et al. Selective stimulation of cardiac lymphangiogenesis reduces myocardial edema and fibrosis leading to improved cardiac function following myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2016;133:1484–1497; discussion 1497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Harrison MR, Feng X, Mo G, Aguayo A, Villafuerte J, Yoshida T, Pearson CA, Schulte-Merker S, Lien CL. Late developing cardiac lymphatic vasculature supports adult zebrafish heart function and regeneration. Elife. 2019;8:e42762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gancz D, Raftrey BC, Perlmoter G, et al. Distinct origins and molecular mechanisms contribute to lymphatic formation during cardiac growth and regeneration. Elife. 2019;8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Liu X, De la Cruz E, Gu X, et al. Lymphoangiocrine signals promote cardiac growth and repair. Nature. 2020;588:705–711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Weitman ES, Aschen SZ, Farias-Eisner G, Albano N, Cuzzone DA, Ghanta S, Zampell JC, Thorek D, Mehrara BJ. Obesity impairs lymphatic fluid transport and dendritic cell migration to lymph nodes. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Scallan JP, Hill MA, Davis MJ. Lymphatic vascular integrity is disrupted in type 2 diabetes due to impaired nitric oxide signalling. Cardiovasc Res. 2015;107:89–97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Garcia Nores GD, Cuzzone DA, Albano NJ, et al. Obesity but not high-fat diet impairs lymphatic function. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016;40:1582–1590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Nitti MD, Hespe GE, Kataru RP, Garcia Nores GD, Savetsky IL, Torrisi JS, Gardenier JC, Dannenberg AJ, Mehrara BJ. Obesity-induced lymphatic dysfunction is reversible with weight loss. J Physiol. 2016;594:7073–7087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lee Y, Fluckey JD, Chakraborty S, Muthuchamy M. Hyperglycemia- and hyperinsulinemia-induced insulin resistance causes alterations in cellular bioenergetics and activation of inflammatory signaling in lymphatic muscle. FASEB J. 2017;31:2744–2759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lee Y, Chakraborty S, Meininger CJ, Muthuchamy M. Insulin resistance disrupts cell integrity, mitochondrial function, and inflammatory signaling in lymphatic endothelium. Microcirculation. 2018;25:e12492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Maruyama K, Asai J, Ii M, Thorne T, Losordo DW, D'Amore PA. Decreased macrophage number and activation lead to reduced lymphatic vessel formation and contribute to impaired diabetic wound healing. Am J Pathol. 2007;170:1178–1191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Harvey NL, Srinivasan RS, Dillard ME, Johnson NC, Witte MH, Boyd K, Sleeman MW, Oliver G. Lymphatic vascular defects promoted by prox1 haploinsufficiency cause adult-onset obesity. Nat Genet. 2005;37:1072–1081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Karkkainen MJ, Saaristo A, Jussila L, et al. A model for gene therapy of human hereditary lymphedema. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:12677–12682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rutkowski JM, Markhus CE, Gyenge CC, Alitalo K, Wiig H, Swartz MA. Dermal collagen and lipid deposition correlate with tissue swelling and hydraulic conductivity in murine primary lymphedema. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:1122–1129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Escobedo N, Proulx ST, Karaman S, Dillard ME, Johnson N, Detmar M, Oliver G. Restoration of lymphatic function rescues obesity in prox1-haploinsufficient mice. JCI Insight. 2016;1:e85096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Liu X, Pasula S, Song H, et al. Temporal and spatial regulation of epsin abundance and vegfr3 signaling are required for lymphatic valve formation and function. Sci Signal. 2014;7:ra97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wu H, Rahman HNA, Dong Y, et al. Epsin deficiency promotes lymphangiogenesis through regulation of vegfr3 degradation in diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2018;128:4025–4043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chakraborty A, Barajas S, Lammoglia GM, Reyna AJ, Morley TS, Johnson JA, Scherer PE, Rutkowski JM. Vascular endothelial growth factor-d (vegf-d) overexpression and lymphatic expansion in murine adipose tissue improves metabolism in obesity. Am J Pathol. 2019;189:924–939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Libby P The biology of atherosclerosis comes full circle: Lessons for conquering cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:683–684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yu XH, Fu YC, Zhang DW, Yin K, Tang CK. Foam cells in atherosclerosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;424:245–252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Glass CK, Witztum JL. Atherosclerosis. The road ahead. Cell. 2001;104:503–516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Libby P, Hansson GK. Inflammation and immunity in diseases of the arterial tree: Players and layers. Circ Res. 2015;116:307–311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Shi GP, Bot I, Kovanen PT. Mast cells in human and experimental cardiometabolic diseases. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:643–658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Lim HY, Thiam CH, Yeo KP, et al. Lymphatic vessels are essential for the removal of cholesterol from peripheral tissues by sr-bi-mediated transport of hdl. Cell metabolism. 2013;17:671–684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Martel C, Li W, Fulp B, et al. Lymphatic vasculature mediates macrophage reverse cholesterol transport in mice. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:1571–1579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Randolph GJ, Miller NE. Lymphatic transport of high-density lipoproteins and chylomicrons. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:929–935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Rademakers T, van der Vorst EP, Daissormont IT, et al. Adventitial lymphatic capillary expansion impacts on plaque t cell accumulation in atherosclerosis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Yeo KP, Lim HY, Thiam CH, et al. Efficient aortic lymphatic drainage is necessary for atherosclerosis regression induced by ezetimibe. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eabc2697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Milasan A, Smaani A, Martel C. Early rescue of lymphatic function limits atherosclerosis progression in ldlr(−/−) mice. Atherosclerosis. 2019;283:106–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Silvestre-Roig C, Lemnitzer P, Gall J, Schwager S, Toska A, Yvan-Charvet L, Detmar M, Soehnlein O. Arterial delivery of vegf-c stabilizes atherosclerotic lesions. Circ Res. 2021;128:284–286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bradham RR, Parker EF, Barrington BA Jr., Webb CM, Stallworth JM. The cardiac lymphatics. Ann Surg. 1970;171:899–902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Mehlhorn U, Geissler HJ, Laine GA, Allen SJ. Myocardial fluid balance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:1220–1230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Cui Y. Impact of lymphatic vessels on the heart. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;58:1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ishikawa Y, Akishima-Fukasawa Y, Ito K, et al. Lymphangiogenesis in myocardial remodelling after infarction. Histopathology. 2007;51:345–353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK, Aikawa E, Stangenberg L, Wurdinger T, Figueiredo JL, Libby P, Weissleder R, Pittet MJ. The healing myocardium sequentially mobilizes two monocyte subsets with divergent and complementary functions. J Exp Med. 2007;204:3037–3047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Houssari M, Dumesnil A, Tardif V, et al. Lymphatic and immune cell cross-talk regulates cardiac recovery after experimental myocardial infarction. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020;40:1722–1737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Tatin F, Renaud-Gabardos E, Godet AC, et al. Apelin modulates pathological remodeling of lymphatic endothelium after myocardial infarction. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e93887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Gancz D, Raftrey BC, Perlmoter G, et al. Distinct origins and molecular mechanisms contribute to lymphatic formation during cardiac growth and regeneration. Elife. 2019;8:e44153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Song L, Chen X, Swanson TA, et al. Lymphangiogenic therapy prevents cardiac dysfunction by ameliorating inflammation and hypertension. Elife. 2020;9:e58376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Henri O, Pouehe C, Houssari M, et al. Selective stimulation of cardiac lymphangiogenesis reduces myocardial edema and fibrosis leading to improved cardiac function following myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2016;133:1484–1497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Li J, Li E, Czepielewski RS, et al. Neurotensin is an anti-thermogenic peptide produced by lymphatic endothelial cells. Cell metabolism. 2021;33:1449–1465 e1446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Niec RE, Chu T, Schernthanner M, et al. Lymphatics act as a signaling hub to regulate intestinal stem cell activity. Cell stem cell. 2022;29:1067–1082 e1018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Pei G, Yao Y, Yang Q, et al. Lymphangiogenesis in kidney and lymph node mediates renal inflammation and fibrosis. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaaw5075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Jafree DJ, Moulding D, Kolatsi-Joannou M, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics and heterogeneity of renal lymphatics in mammalian development and cystic kidney disease. Elife. 2019;8:e48183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Jafree DJ, Long DA. Beyond a passive conduit: Implications of lymphatic biology for kidney diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31:1178–1190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Kim JD, Kang Y, Kim J, et al. Essential role of apelin signaling during lymphatic development in zebrafish. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:338–345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kneedler SC, Phillips LE, Hudson KR, Beckman KM, Lopez Gelston CA, Rutkowski JM, Parrish AR, Doris PA, Mitchell BM. Renal inflammation and injury are associated with lymphangiogenesis in hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2017;312:F861–F869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ochsenbein AM, Karaman S, Proulx ST, et al. Regulation of lymphangiogenesis in the diaphragm by macrophages and vegfr-3 signaling. Angiogenesis. 2016;19:513–524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kon V, Shelton EL, Pitzer A, Yang HC, Kirabo A. Inflammation, lymphatics, and cardiovascular disease: Amplification by chronic kidney disease. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2022;24:455–463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Lopez Gelston CA, Balasubbramanian D, Abouelkheir GR, Lopez AH, Hudson KR, Johnson ER, Muthuchamy M, Mitchell BM, Rutkowski JM. Enhancing renal lymphatic expansion prevents hypertension in mice. Circ Res. 2018;122:1094–1101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Balasubbramanian D, Gelston CAL, Lopez AH, Iskander G, Tate W, Holderness H, Rutkowski JM, Mitchell BM. Augmenting renal lymphatic density prevents angiotensin ii-induced hypertension in male and female mice. Am J Hypertens. 2020;33:61–69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Balasubbramanian D, Baranwal G, Clark MC, Goodlett BL, Mitchell BM, Rutkowski JM. Kidney-specific lymphangiogenesis increases sodium excretion and lowers blood pressure in mice. J Hypertens. 2020;38:874–885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Morfoisse F, Tatin F, Chaput B, et al. Lymphatic vasculature requires estrogen receptor-alpha signaling to protect from lymphedema. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018;38:1346–1357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Karlsen TV, Nikpey E, Han J, et al. High-salt diet causes expansion of the lymphatic network and increased lymph flow in skin and muscle of rats. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018;38:2054–2064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Thowsen IM, Reikvam T, Skogstrand T, Samuelsson AM, Muller DN, Tenstad O, Alitalo K, Karlsen T, Wiig H. Genetic engineering of lymphangiogenesis in skin does not affect blood pressure in mouse models of salt-sensitive hypertension. Hypertension. 2022;79:2451–2462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Alitalo AK, Proulx ST, Karaman S, Aebischer D, Martino S, Jost M, Schneider N, Bry M, Detmar M. Vegf-c and vegf-d blockade inhibits inflammatory skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2013;73:4212–4221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

