Correction to: Communications Biology 10.1038/s42003-022-04202-1, published online 12 November 2022.
The original version of this Article had several incorrect references in the following paragraphs of the Results and Discussion section:
Last sentence of subheading “Biosynthesis of olivetolic acid in engineered Y. lipolytica”:
“The resulting strain YL101 only produced 0.11 mg/L OLA after 96 h cultivation (Fig. 2b), which is comparable to the initial OLA production in S. cerevisiae19.”
The correct version of this paragraph should appear as:
“The resulting strain YL101 only produced 0.11 mg/L OLA after 96 h cultivation (Fig. 2b), which is comparable to the initial OLA production in S. cerevisiae17.”
Second paragraph of subheading “Screening enzymes to improve pool size of hexanoyl-CoA”:
“ [..] We also removed the C-terminal peroxisome targeting sequence 1 (PTS1) and overexpressed the codon-optimized CsAAE3 in Y. lipolytica20,21,22. […] The LvaE gene encoding the short-chain acyl-CoA synthetase of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 (PpLvaE, PP_2795 with uniport ID Q88J54), which is reported to active with C4-C6 carboxylic acids, was also selected19. […]. The overexpression of CsAAE1 in S. cerevisiae only showed a twofold increase in OLA titer19. […]”
The correct version of this paragraph should appear as:
“ [..] We also removed the C-terminal peroxisome targeting sequence 1 (PTS1) and overexpressed the codon-optimized CsAAE3 in Y. lipolytica19-21. […] The LvaE gene encoding the short-chain acyl-CoA synthetase of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 (PpLvaE, PP_2795 with uniport ID Q88J54), which is reported to active with C4-C6 carboxylic acids, was also selected22. […]. The overexpression of CsAAE1 in S. cerevisiae only showed a twofold increase in OLA titer17. […]”
These have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.