Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Dec 22;12:22167. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26158-2

Climatic control on the location of continental volcanic arcs

Veleda A P Muller 1,, Pietro Sternai 1, Christian Sue 2,3, Thibaud Simon-Labric 4, Pierre G Valla 2
PMCID: PMC9780350  PMID: 36550179

Abstract

Orogens and volcanic arcs at continental plate margins are primary surface expressions of convergent plate tectonics. Although it is established that climate affects the shape, size, and architecture of orogens via orographic erosion gradients, the ascent of magma through the crust and location of volcanoes along magmatic arcs have been considered insensitive to erosion. However, available data reveal westward migration of late-Cenozoic volcanic activity in the Southern Andes and Cascade Range where orography drives an eastward migration of the topographic water divide by increased precipitation and erosion along west-facing slopes. Thermomechanical numerical modeling shows that orographic erosion and the associated leeward topographic migration may entail asymmetric crustal structures that drive the magma ascent toward the region of enhanced erosion. Despite the different tectonic histories of the Southern Andes and the Cascade Range, orographic erosion is a shared causal mechanism that can explain the late-Cenozoic westward migration of the volcanic front along both magmatic arcs.

Subject terms: Geodynamics, Geology, Geomorphology, Tectonics, Volcanology

Introduction

Volcanic arcs at convergent plate margins are located above the zone of dehydration of a subducting oceanic plate, leading to partial melting of mantle rocks at depths around ~ 100 km, depending on the mean slab dip angle, convergence velocity and thermal structure of the slab and mantle wedge14. Assuming a vertical magma transfer from the mantle melting zone to the upper crust in subduction settings4, slab rollback and trench retreat lead to arc migration towards the subducting plate, whereas slab flattening and trench advancement force the migration of the arc front towards the continent3,5,6. In addition to processes that change the depth and position of the mantle melting zone, lithospheric brittle-ductile shear zones serve as fundamental conduits to drive the magma ascent to the surface, thereby affecting the location of the volcanic arc front with respect to the magma source in the mantle and crust710. The evolution of lithospheric brittle-ductile structures, in turn, depend on the erosion patterns, besides several other factors such as inherited structures, lithology, and convergence rate1113. As a general rule, under the same tectonic conditions, low erosion rates allow forming high and wide orogenic plateaus, whereas high erosion rates imply the formation of smaller orogenic wedges. The climate-tectonics feedbacks also involve orography such that, if the orogen acts as a barrier to atmospheric circulation, enhanced precipitation and erosion on upwind slopes force a leeward migration of the topography11,13,14. Although the climatic control on the overall orogenic architecture via surface processes has been largely investigated, its control on rock melting and magma transfer, recognized in extensional settings1518, has been essentially overlooked in convergent continental margins. Here, we propose that an orographic leeward migration of the topographic load may entail the upwind migration of the volcanic arc front due to formation of asymmetric crustal shear zones that allow for magma ascent through the crust, a mechanism that explains observations along the northern and southern American Cordillera.

The Cascade Range and southern Andes case studies

The Cascade Range and Volcanic Arc (CVA) are generated by the subduction of the oceanic Juan de Fuca Plate (JDF), a remnant of the larger and long-lived Farallon Plate, beneath the western margin of the North American continent between latitudes 40–50°N (Ref.19,20). Current subduction occurs at an average rate of ~ 4 cm/yr, increasing from ~ 3 to ~ 4.5 cm/yr from south to north21. The subducting plate is ~ 10 Ma old in its central part at ~ 45°N and rejuvenates toward its northern and southern edges (Fig. 1a) providing an example of young, hot and buoyant subducting slab1925. Resistance to subduction and break-up of the JDF Plate into the Explorer and the Gorda microplates is therefore increased since the last ~ 6 Ma in the north and south respectively21,26,27. Asthenospheric upwelling is proposed where break-up between the JDF and the Explorer plates occurs accommodated by the transform Nootka Fault entering into subduction21,27, and along the southern edge of the JDF plate, nearby the Mendocino Triple Junction19,21. Emplacement of volcanic and plutonic rocks in the North Cascades (48–50°N) occurs through compressive and transcurrent shear zones, such as the Straight Creek and Ross Lake fault, that accommodate the accretion of allochthonous terranes since the Mesozoic2830. These shear zones were suggested as preferential conduits for the emplacement of the Chilliwack Batholith, which crystallized from ~ 35 to ~ 4 Ma and is considered of the same magmatic origin as the Quaternary Mt. Baker volcano23,3134 (transect Fig. 1a, b). The volcanic arc in the North Cascades migrates from the northeast towards the southwest since at least ~ 4 Ma. If one considers the intrusive rocks of the Chilliwack Batholith the onset of such trend can be dated back to ~ 12 Ma (Refs.23,3133). Conversely, in the High Cascades (40–48°N) volcanic rocks erupted since the late Miocene are preserved, providing the record of an eastward migration of the arc front23,3134 in a predominantly transtensional tectonic regime that extends into the Basin and Range sector19,20,34,35.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Data compilation from the Cascade Range and the Southern Andes. (a, c) Maps of the Cascade Range and Southern Andes with mean annual precipitation36 and approximated direction of westerlies winds (blue arrows), Quaternary volcanoes60 (red triangles: arc volcanoes; black triangles: within-plate volcanoes21,47), convergence velocity (gray arrows)21,41, isodepths of the top of the slab43 (white lines), Quaternary exhumation rates40,58 (red lines), topographic water divide (blue line), subduction trench (black line) and the age range of oceanic plates25,45. The insets show where the thermochronological data plotted in (b, d) were compiled (Supplementary Table 1a–d) and the dashed lines show the location of the east–west profiles through the Mt. Baker (MB) in CVA, and Osorno (OS) and Tronador (TD) volcanoes in SVZ. Abbreviations: AT: Antarctic Plate; NZ: Nazca Plate; SAM: South American Plate; NAM: North American Plate; JDF: Juan de Fuca Plate; GD: Gorda Plate; PC: Pacific Plate; CTJ: Chile Triple Junction; MTJ: Mendocino Triple Junction; LOFZ: Liquiñe-Ofqui Fault Zone; SCF: Straight Creek Fault, RLF: Ross Lake Fault. (b, d). Top panels show the mean and maximum elevations (water divide location shown by the black downward triangle, blue arrows show the direction of migration of the topographic water divide). Central panels show the mean annual precipitation rates and apatite (U-Th)/He (AHe) and fission tracks (AFT) ages (Supplementary Table 1a, c and references therein). Bottom panels show emplacement ages of intrusive and volcanic rocks based on K–Ar and 40Ar/39Ar in volcanic and intrusive rocks, and zircon fission tracks (ZFT) in intrusive rocks (Supplementary Table 1b, d and references therein), red arrows represent the main sense of volcanic arc migration/narrowing.

The North Cascades interact with westerly Pacific winds, which generate ten times higher precipitation rates on western slopes with respect to the eastern side of the orogen at latitudes where the westerlies are perpendicular to the orogenic belt36 (north of ~ 46° N, Fig. 1a). This precipitation pattern is consistent with focused rock exhumation in the western flank of the North Cascades since ~ 10 Ma (Fig. 1b), suggesting that orographic effects are long term features in western North America11,14,3740. While Mesozoic to Tertiary plutonic rocks and metamorphic basement are exhumed in the North Cascades due to orographic erosion, Tertiary to Quaternary volcanics are still preserved in the High Cascades23,30,31,33,37. Accordingly, the topographic water divide north of ~ 46°N is 40–70 km more to the east and the average elevation is lower by about 500–1000 m than in the southern sector (Fig. 1a, b). The water divide migration is supposed to have occurred during the Plio-Quaternary14. Quaternary volcanoes north of ~ 46°N commonly overlie slab isodepths < 100 km and are systematically located west of the topographic water divide (Fig. 1a). Quaternary volcanoes south of ~ 46°N, instead, overlie slab isodepths ≥ 100 km and are found along the topographic water divide.

The Southern Andes Volcanic Zone (SVZ) is generated by the subduction of the Nazca oceanic plate below the western margin of the South American continent between latitudes 33–46°S (Fig. 1c). Subduction occurs at an average rate of ~ 7 cm/yr (Ref.41) with an average slab dip angle of ~ 25° (Refs.42,43) since the late Miocene44. The age of the subducting oceanic plate decreases southward from ~ 40 Ma to present-day where the Chile Ridge is currently entering into subduction at the Chile Triple Junction (CTJ, Ref.45). In the southern Central Andes (33–38°S) several fold-and-thrust belts accommodate deformation and volcanic emplacement since at least the Miocene44,46,47. In the northern Patagonian Andes (38–46°S) the general compressive tectonic regime changes to transpressive accommodated by the major strike-slip Liquiñe-Ofqui Fault Zone (LOFZ) active since at least ~ 5 Ma, with denudation ages between ~ 16–10 Ma suggesting an earlier activation4851. In this sector, the Patagonian Batholith is exposed, which allows for reconstructions of the magmatic arc migration since the Cretaceous52. Conversely, batholiths are not exposed in the Central Andes where deformed volcanic and sedimentary rocks are preserved at the surface44,46. Eruption and emplacement ages of volcanic and intrusive rocks south of 40°S suggest a westward migration and narrowing of the southern volcanic front by around 50 km into the region of the LOFZ since at least the Pleistocene47,5355 (e.g., Tronador-Osorno transect, Fig. 1c, d).

Similarly to the Cascade Range, south of 40°S the SVZ interacts with westerly Pacific winds perpendicular to the orogenic belt associated with significantly increased precipitation on the western slopes of the Southern Andes36 (Fig. 1c). Exhumation ages younger than ~ 10 Ma are recorded in the western part of the orogen, whereas systematically older exhumation ages are recorded on the drier eastern peaks of the orogen49,50,56 (Fig. 1d). An abrupt increase in exhumation rates since ~ 7 Ma is recorded in the Patagonian Andes, pinpointing the onset of Andean glaciations40,49,5658. An erosion hotspot at 42–46°S is observed in thermochronologic data 2 ± 2 Ma (Fig. 1c, Ref.58). In addition, an overall decrease in mean elevation from about 3 km to 1 km and an ~ 70 km eastward migration of the topographic water divide further testify the long-term regional orographic effects on the Andean topography56,59. Quaternary stratovolcanoes overlie slab isodepths ≤ 100 km south of 40°S and are systematically west of the topographic water divide (Fig. 1c) whereas, north of 40°S, they overlie slab isodepths > 100 km and are found along the main topographic divide.

The observed topographic leeward and volcanic arc front windward migrations, shared by both the CVA and SVZ despite the different tectonic history, suggest a potential climatic control via erosion on the long-term evolution and location of these continental volcanic arcs. Hereafter, we assess the plausibility of a coupling between crustal magma transfer and climate-controlled erosion.

Coupled geodynamic and erosion numerical modeling

We use a thermo-mechanical (visco-elasto-plastic) geodynamic numerical model coupled to the stream power erosion model (see Methods) to test the hypothesis of an upwind (i.e., westward) migration of the magma ascent and volcanic arc front forced by orography-driven topographic change. The model accounts for the continental crust, upper mantle, asthenosphere (rheological properties are shown in Supplementary Table 2) and a wedge-shaped topography up to 2.5 km high. In a first set of numerical experiments, we impose the initial topography directly above or shifted to the right with respect to a central mantle melting zone (MMZ), analogue to the region where partial melting is generated at ~ 100 km depth feeding crustal magma reservoirs and surface volcanoes14 (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figs. 14), and no erosion is imposed. This first set of numerical experiments allows us to assess changes in the magma ascent prior to and after the topographic landscape has adjusted to an orographic erosional gradient. In a second set of simulations we impose asymmetric surface erosion, with stream power erosion rates being one order of magnitude higher on left-facing slopes than on right-facing slopes. In these experiments, we consider an initial topography directly above the MMZ (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Figs. 58), consistently with observed exhumation rate patterns from the CVA14,3740 and SVZ40,49,5658. The local drainage areas and topographic slopes, continuously adjusting to the progressive crustal deformation due to the emplacement of magma, modulate the erosion rates11,61 (see Eq. 13 in Methods), allowing us to address the transient evolution of magma ascent as the topography adjusts to orographic erosion. In order to isolate the effects of climate-driven orography over the crustal trajectories of magma emplacement and ascent towards the surface, we did not impose any tectonic convergence, subduction of oceanic plate, crustal accretion nor sedimentation in these experiments, which simply evolve by upwelling of buoyant magma into the crust until depletion of the MMZ over about 0.3 Ma. This is obviously an oversimplification, but it reduces the degree of complexity of the model and removes any effect from poorly constrained parameters (e.g. spatial–temporal changes in convergence rate or thermal/mechanical/rheological properties). Although this approach does not allow to reproduce the geologic history of the CVA and SVZ in our simulations, it enables us to explore plausible orographic effects on the joint evolution of the topographic landscapes, crustal structures and magma ascent observed in these settings, that is our ultimate goal. We obviously bear this limitation in mind when framing our results in the contexts of the CVA and SVZ.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Numerical outcomes of the first set of simulations (Ch = 35 km, Lh = 100 km, Dmc = 20 km). (a, c) Initial and final lithologic and thermal distribution of the reference simulations with initial central and lateral topography. The color layering in the crust shows the deformation and the vertical exaggeration of the topographic profiles is 3x. (b, d) Initial and final cumulative bulk strain of the same numerical simulations shown in (a, c). Note the final symmetric system of brittle-ductile structures accommodating the rise of magma to near the surface with initial central topography (a, b). Note the final asymmetric system of brittle-ductile structures, leading to left-verging magma ascent with initial lateral (shifted rightward) topography (c, d). δd=dr-dl, where dr and dl are defined in the text. SA—sticky air; C—crust; LM—lithospheric mantle; A—asthenosphere; MA—molten asthenosphere; MMZ: mantle melting zone.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Initial, intermediate and final steps of selected numerical simulation with asymmetric erosion from the second set of simulations (Ch = 35 km, Lh = 100 km, Dmc = 20 km). Topographic profile (8 × vertical exaggeration) and erosion rates (top panels), lithologic and thermal distribution (middle panels), and cumulative bulk strain (lower panels) of the initial state with central topography (a), early transient state (b), and advanced transient state (c). Note the initial water divide (white downward triangle) migrating to the right throughout the simulation (black downward triangle) due to asymmetric erosion and the final asymmetric system of brittle-ductile structures, leading to lateral magma ascent toward the opposite side of the initial topography. Abbreviations are the same as in Fig. 2.

The model domain extends over 200 × 120 km (horizontal, x, and vertical, y, dimensions), resolved by 201 × 61 grid points respectively, and is distributed on an irregular Eulerian grid that accounts for a maximum resolution of 1 km along the x and y directions in the upper-central part of the model domain. 400 × 400 Lagrangian markers are randomly distributed along the x and y dimensions and used for advecting the material properties16,62,63 (Supplementary Table 2). The material properties carried by Lagrangian markers are then interpolated onto the Eulerian grid via a 4th order Runge–Kutta interpolation scheme62,63. An internal free surface is simulated through a 10 -km thick layer of sticky air62. The velocity boundary conditions are free slip at all boundaries (x = 0 and x = 200 km; y = 0 and y = 120 km). The initial temperature gradient is piece-wise linear resulting from an adiabatic temperature gradient of 0.5 °C/km in the asthenosphere64 and thermal boundary conditions fixed at 0 °C at the surface and 1327 °C at the lower boundary, with nil horizontal heat flux across the vertical boundaries63. Temperature is set to 1327 °C in the MMZ, that is initially circular with 20 km diameter and imposed in the center of the model domain at 100 km depth, consistent with estimates from the CVA21,65 and SV1,66,67. The upward transfer and emplacement of magma into the crust occurs by buoyancy through a 3 -km wide magmatic channel, which allows for a simplified representation of magmatic percolation by hydrofractures, diffusion, porous flow, and reactive flow through the rheologically stronger mantle lithosphere63. The bulk composition of the MMZ is ultramafic, but enrichment by 25% mafic melt is prescribed in the magmatic channel63. The viscosity, ηductile (Eq. 3 in Methods), of partially molten rocks (with ξ > 0.1, Eq. 10 in Methods) is assigned a low constant value of 1016 Pa s, and the ηductile upper limit is set to 1025 Pa s (Refs.16,63,64). The topographic wedge measures 2.5 km in simulations with central topography, and 1.5 km in simulations with lateral topography, consistent with the observed orography-related change in mean altitude in the CVA and SVZ (Refs.38,39,56,59).

The parametric study focuses on three main parameters. First, the crustal thickness (Ch) varies between 45 and 35 km, consistently with literature values42,65. Second, the initial depth of the magmatic channel upper tip (Dmc), which assumes values of 15, 20, and 25 km to account for efficient/inefficient magma transfer through the crust. Values are based on estimates of the depth of the regional brittle-ductile transition (~ 20 km, Refs.42,51,65), assuming that the rheology of the upper plate crust exerts a primary control on the efficiency of magma transfer. Third, the thickness of the thermal lithosphere (Lh) varies between 90 and 100 km allowing us to account for variations of the elastic lithosphere between ~ 55 and ~ 65 km, as estimated from the regional geophysical data42,65.

Results

Results from the first set of numerical experiments show that the emplacement of magma into the crust is accommodated by structures that affect both the brittle upper crust and the ductile lower crust. Simulations that account for an initial central topography allow the formation of symmetric crustal magma reservoirs and structures with respect to the MMZ, feeding volcanoes on both sides of the topographic wedge (Fig. 2a, b and Supplementary Figs. 14). Simulations that account for an initial lateral topography develop highly asymmetric crustal magma reservoirs and structures, feeding volcanoes on the opposite side of the initial topographic wedge (Fig. 2c, d and Supplementary Figs. 14). We define the degree of asymmetry of the resultant structures (shown by the cumulative bulk strain in Figs. 2b, d and 3) as δd=dr-dl, where dr and dl are the maximum horizontal distance between the center of the model domain and the surface fault tips to the right and left, respectively. Increasing positive and negative δd values indicate increasing asymmetry toward the right and left of the system, respectively (results in Table 1 and Fig. 4). For all tested configurations, a thin crust (Ch = 35 km) and a cold lithosphere (Lh = 100 km) facilitate the brittle strain (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figs. 1, 2). When the initial topography is lateral, the leftward asymmetry of the strain and magma ascent is enhanced (Figs. 2c–d, 3, and Supplementary Figs. 1, 2). When the initial depth of the magmatic channel upper tip is deep (Dmc = 25 km), the viscous strain in the lower crust accommodates the emplacement of magma, inhibiting the formation of brittle upper crustal structures and the rise of magma to the near surface (Supplementary Figs. 14). When Dmc is shallow (15 km), the magma rises easily to the surface through brittle structures near the center of the model, resulting in relatively small values of δd (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Figs. 14). When Dmc is intermediate (20 km), brittle-ductile structures cross through the crust reaching the surface at further distance from the center of the model (Figs. 23, and Supplementary Figs. 1, 3, 4). In the reference model (i.e., Ch = 35 km, Lh = 100 km, and Dmc = 20 km, Fig. 2), an initial lateral topography leads to δd-45 km (i.e., leftward asymmetry), comparable to the observed westward migration of the magmatic arcs in the natural case studies (Fig. 1). We further remark that, in simulations with initial central topography, a symmetric set of thrusts rooted in the region of magma emplacement form a pop-up structure similar to those observed in the northern sector of the SVZ46,47. In the simulations with initial lateral topography, the asymmetric thrust verging towards the west is similar to the “Western Patagonian Thrust” proposed by Ref.51.

Table 1.

Results of the parametric study.

Ch (km) Lh (km) Dmc (km) Initial topography Orographic Erosion dl (km) dr (km) δd = dr − dl (km)
35 90 15 Central No 65 60 -5
35 90 20 Central No 70 65 -5
35 90 25 Central No 10 10 0
35 90 15 Lateral No 50 10 -40
35 90 20 Lateral No 50 5 -45
35 90 25 Cateral No 64 64 0
35 100 15 Central No 15 15 0
35 100 20 Central No 65 65 0
35 100 25 Central No 65 65 0
35 100 15 Lateral No 15 5 -10
35 100 20 Lateral No 45 0 -45
35 100 25 Lateral No 50 10 -40
45 90 15 Central No 90 100 10
45 90 20 Central No 3 13 10
45 90 25 Central No 0 0 0
45 90 15 Lateral No 90 25 -65
45 90 20 Lateral No 25 5 -20
45 90 25 Lateral No 25 5 -20
45 100 15 Central No 90 100 10
45 100 20 Central No 90 100 10
45 100 25 Central No 0 0 0
45 100 15 Lateral No 90 10 -80
45 100 20 Lateral No 90 0 -90
45 100 25 Lateral No 30 5 -25
35 90 15 Central Yes 93 3 -90
35 90 20 Central Yes 95 10 -85
35 90 25 Central Yes 25 0 -25
35 100 15 Central Yes 70 10 -60
35 100 20 Central Yes 70 0 -70
35 100 25 Central Yes 70 10 -60
45 90 15 Central Yes 10 10 0
45 90 20 Central Yes 8 5 -3
45 90 25 Central Yes 0 0 0
45 100 15 Central Yes 13 5 -8
45 100 20 Central Yes 5 5 0
45 100 25 Central Yes 0 0 0

Ch Crustal thickness, Lh Lithospheric thickness, Dmc Initial depth of the magmatic channel upper tip dl and dr Maximum horizontal distances between the center of the model domain and the surface fault tips in surface to the left and to the right, respectively; δd=dr-dl is the degree of the asymmetry of the accumulated bulk strain (negative values show asymmetry to the left).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Results of the parametric study. Initial depth of the magmatic channel upper tip (Dmc) vs. δd (see text), with initial central (a) and lateral (b) topography. Triangles in panel (a) are the results of simulations with asymmetric erosion (i.e., second set of simulations, see text). Negative values show asymmetry to the left of the mantle melting zone (MMZ) (i.e., central vertical axis of the model domain). Values of Ch and Lh are shown in the legend, cold and hot colors show simulations with thin and thick crust, respectively. See results of simulations in Figs. 2, 3, Supplementary Figs. 18, and Table 1.

Results from the second set of simulations show that the progressive rightward migration of the topographic divide leads to negative δd values when Ch = 35 km (Figs. 3, 4, and Supplementary Figs. 5, 6). The topography migrates toward the right ~ 20 km in ~ 0.3 Ma (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Figs. 5, 6), roughly consistent with the eastward migration of the water divide by ~ 50–70 km observed in the study regions during the Plio-Quaternary. Uplift of additional topographic peaks on the left side of the model domain occurs due to left-verging thrusts accommodating the magma ascent. We associate this topography to that of volcanic edifices west of the main topographic divide (Fig. 1). When the crust is thick (Ch = 45 km) the viscous strain accommodates almost entirely the magma emplacement and limited bulk strain accumulates along shallow brittle faults that tend to be symmetric (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Figs. 7, 8). Accordingly, no topographic relief is generated on the left side of the model domain and the topography migrates to the right by ~ 10 km in ~ 0.3 Ma (Supplementary Figs. 7, 8).

Discussion

The break-up of the Farallon plate into the Juan de Fuca and Nazca plates in the early Miocene established a kinematic configuration similar to the present day in terms of slab partitioning and convergence rates along the American Cordillera20,44. Although the onset of the eastward migration of the topographic water divide in the CVA and the SVZ is uncertain, systematically younger exhumation ages on the western slopes of both the North Cascades and northern Patagonian Andes (Fig. 1) suggests that orographic effects were already established in the latest Miocene3739,56,57, leading to the formation of the current landform throughout the Pleistocene14,39,58,59. Although low-temperature thermochronometric ages constrain the onset of enhanced erosion between ~ 10 and ~ 6 Ma in the North Cascades and the Southern Andes, respectively37,38,56, large uncertainties exist about the paleo position of topographic water divide and paleo-elevations in general. A similar issue pertains to the onset of arc front migration, which can be only roughly constrained from batholith ages31,52, but precise information about the exact position of the paleo volcanic arc front is lacking. Our modeling results show a fast response of the crustal strain and magmatic plumbing system to orographic erosion, which adjust to topographic changes in just a few hundreds of thousands of years (Figs. 2 and 3).

In the CVA, the present-day clockwise rotation of the Oregon and Washington blocks and the counterclockwise displacement of the volcanic front since the Miocene have been ascribed to differential along strike rollback of the Juan de Fuca slab20,31,34,35. However, since the magmatic source follows the rollbacking slab1,46, this model requires some unjustified degree of decoupling between rollback and arc front migration34. In the North Cascades, the increase in the rate of arc front migration towards the southwest since ~ 4 Ma (Refs.3133) requires faster slab rollback rates than during the late Miocene, difficult to reconcile with the transpressive regime and present northeastward displacements of the Washington block31,34. The presence of slab-derived magmas (i.e., adakites68) in southernmost and northernmost volcanoes of the CVZ may suggest shallower (i.e., closer to the trench) magma production near the breakup of the Juan de Fuca Plate into the Gorda and Explorer plates22,24,68. However, if the thermal gradient along the strike of the subduction system set alone the surface location of the volcanic arc, trench-ward migration of the volcanic front would be observed both in the northern and southern sectors of the CVA. Thus, the opposite sense of arc front migration in the North Cascades and in the High Cascades34 can hardly be explained by along-strike slab age and/or thermal changes alone. Since Quaternary volcanoes are emplaced over fault systems, orographic interactions with westerly Pacific winds (Fig. 1a, b) and the mechanistic link between asymmetric erosion and crustal structures accommodating the magma ascent (Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5) appear as a suitable along-strike differential forcing to drive the observed latitudinal arc migration front trend reversal. Magnetotelluric data (Fig. 5) show westward dipping magmatic plumbing systems in the North Cascades69, consistent with our modeling results (Figs. 2c, d and 3) and an orographic control on the location of volcanic arc front.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Schematic representation of the orographic forcing on the location of continental volcanic arcs. Cross-sections illustrate the magma ascent from a sub-lithospheric mantle melting zone (MMZ) to surface volcanoes (red triangles) trough newly-formed or reactivated structures. (a) Analogy for orogens and volcanic arcs without orographic erosion, and b) with orographic erosion gradient. In the latter case, the deformation is enhanced on the windward side and so is the magma ascent through the brittle-ductile structures. (c) Schematic representation of the crustal magma reservoirs interpreted from magnetotelluric data underneath the Osorno volcano showing the marked westward magma ascent in agreement with our modeling results and the proposed orographic effect on the location of the volcanic arc front (modified after Ref.70).

In the Southern Andes, a Plio-Quaternary magmatic arc narrowing toward the west has been related to the steepening of a formerly shallow slab55 or a decrease in convergence velocity54. South of ~ 40°S, Plio-Pleistocene strain localization along the transpressive system of the LOFZ has been ascribed to oblique convergence of the Nazca Plate and the CTJ approaching its current position4850, driving the ascent of magmas and setting the observed trench-ward deflection of the SVZ8,48,49,54 (Fig. 1c). Geophysical imaging of the deep crust and mantle show that the crustal magma reservoirs of the Osorno volcano are located up to 10 km east of the volcanic edifice70, consistent with our modeling results and hypothesis of focused orographic erosion facilitating the strain and magma ascent across the windward side of orogens1113 (Fig. 5). Field evidence regarding the presence of the west vergent “Western Patagonian Thrust”51 reinforces our proposal of asymmetric faults assisting magma ascent towards the west. Also in agreement with previous studies8, our models indicate that orographic erosion of a thin crust facilitates the formation of major structures, suggesting that orographic erosion may have contributed to the activation, or re-activation, of the LOFZ. Heat advection from the younger slab and the CTJ in the south can likely enhance this effect. The Nazca Plate is younger toward its southern edge (CTJ) and thus the thermal regime of the subduction is likely higher in the northern Patagonian Andes53,67. However, no slab-derived magmas are found in the whole SVZ8,52,66,71 and the depth of the source of partial melting is unlikely to change significantly along the strike of the belt1,52,67. Differences in magma composition along the strike of the SVZ show a tendency toward more mafic magmas in the south. This trend can be simply explained by a reduced crust-magma interaction due to the thinner crust in this sector8,66,71, which also promotes the orographic forcing on the magma ascent proposed here (Fig. 4).

We propose a common explanation to the westward migration of the volcanic arc fronts in the North Cascades and the northern Patagonian Andes, located several thousands of kilometers apart and in different tectonic/structural settings, by the shared orographic interactions between topography and westerly Pacific winds (Fig. 5). The climatic control on magmatism would occur not only through a forcing from ice building-melting and erosion on the magma production15,72, but also through orography and topographic change facilitating crustal strain and magma transfer verging toward the region of enhanced precipitation and erosion. Because volcanic arcs provide a substantial contribution to the evolution of climate across timescales, this recognition provides additional evidence of the tight coupling between climate, surface processes, magmatism, and plate tectonics73,74.

Methods

Thermomechanical model

The numerical model is based on the finite differences with marker-in-cell technique and incorporates temperature-dependent rheologies for solid and partially-molten rocks63. The model accounts for (1) mechanical, (2) visco-elasto-plastic rheological, (3) thermal, and (4) partial rock melting components. A short description of the model components is provided hereafter. Additional details and full description of the numerical techniques are provided elsewhere16,62,63.

Mechanical component

The continuity equation,

ρt+ρv=0, 1

where ρ is the local density, tistime,v is the velocity vector, and is the divergence operator, allows for the conservation of mass during the displacement of a geological continuum.

The momentum equation,

σijxi+ρgi=ρvit+vjvixj, 2

where σij is the stress tensor, xi and xj are spatial coordinates, and gi is the i-th component of the gravity vector, describes the changes in velocity of an object in the gravity field due to internal and external forces.

Rheological component

Ductile deformation is thermally activated and occurs by viscous flow. Diffusion and dislocation creep are computed based on material shear viscosity62,63, ηductile, defined as:

1ηductile=1ηdiff+1ηdisl, 3

with

ηdiff=η02σcrn-1expEa+PVaRT,

and

ηdisl=η01n2expEa+PVanRTε˙II1n-1,

where ηdiff and ηdisl are the shear viscosity for diffusion and dislocation creep, respectively, η0 is the material static viscosity, σcr is the diffusion-dislocation transition critical stress, n is the stress exponent, Ea is the activation energy, Va is the activation volume, P is pressure, R is the gas constant, T is temperature, and εII˙ is the second invariant of the strain rate tensor. Then, the viscous deviatoric strain rate tensor, ε˙ijviscous, is computed as:

ε˙ijviscous=12ηductileσij+δijηbulkε˙kk=12ηdiffσij+12ηdislσij+δijηbulkε˙kk, 4

where σij is the deviatoric stress tensor,δij is the Kronecker delta, ε˙kk is the volumetric strain rate (e.g., related to phase transformations), ηbulk is the bulk viscosity.

Elastic deformation is reversible and assumes proportionality of stress and strain. The elastic deviatoric strain rate tensor, ε˙ijelastic, is computed as:

ε˙ijelastic=12μDσijDt, 5

where μ is the shear modulus and DσijDt is the objective co-rotational time derivative of the deviatoric stress tensor.

Plastic (or brittle) localised deformation occurs at low temperature in the upper part of the lithosphere, after reaching the absolute shear stress limit, σyield, is defined as:

σyield=C+sinφP, 6

where C is cohesion and φ is the effective internal friction angle. The plastic strain rate tensor, ε˙ijplastic, is then computed as:

ε˙ijplastic=0forσII<σyield,ε˙ijplastic=Xσij2σIIforσIIσyield, 7

where X is the plastic multiplier which satisfies the plastic yielding condition σII=σyield.

At the lithospheric scale, all deformation mechanisms occur jointly and the overall visco-elasto-plastic rock strain rate tensor, ε˙ijbulk, is defined as:

ε˙ijbulk=ε˙ijviscous+ε˙ijelastic+ε˙ijplastic 8

Thermal component

Heat conservation during advective and conductive heat transfer in the continuum is computed by the energy equation:

ρCPDTDt-divcT+vT=Hr+Hs+Ha+Hl, 9

where CP is specific heat capacity at a constant P, c is the thermal conductivity, Hr+Hs+Ha+Hl are the volumetric heat productions by radiogenic, shear, adiabatic and latent heat, respectively. HaDPDt, Hs=σijε˙ijviscous, and Hr and Hl are the radiogenic and latent heat productions (defined in Supplementary Table 2).

Partial melting component

Partial melting occurs between the wet solidus, Ts, and dry liquidus, Tl, of the considered lithologies7577 (Supplementary Table 2). ξ is the volumetric fraction of melt that increases linearly with T at a constant P (Ref.64), so that,

ξ=0atTTsξ=T-TsTl-TsatTs<T<Tlξ=1atTTl 10

The effective density, ρeff, of partially molten rocks is then computed by16,63:

ρeff=ρs1-ξ+ξρl0ρs0, 11

where ρl0 and ρs0 are the standard densities of solid and molten rocks, respectively. The solid rock density, ρs, is calculated as63:

ρs=ρo1+βP-P0×1-αT-T0, 12

where β is compressibility, α is thermal expansion and ρo, P0, and T0 are density, pressure and temperature of rocks at surface conditions.

Erosion model

During the fluvial incision of an uplifting topography the erosion rate, e˙, depends primarily on channel slope, river discharge and rock type61. An empirical relationship was derived11,61, such that:

e˙=dzdt=kAmdzdxn 13

where z is the elevation, A is the basin drainage area taken as a proxy for river discharge, dzdx is the magnitude of the local topographic slope, and k, m, and n are empirical parameters, usually determined by fitting models to river longitudinal profiles. While k is used as a scaling constant, different values of m and n lead to differences in the shape of river profiles, but commonly used values (e.g., 0.3 < m < 0.5 and n ≈ 1) predict realistic concave-up profiles such as those observed along bedrock rivers incising uplifting topographies11,61,78. Although simplistic, Eq. (13) captures the main physical processes and parameter dependencies and, most important for this study, it provides the feedback mechanisms between tectonic uplift and erosion. Tectonic uplift increases slope, and the rise of topography increases drainage area, both leading to an increase in erosion rates.

Integration on a discrete topography of the top of the lithosphere allows for Eq. (13) to be solved numerically, thereby assessing surface elevation changes in response to the tectonic strain and fluvial incision11,16. At each time step, the surface load changes associated with modifications of the modelled landscape are computed. The orographic enhancement of precipitation, and hence fluvial erosion, is included in the surface processes model by assigning different k values (Eq. 13) on negatively (left-facing) and positively (right-facing) sloping topography.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

This work is part of the project Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018–2022, of the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of Milano-Bicocca, funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, MIUR. V.A.P.M. acknowledge the Erasmus Program for the period in the Institute des Sciences de la Terre, at the Université Grenoble Alpes, and the “Tectonics, Reliefs & Basins team” support in this last institution. P.S. was supported by the Italian (Rita Levi Montalcini grant, DM 694–26/2017) funded by MIUR. P.G.V. acknowledges funding from the French ANR-PIA program (ANR-18- MPGA-0006). Andrés Echaurren and four anonymous reviewers provided useful comments that helped us improving the manuscript.

Author contributions

V.A.P.M. contributed to the development of the initial scientific question, performed the study and wrote the manuscript. P.S. conceived the initial scientific question, helped with the data interpretation and numerical investigation, and wrote the manuscript. C.S. contributed to the development of the initial scientific questions, helped with the interpretation of the geological data and numerical models, and contributed to manuscript writing. T.S.-L. helped with the compilation and interpretation of the geological data, and contributed to manuscript writing. P.G.V. helped with interpretation of the geological data and manuscript writing.

Data availability

Supplementary Tables and Figures are available for this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-26158-2.

References

  • 1.England P, Engdahl R, Thatcher W. Systematic variation in the depths of slabs beneath arc volcanoes. Geophys. J. Int. 2004;156:377–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2003.02132.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.England P, Wilkins C. A simple analytical approximation to the temperature structure in subduction zones. Geophys. J. Int. 2004;159:1138–1154. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02419.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Syracuse EM, Abers GA. Global compilation of variations in slab depth beneath arc volcanoes and implications. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2006;7:1–18. doi: 10.1029/2005GC001045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.England PC, Katz RF. Melting above the anhydrous solidus controls the location of volcanic arcs. Nature. 2010;467:700–703. doi: 10.1038/nature09417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heuret A, Lallemand S. Plate motions, slab dynamics and back-arc deformation. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2005;149:31–51. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2004.08.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gianni GM, Luján SP. Geodynamic controls on magmatic arc migration and quiescence. Earth Sci. Rev. 2021;218:103676. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103676. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Petford N, Cruden AR, McCaffrey KJW, Vigneresse JL. Granite magma formation, transport and emplacement in the Earth’s crust. Nature. 2000;408:669–673. doi: 10.1038/35047000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cembrano J, Lara L. The link between volcanism and tectonics in the southern volcanic zone of the Chilean Andes: A review. Tectonophysics. 2009;471:96–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2009.02.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Reyes EC, et al. Subduction zone fluids and arc magmas conducted by lithospheric deformed regions beneath the central Andes. Sci. Rep. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02430-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maccaferri F, Acocella V, Rivalta E. How the differential load induced by normal fault scarps controls the distribution of monogenic volcanism. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2015;42:7507–7512. doi: 10.1002/2015GL065638. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Willett SD. Orogeny and orography: The effects of erosion on the structure of mountain belts. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 1999;104:28957–28981. doi: 10.1029/1999JB900248. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Horton BK. Erosional control on the geometry and kinematics of thrust belt development in the central Andes. Tectonics. 1999;18:1292–1304. doi: 10.1029/1999TC900051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Whipple KX. The influence of climate on the tectonic evolution of mountain belts. Nat. Geosci. 2009;2:97–104. doi: 10.1038/ngeo413. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Simon-Labric T, et al. Low-temperature thermochronologic signature of rangedivide migration and breaching in the North Cascades. Lithosphere. 2014;6:473–482. doi: 10.1130/L382.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jull M, McKenzie D. The effect of deglaciation on mantle melting beneath Iceland. J. Geophys. Res. 1996;101:21815–21828. doi: 10.1029/96JB01308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sternai P. Surface processes forcing on extensional rock melting. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63920-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sternai P, et al. Effects of asthenospheric flow and orographic precipitation on continental rifting. Tectonophysics. 2021;820:229120. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2021.229120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stüwe K, Robl J, Turab SA, Sternai P, Stuart FM. Feedbacks between sea-floor spreading, trade winds and precipitation in the Southern Red Sea. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32293-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Severinghaus J, Atwater T. Cenozoic geometry and thermal state of the subducting slabs beneath western North America. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1990;176:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schellart WP, Stegman DR, Farrington RJ, Freeman J, Moresi L. Cenozoic tectonics of Western North America controlled by evolving width of Farallon slab. Science. 2010;329:316–319. doi: 10.1126/science.1190366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Long MD. The Cascadia Paradox: Mantle flow and slab fragmentation in the Cascadia subduction system. J. Geodyn. 2016;102:151–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2016.09.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yogodzinski GM, et al. Geochemical evidence for the melting of subducting oceanic lithosphere at plate edges. Nature. 2001;409:500–503. doi: 10.1038/35054039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mullen EK, Weis D, Marsh NB, Martindale M. Primitive arc magma diversity: New geochemical insights in the Cascade Arc. Chem. Geol. 2017;448:43–70. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Defant MJ, Drummond MS. Mount St. Helens: Potential example of the partial melting of the subducted lithosphere in a volcanic arc. Geology. 1993;21:547–550. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021&#x0003c;0547:MSHPEO&#x0003e;2.3.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wilson DS. Confidence intervals for motion and deformation of the Juan de Fuca Plate. J. Geophys. Res. 1993;98:16053. doi: 10.1029/93JB01227. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rohr KMM, Tryon AJ. Pacific-North America plate boundary reorganization in response to a change in relative plate motion: Offshore Canada. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2010;11:1–26. doi: 10.1029/2009GC003019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mullen EK, Weis D. Evidence for trench-parallel mantle flow in the northern Cascade Arc from basalt geochemistry. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2015;414:100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.01.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brown EH. Structural geology and accretionary history of the Northwest Cascades system, Washington and British Columbia (USA, Canada) Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1987;99:201–214. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1987)99&#x0003c;201:SGAAHO&#x0003e;2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dickinson WR. Evolution of the North American Cordillera. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2004;32:13–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120257. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Haugerud R, et al. Geologic map of the north Cascade range, Washington. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 2009;120:2940. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mullen EK, Paquette JL, Tepper JH, McCallum IS. Temporal and spatial evolution of Northern Cascade Arc magmatism revealed by LA–ICP–MS U-Pb zircon dating. Can. J. Earth Sci. 2018;55:443–462. doi: 10.1139/cjes-2017-0167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hildreth W, Fierstein J, Lanphere M. Eruptive history and geochronology of the Mount Baker volcanic field, Washington. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 2003;115:729–764. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(2003)115&#x0003c;0729:EHAGOT&#x0003e;2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.du Bray EA, John DA. Petrologic, tectonic, and metallogenic evolution of the Ancestral Cascades magmatic arc, Washington, Oregon, and northern California. Geosphere. 2011;7:1102–1133. doi: 10.1130/GES00669.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wells RE, McCaffrey R. Steady rotation of the Cascade arc. Geology. 2013;41:1027–1030. doi: 10.1130/G34514.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Priest GR. Volcanic and tectonic evolution of the Cascade Volcanic Arc, central Oregon. J. Geophys. Res. 1990;95:19583. doi: 10.1029/JB095iB12p19583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2005;25:1965–1978. doi: 10.1002/joc.1276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Reiners PW, et al. Late Miocene exhumation and uplift of the Washington Cascade Range. Geology. 2002;30:767–770. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030&#x0003c;0767:LMEAUO&#x0003e;2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Reiners PW, Ehlers TA, Mitchell SG, Montgomery DR. Coupled spatial variations in precipitation and long-term erosion rates across the Washington Cascades. Nature. 2003;426:645–647. doi: 10.1038/nature02111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mitchell SG, Montgomery DR. Polygenetic topography of the Cascade Range, Washington State, USA. Am. J. Sci. 2006;306:736–768. doi: 10.2475/09.2006.03. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Herman F, et al. Worldwide acceleration of mountain erosion under a cooling climate. Nature. 2013;504:423–426. doi: 10.1038/nature12877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.DeMets C, Gordon RG, Argus DF. Geologically current plate motions. Geophys. J. Int. 2010;181:1–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04491.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tassara A, Echaurren A. Anatomy of the Andean subduction zone: Three-dimensional density model upgraded and compared against global-scale models. Geophys. J. Int. 2012;189:161–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05397.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hayes GP, et al. Slab2, a comprehensive subduction zone geometry model. Science. 2018;362:58–61. doi: 10.1126/science.aat4723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Maloney KT, Clarke GL, Klepeis KA, Quevedo L. The Late Jurassic to present evolution of the Andean margin: Drivers and the geological record. Tectonics. 2013;32:1049–1065. doi: 10.1002/tect.20067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tebbens SF, et al. The Chile ridge: A tectonic framework. J. Geophys. 1997;102:12035–12059. doi: 10.1029/96JB02581. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Giambiagi L, Mescua J, Bechis F, Tassara A, Hoke G. Thrust belts of the southern Central Andes: Along-strike variations in shortening, topography, crustal geometry, and denudation. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 2012;124:1339–1351. doi: 10.1130/B30609.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Folguera A, Ramos VA. Repeated eastward shifts of arc magmatism in the Southern Andes: A revision to the long-term pattern of Andean uplift and magmatism. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 2011;32:531–546. doi: 10.1016/j.jsames.2011.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cembrano J, et al. Late Cenozoic transpressional ductile deformation north of the Nazca-South America-Antarctica triple junction. Tectonophysics. 2002;354:289–314. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00388-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Thomson SN. Late Cenozoic geomorphic and tectonic evolution of the Patagonian Andes between latitudes 42°S and 46°S: An appraisal based on fission-track results from the transpressional intra-arc Liquiñe-Ofqui fault zone. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 2002;114:1159–1173. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(2002)114&#x0003c;1159:LCGATE&#x0003e;2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Adriasola AC, Thomson SN, Brix MR, Hervé F, Stöckhert B. Postmagmatic cooling and late Cenozoic denudation of the North Patagonian Batholith in the Los Lagos region of Chile, 41°-42°15′S. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2006;95:504–528. doi: 10.1007/s00531-005-0027-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Echaurren A, et al. Fore-to-retroarc crustal structure of the north Patagonian margin: How is shortening distributed in Andean-type orogens? Glob. Planet. Change. 2022;209:103734. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103734. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Castro A, et al. Secular variations of magma source compositions in the North Patagonian batholith from the Jurassic to Tertiary: Was mélange melting involved? Geosphere. 2021;17:766–785. doi: 10.1130/GES02338.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mella M, et al. Petrogenesis of the Pleistocene Tronador volcanic group, Andean southern volcanic zone. Rev. Geol. Chile. 2005;32:131–154. doi: 10.4067/S0716-02082005000100008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lara LE, Folguera A. The Pliocene to Quaternary narrowing of the Southern Andean volcanic arc between 37° and 41°s latitude. Spec. Pap. Geol. Soc. Am. 2006;407:299–315. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Haschke M, et al. Central and southern Andean Tectonic evolution inferred from Arc Magmatism. In: Oncken O, Chong G, Franz G, Giese P, Götze H-J, Ramos VA, Strecker MR, Wigger P, et al., editors. The Andes. Springer; 2006. pp. 337–353. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Thomson SN, et al. Glaciation as a destructive and constructive control on mountain building. Nature. 2010;467:313–317. doi: 10.1038/nature09365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Glodny J, Gräfe K, Echtler H, Rosenau M. Mesozoic to Quaternary continental margin dynamics in South-Central Chile (36–42°S): The apatite and zircon fission track perspective. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2008;97:1271–1291. doi: 10.1007/s00531-007-0203-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Herman F, Brandon M. Mid-latitude glacial erosion hotspot related to equatorial shifts in southern Westerlies. Geology. 2015;43:987–990. doi: 10.1130/G37008.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Montgomery DR, Balco G, Willett SD. Climate, tectonics, and the morphology of the Andes. Geology. 2001;29:579–582. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029&#x0003c;0579:CTATMO&#x0003e;2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Venzke, E. Global volcanism program. In Volcanoes of the World. 10.5479/si.GVP.VOTW4-2013 (2013).
  • 61.Whipple KX, Tucker GE. Dynamics of the stream-power river incision model: Implications for the height limits of mountain ranges, landscape response timescales, and research need. J. Geophys. Res. 1999;104:661–674. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gerya TV, Yuen DA. Robust characteristics method for modelling multiphase visco-elasto-plastic thermo-mechanical problems. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2007;163:83–105. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2007.04.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gerya TV. Introduction to Geodynamic Numerical Modeling. Cambridge University Press; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Turcotte DL, Schubert G. Geodynamics. Cambridge University Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhao D, Hua Y. Anisotropic tomography of the Cascadia subduction zone. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 2021;318:106767. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2021.106767. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hildreth W, Moorbath S. Crustal contributions to arc magmatism in the Andes of Central Chile. Contrib. to Mineral. Petrol. 1988;98:455–489. doi: 10.1007/BF00372365. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Völker D, Kutterolf S, Wehrmann H. Comparative mass balance of volcanic edifices at the southern volcanic zone of the Andes between 33°S and 46°S. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2011;205:114–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2011.03.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Defant MJ, Drummont MS. Derivation of some modern arc magmas by melting of young subducted lithosphere. Nature. 1990;347:662–665. doi: 10.1038/347662a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wannamaker PE, Evans RL, Bedrosian PA, Unsworth MJ, Maris Vi, McGary S. Segmentation of plate coupling, fate of subduction fluids, and modes of arc magmatism in Cascadia, inferred from magnetotelluric resistivity. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2014 doi: 10.1002/2014GC005509.Received. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Díaz D, Zúñiga F, Castruccio A. The interaction between active crustal faults and volcanism: A case study of the Liquiñe-Ofqui Fault Zone and Osorno volcano, Southern Andes, using magnetotellurics. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2020;393:106806. doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.106806. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.López Escobar Á, Cembrano J, Moreno H. Geochemistry and tectonics of the Chilean Southern Andes basaltic Quaternary volcanism (37–46°S) Andean Geol. 1995;22:219–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sternai P, Caricchi L, Castelltort S, Champagnac JD. Deglaciation and glacial erosion: A joint control on magma productivity by continental unloading. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2016;43:1632–1641. doi: 10.1002/2015GL067285. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sternai, P. Feedbacks between internal and external Earth dynamics. In Dynamics of Plate Tectonics and Mantle Convection (ed. Duarte, J.) (2022).
  • 74.Sternai P, et al. Magmatic forcing of Cenozoic climate? J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 2020;125:1–22. doi: 10.1029/2018JB016460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ranalli G. Rheology of Earth. Springer Sciences and Business Media; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hirschmann, M. M. Mantle solidus: Experimental constraints and the effects of peridotite composition. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.1 (2000).
  • 77.Johannes W. The significance of experimental studies for the formation of migmatites. In: Ashworth JR, editor. Migmatites. Blackie & Son Ltd, USA Chapman & Hall; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sternai P, et al. Pre-glacial topography of the European Alps. Geology. 2012;40:1067–1070. doi: 10.1130/G33540.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Supplementary Tables and Figures are available for this paper.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES