Greenstone burial–exhumation cycles at the late Archean transition to plate tectonics

Zibra Ivan; Kemp Anthony I S; Smithies R Hugh; Rubatto Daniela; Korhonen Fawna; Hammerli Johannes; Johnson Tim E; Gessner Klaus; Weinberg Roberto F; Vervoort Jeff D; Martin Laure; Romano Sandra S

doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35208-2

. 2022 Dec 22;13:7893. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35208-2

Greenstone burial–exhumation cycles at the late Archean transition to plate tectonics

Zibra Ivan ^1,^2,^✉, Kemp Anthony I S ³, Smithies R Hugh ^1,⁴, Rubatto Daniela ^5,⁶, Korhonen Fawna ¹, Hammerli Johannes ^3,⁶, Johnson Tim E ⁴, Gessner Klaus ¹, Weinberg Roberto F ², Vervoort Jeff D ⁷, Martin Laure ⁸, Romano Sandra S ^1,³

PMCID: PMC9780361 PMID: 36550109

Abstract

Converging lines of evidence suggest that, during the late Archean, Earth completed its transition from a stagnant-lid to a plate tectonics regime, although how and when this transition occurred is debated. The geological record indicates that some form of subduction, a key component of plate tectonics—has operated since the Mesoarchean, even though the tectonic style and timescales of burial and exhumation cycles within ancient convergent margins are poorly constrained. Here, we present a Neoarchean pressure–temperature–time (P–T–t) path from supracrustal rocks of the transpressional Yilgarn orogen (Western Australia), which documents how sea-floor-altered rocks underwent deep burial then exhumation during shortening that was unrelated to the episode of burial. Archean subduction, even if generally short-lived, was capable of producing eclogites along converging lithosphere boundaries, although exhumation processes in those environments were likely less efficient than today, such that return of high-pressure rocks to the surface was rare.

Subject terms: Precambrian geology, Geochemistry, Tectonics, Petrology, Geodynamics

Supracrustal rocks of the Yilgarn orogen underwent deep burial, and later syn-shortening exhumation. Archean exhumation processes were likely less efficient that today, so that complete exhumation of high-pressure rocks was rare and accidental.

Introduction

Understanding which geodynamic mode(s) prevailed on our planet before plate tectonics is a major challenge in Earth science¹. The secular evolution in global trends of geochemical^2,3, metamorphic^4,5, geophysical⁶ and paleomagnetic⁷ data from Archean rocks suggest that, towards the end of the Archean Eon (3200–2500 Ma), Earth underwent a fundamental secular shift between geodynamic modes⁸. This shift has been widely interpreted to represent the transition from a stagnant lid convection regime⁹, dominated by mantle upwelling and episodic, local, short-lived subduction events^3,9–11, to some form of plate tectonics (the archetype of a mobile-lid tectonic regime) that likely was complete by the early Paleoproterozoic¹². Nevertheless, the proposed timing for the onset of plate tectonics remains uncertain, encompassing most of Earth’s history¹³. To complicate the picture further, such a transition may have taken place via the transient establishment of other ancient forms of mobile lid behaviour that may have differed from modern plate tectonics¹⁴. Plate tectonics is characterized by rigid plates bounded by an interconnected network of plate boundaries comprising mid-ocean ridges, subduction zones and transform faults¹³. Therefore, the main challenge when interrogating the fragmented Archean rock record is to establish whether a given geological feature was part of a global network.

Structural studies represent an important but often overlooked tool to improve our understanding of early-Earth tectonic processes and geodynamic environments¹⁵. Two end-member styles of Archean crustal deformation are generally termed “dome-and-keel” and “linear imbricated belts”^8,16 that may reflect distinct geodynamic environments¹⁷. Dome-and-keel domains were shaped by the juxtaposition of rising granite batholiths and sinking denser greenstones, with a tectonic style dominated by gravitational instabilities and body forces¹⁸. In these environments, cycles of deep-burial and exhumation of supracrustal rocks may have occurred in a few Myr only¹⁹, during periods of tectonic quiescence and/or extension, as in the case of the East Pilbara terrane¹⁸ and the Meso- to Neoarchean pre-orogenic evolution of the Yilgarn Craton (Western Australia)²⁰. The dome-and-keel tectonic style lacks clear modern analogues, thereby offering limited information about how Earth transitioned to plate tectonics. In contrast, linear imbricated belts are generally interpreted to reflect accretionary processes associated with production of juvenile crust along ancient crustal boundaries^3,16,21, and are characterized by large-scale shear zones juxtaposing crustal blocks with contrasting evolutionary histories. Archetypal examples of this tectonic style are the Superior Province (Canada) and the western Yilgarn Craton, both of which are characterized by large-scale transpressional shear zones^22,23, and greenstones exhibiting “arc-like” geochemical signatures, interpreted to reflect subduction-accretion processes^10,24. Furthermore, both cratons contain seismic reflectors in the uppermost mantle, interpreted to reflect relict suture zones associated with Archean subduction^25,26. These features, together with overall crustal architecture⁶, stratigraphic and paleomagnetic data⁸, have been taken as evidence for the existence of accretionary orogens—and therefore of some local form of subduction—since at least the Mesoarchean²⁷, although discordant views exist^28,29.

One way to increase our understanding of the modality and emergence of plate tectonics is by examining the structural and metamorphic record of rocks exposed along major tectonic boundaries within Archean terranes characterized by linear imbricated belts. These are the most likely environments in which plate tectonic indicators can be found on ancient continents³⁰. Although the metamorphic record preserved in these belts shows that of rocks equilibrated at depths of up to ~50 km during the Archean⁵, consistent with some form of convergent tectonic regime, both the tectonic style and timescales of burial–exhumation cycles remain poorly constrained^31–34. To overcome these issues, here we integrate geochemical, geochronological and metamorphic data with available structural data³⁵, to unravel the P–T–t paths of Archean greenstone belts.

We document a complete cycle of deep burial and exhumation in metamorphosed volcano-sedimentary rocks of the Waroonga Greenstone Belt (WGB) along the Ida Fault, a major tectonic boundary (≥500 km long) within the Yilgarn Craton.

The Yilgarn Craton mostly exposes Meso- to Neoarchean granite–greenstone terranes (Fig. 1) that were largely unaffected by post-Archean deformation³⁶. The oldest-preserved supracrustal rocks are fluvial to shallow-marine quartzites deposited between 3250 and 2935 Ma³⁷ that were deposited during rifting of the Eoarchean Yilgarn proto-craton³⁸. Quartzites are exposed along a ~330 km-long belt (Fig. 1a), indicating a craton-scale rifting event. Subsequently, in the period 2960–2750 Ma, craton-wide mafic to ultramafic sequences interlayered with banded iron formation (BIF) developed in deep-marine basins during prevailing lithospheric extension^39,40. Large-scale horizontal shortening started after the deposition of the 2750 Ma Wilgie Mia Formation, at c. 2730 Ma⁴⁰. The arc-like geochemical signature of the <2820 Ma component of the greenstone sequence is interpreted to reflect a subduction-related genesis⁴¹ and, at c. 2730 Ma, collision between the Narryer Terrane to the west with the rest of the Yilgarn Craton^26,38. This collision was the likely driver for the onset of the 2730–2650 Ma Neoarchean Yilgarn Orogeny⁴⁰, which produced a transpressional belt characterized by crustal-scale shearing and syntectonic granitic magmatism²³. In the central–eastern part of the craton (i.e., Eastern Goldfields Superterrane, EGST, Fig. 1), a younger, craton‐scale (~800 km along strike) cycle of asthenosphere-derived magmatism produced a > 10‐km‐thick sequence of mafic–ultramafic lavas and intrusive rocks (Kalgoorlie Group), during a 2715–2690 Ma rifting along the eastern flank of the Ida Fault¹⁰. Horizontal shortening resumed at c. 2680 Ma²³, during which metamorphosed greenstones of the WGB, which record an earlier metamorphic peak at ~13 kbar³⁵, were exhumed along the c. 2660 Ma Waroonga shear zone (WSZ)³⁵. The age of this shearing event is constrained by the c. 2662 Ma depositional age of the footwall sedimentary sequence, and by the c. 2655 Ma crystallization age of granites intruded into the shear zone³⁵. The lithospheric wedge produced during the orogeny includes a network of east dipping, crustal-scale shear zones, concordant with a regionally east-dipping Moho⁶ (Fig. 1b). The minimum age of this lithospheric architecture is c.2730 Ma⁴⁰.

As part of this study, we investigated an area along the Ida Fault⁴² at the boundary between the Youanmi Terrane and the EGST, in the central Yilgarn Craton (Fig. 1). The two terranes differ in terms of greenstone stratigraphy and tectonic evolution³⁸.

The cross-section across the central portion of the Ida Fault (Fig. 1c, d) offers a synthesis of the regional-scale architecture, and of the time constraints for the tectonic evolution of the area. The main tectonic fabrics along this major crustal boundary developed during regional-scale D₁ and D₂ events of transpressional, synmagmatic shearing along the east-dipping, c. 2680–2664 Ma Ballard shear zone²³ and the west-dipping, c. 2660 Ma WSZ³⁵. These two events postdate the prominent c. 2730 Ma²³ regional-scale low-angle tectonic fabric, which is well preserved for ~180 km along strike (Fig. 2) of the ≥2750 Ma BIF-basalt sequence of the Mt Ida greenstone belt, along the western flank of the Ida Fault (Fig. 1c and d).

Fig. 2 — Outcrops location shown in Fig. 1b. a Approximately 20 m-thick BIF (Banded Iron Formation) ridge, showing gently east-dipping transposed bedding. b Panoramic view from Mt Mason, looking southward. Interlayered, weathering-resistant BIF and basalts are associated with a prominent topographic scarp, 100–200 m higher than the flat landscape at west, dominated by the more erodible granite. The consistently east dipping transposed bedding in BIF (marked by the dashed lines) can be followed for nearly 200 km along strike. c Close-up view of the transposed bedding in BIF, with tight isoclinal folds whose axes, subparallel to the stretching lineation, are invariably gently east-plunging. d View from above (parallel to the transposed bedding) of BIF exposure. The prominent stretching lineation is marked by elongate quartz-magnetite aggregates.

The WGB is a metamorphosed and tectonically attenuated volcano-sedimentary sequence exposed in the hanging wall of the WSZ. Our work is focused on the central part of the shear zone, along a nearly continuous ~15 km-long east–west transect (Fig. 1b). The Waroonga shear zone consists of the Waroonga Gneiss, a syntectonic, c. 2660 Ma tonalitic–granitic pluton that contains 10–1000 m long slivers of WGB greenstones (Fig. 3). The WGB mainly contains amphibolite (metabasalt) and metamorphosed BIF, with subordinate metamorphosed felsic volcanic rocks, mica schist, quartzite, leucoamphibolite and ultramafic schist. The greenstone slivers in the Waroonga gneiss have high aspect ratios (10:1 to 100:1) in map view, with long axes aligned subparallel to the roughly north-striking, arcuate pattern of the Waroonga shear zone (Fig. 3). Amphibolite from the WGB shows variably retrogressed high-pressure granulite-facies assemblages³⁵. Retrogression in the leucoamphibolite included the development of a migmatitic fabric (Supplementary section 3). Most greenstone slivers preserve internal lithological contacts interpreted to represent transposed primary contacts within the original volcano-sedimentary succession³⁵.

Fig. 3 — a Geological map of the study area, across the central portion of the Waroonga shear zone (Fig. 1c for location). The rectangle shows the location of the map shown in panel c. b Merged magnetic anomaly map of the Waroonga shear zone, as part of the magnetic anomaly grid (40 m) of Western Australia, Version 1 – 2013. The full map is available on the Geological Survey of Western Australia (GSWA) website: http://www.dmp.wa.gov.au/Geological-Survey/Regional-geophysical-survey-data-1392.aspx. The rectangle shows the location of panel a. c Geological map of the sampling area, showing location of samples collected for geochronology and *P–T* estimations.

Garnet amphibolite is medium- to coarse-grained (average grain size 0.5 − 2 cm, Fig. 4a) with euhedral to anhedral garnet and pyroxene porphyroblasts that are surrounded by amphibole-rich symplectites (compare Fig. 4a, b). It contains a clinopyroxene–garnet–orthopyroxene–hornblende–plagioclase–quartz –rutile assemblage. Inclusion trails in garnet porphyroblasts define a crenulation cleavage (Fig. 4c), indicating that final porphyroblast growth at peak metamorphic conditions postdated at least two generations of tectonic foliation. Leucoamphibolite is fine-grained and preserves meso-and microstructures indicative of a partial melting event that predated c. 2660 Ma exhumation along the WSZ³⁵; these microstructures are described in detail in the supplementary section 3.

Metamorphosed felsic volcanic rocks and mica schist contain quartz, muscovite, biotite, plagioclase, K-feldspar and sillimanite. These felsic rocks retain primary contacts with BIF, amphibolite and ultramafic rocks, within the same, composite greenstone slivers, demonstrating the volcano-sedimentary nature of the WGB. Bedding in BIF shows a variable degree of transposition, with thickening in fold hinges and marked attenuation along fold limbs (Figs. 2c and 4d). BIF layers are commonly coarse-grained and granoblastic. Most BIF layers are enriched in acicular amphibole that may contain cores of clinopyroxene. BIF is associated with layers of coarse-grained quartzite (Fig. 4e), which contain elongate ribbons of garnet, quartz and plagioclase aggregates, including small, rounded clinopyroxene porphyroblasts. Garnet aggregates in places show a skeletal habit and include sillimanite needles (Fig. 4f). This assemblage suggests that, like mafic rocks, metasedimentary rocks of the WGB reached high-pressure granulite-facies conditions⁴³. In the eastern part of the studied area, a group of greenstone slivers is clustered in an area 1.8 km across-strike by 3.7 km along strike (Fig. 3c). Pre- 2660 Ma high-grade assemblages of the WGB are best preserved in this area, which include the garnet amphibolite, leucoamphibolite, BIF and meta-felsic volcanic rocks studied here.

Results

Geochemistry and O isotopes in garnet

We determined the whole-rock major- and trace-element compositions of garnet amphibolite (n = 43) and BIF (n = 51) within the WGB to constrain the nature of the protoliths (Supplementary section 1). Amphibolite defines major-element trends typical of tholeiitic basalts of the Yilgarn Craton (Supplementary Figs 1 and 2) but, based on trace-element concentrations, includes distinct unenriched and enriched groups (UA and EA, respectively, Fig. 5a). The UA shows NMORB (normal mid-ocean ridge basalts)-like incompatible trace-element patterns, whereas the EA shows extreme enrichments in rare earth elements (REE) and Y (Fig. 5a). Notably, contrasts in the trace-element compositions of the two groups are not reflected in their mineralogy, textures or major-element geochemistry, although the trace element chemistry of garnet and hornblende in the UA and EA mimic those of their respective whole rocks (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 3a, b).

The close compositional similarity between UA and typical Yilgarn tholeiitic basalt (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2), particularly in terms of melt-mobile elements such as light REE, Zr, Nb and Th, indicates that the compositions of the UA samples were largely unaffected by high-grade metamorphism. Based on similar compositional criteria, BIF from the WGB also falls into enriched and unenriched groups (Supplementary Fig. 3c).

Secondary ion mass spectrometer (SIMS) δ¹⁸O data show that garnet porphyroblasts within each sample are compositionally homogeneous (Fig. 5c). Garnet from typical EA rocks (sample 155899) has average δ¹⁸O values (vs. Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water, VSMOW) of 4.2‰; ±0.6‰; (2σ), while those in typical UA examples (sample 214208) have distinctly lower δ¹⁸O values (average of 1.3‰; ±0.5‰;, 2σ), which are well below those of mantle rocks (~5.3‰; ±0.6‰;⁴⁴) and among the lowest recorded δ¹⁸O values from garnet in mafic rocks⁴⁵. Such low δ¹⁸O values in mafic rocks are typical of high-temperature seafloor alteration⁴⁶ and are commonly preserved during metamorphism⁴⁷.

Zircon, monazite and garnet geochronology

To constrain the age of WGB deposition at the ocean floor, we separated zircon crystals from a metamorphosed felsic volcanic rock (sample 212070) that show core–rim microstructures (Fig. 6a). In cathodoluminescence (CL) images, the cores preserve oscillatory zoning and have high Th/U ratios (0.25–0.82) typical of magmatic growth, whereas the thin (<25 µm thick) rims are unzoned and generally have much lower Th/U (down to 0.02), typical of metamorphic zircon. Most core U–Pb analyses (12/15) yield the oldest ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb dates and define a discordia with an upper intercept at 2819 ± 8 Ma (mean square weighted deviation, MSWD = 1.4; all ages reported at 95% confidence level) anchored by five concordant analyses (Fig. 6a and Tab. S10). The zoning, chemistry and consistent dates of the zircon suggest a magmatic origin. Given the occurrence of primary contacts between WGB lithologies, and the evidence of shared (i) alteration-related geochemical signature and (ii) metamorphic cycles (described below), we interpret the zircon core age to constrain the eruption age of the WGB at the ocean floor. Analyses of monazite from the same sample define a discordia with an upper intercept of 2704 + 23/−9 Ma (Fig. 6b). Eleven monazite analyses that are > 90% concordant define a ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb age of 2702 ± 9 Ma (MSWD = 0.74).

Fig. 6 — a–c Concordia diagrams of U-Pb analyses of zircon and monazite. The inset in each panel shows representative cathodoluminescence (CL; zircon) and back-scattered electron (BSE; monazite) images of analysed grains with the spot location (white circle) and corresponding ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb dates. d Lu–Hf isochron diagram showing data obtained from three garnet fractions, the corresponding whole rock, and a garnet-free whole rock aliquot. The red circles outline the position of individual data points, which are only barely resolvable at this scale.

We separated zircon crystals from leucoamphibolite (samples 212796 and 219364) to constrain the age of the migmatitic fabric. In CL, these crystals show complex mottled or chaotic zoning and contain abundant micro-inclusions (Fig. 6c); oscillatory zoning is rarely preserved. Concentrations of U and Th in CL-dark cores are high (415–1390 and 230–1900 ppm, respectively, with Th/U = 0.27–2.5), and the most extreme compositions correspond to discordant U–Pb analyses. ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb dates range from 1917–2723 Ma in sample 212796, and 2230–2719 Ma in sample 219364 (Fig. 6c), with no systematic difference in dates between CL-dark domains and CL-bright rims. The microstructure and high U–Th contents of the zircon cores suggest intense alteration and metamictization. Although the analyses from both samples do not define a unique discordia, the oldest group of mostly concordant analyses has an average ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb age of 2717 ± 5 Ma, which is taken to represent the timing of melt crystallization in the migmatite⁴⁸ (Fig. 6c).

To constrain the age of peak metamorphism in the WGB, we performed Lu–Hf geochronology on a garnet amphibolite (sample 214208, UA). Analyses of two whole-rock (including a garnet-free matrix), and three different garnet fractions yielded a statistically significant isochron with a date of 2730 ± 7 Ma (Fig. 6d). We interpret this date to record garnet growth close to the metamorphic peak^49,50.

Metamorphic data

We produced P–T data from the dated migmatitic leucoamphibolite (sample 219364; Supplementary section 3). These results are integrated with existing metamorphic data from the WGB (sample 209029³⁵, UA) to define a near-complete P–T–t path (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7 — Summary of the metamorphic evolution for the WGB, based on phase equilibrium modelling of samples 209029 and 219364. The five insets show the representative microstructures for each of the steps that we used to trace the *P–T–t* path. (i) Dating of euhedral zircons in sample 212070 define the formation age of the WGB; (ii) the peak assemblage in amphibolite clinopyroxene–garnet–quartz is well preserved in sample 209029, and dated by garnet-whole rock Lu–Hf isotopes in chemically similar sample 214208; zircon dating in leucoamphibolite (iii) and monazite dating in sample 212070 (iv) represent mid-crustal cooling of the WGB, during stepwise exhumation; (v) at c. 2660 Ma, exhumation was associated with the widespread development (in garnet amphibolite) of synkinematic hornblende, replacing both garnet (as shown in the micrograph) and clinopyroxene.

Sample 209029 contains an interpreted peak mineral assemblage of clinopyroxene–hornblende–garnet–rutile–quartz–plagioclase. Phase equilibrium modelling of this assemblage³⁵, based on the major oxide composition of this sample, combined with isopleths of garnet core compositions, constrains peak conditions to 11.2–13.0 kbar and 765–850 °C (M1a, Fig. 7). Slightly lower pressures of 10.0–11.5 kbar at similar temperatures³⁵ are constrained by the integrated composition of former peak clinopyroxene (Cpx1) and plagioclase cores (M1b, Fig. 7). Leucoamphibolite sample 219364 contains the peak assemblage garnet–quartz–plagioclase–ilmenite–melt. Phase equilibrium modelling provides less well-constrained conditions that overlap with those from sample 209029 (Fig. 7). Predicted garnet compositions within this broad field do not vary and correspond well with measured values (Supplementary Fig. 12; Table 12).

The retrograde evolution of the rocks includes the pseudomorphic replacement of peak clinopyroxene (Cpx1) by retrograde clinopyroxene (Cpx2) with plagioclase and quartz (sample 209029, Fig. 4b, c), which is stable above 7 kbar and 740 °C (M2, Fig. 7). The growth of magnetite followed by hornblende (sample 219364) indicates a similar post-peak history of decompression, cooling and finally melt crystallization at 640–710 °C and 5.0–7.5 kbar (Supplementary section 3).

The youngest event recorded by the WGB corresponds to the synkinematic M3 assemblage defined by the pervasive development of hornblende ((v), Fig. 7). Syn- M3, synkinematic migmatitic amphibolite indicates that the first appearance of this assemblage must have occurred above the solidus (>650 °C) but at pressures below the M2 constraints of 7 kbar³⁵ (Fig. 7).

Discussion

Our data, together with existing constraints, elucidate the Meso- to Neoarchean tectonic evolution of the WGB. Apart from having wide implications for the evolution of the Yilgarn Craton, this offers new insights into Neoarchean tectonics in general (Fig. 8). The WGB shares age, lithological and geochemical characteristics that are strikingly similar to greenstones from elsewhere in the Youanmi Terrane^10,39,41 (Supplementary Figs 1 and 2). However, in a landscape dominated by low-grade metamorphic assemblages^10,39, the high-grade metamorphic cycle (Fig. 7), together with the peculiar REE and O isotopic signatures in the amphibolite and BIF studied here, are so far unique to the WGB.

Fig. 8 — Cartoon outlining the tectonomagmatic evolution of the WGB and the Yilgarn lithosphere in the Meso- to Neoarchean. Note the change of scale from (a) to (b). a Long-term plate configuration characterized by the convergence between the Narryer (NT) and the Youanmi-Eastern goldfields terranes (YT and EG, respectively). Volcanism with an arc signature occurred in the Murchison⁴¹ (Mu), Marda⁶³ (Md) and Cosmos⁶¹(Cs) areas. b The pre-orogenic period (until c.2750 Ma⁴⁰) reflects the accumulation of a thick greenstone pile dominated by mafic–ultramafic volcanic rocks interlayered with BIFs, devoid of any clastic input⁴⁰. The WGB developed at c. 2820 Ma, in the vicinity of the proto-Ida Fault. c Synmagmatic shearing along large-scale, east-dipping contractional structures, together with subaerial volcanism and development of high-energy sedimentary basins above a regional unconformity, mark the onset of the Neoarchean orogeny. Meanwhile, the WGB was buried to lower-crustal depths (12–13 Kbar³⁵), along the Ida Fault, and subsequently partly exhumed to mid-crustal levels (7 kbar). Coeval volcanism with arc affinity occurred in the Cosmos area (Cs)⁶¹.d Mafic–ultramafic magmatism along the eastern margin of the Youanmi Terrane produced the Kalgoorlie Group greenstone sequence¹⁰ (KG). Asthenospheric magma (pictured in dark blue) was likely channelled along the main crustal-scale structure in the area, the Ida Fault. e Late-orogenic exhumation of the WGB took place along the Waroonga shear zone³⁵, which channelled the emplacement of the syntectonic Waroonga Gneiss, transporting slivers of the WGB to their present position.

Strong enrichments in bulk rock REE, without coupled increases in Th and high field strength elements (HFSE), are not recognized primary features of basalt petrogenesis, and have not been recorded in unaltered Archean basalt¹⁰. Such compositional patterns, including the development of negative Ce anomalies, reflect post-magmatic net gains in REE, with only slight to moderate fractionation of LREE/HREE ratios. Similar enrichments in basalt may result from near-surface hydrothermal/metasomatic fluid interactions, fixing REE in secondary phosphates^51,52, particularly within major shear zones⁵³. The observed similarities between UA and EA whole-rock major element, Nb and Th contents, but striking whole-rock REE variations that are matched by respective garnet and amphibole compositions, further suggest that whole-rock REE enrichment in EA predated peak metamorphism and garnet growth. The absence of isotopic zoning (Fig. 5c) suggests that garnet grew in an environment that attained its oxygen isotope composition before garnet growth. Notably, garnet typically attains lower δ¹⁸O isotope signatures compared to the whole-rock values, due to isotope fractionation between other minerals, which is controlled by oxygen bond types⁵⁴. Modelling has shown that the maximum oxygen isotope fractionation between whole rock and garnet at high temperature (>400 °C) is <2‰, with particularly low fractionation in mafic rocks that are poor in quartz and calcite^44,55, such as the amphibolites studied here. The whole-rock δ¹⁸O value of EA sample 155899, at the time of garnet formation, therefore likely overlapped with a mantle-like δ¹⁸O signature (Fig. 5c). In contrast, the low δ¹⁸O values garnet in the unenriched amphibolite 214208 (~1.3‰, Fig. 5c), imply a distinctly sub-mantle whole-rock δ¹⁸O value of <3.3‰; at the time of garnet formation. Such an ¹⁸O-depleted composition is consistent with intense, near-surface high-temperature (hydrothermal) interaction with an isotopically light fluid, such as seawater or meteoric fluids⁴⁵. We suggest that this garnet δ¹⁸O preserves the seafloor alteration signal in the unenriched amphibolites, whereas the slightly heavier O isotope composition of the enriched amphibolites reflects later, lower temperature fluid-rock interactions that also concentrated the REE in these rocks.

Since most greenstone sequences worldwide endured prolonged residence at (or near to) the ocean floor¹⁰, this history alone cannot explain the peculiar geochemical and isotopic signatures we document here. The requirement for locally intense hydrothermal alteration, combined with the observation that this alteration, characterized by addition of REE but not HFSE, occurs along major shear zones⁵³, points to alteration of the WGB along a major structural discontinuity that may have corresponded to the Ida Fault (Fig. 8b), whose early activity dates back to c.3050 Ma³⁸. Therefore, we suggest that the burial of the WGB started along a pre-existing weakness, an important prerequisite for any type of subduction initiation⁵⁶.

Stratigraphic, structural and geochronological data indicate that the development of contractional structures in the Yilgarn Craton postdated the c. 2766–2747 Ma episodes of regional-scale granitic diapirism²⁰. Furthermore, the regionally extensive, deep-marine BIFs of the c. 2750 Ma Wilgie Mia Formation, which were deposited during prevailing extension^39,40, were then uplifted and eroded in the c.2734–2725 Ma interval during which a regional-scale unconformity developed⁴⁰. Combined stratigraphic and structural data also indicate that the main regional structures in the central portion of the Yilgarn Craton studied here formed at c. 2730 Ma⁵⁷, as part of the prominent Yilgarn-wide episode of crustal thickening. Thickening was accommodated within crustal-scale shear zones at the c. 2730 Ma onset of the Yilgarn orogeny⁴⁰ (Fig. 8c), and ascribed to the collision between the Narryer and Youanmi terranes³⁸ (Fig. 8a). Overall, these data indicate that burial of the WGB started after 2750 Ma (Fig. 8b), and that peak conditions of ~13 kbar were reached by 2730 ± 7 Ma, as revealed by our Lu–Hf garnet dating (Figs. 6d and 8c). Thus, there is a good correlation between the timing of collision between the Narryer and Youanmi blocks, craton-wide crustal thickening and high-P metamorphism in the WGB (Fig. 8a and c). We interpret the regionally preserved, gently east-dipping shear fabric that is exposed in low-grade greenstones along the footwall of the Ida Fault (Figs. 1c, d, and 2), and which characterizes the lithosphere-scale architecture of the whole craton (Fig. 1b), to represent the expression of such a convergent tectonic setting (Fig. 8c).

Exhumation to mid-crustal levels (~7 kbar, as recorded by the leucoamphibolite sample 219364, Figs. 6c and 7) was achieved by 2717 ± 5 Ma, essentially during the same contractional event that marked the onset of the Yilgarn orogeny⁴⁰. This zircon age of the migmatitic fabric recorded within the leucoamphibolite sample (Fig. 6c) coincides with the onset of eruption of the mafic–ultramafic Kalgoorlie Group (c. 2714 Ma⁵⁸). Therefore, we interpret this migmatitic event as the signature of the crustal-scale thermal antiform associated with lithospheric thinning and the transfer of voluminous, asthenosphere-derived mafic–ultramafic magma¹⁰ (Fig. 8d). The monazite U–Pb age (c. 2700 Ma, sample 212070, Fig. 6b) likely marks the same thermal event, at a similar mid-crustal level (Fig. 7). About 50–60 Myr later, c. 2660 Ma exhumation along the WSZ (Fig. 8e) to the near surface commenced at the same mid-crustal level (~7 kbar, Fig. 7), and was achieved during a major synmagmatic episode of transpressional tectonics³⁵.

In the central part of the Yilgarn Craton, the c. 3000 Ma syn-rift quartzites have a current along-strike exposure of ~330 km, and the Ida Fault has a current along-strike continuity of ~500 km (Fig. 1). This suggests that both the Mesoarchean rift-related structures (Fig. 9a and b), and the Neoarchean convergent margin (along which the WGB was buried to lower-crustal conditions), were craton-scale features, several hundreds of km in size (Fig. 9a–d). Furthermore, given that the 2715–2690 Ma Kalgoorlie Group has a present-day along-strike extension of ~ 800 km, the rift-related structures that controlled the development of this asthenosphere-derived volcanic succession¹⁰ were likely of comparable size (Fig. 9e). Overall, the deformation style pictured here, which includes regional-scale shearing along crustal-scale shear zones (Figs. 1, 8 and 9), is indicative of relatively high integrated lithospheric strength^15,35,59, suggesting that burial of the WGB occurred through some form of subduction, rather than through gravity-driven drip tectonics. The latter typically produced dome-and-keel map patterns with minimal along-strike continuity⁶⁰, in weak lithospheric domains^19,59, which are incompatible with the overall lithospheric geometries and structural style that typified the Yilgarn Craton since at least c. 3000 Ma (Fig. 9). The occurrence of 2736–2724 Ma volcanic arc-like successions in the hanging wall of the Ida Fault⁶¹ (Fig. 8c) suggest that the burial of the WGB took place in the context of an east-dipping subduction setting, consistent with the coeval subduction zone inferred to have existed at that time along the western margin of the craton^26,38,41 (Fig. 8a), and with the east-dipping fabric preserved throughout the craton (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 9 — Meso- to Neoarchean tectonic evolution of the central portion of the Yilgarn Craton, with emphasis on the along-strike structural continuity. a C. 3000 Ma, regional-scale rifting occurred in the central part of the Yilgarn Craton. The minimum size of the rift-related structures is inferred by the current along-strike exposure (~330 km) of the syn-rift quartzite (Fig. 1a). b Detail from a showing the syn-rift deposition of conglomerate (orange) and quartzite (yellow) at c. 3000 Ma, followed by the 2960–2750 Ma post-rift, deep-marine sequence (green), of prevailing basalt and Banded Iron Formation (BIF). c 2750–2730 Ma burial of the eastern margin of the Youanmi Terrane under the Eastern Goldfields Superterrane (EGST). The current extension of the Ida Fault (~500 km) suggests that the buried margin extended for several hundred km along strike. d Detail from (c) showing the post-peak, syn-shortening exhumation of the Waroonga greenstone belt (WGB) (asterisk) to mid-crustal levels, broadly coeval with the Arc-type magmatism in the hanging wall. e 2715–2690 Ma asthenospheric magmatism occurred along a rift zone that was ~800 km along strike, as suggested by the current distribution of the Kalgoorlie Group, in the hanging wall of the Ida Fault. Asthenosphere upwelling may have been triggered by slab rollback or break off. f Exhumation of portions of the WGB took place along the Waroonga Shear Zone (WSZ), a structure that is unrelated to the Ida Fault. Since this structure provided ~10 km uplift at c. 2660 Ma, other portions of the WGB are inferred to now lie at mid-crustal levels.

Assuming that the ~13 kbar peak pressure recorded by the WGB corresponds to burial to ~45 km (considering an average crustal density of 2.8 gr/cm³), and that burial occurred within a maximum time span of 20 Myr (from ≤ 2750 to 2730 Ma), minimum burial rates in the order of ~2.3 mm/yr can be calculated. This value is about one order of magnitude lower than Phanerozoic rates of subduction⁶², although burial of the WGB may have started well after c. 2750 Ma, such that burial rates were higher. Peak conditions reflect an apparent thermal gradient of 70 °C/kbar, which is in line with intermediate T/P style of metamorphism that is widely registered in the Neoarchean rock record⁵ (Fig. S14). The subsequent exhumation to ~25 km, which was achieved by 2715 Ma (Fig. 7), was essentially coeval with 2736–2724 Ma arc-like volcanism that took place during active convergence (Fig. 9d), with minimum uplift rates in the order of 1.3 mm/yr. Notably, exhumation from peak conditions took place along a P–T path approaching isothermal decompression (Fig. 7), consistently with fast, tectonic exhumation via return flow, within an active convergent margin⁵⁹.

From a craton-wide perspective, by combining our data with those available from the literature, we identify two broadly coeval, east-dipping subduction zones that offer a strikingly contrasting geological record. In the west, along the Narryer–Youanmi boundary (Fig. 8a), 2820–2730 Ma protracted subduction²⁶ generated one of the most complete Archean arc-related sequences, with compositional ranges approaching those of modern-style subduction settings^10,41,63, but with no record of exhumed high-pressure rocks. Conversely, burial along the Ida Fault has left a short-lived supracrustal arc signature (2736–2724 Ma)⁶¹ (Fig. 8c), but has exposed greenstones previously buried to lower-crustal depths. Assuming that such contrasting records do not reflect preservation bias, they may represent one of the hallmarks of the transitional tectonic style that typified the Neoarchean Earth^2,12. Overall, burial along late-Archean subduction zones bore similarities with modern subduction: the transformation of basalt to dense garnet-bearing rocks including eclogite would have been the primary driver for Archean subduction, as it is today. However, the burial of hotter (weaker) mafic crust implied that the early stages of subduction would have been inherently more unstable than today, favoring episodes of slab breakoff and slab rollback¹¹. These would have in turn triggered vigorous asthenosphere upwelling, driving deeply sourced basaltic magmatism, and suppression of arc magmatism⁶⁴, which accounts for the two types of volcanism recorded in the hanging wall of the Ida Fault (Fig. 9d and e), and in many greenstone sequences worldwide^10,11. Overall, short-lived subduction was likely the prevailing modus operandi during the late Archean^9,11, consistent with the prevalence of subduction initiation sequences in the Archean crustal record¹⁰.

Our data also show that post-peak exhumation to mid-crustal depths along the WSZ was followed by a 50–60 Myr-long period of apparent tectonic quiescence, before final exhumation to depths of a few km (Figs. 8e and 9f), which provided ≥10 km of uplift at c. 2660 Ma³⁵. Remarkably, greenstones slices within the WGB are only exposed along a ~20 km-long (along-strike) segment of the WSZ (Fig. 3a). We infer these slices to represent a minor component of the greenstones originally buried along the convergent margin, which are inferred to now lie within the mid-crustal portions of the Ida Fault (Fig. 9f). Furthermore, between the exposed portions of the WGB, relatively pristine peak assemblages are only preserved locally, within a km-scale segment of the shear zone (Fig. 3c); elsewhere along the WSZ, amphibolite is typically strongly retrogressed and amphibole rich, preserving only rare garnet fragments and/or garnet pseudomorphs³⁵ ((v) in Fig. 7). Although the presence of a hot and magma-rich medium facilitated greenstone exhumation along the WSZ, it also favoured pervasive retrogression of the high-pressure, anhydrous assemblages.

The timing, rate and P–T path of the first stage of WGB exhumation (from lower to mid-crustal levels) are all comparable to those typically observed in modern subduction zones⁶⁵. This suggests that exhumation processes that operated at late Archean convergent margins may have been similar—at least locally—to those that characterize Phanerozoic subduction zones. However, while exhumation of high-P rocks along modern convergent margins is typically completed during active subduction⁶⁵, in the studied rocks final exhumation (from the mid crust to near-surface levels) was achieved through melt-assisted transpression³⁵, during a tectonic episode that occurred c. 60 Myr after that responsible for burial and early exhumation (Figs. 8e and 9f). A similar—and coeval—tectonic evolution is recorded in West Greenland (North Atlantic Craton), where c. 2715 Ma exhumation of greenstone to mid-crustal levels (~ 5 kbar) took place shortly after peak metamorphism (at ~10 kbar), and was followed by slow isobaric cooling⁶⁶.

Both the tectonic style and the time scale of the burial–exhumation cycle described here differ substantially from those typifying sagduction-driven burial–exhumation cycles associated with gneiss domes, which may occur in a few Myr only¹⁹. This should not be surprising since, as outlined earlier, the transpressional orogen exposed in the Yilgarn Craton and the archetypal dome-and-keel architecture of the Pilbara Craton lie at the opposite ends of the spectrum, in terms of Archean tectonic styles.

The oldest-known, laterally continuous belt of exhumed high-pressure rocks corresponds to the Paleoproterozoic (c. 2000 Ma) Usagaran belt of Tanzania⁶⁷. Before that, short-lived, unstable subduction was capable of producing eclogites along Archean convergent margins³⁴, but exhumation processes in those environments were likely less efficient than today, so that complete exhumation of high-pressure rocks was much rarer. Furthermore, those rare rocks had lower preservation potential than today, if exhumation was assisted by a low-viscosity, buoyant, hot and fluid-rich medium such as partially molten rocks, which would favour retrogression of anhydrous assemblages.

Fast (tectonic) exhumation requires efficient strain localization along large-scale shear zones¹⁵, which in turn needs to be supported by a stiff lithospheric mantle⁵⁹. The mixed signals that we detect in the late Archean rock record reflect a transitional tectonic style, consistently with the progressive cooling of the Earth’s mantle¹¹.

Although our study cannot directly prove (or disprove) the existence of plate tectonics in the late Archean, our results are consistent with those emerging from other Neoarchean environments. Late Archean geological processes that include subduction and high-grade metamorphism during terrane assembly along convergent margins have been inferred in the Superior Province²⁵, and in the North Atlantic^34,66 and Dharwar⁶⁸ cratons. The resulting picture describes the Neoarchean as a transitional and highly dynamic phase of Earth’s evolution, which has left a mixed signal in the geological record (reflecting variably short-lived subduction events¹¹, and variably efficient exhumation styles) and led to the progressive establishment of a global network of plates and long-lived subduction zones—the critical ingredients of modern-style plate tectonics⁹—during the early Paleoproterozoic^12,69.

Methods

Whole-rock major and trace element analyses

Whole-rock major and trace elements were determined either at Bureau Veritas, Perth, Western Australia. Major and minor elements (Si, Ti, Al, Cr, Fe, Mn, Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Na, K and P) were determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry on a fused glass disk and loss on ignition (LOI) was determined by thermogravimetric analysis. The concentrations of Ag, As, Ba, Be, Bi, Cd, Ce, Co, Cr, Cs, Cu, Dy, Er, Eu, Ga, Gd, Ge, Hf, Ho, La, Lu, Nb, Nd, Ni, Pb, Pr, Rb, Sc, Sm, Sn, Sr, Ta, Tb, Th, Tl, Tm, U, V, W, Y, Yb, Zn and Zr were all determined by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) on a fragment of the same glass disk used earlier for XRF analysis. Data quality was monitored by blind insertion of sample duplicates, internal reference materials, and the certified reference material OREAS 24b. Bureau Veritas also included duplicate samples, certified reference materials (including OREAS 24b), and blanks. Total uncertainties for major elements are ≤1.5%, those for minor elements are <2.5% (at concentrations >0.1 wt.%) and those for most trace elements are ≤10% (Lu ± 20%).

Major element analyses and quantitative element mapping via electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA)

Quantitative element analyses on thin section (Supplementary Table 2) were acquired on a JEOL JXA8530F electron probe micro-analyzer instrument, equipped with five tunable wavelength-dispersive spectrometers, at the Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis (CMCA) at The University of Western Australia. Operating conditions were 40° take-off angle, and 15 keV of beam energy. The beam current was 20 nA, and the beam diameter was 5 µm. Elements were acquired using analyzing crystals LiF for Fe kα, Mn kα, PETJ for Ca kα, K kα, Ti kα, Cr kα, P kα, and TAP for Na kα, Si kα, Mg kα, Al kα. The standards used for instrument calibration were periclase for Mg, San Carlos olivine for Si, Durango apatite for Ca and P, corundum for Al, jadeite for Na, magnetite for Fe, Mn metal for Mn, Cr₂O₃ for Cr rutile for Ti, and orthoclase for K. The on-peak counting time was 20 s for all elements and Mean Atomic Number (MAN) background corrections used throughout⁷⁰. The sample and standard intensities were corrected for deadtime. The intensity data were corrected for Time Dependent Intensity (TDI) loss (or gain) using a self-calibrated correction for Na kα, Si kα, Fe kα, K kα. The matrix correction method was ZAF⁷¹ and data reduction used the Probe for EPMA software package. Typical detection limits ranged from 0.01 weight percent for Al kα to 0.02 for Na. Oxygen was calculated by cation stoichiometry and included in the matrix correction.

Quantitative map acquisition was performed using the Probe Image® software for X-ray intensity acquisition. The beam current was 40 nA with a 40 msec per pixel dwell time and a 2 × 2 µm pixel dimension. Image processing and quantification was performed off-line with the CalcImage® software, the calibration procedure outlined above and output to Surfer®. Supplementary Fig. 8 shows quantitative EPMA maps of individual garnets, while Supplementary Fig. 9 shows point analyses along transects in individual garnet crystals.

Trace-element analyses via LA-ICP-MS

Garnet from sample 214208 were analysed on polished thin sections at the University Western Australia, Perth (Australia), following the same profiles that were analysed by EPMA for their major element concentrations. LA-ICP-MS analyses followed the procedure described in⁷² and were conducted using an X-series II quadrupole ICP-MS attached to an Analyte G2 Excimer laser system (193 nm wavelength) with a standard dual volume cell. The He carrier gas was set at 1.0 l/min (MFC1 = 0.6 l/min and MFC2 = 0.4 l/min) and was mixed with a nebulizer flow of argon (0.7 l/min) in a glass mixing bulb. N₂ was added with a steady flow of ~5 ml/min in order to enhance sensitivity and reduce oxide production before being introduced into the plasma. The mass spectrometer was tuned to maximum sensitivity at plasma conditions of Th/U ~1 in a NIST610 glass, and the production of molecular oxide species was monitored by maintaining a low ThO⁺/Th⁺ ratio <0.25%. The laser ablation repetition rate was 10 Hz, with a laser fluence of 5 J/cm². A circular spot of 50 μm diameters was used for all unknowns and standards. The dwell time for each element was set at 10 ms. A 30 s background was collected prior to each analysis. Element concentrations were reduced with the Iolite software package⁷³ using bracketing analysis of NIST610 as an external standard with the reference concentrations taken from⁷⁴. CaO determined by EPMA was used as the internal standard values for each analysed grain and NIST612 was analysed and used as a secondary standard. Supplementary Table 3 shows all LA-ICP-MS data, including standard reference material, while Supplementary Fig. 10 and 11 show analytical profiles of individual garnet grains.

Oxygen isotope analyses via SIMS

In-situ ¹⁸O/¹⁶O measurements in garnet were carried out using a Cameca IMS 1280 housed at the Centre for Microscopy Characterisation and Analysis at the University of Western Australia. O isotope measurements were performed on thin sections cut with a precision saw and mounted in epoxy, together with pre-polished blocks containing a range of reference materials for O isotope measurements in garnet (as detailed below).

The sample mounts were thoroughly cleaned with detergent, ethanol and distilled water in an ultrasonic bath and coated with a 30nm-thick Au coating prior to SIMS analyses. During the analyses, the sample surface was sputtered over a 10 × 10 µm area with a 10 kV, gaussian Cs⁺ beam with intensity of 2.5 nA and a total impact energy of 20 keV. An electron gun was used to ensure charge compensation during the analyses. Secondary ions were admitted within a 110 µm entrance slit and focused in the centre of a 4000 µm field aperture (x 130 magnification). Energy filtering was applied using a 30 eV band pass with a 5 eV gap toward the high-energy side. ¹⁶O and ¹⁸O were collected simultaneously in Faraday cup detectors fitted with 10¹⁰ Ω (L’2) and 10¹¹ Ω (H1) resistors, respectively, and operating at a mass resolution of ~2430. The magnetic field was regulated using NMR control.

Each analysis includes a pre-sputtering over a 15 × 15 µm area during 40 s, followed by the automatic centreing of the secondary ions in the field aperture, contrast aperture and entrance slit. Each analysis then consists of 20 four-second cycles, which give an average internal precision of ~0.16‰; (2 SE). The analytical session was monitored in term of stability using at least two bracketing standards (UWG-2) every 5 to 6 sample analyses. The spot-to-spot reproducibility on UWG-2 was ~0.4‰; (2 SD) during the analytical session. For garnet, the correction for instrumental mass fractionation has to account for the bias, or matrix effect, related to the difference in chemistry between the unknowns and the reference materials^75–77. In absence of uvarovite and andradite components in garnet (as it was confirmed by EPMA data in the present study, Supplementary Table 2), the grossular component (X_Gr) creates the largest bias on oxygen isotope measurements by SIMS^75–77. Therefore, six garnet reference materials, with different X_Gr, were analysed at the beginning, middle and end of the analytical session, for each mount, to model the matrix effect and correct the measurements of the unknowns. Oxygen isotope analyses in the samples were acquired next to the spot locations where EPMA measurements were performed for the matrix correction (Supplementary Figs 6 and 7). The garnet reference materials used in this study were the same for the 2 mounts: 10691, 2B3, GRS-SE and UWG2^75,76 and ALM-GEM (in house, X_Gr = 0.01, d¹⁸O = 6.79‰;). For both mounts, the relationship between bias and X_Gr can be fit with a parabola, with a correlation coefficient (r²) better than 0.97, returning a regression residual of ~0.3 per mil, in the range of the external reproducibility observed on UWG-2.

The uncertainty on single spot analyses reflects the residual observed on the calibration curve, which represent the average difference between the model and the measurements for the matrix effect calibration curve and the external reproducibility on UWG-2. Supplementary Table 4 presents the raw ¹⁸O/¹⁶O ratios and the corrected δ¹⁸O values (quoted with respect to Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water or VSMOW in per mil).

Rare earth element analyses

REE analyses of garnet and hornblende were performed at the John de Laeter LA–ICP–MS facility using a Resonetics M-50 193 nm excimer laser with an Agilent 7700 mass spectrometer. Both minerals were analysed in polished thin sections, using a beam diameter of 23 μm and a repetition rate of 5 Hz, which produced a laser power density of ~3 J/cm-2. Data was collected using time-resolved data acquisition and processed using the Iolite software package^78,79. Total acquisition time per analysis was 80 s including 30 s of background time and 40 s of sample ablation, followed by a 10 s washout period. Calibration was performed against the NIST 610 standard glass using the coefficients of⁸⁰. Stoichiometric Si was used as the internal standardization element for garnet (18%) and the Si content of hornblende as determined by EPMA. Precision based on repeated analysis of standards is 5–10%, with detection limits for REE in this study ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 ppm.

Zircon and monazite geochronology

The zircons were separated after rock crushing using conventional heavy liquid and magnetic properties. The grains were mounted in epoxy resin and polish down to expose the near equatorial section. Cathodoluminescence (CL) investigation was carried out on a HITACHI S2250N scanning electron microscope supplied with an ellipsoidal mirror for CL at the Electron Microscopy Unit at the Australian National University in Canberra. Operating conditions for the SEM were 15 kV/60 µA and 20 mm working distance. Zircon crystals from sample 219364 were imaged for CL using a CamScan MV2300 at the Institute of Earth Sciences at University of Lausanne, Switzerland, working at 10 kV and a working distance of 10 mm. The zircon crystals were analysed for U-Th-Pb using the sensitive high resolution ion microprobes (SHRIMP II, sample 212070 and 212796) at the Australian National University, and the Cameca IMS 1280-HR at the University of Lausanne (sample 219364). Instrumental conditions and data acquisition were generally as described by⁸¹ for SHRIMP and by⁸² for Cameca IMS 1280. The data were collected in sets of six scans throughout the masses and a reference zircon was analysed each fourth analysis. U-Pb data were collected over two analytical sessions having calibration uncertainties of 1.0 and 2.1% (2 sigma, Pb/U versus UO/U calibration), which was propagated to single analyses. The measured ²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U ratio was corrected using reference zircon FC1 (1099 Ma, REF) during SHRIMP analyses and zircon 91500 (1065 Ma⁸³) during Cameca-1280 analyses, while FC1 zircon was used as secondary standard (obtained Concordia age 1094 ± 11 Ma). Monazite crystals were analysed using the SHRIMP II ion microprobe following similar analytical conditions as for zircon. Data were collected over a single analytical session with a calibration uncertainty of 1%, using Thompson Mine Monazite as standard (1766 Ma⁸⁴). The analyses for zircon and monazite were corrected for common Pb based on the measured ²⁰⁴Pb according to⁸¹. Data evaluation and age calculation were done using the software Squid 2 and Isoplot/Ex⁸⁵. The common Pb composition was assumed to be that predicted by⁸⁶ model. Average ages are quoted at 95% confidence level (c.l.).

Garnet Sm-Nd and Lu-Hf geochronology

We selected the garnet amphibolite sample 214208 for garnet Sm-Nd and Lu-Hf geochronology, following the methods described by^87,88. In the first instance, pieces of texturally homogeneous rock, free of visible weathering or alteration, were pulverised to gravel-sized particles. From this, ~100 g of clean rock chips were selected for whole rock geochemistry, where the chips were rinsed in de-ionised water. A rotating splitter was used to obtain a 20 g aliquot of chips, which was then ground to powder in an agate ball mill. A second 10 g aliquot was prepared from small rock chips that lacked visible garnet (‘matrix’) and this was powdered separately. The remaining crushed material was disc-milled to a < 500 µm fraction for mineral separation. A garnet concentrate was prepared by standard hydrodynamic and magnetic separation techniques, and from this three aliquots of garnet grains of ~200–250 mg were handpicked under a binocular microscope, emphasising fragments of highest optical clarity and lack of inclusions. These garnet separates were firstly leached in 1 M HCl in an ultrasonic bath, rinsed with MilliQ water, and dried.

The garnet fractions and two ~250 mg whole-rock powders were subsequently dissolved in concentrated HF-HNO₃ mixtures (10:1). The whole rock powders were digested at high pressure in a steel-jacketed PTFE (Teflon) dissolution vessel (Parr type bomb) at 150 °C for 1 week, whereas the garnets were dissolved in sealed Savillex beakers on a 120 °C hotplate for 3 days, to minimise the dissolution of older un-equilibrated accessory phases, such as zircon. Solutions (minus any solid residue in the garnet fractions) were dried and converted to chloride form using firstly a mixture of H₃BO₃ and 6 M HCl and secondly by transferring all samples in 6 M HCl to steel jacket digestion vessels and heating overnight at 150 °C. This yielded clear solutions that were then transferred back to Savillex beakers, spiked with mixed ¹⁷⁶Lu-¹⁸⁰Hf and ¹⁴⁹Sm-¹⁵⁰Nd tracer solutions and allowed to equilibrate on a hotplate for 24 h.

Procedures for chemical separation of Sm, Nd, Lu, and Hf using cation exchange chromatography followed the methodology outlined by⁸⁹. The first stage columns contained 10 ml of BioRad AG50w-X12 resin, onto which samples were loaded as 3 ml 1.0 M HCl/0.1 M HF solutions. The HFS elements were subsequently eluted with 6 ml of 1.0 M HCl/0.1 M HF. The sample matrix was washed from the column with 60 ml of 1.0 M 2.5 M HCl, before a HREE cut was collected using a further 80 ml of 2.5 M HCl. Upon passage of another 25 mL of 2.5 M HCl, the LREE, including Sm and Nd, were eluted in 50 mL of 6.0 M HCl. The HFSE and both the HREE and LREE cuts were then dried for subsequent purification.

The HFSE cut from the first column was dried, re-dissolved in 5 ml of 2.5 M HCl and loaded onto a 0.9 mL column packed with Eichrom Ln-spec resin. The resulting procedure followed the methods of⁹⁰. The column was first washed with 10 ml of both 2.5 M HCl and 6.0 M HCl, after which Ti was removed from the other HFSE with a 0.45 M HNO₃/0.09 M citric acid/1%H₂O₂ mixture. A 6 M HCl/0.06 M HF solution was then used to wash Zr from the column, before Hf was eluted using 5 mL of 6.0 M HCl/0.4 M HF. As a final purification step to remove any remaining REE, this Hf cut was dried, and then loaded as a 0.2 mL 1.0 M HCl/0.1 M HF solution onto a miniaturized (0.6 mL) version of the first stage column. The Hf was collected using 0.6 mL of 1.0 M HCl /0.1 M HF.

The LREE eluate from the first column stage was dissolved in 1 mL of 0.14 M HCl and loaded onto a column filled with 1.7 ml of LnSpec resin for separation of Sm and Nd. Initially, 45 ml of 0.14 M HCl was passed though the column, before Nd was eluted in 40 ml 0.14 M HCl. Sm was subsequently eluted using 10 ml of 0.4 M HCl. The HREE fraction from the first stage column was dissolved in 0.5 mL of 2.5 M HCl and loaded onto 0.9 mL columns containing Ln-spec resin. The resin was then rinsed with 35 mL of 2.5 M HCl to remove the majority of the Yb, before Lu and the remaining Yb was eluted using 5 mL of 6.0 M HCl.

The purified Sm, Nd, Hf and Lu cuts were dried and dissolved in 2% HNO3 in preparation for mass spectrometry. All isotopic analyses were performed on the ThermoFinnigan Neptune multicollector ICP-MS at Washington State University, following procedures outlined by⁹¹ and by⁹². Nd analyses were corrected for mass fractionation using ¹⁴⁶Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd = 0.7219 and normalized using the JNdi reference solution. Sm analyses were corrected for fractionation using ¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁵²Sm = 0.56081. Whole-rock Hf analyses were corrected for mass fractionation using ¹⁷⁹Hf/¹⁷⁷Hf = 0.7325⁹³ and normalized using the JMC-475 reference Hf solution. Lu measurements were made according to the procedure of⁹¹. Mass fractionation corrections were made using the exponential law. Over the course of the study, the mean measured ¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd value for the JNdi solution was 0.512088 ± 0.000016 (2σ, n = 10), and the mean ¹⁷⁶Hf/¹⁷⁷Hf value for the JMC 475 Hf standard was 0.282141 ± 0.000008 (2σ, n = 9).

The Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd isochron dates were calculated with a ¹⁷⁶Lu decay constant of 1.867 × 10-11 a^−1,⁹⁴ and ¹⁴⁷Sm decay constant of 6.54 × 10–12 a⁻¹ ref. 95 Isochron regressions were performed with Isoplot/Ex⁸⁵.

Metamorphism

Mineral chemistry data from sample 219364 was acquired using a Cameca SX-Five electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) at Adelaide Microscopy, University of Adelaide, equipped with 5 tuneable wavelength-dispersive spectrometers. Instrument operating conditions were 15 kV/20 nA with a defocused beam of 5 µm. Beam damage and alkali element migration in silicate analyses were minimized via use of a defocused electron beam. Calibration was performed on certified synthetic and natural mineral standards from Astimex Ltd and P&H Associates. Mean Atomic Number (MAN) background correction was used⁹⁶. Data calibration and reduction was carried out in Probe for EPMA, distributed by Probe Software Inc.

The bulk rock composition used for phase equilibria modelling was determined by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy at Genalysis Laboratory Services, Australia, together with loss on ignition (LOI). FeO content was analysed by Fe²⁺ titration also at ALS Chemex, Australia, and Fe₂O₃ calculated by difference.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information^{(10.7MB, docx)}

41467_2022_35208_MOESM2_ESM.zip^{(444.5KB, zip)}

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data^{(54.3KB, pdf)}

Acknowledgements

Mike Prause helped improving the figures. Z.I., S.R.H., K.F., G.K. and R.S.S. published with the permission of the director of the Geological Survey of Western Australia. K.A.I.S. acknowledges funding from the Australian Research Council (FT100100059) and field logistic support from the Geological Survey of Western Australia. J.T.E. acknowledges funding from the Australian Government via the Australian Research Council Discovery Project scheme (DP200101104).

Author contributions

Z.I. designed the research project, conducted fieldwork, including mapping, sampling, microstructural and petrographic work. He wrote most of the manuscript and coordinated the contributions of the co-authors. K.A.I.S. conducted part of the sampling and all the analytical work for garnet dating, and coordinated the garnet O isotopic investigation. S.R.H. conducted part of the sampling and performed the whole-rock geochemical study. R.D. conducted the zircon and monazite geochronology investigations. K.F. conducted the metamorphic work. H.J. undertook sample preparation and conducted the O isotopic measurements of garnet, with oversight by M.L. J.T.E. conducted the rare earth element (REE) analyses and contributed to writing and editing the manuscript. G.K. conducted part of the fieldwork and contributed to writing and editing the manuscript. W.R.F. contributed to writing and editing the manuscript. V.J.D. developed the protocols for garnet dating and provided advice on analytical procedures. R.S.S. performed the major element analyses and quantitative element mapping of garnet via EPMA. All the co-authors contributed to interpreting the data, to writing/editing the manuscript and compiling figures and tables.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Craig O’Neill, Patrice Rey and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Data availability

All the data that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Open Science Framework, and are available at the following link: https://osf.io/ykrqf/?view_only=118264df69a142f19c9918ce243b1d28.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-35208-2.

References

1.Gerya, T. Geodynamics of the early Earth: quest for the missing paradigm. Geology10.1130/focus102019.1 (2019).
2.Laurent O, Martin H, Moyen JF, Doucelance R. The diversity and evolution of late-Archean granitoids: evidence for the onset of “modern-style” plate tectonics between 3.0 and 2.5Ga. Lithos. 2014;205:208–235. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2014.06.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
3.Smithies RH, Champion DC, van Kranendonk MJ, Howard HM, Hickman AH. Modern-style subduction processes in the Mesoarchaean: Geochemical evidence from the 3.12 Ga Whundo intra-oceanic arc. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2005;231:221–237. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.12.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
4.Holder, R. M., Viete, D. R., Brown, M. & Johnson, T. E. Metamorphism and the evolution of plate tectonics. Nature572, 378–381 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]
5.Brown M, Johnson T. Secular change in metamorphism and the onset of global plate tectonics. Am. Mineralogist. 2018;103:181–196. doi: 10.2138/am-2018-6166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6.van der Velden AJ, Cook FA, Drummond BJ, Goleby BR. Reflections of the Neoarchean: a global perspective. Archean Geodynamics Environ. 2006;164:255–265. doi: 10.1029/164GM16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7.O’Neill C, Lenardic A, Moresi L, Torsvik TH, Lee C-TA. Episodic Precambrian subduction. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2007;262:552–562. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.04.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8.Cawood PA, et al. Geological archive of the onset of plate tectonics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci. 2018;376:20170405. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.O’Neill C, Turner S, Rushmer T. The inception of plate tectonics: a record of failure. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci. 2018;376:20170414. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Smithies R, et al. Two distinct origins for Archean greenstone belts. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2018;487:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.01.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11.Moyen J-F, van Hunen J. Short-term episodicity of Archean plate tectonics. Geology. 2012;40:451–454. doi: 10.1130/G322894.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12.Brown, M., Johnson, T. & Gardiner, N. J. Plate tectonics and the Archean Earth. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci.10.1146/annurev-earth-081619-052705 (2020).
13.Korenaga J. Initiation and evolution of plate tectonics on earth: theories and observations. Annu Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 2013;41:117–151. doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14.Bauer, A. M. et al. Hafnium isotopes in zircons document the gradual onset of mobile-lid tectonics. Geochem. Perspect. Lett. 10.7185/geochemlet.2015 (2020).
15.Cagnard F, Barbey P, Gapais D. Transition between “Archaean-type” and “modern-type” tectonics: insights from the Finnish Lapland Granulite Belt. Precambrian Res. 2011;187:127–142. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2011.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16.Choukroune P, Ludden JN, Chardon D, Calvert AJ, Bouhallier H. Archaean crustal growth and tectonic processes: a comparison of the Superior Province, Canada and the Dharwar Craton, India. Geol. Soc., Lond., Spec. Publ. 1997;121:63–98. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1997.121.01.04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17.Hickman AH. Two contrasting granite-greenstone terranes in the Pilbara Craton, Australia: evidence for vertical and horizontal tectonic regimes prior to 2900 Ma. Precambrian Res. 2004;131:153–172. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2003.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18.Collins W, van Kranendonk M, Teyssier C. Partial convective overturn of Archaean crust in the east Pilbara Craton, Western Australia: driving mechanisms and tectonic implications. J. Struct. Geol. 1998;20:1405–1424. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00073-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19.François C, Philippot P, Rey P, Rubatto D. Burial and exhumation during Archean sagduction in the east Pilbara granite-greenstone terrane. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2014;396:235–251. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.04.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20.Zibra I, et al. Regional-scale polydiapirism predating the Neoarchean Yilgarn Orogeny. Tectonophysics. 2020;779:228375. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
21.Polat, A. & Kerrich, R. Formation of an Archean tectonic melange in the Schreiber-Hemlo greenstone belt, Superior Province, Canada: implications for Archean subduction-accretion process. Tectonics10.1029/1999TC900032 (1999).
22.Czeck DM, Hudleston PJ. Testing models for obliquely plunging lineations in transpression: a natural example and theoretical discussion. J. Struct. Geol. 2003;25:959–982. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(02)00079-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23.Zibra I, Weinberg RF, Peternell M. Neoarchean synmagmatic crustal extrusion in the transpressional Yilgarn Orogen. Tectonics. 2020;39:2019TC005947. doi: 10.1029/2019TC005947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
24.Percival, J. A. et al. Geology and Tectonic Evolution of the Superior Province, Canada (Geological Association of Canada, 2012).
25.Calvert AJA, Ludden JN. Archean continental assembly in the southeastern superior province of Canada. Tectonics. 1999;18:412–429. doi: 10.1029/1999TC900006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
26.Calvert, A. J., Doublier, M. P. & Sellars, S. E. Seismic reflections from a lithospheric suture zone below the Archaean Yilgarn Craton. Nat Commun12, 7245 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
27.Pease, V., Percival, J., Smithies, H., Stevens, G. & van Kranendonk, M. When did plate tectonics begin? evidence from the orogenic record. Special Paper Geol. Soc. Am.10.1130/2008.2440(14) (2008).
28.Hamilton W. Archean magmatism and deformation were not products of plate tectonics. Precambrian Res. 1998;91:143–179. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9268(98)00042-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
29.Stern RJ. The evolution of plate tectonics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci. 2018;376:20170406. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Cawood PA, et al. Accretionary orogens through Earth history. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 2009;318:1–36. doi: 10.1144/SP318.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
31.Johnson TE, et al. Subduction or sagduction? Ambiguity in constraining the origin of ultramafic–mafic bodies in the Archean crust of NW Scotland. Precambrian Res. 2016;283:89–105. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2016.07.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
32.van Kranendonk M, Kröner A, Hoffman JE, Nagel T, Anhaeusser CR. Just another drip: Re-analysis of a proposed Mesoarchean suture from the Barberton mountain land, South Africa. Precambrian Res. 2014;254:19–35. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2014.07.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
33.Webb AAG, Müller T, Zuo J, Haproff PJ, Ramírez-Salazar A. A non–plate tectonic model for the Eoarchean Isua supracrustal belt. Lithosphere. 2020;12:166–179. doi: 10.1130/L1130.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
34.Tappe, S., Smart, K. A., Pearson, D. G., Steenfelt, A. & Simonetti, A. Craton formation in Late Archean subduction zones revealed by first Greenland eclogites. Geology10.1130/G32348.1 (2011).
35.Zibra I, et al. On thrusting, regional unconformities and exhumation of high-grade greenstones in Neoarchean orogens. The case of the Waroonga Shear Zone, Yilgarn Craton. Tectonophysics. 2017;712–713:362–395. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
36.Zibra I. Neoarchean structural evolution of the Murchison Domain (Yilgarn Craton) Precambrian Res. 2020;343:105719. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105719. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
37.Thern ER, Blereau E, Jourdan F, Nelson DR. Tourmaline 40Ar/39Ar geochronology and thermochronology: example from Hadean-zircon-bearing siliciclastic metasedimentary rocks from the Yilgarn Craton. Geochim Cosmochim. Acta. 2020;277:285–299. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2020.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
38.Mole DR, et al. Time-space evolution of an Archean craton: a Hf-isotope window into continent formation. Earth Sci. Rev. 2019;196:102831. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
39.van Kranendonk M, Ivanic TJ, Wingate MTD, Kirkland CL, Wyche S. Long-lived, autochthonous development of the Archean Murchison Domain, and implications for Yilgarn Craton tectonics. Precambrian Res. 2013;229:49–92. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2012.08.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
40.Zibra I, Clos F, Weinberg RF, Peternell M. The ~2730 Ma onset of the Neoarchean Yilgarn Orogeny. Tectonics. 2017;36:1787–1813. doi: 10.1002/2017TC004562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
41.Lowrey, J. R., Wyman, D. A., Ivanic, T. J., Smithies, R. H. & Maas, R. Archean boninite-like rocks of the Northwestern Youanmi Terrane, Yilgarn Craton: Geochemistry and Genesis. J. Petrol.10.1093/petrology/egaa002 (2020).
42.Swager CP, Goleby BR, Drummond BJ, Rattenbury MS, Williams PR. Crustal structure of granite-greenstone terranes in the Eastern Goldfields, Yilgarn Craton, as revealed by seismic reflection profiling. Precambrian Res. 1997;83:43–56. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9268(97)00004-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
43.Klein C. Some Precambrian banded iron-formations (BIFs) from around the world: Their age, geologic setting, mineralogy, metamorphism, geochemistry, and origin. Am. Mineralogist. 2005;90:1473–1499. doi: 10.2138/am.2005.1871. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
44.Valley, J. W. Oxygen isotopes in zircon. Rev. Mineral Geochem. 10.2113/0530343 (2003).
45.Bovay, T., Rubatto, D. & Lanari, P. Pervasive fluid-rock interaction in subducted oceanic crust revealed by oxygen isotope zoning in garnet. Contrib. to Mineral. Petrol.176, 55 (2021).
46.Gregory, R. T. & Taylor, H. P. An oxygen isotope profile in a section of Cretaceous oceanic crust, Samail Ophiolite, Oman: evidence for δ 18 O buffering of the oceans by deep (>5 km) seawater-hydrothermal circulation at mid-ocean ridges. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth10.1029/JB086iB04p02737 (1981).
47.Putlitz, B., Katzir, Y., Matthews, A. & Valley, J. W. Oceanic and orogenic fluid-rock interaction in 18 O/16O-enriched metagabbros of an ophiolite (Tinos, Cyclades). Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00508-8 (2001).
48.Kawakami, T. et al. Behavior of zircon in the upper-amphibolite to granulite facies schist/migmatite transition, Ryoke metamorphic belt, SW Japan: constraints from the melt inclusions in zircon. Contrib. to Mineral. Petrol.165, 575–591 (2013).
49.Duchêne, S. et al. The Lu-Hf dating of garnets and the ages of the Alpine high-pressure metamorphism. Nature387, 586–589 (1997).
50.Godet, A. et al. Lu–Hf garnet dating and the timing of collisions: Palaeoproterozoic accretionary tectonics revealed in the Southeastern Churchill Province, Trans-Hudson Orogen, Canada. J. Metamorph. Geol.10.1111/jmg.12599 (2021).
51.Fodor, R. V., Bauer, G. R., Jacobs, R. S. & Bornhorst, T. J. Kahoolawe Island, Hawaii: Tholeiitic, alkalic, and unusual hydrothermal(?) “enrichment” characteristics. J. Volcanol. Geothermal. Res.31, 171–176 (1987)..
52.Price RC, Gray CM, Wilson RE, Frey FA, Taylor SR. The effects of weathering on rare-earth element, Y and Ba abundances in Tertiary basalts from southeastern Australia. Chem. Geol. 1991;93:245–265. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(91)90117-A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
53.Morris P. Integrating petrogenesis and weathering to understand regolith chemistry: examples from the Palaeoproterozoic Carson Volcanics, north Kimberley, Western Australia. Geochem.: Exploration, Environ., Anal. 2018;18:1–11. [Google Scholar]
54.Yong-Fei, Z. Calculation of oxygen isotope fractionation in anhydrous silicate minerals. Geochim Cosmochim. Acta57, 1079–1091 (1993).
55.Vho, A., Lanari, P., Rubatto, D. & Hermann, J. Tracing fluid transfers in subduction zones: an integrated thermodynamic and δ18O fractionation modelling approach. Solid Earth10.5194/se-2019-140 (2020).
56.Stern RJ, Gerya T. Subduction initiation in nature and models: a review. Tectonophysics. 2018;746:173–198. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
57.Chen S, Libby J, Wyche S, Riganti A. Kinematic nature and origin of regional-scale ductile shear zones in the central Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia. Tectonophysics. 2004;394:139–153. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2004.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
58.Hill, R. I., Chappell, B. W. & Campbell, I. H. in Geological Society of America Special Papers Vol. 272 211–226 (Geological Society of America, 1992).
59.Gapais D, Cagnard F, Gueydan F, Barbey P, Ballèvre M. Mountain building and exhumation processes through time: Inferences from nature and models. Terra Nova. 2009;21:188–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3121.2009.00873.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
60.van Kranendonk M, Collins W, Hickman A. Critical tests of vertical vs. horizontal tectonic models for the Archaean East Pilbara granite–greenstone terrane, Pilbara craton, western Australia. Precambrian Res. 2004;131:173–211. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2003.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
61.de Joux A, Thordarson T, Fitton JG, Hastie AR. The Cosmos greenstone succession, Agnew-Wiluna greenstone belt, Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia: geochemistry of an enriched Neoarchaean volcanic arc succession. Lithos. 2014;205:148–167. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2014.06.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
62.Rubatto D, Hermann J. Exhumation as fast as subduction? Geology. 2001;29:3–6. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0003:EAFAS>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
63.Morris P, Kirkland C. Melting of a subduction-modified mantle source: a case study from the Archean Marda Volcanic Complex, central Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia. Lithos. 2014;190:403–419. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
64.Perchuk AL, Zakharov VS, Gerya TV, Brown M. Hotter mantle but colder subduction in the Precambrian: What are the implications? Precambrian Res. 2019;330:20–34. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2019.04.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
65.Agard P, Yamato P, Jolivet L, Burov E. Exhumation of oceanic blueschists and eclogites in subduction zones: timing and mechanisms. Earth Sci. Rev. 2009;92:53–79. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
66.Dziggel A, Diener JFA, Kolb J, Kokfelt TF. Metamorphic record of accretionary processes during the Neoarchaean: the Nuuk region, southern West Greenland. Precambrian Res. 2014;242:22–38. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2013.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
67.Reddy, S. M., Collins, A. S. & Mruma, A. Complex high-strain deformation in the Usagaran Orogen, Tanzania: Structural setting of Palaeoproterozoic eclogites. Tectonophysics375, 101–123 (2003).
68.Mandal, B. et al. Deep crustal seismic reflection images from the Dharwar craton, Southern India-evidence for the Neoarchean subduction. Geophys. J. Int.10.1093/gji/ggx427 (2018).
69.Reddy SM, Evans DAD. Palaeoproterozoic supercontinents and global evolution: correlations from core to atmosphere. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2009;323:1–26. doi: 10.1144/SP323.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
70.Donovan JJ, Singer JW, Armstrong JT. A new EPMA method for fast trace element analysis in simple matrices. Am. Mineralogist. 2016;101:1839–1853. doi: 10.2138/am-2016-5628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
71.Armstrong, J. T. Quantitative Elemental Analysis of Individual Microparticles with Electron Beam Instruments. Electron Probe Quantitat.10.1007/978-1-4899-2617-3_15 (1991).
72.Hammerli J, et al. Sulfur isotope signatures in the lower crust: A SIMS study on S-rich scapolite of granulites. Chem. Geol. 2017;454:54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.02.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
73.Hellstrom J, Paton C, Woodhead J, Hergt J. Iolite: Software for spatially resolved LA-(Quad and MC)-ICP-MS Analysis. Laser Ablation ICP-MS Earth Sci.: Curr. Pract. Oustanding Issues. 2008;40:343–348. [Google Scholar]
74.Jochum KP, et al. Determination of reference values for NIST SRM 610-617 glasses following ISO guidelines. Geostand. Geoanal Res. 2011;35:397–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2011.00120.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
75.Vielzeuf D, Champenois M, Valley JW, Brunet F, Devidal JL. SIMS analyses of oxygen isotopes: Matrix effects in Fe–Mg–Ca garnets. Chem. Geol. 2005;223:208–226. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
76.Page FZ, Kita NT, Valley JW. Ion microprobe analysis of oxygen isotopes in garnets of complex chemistry. Chem. Geol. 2010;270:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
77.Martin LAJ, et al. Garnet oxygen analysis by SHRIMP-SI: Matrix corrections and application to high-pressure metasomatic rocks from Alpine Corsica. Chem. Geol. 2014;374–375:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.02.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
78.Paton C, Hellstrom J, Paul B, Woodhead J, Hergt J. Iolite: Freeware for the visualisation and processing of mass spectrometric data. J. Anal. Spectrom. 2011;26:2508. doi: 10.1039/c1ja10172b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
79.Paton C, et al. Improved laser ablation U-Pb zircon geochronology through robust downhole fractionation correction. Geochem., Geophysics, Geosystems. 2010;11:n/a–n/a. doi: 10.1029/2009GC002618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
80.Pearce NJG, et al. A compilation of new and published major and trace element data for NIST SRM 610 and NIST SRM 612 glass reference materials. Geostand. Geoanal Res. 1997;21:115–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.1997.tb00538.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
81.Williams IS. U-Th-Pb geochronology by ion microprobe ABOUT TIME. Rev. Economic Geol. 1998;7:1–35. [Google Scholar]
82.Whitehouse MJ. Assigning dates to thin Gneissic veins in high-grade metamorphic terranes: a cautionary tale from Akilia, Southwest Greenland. J. Petrol. 2004;46:291–318. doi: 10.1093/petrology/egh075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
83.Wiedenbeck M, et al. Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analyses. Geostand. Geoanal Res. 1995;19:1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.1995.tb00147.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
84.Stern RA, Berman RG. Monazite U–Pb and Th–Pb geochronology by ion microprobe, with an application to in situ dating of an Archean metasedimentary rock. Chem. Geol. 2001;172:113–130. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00239-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
85.Ludwig KR. User’s manual for Isoplot 3.00, a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronology Center special publication no.4. Components. 2003;4:25–32. [Google Scholar]
86.Stacey JS, Kramers JD. Approximation of terrestrial lead isotope evolution by a two-stage model. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 1975;26:207–221. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(75)90088-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
87.Cheng, H., Lu, T. & Cao, D. Coupled Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd geochronology constrains blueschist-facies metamorphism and closure timing of the Qilian Ocean in the North Qilian orogen. Gondwana Res.34, 99–108 (2016).
88.Zirakparvar, N. A., Vervoort, J. D., McClelland, W. & Lewis, R. S. Insights into the metamorphic evolution of the Belt-Purcell basin; evidence from Lu-Hf garnet geochronology. Can. J. Earth Sci. 10.1139/E10-001 (2010).
89.Johnson TA, Vervoort JD, Ramsey MJ, Aleinikoff JN, Southworth S. Constraints on the timing and duration of orogenic events by combined Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd geochronology: An example from the Grenville orogeny. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2018;501:152–164. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.08.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
90.Münker, C., Weyer, S., Scherer, E. & Mezger, K. Separation of high field strength elements (Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf) and Lu from rock samples for MC-ICPMS measurements. Geochem. Geophys., Geosys.10.1029/2001GC000183 (2001).
91.Vervoort, J. D., Patehett, P. J., Söderlund, U. & Baker, M. Isotopie composition of Yb and the determination of Lu concentrations and Lu/Hf ratios by isotope dilution using MC-ICPMS. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys.10.1029/2004GC000721 (2004).
92.Bouvier A, Vervoort JD, Patchett PJ. The Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd isotopic composition of CHUR: Constraints from unequilibrated chondrites and implications for the bulk composition of terrestrial planets. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2008;273:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
93.Patchett, P. J. & Tatsumoto, M. A routine high-precision method for Lu-Hf isotope geochemistry and chronology. Contrib. to Mineral. Petrol.75, 263–267 (1981).
94.Söderlund, U., Patchett, P. J., Vervoort, J. D. & Isachsen, C. E. The 176Lu decay constant determined by Lu-Hf and U-Pb isotope systematics of Precambrian mafic intrusions. Earth Planet Sci. Lett.10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00012-3 (2004).
95.Lugmair, G. W. & Marti, K. Lunar initial 143Nd/144Nd: differential evolution of the lunar crust and mantle. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 10.1016/0012-821X(78)90021-3 (1978).
96.Donovan, J. J. & Tingle, T. N. An improved mean atomic number background correction for quantitative microanalysis. Microsc. Microanal.10.1017/S1431927696210013 (1996).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information^{(10.7MB, docx)}

41467_2022_35208_MOESM2_ESM.zip^{(444.5KB, zip)}

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data^{(54.3KB, pdf)}

Data Availability Statement

[CR1] 1.Gerya, T. Geodynamics of the early Earth: quest for the missing paradigm. Geology10.1130/focus102019.1 (2019).

[CR2] 2.Laurent O, Martin H, Moyen JF, Doucelance R. The diversity and evolution of late-Archean granitoids: evidence for the onset of “modern-style” plate tectonics between 3.0 and 2.5Ga. Lithos. 2014;205:208–235. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2014.06.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR3] 3.Smithies RH, Champion DC, van Kranendonk MJ, Howard HM, Hickman AH. Modern-style subduction processes in the Mesoarchaean: Geochemical evidence from the 3.12 Ga Whundo intra-oceanic arc. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2005;231:221–237. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.12.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Holder, R. M., Viete, D. R., Brown, M. & Johnson, T. E. Metamorphism and the evolution of plate tectonics. Nature572, 378–381 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR5] 5.Brown M, Johnson T. Secular change in metamorphism and the onset of global plate tectonics. Am. Mineralogist. 2018;103:181–196. doi: 10.2138/am-2018-6166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR6] 6.van der Velden AJ, Cook FA, Drummond BJ, Goleby BR. Reflections of the Neoarchean: a global perspective. Archean Geodynamics Environ. 2006;164:255–265. doi: 10.1029/164GM16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.O’Neill C, Lenardic A, Moresi L, Torsvik TH, Lee C-TA. Episodic Precambrian subduction. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2007;262:552–562. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.04.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.Cawood PA, et al. Geological archive of the onset of plate tectonics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci. 2018;376:20170405. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.O’Neill C, Turner S, Rushmer T. The inception of plate tectonics: a record of failure. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci. 2018;376:20170414. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR10] 10.Smithies R, et al. Two distinct origins for Archean greenstone belts. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2018;487:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.01.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR11] 11.Moyen J-F, van Hunen J. Short-term episodicity of Archean plate tectonics. Geology. 2012;40:451–454. doi: 10.1130/G322894.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Brown, M., Johnson, T. & Gardiner, N. J. Plate tectonics and the Archean Earth. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci.10.1146/annurev-earth-081619-052705 (2020).

[CR13] 13.Korenaga J. Initiation and evolution of plate tectonics on earth: theories and observations. Annu Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 2013;41:117–151. doi: 10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.Bauer, A. M. et al. Hafnium isotopes in zircons document the gradual onset of mobile-lid tectonics. Geochem. Perspect. Lett. 10.7185/geochemlet.2015 (2020).

[CR15] 15.Cagnard F, Barbey P, Gapais D. Transition between “Archaean-type” and “modern-type” tectonics: insights from the Finnish Lapland Granulite Belt. Precambrian Res. 2011;187:127–142. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2011.02.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR16] 16.Choukroune P, Ludden JN, Chardon D, Calvert AJ, Bouhallier H. Archaean crustal growth and tectonic processes: a comparison of the Superior Province, Canada and the Dharwar Craton, India. Geol. Soc., Lond., Spec. Publ. 1997;121:63–98. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1997.121.01.04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.Hickman AH. Two contrasting granite-greenstone terranes in the Pilbara Craton, Australia: evidence for vertical and horizontal tectonic regimes prior to 2900 Ma. Precambrian Res. 2004;131:153–172. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2003.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.Collins W, van Kranendonk M, Teyssier C. Partial convective overturn of Archaean crust in the east Pilbara Craton, Western Australia: driving mechanisms and tectonic implications. J. Struct. Geol. 1998;20:1405–1424. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(98)00073-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR19] 19.François C, Philippot P, Rey P, Rubatto D. Burial and exhumation during Archean sagduction in the east Pilbara granite-greenstone terrane. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2014;396:235–251. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.04.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR20] 20.Zibra I, et al. Regional-scale polydiapirism predating the Neoarchean Yilgarn Orogeny. Tectonophysics. 2020;779:228375. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR21] 21.Polat, A. & Kerrich, R. Formation of an Archean tectonic melange in the Schreiber-Hemlo greenstone belt, Superior Province, Canada: implications for Archean subduction-accretion process. Tectonics10.1029/1999TC900032 (1999).

[CR22] 22.Czeck DM, Hudleston PJ. Testing models for obliquely plunging lineations in transpression: a natural example and theoretical discussion. J. Struct. Geol. 2003;25:959–982. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(02)00079-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR23] 23.Zibra I, Weinberg RF, Peternell M. Neoarchean synmagmatic crustal extrusion in the transpressional Yilgarn Orogen. Tectonics. 2020;39:2019TC005947. doi: 10.1029/2019TC005947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR24] 24.Percival, J. A. et al. Geology and Tectonic Evolution of the Superior Province, Canada (Geological Association of Canada, 2012).

[CR25] 25.Calvert AJA, Ludden JN. Archean continental assembly in the southeastern superior province of Canada. Tectonics. 1999;18:412–429. doi: 10.1029/1999TC900006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR26] 26.Calvert, A. J., Doublier, M. P. & Sellars, S. E. Seismic reflections from a lithospheric suture zone below the Archaean Yilgarn Craton. Nat Commun12, 7245 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR27] 27.Pease, V., Percival, J., Smithies, H., Stevens, G. & van Kranendonk, M. When did plate tectonics begin? evidence from the orogenic record. Special Paper Geol. Soc. Am.10.1130/2008.2440(14) (2008).

[CR28] 28.Hamilton W. Archean magmatism and deformation were not products of plate tectonics. Precambrian Res. 1998;91:143–179. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9268(98)00042-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR29] 29.Stern RJ. The evolution of plate tectonics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci. 2018;376:20170406. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR30] 30.Cawood PA, et al. Accretionary orogens through Earth history. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 2009;318:1–36. doi: 10.1144/SP318.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR31] 31.Johnson TE, et al. Subduction or sagduction? Ambiguity in constraining the origin of ultramafic–mafic bodies in the Archean crust of NW Scotland. Precambrian Res. 2016;283:89–105. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2016.07.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR32] 32.van Kranendonk M, Kröner A, Hoffman JE, Nagel T, Anhaeusser CR. Just another drip: Re-analysis of a proposed Mesoarchean suture from the Barberton mountain land, South Africa. Precambrian Res. 2014;254:19–35. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2014.07.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR33] 33.Webb AAG, Müller T, Zuo J, Haproff PJ, Ramírez-Salazar A. A non–plate tectonic model for the Eoarchean Isua supracrustal belt. Lithosphere. 2020;12:166–179. doi: 10.1130/L1130.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR34] 34.Tappe, S., Smart, K. A., Pearson, D. G., Steenfelt, A. & Simonetti, A. Craton formation in Late Archean subduction zones revealed by first Greenland eclogites. Geology10.1130/G32348.1 (2011).

[CR35] 35.Zibra I, et al. On thrusting, regional unconformities and exhumation of high-grade greenstones in Neoarchean orogens. The case of the Waroonga Shear Zone, Yilgarn Craton. Tectonophysics. 2017;712–713:362–395. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR36] 36.Zibra I. Neoarchean structural evolution of the Murchison Domain (Yilgarn Craton) Precambrian Res. 2020;343:105719. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2020.105719. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR37] 37.Thern ER, Blereau E, Jourdan F, Nelson DR. Tourmaline 40Ar/39Ar geochronology and thermochronology: example from Hadean-zircon-bearing siliciclastic metasedimentary rocks from the Yilgarn Craton. Geochim Cosmochim. Acta. 2020;277:285–299. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2020.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR38] 38.Mole DR, et al. Time-space evolution of an Archean craton: a Hf-isotope window into continent formation. Earth Sci. Rev. 2019;196:102831. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR39] 39.van Kranendonk M, Ivanic TJ, Wingate MTD, Kirkland CL, Wyche S. Long-lived, autochthonous development of the Archean Murchison Domain, and implications for Yilgarn Craton tectonics. Precambrian Res. 2013;229:49–92. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2012.08.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR40] 40.Zibra I, Clos F, Weinberg RF, Peternell M. The ~2730 Ma onset of the Neoarchean Yilgarn Orogeny. Tectonics. 2017;36:1787–1813. doi: 10.1002/2017TC004562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR41] 41.Lowrey, J. R., Wyman, D. A., Ivanic, T. J., Smithies, R. H. & Maas, R. Archean boninite-like rocks of the Northwestern Youanmi Terrane, Yilgarn Craton: Geochemistry and Genesis. J. Petrol.10.1093/petrology/egaa002 (2020).

[CR42] 42.Swager CP, Goleby BR, Drummond BJ, Rattenbury MS, Williams PR. Crustal structure of granite-greenstone terranes in the Eastern Goldfields, Yilgarn Craton, as revealed by seismic reflection profiling. Precambrian Res. 1997;83:43–56. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9268(97)00004-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR43] 43.Klein C. Some Precambrian banded iron-formations (BIFs) from around the world: Their age, geologic setting, mineralogy, metamorphism, geochemistry, and origin. Am. Mineralogist. 2005;90:1473–1499. doi: 10.2138/am.2005.1871. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR44] 44.Valley, J. W. Oxygen isotopes in zircon. Rev. Mineral Geochem. 10.2113/0530343 (2003).

[CR45] 45.Bovay, T., Rubatto, D. & Lanari, P. Pervasive fluid-rock interaction in subducted oceanic crust revealed by oxygen isotope zoning in garnet. Contrib. to Mineral. Petrol.176, 55 (2021).

[CR46] 46.Gregory, R. T. & Taylor, H. P. An oxygen isotope profile in a section of Cretaceous oceanic crust, Samail Ophiolite, Oman: evidence for δ 18 O buffering of the oceans by deep (>5 km) seawater-hydrothermal circulation at mid-ocean ridges. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth10.1029/JB086iB04p02737 (1981).

[CR47] 47.Putlitz, B., Katzir, Y., Matthews, A. & Valley, J. W. Oceanic and orogenic fluid-rock interaction in 18 O/16O-enriched metagabbros of an ophiolite (Tinos, Cyclades). Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00508-8 (2001).

[CR48] 48.Kawakami, T. et al. Behavior of zircon in the upper-amphibolite to granulite facies schist/migmatite transition, Ryoke metamorphic belt, SW Japan: constraints from the melt inclusions in zircon. Contrib. to Mineral. Petrol.165, 575–591 (2013).

[CR49] 49.Duchêne, S. et al. The Lu-Hf dating of garnets and the ages of the Alpine high-pressure metamorphism. Nature387, 586–589 (1997).

[CR50] 50.Godet, A. et al. Lu–Hf garnet dating and the timing of collisions: Palaeoproterozoic accretionary tectonics revealed in the Southeastern Churchill Province, Trans-Hudson Orogen, Canada. J. Metamorph. Geol.10.1111/jmg.12599 (2021).

[CR51] 51.Fodor, R. V., Bauer, G. R., Jacobs, R. S. & Bornhorst, T. J. Kahoolawe Island, Hawaii: Tholeiitic, alkalic, and unusual hydrothermal(?) “enrichment” characteristics. J. Volcanol. Geothermal. Res.31, 171–176 (1987)..

[CR52] 52.Price RC, Gray CM, Wilson RE, Frey FA, Taylor SR. The effects of weathering on rare-earth element, Y and Ba abundances in Tertiary basalts from southeastern Australia. Chem. Geol. 1991;93:245–265. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(91)90117-A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR53] 53.Morris P. Integrating petrogenesis and weathering to understand regolith chemistry: examples from the Palaeoproterozoic Carson Volcanics, north Kimberley, Western Australia. Geochem.: Exploration, Environ., Anal. 2018;18:1–11. [Google Scholar]

[CR54] 54.Yong-Fei, Z. Calculation of oxygen isotope fractionation in anhydrous silicate minerals. Geochim Cosmochim. Acta57, 1079–1091 (1993).

[CR55] 55.Vho, A., Lanari, P., Rubatto, D. & Hermann, J. Tracing fluid transfers in subduction zones: an integrated thermodynamic and δ18O fractionation modelling approach. Solid Earth10.5194/se-2019-140 (2020).

[CR56] 56.Stern RJ, Gerya T. Subduction initiation in nature and models: a review. Tectonophysics. 2018;746:173–198. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR57] 57.Chen S, Libby J, Wyche S, Riganti A. Kinematic nature and origin of regional-scale ductile shear zones in the central Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia. Tectonophysics. 2004;394:139–153. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2004.08.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR58] 58.Hill, R. I., Chappell, B. W. & Campbell, I. H. in Geological Society of America Special Papers Vol. 272 211–226 (Geological Society of America, 1992).

[CR59] 59.Gapais D, Cagnard F, Gueydan F, Barbey P, Ballèvre M. Mountain building and exhumation processes through time: Inferences from nature and models. Terra Nova. 2009;21:188–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3121.2009.00873.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR60] 60.van Kranendonk M, Collins W, Hickman A. Critical tests of vertical vs. horizontal tectonic models for the Archaean East Pilbara granite–greenstone terrane, Pilbara craton, western Australia. Precambrian Res. 2004;131:173–211. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2003.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR61] 61.de Joux A, Thordarson T, Fitton JG, Hastie AR. The Cosmos greenstone succession, Agnew-Wiluna greenstone belt, Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia: geochemistry of an enriched Neoarchaean volcanic arc succession. Lithos. 2014;205:148–167. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2014.06.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR62] 62.Rubatto D, Hermann J. Exhumation as fast as subduction? Geology. 2001;29:3–6. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0003:EAFAS>2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR63] 63.Morris P, Kirkland C. Melting of a subduction-modified mantle source: a case study from the Archean Marda Volcanic Complex, central Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia. Lithos. 2014;190:403–419. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR64] 64.Perchuk AL, Zakharov VS, Gerya TV, Brown M. Hotter mantle but colder subduction in the Precambrian: What are the implications? Precambrian Res. 2019;330:20–34. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2019.04.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR65] 65.Agard P, Yamato P, Jolivet L, Burov E. Exhumation of oceanic blueschists and eclogites in subduction zones: timing and mechanisms. Earth Sci. Rev. 2009;92:53–79. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR66] 66.Dziggel A, Diener JFA, Kolb J, Kokfelt TF. Metamorphic record of accretionary processes during the Neoarchaean: the Nuuk region, southern West Greenland. Precambrian Res. 2014;242:22–38. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2013.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR67] 67.Reddy, S. M., Collins, A. S. & Mruma, A. Complex high-strain deformation in the Usagaran Orogen, Tanzania: Structural setting of Palaeoproterozoic eclogites. Tectonophysics375, 101–123 (2003).

[CR68] 68.Mandal, B. et al. Deep crustal seismic reflection images from the Dharwar craton, Southern India-evidence for the Neoarchean subduction. Geophys. J. Int.10.1093/gji/ggx427 (2018).

[CR69] 69.Reddy SM, Evans DAD. Palaeoproterozoic supercontinents and global evolution: correlations from core to atmosphere. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2009;323:1–26. doi: 10.1144/SP323.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR70] 70.Donovan JJ, Singer JW, Armstrong JT. A new EPMA method for fast trace element analysis in simple matrices. Am. Mineralogist. 2016;101:1839–1853. doi: 10.2138/am-2016-5628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR71] 71.Armstrong, J. T. Quantitative Elemental Analysis of Individual Microparticles with Electron Beam Instruments. Electron Probe Quantitat.10.1007/978-1-4899-2617-3_15 (1991).

[CR72] 72.Hammerli J, et al. Sulfur isotope signatures in the lower crust: A SIMS study on S-rich scapolite of granulites. Chem. Geol. 2017;454:54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2017.02.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR73] 73.Hellstrom J, Paton C, Woodhead J, Hergt J. Iolite: Software for spatially resolved LA-(Quad and MC)-ICP-MS Analysis. Laser Ablation ICP-MS Earth Sci.: Curr. Pract. Oustanding Issues. 2008;40:343–348. [Google Scholar]

[CR74] 74.Jochum KP, et al. Determination of reference values for NIST SRM 610-617 glasses following ISO guidelines. Geostand. Geoanal Res. 2011;35:397–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2011.00120.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR75] 75.Vielzeuf D, Champenois M, Valley JW, Brunet F, Devidal JL. SIMS analyses of oxygen isotopes: Matrix effects in Fe–Mg–Ca garnets. Chem. Geol. 2005;223:208–226. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR76] 76.Page FZ, Kita NT, Valley JW. Ion microprobe analysis of oxygen isotopes in garnets of complex chemistry. Chem. Geol. 2010;270:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR77] 77.Martin LAJ, et al. Garnet oxygen analysis by SHRIMP-SI: Matrix corrections and application to high-pressure metasomatic rocks from Alpine Corsica. Chem. Geol. 2014;374–375:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.02.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR78] 78.Paton C, Hellstrom J, Paul B, Woodhead J, Hergt J. Iolite: Freeware for the visualisation and processing of mass spectrometric data. J. Anal. Spectrom. 2011;26:2508. doi: 10.1039/c1ja10172b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR79] 79.Paton C, et al. Improved laser ablation U-Pb zircon geochronology through robust downhole fractionation correction. Geochem., Geophysics, Geosystems. 2010;11:n/a–n/a. doi: 10.1029/2009GC002618. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR80] 80.Pearce NJG, et al. A compilation of new and published major and trace element data for NIST SRM 610 and NIST SRM 612 glass reference materials. Geostand. Geoanal Res. 1997;21:115–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.1997.tb00538.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR81] 81.Williams IS. U-Th-Pb geochronology by ion microprobe ABOUT TIME. Rev. Economic Geol. 1998;7:1–35. [Google Scholar]

[CR82] 82.Whitehouse MJ. Assigning dates to thin Gneissic veins in high-grade metamorphic terranes: a cautionary tale from Akilia, Southwest Greenland. J. Petrol. 2004;46:291–318. doi: 10.1093/petrology/egh075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR83] 83.Wiedenbeck M, et al. Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analyses. Geostand. Geoanal Res. 1995;19:1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.1995.tb00147.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR84] 84.Stern RA, Berman RG. Monazite U–Pb and Th–Pb geochronology by ion microprobe, with an application to in situ dating of an Archean metasedimentary rock. Chem. Geol. 2001;172:113–130. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00239-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR85] 85.Ludwig KR. User’s manual for Isoplot 3.00, a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronology Center special publication no.4. Components. 2003;4:25–32. [Google Scholar]

[CR86] 86.Stacey JS, Kramers JD. Approximation of terrestrial lead isotope evolution by a two-stage model. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 1975;26:207–221. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(75)90088-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR87] 87.Cheng, H., Lu, T. & Cao, D. Coupled Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd geochronology constrains blueschist-facies metamorphism and closure timing of the Qilian Ocean in the North Qilian orogen. Gondwana Res.34, 99–108 (2016).

[CR88] 88.Zirakparvar, N. A., Vervoort, J. D., McClelland, W. & Lewis, R. S. Insights into the metamorphic evolution of the Belt-Purcell basin; evidence from Lu-Hf garnet geochronology. Can. J. Earth Sci. 10.1139/E10-001 (2010).

[CR89] 89.Johnson TA, Vervoort JD, Ramsey MJ, Aleinikoff JN, Southworth S. Constraints on the timing and duration of orogenic events by combined Lu–Hf and Sm–Nd geochronology: An example from the Grenville orogeny. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2018;501:152–164. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.08.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR90] 90.Münker, C., Weyer, S., Scherer, E. & Mezger, K. Separation of high field strength elements (Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf) and Lu from rock samples for MC-ICPMS measurements. Geochem. Geophys., Geosys.10.1029/2001GC000183 (2001).

[CR91] 91.Vervoort, J. D., Patehett, P. J., Söderlund, U. & Baker, M. Isotopie composition of Yb and the determination of Lu concentrations and Lu/Hf ratios by isotope dilution using MC-ICPMS. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys.10.1029/2004GC000721 (2004).

[CR92] 92.Bouvier A, Vervoort JD, Patchett PJ. The Lu-Hf and Sm-Nd isotopic composition of CHUR: Constraints from unequilibrated chondrites and implications for the bulk composition of terrestrial planets. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 2008;273:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[CR93] 93.Patchett, P. J. & Tatsumoto, M. A routine high-precision method for Lu-Hf isotope geochemistry and chronology. Contrib. to Mineral. Petrol.75, 263–267 (1981).

[CR94] 94.Söderlund, U., Patchett, P. J., Vervoort, J. D. & Isachsen, C. E. The 176Lu decay constant determined by Lu-Hf and U-Pb isotope systematics of Precambrian mafic intrusions. Earth Planet Sci. Lett.10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00012-3 (2004).

[CR95] 95.Lugmair, G. W. & Marti, K. Lunar initial 143Nd/144Nd: differential evolution of the lunar crust and mantle. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 10.1016/0012-821X(78)90021-3 (1978).

[CR96] 96.Donovan, J. J. & Tingle, T. N. An improved mean atomic number background correction for quantitative microanalysis. Microsc. Microanal.10.1017/S1431927696210013 (1996).

PERMALINK

Greenstone burial–exhumation cycles at the late Archean transition to plate tectonics

Zibra Ivan

Kemp Anthony I S

Smithies R Hugh

Rubatto Daniela

Korhonen Fawna

Hammerli Johannes

Johnson Tim E

Gessner Klaus

Weinberg Roberto F

Vervoort Jeff D

Martin Laure

Romano Sandra S

Abstract

Introduction

Fig. 1. Geological maps and cross sections, Yilgarn Craton.

Fig. 2. Prominent outcrop-scale features of the Mount Ida greenstone belt.

Fig. 3. Geological maps of the Waroonga shear zone.

Fig. 4. Typical meso- and microscale features of the main rock types in the Waroonga greenstone belt.

Results

Geochemistry and O isotopes in garnet

Fig. 5. Trace-element and O-isotope compositions of amphibolite from the Waroonga greenstone belt.

Zircon, monazite and garnet geochronology

Fig. 6. Geochronology results for zircon, monazite and garnet.

Metamorphic data

Fig. 7. Metamorphic evolution of the Waroonga greenstone belt (WGB).

Discussion

Fig. 8. Tectonomagmatic evolution of the Waroonga greenstone belt (WGB) and the Yilgarn lithosphere.

Fig. 9. Tectonic evolution of the central portion of the Yilgarn Craton.

Methods

Whole-rock major and trace element analyses

Major element analyses and quantitative element mapping via electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA)

Trace-element analyses via LA-ICP-MS

Oxygen isotope analyses via SIMS

Rare earth element analyses

Zircon and monazite geochronology

Garnet Sm-Nd and Lu-Hf geochronology

Metamorphism

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Peer review

Peer review information

Data availability

Competing interests

Footnotes

Supplementary information

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases