Skip to main content
Frontiers in Physiology logoLink to Frontiers in Physiology
. 2022 Dec 9;13:1105285. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1105285

Corrigendum: Cerebrovascular reactivity measurement using magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review

Emilie Sleight 1,2, Michael S Stringer 1,2,*, Ian Marshall 1,2, Joanna M Wardlaw 1,2, Michael J Thrippleton 1,2
PMCID: PMC9780690  PMID: 36569753

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 5 as published: the wrong Figure 5A was inserted. The corrected Figure 5 and its caption appear below.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Distribution of the (A) CVR processing and (B) delay computation methods with the associated year of publication of the paper. The category “Others” in (B) includes deconvolution to find the HRF between the EtCO2 and the MRI signal, and GLM with two (“fast” and “slow”) regressors. STD, standard deviation of MRI signal; HRF, haemodynamic response function; GLM, general linear model.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Articles from Frontiers in Physiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES