Skip to main content
OTA International logoLink to OTA International
. 2022 Sep 19;5(4):e207. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000207

Impact of local anesthesia block on pain medication use and length of hospital stay in elderly indigenous patients in Alaska hospitalized for fragility fracture

Aimee Young a,*, Renee Robinson b, Elaine Nguyen b, Eric Stewart a, Ai-Ling Lin a, Michelle Locke a, Rowan Hurrell a
PMCID: PMC9782348  PMID: 36569104

Abstract

Introduction: Fragility fractures (low-energy, minimal-trauma fractures) are common in the aging population and can lead to decreased function, increased mortality, and long-lasting pain. Although opioids are helpful in reducing acute postoperative pain, they present risks that may lead to increased morbidity and mortality.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective review of medical records of all Alaska Native and American Indian people older than 50 years, who received surgery for hip fracture repair between January 2018 and June 2019 (n = 128).

Results: We found that receipt of a peripheral nerve block (PNB) is a predictor for decreased length of hospital stay. However, receipt of PNB did not predict a reduction in postoperative morphine milligram equivalents opioid doses.

Discussion: Further study is required to determine whether one PNB method is superior to others based on individual-level characteristics.

Keywords: anesthesia block, fragility fracture, hip fracture, pain management, pain

1. Introduction

Osteoporosis occurs in over 6 million hip fractures each year.[1] Approximately 20% of patients with hip fracture die within a year after fracture, 40% lose the ability to walk independently, 10% suffer another fracture within the 1 year,[2] and 5%–10% are diagnosed with a subsequent hip fracture within 3 years, costing the US health care system over $17 billion per year.[3] Fragility fractures, often referred to as low-energy, minimal-trauma fractures, are becoming more common in the aging population.[4,5] Fragility fractures such as proximal femur fractures can be disabling, leading to decreased function, increased mortality, and long-lasting pain. Despite opioid medications not being a first-line treatment for chronic, nonmalignant, surgical pain, 25% of adults 65 years and older filled at least one opioid prescription in the past year.[6] Age-related alterations in metabolism, higher burden of comorbid conditions, and polypharmacy make elderly patients more vulnerable to drug-related harm, fractures, and recurrent fractures postoperatively.[7]

To limit opioid exposure in elderly patients requiring surgical treatment, peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) and regional anesthesia have been used to enhance patient analgesia.[8] PNBs reversibly inhibit nerve transmission binding voltage-gated sodium channels in the nerve plasma membrane, blocking pain signals from reaching the brain, which could potentially decrease both postoperative opioid requirements and the risk of opioid-related adverse events in elder patients receiving surgical treatment for hip fractures. In 2018, the International Fragility Fracture Network issued a consensus statement recommending anesthetists develop and implement analgesia protocols that incorporate nerve blockade to minimize opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, and sedative medications.[9] Interventions that include PNBs have been shown to be low risk, increasing mobility, and reducing pain in patients undergoing surgery for a fragility fracture.[10] Relatively little is known about the osteoporosis femur fracture risk and the effectiveness of current management strategies in the Alaska Native (AN) and American Indian (AI) population in Alaska. A limited number of studies on osteoporosis risk reduction, prevention, and management exist in AI communities and even fewer in AN people.[6,11] Most health research with and for AN and AI people has been conducted with tribal communities living on reservations, receiving care primarily by the federal government (Indian Health Service).[11] Alaska Native individuals are generally of shorter stature and have been attributed to unique environmental influences, diet, and genetics.[7] A majority of AN and AI individuals in Alaska live in an urban setting and receive care directly from interdisciplinary health care teams within the Alaska Native Medical Center (ANMC) tribally owned and operated health care system.[12] It is unclear whether opioid-sparing, multimodal approaches to pain management using PNBs are effective in AN/AI communities. Clinical trials are currently examining opioid use in single-shot nerve block versus continuous peripheral nerve infusion in anterior cruciate ligament repair; however, the use in fragility fractures including proximal femur fractures in the AN community is not evaluated. This review sought to determine whether PNBs are predictive in reducing postoperative opioid use and length of hospitalization in AN/AI elder patients requiring surgery for fracture repair.

2. Materials and Methods

ANMC is a tribally owned and operated health corporation that provides comprehensive medical services (including acute, specialty, primary, and behavioral health services) to 166,000 AN/AI people living across Alaska.

Consistent with the International Fragility Fracture Network recommendations, ANMC hospitalists, in collaboration with pharmacy personnel, established a multimodal care protocol. Per the protocol, 1 of 7 anesthesiologists evaluated candidates for PNB for patients admitted to the hospital with a fragility fracture.

A retrospective review was undertaken of medical records of all AN and AI beneficiaries eligible for health care services within ANMC and who were age older than 50 years, who received surgery for fracture repair between January 2018 and June 2019. ANMC provides services to 158,000 beneficiaries across the state of Alaska covering >660,000 square miles. Individuals with a history of chronic opioid use (use of long-acting opioids, >7 days) were excluded. The time frame was chosen based on the change in regional anesthesia use and site initiation of a project design. Procedures were reviewed and approved by the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium research review committee and Alaska Area Institutional Review Board and deemed non-research.

The following patient data were extracted (by information technology services or chart review) from the Cerner electronic medical record: age, sex, geographic region, height, weight, postoperative day of ambulation, chronic conditions, acute and chronic medications received, and type of surgery for hip fracture (International Classification of Diseases-10). Pertinent laboratory variables that would affect medication metabolism and response (serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, serum calcium, and vitamin D) were also collected. The primary outcome of this study was length of stay (LOS), and the secondary outcome was morphine milligram equivalents (MME) dose from postoperative days 1 to 3.

Baseline variables between those who received a PNB (fascia iliaca compartment block) and those who did not were compared using the t test and χ2 test for continuous and categorical data, respectively. Simple linear regression was performed for each variable, and those found to be statistically significant were added to the multiple linear regression model with the block variable. In both regression models, categorical variables were recoded into dummy continuous variables. P-values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

In total, 128 patients were included in the analysis: 61 patients (46% urban) received a PNB and 67 patients (54% urban) did not receive a PNB (Table 1). The mean (SD) LOS for patients receiving a PNB and patients who did not receive a PNB was 10.2 (6.5) days and 13.5 (11.6) days, respectively. In the simple linear regression for LOS, the following variables were statistically significant: PNB, sex, age, height, weight, postoperative day of ambulation, diabetes, and functional health status (Table 2). When these variables were added to the multiple linear regression, PNB, age, postoperative day of ambulation, and diabetes remained significant.

TABLE 1.

Baseline Characteristics (N = 128).

Characteristic No PNB (n = 67), n (%) PNB (n = 61), n (%) P *
Sex, male 20 (29.9) 17 (27.9) 0.8049
Age (years), mean (SD) 75.6 (9.8) 74.0 (10.3) 0.3800
Region 0.4611
 Far north 7 (10.5) 10 (16.4)
 Interior 1 (1.5) 2 (3.3)
 Southeast 3 (4.5) 5 (8.2)
 South central 31 (46.3) 22 (36.1)
 Southwest 23 (34.3) 22 (36.1)
 Non-Alaska 2 (3.0) 0 (0)
Height (cm), mean (SD) 156.6 (10.7) 157.6 (10.7) 0.5852
Weight (kg), mean (SD) 61.6 (16.0) 58.8 (15.7) 0.3255
Postoperative day of ambulation, mean (SD) 1.8 (1.4) 1.7 (1.3) 0.5708
Diabetes 7 (10.5) 10 (16.4) 0.3222
Current smoker within 1 year 10 (14.9) 24 (39.3) 0.0018
Functional health status 0.9193
 Independent 52 (77.6) 49 (80.3)
 Partially dependent 14 (20.9) 11 (18.0)
 Totally dependent 1 (1.5) 1 (1.6)
Hypertension requiring medication 46 (68.7) 37 (60.7) 0.3437
CKD 3 or 4 9 (13.4) 5 (8.2) 0.3431
Steroid/immunosuppressant use 2 (3.0) 9 (14.8) 0.0177
Chronic liver failure 2 (3.0) 2 (3.3) 0.9240
History of fracture 11 (16.4) 12 (19.7) 0.6320
Osteoporosis or fragility fracture history 19 (28.4) 20 (32.8) 0.5867
Laboratory values, mean (SD)
 Serum creatinine 0.8 (0.5) 0.8 (0.2) 0.2635
 BUN 19.4 (11.6) 17.2 (10.4) 0.2806
 Calcium 8.9 (0.6) 8.7 (0.6) 0.1110
 AST/SGOTc 29.2 (19.1) 24.8 (10.5) 0.1117
 ALTc 23.3 (17.0) 21.8 (21.6) 0.6816
 Vitamin D 32.1 (12.1) 30.7 (13.1) 0.5911
Postoperative ICD-10 code 0.0690
 Osteoporosis with current pathological fracture (M80-) 13 (19.4) 21 (34.4)
 Fracture of head and neck of femur (S72.0-) 23 (34.3) 12 (19.7)
 Pertrochanteric fracture (S72.1-) or subtrochanteric fracture of femur (S72.2-) 25 (37.3) 26 (42.6)
 Others 6 (9.0) 2 (3.3)

Bold entries are statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05).

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CKD, chronic kidney disease; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; PNB, peripheral nerve block; SGOT, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase.

*

Categorical data were compared using the Pearson χ2 test; continuous data were compared using the pooled t test for equal variances and unpooled t test for unequal variances.

TABLE 2.

Regression Models Results for LOS.

Variable* P
Simple linear regression
 Block 0.0495
 Sex 0.0031
 Age 0.0112
 Height 0.0416
 Weight 0.0028
 Postoperative day of ambulation <0.0001
 Diabetes 0.0141
 Functional health status 0.0394
Multiple linear regression
 Block 0.0476
 Age 0.0041
 Postoperative day of ambulation 0.0003
Regression model results for mean MEQ dose from postoperative days 1 to 3
 Diabetes 0.0280
Simple linear regression
 Block 0.7706
 Age 0.0009
 History of fracture 0.0060
 Osteoporosis or fragility fracture history 0.0006
Multiple linear regression
 Block 0.9372
 Age 0.0059

LOS, length of stay; MEQ, milliequivalents.

*

Only statistically significant variables are shown (P ≤ 0.05); block variable are always shown.

Categorical variables recoded into dummy continuous variables.

The mean (SD) MME dose from postoperative days 1 to 3 for patients receiving PNB and those who did not receive PNB was 22.6 (20.9) mg and 21.5 (21.2) mg, respectively. In the simple linear regression for mean MME dose from postoperative days 1 to 3, only age, history of fracture, and osteoporosis were significant (Table 2). In the multiple linear regression model with these variables and PNB, age remained significant. However, receipt of PNB did not predict a reduction in postoperative MME opioid doses.

4. Discussion

Access to health care services is limited in many areas of Alaska requiring the use of frontline health care providers in the community to screen patients and provide protocol-based care to individuals in rural and underserved communities.[10,1315] The focus of the codeveloped multimodal care protocol was to better identify, treat, and prevent fractures, improving health outcomes and reducing complications. The multimodal care protocol standardizes care, prompting laboratory assessment (eg, vitamin D and serum calcium), screening for secondary causes of osteoporosis, and guiding pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment (eg, vitamin D, calcium, bisphosphonates, improved pain control, using less narcotics, improved early mobility, etc).

Care of hip fractures is complicated by the number of comorbid conditions, limited physiologic reserve, cognitive impairment, and frailty. Early fracture repair and mobilization is associated with better health outcomes, decreased composite mortality, and medical complications (myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia).[1618] Poor pain control impedes postoperative rehabilitation, is associated with adverse physiological and psychological consequences, and reduces patients' health-related quality of life.[19] Many patients complain of pain >1 year after fracture unrelieved by analgesics, affecting mobility, functional activity, independence, sleep, and energy.[19,20] Approximately 10% of opioid-naive older adults who received postoperative prescription for an opioid continue to request and take opioids for pain 3 months after surgery.[11] Increased use of opioids in older adults, although helpful in reducing postoperative pain, can lead to additional risks (eg, falls, constipation, misuse, and/or addiction), requiring safer pain management options such as PNBs.

Local anesthetics and opioid drugs have been used to treat postoperative pain since the early 1980s. PNBs, single-shot or catheter-based, have been shown to provide improved and extended pain control, reduce opioid utilization, and improve patient satisfaction and health outcomes in both upper and lower extremity surgeries such as hip fractures. However, PNBs are still not widely available to all persons with fractures. It is unclear whether clinical response differs based on fracture site, general and spinal techniques used, depth of sedation, and/or individual patient difference. In our study, PNB use, age, postoperative day of ambulation, and history of diabetes significantly predicted LOS. However, further study is required to determine whether one PNB method is better than another based on individual-level characteristics (age, sex, hip fracture severity, previous hip fracture, and individual-level variations in nerve distributions and pain blockade). The results support further study of PNBs for postoperative pain control, including different PNB methods and patient-level characteristics that may affect outcomes. Given the study design, we were unable to account for all residual confounders. There may be other factors that affect our outcomes of interest.

Notable limitations of this pragmatic study include but are not limited to the following: small sample population, nonrandom therapy selection by providers, cultural bias regarding therapy selection and pain management support, and lack of previous research studies on the topic. However, the diverse communities participating in this study are historically understudied and have a history of variable response to pain management strategies warranting further study.[12]

5. Conclusion

In our study, PNB use, recommended by the multimodal care protocol, was shown to significantly predict decreased LOS postoperatively by AN and AI elder patients surgically treated for hip fracture.

Footnotes

The study was deemed exempt from Institutional Review Board and Animal Use Committee Review.

Source of funding: Nil.

None of the investigators in the study had any conflicts of interest, and this project did not receive any specific grant funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Contributor Information

Renee Robinson, Email: reneerobinson@isu.edu.

Elaine Nguyen, Email: nguyelai@isu.edu.

Eric Stewart, Email: enstewart@anthc.org.

Ai-Ling Lin, Email: alin@anthc.org.

Michelle Locke, Email: mrlocke@anthc.org.

Rowan Hurrell, Email: rjwhurrell@anthc.org.

References

  • 1.Wright MC, Dunbar S, Macpherson BC, et al. Toward designing information display to support critical care. A qualitative contextual evaluation and visioning effort. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7:912–929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Balasubramanian A, Zhang J, Chen L, et al. Risk of subsequent fracture after prior fracture among older women. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30:79–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, et al. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brown JP, Josse RG; Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ. 2002;167(10 suppl):S1–S34. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vanasse A, Dagenais P, Niyonsenga T, et al. Bone mineral density measurement and osteoporosis treatment after a fragility fracture in older adults: regional variation and determinants of use in Quebec. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Amir O, Berry SD, Zullo AR, et al. Incidence of hip fracture in Native American residents of U.S. nursing homes. Bone. 2019;123:204–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Heller CA. Height, weight, and growth of Alaskan Eskimos. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1967;113:338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rashiq S, Vandermeer B, Abou-Setta AM, et al. Efficacy of supplemental peripheral nerve blockade for hip fracture surgery: multiple treatment comparison. Can J Anesth. 2013;60:230–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.White SM, Altermatt F, Barry J, et al. International Fragility Fracture Network Delphi consensus statement on the principles of anaesthesia for patients with hip fracture. Anaesthesia. 2018;73:863–874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Comeau-Gauthier M, Bhandari M. Cochrane in CORR®: peripheral nerve blocks for hip fracture surgery in adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479:885–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Frech T, Mani K, Ferrucci ED, et al. Prevalence of fracture and osteoporosis risk factors in American Indian and Alaska Native people. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23:1157–1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yuan NP, Bartgis J, Demers D. Promoting ethical research with American Indian and Alaska Native people living in urban areas. Am J Public Health. 2014;104:2085–2091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cueva M, Hicks T, Kuhnley R, Cueva K. A wellness course for community health workers in Alaska: “wellness lives in the heart of the community.” Int J Circumpolar Health. 2012;71:19125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guay J, Parker MJ, Griffiths R, Kopp S. Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5:CD001159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guay J, Kopp S. Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;11:CD001159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, et al. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2010;182:1609–1616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pincus D, Ravi B, Wasserstein D, et al. Association between wait time and 30-day mortality in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery. JAMA. 2017;318:1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wagner DD, Hynes RO. Topological arrangement of the major structural features of fibronectin. J Biol Chem. 1980;255:4304–4312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wu CL, Cohen SR, Richman JM, et al. Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:1079–1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Karani R, Meier DE. Systemic pharmacologic postoperative pain management in the geriatric orthopaedic patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;425:26–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from OTA International are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES