Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 Sep 12;10(38):12873–12881. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04045

Assessing the Influence of Betaine-Based Natural Deep Eutectic Systems on Horseradish Peroxidase

Nicolás F Gajardo-Parra , Liane Meneses , Ana Rita C Duarte , Alexandre Paiva ‡,*, Christoph Held †,*
PMCID: PMC9783073  PMID: 36573121

Abstract

graphic file with name sc2c04045_0008.jpg

To validate the use of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in natural deep eutectic systems (NADES), five different betaine-based NADES were characterized in terms of water content, water activity, density, and viscosity experimentally and by thermodynamic modeling. The results show that the NADES under study have a water activity of about 0.4 at 37 °C for water contents between 14 and 22 wt %. The densities of the studied NADES had values between 1.2 and 1.3 g.cm–3 at 20 °C. The density was modeled with a state-of-the-art equation of state; an excellent agreement with the experimental density data was achieved, allowing reasonable predictions for water activities. The system betaine:glycerol (1:2) was found to be the most viscous with a dynamic viscosity of ∼600 mPa.s at 40 °C, while all the other systems had viscosities <350 mPa.s at 40 °C. The impact of the NADES on the enzymatic activity, as well as on, conformational and thermal stability was assessed. The system betaine/sorbitol:water (1:1:3) showed the highest benefit for enzymatic activity, increasing it by two-folds. Moreover, upon NADES addition, thermal stability was increased followed by an increment in a-helix secondary structure content.

Keywords: biocatalysis, thermodynamics, natural deep eutectic systems (NADES), perturbed-chain statistical associating fluid theory (PC-SAFT), viscosity, density, water activity

Short abstract

In this work, the influence of five betaine-based natural deep eutectic systems on the activity and conformation of horseradish peroxidase was studied. The important conclusion is that binary parameters that were fitted to density were able to predict aw values successfully.

1. Introduction

Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) is an oxidoreductase enzyme (E.C. 1.11.1.7) present in the roots of the perennial herb, produced on a large scale due to its industrial application in clinical diagnostic kits or immunoassays.1,2 Although HRP is a considerably thermostable enzyme, its structural stability and biocatalytic activity are essential for the inclusion in industrial processes.3 Various approaches have been used in the literature to increase enzyme activity without decreasing stability, such as protein engineering, high-pressure operation, protein immobilization, and the addition of co-solvents.4

Among the green solvents studied, deep eutectic systems (DES) are prominent homogeneou liquids solvents obtained from the mixture of two or more components that, in a particular molar ratio show a pronounced decrease in the melting point due to strong interactions.5 When all the components used are naturally occurring products they are categorized as natural deep eutectic systems (NADES).6 DES and NADES have been applied in numerous engineering fields.6 Specifically, NADES have been used in several enzymatic reactions, either as a co-solvent or as reaction medium.7 NADES had positive effects on the reaction kinetics of bovine live catalase,8 boost the enzymatic activity of laccases,9 improved the stability of lipases,10 and increased the yield of oxidoreductases,11 among others. Nevertheless, in most cases, the election of an appropriate NADES for the reaction lacks theoretical explanation and is based on trial-and-error procedures.

Water activity (aw) is one of the parameters that highly influences enzymatic activity, and several authors have studied its influence. Water is necessary to ensure enzymatic mobility; nevertheless, in excess it can also promote interactions that could change the enzyme confirmation, which can be harmful due to the complete loss of the structure.12 Enzyme conformation during storage and reaction depends on an essential hydration shell, which acts as a lubricant that allows conformational mobility and molecular environment adaptation.13 A reaction environment with controlled aw can also positively affect the enzyme thermostability, preventing heat inactivation.14 Knowledge of aw of the NADES allows us to design media for enzyme storage and stabilization without compromising their enzymatic activity due to the inadequate moisture content.

Bioprocesses significantly benefit from predictive methods that substantially reduce the number of required trial and error experiments.15 The above-described important property, aw, can be accessed from predictive methods. Equations of state are particularly promising due to the ability to describe densities and activity coefficients by taking into account explicit molecular interactions.16 Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory (PC-SAFT) has proven to be capable of predicting physicochemical properties of different compounds and mixtures.17,18 PC-SAFT calculations have been successful for systems of varying complexity such as amino acids,19 aromatics,20 electrolytes,21 proteins,22 ionic liquids, and deep eutectic solvents.23,24 Specifically, Zubeir et al. proposed the individual-component approach for modeling of DES.25 This approach provides the flexibility to screen physical properties from DES based on their hydrogen bond acceptors (HBAs) and hydrogen bond donors (HBDs) constituents as a function of molar ratios using only pure-component parameters of HBAs and HBD.

Enhanced enzyme activity and stability toward solvent and temperature are desired in industrial processes to enable a broader process-operation window for more flexible processes and potentially improved efficiencies.26 Liquid-phase conditions such as pressure, pH, aw, ionic strength, and the addition of co-solvents are known to affect the stability of an enzyme.27 Co-solvents influence enzymatic stability by modifying the chemical structure, polarity, viscosity, and the ability to build hydrogen bonds with the protein surface.28 Thermal stability is often represented by the temperature at which 50% of a protein is folded. In contrast, structural stability is often characterized by changes in the conformation of protein secondary major structures.29,30 Various methods such as differential scanning calorimetry, circular dichroism (CD), or differential scanning fluorometry (DSF) can be used to quantify the temperature at which the protein changes from an entirely folded native state to an unfolded state.3133 Previous studies on HRP have studied the effects of pH,34,35 and the addition of co-solvents such as ionic liquids,36 sugars,37 and ammonium salts38 on thermal stability and also on enzymatic activity.39,40 Co-solvents stabilize proteins mainly by the excluded volume effect, while some sugars such as trehalose, sucrose, and sorbitol use enthalpic interactions with amino acids from the protein backbone that can lead to a decrease in enzymatic activity for high sugar concentrations. Additive effects in co-solvent mixtures have been previously reported by Jaworek et al., suggesting that protein stability can benefit from both the exclusion effect and enthalpic interactions.41

In this work, we proposed the use of betaine-based NADES to improve the enzymatic activity and stability of HRP. Five different NADES were characterized by measuring density, viscosity, and aw. These properties were obtained experimentally, as well as modeled, using PC-SAFT. nanoDSF was used to obtain the denaturation temperature to evaluate the effect of NADES on the thermal stability of HRP, and CD was used to quantify the conformational changes in the secondary structure of HRP. Boosting enzyme stability and activity using green solvents enhances the possibility of using these technologies in industrial processes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Lyophilized powder of peroxidase from HRP, (type I, 89.63 U/mg solid, CAS 9003-99-0) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and used without further purification. D-(+)-xylose (≥99%, CAS 58-86-6), glycerol (≥99.5% CAS 56-81-5), D-sorbitol (≥98%, CAS 50-70-4), DL-proline (99%, CAS 609-36-9), phenol-4-sulfonic acid sodium salt dihydrate (PSA, 98%, CAS 10580-19-5), 4-aminoantipyrine (4-AAP, ≥ 99%, CAS 83-07-8) and hydrogen peroxide 30% solution (CAS 7722-84-1) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA). Trehalose dihydrate (CAS 6138-23-4) was kindly provided by Hayashibara Co., LDA (Okayama, Japan). Betaine anhydrous (>97%, CAS 107-43-7) was obtained from TCI (Tokyo, Japan) and sucrose (CAS 57-50-1) was purchased from Cmd Chemicals (Funchal, Portugal).

2.2. NADES Preparation and Water Concentrations

Five systems were prepared using betaine as HBA, with the HBDs: xylose, trehalose, sucrose, proline, or glycerol. All NADES used in this work were prepared gravimetrically using the heating-and-stirring method described elsewhere.42 The systems prepared are listed in Table 1. To further study the influence of different water contents on the properties of the NADES and HRP conformation, BGly + water mixtures were prepared with varying contents of water, to obtain 95, 90, 85 and 80 wt % BGly.

Table 1. Components Used to Prepare the Systems Used in This Work With the Respective Molar Ratios and Code Namesa.

code molar ratio component A component B component C component D reference
BXylW 2:1:6 betaine anhydrous D-(+)-xylose water   Jesus, 2021
BTrehGlyW 2:1:3:5 betaine anhydrous trehalose dihydrate glycerol water Jesus, 2021
BSorbW 1:1:3 betaine anhydrous D-sorbitol water   this work
BSucProW 5:2:2:21 betaine anhydrous sucrose DL-proline water Jesus, 2021
BGly* 1:2 betaine anhydrous glycerol     Rodrigues, 2021
a

different weight fractions of water were prepared: 5, 10, 15 and 20 wt % water (95, 90, 85 and 80 wt % BGly, respectively).

2.3. NADES Characterization

2.3.1. Water Content and Water Activity

The water content of the systems was determined by Karl-Fisher (KF) titration, performed in an 831 KF Coulometer with the generator electrode without diaphragm, using Hydranal Coulomat AG as a reagent. For each system, the water content was determined in triplicate. The aw of the systems was determined using a AwTherm–Water Activity meter (Rotronic, Bassersdorf, Switzerland), in equilibrium mode, at 37 and 60 °C. For each system, the aw was determined in triplicate.

2.4. Density and Viscosity Measurements

The viscosities and the densities of the systems were determined using an Anton Paar SVM 3001 viscometer (Graz, Austria) in a temperature range from 20 to 80 °C (±0.03 °C), with 10 °C steps. The measurements were performed in triplicate for each sample. The pressure of the equipment was 100 kPa, and the uncertainty of density measurements was 0.0002 g.cm–3.

2.5. Enzyme Stability

2.5.1. Enzymatic Activity Assay

HRP in NADES mixtures were prepared by suspending HRP in pure NADES. After that, PBS (100 mM, pH 7) was added, resulting in the dissolution of all the components in PBS, hence obtaining a NADES aqueous solution (NADES-AS), containing 1 mg.mL–1 HRP, and 20 wt % NADES. The enzymatic activity of HRP in the presence of the NADES was determined using a colorimetric method adapted from Wu et al.43 Briefly, in a cuvette, 950 μL of PSA, 950 μL of 4-AAP, and 50 μL of H2O2, were added to 1 mL of PBS, yielding the final concentrations of 10, 2.4, and 2 mM, respectively. After homogenization, this solution was used as a blank reference. Then, 50 μL of NADES-AS was added, and the increase in the absorbance at 490 nm was followed for 1 min in an UV–vis Genesys 50 spectrophotometer (ThermoFischer Scientific, Waltham USA). The molar extinction coefficient (ε) of 5560 M.cm–3 was used as determined elsewhere.1 The assays were performed in triplicate at 25 °C. The concentration of HRP in NADES-AS was determined using the Lowry method for protein quantification,44 using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard, in concentrations ranging from 20 to 100 μg.mL–1 at 25 °C.

2.6. Thermal Stability with nanoDSF

In this work, unfolding temperature (Tunfolding) was measured using the nanoDSF apparatus Prometheus NT.48 (NanoTemper, Munich, Germany). The method is based on the difference in measured fluorescence between tryptophan and tyrosine, present in abundance before and after the denaturation process, respectively. For this, the fluorescence ratio F350/F330 is used as previously described in the literature.41,45,46 Furthermore, the equipment has a back-reflection technology that detects the aggregation of the sample, by the attenuation of the light that passes through the cell, which is collected from its reflection on the surface of the sample. The equipment is charged with 10 μL of the enzyme + NADES-AS. The HRP concentration was 0.5 μM in PBS (100 mM, pH 7) buffer solution. Measurements were performed for the different NADES-AS of this work at 20 wt % in the buffer solution. For data collection and data processing, software PR.ThermControl, version 2.1.2, was used.

2.7. Structural Stability with Circular Dichroism

CD spectra were obtained between 190 and 250 nm in a Chirascan qCD spectrometer (Applied Photophysics, Leatherhead, UK) equipped with a Quantum Northwest TC125 temperature controller. HRPs (5 μM) in NADES-AS (5 wt %) were used to obtain the spectra from 190 to 240 nm, at 25 °C, using a 0.1 mm pathlength. The secondary structure contents were calculated using CONTIN-LL (Provencher & Glockner Method), with reference data set SP175,47 in the DICHROWEB web server (http://dichroweb.cryst.bbk.ac.uk).

3. Modeling

In 2001, Gross and Sadowski introduced the state-of-the-art thermodynamic equation of state PC-SAFT.17,18 In this work, PC-SAFT was used to predict the water influence on thermodynamic properties, specifically the aw in NADES. PC-SAFT commonly calculates the residual Helmholtz-energy difference between the total molar energy and the ideal gas energy. The residual energy is calculated as the sum of the contributions of hard-chain repulsion,48 dispersion attraction, and site–site bonding interactions, as shown in eq 1.

3. 1

A detailed description of each contribution is given elsewhere.17,18 Five pure-component parameters are necessary to calculate these contributions for associating molecules: segment number, miseg, the segment diameter, σi, the dispersion–energy parameter, ui/kB, the association–energy parameter, εAiBi/kB, and the association–volume parameter, κAiBi. Each molecule was characterized separately to describe the contributions in NADES, using the individual-component approach described by Zubeir et al.25 For the description of mixtures, the Berthelot-Lorenz combining rules were used for the segment diameter and the dispersion energy, as shown in eqs 2 and 3 where kij is an adjustable binary interaction parameter used in this work.

3. 2
3. 3

The combining rules suggested by Wolbach and Sandler for associative compounds were applied.49 Available pure-component parameters and binary interactions parameters were retrieved from the literature. All PC-SAFT parameters used in this work are reported in Table S1. Calculating the aw requires assessing the water activity coefficients. For this, PC-SAFT was used to determine the water fugacity coefficient in the mixture normalized by the pure-component state, as shown in eq 4

3. 4

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Viscosity

The presence of betaine as HBA turns the obtained NADES into highly viscous liquids; it is known from the literature that this is caused by the strong molecular interactions that can affect molecular mobility.50 As shown in Figure 1A, BTrehGlyW has the highest viscosity, possibly due to the low flexibility for molecular mobility that hydrogen bond interactions and structures provide among the NADES constituents (betaine, trehalose and glycerol) and water. BSucProW and BSorbW have similar viscosity values. It would be expected that BSucProW, due to the higher complexity of its structure offered by the additional component, would have a higher viscosity than BSorbW. However, due to the higher water content of BSucProW (19.3 wt %) the viscosities of the two NADES almost overlap, as it can be noticed in Figure 1A. Due to the low water content, BGly is one the systems with higher viscosity, while BXylW has the lowest viscosity of the NADES studied. This can be caused by a combination of factors, namely, its simple chemical structure, low density, and higher water content. As expected, the viscosity decreases drastically with the temperature for all NADES, as shown in Table S3.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Experimental viscosity (mPa·s) as a function of the temperature for (A) BXylW (stars), BTrehGlyW (squares), BSorbW (triangles), BSucProW (cross), and BGly (circles) and (B) BGly as a function of water mole fraction at different temperatures: 20 °C (white), 30 °C (light gray), 40 °C (gray), 50 °C (dark gray), 60 °C and (black). Data are shown in Table S3 and S4.

Side by side with temperature, water addition is known to decrease the viscosity of these systems.35,36 We have studied its effect on the system BGly and as shown in Figure 1B, adding 20 wt % water, at 20 °C, reduces the viscosity from ∼2600 mPa·s down to ∼60 mPa·s (the values are listed in Table S4). Although water addition is an essential tool for reducing the viscosity in industrial applications, it is crucial to make sure the non-disruption of the molecular interactions between the HBA and HBD of the NADES, that for choline chloride based NADES starts at around 40% molar of water.51 Nevertheless, the exact influence of water concentrations on the behavior of betaine based DESs is not yet known.

4.2. Density of NADES

The density of the NADES was determined experimentally in a temperature range from 30 to 80 °C and PC-SAFT was used to model the data. The density of the systems ranged from 1.210 g.cm–3, for BXylW and BGlyW, to 1.280 g.cm–3, for BTrehGlyW at 40 °C. These values are similar to other betaine-based systems with polyols reported by Rodrigues et al.24,52 Moreover, Kucan et al. studied the density of BGly in a different molar ratio (1:3), which also fell within the range obtained in this study, 1.20 g.cm–3, at 15 °C and 1.23 g.cm–3, at 55 °C.53 Altamash et al. have also reported the density of NADES combining betaine and other compounds, such as acids, and the values range between 1.2 and 1.3 g.cm–3.54

As expected, the density decreased linearly with increasing temperature for all systems, as shown in Figure 2A. BGly and BXylW have a similar density, which is lower than the other systems under study, although having a significantly different amount of water. On the one hand, the differences in density can be attributed to electrostatic forces and hydrogen bonds between HBA, HBD, and water, which decreases the free volume in the mixture and increases the density. In other words, the more OH groups within the NADES the higher the density.11,34 On the other hand, the spatial orientation influences density of NADES due to the steric effect of aromatic groups or large sugars, as in the case of systems comprising xylose. As shown in Figure 2B, water addition causes a decrease in density. Table S5 shows the density values of the all the systems at different temperatures.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Density (g·cm–3) in function of the temperature of (A) BXylW (stars), BTrehGlyW (squares), BSorbW (triangles), BSucProW (cross), and BGly (circles) and (B) BGly as a function of mass fractions of BGly: 100% (white), 95% (light gray), 90% (gray), 85% (dark gray), and 80% (black). Dashed lines represent PC-SAFT calculations with parameters reported in Table S1 and S2. Data are shown in Table S5 and S6.

The liquid densities for the systems used in this work were modeled with PC-SAFT using the individual-component approach. Although modeling density is straightforward for equations of state, modeling density of NADES is challenging. The reason is that the HBA and HBD are solids2,12 except glycerol, and parameters of HBA and HBA could thus not be fitted to density of the pure HBA and HBD in the original references for the parameters of HBA and HBD (see Table S1), respectively. Thus, it was necessary to use binary interaction parameters to correlate the density of the systems under study. The modeling results were within an overall average absolute deviation (AAD) of 0.43%. This is an excellent result, and it shows that fitting binary parameters to experimental density is a valid option. Furthermore, these parameters were used to predict other properties (see the next section).

4.3. Water Activity

Since these systems were chosen based on their potential use in biocatalytic applications, determining water activity is quite relevant. The water activity of the systems under study was simultaneously predicted using PC-SAFT and determined experimentally and the results demonstrate that the predicted values are in accordance with the results obtained, validating the model used. First, the experimental data is discussed. The experimental results for water activity at defined water contents of the NADES used in this work are shown in Table 2. Except for BGly, all the NADES needed the addition of water (ranging between 40 and 70 mol %) to be prepared (Table 1). These water mole fractions correspond to water mass fractions between 14 and 22 wt % water, respectively. From the results presented in Table 2, it is possible to observe that the aw values of the systems at 37 °C (except for BGly) are aw ∼ 0.4, despite the mixtures were prepared with very different amounts of water contents. Even though some NADES present high water mass fractions, NMR studies of the NADES herein used and reported elsewhere, prove that in these conditions water is part of the hydrogen bond network that is involved in the formation of the supramolecular structure of the NADES.55

Table 2. Water Content (wt %) and aw at 37 and 60 °C at 100 kPa of the Systems Under Study.

system water content (wt %) aw at 37 °C aw at 60 °C
BXylW 21.9 ± 0.2 0.444 ± 0.004 0.469 ± 0.005
BTrehGlyW 14.6 ± 0.3 0.394 ± 0.002 0.413 ± 0.005
BSorbW2 14.3 ± 0.5 0.433 ± 0.009 0.417 ± 0.008
BSucProW 19.3 ± 1.2 0.443 ± 0.001 0.461 ± 0.007
BGly 1.7 ± 0.1 0.071 ± 0.004 0.082 ± 0.003

The NADES BGly contains only residual water (<2 wt %), and, as so, aw is lower than that for the other studied NADES. As expected, aw increases upon addition of water to BGly, cf. Figure 3B. At the maximum water mole fraction studied (xw = 0.6, which corresponds to ≈20 wt % water), the aw was found to be ≈0.43, which falls within the aw values determined for the other systems (cf. Table 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

aw values at 37 °C and 100 kPa. (A) NADES with compositions in Table 1. Experimental (empty bars), PC-SAFT predictions kij = 0 (stripped bars). (B) Water influence on BGly. Experimental data (circles), PC-SAFT predictions with kij = 0 between betaine and glycerol (dashed line), PC-SAFT predictions using kij between betaine and glycerol fitted to density (full line). PC-SAFT parameters are reported in Tables S1 and S2.

It can be further seen from Figure 3B that aw and the water mole fraction are different, and the difference is most pronounced at equimolar NADES/water ratio. Furthermore, activity is lower than the mole fraction; that is, activity coefficients of water (γw) must be lower than one (aw = xw γw). The γw values modeled with PC-SAFT are lower than one for the systems under study; that is, water interactions in the NADES mixtures are more substantial than that in pure water. This is caused by the strong hydrogen bonding of the NADES constituents with water. Figure 3A shows the qualitative agreement for aw obtained by the predictions with PC-SAFT without using any binary interaction parameters between HBA and HBD. As Baz et al.56 noticed, the individual-component approach provides flexibility to the model without losing quality in the predictive results, achieving an AAD of 7.76%. However, by increasing the amount of water in the mixture, the HBA-HBD interactions weaken rapidly.57 Hence, incorporating a binary interaction parameter increases the accuracy of PC-SAFT modeled aw in the BGly + water dilutions, as shown in Figure 3B. It is important to note that for the system BGly one binary parameter between betaine and glycerol was fitted to the independent experimental data (density data, cf. Section 4.2); the availability of this single parameter allows predicting shape of the aw curve within an AAD of 16.2%, a satisfying agreement from the experimental data with water uptake up to xw = 0.6 (cf. Figure 3B).

4.4. Influence of NADES on Enzymatic Activity of HRP

The enzymatic activity of HRP at 37 °C was studied in NADES-AS, using PBS (100 mM, pH 7) as control. The activity was assessed by a colorimetric method to determine the production of a dye, by the oxidation of PSA in the presence of 4-AAP.1Figure 4 illustrates that in all the NADES-AS, there was an increase in the enzymatic activity and reaction rate, compared to the control buffer. The addition of BTrehGlyW, BSucProW, and BGly lead to an increase in the enzymatic activity of approximately 60%. The NADES that caused the highest impact on enzymatic activity was BSorbW, in which the enzymatic activity increased two-fold compared to the control buffer.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relative enzymatic activity of HRP in five different NADES-AS using PBS (100 mM, pH 7) as control at 37 °C and 100 kPa.

In the literature, only the effect of choline-based DES had been studied on HRP; however, discordant results were found. While one study shows the improvement of HRP activity in the presence of DES,43 more recent results indicate that HRP’s activity decreased, especially for higher DES concentrations.58 Moreover, as recently reviewed, most DES used for protein stabilization and activation are based on choline derivatives.59 These two findings were the driven force for the development of this work. On the one hand, it was important to study the impact of NADES on HRP activity and stability. On the other hand, replacing choline chloride in such applications has become urgent due to its hygroscopic behavior, as well as the limitations to its application imposed by several industries. Betaine-based NADES have been used for some preservation ends, such as for protein stabilization59 or cryopreservation,55 hence this was our starting point for choosing this family of NADES.

In order to understand how NADES influenced HRP’s enzymatic activity, several structural studies were performed, which will now be discussed.

4.5. Temperatures of Unfolding

The denaturation temperature was measured to determine the impact of NADES on the protein unfolding process. As thermal stabilization mediated by the co-solvents directly influences unfolding temperature,60 it was expected that the NADES used in this work also increase unfolding temperatures (Tunfolding); this could indeed be observed, as shown in Figure 5. Table S7 shows the Tunfolding and aggregation temperatures (Taggregation) at ambient pressure, and a heating rate of 0.7 °C·min–1. Tunfolding and Taggregation are listed in the control buffer as well as in the different NADES-AS.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Thermal stability of HRP in the presence of NADES-AS used in this work. (A) Experimental unfolding temperature and (B) aggregation temperature. Experiments carried out at 100 kPa and pH 7. The horizontal continuous black line represents the unfolding temperature in neat buffer.

HRP follows the denaturation model proposed by Lumir and Eyring,61 in which an intermediate state can be observed before unfolding. This intermediate state is determined by the melting of the tertiary structure of the protein near the distal heme group, without significant changes in the secondary structure.35 As shown in Table S7 the addition of NADES-AS decreases, in the case of BSorbW and BSucProW considerably, the Ton-set with respect to the experiment in a neat buffer. This temperature represents the beginning of the protein unfolding, so this result could indicate that NADES-AS promotes the HRP intermediate state coupled with changes in the secondary structure, an effect previously observed in other enzymes.58,62 This is accompanied by a slow unfolding, where the enzyme exhibits a boost in activity, ending later than the control in neat buffer. Hydrogen bond-like interactions of the exposed distal heme pocket, at temperatures below Tunfolding, might promote an increase in the enzymatic activity. Nevertheless, NADES addition causes the appearance of enzyme aggregates at high temperatures, as shown in Figure 5B, which have a known effect against activity due to blocking active sites.63,64 However, water addition does not influence Tunfolding of HRP (Figure S2). Tunfolding values are in the range of what is reported in the literature, namely in the range between 70 and 85 °C.19,20,22,24,25 In addition, protein aggregation is observed at temperatures between 80 and 85 °C in the presence of NADES as shown in Figure 5B and Table S7, which was not observed for the control in PBS buffer.

4.6. Structural Studies of HRP

The secondary structure of HRP in different solutions was assessed by CD, and measurements in PBS (100 mM, pH 7) were used as a control. Figure 6A compares the HRP’s CD spectra in PBS versus the five NADES-AS herein studied, obtained from 190 to 240 nm. All the CD spectra obtained have similar shapes, with slight intensity differences at 205 nm, which can be attributed to changes in α-helix contents.65 It is also possible to observe that there are no signs of protein denaturation, which is usually characterized by a broad negative band below 200 nm.66

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(A) CD spectra of HRP (5 μM) dissolved in PBS (100 mM, pH 7) (black line), as well as BXylW (green line), BTrehGlyW (orange line), BSorbW (light gray line), BSucProW (blue line) and BGly (gray line) solutions; and (B) relative content of secondary structures of HRP in control and NADES: α-helix (white), β-sheet (light gray), turns (dark gray) and random coils (black). Values are reported in Table S8.

To obtain more information about the HRP structure, the relative content of each major secondary structure (α-helix, β-sheet and turns) and the random coil of HRP were determined and can be observed in Figure 6B. The CONTIN-LL method was used (via the DICHROWEB web server).47 The native HRP structure was the following: 31% α-helix, 9% β-sheet, 16% turns and 44% random coil. It can also be seen in Figure 6B, that the presence of NADES did not significantly change the random coil (∼42%) and turns (∼15%) content of HRP compared to PBS control, according to the information obtained from the spectra analysis. However, it was possible to detect some alterations in the α-helix and β-sheet contents of HRP depending on the NADES in solution. In the presence of BXylW, the contents of α-helix and β-sheet become nearly identical (20% α-helix and 23% β-sheet), while in the presence of BSorbW α-helix was increased at the cost of the decreased β-sheet content (35% α-helix and 5% β-sheet).

HRP is described as a protein with high content of α-helix secondary structure and small β-sheet regions.2 Hence, in the presence of BSorbW, the structural changes favored the increase in the α-helix content by 13%, which can be related to the rise in activity (Figure 4). There is evidence that HRP’s activity can be facilitated by higher α-helix and lower β-sheet contents.43 As previously demonstrated, a reduction of the relative activity of HRP to 12%, was associated to a decrease in the α-helix structure of c.a. 18%.65 More studies show the same relation between loss of activity and drop in the α-helix content of HRP, upon different treatments.6769 These conformational changes are added to positive molecular interactions generated by co-solvents within the protein’s active site, as demonstrated previously in the literature.9,41

Conclusion

In this work, the influence of five betaine-based NADES on the activity and conformation of HRP was studied. First, density, viscosity, and aw were measured from 20 to 80 °C at a pressure of 100 kPa. Even though the water mole fractions of the studied systems varied strongly, aw values of all the systems were measured to be around 0.4. For the system BGly, the influence of the water content on aw was measured. Density and aw were modelled with PC-SAFT. PC-SAFT achieves an overall AAD of 0.432 and 7.76% for densities and aw, respectively. The important conclusion is that binary parameters that were fitted to density were able to predict aw values successfully. The ability to use this predictive power of PC-SAFT to characterize aw values of NADES will allow the generation of tailor-made solvents for different enzymes in the future, thereby optimizing the design of biocatalytic processes.

As demonstrated in this case study, the presence of NADES in solution, promoted an increase in the thermal and structural stability of HRP. The approach of using NADES in enzyme solutions contributes to a broader insight into biocatalytic reactions in crowded environments and ultimately aims at optimizing the enzymatic environment towards improved stability and efficiency. Overall, an increase in unfolding temperature was observed, and the aggregation appeared at higher temperatures. A transition state before denaturation is promoted by the presence of NADES systems, which could increase enzymatic activity due to the exposure of the heme pocket. On the other hand, the changes in the composition of the secondary structures, α-helix, and β-sheet, show how the protein is restructured in the presence of NADES, by the hydrogen bond network. These conformational changes, more specifically the increase in the α-helix content, increased enzymatic activity with the system BSorbW showing a two-fold increase in HRP’s activity. This improvement reflects the suitability of NADES to be used as efficient co-solvents in biocatalytic reactions as a preserving agent against denaturation and for significant enhanced activity.

Acknowledgments

The work of Nicolás Gajardo was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy - EXC 2033 - 390677874–RESOLV and by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) under the Graduate School Scholarship Programme, 2020 (57516591). This work has also received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 (European Research Council) under grant agreement no ERC-2016-CoG 725034. This work was further supported by the Associate Laboratory for Green Chemistry - LAQV and the project CryoDES which are financed by national funds from FCT/MCTES: UIDB/50006/2020 and PTDC/EQU–EQU/29851/2017, respectively. A.P. and L.M. also acknowledge FCT/MCTES for the financial support through IF/01146/2015 and SFRH/BD/148510/2019, respectively. The authors wish to thank Elisabete Ferreira from the BioLab, supported by the Applied Molecular Biosciences Research Unit-UCIBIO and the Associated Laboratory for Green Chemistry Research Unit–LAQV (UIDP/04378/2020, UIDB/04378/2020 and UIDB/50006/2020, UIDP/50006/2020, respectively).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04045.

  • PC-SAFT predictions for all NADES aw; HRP unfolding temperature in BGly + water formulations; PC-SAFT parameters used; PC-SAFT binary interactions parameters used; viscosity values of the NADES under study; viscosity of the BGly + water formulations under study; density of the NADES under study; density of the BGly + water formulations under study; unfolding and aggregation temperatures of HRP; secondary structure composition of HRP (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

sc2c04045_si_001.pdf (387.4KB, pdf)

References

  1. Vojinović V.; Azevedo A.; Martins V.; Cabral J.; Gibson T.; Fonseca L. Assay of H2O2 by HRP catalysed co-oxidation of phenol-4-sulphonic acid and 4-aminoantipyrine: characterisation and optimisation. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2004, 28, 129–135. 10.1016/j.molcatb.2004.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Veitch N. C. Horseradish peroxidase: a modern view of a classic enzyme. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 249–259. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2003.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman J.; Ismail A.; Dinu C. Industrial Applications of Enzymes: Recent Advances. Techniques, and OutlooksCatalysts 2018, 8, 238. 10.3390/catal8060238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Iyer P. V.; Ananthanarayan L. Enzyme stability and stabilization—Aqueous and non-aqueous environment. Process Biochem. 2008, 43, 1019–1032. 10.1016/j.procbio.2008.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Abbott A. P.; Capper G.; Davies D. L.; Rasheed R. K.; Tambyrajah V. Novel solvent properties of choline chloride/urea mixtures. Chem. Commun. (Camb) 2003, 70–71. 10.1039/B210714G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Paiva A.; Craveiro R.; Aroso I.; Martins M.; Reis R. L.; Duarte A. R. C. Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents – Solvents for the 21st Century. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1063–1071. 10.1021/sc500096j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Craveiro R.; Meneses L.; Durazzo L.; Rocha Â.; Silva J. M.; Reis R. L.; Barreiros S.; Duarte A. R. C.; Paiva A. Deep Eutectic Solvents for Enzymatic Esterification of Racemic Menthol. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 19943. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ghobadi R.; Divsalar A. Enzymatic behavior of bovine liver catalase in aqueous medium of sugar based deep eutectic solvents. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 310, 113207. 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113207. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Toledo M. L.; Pereira M. M.; Freire M. G.; Silva J. P. A.; Coutinho J. A. P.; Tavares A. P. M. Laccase Activation in Deep Eutectic Solvents. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 11806–11814. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shehata M.; Unlu A.; Sezerman U.; Timucin E. Lipase and Water in a Deep Eutectic Solvent: Molecular Dynamics and Experimental Studies of the Effects of Water-In-Deep Eutectic Solvents on Lipase Stability. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 8801–8810. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c07041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Maugeri Z.; Domínguez de María P. Whole-Cell Biocatalysis in Deep-Eutectic-Solvents/Aqueous Mixtures. ChemCatChem 2014, 6, 1535–1537. 10.1002/cctc.201400077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hendrickx M.; Saraiva J.; Lyssens J.; Oliveira J.; Tobback P. The influence of water activity on thermal stability of horseradish peroxidase. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 1992, 27, 33–40. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1992.tb01175.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Klibanov A. Enzymatic catalysis in anhydrous organic solvents. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1989, 14, 141–144. 10.1016/0968-0004(89)90146-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Setikaite I.; Koutchma T.; Patazca E.; Parisi B. Effects of Water Activity in Model Systems on High-Pressure Inactivation of Escherichia coli. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2009, 2, 213–221. 10.1007/s11947-008-0069-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kontogeorgis G. M.; Dohrn R.; Economou I. G.; de Hemptinne J.-C.; ten Kate A.; Kuitunen S.; Mooijer M.; Žilnik L. F.; Vesovic V. Industrial Requirements for Thermodynamic and Transport Properties: 2020. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 4987–5013. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c05356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cea-Klapp E.; Polishuk I.; Canales R. I.; Quinteros-Lama H.; Garrido J. M. Estimation of Thermodynamic Properties and Phase Equilibria in Systems of Deep Eutectic Solvents by PC-SAFT EoS. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 22292–22300. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c05109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gross J.; Sadowski G. Perturbed-Chain SAFT: An Equation of State Based on a Perturbation Theory for Chain Molecules. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 1244–1260. 10.1021/ie0003887. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gross J.; Sadowski G. Application of the Perturbed-Chain SAFT Equation of State to Associating Systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 5510–5515. 10.1021/ie010954d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Do H. T.; Chakrabarty S.; Held C. Modeling solubility of amino acids and peptides in water and in water+2-propanol mixtures: PC-SAFT vs. gE models. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2021, 542, 113087–113543. 10.1016/j.fluid.2021.113087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sepúlveda-Orellana B.; Gajardo-Parra N. F.; Do H. T.; Pérez-Correa J. R.; Held C.; Sadowski G.; Canales R. I. Measurement and PC-SAFT Modeling of the Solubility of Gallic Acid in Aqueous Mixtures of Deep Eutectic Solvents. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2021, 66, 958–967. 10.1021/acs.jced.0c00784. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bülow M.; Ascani M.; Held C. ePC-SAFT advanced – Part II: Application to Salt Solubility in Ionic and Organic Solvents and the Impact of Ion Pairing. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2021, 537, 112989. 10.1016/j.fluid.2021.112989. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Knierbein M.; Wangler A.; Luong T. Q.; Winter R.; Held C.; Sadowski G. Combined co-solvent and pressure effect on kinetics of a peptide hydrolysis: an activity-based approach. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 22224–22229. 10.1039/C9CP03868J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sun Y.; Zuo Z.; Shen G.; Held C.; Lu X.; Ji X. Modeling interfacial properties of ionic liquids with ePC-SAFT combined with density gradient theory. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2021, 536, 112984. 10.1016/j.fluid.2021.112984. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cotroneo-Figueroa V. P.; Gajardo-Parra N. F.; López-Porfiri P.; Leiva Á.; Gonzalez-Miquel M.; Garrido J. M.; Canales R. I. Hydrogen bond donor and alcohol chain length effect on the physicochemical properties of choline chloride based deep eutectic solvents mixed with alcohols. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 345, 116986. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116986. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zubeir L. F.; Held C.; Sadowski G.; Kroon M. C. PC-SAFT Modeling of CO2 Solubilities in Deep Eutectic Solvents. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 2300–2310. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b07888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang T.; Wade R. C. On the Use of Elevated Temperature in Simulations To Study Protein Unfolding Mechanisms. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007, 3, 1476–1483. 10.1021/ct700063c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bornscheuer U. T.; Huisman G. W.; Kazlauskas R. J.; Lutz S.; Moore J. C.; Robins K. Engineering the third wave of biocatalysis. Nature 2012, 485, 185–194. 10.1038/nature11117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gao W.-W.; Zhang F.-X.; Zhang G.-X.; Zhou C.-H. Key factors affecting the activity and stability of enzymes in ionic liquids and novel applications in biocatalysis. Biochem. Eng. J. 2015, 99, 67–84. 10.1016/j.bej.2015.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Daniel R. M.; Peterson M. E.; Danson M. J.; Price N. C.; Kelly S. M.; Monk C. R.; Weinberg C. S.; Oudshoorn M. L.; Lee C. K. The molecular basis of the effect of temperature on enzyme activity. Biochem. J. 2009, 425, 353–360. 10.1042/BJ20091254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Farhadian S.; Shareghi B.; Saboury A. A.; Evini M. The influence of putrescine on the structure, enzyme activity and stability of α-chymotrypsin. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 29264–29278. 10.1039/C5RA25053F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Prenner M. H.; Chiu E. J. Differential scanning calorimetry: An invaluable tool for a detailed thermodynamic characterization of macromolecules and their interactions. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2011, 3, 39–59. 10.4103/0975-7406.76463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lucius M.; Falatach R.; McGlone C.; Makaroff K.; Danielson A.; Williams C.; Nix J. C.; Konkolewicz D.; Page R. C.; Berberich J. A. Investigating the Impact of Polymer Functional Groups on the Stability and Activity of Lysozyme-Polymer Conjugates. Biomacromolecules 2016, 17, 1123–1134. 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Greenfield N. J. Using circular dichroism collected as a function of temperature to determine the thermodynamics of protein unfolding and binding interactions. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2527–2535. 10.1038/nprot.2006.204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Haifeng L.; Yuwen L.; Xiaomin C.; Zhiyong W.; Cunxin W. Effects of sodium phosphate buffer on horseradish peroxidase thermal stability. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2008, 93, 569–574. 10.1007/s10973-007-8407-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Chattopadhyay K.; Mazumdar S. Structural and conformational stability of horseradish peroxidase: effect of temperature and pH. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 263–270. 10.1021/bi990729o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Machado M. F.; Saraiva J. M. Thermal stability and activity regain of horseradish peroxidase in aqueous mixtures of imidazolium-based ionic liquids. Biotechnol. Lett. 2005, 27, 1233–1239. 10.1007/s10529-005-0023-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Chang B. S.; Park K. H.; Lund D. B. Thermal Inactivation Kinetics of Horseradish Peroxidase. J Food Science 1988, 53, 920–923. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb08986.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Moosavi-Movahedi A. A.; Nazari K.; Saboury A. A. Thermodynamics of denaturation of horseradish peroxidase with sodium n-dodecyl sulphate and n-dodecyl trimethylammonium bromide. Colloids Surf., B 1997, 9, 123–130. 10.1016/S0927-7765(97)00016-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pina D. G.; Shnyrova A. V.; Gavilanes F.; Rodríguez A.; Leal F.; Roig M. G.; Sakharov I. Y.; Zhadan G. G.; Villar E.; Shnyrov V. L. Thermally induced conformational changes in horseradish peroxidase. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001, 268, 120–126. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2001.01855.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Holzbaur I. E.; English A. M.; Ismail A. A. FTIR study of the thermal denaturation of horseradish and cytochrome c peroxidases in D2O. Biochemistry 1996, 35, 5488–5494. 10.1021/bi952233m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Jaworek M. W.; Gajardo-Parra N. F.; Sadowski G.; Winter R.; Held C. Boosting the Kinetic Efficiency of Formate Dehydrogenase by Combining the Effects of Temperature, High Pressure and Co-solvent Mixtures. Colloids Surf., B 2021, 208, 112127. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Meneses L.; Santos F.; Gameiro A. R.; Paiva A.; Duarte A. R. C. Preparation of Binary and Ternary Deep Eutectic Systems. J. Vis. Exp. 2019, 10.3791/60326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wu B.-P.; Wen Q.; Xu H.; Yang Z. Insights into the impact of deep eutectic solvents on horseradish peroxidase: Activity, stability and structure. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2014, 101, 101–107. 10.1016/j.molcatb.2014.01.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lowry O.; Rosebrough N.; Farr A. L.; Randall R. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pagano B.; Iaccarino N.; Di Porzio A.; Randazzo A.; Amato J. Screening of DNA G-quadruplex stabilizing ligands by nano differential scanning fluorimetry. Analyst 2019, 144, 6512–6516. 10.1039/c9an01463b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wen J.; Lord H.; Knutson N.; Wikström M. Nano differential scanning fluorimetry for comparability studies of therapeutic proteins. Anal. Biochem. 2020, 593, 113581. 10.1016/j.ab.2020.113581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lees J. G.; Miles A. J.; Wien F.; Wallace B. A. A reference database for circular dichroism spectroscopy covering fold and secondary structure space. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 1955–1962. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wertheim M. S. Fluids with highly directional attractive forces. I. Statistical thermodynamics. J. Stat. Phys. 1984, 35, 19–34. 10.1007/BF01017362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wolbach J. P.; Sandler S. I. Using Molecular Orbital Calculations To Describe the Phase Behavior of Cross-associating Mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 2917–2928. 10.1021/ie970781l. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gajardo-Parra N. F.; Cotroneo-Figueroa V. P.; Aravena P.; Vesovic V.; Canales R. I. Viscosity of Choline Chloride-Based Deep Eutectic Solvents: Experiments and Modeling. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2020, 65, 5581–5592. 10.1021/acs.jced.0c00715. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kaur S.; Gupta A.; Kashyap H. K. How Hydration Affects the Microscopic Structural Morphology in a Deep Eutectic Solvent. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 2230–2237. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b11753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rodrigues L. A.; Cardeira M.; Leonardo I. C.; Gaspar F. B.; Radojčić Redovniković I.; Duarte A. R. C.; Paiva A.; Matias A. A. Deep eutectic systems from betaine and polyols – Physicochemical and toxicological properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 335, 116201. 10.1016/j.molliq.2021.116201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kučan K. Z.; Perković M.; Cmrk K.; Načinović D.; Rogošić M. Betaine + (Glycerol or Ethylene Glycol or Propylene Glycol) Deep Eutectic Solvents for Extractive Purification of Gasoline. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 12582–12590. 10.1002/slct.201803251. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Altamash T.; Nasser M. S.; Elhamarnah Y.; Magzoub M.; Ullah R.; Qiblawey H.; Aparicio S.; Atilhan M. Gas solubility and rheological behavior study of betaine and alanine based natural deep eutectic solvents (NADES). J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 256, 286–295. 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.02.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Jesus A. R.; Meneses L.; Duarte A. R. C.; Paiva A. Natural deep eutectic systems, an emerging class of cryoprotectant agents. Cryobiology 2021, 101, 95–104. 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2021.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Baz J.; Held C.; Pleiss J.; Hansen N. Thermophysical properties of glyceline-water mixtures investigated by molecular modelling. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 6467–6476. 10.1039/C9CP00036D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Fisher T. R.; Zhou G.; Shi Y.; Huang L. How does hydrogen bond network analysis reveal the golden ratio of water-glycerol mixtures?. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 2887–2907. 10.1039/C9CP06246G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Papadopoulou A. A.; Efstathiadou E.; Patila M.; Polydera A. C.; Stamatis H. Deep Eutectic Solvents as Media for Peroxidation Reactions Catalyzed by Heme-Dependent Biocatalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 5145–5151. 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04867. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yadav N.; Venkatesu P. Current understanding and insights towards protein stabilization and activation in deep eutectic solvents as sustainable solvent media. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 13474–13509. 10.1039/d2cp00084a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wessner M.; Nowaczyk M.; Brandenbusch C. Rapid identification of tailor-made aqueous two-phase systems for the extractive purification of high-value biomolecules. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 314, 113655. 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113655. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lumry R.; Eyring H. Conformation Changes of Proteins. J. Phys. Chem. 1954, 58, 110–120. 10.1021/j150512a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yadav N.; Bhakuni K.; Bisht M.; Bahadur I.; Venkatesu P. Expanding the Potential Role of Deep Eutectic Solvents toward Facilitating the Structural and Thermal Stability of α-Chymotrypsin. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 10151–10160. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c02213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Smeller L.; Fidy J.; Heremans K. Protein folding, unfolding and aggregation. Pressure induced intermediate states on the refolding pathway of horseradish peroxidase. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2004, 16, S1053–S1058. 10.1088/0953-8984/16/14/015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Wang B.; Zhang Y.; Venkitasamy C.; Wu B.; Pan Z.; Ma H. Effect of pulsed light on activity and structural changes of horseradish peroxidase. Food Chem. 2017, 234, 20–25. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Gui F.; Chen F.; Wu J.; Wang Z.; Liao X.; Hu X. Inactivation and structural change of horseradish peroxidase treated with supercritical carbon dioxide. Food Chem. 2006, 97, 480–489. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Dodero V. I.; Quirolo Z. B.; Sequeira M. A. Biomolecular studies by circular dichroism. Front. Biosci. 2011, 16, 61–73. 10.2741/3676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhong K.; Hu X.; Zhao G.; Chen F.; Liao X. Inactivation and conformational change of horseradish peroxidase induced by pulsed electric field. Food Chem. 2005, 92, 473–479. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.08.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Guo Y.; Wu B.; Guo X.; Liu D.; Qiu C.; Ma H. Thermosonication inactivation of horseradish peroxidase with different frequency modes: Effect on activity, structure, morphology and mechanisms. Food Chem. 2022, 384, 132537. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Han Y.-X.; Cheng J.-H.; Sun D.-W. Changes in activity, structure and morphology of horseradish peroxidase induced by cold plasma. Food Chem. 2019, 301, 125240. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sc2c04045_si_001.pdf (387.4KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES