Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2022 Dec 8;27(24):8689. doi: 10.3390/molecules27248689

A Review on Polyacrylonitrile as an Effective and Economic Constituent of Adsorbents for Wastewater Treatment

Archana Gupta 1, Vishal Sharma 2,*, Pawan Kumar Mishra 3,*, Adam Ekielski 4
Editor: Guohui Dong
PMCID: PMC9784622  PMID: 36557823

Abstract

Water gets polluted due to the dumping of untreated industrial waste into bodies of water, particularly those containing heavy metals and dyes. Industrial water contains both inorganic and organic wastes. Numerous adsorbents that are inexpensive and easily available can be used to address the issue of water deterioration. This review report is focused on polyacrylonitrile as an efficient constituent of adsorbents to extract toxic ions and dyes. It discusses the various formulations of polyacrylonitrile, such as ion exchange resins, chelating resins, fibers, membranes, and hydrogels, synthesized through different polymerization methods, such as suspension polymerization, electrospinning, grafting, redox, and emulsion polymerization. Moreover, regeneration of adsorbent and heavy metal ions makes the adsorption process more cost-effective and efficient. The literature reporting successful regeneration of the adsorbent is included. The factors affecting the performance and outcomes of the adsorption process are also discussed.

Keywords: polyacrylonitrile, adsorbent, wastewater treatment, heavy metal, dyes

1. Introduction

Safe and readily accessible water is vital for everyone, whether it is used for drinking, domestic use, food production, or amusement purposes. Better water supply and more hygienic and improved management of water resources can improve countries’ state of health and living. A shocking increase in toxic metal contaminants over the last few decades has caused several problems for biotic organisms and ecology [1]. The harmful contaminants in the water have detrimental effects on marine life and make the water unsafe for consumption by humans. Polluted water contains bacteria which cause diseases such as diarrhea, cholera, dysentery, typhoid, hepatitis A, and polio [2,3].

Various research activities have been conducted to generate techniques for extracting toxic ions and dyes, especially in the aqueous solution of hydrometallurgy, and hence to reutilize these ions. The methods of removing metal ions include filtration, chemical precipitation, electrocoagulation, neutralization, chelating ion exchange, and adsorption [4,5,6,7,8]. A volume of work has been conducted by researchers to extract these ions by utilizing various techniques and different low-cost adsorbents such as lignin, chitosan, clay, zeolite, activated carbon, polymeric adsorbents, chelating resins, etc. [9]. It is found from the literature that adsorption is the most favored method due to its simplicity, easy accessibility, cost efficacy, selectivity, and efficiency for the extraction of heavy toxic metal ions, dyes, and other pollutants [10,11]. According to the literature, a chelating resin, compared with traditional anion and cation exchange resins, is more effective in removing pollutants and also overcomes the low selectivity of ion exchange resins [12,13,14]. Generally, adsorption of toxic ions is done by moieties present on the surface of the adsorbent [15,16]. Moreover, chelating adsorbents can be produced by modifying the polymers with functional groups [17]. Chelating resins adsorb the toxic wastes present in the water on their surface through various chemical and physical attractions. New classes of synthetic permeable polymeric adsorbents have been discovered with adequate porosity, ample surface area, greater structural stability, and quick adsorption kinetics. A chelating agent is a type of ion exchange resin that is highly selective for anions or clusters of ions. They are capable of adsorbing ions through coordination interaction as a substitute for columbic forces in ion exchangers. Several chelating resins mentioned in published studies are synthesized by modifying polyacrylonitrile with different ligands such as polyethylene imine, amidoxime, acrylamide, dithiocarbonate, thiazoline, and amino acids [18].

Although there are several different composites and conjugates used for wastewater treatment, polyacrylonitrile has attracted great interest because of its exceptional properties such as environmental compatibility, commercial feasibility, high temperature resistance, and high tensile strength [19]. Polyacrylonitrile is an inexpensive raw substance utilized in fabric production units and is used in ion exchange substances in the form of beads due to their high porosity. Different varieties of polyacrylonitrile adsorbents are synthesized by mixing various monomers with acrylonitrile as a basic unit. It is a multipurpose polymer utilized to fabricate various products, including ultrafiltration membranes, hydrogels, hollow fibers for reverse osmosis, fibers for textiles, oxidized polyacrylonitrile fibers, etc. (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Use of polyacrylonitrile in different forms for extraction of metal ions.

Polyacrylonitrile fibers are the chemical initiators to form carbon fibers with good characteristics [11]. Among the various polymers used for toxic pollutant removal, polyacrylonitrile is highlighted in this paper because it contains a nitrile group (-CN) and can easily form different stable products after functionalization with other groups.

There are many reports published on polyacrylonitrile for wastewater treatment; however, most of them are either focused on fiber forms of polyacrylonitrile, or do not comprehensively cover all forms [20,21,22,23]. The purpose of this review is to investigate in one place all the various formulations of polyacrylonitrile as valuable adsorbents for the extraction of water pollutants, along with the factors that alter the performance of the adsorbents. This report gives an overview of how polyacrylonitrile has been functionalized using different techniques to formulate effective adsorbents that were then successfully used for wastewater treatment.

2. Heavy Metals and Their Effects

Heavy metals enter water bodies through leaching from rocks, soils, and various human activities such as mining, use of pesticides, insecticides, paints, and power plants [24]. Generally, heavy metals are high atomic weight elements with a high density (more than water). Lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), arsenic (As), chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd), and nickel (Ni) are examples of heavy metals. These toxic metals are metabolic toxins and compound inhibitors [3]. However, metal ions such as copper, molybdenum, manganese, zinc, iron, boron, and nickel are vital for plant growth. These metals behave as micronutrients for animals and humans as well if they are present in permissible amounts [2]. The tolerable upper intake levels for humans of copper, molybdenum, manganese, zinc, iron, boron, and nickel are 10 mg/day, 2 mg/day, 11 mg/day, 40 mg/day, 45 mg/day, 13 mg/day, and 1 mg/day, respectively. Heavy metals play an important role in many biological and chemical reactions in living organisms and act as enzymes in many redox reactions. However, they are not biodegradable and tend to get accumulated in living beings, causing different ailments and disorders, as depicted in Figure 2. They may also cause mental retardation and brain damage. These metals are exceptionally lethal and can cause harmful impacts even at low concentrations [3]. Heavy metals may enter the living system by means of inhalation, ingestion, and skin penetration. Progressive accumulation of poisonous metals may cause serious health issues like fatigue, pain, neurological disorders, depression, and allergic hypersensitivity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects of heavy metals on the health of living systems.

Heavy metals are discharged into the ecosystem in a variety of ways (Figure 3), including coal combustion, sewage wastewater, vehicle discharge, the battery industry, mining exercises, tanneries, and the use of fossil fuels [4]. Heavy metals are also utilized as a part of the agriculture industry. Although their wide application has helped in bringing advancement in the economy, heavy metal compounds are dangerous due to their tendency to accumulate in the food chain and in soft (e.g., kidney) and hard tissues (e.g., bone). The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have laid down certain permissible limits for the discharge of heavy metals into the environment to reduce water pollution [2].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Sources of heavy metal contamination.

It is vital to understand, evaluate, and control the toxic metal waste in the environment. Few heavy metals are discussed below:

2.1. Cadmium

Cadmium plays no role in the functioning of the human body and can cause toxic effects even in trace amounts [25]. Cadmium has been produced as a byproduct of zinc and lead refineries, electroplating industries, paints, nickel–cadmium battery industries, textiles, pesticides and insecticides, solders, television, etc. It is also used as a neutron absorber in nuclear reactors. Cadmium is highly soluble in water, so it can easily enter plants and aquatic life forms and is harmful to organisms, even in trace amounts. Inhalation through cigarette smoke and intake from food are the main causes of exposure to cadmium; skin absorption occurs rarely. The diseases caused in human beings by exposure to cadmium are kidney disorders, bone deterioration, liver damage, and cancer. The permissible limit of cadmium in water as recommended by the EPA is 0.005 mg/L [24].

2.2. Lead

Lead metal is present in the environment due to contaminated water, food, household waste, and industrial waste. Lead is hazardous to biotic species and can stay in the environment for a longer duration [25]. Organolead compounds such as tetraethyl lead have distinct toxic effects compared with inorganic forms (e.g., lead oxide, lead chromate). The main sources of lead are paints, petroleum products, lead acid batteries, vehicle industries, electroplating industries, etc. Lead is more toxic in its ionic form, such as Pb2+/Pb4+, because it can easily substitute calcium, magnesium, iron, and sodium cations in cells and disrupt biochemical reactions. A higher concentration of lead in plants is responsible for the destruction of their lipid membranes due to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which finally disturb the photochemical processes and inhibit the development of the plant. The permissible limit of lead in water as recommended by the EPA is 0.015 mg/L [24].

2.3. Mercury

Mercury is extremely poisonous and easily accumulates in living organisms. In nature, it exists in three forms: elemental Hg(0), inorganic compounds (HgCl2, HgS, HgO), and organic molecules; each form has a different toxicity, use, and characteristics. The inorganic form of mercury, which is more soluble and reactive towards chemicals, results in the easy deposition of mercury. Many organic compounds such as methylmercury, ethylmercury, and dimethylmercury are found in nature, but methylmercury is the most common form of mercury [26]. Mercury is used in battery industries, semiconductors, chemical industries, dental amalgam, and the agriculture industry. Mercury acts as a neurotoxin and tends to retard mental operations like cognizant, auditory, and sensory functions. Mercury has adverse effects on the kidneys and muscles, causes deformation of the structure of proteins, disorders of the central nervous system, and respiratory problems. The permissible limit of mercury in water as recommended by the EPA is 0.002 mg/L [24].

2.4. Arsenic

It is found in literature that many human beings are affected by arsenic exposure, predominantly in countries such as Bangladesh, India, Chile, Uruguay, Mexico, and Taiwan, where underground water is polluted with large amounts of arsenic. In water, its permissible limit is 10 ppb, even though its higher concentration is found in mineral resources. Arsenic is a metalloid present in a trace amount in nature. It is found primarily in organic forms such as monomethylarsonic acid, dimethylarsinic acid, and trimethylarsine oxide, as well as inorganic forms such as arsenite As3+ and arsenate As5+. In general, inorganic arsenic is more hazardous in comparison with organic forms. Moreover, arsenite is more poisonous as it is more soluble in water than arsenate. The sources of arsenic are volcanic explosions, abrasion of soil, agriculture, industry, dyes, electronic industry, and medical fields. Arsenite binds to the thiol moiety on proteins and enzymes during biochemical reactions and deactivates around 200 enzymes. It can cause neurologic problems, lower RBC counts, resulting in anemia, and lower white blood cell counts, resulting in leucopenia. Exposure to high concentrations of arsenic causes vomiting, diarrhea, and pulmonic hypoxemia. The permissible limit of arsenic in water as recommended by the EPA is 0.01 mg/L [24].

2.5. Nickel

The heavy metal nickel has a silver-gray color and can be found in oxidation states +2, +3, and +4. It is employed in the production of various alloys, including nichrome, monel, permalloy, stainless steel, nickel silver, and others, for use in a variety of applications, including high-temperature resistance, corrosion-resistant materials, alnico used for permanent magnets, coatings, desalination plants, household appliances, storage batteries, chemical and food processing equipment, and as a catalyst for hydrogenation in coinage. During nickel mining and in industries that manufacture or use nickel, nickel alloys, or nickel compounds, nickel is emitted into the atmosphere. These industries can also release nickel into effluent [27]. Oil-burning power stations, coal-burning power plants, and garbage incinerators are further sources of nickel emissions into the atmosphere. Depending on the dose and duration of exposure, nickel can harm the immune system and cause cancer and other health problems, such as an itchy rash caused by direct contact with a substance, heart disease, asthma, lung fibrosis, and cancers of the lung and nasal sinus. More significantly, the optimum nickel concentration in drinking water should be kept at 0.01 mg/L, and in industrial effluents, it should be between 0.2 to 2.0 mg/ L [28].

2.6. Dyes

Dyes are substances that give color to objects such as textiles, paper, and leather. Dyes are introduced into water bodies and the environment through industries such as food, textiles, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, etc. The dyes contain toxic metals including lead, cadmium, chromium, zinc, copper, and nickel [29]. Dyes are categorized as cationic, anionic, and non-ionic dyes. A variety of dyes are utilized in different industries, such as acid dyes, reactive dyes, basic dyes, azo dyes, direct dyes, vat dyes, and dispersed dyes [15].

Dyes are naturally and chemically synthesized compounds applied to substances that we want to make colorful. There are various types of dyes containing different chemical substances and are used for different purposes, such as acid dyes for coloring animal fibers, basic dyes used for paper, pigment dyes used in paints, and direct dyes for cotton silk [30]. Natural dyes are derived from plants; these are limited in number and fade fast. Synthetic dyes are found in different varieties, and these cannot be destroyed easily. Dyes present in wastewater discharged from dye manufacturing units are dangerous to biotic beings and the environment. Synthetic dyes can be degraded at high temperature conditions by use of oxidants [31]. Pollution due to dyes contains hazardous chemicals resulting in an increase in various diseases. When dyes are not treated and enter the aquatic system, they cause allergic dermatoses, respiratory diseases, carcinogenesis, and mutagenesis.

3. Types of Adsorbents Made from Polyacrylonitrile

The adsorption process is an inexpensive method having a very low operating cost. Furthermore, it causes less toxicity during the extraction process of hazardous metals compared with other conventional methods such as filtration, sedimentation, coagulation, chemical precipitation, solvent extraction, neutralization, etc. The adsorption process involves the transport of substances from the liquid phase to the solid surface. The forces which bind the substances to the solid surface can be physical forces or chemical forces. Based on attractive forces, the adsorption process can take place in two ways: physical adsorption and chemical adsorption. In physical adsorption, also known as physisorption, the attractive forces are Vander Waals forces, due to which adsorption is multilayered. A physisorption phenomenon involves weak forces that are reversible and nonspecific in nature, and desorption of solute molecules takes place easily, whereas in chemisorption, the attractive forces are chemical bonds, which result in a monolayered adsorption process. Chemisorption is irreversible, specific in nature, and has a high heat of adsorption due to the chemical bonds involved. Although they are different processes, they work together during the adsorption process. The solute adhered to the solid surface during the adsorption process is called an adsorbate, while the substance on which the solute is sustained is known as an adsorbent [16].

Various adsorbents used for the extraction of toxic metal ions and dyes from wastewater are discussed below.

3.1. Polyacrylonitrile in Ion Exchange Resins

Ion exchange resins are high-molecular-weight crosslinked polymers used to exchange the ions present in the wastewater with the ions present in the resin. Ion exchange resins are insoluble in water as well as in organic solutions, and these crosslinked polymers are connected through covalent bonds [32]. Ion exchange resins are of two types, namely, cation exchangers and anion exchangers. There are several research papers available on ion exchange resins that are used to extract toxic ions and dyes. In an initial experiment, the anion exchange resin was obtained by the reaction of highly permeable acrylonitrile–DVB copolymers with hydrazines, ethylene diamine, diethylene triamine, and triethylene tetramine, and their complexing properties towards copper and cobalt ions were explored [33]. The complexation values were found to be 13–53 mg/g for copper and 27–60 mg/g for cobalt. In another study, a redox technique was used to prepare poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylamide) poly(AN-co- AM) by utilizing sodium bisulfite and potassium persulfate as the initiators [34]. The resultant copolymers were then modified by chemical treatment with hydroxylamine hydrochloride to introduce amidoxime functional moieties into the polyacrylonitrile (PAN) framework. The function of the amidoxime moiety was to develop a chelating ion-exchange resin formed through acrylonitrile for the extraction of toxic metal waste in water. Inductively coupled plasma was used to investigate the sorption behavior of poly(AN-co-AM) for Cu2+ ions. The adsorption capacity of Cu2+ increased with an increase in pH until optimum adsorption of Cu2+ (52.63 mg/g) at pH 5. The adsorption of Cu2+ onto poly(AN-co-AM) correlates well with the Langmuir equation. A kinetic study showed that the adsorption of Cu2+ follows the pseudo-second-order model. The adsorption capacity of Cu2+ onto amidoximed poly(AN-co-AM) decreased as the adsorbent amount increased. Zhang et al. (1994) reported the -COOH moiety containing hydrazine immobilized polyacrylonitrile fibers [35]. The highest uptake values of functionalized polyacrylonitrile fiber for the heavy metal ions Cu2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Pb2+, Cr3+, Ni2+, and Hg2+ were found to be 1.33 mmol/g, 1.30 mmol/g, 1.03 mmol/g, 1.02 mmol/g, 0.98 mmol/g, 0.96 mmol/g, 0.95 mmol/g, and 0.63 mmol/g, respectively. This cation exchanger was selective for different metal ions and was arranged according to their distribution coefficient values as follows: Cu2+> Zn2+> Cr3+> Hg2+> Cd2+> Pb2+> Ni2+> Co2+. The product could be regenerated and reused after recovery with diluted nitric acid.

A polyacrylonitrile-based adsorbent was synthesized for the separation of cesium and cobalt ions from radioactive waste [36]. Inorganic–organic adsorbent was formed by inorganic ion exchangers modified by polyacrylonitrile having larger size particles with higher granular strength. Potassium nickel hexacyanoferrate (KCNFPAN) was used as an inorganic ion exchanger and polyacrylonitrile as a binding matrix to produce a composite adsorbent. Three different complexing agents based on granular hexacyanoferrate were utilized to extract Cs+ and Co2+ ions from aqueous solution. The ion exchange ability of the adsorbent was also dependent on the drying temperature of samples; the sorption value of adsorbent KCNFPAN was increased as the temperature reached 110 °C. The highest adsorption values were obtained to be 2.85 mmol/g and 2.15 mmol/g for cesium and cobalt ions, respectively. Shunkevich et al. (2005) synthesized polyacrylonitrile fiber by using various strong and weak base moieties to produce an anion exchange fiber [37]. Potentiometric titration curves were used to study the acid–base characteristics of the anion exchangers by calculating the acidity variables. These ion exchange fibers contained at least four different functional groups and their ion exchange capacity was around 3.5 meq/g. The ion exchange value of resin containing strong base quaternary amino groups (pK≅ 2) was 2.5 meq/g. The nitrile groups in the polyacrylonitrile underwent hydrolysis and introduced carboxylic acid moieties in the ion exchange fibers. Moon et al. (2004) developed ion exchanger beads for the extraction of Sr2+ and Ag+ ions in acidic conditions [38]. Potassium titanate (K2Ti4O9) and nickelferrocyanate (Ni2Fe(CN)6) powders were utilized to form inorganic ion exchanger beads. These powders were dissolved in the solvent dimethylsulfuoxide with a small amount of TWEEN-80 surfactant, mixed at 50°C. The polyacrylonitrile powder was then mixed in a known quantity of the above homogeneous solution at a temperature of 323 K to obtain a uniform solution. The diffused air in the solution was removed and a composite solution was passed through a dual nozzle to obtain sphere-shaped beads. It was found that nickelferrocyanate ion exchangers were more selective for Ag+ ions in comparison with potassium titanate, while potassium titanate ion exchangers showed more affinity for Sr2+ ions than Ag+ ions.

Chelating resin belongs to the category of ion exchange resins and contains functional groups connected to the backbone of the main chain polymer. It has one or more electron donor atoms, such as nitrogen, sulfur, oxygen, and phosphorous, that can form coordinate bonds with most of the poisonous heavy metals. A chelating resin containing amidoxime groups was utilized to extract copper ions [15]. This resin was synthesized by the aqueous suspension copolymerization of acrylonitrile and divinyl benzene and subsequent modification of cyano groups by reaction with hydroxyl amine. Another poly(acrylamidoxime) chelate resin was reported by Kim, Shin, and Maeng, (1982), synthesized through redox polymerization of acrylonitrile and divinyl benzene and then reacted with hydroxylamine hydrochloride to generate a functional moiety [39]. Poly(acrylamidoxime) resin’s complex formation properties were discovered to be viable for the extraction of lanthanum, cerium, and neodymium from wastewater. Polyacrylonitrile copolymers containing cysteine groups were synthesized by reacting polyacrylonitrile copolymers with L-cysteine and 1,6 hexanediol. This resin was much more selective towards Ag+, Hg2+, Au3+ and Pt4+ in diluted acidic conditions; the highest adsorption values were found to be 0.97 millimole, 0.65 millimole, 1.22 millimole, and 0.39 millimole per gram of resin [40].

In another experiment, substituted polyamides were formed by reacting acrylonitrile–vinylacetate–divinylbenzene copolymer with amino guanidine bicarbonate for effective removal of gold cyanide (49.3 mg/g) in a butanol–water mixture [41].

Various resins with guanidyl groups are also reported. Oswik et al. reported the adsorption of copper by the resin containing guanidine ligand derivatives [42]. The aminolysis of poly(acrylonitrile–vinylacetate–DVB) was carried out by utilizing ethylene–diamine or hydroxyl amine hydrochloride after their reaction with dicyandiamide, cyanamide, and sodium dicyanimide. The resultant resins had biguanidyl, guanidyl, or nitrilguanidyl derivatives in the polymer side chain, respectively. The structure of ligand complexes with copper ions was determined through electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Arsalani and Hossein Zadeh (2005) have reported ethylenediamine containing polyacrylonitrile for the extraction of toxic ions [43]. The highest and lowest metal adsorption values were 5.2 millimole per gram for Ni2+ at pH 5.0 and 1.5 millimole per gram for Co2+ at pH 1.0, respectively. Jermakowicz–Bartkowiak, Kolarz, and Serwin (2005) investigated functionalized copolymers by reacting poly (vinyl benzyl chloride–acrylonitrile–divinyl benzene) matrix with ethylene diamine, bis(aminopropyl) amine, bis(aminohexyl) triamine, and tris(2-amino ethyl) amine followed by reaction with 5-ethylthiourea to obtain a copolymer having 2.8–5.0 millimole of amino moiety per gram of resin [44]. The adsorption value of the above copolymer for gold, platinum, and palladium chloro complex were determined in 0.1 M HCl acidic solution and were found to be 190 mg/g, 245 mg/g, and 280 mg/g of resin, respectively. Another chelating resin, polyacrylonitrile-2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole (PAN-ATD) was developed through a single step reaction and its composition was described through FT-IR [45]. The adsorption of mercury ions by the resultant copolymer was examined through batch and column techniques. The results obtained through the batch method demonstrated that polyacrylonitrile-2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole had an affinity for mercury ions and the highest adsorption value assessed from the Langmuir method was 526.9 mg/g at 308 K. Moreover, this resin was more selective for mercury ions in the mixture of metal ions such as Hg2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, and Zn2+ at the same pH.

Morcali and Zeytuncu (2015) synthesized thiourea- and glutaraldehyde-modified polyacrylonitrile adsorbents [46]. The parameters affecting the adsorption process, such as pH range (0.70 to 2.00) and adsorbent dose (100 to 800 mg), were studied for different time intervals. The optimum pH for the extraction of platinum and palladium was found to be 1.5. The Langmuir isotherm model illustrates the adsorption of toxic ions by the adsorbent much more precisely compared with the Freundlich model. It was found that the extraction rate for platinum and palladium reached around 93% in 0.50 M HCl–0.50 M thiourea solution and no noteworthy decline after 5 adsorption–desorption cycles was obtained.

The adsorption of Cu2+ and Cr2+ on pumice and a polyacrylonitrile/pumice composite was examined by Yavuz et al. (2008) by utilizing a batch technique at room temperature, and their adsorption properties were evaluated on pumice and the composite [47]. The sorbent’s adsorption rates were discovered to vary with their properties, such as surface functionalization, preliminary concentration of metal ions solution, adsorption kinetics, and solution pH. The time needed to remove metal ions from wastewater was six hours, and solution concentrations were in the range of 100–500 mg/g of resin. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models were utilized to determine the amount of adsorption of Cu2+ and Cr3+ on the adsorbent and results were found to fit in the Langmuir models. The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models were utilized to determine the amount of adsorption of Cu2+ and Cr3+ on the adsorbent, and the results were found to fit in the Langmuir models. The extraction of Cu2+ and Cr3+ from the metal ion mixture was greater in the composite than in pumice. The adsorption values of the sorbents pumice and polyacrylonitrile/pumice composite observed from the isotherm equations were 0.055 and 0.065 for Cu2+ and 0.031 and 0.268 mmol/g for Cr3+ ions, respectively. In another study, the amidoximated chitosan-grafted polyacrylonitrile (CTS-g-PAO) was reported to adsorb UO2+ from aqueous solution [48]. The adsorption capacity of CTS-g-PAO was found to be 312.06 mg/g and equilibrium was attained within 120 min. Maximum loaded uranium on CTS-g-PAO (more than 80%) was desorbed through 0.1 M HCl or EDTA-Na, CTS-g-PAO, and reutilized for at least three cycles.

Y. Park et al. (2010) examined heavy metals such as cobalt, strontium, and cesium released into water bodies through radioactive industries and removed them by using an ammonium molybdophosphate–polyacrylonitrile (AMP–PAN) adsorbent [49]. In a single and binary solution of metal ions, the competitive adsorption of Co2+, Sr2+, and Cs+ by ammonium AMP-PAN was examined. The binary system of metal ions Sr2+/Co2+, Sr2+/Cs+, and Co2+/Cs+ were synthesized by combining the similar metal concentration solution with an identical volume ratio for every metal. Binary metal adsorption performance was best explained by the Langmuir model. The Freundlich, Langmuir, and D–R models were best fitted to the adsorption records by using the non-linear regression system. The adsorption model demonstrated that AMP–PAN was more selective for Cs+ ions and the maximal uptake values were 0.16 mmol/g, 0.18 mmol/g, and 0.61 mmol/g for Co2+, Sr2+, and Cs+, respectively. Due to competition among metal ions in a binary system, adsorption of one metal ion was suppressed in the presence of another metal ion. Alkali metals (Na+) inhibited the adsorption of cesium and calcium ions and diminished the adsorption of cobalt ions onto AMP–PAN. Adsorptions of Co2+, Sr2+, and Cs+ onto AMP–PAN in the vicinity of surfactants were quite dissimilar. The presence of cationic (OTMA and HDTMA) and anionic (SDBS and SOBS) surfactants diminished the adsorption of Co2+, Sr2+, and Cs+ onto AMP–PAN. However, the presence of non-ionic surfactants (Tween 80 and Triton X-100) did not decrease the adsorption.

The zirconium–manganese oxide/polyacrylonitrile (Zr–Mn oxide/PAN) composite was synthesized in another study and used to remove Sr2+ ions from wastewater [50]. Here, zirconium–manganese hydrous oxide was used as an inorganic active ion exchanger to prepare composite spheres. Zr–Mn mixed oxide powder was obtained through the co-precipitation method and then blended with polyacrylonitrile (PAN) to produce Zr–Mn oxide/PAN composite spheres. The adsorption process was carried out with an initial metal ion concentration of 20 ppm at pH 7.7 and a temperature of 324.2 K. The adsorption of Sr2+metal ions was investigated at concentrations ranging from 20 to 200 ppm, and the results were explained using Freundlich, Langmuir, and D–R models. Hydrous manganese dioxide–polyacrylonitrile (MnO2–PAN) spheres were chemically prepared and used for the removal of radio-contaminant cesium-137 from metal ion solutions [51]. Inductively coupled plasma was used to study manganese and other elements such as carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen, determined through the CHN elemental analyzer. MnO2–PAN adsorbent showed thermal stability up to 583 K and had a crystalline structure. Zong et al. (2011) developed a novel method for the modification of the surface of N-chlorosulfonamidated polystyrene through activators recovered by electron transfer and atom transfer radical polymerization (ARGET ATRP) methods [52], achieved by the use of ferric trichloride anhydrous (FeCl3)/iminodiacetic acid (IDA) as a catalyst, L-ascorbic acid (VC) used as a reductant, and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as the solvent. Polyacrylonitrile was bound to the surface of polystyrene and the cyano moiety of the PAN-g-PS polymer was treated with hydroxylamine hydrochloride to introduce amidoxime (AO) groups in the PAN chain. The amidoxime moieties were efficient for the extraction of Hg2+ ions from solutions. Adsorption phenomena were also investigated in binary metal systems such as Hg2+-Pb2+, Hg2+-Ag+, and Hg2+ -Cu2+, with the results indicating that resin exhibited selectivity for mercury ions. A biosorbent was produced by immobilizing dead fungal biomass on polyacrylonitrile to examine the ability of microorganisms to extract metal ions from solution [53]. This adsorbent was used for the extraction of hazardous metals such as Cu2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+ from the mixtures. The metal removal capacities of the adsorbent (concentrations 50%) were 16 mg/g, 7 mg/g, and 0.25 mg/g at pH 7 for Zn2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+, respectively. The adsorption values of PAN (concentrations of 75%) were 18, 7.9 mg/g and 0.25 mg/g for Zn2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+ ions, respectively. Dong, Chen, and Gao (2007) used an γ-ray irradiation technique to connect a partially deacetylated chitin (deacetylation degree of around 40%) to acrylonitrile. The maximum binding value of acrylonitrile onto the pre-irradiated chitin at 25 ± 1.2 kGy was 114% for an acrylonitrile concentration of 40% (v/v) in dimethylformamide at 343 K for eight hours. The mixture ratio of 0.1 N hydroxylamine hydrochloride to 0.1 N sodium hydroxide was chosen to be 7:3 (v/v) for the conversion of cyano groups on grafted chitin (Chi-g-AN) into amidoxime. The equilibrium value of As3+ on Chi-g-AN converted amidoxime (Chi-g-AN-C) was well fitted in the Langmuir model and its highest adsorption value was 19.724 mg/g.

Different polymeric materials were reported by Kiani et al. for the extraction of Ag+ and Pb2+ ions from synthetic solutions [54]. They treated the polyacrylonitrile with triethylenetetramine (PAN–TETA 50 and 100) using different amounts. Polyacrylonitrile–triethylenetetramine and their metal complexes were investigated through FT-IR and SEM. At pH 6.0, the highest uptake values for Ag+ and Pb2+ ions were 108.14 mg/g and 99.01 mg/g, respectively. Desorption of Ag+ and Pb2+ ions were done in 0.5 M HCl acidic solution and the desorption value was found to be 91%. In another study, a permeable acrylonitrile (AN)/methyl acrylate (MA) copolymer was prepared through the suspension emulsion polymerization method and the resultant copolymer was functionalized with hydroxylamine hydrochloride to form an amidoxime group to extract toxic ions from wastewater [55]. The results confirmed that amidoximated AN/MA beads showed good adsorption values for Hg2+, Ag+, and Cu2+ with great selectivity for Hg2+ ions. The equilibrium adsorption values of amidoximated AN/MA copolymer for various ions were found to be 2.68 mmol/g for mercury ions, 1.35 mmol/g for silver ions, 2.01 mmol/g for copper ions, 0.74 mmol/g for iron ions, and 0.06 mmol/g for lead ions, with the initial concentration of metal ions solutions being 5.0 mM. On the other hand, untreated AN/MA did not show any removal efficiency. The equilibrium was attained within 10 h through adsorption kinetics. Another study reports the development of crosslinked acrylic acid (AA)-acrylonitrile (AN) resin through the suspension polymerization method by using poly(vinyl alcohol) as a suspending agent and N,N-methylenebisacrylamide (MBA) and divinylbenzene (DVB) as crosslinkers [56]. Acrylonitrile and acrylic acid were used in a mole percent ratio of 95:5, while various ratios of crosslinking agents (2.0, 5.0, and 10.0 weight percent) were used during the formation of the copolymer. The adsorption of uranium took place in HNO3, HCl, and H2SO4 solutions. This paper also discusses the impact of different parameters such as pH, time to adsorb toxic ions, kind of acid, nature of crosslinking agents, their amounts, and desorption phenomena. In another study, the synthesis of iminodiacetate functionalized acrylonitrile–divinylbenzene (AN-DVB) copolymers by using crosslinkers at amounts of 10 and 15 weight percent is reported. These chelating resins were utilized to extract Pb2+, Cd2+, and Zn2+ from wastewater through batch and column methods. The amount of metal ions adsorbed by resin was studied through Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm models. It was found from the results that chelating resins adsorbed the ions in single metal systems in the order Cd2+ > Pb2+ > Zn2+. Monodispersed poly(acrylonitrile) was synthesized through a surfactant-free emulsion polymerization technique and the nitrile moiety was transformed into amidoxime on reaction with hydroxylamine hydrochloride in water [57]. The synthesized resin was used as an adsorbent in the extraction of three types of contaminants; methylene blue (MB) and rhodamine 6G (R6G), a heavy metal ion Cd2+, and the herbicide paraquat. The various factors that influenced the adsorption rate were amidoxime concentration, pH of contaminated water, adsorbent dose, and initial metal ion concentration. Amidoximated poly(acrylonitrile) polymer extraction ability was increased to 87 mg/g, 91 mg/g, 74 mg/g, and 91 mg/g from 5 mg/g, 1.54 mg/g, 1.06 mg/g, and 1.22 mg/g for Cd2+, methylene blue, rhodamine 6G, and herbicide paraquat, respectively. D. J. Wang et al. (2014) reported polyacrylonitrile embedded on the surface of a wheat straw matrix (WSM) via single-electron transfer-living radical polymerization (SET-LRP) [58]. Wheat straw matrix grafted polyacrylonitrile was converted into wheat straw matrix grafted-amidoxime group by reacting with hydroxylamine hydrochloride. Wheat straw matrix grafted-amidoxime was used to extract mercury metal ions with the utmost adsorption ability of 4.7 mmol/g. It was found that in the binary system of metal ions Hg2+- Pb2+, Hg2+- Ni2+, Hg2+-Zn2+, Hg2+- Ag+, and Hg2+- Cu2+, the above adsorbent showed high selectivity for mercury ions. As per the acid–base theory, mercury ions form stable complexes with the ligands containing nitrogen and sulfur atoms. Feng et al. explained the preparation of polyacrylonitrile containing carbon materials (PPC-0.6-600, PPC-0.8-600, PPC-0.6-800, and PPC-0.8-800) [59]. These materials were synthesized by heating carbon with potassium hydroxide at 600 °C and 800 °C for the extraction of chromium ions from aquatic systems. The adsorption value of chromium ion on PPC-0.8-800 was more than other carbon materials, and the greatest adsorption capacity was found to be 374.90 mg/g at pH 2.0. This resin could be reused even after five cycles. This adsorption process was due to the electrostatic force between polyacrylonitrile-based porous carbon materials and hydrogen chromate (HCrO4−1) ions. For the extraction of Pb2+ ions, an ethyleneamine functionalized crosslinked poly(acrylonitrile-ethylene glycoldimethacrylate) chelating resin was synthesized [60]. This resin was modified with different amine groups such as ethylenediamine, triethylenetetraamine, and tetraethylenepentamine. The maximum extraction value for toxic metal lead ions was obtained at pH 4.6 in the pH range of 1–4.6 studied for all copolymers. The adsorption of Pb2+ ions was conducted with an artificial metal ion solution having a concentration of 0.483–2.4154 mmol/L at pH 4.6. Maximum uptake values of lead ions were 1.73 mmol/g, 1.68 mmol/g, and 1.62 mmol/g, respectively. In another experiment, an adsorbent was prepared by graft polymerization of polyacrylonitrile with arabic gum (PAN–g–AG) by using potassium permanganate or nitric acid as a redox initiator for the extraction of lead, cadmium, and copper ions from their solutions [61]. The grafted copolymer was modified with hydrazine and then hydrolyzed with sodium hydroxide. The batch adsorption method was used for the extraction of the metal ions from a solution having an initial concentration of 100 ppm by using 50 mg of improved PAN–g–AG for four hours. Results showed that maximum adsorption of lead ions took place at pH = 5, while pH = 6 was suitable for cadmium and copper ions. The comparison between PAN–g–AG and polyacrylonitrile fibers indicated that PAN–g–AG had much better adsorption capacity for toxic metal ions compared with polyacrylonitrile fibers. Malachite green (MG) dye is utilized in cloth mills, leather manufacturing units, paper industries, and as a fungicide, fish cannery, and antibacterial agent. Its exposure to living beings has a toxic effect on various organs such as the liver, kidney, lung, spleen, and skin. Therefore, an adsorbent of thiourea functionalized poly (acrylonitrile–acrylic acid) was prepared to remove dye MG [62]. This copolymer was synthesized by acrylonitrile (97.0%) and acrylic acid (3.0%) through the redox polymerization method at 60°C by using sodium bisulfate and potassium persulfate as initiators. It was then reacted with thiourea to produce a thiourea functionalized copolymer. A solution of malachite green having a different concentration (20 to 100 ppm) was used. Adsorption equilibrium was obtained with a 100 mL solution of a concentration of 20 to 100 ppm by using 0.002 g of adsorbent dosage. Regeneration of the adsorbent was done through a mixture of 1.0 mol/L of nitric acid and 0.5 mol/L of thiourea by shaking the solvent with the adsorbent for three hours. New sulfonated poly(acrylonitrile-co-styrene) and poly(acrylonitrile-co-styrene) nanocomposites were made using a precipitation polymerization technique, and multiwall carbon nanotubes were synthesized using chemical vapor deposition. To remove the methyl orange dye from the aqueous solution, sulfonated and multiwall carbon nanotubes were impregnated into the poly(AN-co-St) nanocomposite at a 1:1 ratio [63]. The Langmuir isotherm determined that the maximal adsorption values for poly(AN-co-St)/MWCNTs, sulfonated (AN-co-St), and poly(AN-co-St) composites were 121.95 mg/g, 48.78 mg/g, and 47.84 mg/g, respectively. Furthermore, when compared with previous studies, the maximal sorption capacity of poly(AN-co-St)/MWCNTs was 121.95 mg/g. Particle size distribution and scanning electron microscopy images were used to show the morphology of the nanocomposite molecules.

3.2. Polyacrylonitrile as Fiber

Polyacrylonitrile fiber has many favorable characteristics, such as elasticity, huge surface area, and excellent toughness, making it a super adsorbent [64]. The polyacrylonitrile structure contains semi-crystalline and amorphous phases. Polyacrylonitrile contains a large number of carbon–carbon in its formula, which is responsible for its stability and excellent toughness. It is used to produce carbon nanofibers owing to its high carbon content (56%), and thus, stable products are formed through the reaction of the nitrile group [65]. Many research papers have discussed the techniques for forming nanofibers such as vapor growth, arc discharge, laser ablation, and chemical vapor deposition. However, these methods are very costly and the product yield is very poor. Electrospinning is a new method employed to produce fibers from polymer solutions under electrostatic forces. The components used in the electrospinning process are the high-voltage power supply, syringe pump, spinneret, and collector (Figure 4). In this process, high voltage is applied to a polymer viscous solution obtained by dissolving polymer into a suitable solvent and spinning it by applying high voltage current.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Schematic diagram for preparation of nanofibers through the electrospinning method.

Many researchers have reported different modified fiber adsorbents of polyacrylonitrile, as discussed below.

Shubo Deng and Bai (2004) utilized aminated polyacrylonitrile fibers (APANFs) as adsorbents for the evacuation of Cr3+ and Cr6+ species from wastewater at various values of pH [66]. The adsorption values demonstrated that large quantities of Cr3+ and Cr6+ species are absorbed using APANFs, even though the adsorption values depend on the pH. As per the results, the amount of adsorbed of Cr3+ ions increased with the increase in pH in the range of 1.5 to 6.5, and adsorption of Cr6+ was decreased with the rise in pH of the solution in the range of 2.4 to 12. The adsorption performances of Cr3+ and Cr6+ on aminated polyacrylonitrile fibers varied according to the forces between metal and adsorbent. A kinetic study revealed that adsorption equilibrium was obtained within one to two hours. Recovery of Cr6+ ions from the adsorbent APANFs was done in basic conditions and reutilized without loss of adsorption value, while Cr3+ ions recovery in acidic conditions was not very effective. The adsorption of metal on oxime-modified polyacrylonitrile nanofibers was studied by Saeed et al. (2008). They obtained functionalized polyacrylonitrile nanofibers by reacting hydroxylamine hydrochloride with the cyano group of polyacrylonitrile [67]. The maximal adsorption uptake values for Cu2+and Pb2+ were 52.70 mg/g and 263.45 mg/g, respectively, obtained from the Langmuir adsorption isotherm, indicating that the adsorption was a single layer on nanofiber. The desorption of metal stacked on the above adsorbent could be done by 1.0 M HNO3 acid. Acrylonitrile was introduced into polypropylene fiber by γ-rays irradiation followed by reaction with diethylene triamine, resulting in an aminated chelating fiber with a high adsorption value for Hg2+ ions [68]. The functionalized chelating fibers were found to be much more suitable adsorbents for mercury ions, and the maximum adsorption value for mercury ions was 657.9 mg/g. The maximum adsorption value of mercury ions was due to attraction between the NH2 moiety and Hg2+ ions. Hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile fibers have also been successful in the extraction of copper ions [69]. Polyacrylonitrile and PAN fibers functionalized with amines were used to remove lead and nickel individually from the aqueous medium by the hexamethylenediamine-modified polyacrylonitrile nanofibers and utilized for the extraction of toxic ions of lead, copper, and nickel from the artificial solution of metal ions [21,54,70,71]. The electrospinning method was utilized to make polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats, which were then improvised through hexamethylenediamine to obtain the aminated polyacrylonitrile (APAN) nanofiber mats. The obtained nanofiber mat was utilized to extract three kinds of metal ions, namely, Pb2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+ ions from aqueous solution. The maximum uptake values for Pb2+, Cu2+, and Ni2+ metal ions on the APAN nanofiber mats were 175, 162.5, and 48.5 milligrams per gram of adsorbent, respectively. Another study examined the effectiveness of removing Cr3+, Pb2+, and Hg2+ ions from industrial effluents using hydrolyzed/thioamidated polyacrylonitrile fibers [72]. The adsorption values for Cr3+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ were found to be 0.73 mmol/g, 0.09 mmol/g, and 0.14 mmol/g (at pH 4.0), respectively. This adsorbent was very selective for the Cr3+ ions compared with Pb2+ and Hg2+ ions.

Neghlani, Rafizadeh, and Taromi (2011) synthesized polyacrylonitrile nanofibers by the electrospinning method and modified them by diethylenetriamine to form aminated-polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membranes [73]. These membranes were utilized to remove Cu2+ ions from synthetic solutions. The percentage of amine loading on fibers was calculated by the gravimetric method. Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) was utilized to determine the concentration of Cu2+ ions in the aqueous solution after adsorption. The maximum adsorption value achieved through the Langmuir model for Cu2+ ions was 116.522 mg/g. Atomic force microscopy was used to study the changes in morphology before and after the adsorption of copper ions, as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Three-dimensional AFM images of (a) aminated PAN-NF before adsorption and (b) after copper adsorption. Adapted with permission from reference [73].

Huang et al., 2013 produced polyacrylonitrile nanofibers through an electrospinning process and then functionalized them with-NH2OH to form chelating nanofibers [74]. These nanofibers were used to extract Fe3+ and Cu2+ ions. Amidoxime-containing polyacrylonitrile nanofibers (AOPAN) showed the highest uptake values of 320 mg/g and 380 mg/g for Cu2+ ions and Fe3+, respectively. The adsorption value of Fe3+ by the adsorbent was found to be higher compared with Cu2+ ions. Higher affinity for iron ions towards nanofibers could be explained on the basis of the hard–soft acid base theory. The maximum uptake value was dependent upon attractions between AOPAN and metal ions with similar initial concentrations. Another study reported the synthesis of activated carbons from polyacrylonitrile fibers and investigated their ability to remove toxic ions from wastewater [75]. Polyacrylonitrile fibers were oxidized in the presence of air in a temperature range of 463 K to 553 K for 3–4 days. Activated carbon was produced by treating the fibers at a higher temperature (553–573 K) and keeping them until the fibers converted to hard carbon deposits with the release of smoke. This carbon is then transformed into a powdery form before the activation.

Carbon dioxide and steam are the most common activating agents used for polyacrylonitrile oxidizing fibers (Figure 6). Two forms of commercially available activated carbon fibers, A-20 and W10-W, were used for comparable studies. It was found that the steam activation method produced a large surface area but low product of activated coke compared with carbon dioxide.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Activated carbon derived from PAN fibers.

In another study, the synthesis of polyacrylonitrile–polyamidoamine (PAMAM) composite nanofibers was done by an electrospinning scheme to investigate their dye removal ability [76]. Direct red 80 (DR80) and direct red 23 (DR23) with concentrations of 40 ppm were utilized to study the adsorption capacity of the resultant fibers. The factors such as adsorbent dose, initial dye concentration, and pH of the solution affected the dye removal process. Pseudo second-order kinetics and Langmuir isotherm were used to study the time taken to extract metal ions and the concentration of metal ions to be adsorbed. The maximum uptake value of dyes by PAN/PAMAM composite nanofibers was 1666.66 mg/g and 2000 mg/g for DR80 and DR23, respectively.

The preparation of polyacrylonitrile/polypyrrole (PAN/PPy) core–shell structure nanofibers was carried out through an in situ chemical oxidative polymerization technique to extract Cr6+ from wastewater [77]. The pH was found to be an important parameter to affect the adsorption of Cr6+ ions; adsorption of Cr6+ ions was enhanced with a decrease in the pH of the solution. The time taken to reach equilibrium was 30 min and 90 min, with the change in initial concentration from 100 ppm to 200 ppm. The results agreed with the pseudo-second-order model. Horzum et al. (2012) contemplated a method to synthesize polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fibers by an electrospinning method for the removal of radioactive uranium particles from aqueous systems via column adsorption under continuous flow [78]. These fibers were functionalized with NH2OH.HCl to convert nitrile moieties into amidoxime moieties. Amidoximated polyacrylonitrile fibers could be used repeatedly, however, their adsorption tendency decreased regularly. L. Zhang et al. (2009) investigated functionalized polyacrylonitrile fiber by reacting it with diethylenetriamine and chloroacetic acid to form a reusable chelating fiber containing polyamino–polycarboxylic acid ligands [79]. The immobilization of amine and carboxymethylation into polyacrylonitrile fibers was determined through X-ray diffraction, SEM, and FT-IR. These chelating fibers decreased the Cd2+ ions concentration in sewage water by up to 0.001 ppm, although the highest adsorption value of Cd2+ ions was 1.34 mmol/g. In addition, the resultant adsorbent was highly efficient for treating other metal ions such as Cu2+, Ca2+, Zn2+, Mg2+, Pb2+, Ni2+, Ag+, and Hg2+ ions. Another study reports acrylic fibers synthesized and improved by diethylenetriamine to produce modified chelating fibers [80]. This functionalized resin was utilized to remove Pb2+, Cu2+, and Ce4+ ions from water. It was found that the mechanical strength of modified resin was low compared with unmodified resin. In other research, activated carbon nanofibers (ACNFs) were synthesized from the precursor polyacrylonitrile and magnesium oxide through an electrospinning process [81]. Adsorption of cadmium ions was investigated using different adsorbents such as polyacrylonitrile-based activated carbon nanofibers/magnesium oxide, pristine, activated carbon nanofibers, and granular-activated carbon. A batch adsorption study showed that polyacrylonitrile-based activated carbon nanofibers/magnesium oxide and activated carbon nanofibers were best in the extraction of cadmium compared with granular activated carbon. The polyacrylonitrile/magnetite nanofibers were prepared via an electrospinning process followed by chemical precipitation by magnetite (Fe3O4) [82]. It was a two-step process. Iron nanoparticles tend to accumulate and settle down at the bottom, making them less effective in the removal process. Therefore, iron nanoparticles were loaded onto polyacrylonitrile to enhance their efficiency in the extraction of metal ions. A batch method was used for the extraction of lead ions using polyacrylonitrile/magnetite nanofibers. An equilibrium time study was conducted with a 50 mg/L solution for different time intervals. It was observed that maximum adsorption capacity for lead ions was obtained within 80 min. Afterwards, there was no change in the adsorption capacity. The polyacrylonitrile-based calixarene nanofibrous sorbents were synthesized by an electrospinning process for the extraction of Cr6+ ions [31]. Calixarene molecules having piperidine groups at the lower or upper ends of their calix structure were used as water-resistant composite nanofiber adsorbents. This adsorbent showed the greatest sorption for chromium ions. Moreover, the thermal stability of calixarene immobilized polyacrylonitrile nanofibers was found to be greater than that of polyacrylonitrile. E. F. Chaúque et al. (2016) synthesized polyacrylonitrile nanofibers through an electrospinning method [83]. The surface of the fibers was modified with poly ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) using ethylenediamine (EDA) as the cross-linker. The resultant fibers were used for the removal of Cd2+ and Cr4+ ions from aqueous solution. The utmost adsorption by modified fibers was 32.68 mg/g and 66.24 mg/g for Cd2+ and Cr4+ ions, respectively, at 298 K. Regeneration of nanofibers could be done through a 2M HCl solution. Another study reports activated carbon nanofibers (ACNFs) developed from precursor polyacrylonitrile and manganese oxide (MnO2) through an electrospinning technique [84]. For the comparison of the extraction of Cd2+ ions from the aqueous solution, ACNFs, composite ACNFs, and commercial powdered activated carbon were used to make a comparison. From the adsorption data, it was found that Cd2+ ion extraction by activated carbon nanofibers/MnO2 was maximum (97%), followed by activated carbon nanofibers (96%), and then followed by powdered activated carbon (74%). Silver-coated polyacrylonitrile membranes were also synthesized by an electrospinning technique [65]. The amidoxime moiety was attached to silver ions after polyacrylonitrile was modified with hydroxylamine and immersed in silver nitrate aqueous solution. This membrane was used for the complete removal of E. coli with an efficient filtration rate of 8.0 mL/cm2 min. Another paper reported the preparation of boehmite nanoparticles with polyacrylonitrile [85]. The boehmite nanoparticles were synthesized through the sol–gel method. Then, these boehmite nanoparticles were immobilized on polyacrylonitrile nanofibers through the electrospinning method. The synthesized nanofibers were more effective in the removal of E. coli bacteria. Moreover, removal efficiency increased from 72.33% to 97.37% with an increase in boehmite nanoparticle concentration from 0 to 10% by weight. Maximum bacterial elimination was due to attractive forces among nanoparticles and bacteria, and due to the increased surface area of the nanoparticles. E. coli bacterial extraction from the water bodies increased to 99.99% by repeating the filtration technique four times. The adsorption value of PAN/boehmite nanofibers for cadmium ions was found to be 0.23 mg/g for a 5 mL cadmium ion solution at pH 4.0. Xiao et al. (2020b) investigated the various anionic groups of modified fibers [64] such as ethylsulfate-functionalized fibers, ethylsulfonic acid-functionalized fibers, benzoic acid-functionalized fibers, and phenol-functionalized fibers, all of which are promising adsorbents for cationic dyes. Brilliant cresyl blue, a hazardous cationic dye, was chosen to study the adsorption ability of the above modified fibers. It was found from the results that unmodified polyacrylonitrile fibers were not able to remove brilliant cresyl blue dye, while the phenolate immobilized fibers exhibited the strongest adsorption. Moreover, the adsorption values of the sorbents were decreased in the basic medium. Chen et al. (2021) reported the triazine-modified dendrimer introduced into polyacrylonitrile fibers by a grafting technique and used them for the extraction of Hg2+ ions from aqueous solution at adjusted pH 6 [86]. The equilibrium adsorption time was found to be 180 min. The extraction of mercury ions changed with the change in concentration from 0.1 g/L to 1.0 g/L, and adsorption did not increase beyond 1.0 g/L. Regeneration was partially achieved with 0.5 M HCl (37.22%) and 0.5 M HNO3 (60.36%), while 0.5 M Na2S resulted in 80% desorption of the adsorbent.

Another author has discussed the synthesis of polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mat by an electrospinning technique and embedded α-Fe2O3 into nanofibers through a hydrothermal process [87]. This α-Fe2O3/polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mat could effectively extract lead ions from the mixture of nickel and copper ions at pH 4.8. A pseudo-second-order model better explained the kinetics of adsorption. Moreover, the Langmuir adsorption isotherm better explained the adsorption process than the Freundlich isotherm. Haddad and Alharbi (2019) reported the incorporation of various quantities of zinc oxide into polyacrylonitrile nanofibers and utilized them for the extraction of Pb2+ and Cd2+ ions [88]. A field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) was used to study the surface morphology of polyacrylonitrile nanofibers as well as zinc oxide immobilized polyacrylonitrile nanofibers. The addition of zinc oxide on the surface of the nanofibers increased the mean diameter from 135 nm to 240 nm. Z. Xu et al. (2018) fabricated TiO2-Ag3VO4 polyacrylonitrile nanofibers through an electrospinning process and used them to remove methylene blue [89]. The extraction of dyes increased within the pH range of 3-8 and further, there was no change in removal efficiency with an increase in pH. The adsorption process was also affected by temperature, contact time, and adsorption dose. Morillo Martn et al. (2018) reported effective ion-selective polyacrylonitrile nanofibers that were chemically modified in two steps: first, hydrolysis, and then reaction with ethylenediamine (EDA), ethyleneglycol (EG), or diethylenetriamine (DTA). These chemically modified nanofibers were used to extract Cu2+, Pb2+, and Zn2+ ions from aqueous solutions [90]. The anions such as Cl, NO32−, SO42−, and PO43− present in water were found to affect the adsorption process by competing with the metal ions and hence lowering the adsorption ability towards the adsorbent. In another study, the authors used an electrospinning technique to create a different amine-modified polyacrylonitrile nanofiber to extract anionic Congo red dye from aqueous solution [91]. Since Congo red dye is an anionic dye, it could be easily attracted by cationic species (-NH3+) present on the surface of the adsorbent in acidic conditions. Sun and Zheng (2020) reported polyacrylonitrile anion exchange fibers immobilized with polyethylenimine [92]. Alkylation of amine moieties present in polyethylenimine-functionalized polyacrylonitrile was carried out to synthesize three anion exchange fibers (PAN-PEI-3C, PAN-PEI-5C, and PAN-PEI-8C). These three adsorbents were studied for the removal of nitrate ions. It was found from the results that the uptake values of all adsorbents were the same, but PAN-PEI-5C showed more attraction towards the nitrate ions. Zhao et al. (2017) reported polyacrylonitrile fibers synthesized through an electrospinning process and covered with carbon matter via an aqueous carbonization method utilizing diethylenetriamine and glucose as the forerunner [93]. Here, toxic metal ions, chromium (Cr6+), and herbicide 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid were removed through the obtained resin. Chromium was removed in two steps: (1) Cr6+ diffused in the form of HCrO4− and Cr2O72−, which were attracted by the -NH3+ moiety of amine-containing hydrothermal carbon-coated polyacrylonitrile fiber (PAN@NC) and (2) Cr6+ was reduced to Cr3+ ions by gaining electrons from the -NH3, -OH, and -COOH moieties. Elzain et al. (2019) synthesized carbon nanotubes and graphite impregnated poly(styrene–acrylonitrile) nanofibers to adsorb methylene blue dye [94]. A precipitation technique was used to make these nanoparticles utilizing potassium persulfate as an initiator, and then poly(styrene–acrylonitrile) poly(St-co-AN) was electrospun into nanofibers through an electrospinning method. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm was followed by poly(St-co-AN) nanofibers during the adsorption of methylene blue. Moreover, the rate of adsorption was well explained by a pseudo 2nd order model.

In another experiment, a chitosan immobilized polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous mat was prepared, as chitosan could easily bind to the nanofibers due to hydrogen bonding [95]. The mat was used to check the removal efficiency of acid blue-113 anionic dye. This adsorbent could be regenerated five times with almost similar efficiency to remove the adsorbate. The adsorption process was basically monolayer followed by the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. Mokhtari-Shourijeh et al. (2020) synthesized electrospun porous polyacrylonitrile/polyvinylidene fluoride nanofibers to adsorb direct red 23 dyes [96]. The resultant nanofiber porosity and diameter could be increased by dissolving them in a solvent and then removing the solvent to enhance the fiber porosity. The adsorption phenomenon was well explained by intraparticle diffusion kinetics and the Langmuir isotherm.

Polyacrylonitrile-coated graphene/carbon nanotube hybrid beads were prepared to absorb methylene blue dye [97]. During the synthesis of this adsorbent, the first step was the formation of a hydrogel through emulsification and self-assembly of graphene sheets and carbon nanotubes, and then immobilizing the polyacrylonitrile onto the hydrogel. In the second step, this polyacrylonitrile-coated hydrogel was activated through a potassium hydroxide carbonization technique. Through this whole procedure, extremely porous graphene/CNT hybrids were obtained with high mechanical strength and better physical properties. Yarandpour et al. (2018) synthesized core–shell nanofibers using a mixture of polyacrylic acid and dextran-polyaniline via electrospinning and in situ polymerization techniques, and used the formulated nanofibers to absorb Pb2+ and Cu2+ ions [98]. Polyacrylic acid and dextran were connected through crosslinking using a thermal treatment technique. Since dextran is a water-soluble polysaccharide and has many side chains, it can be easily chemically modified by aldehydes, methacrylate, thiol, phenol, maleimide, and vinyl sulfone moieties. Calcium carbonate was incorporated in various amounts into nanofibers of polyaniline to make the structure mesoporous. Nasimi, Baghdadi, and Dorosti (2020) prepared ethylenediamine-modified polyacrylonitrile fibers for the removal of mercury ions from aqueous systems [99]. The Freundlich, Langmuir, UT, Redlich-Peterson, and Temkin isotherm models were used to explain the equilibrium adsorption value of mercury ions by the above adsorbent. Box-Behnken designs in combination with response surface methodology were employed to explain the factors affecting the adsorption process, such as pH, equilibrium time, temperature, and initial concentration. A batch test as well as a column method were used to study the various parameters affecting the adsorption process. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm was found to explain the adsorption process well. Phan et al. (2020) prepared a composite by impregnating zinc oxide nanoparticles onto polyacrylonitrile nanofibers [100]. The addition of hinokitiol to composite nanofibers was found to be effective in increasing nanofiber efficiency. It also improved antibacterial activity against bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Hinokitiol is related to terpenoid compounds obtained from the wood of trees in the family Cupressaceae. Abd-Elhamid et al. (2019) fabricated a composite of graphene oxide/polyacrylonitrile/β-cyclodextrin nanofibers by an electrospinning method to study their efficacy for the removal of crystal violet [101]. A light microscope was used to obtain the light image of the composite nanofiber and X-ray diffraction was used to study the crystallography of the nanofiber adsorbent. Another study reported ZnO-TiO2-modified polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats prepared by electrospinning and their comparison with ZnO and TiO2 polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats for chromium ion extraction from aqueous solution. These nanoparticles were synthesized through the arc discharge method with similar spinning factors and circumstances. The sorption of chromium is affected by the pH of the solution as it exists in different oxidation states in acidic conditions such as H2CrO4, HCrO4, CrO42−, and Cr2O72−and was carried out at pH 1.5 and 6.0 [102].

3.3. Polyacrylonitrile in Membranes

The extraction of the pollutants using different membranes is a significant approach in the field of chemistry. Among these different membranes, ion exchange membranes are mostly used in fields such as dialysis, reverse osmosis, food industries, wastewater remediation, pharmaceutical industries, etc. Polyacrylonitrile, when used as a membrane for various processes, showed outstanding features, including heat resistance, and tolerance towards solvents, microorganisms, and radiation [103]. Khan and Baig (2012) reported an anion-exchange membrane of polyacrylonitrile/silica gel prepared through the solution casting method by taking various concentrations of polyacrylonitrile and silica gel [104]. The maximum anion exchange value was obtained with an equal ratio of polyacrylonitrile and silica gel. The above membrane was used to manufacture an arsenic selective electrode to determine the different concentrations of arsenic in solutions. The useful pH of the electrode was 5.0–10.0. In addition, the electrode demonstrated good selectivity for As5+ over interfering anions. In another study, highly porous polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous membranes were successfully fabricated using a hot water bath as an extractor from a polyacrylonitrile and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) blended solution, and then aminated with diethylene triamine (DETA). The obtained aminated nanofibrous mats (APAN) showed unique micro/nano structures and possessed an extra-high extraction capability for the removal of lead ions (Pb2+) from aqueous solution (maximum uptake capacity of Pb2+ was up to 1520.0 mg/g) and could maintain over 90% of its extraction capacity at the sixth cycle of extraction–dissociation [105].

Adsorptive ultrafiltration membranes were formulated from synthesized polyvinyltetrazole-co-polyacrylonitrile (PVT-co-PAN) by nonsolvent-induced phase separation [106]. PVT-co-PAN with varied degree of functionalization was explored to prepare adsorptive membranes. It was found that PVT segments could alter the pore size, charge, and hydrophilic behavior of the membranes; the membranes became more negatively charged and hydrophilic after the addition of PVT. The PVT segments also served as the primary binding sites for Cu2+ ion adsorption from aqueous solution. At pH = 5, the maximum adsorption of Cu2+ ions in a continuous ultrafiltration solution of 10 ppm were achieved. The Freundlich isotherm model accurately described the aqueous solution Cu2+ ion adsorption on membranes. The adsorption capacity obtained from the Freundlich isotherm model was 44.3 mg/g, which is higher than others. Alharbi et al. (2020) produced bilayer nanofiber membranes with enhanced adsorption and mechanical properties by functionalizing a layer of polyacrylonitrile with metal oxides (ZnO or TiO2) and chitosan via consecutive electrospinning [107]. The incorporation of a chitosan layer into nanofibers increased lead adsorption capacity by 102% and cadmium adsorption capacity by 405%. Chitosan also enhanced the tensile strength of the membrane by approximately 68%, owing to the strong interaction between the fibers at the interface of the two layers. A. Almasian et al. (2018) prepared a polyacrylonitrile/polyaniline (PANI)-nylon core–shell nanofiber membrane as a filtration–adsorption membrane and modified its surface with diethylenetriamine (DETA) for separating Pb2+ and Cd2+ ions from aqueous solutions [20]. The modification resulted in an increase in the hydrophilicity and permeability of the membrane. The anti-fouling of the membrane was tested by bovine serum albumin filtration. The results revealed a rejection efficiency of 89.11% for BSA and a flux recovery ratio of 91.85%, which can be owed to the hydrophilic nature of nanofibers. The prepared membrane also showed an adsorption capacity of 960 mg/g and 911.72 mg/g for lead and cadmium ions, respectively, due to incorporated nitrogen atoms on the nanofiber surface. The use of nylon as the core significantly improved the mechanical properties of the membrane. The results showed the rejection of 96.77% and 95.11% for Pb2+ and Cd2+, respectively, for 12 h. The modified membrane also showed a good regeneration property, and the rejection of Pb and Cd ions was 87.57% and 86% even after 10 filtration cycles. Another paper described the preparation of a membrane of polyacrylonitrile and its corresponding membrane coated with polyaniline (PANI) for the adsorption of heavy metal ions Pb2+ and Cr2O72−. Membranes coated with PANI showed better adsorption performance and their direct current conductivities were correlated to the concentrations of heavy metal ions. The maximum adsorption capacities of lead and chromate ions on the PANI-coated membranes were found to be 290.12 mg/g and 1202.53 mg/g, respectively [108]. Xu et al. (2020) selected graphene oxide as a structural optimizer to tune the porous structure of the polyacrylonitrile membrane [109]. The pore size and porosity of the membrane were increased from 156.4 nm and 37.0% to 590.8 nm and 81.4% with an increase in graphene oxide amount from 0 to 0.15%. The membrane was then decorated with well-dispersed iron/manganese oxide to achieve a functional membrane that could efficiently remove methylene blue from water in the presence of peroxide. The functional membrane was found to have a higher oxide decoration ratio, lower water contact angle, larger pores, higher porosity, and better mechanical properties compared with the membrane without graphene oxide. The solution flux of methylene blue was approximately two times higher. Moreover, the functional membrane could remove the dye from water even after 30 cycles without any obvious efficiency attenuation, while the removal efficiency of the membrane without graphene oxide was clearly attenuated after 25 cycles. In another study, polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membrane was prepared by electrospinning and was functionalized with hydroxylamine hydrochloride and sodium hydroxide to obtain the amidoxime modified nanofiber membrane [110]. The amidoximated polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membrane was then kept in CuSO4 and FeCl3 metallic solutions to produce Cu-Fe bimetal-improvised polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membranes (BM-PANNM). This adsorbent was used to remove reactive blue 19. It was found that a copper-loaded membrane showed slower degradation than an iron-containing nanofiber membrane. R. Wang et al. (2013) synthesized a new membrane by fusing cellulose nanofiber (CNF) into a bilayer of nanosize electrospun polyacrylonitrile/microsize polyethylene terephthalate [111]. The resultant membrane was efficient at removing bacteria, viruses, and hazardous metal ions.

3.4. Polyacrylonitrile in Hydrogels

Hydrogels consist of a three-dimensional structure of polymer capable of absorbing large quantities of water and thus can also be used in many biomedical fields. However, hydrogels do not dissolve in water due to chemical and physical crosslinking between the chains of the polymer. Moreover, the functional groups present in hydrogels, such as COOH, -SO3H, -NH2, and -OH, improve the chelating power and increase adsorption value towards the toxic metal ions and dyes [112]. Hydrogels have attracted the attention of many researchers because of their lower cost and more effective properties [113]. Available literature confirms that hydrogels are effective in the removal of water pollutants. In one study, polyacrylamide hydrogel was synthesized using different concentrations of amine via transamidation and Hofmann methods [114]. The obtained products were utilized for the extraction of Cu2+ ions at pH 5.5 by the batch adsorption method. The maximum extraction value of copper was 2.93 mmol/g, acquired after a recovery cycle. Adsorption rate constants and activation energy of resin for ruthenium and iridium were also reported in this investigation. M. Ajmal et al. (2015) reported cobalt–iron bimetallic magnetic nanoparticles prepared through the inverse suspension polymerization method [115]. The amidoxime group was introduced by reacting the cyano group with hydroxylamine hydrochloride, which helped to increase the extraction capacity of the microgel. The magnetic behavior was introduced in the functionalized microgel matrix by in situ synthesis using cobalt–iron nanoparticles. This modified magnetic microgel was an effective adsorbent for the extraction of metal ions such as cadmium, chromium, and organic dyes such as methylene blue, rhodamine 6G, and herbicide paraquat. The adsorption values of amidoxime-poly(methacrylic-co-acrylonitrile) microgels for methylene blue, rhodamine 6G, paraquat, cadmium, and chromium ions were 88.1 ppm, 89.9 ppm, 190.0 ppm, 334.5 ppm, and 166.5 ppm (previous values were 40.2 ppm, 37.4 ppm, 75.3 ppm, 57.4 ppm, and 56.3 ppm). In another study, the ultra-fine CNF membrane was synthesized through a TEMPO (2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl) oxyl) oxidation approach [116]. The dynamic adsorption experiment was performed in dead-end filtration to study the adsorption of lead and chromium metal ions. The pH of the solutions was adjusted by using sodium hydroxide solution and hydrochloric acid. The elimination of bacteria and viruses through filtration membranes was determined via a retention test. For this test, 10 mL of E. coli suspension (106 CFU/mL) or MS2 bacteriophage suspension (106 PFU/mL) was used in a dead-end filtration mode. Different copolymer hydrogels of acrylonitrile-N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone (NVP/AN) and acrylonitrile-methylmethacrylate (NVP/MMA) were synthesized by subjecting them to γ-irradiation in different dosages. These hydrogels were then modified with a hydroxylamine–hydrochloride solution at pH 7. The amidoxime-containing hydrogels were washed to remove hydroxylamine, desiccated at 70 °C for six hours, and used to remove dyes from industry wastewater. It was found that the adsorption of dyes increased with the increase in concentration of dyes in a synthesized solution up to 200 ppm, after which there was a decrease in adsorption values. Results showed that modified NVP/AN hydrogel showed more attraction for dyes compared with NVP/MMA. Moreover, dye adsorption increased with an increase in temperature because of the heating effect. In another study, a semi-interpenetrating polymer network (semi-IPNs) was prepared by combining chitosan and polyacrylonitrile hydrogel with glutaraldehyde by a casting solution process [22]. As hydrogels are soft and can be easily distorted, semi-IPN was used to increase the stability and mechanical strength of the gel. In semi-IPNs, one polymer is crosslinked and the other is present in linear form, as shown in Figure 7. These were prepared by polymerization of acrylonitrile with chitosan and were used for the adsorption of Rhodamine B dye.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(I) Polymer hydrogels: (a) polymer network, (b) polymer blend, (c) sIPN, (d) full IPN, and (II) schematic representation of preparation of semi-IPN. Adapted with permission from reference [22].

A 3D hydrogel was synthesized by immobilizing sodium alginate into graphene oxide (GO) by using ultrasonic radiation. This solution was then modified with acrylonitrile by stirring and washed with dimethylformamide to obtain the precipitate. Afterwards, calcium chloride solution was added into the resultant precipitate of the graphene oxide/alginate-polyacrylonitrile (GO/Ca-Alg2-PAN) adsorbent. Generally, GO is a good adsorbent due to its high stability and large surface area, but sometimes it becomes difficult to regenerate GO due to its hydrophilic nature. Therefore, sodium alginate was encapsulated into GO to convert the single 2D structure into three dimensional networks. This adsorbent was used for the extraction of copper ions from aqueous media. Dudu et al. (2015) synthesized poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylamidopropyl-trimethyl ammonium chloride) hydrogels to remove toxic ions such as As5+, Cr3+, and Cr6+ from the aqueous system [117]. The adsorbent was further treated with hydroxylamine hydrochloride (NH2OH.HCI) to introduce a hydrophilic amidoxime group in the hydrogels. Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption isotherms were used to study the adsorption data. As5+ ion adsorption followed the Freundlich model, whereas Cr3+ and Cr6+ ion data fit well into the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. Moreover, the As5+ ion adsorption process followed the pseudo first-order kinetic model, while Cr3+ and Cr6+ ion adsorption followed the pseudo second-order models. Ekebafe, Ogbeifun, and Okieimen (2012) reported the copolymer of cassava starch (mainly found in Nigeria) and acrylonitrile by grafting technique and utilized it to remove lead, nickel, and copper ions from the aqueous system [118]. Hydrolysis of the resultant hydrogel with sodium hydroxide helped to enhance the removal efficiency of toxic metal ions. Regeneration of metal and hydrogel was carried out with 2% hydrochloric acid. Lu et al. (2020) prepared a hydrogel by using amidoxime-modified polyacrylonitrile, chitosan, and graphene oxide for the extraction of U6+ ions [119]. The hydrogel was obtained in the form of small beads of a diameter of 3 mm. The Langmuir adsorption isotherm best explained that adsorption took place through the formation of a monolayer of adsorbate on the adsorbent through chemical bonding, and the rate of adsorption was described via a pseudo-second-order model. The desorption process was carried out by using 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate to obtain the adsorbent and metal ions. Table 1 gives an overview of the performance of various polyacrylonitrile-based adsorbents.

Table 1.

Performance overview of various polyacrylonitrile-based adsorbents.

S. No. Adsorbent Maximum Adsorption Capacity/Contact Time Intial Concentration Optimum pH Reference
CHELATES
1. Polyacrylonitrile-2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole Hg2+: 526.9 mg/g - 6.5 [45]
2. EDTA-functionalized polyacrylonitrile Ni2+: 305.24 mg/g
Co2+: 88.35 mg/g
- 5.0
1.0
[43]
3. Ammonium molybdophosphate–polyacrylonitrile Co2+: 9.424 mg/g
Sr2+: 87.62 mg/g
Cs+: 81.069 mg/g
10 mM 5.0
6.0
7.0
[49]
4. Polyacrylonitrile-TETA Ag+: 108.14 mg/g/30 min
Pb2+: 99.01 mg/g/30 min
110 ppm 6.0
7.0
[120]
5. Amidoximated AN/MA Hg2+: 521.534 mg/g/600 min
Ag+:145.62 mg/g/600 min
Cu2+: 127.727 mg/g/600 min
Fe2+: 41.325 mg/g/600 min
Pb2+: 12.42 mg/g//600 min
5 mM 2.0 [55]
6. Amidoximated polyacrylonitrile Cd2+: 87 mg/g/40 min
Herbicide paraquat: 91 mg/g/40 min
250 ppm
100 ppm
6.0 [57]
7. Polyacrylonitrile-based porous carbon materials Cr6+: 374.90 mg/g/120 min 448.7 ppm 2.0 [59]
8. NaOH-hydrolyzed kapok–Polyacrylonitrile nanocomposites Pb2+: 78.34 mg/g 200 ppm - [121]
9. Chelating polyacrylonitrile beads Pb2+: 145 mg/g/180 min
Cd2+: 156 mg/g/1800 min
50–2000 ppm 7.0 [122]
MEMBRANES
3. PVAm-CNF membrane Cr6+: 23.55 mg/g/30 min
Cr6+: 44.95 mg/g/90 min
100 ppm
200 ppm
6.0 [77]
4. Aminated-polyacrylonitrile nanofiber membranes Cu2+: 116.522 mg/g/20 min - 6.0 [73]
5. Bilayer polyacrylonitrile /Chitosan nanofiber membranes Pb2+: 461 mg/g/5 min
Cd2+: 389 mg/g/60 min
150–800 ppm 5.0
7.0
[107]
6. PAN/PANI-nylon core–shell nanofiber membranes Pb2+: 960 mg/g/7 min
Cd2+: 911.72 mg/g/7 min
50 ppm 6.5 [20]
7. PAN/PANI membranes Pb2+: 290.12 mg/g/180 min
Cr6+: 1202.53 mg/g/180 min
5–350 ppm
5–500 ppm
7.0 [108]
8. PAN-EDA membrane
PAN-NH2 membrane
PAN-CONH2 membrane
Congo red dye: 90%/60 min
Congo red dye: 87%/60 min
Congo red dye: 82%/90 min
10–70 ppm
10–70 ppm
- [91]
9. Chitosan-coated polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous mat Acid Blue-1368 mg/g/7200 min 250 ppm - [95]
10. Copper-iron bimetal-modified polyacrylonitrile
nanofibrous membranes
Reactive blue 19: 99.9%/60 min 6.0/ 0.20 g - [110]
HYDROGELS
1. Magnetic Co–Fe nanoparticle-containing modified microgel Cd2+: 87 mg/g/7–20 min
Paraquat: 91 mg/g/30 min
100 ppm
100 ppm
6.0
-
[115]
2. Graphene oxide/alginate-polyacrylonitrile 3D double network hydrogels Cu2+: 381.14 mg/g/147 min 2 mM - [123]
3. Amidoximated
poly(acrylonitrile/N-vinylimidazole) hydrogel
UO22+: 640 mg/g gel 650–1850 ppm 4.0 [18]
4. Amidoxime p(AN-co-APTMACl) hydrogels As5+: 3333.3 mg/g/ 1480 min
Cr3+: 26.7 mg/g/720 min
Cr6+: 1111.13 mg/g/900 min
1–5000 ppm, 3.0
5.0
9.0
[117]
5. Cassava starch-g-polyacrylonitrile hydrogel Pb2+: 72 mg/g
Cu2+: 76.6 mg/g
Ni2+: 86.5 mg/g
80 ppm
124 ppm
196 ppm
8.5 [118]
FIBERS
1. Amidoxime-modified polyacrylonitrile fibers Cu2+: 52.7 mg/g/5760 min
Pb2+: 263 mg/g/5760 min
-
0.2 g
[67]
2. Hydrolyzed/thioamidated polyacrylonitrile fibers Cr3+: 37.9527 mg/g/60 min
Hg2+: 18.05 mg/g/60 min
Pb2+: 28.56 mg/g/60 min
10–350 ppm [72]
3. Polyacrylonitrile nanofibers
Amidoxime polyacrylonitrile chelating nanofibers
Cu2+: 215.18 mg/g/4320 min
Fe3+: 221.37 mg/g/4320 min
Cu2+: 215.18 mg/g/4320 min
Fe3+: 221.37 mg/g/4320 min
- [74]
4 Aminated chelating fibers Hg2+: 657.9 mg/g 20–2000 ppm [68]
5. Aminated polyacrylonitrile nanofibrous mats Pb2+: 520.0 mg/g/300 min - [105]
6. Polyacrylonitrile /boehmite nanofibers Cd2+: 0.23 mg/g/60 min
E. coli = 97.37%
5 ppm [85]
7. Dendrimer-grafted
polyacrylonitrile fibers
Hg2+: 227.64 mg /g/180 min 1–500 ppm [86]
8. Thio-functionalized polyacrylonitrile fibers Hg2+: 322.8 mg /g/200 min
Cd2+: 350.6 mg /g/200 min
30–500 ppm [32]
9. Maghemite- and graphene-oxide-embedded Polyacrylonitrile As5+: 36.1 mg/g/90 min 1–50 ppm [124]
10. α-Fe2O3/polyacrylonitrile nanofiber
mat
Pb2+: 70.34 mg/g/120 min
Pb2+: 49.57 mg/g/120 min
100 ppm
50 ppm
[87]
11. Alkylated polyacrylonitrile-PEI anion exchange fiber NO3-: 31.32 mg/g/10 min 10–100 ppm [92]
12. Polyacrylonitrile @NC fibers Cr6+: 290.70 mg/g/2880 min
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid: 164.47 mg/g/2160 min
20–300 ppm
20–300 ppm
[93]
13. Amine-modified polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats Cu2+: 150.6 mg/g/600 min
Ag+: 155.5 mg/g/300 min
Fe2+: 116.5 mg/g/300 min
Pb2+: 60.6 mg/g/300 min
200 ppm
200 ppm
200 ppm
200 ppm
[125]
14. PAA/dextran/aniline nanofibers Pb2+: 951.1 mg/g/5 min
Cu2+: 832.7 mg/g/5 min
200 ppm [98]
15. Amino-functionalized polyacrylonitrile fibers Hg2+: 1116 mg /g/120 min 850 ppm [99]
16. Polyacrylonitrile/cyclodextrin/graphene oxide nanofibers Crystal violet: 16.47 mg/g/10 min 25–100 ppm [101]
17. Polyacrylonitrile/polyamido amine composite nanofibers Direct red 80: 999 mg/g/5 min
Direct red 23: 942 mg/g/5 min
40 ppm [76]
18. Aminated PAN/PVDF composite nanofibers Direct red 23: 573.3 mg/g/2.5–5 min 50 ppm [96]
19. Carbon-dot-modified Polyacrylonitrile fiber Methyl orange: 422 mg/g 65 μg/mL [126]
20. Fe/Ag bimetallic nanoparticles
immobilized on EDTA-EDA-modified polyacrylonitrile nanofibers
Methyl orange: 96% 100 ppm [127]

4. Factors that Affect the Adsorption Process

4.1. Effect of pH

The extraction of the ions can be altered through the pH of the solution. The desired pH can be obtained through a suitable buffer. Buffer affects the process of ion formation during the interaction of metal ions and adsorbent. A discussion in an article explained the impact of pH on the adsorption of mercury ions by polyacrylonitrile-2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole (PAN-ATD) in the pH range 2.5–6.5 at 298 K. It was found that adsorption value of chelating resin rises with pH from 2.5 to 6.5 and attained the highest value 456.1 mg/g at pH 6.5. The adsorption was decreased at low pH value of solution due to the competitive adsorption effect of H+ ions with mercury ions. As the value of pH reached 4.0, mercuric hydroxide (Hg(OH)2) was the main compound to be formed. The amine group was deprotonated as the pH was increased as shown in Figure 8 [45].

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Effect of pH on the sorption value of polyacrylonitrile-2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole adsorbent for Hg2+ ions (adsorbent dose used = 0.015g, Co = 10.0 mg/30.0 mL, pH 2.5–6.5, T = 298 K, 100 rpm). Reproduced with permission from reference [45].

4.2. Effect of Contact Time

Another important parameter is the effect of contact time on the adsorption of metal ions by the adsorbent at various initial metal ion concentrations, which helps to determine the equilibrium time of adsorption. The tendency to attain the equilibrium at different times depends upon the concentration of metal ions, the adsorbent, the initial concentration, and the temperature of the solution [43,55,122].

Wang et al. reported the synthesis of polyacrylonitrile/polypyrrole (PAN/PPy) core–shell structure nanofibers by means of electrospinning. The saturation of adsorption would take place within 30 to 90 min as the initial concentration increased from 100 to 200 ppm. The rate of adsorption increased with an increase in contact time; saturation values were 23.55 mg/g, 35.12 mg/g, and 44.95 mg/g at the concentrations of 100 ppm, 150 ppm, and 200 ppm of initial Cr6+ solution, as shown in Figure 9 [77].

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Effect of contact time and initial concentration on the adsorption of Cr6+ of the PAN/PPy nanofiber mat. Temperature = 25C, pH = 2.0. Adapted with permission from reference [77].

4.3. Effect of Other Co-Existing Ions

The extraction of toxic heavy metal ions from aquatic systems is also affected by the presence of a mixture of the ions in the form of either cations or anions. These metal ions compete for their adsorption on vacant sites of the adsorbent [55,71]. In a study, the impact of coexisting ions on the adsorption process was examined in a solution containing a combination of metal ions Ni2+, Cu2+, and Cr6+. Adsorption by PAN/PPy nanofiber mats (100 mg) was done by dissolving the adsorbent in a 30 mL solution of a mixture of metal ions, with the initial concentration of every metal ion being 200 ppm at pH 2. It was found that uptake of Cr6+ ions was decreased in the presence of Ni2+ and Cu2+ ions (Figure 10). However, PAN/PPy nanofiber was still more selective for Cr6+ ions compared with Ni2+ and Cu2+ ions [77].

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Effect of coexisting ions on adsorption capacities of PAN/PPy nanofiber mat for Cr6+, Ni2+, and Cu2+. Adapted with permission from reference [77].

4.4. Effect of Adsorbent Amount

The amount of adsorbent is also a determining factor affecting the concentration of adsorbate adsorbed and thus is important to make the whole process of adsorption more cost-effective. The increase in adsorption efficiency with an increase in the amount of adsorbent is due to more available space for adsorption. Although, after a particular adsorbent amount, the extraction ability becomes constant. This is due to the large number of available vacant sites in comparison with the adsorbate amount. Hence, it is better to use the optimum amount of the adsorbent instead of using it in excess [45,55,128]. For example, the effect of the adsorbent amount on the adsorption of Th4+, U6+, Cd2+, and Ni2+ was examined by using an amount of 0.1–0.5 g in 100 mL of toxic metal solutions with a starting concentration of the adsorbent of 100 ppm at 298 K and pH 6.0. As evident from Figure 11, the adsorption of Th4+, U6+, Cd2+, and Ni2+ by the adsorbent was higher at 100 mg and then decreased. As the concentration of the adsorbent increased, it became difficult to approach the unused sites due to the higher concentration of adsorbent, thus reducing the adsorption efficiency of metal ions [129].

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Effect of adsorbent dosage on the adsorption of metal ions. Adapted with permission from reference [129].

4.5. Reusability of Adsorbent

Revival and desorption of the adsorbent is an essential parameter for industry to reduce the cost of the extraction process. Acids (HCl, H2SO4, HNO3), bases (NaOH, KOH), salts (CaCl2, Ca(NO3)2, Na2SO4, Na2CO3), and chelating agents (EDTA) can all be used to desorb [120]. The regenerating agents are considered effective if they can recover the metal ions without destroying the adsorbent binding sites. For example, Xiong et al. (2015b) studied the desorption of mercury ions from polyacrylonitrile-2-amino-1,3,4-thiadiazole chelating resin (PAN-ATD) by using 30 mL of HCl and HNO3 in different amounts (0.5–4.0 M) [45]. It was found that a 4.0 M solution of HCl or HNO3 solution completely (100%) desorbed mercury ions. The adsorption–desorption phenomenon was carried out five times, and it hardly affected the adsorption value. Adsorption values were sustained at up to 90.8%, even after repeating this phenomenon 5 times. In one of our desorption studies, the removal efficiencies of Pb2+ at 0.1M HCl for cycles 1, 2, and 3 were found to be 89.3%, 63.2%, and 54.6%, respectively as shown in Figure 12 [128].

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Regeneration process of the modified polyacrylonitrile. Adapted with permission from reference [128].

Sheng Deng et al. (2017) synthesized thiol-functionalized polyacrylonitrile fibers by a microwave irradiation technique for the extraction of Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions [32]. This technique is better than conventional methods due to reduced reaction time, reduced side products formation, and an increase in the reaction yield. Moreover, the desorption of Cd2+ and Hg2+ ions was conducted through 0.1M HCl, and the regeneration process of metal ions, as well as fibers, was repeated 5 times (Figure 13). The effective desorption of these metal ions from the fibers could take place due to the greater attraction of H+ ions towards the fibers compared with metal ions.

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Adsorption capacities of Hg2+ and Cd2+ on PANMW-Thiol fiber regeneration. Reproduced with permission from reference [32].

4.6. Adsorption Mechanism

Some of the methods used to remove harmful metals from the environment include surface adsorption, ion exchange, electrostatic forces, precipitation, and chelation [130]. Metal is diffused onto the adsorbent’s pores via the physisorption process known as surface adsorption. The adsorbent and the charge on the metal ions (the adsorbate) interact electrostatically to cause sorption. Moreover, the complex formation generally involves the interaction between electron donor ligands and metal ions, which is responsible for extraction. The following studies are briefly discussed:

Nouri et al. 2014 explored the properties of polyacrylonitrile/oxime/nano iron oxide as an adsorbent for the extraction of fluoride ions from aqueous solution (Figure 14) [131].

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Adsorption mechanism of fluoride ions by polyacrylonitrile-oxime-iron oxide nano-particles.

Here, the adsorption of fluoride ions occurred through hydrogen bonding, complex formation, as well by surface adsorption.

Magnificent adsorption capacity of poly(acrylonitrile-2-amino-2-thiazoline) resin was demonstrated by Y. Chen and Zhao (2003). The adsorption values of poly(acrylonitrile-2-amino-2-thiazoline) resin for Rh3+, Ru4+, Ir4+, and Pd2+ were 72.07 mg/g, 137.6 mg/g, 147.1 mg/g, and 230.7 mg/g resin, respectively (Figure 15) [132].

Figure 15.

Figure 15

Possible sorption mechanism of different metal ions by poly(acrylonitrile-2-amino-2-thiazoline) resin. The adsorption by modified adsorbent was more selective for Pd2+ and Rh3+ in acidic conditions.

Tripathy and Hota (2019) reported maghemite- (γ- Fe2O3) and graphene-oxide-incorporated polyacrylonitrile nanofibers synthesized through an electrospinning method and used them to remove As5+ ions from aqueous solution [124]. The removal efficiency was influenced by factors such as adsorbent dose (0.01–0.09 g), pH (3–8), exposure period (30−180 min), and initial As5+ ion concentration (1–50 ppm). As shown in Figure 16, the adsorption of arsenic by the GO/γ-Fe2O3-modified polyacrylonitrile was increased due to ionic interaction as well as complex formation by the ions.

Figure 16.

Figure 16

Schematic representation of possible adsorption mechanism for As5+ removal on the surface of PAN/GO/γ- Fe2O3 nanofiber Membrane. Reproduced with permission from reference [124].

5. Adsorption Isotherms Models

The relationship between the amount adsorbed and the concentration of solution is known as the adsorption isotherm. This adsorption isotherm explains the distribution of metal ions on the surface of an adsorbent as well as in solution and helps to study the efficiency of adsorbents. A variety of adsorption isotherm models are accessible to explain the equilibrium of adsorption, including Langmuir, Freundlich, BET, Toth, Temkin, Redlich–Peterson, Sips, Frumkin, Harkins–Jura, Halsey, Henderson, and Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherms [133]. A huge literature is available to show that Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms are used most of the time for extraction of toxic metal ions [44,47,134]. These are briefly described below.

5.1. Freundlich Adsorption Isotherm Model

In the Freundlich isotherm model, maximum adsorption takes place on the surface of an adsorbent by forming multiple layers. This isotherm is related to heterogeneous surfaces. It is assumed that multiple layers are formed on the surface of the adsorbent, and solute particles are constantly bound to the surface of the adsorbent.

This isotherm can be described by the equations given below.

qe = Kf Ce1/n (1)

Linear equation;

logqe = logKf + logCe (2)

The quantity of solute adsorbed onto the adsorbent at adsorption equilibrium is represented by qe (mg/g, mmol/g); Ce (mg/L, mmol/L) is the solute concentration in solution at adsorption equilibrium; Kf (mg/g) indicates increased adsorption ability of the adsorbent; and n (L/mg) is the Freundlich isotherm constant. The value of 1/n indicates the feasibility of the process. If its value is less than 1, it means adsorption is chemical; and if its value is more than 1, it indicates the process of adsorption is physical, if 1/n =0, it means the process is irreversible.

The limitation of this model is that it is applicable over a certain range of pressures and concentration only. This model fails when the concentration of the adsorbent is very high. It is a purely empirical model without any theoretical basis [135].

5.2. Langmuir Adsorption Isotherm Model

A Langmuir adsorption isotherm model is utilized to explain the equilibrium between an adsorbate and an adsorbent system when the surface of the adsorbent is homogeneous. It also indicates that the adsorption is monolayer as the adsorbent has equal affinity for all adsorbate molecules [134]. Adsorption phenomena depend on the number of sites uncovered on the adsorbent, and desorption depends on the number of sites of the adsorbent covered.

The Langmuir isotherm model is expressed as:

Ce/qe = 1/q0KL + Ce q0 (3)

The quantity of solute adsorbed onto the adsorbent at adsorption equilibrium is represented by qe (mg/g, mmol/g); Ce (mg/L, mmol/L) is the solute concentration in solution at adsorption equilibrium; qo (mg/g, mmol/g) is the highest adsorption capability; and KL (L/mg, L/mmol) is the Langmuir isotherm constant. By plotting Ce/qe versus Ce, we obtain a linear relationship. The values of both q0 and KL can be obtained from the slope (1/q0) and the intercept (1/q0 KL), respectively.

The advantage of this model is that the surface of the adsorbent is uniform, and there is no interaction among adsorbates. It follows Henry’s law at low concentration levels. Moreover, the adsorption process is unimolecular, and when the whole surface is covered by solute, further adsorption does not occur, and this indicates a maximum of adsorption saturation of adsorption. The disadvantage is that, according to Langmuir, a saturated value of adsorption is independent of temperature, but experimentally it was found that adsorption decreases with a rise in temperature. This model does not give an idea about the roughness of the adsorbent surface or heterogeneous adsorption [135].

5.3. Dubinin–Radushkevich Isotherms (D–R Isotherm)

The D–R isotherm is used to describe the mechanism of adsorption onto a heterogeneous surface by a Gaussian energy distribution [136].

The Dubinin–Radushkevich equation looks like this:

ln qe = ln qth − K·ε2 (4)

Here, qe is the amount adsorbed at equilibrium (mg/g), qth is adsorption capacity (mg/g), K is the activity coefficient related to the mean free energy of adsorption or D–R isotherm constant (mol2 k/J 2), and ε is the Polanyi potential or adsorption potential (kJ/mol) that is determined by

ε = RT ln (1 + 1/Ce) (5)

R, T, and Ce are universal gas constants (8.314 J/mol/K), Kelvin temperature (K), and adsorbate equilibrium concentration (mg/L) in that order. The approach is usually applied to distinguish the physical and chemical adsorption of metal ions with their mean free energy.

Additionally, the adsorption energy E (kJ/mol) is the free energy change needed to move 1 mol of ions from the adsorbate to the adsorbent surface. This equation expresses this term.

E = 1/2 K (6)

Plotting ln qe against ε2, the constants K and qth can be calculated from the slope and intercept, respectively. This means that the free energy can determine the type of adsorption; if 8 < E < 16 kJ/ mol, the process is chemisorption; if it is less than 8 kJ/mol, the process is physisorption.

In one of the research articles, the authors discussed the synthesis of polyacrylonitrile nanofiber by treating it with sodium bicarbonate and examining the adsorption efficiency of the modified adsorbent for the removal of lead and nickel ions from aqueous solutions. Different isotherm models were used in this research to study whether the sorption takes place by a physical or chemical method. The authors illustrated that the Langmuir isotherm was well fitted for the lead ions, suggesting monolayer adsorption, and the Freundlich isotherm adsorption values were well-fitted for the nickel ions, suggesting multilayer adsorption. The D–R isotherm determined the mean free energy of adsorption and suggested that both heavy metal ions are physically bound to the modified polyacrylonitrile surface. The estimated mean free energy of adsorption by the D–R isotherm was, E < 8 kJ/mol, clearly showing that both heavy metal ions were physically attached to the surface of the modified polyacrylonitrile. In the literature, several investigations based on the adsorption of metal ions on modified polyacrylonitrile surfaces have been published. In Table 2, a few research datasets have been summarized.

Table 2.

Various adsorption isotherm models of the metal ion and dye sorption on modified polyacrylonitrile adsorbent.

Scheme. Adsorbents Metal/Dye Isotherm References
1 Chitosan/polyacrylonitrile semi-IPN hydrogel Rhodamine B dye Langmuir adsorption
isotherm
[22]
2 Thiourea-modified poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid) Malachite green Freundlich isotherm [62]
3 Polyacrylonitrile/polyamidoamine composite nanofibers DR80 and DR23 Langmuir adsorption
isotherm
[76]
4 Nanoporous polyacrylonitrile/calcium carbonate DB78 Langmuir adsorption
isotherm
[96]
5 Anionic functionalized polyacrylonitrile fibers BCB Langmuir adsorption
isotherm
[64]
6 Poly(methacrylic-co-acrylonitrile) Cd2+, Cr3+, MB, R6G, and paraquat Langmuir adsorption
isotherm
[115]
7 Modified PAN/SiO2 composite nanofiber Th4+, U6+, Cd2+, and Ni2+ Langmuir adsorption
isotherm
[129]
8 Poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylamidopropyl-trimethyl ammonium chloride) As5+, Cr6+, and Cr3+ Langmuir adsorption
isotherm
[117]
9 Activated nanofibrous polyacrylonitrile Ni2+
Pb2+
Freundlich isotherm
Langmuir adsorption
isotherm
[136]

5.4. Adsorption Kinetic Models

Adsorption kinetics explains the rate of uptake of a solute from an aqueous solution onto the given adsorbent. It gives details about the rate of adsorption and factors affecting the overall rate of reaction and the mechanism used in the adsorption process. Different kinetic models such as Lagergren’s pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, Elovich kinetic equation, and parabolic diffusion model are used to study adsorption kinetic phenomena. Among all the models, the rate of adsorption is generally studied using the Lagergren pseudo-first-order model and pseudo-second-order model [133].

5.5. Lagergren’s Pseudo-First-Order Kinetics

The pseudo-first-order kinetic model has been mostly used to speculate on the rate of adsorption of metals, which is expressed as

dq/dt = k1 (qe − q) (7)

q (mg/g) is the quantity of the metal adsorbed at a particular time; qe (mg/g) is the quantity of metal adsorbed at equilibrium; and k1 (min−1) is the pseudo-first-order rate constant. Integrating Equation (7) by using boundary conditions q = 0 at t = 0 and q = q at t = t, then the solved Equation (8) is:

In (qe /qe − q) = k1 T (8)

Thus, the rate constant k1 (min−1) can be obtained from the graph of In (qe /qe − q) versus time [133].

5.6. Blanchard’s Pseudo-Second-Order Kinetics

The adsorption rate factors can be further studied by using Blanchard pseudo-second-order kinetics, which is explained by

dq/dt = k2 (qe − q)2 (9)

q (mg/g) is the quantity of metal adsorbed at a particular time; qe (mg/g) is the amount of metal adsorbed at equilibrium; and k2 (g/mg.min) is the pseudo-second-order rate constant [133].

Arranging the variables in Equation (9) gives:

dq/(qe − q)2 = k2 dt (10)

Integrating Equation (10) using boundary conditions t = 0 to t = t and q = 0 and q = qe gives:

t/q = 1/k2 qe2 + 1/qe t (11)

A graph between t/q versus t gives the value of the constant k2 (g/mg h) and qe (mg/g) can also be calculated.

6. Adsorption Thermodynamic Study

Adsorption thermodynamics are discussed in detail in order to demonstrate the thermodynamic viability of any adsorbent for metal ion adsorption. Thermodynamic parameters help to describe the energy changes involved in the adsorption process. It helps to determine whether adsorption phenomena are physical or chemical, spontaneous, or non-spontaneous, and exothermic or endothermic. Thermodynamic factors such as change in enthalpy (ΔH°), change in entropy (ΔS°), and change in Gibbs free energy (∆G0) can be calculated through the Van ’t Hoff equation. The value of ∆G0 is negative at a particular temperature, which indicates the adsorption process is spontaneous, and the positive change in value of ∆G0 suggests that desorption may take place at high temperatures. The positive value of ΔH° suggests that the reaction is endothermic, and the negative value of ΔH° suggests that the process is exothermic. A positive ΔS° implies enhanced randomness at the adsorbent/adsorbate interface.

d(InKeq)/dT = ∆H/RT2 (12)
{\displaystyle K_{eq}}Keq = qe/C (13)

Keq is the thermodynamic equilibrium constant; R is the ideal gas constant; ∆H is the reaction enthalpy; and T is the temperature (K).

The free energy change in the reaction can be calculated by the following equation:

∆G0 = ∆H0 − T∆S0 (14)

The Gibbs free energy change is related to the equilibrium constant by the equation:

∆G0 = −RT InKeq (15)

By using Equations (14) and (15), Equation (16) is obtained that shows a relationship between the equilibrium constant of thermodynamic, change in enthalpy, and entropy as explained by the Van’t Hoff equation given below.

In Keq = − ∆H0/RT + ∆S0/R (16)

The values of ΔH° and ΔS° are calculated from the slope and intercept of a straight-line graph between InKeq versus 1/T as shown in Figure 17 [62].

Figure 17.

Figure 17

Van ’t Hoff graph for the sorption of malachite green on thiourea-modified-poly(AN co-AA) (malachite green: 100 ppm; adsorbent dose: 500 mg; contact time: 60 min; agitation speed: 100 rpm) Adapted with the permission from the reference [62].

Adeyi et al. investigated the effect of temperature on the adsorption of malachite green dye by thiourea-modified poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid) (TU-poly(AN-co-AA)) at various temperatures of 298 K, 308 K, 318 K, and 328 K [62]. The negative value of change in enthalpy (H0 = −17.06 kJ/mol) confirmed that the adsorption of the malachite green dye on TU-poly(AN-co-AA) was not supported at elevated temperatures. Further, the negative value of ∆G0 indicated that the process was spontaneous.

7. Conclusions

Water resources have consistently been polluted with industrial waste and other contaminants, such as pesticides, paints, dyes, toxic metal ions, and other substances despite the fact that water is one of the most basic needs of living things and must therefore be completely hygienic. The major water contaminants are heavy metals, including mercury, arsenic, lead, cadmium, etc. These metals are so toxic that they may cause the most serious diseases, such as cancer, respiratory diseases, immunological disorders, central nervous system issues, digestive problems, and so on. It is very important to treat the water before declaring if it is fit for human consumption. Adsorption is one of the most efficient, economical, and environment friendly methods for the treatment of environmental issues. A variety of adsorbents have physicochemical properties that make them promising candidates for wastewater treatment. Among them, polyacrylonitrile is an adsorbent that has been successfully used for wastewater treatment owing to its favorable properties. Moreover, polyacrylonitrile has a significant potential for modification, which increases the efficiency of adsorption and modified polyacrylonitrile has been used as chelating resins, membranes, hydrogels, fibers, and ion exchange resins as discussed in the present review. Polyacrylonitrile-based adsorbents also exhibit good regeneration, making the whole process more economical. Additionally, an analysis of the effects of factors on the adsorption process, including pH of the solution, adsorbent dosage, temperature, time, and initial concentration of metal ions, has also been provided. It has been determined that pH is a significant parameter that significantly influences the extraction of cations from solution. The removal of metal ions was shown to be more effective at moderate pH values compared with very low or high pH. The ratio of metal to binding sites determines the adsorbent’s capacity for adsorption, which explains how much adsorbent to use. Temperature has a considerable impact on the adsorption process as well. While an endothermic adsorption process results in greater adsorption capacity at high temperatures, an exothermic adsorption process sees a drop in adsorption rate as the temperature rises. The effect of contact time demonstrated that removal is initially quick, which slows down after reaching equilibrium. Similarly, the effect of initial ion concentration showed that the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent initially rises with increasing metal ion concentration and then falls as a result of saturation of the adsorbent’s active sites.

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my special thanks to Anuj Gupta, Nitin Bhatnagar, and others who helped me to complete this review paper.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Galiatsatou P., Metaxas M., Kasselouri-Rigopoulou V. Adsorption of Zinc by Activated Carbons Prepared from Solvent Extracted Olive Pulp. J. Hazard. Mater. 2002;91:187–203. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vardhan K.H., Kumar P.S., Panda R.C. A Review on Heavy Metal Pollution, Toxicity and Remedial Measures: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. J. Mol. Liq. 2019;290:111197. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Friberg L., Nordberg G., Vouk V.B. Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals. Elsevier-North-Holland Biomedical Press; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brajter K., Dabek-Zlotorzynska E. Separation of Metal Ions on a Modified Aluminium Oxide. Talanta. 1990;37:613–618. doi: 10.1016/0039-9140(90)80204-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Beauvais R.A., Alexandratos S.D. Polymer-Supported Reagents for the Selective Complexation of Metal Ions: An Overview. React. Funct. Polym. 1998;36:113–123. doi: 10.1016/S1381-5148(98)00016-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hesse G. Adsorption and Chromatography (Technique of Organic Chemistry, Vol. V) von H. G. Cassidy, Interscience Publishers New York Und London 1951. 1. Aufl., XV, 360 S., Gebd. $7.–. Angew. Chem. 1954;66:64. doi: 10.1002/ange.19540660213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kantipuly C., Katragadda S., Chow A., Gesser H. Chelating Polymers and Related Supports for Separation and Preconcentration of Trace Metals. Talanta. 1990;37:491–517. doi: 10.1016/0039-9140(90)80075-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reed B.E., Lin W., Matsumoto M.R., Jensen J.N. Physicochemical Processes. Water Environ. Res. 1997;69:444–462. doi: 10.2175/106143097X134777. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bailey S.E., Olin T.J., Bricka R., Adrian D. A Review of Potentially Low-Cost Sorbents for Heavy Metals. Water Res. 1999;33:2469–2479. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00475-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Coleman A.K. New Concepts in the Handling of Industrial Wastes. Chem. Ind. 1975;5:5344. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wulff G., Dhal P.K. Synthesis and Separations Using Functional Polymers. By D. C. Sherrington and P. Hodge. Wiley, Chichester 1988. x, 454 Pp., Bound, £ 52.50.—ISBN 0-471-91848-2. Angew. Chem. 1989;101:397–398. doi: 10.1002/ange.19891010350. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prasad H.H., Senger A., Chauhan K., Popat K.M., Anand P.S. Synthesis of Crosslinked Methacrylic Acid-Co-N, N-Methylene Bis Acrylamide Sorbents for Recovery of Heavy Metal Ions from Dilute Solutions. Ind. J. Chem. Tech. 2001;8:371–377. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kara A. Poly(Ethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate-n-Vinyl Imidazole) Beads for Heavy Metal Removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004;106:93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2003.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Duran A., Soylak M., Tuncel S.A. Poly(Vinyl Pyridine-Poly Ethylene Glycol Methacrylate-Ethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate) Beads for Heavy Metal Removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;155:114–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Coutinho F.M., Rezende S.M., Barbosa C.C. Influence of the Morphological Structure of Macroreticular Amidoxime Resins on Their Complexation Capacity. React. Funct. Polym. 2001;49:235–248. doi: 10.1016/S1381-5148(01)00079-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Şenkal B.F., Biçak N. Glycidyl Methacrylate Based Polymer Resins with Diethylene Triamine Tetra Acetic Acid Functions for Efficient Removal of Ca (II) and Mg (II) React. Funct. Polym. 2001;49:151–157. doi: 10.1016/S1381-5148(01)00075-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Atia A.A., Donia A.M., Elwakeel K. Selective Separation of Mercury (II) Using a Synthetic Resin Containing Amine and Mercaptan as Chelating Groups. React. Funct. Polym. 2005;65:267–275. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2005.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Almasian A., Giahi M., Fard G.C., Dehdast S., Maleknia L. Removal of Heavy Metal Ions by Modified PAN/PANI-Nylon Core-Shell Nanofibers Membrane: Filtration Performance, Antifouling and Regeneration Behavior. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;351:1166–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Arsalani N., Rakh R., Ghasemi E., Entezami A.A. Removal of Ni(II) from Synthetic Solutions Using New Amine-Containing Resins Based on Polyacrylonitrile. Iran. Pol. J. 2009;18:623–632. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Al-Mubaddel F.S., Haider S., Aijaz M.O., Haider A., Kamal T., Almasry W., Javid M., Khan S.U.-D. Preparation of the Chitosan/Polyacrylonitrile Semi-IPN Hydrogel via Glutaraldehyde Vapors for the Removal of Rhodamine B Dye. Polym. Bull. 2017;74:1535–1551. doi: 10.1007/s00289-016-1788-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dong T.-T., Chen G.-H., Gao C.-J. Preparation of Chitin Xanthate/Polyacrylonitrile NF Composite Membrane with Cross-Linking Agent Hydrogen Peroxide and Its Characterization. J Membr. Sci. 2007;304:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Engwa G.A., Ferdinand P.U., Nwalo F.N., Unachukwu M.N. Poisoning in the Modern World-New Tricks for an Old Dog. Volume 10 IntechOpen; London, UK: 2019. Mechanism and Health Effects of Heavy Metal Toxicity in Humans. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wu X., Cobbina S.J., Mao G., Xu H., Zhang Z., Yang L. A Review of Toxicity and Mechanisms of Individual and Mixtures of Heavy Metals in the Environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016;23:8244–8259. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6333-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Park J.-D., Zheng W. Human Exposure and Health Effects of Inorganic and Elemental Mercury. J. Prev. Med. Public Health. 2012;45:344–352. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.6.344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Al-Abbad E.A., Al Dwairi R.A. Removal of Nickel(II) Ions from Water by Jordan Natural Zeolite as Sorbent Material. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2021;25:101233. doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2021.101233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Genchi G., Carocci A., Lauria G., Sinicropi M.S., Catalano A. Nickel: Human Health and Environmental Toxicology. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:679. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sani Z.M., Abdullahi I.L., Sani A. Toxicity Evaluation of Selected Dyes Commonly Used for Clothing Materials in Urban Kano, Nigeria. Eur. J. Exp. Biol. 2018;8:26. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Katheresan V., Kansedo J., Lau S.Y. Efficiency of Various Recent Wastewater Dye Removal Methods: A Review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018;6:4676–4697. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bayrakci M., Ozcan F., Yilmaz B., Ertul S. Electrospun Nanofibrous Polyacrylonitrile/Calixarene Mats: An Excellent Adsorbent for the Removal of Chromate Ions from Aqueous Solutions. Acta Chim. Slov. 2017;64:679–685. doi: 10.17344/acsi.2017.3559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Deng S., Zhang G., Liang S., Wang P. Microwave Assisted Preparation of Thio-Functionalized Polyacrylonitrile Fiber for the Selective and Enhanced Adsorption of Mercury and Cadmium from Water. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017;5:6054–6063. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00917. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Trochimczuk A., Kolarz B.N., Wojaczyǹska M. Acrylic Anion Exchangers and Their Sorption Properties towards Copper(II) and Cobalt(II). Selected Papers Presented at the 5th Symposium on Ion Exchange. React. Polym. Ion Exch. Sorbents. 1988;7:197–202. doi: 10.1016/0167-6989(88)90140-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jamil S.N.A.B., Khairuddin M., Daik R. Preparation of Acrylonitrile/Acrylamide Copolymer Beads via a Redox Method and Their Adsorption Properties after Chemical Modification. E-Polymers. 2015;15:45–54. doi: 10.1515/epoly-2014-0109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang B., Fischer K., Bieniek D., Kettrup A. Synthesis of Carboxyl Group Containing Hydrazine-Modified Polyacrylonitrile Fibres and Application for the Removal of Heavy Metals. React. Polym. 1994;24:49–58. doi: 10.1016/0923-1137(94)90136-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nilchi A., Atashi H., Javid A., Saberi R. Preparations of PAN-Based Adsorbers for Separation of Cesium and Cobalt from Radioactive Wastes. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2007;65:482–487. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shunkevich A., Akulich Z., Mediak G., Soldatov V. Acid–Base Properties of Ion Exchangers. III. Anion Exchangers on the Basis of Polyacrylonitrile Fiber. React. Funct. Polym. 2005;63:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2005.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Moon J.-K., Kim K.-W., Jung C.-H., Shul Y.-G., Lee E.-H. Preparation of Organic-Inorganic Composite Adsorbent Beads for Removal of Radionuclides and Heavy Metal Ions. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2004;246:299–307. doi: 10.1023/A:1006714322455. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kim W., Shin H., Maeng K. Complexation Characteristics of Poly (Acrylamidoxime) Chelating Resins Using Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (Korea) Polymer. 1982;6:119–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu C.Y., Sun P.J. Preparation and Analytical Properties of a Chelating Resin Containing Cysteine Groups. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1981;132:187–193. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(01)93889-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kolarz B.N., Bartkowiak D., Trochimczuk A.W., Apostoluk W., Pawłów B. New Selective Resins with Guanidyl Groups. React. Funct. Polym. 1998;36:185–195. doi: 10.1016/S1381-5148(97)00104-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Owsik I.A., Kolarz B.N., Jermakowicz-Bartkowiak D., Jezierska J. Synthesis and Characterization of Resins with Ligands Containing Guanidinine Derivatives. Cu(II) Sorption and Coordination Properties. Polymer. 2003;44:5547–5558. doi: 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00582-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Arsalani N., HOSSEIN Z.M. Synthesis and Characterization of EDTA Functionalized Polyacrylonitile and Their Metal Complexes. Iran. Polym. J. Engl. 2005;14:345–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jermakowicz-Bartkowiak D., Kolarz B.N., Serwin A. Sorption of Precious Metals from Acid Solutions by Functionalised Vinylbenzyl Chloride–Acrylonitryle–Divinylbenzene Copolymers Bearing Amino and Guanidine Ligands. React. Funct. Polym. 2005;65:135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2004.11.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xiong C., Li Y., Wang G., Fang L., Zhou S., Yao C., Chen Q., Zheng X., Qi D., Fu Y., et al. Selective Removal of Hg(II) with Polyacrylonitrile-2-Amino-1,3,4-Thiadiazole Chelating Resin: Batch and Column Study. Chem. Eng. J. 2015;259:257–265. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Morcali M.H., Zeytuncu B. Investigation of Adsorption Parameters for Platinum and Palladium onto a Modified Polyacrylonitrile-Based Sorbent. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2015;137:52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.minpro.2015.02.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yavuz M., Gode F., Pehlivan E., Ozmert S., Sharma Y. An Economic Removal of Cu2+ and Cr3+ on the New Adsorbents: Pumice and Polyacrylonitrile/Pumice Composite. Chem. Eng. J. 2008;137:453–461. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2007.04.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xu C., Wang J., Yang T., Chen X., Liu X., Ding X. Adsorption of Uranium by Amidoximated Chitosan-Grafted Polyacrylonitrile, Using Response Surface Methodology. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015;121:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Park Y., Lee Y.-C., Shin W.S., Choi S.-J. Removal of Cobalt, Strontium and Cesium from Radioactive Laundry Wastewater by Ammonium Molybdophosphate–Polyacrylonitrile (AMP–PAN) Chem. Eng. J. 2010;162:685–695. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.06.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Inan S., Altaş Y. Preparation of Zirconium–Manganese Oxide/Polyacrylonitrile (Zr–Mn Oxide/PAN) Composite Spheres and the Investigation of Sr(II) Sorption by Experimental Design. Chem. Eng. J. 2011;168:1263–1271. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.02.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nilchi A., Saberi R., Garmarodi S.R., Bagheri A. Evaluation of PAN-Based Manganese Dioxide Composite for the Sorptive Removal of Cesium-137 from Aqueous Solutions. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2012;70:369–374. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zong G., Chen H., Qu R., Wang C., Ji N. Synthesis of Polyacrylonitrile-Grafted Cross-Linked N-Chlorosulfonamidated Polystyrene via Surface-Initiated ARGET ATRP, and Use of the Resin in Mercury Removal after Modification. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;186:614–621. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zouboulis A.I., Matis K.A., Loukidou M., Šebesta F. Metal Biosorption by PAN-Immobilized Fungal Biomass in Simulated Wastewaters. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2003;212:185–195. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00304-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kiani G., Sheikhloie H., Arsalani N. Heavy Metal Ion Removal from Aqueous Solutions by Functionalized Polyacrylonitrile. Desalination. 2011;269:266–270. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu X., Chen H., Wang C., Qu R., Ji C., Sun C., Zhang Y. Synthesis of Porous Acrylonitrile/Methyl Acrylate Copolymer Beads by Suspended Emulsion Polymerization and Their Adsorption Properties after Amidoximation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;175:1014–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Atta A.M., Abdel-Rahman A.A.-H., El Aassy I.E., Ahmed F.Y., Hamza M.F. Adsorption Properties of Uranium (VI) Ions on Reactive Crosslinked Acrylamidoxime and Acrylic Acid Copolymer Resins. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2010;32:84–94. doi: 10.1080/00377990903543053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ajmal M., Siddiq M., Aktas N., Sahiner N. Amidoximated Poly(Acrylonitrile) Particles for Environmental Applications: Removal of Heavy Metal Ions, Dyes, and Herbicides from Water with Different Sources. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016;133:43873–43884. doi: 10.1002/app.43032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang D.J., Chen H., Xu H., Sun J.M., Xu Y.Y. Preparation of Wheat Straw Matrix-g-Polyacrylonitrile-Based Adsorbent by SET-LRP and Its Applications for Heavy Metal Ion Removal. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014;2:1843–1848. doi: 10.1021/sc500308x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Feng B., Shen W., Shi L., Qu S. Adsorption of Hexavalent Chromium by Polyacrylonitrile-Based Porous Carbon from Aqueous Solution. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2022;5:171662. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gupta A. Preparation of Ethyleneamine Functionalized Crosslinked Poly(Acrylonitrile-Ethylene Glycol-Dimethacrylate) Chelating Resins for Adsorption of Lead Ions. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2017;52:447–455. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2016.1264961. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Elbedwehy A.M., Abou-Elanwar A.M., Ezzat A.O., Atta A.M. Super Effective Removal of Toxic Metals Water Pollutants Using Multi Functionalized Polyacrylonitrile and Arabic Gum Grafts. Polymers. 2019;11:1938. doi: 10.3390/polym11121938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Adeyi A.A., Jamil S.N.A.M., Abdullah L.C., Choong T.S.Y. Adsorption of Malachite Green Dye from Liquid Phase Using Hydrophilic Thiourea-Modified Poly(Acrylonitrile-Co-Acrylic Acid): Kinetic and Isotherm Studies. J. Chem. 2019;2019:e4321475. doi: 10.1155/2019/4321475. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Abualnaja K.M., Alprol A.E., Abu-Saied M.A., Mansour A.T., Ashour M. Studying the Adsorptive Behavior of Poly(Acrylonitrile-Co-Styrene) and Carbon Nanotubes (Nanocomposites) Impregnated with Adsorbent Materials towards Methyl Orange Dye. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:1144. doi: 10.3390/nano11051144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Xiao J., Wang L., Ran J., Zhao J., Tao M., Zhang W. Highly Selective Removal of Cationic Dyes from Water by Acid-Base Regulated Anionic Functionalized Polyacrylonitrile Fiber: Fast Adsorption, Low Detection Limit, Reusability. React. Funct. Polym. 2020;146:104394. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.104394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Parekh S.A., David R.N., Bannuru K.K.R., Krishnaswamy L., Baji A. Electrospun Silver Coated Polyacrylonitrile Membranes for Water Filtration Applications. Membranes. 2018;8:59. doi: 10.3390/membranes8030059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Deng S., Bai R. Removal of Trivalent and Hexavalent Chromium with Aminated Polyacrylonitrile Fibers: Performance and Mechanisms. Water Res. 2004;38:2424–2432. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Saeed K., Haider S., Oh T.-J., Park S.-Y. Preparation of Amidoxime-Modified Polyacrylonitrile (PAN-Oxime) Nanofibers and Their Applications to Metal Ions Adsorption. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;322:400–405. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.05.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ma N., Yang Y., Chen S., Zhang Q. Preparation of Amine Group-Containing Chelating Fiber for Thorough Removal of Mercury Ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;171:288–293. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Deng S., Bai R., Chen J.P. Aminated Polyacrylonitrile Fibers for Lead and Copper Removal. Langmuir. 2003;19:5058–5064. doi: 10.1021/la034061x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Deng S., Bai R., Chen J. Behaviors and Mechanisms of Copper Adsorption on Hydrolyzed Polyacrylonitrile Fibers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003;260:265–272. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00243-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mohamed A., Fiikry N.M., Shalaby T., Aloufy A. The Adsorption Behaviour of Polycrylonitrilenanofibre by Hexamethylenediamine for Removing Pb (II), Cu (II) and Ni (II) Metal Ions from Water. Int. J. Chem. Appl. Biol. Sci. 2014;1:52. doi: 10.4103/2348-0734.131800. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bagheri B., Abdous M., Mohammadi A.M., Mousavi S.A. Efficient Removal of Cr3+, Pb2+ and Hg2+ Ions from Industrial Effluents By Hydrolyzed/Thioamidated Polyacrylonitrile Fibres. Sci. Inf. Database. 2010;19:911–925. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Neghlani P.K., Rafizadeh M., Taromi F.A. Preparation of Aminated-Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber Membranes for the Adsorption of Metal Ions: Comparison with Microfibers. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;186:182–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Huang F., Xu Y., Liao S., Yang D., Hsieh Y.-L., Wei Q. Preparation of Amidoxime Polyacrylonitrile Chelating Nanofibers and Their Application for Adsorption of Metal Ions. Materials. 2013;6:969–980. doi: 10.3390/ma6030969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zaini M.A.A., Amano Y., Machida M. Adsorption of Heavy Metals onto Activated Carbons Derived from Polyacrylonitrile Fiber. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010;180:552–560. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Almasian A., Olya M.E., Mahmoodi N.M. Synthesis of Polyacrylonitrile/Polyamidoamine Composite Nanofibers Using Electrospinning Technique and Their Dye Removal Capacity. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2015;49:119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2014.11.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wang J., Pan K., He Q., Cao B. Polyacrylonitrile/Polypyrrole Core/Shell Nanofiber Mat for the Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Aqueous Solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013;244:121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Horzum N., Shahwan T., Parlak O., Demir M.M. Synthesis of Amidoximated Polyacrylonitrile Fibers and Its Application for Sorption of Aqueous Uranyl Ions under Continuous Flow. Chem. Eng. J. 2012;213:41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Zhang L., Zhang X., Li P., Zhang W. Effective Cd2+ Chelating Fiber Based on Polyacrylonitrile. React. Funct. Polym. 2009;69:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2008.10.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Abdouss M., Shoushtari M., Haji A., Moshref B. Fabrication of Chelating Diethylenetriaminated Pan Micro-and Nano-Fibers for Heavy Metal Removal. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q./CICEQ. 2012;18:27–34. doi: 10.2298/CICEQ110719043A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Othman F.E.C., Yusof N., Jaafar J., Ismail A.F., Abdullah N., Hasbullah H. Adsorption of Cadmium (II) Ions by Polyacrylonitrile-Based Activated Carbon Nanofibers/Magnesium Oxide as Its Adsorbents. Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 2016;20:1467–1473. doi: 10.17576/mjas-2016-2006-27. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Malik H., Qureshi U.A., Muqeet M., Mahar R.B., Ahmed F., Khatri Z. Removal of Lead from Aqueous Solution Using Polyacrylonitrile/Magnetite Nanofibers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018;25:3557–3564. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0706-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chaúque E.F., Dlamini L.N., Adelodun A.A., Greyling C.J., Ngila J.C. Modification of Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers with EDTA for the Removal of Cd and Cr Ions from Water Effluents. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016;369:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Abdullah N., Yusof N., Jaafar J., Ismail A.F., Othman F.E.C., Salleh W.N.W., Misdan N. Preliminary Study of Polyacrylonitrile (PAN)/Manganese Oxide Activated Carbon Nanofibers for Cd(II) Adsorption. J. Appl. Membr. Sci. Technol. 2016;18:1. doi: 10.11113/amst.v18i1.18. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Borhani S., Asadi A., Dabbagh H.A. Preparation and Characterization of PAN Nanofibers Containing Boehmite Nanoparticles for the Removal of Microbial Contaminants and Cadmium Ions from Water. J. Water Health. 2020;18:106–117. doi: 10.2166/wh.2020.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chen C., Kang J., Shen J., Zhao S., Wang B., Chen Z., Chen Q. Selective and Efficient Removal of Hg (II) from Aqueous Media by a Low-Cost Dendrimer-Grafted Polyacrylonitrile Fiber: Performance and Mechanism. Chemosphere. 2021;262:127836. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Chang J., Wang J., Qu J., Li Y.V., Ma L., Wang L., Wang X., Pan K. Preparation of α-Fe2O3/Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber Mat as an Effective Lead Adsorbent. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2016;3:894–901. doi: 10.1039/C6EN00088F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Haddad M.Y., Alharbi H.F. Enhancement of Heavy Metal Ion Adsorption Using Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers Loaded with ZnO Nanoparticles. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019;136:47209. doi: 10.1002/app.47209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Xu Z., Wei C., Jin J., Xu W., Wu Q., Gu J., Ou M., Xu X. Development of a Novel Mixed Titanium, Silver Oxide Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber as a Superior Adsorbent and Its Application for MB Removal in Wastewater Treatment. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2018;29:560–571. doi: 10.21577/0103-5053.20170168. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Martín D.M., Faccini M., García M., Amantia D. Highly Efficient Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Polluted Water Using Ion-Selective Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018;6:236–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.11.073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Patel S., Hota G. Synthesis of Novel Surface Functionalized Electrospun PAN Nanofibers Matrix for Efficient Adsorption of Anionic CR Dye from Water. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018;6:5301–5310. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.08.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Sun Y., Zheng W. Polyethylenimine-Functionalized Polyacrylonitrile Anion Exchange Fiber as a Novel Adsorbent for Rapid Removal of Nitrate from Wastewater. Chemosphere. 2020;258:127373. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zhao R., Li X., Sun B., Ji H., Wang C. Diethylenetriamine-Assisted Synthesis of Amino-Rich Hydrothermal Carbon-Coated Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile Fiber Adsorbents for the Removal of Cr(VI) and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;487:297–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Elzain A.A., El-Aassar M., Hashem F., Mohamed F., Ali A.S. Removal of Methylene Dye Using Composites of Poly (Styrene-Co-Acrylonitrile) Nanofibers Impregnated with Adsorbent Materials. J. Mol. Liq. 2019;291:111335. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111335. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lou T., Yan X., Wang X. Chitosan Coated Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibrous Mat for Dye Adsorption. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;135:919–925. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Mokhtari-Shourijeh Z., Langari S., Montazerghaem L., Mahmoodi N.M. Synthesis of Porous Aminated PAN/PVDF Composite Nanofibers by Electrospinning: Characterization and Direct Red 23 Removal. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020;8:103876. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.103876. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Yao T., Qiao L., Du K. High Tough and Highly Porous Graphene/Carbon Nanotubes Hybrid Beads Enhanced by Carbonized Polyacrylonitrile for Efficient Dyes Adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020;292:109716. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Yarandpour M., Rashidi A., Khajavi R., Eslahi N., Yazdanshenas M. Yazdanshenas. Mesoporous PAA/Dextran-Polyaniline Core-Shell Nanofibers: Optimization of Producing Conditions, Characterization and Heavy Metal Adsorptions. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2018;93:566–581. doi: 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Nasimi S., Baghdadi M., Dorosti M. Surface Functionalization of Recycled Polyacrylonitrile Fibers with Ethylenediamine for Highly Effective Adsorption of Hg(II) from Contaminated Waters. J. Environ. Manag. 2020;270:110883. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Phan D.-N., Rebia R.A., Saito Y., Kharaghani D., Khatri M., Tanaka T., Lee H., Kim I.-S. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Attached to Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers with Hinokitiol as Gluing Agent for Synergistic Antibacterial Activities and Effective Dye Removal. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020;85:258–268. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2020.02.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Abd-Elhamid A., El-Aassar M., El Fawal G.F., Soliman H.M. Fabrication of Polyacrylonitrile/β-Cyclodextrin/Graphene Oxide Nanofibers Composite as an Efficient Adsorbent for Cationic Dye. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2019;11:100207. doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2018.100207. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Parlayıcı Ş., Yar A., Pehlivan E., Avcı A. ZnO-TiO2 Doped Polyacrylonitrile Nano Fiber-Mat for Elimination of Cr(VI) from Polluted Water. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2019;10:24. doi: 10.1186/s40543-019-0183-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Wang Z.-G., Wan L.-S., Xu Z.-K. Surface Engineerings of Polyacrylonitrile-Based Asymmetric Membranes towards Biomedical Applications: An Overview. J. Membr. Sci. 2007;304:8–23. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.05.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Khan A., Baig U. Polyacrylonitrile-Based Organic-Inorganic Composite Anion-Exchange Membranes: Preparation, Characterization and Its Application in Making Ion-Selective Membrane Electrode for Determination of As(V) Desalination. 2012;289:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.12.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hong G., Li X., Shen L., Wang M., Wang C., Yu X., Wang X. High Recovery of Lead Ions from Aminated Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibrous Affinity Membranes with Micro/Nano Structure. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015;295:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kumar M., Shevate R., Hilke R., Peinemann K.V. Novel Adsorptive Ultrafiltration Membranes Derived from Polyvinyltetrazole-Co-Polyacrylonitrile for Cu(II) Ions Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2016;301:306–314. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Alharbi H.F., Haddad M.Y., Aijaz M.O., Assaifan A.K., Karim M.R. Electrospun Bilayer PAN/Chitosan Nanofiber Membranes Incorporated with Metal Oxide Nanoparticles for Heavy Metal Ion Adsorption. Coatings. 2020;10:285. doi: 10.3390/coatings10030285. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Mohammad N., Atassi Y. Enhancement of Removal Efficiency of Heavy Metal Ions by Polyaniline Deposition on Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile Membranes. Water Sci. Eng. 2021;14:129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2021.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Xu N., Hao Z., Xiao C., Zhang X., Feng Y., Dirican M., Yan C. Iron/Manganese Oxide-Decorated GO-Regulated Highly Porous Polyacrylonitrile Hollow Fiber Membrane and Its Excellent Methylene Blue-Removing Performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2020;607:118180. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Yi S., Sun S., Zhang Y., Zou Y., Dai F., Si Y. Scalable Fabrication of Bimetal Modified Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) Nanofibrous Membranes for Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;559:134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Wang R., Guan S., Sato A., Wang X., Wang Z., Yang R., Hsiao B.S., Chu B. Nanofibrous Microfiltration Membranes Capable of Removing Bacteria, Viruses and Heavy Metal Ions. J. Membr. Sci. 2013;446:376–382. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Shalla A.H., Yaseen Z., Bhat M.A., Rangreez T.A., Maswal M. Recent Review for Removal of Metal Ions by Hydrogels. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2019;54:89–100. doi: 10.1080/01496395.2018.1503307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Van Tran V., Park D., Lee Y.-C. Hydrogel Applications for Adsorption of Contaminants in Water and Wastewater Treatment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018;25:24569–24599. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2605-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Pekel N., Şahiner N., Güven O. Development of New Chelating Hydrogels Based on N-Vinyl Imidazole and Acrylonitrile. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2000;59:485–491. doi: 10.1016/S0969-806X(00)00308-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Ajmal M., Siddiq M., Aktas N., Sahiner N. Magnetic Co–Fe Bimetallic Nanoparticle Containing Modifiable Microgels for the Removal of Heavy Metal Ions, Organic Dyes and Herbicides from Aqueous Media. RSC Adv. 2015;5:43873–43884. doi: 10.1039/C5RA05785J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.El-Aal S.E.A., Hegazy E.-S.A., AbuTaleb M.F., Dessouki A.M. Radiation Synthesis of Copolymers for Adsorption of Dyes from Their Industrial Wastes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005;96:753–763. doi: 10.1002/app.21514. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Dudu T.E., Sahiner M., Alpaslan D., Demirci S., Aktas N. Removal of As(V), Cr(III) and Cr(VI) from Aqueous Environments by Poly(Acrylonitril-Co-Acrylamidopropyl-Trimethyl Ammonium Chloride)-Based Hydrogels. J. Environ. Manag. 2015;161:243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Ekebafe L.O., Ogbeifun D.E., Okieimen F.E. Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Media Using Native Cassava Starch Hydrogel. Afr. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;6:275–282. doi: 10.5897/AJEST12.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Lu W., Dai Z., Li L., Liu J., Wang S., Yang H., Cao C., Liu L., Chen T., Zhu B., et al. Preparation of Composite Hydrogel (PCG) and Its Adsorption Performance for Uranium(VI) J. Mol. Liq. 2020;303:112604. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.112604. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kiani G., Soltanzadeh M. High Capacity Removal of Silver(I) and Lead(II) Ions by Modified Polyacrylonitrile from Aqueous Solutions. Desalination Water Treat. 2014;52:3206–3218. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.797673. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Balela M., Intila N., Salvanera S. Adsorptive Removal of Lead Ions in Aqueous Solution by Kapok-Polyacrylonitrile Nanocomposites. Mater. Today Proc. 2019;17:672–678. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.349. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Bhunia P., Chatterjee S., Rudra P., De S. Chelating Polyacrylonitrile Beads for Removal of Lead and Cadmium from Wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018;193:202–213. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Choi J.-W., Kim H.J., Ryu H., Oh S., Choi S.-J. Three-Dimensional Double-Network Hydrogels of Graphene Oxide, Alginate, and Polyacrylonitrile for Copper Removal from Aqueous Solution. Environ. Eng. Res. 2020;25:924–929. doi: 10.4491/eer.2019.442. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Tripathy M., Hota G. Maghemite and Graphene Oxide Embedded Polyacrylonitrile Electrospun Nanofiber Matrix for Remediation of Arsenate Ions. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019;2:604–617. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.9b00982. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Kampalanonwat P., Supaphol P. Preparation and Adsorption Behavior of Aminated Electrospun Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber Mats for Heavy Metal Ion Removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2010;2:3619–3627. doi: 10.1021/am1008024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Wang B., Chen P.-Y., Zhao R.-X., Zhang L., Chen Y., Yu L.-P. Carbon-Dot Modified Polyacrylonitrile Fibers: Recyclable Materials Capable of Selectively and Reversibly Adsorbing Small-Sized Anionic Dyes. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;391:123484. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123484. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Chaúque E.F., Ngila J.C., Ray S.C., Ndlwana L. Degradation of Methyl Orange on Fe/Ag Nanoparticles Immobilized on Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers Using EDTA Chelating Agents. J. Environ. Manag. 2019;236:481–489. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Gupta A. Polyacrylonitrile Crosslinked with Diethylenetriamine and Its Use for the Removal of Lead Ions from Aquatic Systems. Chem. Sel. 2022;7:28. doi: 10.1002/slct.202201262. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Dastbaz A., Keshtkar A.R. Adsorption of Th4+, U6+, Cd2+, and Ni2+ from Aqueous Solution by a Novel Modified Polyacrylonitrile Composite Nanofiber Adsorbent Prepared by Electrospinning. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014;293:336–344. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.164. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Ambaye T.G., Vaccari M., van Hullebusch E.D., Amrane A., Rtimi S. Mechanisms and Adsorption Capacities of Biochar for the Removal of Organic and Inorganic Pollutants from Industrial Wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;18:3273–3294. doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-03060-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Nouri J., Nabizadeh R., Jahangiri-Rad M., Yunesian M., Moattar F. Fluoride Removal from Aqueous Solution by Functionalized-Polyacrylonitrile Coated with Iron Oxide Nano Particles: Characterization and Sorption Studies. Desalination Water Treat. 2014;52:4369–4375. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.801792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Chen Y., Zhao Y. Synthesis and Characterization of Polyacrylonitrile-2-Amino-2-Thiazoline Resin and Its Sorption Behaviors for Noble Metal Ions. React. Funct. Polym. 2003;55:89–98. doi: 10.1016/S1381-5148(02)00218-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Wang J., Guo X. Adsorption Kinetic Models: Physical Meanings, Applications, and Solving Methods. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020;390:122156. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Do D.D. Adsorption Analysis: Equilibria And Kinetics (with Cd Containing Computer Matlab Programs) World Scientific; Singapore: 1998. p. 916. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Laskar I.I., Hashisho Z. Insights into modeling adsorption equilibria of single and multicomponent systems of organic and water vapors. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020;241:116681. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116681. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Farghali M.A., Abo-Aly M.M., Salaheldin T.A. Modified Mesoporous Zeolite-A/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite For Dual Removal of Methylene Blue and Pb2+ ions from Wastewater. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021;126:108487. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2021.108487. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Amin M.T., Alazba A.A., Shafiq M. Comparative Removal of Lead and Nickel Ions onto Nanofibrous Sheet of Activated Polyacrylonitrile in Batch Adsorption and Application of Conventional Kinetic and Isotherm Models. Membranes. 2021;11:10. doi: 10.3390/membranes11010010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Yu H., Liu Y., Shu X., Fang H., Sun X., Pan Y., Ma L. Equilibrium, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies on the Adsorption of Atrazine in Soils of the Water Fluctuation Zone in the Three-Gorges Reservoir. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2020;32:27. doi: 10.1186/s12302-020-00303-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES