Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2022 Nov 15;10(6):e01215-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01215-22

Changes in the Microbial Structure of the Root Soil and the Yield of Chinese Baby Cabbage by Chemical Fertilizer Reduction with Bio-Organic Fertilizer Application

Li Jin a, Ning Jin a, Shuya Wang a, Jinwu Li a, Xin Meng a, Yandong Xie a, Yue Wu a, Shilei Luo a, Jian Lyu a,b,, Jihua Yu a,b,
Editor: Erik F Y Homc
PMCID: PMC9784769  PMID: 36377898

ABSTRACT

Using high-throughput sequencing, this study aimed to explore the response of soil microbial community and Chinese baby cabbage yield to the reduction of chemical fertilizers combined with bio-organic fertilizer. Our experiments consisted of conventional fertilizer (CK), 30% chemical fertilizer reduction + 6,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer (T1), 30% chemical fertilizer reduction + 9,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer (T2), 40% chemical fertilizer reduction + 6,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer (T3), and 40% chemical fertilizer reduction + 9,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer (T4). Compared with CK, soil microbial diversity and richness were higher for all treatments with added bio-organic fertilizer. Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed that the bacterial and fungal communities in T2 and T4 were similar to each other. Redundancy and Spearman's correlation analyses of microbial communities and soil physicochemical properties revealed that reductions in chemical fertilizer rate combined with bio-organic fertilizer had a stronger impact on the fungal than the bacterial community. They also increased the relative abundance of the dominant bacterial and fungal phyla. Chinese baby cabbage yield was relatively higher under the combined bio-organic fertilizer plus reduced chemical fertilizer rate with T2 showing the highest yield. Therefore, this approach is feasible for sustainable agricultural, cost-effective and profitable crop production.

IMPORTANCE Chemical fertilizers are commonly used for agriculture, though bio-organic fertilizers may be more efficient. We found that a mixture of bio-organic and moderately reduced chemical fertilizer was more effective than chemical fertilizer alone, as it raised the Chinese baby cabbage yield. Further, the presence of bio-organic fertilizer enhanced overall soil physicochemistry, as well as improved the beneficial bacterial and fungal abundance and diversity. Thus, we found that fertilizer combination sustainably & cost-effectively improves crop & soil quality.

KEYWORDS: Chinese baby cabbage, bio-organic fertilizer, microbial community, sustainable agriculture, yield

INTRODUCTION

Chinese baby cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis) is a subspecies of Brassica oleracea in the crucifer family, with tender yellow inner leaves, short growth period, tender and crispy taste, and is loved by consumers (1). To cope with the surge of social demand, the cultivation scale of Chinese baby cabbage has been gradually expanded in recent years. However, traditional agricultural systems usually rely on high inputs of chemical fertilizers to improve soil fertility and crop growth (2). Chemical fertilizer overuse is also accompanied by a reduction in soil nutrient absorption efficiency, soil quality deterioration, greenhouse gas emissions, and aquatic ecosystem eutrophication (35).

Under the advocacy of the sustainable development practice known as “zero growth action plan for fertilizer use in China in 2020,” organic agriculture based on natural products such as humic acid and natural fertilizer has been implemented to improve soil quality. This practice is conducive to agricultural productivity and ecosystem health (6, 7). The application of plant growth-promoting microorganisms to the soil is efficacious in organic agriculture. This approach compensates for the low efficiency of synthetic fertilizer, improves nutrient utilization efficiency and plant growth, reduces fertilizer investment by 50%, and causes no yield loss (810). However, organic fertilizer input may also create competition for nutrients between crops and soil microorganisms decomposing the fertilizer (11). To balance this competition, integrated agricultural systems are, nonetheless, supplemented with chemical fertilizers to mitigate nutrient limitation (12). Plant probiotic enrichment in the form of organic substrates, such as bio-organic fertilizers, can help beneficial microorganisms thrive in the soil and improve their function (1316). Diacono and Montemurro (17) conducted over 20 long-term tests confirming that organic modifiers never lower crop yield. Zhang et al. (18) showed that replacing 30% of the total nitrogen fertilizer (250 kg N/ha) with 3,000 kg/ha compost (equivalent to 60 kg N/ha) improved maize yield, N uptake, and soil fertility, and reduced N loss. Hence, there is a growing demand for bio-based organic fertilizers in agricultural production (19).

Soil microorganisms regulate soil ecosystem functions and are indicators of soil quality (20). They promote nutrient cycling and organic matter transformation, improve plant productivity, and control soilborne diseases (2123). Microbial abundance, composition, and activity largely determine sustainable agricultural productivity (24). The soil microbiome may be positively or negatively affected by soil disturbances and management practices that alter soil microbiome classification and function (25, 26). Long-term, large-scale chemical fertilizer use leads to the deterioration of soil quality, nutrient imbalances, reductions in soil microbial diversity, loss of microbial structural integrity, and a decrease in sustainable farmland productivity (27). Bio-organic fertilizers contain beneficial microorganisms and organic components that directly or indirectly promote soil nutrient mobilization, have a positive impact on plant health, and improve crop yield (28). Previous studies showed that bio-organic fertilizers stimulate specific microbiota associated with plant disease inhibition such as Pseudomonas, Streptomyces, Flavobacterium, and others (2931). Therefore, strategies to stimulate the activity of these soilborne microbiota may be particularly effective in helping to suppress plant diseases. Although there are many reports of bio-organic fertilizer applications on crops, each crop has different fertilizer requirements and produces very different results. There are few reports on the benefits produced by the application of bio-organic fertilizers to Chinese baby cabbage, and even fewer studies on the changes in the microbial community of the root system of Chinese baby cabbage after bio-organic fertilizer application.

In this study, we conducted field trials on Chinese baby cabbage under conventional fertilization, 30% chemical fertilizer reduction + 6,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer, 30% chemical fertilizer reduction + 9,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer, 40% chemical fertilizer reduction + 6,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer, and 40% chemical fertilizer reduction + 9,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer. We used directional sequencing of bacterial and fungal communities to analyze the response of the soil microbial community to the foregoing treatments. The aims of this study were to: (i) determine the changes in the physicochemical properties of the soil and the soil microbial community in response to various fertilizer treatments; (ii) evaluate the impact of the different fertilizer treatments on Chinese baby cabbage crop yield; (iii) identify the correlations among between soil microbial community composition, soil properties, and crop yield, (iv) assess the benefits of combining bio-organic and chemical fertilizers, and (v) recommend an optimal fertilization method for the growth of Chinese baby cabbage. The results of this study will optimize crop productivity while minimizing the impact of chemical fertilization on the environment.

RESULTS

Soil physicochemical properties under different fertilization regimes.

The physicochemical properties of the soil significantly differed among fertilization treatments (Table 1). Compared with conventional fertilization (CK), the soil total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and total potassium (TK) increased with bio-organic fertilizer application rate. TN and TP were highest for the soil under 30% chemical fertilizer reduction + 9,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer (T2), and were 23.08% and 39.76% greater than those under CK. Compared with CK, TP under 40% chemical fertilizer reduction + 6,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer (T3) and 40% chemical fertilizer reduction + 9,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer (T4) were 7.73% and 10.27% higher, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05). The soil organic matter (SOM) content was lowest for CK and was significantly lower than the SOM under all other treatments (P < 0.05). The SOM content increased sequentially from 30% chemical fertilizer reduction + 6,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer (T1) to T4 (P < 0.05). All values were significantly higher than that of CK (P < 0.05). The SOM content was highest under T4 and 48.08% greater than the SOM content under CK. The soil EC was highest under CK and was significantly higher than the soil EC under all other treatments (P < 0.05). The soil EC under T1 through T4 were 37.49%, 29.28%, 24.36%, and 21.80% lower than the soil EC under CK, respectively, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05). The soil pH was highest under T2 and was 4.14% higher than the soil pH under CK. The difference was significant (P < 0.05). The soil pH under all other treatments did not significantly differ from that under T2 but were significantly higher than that under CK (P < 0.05).

TABLE 1.

Physicochemical properties of soils under different fertilization conditionsa

Treatments TNb TPc TKd SOMe ECf pHg
(g/kg) (g/kg) (g/kg) (g/kg) (uS/cm)
CK 0.39 ± 0.02c 0.83 ± 0.02d 16.17 ± 0.30b 33.38 ± 0.58e 507.67 ± 5.21a 7.25 ± 0.07c
T1 0.48 ± 0.01b 0.94 ± 0.06c 17.17 ± 0.44ab 35.78 ± 0.55d 317.33 ± 2.6d 7.49 ± 0.01ab
T2 0.54 ± 0.03a 1.16 ± 0.03a 17.42 ± 0.30ab 38.56 ± 0.91c 359.00 ± 5.86c 7.55 ± 0.02a
T3 0.48 ± 0.01b 1.06 ± 0.05b 17.67 ± 0.55a 43.74 ± 0.33b 384.00 ± 4.04b 7.43 ± 0.12ab
T4 0.50 ± 0.01ab 1.11 ± 0.04ab 17.83 ± 0.51a 49.43 ± 0.77a 397.00 ± 5.87b 7.48 ± 0.08ab
a

Values (mean ± standard deviation) followed by different lowercase letters within a column for the same factor indicate significant differences by Tukey test (P < 0.05).

b

TN, total nitrogen.

c

TP, total phosphorus.

d

TK, total potassium.

e

SOM, soil organic matter.

f

EC, soil electrical conductivity.

g

pH, soil pH.

Changes in soil microbial α-diversity under different fertilization regimes.

We measured the Shannon, Simpson, and Chao indices of bacteria (Fig. 1 A to C) and fungi (Fig. 1 D to F) to evaluate the α-diversity of the soil microbial community in the Chinese baby cabbage root soil under different fertilization treatments. The Shannon index is directly proportional to the diversity while the Simpson index is inversely proportional to it. The Chao index is directly proportional to the microbial abundance. Figure 1A shows that, after the various fertilization treatments, the Shannon index was 0.63% and 0.78% higher for the soil bacteria under T1 and T3, respectively, than it was for those under CK, and the differences were significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between T4 and CK in terms of the Shannon index (P < 0.05). However, the Shannon index was 1.10% lower under T2 than CK and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences among fertilization treatments in terms of their bacterial Simpson indices (Fig. 1B). The bacterial Chao index was highest under T4 and was 34.20% higher than that under CK. However, there were no significant differences among the other treatments and CK in terms of the bacterial Chao index (Fig. 1C). The fungal Shannon indices under T1 through T4 were 10.66, 14.42, 8.46, and 14.73% higher, respectively, than that under CK, and the differences were significant (Fig. 1D) (P < 0.05). The fungal Simpson indices under T1 through T4 were 44.53, 53.13, 34.38, and 50.78% lower, respectively, than that under CK, and the differences were significant (Fig. 1E) (P < 0.05). The fungal Chao indices under T2 and T4 were 23.40% and 23.49% higher, respectively, than that under CK, and the differences were significant (Fig. 1F).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

The α-diversity of bacteria (A) to (C) and fungi (D) to (F) in the root soil of Chinese baby cabbage under different fertilization treatments. Different letters over the plots indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Changes in soil microbial α-diversity under different fertilization regimes.

We applied a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on the Bray-Curtis algorithm to analyze overall structural changes in the bacterial and fungal microbial communities and determine the impact of reducing chemical fertilizers and adding bio-organic fertilizers on their structure. The fertilization regimes significantly altered soil bacterial and fungal community structure in the Chinese baby cabbage root soil. The PCoA assigned the bacterial communities to 2 groups, namely, (CK, T1, and T3) and (T2 and T4) (Fig. 2A). The T2 and T4 bacterial community structures were clustered together and were remote from those of the other treatment groups (Fig. 2A). Hence, the soil bacterial community structure significantly changed with increasing bio-organic fertilizer application rate. The PCoA assigned the fungal communities to 3 groups, namely, (CK), (T1 and T3), and (T2 and T4) (Fig. 2B). The T2 and T4 fungal community structures were clustered together and were remote from that of CK (Fig. 2B). There was a certain distance between T1 and T3, but both were nonetheless in the same quadrant. Thus, the change in the fungal community structure of the Chinese baby cabbage root soil depended on whether biological organic fertilizer was used, and the quantity added. PERMANOVA revealed that each fertilization treatment significantly affected the bacterial (F = 1.64, P = 0.01) and fungal (F = 6.66, P = 0.01) community structures.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the bacteria (A) and fungi (B) communities based on the Bray–Curtis distances.

Associations between soil microbial communities and environmental factors.

A redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to evaluate the influences of environmental factors on the soil microbial community composition in Chinese baby cabbage root soil (Fig. 3). The changes in the soil properties in response to the different fertilization treatments strongly affected the soil bacterial and fungal community structures. In Fig. 3A, the first 2 axes of RDA explain 16.29% and 3.34% of the total variation in the soil bacterial data, respectively. In Fig. 3C, the first 2 axes of the RDA explain 80.34% and 1.22% of the total variation in the soil fungal data, respectively. The first axis in Fig. 3A was positively correlated with soil TN, TK, TP, pH, and SOM and negatively correlated with soil EC. The second axis was positively correlated with soil EC, TP, and pH and negatively correlated with soil TN, TK, and SOM. We also used Spearman’s rank correlation to evaluate the relationships among the abundant bacterial phyla and soil physicochemistry (Fig. 3B). Bacteroidota were significantly, positively correlated with soil TN and TK, SAR324_cladeMarine_group_B and Firmicutes were significantly, negatively correlated with soil EC, Acidobacteriota were significantly, negatively correlated with soil TN and pH, and Methylomirabilota and Latescibacterota were significantly, negatively correlated with SOM (P < 0.05). The first axis in Fig. 3B was positively correlated with soil TN, TK, TP, pH, and SOM and negatively correlated with soil EC. The second axis was positively correlated with soil EC and SOM and negatively correlated with soil TN, TK, TP, and pH. Spearman’s rank correlation between the soil fungal community and physicochemistry disclosed that Zoopagomycota, unclassified_k__Fungi, and Mortierellomycota were significantly, positively correlated with soil TP, SOM, and TN, respectively (P < 0.05), and Ascomycota were significantly, positively correlated with soil TK, SOM, and TN (P < 0.05), and significantly, positively correlated with soil pH (P < 0.01). Mortierellomycota, Kickxellomycota, and Blastocladiomycota were significantly, negatively correlated with soil EC, while Olpidiomycota were significantly, negatively correlated with SOM and soil pH (P < 0.05).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Redundancy analysis (RDA) and Spesrman’s rank correlation heatmap (P < 0.05 *, P < 0.01**), used to study the correlation between the microbial communities of bacteria (A) and (B) and fungi (C) and (D) and soil physical and chemical properties. TP, total phosphorus; TK, total potassium; TN, total nitrogen; pH, soil pH; EC, soil electrical conductivity; SOM, soil organic matter.

Relative abundance of major bacterial and fungal taxa.

The main bacterial phyla were Actinobacteriota, Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Acidobacteriota (Fig. 4A), and their average relative abundances were 35.14, 19.83, 16.39, and 10.56%, respectively. The subdominant bacterial phyla were Gemmatimonadota, Bacteroidota, Myxococcota, and Firmicutes. T1 through T4 had higher Actinobacteria richness than that of CK. T2 and T4 had the highest and second highest Actinobacteriota abundance. Actinobacteriota abundance was higher under T1 than T3. T3 and T4 had higher Proteobacteria abundance than CK. However, Proteobacteria abundance did not significantly (P > 0.05) differ between T1 and T2. Compared with CK, Chloroflexi, Acidobacteriota, and Gemmatimonadota had higher abundance, while Bacteroidota and Firmicutes had lower abundance under T1 through T4. The main fungal taxa were Ascomycota, Olpidiomycota, Mortierellomycota, Basidiomycota, and unclassified_k__Fungi (Fig. 4B). T1 through T4 had higher Ascomycota abundance than CK. T2 had the highest Ascomycota abundance but relatively low Olpidiomycota abundance. T1 through T4 had relatively high Mortierellomycota abundance.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

The relative abundance of major taxonomic groups at the phylum level (Others incorporated < 0.01) for bacteria (A) and fungi (B). The data were visualized by Circos. The width of the bars from each phylum indicated the relative abundance of the phylum.

Effect of different fertilization regimes on Chinese baby cabbage yield.

We measured Chinese baby cabbage yield in 2019 and 2020, and calculated the average for both years. Compared with CK, T1 through T4 significantly increased Chinese baby cabbage yield by 6.39, 8.89, 3.94, and 5.14%, respectively (P < 0.05). The yield was highest under T2 but did not significantly differ from that under T1 (Fig. 5).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Average yield of Chinese baby cabbage under different fertilization systems in 2019–2020. Different letters over the plots indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Widespread use of chemical fertilizers has led to losses of soil quality and organic carbon content (32, 33). Therefore, fertilization must be optimized to ensure sustainable food production. Compared with conventional soil cultivation, organic soil cultivation enhances microbial functional diversity (34). Long-term application of organic fertilizers or organic-inorganic compound fertilizers may increase microbial biomass and enzyme activity and improve SOM quantity and quality (35). In our study, compared with conventional fertilization, all four chemical fertilizer reduction and combined with bio-organic fertilizer application treatments significantly increased soil TP, TN, TK, pH, and SOM. Furthermore, both TK and SOM increased with bioorganic fertilizer application rate (Table 1). Therefore, the combined application of organic and chemical fertilizers increases soil fertility and supports sustainable productivity more effectively than chemical fertilizer application alone (36, 37). The addition of Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas stutzeri to the organic fertilizer further increased soil extracellular enzyme activity and nutrient content (38). TP, TN, and pH were at their maxima under T2 (Table 1). For this reason, even moderate reductions in chemical fertilizer application rate followed by bio-organic fertilizer treatment effectively increase soil nutrient content and improve soil quality. By contrast, excessive reductions in chemical fertilizer application may decrease soil nutrient levels even when sufficient bio-organic fertilizer is used.

Several studies evaluated the effects of fertilization on soil microbes. Organic fertilizers, such as manure might have a positive effect on the soil microbial community. Compared with chemical or no fertilization, organic fertilization improves the resistance of the soil microbial community to perturbations (3941). Our results showed that compared with conventional fertilization, T1 and T3 significantly increased bacterial diversity while T4 significantly increased bacterial richness (Fig. 1A to C). Previous studies have also shown that under chemical fertilizer reduction conditions, organic supplementation can significantly alter the soil bacterial community structure, while also significantly increasing bacterial species richness, chao1, and Shannon index values (42, 43). This may be because organic fertilizers can not only provide greater diversity of microbial active substrates than inorganic fertilizers, but also directly introduce naturally occurring microorganisms into the soil (44). In our experiments, organic fertilizers were supplemented with additional beneficial microorganisms, which beneficially increased the diversity and richness of the bacterial community. In addition, the novelty of our study was to compare the effects of different ratios of chemical fertilizers and bio-organic fertilizers on the diversity and richness of microbial communities. From our results, it is evident that different ratios of chemical fertilizers and bio-organic fertilizers have varying effects on the diversity and richness of bacterial communities. Therefore, optimized fertilizer ratios should be selected during the cultivation of Chinese baby cabbage. Compared with conventional fertilization, organic fertilization had a stronger effect on soil fungal communities (45, 46). All treatments with bio-organic fertilizer increased soil fungal community diversity and richness. However, T2 and T4 were the most effective (Fig. 1D to F). That is, the effective enhancement of soil microbial diversity and richness may be a combined effect of Bioorganic and chemical fertilizer applications (47).

The soil microbial community structure significantly differed between the bio-organic fertilizer and other treatments. The PCoA showed that the bacterial and fungal community structures under T2 and T4, and those under T1 and T3 were similar. In both cases, they were separated by CK (Fig. 2A and B). These discoveries were consistent with previous observations that soil microbial community structures differ in response to organic and inorganic fertilizers (48, 49). Moreover, fertilization regimes more strongly influence fungal than bacterial community structure (50, 51).

A combination of PCoA and RDA demonstrated that fertilization may modulate the impact of environmental factors on fungal community structure. The variance between fungal community structure and environmental factors was 81.56% (Fig. 3C). By contrast, the variance between bacterial community structure and environmental factors was only 19.63% (Fig. 3A). Fertilizer application increases the abundance of oligotrophic organisms such as Bacteroidota, which are significantly positively correlated with soil TN and TK (Fig. 3B). Oligotrophic organisms tend toward K-selection (52). A high relative abundance of K-strategists promotes microbial community resistance and stability (53). Soil pH is positively correlated with most bacterial communities but negatively correlated with Acidobacteriota (Fig. 3B). In this study, the soil pH was near neutrality and organic fertilizer application prevented soil acidification. In this manner, it buffered the potential effects of soil acidity on bacterial richness and diversity (54). However, fungal communities are comparatively more strongly affected by the type of fertilization system. Fungal richness is positively correlated with soil N availability (55). Ascomycota are the most abundant fungi in the Chinese baby cabbage root soil and are significantly, positively correlated with TN (Fig. 3D). Hence, the fungal community is closely related to the soil nitrogen fertilizer application rate. SOM also plays an important role in fungal community composition (56, 57). Most dominant fungal phyla such as Ascomycota, Zoopagomycota, unclassified_k__Fungi, and Mortierellomycota are positively correlated with SOM. Increases in EC are the result of increases in salinity caused by continuous soil cropping. Soil salinity has negative effects on soil microbial communities (58). The application of bio-organic fertilizer can reduce EC. Most dominant fungal phyla are negatively correlated with this parameter (Fig. 3D).

In all fertilization treatments, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Acidobacteria were the dominant bacterial phyla (Fig. 4A). This observation was consistent with those of previous studies (59, 60). Actinobacteriota comprise a group of co-nutrients suitable for plant growth in high-C environments (61). Bio-organic fertilizers promote Actinobacteriota proliferation because they create nutrient- and carbon-rich environments and their abundance significantly increased in response to bio-organic fertilizer treatment and was highest under T2. Composting is beneficial to the growth of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes (62). In this study, bio-organic fertilizer treatment also increased Proteobacteria and Firmicutes abundance. This change in abundance may be due to the presence of B. subtilis (Firmicutes) and P. stutzeri (Proteobacteria) in the bio-organic fertilizers used in this study. Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. are widely used bacterial and fungal biocontrol agents, and are used to control soilborne plant diseases (63, 64). Cooperation between Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. can induce positive interactions and generate multispecies biofilms at the root-microbiome interface, which can potentially trigger microbial root colonization and resultant plant disease resistance (6568). In addition, in this study, only B. subtilis and P. stutzeri were included in the bio- organic fertilizer formula. The enrichment of other potentially beneficial microorganisms in the root soil of Chinese baby cabbages may be due to the inhibition of soilborne pathogens and rebalancing of the microbial community structure. Therefore, the strategy of reducing chemical fertilizer and applying bio-organic fertilizer for changing plant soil microbial community composition has potential for controlling soilborne diseases and improving plant growth. Chloroflexi include numerous acid-producing bacteria that anaerobically digest food waste and produce methane gas (69). Long-term chemical fertilizer application may acidify the soil (70), thereby reducing soil microbial diversity and community structure (71). In this study, Chloroflexi abundance was higher under the conventional fertilization treatment. The addition of bio-organic fertilizer increased the soil pH (Table 1) and reduced Chloroflexi abundance. Acidobacteria are slow-growing oligotrophs that flourish under low-nutrient conditions. Their growth is inhibited by N input (72). Bio-organic fertilizer addition increased soil nutrient levels and inhibited Acidobacteria growth. Nevertheless, further research is required to elucidate the mechanism(s) by which bio-organic fertilizer addition increases bacterial abundance.

Ascomycota were the dominant fungi in this study (Fig. 4B). These saprophytes can thrive in arid environments, have strong environmental adaptability, degrade organic substrates, and are major decomposers of SOM containing cellulose, lignin, and pectin (73). The combination of bio-organic fertilizer plus chemical fertilizer reduction increased Ascomycota abundance. Ascomycota richness was highest under T2. Mortierellomycota are saprophytic and ubiquitous. They can dissolve phosphorus, increase crop yield, and form symbiotic relationships with plants (74, 75). In this study, Mortierellomycota abundance increased in response to bio-organic fertilizer treatment and was significantly positively correlated with TP, SOM, and TN (Fig. 3D). Therefore, improvements in the soil nutrients in Chinese baby cabbage root soil may be associated with higher relative Mortierellomycota abundance.

The production and integration of new bio-organic fertilizers with beneficial microorganisms and mature compost is an important way to increase crop yields and/or strengthen the control of soilborne diseases (76, 77) . It is feasible but difficult to reduce fertilizer application without causing a loss of productivity (8). The results of this experiment confirmed our hypothesis that bio-organic fertilizer significantly increased Chinese baby cabbage yield compared with chemical fertilizer. T2 (30% chemical fertilizer reduction + 9,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer) realized the highest crop yield of all treatments. Ye et al. (78) showed that a combination of chemical fertilizer reduction and bio-organic fertilizer application could improve crop yield and quality.

These results provide a foundation for understanding how the addition of bioorganic fertilizers caused soil physicochemical improvement and changes in soil microbial diversity and richness, which, in turn, enhanced Chinese baby cabbage yield (Fig. 6).

FIG 6.

FIG 6

A model of soil physical and chemical properties, microbial community, and yield changes after adding bio-organic fertilizer.

Conclusions.

This study examined the effects of various fertilization regimes on soil microbial diversity and community structure in the soil of Chinese baby cabbage grown on the Gansu Plateau. The potential value of bio-organic fertilization in Chinese baby cabbage cultivation was assessed in terms of microbial structure and crop yield. Reduction of chemical fertilizers and addition of bio-organic fertilizers improved soil physicochemistry, markedly altered the soil bacterial and fungal communities, increased their diversity and abundance, and improved the soil microenvironment. Compared with conventional fertilization, the combination of bio-organic fertilizer and reduced chemical fertilizer created a richer, more diverse microenvironment and realized higher Chinese baby cabbage yield. Overall, the T2 fertilization formulation (30% chemical fertilizer reduction + 9,000 kg/ha bio-organic fertilizer) was more beneficial for soil microbial community structure regulation in the root soil of Chinese baby cabbages, which further promoted plant growth and development. Hence, this novel approach is relatively more efficient and desirable in terms of sustainable and high crop yield. Future research should investigate the changes that occur in the microbial profile of the soil and the effects of these microorganisms on the yield and quality of Chinese baby cabbage subjected to long-term bio-organic fertilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bio-organic fertilizer preparation.

Bio-organic fertilizer was provided by Gansu Luneng Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd., and was prepared as follows:

B. subtilis and P. stutzeri were provided by the Microbial Strain Conservation Center of Gansu Province and composed the microorganisms in the biological product. B. subtilis and P. stutzeri were added to the sterilized beef extract peptone medium (3.0 g beef extract, 10.0 g peptone, 5.0 g sodium chloride, 1000 mL water, 20.0 g agar; pH 7.4 to 7.6, 121°C high-pressure steam sterilized for 20 min) in a 500 mL shaking flask, and cultured at 30°C and 200 r/min for 24 h. The suspension of B. subtilis and P. stutzeri was then prepared into a compound bacterial solution at a 1:1 ratio. This complex bacterial solution was directly used to prepare biological products as described below.

The organic fertilizer used for biological products was composed of sheep manure and humic acid (formed from activated weathered coal) compost. Sheep manure and humic acid (4:1, wt/wt) were mixed evenly and stacked into strip ridges with a width of 1.5 to 5.0 m and height of 0.8 to 2.5 m for aerobic fermentation. The fermentation temperature was maintained between 40 and 60°C, and the piles were turned over every 4 to 6 days until the end of fermentation. The content of organic matter, humic acid, and water in the fermented organic fertilizer were 40%, 25%, and 30%, respectively, and contained 2.1% nitrogen, 0.7% P2O5, 1.2% K2O, and pH = 6.8.

Bio-organic fertilizer was prepared by adding compound bacterial solution (inoculation amount: 20%) to the above fermented organic fertilizer and fermenting again for 5 to 6 days. After fermentation, the density of B. subtilis and P. stutzeri in the bio-organic fertilizer was 0.2 × 108 CFU/g.

Experiment design and sampling.

The experiment was conducted in Dachaigou Town (37°09′N, 102°99′E), Tianzhu County, Gansu Province between July 2019 and September 2020. This region has a continental plateau monsoon climate, altitude of ~2,630 m above sea level, annual average temperature of −2°C, annual average precipitation of 400 to 450 mm, and average annual sunshine hours of 2,500 to 2,700 h. The test site had a flat terrain and loam soil with medium, uniform fertility.

The Chinese baby cabbage variety was “DeQin Golden Queen” produced by Beijing De Runcheng Agricultural Science and Technology Development Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). The experiment was conducted over a 2 year period. In 2019, the Chinese baby cabbage was planted on July 10 and harvested in September. In 2020, the Chinese baby cabbage was planted in July and harvested in September. The fertilizers were urea (N ≥ 46%), calcium superphosphate (P2O5 ≥ 16%), potassium sulfate (K2O ≥ 52%), and bio-organic fertilizer. The calcium superphosphate and bio-organic fertilizer were applied as basic fertilizer. Thirty percent of the urea and potassium sulfate was applied as basal fertilizer, another 30% was applied at the rosette stage, and the remaining 40% was applied at early heading.

The experimental design comprised of CK, T1, T2, T3, and T4. Each plot was 0.008 ha in area and the cultivation mode was film-mulching ridge-furrow. The cultivation density was 59,550 plants/ha. The ridge and furrow widths were 50 cm and 40 cm, respectively, and the planting and row distances were 33 cm and 30 cm, respectively. Field management was consistent with local traditional cultivation. The fertilization rates under each treatment are listed in Table 2.

TABLE 2.

Fertilization rates for each treatment

Treatments Total amt of fertilization over the entire growth period (kg/ha)
N P K Bio-organic fertilizer
CK 566.3 321.4 129.1 0.0
T1 348.3 166.6 196.9 6000
T2 348.3 166.6 196.9 9000
T3 298.5 142.8 168.7 6000
T4 298.5 142.8 168.7 9000

The first crop of Chinese baby cabbage was harvested on September 16, 2019, and its yield was measured. The second crop of Chinese baby cabbage was harvested on September 11, 2020, to determine its yield, and soil samples were collected. A 5-point random sampling method was adopted for each plot of land, and the area of each sampling point was 1 m × 1 m (7982), and there were 6 plants in total where all of them were collected. A total of 30 plant roots were selected for soil sampling. The specific sampling details were: surface soil was removed with a shovel from 0 to 5 cm depth. The roots of the plants were dug out, leaving them intact as much as possible, and then any large clods of soil around the roots were shook off. The soil near the root systems was brushed with a brush, sealed in bags, placed in ice boxes, and taken to the laboratory. The soil samples were divided into 2 parts: One was air-dried and used in the physicochemical property determinations, and the other was sieved through a 2-mm screen and stored at −80°C for DNA extraction.

Analysis of soil physical and chemical properties.

Soil physical and chemical properties were determined using the method of Lyu et al. (83). Soil pH and EC were measured with a pH Meter (PHS-3E; Shanghai Jingke) and an EC Meter (DSJ-308Al Shanghai Jingke) (1:5 soil: water [w: v]), respectively. The soil organic matter content was measured by the potassium dichromate method. Total N, P, and K were determined by the Kjeldahl, molybdenum antimony colorimetry, and flame spectrophotometry (FP6410) methods, respectively.

DNA extraction and PCR amplification.

Microbial genomic DNA extraction from soil samples was performed with the E.Z.N.A. Soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek). DNA quality assays were performed on 1% agarose gels. DNA concentration and purity were determined with a NanoDrop 2000 UV-vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for determination. The V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primers s338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). The fungal ITS2 region was amplified with primers ITS1F (5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′) and ITS2R (5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′). PCR was performed using an ABI GeneAmp 9700 PCR thermocycler (Applied Biosystems). The PCR amplification process was as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, denaturation at 95°C for 27 cycles of 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 45 s, one-time extension at 72°C for 10 min, and termination at 4°C. A total volume of 20 μL of PCR mixture included 4 μL of 5× TransStart FastPfu buffer, 2 μL of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.8 μL of 5 μM (each) forward and reverse primers, 0.4 μL of TransStart FastPfu DNA polymerase, 10 ng of template DNA, and sufficient ddH2O. PCR Reactions were performed in triplicate. PCR products were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel, then purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences) and quantified using a Quantus fluorometer (Promega).

Illumina MiSeq sequencing.

Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar quantities and paired-end sequenced (2 × 300) according to standard protocols on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina) by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. The registration numbers for the sequencing data are: SRP359012.

Processing of sequencing data.

The raw 16S rRNA and ITS gene sequencing reads were demultiplexed, quality-filtered with Trimmomatic (https://github.com/usadellab/Trimmomatic), and merged by FLASH (https://sourceforge.net/projects/flashpage/files/) using the following criteria: (i) The 300-bp reads were truncated at any site with an average quality score <20 over a 50-bp sliding window. Truncated reads <50 bp and reads containing ambiguous characters were discarded. (ii) Only overlapping sequences >10 bp were assembled. The maximum mismatch ratio of the overlap region was 0.2. Reads that could not be assembled were discarded. (iii) Samples were distinguished by their barcodes and primers and the sequence direction was adjusted. Exact barcode matching was used, and 2 nucleotide mismatches were permitted in the primer matching.

The clean tags with sequence similarity greater than 97% were designated as an OTU using UPARSE v. 7.1 (http://drive5.com/uparse/), and then clustering was performed. The taxonomy of each OTU representative sequence (0.7 confidence threshold) was analyzed using the RDP classifier (http://sourceforge.net/projects/rdp-classifier/) against the fungal ITS (Unite 8.0) and bacterial 16S rRNA (Silva SSU128) databases.

Determination of yield.

On September 16, 2019 and September 11, 2020, we used a 5-point sampling method for yield determination. We artificially harvested in each sample point with an area of 1 m × 1 m, and a total of 30 plant samples were harvested for each treatment to obtain the fresh weight. The yield per hectare was given by yield = (n * W)/30, where W is the weight of 30 Chinese baby cabbages, and n is the number of Chinese baby cabbages per hectare.

Statistical analysis.

Microbiological data analyses were conducted in R v. 3.5.2 (84). The Shannon, Simpson, and Chao indices were calculated with QIIME (https://qiime2.org). A PCoA was performed based on the Bray-Curtis distance, and it evaluated the similarities of the microbial community composition among samples. A RDA and Spearman’s rank correlation heat map analysis were used to study the relationships between soil physicochemical properties and soil microbial communities. Permutational multivariate ANOVA (PerMANOVA) was used to assess the effects of different fertilization regimes on soil microbial communities. PCoA, RDA, and PerMANOVA was implemented using the functions in the R vegan package (85). The Circos graph was plotted with Circos-0.67-7 (http://circos.ca/) (86). SPSS v. 21.0 (SPSS Inc.) was used to perform basic statistical tests such as one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson’s correlation analysis. Significant differences among treatments were indicated by P < 0.05 or other P values.

Data availability.

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Sequencing data are stored in the NCBI database, access link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRP359012.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (677.9KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was funded by the Education science and technology innovation project of Gansu Province (GSSYLXM-02), the Special project of central government guiding local science and technology development (ZCYD-2021-07), Gansu people's livelihood science and technology project (20CX9NA099), the Fuxi Young Talents Fund of Gansu Agricultural University (GAUfx-04Y03), and Gansu Top Leading Talent Plan (GSBJLJ-2021-14).

This article thanks the experimental field provided by Tianzhu experimental station, as well as the editors and several reviewers for their valuable comments on this article.

We declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Contributor Information

Jian Lyu, Email: lvjiangs@126.com.

Jihua Yu, Email: yujihuagg@163.com.

Erik F. Y. Hom, University of Mississippi

REFERENCES

  • 1.Han X, Yin J, Ullah I, Luo E, Yue Y. 2021. Plasmodiophora brassicae in Yunnan and its resistant sources in Chinese cabbage. IJAB 25:805–812. doi: 10.17957/IJAB/15.1732. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hartmann M, Frey B, Mayer J, Mäder P, Widmer F. 2015. Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming. ISME J 9:1177–1194. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ajeng AA, Abdullah R, Ling TC, Ismail S, Lau BF, Ong HC, Chew KW, Show PL, Chang J-S. 2020. Bioformulation of biochar as a potential inoculant carrier for sustainable agriculture. Environ Technol & Innovation 20:101168. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101168. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhu Y-G, Su J-Q, Cao Z, Xue K, Quensen J, Guo G-X, Yang Y-F, Zhou J, Chu H-Y, Tiedje JM. 2016. A buried Neolithic paddy soil reveals loss of microbial functional diversity after modern rice cultivation. Science Bull 61:1052–1060. doi: 10.1007/s11434-016-1112-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhao Xiang W, Huihu L, Qiaoli L, Changyan Y, Faxin Y. 2020. Application of bio-organic fertilizer, not biochar, in degraded red soil improves soil nutrients and plant growth. Rhizosphere 16:100264. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100264. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Huang R, Wang Y, Liu J, Gao J, Zhang Y, Ni J, Xie D, Wang Z, Gao M. 2020. Partial substitution of chemical fertilizer by organic materials changed the abundance, diversity, and activity of nirS-type denitrifying bacterial communities in a vegetable soil. Appl Soil Ecol 152:103589. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103589. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Semida WM, Beheiry HR, Sétamou M, Simpson CR, Abd El-Mageed TA, Rady MM, Nelson SD. 2019. Biochar implications for sustainable agriculture and environment: a review. South African J Botany 127:333–347. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.11.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Da Costa PB, Beneduzi A, de Souza R, Schoenfeld R, Vargas LK, Passaglia LM. 2013. The effects of different fertilization conditions on bacterial plant growth promoting traits: guidelines for directed bacterial prospection and testing. Plant Soil 368:267–280. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1513-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Good AG, Beatty PH. 2011. Fertilizing nature: a tragedy of excess in the commons. PLoS Biol 9:e1001124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hayat R, Ali S, Amara U, Khalid R, Ahmed I. 2010. Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review. Ann Microbiol 60:579–598. doi: 10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu M, Hu F, Chen X, Huang Q, Jiao J, Zhang B, Li H. 2009. Organic amendments with reduced chemical fertilizer promote soil microbial development and nutrient availability in a subtropical paddy field: the influence of quantity, type and application time of organic amendments. Appl Soil Ecol 42:166–175. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.03.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Harris J. 2009. Soil microbial communities and restoration ecology: facilitators or followers? Science 325:573–574. doi: 10.1126/science.1172975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yang X, Chen L, Yong X, Shen Q. 2011. Formulations can affect rhizosphere colonization and biocontrol efficiency of Trichoderma harzianum SQR-T037 against Fusarium wilt of cucumbers. Biol Fertil Soils 47:239–248. doi: 10.1007/s00374-010-0527-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mukta JA, Rahman M, Sabir AA, Gupta DR, Surovy MZ, Rahman M, Islam MT. 2017. Chitosan and plant probiotics application enhance growth and yield of strawberry. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 11:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2017.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bubici G, Kaushal M, Prigigallo MI, Gómez-Lama Cabanás C, Mercado-Blanco J. 2019. Biological control agents against Fusarium wilt of banana. Front Microbiol 10:616. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xiong W, Jousset A, Guo S, Karlsson I, Zhao Q, Wu H, Kowalchuk GA, Shen Q, Li R, Geisen S. 2018. Soil protist communities form a dynamic hub in the soil microbiome. ISME J 12:634–638. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Diacono M, Montemurro F. 2011. Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. Sustainable Agriculture 2:761–786. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0394-0_34. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang Y, Li C, Wang Y, Hu Y, Christie P, Zhang J, Li X. 2016. Maize yield and soil fertility with combined use of compost and inorganic fertilizers on a calcareous soil on the North China Plain. Soil and Tillage Res 155:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.08.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Raja N. 2013. Biopesticides and biofertilizers: ecofriendly sources for sustainable agriculture. J Biofertil Biopestici 4:1–2. doi: 10.4172/2155-6202.1000e112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sharma SK, Ramesh A, Sharma MP, Joshi OP, Govaerts B, Steenwerth KL, Karlen DL. 2010. Microbial community structure and diversity as indicators for evaluating soil quality, p 317–358. Biodiversity, biofuels, agroforestry and conservation agriculture. Springer, New York NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bakker PA, Pieterse CM, de Jonge R, Berendsen RL. 2018. The soil-borne legacy. Cell 172:1178–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Barrios E. 2007. Soil biota, ecosystem services and land productivity. Ecological Economics 64:269–285. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pieterse CM, de Jonge R, Berendsen RL. 2016. The soil-borne supremacy. Trends Plant Sci 21:171–173. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Van Der Heijden MG, Bardgett RD, Van Straalen NM. 2008. The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11:296–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, Van Der Putten WH. 2013. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:789–799. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cordovez V, Dini-Andreote F, Carrión VJ, Raaijmakers JM. 2019. Ecology and evolution of plant microbiomes. Annu Rev Microbiol 73:69–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090817-062524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Savci S. 2012. An agricultural pollutant: chemical fertilizer. Ijesd 3:73–80. doi: 10.7763/IJESD.2012.V3.191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tamreihao K, Ningthoujam DS, Nimaichand S, Singh ES, Reena P, Singh SH, Nongthomba U. 2016. Biocontrol and plant growth promoting activities of a Streptomyces corchorusii strain UCR3-16 and preparation of powder formulation for application as biofertilizer agents for rice plant. Microbiol Res 192:260–270. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mendes R, Kruijt M, de Bruijn I, Dekkers E, van der Voort M, Schneider JHM, Piceno YM, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Bakker PAHM, Raaijmakers JM. 2011. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332:1097–1100. doi: 10.1126/science.1203980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cha J-Y, Han S, Hong H-J, Cho H, Kim D, Kwon Y, Kwon S-K, Crüsemann M, Bok Lee Y, Kim JF, Giaever G, Nislow C, Moore BS, Thomashow LS, Weller DM, Kwak Y-S. 2016. Microbial and biochemical basis of a Fusarium wilt-suppressive soil. ISME J 10:119–129. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kwak M-J, Kong HG, Choi K, Kwon S-K, Song JY, Lee J, Lee PA, Choi SY, Seo M, Lee HJ, Jung EJ, Park H, Roy N, Kim H, Lee MM, Rubin EM, Lee S-W, Kim JF. 2018. Rhizosphere microbiome structure alters to enable wilt resistance in tomato. Nat Biotechnol 36:1100–1109. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kumar U, Kumar Nayak A, Shahid M, Gupta VV, Panneerselvam P, Mohanty S, Kaviraj M, Kumar A, Chatterjee D, Lal B, Gautam P, Tripathi R, Panda BB. 2018. Continuous application of inorganic and organic fertilizers over 47 years in paddy soil alters the bacterial community structure and its influence on rice production. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 262:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.04.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kumar U, Panneerselvam P, Govindasamy V, Vithalkumar L, Senthilkumar M, Banik A, Annapurna K. 2017. Long-term aromatic rice cultivation effect on frequency and diversity of diazotrophs in its rhizosphere. Ecological Engineering 101:227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gu S, Hu Q, Cheng Y, Bai L, Liu Z, Xiao W, Gong Z, Wu Y, Feng K, Deng Y, Tan L. 2019. Application of organic fertilizer improves microbial community diversity and alters microbial network structure in tea (Camellia sinensis) plantation soils. Soil and Tillage Res 195:104356. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2019.104356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bending GD, Turner MK, Rayns F, Marx M-C, Wood M. 2004. Microbial and biochemical soil quality indicators and their potential for differentiating areas under contrasting agricultural management regimes. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1785–1792. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jiang C, Liu P, Liu M, Wu M, Li Z. 2017. Dynamics of aggregates composition and C, N distribution in rhizosphere of rice plants in red paddy soils different in soil fertility. Acta Pedologica Sinica 54:138–149. doi: 10.11766/trxb201605060123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu X-Y, Zou J-D, Xu L-L, Zhang X-Y, Yang F-T, Dai X-Q, Wang Z-Q, Sun X-M. 2014. Effects of different fertilizer species on carbon and nitrogen leaching in a reddish paddy soil. Huan Jing ke Xue= Huanjing Kexue 35:3083–3090. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2014.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li B, Guo L, Wang H, Li Y, Lai H, Wang X, Wei X. 2021. Bio-organic fertilizers manipulate abundance patterns of rhizosphere soil microbial community structure to improve tomato productivity. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-852188/v1. [DOI]
  • 39.Cui X, Zhang Y, Gao J, Peng F, Gao P. 2018. Long-term combined application of manure and chemical fertilizer sustained higher nutrient status and rhizospheric bacterial diversity in reddish paddy soil of Central South China. Sci Rep 8:11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34685-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Francioli D, Schulz E, Lentendu G, Wubet T, Buscot F, Reitz T. 2016. Mineral vs. organic amendments: microbial community structure, activity and abundance of agriculturally relevant microbes are driven by long-term fertilization strategies. Front Microbiol 7:1446. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Legrand F, Picot A, Cobo-Díaz JF, Carof M, Chen W, Le Floch G. 2018. Effect of tillage and static abiotic soil properties on microbial diversity. Appl Soil Ecol 132:135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.08.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Han J, Dong Y, Zhang M. 2021. Chemical fertilizer reduction with organic fertilizer effectively improve soil fertility and microbial community from newly cultivated land in the Loess Plateau of China. Appl Soil Ecol 165:103966. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103966. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kamaa M, Mburu H, Blanchart E, Chibole L, Chotte J-L, Kibunja C, Lesueur D. 2011. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilization on soil bacterial and fungal microbial diversity in the Kabete long-term trial, Kenya. Biol Fertil Soils 47:315–321. doi: 10.1007/s00374-011-0539-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dong W-Y, Zhang X-Y, Dai X-Q, Fu X-L, Yang F-T, Liu X-Y, Sun X-M, Wen X-F, Schaeffer S. 2014. Changes in soil microbial community composition in response to fertilization of paddy soils in subtropical China. Appl Soil Ecol 84:140–147. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.06.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wei M, Hu G, Wang H, Bai E, Lou Y, Zhang A, Zhuge Y. 2017. 35 years of manure and chemical fertilizer application alters soil microbial community composition in a Fluvo-aquic soil in Northern China. European J Soil Biology 82:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2017.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cwalina-Ambroziak B, Bowszys T. 2009. Changes in fungal communities in organically fertilized soil. Plant Soil Environ 55:25–32. doi: 10.17221/327-PSE. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ding L-J, Su J-Q, Sun G-X, Wu J-S, Wei W-X. 2018. Increased microbial functional diversity under long-term organic and integrated fertilization in a paddy soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:1969–1982. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8704-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Marschner P, Kandeler E, Marschner B. 2003. Structure and function of the soil microbial community in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 35:453–461. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00297-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhang Q-C, Shamsi IH, Xu D-T, Wang G-H, Lin X-Y, Jilani G, Hussain N, Chaudhry AN. 2012. Chemical fertilizer and organic manure inputs in soil exhibit a vice versa pattern of microbial community structure. Appl Soil Ecol 57:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.02.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang Y, Hao X, Alexander TW, Thomas BW, Shi X, Lupwayi NZ. 2018. Long-term and legacy effects of manure application on soil microbial community composition. Biol Fertil Soils 54:269–283. doi: 10.1007/s00374-017-1257-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang Y, Ji H, Hu Y, Wang R, Rui J, Guo S. 2018. Different selectivity in fungal communities between manure and mineral fertilizers: a study in an alkaline soil after 30 years fertilization. Front Microbiol 9:2613. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Berg G, Smalla K. 2009. Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 68:1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00654.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Simonin M, Nunan N, Bloor JM, Pouteau V, Niboyet A. 2017. Short-term responses and resistance of soil microbial community structure to elevated CO2 and N addition in grassland mesocosms. FEMS Microbiology Lett 364:fnx077. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhang Y, Shen H, He X, Thomas BW, Lupwayi NZ, Hao X, Thomas MC, Shi X. 2017. Fertilization shapes bacterial community structure by alteration of soil pH. Front Microbiol 8:1325. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hu X, Liu J, Wei D, Zhu P, Cui X, Zhou B, Chen X, Jin J, Liu X, Wang G. 2017. Effects of over 30-year of different fertilization regimes on fungal community compositions in the black soils of northeast China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 248:113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.07.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yao Q, Liu J, Yu Z, Li Y, Jin J, Liu X, Wang G. 2017. Three years of biochar amendment alters soil physiochemical properties and fungal community composition in a black soil of northeast China. Soil Biol Biochem 110:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dai Z, Enders A, Rodrigues JL, Hanley KL, Brookes PC, Xu J, Lehmann J. 2018. Soil fungal taxonomic and functional community composition as affected by biochar properties. Soil Biol Biochem 126:159–167. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shen W, Ni Y, Gao N, Bian B, Zheng S, Lin X, Chu H. 2016. Bacterial community composition is shaped by soil secondary salinization and acidification brought on by high nitrogen fertilization rates. Appl Soil Ecol 108:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Guo J, Liu W, Zhu C, Luo G, Kong Y, Ling N, Wang M, Dai J, Shen Q, Guo S. 2018. Bacterial rather than fungal community composition is associated with microbial activities and nutrient-use efficiencies in a paddy soil with short-term organic amendments. Plant Soil 424:335–349. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3547-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Huang F, Liu Z, Mou H, Li J, Zhang P, Jia Z. 2019. Impact of farmland mulching practices on the soil bacterial community structure in the semiarid area of the loess plateau in China. European J Soil Biology 92:8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2019.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fierer N, Lauber CL, Ramirez KS, Zaneveld J, Bradford MA, Knight R. 2012. Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients. ISME J 6:1007–1017. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Martínez-García LB, Korthals G, Brussaard L, Jørgensen HB, De Deyn GB. 2018. Organic management and cover crop species steer soil microbial community structure and functionality along with soil organic matter properties. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 263:7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.04.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Weller DM. 2007. Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens: looking back over 30 years. Phytopathology 97:250–256. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-2-0250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ding C, Shen Q, Zhang R, Chen W. 2013. Evaluation of rhizosphere bacteria and derived bio-organic fertilizers as potential biocontrol agents against bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) of potato. Plant Soil 366:453–466. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1425-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Beauregard PB, Chai Y, Vlamakis H, Losick R, Kolter R. 2013. Bacillus subtilis biofilm induction by plant polysaccharides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:E1621–E1630. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218984110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bais HP, Fall R, Vivanco JM. 2004. Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against infection of Arabidopsis roots by Pseudomonas syringae is facilitated by biofilm formation and surfactin production. Plant Physiol 134:307–319. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.028712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tao C, Li R, Xiong W, Shen Z, Liu S, Wang B, Ruan Y, Geisen S, Shen Q, Kowalchuk GA. 2020. Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil Pseudomonas populations to enhance plant disease suppression. Microbiome 8:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00892-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ren D, Madsen JS, Sørensen SJ, Burmølle M. 2015. High prevalence of biofilm synergy among bacterial soil isolates in cocultures indicates bacterial interspecific cooperation. ISME J 9:81–89. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang P, Wang H, Qiu Y, Ren L, Jiang B. 2018. Microbial characteristics in anaerobic digestion process of food waste for methane production–a review. Bioresour Technol 248:29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Guo JH, Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Shen JL, Han WX, Zhang WF, Christie P, Goulding K, Vitousek PM, Zhang F. 2010. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327:1008–1010. doi: 10.1126/science.1182570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhang X, Liu W, Zhang G, Jiang L, Han X. 2015. Mechanisms of soil acidification reducing bacterial diversity. Soil Biol Biochem 81:275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Trivedi P, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Jeffries TC, Trivedi C, Anderson IC, Lai K, McNee M, Flower K, Pal Singh B, Minkey D, Singh BK. 2017. Soil aggregation and associated microbial communities modify the impact of agricultural management on carbon content. Environ Microbiol 19:3070–3086. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yelle DJ, Ralph J, Lu F, Hammel KE. 2008. Evidence for cleavage of lignin by a brown rot basidiomycete. Environ Microbiol 10:1844–1849. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01605.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Fröhlich-Nowoisky J, Hill TC, Pummer BG, Yordanova P, Franc GD, Pöschl U. 2015. Ice nucleation activity in the widespread soil fungus Mortierella alpina. Biogeosciences 12:1057–1071. doi: 10.5194/bg-12-1057-2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Grządziel J, Gałązka A. 2019. Fungal biodiversity of the most common types of polish soil in a long-term microplot experiment. Front Microbiol 10:6. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zheng X, Zhu Y, Wang Z, Zhang H, Chen M, Chen Y, Wang J, Liu B. 2020. Effects of a novel bio-organic fertilizer on the composition of rhizobacterial communities and bacterial wilt outbreak in a continuously mono-cropped tomato field. Appl Soil Ecol 156:103717. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103717. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chen Y, Li X, Li S, Xu Y. 2020. Novel-integrated process for production of bio-organic fertilizer via swine manure composting. Environmental Engineering Res 26:. doi: 10.4491/eer.2019.522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ye L, Zhao X, Bao E, Li J, Zou Z, Cao K. 2020. Bio-organic fertilizer with reduced rates of chemical fertilization improves soil fertility and enhances tomato yield and quality. Sci Rep 10:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56954-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chen W, Xu R, Chen J, Yuan X, Zhou L, Tan T, Fan J, Zhang Y, Hu T. 2018. Consistent responses of surface-and subsurface soil fungal diversity to N enrichment are mediated differently by acidification and plant community in a semi-arid grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 127:110–119. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.09.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Jiao S, Liu Z, Lin Y, Yang J, Chen W, Wei G. 2016. Bacterial communities in oil contaminated soils: biogeography and co-occurrence patterns. Soil Biol Biochem 98:64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ma B, Lv X, Cai Y, Chang SX, Dyck MF. 2018. Liming does not counteract the influence of long-term fertilization on soil bacterial community structure and its co-occurrence pattern. Soil Biol Biochem 123:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Guo P, Zhang C, Wang Y, Yu X, Zhang Z, Zhang D. 2018. Effect of long-term fertilization on humic redox mediators in multiple microbial redox reactions. Environ Pollut 234:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lyu J, Jin L, Jin N, Xie J, Xiao X, Hu L, Tang Z, Wu Y, Niu L, Yu J. 2020. Effects of different vegetable rotations on fungal community structure in continuous tomato cropping matrix in greenhouse. Front Microbiol 11:829. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Team RC. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 9 April 2021.
  • 85.Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara R, Simpson G, Solymos P. 2020. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-6, 2019. Accessed 20 April 2021.
  • 86.Yan M, Chen S, Huang T, Li B, Li N, Liu K, Zong R, Miao Y, Huang X. 2020. Community compositions of phytoplankton and eukaryotes during the mixing periods of a drinking water reservoir: dynamics and interactions. Ijerph 17:1128. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (677.9KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Sequencing data are stored in the NCBI database, access link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRP359012.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES