Skip to main content
Life logoLink to Life
. 2022 Nov 23;12(12):1957. doi: 10.3390/life12121957

From Biodiversity to Musketry: Detection of Plant Diversity in Pre-Industrial Peloponnese during the Flora Graeca Expedition

Chrysanthi Chimona 1, Sophia Papadopoulou 1, Foteini Kolyva 1, Maria Mina 1, Sophia Rhizopoulou 1,*
Editors: Wajid Zaman1, Hakim Manghwar1
PMCID: PMC9785030  PMID: 36556322

Abstract

As the interest in natural, sustainable ecosystems arises in many fields, wild plant diversity is reconsidered. The present study is based on extant literature evidence from the journey of John Sibthorp (Professor of Botany, Oxford University) to Peloponnese (Greece) in pre-industrial time. In the year 1795, Peloponnese was a botanically unknown region, very dangerous for travellers and under civil unrest, in conjuncture with a pre-rebellion period. Our study reveals approximately 200 wild plant taxa that were collected from Peloponnese localities in 1795, transported to Oxford University (UK), and quoted in the magnificent edition Flora Graeca Sibthorpiana of the 19th century. Moreover, these plants currently constitute a living collection in Peloponnese, confirmed according to updated data on the vascular Flora of Greece. The presented lists constitute a source of information for plant biologists, linking the past to the present, shedding light on the study of adaptive traits of wild Mediterranean plants and revealing the temporal dimension of natural history. Nowadays, increasing and thorough understanding of the considered plants’ functionality to abiotic and biotic environmental stimuli provides a new framework of sustainability and management options.

Keywords: archives, botanical collection, Greece, landscape, pre-rebellion period

1. Introduction

In the 18th century, travelers’ journey to Greece was also a journey through its history. The naturalists’ travels were explorations, linked to searching for specimens of natural history. The travelers’ observations became a way of identifying and revealing cultural and economic changes that have occurred over the last centuries. The botanical expeditions and the collections of specimens connected observations and descriptions with landscapes and environmental conditions; plants had been there for thousands of years, linked to the history and adapted to abiotic and biotic conditions of the localities [1,2,3,4,5].

John Sibthorp (1758–1796), Professor of Botany in the University of Oxford, decided to travel to unexplored areas of Greece, collecting and recording botanical specimens in the late 1780s and 1790s; at that time, Greece was an unknown region, very dangerous and difficult to visit owing to diseases, civil unrest, and bandit groups—known as armatoloi and klephts– that included illiterate peasants, artisans, and local clergy, together with the local notables and landowners in Peloponnese [6,7,8].

Sibthorp’s main interest was linked to plants known since the classical antiquity and mainly quoted in the texts of Dioscorides (1st century AD) [9,10,11,12,13,14]. During the first exploration from 1786 to 1787, Sibthorp was accompanied by the Austrian painter Ferdinand Lucas Bauer (1760–1826) as his draughtsman [6,7]; this was a time when travelers were accompanied by a professional artist, whose work supplemented their discoveries with visual evidence [15,16,17,18]. Actually, the magnificent, illustrated edition Flora Graeca Sibthorpiana (hereafter FGS), published from 1806 to 1840, contains botanical hand-coloured engravings that are important icons of the Mediterranean flora [7,19,20].

John Sibthorp and his companion undertook a second botanical expedition to the Levant from 1794 to 1795. During this journey, they arrived in Peloponnese (Morea is the name used in their diaries and letters) on 26 February 1795 and visited numerous localities botanizing in a more or less largely unknown area, frequently hearing the firing of guns [6,15,21,22]. Those days, major parts of Peloponnese, electively ruled by semi-autonomous agas (persons of high rank or social position during the era of the Ottoman Empire [23]), were only nominally part of the Ottoman Empire [24,25].

Although substantial, revived research has been carried out on the content of FGS [7,8,20,26,27,28,29,30], the Peloponnese tour and the collected botanical specimens by Sibthorp in 1795 have received little attention [6] (pp. 164–169) [7] (pp. 144–146). The importance of studying local floras, historical and environmental conditions, distribution records, and species lists has been repeatedly stressed in the literature and awareness of this subject has recently been rising.

Plants collected during a pre-rebellion period (i.e., before the Greek Revolution of 1821) in Peloponnese correspond to “visual evidence” from a particular time (spring 1795), revealing regional plant species pool of this particular area, as well as physical, cultural, and aesthetic values of the natural environment. The main goal of this study was to study plants that have been recorded in Peloponnese in pre-industrial time, as functional components of a biodiversity, which, to the best of our knowledge, has not hitherto been published. A secondary goal of this study was to confirm the above-mentioned plant diversity in Peloponnese during the 21st century.

2. Materials and Methods

This research is based on our survey of written sources, i.e., books, travel reports, letters, diaries, plant catalogues, online published, and printed archives mainly linked to the “Flora Graeca” expedition in Peloponnese (Greece) in 1795 [6,7]. Two copies of FGS, i.e., a copy adorned the National Library of Greece since 1916 and another copy acquired by the Gennadius Library of Athens in 1967 were surveyed. Moreover, we studied the digitized published hand-coloured engravings and the original watercolours, together with the Mediterranean scenes that are freely available and accessible online via Digital Bodleian (https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/collections/flora-and-fauna-graeca/, accessed on 9 October 2022). In addition, rigorous research of the Florae Graecae Prodromus [30] (hereafter Prodromus) housed in the Department of Botany at National and Kapodistrian University of Athens in Greece was carried out; it has to be noted that the Prodromus contains indexes of modern Greek vernacular names of plants (Index Nominum Graecorum, pp. 383–391), ancient Greek names of plants quoted in Dioscorides’ codex (Index Dioscoridem, pp. 392–404), and scientific names of plants (Index Generum et Synonymorum, pp. 405–422), as well as plant locality data [31]. Furthermore, two books were taken in consideration; the first by Robert Walpole (1781–1856, an English classical scholar with degrees from Trinity College at Cambridge in UK and Merton College at Oxford in UK, who travelled to Greece; his Memoirs including notes of various travelers’ diaries, among them Sibthorp’s and his companion [32] were first published in 1817) and the second by John Bacon Sawrey Morritt (1772–1843, who immediately after his BA degree from St. John’s College at Cambridge in UK, started on the travels described in his book that was first published in 1914; Morritt travelled over a considerable part of Peloponnese in 1795 [33]). A plant taxon was included in the results if there was a record in Prodromus stating locality data from Peloponnese. Information linked to the currently accepted plant nomenclature and distribution was derived from the Flora of Greece web (https://portal.cybertaxonomy.org/flora-greece/, accessed on 21 October 2022).

3. Results

3.1. Peloponnese Tour

In Figure 1, the Peloponnese tours followed by Sibthorp and Morritt in 1795 are depicted in red and green lines, respectively. Sibthorp and his colleagues travelled from the island of Zakynthos to the port of Skaffidia (Ileia County); their route included Pyrgos, Lalla, and Tripolis, passing through several villages. The tour continued to Palaiepiscopi, ancient Tegea, and Arcadia. Next, they travelled to Argos and visited ancient Mycenae as well as Napoli di Roamin (Nafplion) in Argolida County. Then, they travelled to Korinthos and Patras, continued in Achaia County through villages, and proceeded to Ileia County again; from there, they followed different directions until they arrived in Kalamata (Messinia County). After Kalamata, they proceeded to Kutchuk Maina, Kardamili, Sparta (Laconia County), and Mystras; from there, they continued to Messini and Petallida and on 25 April 1795 they arrived at Zakynthos and, by ship, returned to England. Morritt’s journey started from Kalamata; he visited Kutchukmaina, Palaeocastro and ancient Thuria (Messinia County), Corone, Abia, and Kitreés and, through various villages, went to Kardamili/Cardamyla; he arrived by boat at Platsa and then continued to Oetylos, Marathonisi (ancient Gythium), and Mystras (Laconia County).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Map of Peloponnese (obtained by https://d-maps.com/ accessed on 10 October 2021 and modified accordingly), showing two tours, i.e., by Sibthorp (red line) and Morritt (green line) in 1795. The red symbol A indicates the start of Sibthorp’s journey; red lines and arrows indicate locations and directions, respectively. In the insert, the map of Greece (blue) is presented and, in yellow, the Peloponnese peninsula is indicated. The green lines and arrows indicate locations and directions of Morritt’s journey. The black-white dot indicates the capital of Greece, Athens (37.9838° N, 23.7275° E); the small black dots indicate the locations of cities: Patras (38.2466° N, 21.7346° E) and Tripolis (37.5101° N, 22.3726° E).

3.2. Plant Diversity in Pre-Industrial Peloponnese

Our study provides evidence for 183 plant taxa grown in pre-industrial Peloponnese, which had been collected during Sibthorp’s expedition, drawn and cited in FGS (Table 1). Moreover, 21 plants quoted in Prodromus and linked to localities of Peloponnese, but neither drawn nor cited in FGS, were found (Table 2). Although citations for prickly pear [Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.], walnut (Juglans regia L.), and mulberries (Morus nigra L.) were found in the considered archival research concerning Peloponnese, these plants were neither drawn nor cited in both FGS and Prodromus. It should be mentioned that the botanist Sir James Edward Smith (1759–1828)—founder and first president of the Linnean Society of London—wrote the texts for the plants attested in FGS and Prodromus and excluded all species he regarded as not being part of the natural flora.

Table 1.

List of plants found in Peloponnese and cited in Flora Graeca Sibthorpiana (FGS). First column: plant names quoted in the first edition of FGS (1806–1840). Second column: numerical register of hand-coloured engravings (plates) of plants cited in the first published edition of FGS. Third column: numerical register of the original watercolours by Ferdinand Bauer preserved at Oxford (MS. Sherard 241–245), digitized and electronically accessed via Digital Bodleian; whenever the picture of the original drawing was not digitally available, the digital hand-coloured engraving from the first printed edition is mentioned (Sherard 761 and 764). Fourth column: current scientific name.

Plant Name Cited in FGS Engraving Watercoulor Scientific Name
Phillyrea latifolia 2 761: pl.2 Phillyrea latifolia L.
Olea europaea 3 761: pl.3 Olea europaea L.
Veronica glauca 7 244: f.66 Veronica glauca Sm.
Veronica triphyllos 10 244: f.69 Veronica triphyllos L.
Salvia triloba 17 244: f.158 Salvia fruticosa Mill.
Salvia ringens 18 244: f.159 Salvia ringens Sm.
Salvia sibthorpii 22 244: f.163 Salvia virgata Jacq.
Morina persica 28 761: pl.28 Morina persica L.
Crocus aureus 35 245: f.65 Crocus flavus Weston subsp. flavus
Iris florentina 39 245: f.69 Iris albicans Lange
Iris sisyrinchium 42 245: f.72 Moraea sisyrinchium (L.) Ker-Gawl.
Schoenus mucronatus 43 245: f.112 Cyperus capitatus Vand.
Saccharum ravennae 52 245: f.120 Tripidium ravennae (L.) H. Scholz
Panicum repens 61 245: f.130 Panicum repens L.
Briza minor 74 245: f.142 Briza minor L.
Festuga littoralis 80 245: f.148 Aeluropus littoralis (Gouan) Parl.
Bromus tectorum 82 245: f.150 Bromus tectorum L.
Bromus rubens 83 245: f.151 Bromus rubens L.
Stipa paleacea 86 245: f.154 Stipa capensis Thunb.
Triticum junceum 99 245: f.166 Elytrigia juncea (L.) Nevski
Valantia muralis 137 242: f.202 Valantia muralis L.
Crucianella latifolia 139 242: f.204 Crucianella latifolia L.
Plantago lagopus 144 244: f.182 Plantago lagopus L.
Hypecoum imberbe 156 241: f.30 Hypecoum imberbe Sm.
Anchusa tinctoria 166 244: f.33 Anchusa tinctoria L.
Cerinthe aspera 170 244: f.37 Cerinthe major L.
Cerinthe retorta 171 244: f.38 Cerinthe retorta Sm.
Asperugo procumbens 177 244: f.44 Asperugo procumbens L.
Lycopsis variegata 178 244: f.36 Anchusella variegata (L.) Bigazzi & al.
Primula vulgaris 184 244: f.175 Primula vulgaris Huds.
Lysimachia linum-stellatum 189 244: f.181 Asterolinon linum-stellatum (L.) Duby
Plumbago europaea 191 244: f.196 Plumbago europaea L.
Convolvulus siculus 196 244: f.15 Convolvulus siculus L.
Campanula rupestris 213 243: f.178 Campanula rupestris Sm.
Campanula drabifolia 215 243: f.180 Campanula drabifolia Sm.
Viola gracilis 222 241: f.85 Viola gracilis Sm.
Chironia maritima 237 244: f.9 Centaurium maritimum (L.) Fritsch
Chironia spicata 238 244: f.10 Schenkia spicata (L.) G. Mans.
Vitis vinifera 242 241: f.178 Vitis vinifera L.
Herniaria macrocarpa 252 242: f.125 Herniaria incana Lam.
Eryngium multifidum 259 242: f.148 Eryngium amethystinum L.
Bupleurum sibthorpianum 264 242: f.153 Bupleurum falcatum subsp. cernuum (Ten.) Arcang.
Echinophora spinosa 265 242: f.154 Echinophora spinosa L.
Echinophora tenuifolia 266 242: f.155 Echinophora tenuifolia L.
Artedia squamata 268 242: f.157 Artedia squamata L.
Peucedanum obtusifolium 277 242: f.175 Selinum silaifolium (Jacq.) Beck
Coriandrum sativum 283 242: f.170 Coriandrum sativum L.
Pastinaca opopanax 288 242: f.176 Opopanax hispidus (Friv.) Griseb.
Linum gallicum 303 241: f.160 Linum trigynum L.
Narcissus tazetta 308 245: f.73 Narcissus tazetta L.
Amaryllis lutea 310 245: f.75 Sternbergia lutea (L.) Spreng. subsp. lutea
Tulipa sibthorpiana 330 245: f.79 Fritillaria sibthorpiana (Sm.) Baker
Ornithogalum arvense 332 245: f.97 Gagea villosa (M. Bieb.) Sweet
Ornithogalum nanum 333 245: f.98 Ornithogalum sibthorpii Greuter
Asphodelus ramosus 334 245: f.99 Asphodelus ramosus L.
Anthericum graecum 336 245: f.101 Gagea graeca (L.) Irmisch
Asparagus acutifolius 337 245: f.102 Asparagus acutifolius L.
Hyacinthus romanus 340 245: f.105 Bellevalia romana (L.) Sweet
Frankenia hirsuta 343 241: f.88 Frankenia hirsuta L.
Erica arborea 351 243: f.190 Erica arborea L.
Arbutus unedo 373 243: f.191 Arbutus unedo L.
Arbutus andrachne 374 243: f.192 Arbutus andrachne L.
Saxifraga media 376 242: f.142 Saxifraga sempervivum K. Koch
Saxifraga rotundifolia 377 242: f.143 Saxifraga rotundifolia L.
Saxifraga cymbalaria 378 242: f.144 Saxifraga sibthorpii Boiss.
Dianthus cinnamomeus 400 241: f.110 Dianthus cinnamomeus Sm.
Silene nocturna 408 241: f.118 Silene nocturna L.
Silene behen 416 241: f.126 Silene behen L.
Silene italica 429 241: f.138 Silene italica (L.) Pers.
Silene staticifolia 434 241: f.144 Silene bupleuroides subsp. staticifolia (Sm.) Chowdhuri
Sedum tetraphyllum 448 242: f.135 Sedum cepaea L.
Oxalis corniculata 451 241: f.190 Oxalis corniculata L.
Cerastium pilosum 454 241: f.149 Cerastium illyricum Ard.
Cerastium tomentosum 455 241: f.150 Cerastium candidissimum Correns
Reseda alba 459 245: f.49 Reseda alba L.
Euphorbia spinosa 463 245: f.39 Euphorbia acanthothamnos Boiss.
Euphorbia leiosperma 465 245: f.41 Euphorbia terracina L.
Myrtus communis 475 242: f.120 Myrtus communis L.
Prunus prostrata 478 242: f. 109 Prunus prostrata Labill.
Pyrus aria 479 242: f.118 Sorbus umbellata (Desf.) Fritsch
Papaver somniferum 491 241: f.24 Papaver somniferum L.
Cistus monspeliensis 493 241: f.75 Cistus monspeliensis L.
Cistus incanus 494 241: f.74 Cistus creticus subsp. eriocephalus (Viv.) Greuter & Burdet
Cistus salviifolius 497 241: f.78 Cistus salviifolius L.
Cistus guttatus 498 241: f.79 Tuberaria guttata (L.) Fourr.
Cistus salicifolius 499 241: f.80 Helianthemum salicifolium (L.) Mill.
Delphinium consolida 504 241: f.7 Consolida phrygia (Boiss.) Soó
Anemone coronaria 514 241: f.17 Anemone coronaria L.
Ranunculus millefoliatus 521 241: f.4 Ranunculus millefoliatus Vahl
Satureja juliana 540 244: f.117 Micromeria juliana (L.) Rchb.
Satureja graeca 542 244: f.118 Micromeria graeca (L.) Rchb.
Satureja capitata 544 244: f.115 Thymbra capitata (L.) Cav.
Nepeta nuda 547 244: f.120 Nepeta nuda L.
Lamium maculatum 556 244: f.127 Lamium maculatum L.
Stachys orientalis 560 244: f.146 Stachys obliqua Waldst. & Kit.
Marrubium pseudodictamnus 562 244: f.147 Ballota pseudodictamnus (L.) Benth.
Prasium majus 584 244: f.155 Prasium majus L.
Bartsia latifolia 586 244: f.71 Bellardia latifolia (L.) Cuatrec.
Antirrhinum pelisserianum 591 244: f.76 Linaria pelisseriana (L.) Mill.
Antirrhinum chalepense 592 244: f.77 Linaria chalepensis (L.) Mill.
Antirrhinum reflexum 593 244: f.78 Linaria triphylla (L.) Mill.
Scrophularia canina 598 244: f.83 Scrophularia canina subsp. bicolor (Sm.) Greuter
Scrophularia caesia 604 244: f.89 Scrophularia heterophylla Willd.
Orobanche ramosa 608 244: f.93 Phelipanche mutelii (F.W. Schultz) Pomel
Acanthus spinosus 611 244: f.95 Acanthus spinosus L.
Bunias raphanifolia 612 241: f.33 Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All.
Aubrieta deltoidea 628 241: f.49 Aubrieta deltoidea (L.) DC.
Biscutella columnae 629 241: f.50 Biscutella didyma subsp. apula Nyman
Arabis verna 641 241: f.62 Arabis verna (L.) R. Br.
Erodium romanum 654 241: f.182 Erodium acaule (L.) Bech. & Thell.
Erodium gruinum 656 241: f.184 Erodium gruinum (L.) L’Hér.
Erodium malacoides 658 241: f.186 Erodium malacoides (L.) L’Hér.
Geranium tuberosum 659 241: f.187 Geranium tuberosum L.
Alcea ficifolia 663 241: f.166 Alcea biennis Winterl
Hibiscus trionum 666 241: f.169 Hibiscus trionum L.
Polygala venulosa 669 241: f.86 Polygala venulosa Sm.
Ononis antiquorum 675 242: f.11 Ononis spinosa subsp. diacantha (Rchb.) Greuter
Anthyllis tetraphylla 681 242: f.17 Tripodion tetraphyllum (L.) Fourr.
Orobus sessilifolius 692 242: f.27 Lathyrus digitatus (M. Bieb.) Fiori
Lathyrus sativus 695 242: f.31 Lathyrus sativus L.
Lathyrus grandiflorus 698 242: f.34 Lathyrus grandiflorus Sm.
Vicia polyphylla 699 242: f.35 Vicia villosa subsp. varia (Host) Corb.
Vicia melanops 701 242: f.37 Vicia melanops Sm.
Cytisus sessilifolius 705 242: f.41 Podocytisus caramanicus Boiss. & Heldr.
Coronilla emerus 710 242: f.46 Hippocrepis emerus (L.) Lassen
Coronilla securidaca 712 242: f.48 Securigera securidaca (L.) Degen & Dörfl.
Ornithopus compressus 714 242: f.50 Ornithopus compressus L.
Ornithopus scorpioides 715 242: f.51 Coronilla scorpioides (L.) W.D.J. Koch
Hippocrepis unisiliquosa 716 242: f.52 Hippocrepis unisiliquosa L.
Hedysarum c aput -galli 723 242: f.59 Onobrychis caput-galli (L.) Lam.
Phaca baetica 727 242: f.63 Erophaca baetica (L.) Boiss.
Astragalus incanus 732 242: f.68 Astragalus spruneri Boiss.
Astragalus aristatus 735 242: f.71 Astragalus thracicus subsp. parnassi (Boiss.) Strid
Biserrula pelecinus 737 242: f.73 Astragalus pelecinus (L.) Barneby
Trifolium cherleri 745 242: f.81 Trifolium cherleri L.
Trifolium rotundifolium 747 764: pl.747 Trigonella rotundifolia (Sm.) Strid
Trifolium stellatum 750 242: f.86 Trifolium stellatum L.
Trifolium clypeatum 751 242: f.87 Trifolium clypeatum L.
Trifolium uniflorum 752 242: f.88 Trifolium uniflorum L.
Lotus tetragonolobus 755 242: f.91 Tetragonolobus purpureus Moench
Lotus edulis 756 242: f.92 Lotus edulis L.
Lotus creticus 758 242: f.94 Lotus creticus L.
Lotus hirsutus 759 242: f.95 Dorycnium hirsutum (L.) Ser.
Trigonella corniculata 761 242: f.97 Trigonella corniculata (L.) L.
Trigonella monspeliaca 765 242: f.101 Medicago monspeliaca (L.) Trautv.
Medicago marina 770 242: f.106 Medicago marina L.
Hypericum olympicum 772 241: f.171 Hypericum olympicum L.
Hypericum hircinum 773 241: f.172 Hypericum hircinum L.
Hypericum crispum 776 241: f.175 Hypericum triquetrifolium Turra
Scorzonera laciniata 788 243: f.144 Podospermum laciniatum (L.) DC.
Sonchus picroides 793 243: f.166 Reichardia picroides (L.) Roth
Crepis rubra 801 243: f.157 Crepis rubra L.
Hedypnois cretica 813 243: f.132 Hedypnois rhagadioloides (L.) F.W. Schmidt
Hypochoeris minima 816 243: f.123 Hypochaeris arachnoides Poir.
Lapsana stellata 817 243: f.126 Rhagadiolus stellatus (L.) Gaertn.
Catananche lutea 821 243: f.129 Catananche lutea L.
Carduus glycacanthus 826 243: f.96 Jurinea glycacantha DC.
Cnicus acarna 827 243: f.94 Picnomon acarna (L.) Cass.
Onopordum elatum 833 243: f.87 Onopordum tauricum Willd.
Cynara humilis 835 243: f.89 Cynara cardunculus L.
Carlina lanata 836 243: f.82 Carlina lanata L.
Carlina corymbosa 837 243: f.83 Carlina corymbosa subsp. graeca (Heldr. & Sartori) Nyman
Acarna cancellata 839 243: f.85 Atractylis cancellata L.
Carthamus lanatus 841 243: f.118 Carthamus lanatus L.
Carthamus caeruleus 843 243: f.120 Carthamus caeruleus L.
Staehelina chamaepeuce 847 243: f.90 Ptilostemon chamaepeuce (L.) Less.
Senecio trilobus 869 243: f.65 Senecio trilobus L.
Bellis annua 876 243: f.22 Bellis annua L.
Chrysanthemum coronarium 877 243: f.58 Glebionis coronaria (L.) Spach
Anthemis cota 880 243: f.35 Anthemis altissima L.
Anthemis altissima 881 243: f.36 Anthemis altissima L.
Achillea aegyptiaca 892 243: f.51 Achillea taygetea Boiss. & Heldr.
Centaurea benedicta 906 243: f.114 Centaurea benedicta (L.) L.
Centaurea aegyptiaca 907 243: f.102 Centaurea aegyptiaca Sm.
Centaurea melitensis 909 243: f.104 Centaurea melitensis L.
Centaurea collina 914 243: f.109 Centaurea salonitana Vis.
Centaurea galactites 919 243: f.115 Galactites tomentosus Moench
Filago pygmaea 921 243: f.28 Filago pygmaea L.
Orchis undulatifolia 927 245: f.58 Orchis italica Poir.
Orchis papilionacea 928 245: f.59 Anacamptis papilionacea subsp. aegaea (P. Delforge) L. Lewis & Kreutz
Ophrys fusca 930 245: f.61 Ophrys fusca Link
Pistacia terebinthus 956 242: f.4 Pistacia terebinthus L.
Atriplex halimus 962 245: f.8 Atriplex halimus L.

Table 2.

List of plants found in Peloponnese and cited in Prodromus. First column: plant names alphabetically presented according to the name given in archives, which are quoted in Prodromus, but not referred in FGS. Second column: numerical register of volume and page, respectively, in Prodromus. Third column: current scientific name.

Plant Name Cited in Prodromus Volume, Page Scientific Name
Castanea sativa 2, 242 Castanea sativa Mill.
Corylus spp. (hazel) 2, 244 Corylus avellana L., C. colurna L.
Euphorbia apios 1, 326 Euphorbia apios L.
Ficus carica 2, 268 Ficus carica L.
Fraxinella 1, 271 Dictamnus albus L.
Globularia alypum 1, 78 Globularia alypum L.
Leontic e altaica 1, 234 Gymnospermium peloponnesiacum (Phitos) Strid
Leontice chrysogonum 1, 234 Bongardia chrysogonum (L.) Spach
Leontice leontopetalum 1, 234 Leontice leontopetalum L.
Lolium 1, 70 Lolium perenne L., L. subulatum Vis., L. temulentum L.
Imperatoria 1, 199 Imperatoria ostruthium L.
Loranthus 1, 242 Loranthus europaeus Jacq.
Urtica 2, 233 Urtica dioica L., U. pilulifera L., U. urens L.
Quercus spp. 2, 239 Quercus aegilops L., Q. coccifera L., Q. ilex L., Q. pubescens Willd.
Pinus 2, 242 Pinus pinea L.
Rubus spp. 1, 349 Rubus sanctus Schreb., R. canescens DC.
Salicornia 1, 1 Salicornia fruticosa L., S. perennans Willd.
Satyrium 2, 215 Satyrium L., Orchis sp.
Scilla 1, 237 Scilla nivalis Boiss., S. messeniaca Boiss., S. pneumonanthe Speta
Viola 1, 145 Viola scorpiuroides Coss., Viola graeca (W. Becker) Halácsy
Nymphaea 1, 360–361 Nymphaea alba L.

In 1795, in western Peloponnese, Salicornia fruticosa L. was observed growing near lake banks, Asphodelus ramosus L. near rivers, and Bromus rubens L. in between cultivated fields. Stands of Phillyrea latifolia L., Erica arborea L., Arbutus unedo L., Pistacia lentiscus L., vernal (spring) Crocus flavus Weston, and primroses (Primula vulgaris Huds.) in bloom—observed in early March 1795—were encountered. In the southern Peloponnese (county of Messinia), black mulberry trees (Morus nigra L.) and prickly pear surrounded many villages. Moreover, they depicted fig trees (Ficus carica L.), grapevines, cotton, grains, corn, olive trees, Euphorbia exigua L., Euphorbia spinosa L., Lolium perenne L., and Orobanche ramosa L. Some regions produced flax and tobacco. In the eastern Peloponnese, Quercus species, as well as corn, grains, grapevines, olive trees, fig trees, mulberry trees, and chestnut trees, had been detected. In the central Peloponnese (county of Arcadia), they visited oaks’ forest; moreover, they observed a huge walnut tree (Juglans regia L.), Hyacinthus romanus L., and Hyacinthus spicatus Sm. in bloom. In addition, the presence of floating crystal-wort (Riccia fluitans L.) and Boletus (a genus of mushroom-producing fungi that comprises over 100 species) and the use of truffle were mentioned. Cultivation of pear trees with open blossoms (10 March 1795) and corns grown among the remains of cities and temples of the ancient Greek territories were detected.

John Sibthorp arrived in Peloponnese bearing a mode of seeing, endowing the professorship of “Agriculture and Rural Economy” in the University of Oxford, thus the state of the agriculture in Peloponnese attracted his attention in 1795; the cultivation of corn (Zea mays L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), millet (Panicum repens L.), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.), and wheat (Triticum junceum L. and Aegilops comosa Sm.) was detected.

4. Discussion

Professor John Sibthorp and his colleagues visited Greek territories twice in pre-industrial time, i.e., 1786–1787 and 1794–1795, and collected wild plants grown under natural conditions [7,16,34]. It was an outstanding achievement, considering the duration, the collections of specimens of plants from which “a legacy of 2462 pressed specimens are still preserved in the Sibthorpian Herbarium” [35] (Figure 2), and the geographical coverage, during the above-mentioned botanical expeditions. Moreover, a number of specimens found in Kew are of considerable importance as supplementing Sibthorp’s collection at Oxford [36]; these specimens have been published [36] according to the sequence of plants cited in Prodromus [30].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Dried specimens of plants in the Sibthorpian herbarium at the University of Oxford, associated with the Flora Graeca expeditions and collected from the eastern Mediterranean in the 18th century. Courtesy of Stephen Harris, modified by Sophia Rhizopoulou.

The revived interest in FGS is partially due to recent publications [22,28,37,38,39], but mainly to biodiversity issues raised under the threat of climate change, which gives another dimension to the whole achievement. Moreover, exhibitions dedicated to the concept and the content of Flora Graeca Sibthorpiana contributed to public awareness, e.g., in Oxford entitled “Painting by numbers” (Bodleian Library, 29 – 9 July 2017, https://treasures.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/treasures/flora-graeca/ accessed on 9 May 2017) and Athens entitled “Flora Graeca” (Gennadius Library, 8 March–4 July 2016, https://www.ascsa.edu.gr/events/details/flora-graeca-exhibition, accessed on 8 March 2016).

In Table 1, we compiled a list of 183 wild plants cited in FGS and located in Peloponnese, which is indicative of the biodiversity, environmental physiology, phenology, and short flowering season in response to drought conditions, i.e., during the period of spring rainfall and the concomitantly active pollinators [40,41]. The later generations of plant biologists studied plant species grown in geographic locations visited by Sibthorp and his companion in Peloponnese, increasing the overall knowledge about distribution, ecophysiology, and taxonomy of plants quoted in FGS and Prodromus [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Τhe mediterranean-type climate is characterized by a marked seasonality, typified by the alternation of a hot and dry period with a cold and wet period. For example, Sibthorp observed open flowers of Anemone coronaria L., Oxalis corniculata L., and Asphodelus ramosus L. on 27 February 1795, as well as of Crocus flavus Weston in early spring (cited as Crocus aureus in FGS and Crocus vernus latifolius aureus in Prodromus, vol. I, pp. 24–25); such observations are supported by recent publications [5,50,51]. Moreover, in the 21st century, it is known that seasonal blossom is related to adaptive floral traits; for example, the study of petals revealed a surface nano-sculpture that declines water droplet adhesion and enhances the water repellence of these fragile floral tissues, which are exposed to the rainy conditions of the early spring flowering season [52,53,54]. In Anemone coronaria L., the temperature plays a critical role in the onset of dormancy [55]. Other species possess deeply rooted systems that enhance drought resistance (e.g., Myrtus communis L., Pistacia lentiscus L., and Quercus species). In addition, recent research revealed leaf functional traits linked to hydrophobicity and water status, highlighting species’ responses to drought conditions [56,57,58]; this may be critical for resilience in the face of increasing drought stress.

Moreover, Sibthorp noticed that oaks in Peloponnese were frequently infested with the mistletoe Loranthus europaeus Jacq. [59,60,61]; it is worth mentioning that he regarded the deciduous, yellow Loranthus europaeus Jacq. as the “true mistletoe of the ancients” [6] (p. 165).

Sibthorp and his companion visited a mountainy area, barren and stony beyond conception; it was hard work botanizing under harsh field conditions. The earth, washed by the rains and torrents from the higher parts, was supported on a plethora of terraces cultivated with wheat, cotton, maize, and millet, while olives and mulberry trees seemed to grow out of the rocky substrate itself. However, carpets of geophytes and numerous annual plants produced a spring flowering distinctive to the human eye. The results from this tour in the late 1790s, in pre-industrial landscapes, barely resembled the area we see today in Peloponnese, and brought information about numerous unknown to science (those days) wild plants, oak woodlands, pine forests, crops, cultivated areas, and arable lands of the monasteries [62]. Nowadays, several places of Peloponnese that Sibthorp visited in 1795 are included in the European network Natura 2000—i.e., the cornerstone of European Union nature conservation policy—of designated sites (https://eunis.eea.europa.eu/sites, accessed on 18 October 2022) relevant for flora and habitat protection [63,64,65], e.g., mountainy landscapes such as Parnonas: GR2520006, Mainalo (Arcadia): GR2520001, and Taygetos: GR2550006, as well as Folois plateau: GR2330002 and Olympia: GR2330004. Other progression was also recorded; that is, information linked to the current distribution of the considered plants, confirmed via the Flora of Greece web, contributed to our knowledge about natural stands of wild plants.

According to our study, on one hand, among the plants found in Peloponnese in 1795 and cited in FGS and Prodromus, there are species either widely distributed or grown in restricted areas, e.g., Achillea taygetea Boiss. & Heldr., Erophaca baetica Boiss., Saxifraga sibthorpii Boiss., and Scilla messeniaca Boiss. On the other hand, Zea mays L., originated from the Americas and found among the few cultivated species in isolated valleys in Peloponnese in pre-industrial time, might be attributed to the Venetian occupation of Peloponnese (1688–1715); during that period, when the area was dependent on the European market, plants might have been a product of cross-cultural communication between the conquerors and conquered [66,67,68,69,70].

Sibthorp’s expedition in Peloponnese contributed to our understanding of botany in the field and revealed the diversity of plants grown in their habitats, in pre-industrial time. Historical time was linked to a gradually known plant diversity, as locations were explored and knowledge about the natural fertility of the land increased. However, anthropogenic pressure maintained by human activities, grazing, and fires in Peloponnese added to environmental stresses and caused profound transformation in the natural landscape, reducing the distribution of indigenous plants and enhancing a widespread concern about the extent of habitat and species loss [71,72,73,74,75,76]. This means that whatever effort can be made to study, maintain, and protect the diversity of ecosystems in this region is closely connected to a sustainable future, via the preservation of numerous plant taxa cited in the monumental FGS and Prodromus. Nowadays, Oxford Botanic Garden in UK (where visitors can enjoy the full sensory experience of walking through an aromatic Mediterranean landscape while learning about the work of Sibthorp and Bauer and its important botanical and horticultural legacy [35]) and Diomedes’ Botanic Garden in Greece (due to the fact that administration of Diomedes’ Botanic Garden is directly linked to the staff of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens in Greece, this Garden has also been used for relevant, educational programs [37]) contain living collections of Mediterranean plants cited in FGS, which may be perceived as celebrations for Flora Graeca expeditions and FGS [35,37]. However, a larger number of plants quoted in FGS and Prodromus may be introduced and cultivated in the above-mentioned botanic gardens and/or the network of botanic gardens in Greece, in order to detect the diversity and the life-cycle of wild plants within the context of the seasons, floral colours in Mediterranean ecosystems, and collection and deposition of seeds in seed-banks. As such, botanic gardens can be used as common gardens, where researchers can conduct unmatched comparative research studies of plant ecophysiology, morphology, anatomy, and responses to climate change [77,78]. It is worth mentioning that Sibthorp introduced new species into English horticulture; moreover, he returned to Oxford from his eastern Mediterranean explorations with seeds, bulbs, and corms for the Botanic Garden, but few details of these collections have survived, and the plants and any knowledge about their propagation have been lost through many routes [7] (p. 180) and neglected [79] (p. 102).

This work provides a novel and valuable insight into the development of early plant environmental biology and is an important element of timelessness aspects of botany [80,81]. The study of plant diversity in Peloponnese peninsula, during the pre-rebellion period in Greece, tracing long-term changes in the region, is also a reminder that nature is often a repository at which nations look when crafting their identity.

5. Conclusions

The interest in archival material has been revived on account of research for a biodiversity threatened by climatic change. In this context, our research gives prominence to approximately 200 wild plant taxa found in Peloponnese (Greece)—most of them quoted in the magnificent edition Flora Graeca Sibthorpiana of the 19th century—and few cultivated introduced plants, all grown under ambient conditions and exposed to environmental stresses of the eastern Mediterranean during the pre-rebellion period, representing plant environmental issues in pre-industrial time, which have not hitherto been published.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Stephen Harris (Department of Biology, University of Oxford, UK) for early discussions on the subject.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.R.; methodology, C.C., S.P., F.K., M.M. and S.R.; validation, C.C., S.P., F.K., M.M. and S.R.; investigation, C.C., S.P., F.K. and M.M.; resources, S.R.; data curation, C.C., S.P., F.K., M.M. and S.R.; writing—original draft preparation, C.C., S.P., F.K. and S.R.; writing—review and editing, C.C. and S.R.; supervision, S.R.; project administration, S.R.; funding acquisition, C.C., S.P. and F.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available from the authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was implemented in the framework of the project entitled “Contribution of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens to the research for the study of the history and memory of the Revolution of 1821”, and funded by the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, grant number 16614.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Raven J.E. Plants and Plant Lore in Ancient Greece. Leopard’s Head; Oxford, UK: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rhizopoulou S. Symbolic plant (s) of the Olympic Games. J. Exp. Bot. 2004;55:1601–1606. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rhizopoulou S., Marmarinos M. Plants as an element of cultural heritage: What Oedipus does not see when he arrives at Colonus. BIO. 2004;11:48–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Day J. Botany meets archaeology: People and plants in the past. J. Exp. Bot. 2013;64:5805–5816. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.D’Agata C., Rhizopoulou S. Cretan and Greek plants in Italian Renaissance gardens cited in archives. Plant Biosyst. 2022;156:598–605. doi: 10.1080/11263504.2021.2013333. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lack H.W., Mabberley D.J. The Flora Graeca Story, Sibthorp, Bauer and Hawkins in the Levant. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Harris S. The magnificent Flora Graeca. Bodleian Library; Oxford, UK: 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Asdrachas S. Primitive Revolution, Amatoloi and Klephts (18–19th c.) Hellenic Open University; Athens, Greece: 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stearn W.T. From Theophrastus and Dioscorides to Sibthorp and Smith: The background and origin of the Flora Graeca. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1976;8:285–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1976.tb00251.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Negbi M. Theophrastus on geophytes. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1989;100:15–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1989.tb01708.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Scarborough J. Theophrastus on herbals and herbal remedies. [(accessed on 7 September 2022)];J. His. Biol. 1978 11:353–385. doi: 10.1007/BF00389304. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4330714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weiher E., Van Der Werf A., Thompson K., Roderick M., Garnier E., Eriksson O. Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 1999;10:609–620. doi: 10.2307/3237076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.O’Neill Y.V., Infusino M., Medicina Antiqua Codex Vindobonensis 93. Vienna, Österreichische National-bibliothek. Bull. Hist. Med. 2001;75:558–560. doi: 10.1353/bhm.2001.0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Irwin M.E. Flower power in Medicine and Magic: Theophrastus’ response to the rootcutters. Mouseion. 2006;6:425–437. doi: 10.1353/mou.2006.0009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Greuter W. The early botanical exploration of Greece. In: Tsekos I., Moustakas M., editors. Progress in Botanical Research. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 1998. pp. 9–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krimbas C.B. HW Lack with DJ Mabberley, The Flora Graeca Story—Sibthorp, Bauer and Hawkins in the Levant. Hist. Rev. 2004;1:275–285. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nickelsen K. Draughtsmen, botanists and nature: Constructing eighteenth-century botanical illustrations. Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 2006;37:1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Riedl-Dorn C., Riedl M. Ferdinand Bauer or Johann and Joseph Knapp? A rectification. Gard. Bull. 2019;71:123–142. doi: 10.26492/gbs71(suppl.2).2019-10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lack H.W. The Sibthorpian herbarium at Oxford—guidelines for its use. Taxon. 1997;46:253–263. doi: 10.2307/1224095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Harris S.A. Sibthorp, Bauer and the Flora Graeca. OPS. 2008;15:7. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Harlan D. Travel, Pictures, and a Victorian Gentleman in Greece. [(accessed on 15 September 2022)];Hesperia. 2009 78:421–453. doi: 10.2972/hesp.78.3.421. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25622703. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Strid A. The botanical exploration of Greece. Plant Syst. Evol. 2020;306:1–23. doi: 10.1007/s00606-020-01637-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kostantaras D.J. Christian elites of the Peloponnese and the Ottoman state 1715–1821. Eur. Hist. Q. 2013;43:628–656. doi: 10.1177/0265691413499712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Andrews K. Castles of the Morea. American School of Classical Studies at Athens; Princeton, NJ, USA: 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gündoğdu B. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Toronto; Toronto, ON, Canada: 2012. Ottoman Constructions of Morea Rebellion, 1770s: A Comprehensive Study for Attitudes to the Greek Uprising. Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wise R. A naturalist’s paradise. New Sci. 1989;123:68. doi: 10.1177/026569141349971. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mills R. Flora Graeca online. OPS. 2008;15:8. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lack H.W. Flora Graeca on the European continent. Gard. Bull. 2019;71:109–122. doi: 10.26492/gbs71(suppl.2).2019-09. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sibthorp J., Smith J.E. Flora Graeca: Sive Plantarum Rariorum Historia, Quas in Provinciis Aut Insulis Graeciae. Richard Taylor; London, UK: 1806–1840. ten volumes. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sibthorp J., Smith J.E. Flora Graeca Prodromus. Volume 2 Richard Taylor; London, UK: 1806, 1813. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stearn W.T. Sibthorp, Smith, the Flora Graeca and the Florae Graecae Prodromus. Taxon. 1967;16:168–178. doi: 10.2307/1216982. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Walpole R. Memoirs Relating to European and Asiatic Turkey: And Other Countries of the East. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Morritt J.B. The Letters of John BS Morritt of Rokeby: Descriptive of Journeys in Europe and Asia Minor in the Years 1794–1796. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lack H.W. Lilac and horse-chestnut: Discovery and rediscovery. [(accessed on 10 October 2022)];Curtis’s Bot. Mag. 2000 17:109–141. doi: 10.1111/1467-8748.00255. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/45065430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thorogood C.J. The University of Oxford Botanic Garden: Sharing the scientific wonder and importance of plants with the world. Curtis’s Bot. Mag. 2021;38:438–450. doi: 10.1111/curt.12419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Turrill W.B. Revision of Sibthorp’s plants at Kew. Bull. Misc. Inform. (R. Bot. Gard. Kew) 1926;3:120–128. doi: 10.2307/4115044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rhizopoulou S., Lykos A., Delipetrou P., Vallianatou I. Living Collection of Flora Graeca Sibthorpiana. Sibbaldia. 2012;10:171–196. doi: 10.24823/Sibbaldia.2012.85. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mulholland R. Ferdinand Bauer’s Flora Graeca colour code. In: Evens H., Muir K., editors. Technology and Practice: Studying Eighteenth Century Paintings and Works of Art oOn Paper. Archetype; London, UK: 2015. pp. 153–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zografidis A. Resurrection and typification of Verbascum auriculatum (Scrophulariaceae), a long-disused name in Flora Graeca Sibthorpiana. Phytotaxa. 2018;361:233–243. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.361.2.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Petanidou T., Lamborn E. A land for flowers and bees: Studying pollination ecology in Mediterranean communities. Plant Biosyst. 2005;139:279–294. doi: 10.1080/11263500500333941. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rhizopoulou S., Pantazi H. Constraints on floral water status of successively blossoming Mediterranean plants under natural conditions. Acta Bot. Gallica. 2015;162:97–102. doi: 10.1080/12538078.2014.991753. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Giannopoulos K., Tan K., Vold G. Contributions to the bulb flora of Ilias (NW Peloponnese, Greece): Amaryllidaceae, Araceae and Aristolochiaceae. Phytol. Balcan. 2021;27:97–106. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Atherden M., Hall J., Wright J.C. A pollen diagram from the northeast Peloponnese, Greece: Implications for vegetation history and archaeology. Holocene. 1993;3:351–356. doi: 10.1177/095968369300300407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Strid A. Lost and found in the Greek flora; Proceedings of the 3rd Global Botanic Gardens Congress; Wuhan, China. 16–20 April 2007; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Trigas P., Tsiftsis S., Tsiripidis I., Iatrou G. Distribution patterns and conservation perspectives of the endemic flora of Peloponnese (Greece) Folia Geobot. 2012;47:421–439. doi: 10.1007/s12224-012-9130-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Allen H. Mediterranean Ecogeography. Routledge; London, UK: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Meletiou-Christou M.S., Rhizopoulou S. Leaf functional traits of four evergreen species growing in Mediterranean environmental conditions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2017;39:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11738-016-2330-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chimona C., Rhizopoulou S. Water economy through matching plant root elongation to Mediterranean landscapes. World J. Res. Rev. 2017;5:22–24. doi: 10.31871/WJRR.5.2.32. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cheminal A., Kokkoris I.P., Zotos A., Strid A., Dimopoulos P. Assessing the Ecosystem Services Potential of Endemic Floras: A Systematic Review on the Greek Endemics of Peloponnese. Sustainability. 2022;14:5926. doi: 10.3390/su14105926. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pastor-Férriz T., De-los-Mozos-Pascual M., Renau-Morata B., Nebauer S.G., Sanchis E., Busconi M., Fernádez J.-A., Kamenetsky R., Molina R.V. Ongoing evolution in the genus Crocus: Diversity of flowering strategies on the way to hysteranthy. Plants. 2021;10:477. doi: 10.3390/plants10030477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tan K., Giannopoulos K. Contributions to the bulb flora of Ilias (NW Peloponnese, Greece): Iridaceae. Phytol. Balcan. 2022;28:85–101. doi: 10.7546/PhB.28.2.2022.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Argiropoulos A., Rhizopoulou S. Micromorphology of the petals of the invasive weed Oxalis pes-caprae. Weed Biol. Manag. 2012;12:47–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-6664.2012.00434.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gkikas D., Argiropoulos A., Rhizopoulou S. Epidermal focusing of light and modelling of reflectance in floral-petals with conically shaped epidermal cells. Flora. 2015;212:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2015.02.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chimona C., Koukos D., Meletiou-Christou M.S., Spanakis E., Argiropoulos A., Rhizopoulou S. Functional traits of floral and leaf surfaces of the early spring flowering Asphodelus ramosus in the Mediterranean region. Flora. 2018;248:10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2018.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ben-Hod G., Kigel J., Steinitz B. Dormancy and flowering in Anemone coronaria L. as affected by photoperiod and temperature. Ann. Bot. 1988;61:623–633. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087596. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Koukos D., Meletiou-Christou M.S., Rhizopoulou S. Leaf surface wettability and fatty acid composition of Arbutus unedo and Arbutus andrachne grown under ambient conditions in a natural macchia. Acta Bot. Gallica. 2015;162:225–232. doi: 10.1080/12538078.2015.1039579. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bertsouklis K.F., Papafotiou M. Morphometric and molecular analysis of the three Arbutus species of Greece. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. 2016;44:423–430. doi: 10.15835/nbha44210572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Karatassiou M., Karaiskou P., Verykouki E., Rhizopoulou S. Hydraulic Response of Deciduous and Evergreen Broadleaved Shrubs, Grown on Olympus Mountain in Greece, to Vapour Pressure Deficit. Plants. 2022;11:1013. doi: 10.3390/plants11081013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Glatzel G. Mineral nutrition and water relations of hemiparasitic mistletoes: A question of partitioning. Experiments with Loranthus europaeus on Quercus petraea and Quercus robur. Oecologia. 1983;53:193–201. doi: 10.1007/BF00379691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dimopoulos P., Bergmeier E. Wood pasture in an ancient submediterranean oak forest (Peloponnese, Greece) Ecol. Mediterr. 2004;30:137–146. doi: 10.3406/ecmed.2004.1454. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Katsarou A., Rhizopoulou S., Kefalas P. Antioxidant potential of the aerial tissues of the mistletoe Loranthus europaeus Jacq. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2012;6:394–397. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Parveva S. Agrarian land and harvest in South-West Peloponnese in the Early 18th Century. Étud. Balk. 2003;1:83–123. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Natura 2000. [(accessed on 24 October 2022)]. Available online: https://natura2000.eea.europa.eu/
  • 64.Evans D. Building the European union’s Natura 2000 network. Nat. Conserv. 2012;1:11–26. doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.1.1808. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Spiliopoulou K., Dimitrakopoulos P.G., Brooks T.M., Kelaidi G., Paragamian K., Kati V., Oikonomou A., Vavylis D., Trigas P., Lymberakis P., et al. The Natura 2000 network and the ranges of threatened species in Greece. Biodivers. Conserv. 2021;30:945–961. doi: 10.1007/s10531-021-02125-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Harris S. What Have Plants ever Done for Us? Bodleian Library, University of Oxford; Oxford, UK: 2015. pp. 155–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Stouraiti A. Colonial encounters, local knowledge and the making of the cartographic archive in the Venetian Peloponnese. Eur. Rev. Hist./Rev. 2012;19:491–514. doi: 10.1080/13507486.2012.697874. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Goodman M.M., Galinat W.C. The history and evolution of maize. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1988;7:197–220. doi: 10.1080/07352688809382264. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Janick J., Caneva G. The first images of maize in Europe. Maydica. 2005;50:71–80. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ongaro G. Maize diffusion in the Republic of Venice: The case of the Province of Vicenza (sixteenth-eighteenth century) In: Mocarelli L., Panjek A., editors. Maize to the People! Cultivation, Consumption and Trade in the North-Eastern Mediterranean (Sixteenth-Nineteenth Century) University of Primorska Press; Koper, Slovenia: 2020. pp. 25–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Jones-Walters L., Čivić K.K. Wilderness and biodiversity. J. Nat. Conserv. 2010;18:338–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2010.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Magurran A.E., Dornelas M. Biological diversity in a changing world. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2010;365:3593–3597. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Paich S.D. Where olive, lemon and laurel trees grow: A diachronic examination of cultural similarities under different names in greater Mediterranean history. J. Intercult. Stud. 2010;31:313–328. doi: 10.1080/07256861003724565. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rhizopoulou S. Changing Mediterranean environment: Irrefutable evidence from pre-industrial, unpublished scenes contemporary with a mission (1786–1787) in the Levant. Global Nest J. 2012;14:516–524. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Paraskevopoulou A.T., Nektarios P.A., Kotsiris G. Post-fire attitudes and perceptions of people towards the landscape character and development in the rural Peloponnese, a case study of the traditional village of Leontari, Arcadia, Greece. J. Environ. Manag. 2019;241:567–574. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gemitzi A., Koutsias N. Assessment of properties of vegetation phenology in fire-affected areas from 2000 to 2015 in the Peloponnese, Greece. RSASE. 2021;23:100535. doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Krishnan S., Novy A. The role of botanic gardens in the twenty-first century. CABI Rev. 2016;11:1–10. doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR201611023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Primack R.B., Ellwood E.R., Gallinat A.S., Miller-Rushing A.J. The growing and vital role of botanical gardens in climate change research. New Phytol. 2021;231:917–932. doi: 10.1111/nph.17410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Harris S.A. Oxford Botanic Garden & Arboretum. A Brief History. Bodleian Library; Oxford, UK: 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Harris S.A. Sibthorp’s Flora Graeca expedition and teaching Linnaean botany in Oxford physic garden. Curtis’s Bot. Mag. 2021;38:451–471. doi: 10.1111/curt.12421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rhizopoulou S., Koukos D., Rhizopoulou A.E. The botanical content of Hypnerotomachia Poliphili revisited. Bot. Lett. 2022:1–6. doi: 10.1080/23818107.2022.2126885. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available from the authors upon request.


Articles from Life are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES