Abstract
Currently used pesticides are rapidly metabolised and excreted, primarily in urine, and urinary concentrations of pesticides/metabolites are therefore useful biomarkers for the integrated exposure from all sources. Pyrethroid insecticides, the organophosphate insecticide chlorpyrifos, and the herbicide glyphosate, were among the prioritised substances in the HBM4EU project and comparable human biomonitoring (HBM)-data were obtained from the HBM4EU Aligned Studies. The aim of this review was to supplement these data by presenting additional HBM studies of the priority pesticides across the HBM4EU partner countries published since 2000. We identified relevant studies (44 for pyrethroids, 23 for chlorpyrifos, 24 for glyphosate) by literature search using PubMed and Web of Science. Most studies were from the Western and Southern part of the EU and data were lacking from more than half of the HBM4EU-partner countries. Many studies were regional with relatively small sample size and few studies address residential and occupational exposure. Variation in urine sampling, analytical methods, and reporting of the HBM-data hampered the comparability of the results across studies. Despite these shortcomings, a widespread exposure to these substances in the general EU population with marked geographical differences was indicated. The findings emphasise the need for harmonisation of methods and reporting in future studies as initiated during HBM4EU.
Keywords: pyrethroids, chlorpyrifos, glyphosate, human biomonitoring, urinary concentration
1. Introduction
The general population is exposed to pesticides from residues in food items [1,2], but drifting from agricultural areas, and indoor use of biocides are other important sources of exposure [3,4,5,6]. In addition, some individuals are occupationally exposed. Currently used pesticides are metabolised and excreted, primarily in the urine, within a few days [7,8,9,10,11]. Urinary concentrations of pesticides or their metabolites are therefore useful as biomarkers for the integrated pesticide exposure from all sources. Within the European Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU) the following pesticides were prioritised: pyrethroids (whole group), chlorpyrifos and dimethoate (organophosphate insecticides), fipronil (phenyl pyrazole insecticide), and glyphosate (organophosphate herbicide) in combination with polyethoxylated tallow amine (POEA) used as additive in glyphosate herbicide formulations. The prioritisation strategy has been described previously [12]. The primary aim was to get better information on the human internal exposure of these substances in the EU population(s), including potential differences between countries and population groups and time-trends. Another goal was to identify main sources and pathways of exposure across the member states.
Since no suitable urinary biomarkers were available for dimethoate, fipronil or POEA there was no existing European human biomonitoring (HBM)-data on these substances. For the remaining pesticides (pyrethroids, chlorpyrifos and glyphosate) the analytical methods were evaluated and harmonised and used for analysing urine samples collected in HBM4EU Aligned Studies [13,14]. These results have recently been published [14,15,16,17,18] or are in preparation for publication and were not available when the literature searches were completed for this review. The aim of this study was to present additional HBM studies on urinary metabolite concentrations of the priority pesticides: pyrethroids, chlorpyrifos, and glyphosate, across the HBM4EU partner countries published since 2000 in order to supplement the HBM-data obtained from the HBM4EU Aligned Studies. The findings in this review, combined with the results obtained from the HBM4EU-aligned studies, will provide a complete picture of the current HBM-data for these pesticides in Europe and might be useful for the planning of future HBM-studies.
2. Materials and Methods
Literature searches were performed in PubMed and Web of Science, for each of the search terms ‘pyrethroid*’, ‘chlorpyrifos OR chlorpyrifos-methyl’, and ‘glyphosate OR AMPA’ combined with ‘urine AND human’ or ‘human biomonitoring’ restricted to publications published between 01.01.2000 and 30.06.2022. We used no language restriction if an English abstract was provided. After exclusion of duplicates, all abstracts (and if necessary, method sections) were screened and only studies that presented HBM data based on urine samples collected in HBM4EU participating countries (i.e., EU Member States, as well as Norway, Iceland, Israel, Switzerland, and UK) were included. Publications with a focus on method development and/or validation were excluded if they presented HBM-data from less than 20 individuals and/or the participants were directly exposed to the pesticides as a part of the study.
Table 1 presents the urinary pesticide biomarkers included. Data on limit of detection/quantification (LOD/LOQ), the frequency of detection (% above LOD/LOQ) and urine concentrations for the biomarkers were extracted. To make the studies as comparable as possible, the concentrations are presented as 50th percentiles (P50 or medians) and 95th percentiles (P95) in micrograms per litre (μg/L). Volume based concentrations were chosen because these values were provided in most studies and dilution adjustments (creatinine, osmolarity, relative density) varied between studies. If these data were not available other measures of central and upper concentrations were used as indicated in Tables. We also extracted information on some population characteristics and urine sampling method. Publications were not assessed for their overall quality but some information on quality control of the analytical methods was extracted, as was information on the analytical platform and deconjugation procedure, i.e., enzymatic hydrolyses (β-glucuronidase and/or sulfatase) or acidic hydrolysis, to help assess comparability of the urinary concentration between the studies. Finally, potential information on exposure determinants identified within the individual studies was included.
Table 1.
Biomarker | Metabolite | Parent Pesticide |
---|---|---|
3-PBA | 3-phenoxybenzoic acid | generic metabolite of most pyrethroids, e.g., cypermethrin, deltamethrin, permethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, etofenprox, tau-fluvalinate, esfenvalerate, fenpropathrin, (but not cyfluthrin or bifenthrin) |
4-F-3PBA | 4-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzoic acid | cyfluthrin |
cis-DCCA | cis-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid | cis-permethrin, cis-cypermethrin, cyfluthrin |
trans-DCCA | trans-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid | trans-permethrin, trans-cypermethrin, cyfluthrin |
cis-DBCA | cis-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid | deltamethrin |
CFCA | 3-(-2-Chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2- dimethyl-cyclopropane-carboxylic acid | bifenthrin, λ-cyhalothrin and tefluthrin |
TCPy | 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol | chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-methyl |
Gly | glyphosate | glyphosate |
AMPA | aminomethylphosphonic acid | glyphosate, main environmental biodegradation product of glyphosate |
3. Results
3.1. Pyrethroids
We identified 44 studies presenting urinary pyrethroid metabolite concentrations in European populations from 13 different countries (Table 2) mainly from the Western and Southern part of the EU. The datasets represent a range of different population groups including pregnant women (5 studies) and children (12 studies). Most of the studies were regional and only three studies claimed to be nationally representative for the respective population group, i.e., for pregnant women [19] and adults [20] in France and for children in Germany [21]. The majority of studies were based on single spot urine samples (25 studies) or first morning voids (FMV) (12 studies).
The generic pyrethroid metabolite, 3-PBA, representing the combined exposure to most pyrethroids, was included in most studies, while inclusion of more specific metabolites was more variable and only three studies included CFCA which is a metabolite of bifenthrin and λ-cyhalothrin [22,23,24]. The specific metabolites are formed in parallel to 3-PBA by ester cleavage of the parent compounds catalysed by carboxylesterase enzymes [25]. Accordingly, most studies showed highest detection frequency and urine concentration of 3-PBA.
The methodologies used to determine the metabolite concentrations varied both regarding pre-treatment of the urine sample and the analytical platform used for detection. Pyrethroid metabolites are present mainly as phase II conjugates (mainly glucuronide) in urine [26] and omitting a deconjugation step might underestimate the exposure level. Therefore, information on a deconjugation step or not, as well as the method used (i.e., enzymatic or acidic hydrolyses) were reported for each study (Table 2). Acidic hydrolyses is less specific than enzymatic deconjugation leading to potential release from other conjugates than glucuronide and thus slightly higher concentrations, as previously demonstrated for 3-PBA [27]. Of the included studies, 18 reported enzymatic deconjugation using β-glucuronidase, 18 reported acidic hydrolysis, and 8 studies did not mention any deconjugation step. For these studies, it was not possible to determine if the description was missing or deconjugation was not performed. Two of these datasets, based on the French PELAGIE cohort [28,29], and one from the Spanish INMA-Granada cohort [30] reported very low 3-PBA concentrations compared to the other studies. Thus, we suspect that these concentrations might be underestimated. The potential impact on the concentrations of the more specific pyrethroid metabolites is difficult to assess since these concentrations were more like those in other datasets.
Regarding the analytical platform, LC-MS/MS was used for all the metabolites in 19 studies. Two datasets from children and mothers from the PELAGIE cohort, respectively, used LC only for 3-PBA and 4-F-3-PBA while other metabolites were analysed by GC-MS/MS [28,29]. GC-MS/MS was used for all metabolites in 21 of the studies. One study used an immunoassay [31] and one study did not describe the analytical method but referred to an ISO9001 accredited lab [22]. Reported LOD/LOQs for, e.g., 3-PBA varied from a LOD of 0.004 to a LOQ of 0.8 µg/L between the included studies leading to large variation in detection frequencies.
The wide variation in urine sampling and analytical methods hamper the comparability of the results across studies and the possibility to assess time trends and geographical differences in pyrethroid exposure. Two studies from Sweden reported increasing 3-PBA concentrations between 2000 and 2017 among young adults [23] and between 2009 and 2014 among women after delivery [32]. Further, the highest 3-PBA concentrations in general population groups were reported from studies with urine samples collected after 2015, i.e., among children from Cyprus (median 1.93 µg/L) [33], the Valencia region in Spain for children (1.63 µg/L) [34] and lactating mothers (1.7 µg/L) [35] and among adolescents (0.87 µg/L) and children (0.98 µg/L) from Flanders in Belgium [36,37].
When urine samples were obtained from both children and adults within the same country and time period, the 3-PBA concentrations were in general higher in children than adults, e.g., medians of 0.56 vs. 0.24 µg/L, respectively, in Denmark [38,39], 0.29 vs. 0.23 µg/L in Poland [40], and 0.40 vs. 0.24 µg/L in Slovenia [41].
A limited number of the studies investigated exposure sources for pyrethroids in the general population. Regarding dietary exposure determinants, consumption of vegetables, fruits, and food items based on cereals (e.g., pasta and whole grain bread) [20,28,42,43,44,45] and in some studies also fish [19,20] was associated with higher urinary pyrethroid metabolite concentrations. High organic food consumption was associated with lower urinary concentrations [2,28].
For non-dietary exposure determinants, indoor use of biocides [19,37,43,44,45,46] including pet care products [40] was related to higher urinary metabolite concentrations. Two studies from France reported higher pyrethroid metabolite concentrations among pregnant women [19] and children [28] living in the vicinity of cultivated crops indicating some drift-exposure of residents in agricultural areas. Further, higher concentrations were reported from children and parents in rural areas in Poland compared to urban residence [40] and among children whose parents were occupationally exposed to pesticides [28,38]. Only few, and mostly small, studies included occupationally exposed groups such as pesticide applicators [47], farmers [31,48,49] and greenhouse workers [50] or focused on residents after indoor use of pyrethroids [51,52]. Overall, these studies found higher urinary concentrations of pyrethroid metabolites related to recent occupational or residential exposure although a few studies were unable to demonstrate a difference, likely because of high LODs and correspondingly low numbers of participants with detectable concentrations [48,52].
Table 2.
Country, Region, (Cohort) | Study Population | Sampling Year and Method | Analytical Method and Quality Control (QC), Correction Method for Urine Dilution | LOD/LOQ, DF, and Urinary Concentrations (μg/L Unless Other Stated) | Exposure Determinants Reported | Ref | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Northern EU | 3-PBA | Specific metabolites | |||||
Denmark, Funen (OCC) | Pregnant women (n = 948) | 2010–2012; Spot urine (morning after overnight fasting), GW 28 |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards, participation in G-EQUAS for 3-PBA, trans-DCCA, and cis-DBCA; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.03 DF: 94.3 P50: 0.24 P75: 0.46 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.2 DF: 0.1 trans-DCCA LOD: 0.4 DF: 11.4 cis-DCCA LOD: 0.5 DF: 2.8 cis-DBCA LOD: 0.5 DF: 3.0 |
3-PBA not significantly related to any demographic characteristics, no information on diet or home use of pesticides | Dalsager et al., 2019 [39] |
Denmark, Funen (DGCC) | Children, 10–16 y (n = 143) | 2011–2012; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards, participation in G-EQUAS for 3- PBA, trans-DCCA, and cis-DBCA; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.03 DF: 100 P50: 0.56 P95: 8.90 |
trans-DCCA LOD: 0.4 DF: 9.8 P95: 2.3 cis-DCCA LOD: 0.5 DF: 2.8 cis-DBCA LOD: 0.5 DF: 2.1 |
Higher 3-PBA in samples from autumn/winter than spring/summer, and if mother were occupationally exposed to pesticides | Andersen et al., 2021 [38] |
Sweden, Scania | Adolescents aged 17–21 (approx. 200 per year in 2000, 2004, 2009, 2013, and 2017) | 2000–2017; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: spiked urine samples, participate in Erlangen inter-laboratory comparison for 3-PBA; Urine density and creatinine |
LOD: 0.009 DF: 96–100 P50: 0.11–0.21 P95: 0.56–0.92 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.005 DF: 42–74 P50: <LOD–0.01 P95: 0.02–0.06 CFCA LOD: 0.006 DF: 39–90 P50: <LOD–0.02 P95: 0.05–0.40 DCCA LOD: 0.017 DF: 97–99 P50: 0.16–0.22 P95: 0.53–0.89 |
Increasing temporal trend for 3-PBA (3.7% per year), no information on exposure sources | Noren et al., 2020 [23] |
Sweden, Uppsala County (POPUP) | Women, after delivery (n = 178) | 2009–2014; Morning spot urine, 3 weeks after delivery |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards, participate in Erlangen inter-laboratory comparison; Urine density |
LOD: 0.03 DF: 98 P50: 0.22 Max: 2.59 |
NR | Increasing trend in 3-PBA from 2009 to 2014, no information on determinants | Gyllen-hammar et al., 2017 [32] |
Sweden, Värmland county (SELMA) | Pregnant women (n = 718) | 2007–2010; FMV, GW 10 |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.017 DF: 99 GM (GSD) 0.16 (2.7) |
NR | NR | Tanner et al., 2020 [53] |
Western EU | |||||||
Belgium, Flanders, FLEHS IV | Adolescents, 14–15 y (n = 415) | 2017–2018, spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards, participation in G-EQUAS for 3-PBA; Specific gravity |
LOD: 0.03 DF: 99.5 P50: 0.87 P90: 2.77 |
NR | Higher 3-PBA associated with higher household education in binary analyses | Schoeters et al., 2022 [36] |
Belgium, Walloon region | Children, 9–12 y (n = 258) from five different locations (urban or agricultural) | 2016; FMV |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; GC-MS/MS; QC: Internal standards and materials from previous G-EQUAS programs; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.09 DF: 99.6 P50: 0.98 P95: 5.33 |
4F-3PBA LOQ: 0.11 DF: 2.2 trans-DCCA LOQ: 0.15 DF: 93.2 P50: 0.66 P95: 4.29 cis-DCCA LOQ: 0.50 DF: 40.3 P95: 2.01 |
Higher trans-DCCA and 3-PBA associated with indoor use of pyrethroids, and negatively associated with consumption of grey bread (graubrot) | Pirard et al., 2020 [37] |
France, NutriNet-Sante | Adults from general population, mean age 58.5 y (n = 300, divided in two matched groups based on low (<10%) or high (>50%) organic food consumption from questionnaire | 2014; Spot urine, fasted 6 h before collection |
Samples were analysed both without and with a deconjugation step included. Enzymatic hydrolyses: LC-MS-MS; QC: internal standards and control samples; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.02 Organic DF: 23 Mean: 0.12 Conventional DF: 35 Mean: 0.13 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.02 Organic: DF: 3 Mean: 0.012 Conventional: DF: 3 Mean: 0.014 |
3-PBA was slightly lower if high organic food consumption but only significant when urine samples were analysed without a deconjugation step (mean: 0.026 vs. 0.042 μg/L for high and low organic intake) | Baudry et al., 2019 [2] |
France (ELFE) | Pregnant women (n = 1077), nationally representative | 2011; Spot urine, at delivery |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; GC-MS/MS; QC: Internal standards and control samples; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.004 DF: 100 P50: 0.36 P95: 1.89 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.005 DF: 17.8 P95: 0.02 trans-DCCA LOD: 0.006 DF: 100 P50: 0.26 P95: 2.29 cis-DCCA LOD: 0.003 DF: 100 P50: 0.16 P95: 0.91 cis-DBCA LOD: 0.005 DF: 100 P50: 0.23 P95: 1.38 |
Urinary concentrations of pyrethroid metabolites (3-PBA or sum of metabolites) were positively related to smoking during pregnancy, consuming of fish and alcohol, domestic pesticide use and living in the vicinity of crops during pregnancy. | Dereu-meaux et al., 2018, 2016 [19,46] |
France, Brittany (PELAGIE) | Children, 6 y, (n = 245), 55 % rural residence | 2009–2012; FMV |
No information on deconjugation; LC-MS/MS for 3-PBA and 4-F-3PBA GC-MS/MS for Trans-DCCA, Cis-DCCA, and Cis-DBCA; QC: Internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.008 DF: 63 P50: 0.02 P95: 0.20 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.003 DF: 15.8 P95: 0.02 trans-DCCA LOD: 0.01 DF: 95 P50: 0.22 P95: 1.75 cis-DCCA LOD: 0.07 DF: 64 P50: 0.09 P95:0.49 cis-DBCA LOD: 0.07 DF: 84 P50: 0.20 P95: 1.12 |
3-PBA and Cis-DBCA higher in children living in proximity (<500 m) to crops. 3-PBA correlated to high fruit consumption, parental occupational pesticide exposure. cis-DBCA related to high consumption of cereal and whole grain bread. Higher trans/cis-DCCA when floor cleaning at least twice a week; cis-DCCA associated with daily consumption of pasta, rice, or semolina. Organic food intake was associated with lower 3-PBA, cis-DBCA and trans-DCCA. | Gloren-nec et al., 2017 [28] |
France, Brittany (PELAGIE) | Pregnant women (n = 205), 55.1% rural residence | 2002–2006; FMV, GW 6–19 |
No information on deconjugation; LC-MS/MS for 3-PBA and 4-F-3PBA, GC-MS/MS for trans- and cis-DCCA, and cis-DBCA; QC: Internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.008 DF: 30.2 P90: 0.075 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.003 DF: 8.8 trans-DCCA LOD: 0.01 DF: 98 P50: 0.14 P90: 0.57 cis-DCCA LOD: 0.07 DF: 64.9 P50: 0.09 P90: 0.30 cis-DBCA LOD: 0.07 DF: 68.3 P50: 0.11 P90: 0.39 |
NR | Viel et al., 2017, 2015 [29,54] |
France (Pilot-ELFE study) |
Pregnant women (n = 93) | 2007; Spot urine at delivery |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS/MS: QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.046 DF: 100 P50: 0.37 P95: 3.06 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.1 DF: 2 DCCA LOD: 0.04 DF: 100 P50: 0.34 P95: 4.13 CFCA LOD: 0.004 DF: 18 P95: 0.15 cis-DBCA LOD: 0.02 DF: 86 P50: 0.13 P95: 0.54 |
NR, method validation study | Hardy et al., 2021 [55] |
France (ENNS) | Adults, 18–74 y (n = 396), nationally representative | 2006–2007; FMV |
Acidic hydrolysis/; GC- MS/MS; QC: Internal standards and quality control samples; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.03 DF: 98.1 P50: 0.65 P95: 4.36 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.03 DF: 29.8 P95: 0.82 trans-DCCA LOD: 0.03 DF: 86.1 P50: 0.31 P95: 3.85 cis-DCCA LOD: 0.03 DF: 56.1 P50: 0.13 P95: 1.42 cis-DBCA LOD: 0.03 DF: 83.1 P50: 0.36 P95:2.33 |
Associations with higher intake of solanaceous (e.g., tomatoes, aubergines) vegetables and shellfish and non-significantly with fish intake. | Fréry et al., 2017 [20] |
France, Limousine region | Adults, 24–62 y, (n = 39) |
No information on sampling year; Spot urine | Acidic hydrolysis; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.015 DF: 100 P50: 0.63 P95: 2.05 |
LOD: 0.015 all metabolites 4F-3PBA DF: 10 P95: NR trans-DCCA DF: 100 P50: 0.33 P95: 1.10 cis-DCCA DF: 97 P50: 0.19 P95: 0.49 cis-DBCA DF: 97 P50: 0.18 P95: 0.69 |
NR, method development study | Le Grand et al., 2012 [56] |
Germany | Adults, 26–58 y (n = 38) | 2012; Spot urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.01 DF: 100 P50: 0.22 P95: 1.79 |
LOQ: 0.01 all metabolites 4F-3PBA DF: 5 trans-DCCA DF: 100 P50: 0.17 P95: 0.92 cis-DCCA DF: 100 P50: 0.08 P95: 0.57 cis-DBCA DF: 80 P50: 0.04 P95: 0.28 CFCA DF: 90 P50: 0.04 P95: 0.98 |
NR, method development study | Schettgen et al., 2016 [24] |
Germany (GerES IV) |
Children, 3–14 y (n = 598), nationally representative | 2003–2006; Spot urine |
NR but references to previous GerES-studies | LOQ: 0.1 DF: 98 P50: 0.43 P95: 3.80 |
LOQ: 0.01 for all metabolites trans-DCCA DF: 86 P50: 0.25 P95: 2.46 cis-DCCA DF: 60 P50: 0.12 P95: 1.00 |
Girls had higher concentrations than boys, no information on determinants | Schulz et al., 2009 [21] |
Germany (GerES IV), pilot study |
Children, 2–17 y (n = 396), Berlin and two rural areas | 2001–2002; Morning spot urine |
No information on deconjugation; GC-MS; Internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 90 P50: 0.29 P95: 2.35 |
LOQ: 0.01 for all metabolites 4F-3PBA DF: <1 trans-DCCA DF: 74 P50: 0.19 P95: 1.73 cis-DCCA DF: 56 P50: 0.11 P95: 0.74 cis-DBCA DF: 22 P95: 0.52 |
3-PBA, cis- and trans-DCCA negatively associated with child age and positively with permethrin in house dust, use of biocides indoor, consumption of boiled vegetables, and Berlin sampling area | Becker et al., 2006 [43] |
Germany | Occupational exposure: male workers exposed to pesticides in agriculture (n = 19), pest control (n = 15) or greenhouses (n = 2) | Sampling year is unclear; 24 h urine collected after pyrethroid application, repeated sampling for some workers |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS; Internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.5 DF: 67–100 P50: 0.6–2.9 μg/g crea |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.5 DF: 0–3 DCCA LOD: 0.5 DF: 46–100 P50: <LOD–2.9 μg/g crea cis-DBCA LOD: 0.3 DF: 0–71 P50: <LOD–0.50 μg/g crea |
Highest concentration of 3-PBA and DCCA in pest control workers. | Hardt and Angerer 2003 [47] |
Germany, Frankfurt am Main | General population, 0–65 y (n = 1177), urban residence | 1998; Spot urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GS-MS; QC: internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
NR | LOD: 0.1–0.2 for all metabolites 4F-3PBA DF: 16.4 P95: 0.27 trans-DCCA DF: 65.3 P50: 0.24 P95:1.43 cis-DCCA DF: 29.4 P95: 0.51 cis-DBCA DF: 19.3 P95: 0.30 |
No significant correlation with age, smoking habits, sampling season or permethrin in dust | Heudorf and Angerer 2001 [57], Schettgen et al., 2002 [58] |
Germany, Frankfurt am Main | Children 0–17.9 y, (n = 673), urban residence | 1998; Spot urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS; QC: internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
NR | LOD 0.1–0.2 for all metabolites, DFs not provided 4F-3PBA P95: 0.30 trans-DCCA P50: 0.25 P95: 1.22 cis-DCCA P95: 0.44 cis-DBCA P95: 0.30 |
No correlation with age of the children or permethrin in dust | Heudorf et al., 2004 [59] |
Germany | Residents after pyrethroid used indoors, (n = 56) |
1996–1998; collected before and day 1 and 3, and 4–6 months and 10–12 months after application, Spot and 24 h urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS; QC: internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.2 DF: 5–28 P95: 0.2–1.8 |
4F-3PBA DF: 0–5 P95: <LOD–LOD trans-DCCA DF: 4–32 P95: <LOD–1.5 cis-DCCA DF: 3–21 P95: >LOD–0.6 cis-DBCA DF: 0–6 P95: <LOD–0.3 |
Highest concentrations seen 1 and 3 days after application but most samples were below LOD | Leng et al., 2003 [51] |
Germany, Hannover |
Residents after pyrethroid (permethrin) used indoors in homes with carpets of wool, 9 months–78 y (n = 145), | 1996–1998, 24 h urine from adults, spot urine from young children |
Method not described but reference to Leng et al., 1997 (se study above) | LOD: 0.2 DF: 28 P95: 0.90 |
DCCA LOD: 0.2 DF: 19 P95: 1.50 |
Most samples below LOD, children tended to have higher detection frequency than adults although not statistically significant (few children included) | Berger-Preiss et al., 2002 [52] |
UK | Adults, 63.8 ± 10.4 y (n = 111, representing 65 twin pairs from the TwinsUK-cohort) | No information | Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards |
LOD: 0.015 DF: 80 P50: 0.12 P75: 1.8 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.015 DF: 10 trans-DCCA LOD: 0.02 DF: 96.9 P50: 0.18 P75: 1.2 cis-DCCA LOD: 0.01 DF: 98.4 P50: 0.07 P75: 0.38 cis-DBCA LOD: 0.015 DF: 95.4 P50: 0.08 P75: 0.42 |
No difference between urban or rural residence, not possible to investigate impact of organic food as planned because of few participants with high intake of organic food | Mesnage et al., 2022 [60] |
UK, Lothian, Kent and Norfolk | Farmers and residents in agricultural areas, <100 m from sprayed fields, Adults >18 y (n = 238) and children 4–12 y (n = 58); 140 with repeated samples | 2011–2012; FMV within 2 days after spraying events and outwith the spraying season (140 with repeated samples) |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Participate in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
cis/trans-DCCA LOD: 1.0 DF: 7 Max conc (μg/g crea): Outwith spraying season: 15.4 Within spraying season, 10.8 After spray event: 7.0 |
No difference related to spraying activity or spraying season but low detection frequency (high LOD) | Galea et al., 2015 [48] | |
UK, | Randomly sought adult volunteers, >18 y (n = 405), nationwide |
NI on sampling year (after 2005); Spot urine |
No description but all analyses were carried out by an ISO9001: 2008 accredited laboratory with internal quality control, participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.5 nM DF: 87 P95: 6.1 |
LOD: 0.5 nM for all metabolites trans-DCCA DF: 66 P95: 1.6 cis-DCCA DF: 54 P95: 0.8 cis-DBCA DF: 50 P95: 1.6 CFCA DF: 41 P95: 3.2 |
NR | Bevan et al., 2013 [22] |
Eastern EU | |||||||
Poland, Łódź | Women, 25–45 y (n = 450) attending a fertility clinic, | 2017–2019; 1–2 spot urine per IVF cycle (total 739 urine samples) |
No information on deconjugation; GC–MS; QC: No information; Specific gravity |
LOD: 0.1 DF: 68 GM: 0.35 GSD: 2.66 |
LOD: 0.1 for all metabolites trans-DCCA DF: 45 GM: 0.43 GSD: 2.48 cis-DCCA DF: 34 GM: 0.29 GSD: 2.18 cis-DBCA DF: 22 GM: 0.28 GSD: 2.51 |
NR | Radwan et al., 2022 [61] |
Poland Łódź | Young men, 19–33 y (n = 306), urban area residence | 2015–2018; morning spot urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS; QC: Internal standards (spiked urine samples); participation in G-EQUAS; Specific gravity |
LOD: 0.1 DF: 69 P50: 0.20 P95: 1.67 |
LOD: 0.1 for all metabolites trans-DCCA DF: 76 P50: 0.26 P95: 2.07 cis-DCCA DF: 36 P95: 0.94 cis-DBCA DF: 32 P95: 0.93 |
trans-DCCA and 3-PBA associated with dog ownership, pesticide use indoor and household pets. Seeds and nuts consumption was also associated with higher 3-PBA and vegetable juice intake with higher trans-DCCA. | Rodzaj et al., 2021 [45] |
Poland | Women, 25–39 y, (n = 511), attending a fertility clinic | No information on sampling year (likely after funding grant in 2017); Spot urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC–MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Specific gravity |
LOD: 0.1 DF: 66.5 P50: 0.25 P95: 2.28 |
LOD: 0.1 for all metabolites trans-DCCA DF: 34.9 P95: 3.47 cis-DCCA DF: 32.8 P95: 1.54 cis-DBCA DF: 19.4 P95: 2.17 |
NR | Jurewicz et al., 2020 [62] |
Poland, Gdansk, | General population, 5–77 y (n = 132), Urban residence |
2010–2011; FMV |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS; QC: Internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.1 DF: 80 P50: 0.26 P95: 1.15 |
LOD: 0.1 for all metabolites trans-DCCA DF: 7 P95: 0.12 cis-DCCA DF: 8 P95: 0.15 cis-DBCA DF: 11 P95: 0.31 |
No age or sex related differences in 3-PBA | Wielgo-mas et al., 2013 [63] |
Poland, North | Children <18 y (n = 184) and parents (n = 190); Urban or rural residence |
2012; FMV |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS; QC: Internal standards, participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.1 DF: 82.4 P50: 0.25 (all); 0.29 (children); 0.23 (adults) P95: 1.24 (all) |
LOD: 0.1 for all metabolites trans-DCCA DF: 46.8 P95: 1.00 cis-DCCA DF: 46 P95: 0.89 cis-DBCA DF: 17.1 P95: 0.50 |
Higher concentrations of all metabolites in rural areas, higher 3-PBA in participants using pesticide containing pet care products in the last 6 months for both rural and urban locations. Higher 3-PBA in children than adults | Wielgo-mas and Piskuno-wicz 2013 [40] |
Poland, Łódź | Adult men, 23–45 y (n = 195) recruited from fertility clinic | 2008–2011; Spot urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS; QC: participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.1 DF: 71.6 P50: 0.16 P95: 0.50 |
LOD: 0.1 for all metabolites Trans-DCCA DF: 65.5 P50: 0.16 P95: 0.62 cis-DCCA DF: 58 P50: 0.12 P95: 0.46 cis-DBCA DF: 16.8 P95: 0.27 |
NR | Radwan et al., 2015, Jurewicz et al., 2016 [64,65] |
Slovenia, Ljubljana (PHIME) | Children 7–8 y (n = 168) and their mothers (n = 168) | 2016; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; UPLC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Specific gravity and creatinine |
LOD: 0.018 Children DF: 80 P50: 0.40 Max: 12.0 Mothers DF: 76 P50: 0.24 Max: 12.0 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.019 Children DF: 30 Max: 0.53 Mothers DF: 16 Max: 0.73 |
Children had higher concentrations than mothers, no significant associations with demographic variables (education, smoking, BMI etc.) | Bravo et al., 2020 [41] |
Southern EU | |||||||
Cyprus, Limassol (ORGANIKO) | Children, 10–11 y (n = 177), urban area | 2017; FMV |
No information on deconjugation; LC-MS/ MS; QC: Analysed in HBM4EU-accredited lab; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 100 P50: 1.93 P95: 6.59 |
LOQ: 0.2 for DBCA, 0.1 for all other metabolites 4F-3PBA DF: 6 trans-DCCA DF: 100 P50: 0.93 P95: 4.28 cis-DCCA DF: 99 P50: 0.61 P95: 2.22 cis-DBCA DF: 97 P50: 0.60 P95: 3.85 CFCA DF: 30 P95: 0.27 |
Cis- and trans-DCCA were negatively associated with maternal education level and paternal education positively associated with DBCA (binary analyses) | Makris et al., 2022 [33] |
Greece, Athens | Adults, (n = 40), part of multi-country study | 2012–2014; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; HPLC-MS-MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.003 DF: 100 P50: 0.50 Max: 6.6 |
4F-3PBA LOQ: 0.002 DF: 80 P50: 0.01 Max: 0.2 trans-DCCA LOQ: 0.002 DF: 100 P50: 0.6 Max: 4.0 cis-DCCA LOQ: 0.003 DF: 97.5 P50: 0.8 Max: 17.0 cis-DBCA LOQ: 0.019 DF: 50 P50: 0.02 Max: 6.0 |
NR | Li and Kannan 2018 [66] |
Italy, NACII (PHIME) | Children 7 y (n = 199) | 2014–2015; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; UPLC-MS-MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Specific gravity |
LOD: 0.018 DF: 81 P50: 0.56 Max: 36.0 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.019 DF: 24 Max: 1.3 |
No significant associations with population characteristics (education, age etc) or fish intake in binary analyses | Bravo et al., 2019 [67] |
Italy, Rome | Adults (n = 55) patients referred to hospital for skin diseases |
No information on sampling year; Spot urine |
Acidic hydrolyses; GC-MS/SIM, QC: Internal standards; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.5 Males: DF: 34.5 Mean (SD): 0.52 (0.32) μg/g crea Females: DF: 65.5 Mean (SD): 0.74 (0.61) μg/g crea |
Small sample size hamper significant results but tendencies to higher 3-PBA in samples collected in spring than winter, in females and among smokers, and if insecticides had been used inside or outdoor (binary analyses). Significantly associated with high intake of cooked vegetables | Fortes et al., 2013 [44] | |
Italy, Ragusa | Occupational, male greenhouse male workers (n = 30) exposed to alpha-cypermethrin and office workers as controls (n = 30) |
No information on sampling year; Spot urine collected 3 months after occupational use of alpha-cypermethrin (Fastac) | Acidic hydrolysis; GS-MS; QC: no information; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.04 Mean (SD): 7.8 (2.1) μg/g crea for workers <LOD for controls |
Higher 3-PBA among workers occupationally exposed to alpha-cypermethrin | Costa et al., 2013 [50] | |
Italy, EPIC (substudy) | Adults (n = 69, 51 from Florence and 18 from Ragusa) | 1993–1998; 24 h urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS; QC: Internal spiked standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 2.5 nmol/L DF: 53.6 P50: 5.6 nmol/day Max: 52.8 nmol/day |
Higher concentrations in Florence than Ragusa, tended to be higher in overweight/obese individuals | Saieva et al., 2004 [68] | |
Portugal, Oporto | Occupational, non-organic (n = 85) and organic (n = 36) farmers, controls from same area (n = 61) |
No information on sampling year; Spot urine | No information on deconjugation; ELISA Immunoassay, QC: internal standards; Creatinine |
Mean Total pyrethroid, μg/mmol crea, Organic: 0.06 Non-organic: 0.08 Controls: 0.13 |
No significant differences | Costa et al., 2014 [31] | |
Spain, INMA-Granada-Cohort | Male adolescents, 15–17 y (n = 134), 71.6% from urban area | 2017–2019; FMV |
No information on deconjugation; LC-MS/MS; QC: no information; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.12 DF: 19.4 P95: 0.25 |
NR | Freire et al., 2021 [30] | |
Spain, Valencia Region, BIOVAL | Children, 5–12 y (n = 568), 78% from urban area | 2016; FMV |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.50 DF: 79 P50: 1.63 P95: 11.57 |
4F-3PBA LOQ: 0.13 DF: 4 DCCA LOQ: 5.00 DF: 20 P95: 46.7 cis-DBCA LOQ: 1.25 DF: 14 P95: 5.6 |
Intake of fresh vegetables within 72 h | Fernán-dez et al., 2020 [34] |
Spain, Valencia | Women (n = 116), lactating mothers, 2–8 weeks after birth, 80% from urban areas | 2015; FMV |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.50 DF: 65 P50: 1.7 P95: 18.8 |
No significant associations with population characteristics or dietary variables | Fernán-dez et al., 2020 [35] | |
Spain, Catalonia and Galicia | Occupational, adults (n = 125), 36% farmworkers | No information on sampling year; Spot urine | Enzymatic hydrolyses; UPLC-MS-MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Specific gravity and creatinine |
LOD: 0.018 DF: 82 P50: 1.5 Max: 20.5 |
4F-3PBA LOD: 0.019 DF: 54 P50: 0.08 Max: 0.34 |
Higher 3-PBA concentrations in farmworkers | Gari et al., 2018 [49] |
Spain, Valencia | Children 6–11 y (n = 125) | 2010; FMV |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.8 DF: 23 P95: 12.3 μg/g crea |
4F-3PBA LOQ: 0.2 DF: 0 trans-DCCA LOQ: 0.4 DF: 26 P95: 4.44 μg/g crea cis-DCCA LOQ: 0.4 DF: 10 P95: 1.26 μg/g crea cis-DBCA LOQ: 0.8 DF: 23 P95: 3.77 μg/g crea |
No significant associations with population characteristics or dietary variables | Roca et al., 2014 [69] |
DF: detection frequency (%>LOD/LOQ); FMV: first morning void; German External Quality Assessment Scheme (G-EQUAS); NR: not reported; P50: 50th percentile (median); P25, P75, P90, P95: the respective percentile; GM: geometric mean; GSD: geometric standard derivation; SD: standard derivation; GW: gestational week; 3-PBA: 3-phenoxybenzoic acid; 4-F-3-PBA: 4-fluoro-3-phenoxybenzoic acid; cis-DCCA: cis-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; trans-DCCA: trans-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; cis-DBCA: cis-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; CFCA (3-(-2-Chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2- dimethyl-cyclopropane-carboxylic acid; crea: creatinine.
3.2. Chlorpyrifos
The specific metabolite, TCPy, of chlorpyrifos/chlorpyrifos-methyl was included in 23 studies representing 12 different countries (Table 3). Of these, the urine samples were collected among pregnant women in six studies, women after delivery in two studies, and children in seven studies. Only one study, among pregnant women in Norway (MoBa), was reported to be nationwide [70]. One study collected repeated spot urine samples in each trimester of pregnancy [71], one study collected a 24 h urine sample [68] while the remaining studies were based on single spot urine samples (14 studies) or FMVs (7 studies).
TCPy was analysed by LC-MS/MS in 16 studies and by GS-MS/MS in six studies while one study used Gas-Liquid Chromatography. The reported LODs/LOQs varied between the studies from a LOD of 0.02 µg/L to a LOQ of 0.8 µg/L. A deconjugation step based on enzymatic (16 studies) or acidic (4 studies) hydrolyses was described in all except for three studies. One of these, a study from Spain [72], reported a low detection frequency and maximum concentration compared to most other studies, and an underestimation of the concentration cannot be excluded. However, another Spanish study [71] reported an even lower detection frequency and maximum concentration despite inclusion of enzymatic hydrolyses. The two studies included different population groups, i.e., adolescent males and pregnant women, respectively, but sampling years (2017–2019 and 2016–2017) and LODs were comparable. Other studies from the Valencia Region in Spain from the same time period reported considerably higher detection frequencies and urine concentrations [34,35]. These results indicate regional differences in exposure levels but, as for the pyrethroids, the variation in urine sampling and analytical methods hamper direct comparison of the results across the studies. Overall, the TCPy concentrations varied considerably between the studies. The highest median concentrations were reported among children from Cyprus (6.72 μg/L) [33], adolescents and children from Belgium (4.45 and 3.87 μg/L) [36,37], and among adults from the Amirim community in Israel (4.32 μg/L) [73] based on urine samples collected between 2013 and 2018 (Table 3).
Only one study investigated time-trends in TCPy concentrations and reported an increasing trend from 2001 to 2017 among adolescents in Sweden with the highest median concentration in 2009 and the highest P95 concentration in 2017 [23]. Few of the studies investigated dietary exposure determinants and reported higher TCPy concentrations associated with high vegetable consumption [69,73,74] and negatively associated with organic food intake [73]. Besides, TCPy was associated with higher education level and lower BMI in some studies [35,39,41] which might reflect a diet with high vegetable and fruit content. Higher TCPy concentrations were also related to farm working [49]. None of the studies included urine samples collected after the ban of chlorpyrifos/chlorpyrifos-methyl in the EU in 2020.
Table 3.
Country, Region, (Cohort) | Study Population | Sampling Year and Method | Analytical Method and Quality Control (QC), Correction Method for Urine Dilution | LOD/LOQ, DF, and Urinary Concentrations (μg/L Unless Other Stated) | Exposure Determinants Reported | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Northern EU | TCPy | |||||
Denmark, Funen (OCC) | Pregnant women (n = 948) | 2010–2012; Spot urine (morning after overnight fasting), GW 28 |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: isotope-labelled internal standards, participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.3 DF: 90.4 P50: 1.61 P95: 8.49 |
TCPy associated with higher education level in binary analyses, no information on diet or home use of pesticides | Dalsager et al., 2019 [39] |
Denmark, Funen, (DGCC) | Children, 10–16 y (n = 143) | 2010–2012; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: isotope-labelled internal standards, participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.3 DF: 95.8 P50: 1.43 P95: 6.05 |
No significant associations with age, SES, urban or rural residence or sampling season | Andersen et al., 2021 [38] |
Norway, MoBa | Pregnant women (n = 110, urine samples were combined into 10 pools, each comprising 1 mL urine sample from 11 women), nationwide | 1999–2008; Spot urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS/MS; QC: Internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.15 Mean: 2.33 GM (estimated): 0.99 |
NR | Ye et al., 2009 [70] |
Sweden, Scania | Adolescents aged 17–21 y (n = approx. 200 per year in 2000, 2004, 2009, 2013, and 2017), | 2000–2017; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Internal spiked standards, participation in Erlangen inter-laboratory comparison; Urine density and creatinine |
LOD: 0.063 DF: 99–100 P50: 0.82–1.41 (max in 2009) P95: 3.50–6.54 (max in 2017) |
Increasing temporal trend for TCPy with peak for median concentration in 2009 and indication of a downward trend thereafter | Noren et al., 2020 [23] |
Sweden, Uppsala County (POPUP) | Women (n = 178), after delivery | 2009–2014; Morning spot urine, 3 weeks after delivery |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards, participate in Erlangen inter-laboratory comparison; Urine density |
LOD: 0.02 DF: 100 P50: 1.32 Max: 14.2 |
NR | Gyllenhammar et al., 2017 [32] |
Sweden, Värmland county (SELMA) | Pregnant women (n = 718) | 2007–2010; FMV, GW 10 |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards, participate in Erlangen inter-laboratory comparison; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.3035 DF: 100 GM (GSD): 1.25 (2.5) |
NR | Tanner et al., 2020 [53] |
Western EU | ||||||
Belgium, Flanders, FLEHS IV | Adolescents, 14–15 y (n = 415) | 2017–2018; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards; Specific gravity |
LOD: 0.3 DF: 98.5 P50: 4.45 P95: 12.3 specific gravity normalised |
NR | Schoeters et al., 2022 [36] |
Belgium, Wallonia | Children, 9–12 y (n = 229), from five different locations (urban or agricultural) | 2016; FMV |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; GC-MS/MS; QC: Internal standards and materials from previous G-EQUAS programs; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.08 DF: 100 P50: 3.87 P95: 12.12 |
Negatively associated with intake of grey bread (graubrot) | Pirard et al., 2020 [37] |
Germany, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | Adults, 22–57 y (n = 50) | No information on sampling year; Spot urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS/MS; QC: Internal standards, Creatinine |
LOD: 0.05 DF: 100 P50: 1.4 P95: 4.8 |
NR | Koch et al., 2001 [75] |
Netherlands, Generation R | Pregnant women (n = 100) | 2002–2006; Spot urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GC-MS/MS; QC: Internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.15 DF: 100 P50: 1.2 P95: 6.4 |
Women with other ethnicity than Dutch had higher concentrations | Ye et al., 2008 [76] |
Eastern EU | ||||||
Polen, Lodz, | Adult men, age <45 y (n = 315) recruited from fertility clinic | 2008–2011; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; GC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.50 DF: 100 P50: 1.14 P95: 7.99 |
NR | Dziewirska et al., 2019 [77] |
Slovenia, Ljubljana (PHIME), | Children 7–8 y (n = 168) and their mothers (n = 168) | 2016; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; UPLC-MS-MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Specific gravity and creatinine |
LOD: 0.02 Children: DF: 88 P50: 0.06 Max: 2.8 Mothers: DF: 84 P50: 0.18 Max: 4.5 |
Children had lower concentrations than mothers, women with normal BMI had higher concentrations than overweight women | Bravo et al., 2020 [41] |
Southern EU | ||||||
Cyprus (ORGANIKO) | Children, 10–11 y (n = 177) | 2017; FMV |
No information on deconjugation; LC-MS/MS; QC: analysed in HBM4EU-accredited lab; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.8 DF: 100 P50: 6.72 P95: 13.7 |
Negatively associated with maternal education | Makris et al., 2022 [33] |
Italy, NACII (PHIME) | Children, 7 y (n = 199) | 2014–2015; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; UPLC-MS-MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Specific gravity |
LOD: 0.02 DF: 80 P50: 0.36 Max: 6.0 |
No associations with population characteristics, girls had higher concentrations than boys | Bravo et al., 2019 [67] |
Italy, EPIC (substudy) | Adults (n = 69, 51 from Florence and 18 from Ragusa) | 1993–1998; 24 h urine |
Acidic hydrolysis; GLC-MS; QC: Internal spiked standards |
LOD: 5.0 nmol/L DF: 78.3 P50: 29.5 nmol/day Max: 87.9 nmol/day |
Highest concentration in Florence, no associations with other population characteristics | Saieva et al., 2004 [68] |
Israel, IBS (nationwide) and Amirim community in Northern Israel | Adults from Amirim community with rural residence (n = 42) and Jewish participants from the Israel Biomonitoring Study (IBS) (n = 182) | 2013–2014 (IBS in 2011); Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; GC-MS-MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.2 DF: 100 Amirim: P50: 4.32 P95: 21.8 IBS: P50: 2.34 P95: 8.52 |
Highest in the Amirim population and associated positively with vegetable intake and negatively with organic food intake. | Berman et al., 2016 [73] |
Spain, Granada, INMA | Adolescent males, 15–17 y (n = 117) | 2017–2019; FMV |
No information on deconjugation; HPLC-MS/MS, QC: Internal standards; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.039 DF: 34.2 Max: 1.21 |
NR | Suarez et al., 2021 [72] |
Spain, Tarragona (EXHES-Spain) | Pregnant women (n = 54) from area of intense agricultural activity | 2016–2017; Spot urine samples during each trimester (repeated samples) |
Enzymatic hydrolyses, LC-MS/MS, QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS;, Creatinine |
LOD: 0.02 DF: 4 Max: 0.15 |
Not investigated due to low detection frequency | Bravo et al., 2020 [71] |
Spain, Valencia Region, BIOVAL | Children, 5–12 y (n = 568), 78% from urban area |
2016; FMV |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.50 DF: 74 P50: 1.13 P95: 11.08 |
Lower if foreign birth country, differed between province of residence | Fernández et al., 2020 [34] |
Spain, Valencia | Lactating mothers (n = 116), 2–8 weeks after birth, 80 % from urban areas | 2015; FMV |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.25 DF: 85 P50: 2.0 P95: 7.9 |
Associated with living near farming activities (<200 m). Negatively associated with pre-pregnancy BMI. | Fernandez et al., 2020 [35] |
Spain, Valencia | Children 6–11 y (n = 125) | 2010; FMV |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.8 DF: 86 P50: 3.40 μg/g crea P95: 12.97 μg/g crea |
Positively associated with vegetable consumption. | Roca et al., 2014 [69] |
Spain, Valencia, INMA | Pregnant women (n = 573) | 2003–2006; Spot urine, GW 32 |
Hydrolysed urine (deconjugation method not described); UPLC-HRMS; QC: Internal spiked standards; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.8 DF: 39.1 GM: 0.49 Max: 117.3 |
Positively associated with vegetable consumption and sample season (highest in summer) | Llop et al., 2017 [74] |
Spain, Catalonia and Galicia | Adults (n = 125) 36% farmworkers, occupational exposure |
No information on sampling year; Spot urine |
Enzymatic hydrolyses; UPLC-MS-MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS Specific gravity and creatinine |
LOD: 0.02 DF: 95 P50: 3.2 Max: 20.0 |
Higher concentrations in farmworkers | Gari et al., 2018 [49] |
DF: detection frequency (%>LOD/LOQ); FMV: first morning void; German External Quality Assessment Scheme (G-EQUAS); NR: not reported; P50: 50th percentile (median); P25, P75, P90, P95: the respective percentile; GM: geometric mean; GSD: geometric standard derivation; SD: standard derivation; GW: gestational week; TCPy: 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol; crea: creatinine.
3.3. Glyphosate
Glyphosate (Gly) and its main environmental degradation product aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) are excreted unchanged in urine. Since, they do not undergo phase II conjugation a deconjugation step is not necessary for urine analyses [78]. Gly was analysed in 23 studies of which 15 studies also analysed AMPA. A single study analysed AMPA but not Gly (Table 4). Two studies collected single 24 h urine samples while single spot urine samples or FMVs were used in 12 and 8 studies, respectively. Three studies did not report the urine sampling method. LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS was equally used in 10 studies each for quantification of Gly and/or AMPA, while four studies used Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for quantification of Gly. LODs/LOQs varied between 0.05 and 1.0 µg/L. The studies were performed in 11 different EU-countries mainly from the western and southern part of the EU while two studies included samples from several countries.
In general, detection frequencies and reported urinary concentrations of Gly were considerably higher in studies using ELISA than those using LC- or GC-MS/MS and the results were not considered to be directly comparable. Most studies using LC- or GC-MS/MS to analyse samples from the general population had detection frequencies below 50% and therefor medians could not be obtained. Among these studies, the highest P95 concentrations for Gly were reported among children from Cyprus (1.01 µg/L) [33], lactating mothers from the Valencia Region in Spain (0.62 µg/L) [79] a nationally representative group of children from Germany (0.51µg/L) [80] and young children from Germany in a regional study (0.97 µg/L) [80]. Urine samples in these studies were collected between 2014 and 2017. In general, the majority of studies were based on urine samples collected after 2010 but one study from Germany included urine samples collected between 2001 and 2015 and reported a continuous increase in the fraction of samples with detectable concentrations with a peak in 2012–2013 [81].
A few studies found associations between urinary Gly and/or AMPA and higher intake of specific food items, e.g., beer and fruit juice [82], pulses and mushrooms [83], eggs and fruit [79], nuts and whole grain rice [84], and self-produced vegetables [85]. However, most of the included studies did not investigate or were unable to identify specific exposure determinants for the general population (Table 4). Two small studies from Ireland included occupational exposures among amenity horticultural workers and found higher urinary Gly-concentrations after work exposure with peak values 3 h after exposure [86,87].
Table 4.
Country, Region, (Cohort) | Study Population | Sampling Year and Method | Analytical Method and Quality Control (QC), Correction Method for Urine Dilution | LOD/LOQ, DF, and Urinary Concentrations (μg/L Unless Other Stated) | Exposure Determinants Reported | Ref | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Northern EU | Gly | AMPA | |||||
Denmark (DK-DEMOCOPHES) | Mothers (n = 13) and children 6–11 y (n = 14) | 2011; Spot urine |
ELISA immunoassay; QC: no information; Creatinine |
LOD: 0.075 DF: 100 Mothers Mean:1.28 Max: 3.22 Children Mean: 1.96 Max: 3.31 |
NR | NR | Knudsen et al., 2017 [88] |
Sweden, Scania | Young adults 18–19 y (n = 197) | 2017; Spot urine |
LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards, participation in G-EQUAS for Gly; Creatinine and density |
LOD: 0.1 DF: 20 P95: 0.24 (density adjusted) |
LOD: 0.1 DF: 29 P95: 0.25 (density adjusted) |
NR | Faniband et al., 2021 [89] |
Western EU | |||||||
Belgium, Flanders, FLEHS IV | Adolescents, 14–15 years (n = 415) | 2017–2018; Spot urine |
GC–MS/MS; QC: internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS for Gly; Specific gravity |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 41.4 P95: 0.39 specific gravity normalised |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 55.9 P50: 0.11 P95: 0.37 specific gravity normalised |
No significant associations with population characteristics | Schoeters et al., 2022 [36] |
Belgium, Flanders, FLEHS III | Adults, 50–65 y (n = 181) | 2012–2015; Spot urine |
GC-MS-MS; QC: internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS for Gly; Specific gravity |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 42.5 P95: 0.31 |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 58.6 P50: 0.10 P95: 0.40 |
NR | Cosemans et al., 2022 [90] |
France, ELFE | Pregnant women (n = 1036), nationally representative | 2011; Spot urine at delivery |
UPLC-MS-MS; QC: internal standards, ISO/CEI certified labs, participate in inter-lab comparison; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.05 DF: 0.3 |
LOQ: 0.05 DF: 0.1 |
NR | Dereumeaux et al., 2016 [46] |
France, Esterban (sub-sample) | Adults (n = 60) and children (n = 61) living close (within a radius of 500 m) or far from vineyards (n = 121) | 2014–2016; FMV |
LC-MS/MS; QC: no information; Creatinine |
Glyphosate was not analysed | LOD: 0.02 Adults DF: 83 P50: 0.06 P95: 033 Children DF: 88 P50: 0.14 P95: 0.57 |
Higher AMPA if self-produced vegetables intake more than once per month (in adults), no other significant associations with population characteristics | Dereumeaux et al., 2022 [85] |
France, 63 different districts | General population, median age of 53 y, (range: 0.5–94 y) (n = 6795), | 2018–2020; Spot urine | ELISA immunoassay; QC: no information |
LOQ: 0.075 DF: 99.8 Mean: 1.19 Max: 7.36 Values adjusted for BMI |
NR | Higher in samples collected during spring/summer than winter, higher in males and children, among farmers, smokers, and individuals with high beer and fruit juice consumption, lower if filtered drinking water, analyses were adjusted for BMI but not for urine dilution | Grau et al., 2022 [82] |
Germany, Baden-Württemberg | Adults, 18–70 y (n = 109) | 2019; FMV |
GC-MS-MS; QC: no information |
LOD: 0.1 DF: 8 |
NR | After 10 days fasting none had Gly values above LOD | Grundler et al., 2021 [91] |
Germany (GerES V) | Children/adolescents 3–17 y (n = 2144), nationally representative | 2015–2017; FMV | GC–MS/MS; QC: internal standards and participation in G-EQUAS for Gly; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 52 P50: 0.1 P95: 0.51 |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 46 P95: 0.48 |
Highest for medium SES, and children aged 1–13 y, no major exposure sources identified but higher for children living in larger communities | Lemke et al., 2021 [80] |
Germany | Adults, ages 23–61 y (n = 41), | 2016–2017; Spot urine | GC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards, Participating in G-EQUAS for Gly and HBM4EU inter-lab comparison for Gly and AMPA; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.05 DF: 66 P50: 0.09 Max: 0.33 |
LOQ: 0.05 DF: 90 P50: 0.20 Max: 2.54 |
NR—Method development study | Connolly et al., 2020 [92] |
Germany | Children 2–6 y (n = 250), regional study | 2014–2015; Spot urine and FMV | GC–MS/MS; QC: no information |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 63 Mean: 0.14 P95: 0.97 |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 58 Mean: 0.13 P95: 0.44 |
NR | LANUV (2016), results presented in Lemke et al., 2021 [80] |
Germany, GESB-Local sub-study in Greifswald | Young adults, aged 20–29 y (n = 399, approx. 40 per year in 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015) | 2001–2015; 24 h samples |
GC–MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards, Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.1 For 2015 DF: 40 P95: 0.45 |
LOQ: 0.1 For 2015 DF: 42.5 P95: 0.38 |
Continuous increase in detectable fraction from 2001 with peak in 2012–2013, higher concentrations in males | Conrad et al., 2017 [81] |
Germany, KarMeN study | Adults, 18–80 y (n = 301), | 2012–2013; 24 h samples |
LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards |
LOD: 0.05 DF: 30.9 P50 *: 0.11 Max: 1.36 * Among those with concentrations >LOD |
LOD: 0.09 DF: 10.3 P50 *: 0.14 Max: 1.53 * Among those with concentrations >LOD |
Associated with intake of pulses and for AMPA also mushrooms | Soukup et al., 2020 [83] |
Ireland | Occupational, amenity horticultural workers (n = 20, repeated samples for different working tasks) | 2016–2017; Spot urine |
LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards; Creatinine. |
LOQ: 0.5 Pre-work samples (n = 29) DF: 62 GM: 0.68 P90: 2.99 Post -work samples (n = 28) DF: 82 GM: 1.17 P90: 4.95 |
NR | Higher after work exposure with peak values approx. 3 h after application | Connolly et al., 2018 and 2019 [86,93] |
Ireland | Adults, 18–82 y (n = 50), pilot study | 2017; FMV |
LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope labelled internal standards; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.5 DF: 20 Max: 1.35 |
NR | Small number of samples and no associations with dietary habits or lifestyle information obtained from questionnaires | Connolly et al., 2018 [94] |
Ireland | Occupational, amenity horticultural workers (n = 17, repeated samples collected before and within 1 h after work task) | 2015; Spot urine |
LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.5 Pre-work samples (n = 31) DF: 35 GM: 0.42 max: 3.43 Post-work samples (n = 31) DF: 55 GM: 0.66 Max: 10.7 |
NR | Higher after work exposure | Connolly et al., 2017 [87] |
UK, different locations in UK | Adults, 63.8 ± 10.4 y (n = 111 representing 65 twin pairs) | No information on sampling year or collection method | LC-MS-MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards |
LOD 0.05 DF: 53 P50: 0.05 Max: 2.8 |
LOD: 0.1 DF: 5.6 Max: 1.4 |
No difference between urban and rural residence | Mesnage et al., 2022 [60] |
Southern EU | |||||||
Cyprus (ORGANIKO) | Children, 10–11 y (n = 177) | 2017; FMV |
GC-MS-MS; QC: HBM4EU-accredited lab (IPASUM), Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 46 P95: 1.01 |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 75 P50: 0.18 P95: 0.65 |
No significant associations with population characteristics | Makris et al., 2022 [33] |
Portugal | Children 2–13 y (n = 41), four different regions | 2018–2019; Spot urine |
ELISA immunoassay; QC: no information |
LOD: 0.6 DF: 95.1 Average: 1.77 Max: 4.35 |
NR | Increase with age, higher in girls, higher if living close (<1 km) to agricultural fields, use of agrochemicals in household, high consumption of home-produced food | Ferreira et al., 2021 [95] |
Spain, Sevilla | Occupational, Female farmers (n = 20), indirect pesticide exposure, | No information on sampling year; FMV |
UPLC-MS/MS; QC: Internal standards |
LOQ: 1.0 DF: 5 |
LOQ: 0.5 DF: 0 |
Only one sample had detectable concentration (2 μg/L). Method validation study. | Martin-Reina et al., 2021 [96] |
Spain, Valencia, BETTERMILK | Lactating mothers (n = 94), regional study | 2015; FMV |
LC-MS/MS; QC: Isotope-labelled internal standards, participation in G-EQUAS for Gly; Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 54 P50: 0.12 P95: 0.62 |
LOQ: 0.1 DF: 60 P50: 0.13 P95: 0.69 |
Gly associated with high intake of eggs and fruit | Ruiz et al., 2021 [79] |
Eastern-EU | |||||||
Slovenia | Children/adolescents 7–15 y (n = 246), agricultural region, two sampling periods (winter/summer) | 2018; FMV |
GC–MS/MS; QC: Internal standards; Creatinine and specific gravity |
LOQ: 0.1 Winter DF: 27 P95: 0.19 Summer DF: 22 P95: 0.19 |
LOQ: 0.1 Winter DF: 50 P95: 0.29 Summer DF: 56 P50: 0.1 P95: 0.33 |
Higher detection rates related to lower age, and high intake of nuts and wholegrain rice | Stajnko et al., 2020 [84] |
EU, countries not specified | Conventional (n = 99) and organic (n = 41) diet; healthy (n = 102) and chronically diseased (n = 199) | No information on sample collection | ELISA immunoassay; QC: some validation against GS-MS |
data only reported in figures | NR | Higher if conventional than organic diet and in chronically ill than healthy subjects. | Krüger et al., 2014 [97] |
EU, 18 different countries | 182 urine samples (approx. 10 per country) | No information on sampling year or collection method | GC–MS/MS; QC: internal standards, Creatinine |
LOQ: 0.15 DF: 44 Max: 1.56 |
LOQ: 0.15 DF: 36 Max: 2.63 |
Considerable regional variation, DF for Gly varied between 10 and 90% and for AMPA between 0 and 90% | Hoppe 2013 [98] |
DF: detection frequency (%>LOD/LOQ); FMV: first morning void; German External Quality Assessment Scheme (G-EQUAS); NR: not reported; P50: 50th percentile (median); P25, P75, P90, P95: the respective percentile; GM: geometric mean; GSD: geometric standard derivation; SD: standard derivation; GW: gestational week; Gly: glyphosate; AMPA: aminomethylphosphonic acid; crea: creatinine.
4. Discussion
In this review, we identified HBM-studies that measured the internal exposure to pyrethroids, chlorpyrifos, and glyphosate in European population groups by analysing urinary concentrations of suitable biomarkers. We included studies that have been published from 2000 until June 2022. For all three substance groups the number of studies increased during the years and the majority were published during the last ten years. Variation in analytical methods displaying different sensitivities impacted the reported frequencies of detection and the urinary concentrations. Besides, the urine sampling methods varied, and the quantitative data was reported differently. Thus, direct comparison of the urinary concentrations across the studies was not always possible although many of the studies participated in external quality control programs such as the German External Quality Assessment Scheme (G-EQUAS). Further, less than half of the HBM4EU participating countries were covered and especially studies from the eastern part of Europe were scarce. Many studies were regional with relatively small sample size. Despite these shortcomings, the results indicate a widespread exposure to these substances in the general EU population with marked geographical differences. Studies form Cyprus and the Valencia region in Spain reported the highest urinary concentrations for all the included pesticides. Thus, identification of the main exposure sources in these areas can be used to reduce exposure. In general, children had higher urinary concentrations of the pesticide metabolites than adults as also seen in studies from, e.g., the US [25]. An obvious explanation is a relatively higher food intake per kg body weight in children leading to higher exposure levels from pesticide residues in food, but also other physiological and behavioural differences may predispose children to elevated exposure [6,99,100].
The organophosphate chlorpyrifos was for decades one of the most widely used insecticides in agriculture worldwide [101] leading to a widespread exposure of the general population from residues in food, as reflected in the high detection frequency of TCPy in most of the included studies. However, the authorization for chlorpyrifos (and chlorpyrifos-methyl) in the EU was withdrawn by February 2020 because of concern for genotoxicity and developmental neurotoxicity [102]. Before this ban, acceptable daily intake (ADI) for chlorpyrifos was reduced from 0.01 to 0.001 mg/kg body weight/day in 2014. Because of parallel reductions in EU maximum residue levels (MRLs) in food items, the exposure level in the general population would be expected to have decreased in this period. A corresponding drop in urinary TCPy concentrations could not be documented from the included studies, but no urine samples collected after the ban in 2020 were included. Thus, the concentrations reported in the current studies can be used for comparison in future studies.
The studies on pyrethroids showed higher urinary concentrations of 3-PBA in samples collected in the most recent years indicating an increasing population exposure to these insecticides. A rise in exposure would be expected, since pyrethroids have replaced organophosphate insecticides in biocidal products and to some degree also as plant protection products. Accordingly, increasing urinary metabolite concentrations were also found in the human biomonitoring programs The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in the US [103] and the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) [104]. Indoor use of pyrethroids were associated with higher urinary metabolite concentrations in several of the included studies as also demonstrated in studies form the US [6,105].
Glyphosate is the most used pesticide worldwide and also one of the most widely used herbicides in agriculture in the EU [106] but HBM-data are limited, both from Europe and elsewhere. The included studies indicate a widespread low Gly exposure with rather low detection frequency in urine probably reflecting the low urinary excretion fraction of 1% for Gly estimated in humans after oral exposure [8,89]. In general, the knowledge on toxicokinetics of Gly and AMPA in humans is limited and more information on, e.g., uptake after inhalation exposure is needed.
For both pyrethroids and glyphosate there is a paucity of HBM-data regarding exposure levels in potentially higher exposed (sub)populations in occupational and environmental settings, e.g., studies focusing on exposure after indoor and outdoor residential use, exposure from living in vicinity to pesticide treated areas, occupational and para-occupational exposure levels including take-home exposure after work. Such studies are complicated by the fact that currently used pesticides are rapidly metabolised and excreted within few days and therefor urinary concentrations reflect only recent exposure to the specific pesticides. Therefore, such studies require careful planning to obtain valid information on exposure levels and peak exposures.
The results from this review illustrate the need for harmonisation of the analytical methods as well as the reporting of HBM-data to enable comparisons of exposure levels across studies to obtain information on population differences in exposure sources and time-trends. Such a process was initiated within the HBM4EU initiative, in which harmonised HBM-data was obtained for the prioritised pesticides either by analysing new urine samples or by quality-assurance of data already collected in the HBM4EU Aligned Studies [13,107]. In this way, HBM-data on glyphosate was achieved among children from five countries, Slovenia, Germany, France, Belgium and Cyprus [16], and adults from Germany, Switzerland, France, and Iceland [15]. Data on pyrethroids and chlorpyrifos were obtained among children from Slovenia, Cyprus, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Israel and among adults from Germany, France, Switzerland and Israel [14,17,18]. These HBM-data from the HBM4EU Aligned Studies is available for visualization in the EU-HBM dashboard: https://www.hbm4eu.eu/what-we-do/european-hbm-platform/eu-hbm-dashboard/ (accessed on 18 10 2022) along with HBM-data from some of the studies included in this review. However, more HBM-data are needed to get an EU-wide picture of the exposure and to evaluate differences between countries and population groups, time trends, and age-related differences in exposure levels and sources. The data presented in this review, combined with the HBM-data from the HBM4EU-aligned studies, can be used as a baseline for future studies of exposure to these pesticides. Furthermore, there is a need to establish harmonised and sensitive biomarkers for other frequently used pesticides/pesticide groups in order to get an overall picture of pesticide exposure in Europe.
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft preparation, H.R.A.; writing—review and editing, L.R., M.R., J.B., S.R., T.B. and E.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This review was performed as part of the HBM4EU initiative which is co-financed by EUs Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 733032).
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Rempelos L., Wang J., Baranski M., Watson A., Volakakis N., Hoppe H.W., Kuhn-Velten W.N., Hadall C., Hasanaliyeva G., Chatzidimitriou E., et al. Diet and food type affect urinary pesticide residue excretion profiles in healthy individuals: Results of a randomized controlled dietary intervention trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2022;115:364–377. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baudry J., Debrauwer L., Durand G., Limon G., Delcambre A., Vidal R., Taupier-Letage B., Druesne-Pecollo N., Galan P., Hercberg S., et al. Urinary pesticide concentrations in French adults with low and high organic food consumption: Results from the general population-based NutriNet-Sante. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2019;29:366–378. doi: 10.1038/s41370-018-0062-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tamaro C.M., Smith M.N., Workman T., Griffith W.C., Thompson B., Faustman E.M. Characterization of organophosphate pesticides in urine and home environment dust in an agricultural community. Biomarkers. 2018;23:174–187. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2017.1395080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dereumeaux C., Fillol C., Quenel P., Denys S. Pesticide exposures for residents living close to agricultural lands: A review. Environ. Int. 2020;134:105210. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Deziel N.C., Freeman L.E., Graubard B.I., Jones R.R., Hoppin J.A., Thomas K., Hines C.J., Blair A., Sandler D.P., Chen H., et al. Relative Contributions of Agricultural Drift, Para-Occupational, and Residential Use Exposure Pathways to House Dust Pesticide Concentrations: Meta-Regression of Published Data. Environ. Health Perspect. 2017;125:296–305. doi: 10.1289/EHP426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Trunnelle K.J., Bennett D.H., Tulve N.S., Clifton M.S., Davis M.D., Calafat A.M., Moran R., Tancredi D.J., Hertz-Picciotto I. Urinary pyrethroid and chlorpyrifos metabolite concentrations in Northern California families and their relationship to indoor residential insecticide levels, part of the Study of Use of Products and Exposure Related Behavior (SUPERB) Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:1931–1939. doi: 10.1021/es403661a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ratelle M., Cote J., Bouchard M. Time profiles and toxicokinetic parameters of key biomarkers of exposure to cypermethrin in orally exposed volunteers compared with previously available kinetic data following permethrin exposure. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2015;35:1586–1593. doi: 10.1002/jat.3124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zoller O., Rhyn P., Zarn J.A., Dudler V. Urine glyphosate level as a quantitative biomarker of oral exposure. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2020;228:113526. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nolan R.J., Rick D.L., Freshour N.L., Saunders J.H. Chlorpyrifos: Pharmacokinetics in human volunteers. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1984;73:8–15. doi: 10.1016/0041-008X(84)90046-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bouchard M., Carrier G., Brunet R.C., Bonvalot Y., Gosselin N.H. Determination of biological reference values for chlorpyrifos metabolites in human urine using a toxicokinetic approach. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2005;2:155–168. doi: 10.1080/15459620590922407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Leng G., Kuhn K.H., Idel H. Biological monitoring of pyrethroids in blood and pyrethroid metabolites in urine: Applications and limitations. Sci. Total Environ. 1997;199:173–181. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(97)05493-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ougier E., Ganzleben C., Lecoq P., Bessems J., David M., Schoeters G., Lange R., Meslin M., Uhl M., Kolossa-Gehring M., et al. Chemical prioritisation strategy in the European Human Biomonitoring Initiative (HBM4EU)—Development and results. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2021;236:113778. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gilles L., Govarts E., Rodriguez Martin L., Andersson A.M., Appenzeller B.M.R., Barbone F., Castano A., Coertjens D., Den Hond E., Dzhedzheia V., et al. Harmonization of Human Biomonitoring Studies in Europe: Characteristics of the HBM4EU-Aligned Studies Participants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:6787. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Govarts E., Gilles L., Rodriguez M.L., Santonen T., Apel P., Alvito P., Anastasi E., Andersen H.R., Andersson A.-M., Andryskova L., et al. Human Biomonitoring Data in European children, teenagers and adults: Results from the HBM4EU aligned studies (2014–2021) IJHEH. 2022. submitted .
- 15.Buekers J., Remy S., Bessems J., Govarts E., Rambaud L., Riou M., Halldorsson T.I., Ólafsdóttir K., Probst-Hensch N., Ammann P., et al. Glyphosate and AMPA in Human Urine of HBM4EU-Aligned Studies: Part B Adults. Toxics. 2022;10:552. doi: 10.3390/toxics10100552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Buekers J., Remy S., Bessems J., Govarts E., Rambaud L., Riou M., Tratnik J.S., Stajnko A., Katsonouri A., Makris K.C., et al. Glyphosate and AMPA in Human Urine of HBM4EU Aligned Studies: Part A Children. Toxics. 2022;10:470. doi: 10.3390/toxics10080470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tarazona J.V., Cattaneo I., Niemann L., Pedraza-Diaz S., Gonzalez-Caballero M.C., de Alba-Gonzalez M., Canas A., Dominguez-Morueco N., Esteban-Lopez M., Castano A., et al. A Tiered Approach for Assessing Individual and Combined Risk of Pyrethroids Using Human Biomonitoring Data. Toxics. 2022;10:451. doi: 10.3390/toxics10080451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tarazona J.V., González-Caballero M.d.C., Alba-Gonzalez M.d., Pedraza-Diaz S., Cañas A., Dominguez-Morueco N., Esteban-López M., Cattaneo I., Katsonouri A., Makris K.C. Improving the Risk Assessment of Pesticides through the Integration of Human Biomonitoring and Food Monitoring Data: A Case Study for Chlorpyrifos. Toxics. 2022;10:313. doi: 10.3390/toxics10060313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dereumeaux C., Saoudi A., Goria S., Wagner V., De Crouy-Chanel P., Pecheux M., Berat B., Zaros C., Guldner L. Urinary levels of pyrethroid pesticides and determinants in pregnant French women from the Elfe cohort. Environ. Int. 2018;119:89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fréry N., Fillol C., Garnier R., Falq G., Bidondo M.-L., Guldner L., Zeghnoun A. Exposition de la population française aux substances chimiques de l’environnement–Étude ENNS 2006–2007. Toxicol. Anal. Clin. 2017;29:441–482. doi: 10.1016/j.toxac.2017.06.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schulz C., Angerer J., Ewers U., Heudorf U., Wilhelm M. Revised and new reference values for environmental pollutants in urine or blood of children in Germany derived from the German environmental survey on children 2003-2006 (GerES IV) Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2009;212:637–647. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2009.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bevan R., Jones K., Cocker J., Assem F.L., Levy L.S. Reference ranges for key biomarkers of chemical exposure within the UK population. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2013;216:170–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Noren E., Lindh C., Rylander L., Glynn A., Axelsson J., Littorin M., Faniband M., Larsson E., Nielsen C. Concentrations and temporal trends in pesticide biomarkers in urine of Swedish adolescents, 2000–2017. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2020;30:756–767. doi: 10.1038/s41370-020-0212-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schettgen T., Dewes P., Kraus T. A method for the simultaneous quantification of eight metabolites of synthetic pyrethroids in urine of the general population using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016;408:5467–5478. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9645-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Barr D.B., Olsson A.O., Wong L.Y., Udunka S., Baker S.E., Whitehead R.D., Magsumbol M.S., Williams B.L., Needham L.L. Urinary concentrations of metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides in the general U.S. population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2002. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010;118:742–748. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baker S.E., Olsson A.O., Barr D.B. Isotope dilution high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for quantifying urinary metabolites of synthetic pyrethroid insecticides. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2004;46:281–288. doi: 10.1007/s00244-003-3044-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Toshima H., Yoshinaga J., Shiraishi H., Ito Y., Kamijima M., Ueyama J. Comparison of different urine pretreatments for biological monitoring of pyrethroid insecticides. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2015;39:133–136. doi: 10.1093/jat/bku142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Glorennec P., Serrano T., Fravallo M., Warembourg C., Monfort C., Cordier S., Viel J.F., Le Gleau F., Le Bot B., Chevrier C. Determinants of children’s exposure to pyrethroid insecticides in western France. Environ. Int. 2017;104:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Viel J.F., Warembourg C., Le Maner-Idrissi G., Lacroix A., Limon G., Rouget F., Monfort C., Durand G., Cordier S., Chevrier C. Pyrethroid insecticide exposure and cognitive developmental disabilities in children: The PELAGIE mother-child cohort. Environ. Int. 2015;82:69–75. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Freire C., Suarez B., Vela-Soria F., Castiello F., Reina-Perez I., Andersen H.R., Olea N., Fernandez M.F. Urinary metabolites of non-persistent pesticides and serum hormones in Spanish adolescent males. Environ. Res. 2021;197:111016. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Costa C., Garcia-Leston J., Costa S., Coelho P., Silva S., Pingarilho M., Valdiglesias V., Mattei F., Dall’Armi V., Bonassi S., et al. Is organic farming safer to farmers’ health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming. Toxicol. Lett. 2014;230:166–176. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gyllenhammar I., Glynn A., Jonsson B.A., Lindh C.H., Darnerud P.O., Svensson K., Lignell S. Diverging temporal trends of human exposure to bisphenols and plastizisers, such as phthalates, caused by substitution of legacy EDCs? Environ. Res. 2017;153:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Makris K.C., Efthymiou N., Konstantinou C., Anastasi E., Schoeters G., Kolossa-Gehring M., Katsonouri A. Oxidative stress of glyphosate, AMPA and metabolites of pyrethroids and chlorpyrifos pesticides among primary school children in Cyprus. Environ. Res. 2022;212:113316. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fernández S.F., Pardo O., Corpas-Burgos F., Yusà V. Exposure and cumulative risk assessment to non-persistent pesticides in Spanish children using biomonitoring. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;746:140983. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fernandez S.F., Pardo O., Adam-Cervera I., Montesinos L., Corpas-Burgos F., Roca M., Pastor A., Vento M., Cernada M., Yusa V., et al. Biomonitoring of non-persistent pesticides in urine from lactating mothers: Exposure and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;699:134385. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Schoeters G., Verheyen V.J., Colles A., Remy S., Martin L.R., Govarts E., Nelen V., Den Hond E., De Decker A., Franken C., et al. Internal exposure of Flemish teenagers to environmental pollutants: Results of the Flemish Environment and Health Study 2016-2020 (FLEHS IV) Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2022;242:113972. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.113972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pirard C., Remy S., Giusti A., Champon L., Charlier C. Assessment of children’s exposure to currently used pesticides in wallonia, Belgium. Toxicol. Lett. 2020;329:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Andersen H.R., Dalsager L. Pesticide Exposure and Health Risk in Susceptible Population Groups. Danish EPA; Odense, Denmark: 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dalsager L., Fage-Larsen B., Bilenberg N., Jensen T.K., Nielsen F., Kyhl H.B., Grandjean P., Andersen H.R. Maternal urinary concentrations of pyrethroid and chlorpyrifos metabolites and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in 2-4-year-old children from the Odense Child Cohort. Environ. Res. 2019;176:108533. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wielgomas B., Piskunowicz M. Biomonitoring of pyrethroid exposure among rural and urban populations in northern Poland. Chemosphere. 2013;93:2547–2553. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bravo N., Grimalt J.O., Mazej D., Tratnik J.S., Sarigiannis D.A., Horvat M. Mother/child organophosphate and pyrethroid distributions. Environ. Int. 2020;134:105264. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Almstrup K., Fernandez M.F., Petersen J.H., Olea N., Skakkebaek N.E., Leffers H. Dual effects of phytoestrogens result in u-shaped dose-response curves. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002;110:743–748. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Becker K., Seiwert M., Angerer J., Kolossa-Gehring M., Hoppe H.W., Ball M., Schulz C., Thumulla J., Seifert B. GerES IV Pilot Study: Assessment of the exposure of German children to organophosphorus and pyrethroid pesticides. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2006;209:221–233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fortes C., Mastroeni S., Pilla M.A., Antonelli G., Lunghini L., Aprea C. The relation between dietary habits and urinary levels of 3-phenoxybenzoic acid, a pyrethroid metabolite. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013;52:91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rodzaj W., Wilenska M., Klimowska A., Dziewirska E., Jurewicz J., Walczak-Jedrzejowska R., Slowikowska-Hilczer J., Hanke W., Wielgomas B. Concentrations of urinary biomarkers and predictors of exposure to pyrethroid insecticides in young, Polish, urban-dwelling men. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;773:145666. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dereumeaux C., Saoudi A., Pecheux M., Berat B., de Crouy-Chanel P., Zaros C., Brunel S., Delamaire C., le Tertre A., Lefranc A., et al. Biomarkers of exposure to environmental contaminants in French pregnant women from the Elfe cohort in 2011. Environ. Int. 2016;97:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hardt J., Angerer J. Biological monitoring of workers after the application of insecticidal pyrethroids. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 2003;76:492–498. doi: 10.1007/s00420-003-0451-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Galea K.S., MacCalman L., Jones K., Cocker J., Teedon P., Cherrie J.W., van Tongeren M. Urinary biomarker concentrations of captan, chlormequat, chlorpyrifos and cypermethrin in UK adults and children living near agricultural land. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2015;25:623–631. doi: 10.1038/jes.2015.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gari M., Gonzalez-Quinteiro Y., Bravo N., Grimalt J.O. Analysis of metabolites of organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides in human urine from urban and agricultural populations (Catalonia and Galicia) Sci. Total Environ. 2018;622-623:526–533. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Costa C., Rapisarda V., Catania S., Di Nola C., Ledda C., Fenga C. Cytokine patterns in greenhouse workers occupationally exposed to alpha-cypermethrin: An observational study. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013;36:796–800. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Leng G., Ranft U., Sugiri D., Hadnagy W., Berger-Preiss E., Idel H. Pyrethroids used indoors--biological monitoring of exposure to pyrethroids following an indoor pest control operation. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2003;206:85–92. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Berger-Preiss E., Levsen K., Leng G., Idel H., Sugiri D., Ranft U. Indoor pyrethroid exposure in homes with woollen textile floor coverings. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2002;205:459–472. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tanner E.M., Hallerback M.U., Wikstrom S., Lindh C., Kiviranta H., Gennings C., Bornehag C.G. Early prenatal exposure to suspected endocrine disruptor mixtures is associated with lower IQ at age seven. Environ. Int. 2020;134:105185. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Viel J.F., Rouget F., Warembourg C., Monfort C., Limon G., Cordier S., Chevrier C. Behavioural disorders in 6-year-old children and pyrethroid insecticide exposure: The PELAGIE mother-child cohort. Occup. Environ. Med. 2017;74:275–281. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hardy E.M., Dereumeaux C., Guldner L., Briand O., Vandentorren S., Oleko A., Zaros C., Appenzeller B.M.R. Hair versus urine for the biomonitoring of pesticide exposure: Results from a pilot cohort study on pregnant women. Environ. Int. 2021;152:106481. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Le Grand R., Dulaurent S., Gaulier J.M., Saint-Marcoux F., Moesch C., Lachatre G. Simultaneous determination of five synthetic pyrethroid metabolites in urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Application to 39 persons without known exposure to pyrethroids. Toxicol. Lett. 2012;210:248–253. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Heudorf U., Angerer J. Metabolites of pyrethroid insecticides in urine specimens: Current exposure in an urban population in Germany. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001;109:213–217. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schettgen T., Heudorf U., Drexler H., Angerer J. Pyrethroid exposure of the general population-is this due to diet. Toxicol.Lett. 2002;134:141–145. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4274(02)00183-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Heudorf U., Angerer J., Drexler H. Current internal exposure to pesticides in children and adolescents in Germany: Urinary levels of metabolites of pyrethroid and organophosphorus insecticides. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 2004;77:67–72. doi: 10.1007/s00420-003-0470-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mesnage R., Bowyer R.C.E., El Balkhi S., Saint-Marcoux F., Gardere A., Ducarmon Q.R., Geelen A.R., Zwittink R.D., Tsoukalas D., Sarandi E., et al. Impacts of dietary exposure to pesticides on faecal microbiome metabolism in adult twins. Environ. Health A Glob. Access Sci. Source. 2022;21:46. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00860-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Radwan P., Wielgomas B., Radwan M., Krasinski R., Kilanowicz-Sapota A., Banaszczyk R., Jurewicz J. Synthetic Pyrethroids Exposure and Embryological Outcomes: A Cohort Study in Women from Fertility Clinic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:5117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jurewicz J., Radwan P., Wielgomas B., Radwan M., Karwacka A., Kaluzny P., Piskunowicz M., Dziewirska E., Hanke W. Exposure to pyrethroid pesticides and ovarian reserve. Environ. Int. 2020;144:106028. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wielgomas B., Nahorski W., Czarnowski W. Urinary concentrations of pyrethroid metabolites in the convenience sample of an urban population of Northern Poland. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2013;216:295–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Radwan M., Jurewicz J., Wielgomas B., Piskunowicz M., Sobala W., Radwan P., Jakubowski L., Hawula W., Hanke W. The association between environmental exposure to pyrethroids and sperm aneuploidy. Chemosphere. 2015;128:42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Jurewicz J., Radwan M., Sobala W., Radwan P., Jakubowski L., Wielgomas B., Ligocka D., Brzeznicki S., Hanke W. Exposure to widespread environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals and human sperm sex ratio. Environ. Pollut. 2016;213:732–740. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Li A.J., Kannan K. Urinary concentrations and profiles of organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticide metabolites and phenoxyacid herbicides in populations in eight countries. Environ. Int. 2018;121:1148–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bravo N., Grimalt J.O., Bocca B., Pino A., Bin M., Brumatti L.V., Rosolen V., Barbone F., Ronfani L., Alimonti A., et al. Urinary metabolites of organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides in children from an Italian cohort (PHIME, Trieste) Environ. Res. 2019;176:108508. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.05.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Saieva C., Aprea C., Tumino R., Masala G., Salvini S., Frasca G., Giurdanella M.C., Zanna I., Decarli A., Sciarra G., et al. Twenty-four-hour urinary excretion of ten pesticide metabolites in healthy adults in two different areas of Italy (Florence and Ragusa) Sci. Total Environ. 2004;332:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Roca M., Miralles-Marco A., Ferre J., Perez R., Yusa V. Biomonitoring exposure assessment to contemporary pesticides in a school children population of Spain. Environ. Res. 2014;131C:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ye X., Pierik F.H., Angerer J., Meltzer H.M., Jaddoe V.W., Tiemeier H., Hoppin J.A., Longnecker M.P. Levels of metabolites of organophosphate pesticides, phthalates, and bisphenol A in pooled urine specimens from pregnant women participating in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2009;212:481–491. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bravo N., Peralta S., Grimalt J.O., Martinez M.A., Rovira J., Schuhmacher M. Organophosphate metabolite concentrations in maternal urine during pregnancy. Environ. Res. 2020;182:109003. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.109003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Suarez B., Vela-Soria F., Castiello F., Olivas-Martinez A., Acuna-Castroviejo D., Gomez-Vida J., Olea N., Fernandez M.F., Freire C. Organophosphate pesticide exposure, hormone levels, and interaction with PON1 polymorphisms in male adolescents. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;769:144563. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Berman T., Goen T., Novack L., Beacher L., Grinshpan L., Segev D., Tordjman K. Urinary concentrations of organophosphate and carbamate pesticides in residents of a vegetarian community. Environ. Int. 2016;96:34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Llop S., Murcia M., Iniguez C., Roca M., Gonzalez L., Yusa V., Rebagliato M., Ballester F. Distributions and determinants of urinary biomarkers of organophosphate pesticide exposure in a prospective Spanish birth cohort study. Environ. Health A Glob. Access Sci. Source. 2017;16:46. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0255-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Koch H.M., Hardt J., Angerer J. Biological monitoring of exposure of the general population to the organophosphorus pesticides chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-methyl by determination of their specific metabolite 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2001;204:175–180. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ye X., Pierik F.H., Hauser R., Duty S., Angerer J., Park M.M., Burdorf A., Hofman A., Jaddoe V.W., Mackenbach J.P., et al. Urinary metabolite concentrations of organophosphorous pesticides, bisphenol A, and phthalates among pregnant women in Rotterdam, the Netherlands: The Generation R study. Environ. Res. 2008;108:260–267. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Dziewirska E., Radwan M., Wielgomas B., Klimowska A., Radwan P., Kaluzny P., Hanke W., Slodki M., Jurewicz J. Human Semen Quality, Sperm DNA Damage, and the Level of Urinary Concentrations of 1N and TCPY, the Biomarkers of Nonpersistent Insecticides. Am. J. Mens. Health. 2019;13:1557988318816598. doi: 10.1177/1557988318816598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Schutze A., Morales-Agudelo P., Vidal M., Calafat A.M., Ospina M. Quantification of glyphosate and other organophosphorus compounds in human urine via ion chromatography isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry. Chemosphere. 2021;274:129427. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ruiz P., Dualde P., Coscolla C., Fernandez S.F., Carbonell E., Yusa V. Biomonitoring of glyphosate and AMPA in the urine of Spanish lactating mothers. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;801:149688. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lemke N., Murawski A., Schmied-Tobies M.I.H., Rucic E., Hoppe H.W., Conrad A., Kolossa-Gehring M. Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in urine of children and adolescents in Germany—Human biomonitoring results of the German Environmental Survey 2014–2017 (GerES V) Environ. Int. 2021;156:106769. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Conrad A., Schroter-Kermani C., Hoppe H.W., Ruther M., Pieper S., Kolossa-Gehring M. Glyphosate in German adults—Time trend (2001 to 2015) of human exposure to a widely used herbicide. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2017;220:8–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Grau D., Grau N., Gascuel Q., Paroissin C., Stratonovitch C., Lairon D., Devault D.A., Di Cristofaro J. Quantifiable urine glyphosate levels detected in 99% of the French population, with higher values in men, in younger people, and in farmers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022;29:32882–32893. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18110-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Soukup S.T., Merz B., Bub A., Hoffmann I., Watzl B., Steinberg P., Kulling S.E. Glyphosate and AMPA levels in human urine samples and their correlation with food consumption: Results of the cross-sectional KarMeN study in Germany. Arch. Toxicol. 2020;94:1575–1584. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02704-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Stajnko A., Snoj Tratnik J., Kosjek T., Mazej D., Jagodic M., Erzen I., Horvat M. Seasonal glyphosate and AMPA levels in urine of children and adolescents living in rural regions of Northeastern Slovenia. Environ. Int. 2020;143:105985. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Dereumeaux C., Mercier F., Soulard P., Hulin M., Oleko A., Pecheux M., Fillol C., Denys S., Quenel P. Identification of pesticides exposure biomarkers for residents living close to vineyards in France. Environ. Int. 2022;159:107013. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Connolly A., Basinas I., Jones K., Galea K.S., Kenny L., McGowan P., Coggins M.A. Characterising glyphosate exposures among amenity horticulturists using multiple spot urine samples. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2018;221:1012–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Connolly A., Jones K., Galea K.S., Basinas I., Kenny L., McGowan P., Coggins M. Exposure assessment using human biomonitoring for glyphosate and fluroxypyr users in amenity horticulture. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2017;220:1064–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Knudsen L.E., Hansen P.W., Mizrak S., Hansen H.K., Morck T.A., Nielsen F., Siersma V., Mathiesen L. Biomonitoring of Danish school children and mothers including biomarkers of PBDE and glyphosate. Rev. Environ. Health. 2017;32:279–290. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2016-0067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Faniband M.H., Noren E., Littorin M., Lindh C.H. Human experimental exposure to glyphosate and biomonitoring of young Swedish adults. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2021;231:113657. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Cosemans C., Van Larebeke N., Janssen B.G., Martens D.S., Baeyens W., Bruckers L., Den Hond E., Coertjens D., Nelen V., Schoeters G., et al. Glyphosate and AMPA exposure in relation to markers of biological aging in an adult population-based study. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2022;240:113895. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Grundler F., Seralini G.E., Mesnage R., Peynet V., Wilhelmi de Toledo F. Excretion of Heavy Metals and Glyphosate in Urine and Hair Before and After Long-Term Fasting in Humans. Front. Nutr. 2021;8:708069. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.708069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Connolly A., Koslitz S., Bury D., Bruning T., Conrad A., Kolossa-Gehring M., Coggins M.A., Koch H.M. Sensitive and selective quantification of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in urine of the general population by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2020;1158:122348. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2020.122348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Connolly A., Coggins M.A., Galea K.S., Jones K., Kenny L., McGowan P., Basinas I. Evaluating Glyphosate Exposure Routes and Their Contribution to Total Body Burden: A Study Among Amenity Horticulturalists. Ann. Work Expo. Health. 2019;63:133–147. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxy104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Connolly A., Leahy M., Jones K., Kenny L., Coggins M.A. Glyphosate in Irish adults—A pilot study in 2017. Environ. Res. 2018;165:235–236. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Ferreira C., Duarte S.C., Costa E., Pereira A., Silva L.J.G., Almeida A., Lino C., Pena A. Urine biomonitoring of glyphosate in children: Exposure and risk assessment. Environ. Res. 2021;198:111294. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Martin-Reina J., Dahiri B., Carbonero-Aguilar P., Soria-Dıaz M.E., González A.G., Bautista J., Moreno I. Validation of a simple method for the determination of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in human urine by UPLC-MS/MS. Microchem. J. 2021;170:106760. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106760. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Krüger M., Schledorn P., Schrödl W., Hoppe H.-W., Lutz W., Shehata A.A. Detection of glyphosate residues in animals and humans. J. Environ. Anal. Toxicol. 2014;4:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 98.Hoppe H. Determination of Glyphosate Residues in Human Urine Samples from 18 European Countries. Medical Laboratory Bremen; Bremen, Germany: 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 99.Lu C., Barr D.B., Pearson M.A., Walker L.A., Bravo R. The attribution of urban and suburban children’s exposure to synthetic pyrethroid insecticides: A longitudinal assessment. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2009;19:69–78. doi: 10.1038/jes.2008.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Pascale A., Laborde A. Impact of pesticide exposure in childhood. Rev. Environ. Health. 2020;35:221–227. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2020-0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Eaton D.L., Daroff R.B., Autrup H., Bridges J., Buffler P., Costa L.G., Coyle J., McKhann G., Mobley W.C., Nadel L., et al. Review of the toxicology of chlorpyrifos with an emphasis on human exposure and neurodevelopment. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2008;38((Suppl. S2)):1–125. doi: 10.1080/10408440802272158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.EFSA Statement on the available outcomes of the human health assessment in the context of the pesticides peer review of the active substance chlorpyrifos. EFSA J. 2019;17:e05809. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.CDC . Fourth National Exposure Report, Updated Tables. February 2015. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 104.Second Report on Human Biomonitoring of Environmental Chemicals in Canada. Health Canada; Ottawa, ON, Canada: 2013. CHMS. Results of the Canadian Health Measures Survey Cycle 2 (2009–2011) [Google Scholar]
- 105.Morgan M.K. Children’s exposures to pyrethroid insecticides at home: A review of data collected in published exposure measurement studies conducted in the United States. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2012;9:2964–2985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9082964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Antier C., Andersson R., Auskalniene O., Barić K., Simić M. A survey on the uses of glyphosate in European countries. ENDURE Netw. 2020;2020:1–60. [Google Scholar]
- 107.Esteban Lopez M., Goen T., Mol H., Nubler S., Haji-Abbas-Zarrabi K., Koch H.M., Kasper-Sonnenberg M., Dvorakova D., Hajslova J., Antignac J.P., et al. The European human biomonitoring platform—Design and implementation of a laboratory quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) programme for selected priority chemicals. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2021;234:113740. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.