Abstract
A dynamical control of the coupling strengths between dressed states and probe photon states is demonstrated with a transmon-like artificial atom coupled to two closely spaced resonant modes. When the atom is driven with one mode, the atom state and driving photon states form the so-called dressed states. Dressed states with sideband index up to 3 were prepared and probed via the strong coupling to the other resonant mode. Spectroscopy reveals that the coupling strengths are “dressed” and can be modulated by the power and sideband index of the driving. The transmission of the probe tone is modulated by the driving microwave amplitude with a Bessel behavior, displaying multi-photon process associated with the inter-atomic level transitions.
Subject terms: Electronics, photonics and device physics; Quantum physics
Introduction
The development of superconducting quantum circuits has realized quantum optics at microwave frequencies in many aspects1. In particular, such a platform provides a great enhancement in the interaction between electromagnetic waves and the circuits, which are also called “artificial atoms”. Taking the advantage of strong coupling, a broad range of quantum optical phenomena, such as single atom spectroscopy2, dressed states3, amplification of light4, lasing5, quantum wave mixing6,7, Mollow triplets, Aulter-Townes splitting8–10, electromagnetically-induced transparency11,12, two-photon fluorescence13, fluorescence in squeezed vacuum14, emission of anti-bunched photons or photon multiplets15,16, and cooperative radiation in a topological waveguide17 have been demonstrated. In addition, wide tunability in superconducting quantum circuits as artificial atoms allows observation of various phenomena without restrictions in operation frequency.
Strongly driven two level system(TLS) may produce Landau-Zener (LZ) transition18 that can be demonstrated in various systems, such as an atom in an intensive laser field. LZ transition has been investigated in superconducting quantum circuits, such as Cooper-pair boxes(CPB)3,19–21, transmons22, and flux qubits23,24; as well as in quantum dots as spin qubits25–28 and charge qubits29,30. The large driving fields that can be achieved for these quantum circuits grant the phenomena observed to be significant. Under a strong drive, multi-photon processes occur when the TLS energy matches the energy of an integer number of photons. The population as a function of driving amplitude shows oscillatory behavior, a general signature of Landau-Zener-Stückelberg (LZS) interferometry20,21,23,24. The interference between these transitions becomes easy to access and control, that can be used for engineering quantum systems31.
For most atomic systems, such a multi-photon process is difficult to observe in open space due to the small atom-light interaction. Nevertheless, one may solve the problem by using a resonator to couple the driven artificial atom, in the scope of circuit quantum electrodynamics (QED)32–38. In particular, the strong coupling between an artificial atom and a resonator usually display a Jaynes–Cummings (JC) interaction32,39,40. When the coupling is dispersive, probing the resonator frequency implements a state measurement of high visibility for a two-level atom as a qubit41–43. Observations of the multi-photon transitions up to 5 photons has been reported by dispersively monitoring the transition44. Nonlinear response of the vacuum Rabi resonance is found when the atom and resonator are in resonance45. Schemes achieving ultrastrong coupling have also been shown46,47, revealing breakdown of the Jaynes–Cummings approximation48. In a driven system, qubit-resonator coupling in the dispersive regime present classical Bloch-Siegert shift49, while the Rabi oscillations in resonance with a resonator can introduce signal amplification50.
On one hand, circuit QED based on JC model can be used in quantum information processing, such as for coupling distant qubits51, 2-qubit operations52,53, entangling qubits54, preparation of the “cat state”55, photon storage56, and quantum memory57. On the other hand, there are many other extensions of the standard JC model, such as intensity-dependent coupling, multi-photon transitions, multi cavity modes58, damped JC model59, JC model with Kerr medium60, driven JC model61, the Tavis-Cummings model for many identical atoms62, and the Jaynes-Cummings-Hubbard model based on coupled resonators63,64.
The implementation of circuit QED with an artificial atom is usually restricted to a fixed coupling strength, depending on the microwave structure of the quantum circuit. Inspired by the LZS interferometry of a driven two-level atom, we propose the concept of “dressed” coupling, controllable by the driving photon number, between a resonator and a dressed atom. To realize such a proposal, we consider a scheme that an artificial atom is coupled to two resonance modes as shown in Fig. 1a. One mode serves as the driving one for the preparation of the demanded dressed state with a driving photon number, . It can be shown that the coupling of the dressed state to a probe resonator can be modulated by and sideband index m.
Figure 1.
(a) The proposed scheme of circuit QED with a dressed artificial atom. A two-level atom is dressed with driving photon number with a bare coupling strength at a sideband transition to an excited atom level . Transitions in the dressed state is in resonance to a probe resonator with a modulated coupling strength, . (b) The energy diagram of a transmon. When and 3, the TLS excited state is chosen to be and , respectively. The orange and blue arrows illustrate the absorption of photons from the driving and probe resonators. (c) Dressed states are composite quantum states of and . can be modulated by and sideband order , and results in Rabi splitting of the spectrum. The probe channel is set at a frequency slightly detuned from the resonator frequency.
The desired atom system allowing multi-photon transitions can be implemented with transmons, of which hamiltonian reads . The transmon energies are described by the anharmonicity as 65. The ladder (or cascade) type atom allows resonances between the levels and with photon transitions at the condition of , or with the photon frequency 44. Such a feature ensures the investigation of the “dressed” coupling of the sideband transition, close to these resonance condition when choosing the effective TLS as (ground state) and (excited state) as schematically shown in Fig. 1b for and 3 cases.
The essence of the scheme can be understood by using the model of a dressed TLS, and the drive is quantized as excitations of a harmonic oscillator1,
| 1 |
is the two-level atom energy and is the driving frequency. can be interpreted as the dimensionless coupling energy between the TLS and driving photon field, of which b and are annihilation and creation operators. Pauli matrices are defined in the subspace expanded by the transmon state and , and or z depending on the driving type. is related to the driving amplitude . While several works have pointed out that the X-driving has an exact numerical solution for the eigenstates66, the Z-driving model provides an analytical description of the dressed states , allowing a simple analysis for the major features of the problem3,19.
The coupling between a dressed TLS and a probe resonator can be expressed by an additional JC interaction,
| 2 |
where a and are annihilation and creation operators of the resonator photons. The coupling strength g usually depends on the microwave structure of the circuit. When there is a drive, the matrix elements of in the basis formed by dressed states can be written as:
| 3 |
As shown in Fig. 1c, when there is a resonance, , two composite states and are degenerate and mixed with a coupling strength, . Here is the photon number in the probe resonator. We note that this can be expressed as the matrix element of the displacement operator , taking a form of an exponential times an associated Laguerre polynomial. If the coupling is small but , the associated Laguerre polynomial can be approximated by the Bessel functions, namely where 19. The effective coupling, coined as “dressed” coupling modulated by driving photon number together with sideband index leads to possible dynamical control of circuit QED. Moreover, the coupling can be switched off at the zeros of Bessel functions.
In this paper, we report the dynamical control of couplings for dressed states to a resonator in various channels allowed by sideband transitions. We utilize a CPB/transmon-type artificial atom, which is strongly coupled to two different photon modes, supplying required g and in the proposed scheme. Avoided-crossing structures in spectrum assure the existence of the power-dependent coupling strengths. With a probe set slightly off-resonance to the resonator, we are able to observe resonance fluorescence when the sideband transition is in resonance to the probe mode. In particular, emission from the probe resonator can be modulated by the driving photon number, and can be completely turned off. The transmission amplitude follows the Bessel behavior as a function of driving amplitude with multi-photon processes up to and can be explained by the Z-driving model. In other words, our system effectively exhibits a 2 or 3-photon Jaynes-Cummings model depending on the selection of driving frequency and driving amplitude.
Methods
As illustrated in Fig. 2a, our sample is a transmon-like circuit coupled to a co-planar waveguide resonator65. The artificial atom and the resonator were made of Al and Nb, respectively on a Si substrate. We used finite element simulations (Ansys Q3D) to finely determine the coupling capacitances between electrodes in our design. The transmission-type resonator has an input and an output port with coupling capacitances of 5.98 fF and 83.3 fF, respectively. The atom is coupled to the signal line with a large capacitance 11.6 fF. The total capacitance of the atom, including those of junctions and that to the ground plane is estimated to be 27.5 fF, resulting in a charing energy of about 0.704 GHz. We will see later that it can be compared to the one obtained by transmon spectrum measurement. Such a value is larger than those in common transmon devices, because our design lacks interdigital electrodes, which can produce extra shunt capacitance across the junction. The Josephson coupling energy in zero magnetic field is estimated as 150 GHz. A superconducting quantum interference device in the quantum circuit allows the tuning of transmon energies by biasing magnetic flux. The sample was measured in a dilution refrigerator at the base temperature below 40 mK. The transmission data was measured by using a commercial vector network analyzer and a spectrum analyzer.
Figure 2.
(a) The schematic of the 2-tone measurement. The transmon-like atom is placed in the slot of a transmission type resonator. (b) and (c) The microwave transmissions nearby the two resonances at 5.514 GHz (b) and 5.455 GHz (c). The curves are for the atom in resonance (red) and off-resonance (blue) with the 5.514 GHz mode. (d) and (e) The microwave transmission amplitude change as a function of bias flux number and frequency in the vicinity of 5.514 GHz (d) and the transmission amplitude change nearby 5.455 GHz (e). Both plots show the vacuum Rabi effect due to the coupling of the atom to the resonant modes.
Results: atom spectroscopy
It turns out that the major resonator, which is expect to have a coupling strength of 80 MHz was not functioning normally and properly. Nevertheless, we found two high-Q resonant modes, which could display a strong coupling to the atom. Without flux-biasing, the atom is far detuned from both mode frequencies of 5.514 GHz and 5.455 GHz. Figure 2b,c respectively show the microwave transmission amplitude as a function of frequency in vicinity of the two modes. The blue curve is for the atom far off-resonance with both modes, while the red one is for the atom in-resonance with the higher mode. Figure 2d,e show the microwave transmission amplitude as a function of bias flux number and frequency in vicinity of and , respectively. Avoided-crossing structures can be clearly seen when the atom and a mode is in resonance. Because the loss of the resonant mode is smaller than the coupling energy, we may resolve the splitting and estimate the mode-atom coupling energies, 10 MHz and 5 MHz. Though the origin of mode is unclear and the couplings are not as big as state-of-the-art values, the two modes could serve for our operation. This system is interesting because the frequencies of two resonant modes and atom transition can be tuned very close to each other. Important parameters of the device are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Important parameters of the circuit QED with artificial atom presented in unit of GHz. and .
| Parameters | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Values (GHz) | 150 | 0.65 | 1.0 | 5.514 | 5.455 |
When the probe frequency is detuned from but not larger than , we are able to observe the atom resonance due to the transition from ground to the 1st excited state . This transition is shown in Fig. 3b as a resonance peak in the transmission amplitude at the bias flux number of 0.484 with the probe tone at a frequency of 5.5145 GHz and at the probe power dBm(black curve). A strong probe power reveals very rich transmission structures featuring the resonant transition to a higher excited state with multiple photon absorption. The red curve in Fig. 3b for a high power dBm shows three more resonance peaks located at an equal spacing of about to the lower flux numbers.
Figure 3.
(a) The calculated transition energies as a function of bias flux number in our atom. The grey horizontal line marks GHz. (b) The transmission amplitude as a function of bias flux number(change) for different probe powers at 5.5145 GHz. At a lower power dBm, only to transition was observed(black). At a higher power dBm, to transitions with 1, 2, 3 and 4 were observed (red). The peak positions agree well with the crossing points in (a). (c) The transmission of the probe microwaves at GHz as a function of flux number change at various driving microwave powers at GHz. The curves are vertically shifted for clarity. From the bottom to top, the driving power: off, and − 100 dBm. In the absence of driving microwaves, the transmission shows a single resonance peak corresponding to transition energy . For higher driving powers, the resonance peaks appear at flux number and , corresponding to , and 3 in (b), respectively.
As mentioned before, multi-photon resonances in transmon atom are expected to occur at the conditions with a probe frequency . In our setup, the atom frequency is flux dependent with a conversion ratio of − 0.19 GHz per flux number at the operation point. Given GHz, the resonance positions in flux number change can be simply written as , agreeing well with our observation. The charging energy can be determined as GHz by employing a CPB/transmon model presented in supplementary document. This value is consistent with what estimated from the device geometry and confirmed by other similar devices, which were tested using 2-tone measurement such as Aulter-Townes splitting67. The calculated photon energies for m-photon transitions close to the probe frequency are illustrated in Fig. 3a for a confirmation of these transition at different bias flux numbers.
Results: observation of dressed states
2-tone spectroscopy measurements were performed with a low probe power dBm and a large driving microwave field at the frequency 5.455 GHz. The probe frequency was chosen to be 5.513 GHz, about 1 MHz red detuned from . Again, such a small detuning allows us to clearly observe the atom spectrum shown as the black curve in Fig. 3c. In this operation, model parameters in Eqs. (1) and (2) can be assigned as and . As the driving power increases, the resonance peak associated with transition begins to disappear. In the meanwhile, a resonance structure starts to build up at the position of transition in the 1-tone spectroscopy, followed by the appearance of a higher order one. However, unlike the monotonic behavior in 1-tone case, these peaks appear periodically in driving power. As such the resonance peaks associated with and transitions vanish completely and microwave transmission in these resonance channels are shut off at the powers of dBm and dBm, respectively.
To elucidate the origin of the resonance peaks associated with and 3, we conducted the spectroscopy measurement in vicinity of . Figure 4a,b respectively illustrate the transmission amplitude and phase at dBm in the flux bias region displaying to 3 channels. In addition to the avoided crossing for indicated by the blue arrow, one can clearly see the onset of avoided-crossing for (red arrow). At an elevated dBm, avoided-crossing can be found for (green arrow) in both transmission amplitude and phase plots as illustrated in Fig. 4c,d, respectively. The occurrence of avoided-crossing structures for and provide the evidence of the strong coupling between the probe resonator and dressed states attributed to the pronounced interaction of the bare atom and driving microwaves. The resonance conditions are given by , closed to that for aforementioned m-photon transition. Here .
Figure 4.
Avoided-crossing of dressed states. Transmission amplitude (a) and phase (b) as a function of flux number change at dBm. Transmission amplitude (c) and phase (d) as a function of flux number change at dBm. The blue, red and green arrows respectively indicate the resonance for , 2 and 3 sidebands with the probe resonator.
To investigate how the resonance structures are modulated by the driving power, we plot the peak heights in Fig. 3c against the normalized driving amplitude as illustrated in Fig. 5a,b. The curve for channel reaches zero at the normalized driving amplitude of 1.75. Zeros are 2.8 for and 3.4 for channels, respectively. Again, the modulated resonance transmission of all channels suggest that the coupling strengths are modulated by driving power in an oscillatory manner.
Figure 5.
(a) and (b) Normalized peak height as a function of normalized driving microwave amplitude for (blue), 2 (red) and 3 (green) processes. All data sets are normalized by identical parameters. The solid curves are while the dash curves show the results by Eq. (5). (c) and (d) The calculated transmission amplitudes as a function of driving amplitude for X-driving model (c) and Z-driving model (d).
Discussion
Here, we provide a quantitative analysis of the oscillatory behavior in the transmission height by noting two practical points: finite probe photon number , and the selection of . Although the probe tone is weak, we cannot overlook the large energy conversion from an intensive driving to the probe resonator. Therefore, we may consider the situation that the resonator state no longer can be described by the photon number state, but a coherent state. Indeed, when the photon generating rate and the loss rate in a resonator are balanced, the resonator state is better described by a coherent state. For a specified coherent state , there is a most probable photon number state and a spread of . The expanded quantum states(composited of dressed states and states) are noted as with energy of .
We ever mentioned that when the transmon is biased such that its energy level spacing between ground state and mth excited state satisifying , two expanded states and become degenerate and mixed with a coupling strength, . In vicinity of the degeneracy, the quantum system can be described by a 2-state subspace,
Here is the detuning for m-photon transition and . In our case, is small so that the resonance conditions are close to . When there is a resonance , the lower energy eigenstate is given by , which is the state we intended to probe.
According to the linear response theory, the transmission of the probe microwave is given by the matrix element, , in which destruction operator . Combining the expression of , one readily gets
| 4 |
The expression is also valid for a coherent state when is large.
In the case of X-driving, the dressed state energy is 66. Regardless how large is the atom level spacing, the two expanded states in resonance would be and with the coupling strength of . The lower mixed state is which results in a transmission,
Though the integrability and the route to exact solution of the X-driving model has been shown66, the matrix elements were calculated numerically when and illustrated in Fig. 5c, allowing a comparison to the Z-driving case shown in Fig. 5d.
The experimental |T| curves scaled with a single parameter() in the driving amplitude are in high accordance with the Bessel functions predicted in Z-driving case presented by the solid curves in Fig. 5a,b. Provided and , the scaling factor is , in which is the quality factor of the driving resonator. By knowing obtained from transmission data and the scaling factor 1.4, we can estimate dimensionless coupling strength , which is close to another estimation .
Above results neglect the finite probe detuning, and decay rate . An analytical correction by using 2-level approximation reads
| 5 |
The detailed derivation is presented in supplementary document. When , the result is consistent with Eq.(4). As an example, |T| with and are shown as dash curves in Fig. 5a,b. There is slight change in peak height but zeros remain the same as those in Bessel dependences.
We would like to note that in the category of CPBs and transmons, the dominant electric dipolar interaction results in an interaction hamiltonian that can be described by the charge number operator n68. It has been pointed out that for a CPB in a 2-level approximation, the effective interaction is -type when the gate charge is close to 0(0.5), depending on the analogy to the application of an ac z(x) field to the spin magnetic resonance68,69. When , the circuit becomes less -sensitive and -type interaction becomes dominant65. The power dependence in accordance with the Z-driving model is probably due to the low value, ranging from 11.5 to 15.5 at the operation point, where the atom frequency is varied from 5.5 to 6.5 GHz. As such, the driving from the resonator may not be X-driving as one will expect for ideal transmons. We expect that further investigations on similar quantum circuits with lower values could clarify this point.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have studied the microwave dressed states of a transmon-like atom coupled to a resonator. Avoided-crossing structures for sideband resonances are observed in spectrum, confirming the existence of the power-dependent coupling strengths. With a probe set slightly off-resonance to the resonator, we are able to observe resonance fluorescence when the sideband transition is in resonance to the probe mode. Emission from the probe resonator can be modulated by the driving photon number, following the similar power dependence in “dressed” coupling strength. The transmission amplitude as a function of the driving microwave amplitude via m-photon channel obeys the Bessel function . At the zeros of Bessel functions, the output probe microwaves are completely suppressed, leading to the controlled darkening of these resonance channels. The output of probe photons also follows m-photon process and can find its application for a tunable source of correlated m photons.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the computing support from National Center for High-performance Computing and measurement support from Instrument Center, NCHU. Fruitful discussions with M. C. Chung and K. Y. Chen are acknowledged. This work is financially supported by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan under grant Nos. 102-2628-M-005-001-MY4 and 111-2112-M-005-010, and i-Center for Advanced Science and Technology, NCHU.
Author contributions
Y.H.C. and D.D. conducted the measurements. W.C.C. designed the samples and setup the measurement. C.H.C. fabricated the samples. Y.H.C. and W.K. analysed the results and prepared the figures. C.S.W. and W.K. supervised the experimental works and wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Data availability
The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-26828-1.
References
- 1.You JQ, Nori F. Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits. Nature. 2011;474:589–597. doi: 10.1038/nature10122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Astafiev O, et al. Resonance fluorescence of a single artificial atom. Science. 2010;327:840–843. doi: 10.1126/science.1181918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wilson C, et al. Coherence times of dressed states of a superconducting qubit under extreme driving. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;98:257003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.257003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Astafiev OV, et al. Ultimate on-chip quantum amplifier. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104:183603. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.183603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Astafiev O, et al. Single artificial-atom lasing. Nature. 2007;449:588–590. doi: 10.1038/nature06141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dmitriev AY, Shaikhaidarov R, Antonov VN, Hönigl-Decrinis T, Astafiev OV. Quantum wave mixing and visualisation of coherent and superposed photonic states in a waveguide. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1352. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01471-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hönigl-Decrinis T, et al. Mixing of coherent waves in a single three-level artificial atom. Phys. Rev. A. 2018;98:041801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.041801. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sillanpää MA, et al. Autler–Townes effect in a superconducting three-level system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;103:193601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.193601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hoi I-C, et al. Giant cross Kerr effect for propagating microwaves induced by an artificial atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;111:053601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.053601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Peng ZH, et al. Vacuum-induced Autler–Townes splitting in a superconducting artificial atom. Phys. Rev. A. 2018;97:063809. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.063809. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abdumalikov AA, et al. Electromagnetically induced transparency on a single artificial atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104:193601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.193601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu Q-C, et al. Method for identifying electromagnetically induced transparency in a tunable circuit quantum electrodynamics system. Phys. Rev. A. 2016;93:053838. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.053838. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gasparinetti S, et al. Two-photon resonance fluorescence of a ladder-type atomic system. Phys. Rev. A. 2019;100:033802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.033802. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Toyli DM, et al. Resonance fluorescence from an artificial atom in squeezed vacuum. Phys. Rev. X. 2016;6:031004. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rolland C, et al. Antibunched photons emitted by a dc-biased Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:186804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.186804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Menard GC, et al. Emission of photon multiplets by a dc-biased superconducting circuit. Phys. Rev. X. 2022;12:021006. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim E, et al. Quantum electrodynamics in a topological waveguide. Phys. Rev. X. 2021;11:011015. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shevchenko SN, Ashhab S, Nori F. Landau-Zener-Stückelberg interferometry. Phys. Rep. 2010;492:1–30. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.03.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nakamura Y, Pashkin YA, Tsai JS. Rabi oscillations in a Josephson-junction charge two-level system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001;87:246601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.246601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sillanpää M, Lehtinen T, Paila A, Makhlin Y, Hakonen P. Continuous-time monitoring of Landau–Zener interference in a cooper-pair box. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;96:187002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.187002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.LaHaye MD, Suh J, Echternach PM, Schwab KC, Roukes ML. Nanomechanical measurements of a superconducting qubit. Nature. 2009;459:960. doi: 10.1038/nature08093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Koshino K, et al. Observation of the three-state dressed states in circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;110:263601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.263601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Oliver WD, et al. Mach–Zehnder interferometry in a strongly driven superconducting qubit. Science. 2005;310:1653. doi: 10.1126/science.1119678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sun G, et al. Population inversion induced by Landau–Zener transition in a strongly driven rf superconducting quantum interference device. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009;94:102502. doi: 10.1063/1.3093823. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Petta JR, Lu H, Gossard AC. A coherent beam splitter for electronic spin states. Science. 2010;327:669–672. doi: 10.1126/science.1183628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stehlik J, et al. Landau–Zener–Stückelberg interferometry of a single electron charge qubit. Phys. Rev. B. 2012;86:121303. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.121303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nakajima T, et al. Coherent transfer of electron spin correlations assisted by dephasing noise. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2133. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04544-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jirovec D, et al. Dynamics of hole singlet-triplet qubits with large -factor differences. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022;128:126803. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.126803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nalbach P, Knörzer J, Ludwig S. Nonequilibrium Landau–Zener–Stueckelberg spectroscopy in a double quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;87:165425. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.165425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cao G, et al. Ultrafast universal quantum control of a quantum-dot charge qubit using Landau–Zener–Stückelberg interference. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:1401. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ivakhnenko O, Shevchenko S, Nori F. Quantum control via Landau–Zener–Stückelberg–Majorana transitions. Phys. Rep. 2023;995:1–89. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wallraff A, et al. Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature. 2004;431:162–167. doi: 10.1038/nature02851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gambetta J, et al. Qubit-photon interactions in a cavity: Measurement-induced dephasing and number splitting. Phys. Rev. A. 2006;74:042318. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.042318. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Paik H, et al. Observation of high coherence in Josephson junction qubits measured in a three-dimensional circuit qed architecture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;107:240501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.240501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fedorov A, et al. Strong coupling of a quantum oscillator to a flux qubit at its symmetry point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;105:060503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.060503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Stern M, et al. Flux qubits with long coherence times for hybrid quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;113:123601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.123601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Peterer MJ, et al. Coherence and decay of higher energy levels of a superconducting Transmon qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015;114:010501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.010501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Blais A, Girvin SM, Oliver WD. Quantum information processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nat. Phys. 2020;16:247–256. doi: 10.1038/s41567-020-0806-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wallraff A, et al. Approaching unit visibility for control of a superconducting qubit with dispersive readout. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;95:060501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.060501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Manucharyan VE, Koch J, Glazman LI, Devoret MH. Fluxonium: single cooper-pair circuit free of charge offsets. Science. 2009;326:113–116. doi: 10.1126/science.1175552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Houck AA, et al. Controlling the spontaneous emission of a superconducting Transmon qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;101:080502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.080502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mallet F, et al. Single-shot qubit readout in circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nat. Phys. 2009;5:791–795. doi: 10.1038/nphys1400. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vijay R, Slichter DH, Siddiqi I. Observation of quantum jumps in a superconducting artificial atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106:110502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.110502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Braumüller J, et al. Multiphoton dressing of an anharmonic superconducting many-level quantum circuit. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;91:054523. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.054523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bishop LS, et al. Nonlinear response of the vacuum rabi resonance. Nat. Phys. 2009;5:105–109. doi: 10.1038/nphys1154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Forn-Díaz P, et al. Ultrastrong coupling of a single artificial atom to an electromagnetic continuum in the nonperturbative regime. Nat. Phys. 2017;13:39–43. doi: 10.1038/nphys3905. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yoshihara F, et al. Superconducting qubit-oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime. Nat. Phys. 2017;13:44–47. doi: 10.1038/nphys3906. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Baust A, et al. Ultrastrong coupling in two-resonator circuit qed. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:214501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pietikäinen I, et al. Observation of the Bloch–Siegert shift in a driven quantum-to-classical transition. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:020501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.020501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Oelsner G, et al. Dressed-state amplification by a single superconducting qubit. Phys.l Rev. Lett. 2013;110:053602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.053602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Majer J, et al. Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus. Nature. 2007;449:443–447. doi: 10.1038/nature06184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Leek PJ, et al. Using sideband transitions for two-qubit operations in superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. B. 2009;79:180511. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.180511. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.DiCarlo L, et al. Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor. Nature. 2009;460:240–244. doi: 10.1038/nature08121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Poletto S, et al. Entanglement of two superconducting qubits in a waveguide cavity via monochromatic two-photon excitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012;109:240505. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.240505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ofek N, et al. Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits. Nature. 2016;536:441–445. doi: 10.1038/nature18949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Leek PJ, et al. Cavity quantum electrodynamics with separate photon storage and qubit readout modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;104:100504. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.100504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Vrajitoarea A, Huang Z, Groszkowski P, Koch J, Houck AA. Quantum control of an oscillator using a stimulated Josephson nonlinearity. Nat. Phys. 2020;16:211–217. doi: 10.1038/s41567-019-0703-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Singh S. Field statistics in some generalized Jaynes–cummings models. Phys. Rev. A. 1982;25:3206–3216. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.25.3206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Puri RR, Agarwal GS. Collapse and revival phenomena in the Jaynes–Cummings model with cavity damping. Phys. Rev. A. 1986;33:3610–3613. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.3610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Agarwal GS, Puri RR. Collapse and revival phenomenon in the evolution of a resonant field in a Kerr-like medium. Phys. Rev. A. 1989;39:2969–2977. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.39.2969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dutra SM, Knight PL, Moya-Cessa H. Large-scale fluctuations in the driven Jaynes–Cummings model. Phys. Rev. A. 1994;49:1993–1998. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.49.1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tavis M, Cummings FW. Exact solution for an -molecule-radiation-field Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. 1968;170:379–384. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.170.379. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Greentree AD, Tahan C, Cole JH, Hollenberg LCL. Quantum phase transitions of light. Nat. Phys. 2006;2:66. doi: 10.1038/nphys466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hartmann MJ, Brandão FGSL, Plenio MB. Strongly interacting polaritons in coupled arrays of cavities. Nat. Phys. 2006;2:66. doi: 10.1038/nphys462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A76, 042319 (2007).
- 66.Braak D. Integrability of the rabi model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;107:100401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.100401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chien W-C, et al. Optical amplification assisted by two-photon processes in a 3-level Transmon artificial atom. Opt. Express. 2019;27:36088–36099. doi: 10.1364/OE.27.036088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Blais A, Huang R-S, Wallraff A, Girvin SM, Schoelkopf RJ. Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: An architecture for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A. 2004;69:062320. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ho IL, Kuo W. Energy conversion from environmental fluctuations to coherent fields by cooper-pair box quantum meta-materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2018;31:055702. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/aaf1f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.





