Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a multifactor intestinal disease with increased morbidity. Recently, pleiotropic drugs with exact biosafety have been urgently needed. Honokiol (HKL) is the major bioactive component of traditional Chinese medicine “Houpu,” with almost no toxic effects and approved anti-inflammation, antioxidant, antispasmodic, etc. effects. This study examined the therapeutic effect of HKL in dextran sulfate sodium- (DSS-) induced experimental colitis. In vivo, C57BL/6 mice received 3% DSS for seven days to generate UC, and HKL was pretreated for five days and given during the whole DSS-induced period. In vitro, RAW264.7 macrophages were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to induce inflammation, and mouse colon epithelial cells (MCEC) were treated with HKL or pretreated with HKL and then stimulated with LPS-induced macrophage supernate to investigate the barrier enhancement roles. HKL significantly ameliorated disease activity index (DAI), colon length, and histopathological scores in DSS-induced colitis. The inflammatory mediators of interleukin 1β (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) were decreased, and the tight conjunction proteins were increased in the HKL-treated group both in vivo and in vitro. Above all, HKL can relieve experimental UC through anti-inflammation, antioxidant, and epithelial barrier enhancement roles. These effects were associated with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ)/nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) p65, sirtuin3 (SIRT3)/adenosine 5′-monophosphate- (AMP-) activated protein kinase (AMPK), and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2)/heme oxygenase 1 (HO1) signaling pathways. In conclusion, after further clinical studies, HKL may be a promising drug for UC.
1. Introduction
UC is a chronic relapsing inflammatory disease limited to the mucosal layer of the colon [1]. The exact pathogenesis of UC is still unknown; the most widely accepted view is that it is multifactorial, including dysregulated immune responses, altered gut microbiota, genetic susceptibility, and environmental factors [1–3]. The global burden of UC continues to increase, for instance, in the US market, from $5.0 billion in 2020 to predicated $11-12 billion by 2026 [4]. The new drugs for UC treatment have been impressive in recent years. However, none is effective in most patients, let alone the biologic-experienced patients [5]. In a nationwide study in Israel, colectomy and steroid dependency rates have remained unchanged in patients with UC during the biological era [6]. The large proportion of primary nonresponders to each molecularly targeted agent may be due to different dominant cytokine levels depending on disease stage and patient characteristics [7]. The pathology of UC is very complex. Up to now, there is no treatment and unlikely to have a therapy suitable for all. So, there is an urgent need for low cost, few side effects, and pleiotropic drugs to enrich current treatment options.
HKL is a simple biphenyl neolignane found in Magnolia species [8]. Its structure is shown in Scheme 1. It is brown to white fine powder, aromatic, spicy taste, and slightly bitter. It is soluble in general organic solvents; easily in benzene, ether, chloroform, ethanol, etc.; and insoluble in water [9]. It is a potent bioactive compound of traditional Chinese medicine “Houpu.” According to the Chinese medicine meridian theory, “Houpu” returns to the large intestine meridian and is widely used to treat gastrointestinal diseases. Modern investigations have confirmed that HKL has anti-inflammation [10], antimicrobial [11, 12], antioxidant [13–15], antispasmodic [16], anticancer [8, 17–19], antithrombotic [20], antidepressant, anxiolytic [21], and other actions [22, 23]. As known to all, synthetic drugs have many side effects, including damage to the endocrine system, immune system, and gastrointestinal tract. Regarding the numerous pharmacologic benefits without noticeable side effects of HKL, we hypothesize that HKL might have therapeutic effects on UC.
In the present study, we investigated the anti-inflammation, antioxidant, and intestinal barrier enhancement roles of HKL on UC treatment in vitro and in vivo. The mechanisms responsible for its actions have also been explored.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animal Model and Treatments
Six- to eight-week-old female C57BL/6 mice weighed 15-20 g and were purchased from the Laboratory animal center of Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital (Shanxi, China, animal license number: SYXK (Jin) 2019-0003) and kept in the specified pathogen-free (SPF) condition at 22-23°C with a standard 12 h light/dark cycle. All mice have free access to food and water. Forty mice were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10 per group). The control group was given a normal diet; the HKL group received HKL (40 mg/kg wt. purity≥98%, Yuanye, China) dissolved in olive oil (Yuanye, China) via oral gavage (10ul/g) from D1 to D12; the DSS group received DSS (3% w/v, g/ml, 36-50 kDa, Yeasen, China) via drinking water D6-D12; the DSS+HKL group pretreated with HKL for five days and then received 3% DSS for seven days with HKL gavage once a day. The control and DSS groups received olive oil (10ul/g) once daily by gavage during the experimental period. The Animal Ethics Committee approved all animal procedures of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (Approval No. DW2022051).
2.2. Macroscopic Grading and Histological Analysis of Colitis
The macroscopic grading of DSS-induced colitis is based on a standard scoring system called the disease activity index (DAI) [24]. The details are shown in Table 1. The body weight, stool consistency, and rectal bleeding of each mouse were recorded in fact daily. All mice were anesthetized and sacrificed by cervical dislocation 24 h after the last drug treatment. Their colons were excised, and the length was measured promptly. The distal colonic tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution (Servicebio, China), embedded in paraffin (Solarbio, China), sectioned, and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) (Solarbio, China) for optical microscopic (CKX53, Olympus, Japan) observation. Histopathological scores were determined according to the previous criteria [25] shown in Table 2.
Table 1.
Score | Weight loss | Stool consistency | Blood |
---|---|---|---|
0 | None | Normal | Negative hemoccult |
1 | 1-5% | Soft but still formed | Negative hemoccult |
2 | 6-10% | Soft | Positive hemoccult |
3 | 11-18% | Very soft, wet | Blood traces in stool visible |
4 | >18% | Watery diarrhea | Gross rectal bleeding |
Table 2.
Score | Inflammation | Crypt damage | Ulceration | Edema |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | No infiltrate | None | None | Absent |
1 | Occasional cells limited to submucosa | Some crypt damage, spaces between crypts | Small, focal ulcers | Present |
2 | Significant presence of inflammatory cells in submucosa limited to focal areas | Larger spaces between crypts, loss of goblet cells, some shortening of crypts | Frequent small ulcers | |
3 | Infiltrate is present in both submucosa and lamina propria, limited to focal areas | Large areas without crypts, surrounded by normal crypts | Large areas lacking surface epithelium | |
4 | A large amount of infiltrate in the submucosa, lamina propria, and surrounding blood vessels, covering large areas of mucosa | No crypts | ||
5 | Transmural inflammation (mucosa to muscularis) |
2.3. Immunohistochemistry
After dewaxing the paraffin-embedded colon sections, citric acid (Solarbio, China) was used for antigen reparation. Then, the slices were rinsed with 3% H2O2 (Solarbio, China) for 25 min at room temperature to block endogenous peroxidase activity and incubated with 3% bovine serum albumin (Solarbio, China) for 30 min to block nonspecific binding. Followed by setting with the first antibodies (Proteintech, USA) in a wet box at 4°C overnight, the sections were incubated with the corresponding secondary antibody: anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1 : 200) (Proteintech, USA). Then, the freshly prepared diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Solarbio, China) chromogenic solution was dripped on the slices for coloration. The coloration time was controlled under a microscope (CKX53, Olympus, Japan), rinsing with tap water to stop. Counterstaining was performed using HE (Solarbio, China), sealing the sections with synthetic resin (Servicebio, China). Finally, we conducted the microscope examination and the positive results were shown in brown.
2.4. Cell Culture
RAW264.7 macrophages, purchased from Bena Culture Collection, and MCEC, purchased from Bluefbio, were both cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Australia) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Australia), maintaining at 37°C in a humidified chamber (HF100, Heal Force, China) of 5% CO2. The cells were seeded into a 10 cm plate and subcultured every 2-3 days when the cells were 90% confluence. For further experiments, cells were seeded in a 6-well plate and treated with HKL or LPS (Solarbio, China) when the RAW264.7 cells were 80% confluence and MCEC 100% confluence, respectively.
2.5. Cell Viability Assay
RAW264.7 cells or MCEC were seeded into 96-well plates (NEST, China) (103-104 cells/well) and treated with various concentrations of HKL for 24 h. Then, 10ul of Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) (Boster, China) was added to each well for reaction; 15-30 minutes later, a microplate reader (Epoch, BioTek, USA) was used to measure the OD values of each well at 450 nm. The cellular viability was calculated following the instructions of the manufacturer.
2.6. Transepithelial Electric Resistance (TEER)
The MCEC were well suspended and seeded at a density of 105 cells/well, 0.5 ml suspension was added to the upper chamber of a Transwell plate (12 mm diameter inserts and 0.4 um pore size) (Corning Costar, USA), and 1.5 ml of culture medium was added to the lower chamber, cultured for 3-4 days to form a cell monolayer. The culture medium was replaced with an equal volume of D-Hank's solution (Boster, China) and incubated for 20 min at 37°C. Then, the resistance value was acquired by using an epithelial voltmeter (EVOM2, WPI, USA) and inserting two silver chloride electrodes on both sides of the Transwell membrane. The resistance values were measured every other day. When the values were stable, the LPS group has added the supernatant of 12h-LPS-induced RAW264.7 macrophages; the HKL group was added HKL (40 uM) for 14 h; the HKL+LPS group was added HKL (40 uM) for 2 h, then added the supernatant of 12h-LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells for another 12 h, respectively, to the lower chamber. The details are shown in Figure 1(e). After that, the resistance value of each group was measured as mentioned above. The TEER calculation formula is as follows: TEER = (R − RB) × surface area (R is the resistance value of the testing well, RB is the resistance value of the blank well, and surface area = 1.12 cm2).
2.7. Cell Immunofluorescence
When corresponding conditions had treated cells, they were washed with 37°C 1x PBS (Meilunbio, China) twice, then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Servicebio, China) for 10 min, and washed with 1x PBS thrice. Then, incubate with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Mini Bio, China) for 15 min and washed with 1x PBS thrice. They were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (Solarbio, China) for one hour at room temperature. Then, cells were incubated with the primary antibodies against NF-κB p65 (Proteintech, USA), NRF2 (Proteintech, USA), ZO1 (Proteintech, USA), occludin (Proteintech, USA), and Claudin1 (Proteintech, USA) diluted to 1 : 500 at 4°C overnight and washed with cold PBS sufficiently thrice. Then the cells were incubated with secondary antibodies (ABclonal, USA) (1 : 500) at room temperature for one hour and washed with PBS thrice. Subsequently, cells were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Solarbio, China) for 5 min. The images were acquired using a Nikon Ni-U upright fluorescence microscope.
2.8. Western Blot Analysis
Proteins were extracted from both colon tissue homogenates and cells using RIPA lysis buffer (Solarbio, China) containing 1% phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride (Solarbio, China) and 1% protein phosphatase inhibitors (Solarbio, China), centrifuging at 12000g at 4°C for 15 min (Centrifuge 5430R, Eppendorf, Germany), and collecting the suspension liquid. The protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid kit (Thermo Fisher, USA). Equal amounts of protein extract samples (40-50 μg) were separated by 10% or 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate- (SDS-) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Immobilon-PSQ, Millipore, Ireland). After blocking the PVDF membranes with 5% skim milk (Solarbio, China) for one hour at room temperature, washed with Tris-buffered saline Tween (TBST) solution twice, the membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies (NF-κB p65 (Proteintech, USA), NRF2 (Proteintech, USA), HO1 (Proteintech, USA), phosphorylation-AMPKα (Thr172) (Cell Signaling, USA), AMPK (Proteintech, USA), SIRT3 (Proteintech, USA), COX2 (Proteintech, USA), iNOS (Proteintech, USA), ZO1 (Proteintech, USA), occludin (Proteintech, USA), Claudin1 (Proteintech, USA), and GAPDH (Proteintech, USA) (dilution 1 : 1000)) overnight at 4°C and washed with TBST thrice, followed by incubation with an HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibody (ABclonal, USA) (dilution 1 : 2000) at room temperature for one hour and rinsed thrice with TBST buffer. Finally, protein bands were reacted to an enhanced chemiluminescence solution (Boster, China) and detected using the Bio-Rad Image Lab system (ChemiDoc XRS+, Bio-Rad, USA). The intensity of the bands was quantified using the ImageJ software, and the results of GAPDH normalized the relative protein expression levels.
2.9. Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from the colon tissue homogenates, and RAW264.7 cells or MCEC using RNAiso Plus (Takara, Japan) and their concentrations were determined. The primer sequences of interleukin IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, ZO1, occludin, and Claudin1 are shown in Table 3. 1 μg RNA was reverse-transcribed into complementary DNA using a commercial RT-PCR kit (Takara, Japan). RT-PCR assays were performed using the 2x M5 HiPer SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix (Mei5 Biotechnology, China) with the CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (CFX Connect, Bio-Rad, USA). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. The expression levels of target mRNA were normalized with β-actin and calculated with the 2-ΔΔct method.
Table 3.
Gene | Primer sequence | |
---|---|---|
IL-1β | F: 5′-GTTCCCATTAGACAACTGCACTACAG-3′ | R: 5′-GTCGTTGCTTGGTTCTCCTTGTA-3′ |
IL-6 | F: 5′-CCAGAAACCGCTATGAAGTTCC-3′ | R: 5′-GTTGGGAGTGGTATCCTCTGTGA-3′ |
TNF-α | F: 5′-CCCCAAAGGGATGAGAAGTTC-3′ | R: 5′-CCTCCACTTGGTGGTTTGCT-3′ |
ZO-1 | F: 5′-GACCTTGATTTGCATGACGA-3′ | R: 5′-AGGACCGTGTAATGGCAGAC-3′ |
Occludin | F: 5′-ACACTTGCTTGGGACAGAGG-3′ | R: 5′-AAGGAAGCGATGAAGCAGAA-3′ |
Claudin-1 | F: 5′-AGGTCTGGCGACATTAGTGG-3′ | R: 5′-CGTGGTGTTGGGTAAGAGGT-3′ |
β-Actin | F: 5′-GTCAGGTCATCACTATCGGCAAT-3′ | R: 5′-AGAGGTCTTTACGGATGTCAACGT-3′ |
iNOS | F: 5′-GAACTGTAGCACAGCACAGGAAAT-3′ | R: 5′-CGTACCGGATGAGCTGTGAAT-3′ |
COX2 | F: 5′-CAGTTTATGTTGTCTGTCCAGAGTTTC-3′ | R: 5′-CCAGCACTTCACCCATCAGTT-3′ |
2.10. Statistical Analysis
All data are shown as mean ± SEM. The statistical analyses were performed in the GraphPad Prism software version 8.0. The significance of the differences between groups was analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple range tests. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. For every result in this study, equal or greater than three biological repetitions were conducted.
3. Results
3.1. HKL Ameliorated DAI and Colon Length in DSS-Induced Colitis in Mice
DSS-induced experimental colitis is a classical ulcerative colitis animal model for its similar symptoms and histopathological characteristics. In this study, the HKL treatment group had lower disease activity index, which consists of weight loss, stool character, and fecal occult blood, compared with the DSS group (Figure 2(c)). Among these indexes, the body weight change is a quantifiable visual indicator of the state of the mice. As shown, the body weight of the model group mice decreased remarkably from the fifth day when they received special water containing 3% DSS. In contrast, the HKL pretreated group showed a mitigated decrease in body weight (Figure 2(b)). The shortening of colon length revealed the severity of DSS-induced colitis. The HKL+DSS group showed an attenuated degree of this trend compared with the DSS group (Figure 2(a)).
3.2. HKL Treatment Decreases Inflammatory Mediators in DSS-Induced Mice
The qRT-PCR results showed that the levels of IL-1β (Figure 3(a)), IL-6 (Figure 3(b)), TNF-α (Figure 3(c)), iNOS (Figure 3(d)), and COX2 (Figure 3(e)) significantly increased in colon tissue homogenates of the DSS group compared with the control group. In contrast, the levels of the above inflammatory mediators were marked decreased in the HKL treatment group compared with the DSS group. These data suggested that HKL played an anti-inflammatory role in vivo.
3.3. HKL Treatment Improved the Histopathological Features of the DSS-Induced Mice
The histopathological features of the HE-stained sections showed marked infiltration of inflammatory cells, loss of crypts, formation of crypt abscesses, destruction of the mucosal layer, and thickening of the muscular layer in the DSS group. In contrast, the DSS+HKL group showed alleviated pathological injuries of the above features (Figure 4(a)). This is also measured by the histological score to show more intuitively (Figure 4(b)). HKL could mitigate the histopathological injuries of experimental colitis from this study, which is also the golden standard of clinical cure.
3.4. HKL Improved the Barrier Function of the DSS-Induced Mice
The gene-expressed levels (Figure 5(a)) and the protein-expressed levels (Figure 5(b)) of ZO1, occludin, and Claudin1 increased dramatically in the DSS+HKL group compared with the DSS group. Additionally, the colon tissue immunohistochemistry showed the expression of MUC2, MUC3, and trefoil factor-3 (TFF3) decreased in DSS-induced mice; however, HKL treatment ameliorated the levels of the above proteins (Figure 5(c)). These results indicated that HKL improved barrier function in DSS-induced colitis partially by restoring the tight junction proteins, mucins, and TFF3 levels.
3.5. HKL Suppressed Proinflammatory Cytokine Expression in LPS-Stimulated Macrophages
Cell viability assay showed that for RAW264.7 cells, HKL did not affect cell viability up to 10 μM; for MCEC, the concentration was up to 40 μM for no significant difference (Figure 6(a)); combined with previous studies [22], 10 μM and 40 μM concentrations were chosen for RAW264.7 cells and MCEC, respectively, for subsequent experiments. The qRT-PCR analyses indicated that the proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α, increased markedly in 6h-LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells (Figure 6(b)), and the western blot analyses showed that the expression of iNOS and COX2 also significantly increases in 12h-LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells (Figure 6(c)). In contrast, the LPS+HKL group showed reduced gene and protein expression levels of the above inflammatory mediators. Collectively, these data demonstrated that HKL had an inhibiting effect on inflammatory response in vitro.
3.6. HKL Maintained a Normal Epithelium Barrier in MCEC
To investigate the protective role of HKL on the intestinal epithelium barrier in vitro, the MCEC were stimulated with the supernatant of 12h-LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells. The qRT-PCR data indicated that compared with the LPS-stimulated supernatant group, the HKL pretreated group had an average level of the ZO1 and occludin mRNA expression (Figure 1(a)). Immunofluorescence was also used to show more intuitively the ZO1, occludin, and Claudin1 protein expression levels of the MCEC with the same cell stimulation condition (Figure 1(b)). In addition, the western blot analysis showed that the ZO1, occludin, and Claudin1 protein expressions were significantly increased with the HKL treatment compared with the control group. However, the optimum effects occurred at the distinct time point for different proteins (Figure 1(c)).
A Transwell plate was also used to observe the TEER change. The data showed that the supernatant of 12h-LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells significantly decreased the resistance value of the MCEC monolayer, whereas pretreating with HKL observably inhibited this reducing effect (Figure 1(d)).
Above all, these data demonstrated that HKL exerts a strengthening and repairing role in the intestinal epithelium barrier of MCEC.
3.7. HKL Regulated DSS-Induced Activation of PPARγ/NF-κB Signaling in Mice
It is well known that NF-κB is a crucial nuclear transcription factor that regulates inflammatory response. So, the effect of HKL on phosphorylation levels of p65 in colonic tissue homogenates was analyzed using a western blot. Compared to the control group, the DSS treatment group caused elevated phosphorylation levels of p65. The DSS+HKL group showed markedly reduced phosphorylation of p65 protein. Regarding the PPARγ signaling pathway that is essential for NF-κB activation [26], HKL has been proven to be a PPARγ agonist [27]. The expression of PPARγ was further investigated. As shown in this study, PPARγ significantly reduced in the colonic tissue of the DSS group, while the HKL treatment could recover this trend. Besides, HKL alone could stimulate the expression of PPARγ (Figure 7).
3.8. The Effects of HKL on PPARγ/NF-κB p65, SIRT3/AMPK, and NRF2/HO1 Signaling Pathways In Vitro
Similar to the findings in vivo, HKL treatment markedly reduced the elevated phosphorylation level of p65 and normalized the reduced level of PPARγ (Figure 8(a)). To further explore the underlying mechanism of the epithelial barrier reinforced the role of HKL, the SIRT3/AMPK and NRF2/HO1 signaling pathways were investigated. As shown in the present study, the phosphorylation level of AMPK at Thr172, SIRT3, NRF2, and HO1 expressions was significantly increased at the different time points in MCEC, which were treated by HKL (Figure 8(b)).
Immunofluorescent staining was also used to investigate the nuclear translocation of p65 and NRF2. When the RAW264.7 macrophages were grown to 80% confluence, pretreated with 10 μM HKL for one hour, and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg/ml) for six hours, images showed that LPS blocked the nuclear translocation of NRF2, while HKL compensated for this effect (Figure 8(c)). In contrast, LPS significantly stimulated the nuclear translocation of NF-κB p65, while HKL inhibited this process (Figure 8(d)).
4. Discussion
Nowadays, UC has been considered more than a superficial disease confined to the mucosa, which includes the risk of proximal extension, reduced rectal compliance, increased risk of neoplasia, reduced likelihood of responding to medical therapies, fibrosis in the submucosa, altered motility, overlapping functional symptom effects on the myenteric plexus, and even increased risks of cardiovascular morbidity [28]. With all this in-depth knowledge of UC, new individualized treatment is urgently needed. At present, histo-endoscopic remission might be a complete definition of mucosal healing, which is a desirable therapeutic goal in UC [29]. HKL showed a remarkable effect on clinical presentations and histopathological recovery of DSS-induced UC in the present study. Furthermore, chemically induced models mimic some key immunological and histopathological features of IBD in humans. The strengths of the acute models are the similar alterations of barrier function, innate immune effects, and flares [24]. So, the current results provided potential therapeutic strategies for UC in a preclinical setting. However, further investigations about HKL on the chronic models of UC should be carried on. Previously, HKL has been proven to affect stem cell viability to inhibit colon tumorigenesis by suppressing oncogenic YAP1 function [30]. In that study, an AOM/DSS-induced colitis-associated cancer model was used.
Regardless of the unclear etiology of UC, the ultimate symptom is barrier disruption, so restoration of intestinal barrier function is the primary therapeutic aim, which can be achieved by promoting inflammation resolution and accelerating mucosa reparation [2, 31]. Consequently, both the anti-inflammation and the intestinal mucosa reparation roles of HKL had been observed in this study. On the anti-inflammation aspect, inflammatory mediators, such as iNOS and COX2, and inflammatory genes, such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, were increased in the LPS-treated RAW264.7 macrophages, and the LPS+HKL group showed decreased levels. Similar effects were also observed in the DSS and DSS+HKL in vivo groups. The anti-inflammatory effects may work through PPARγ/NF-κB signaling pathway. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor highly expressed in the colon. It has been proposed as a critical inhibitor of colitis by attenuating nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) activity [26, 32]. Many studies about natural agents, such as PPARγ agonists, could protect mice from DSS-induced UC through its anti-inflammatory role [33–37]. The activation of the PPARγ response elements (PPRE) in the nuclear is based on forming a heterodimer between PPARγ and retinoid X receptor (RXR). So, agents with synergistic effects on PPARγ/RXR heterodimer may be of better efficacy than pure PPARγ agonists. Interestingly, HKL, apart from its activation of PPARγ, also works as an RXR agonist [38], coincidently meeting this condition.
Besides inflammation, the overwhelming ROS generation and defective antioxidant defense contribute to IBD's progression. Oxidative stress is now regarded as a pathogenic and critical factor in the initiation, progression, and severity of IBD rather than a consequence of chronic inflammation in the intestinal mucosa [39]. NRF2 is a stress-responsive transcription factor associated with cellular homeostasis and has been speculated to have a protective effect on UC by regulating the oxidative stress response and repressing inflammation [40–42]. When the homeostatic balance is interrupted, NRF2 translocates into the nucleus and activates the expression of various genes, one of which is the antioxidant enzyme: HO-1 [43]. Our results showed the activation of NRF2/HO-1 expression in MCEC and the translocation of NRF2 from the cytoplasm to nuclear in RAW264.7 macrophages when treated by HKL, indicating the antioxidant effects of HKL. As previously described, there is a cross-talk between the AMPK and NRF2 axes, and that AMPK works upstream of NRF2 [44–46]. So the activation of AMPK may have both energy homeostatic maintenance and oxidative clearance roles.
AMPK is a crucial cellular energy sensor [47]. AMPK can promote autophagy, which is a process that maintains intestinal barrier function by regulating tight junction proteins [48]. In addition, AMPK has been demonstrated to enhance intestinal barrier function and epithelial differentiation via promoting caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) expression [49]. The previous study shows that mitochondrial deacetylase SIRT3 activates AMPK to enhance macroautophagy and chaperon-mediated autophagy to protect hepatocytes against lipotoxicity [50]; since HKL has an apparent activation on SIRT3, the potential mechanism of the interaction between SIRT3 and AMPK in intestinal epithelial barrier enhancement can be further investigated. Apart from its roles in intestinal barrier maintenance, AMPK activators can reduce macrophage inflammation through various signaling pathways, such as AMPK/MAPK [51], AMPK/SIRT1/NF-κB [52], and AMPK/NRF2/HO-1 [44], which indicates the further investigation of HKL as an anti-inflammation agent through AMPK activation. Above all, the upregulated levels of tight junction proteins in the MCEC monolayer when treated by HKL and in the colons of DSS+HKL-treated mice compared to the DSS-induced subjects may be acted through AMPK/NRF2/HO-1 antioxidant pathway and SIRT3/AMPK energy regulation pathway. The cross-talk between these pathways should be further investigated.
Besides new drugs, advanced colon-targeting delivery systems, which exploit multiple characteristics of the colonic environment and exert their actions in parallel to achieve more robust and reliable site-specific drug delivery, can also be utilized to achieve better therapeutic effects [53]. This system can be used to realize the targeted delivery of HKL to the colon focal zone for a better therapeutic action of UC in the future.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that HKL could alleviate DSS-induced colitis by reducing inflammation, inhibiting oxidative stress, and strengthening intestinal barrier integrity. The underlying signaling pathways likely involve PPARγ/NF-κB, NRF2/HO-1, and SIRT3/AMPK (Figure 9). The noticeable alleviating effects suggest that HKL is a promising treatment strategy for the prevention of UC.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Experimental Animal Center of Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital for providing and breeding experimental animals. This research was funded by the Four Batch of Science and Technology Innovation Plan Foundation of Shanxi Province (grant number 2021XM03) and Shanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Science and Technology.
Abbreviations
- UC:
Ulcerative colitis
- HKL:
Honokiol
- DSS:
Dextran sulfate sodium
- LPS:
Lipopolysaccharide
- MCEC:
Epithelial cells
- DAI:
Disease activity index
- IL-1β:
Interleukin 1β
- IL-6:
Interleukin 6
- TNF-α:
Tumor necrosis factor α
- iNOS:
Inducible nitric oxide synthase
- COX2:
Cyclooxygenase-2
- PPARγ:
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ
- NF-κB:
Nuclear factor-κB
- SIRT3:
Sirtuin3
- AMPK:
Adenosine 5′-monophosphate-activated protein kinase
- NRF2:
Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2
- HO1:
Heme oxygenase 1
- SPF:
Specified pathogen free
- HE:
Hematoxylin and eosin
- DAB:
Diaminobenzidine
- DMEM:
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium
- FBS:
Fetal bovine serum
- CCK-8:
Cell Counting Kit-8
- TEER:
Transepithelial electric resistance
- DAPI:
4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole
- SDS:
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
- PVDF:
Polyvinylidene difluoride
- TBST:
Tris-buffered saline Tween
- qRT-PCR:
Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction
- TFF3:
Trefoil factor-3
- PPRE:
PPARγ response elements
- RXR:
Retinoid X receptor
- CDX2:
Caudal type homeobox 2.
Data Availability
The data used to support the finding of this study are included within the article, and all data are available.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Authors' Contributions
Lu Wang conducted experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the original draft. Junping Wang completed the review and modified the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Ungaro R., Mehandru S., Allen P. B., Peyrin-Biroulet L., Colombel J. F. Ulcerative colitis. The Lancet . 2017;389(10080):1756–1770. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32126-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kobayashi T., Siegmund B., le Berre C., et al. Ulcerative colitis. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers . 2020;6(1):p. 74. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0205-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Neurath M. F. Targeting immune cell circuits and trafficking in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature Immunology . 2019;20(8):970–979. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0415-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Al-Horani R., Spanudakis E., Hamad B. The market for ulcerative colitis. Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery . 2022;21(1):15–16. doi: 10.1038/d41573-021-00194-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Grossberg L. B., Papamichael K., Cheifetz A. S. Review article: emerging drug therapies in inflammatory bowel disease. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics . 2022;55(7):789–804. doi: 10.1111/apt.16785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Atia O., Orlanski-Meyer E., Lujan R., et al. Colectomy rates did not decrease in paediatric- and adult-onset ulcerative colitis during the biologics era: a nationwide study from the epi-IIRN. Journal of Crohn's & Colitis . 2021;16(5):796–803. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nakase H., Sato N., Mizuno N., Ikawa Y. The influence of cytokines on the complex pathology of ulcerative colitis. Autoimmunity Reviews . 2022;21(3, article 103017) doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.103017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ong C. P., Lee W. L., Tang Y. Q., Yap W. H. Honokiol: a review of its anticancer potential and mechanisms. Cancers (Basel) . 2020;12(1) doi: 10.3390/cancers12010048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Amorati R., Zotova J., Baschieri A., Valgimigli L. Anti-oxidant activity of magnolol and honokiol: kinetic and mechanistic investigations of their reaction with peroxyl radicals. The Journal of Organic Chemistry . 2015;80(21):10651–10659. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b01772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Munroe M. E., Arbiser J. L., Bishop G. A. Honokiol, a natural plant product, inhibits inflammatory signals and alleviates inflammatory arthritis. Journal of Immunology . 2007;179(2):753–763. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.2.753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chiu K. C., Shih Y. H., Wang T. H., et al. In vitro antimicrobial and antipro-inflammation potential of honokiol and magnolol against oral pathogens and macrophages. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association . 2021;120(2):827–837. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Oufensou S., Scherm B., Pani G., et al. Honokiol, magnolol and its monoacetyl derivative show strong anti-fungal effect on Fusarium isolates of clinical relevance. PLoS One . 2019;14(9, article e0221249) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xia S., Lin H., Liu H., et al. Honokiol attenuates sepsis-associated acute kidney injury via the inhibition of oxidative stress and inflammation. Inflammation . 2019;42(3):826–834. doi: 10.1007/s10753-018-0937-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ye J. S., Chen L., Lu Y. Y., Lei S. Q., Peng M., Xia Z. Y. SIRT3 activator honokiol ameliorates surgery/anesthesia-induced cognitive decline in mice through anti-oxidative stress and anti-inflammatory in hippocampus. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics . 2019;25(3):355–366. doi: 10.1111/cns.13053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhang B., Wang C., Sun Y., et al. Xylanase and fermented polysaccharide of _Hericium caputmedusae_ reduce pathogenic infection of broilers by improving antioxidant and anti- inflammatory properties. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity . 2018;2018:11. doi: 10.1155/2018/4296985.4296985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chan S. S., Zhao M., Lao L., Fong H., Che C. T. Magnolol and honokiol account for the anti-spasmodic effect of Magnolia officinalis in isolated guinea pig ileum. Planta Medica . 2008;74(4):381–384. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Maioli M., Basoli V., Carta P., et al. Synthesis of magnolol and honokiol derivatives and their effect against hepatocarcinoma cells. PLoS One . 2018;13(2, article e0192178) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang H. H., Chen Y., Changchien C. Y., et al. Pharmaceutical evaluation of honokiol and magnolol on apoptosis and migration inhibition in human bladder cancer cells. Frontiers in Pharmacology . 2020;11, article 549338 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.549338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhao M., Zheng Y. H., Zhao Q. Y., et al. Synthesis and evaluation of new compounds bearing 3-(4-aminopiperidin-1-yl)methyl magnolol scaffold as anticancer agents for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer via targeting autophagy. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry . 2021;209, article 112922 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li L., Chen C., Zhang C., et al. A honokiol-mediated robust coating for blood-contacting devices with anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and antithrombotic properties. Journal of Materials Chemistry B . 2021;9(47):9770–9783. doi: 10.1039/D1TB01617B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Woodbury A., Yu S. P., Wei L., García P. Neuro-modulating effects of honokiol: a review. Frontiers in Neurology . 2013;4:p. 130. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2013.00130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rauf A., Olatunde A., Imran M., et al. Honokiol: a review of its pharmacological potential and therapeutic insights. Phytomedicine . 2021;90, article 153647 doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ding Y., Song Z., Li H., et al. Honokiol ameliorates high-fat-diet-induced obesity of different sexes of mice by modulating the composition of the gut microbiota. Frontiers in Immunology . 2019;10:p. 2800. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wirtz S., Popp V., Kindermann M., et al. Chemically induced mouse models of acute and chronic intestinal inflammation. Nature Protocols . 2017;12(7):1295–1309. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stillie R., Stadnyk A. W. Role of TNF receptors, TNFR1 and TNFR2, in dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases . 2009;15(10):1515–1525. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dubuquoy L., Rousseaux C., Thuru X., et al. PPARgamma as a new therapeutic target in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut . 2006;55(9):p. 1341. doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.093484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhong X., Liu H. Honokiol attenuates diet-induced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by regulating macrophage polarization through activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology . 2018;33(2):524–532. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Krugliak Cleveland N., Torres J., Rubin D. T. What does disease progression look like in ulcerative colitis, and how might it be prevented? Gastroenterology . 2022;162(5):1396–1408. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hernández-Rocha C., Nayeri S., Turpin W., et al. Combined histo-endoscopic remission but not endoscopic healing alone in ulcerative colitis is associated with a mucosal transcriptional profile resembling healthy mucosa. Journal of Crohn's & Colitis . 2022;16(7):1020–1029. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Subramaniam D., Ponnurangam S., Ramalingam S., et al. Honokiol affects stem cell viability by suppressing oncogenic YAP1 function to inhibit colon tumorigenesis. Cell . 2021;10(7):p. 1607. doi: 10.3390/cells10071607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ho G. T., Cartwright J. A., Thompson E. J., Bain C. C., Rossi A. G. Resolution of inflammation and gut repair in IBD: translational steps towards complete mucosal healing. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases . 2020;26(8):1131–1143. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izaa045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dubuquoy L., Jansson E. Å., Deeb S., et al. Impaired expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ in ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology . 2003;124(5):1265–1276. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00271-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cao H., Liu J., Shen P., et al. Protective effect of naringin on DSS-induced ulcerative colitis in mice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 2018;66(50):13133–13140. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kong R., Luo H., Wang N., et al. Portulaca extract attenuates development of dextran sulfate sodium induced colitis in mice through activation of PPARγ. PPAR Research . 2018;2018:11. doi: 10.1155/2018/6079101.6079101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li D., Feng Y., Tian M., Ji J., Hu X., Chen F. Gut microbiota-derived inosine from dietary barley leaf supplementation attenuates colitis through PPARγ signaling activation. Microbiome . 2021;9(1):p. 83. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01028-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tian X., Peng Z., Luo S., et al. Aesculin protects against DSS-induced colitis though activating PPARγ and inhibiting NF-кB pathway. European journal of pharmacology . 2019;857, article 172453 doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang L., Waltenberger B., Pferschy-Wenzig E. M., et al. Natural product agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ): a review. Biochemical Pharmacology . 2014;92(1):73–89. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kotani H., Tanabe H., Mizukami H., Makishima M., Inoue M. Identification of a naturally occurring rexinoid, honokiol, that activates the retinoid X receptor. Journal of Natural Products . 2010;73(8):1332–1336. doi: 10.1021/np100120c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tian T., Wang Z., Zhang J. Pathomechanisms of oxidative stress in inflammatory bowel disease and potential anti-oxidant therapies. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity . 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/4535194.4535194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Khor TO, Huang M. T., Kwon K. H., Chan J. Y., Reddy B. S., Kong A. N. Nrf2-deficient mice have an increased susceptibility to dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. Cancer Research . 2006;66(24):11580–11584. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang R., Luo Y., Lu Y., et al. Maggot extracts alleviate inflammation and oxidative stress in acute experimental colitis via the activation of Nrf2. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity . 2019;2019:18. doi: 10.1155/2019/4703253.4703253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang Y., Yan T., Sun D., et al. Rutaecarpine inhibits KEAP1-NRF2 interaction to activate NRF2 and ameliorate dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. Free Radical Biology & Medicine . 2020;148:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Piotrowska M., Swierczynski M., Fichna J., Piechota-Polanczyk A. The Nrf2 in the pathophysiology of the intestine: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications for inflammatory bowel diseases. Pharmacological Research . 2021;163, article 105243 doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mo C., Wang L., Zhang J., et al. The cross-talk between Nrf2 and AMPK signal pathways is important for the anti-inflammatory effect of berberine in LPS-stimulated macrophages and endotoxin-shocked mice. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling . 2014;20(4):574–588. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.5116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wu W., Wang S., Liu Q., Wang X., Shan T., Wang Y. Cathelicidin-WA attenuates LPS-induced inflammation and redox imbalance through activation of AMPK signaling. Free Radical Biology & Medicine . 2018;129:338–353. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.09.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhou Z., Zhang L., Liu Y., et al. Luteolin protects chondrocytes from H2O2-induced oxidative injury and attenuates osteoarthritis progression by activating AMPK-Nrf2 signaling. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity . 2022;2022:20. doi: 10.1155/2022/5635797.5635797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hardie D. G., Ross F. A., Hawley S. A. AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology . 2012;13(4):251–262. doi: 10.1038/nrm3311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Foerster E. G., Mukherjee T., Cabral-Fernandes L., Rocha J. D. B., Girardin S. E., Philpott D. J. How autophagy controls the intestinal epithelial barrier. Autophagy . 2022;18(1):86–103. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.1909406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sun X., Yang Q., Rogers C. J., du M., Zhu M. J. AMPK improves gut epithelial differentiation and barrier function via regulating _Cdx2_ expression. Cell Death and Differentiation . 2017;24(5):819–831. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2017.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhang T., Liu J., Shen S., Tong Q., Ma X., Lin L. SIRT3 promotes lipophagy and chaperon-mediated autophagy to protect hepatocytes against lipotoxicity. Cell Death and Differentiation . 2020;27(1):329–344. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0356-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jeong H. W., Hsu K. C., Lee J. W., et al. Berberine suppresses pro-inflammatory responses through AMPK activation in macrophages. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism . 2009;296(4):E955–E964. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90599.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yang Z., Kahn B. B., Shi H., Xue B. Z. Macrophage alpha1 AMP-activated protein kinase (alpha1AMPK) antagonizes fatty acid-induced inflammation through SIRT1. The Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2010;285(25):19051–19059. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.123620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Awad A., Madla C. M., McCoubrey L. E., et al. Clinical translation of advanced colonic drug delivery technologies. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews . 2022;181, article 114076 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.114076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the finding of this study are included within the article, and all data are available.