Abstract
In this era of testing uncertainties, changing guidelines, and incomplete knowledge, “clearing” patients for surgery in the time of SARS-COVID-19 has been met with various challenges. Efforts to increase patient fitness have long been at the forefront of surgical practicing guidelines, but the current climate requires a renewed sense of focus on these measures. It is essential to understand how dietary history, previous antibiotic exposure, and baseline microbiota can inform and optimize preoperative and postoperative management of the surgical patient in the time of COVID-19. This piece focuses on the clinical, molecular, and physiologic dynamics that occur in preparing patients for surgery during COVID-19, considering the physiologic stress inherent in the procedure itself and the importance of specialized perioperative management approaches. COVID-19 has created a renewed sense of urgency to maintain our discipline in implementing those practices that have long been confirmed to be beneficial to patient outcome. This practice, along with a renewed interest in understanding how the gut microbiome is affected by the confinement, social distancing, etc., due to the COVID pandemic, is ever more important. Therefore, here we discuss the microbiome’s role as a defense against viral infection and its potential for reactivation during the process of surgery as the next frontier for surgical advancement.
In this piece, we focus on the clinical, molecular, and physiologic dynamics of the process of surgery as it pertains to preparing patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Topics include diet modulation, the judicious use of antibiotics, and the role of a healthy microbiome as a defense against viral infection or reactivation.
VULNERABILITY OF THE SURGICAL PATIENT TO CORONAVIRUS INFECTION
Despite optimal surgical conditions, postoperative infection remains a persistent threat for otherwise healthy patients undergoing elective operations. A study of over 8000 patients demonstrated that hospital-associated infections in surgical patients have been increasing, a large share of which cannot be explained by surgical site infections alone.1 These and other studies suggest that surgery itself, independent of other comorbidities, results in a degree of physiologic and catabolic stress that renders the host vulnerable to infection outside of the operative site, perhaps driven by disruptions in the fragile interaction between the immune system and the microbiome.2,3
A unique aspect of the surgical patient undergoing an elective procedure for a mechanical problem (hernia, obstruction, etc.) or an underlying malignancy is that they likely have undergone multiple previous healthcare encounters to arrive at a proper diagnosis, an antecedent factor recently associated with an increased risk for postoperative infection.4 In 2002, the average number of lifetime surgical procedures was reported to be an astonishing 9.2 throughout an average 85-year lifespan.5 Such encounters expose patients to invasive procedures (eg, endoscopies, biopsies) and antibiotics, each of which has the potential to colonize patients with healthcare-associated pathogens and disrupt their native flora. Similarly, in the context of the current pandemic, there is concern that some patients will arrive with hospital and community-associated COVID-19 exposures.6 Symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 infections have been associated with a higher risk of perioperative complications, including cardiac arrest, sepsis, respiratory decline, and kidney damage.7–9 As a result, many institutions and states now require SARS-CoV-2 testing before proceeding with surgery to help provide assurance and information for both the patient and operative team.10 This change is in conjunction with a joint statement from the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation on April 29, 2020, which recommends preoperative nucleic acid amplification COVID-19 testing for all elective surgical cases.11
Despite robust testing and careful consideration of patient candidacy using the most up-to-date information, there will still be patients who are cleared for surgery who silently harbor the virus, who contract the virus during the lag time between testing and the operation, or who are highly susceptible to horizontal transmission of the virus during their hospital stay. Acute respiratory distress syndrome rates in postoperative patients are higher during influenza season, and a similar trend may play out during periods of high SARS-CoV-2 infectivity.12 For this reason, it is worth outlining the physiologic changes that occur during viral infection and emphasizing that simple preventative measures can be effective at enhancing patient safety, including the judicious use of antibiotics, early discharge, implementation of an unprocessed food diet, and opioid minimization. While these practices are already routine in many centers,13 it is now ever more important to be disciplined in their implementation. The reason for this is that many of these measures can preserve and enhance a patient’s microbiome, which is now emerging as a key element that drives a recovery directed immune response after major surgery and during severe infection (Figure 1).14 Although most surgeons already apply these measures as part of their approach to enhanced recovery bundles, here we assert that given the emerging evidence linking the gut microbiome to resistance to viral infections, renewed awareness of approaches to enhancing recovery may be ever more important during this pandemic.15–18
FIGURE 1.
The intricate interplay between the gut microbiome, lung microbiome, and infectious agents. Created with Biorender.com.
THE ROLE OF THE MICROBIOME AS A DEFENSE AGAINST VIRAL INFECTION
The virtual explosion of information linking the microbiome to the immune system demonstrates that a complex interaction exists between the microbiome and immunity that influences how the host responds to invading pathogens, including viruses.19 The microbiome lining the cells of the gut and lung protects against pathogens by its mere presence, which acts to competitively exclude pathogens from access to deeper tissues (ie, the epithelium) and by its direct tonic effect to stimulate the local immune response.20,21 Alterations in the lung and gut microbiome can disable the immune system and increase the risk of severe lung infections, including acute respiratory distress syndrome and ventilator acquired pneumonia.22–24 New developments describe interactions between the gut and lung immune responses that are now being defined along an intricate gut-lung axis. Gut microbes communicate with one another by expressing quorum-sensing molecules that also interact with the immune system. Microbial metabolites can travel from the gut to the mesenteric lymphatic system and remote systemic sites to transduce cellular processes.25 As a result of these complex multi-dimension interactions, changes in the gut microbial community can affect host fitness globally.
The increasing rise in surgical site infection due to multi-drug resistant pathogens has led to the more widespread use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, the inadvertent consequence of which can deplete gut microbes, increasing patient susceptibility to both gastrointestinal and pulmonary infections.25–27 In the context of vulnerability to viral infections, such as COVID-19, disruption of the normal microbiota (ie, dysbiosis) can alter the intricate balance between the patient microbiota and immune system leading to impaired responsiveness of the host to an invading pathogen. In particular, innate, humoral, and cell-mediated responses can become blunted in the absence of a functional gut microbiome, thereby delaying viral clearance and permitting high severity infections by influenza, H1N1, and hepatitis B.28–30 The extent to which overuse of antibiotics during surgery renders patients more susceptible to COVID-19, either from endogenous reactivation or horizontal transmission remains to be determined. However, in the current era of added precautions, prolonged or overuse of antibiotics should be avoided as they may be considered a risk factor to surgical patients at risk for COVID-19 infection.
While a dysregulated gut microbiome can predispose to systemic infection, the reverse is also true: infection itself can disrupt the microbial structure and disable its immune-stimulating function.2,21 Viral infection is, after all, a significant stressor to the host. Infection increases inflammatory markers as viruses hijack the host’s molecular machinery with an associated elevation of immunosuppressive host factors, such as catecholamines. These substrates, now present at high concentrations in tissues such as the gut and lung, can directly activate the virulence of select pathogenic organisms, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa.31,32 Other common patterns following viral infection include an increase in virulent Proteobacteria in the lung microbiome and Escherichia coli colonization in the gut microbiome, which can induce pathologic mucosal alterations.33,34 Infectious disease exacerbations in patients with inflammatory lung diseases (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis) are similarly linked to increases in lung Proteobacteria.33,35 These findings of microbial dysbiosis could help explain the predisposition of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients to a subsequent nosocomial infection, which has been reported in as many as 20.7% of cases.36
As surgeons face the challenge of operating on patients in current and future pandemics, a more heightened awareness of the microbiome’s potential protective role begs consideration. The observation that SARS-CoV-2 binds ACE-2 receptors present on both the lung and gut epithelium suggests great potential for novel treatment and prevention pathways that target the microbiome.37 The gut epithelium’s role may be vital when considering gastrointestinal surgery since the SARS-CoV-2 virus can persist at this site even following pulmonary clearance.38 Unfortunately, the extent to which microbiome preservation or restoration before, during, and after surgery plays a role in preventing unanticipated respiratory infection following otherwise uncomplicated surgery remains undefined. However, in the interim, restraint in the overuse of antibiotics and rapid return to normal unprocessed nutrition may be ever more important to abrogate the unavoidable effects of both surgery and antibiotic use on the health-promoting effects of the microbiome.39
PROMOTING A HEALTHY MICROBIOME IN THE PREOPERATIVE PERIOD
Surgical access throughout this pandemic period has fluctuated and requires careful consideration of multiple competing factors. On April 7, 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services released a statement recommending the postponement of non-essential surgeries and procedures, recommending a tiered approach to medicine.40 While the American College of Surgeons (ACS) originally released a similar statement, on April 17, 2020, the ACS released a joint statement outlining ways to maintain essential surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.41 Delays that lead to increased patient morbidity and mortality should be avoided with an “elective surgery acuity scale” being endorsed by the ACS as a method of prioritizing cases.42 The timing and appropriate location for the resumption of elective cases where delay causes no harm to the patient remains controversial. Some physicians advocate for the resumption of these cases since in-hospital transmission rates are minimal and these procedures are critical for hospital revenue generation, while others warn that any potential for COVID-19 transmission is unacceptable.43 Given that the pandemic will likely influence the way hospitals function for many months to come and will be dependent on the rapidity and effectiveness of vaccination, it will be essential to continue to provide surgical access for patients with real-time analysis of regional factors and a personalized approach for each hospital system. Yet these uncertain delays in elective surgery should be viewed as an opportunity for patients to optimize their health and fitness in preparation for surgery.
In this regard, one simple measure may be to consider nutritional management for patients before surgery. Nutrition is emerging as among the most important factors involved in microbiome rehabilitation therapies and can influence microbiome community structure and function within as little as 24 hours.44 Nutritional therapy can target intestinal barrier function, prevent intestinal dysbiosis, increase lean body mass, and blunt the systemic inflammatory response.45,46 The efficacy of specific dietary regimens to enhance viral clearance, which will require studies that involve next-generation sequencing, metabolomics, and outcome analyses, remains a vision for the future as common themes for promoting microbiome health emerge. In particular, diets composed of unprocessed foods that are high in fermentable fiber, which increase the production of protective short-chain fatty acids (ie, butyrate), are associated with high levels of protective bacteria.18,47 Butyrate is a key microbial metabolite that has emerged as an essential factor that can favorably provide tonic stimulation to the immune system and drive a recovery directed immune response.48,49 Supplementation with vitamins E, C, D, zinc, and selenium can also aid in promoting immune system function and can be considered in the setting of obesity, which may be viewed as a pro-inflammatory state.50 A retrospective investigation into metabolic surgery demonstrated that patients with with a higher body mass indexs who underwent metabolic surgery were less likely to require hospital and intensive care upon later infection with COVID-19.51 Furthermore, an international analysis of bariatric and metabolic surgeries demonstrated no increase in complications during the COVID-19 period.52 Taken together, these studies suggest that bariatric surgery among high-risk patients may be considered a benefit towards improving COVID-19 fitness. Additionally, considering prophylactic measures for the elderly, immunocompromised, and those with comorbid conditions is appropriate during uncertain periods of delay.50
As mentioned, the unintended consequences of broad-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery can have adverse effects on health-promoting microbial communities. Patients exposed to antibiotics in the months before surgery may harbor drug-resistant organisms and be at greater risk for a postoperative complication.53,54 Even short-term antibiotic courses lead to long-term perturbations in microbiome structure and function, often persisting for years after the initial insult.55 Azithromycin, in particular, which was liberally administered to many COVID-19 patients at the start of the pandemic, despite limited evidence on efficacy, directly modulates Bacteroidetes, Bifidobacterium, and Clostridium colonization.56,57 Perioperative antibiotics can compound these previous antibiotic exposures resulting in the inadvertent selection of pathogenic species to predominate among the microbiota. Given the high likelihood of pathogenic colonization in the most at-risk surgical patients, selective antibiotic treatment may be necessary for the immediate pre- and intraoperative period to decontaminate disease-promoting species. This can be particularly problematic as surgeons face the dilemma of considering antibiotic eradication of certain organisms present in high-risk patients while, at the same time, preventing widespread microbial elimination that can cause unwanted collateral damage to the microbiome.58,59
Finally, population-based emotional distress has intensified during this pandemic period, and there is a significant fear of hospitals and operative interventions.60,61 Further exacerbating this psychological stress is the recent implementation of virtual preprocedural visits, imposing additional stress on the patient-surgeon relationship.62 Many institutions have instituted telehealth appointments for both new patient and postoperative visits as part of their COVID-19 response plan.63 Research investigating the “gut-brain axis” demonstrates that stress is associated with detrimental inflammation and increased gut barrier permeability.64 Projecting trust and a safe environment is challenging, yet essential, during this pandemic and can be a fragile process requiring additional efforts on behalf of the patient and surgeon.65
PROMOTING A HEALTHY MICROBIOME IN THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD
The postoperative period’s primary focus should be a rapid and comprehensive restoration to full patient fitness to limit viral susceptibility. The immediate postoperative period provides a window of opportunity for infection following surgical stress and exposures.1 Contemporary surgical practice has already moved towards shorter hospital stays and early recovery after surgery or fast-track programs, which will become increasingly necessary during COVID-19 times.66 Quick discharges limit the patient’s exposure to nosocomial pathogens and reduce strain on a high capacity hospital system.67
Regarding the microbiome, the postoperative period should focus on reconstitution through a quick return to unprocessed oral feeding. Although periods of starvation and parenteral feeding may be required in some cases, it should be noted that these factors severely limit gut microbiome nutrients, which can lead to virulent transformation and gut barrier dysfunction.68 Early recovery after surgery programs underscore the need to resume enteral whole food diets on postoperative day 1 in their best-practice guidelines.66 High-fiber, plant-based diets, in particular, have been shown to render the microbiome more resilient to maladaptive changes from antibiotics and stress in murine models.39 An important consideration for SARS-CoV-2 respiratory disease susceptibility is that diet affects not only the gut microbiota but also the pulmonary landscape.33 High-fiber diets that increase short-chain fatty acid generation have been shown to decrease maladaptive influenza-associated lung inflammation through T-cell and monocyte-dependent pathways in mice.25 Although this effect remains to be proven in humans, the increasingly critical role of a high-fiber, plant-based diet on human health is emerging and may be applied to enhancing recovery efforts in surgery.
Probiotics represent another route for encouraging the refaunation of a diverse and nonpathogenic microbiota. Many studies on probiotics have shown a benefit in reducing infectious lung diseases, including ventilator-associated pneumonia and cystic fibrosis exacerbations.69 Probiotics have also been shown to increase immunity in the setting of viral vaccination. Probiotics given both before and after vaccine administration has been shown to improve seroprotection, demonstrating the potential for probiotic use in both the pre- and postoperative period.70 Probiotics affect the entire immune activation process, including cytokine regulation, antigen presentation, Th1 and Th17 specific responses, and B cell differentiation.71 While controversy remains over specifics for probiotic treatment plans, segmental filamentous bacteria, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus probiotics have already shown to have a benefit in respiratory infections and provide a good starting point for further investigation.34
Finally, the surgeon must not forget the multitude of other surgical stressors that directly impact the microbiome. Surgeons should diligently manage such factors in the postoperative period to restore homeostasis and decrease stress signaling. Glycemic control during the time of starvation and refeeding should be monitored carefully, particularly in diabetic patients at higher risk for COVID-19.72 Furthermore, consideration should be given to the hypercoagulable state induced by both immobilization from surgery and SARS-CoV-2.73 High-risk patients should be considered for heparin bridging therapy and long-term anticoagulation along with early mobilization in the postoperative period.74,75 Finally, opioids should be administered sparingly since they have been associated with an increase in microbial virulence and promotion of pathogenic bacteria, such as P. aeruginosa.76 It is clear that there are many routes for modulating patient health, which should not be overlooked during this pandemic period (Figure 1).
CONCLUSION
While SARS-CoV-2 may be a novel pathogen not previously considered to be involved in postoperative infection, it now adds to surgeons’ growing concern to properly select, prepare, and protect patients. Contemporary research has demonstrated that many factors, both in the pre- and postoperative period, can modulate patient fitness through changes to the gut and lung microbiome. While COVID-19 testing may be useful with evolving changes in accuracy and application, surgeons should take all precautions and consider every patient high-risk during this and future pandemics. As further research is ongoing to determine specific treatment and prevention measures against COVID-19 infection, a surgeon’s attention to minimalize perturbations to the microbiome and promote its rapid restoration may be a promising approach to enhancing recovery during this pandemic and those to come.77
Footnotes
Disclosure: The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sax H, Uçkay I, Balmelli C, et al. Overall burden of healthcare-associated infections among surgical patients. Results of a national study. Ann Surg. 2011; 253:365–370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Krezalek MA, DeFazio J, Zaborina O, et al. The shift of an intestinal “Microbiome” to a “Pathobiome” governs the course and outcome of sepsis following surgical injury. Shock. 2016; 45:475–482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lederer AK, Pisarski P, Kousoulas L, et al. Postoperative changes of the microbiome: are surgical complications related to the gut flora? A systematic review. BMC Surg. 2017; 17:125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kelava M, Robich M, Houghtaling PL, et al. Hospitalization before surgery increases risk for postoperative infections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148:1615–1621.e3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee PHU, Gawande AA. The number of surgical procedures in an American lifetime in 3 states. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207:S75 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Backer JA, Klinkenberg D, Wallinga J. Incubation period of 2019 novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infections among travellers from Wuhan, China, 20-28 January 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020; 25:2000062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Puylaert CAJ, Scheijmans JCG, Borgstein ABJ, et al. ; SCOUT study group. Yield of screening for COVID-19 in asymptomatic patients before elective or emergency surgery using chest CT and RT-PCR (SCOUT): Multicenter Study. Ann Surg. 2020; 272:919–924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Knisely A, Zhou ZN, Wu J, et al. Perioperative morbidity and mortality of patients with COVID-19 who undergo urgent and emergent surgical procedures. Ann Surg. 2021; 273:34–40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Doglietto F, Vezzoli M, Gheza F, et al. Factors associated with surgical mortality and complications among patients with and without Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy. JAMA Surg. 2020; 155:691–702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Illinois Department of Public Health. COVID-19 Elective Surgeries and Procedures. IOCI 20-673. Printed by Authority of the State of Illinois. 2020Available at: XXX. Accessed March 5, 2021
- 11.ASA & APSF.. The ASA and APSF Joint Statement on Perioperative Testing for the COVID-19 Virus. 2020Available at: https://www.asahq.org/about-asa/newsroom/news-releases/2020/04/asa-and-apsf-joint-statement-on-perioperative-testing-for-the-covid-19-virus. Accessed March 6, 2021
- 12.Groeneveld GH, van Paassen J, van Dissel JT, et al. Influenza season and ARDS after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:772–773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152:292–298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim SM, DeFazio JR, Hyoju SK, et al. Fecal microbiota transplant rescues mice from human pathogen mediated sepsis by restoring systemic immunity. Nat Commun. 2020; 11:2354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wargo JA. Modulating gut microbes. Science. 2020; 369:1302–1303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stefan KL, Kim MV, Iwasaki A, et al. Commensal microbiota modulation of natural resistance to virus infection. Cell. 2020; 183:1312–1324.e10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jurt J, Slieker J, Frauche P, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: can we rely on the key factors or do we need the bel ensemble? World J Surg. 2017; 41:2464–2470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Keskey R, Papazian E, Lam A, et al. Defining microbiome readiness for surgery: dietary prehabilitation and stool biomarkers as predictive tools to improve outcome [published online ahead of print November 4, 2020]. Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000004578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Domínguez-Díaz C, García-Orozco A, Riera-Leal A, et al. Microbiota and its role on viral evasion: is it with us or against us? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019; 9:256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pickard JM, Zeng MY, Caruso R, et al. Gut microbiota: role in pathogen colonization, immune responses, and inflammatory disease. Immunol Rev. 2017; 279:70–89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McDonald B, Zucoloto AZ, Yu IL, et al. Programing of an intravascular immune firewall by the gut microbiota protects against pathogen dissemination during infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2020; 28:660–668.e4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Samuelson DR, Welsh DA, Shellito JE. Regulation of lung immunity and host defense by the intestinal microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6:1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yin Y, Hountras P, Wunderink RG. The microbiome in mechanically ventilated patients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2017; 30:208–213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Panzer AR, Lynch SV, Langelier C, et al. Lung microbiota is related to smoking status and to development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill trauma patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 197:621–631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Enaud R, Prevel R, Ciarlo E, et al. The gut-lung axis in health and respiratory diseases: a place for inter-organ and inter-kingdom crosstalks. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020; 10:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Teillant A, Gandra S, Barter D, et al. Potential burden of antibiotic resistance on surgery and cancer chemotherapy antibiotic prophylaxis in the USA: a literature review and modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015; 15:1429–1437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Charani E, Ahmad R, Tarrant C, et al. Opportunities for system level improvement in antibiotic use across the surgical pathway. Int J Infect Dis. 2017; 60:29–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tsai KN, Kuo CF, Ou JJ. Mechanisms of hepatitis B virus persistence. Trends Microbiol. 2018; 26:33–42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lee KH, Gordon A, Shedden K, et al. The respiratory microbiome and susceptibility to influenza virus infection. PLoS One. 2019; 14:e0207898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hagan T, Cortese M, Rouphael N, et al. Antibiotics-driven gut microbiome perturbation alters immunity to vaccines in humans. Cell. 2019; 178:1313–1328.e13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Freestone PP, Hirst RA, Sandrini SM, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa-catecholamine inotrope interactions: a contributory factor in the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia? Chest. 2012; 142:1200–1210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lyte M, Ernst S. Catecholamine induced growth of gram negative bacteria. Life Sci. 1992; 50:203–212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Marsland BJ, Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES. The gut-lung axis in respiratory disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015; 12suppl 2S150–S156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Budden KF, Gellatly SL, Wood DL, et al. Emerging pathogenic links between microbiota and the gut-lung axis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017; 15:55–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Huffnagle GB, Dickson RP, Lukacs NW. The respiratory tract microbiome and lung inflammation: a two-way street. Mucosal Immunol. 2017; 10:299–306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim D, Quinn J, Pinsky B, et al. Rates of co-infection between SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens. JAMA. 2020; 323:2085–2086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Perlot T, Penninger JM. ACE2 - from the renin-angiotensin system to gut microbiota and malnutrition. Microbes Infect. 2013; 15:866–873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xiao F, Tang M, Zheng X, et al. Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterology. 2020; 158:1831–1833.e3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hyoju SK, Zaborin A, Keskey R, et al. Mice fed an obesogenic western diet, administered antibiotics, and subjected to a sterile surgical procedure develop lethal septicemia with multidrug-resistant pathobionts. mBio. 2019; 10:e00903–e00919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Non-Emergent, Elective Medical Services, and Treatment Recommendations. 2020Available at: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/cms-non-emergent-elective-medical-recommendations.pdf. Accessed March 6, 2021
- 41.American College of Surgeons; American Society of Anesthesiologists; Association of periOperative Registered Nurses; American Hospital Association. Joint Statement: Roadmap for Resuming Elective Surgery after COVID-19 Pandemic. 2020Available at: https://www.asahq.org/about-asa/newsroom/news-releases/2020/04/joint-statement-on-elective-surgery-after-covid-19-pandemic. Accessed March 6, 2021
- 42.American College of Surgeons. COVID-19: Elective Case Triage Guidelines for Surgical Care. 2020Available at: XXX. Accessed March 5, 2021
- 43.Wu K, Smith CR, Lembcke BT, et al. Elective surgery during the Covid-19 pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383:1787–1790 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wu GD, Chen J, Hoffmann C, et al. Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science. 2011; 334:105–108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pallister T, Jackson MA, Martin TC, et al. Untangling the relationship between diet and visceral fat mass through blood metabolomics and gut microbiome profiling. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017; 41:1106–1113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Camilleri M, Lyle BJ, Madsen KL, et al. Role for diet in normal gut barrier function: developing guidance within the framework of food-labeling regulations. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019; 317:G17–G39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.McClave SA, Martindale RG. Why do current strategies for optimal nutritional therapy neglect the microbiome? Nutrition. 2019; 60:100–105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Fukuda S, et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature. 2013; 504:446–450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.van den Berg FF, van Dalen D, Hyoju SK, et al. Western-type diet influences mortality from necrotising pancreatitis and demonstrates a central role for butyrate [published online ahead of print September 1, 2020]. Gut. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Di Renzo L, Gualtieri P, Pivari F, et al. COVID-19: Is there a role for immunonutrition in obese patient? J Transl Med. 2020; 18:415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Aminian A, Fathalizadeh A, Tu C, et al. Association of prior metabolic and bariatric surgery with severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021; 17:208–214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Singhal R, Tahrani AA, Ludwig C, et al. ; GENEVA collaborators. Global 30-day outcomes after bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic (GENEVA): an international cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021; 9:7–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rao GG. Risk factors for the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Drugs. 1998; 55:323–330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Guidry CA, Shah PM, Dietch ZC, et al. Recent anti-microbial exposure is associated with more complications after elective surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018; 19:473–479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jakobsson HE, Jernberg C, Andersson AF, et al. Short-term antibiotic treatment has differing long-term impacts on the human throat and gut microbiome. PLoS One. 2010; 5:e9836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ferrer M, Méndez-García C, Rojo D, et al. Antibiotic use and microbiome function. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017; 134:114–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Rosenberg ES, Dufort EM, Udo T, et al. Association of treatment with hydroxychloroquine or azithromycin with in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 in New York state. JAMA. 2020; 323:2493–2502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Maxson T, Mitchell DA. Targeted treatment for bacterial infections: prospects for pathogen-specific antibiotics coupled with rapid diagnostics. Tetrahedron. 2016; 72:3609–3624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fan Y, Wei Z, Wang W, et al. The incidence and distribution of surgical site infection in mainland China: a meta-analysis of 84 prospective observational studies. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:6783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Torales J, O’Higgins M, Castaldelli-Maia JM, et al. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020; 66:317–320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Caumo W, Schmidt AP, Schneider CN, et al. Risk factors for preoperative anxiety in adults. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001; 45:298–307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Luz PLD. Telemedicine and the doctor/patient relationship. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019; 113:100–102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Grenda TR, Whang S, Evans NR, 3rd. Transitioning a surgery practice to telehealth during COVID-19. Ann Surg. 2020; 272:e168–e169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Karl JP, Hatch AM, Arcidiacono SM, et al. Effects of psychological, environmental and physical stressors on the gut microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Rosenbaum L. The untold toll — the pandemic’s effects on patients without Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382:2368–2371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Thiele RH, Rea KM, Turrentine FE, et al. Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2015; 220:430–443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Cavallo JJ, Donoho DA, Forman HP. Hospital capacity and operations in the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic—planning for the Nth patient [published online ahead of print March 17, 2020]. JAMA Health Forum. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0345 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Dominioni L, Rovera F, Pericelli A, et al. The rationale of early enteral nutrition. Acta Biomed. 2003; 74suppl 241–44 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR, Huffnagle GB. The role of the bacterial microbiome in lung disease. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2013; 7:245–257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Dhakal S, Klein SL. Host factors impact vaccine efficacy: implications for seasonal and universal influenza vaccine programs. J Virol. 2019; 93:e00797-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Chen CJ, Wu GH, Kuo RL, et al. Role of the intestinal microbiota in the immunomodulation of influenza virus infection. Microbes Infect. 2017; 19:570–579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. ; the Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020; 323:2052–2059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Klok FA, Kruip MJHA, van der Meer NJM, et al. Confirmation of the high cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19: an updated analysis. Thromb Res. 2020; 191:148–150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Thachil J, Gatt A, Martlew V. Management of surgical patients receiving anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. Br J Surg. 2008; 95:1437–1448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Pashikanti L, Von Ah D. Impact of early mobilization protocol on the medical-surgical inpatient population: an integrated review of literature. Clin Nurse Spec. 2012; 26:87–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zaborin A, Smith D, Garfield K, et al. Membership and behavior of ultra-low-diversity pathogen communities present in the gut of humans during prolonged critical illness. mBio. 2014; 5:e01361–e01314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Finlay BB, Amato KR, Azad M, et al. The hygiene hypothesis, the COVID pandemic, and consequences for the human microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118:e2010217118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]