Abstract
Co‐culturing the bacterium Streptomyces rapamycinicus and the ascomycete Aspergillus nidulans has previously been shown to trigger the production of orsellinic acid (ORS) and its derivates in the fungal cells. Based on these studies it was assumed that direct physical contact is a prerequisite for the metabolic reaction that involves a fungal amino acid starvation response and activating chromatin modifications at the biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC). Here we show that not physical contact, but a guanidine containing macrolide, named polaramycin B, triggers the response. The substance is produced constitutively by the bacterium and above a certain concentration, provokes the production of ORS. In addition, several other secondary metabolites were induced by polaramycin B. Our genome‐wide transcriptome analysis showed that polaramycin B treatment causes downregulation of fungal genes necessary for membrane stability, general metabolism and growth. A compensatory genetic response can be observed in the fungus that included upregulation of BGCs and genes necessary for ribosome biogenesis, translation and membrane stability. Our work discovered a novel chemical communication, in which the antifungal bacterial metabolite polaramycin B leads to the production of antibacterial defence chemicals and to the upregulation of genes necessary to compensate for the cellular damage caused by polaramycin B.
INTRODUCTION
Saprophytic fungi are dominant recyclers of natural organic substances specialized in breaking down recalcitrant plant material by their highly effective extracellular enzyme system. However, competition for nutrients, water and space by other organisms such as bacteria may urge fungi to produce defence or signalling compounds, for example antibiotics or other toxic compounds, collectively known as secondary metabolites (SMs), that suppress competitors (De Boer et al., 2005; de Menezes et al., 2017; Rousk & Bååth, 2007). The same principle is used by pathogenic fungi which use both extracellular proteins and an arsenal of toxins to penetrate host cells and suppress defence mechanisms, respectively (Doehlemann et al., 2017). Apart from their toxic properties, some of these substances are also known to serve as signalling molecules, e.g. for fungal reproduction (Rodriguez‐Urra et al., 2012), establishment and maintenance of endophytic or symbiotic associations (Chujo et al., 2019) or pathogenesis‐related effectors (Boenisch & Schäfer, 2011; Pusztahelyi et al., 2015). Each fungal species contains genes coding for the biosynthesis of many different SMs but at a given environmental or developmental condition only a specialized set of these secreted molecules is produced. This condition‐specific metabolic signature is regulated by genetic signalling networks that have evolved as energy‐saving modules for these demanding biosynthetic processes (Gacek & Strauss, 2012; Macheleidt et al., 2016; Yu & Keller, 2005). In many cases the signal triggering transcriptional activation of the biosynthetic genes is connected to nutrient starvation or the onset of reproductive development (Nemeth et al., 2016; Tag et al., 2000). But there are other examples in which rich nutrient sources and active growth is correlated with the production of SMs, such as for the production of siderophores that are required for iron acquisition and metabolism (Oberegger et al., 2001).
The biosynthetic pathways for these metabolites usually encompass many different enzymatic steps and it is a striking feature that biosynthetic and regulatory genes as well as genes encoding transport proteins of a given SM are usually clustered in the genome (termed ‘biosynthetic gene clusters’) and transcriptionally co‐regulated. Co‐regulation is achieved by cis‐acting elements targeted by pathway‐specific and broad‐domain transcription factors, as well as by chromatin level regulation which facilitates or inhibits access of these regulatory complexes to the target region (Brakhage, 2013; Keller et al., 2005; Strauss & Reyes‐Dominguez, 2011). One of the main conclusions drawn from the analyses of the ever‐increasing fungal genome databases is the discrepancy between known metabolites and the number of predicted BGCs. For each of the sequenced species, usually only a few SMs are known but many more BGCs are predicted in their genomes (Li et al., 2016). This is not only true for less‐studied species but even in aspergilli or penicillia only 20%–30% of the theoretically existing and predicted chemical diversity is known. Taken together this indicates that the majority of BGCs are not expressed under the usually employed standard laboratory growth conditions and we still are not able to mimic the full diversity of growth and developmental conditions that would trigger the production of the full array of metabolites in any of the studied organisms.
One of the triggers that received high attention recently is biotic interactions. It is known since a long time, for example for pathogenic fungi like Fusarium graminearum, that a high proportion of predicted BGCs are only expressed during pathogenic growth (Boenisch & Schäfer, 2011; Desjardins et al., 1993). The corresponding transcriptional program responds to the encountered plant material (substrate response) and to the plant defence system (active plant response). Each of these conditions activates a different subset of SMs in F. graminearum (Boedi et al., 2016). There are numerous examples in which biotic interactions of a pathogenic, symbiotic or endophytic lifestyle alters the secondary metabolome of the fungal interaction partner. Also, free‐living interactions have been found to alter the SM profiles, for example in the mutual interaction between the soil inhabitants Aspergillus nidulans and Streptomyces rapamycinicus (Schroeckh et al., 2009). In this case, A. nidulans produces orsellinic acid (ORS) and yellow polyketides (YPKs), SMs that are barely found in axenic cultures under standard laboratory growth condition (Sanchez et al., 2010). The bacterial trigger ultimately leads to an activating chromatin landscape at the corresponding ORS/YPK BGC (Nützmann et al., 2011) and the formation of this open chromatin structure depends on the function of BasR, a fungal transcription factor induced by amino acid starvation (Fischer et al., 2018). Consistent with a chromatin‐level regulation of the ORS/YPK cluster the same activation can be observed in mutants lacking CclA or KdmB, central components of complexes which regulate the methylation status of histone H3 lysine 4 (Bok et al., 2009; Gacek‐Matthews et al., 2016). Also, the addition of the non‐metabolizable histidine analogue 3‐aminotriazole (3‐AT) leads to ORS/YPK induction indicating that the intimate fungal–bacterial contact is not mandatory but bacterial cells or their metabolites may function via an amino acid starvation response and so‐far uncharacterized downstream signalling cascades that eventually lead to BasR‐mediated chromatin activation (Fischer et al., 2018). How BasR function is connected to the histone H3K4 methylation/demethylation machinery remains to be uncovered.
Using a particular experimental set‐up, we identified a specific bacterial macrolide, known as polaramycin B, which is able to trigger ORS/YPK production in A. nidulans also in the absence of bacterial cells. We performed RNA‐sequencing to test whether polaramycin B application is equivalent to the direct physical contact between the fungal and bacterial cells and found that it fully mimics the transcriptional and metabolic response of the organismic interaction. Strikingly, only Streptomyces species carrying the predicted BGC for guanidine‐containing macrolides are able to induce the fungal response.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Strains and cultivation conditions for transcriptomics
Aspergillus nidulans WT (pabaA1 veA1) was the fungal strain used throughout the study (Pontecorvo et al., 1953). Streptomyces rapamycinicus strain was the one used by Fischer et al. in our laboratory for the transcriptome and chromatin analysis (Fischer et al., 2018). Conidiospores from cryostocks were plated on Aspergillus minimal medium (AMM) plates (10 mM nitrate, 1% Glucose, 15 pM para‐amino benzoic acid), incubated for 3 days at 37°C and harvested in autoclaved deionized water (diH2O) containing 0.1% Tween‐20. A spore density of 1E6 spores/ml was inoculated in 50 ml of liquid AMM in 100 ml Erlenmeyer flasks, respectively, and the culture was grown at 37°C and 180 rpm. The time of cultivation was 18 h. Treatment with polaramycin B (0.5 μg/ml) for 30 min and 3 h or no treatment was applied.
Starvation plate assay
Starvation plates were agar plates containing only AMM salts without nutrients (0.52 g/l KCl, 0.815 g/l KH2PO4, 1.045 g/l K2HPO4), two circular regions (diameter: 15 mm) were cut out and filled with AMM‐ or M79‐agar and inoculated with 1 μl of Aspergillus or Streptomyces spore suspensions (5E6 and 5E8 spores/ml), respectively. For metabolite analysis 1 × 1 × 0.5 cm agar blocks were cut out and metabolites were extracted in 3 ml Acetonitrile–acetic acid–water (79:1:20) solvent.
Bioassay
The bioassay to detect yellow pigment (YP) production in A. nidulans was designed for 24 well plates. 1E + 6 A. nidulans spores were incubated per ml AMM and grown in submerse culture in 50 ml AMM at 30°C shaking (180 rpm) flask overnight. Single fungal pellets were placed in wells of a 24 well plate and 2 ml of AMM media not containing trace elements was added. The plate was then incubated for 2–3 days at 37°C. No sporulation could be observed till this time point. These plates were then used for testing extracts.
Streptomyces fermentation
Liquid fermentation of Streptomyces rapamycinicus was performed in M79 medium using 1E + 7 spores/ml in 50 ml at 30°C 160 rpm. Solid‐state fermentation was performed on M79 agar plates (10 g/L Glucose, 10 g/L bacto‐peptone, 1 g/L casamino acids, 2 g/L yeast extract, 6 g/L NaCl, pH 7.2). For the final polaramycin B preparation 2000 ml M79 agar was distributed into 40 Petri dishes (large) and each one was inoculated with 1E + 7 spores/plate. After 7 days of growth at 30°C agar was cut into approximately 1 cm × 1 cm pieces and extracted with 1.5 L methanol overnight at room temperature. The filtered methanol fraction was then evaporated to a volume of 5 ml.
Isolation of the macrolide
The crude extract was purified by reversed‐phase silica gel vacuum flash chromatography (Interchim, puriFlash®450), using three consecutive Interchim puriFlash 32 g silica IR‐50C18‐F0025 flash columns (particle size: 50 μm). The columns were eluted with a binary solvent gradient (solvent A: H2O, solvent B: ACN). The starting linear gradient from 10% B to 27% B during 25 min at a flow rate of 15 ml/min was followed by an isocratic elution at 52% B for 10 min. Then a linear gradient from 52% to 66% B over 7 min was applied at the same flow rate and finally the column was washed starting with 100% B for 10 min followed by 100% A for 10 min at a flow rate of 15–30 ml/min. UV 254 nm and UV scan 200–400 nm modes were used for detection and final separation of eight main fractions (F1–F8), which were consequently concentrated under reduced pressure at 45°C. The target compound (activity) was found in fraction F5 (18–20 Rt, yield: 25 mg).
This fraction was further dissolved in 1:1:1; ACN/CH3OH/H2O and purified by an Agilent 1260 Infinity preparative high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (USA) on a reversed‐phase column Gemini NX C‐18 (21.20 × 150 mm, 5 μm, 110 Å). Gradient starting with 30% ACN and 70% H2O up to 95% ACN in 32 min (total time 45 min) and a flow rate of 25 ml/min. Four preparative fractions (pF1–pF4, bioactivity guided fractionation, time‐lapse fractionation) were collected, of which pF3 was found as active. The active fraction was further proceeded with second stage prep HPLC (signal lapse fractionation). The active signal (target) was found at tR 10.5 min, yielding 0.91 mg. For purity check, an Agilent 1200 system was used with the same stationary phase and gradient program.
Secondary metabolite and orsellinic acid quantification
Metabolite analysis was carried out using a 1290 Series HPLC System (Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) coupled to a QTrap 5500 LC–MS/MS System (Applied Biosystems SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA) equipped with Turbo Ion Spray electrospray ionization source as described earlier (Sulyok et al., 2020). Chromatographic separation was performed at 25°C on a Gemini® C18 column, 150 × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm particle size, equipped with a C18 4 × 3 mm i.d. security guard cartridge (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). 5 μl of sterile‐filtered sample was directly injected without any further manipulation.
Confirmation of positive metabolite identification was carried out by the acquisition of two time scheduled multiple reaction monitoring which yielded 4.0 identification points according to the European Commission decision 2002/657. In addition, retention time and ion ratio had to agree to the related values of authentic standards within 0.03 min and 30% rel., respectively. Quantitation was based on external calibration using serial dilutions of a multi‐analyte stock solution. The accuracy of the method is verified on a continuous basis by participation in a proficiency testing scheme organized by BIPEA (Gennevilliers, France) with a current rate of z‐scores between −2 and 2 of >94% (>1300 results submitted).
RNA extraction and expression analysis
RNA was extracted from liquid nitrogen frozen mycelium using TRIzol Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). 2 μg of total RNA was then subjected to DNase I digestion (Thermo Fisher Scientific). cDNA was amplified using iScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio‐Rad) and LunaScript® RT SuperMix Kit (NEB). cDNA was diluted 1:10 and used for qRT‐PCR (Bio‐Rad CFX384).
RNA sequencing and analysis
Total RNA extraction samples were transferred to Vienna Biocenter Core Facilities (https://www.viennabiocenter.org/vbcf/) for library preparation and Illumina high‐throughput sequencing using poly‐A enrichment kit (NEB) and Nextera Library prep kit. 50 bp single‐end sequencing was performed using a HiSeq v4 Illumina sequencer. Obtained sequences were de‐multiplexed, quality controlled, filtered using trimmomatic 0.36 (Bolger et al., 2014) and mapped on the Aspergillus nidulans genome assembly (A_nidulans_FGSC_A4_version_s10‐m03‐r07). Mapping was performed using BWA (Li & Durbin, 2009) and reverse transcripts were counted using python script HTSeq (Anders et al., 2015). Normalization and statistics were done using R/Bioconductor and the limma and edgeR packages, using mean–variance weighting (voom) and TMM normalization (Law et al., 2014). A significance cut‐off of p < 0.01 was applied for analysis. Transcription levels are log2 read counts per kilobase of exon per million library reads (RPKM). For trace graphs, transcript coverage was calculated as explained for the ChIP‐seq experiments to obtain counts per million reads. All data are available at NCBI GEO under the accession number GSE185285.
GO enrichment analysis
To simplify gene ontology (GO) interpretation we used semantic similarity measures to identify major ontologies enriched in specific experiments. This means we clustered the observed GO terms based on their distance in the acyclic GO‐graph (Sayols et al., 2016) and extracted a common parent term.
NMR measurement
All NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Advance II 400 (resonance frequencies 400.13 MHz for 1H and 100.63 MHz for 13C) equipped with an N2‐cooled 5 mm broadband cryoprobe head (Prodigy) with z‐gradients at room temperature with standard Bruker pulse programmes. The sample was dissolved in 0.6 ml of MeOD (99.8% D, Eurisotop, Saint‐Aubin, France). Chemical shifts are given in ppm, referenced to residual solvent signals (3.31 ppm for 1H, 49.0 ppm for 13C). 1H NMR spectrum was collected with 32k complex data points, whereas the 13C‐jmod spectrum with WALTZ16 1H decoupling was acquired using 64k data points. All two‐dimensional experiments were performed with 1k × 256 data points, while the number of transients and the sweep widths were optimized individually. For the TOCSY experiment, the spin‐lock time was set to 100 ms and the spinlock field to 8.3 kHz. HSQC experiment was acquired using adiabatic pulse for inversion of 13C and GARP sequence for broadband 13C decoupling, optimized for 1J(CH) = 145 Hz.
RESULTS
The supernatant of S. rapamycinicus is sufficient to induce yellow pigment and orsellinic acid production
To better understand the interaction between A. nidulans and S. rapamycinicus, we set up an experimental system that allowed us to differentiate fungal hyphae directly interacting with S. rapamycinicus from non‐directly interacting fungal cells. This setup used fungal and bacterial cultures grown on solid surface in contrast to the previously applied conditions of co‐culturing them in liquid shake flasks. In the actual approach the fungal and the bacterial colonies were inoculated at opposing sides of a Petri dish that contained only agar without nutrients. To allow for some limited growth of the inoculated fungal and bacterial cells, the points of inoculation were supplied with nutrients. This set‐up produced a thin, low‐density fungal colony spreading out over the agar surface and this allowed us to easily observe colour or morphological changes of the colonies. Figure 1(A) top shows an example of the experiment in which fungal inoculation points were fed with AMM and bacterial inoculation points with M79 media. Starting from these nutrient reservoirs at the opposite sides of the Petri dish the organisms were able to grow into the nutrient‐free agar. Using this setup, we observed that fungal mycelium spreading from the opposite side towards the bacterial colony was producing some YPs although there was no direct contact yet with the S. rapamycinicus colony [Figure 1(A)]. No colour changes at the A. nidulans mycelia were observed in control experiments growing the fungal cells alone (data not shown). These observations indicated that YPKs and orsellinic acid may be produced by A. nidulans cells in response to the presence of S. rapamycinicus already before their physical contact takes place. To make sure there is no direct interaction via buried bacterial or fungal cell interactions we used a similar setup but containing S. rapamycinicus cells within a dialysis tube. The molecular weight cut off 8.000–10.000 kDa allowed nutrients passing through the membrane at the point of inoculation but prevented bacterial cells to spread on or through the agar. We found also in this setup an induction of YPs [Figure 1(B)]. We assume that the reduced induction in these experiments is likely caused by the dialysis tube barrier affecting free metabolite movements. To test if the signal for fungal pigment production requires actively growing bacterial cells or if a bacterial metabolite may be sufficient to induce YPs we subsequently applied sterile‐filtered culture supernatant from an S. rapamycinicus liquid culture grown in M79 media without A. nidulans. When adding these bacterial culture supernatants to an A. nidulans colony growing alone on the nutrient‐free agar we also observed YP production, although colouration was less intense [Figure 1(C)]. Since in this latter approach S. rapamycinicus was grown ‘solo’ without A. nidulans, we could conclude that production of the YPs in A. nidulans is triggered by one or more compounds secreted by S. rapamycinicus cells growing in M79 medium and that the production of this inducer(s) does not depend on the presence of a competing or interacting organism. However, the presence of a competing organism like A. nidulans may cause elevated production of this unknown molecule(s).
FIGURE 1.

(A) Top: Schematic setup; Aspergillus minimal medium (AMM) and M79 medium were placed into phosphate‐buffered water agar (green and blue circles, respectively). AMM and M79 media were inoculated with A. nidulans (A.n.) and S. rapamycinicus (S.r.), respectively, and incubated for 7 days at 30°C. Bottom: Yellow pigments (YPs) production, (red arrow) of A. nidulans growing on phosphate‐buffered water agar towards S. rapamycinicus colonies. (B) Top: Schematic setup; similar as Figure 1(A), except that S. rapamycinicus was inoculated into a dialysis tube partially filled with M79 medium thus preventing physical contact with A. nidulans cells from the confronting fungal colony. Bottom: red arrow points to the YPs that can also be observed in this setup after 7 days at 30°C, although to a lesser extent. (C) 10 μl of media supernatant (Super) from S. rapamycinicus grown ‘solo’ in liquid M79 for 7 days at 30°C was applied opposite to a growing A. nidulans colony (six well plate) and a clear YPs production was observed
Yellow pigment production correlates with metabolites from the orsellinic acid pathway
As the direct physical A. nidulans–S. rapamycinicus interaction was shown to trigger the production of ORS and YPs, we then tested if production of the pigments in our test system indeed correlate with these metabolites. For chemical analysis a similar, but larger size set‐up of our nutrient‐free agar cultivation assay was used (Petri dishes with 15 cm diameter) where we grew the organisms for 7 days. Subsequently, in a 9 × 4 grid, agar blocks of 1 cm × 1 cm size were cut out, extracted and metabolites within these agar blocks were subsequently analysed via photometric absorption measurements at 400 nm and by HPLC‐MS [Figure 2(A) and Figure S1].
FIGURE 2.

(A) Top/left: Experimental setup with an example of the confrontation assay on agar plates and a magnified section of it below the plate photograph. The raster with numbers represents areas that were cut out from the agar and analysed by mass spectrometry (see Experimental procedures). Growing S. rapamycinicus cells are indicated by blue line circled areas, the A. nidulans colony is indicated by green line circled areas; dotted green line shows the extent of fungal growth (complete right‐hand side of plate is covered by fine mycelia). Dotted black circles indicate the areas of AMM or M79 media in the plate. Conidiation is strongest in the region facing the S. rapamycinicus colony. Heatmaps show metabolite concentrations found in the respective regions, positions of colonies are indicated by blue and green lines. Below the photograph in panel A, heatmaps are shown that represent metabolite concentrations found in the respective region originating from S. rapamycinicus. (B) Heatmaps representing metabolite concentrations of the A. nidulans colony. Absorption (400 nm) representing YPs. Levels of other A. nidulans metabolites are shown as separate heatmaps. Abbreviations: Terra: terragine: Ors: orsellinic acid; Lecanoric: lecanoric acid; meth‐Ors: methyl orsellinic acid; Viol I: violaceol I; Viol II: violaceol II; Nig: nigericin
Results of these chemical analyses showed that several metabolites of the ORS biosynthetic pathway were detectable in the extracts obtained from agar samples derived directly from, or from the vicinity of the A. nidulans cells growing towards the S. rapamycinicus colony. The concentrations of ORS, as well as lecanoric acid (LEC), showed strong correlation with the absorption at 400 nm that visually appears as yellow colour (Spearmen rho: 0.72 and 0.70 for ORS or LEC, respectively, with p‐values of 6.36E‐7 or 1.52E‐6, see also correlation plot in supplementary Figure S2). These data indicated that our macroscopically observed YPs actually contain ORS and LEC. Additional fungal metabolites have been found in the analysed agar blocks (Figure S1). Some of them are also found in higher quantities in the competition zone between fungal and bacterial colonies, but others are more abundant in blocks excised from regions outside of the competition zone.
Interestingly, also S. rapamycinicus metabolites seem to be induced by the presence of the fungal mycelium, for example terragine is clearly more abundant in the competition zone between the two organisms than anywhere else in the agar of the Petri dish. On the other hand, production of the fungal diketopiperazines cyclo(l‐Pro‐l‐Tyr) and cyclo(l‐Pro‐l‐Val) are apparently repressed by the interaction and they show a comparatively lower abundance in this zone (see Figure 2 and Figure S1 with measurements for additional metabolites).
Taken together, our experiments showed that an active communication based on secreted metabolites takes place between these two organisms and that the cellular responses do not depend on physical interaction among them. Different concentrations of specific SMs at different locations within the whole growth area moreover indicate that fungal and bacterial metabolites can be induced or repressed by the chemical signals generated by the cultures.
The inducer of YPs comprising orsellinic and lecanoric acid is a guanidine‐containing polyhydroxyl macrolide
To identify the metabolite(s) from S. rapamycinicus inducing YPs in A. nidulans we grew S. rapamycinicus in the absence of fungal cells ‘solo’ in M79 medium for 7 days and used a sterile‐filtered culture supernatant for the development of an A. nidulans bioassay that would monitor YP induction. The fungal bioassay was based on miniature cultures in a 24‐well microtiter plate format where we grew A. nidulans colonies in submerged cultures and were able to use simple colour change of the medium as an indicator of YP production (see details in Experimental procedures). Using this assay we could confirm that the supernatant of S. rapamycinicus cultures was indeed inducing YP in A. nidulans and thus can be used for bioassay‐guided fractionation tests. Subsequently, several liquid–liquid extraction methods (n‐Hexane, Dichlormethane, Acetonitrile) were tested and we found that the YP inducer always remained in the aqueous phase indicating that it is a polar substance that may be extractable with methanol. Finally, S. rapamycinicus was grown massively on M79 agar plates and the methanol extracts were then further fractionated successively using flash column chromatography and preparative HPLC. All fractions were then tested in the bioassay for YP‐inducing activity. Subsequent structural elucidation of the purified active fraction by HPLC‐MS/MS and NMR identified the guanidine‐containing polyhydroxyl macrolide polaramycin B as the YP, that is ORS and LEC inducing compound (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3.

Structure of Polaramycin B. The C17–C21 hemiketal ring has been shown to be important for antimicrobial activity, whereas C23 malonyl reduced antimicrobial activity
The polaramycin B biosynthetic gene cluster
To bioinformatically identify the so far uncharacterized polaramycin biosynthetic genes, we performed antiSMASH (Medema et al., 2011) searches of six different Streptomyces strains including S. rapamycinicus, S. lateritius, S. zaomyceticus, S. ederensis, S. europaeiscabiei and S. iraniensis based on published genome sequences and annotations. As polaramycin is similar to azalomycin, a well‐characterized guanidine‐containing macrolide, we assumed that similarity to the known azalomycin BGC would be indicative for a BGC potentially responsible for polaramycin production. Only in S. rapamycinicus and S. iraniensis a homology with the azalomycin F3a BGC from Streptomyces sp. 211726 (MIBiG accession: BGC0001523) could be detected (Figure 4). To substantiate our hypothesis, we also cultivated isolates of four additional Streptomyces species under identical conditions as done before for S. rapamycinicus. Strikingly, only the two species S. rapamycinicus and S. iranensis, which contained the predicted gene cluster similar to the azalomycin cluster in their genomes, induced YP production. In contrast, the other four species not harbouring these BGCs showed no YPs (see Figure S3). These findings suggest that the region showing homology to the azalomycin biosynthesis cluster is responsible for the production of polaramycin in S. rapamycinicus and S. iraniensis and thus for YP induction. The data pertaining to S. iranensis metabolites are published separately from this manuscript in the context of azalomycins distribution and putative functions in microbial interactions (pre‐print available at BioRxiv by Krespach et al., doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.09.491136).
FIGURE 4.

Homology search (anti‐SMASH) in S. rapamycinicus, S. iraniensis, S. zaomyceticus, S. ederensis, S. lateritius and S. europaeiscabiei for putative secondary metabolite clusters. Only S. rapamycinicus and S. iraniensis induce YPs, both containing a homologous azalomycin F3a gene cluster (black box). Red colour indicates percent homology
Dose–response of polaramycin B
Since induction of orsellinic acid production was previously only observed when S. rapamycinicus and A. nidulans interacted physically, we reasoned that in these former liquid shake co‐cultures the local concentration of polaramycin B at the fungal cell surface may not have been sufficiently high to induce the metabolic changes. In this former set‐up, the concentration necessary to trigger ORS induction may only have been reached when cells directly interacted with each other because this physical interaction prevented immediate diffusion of the inducer away from the fungal cell surface. We, therefore, tested YPs production and orsA gene expression in A. nidulans cultures treated with different concentrations of polaramycin B in our 24 well plate bioassay. We found that after 48 h of incubation a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml polaramycin B in the A. nidulans growth medium is necessary to induce YPs as well as orsA transcription (Figure S4). This concentration was then used in our genome‐wide transcriptional analysis aimed at determining whether polaramycin B treatment induced a similar genetic response as previously observed in the physical interaction and if other fungal SMs are also affected by the addition of polaramycin B treatment. Moreover, the identification of transcriptional network changes by the treatment is of interest to understand which fungal targets are affected by this compound.
Polaramycin B induces the dba1–dba2 gene cluster for ORS biosynthesis
For RNA‐seq analysis, we used A. nidulans cultures pre‐grown for 18 h in AMM shake cultures and subsequently added polaramycin B at a concentration of 0.5 μg/ml. As the transcriptional network changes triggered by the substance may differ depending on the duration of treatment, we chose two different harvesting times. To test for the short‐term response, we harvested the mycelia after 30 min of incubation and for the response to an extended treatment time the cultures were harvested after 3 h of incubation with polaramycin B. It needs to be mentioned that at this time point there is still 0.45%–0.5% glucose remaining in the AMM medium, a concentration that is known to repress starvation‐induced SMs, such as the production of sterigmatocystin. To control if under these conditions polaramycin B also induces YPs and ORS, we first tested the expression levels of orsA (AN7909), the polyketide synthase‐encoding gene. Using RT‐qPCR we could confirm the induction event (data not shown) and we thus used these samples for RNA sequencing via Illumina Hi‐Seq.
In respect to the ORS gene cluster, our data analysis showed that the genes of the split dba1–dba2 cluster are induced by polaramycin B treatment (Figure 5). Moreover, the regulatory gene dbaA, which encodes the specific transcription factor of this BGC, and which resides within the dba1 cluster, is induced already after 30 min. Consistent with DbaA being the cluster‐specific transcriptional activator protein, other genes within the dba1–dba2 BGC were found to be induced after 3 h post‐treatment. Interestingly, one gene of unknown function (AN7913, designated orsD) and located within the dba2 region also shows the same induction kinetics as the transcription factor (induction after 30 min). Other dba1 cluster genes residing in the neighbourhood of the dbaA transcription factor gene also seemed to be induced after 30 min. This result may hint towards a local chromatin effect that renders the dbaA‐containing region transcriptionally active.
FIGURE 5.

(A) Colour‐coded transcript levels (RPKM) of dba cluster genes, columns represent time after polaramycin B treatment. Gene names or descriptions are shown if available. The transcription factor dbaA is already induced after 30 min following treatment, what seems not to be the case for the remaining cluster genes, which are induced at the later time point, presumably only after the transcription factor protein DbaA was translated and activated. AN7916 and AN7907 are not induced at all and may not be part of the dba cluster. (B) Genome and chromatin organization of both dba1 and dba2 derivative of benzaldehyde 1 gene clusters. Red graph shows histone H3K4 methylation after 18 h, taken from Gacek‐Matthews et al. (2016), a single significant peak found in AN7913
Polaramycin B also induces other BGCs
Our transcriptome data allowed us to analyse whether other BGCs were also affected by the polaramycin B treatment. Indeed, we found that several other BGCs are also changed in their transcriptional activity. For example, a majority of genes in the terrequinone (Bouhired et al., 2007) or aspercryptin (Henke et al., 2016) BGCs are significantly upregulated. Some BGCs showed only partial activity, such as the asperfuranone or the AN10289 cluster (Klejnstrup et al., 2012), in which only roughly half of the predicted cluster genes are induced. Interestingly the penicillin cluster, whose three genes are already transcribed at intermediate levels in our overnight cultures, is significantly downregulated by polaramycin B treatment (see Table 1). Thus, apart from the YPs and few other substances, the majority of BGCs do not show significant alterations in their expression profiles. This transcriptional response is similar to what has been also observed in the previous experiments in which A. nidulans cells experienced direct physical contact with S. rapamycinicus (Schroeckh et al., 2009). These findings indicate that polaramycin B is the responsible substance that mediates the transcriptional response of A. nidulans in the S. rapamycinicus interaction.
TABLE 1.
Selection of BGCs with differentially regulated genes (between 0 and 0.5 h or between 0.5 and 3 h samples)
| BGC | Upregulated | Downregulated | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Derivative of Benzaldehyde 1 (dba) and F9775 hybrid cluster 1 and 2 | 17 (2, 15) | 0 | 19 |
| AN7884 (Aspercryptin)cluster | 13 (4, 13) | 0 | 15 |
| Terrequinone (tdi) cluster | 4 (0, 4) | 0 | 5 |
| Penicillin cluster | 0 | 2 (0, 2) | 3 |
| AN5318 cluster | 2 (1, 1) | 1 (1, 0) | 5 |
| Asperfuranone (afo) cluster | 4 (0, 4) | 1 (0, 1) | 9 |
| AN9129 cluster | 1 (0, 1) | 0 | 2 |
| AN9314 cluster | 1 (0, 1) | 0 | 2 |
| pkdA cluster | 5 (0, 5) | 0 | 11 |
| AN10289 cluster | 2 (0, 2) | 0 | 5 |
Upregulated, downregulated and total refer to number of genes at least twofold upregulated or downregulated and total number of genes predicted or shown to belong to the given cluster, respectively. Genes differentially regulated between 0 and 30 min or between 30 min and 3 h are comma separated in brackets.
The induction kinetic suggests possible modes of action of polaramycin B
We have been involved in the elucidation of the BasR and chromatin‐based mechanisms by which S. rapamycinicus changes the A. nidulans metabolism during their physical interaction (Fischer et al., 2018). To identify putative targets of polaramycin and analyse the possible overlap between physical interaction and chemically triggered responses, the transcriptional profiles were grouped into eight clusters (see Figure 6): Immediately upregulated to steady state (A1); Immediately downregulated to steady state (A2); Immediately upregulated and continuously further upregulated (B1); Immediately downregulated and continuously further downregulated (B2); Delayed upregulated (C1); Delayed downregulated (C2); transiently upregulated (D1); transiently downregulated (D2).
FIGURE 6.

Gene‐set clustering of induction kinetics in response to Polaramycin B at three time points. The combination of a p‐value <0.01 and a differential expression of ±1 was considered a significant differential expression. Y‐axes of diagrams show transcript levels, x‐axes represent time. Total number of genes in each clustered gene set is shown in bold numbers, barplots show GO term enrichments, bar length represent number of genes, number within barplots shows corrected p‐values
A significant regulation was assumed if absolute log2 difference was greater than 1 and p‐value was less than 0.01. The contrasts considered were between time point zero and 30 min as well as between 30 min and 3 h. In case of disagreement between log2 difference and p‐value no differential regulation was assumed. To identify processes possibly involved in the polaramycin response we searched for overrepresented GO annotations in each gene set (Ashburner et al., 2000).
Genes immediately responding to polaramycin B treatment
Interestingly, in the gene set of genes ‘immediately upregulated to steady state’ (A1, 125 genes) GO annotations associated with translation or ribosome biosynthesis were significantly overrepresented. The genes with these annotations in cluster A1 were already transcribed at intermediate levels but polaramycin B caused a significant increase at least twofold.
In addition to the translation process, also few genes putatively associated with membrane stability and function are found in this immediately induced gene set like AN3125 (predicted role in response to stress and integral to membrane localization), AN7327 (predicted glycosylphosphatidylinositol GPI‐anchored protein), AN9342 (predicted role in transmembrane transport and integral to membrane localization) among the highest differentially expressed genes.
In the gene set of genes ‘immediately downregulated to steady state’ (A2, 236 genes) the GO annotation ‘Lipid metabolic process’ was significantly enriched which supports the findings that the antifungal activity of macrolides (like Azalomycin F) is based on disturbance and leakage of the phospholipid cell membrane (Sugawara, 1967). But in our experiments, we found only few genes differentially regulated with the GO annotation ‘Response to osmotic stress’ (e.g. AN065) which could be a hint that the cell membrane disturbance caused by polaramycin B has no large impact or can be well counteracted by the fungal metabolism, such as by those induced genes mentioned above coding for membrane stability functions.
The rather small gene set B1 of genes ‘immediately and continuously upregulated’ (22 genes) mainly contains the upregulated BGCs, such as two genes from the dba cluster and three genes from the AN7884 cluster (aspercryptin) as well as one from the AN0016 cluster (pes1). Statistically, no significant GO term enrichment could be detected what may be due to the small size of this gene set.
Also the gene set B2 of genes ‘immediately and continuously downregulated’ is rather small (16 genes) and contains mainly transport‐related genes. For example, AN9168 (putative solute‐hydrogen symporter activity with role in glycerol transmembrane transport), AN6277 (predicted role in transmembrane transport), AN4277 (putative glucose transmembrane transporter activity), AN3489 (putative endoplasmic reticulum localization) and AN6071 (domains with predicted membrane localization) are found in this gene set.
Genes only responding to extended polaramycin B incubation
We could observe that a larger number of genes are only differentially expressed after prolonged treatment with polaramycin B. These genes were grouped into sets C1 and C2 comprising 638 upregulated and 573 downregulated genes. The upregulated gene set C1 showed no concise picture in respect to enriched GO terms but next to a diverse array of predicted gene functions, it contained basically all upregulated BGCs discussed above. Most of the dba cluster genes fall into this C1 gene set as well as several other SM cluster genes (see Table 1) In addition to BGCs, some of the strongest induced genes have a linkage to oxidative stress responses, like AN7893, which has predicted oxidoreductase activity, AN9315 has a role in NADH oxidation and regulation of reactive oxygen species, AN5397 is a copper‐containing laccase that oxidizes phenolic substrates or AN2559 with predicted nucleotide‐binding and oxidoreductase activity. The fact that these genes are upregulated upon prolonged polaramycin B treatment may be a result of a disturbed membrane potential triggered by the substance eventually causing oxidative stress. If this stress is the ‘real’ inducer of YPs remains to be determined.
Predicted functions of genes downregulated upon prolonged polaramycin treatment (gene set C2) are associated with GO terms like hyphal growth, DNA replication or cell cycle regulation. This indicates that polaramycin B treatment impairs growth processes, a result that we have already observed in our phenotyping plate assays (Figures 1 and 2).
As can be seen in Figure 6 for the gene set C2 general catabolism‐related GO terms fall into this category. These include AN7180 and AN7541, which are two cutinases involved in carbohydrate catabolism, AN11188 with a putative role in endocrocin biosynthetic process, AN2719 with cell wall peptidoglycan catabolic process, AN11159 with phospholipid biosynthetic process. Also, many proteolytic or hydrolytic enzymes are found in this gene set: AN7121 (predicted metallocarboxypeptidase), AN5558 (alkaline protease), AN111981 (predicted UDP‐N‐acetylmuramate dehydrogenase), AN1583 and AN0009 (predicted hydrolase), AN3393 (similarity to neutral metalloprotease II), AN7962 (deuterolysin‐type metalloproteinase), AN8445 (Putative aminopeptidase). The complete list of genes is shown in Supplementary Table S1. The downregulation of these hydrolytic enzymes may be a result of the reduced growth probably to avoid self‐digestion or a reduced turnover of metabolites to not allow potential competitors to feed easily on such generated metabolites.
Genes with a transient response to polaramycin treatment
There are genes that have a strong short‐term response to the treatment with polaramycin B (measured after 30 min of exposure) but this response is lost upon prolonged treatment with the drug (measured after 3 h of exposure) Gene set D1 holds 54 genes which are immediately upregulated by the presence of polaramycin B but no response is observed any more in the 3 h treatment cultures. No clear picture comes out from this gene set but two GPI‐anchored proteins (AN7792 a putative lysophospholipase A and AN8609), AN2798 (predicted role in response to stress and integral to membrane localization), AN0209 (mepB, high‐affinity ammonium transporter), AN4372 (pgaB, a protein with polygalacturonase activity) have been found in this gene set. This may hint towards a reaction on the membrane due to polaramycin B that is transient as the cell may be able to balance the membrane defects after the respective genes have been induced and new membrane components have been produced.
Also, quite a significant number of genes were found to be transiently repressed by polaramycin B treatment. Ninety genes were found in this set of genes designated D2 (Figure 6). Interestingly three genes associated with trehalose, an important storage carbohydrate in fungi, are in this gene set, AN9340 (treA), AN10533 and AN5523 (tpsA). Since trehalose plays also an important role in conidial stability, this may be a reflection of the dynamics following the immediate downregulation of carbohydrate metabolic processes (see gene set A2) post polaramycin B treatment.
DISCUSSION
Polaramycin B structure, function and concentration thresholds for changing fungal metabolism
The molecular details of the interaction between microorganisms that compete for physical space and/or metabolic resources are still a relative sparsely investigated field of molecular microbiology despite its omnipresence in our biosphere. In previous work, it was suggested that a direct, physical contact between S. rapamycinicus and A. nidulans is necessary to trigger the genetic response of the fungus leading to the production of orsellinic acid (ORS) and its derivates (Schroeckh et al., 2009). Using a novel experimental system, we were now able to identify the chemical molecule that triggers the genetic response underlying the ORS production in these co‐cultures. We identified a 36 carbon‐membered polyol macrolide containing a hemiacetal monoester of malonic acid and a guanidyl group, collectively known as polaramycin B. This substance has previously been extracted from Streptomyces hygroscopicus LP‐93 but to the best of our knowledge not much research has been done on this particular variant of guanidine‐containing polyhydroxyl macrolide since its discovery in 1997 (Meng & Jin, 1997).
Generally, these macrolides have been shown to possess broad‐spectrum antibacterial and antifungal activities (reviewed in Song et al., 2019). By comparison of different variants of these macrolides, the following assumptions about structure–function relationships could be made: The size of the lactone ring has minor influence on the antimicrobial activity (32 and 36 sized structures were compared), but the terminal guanidine group is crucial for their antibacterial and antifungal activities. The six‐membered hemiketal ring (C17–C21) plays an essential role in the antimicrobial activity, the malonyl group (C23) reduces the antimicrobial activity and reduction of double bond or methylation of the lactone ring does not have a strong influence on the antimicrobial activity (see Song et al., 2019 and references therein).
Most likely, in many natural environments the concentration of polaramycin B will not reach or exceed the threshold concentration of 0.5 μg polaramycin B per ml of medium, as determined in the artificial laboratory growth condition. Therefore, in nature, direct interaction between bacterial and fungal cells will most likely still be required for effective chemical communication, simply because the triggering molecules freely diffuse. And this may also have been the reason why in high‐volume liquid shake co‐cultures the required concentration of polaramycin B was only reached when cells directly interacted. Also, the fungal cell density plays a role as higher cell densities dilute the number of polaramycin B molecules per fungal cell. We conclude this because in densely growing A. nidulans cultures incubated on high‐nutrient AMM culture plates (55 mM glucose, 10 mM nitrate) the YPs‐inducing effect by opposing S. rapamycinicus colonies was very hard to observe compared to the water‐agar medium lacking these nutrients. In the latter, YPs were easily detectable in the very fine and thin mycelial network that A. nidulans cells develop under these conditions.
The metabolic response of fungal colonies to bacterial confrontation is unidirectional
The water‐agar plate assays allowed us to observe the metabolic ‘warfare’ between the two microorganisms and we could observe that the fungal colony produces YPs and ORS only in the region that faces the bacterial colony, but not in the far side and in distant areas of this competition region. That indicates that the fungal cells respond individually to the presence of the bacterium and that this signal is not transferred very far through the mycelial network. So, a fungal colony only seems to represent a limited ‘information network’ that does not lead to a genetic alert of cells not directly connected to each other. Macroscopically, a fungal colony appears as an interwoven hyphal network, but the single cells within these hyphae may respond individually depending on the prevailing polaramycin B concentration. Apart from the observed production of YPs and other SMs, this spatially isolated response within the fungal colony was also observed for other phenotypic changes like growth inhibition and induction of sporulation that was not observed at the distant, far side of the competition zone. The conidiation phenotype was corroborated with data from our transcriptome analyses in which we observed highly transcribed sporulation‐related genes [e.g. AN3624 (ygA), AN4998(gapA), AN2513 (pipA), AN0928, AN7735 (eglD) and AN0863] after polaramycin B treatment. This observation indicates that a fungal colony, although representing a network of connected cells, does not represent an ‘information network’ in the sense that a signal arriving at one end of the colony is passed on to the other side of the same colony.
Possible mode of action of polaramycin B
Besides the dba1–dba2 cluster for ORS and YPK production, also other BGCs showed increased transcription levels in response to polaramycin B. These included aspercryptin and the terrequinone clusters, but due to the lack of metabolite standards, some low‐quality mass‐spectrometry data or very low metabolite concentrations, the clear‐cut correlation between transcriptional levels and metabolite concentrations cannot be made at the moment. On the other hand, not all A. nidulans BGCs seem to respond equally to polaramycin B treatment. For example, the penicillin cluster is repressed by this substance. This is interesting in light of the fact that Streptomycetes strains are known producers of penicillin and similar antibiotics. Therefore, these bacteria require a strong self‐resistance mechanism against these types of antibiotics and apparently, A. nidulans actively ceases production of an antibiotic that is obviously useless against this specific competitor (reviewed in Ogawara, 2016).
Previously, it has been shown that a closely related molecule to polaramycin B, azalomycin F, acts on fungi via disturbance of the cell membrane, but not much work was committed into deciphering its mode of action. We applied transcriptomics to gain more insight and could identify genes related to lipid metabolism, membrane function and growth regulation as being downregulated during the treatment. Apparently, affected cells responded to this challenge by upregulation of possible compensatory genetic networks, such as genes necessary for membrane stability, translation and ribosomal functions as well as enzymes that counteract oxidative stress. This response overlaps with the 3‐AT treatment and is also similar to the response of the direct physical interaction between A. nidulans and S. rapamycinicus, (Fischer et al., 2018; Nützmann et al., 2011). 3‐AT exposure is known to block histidine biosynthesis eventually leading to an amino acid starvation and induction of the cross‐pathway control genes like cpcA and basR (Braus et al., 2006). Our groups also found chromatin mutants with changes in the ORS and YPs production.
A chromatin‐related function of polaramycin B in activating BGCs?
Chromatin structure is influenced by histone modifications and in fungi, transcriptional co‐regulation of the genes residing inside a certain BGC is facilitated by chromatin transitions (Pfannenstiel & Keller, 2019; Strauss & Reyes‐Dominguez, 2011). Interestingly, a mutant lacking a component of the COMPASS complex that is responsible for positioning histone H3K4 methylation marks (H3K4me2/3) was found to strongly overproduce ORS and YPKs and also featured strongly induced expression of the dba1–dba2 cluster (Bok et al., 2009). Consistently, the opposite type of mutant lacking the H3K4me3 de‐methylase gene KdmB showed lower expression of these BGCs (Bachleitner et al., 2019; Gacek‐Matthews et al., 2016). As H3K4me3 is a histone modification generally associated with activating functions, it seems counter‐intuitive that a mutant lacking this function would be more active in transcription of the ORS/dba cluster. However, it is known that cells lacking the H3K4 methyltransferase system have a defect in silencing loci positioned near telomeres (Margaritis et al., 2012; Nislow et al., 1997). Additionally, or alternatively, the lack of H3K4 methylation may downregulate a basic metabolic gene involved in amino acid biosynthesis thus leading to artificial amino acid starvation and subsequent induction of ORS/YPs production. The experimental proof of this hypothesis awaits further research.
Supporting information
FIGURE S1 Top/Right: Experimental setup with an example of the confrontation assay on agar plates and a magnified section of it at the left side of the plate photograph. The raster with numbers represent areas that were cut out from the agar and analyzed by mass spectrometry (see Experimental procedures). Growing S. rapamycinicus cells are indicated by blue line circled areas, the A. nidulans colony is indicated by green line circled areas; dotted green line shows the extent of fungal growth (complete right hand side of plate is covered by fine mycelia). Dotted black circles indicate the areas of AMM or M79 media in the plate. Conidiation is strongest in the region facing the S. rapamycinicus colony. Heatmaps show metabolite concentrations found in the respective regions, positions of colonies are indicated by blue and green lines. Abbreviations: Terra: terragine: Ors: orsellinic acid; Lecanoric: lecanoric acid; meth‐Ors: methylorsellinic acid; Viol I: violaceol I; Viol II: violaceol II; Nig: nigericin; EmA, EmC, EmE: emericellamid ‐A, ‐C, ‐E; Stc: sterigmatocystin, dh‐Stc: dihydrosterigmatocystin, seco‐Stc: secosterigmaticystin; Aust: austinol; dh‐Aust: dihydro‐austinol; c‐Pro‐Tyr: cyclo(l‐Pro‐l‐Tyr); c‐Pro‐Val: cyclo(l‐Pro‐l‐Val)
FIGURE S2 Spearman correlation plot of metabolites identified in the agar plate. Blue: positive correlation, red: negative correlation
FIGURE S3 Agar plate test of S. zaomyceticus, S. ederensis, S. lateritius and S. europaeiscabiei for inducing yellow pigment production. Neither of these strains contains a homologous azalomycin F3a gene cluster
FIGURE S4 Dose response of Polaramycin B treatment in respect to YP production (measured by absorption at 400 nm) in A. nidulans
APPENDIX S2 Transcriptome data
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to Axel Brakhage and his lab members for provision of bacterial strains and critical discussion of the manuscript. Work was supported by grants from the OEAD ‘Sparkling Science’ program (grant No. SPA 06‐258) and from the Austrian Science Fund FWF, grant CHROCOSM No. P32790‐B.
Berger, H. , Bacher, M. , Labuda, R. , Eppel, I.M. , Bayer, F. , Sulyok, M. et al. (2022) Polaramycin B, and not physical interaction, is the signal that rewires fungal metabolism in the Streptomyces–Aspergillus interaction. Environmental Microbiology, 24(10), 4899–4914. Available from: 10.1111/1462-2920.16118
Funding information Austrian Science Fund, Grant/Award Number: P32790‐B; OEAD ‘Sparkling Science’ program, Grant/Award Number: SPA 06‐258
REFERENCES
- Anders, S. , Pyl, P.T. & Huber, W. (2015) HTSeq—a python framework to work with high‐throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics, 31, 166–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashburner, M. , Ball, C. , Blake, J. , Botstein, D. , Butler, H. , Cherry, J. et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nature Genetics, 25, 25–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bachleitner, S. , Sorensen, J.L. , Gacek‐Matthews, A. , Sulyok, M. , Studt, L. & Strauss, J. (2019) Evidence of a demethylase‐independent role for the H3K4‐specific histone demethylases in Aspergillus nidulans and Fusarium graminearum secondary metabolism. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, 1759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boedi, S. , Berger, H. , Sieber, C. , Münsterkötter, M. , Maloku, I. , Warth, B. et al. (2016) Comparison of Fusarium graminearum transcriptomes on living or dead wheat differentiates substrate‐responsive and defense‐responsive genes. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boenisch, M.J. & Schäfer, W. (2011) Fusarium graminearum forms mycotoxin producing infection structures on wheat. BMC Plant Biology, 11, 110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bok, J.W. , Chiang, Y.M. , Szewczyk, E. , Reyes‐Domingez, Y. , Davidson, A.D. , Sanchez, J.F. et al. (2009) Chromatin‐level regulation of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nature Chemical Biology, 5, 462–464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolger, A.M. , Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 30, 2114–2120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouhired, S. , Weber, M. , Kempf‐Sontag, A. , Keller, N. & Hoffmeister, D. (2007) Accurate prediction of the Aspergillus nidulans terrequinone gene cluster boundaries using the transcriptional regulator LaeA. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 44, 1134–1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brakhage, A.A. (2013) Regulation of fungal secondary metabolism. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 11, 21–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Braus, G.H. , Sasse, C. & Krappmann, S. (2006) Amino acid acquisition, cross‐pathway control, and virulence in Aspergillus. Medical Mycology, 44, 91–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chujo, T. , Lukito, Y. , Eaton, C.J. , Dupont, P.Y. , Johnson, L.J. , Winter, D. et al. (2019) Complex epigenetic regulation of alkaloid biosynthesis and host interaction by heterochromatin protein I in a fungal endophyte‐plant symbiosis. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 125, 71–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Boer, W. , Folman, L.B. , Summerbell, R.C. & Boddy, L. (2005) Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 29, 795–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Desjardins, A.E. , Hohn, T.M. & McCormick, S.P. (1993) Trichothecene biosynthesis in Fusarium species: chemistry, genetics, and significance. Microbiological Reviews, 57, 595–604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doehlemann, G. , Ökmen, B. , Zhu, W. & Sharon, A. (2017) Plant pathogenic fungi. Microbiology Spectrum, 5, 1–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischer, J. , Müller, S.Y. , Netzker, T. , Jäger, N. , Gacek‐Matthews, A. , Scherlach, K. et al. (2018) Chromatin mapping identifies BasR, a key regulator of bacteria‐triggered production of fungal secondary metabolites. eLife, 7, e40969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gacek, A. & Strauss, J. (2012) The chromatin code of fungal secondary metabolite gene clusters. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 95, 1389–1404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gacek‐Matthews, A. , Berger, H. , Sasaki, T. , Wittstein, K. , Gruber, C. , Lewis, Z.A. et al. (2016) KdmB, a Jumonji histone H3 demethylase, regulates genome‐wide H3K4 trimethylation and is required for normal induction of secondary metabolism in Aspergillus nidulans . PLoS Genetics, 12, e1006222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henke, M.T. , Soukup, A.A. , Goering, A.W. , McClure, R.A. , Thomson, R.J. , Keller, N.P. et al. (2016) New aspercryptins, lipopeptide natural products, revealed by HDAC inhibition in Aspergillus nidulans . ACS Chemical Biology, 11, 2117–2123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keller, N.P. , Turner, G. & Bennett, J.W. (2005) Fungal secondary metabolism ‐ from biochemistry to genomics. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 3, 937–947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klejnstrup, M.L. , Frandsen, R.J.N. , Holm, D.K. , Nielsen, M.T. , Mortensen, U.H. , Larsen, T.O. et al. (2012) Genetics of polyketide metabolism in Aspergillus nidulans . In: Metabolites. Basel, Switzerland: MDPI AG, pp. 100–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Law, C.W. , Chen, Y. , Shi, W. & Smyth, G.K. (2014) Voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA‐seq read counts. Genome Biology, 15, R29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, H. & Durbin, R. (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows‐Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 25, 1754–1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y. , Tsai, K. , Harvey, C. , Li, J. , Ary, B. , Berlew, E. et al. (2016) Comprehensive curation and analysis of fungal biosynthetic gene clusters of published natural products. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 89, 18–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macheleidt, J. , Mattern, D.J. , Fischer, J. , Netzker, T. , Weber, J. , Schroeckh, V. et al. (2016) Regulation and role of fungal secondary metabolites. In: Annual review of genetics. San Mateo, CA: Annual Reviews Inc., pp. 371–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Margaritis, T. , Oreal, V. , Brabers, N. , Maestroni, L. , Vitaliano‐Prunier, A. , Benschop, J.J. et al. (2012) Two distinct repressive mechanisms for histone 3 lysine 4 methylation through promoting 3′‐end antisense transcription. PLoS Genetics, 8, e1002952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Medema, M.H. , Blin, K. , Cimermancic, P. , Jager, V.D. , Zakrzewski, P. , Fischbach, M.A. et al. (2011) antiSMASH: rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Research, 39, W339–W346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Menezes, A.B. , Richardson, A.E. & Thrall, P.H. (2017) Linking fungal–bacterial co‐occurrences to soil ecosystem function. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 37, 135–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meng, W. & Jin, W. (1997) Structure determination of new antifungal antibiotics, polaramycins A and B. Yao Xue Xue Bao, 32(5), 352–356. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nemeth, Z. , Molnar, A.P. , Fejes, B. , Novak, L. , Karaffa, L. , Keller, N.P. et al. (2016) Growth‐phase sterigmatocystin formation on lactose is mediated via low specific growth rates in Aspergillus nidulans . Toxins (Basel), 8, 354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nislow, C. , Ray, E. & Pillus, L. (1997) SET1, a yeast member of the trithorax family, functions in transcriptional silencing and diverse cellular processes. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 8, 2421–2436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nützmann, H.W. , Reyes‐Dominguez, Y. , Scherlach, K. , Schroeckh, V. , Horn, F. , Gacek, A. et al. (2011) Bacteria‐induced natural product formation in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans requires Saga/Ada‐mediated histone acetylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 14282–14287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oberegger, H. , Schoeser, M. , Zadra, I. , Abt, B. & Haas, H. (2001) SREA is involved in regulation of siderophore biosynthesis, utilization and uptake in Aspergillus nidulans. Molecular Microbiology, 41, 1077–1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogawara, H. (2016) Self‐resistance in Streptomyces, with special reference to beta‐lactam antibiotics. Molecules, 21, 605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pfannenstiel, B.T. & Keller, N.P. (2019) On top of biosynthetic gene clusters: how epigenetic machinery influences secondary metabolism in fungi. Biotechnology Advances, 37, 107345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pontecorvo, G. , Roper, J.A. , Hemmons, L.M. , Macdonald, K.D. & Bufton, A.W. (1953) The genetics of Aspergillus nidulans . Advances in Genetics, 5, 141–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pusztahelyi, T. , Holb, I.J. & Pocsi, I. (2015) Secondary metabolites in fungus‐plant interactions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez‐Urra, A.B. , Jimenez, C. , Nieto, M.I. , Rodriguez, J. , Hayashi, H. & Ugalde, U. (2012) Signaling the induction of sporulation involves the interaction of two secondary metabolites in Aspergillus nidulans. ACS Chemical Biology, 7, 599–606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rousk, J. & Bååth, E. (2007) Fungal and bacterial growth in soil with plant materials of different C/N ratios. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 62, 258–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez, J.F. , Chiang, Y.M. , Szewczyk, E. , Davidson, A.D. , Ahuja, M. , Elizabeth Oakley, C. et al. (2010) Molecular genetic analysis of the orsellinic acid/F9775 gene cluster of Aspergillus nidulans. Molecular BioSystems, 6, 587–593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sayols, S. , Scherzinger, D. & Klein, H. (2016) dupRadar: a Bioconductor package for the assessment of PCR artifacts in RNA‐Seq data. BMC Bioinformatics, 17, 428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schroeckh, V. , Scherlach, K. , Nützmann, H.W. , Shelest, E. , Schmidt‐Heck, W. , Schuemann, J. et al. (2009) Intimate bacterial‐fungal interaction triggers biosynthesis of archetypal polyketides in Aspergillus nidulans . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 14558–14563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song, X. , Yuan, G. , Li, P. & Cao, S. (2019) Guanidine‐containing polyhydroxyl macrolides: chemistry, biology, and structure‐activity relationship. Molecules, 24, 3913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strauss, J. & Reyes‐Dominguez, Y. (2011) Regulation of secondary metabolism by chromatin structure and epigenetic codes. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 48, 62–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sugawara, S. (1967) Mode of action of azalomycin F. Effect of azalomycin F on Candida albicans. The Journal of Antibiotics, 20, 93–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sulyok, M. , Stadler, D. , Steiner, D. & Krska, R. (2020) Validation of an LC‐MS/MS‐based dilute‐and‐shoot approach for the quantification of > 500 mycotoxins and other secondary metabolites in food crops: challenges and solutions. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 412, 2607–2620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tag, A. , Hicks, J. , Garifullina, G. , Ake, C., Jr. , Phillips, T.D. , Beremand, M. et al. (2000) G‐protein signalling mediates differential production of toxic secondary metabolites. Molecular Microbiology, 38, 658–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu, J.H. & Keller, N. (2005) Regulation of secondary metabolism in filamentous fungi. In: Annual review of phytopathology, Vol. 43. San Mateo, CA: Annual Reviews, pp. 437–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
FIGURE S1 Top/Right: Experimental setup with an example of the confrontation assay on agar plates and a magnified section of it at the left side of the plate photograph. The raster with numbers represent areas that were cut out from the agar and analyzed by mass spectrometry (see Experimental procedures). Growing S. rapamycinicus cells are indicated by blue line circled areas, the A. nidulans colony is indicated by green line circled areas; dotted green line shows the extent of fungal growth (complete right hand side of plate is covered by fine mycelia). Dotted black circles indicate the areas of AMM or M79 media in the plate. Conidiation is strongest in the region facing the S. rapamycinicus colony. Heatmaps show metabolite concentrations found in the respective regions, positions of colonies are indicated by blue and green lines. Abbreviations: Terra: terragine: Ors: orsellinic acid; Lecanoric: lecanoric acid; meth‐Ors: methylorsellinic acid; Viol I: violaceol I; Viol II: violaceol II; Nig: nigericin; EmA, EmC, EmE: emericellamid ‐A, ‐C, ‐E; Stc: sterigmatocystin, dh‐Stc: dihydrosterigmatocystin, seco‐Stc: secosterigmaticystin; Aust: austinol; dh‐Aust: dihydro‐austinol; c‐Pro‐Tyr: cyclo(l‐Pro‐l‐Tyr); c‐Pro‐Val: cyclo(l‐Pro‐l‐Val)
FIGURE S2 Spearman correlation plot of metabolites identified in the agar plate. Blue: positive correlation, red: negative correlation
FIGURE S3 Agar plate test of S. zaomyceticus, S. ederensis, S. lateritius and S. europaeiscabiei for inducing yellow pigment production. Neither of these strains contains a homologous azalomycin F3a gene cluster
FIGURE S4 Dose response of Polaramycin B treatment in respect to YP production (measured by absorption at 400 nm) in A. nidulans
APPENDIX S2 Transcriptome data
